+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Environmental Education Report 2014

Environmental Education Report 2014

Date post: 07-Apr-2016
Category:
Upload: sc-national-heritage-corridor
View: 222 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Funded by an Environmental Protection Agency grant distributed by the North American Association for Environmental Education, the South Carolina National Heritage Corridor worked throughout 2014 to increase and improve environmental education in South Carolina.
Popular Tags:
116
South Carolina Environmental Education Consortium Final Report Presented to: South Carolina National Heritage Corridor (SCNHC) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) North American Association on Environmental Education (NAAEE) Prepared by: Jennifer M. Thomsen, Ph.D and Robert B. Powell, Ph.D. Clemson University Decemeber 2014
Transcript
Page 1: Environmental Education Report 2014

South Carolina Environmental Education Consortium

Final Report

Presented to:South Carolina National Heritage Corridor (SCNHC)

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)North American Association on Environmental Education (NAAEE)

Prepared by:Jennifer M. Thomsen, Ph.D and Robert B. Powell, Ph.D.

Clemson University

Decemeber 2014

Page 2: Environmental Education Report 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The South Carolina Environmental Education Consortium was started this past year to support the South Carolina Great Outdoors initiative’s goal of protecting, creating and promoting the state and its vast natural resources as a premier international outdoor travel destination. This report summarizes the accomplishments and lessons learned from an extensive evaluation of the Consortium’s 2014 activities from a series of surveys and other evaluative means. The main activities highlighted and assessed include:

• StatewideEENeedsAssessment• CollaborationwithBoardofEducation• PartnershipwithMichelin• PartnershipwithEdVenture• PartnershipwithSCETV• FormalandNon-FormalEducatorCertification• DatabaseDevelopmentandUse• ConsortiumWorkshopSeries(7workshopsthroughoutthestateincludingawebinar)• PresentationsandOutreach• ConsortiumImpacts• Planning,Learning,andLookingAhead

TheConsortium’sfirstyearhasimpressiveachievementsandmoreimportantly,theConsortiumisbuildingastrongfoundationforfutureactivitiesandachievinglong-termgoals.ItisinthisinitialstagethattheConsortium has a lot of opportunity for growth, learning, and improvement to further strengthen its collective andindividualmembers’capacities.ThecontinuousevaluationsthroughoutthispastyearofferawealthofvaluablefeedbacktoguidefutureConsortiumplanning.ThefollowingsectionsofthisreporthighlighttheConsortium’s successes and identify areas for improvement in their diverse activities to help the Consortium meetitsshortandlong-termgoalsandprovideguidanceforotheremergingstatewideenvironmentaleducationconsortiums.

Page 3: Environmental Education Report 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Overview......................................................................................................................................1-3

History of South Carolina’s Environmental Education..................................................................4

NeedsAssessment......................................................................................................................5-19

EvaluationofYear1Activities................................................................................................20-22

DatabaseUse,Value,Impact...................................................................................................23-26

WorkshopSeries.......................................................................................................................27-29WorkshopI:www.EEinSC.orgDatabaseTraining.......................................................30-31•WorkshopII:The“How’sandWhy’s”ofDevelopingSustainable•

NetworkingandDynamicPartnerships........................................................................32-41WorkshopIII:EECapacity&GuidelinesofExcellence..............................................42-49•WorkshopIV:DelevopingCreativeEnvironmentalLessonPlans•

andTeachingControversialIssues................................................................................50-58WorkshopV:BuildingSynchronicity............................................................................59-68•WorkshopVI:LearningtoCommunicateMoreEffectivelywith•

ReluctantParties............................................................................................................69-76Webinar:DelevopingCreativeEnvironmentalLessonPlansand•

TeachingControversialIssues.......................................................................................77-85WorkshopVII:WhataretheStepsforDevelopingaSystemfor•

ContinualProgrammaticImprovementandCapturingYourSuccess?.........................86-94

FinalComprehensiveSurveytoAllParticipants...................................................................95-104

ConsortiumandWorkshopAchievements..................................................................................105

OutreachandPresentations.................................................................................................106-107

SustainingProjects..............................................................................................................108-110

ImpactSharing......................................................................................................................111-113

Page 4: Environmental Education Report 2014

OVERVIEW

SouthCarolinaGreatOutdoorsisastatewideinitiativeoftheSouthCarolinaNationalHeritageCorridorwiththe goal of protecting, creating and promoting South Carolina and our vast natural resources as a premier internationaloutdoortraveldestination.Thisinitiative’saimis“toprotectandpromoteSC’snaturalresources,createsustainableeconomicdevelopmentopportunities,andimprovequalityoflife-allwhileinspiringstewardshipinbothvisitorsandresidents.”TheSouthCarolinaEnvironmentalEducationConsortiumwasstarted this past year to support the South Carolina Great Outdoors effort.

This report summarizes the accomplishments and lessons learned from an evaluation of the South Carolina Environmental Education Consortium,whichisafundedinitiativeoftheEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)andtheNorthAmericanAssociationonEnvironmentalEducation(NAAEE).SouthCarolinawasoneofthree states to receive the grant to strengthen and diversify environmental education throughout the state.

InthisfirstyearorPhaseOne,theConsortiumhasfocusedonthreeareas:

Buildingnetworkcapacity•Training and professional development •Evaluation and future planning•

TheConsortium’smid-termgoals(overthenext2-3years)includestrengthening:

numberandtypeoforganizationsandgeographicreach•awarenessamongenvironmentalprofessionalsandcommunitymembersabouttheorganizationand •

initiatives that are a part of EECapacity and the state consortiumnumberoforganizationsandpeopleawareofandinvolvedwithEECapacity/NAAEEthathavenot •

traditionallybeennumberofnewaudiencesstateconsortiummembersareengagingasaresultofparticipatingingrant•numberofminorities,youthandyoungadultsinvolvedinEE•evaluationtechniquesforEEprogramming•

Thelong-termgoals(overthenext4-5years)oftheSouthCarolinaEnvironmentalEducationConsortiuminclude strengthening:

organizationsbecominginvolvedintheconsortium•urbanandcommunityEEpractices•strategiesandpracticesonteachinginurbanandruralsettingsandreachingdiverseaudiences•leadershipandcareeropportunitiesforunderrepresetnedpopulationintheenvironmentalfield•recognitionoftheenvironmentaleducationfieldacrossthestateandregion•

1

Page 5: Environmental Education Report 2014

CURRENT CONSORTIUM PARTNERSHIPS:

SC Parks, Recreation & Tourism• SC Department of Natural Resources•

Francis Marion University• Greenville Zoo•

Palmetto Conservation Foundation• Audubon SC•

SC Wildlife Federation• Clemson University •

EdVenture State Children’s Museum• Sc Aquarium•

SC Forestry Commission• Charleston County Parks •

Addventure Coaching • University of SC•

Calyx Farms• Oconee County•

SC Sea Grant• Wild in SC•

Rock Hill PRT• Youth to Ocean•Jenkins Institute• Catawba Indian Nation•

Palmetto Pride• Watershed Ecology Center•

City of Gaffney• Girl Scouts of SC•

Museum of York County• Hatcher Garden•

Lexington County• SC State University•

SCDHEC• Carolina Living Magazine•

S2TEM Centers of SC• The Nature Conservancy•

Spartanburg County Parks• SC Science Academy•

EVALUATION METHODS:

To evaluate the South Carolina Environmental Education Consortium Workshop Series, workshopparticipantscompletedsurveysaftereachworkshopandacomprehensivesurveyattheendoftheworkshopseriestoassessthequalityandeffectivenessoftheworkshop,thepresenters,andtheutilityoftheskillstaughtineachsession.

