Environmental Assessment SummaryWATAYNIKANEYAP TRANSMISSION PROJECTSUMMER 2018
___WHAT ARE WE DOING TODAY?
Providing information and gathering feedback on:§ The findings of the Phase 2
environmental assessment (EA) including:§ Description of the preferred Project§ Existing environmental conditions
(baseline)§ Predicted effects§ Mitigation commitments, including
monitoring§ EA conclusions
2
___WATAYNIKANEYAP PROJECTS§ $1.6 billion estimated capital cost
Phase 1 – New Transmission Line to Pickle Lake§ Approximately 300 km of 230 kV line
§ Undergoing Individual EA
Phase 2 - Connecting 17 remote First Nation communities currently serviced by diesel generators§ 1,500 km of 115 kV, 44 kV and 25 kV transmission lines§ Potential first community grid connections in 2021; build out to 2023
Pikangikum Distribution Line§ 44 kV and 25 kV distribution line: Red Lake to Pikangikum First Nation
§ Under construction – potential connection in 2018 § Phase 2 – Change operation of 44 kV line to 115 kV transmission line
3
___PHASE 2 PROJECT
4
___WHAT IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA)?§ Requirement under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act and Canadian
Environmental Assessment Act
§ Identifies the potential effects and benefits of the Project on the natural and human environments
§ Identifies how to reduce or remove potential effects or enhance benefits (for example, through the Project design)
§ Contributes to responsible environmental decision-making § Provides opportunity to comment on how the Project may affect
individuals and their use of the land
§ Aboriginal and Stakeholder Engagement is key throughout the process
5
___PHASE 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA)
• For applicable 115 kV sections and associated infrastructure
• For disposition of resources for applicable sections within Provincial Parks• Category C process will be followed
• For applicable less than 115 kV sections and associated infrastructure, and disposition of resources
• Category C process will be followed.
• For sections of the transmission line on First Nation reserve lands
Section 67 Canadian EA Act (CEAA 2012)
Class EA for Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves (Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2004)
Class EA for Resource Stewardship and Facility Development(Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2003)
Class EA for Minor Transmission Facilities (Hydro One 1992)
One integrated Environmental Study Report6
___
Public and Government
Review
Baseline EA Studies
Ongoing Aboriginal and Stakeholder Engagement
Prepare ESR
2016 2017 2018
Anticipated Statement of Completion(Oct 2018)
Preliminary 2-km-wide study corridor
(Sep 2016)
Round 2 Engagement Meetings (Oct 2016 – Feb 2018)
Round 1 Engagement Meetings (Feb – Sep 2016)
Round 3 Engagement Meetings(Mar – Jul 2018)
Submit Draft ESR (Jul 2018)
Submit Final ESR (Sep 2018)
40-m-wide right-of-way
(Jul 2017)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
Public and Government
Review
We are here7
Update for OH
___CURRENT ENGAGEMENT Review of EA findings and the Draft ESR
n Draft Environmental Study Report (ESR) will soon be available for review
n July to August 2018 is the planned public review period
n An electronic and hard copy of the Draft ESR will be available in multiple locations (example: band office or library)
n A notice will be distributed listing the review period dates and locations on where to access the report
n Draft ESR will also be available on the website (www.wataypower.ca)
8
Update for OH
___Round Dates Objectives
1. Pre-EA Notification
2013-2014
Jan 2016 – Sept 2016
- Review preliminary 5-km-wide corridors and identify preferred corridor
- Seek input to revise 5-km-wide corridors to 2-km-wide study corridors
2. Scoping Oct 2016– Feb 2018 - Review 2-km-wide study corridors and alternatives, including preliminary locations of Project components (access roads, laydown areas, camps)
- Collect traditional land and resource use data- Review draft EA Workplan and Engagement Plans
2a. Update Jun 2017 - Provide newsletter including map of proposed 40-m-wide right of way (ROW) and preliminary Project component locations
3. Review EA findings including Draft ESR and later final ESR
MNRF review of Draft ESR: underwayCommunity Meetings:Mar - Jul 2018Draft ESR review:Jul-Aug 2018 (anticipated)
Review:- Baseline data- Effects assessment results - Recommended mitigation
PHASE 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
9
Update for OH
___ALTERNATIVE CORRIDORS
n Corridor routing focused on community input gathered since 2013 -including traditional knowledge and land use - to identify and compare alternatives
n Results of environmental studies and engineering input have also contributed
n Preliminary preferred locations have been identified for the following:n Corridor routes (including consideration of several alternatives)n Other Project components:
n Temporary construction campsn Temporary laydown areasn Temporary and permanent access roadsn Substations
n Provincial Park and protected area crossings (including consideration of alternative crossing locations)
10
___ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STEPS AND CONTENT
Baseline
Conclusion –Predicted Effects
Mitigation
n Vegetation and Wetlands
n Wildlifen Fish and Fish
Habitatn Surface Watern Ground Watern Air Qualityn Noisen Climate Change
n Archaeologyn Cultural Heritagen Socio-Economicsn Non-Aboriginal Land
and Resource Usen Visual Aestheticsn Human Healthn Aboriginal and
Treaty Rights and Interests
Potential Effects
11
___
VEGETATION AND WETLANDS – BASELINE AND POTENTIAL EFFECTS
Baseline Data Potential Effects
Communities identified locations of blueberries, wild rice, and medicinal plants.Data was also collected through field studies:
n 173 vegetation surveys plots (May-Sep. 2016) with 319 species of plants identified
n No Species at Risk (SAR) plants observed
n Seven rare plants identified (one fern, one herb, and five mosses)
n 23 upland ecosystem types, 20 wetland ecosystem types, and two disturbed ecosystem types identified.
