Date post: | 23-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | association-for-project-management |
View: | 1,912 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Enhancing performance
using a programme
dashboard
A Programme Management SIG webinar
www.apm.org.uk/progm
Welcome & housekeeping
This webinar is being recorded
Slides available for viewing on resources
pages on APM website and ProgM
microsite
Please use the questions box to ask
questions
Programme Management SIG (ProgM)
Vision: To be recognised internationally as the
leading group for programme management,
supporting a world in which all projects succeed.
Workstreams:
– Physical Events
– Virtual Events
– Communications
– Higher Education
– Publications
– Corporate
W: www.apm.org.uk/progm
Twitter: @apmprogmsig
Programme Management Conference
Equipping Programme Managers for Global
Success
10th March 2016, London
Early Bird ends 31st Jan
Sponsored by supported by
Speaker Programme
Sir John Armitt, President of the Institution of Civil
Engineers, Chair of the National Express Group and
City & Guilds, and Deputy Chair of the Berkeley
Group
Reinhard Wagner, President of IPMA
Professor Eddie Obeng, Pentacle Virtual Business
School and Professor at the School of
Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Henley Business
School
Dr Bruno Kahne, Head of Leadership Faculty at
Airbus Group Corporate University
Jonnie Jensen, founder of social business agency
Live + Social
Enhancing performance
using a programme
dashboard
Simon Springate
A Programme Management SIG webinar
www.apm.org.uk/progm
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
Simon Springate Project Delivery, Project Control and Project Performance for Europe
8 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Simon
• 20 years looking after London Undergrounds scheduling and
project control systems & tools
• Time in Qatar (Rail) and South Africa Gold Mines
• Today I provide a CH2M European focus for project
management and project control skills, standards and tools
• In the process I have worked with dozens of PMs, a few good
schedulers and a lot of ‘developing’ clients.
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
9 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Introduction
This presentation is intended to share many years of
often painful experience in the design and delivery of
Dashboards for;
• Projects
• Programmes
• Enterprises
• Stakeholders
• And those who can’t describe what they want
but will “recognise it when the see it”
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
10 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Hierarchy
Ne
ed
no
t
Ro
ll-u
p
Must
Roll-
up
M
ust
Ro
ll-u
p
Supplier performance
Project performance
Enterprise
performance
Programme
performance
If at any time the
Enterprise believes data
is altered between
project and them they
will start to
micro-manage
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
11 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Taking a flood of data and turning into Champagne
Project &
Programme
Controls
Dates
Commitment
Milestones Risks
Assurance Cost
Documentation Change
Achievement
Forecasts
Resources
Dashboards
Focused
Interpretation
On multi axis
etc. etc. etc.
Programme Control – in essence!
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
12 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Frequency – the time element of data
• There is no such thing as real time in the Project World
• Data date – the single most important piece of reporting data
• 13 Period / 4 week cycle – Typical Rail Projects
• 4/4/5 week Cycle – Tends to be Aerospace
• Monthly – when there is no imagination to recognise weeks
• Dependant on board meetings and their subsidiaries – not practicalities of
when data is available
• Question, what problems come from “last Friday in the month” as a report
date.