2

Page 6: Environmental Education Report 2014

GOVERNOR’S PROCLAMATION

SouthCarolinawasoneofonlyfifteenstatestoreceivethehonorofJuneasrecognizedasGreatOutdoorsMonthbytheUSDepartmentoftheInterior.ThiscameasaresultofboththeSCGreatOutdoorsinitiative,coupledwiththeEnvironmentalEducationworkacrossthestate.

3

Page 7: Environmental Education Report 2014

ThefollowingexcerptwastakenfromtheInstituteofEducationSciencesandacceptedbytheSCDepartmentof Education as the inception of Environmental Education in South Carolina:

The South Carolina Environmental Education Conference was held February 3 and 4, 1971, at Hobcaw House, Georgetown, South Carolina. The Conference was intended to provide a dialogue between

teacher-training institutions, State Department of Education personnel, and other state agency personnel interested in environmental education. One aim of the Conference was to encourage college and

university education departments to incorporate the use of available environmental education materials into their curriculums. Addresses, accompanied by resulting discussions and suggestions, are presented verbatim in this report. Topics include: The Need for Environmental Education as an Integral Part of

Teacher Education; Existing Teacher Training Programs and Material; Federal Programs as a Source of Funds; Existing Materials for Environmental Education; Principal Parts of a Model Program;

Employment Opportunities; Implementation; and Evaluation of Environmental Education Programs. Lists of conference members, staff, and environmental education materials available from the South

Carolina State Department of Education are included. (http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED055828)

Evenafterfourdecades,SouthCarolinadoesnothaveafirmfoundationforEnvironmentalEducation.NorecordsweremaintainedattheDepartmentofEducationfromadministrationtoadministration,combiningwithalegislaturenothistoricallysupportiveorknowledgeableaboutEnvironmentalEducation;ourstateisleftwithnocentralroadmaporstrategicplanforEE.ANationalHistoryofEnvironmentalEducationcanbefoundatthislink:http://niu.edu/~carter/courses/520/Carter_Simmons.pdf

Fromthisnationalperspective,SouthCarolinawouldfitintothehistoryinthe1970swhenthefirstattemptsweremadeinSCtolaunchtheEnvironmentalEducationAssociationofSouthCarolina(EEASC)withassistancefromtheStateDepartmentofEducation.Manyotherinitiativesstartedaroundthattimehereaswell,however the momentum was lost as administrations changed.

South Carolina needs a strong foundation moving forward. The same discussion and arguments mentioned inthe1971documentarestillapplicabletoday.SouthCarolina’sPeopleandtheEnvironmentCurriculumismentionedbythenewConservationEducationConsultantattheStateDepartmentofEducation,howeverthereisnoformalpositiontomakesurethiscomestofruition.EvenwhenafulltimepersonholdinganEEpositionattheDepartmentofEducationwasinstated,thePeopleandEnvironmentserieswasneverdiscussed,muchlessintroduced into curriculum over a ten year stent.

Asanexample,acourseatUSC’sCollegeofEducation,TeachingEnvironmentalEducation,waseliminatedinthe1990sbecausetheneedwasnotrelevantbasedoncurriculumintheSouthCarolinaschoolsystem.Finally,inthelastdecadeapaneltointroducelegislationtogetenvironmentalcourseworkapproveddiscussedonlyuniversity programs in the state. Even so, the legislature vetoed all.

4

HISTORY OF SOUTH CAROLINA’S ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Page 8: Environmental Education Report 2014

NEEDS ASSESSMENT

OnceawardedthegrantfromtheEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)andtheNorthAmericanAssociationonEnvironmentalEducation(NAAEE),aneedsassessmentwasconductedwithover300individualsinvolvedinenvironmentaleducationtoidentifythegreatestneedsacrossSouthCarolina.Thequestionsandresponsesfromtheneedsassessmentarelistedbelow:

1) How do you define Environmental Education?

Organizedeffortstoteachabouthownaturalenvironmentsfunctionand,particularly,howhumanbeings• canmanagetheirbehaviorandecosystemsinordertolivesustainably

Sharing the wonder and tools for exploring the world around us•

Environmental Education is a process that allows individuals to explore environmental issues, engage • inproblemsolvingandtakeactiontoimprovetheenvironment.Asaresult,individualsdevelop adeeperunderstandingofenvironmentalissuesandhavetheskillstomakeinformedand responsibledecisions

Teachingparticipantsaboutnaturalresourcesandenvironmentalissues,etc.withthegoalofthe • participantgainingatleastanunderstandingofthewaytheenvironmentworks;atmostgetting the participant to respect and appreciate nature and all in entails.

Environmental education refers to the organized effort to teach people of all ages how to more • appropriatelyinteractwiththeirlocalecosystemsinaglobalmindset.Ipersonallybelievethebestway to achieve this is via creating a passion for time spent outdoors in natural areas from a young age.

Anyopportunitytoeducatethepubliconthemanyaspectsofnaturalresources•

Learningabouttheimportanceofnaturalresourcestoourhealthandwellbeing.Alsolearningabout • wildlifeandthenaturalworld(ecology)childrenandadults

Teaching people to appreciate nature•

Environmental education is providing authentic experiences that invite, challenge, and encourage • diverseaudiences(includingK12students,professionals,andthegeneralpublic)toengagecognitively andaffectivelywiththenaturalsciencesincludingecology,hydrology,biology,geology,environmental history,andsustainability;environmentaleducationshouldinformandinspirestewardshipofnatural resources.

IntherealmthatIdealwithit,it’smoreconservationeducationwhereItrytoteachtheprincipalsof • naturalresourcemanagement,promotesustainableuseoftheresourcethroughoutdoorskillslearning andinspire,influenceandenhancethepassionofconservationstewardshipinprogramparticipants.

5

Page 9: Environmental Education Report 2014

Creating, awareness, empathy and action for the environment and those within it.•

Anyeducationthatfocusesonteachingstudentsaboutthebiologyofanimals,andplantsinecosystems • andrelatethatknowledgewithanunderstandingofecologyingeneralandlinkitallwithan understandingofhowhumansplayanintegralroleinourenvironment,whetheritbepositiveor negative.

Learninghowallpartsoftheenvironmentcanbe•

Learningaboutnaturalsystems,theirinterdependence,andtheimpactsofhumanactivity.•

Educatingthepubliconhowtheycanmakesmallchangesintheireverydayactivitiestohaveless • impact on the local environment.

Familiarizingstudentswithlocal,regional,nationalandglobalenvironmentalissuesandtherangeof • solutionsproposedandundertakenbyexpertsandengagedindividualsatalllevels.

Learningaboutthenaturalworld,whetherindoorsoroutdoors.Includessystems,relationships,human • interactionwiththeenvironment,issues-based,science-based,ormultidisciplinaryapproaches.