n Removal of vegetation:
§ Upland, wetland and riparian ecosystems
§ Old forests (>111 years)
§ Rare (not at risk) vegetation
§ Candidate Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest
§ Critical Landform Vegetation Associations
n Introduction of invasive plant species
12
___VEGETATION AND WETLANDS – MITIGATION AND CONCLUSION (PREDICTED EFFECTS)
Mitigation Examples Conclusion (Predicted Effects)n Minimize clearing
§ Limit project footprint§ Use existing access roads to the
extent practical§ Only remove vegetation where
necessary to construct and operate the line
n Regenerate temporary sites after construction
n Develop rare plant management plan
n Implement measures to control the spread of invasive species
n Most of the vegetation types that will be cleared for the Project are common to the area.
n Almost all (99%) of important/unique vegetation types will remain unchanged.
13
___
n Species selected based on: presence, conservation, and engagement
WILDLIFE – BASELINE DATA COLLECTION METHODS
§ Woodland caribou§ Moose§ Wolverine§ Little brown myotis (bat)
§ Horned grebe§ Bald eagle§ Canada warbler§ Bank swallow
§ Common nighthawk§ Olive-sided flycatcher
n Field surveys in 2016 and 2017:§ Remote cameras § Helicopter surveys along Project corridor targeting:
§ areas used by waterbirds: low densities observed§ caribou (focused area): 19 individuals in four groups
§ potential bat habitat: wintering on Red Lake subsystem, abundant maternity § breeding birds: 58 species identified; Canada warbler and olive-sided flycatcher are
the only species at risk observed§ Nightjar acoustic surveys: whip-poor-will recorded near Red Lake only, common
nighthawk frequently observed§ Raptor nests: 19 bald eagle nests noted during various helicopter surveys
Remote camera
14
___WILDLIFE – POTENTIAL EFFECTS AND MITIGATION EXAMPLESPotential Effects Mitigation Examples
n Loss of habitatn Reduced quality of habitat because of
changes in vegetation, water, air, noisen Habitat fragmentationn Noise during construction and
operation
n Avoid working during sensitive times (e.g., nesting) where feasible
n Avoid sensitive habitats where feasiblen Conduct pre-construction surveys, if necessaryPlans:
n Wildlife Managementn Spill Prevention and Emergency Response n Timber Salvage n Clean-up and Reclamation n Liquid Waste Management n Hazardous Waste Management n Non-Hazardous Solid Waste Management n Blasting Management n Traffic/Road Management
n Dust/Air Quality Management
15
___WILDLIFE – CONCLUSIONS (Predicted Effects)
n May be small changes to populations and locations of wildlifen Animals may avoid areas during construction n During operation some animals may be attracted to
certain areas (e.g., cleared ROW)n Some habitat removal – small compared to what’s
available.n Changes to caribou predation risk are expected along
some areas of the Project footprint as a result of increased predator densities and improved predator mobility
n Significant effects already present for:n Bat (Little brown myotis) due to disease
n Woodland Caribou in the Sydney Range due to existing disturbance
n The Project will contribute no to few further effects to these species
16
___FISH AND FISH HABITAT
Baseline Data Potential Effects Mitigation ExamplesConclusion (Predicted Effects)
n Review of
existing
literature and mapping
n Aerial survey
Four criteria
species:
n Walleye
n Sturgeon
n Brook trout
n Lake trout
n Loss or
alteration of
habitat
n Decreased water quality
n Increased access
for anglers
n Avoid work in/near
water where
possible
n Implement timing restrictions during
construction
n Build waterbody crossing structures
using best
management practices and
consistent with
permit conditions
Effects mostly
minimized or
avoided.
