Enterprise 2.0 & Web 2.0: Open Standards, Open Source, WEB2.0 & Enterprise 2.0

Shyam VeerinaAugust 2007

Disclaimer: Source of all the opinions, graphs, titles and images in this presentation are all duly sited in the reference section.

WEB1.0 versus WEB2.0

3

Architectural View: WEB1.0 versus WEB2.0

4

Web1.0 versus WEB 2.0 Adaptation

5

Client View: WEB1.0 versus WEB2.0

READ ONLY READ, EDIT, CONFIGURE

WEB2.0: Consumer vs Enterprise View

7

OG Platform: Open Standards, Internet & WEB2.0

8

Enterprise2.0: Architecture of Partition

Enterprise View

9

Consumer WEB2.0 – Architecture of ParticipationConsumer View

Open Source and Open Standards

11

Open Standards – Why? Why do they exist

The fundamental reason for the existence of Open Standards is that they facilitate choice in the market,

through encouraging both competition and inter-operability.

David Mitchell, 2005

12

Open Standards – What? What types of standards exist

Standards can be categorized by the type of development organization

e.g., national or international body, industry and trade associations, and consortia.

Standards can be viewed as industry voluntary efforts or government-regulated efforts.

Standards can be thought of as formal de jure - developed specifications, or market-dominant de facto product technologies.

13

Open Standards What types of standards exist

De Facto

De Jure

Programming Languages

Data Exchange Formats

Communication Protocols

System

Metadata

Presentation/UI

Software Services

Management & Ops.

David Mitchell, 2005

14

Open Source – Why? Why do open source projects exist

Programming practice and learning Demonstration of ability - job application Functional and technical gaps in market Improve on an existing OSS project Provide an alternative to commercial

products Reference implementation of open

standards Commercial motivation

15

Open Source – What? What types of open source project exist

SugarCRMAlfresco

Jasper

Compiere

phpMyAdmin

16

Open Source – Who? Who participates

17

Open Source – Benefits Flexibility Economic Factors Licensing Intricacies Avoid thinking it is free Focus on real TCO Analyze where real value is added

Enterprise 2.0 Reference Architectures

19

Client/Server Side Architecture

20

Client/Server in Enterprise 2.0

21

WEB2.0 Client Interaction

22

Enterprise Mashup Architecture

23

Use of Mashups

24

AJAX - Application Container

25

AJAX – Cross Section

26

Typical Implementation Model

27

WEB2.0 Application Framework

The Intersection: WEB2.0 within Enterprise 2.0

29

Generating Revenue From Web2.0

30

Enterprises versus SMB (s)

31

Enterprise 2.0 Adaptation Curve

32

Disruption: Evolution of Enterprise 2.0

33

WEB2.0 In Enterprise 2.0

34

Web 2.0 in Enterprise 2.0

35

Open Standards & WEB2.0: Changing Landscape

36

Enterprise2.0: Changing Architectures

37

WEB2.0 and Enterprise2.0

Evolution: Internet, Open Standards WEB2.0 & Enterprise 2.0

39

Evolution: WEB2.0 in Enterprise2.0

40

Enterprise 2.0: Open Standards, Internet and WEB2.0

41

Properties of Web 2.0 – Enterprise 2.0

42

Evolution of WEB Application Architectures

43

Effective WEB2.0 Applications

44

Open Standards and WEB2.0 Applications

45

Best Practices: WEB2.0 Applications

46

Building Open Standards Applications

WEB2.0: Consumer View

48

WEB2.0 Consumer View

49

Consumer Centric WEB 2.0

50

WEB2.0 Consumer View

51

WEB2.0 Consumer View

52

Consumer Web 2.0

53

Web 2.0 in Consumer World

Technology Enablers & Business Benefits

55

Enterprise 2.0 – Web 2.0 Paradigm

56

Enterprise 2.0: How It Works?

57

Web 2.0 Trends in Business

58

Technology Enablers

59

Assembling Web2.0 for Enterprise 2.0

60

Enterprise2.0 Architecture

61

Enterprise 2.0 Benefits

62

Enterprise 2.0 Mashups

63

Mashups in Enterprise 2.0

64

Mashups in Work

65

More on Mashups

66

SOA and Web 2.0

67

SOA and WEB 2.0

68

WEB 2.0 - Self Service Model

69

Product Development in Web 2.0 Era

70

Web 2.0: How It Disrupts Legacy Systems?

71

Summary: The Paradigm Shift, Technology Stack & Business Value

Web 2.0 is the next evolution of the web that has a new usage paradigm as well as a new technology paradigm. The former is characterized by “architecture of participation” and the latter is characterized by “architecture of partition”.

Web 2.0 is more than a consumer phenomenon. There is a consumer as well as an enterprise aspect of web 2.0. Consumer Web 2.0 and Enterprise Web 2.0 intersect at social computing.

Contrary to the common wisdom, Web 2.0 is based on a new technology foundation from Web 1.0. Though still evolving, the web 2.0 technology stack includes an application client container, an internet messaging bus and an enterprise mashup server. This technology stack enables “architecture of partition”, giving developers the capability to decide the appropriate architecture partition according to application requirements for the first time in history.

Beyond being a consumer phenomenon, web 2.0 has a significant impact on business computing by enabling better, faster, richer applications while reducing costs, with tangible and measurable real ROI.

72

References www.coachwei.com http://web2.sys-con.com/ IBM DeveloperWork’s Interview of Sr. Tim Berners-Lee: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206.html,

8/22/2006; “Web 2.0? It doesn’t exist”, Russell Shaw, http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=805, 12/17/2005; “What is Web 2.0”, Tim O’Reilly, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html, 9/30/2005; “Web 2.0 Is here”, Dion HinchCliffe, http://web2.wsj2.com/web2ishere.htm, 9/24/2005; “Tim Berners-Lee Comes Under Fire: Is It Time He Let Go of "Web 1.0"?”, Jeremy Geelan,

http://web2.sys-con.com/read/267479.htm, 9/5/2006; “All We Got Was Web 1.0, When Tim Berners-Lee Actually Gave Us Web 2.0”, Dion HinchCliffe,

http://web2.wsj2.com/all_we_got_was_web_10_when_tim_bernerslee_actually_gave_us_w.htm, 9/4/2006; “The "Perfect Storm" of Web 2.0 Disruption”, Jeremy Geelan, http://web2.sys-con.com/read/267370.htm, 9/7/2006; “The Co-Evolution of SOA and Web 2.0”,Dion HinchCliffe,

http://web2.wsj2.com/continuing_an_industry_discussion_the_coevolution_of_soa_and.htm, 6/6/2006; “Web 2.0: the State of Confusion?”, Coach Wei, http://www.coachwei.com/blog/_archives/2006/9/11/2314800.html, 9/11/2006; “Every Organization Should Have A Web 2.0 Story”, Coach Wei,

http://www.coachwei.com/blog/_archives/2006/7/25/2162250.html, 7/25/2006; “Web 2.0 Communication Layer: from HTTP to Comet to Internet Messaging Bus”, Coach Wei,

http://www.coachwei.com/blog/_archives/2006/10/13/2414519.html, 10/13/2006; “Does every organization need a Web 2.0 strategy?”, Dion HinchCliffe, http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=60, 8/18/2006; “Gartner's 2006 Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle Highlights Key Technology Themes”, Gartner,

http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=495475, 8/9/2006; “Web 2.0 Summit: IBM evolves vision of SOA and Web 2.0”, Dion HinchCliffe, http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=72,

November 2006;