Teachingcitizens(allages)aboutnaturalresources,helpingthemunderstandtheirimportance, • providing guidance on how to sustain and protect them.

Educationaboutthenaturalworldandissuesthatimpactmanandtheenvironment.•

Learningwhatourphysicalenvironmentis,itslimitations,problems,identifyingwaystoteachothers.•

Educationthepublicabouttherelationshipbetweenhumaninfluencesandournaturalresources.•

Teaching,demonstratingandinvolvingothersinenvironmentalawareness,increaseinknowledgeand • bestmanagementpractices.

TheteachingofNaturalHistoryconceptsandthemes,preferablyinoutdoorsettings•

Usingtheenvironmenttoteacheverything—science,math,languagearts,physicaleducation,etc.•

Baba Dioum’s quote I think sums it up the best, “In the end we will conserve only •

what we love; we will love only what we understand; and we will understand

only what we have been taught.”

Teachinghowman’spoliciesandactionsimpactthegeneralecosystemwhichincludesourbeaches, • waterways,forests,theairwebreathe-ouroverallsurroundings.

6

Page 10: Environmental Education Report 2014

Environmentaleducationistheteachingorlearningabouttheinterrelationshipbetweenorganismsand • theirhabitatorenvironment.Connectedtothisishowtheenvironmentinfluencestheorganism either positively or negatively.

A knowledge and respect for natural resources and natural habitat. An understanding • of how human interaction impacts the natural environment

Informingpeopleabouttheenvironmentandcausingameasureablechangeinbehavior.•

Makingpeopleandcompaniesawareoftheimpacttheyhaveontheenvironmentaswellassmall • changestheycanmaketocontributetolargechanges.

Experientiallearningthattakesplaceeitherinoroutdoorstohelpcreateanenvironmentallyliterate • public.

EnvironmentalEducationistheprocessofteachingchildrenandadultsaboutournaturalworld,help • themunderstandtheinteractionsofthatworldwithhumansandlearnhowtomakeinformeddecisions on how to care for our world.

Exposingpeopleofallagestothewondersandimportanceoftheenvironment,includinghowitbenefits• us,sothattheywill,inturn,feelanobligationandcompulsiontoprotectit.

Comingfromahistory,asopposedtosciencebackground,ItendtodefineEEmorealongthelines • of promoting an understanding of how humans interact with their surrounding environment and how the environment has impacted human development.

Theteachingofconceptsrelatedtoournaturalandman-alteredsurroundingsandhowweinteractwitht• thosesurroundings.Whileitisnotnecessary,thistypeofeducationtakesplaceintheenvironments beingdiscussed!

Knowledgeofnature/theenvironmentandourplace,ashumans,withinit.•

Gettingpeopleoutdoorsinareaswheretheycanexperiencethebenefitsofourwork.•

Teachingadultsandchildren(a)abouttheenvironment;(b)howtointerpret,investigate,andunderstand• theenvironment;and(c)howtomakeresponsible,informeddecisionsonenvironmentalissues.

Itisbothclassroomandoutsideexperientialeducationthatbuildsawarenessandappreciationofthe • connectionsbetweenpeople,theirenvironmentandotheranimalsandplants.

7

Page 11: Environmental Education Report 2014

Increasingtheliteracywithinourcommunityofenvironmentalissuesandsolutions.•

Teachingthejoysandissuesoftheenvironment.•

Teachingcenteredaroundtheconceptofnature,outdoors,andecology-usingbothfieldbased • (outside!)teachingmethodsaswellastraditionalclassroom.

Increasingtheknowledgebaseofcitizensandelectedleadersrelatedtothebuiltandnatural • environments.Weespeciallyneedtoincludeeducationatthegrassrootslevelandfordecision makersregardingpoliciesthatsupportbestmanagementpracticestoprotectenvironmentresourcesfor sustainability.

8

Page 12: Environmental Education Report 2014

2) Do you currently have Environmental Education programs in your capacity?*Predominatelysenttoenvironmentaleducationorganizations

3) Does your organization currently partner with other Environmental Education organizations?

4) How do you rate the following as SC’s environmental education challenges?

Responses for “Other” category:Thewordingandoptionsonthisquestionareconfusing.SorryIcouldnotprovidemorefeedback.•Reaching a more diverse audience•SouthCarolinaisWAYbehindinenvironmentaleducationinthepublicschoolsystemwithnohelpfromourgovernment •

cutting out programs.Engagingtheyouthandmakingthemawareofwhythiseducationisnecessaryandfortheirbenefit.•Collaborationwithnon-traditionalpartners•

9

Page 13: Environmental Education Report 2014

5) What is the greatest need for Environmental Education in South Carolina?

EE is necessary for any lasting conservation effort and protection of South Carolina’s natural and • cultural resources.

Raising awareness of our natural resources and options for conserving and protecting; • knowing the difference one person can make.

Atmanylevelsfromthegeneralpublictoelectedpublicofficialsrecognizingallthegreatnatural • resourcesandprovidingastrongenvironmentaleducationprograming/emphasisthatwillsecurethese resources.Also,tousethenaturalresourcesinawaythatsupportsecotourism

Required environmental and outdoor education in the schools.•

Inourentirecountry,Iwouldsaythattheaveragepersonfeelsadistinctdisconnectbetweenthemselves• andnature.Theydonotseethetangiblewaysinwhichwhattheyputoutsideinfluencestheir dailyliving.Ifpeopleweretofeelasenseofintimacyaboutwildspaces,theywouldbemore inclinedtoprotectthem.Ibelievethatfundingissueswillberesolvedifmorepeopleare educatedfirstastotheenvironmentalconcernswehave.

Fundingasinalmostallthings,reachingdiverse(socioeconomic,racial,andage)audiencesand • children in poor communities.

Justdoingit.•

Communitytohelpprovideconsistency,networking,support,recruitment,andretentionofdiverse, • high-qualityenvironmentaleducators.

EnvironmentaleducationemphasisinSCpublicschoolsystem.AnappointedpersonwithSCDEto • establishorcompilegradelevelandstatestandardsappropriateenvironmentaleducationactivities, curricula,fieldtrips,etc.

Awarenessandaction.•

To open the eyes of the next generation that every individual can play an important role as an • environmental steward.

Stewardship.•

Impactsofdevelopmentandotherhumanactivity.•

Anopportunitytoconnectwithotherorganizationsandlocalschooldistrictstoprovideclasses/ • educationalmaterialtothepublic.Anopportunitytonetwork.

10

Page 14: Environmental Education Report 2014

Raisingawarenessabouttheissuesandthestepsthatcanbetakenbyindividuals,politicalentitiesand • industry to address them.

Implementationthroughoutallgrades(usingittoteachawidevarietyofsubjects),plushavingit • availableforadults.Havingorganizationscomingtogether(whereastheyarecurrentlycompeting).

Comprehensive plan that connects the many organizations that already provide these services•

Coordinationofservicestobemoreeffectiveineducationandconservation.Trainingforeducatorsin • schools.