17
___PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS ASSESSMENT (CONT.’D.)
Baseline Potential Effects Mitigation Examples Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
Existing data shows low levels of contaminants in surface water in the project area
n Quality (for example, increased sediments, accidental spills)
n Quantity (for example, water taking or diversion)
Avoid work in or near water where possible.Plans:n Spill Prevention and
Emergency Response
n Liquid Waste Management
n Hazardous Waste Management
n Blasting Management
Monitoring:n Sediment and
erosion controln Nearby wells
Any changes willbe temporary and within the range of conditions present before construction.
Existing data sources used to characterize groundwaterquality and quantity
n Quality (for example, blasting, accidental spills)
n Quantity (for example, dewatering during construction)
18
___Baseline Data Potential
EffectsMitigationExamples
Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
Existing regional air monitoring stations
(Pickle Lake, Kenora,
Thunder Bay and
Winnipeg) describe
generally low levels of
air contaminants
Change in air
quality from
emissions and
dust
n Maintain vehicles
and equipment
n Implement dust
control measures
Effects infrequent and during
construction only.
Current noise levels
were described using
noise standards for
remote areas
Increased
noise levels
n Maintain vehicles
and equipment
Highest noise levels closest
to area of construction.
Slight increase in noise at
substation during operation.
Existing GHG levels
described using
existing data
Emissions
from exhaust,
loss of carbon
uptake from
trees that are
cleared
n Maintain vehicles
and equipment
n Limit idling
n Carpool
Lower GHG emission due to
reduced reliance on diesel
generation.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS ASSESSMENT
Benefits to air quality and climate change expected through
reduction in emissions from diesel generating stations 19
___ARCHAEOLOGY RESOURCES
Baseline Data PotentialEffects Mitigation Examples
Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
Stage 1 assessmentn background
research (for example, maps, historical documents)
n information from engagement
Loss or damage to archaeological resources
n Avoid known archaeological resources to the extent practical
n Complete additional field studies (Stage 2, 3 or 4 assessments) on areas of high potential
n Stop work if there is potential to damage or affect a feature
n Continue engagement with Aboriginal communities
Plans:n Archaeology Management
Plan
Effects avoided or minimized through mitigation and additional studies.
20
___CULTURAL HERITAGE
Baseline Data PotentialEffects Mitigation Examples Conclusion
(Predicted Effects)n Identified through
review of existing data (for example, inventories, archive documents, imagery)
n Types of heritage sites studied included: hunting and trapping sites, travel routes, habitation sites, river crossings, abandoned mines and churches
Heritagesites can be affected during construction activities (e.g., tree removal, vibration from heavy equipment)
n Avoid known sitesn Confirm presence
of additional sites prior to construction
n Use existing roads where possible
n Stop work if it has the potential to damage or affect a feature
Plans:n Built Heritage
Management Plan
Effects avoided or minimized through mitigation and additional studies.
21
___SOCIO-ECONOMIC
Baseline Data Potential Effects Mitigation Examples
Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
Includes existing data and communication with stakeholders and land users to describe:n Labour market
n Regional economyn Government
financesn Housing/
accommodationsn Servicesn Infrastructuren Community Well-
being
n Positive:training, employment, new businesses
n Negative: community well being -(example -nuisance noise)
n Health and Safety training and measures
n Worker codes of conduct
Plans:n Indigenous
Participation Plan
n Skills Development and Training Plan
n Benefits: Jobs and training opportunities during construction.
n Business opportunities and revenues through construction.
n Short term negative effects during construction.
Benefits expected through ability to connect additional homes to power
22
___NON-ABORIGINAL LAND AND RESOURCE USE
Baseline Data Potential Effects Mitigation Examples Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
Includes existing data and communication with stakeholders and land users todescribe:
n Parks and protected areas
n Outdoor tourism and recreational land and resource use
n Commercial industry land and resource use
n Access to and/or use of: natural/cultural/ recreational features of parks or protected area
n Land access and quality for hunters, anglers, trappers
n Remoteness and remote tourism outfitters
n Mining and aggregates, forestry and waterpower
n Align ROW with existing infrastructure
n Engage with land users
n Notify land users of activities
Plans:n Post-construction
Monitoring Plann Traffic/Access
Management Plan
n Minimal effects to parks and protected areas.
n Positive or negative effects to tourism/recreation depending on the land user.
n Minimal effects to commercial industry land and resource use.
23
___VISUAL AESTHETICS
Baseline Data
PotentialEffects Mitigation Examples
Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
A review of existing data and input from engagement identified locations of importance for visual quality
Visual effects of clearing and presence of transmission towers
n Use existing roads and disturbed areas
n Use existing screening from topography and vegetation
n Reclaim temporary construction areas
n Monitor and manage reclamation activities to address potential visual effects
A small change to existing viewing conditions is expected.