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
13 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Basic project dashboard
Report Date:
Data Date: No: Descripton
Project Title:
AE Number:
$K AE Auth AC ForecastContract
Commit
Annual
BudgetNo: Descripton Target Date
Forecast
dateSlip
To-date 482.00 0.00 1 Project Start - Contract awarded 13/07/2013 13/07/2013 0
Jul-13 145.00 4.42 2 Complete tank and steel structure fabrication 08/04/2013 08/04/2013 0
Aug-13 93.00 0.00 3 Install Structural Steel 09/04/2013 09/04/2013 0
Sep-13 145.00 445.88 4 handover on contract deliverables 30/09/2013 01/11/2013 -32
Oct-13 135.00 4.18 5 Installations of Electrical &instrumentation works 11/04/2013 20/04/2013 -9
Nov-13 390 6 Fabrication & installation of Pipe works 20/11/2013 25/11/2013 -5
Dec-13 155 7 Commission and hand over. 30/11/2013 30/11/2013 0
Jan-14 8 0
Feb-14 9 0
Mar-14 10 0
Apr-14 11 0
May-14 12 0
Jun-14 13 0
Qtr 3 2014 14 0
Qtr 4 2014 15 0
2015 16 0
2016 17 0
Future 18 0
Totals 1,000 454 545 0 ----------- 19 0
EFC= 1,000 Variance 0.00% 20 0
Annual Cumulative Total Project
5
Milestones
2
3
4Project which started 13 July is about 80% completed. Plan completion by
November ending. Piping construction may take longer than expected due to in
house construction team labour constrain
C4092
To fabricate and install an additional backfill tank, with agitator and shaft assembly,for hydraulic fill preparation
at STP to optimise feed preparation.Description:
Name Doc control
Name
Project / Department Team
Project Contract Numbers Project Status
PM
Document
Commercial
Cost
Planner
Eng
Name
Monthly Report Proformer
Backfill Storage Tank project Construction team to work longer
period and at weekends.
Risks
Mitigation
1Piping construction may take longer than expected
due to in house construction team labour constrain
Periodic data - Not Cumulative
Name
Name
Name
12 Months
variance
30/11/2013
17/10/2013
Project Managers Forecast Project End
date
Project Managers Baseline Project End
Annual Monthly Values
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-
14
Apr-14 May-
14
Jun-14 Actual Cost
Forecast
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Jul-
13
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3
De
c-13
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Ma
r-14
Ap
r-1
4
Ma
y-1
4
Jun
-14
AE
Actual Cost
Forecast
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
AE AC EFC
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
14 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Dashboard Overload
1. PROJECT DETAILS1
Country: Ghana Asset Name 08/08/2012
2. PROJECT LEADERSHIPProject EXCO Study Sponsor: Project Manager: AGA Asset Shareholidng Share (%): 100%
Project EXCO Execute Sponsor: Project SVP Operational Sponsor: AGA Equity Share (%) : 100%
Project EXCO Commercial Sponsor: Project Asset Operational Sponsor: Is AGA the Project Manager ? Yes
Project Independent Peer Review Leader: Managing Organisation : AGA
3. HEALTH, SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT
Hours Worked No. of Medically Treated
Injuries (MTIs)
No.of Lost
Time Injuries
(LTIs)
No. of FatalitiesFatality Frequency
Rate (FFR)
No. of
Environmental
Incidents
No of
Reportable
Enviro
Incidents to
EPA
Hrs # # # Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual # #
2,380 0 0 0 3.09 1.00 0.32 0.00 3.42 0.00 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7,894 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N/A 2 0
14.88 0
4. STUDY OPTIONS UNDER INVESTIGATION
Option No.
Post
Investment
Mine Life
Indicative NPV5
Indicative
Year 1
Production
Capacity
Indicative Post
Investment
Operational Cost
(USD$/oz)
Years USD$m k.oz/pa USD$/oz
1 11 641 260 784
2 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0
5. SCHEDULE- EXPECTED STAGE GATE START DATES AT TIME OF STUDY KICKOFF 6. COST- EXPECTED STAGE GATE COSTS AT TIME OF STUDY KICKOFF
Option
No.Concept PreFeas Feasibility Execution First Gold
Full Ramp Up/
Full ProductionConcept Feasibility
Co
mm
iss
ion
ing
/ F
irs
t
Go
ld Expected Total
Installed Cost (TIC)
Expected Total
Installed Cost-
AGA Share
yyyy/mm/dd yyyy/mm/dd yyyy/mm/dd yyyy/mm/dd yyyy/mm/dd yyyy/mm/dd USD$m USD$m USD$m USD$m USD$m
1 01/07/2011 08/08/2012 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0.5 6.4 10.7 130.1 130.1
2 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7. SCHEDULE- ACTUALS TO DATE- STAGE GATE START DATES FORECAST AS AT THIS PERIODOption
No.