Aconcentratedeffortamongthestakeholders.•

People to understand the relationship between a healthy environment, quality of life • and economic strength in a community

Ithinkmiddleschoolandhighschooloutreachisanareaofgreatestneed.•

Makingitanintegralpartoftheschoolcurriculum.•

Forteacherstouseitintheirclassrooms,whichwouldrequirethattheyknowhow•

Tobeintertwinedwiththepublicschoolsystems.•

Toreachawideraudiencewitheducationandtoolsonhowtomakeadifferenceinthisarea.•

There seems to be a lack of coordination I often feel like I am working in a vacuum. • There no “community” within the state.

Needtostrikeabalancebetweencommunitydevelopment,theneedsofgrowthandpracticalrestrictions• to protect natural SC.

Awareness.•

Acomprehensiveplan,(ifthereisone,Iamnotawareofit).•

AcertificationprogramandlegitimacyfromtheDept.ofEducation.•

EnvironmentalEducationcanbeusedtoteachmanyofthestandardsoflearningandgetstudentsactive• atthesametime.Weneedschooladministratorstoseeitasalearningtool,notafrivolousfieldtrip.

Buildingthatawarenessoftheimportanceofenvironmentalstewardship.•

11

Page 15: Environmental Education Report 2014

Notsure.•

Moneytopayforstudentstoexperiencethewealthofenvironmentaleducationprogramsavailable • throughout the state.

IthinkDNRdoesagreatajobshowingupatlocaleventsandbeinginthepubliceyewithfun • interactivetoolsthatkids(andoftenadults)canenjoy.

N/A•

Fundingandcommunication(e.g.,howisthisSCNHCinitiativecoordinatedwithexistingSC • EnvironmentalEducationefforts?)

Myexperienceislimited,butitseemsthatmostschooldistrictshavepatheticenvironmentaleducation • programs, and what they do have is usually limited to elementary and middle school. Typically, there is nothing for high school students.

Engagingallpartsofthecommunitynotjustyouth.•

Programsandparticipants.•

Gettingthemessagetoallteachers,includingpre-serviceteachers.•

Educationatgrassrootslevelandtop-downdecision-makereducation.•

6) What are your organization’s Environmental Education goals?

CreateadatabaseofEEorganizations,createanenvironmentalliteracyplan.•

Expandmembers’knowledgebaseandencourageinvolvement•

To partner with more organizations that enable us to expand our environmental • education. Also, to implement more environmental education programing on the Palmetto Trail.

Gettingkidsoutsideandunderstandingnatureandtheenvironment•

Tocreateasenseofintimacybetweenlocalpeopleandtheirnaturalareas(theGlendaleShoals)2.To • partnerwithareaschoolstocreateasetoflongstandingfieldtripprogramming,sothattheGlendale ShoalsbecomearegularpartofSpartanburgareaeducation.3.Tobridgethegapbetweenurban Spartanburgandtheruralcommunity,particularlybyincorporatingWoffordstudentsinourevents.

12

Page 16: Environmental Education Report 2014

Saving land.•

Toinformandinspireunderstandingoffloodplains,forests,andthewatershedsthatnourishthem.•

Specificallyformyprograms,nottheagency’s,istopromotethesportoffishing,anglerethics, • appreciation/understandingofaquaticresourcesandinfluencetheiropinionoftheagency(what’sour purpose).Inadditiontothat,anoverarchinggoalistorecruitnewanglerstothesportoffishing andtomaintainopportunitiestokeepanglersengagedthroughouttheirlifetime.

Tobeatopresourceforenvironmentaleducation.•

To open the eyes of the next generation that every individual can play an important • role as an environmental steward, by providing curriculum that compliments school classes, and shows them how exciting the outdoors can be.

Communication.•

To reduce the impacts of sprawl and protect special places.•

Toeducatethepublic,peopleofallagesintheStateofSConhowtheycanhaveahugeimpactonlocal• waterways.

EnvironmentalEducationisanimportantaspectofouroveralleducationalmission.Aswitheverything • we do, our goal is to improve the lives of all South Carolinians.

Educating adults, underserved groups, and more school presence•

Toinformcitizensofthosethingstheycandotoimpactthequalityofournaturalresources.•

Toprovideinquiry-basedinstructionforstudentsK-12toprovidepubliceducationprogramsand • workshopsrelatedtoEE.TocreatelearningareasthatmotivatestudentstolearnmoreaboutEE.

To provide education opportunities within our county.•

Thesameasabove,justspecificallyfocusedontheSavannahRiver.•

Sustainablebehaviorchangeandinfluenceonat-home,parentalpractices.•

Toeducatethepublicabouttherelationshipbetweenwetlandecosystemsandthequalityoflifeofall • living things.

Educatethepublicabouttheimportanceofforeststoourenvironment,ourstate’seconomy,andour • everyday lives.

13

Page 17: Environmental Education Report 2014

TofindsupportforexpandingenvironmentaleducationinSC.•

Ourorganizationhasn’tarticulatedanyspecificgoalsinthisarea.•

ContinuetoprovidescienceeducationinschoolsanddothisusingPrivatemoneyasmuchaspossible • developatleastonenewprogramineachgradeeachyear.Developwaystoreachouttoadults.

Continuetoeducateonwaterissues,mainlystormwaterrunoff,butthelargerissuesofpollutionand • human impact on wetlands, streams.

Provideinformation/programsonconservationenvironmentaleducation.•

Informingourcommunityaboutairquality,waterquality,andtheimportanceofrecycling.•

Toteachthegeneralpublichowtoadvocateforandbecomestewardsofthestate’smarineresources.•

Notaffiliatedwithanorganization.•

ThegoalhasshiftedawayfromeducationinourAgency,thoughwestilltacklerecyclingandgreen • initiatives.

Our goal is to raise an appreciation of nature as a vital part of understanding our history and that our • choicesthroughouthistoryhavehadasubstantialimpactonthenaturalworld.

Toteachstudentsaboutthevalueofbirdsandotherwildlifeasbothbio-indicatorsandaslifeenriching • representatives of the environment we share.

Raiseawarenessofthebeautyofthenaturalareawhileteachingthosewhovisitittoprotectand • preserve it.

Useoutreachtobuilddonorsupport.•

Promotingnaturalresourceconservation.•

Create a personal connection to nature among younger generations.•

Toincreasethescientificliteracyofourcommunitysothatdecisionmakingisbasedonscientific • principles.

Soil and water conservation education, stormwater education.•

To teach undergraduates, to train teachers, and to inform citizens of the importance of the environment.•

Promotesensiblegrowthandtheprotectionsofspecialplaces.•

14

Page 18: Environmental Education Report 2014

7) List the top 5 training needs for SC Envrionmental Education?

BestPractices,Assessment,Process,EnvironmentalJustice,EnvironmentalPriorities.•

ProtectingwaterqualitynetworkingtoblockimportofgarbageSCconnectionstoregional,national, • and international migrations.

Awareness and sensitivity, Knowledge and understanding, Attitudes skills participation.•

Beingcomfortableoutsideinnature;understandingoftheissues;understandingofbasicenvironmental • principles.