24
___HUMAN HEALTH
Baseline Data Potential Effects Mitigation Examples Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
Looked at the link between health and: noise, air, soil and water quality
n Changes to water quality
n Air and dust emissions
n Noise fromconstruction and/or operations
n Maintain vehicles and equipment
n Implement dust control measures
n Notify residents of work
Plans:n Spill Prevention
and Emergency Response Plan
n Blasting Management Plan
n Short term nuisance effects from changes to air quality andnoise during construction
n Changes to water are expected to be temporary and within the range of conditions present before construction.
n Changes to water are not expected to affect human health.
25
___ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS AND INTERESTS - BASELINE
Baseline Data
Data gathered through: n Engagement n Sharing of existing traditional land and resource use (TLRU) data n New Project-specific TLRU data
Measures to represent Aboriginal and Treaty Rights:n Availability of wildlife, fish and plant species harvested by Aboriginal peoplen Location of, and access to areas used by Aboriginal communities for wildlife,
fish and plant harvestingn Location of, and access to spiritual, ceremonial and cultural use sitesn Quality of land used for traditional purposes
26
___ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS AND INTERESTS -EFFECTS
Potential Effects Mitigation Examples Conclusion (Predicted Effects)
n Limits to ability to continue rights-based activities
n Temporary loss of access during construction
n Overall increase inaccess to land
n Project designed to avoid many of the shared TLRUvalues
n Mitigation measures recommended in the EA will be applied to protect air, water, plants, animals, fish and people
n No restrictions on access to the Project right of way during operations, except for safety reasons during maintenance
n Continue to engage with communities to improve understanding of possible effects and how they can be addressed
n All effects to Aboriginal Treaty Rights and are expected to be mitigated.
n Continue engagement with communities to reduce effects to rights.
27
___CONCLUSIONS
n Net adverse environmental effects of the Project have been predicted to be minor or not significant except for:n Woodland caribou (Sydney Range) and Little Brown bat species
n Both species not currently considered self-sustaining n Project contribution to effects to these species are predicted to be minor
28
___NEXT STEPS AND PROJECT PERMITTING
n Comments on the Draft ESR will be considered and changes will be made where needed
n A Final ESR will be released for public reviewn Notice will be provided and will include
how the Final ESR can be accessed
n Once the EA process is complete, Statement(s) of Completion will be issued
n Required permits will be confirmed and obtained from regulators
29
Update for OH
___
Regulator Examples of Permits
Provincial Ministries
Environment and Climate Change (MOECC)
• Permit to take water• Environmental Compliance Approval (air, noise, wastewater)
Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF)
• Endangered Species Act permit• Far North Act authorization• Public Lands Act – land use permit (tenure), work permit
(water crossings and other activities) • Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act - Scientific collectors permit • Crown Forest Sustainability Act - Forest Resource Licence• Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act permit (water crossings)• Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act – authorization
to conduct research, work permits• Aggregate Resources Act permit• Forest Fires Prevention Act burn permit
Transportation (MTO) • Land Use and Building, Entrance, Encroachment, and Sign permits
Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS)
• Ontario Heritage Act – compliance letter
Northern Development and Mines (MNDM)
• Mining Act - Withdrawal of lands from staking• Mining Act - consent from mining claim holders 30
Update for OH
___
Regulator Examples of Permits
Provincial - Other
Ontario Energy Board (OEB) • Leave to Construct
Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) • Fuel handling licence
Federal MinistriesEnvironment Canada (EC) • Species at Risk Act permit
Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) • Species at Risk Act permit• Other authorizations
Transport Canada (TC) • Navigation Protection Act approval• Canadian Aviation Regulation approval
Department of Indigenous Service Canada (DISC) • Indian Act authorization
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) • Explosives Act permit
31
___
Regulator Examples of Permits
Other
First Nations • Land Sharing Protocols
• Other community-specific protocols
Hydro One Networks Inc. • Transmission System Code Agreement
Private land owners • Easement consent
Other utility companies • Consent to cross
Municipalities • Building Code Act permit
• By-law permits – tree removal, burning
• Planning Act – permits, amendments
32
___
Questions?
33
___WATAYNIKANEYAP EA AND ENGAGEMENT CONTACTSMargaret KenequanashWataynikaneyap Power L.P.(807) 577-5955 [email protected]
Nancy O’NeillEnvironmental Assessment LeadWataynikaneyap Power L.P.(807) 577-5955 [email protected]
John ReidEA Engagement CoordinatorNew Economy Development Group(613) [email protected]
Brett ThompsonProject Manager for EA Golder Associates Ltd.(905) 567 4444 ext 1294 [email protected]
Website: http://www.wataypower.ca
Tribal Council and Independent First Nation Contacts
Keewaytinook Okimakanak Andrea Habinski
Windigo First Nations Council Breann Morgan
Shibogama First Nations Council Laura SayersDonna Brunton
Independent First Nations Alliance Mary Bea Kenny
Sandy Lake First Nation Harry Meekis
34