yyyy/mm/dd Δ Days yyyy/mm/dd Δ Days yyyy/mm/dd Δ Days yyyy/mm/dd yyyy/mm/dd Δ Days
1 01/07/2011 0 08/08/2012 0 08/07/2013 0 30/07/2015 30/09/2015 0
2 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0
3 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0
4 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0
5 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 0 00/01/1900 00/01/1900 0
8. COST- ACTUALS TO DATE- COSTS PER STAGE GATE FORECAST AS AT THIS PERIODOption
No.
USD$m Δ USD$m USD$m Δ USD$m USD$m Δ USD$m USD$m
1 0.38 -0.12 5.5 0.0 6.4 0.0 10.7
2 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9. DETAILED PROGRESS TO DATE- THIS STAGE ONLY FOR ALL OPTIONS
Expected/
BudgetedActual Actual
Forecast End
Date/ Final Cost
% Complete % Complete % Complete yyyy/mm/dd Δ Days Δ %
Recruitment/ Mobilisation- Owners Team and Study Contractor (%) : 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 30/09/2012 0 0.0
Project Scope and Charter (%) : 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 08/08/2012 0 0.0
HSE Management System and HSE Strategy (%) : 15.0% 15.0% 95.0% 15/09/2012 -15 0.0
Sustainability (%) : 1.8% 1.0% 20.0% 26/04/2013 156 0.4
Processing (%) : 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13/12/2012 0 0.0
Geology (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14/03/2013 0 0.0
Mining (%) : 1.6% 1.0% 6.0% 01/03/2013 -12 0.0
Legal & Commercial (%) : 1.8% 4.3% 30.0% 03/05/2013 46 0.1
Business & Financial (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14/03/2013 8 0.0
Operation Readiness (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14/03/2013 8 0.0
HRMP (%) : 3.0% 3.0% 38.8% 07/02/2013 8 0.0
Constructability Review (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 14.5% 16/01/2013 47 0.1
Operational Readiness Strategy (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 29/01/2013 39 0.1
Study Report (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17/05/2013 46 0.1
External Review (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 01/07/2013 46 0.1
Report Acceptance (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21/08/2013 44 0.1
FS Charter (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15/05/2013 0 0.0
Project Sanction (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30/06/2013 0 0.0
% Complete % Complete % Complete yyyy/mm/dd Days Δ %
Shared Services (%) : 1.0% 1.1% 27.0% 26/04/2013 35 0.1
Mining (%) : 2.1% 2.0% 25.8% 03/05/2013 58 0.1
Mineral Processing Plant (%) : 0.3% 1.5% 48.0% 29/01/2013 39 0.1
Balance of Plant & Infrastructure (%) : 2.0% 3.0% 48.0% 08/01/2013 39 0.1
Final Report Documentation (%) : 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900 0 #DIV/0!
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900 0 #DIV/0!
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900 0 #DIV/0!
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900 0 #DIV/0!
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900 0 #DIV/0!
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900 0 #DIV/0!
Project Stage Completion Including Sanctioned Approval (%): 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24/06/2013 -6 0.0
USD$m USD$m Δ USD$m Δ % USD$m Δ USD$m Δ % USD$m Δ USD$m Δ %
Total Capital Commitments- This Stage ($USDm) : 1.02 0.36 -0.7 -64.4 0.87 -1.3 -60.5 2.66 0.0 0.0
Total PreCommittment Capital Committed- This Stage ($USDm) : 0.00 0.00 0.0 #DIV/0! 0.0 #DIV/0! 0.00 0.0 0.0
Total Owners Team Cost- This Stage ($USDm) : 0.25 0.08 -0.2 -66.5 0.37 -0.8 -68.8 2.80 0.0 0.0
Total Expenditure- This Stage ($USDm) : 1.27 0.45 -0.8 -64.8 1.24 -2.2 -63.5 5.47 0.0 0.0
c) Package 3- Balance of Plant/ Infrastructure
11. PROJECT KEY TASKS- NEXT MONTH
c) Package 3- Balance of Plant/ Infrastructure
Concept Project Stage Start Date
Project Description: Accelerated Low Capex expansion and Detox compliance of the existing processing facility at Iduapriem, with an objective of approximately 30% increase in throughput.