Tipsondevelopingnewandcreativeenvironmentallessonplans,focusedonbeinghandsonand • practical.2.Learningtocommunicatemoreeffectivelywithreluctantorresistantparties.3.Adviceon publicizingenvironmentaleducationevents--howdoweencouragepeopletoattend?4.Tipsonmore effectivecommunicatingbetweenlike-mindedenvironmentalgroups,andhowwecanuseeachother tobeastrongermovementasawhole.5.Determinewhichenvironmentaltopics (water,airpollution,speciesdiversity,etc.)aremostvitaltoconvey,andhowwe canhoneourmessagedowntoamemorableamountofinformation.

Programawareness,grantopportunities,facilitatortraining.•

Foreducators-effectivegrassrootsoutreach.Generally-importanceofcleanwater,forestryand • farming opportunities, outdoor recreation opportunities.

Hunting,fishing,farming.•

Climatechangeliteracy*Psychologyandtechniquesforcommunicating“controversial”topicssuch • asclimatechangeandevolution*Trainingthe3frameworkdimensionsintheNASFramework forScienceEducation*Trainingincommoncoremathandquantitativeliteracytohelpenvironmental educatorsusenumbersmeaningfullytoworkthroughfears(includingtheirown andtheaudience’s)ofdealingnumbers.*Traininginframesforconnectingtovarious audiences;thisincludestheworkofNisbetandScheufelebutalsosomeadditionaldimensions oftheologicalandphilosophicalframesthatcanhelpusall(educatorsandaudiencesalike)HOPEinthe face of very real environmental challenges.

AunifiedorganizationtooverseeEEthatdoesmorethanhostsanannualconference(training • opportunities,eventsforthepublicheldbymulti-agencypartnerstoexpose/communicatetothepublic aboutEE;immersiontacticstoenterschoolsystem;etc.).

Fieldexperience(outdoorworkshops),Ageappropriate.•

Notsure...•

15

Page 19: Environmental Education Report 2014

Stewardship, littering, recycling.•

Moreoutreachtoadultsonbehaviorstheycanchange:purchasingdecisions,drivingbehavior,home • and yard care, etc.

Opportunities to get information to people who need to see it.•

1.Emphasizetherelationshipbetweenhealthandneighborhood2.Beginenvironmentaleducation • inelementaryschool3.Statewidedisseminationofinformation4.Empowermentofteens5. Empowerment of local communities.

Regulartrainingworkshops(forteachersoreducationproviders)beingofferedinavisiblemanner(no • oneknowswhotogotoforatrainingsession),abasicunderstandingofwhatEEmeansandhow itcanbeusedacrossdisciplines.

Thetrainingshouldbefocusedonconnectingeducatorswithallthedifferentopportunitiesforlearning • first.Thenexposingthemtoeachoftheminasummaryformat.Theyshouldunderstand watersheds,typicalwaterpollutants,basictreatmentprocesses,somesoilbackground(contaminants, erosion),anddevelopmentimpacts.

GrantwritingforEEleadersDevelopingpartnershipsInquiry-basedinstructionteachereducationto • integrate EE into the Common Core instruction.

1-Qualifiedcoordinators,2-Standardizedtrainingmaterials,3-Collaborativeactivities,4-Assurance• thatSCEducationDeptguidelinesincludeenvironmentaleducationinschoolcurricula.

Educationalmaterialsfundsforchildrentotraveloutinthefield.•

Top5trainingneedsforeducators?1.chemicals’fateintheenvironment2.chemicals’fatein • organisms,creatures,suchasbioaccumulation3.impactsofpoorlymanagedlandusechange4.impacts ofamodifiedhydrology5.waterconservationbestpractices.

EvaluationofEEprogrameffectiveness2.Howtoreachnon-traditionaladultaudiences.•

Huh?•

Publicschoolsystem--gettingthemonboardlikewhatNCisdoingwithoutdooralternativeschoolsor • Maryland’sschooldistrictsprovidingenvironmentaled.through12thgrade,findingcorporatesupport, gettinglocal/citizensupport.

Teachers2)Groupstobetaught3)locationstoteach4)Opportunitiestoimplementwhat’staught5) • Cooperation/collaborationwiththosedealingwiththesameveryissues.

16

Page 20: Environmental Education Report 2014

Improvingandexpandingfundraisingdevelopnewprogramsmanagementoffundsandprograms • Marketingoftheprograms.

1)Resourcesforeducationpurposes2)speakersbureau3)trainingthetrainersprogram4)acohesive • educationalfocus,notre-inventingthewheel,butaccessingwhatisalreadythere5)strongcore curriculum.

AwarenesswithintheEEcommunity2.afewconsistentmessages.•

1)listofexistingresources2)benchmarkofaplaninasimilarcommunity3)litterprevention4) • recycling5)waterquality.

Teachingcontroversialissuessuchasclimatechangeinabalancedmanner.Effectivecommunication • skills.Contentbasedtraining.Incorporatingstandardsbasedcontentintoprograms.Teaching techniques,groupmanagement.

Teachingmethodsinthefield,ContentResourcesavailable,Howtodevelopcurriculum.•

Encourage community involvement in the environments in which they live.•

Notsure.•

HowtocombineforcesforincreasedimpactculturalhistoryoftheenvironmentinSCmanaging • multiplestakeholdergroupsinEE.

Don’tknow.•

N/A•

1. Train classroom teachers to integrate EE with current methods. 2. Gain support for EE at the • administrativelevel(SchoolPrincipals,DistrictSchoolBoards,andStateDepartmentofEducation). 3.Traindecision-makers(politiciansatlocalandstatelevel)intheimportanceofEEsotheywill provide more legislative support and funding for EE initiatives. 4. Support the EE professional communitythroughorganizationsandgroupssuchasEEASCandSCOIES.5.Traineducatorsin appropriateinstruction/interpretationmethodsandstateacademicstandards.

Notsure.•

Mentoringthenextgenerationofleaders,introducingsoundenvironmentalconceptsintoour • community,integratingenvironmentaleducationwitheconomicandqualityoflifeissues,teaching familiesabouttheimportanceofenvironmentaleducation,engaginglocalprofessionalsineducation initiatives.

Training facilitators for national programs.•

17

Page 21: Environmental Education Report 2014

Teachertraining-howtoandwhytousenatureintheclassroom2.toinformthepublic-whynatureis • so important and why and how they need to get themselves and their families outside.

1.PublicSchoolScienceandSocialStudiesTeachers2.Schoolcurriculumthatintegrateseducationon • theimpactoflanduseplanningonpublichealth--specificallyprevalenceofchronicdiseases relatedtoobesityandbeingoverweight.3.Citizen’sdailyimpactonwaterquality4.Needforexpanded solidwasterecyclingprograms,especiallyinSpartanburgCounty5.Electedleaders/decisionmakers.

8) How important is a successful SC Environmental Education Program in the following areas?

Responses for “Other” category:Involementwithotherorganizationswhohavethesamemission•Outdoor recreation•N/A•Thebenefitscitizensgainfromacleanenvironment.•Childhood Education•Youth engagement, health, and academic success•Ecosystem Services•

18

Page 22: Environmental Education Report 2014

9) What benefit do see from participating in the EE Consortium? Mark all that apply.

10) Which of the following would you consider success indicators for the EE Consortium in its first year? Mark all that apply.

19

Page 23: Environmental Education Report 2014

EVALUATION OF YEAR 1 ACTIVITIES

CollaborationwithBoardofEducation

WhentheSouthCarolinaNationalHeritageCorridorandtheEnvironmentalEducationAssociationofSouthCarolinawereawardedtheEPAgranttobeginastatewideconsortiumonEnvironmentalEducation,theDepartmentofEducationhasbeensupportive.Theywereabletolinkontheirwebsitetowww.EEinSC.orghelpingtofurtherbuildthestatewidedatabase;theygraciouslypromotedtheSCEE2014InauguralWorkshopSeries;andaswemoveforwardwithourefforts,havebeenengagedandinformedandwillcometothetableinthecapacitywithwhichtheyfeelbestsuitedtobuildthemomentum.

Partnership with Michelin

Whileunderstandingtheneedsofourstateandlookingforwaystoassist,Micheliniscurrentlyconsideringtwothings:agrantintheamountof$25,000inordertobeginoureffortsinHispanicOutreachwillhopefullybeawardedinFebruary2015;secondly,theSCEEConsortium’sapplicationwillbereviewedintheSpringasapossiblerecipienttotheirCharityGolfTournament.

PartnershipwithEdVenture

Aswemoveinto2015,ourresearchhasshownthatalimitedamountofsystematicstatewideoutreachinourNationexistsforunderservedpopulations.PartneringwithEdVenture,SouthCarolina’sStateChildren’sMuseum,weareworkingwiththeirHispanicOutreachCoordinator,GrantWriterandProjectLearningTreeinordertoco-writeanEPAgrantindependentoftheoverarchingstateconsortiumallowance.Thisinitiativewouldallowforthefollowing:createanevaluationmodel,thefirstinthecountry;identifykeyorganizationsandoutreachexamples;identifyareasofgreatestimpact;translationofmaterials;partnershipbuildingandtrainingofbilingualenvironmentaleducators.

20

Page 24: Environmental Education Report 2014

PartnershipwithSCETV

AsaresultofoureffortstostrengthenanddiversityEnvironmentalEducation,SouthCarolinaEducationalTelevisionallowedourworkshopseriestobecompiledintoandEnvironmentalEducationModule.Thismeansthatteachersfromacrossthestate,whilesearchingforCertifiedEducationalUnits(CEUs)-arequiredrecertificationeachyear,willhaveaccessto2014EEpresenters.Withthisinformation,theywillbeaskedtoanswerquestionspertainingtoincorporationintolessonplans,classroomactivitiesorother.ThisEEmodulewillbeavailablenotonlyfor2015butinyearstocome.

Partenrship with College of Charleston

Movingforwardwithwww.EEinSC.org,ourstate’sEEdatabasae,wefeltthatadditionalattentionshouldbemade towards growing this initiative. College of Charleston, directly from a class on Social Entrepreneurship, decidedthiswouldbeaninterestingwaytoinvolvestudentsalongsidestateagencies,privatebusinessesandvolunteercitizensalllookingtomakechange.Thisfirsthandexperienceimpactedtheirfinalprojectfortheclass and the outcome was a lasting relationship with the College moving forward.

21

Page 25: Environmental Education Report 2014

FormalandNon-FormalEducatorCertification

SinceJanuary2014,theSouthCarolinaSeaGrantConsortium,inpartnershipwithKDBConsulting,continuedwiththedevelopmentofaSouthCarolinaEnvironmentalEducationCertificationProgram(SCEECP).Basedonastate-widesurveythatwasdistributedinOctober2013,twofocusgroupsessionswereheldinMarch2014toaddresscommonthemesandsuggestionsofthesurvey.Duringthistime,researchwasalsoconductedonvariousenvironmentaleducationcertificationprogramsintheUnitedStates,includingtwosoutheasternprograms,NorthCarolinaandGeorgia,inanattempttocomparedifferentprograms.AsitevisitwasheldinJune2014withmembersoftheAdvancedTrainingforEnvironmentalEducationinGeorgia(ATEEG)anda wealth of information was gained pertaining to program content and format development, lessons learned instartingupanEEcertificationprogram,andadviceoneffective“nextsteps”.Basedonthisinformation,twocommitteeswerecreatedinOctober2014:SteeringCommitteeandReviewCommittee.TheSteeringCommitteewillassistinthedevelopmentofcontentandstructureoftheSCEECP.TheReviewCommitteewillbothevaluateandvetcontent,materials,andoverallstructuredevelopedbytheSteeringCommittee.Itwillalsoprovidefeedbackastheinauguralgroupofparticipantstogothrough–andreceive–theirSCEnvironmentalEducationCertification.ContactforthiseffortisEVBell,MarineEducationSpecialist,[email protected].

22

Page 26: Environmental Education Report 2014

Database Use, Value, Impact

TheEnvironmentalEducationwebsite,www.EEinSC.org,isahousingagentforbusinesses,schoolsandorganizationsacrossSouthCarolina.Itisusedasbothamarketingtool,aswellasaresourceforthoselookingtoventureintoanythingenvironmentallyrelated.Thebeautyofthisendeavoristhatthedatabaseisapartofathirteenstateconsortiumallsharingtheirgrants,jobopportunitiesandactivities.Informationisaccessiblewhilestilluniquetoeachstate.SouthCarolinaisintheprocessofbuildingourindividualresourcesandcreating awareness for our partners across the state so that use is second nature when accessing all things EnvironmentalEducation.Currently,apartnershipwasforgedwithCollegeofCharlestonfortheFallsemester2014withfiveinternsandwearecurrentlyworkingwithUniversityofSouthCarolina’sCenterforSustainabilitytogetanotherinternforthedatabaseandtohelpwithour2015HispanicOutreachInitiative.

2014 Database Timeline

January:EPAGrantAwarded;needsassessmentcompleted.

February:DatabaseFlyerCreated;WorkshopSeriesFinalized

March: FirstWorkshopSeries–DatabaseTraining

April:EncouragingConsortiumMemberstoengagewithdatabase;VariousPresentationstoorganizationsacross SC

May:SecondWorkshopSeries–Marketedthroughflyer;VariousPresentationstoorganizationsacrossSC

June:Presentationsatvariousorganizationstomarketdatabaseandinitiative.

July:ThirdWorkshopSeries–Marketedthroughflyer;Variouspresentationstomarketdatabaseandinitiative

August: FourthWorkshopSeries–Marketedthroughflyer;Variouspresentationstomarketdatabaseandinitiative

September:FifthWorkshopSeries–Marketedthroughflyer;PartneredwithCollegeofCharlestonforDatabaseIntern

October:SixthWorkshopSeries–Marketedthroughflyer;PartneredwithCollegeofCharlestonforDatabaseIntern;Variouspresentationstomarketdatabaseandinitiative

November:PartneredwithCollegeofCharlestonforDatabaseIntern

December:FinalWorkshopSeries&PlanningSession;PartneredwithCollegeofCharlestonForDatabaseIntern;Variouspresentationstomarketdatabaseandinitiative.

23

Page 27: Environmental Education Report 2014

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements about the Environmental Education Database:

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Ifeelcomfortableusingthedatabase.

0(0.0%)

13(13.8%)

20(21.3%)

44(44.8%)

17(18.1%)

Ilearnednewwaystoutilizethedatabase.