AGA Continental Africa 3ONE6Monthly Growth Project Flash Report
(Growth Projects In Study -> Concept/ PreFeasibility -> Pre-Sanction)(Project Manager to Send Report in Excel to [email protected] before COB Week 1 Each Month)
Project Name: Iduapriem Expansion PFS 1 Report for Month Ending January-13
Iduapriem Current Project Gate Stage:
Roel Stausebach
Medically Treated Injury
Frquency Rate (MTIFR)
Lost Time Injury
Frequency Rate
(LTIFR)
Total Recordable Injury
Frequency Rate
(TRIFR)
All Injury Frequency
Rate (AIFR)
Ludwig Eybers Paulo Nathan
Mike Birkhead Peter Anderton
Mark Lynam Sicelo Ntuli
This Period
Project Since Start
Date of Next Contractor Mobilisation to Site (yyyy/mm/dd) : Are There Any Onground Works No No. of Weekly Team Meetings Number of PreStart/ Daily Kick Off
Total Project Manning This Month for All Owners Team, Consultants No. of Safety Audits/ Interventions Completed This Month : No of Safety Audits/ Interventions for Whole Projec 0
Option Name Indicative NPV10 Indicative IRRIndicative Plant
Throughput
CAPEX Payback Period -Post
Investment
Indicative Post Investment
Average Head Grade
g/t
Low Capex Plant Expansion 341 27 7.5 4 1.4
Text USD$m % mt/pa Years
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
PreFeas Execution
USD$m USD$m
5.5 107.0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0.0
Concept PreFeasibility Feasibility Execution First Gold
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
00/01/1900 0 0
00/01/1900 0 0
Full Ramp Up/ Full Production
yyyy/mm/dd Δ Days Δ Days
30/03/2014 0 0
Concept PreFeasibility Feasibility Execution Commissioning/ First Gold
00/01/1900 0 0
00/01/1900 0 0
107 0 0 130 130
Forecast Total Installed Cost (TIC)Total Forecast Installed Cost- AGA
Share
USD$m Δ USD$m Δ USD$m USD$m USD$m
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Study Elements in Preparation Δ % % Complete Δ % yyyy/mm/dd
(Do not change RED Text. All other milestones may be adapted if needed.)
This Stage- Increment This Month This Stage- Cumulative Since Stage Start This Stage- Forecast To Complete
VarianceExpected/
BudgetedVariance
Planned/ Budgeted End Date/
Final CostVariance
0.0% 90.0% 5.0% 30/09/2012
-0.8% 35.0% -15.0% 21/11/2012
0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 30/09/2012
0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 08/08/2012
-0.6% 8.0% -2.0% 13/03/2013
2.5% 57.0% -27.0% 18/03/2013
0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 13/12/2012
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14/03/2013
0.0% 50.0% -11.2% 30/01/2013
0.0% 70.0% -55.4% 30/11/2012
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 06/03/2013
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 06/03/2013
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16/05/2013
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 08/07/2013
0.0% 100.0% -5.0% 21/12/2012
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 01/04/2013
Major Project Elements- This Stage Δ % % Complete Δ % yyyy/mm/dd
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15/05/2013
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30/06/2013
1.2% 74.0% -26.0% 21/12/2012
1.0% 52.0% -4.0% 30/11/2012
0.1% 41.5% -14.5% 22/03/2013
-0.1% 38.0% -12.2% 06/03/2013
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30/06/2013
Project Financials- This Stage USD$m USD$m
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 00/01/1900
3.39 6.44
10. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS- LAST MONTH1. Health, Safety and Environment 4. Procurement 7. Project Services: 8. Engineering/Construction
2.19 3.54
0.00 0.00
1.20 2.90
b) Package 2- Mineral ProcessingNothing to report Significant issues with contractual deliverables from Batemanhave been raised
and a formal letter detailing the reasons for rejection of specific deliverables
has been issued. A meeting has been scheduled for 10 Jan to address the
issues and develop a plan.