3(3.2%)

23(24.7%)

36(38.7%)

19(20.4%)

12(12.9%)

Iamgoingtoencourageother organizations to contributetheirinformationandeventstothedatabase,

0(0.0%)

4(4.3%)

22(23.4%)

44(46.8%)

24(25.5%)

24

Page 28: Environmental Education Report 2014

Google Analytics for the Database

Thefollowingfigureillustratestheusageofwww.EEinSC.orgdatabasewebpagefromMarch2013toDecember2013.Lookingatthenumbers,therewasasignificantincrease(4,000+sitevisits)tothesitein2014whentheConsortiumwasdevelopedandthedatabasewasupdatedandpromotedforusethroughoutthestate.

Thefollowingfigureillustratestheusageofwww.EEinSC.orgdatabasewebpagefrommid-February2014toDecember2014.ManyofthepeaksindatabaseactivitycoincidedwiththeworkshopseriesdatesthroughouttheyearaswellasCollegeofCharlestonInternshipsintheFallof2014.

Thefollowingfigureillustratestheincreaseinusageofwww.EEinSC.orgdatabasewebpagrefrom2005toDecember2014.

25

Page 29: Environmental Education Report 2014

Promotional & Informative Database Flyer distributed throughout 2014

26

Page 30: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop Series

TheConsortiumworkshopseriesconsistedofsevenworkshopsandawebinarfromMarch-December2014.TheworkshopsweretargetedforConsortiummembersbutparticipationwasfreeandopentoanyone.Thefollowingflyerliststheoriginalscheduleofworkshopsandpresenters.However,twooftheworkshopsdidchangeinthemeandpresenters.Eachoftheworkshopswereevaluatedinapost-workshopsurveytoparticipants.Theresultsarepresentedforeachworkshopinthefollowingsectionsofthereport.NotethatthefirstworkshoponDatabaseTrainingdoesnothaveresultsbecauseitwaspriortothestartoftheevaluationgrant.

27

Page 31: Environmental Education Report 2014

Overall Information on Workshop Series Participants

Pleaseindicateyourgender:

Howwouldyoudescribeyourself:

28

Page 32: Environmental Education Report 2014

Overall Information on Workshop Series Participants

Pleaseindicatewhichfieldsofenvironmentaleducationbestdescribesyou:

Whichsettingbestdescribesthelocationwhereyouwork?

29

Page 33: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop I: www.EEinSC.org Database Training

March24,2014,WhaleySt.,Columbia,SC/19participants

Workshop Description:Duringthistwohoursessionyouwilllearnhowto1)createaprofileforyourorga-nizationorschool.Thismayalreadyexistinsomecapacityhoweveryouwilllearnhowto2)edittheprofile,3)addeventstothecalendarand4)addresourcesthatyourorganizationorschoolprovidesand5)oneononetimewithKimBaileyforspecificquestionsregardingthedatabase.ThistrainingisextremelyimportantasSouthCarolinamovestowardsacohesivenetworkofenvironmentaleducation–asoneofthreestatestoreceiveanEPAgrantdistributedthroughNAAEEtobeginastatewideconsortium.Thedatabaseisabeginningsteptowardsaconsolidatedeffortinthefieldandmeetthestandardsofourneighboringstates.PleasemakeeveryefforttoattendandinviteallapplicablesoincludedinformationstartstobecomecredibleandaknownvalidresourceforfunctionalandusableEEinformationwithinSouthCarolina.

Presenter Bio:KimBaileyhasworkedinenvironmentaleducationforthelasttwentyyearsandcoordinatingtheEEinGeorgia.orgwebsiteforthelasttwelveyears.ShehasaBSinBiology,BSinEducationandholdsaMastersofSciencedegreeincurriculumandinstructionwithanemphasisinscienceeducation.PastrolesincludeleadnaturalistatElacheeNatureCenterwhereshewasresponsiblefordevelopingcurriculumforenvironmentaleducationprograms.InadditiontoleadingwildernessbackpackingtripsforadultsandstudentsthroughBlueRidgeBackCountryinNorthCarolina.CurrentlyKimistheDirectoroftheSoutheastEnvironmentalEducationwebsitegrantthroughGeorgiaDepartmentofNaturalResources.

30

Page 34: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop I: www.EEinSC.org Database Training

March24,2014,WhaleySt.,Columbia,SC

Noevaluationdatawascollectedforthisworkshopbecauseitoccuredpriortothestartdateoftheevaluationgrant.

31

Page 35: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II: The “How’s and Why’s” of Developing Sustainable Networks and Dynamic Partnerships

May21,2014,EdVenture,Columbia,SC/31participants

Workshop Description:Networks,partnershipsandinterdisciplinarycooperationarecommon21stcenturybuzzwordsforimprovingstrategicoutcomes.Intheory,theseactionsarethoughttoimproveinformationflow,aligninterests,andlowerboundariesamongorganizations.Dr.PatrickJ.HolladayfromTroyUniversitywillleadaworkshop-stylesessionthatwillassistyouinhowtoidentifypartners,understandtheconnectivityamongpartners,quantifystakeholderimportanceanddefinecommunitieswithinyournetworkofpartners.Youwillalsolearnaboutbridgingconnectionsamongtraditionalandnon-traditionalcollaborators,includingtribalpartnerships.Buildingupontheselessons,theworkshopwillhelpyoufacilitatedecisionmaking,appreciateinformationdiffusion,shapecooperation,fosterresilienceandenhancecoordinationeffortswithinyournetworkof partners.

Presenter Bio:Dr.PatrickJ.HolladayearnedhisPh.D.fromClemsonUniversityinParks,Recreation&TourismManagementwithanemphasisinTravel&Tourism.Fornearly20yearshehashadthegreatprivilegetoprofessionallyengageinboththesocialandnaturalsciences.Dr.HolladayhasworkedinconservationandenvironmentaleducationinEasternEurope,ecotourismandnationalparkmanagementinCentralAmerica,sustainabilityandcommunitydevelopmentintheCaribbean,aswellasamyriadofprojectsintheUnitedStatesfromtheblistering,yetbeautifulMojaveDeserttothelushly-forestedmountainsofSouthernAppalachia.PriortojoiningTroyUniversity,Dr.Holladayhasheldacademicpositions

withtheUniversityofSt.Francis,ClemsonUniversityandEasternKentuckyUniversity.Beforehisacademiccareerhewasanecologistfor10yearsandconductedavarietyofbiologicalfieldworkthatincludedDepartmentofDefenseprojectsinsupportoftheEndangeredSpeciesActandheservedasaUSPeaceCorpsVolunteerasanenvironmental consultant.

32

Page 36: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II: Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

CompletelyDissatisfied

MostlySatisfied

Somewhat Dissatisfied

Neitherdissatisfiedorsatisfied

Somewhat satisfied

MostlySatisfied

Presenter’sknowledgeofthematerial.