Note: The meeting has now been held with bateman and the deliverables are
being reworked with support from the owners team. The deliverables will be
submitted on Friday 18 Jan.
Bateman estimates for the exectution phase of the project have been reviewed and feedback
provided.
No safety incident to report Nothing to report a) Scheduling a) Package 1- MiningIndicative figures have been used in this report owing to the Christmas break but do take into account
the issues with Bateman progress. AGA have reviewed the schedule submitted by Bateman and
have provided feedback
3. Operational Readiness 6. Human Resources c) Cost Control, Doc Control, OtherNothing to Report Nothing to report Current month spend below estimate due to planned drilling for December not taking place. Accruals
made for costs not received by cut off date.
2. Geology, Exploration and Mine Planning 5. Contracts b) Cost Estimating
0 Commence procurement of long lead items following approval. a) Scheduling a) Package 1- MiningReview of Schedule for Detox execution phase from Bateman.
1. Health, Safety and Environment: 4. Procurement: 7. Project Services: 8. Engineering/Construction
3. Operational Readiness 6. Human Resources c) Cost Control, Doc Control, OtherNo work planned No work planned
2. Geology, Exploration and Mine Planning: 5. Contracts: b) Cost Estimating b) Package 2- Mineral Processing#VALUE! Continue to work with Bateman to aid successful delivery of outstanding
deliverables
AGA will work with Bateman to revise the exectution phase estimate to ensure a robust delivery on
Friday 18th Jan.
Home Page
Update Safety Graph
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
15 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
There is no universal dashboard
• Has to be designed to support the client priority
• Safety
• Cashflow
• Deliverables
• Risk exposure
• Rate of change
• Commentary –the critical bit
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
16 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Dashboards are not a panacea
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
17 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Programme Control – Its all about the data
Identified
Scope
Risk
Mitigation
Scope
WBS
Schedule Estimate Risk Register
Common Data
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
Key Data Considerations
• Rebuilding Programme coding is never a good idea – start early
• Remember all project tools are databases, integrate the data – not the tools
• Workshop with the delivery team and client – what is important?
19 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Data Cubes
Ja
n
Feb
Mar Apr
May
Actual Cost
Forecast Cost
Budget
Invoiced
Earned value
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
20 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Project Filters
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
21 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
GIS
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
22 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Project Map – just more data assignments
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
23 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Pick out the projects – highlight performance
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
24 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Project Details
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
25 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
The Philosophical bit
• Why do we produce reports?
– Demonstrate to an Auditor that the project was/is under control
– To give an integrated view of the project, a “balanced scorecard” that
encourages balance between the cost, schedule, risk safety, change etc.
– Provide a discussion prompt
– Provide a drumbeat to the project
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
26 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Insights on Programme Reporting
Beware the Water Melon Culture
• RAG Report (Red, Amber Green)
“It’s all Green on surface, but we know inside its all Red. So no one ever
cuts the Watermelon”
• You can’t get redder than red
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
27 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
And to finish, a reporting insight
• Reports are for readers (not the authors)
• They are only part of the story, they promote
the conversation
• Remember being clever means being simple
• If no-one requests you change a reports
format
– it probably isn’t being read!
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
28 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Thankyou for your time
I am always happy to talk
Remember: Our development is based on a conversation, the best only
medium for sharing knowledge
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
29 An Irreverent Guide to Project Reporting
Any Questions?
Enhancing performance using a programme dashboard
Programme Management Conference
Equipping Programme Managers for Global
Success
10th March 2016, London
Early Bird ends 31st Jan
Sponsored by supported by