1(5.0%)

1(5.0%)

0(0.0%)

0(0.0%)

2(10.0%)

16(80.0%)

Organization of the workshop

0(0.0%)

1(5.0%)

1(5.0%)

0(0.0%)

5(25.0%)

13(65.0%)

Qualityandcomfortofthefacility

0(0.0%)

1(5.0%)

0(0.0%)

0(0.0%)

2(10.0%)

17(85.0%)

Locationoftheworkshop 0(0.0%)

1(5.0%)

0(0.0%)

1(5.0%)

1(5.0%)

17(85.0%)

Foodandaccommodations 0(0.0%)

1(5.0%)

1(5.0%)

10(50.0%)

2(10.0%)

6(30.0%)

33

Page 37: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 2

Pleaseratehowyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Thetopicspresentedattheworkshopwereof relevance to my future environmental education goals.

2(10.0%)

0(0.0%)

3(15.0%)

9(45.0%)

6(30.0%)

Theworkshop’sgoalswereclearlystated. 0(0.0%)

0(0.0%)

2(10.0%)

12(60.0%)

6(30.0%)

Thisworkshopwasapositivelearningexperience.

0(0.0%)

1(5.0%)

3(15.0%)

8(40.0%)

8(40.0%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-oninvolvementfromparticipants.

0(0.0%)

0(00.0%)

2(10.0%)

8(40.0%)

10(50.0%)

Theworkshopmetmyexpectations. 1(5.3%)

0(0.0%)

3(15.0%)

9(47.4%)

6(31.6%)

Ilearnedsomethingnewatthisworkshop. 1(5.0%)

3(15.0%)

0(0.0%)

3(15.0%)

13(65.0%)

Overall,thequalityoftheworkshopwasexcellent.

0(0.0%)

3(15.0%)

2(10.0%)

8(40.0%)

7(35.0%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshopwillbeapplicabletomycareerin environmental education.

1(5.0%)

1(5.0%)

2(10.0%)

8(40.0%)

8(40.0%)

Icanputintopracticetheideasandskillscoveredinthisworkshop.

1(5.0%)

1(5.0%)

4(20.0%)

6(30.0%)

8(40.0%)

Workshop II, Question 2 (con’t.)

34

Page 38: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Theworkshopprovidedampleopportunities to meet and interact with othersinmyfield.

0(0.0%)

5(25.0%)

2(10.0%)

7(35.0%)

6(30.0%)

TheworkshopprovidedaforumtointeractwithotherenvironmentaleducatorsthatIwould not have had without participating intheworkshop.

0(0.0%)

2(10.0%)

3(15.0%)

8(40.0%)

7(35.0%)

Thenetworkingfromthisworkshopwillsupportfuturecollaborationwithenvironmental educators.

1(5.0%)

5(25.0%)

4(20.0%)

2(10.0%)

8(40.0%)

Iwasabletoexchangeideas,relevantto my professional future, with other environmental educators.

2(10.0%)

2(10.0%)

4(20.0%)

8(40.0%)

1(20.0%)

35

Page 39: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Nochange Minorchange Moderatechange

Majorchange

Identifypotentialpartners. 3(15.8%)

5(26.3%)

8(42.1%)

3(15.8%)

Definecommunitieswithinnetworksofpartners.

3(15.8%)

4(21.1%)

10(52.6%)

2(10.5%)

Formconnectionsamongtraditionalandnon-traditionalpartners.

4(21.1%)

4(22.1%)

9(47.4%)

2(10.5%)

Abilityotaffectivelydiffuseinformationtootherpartnerswithinmynetwork.

4(22.2%)

4(22.2%)

8(44.4%)

2(11.1%)

Improvecoordinationofactivitiesamongpartners.

3(15.8%)

5(26.3%)

9(47.4%)

2(10.5%)

36

Page 40: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 5

PleaserateyourCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Workshop II, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Identify potential partners. 0 (0.0%)

1 (5.3%)

10 (52.6%)

8 (42.1%)

Define communities within networks of partners.

1 (5.3%)

1 (5.3%)

13 (68.4%)

4 (21.1%)

Form connections among traditional and non-traditional partners.

0 (0.0%)

2 (10.5%)

12 (63.2%)

5 (26.3%)

Ability to affectively diffuse information to other partners within my network.

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.3%)

13 (68.4%)

5 (26.3%)

Improve coordination of activities among partners.

0 (0.0%)

3 (15.8%)

11 (57.9%)

5 (26.3%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

NdenJfy  potenJal  partners.  

WeYne  communiJes  within  networks  of  

partners.  

Form  connecJons  among  tradiJonal  and  

non]tradiJonal  partners.  

Ability  to  afecJFely  difuse  informaJon  to  other  partners  within  

my  network.  

NmproFe  coordinaJon  of  acJFiJes  among  

partners.  

Please  rate  your  LEVEL  OF  CHANGE  in  the  following  skills  from  before  the  workshop  to  aher  the  workshop`  

No  change   Minor  change   Moderate  change   Major  change  

37

Page 41: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 6

Describe two examples of how you will put into practice the skills and ideas from this workshop.

TheconceptisintriguingandIhaveexpandedmyperceptionofpartnerstoincludecontactsthrough • localFacebookoutdoorrecreationclubs.Includingfourseparatekayakfishingclubsandsomelocal hikingclubs.

(1)Plantoaskourboardmemberswhotheyknowsowecanbetteridentifyroutesofcommunication. • (2)Bettercoordinateamongthestaffwhoiscontactwhichpartneraboutwhichproject.

Noexamples;mostoftheideastaughtintheworkshopwerenotapplicable.•

(1)PlantodoaGephianalysiswithpartnersindifferentdepartmentsatmyinstitution.(2)Willreadthe• reference material provided to determine next steps.

(1)Startadatabaseofcurrentpartners.(2)Identifytheirmissionandmakesureitalignswithours,then• identify other potential partners along with their mission.

Ourorganizationwillconductanetworkanalysistobetterunderstandwherewefallwithinthelarger • pictureandwewillfollowuponthatstudywithconcreteactionsthatwillbetterpositionusintermsof information sharing and partnering with others.

Tryingtousethedatabasemore.•

(1)Analyzingthepartnersintwocoalitionsandhoweffectivethecoverage.(2)Usingthecurrent • situationtoadd/subtractpartnerstobemoreeffectiveinscopeofwork.

(1)Imayusetheinformationtoidentifykeypartners.(2)Willfocusonstrongerengagementwith • partners.

(1)Discusswithmycolleaguestheneedtobestrategicindealingwithcurrentpartnersandengaging • newpartners.(2)Makesurethatcurrentpartnersfeelthatourcommonprinciplesandgoalsaremetand reciprocated.

Idonotbelievethetopicoftheworkshopwasbeneficialanddonotplantouseanyoftheskills • presented.

38

Page 42: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 7

Describe two examples of how specific skills and ideas from this training might impact development and implementation of your environmental education program.

IwillsharetheconceptsandideaswiththeWoffordCollegeenvironmentaleducationprogram.•

Helpustogetthewordoutfasteraboutourprogramsandhelpustobettercommunicatewithprogram • participants.

Ididn’tlearnanythingnewfromthistraining;infact,thetrainingwasatamuchmorebasiclevelthanit• seemedtobefromthedescriptiononthewebsite,andmostoftheskillsandideaspresentedarethingsI learned years ago.

(1)Willlikelypartnerwithnewinstitutions,butthathasmoretodowithnetworkingthanwiththe • contentoftheworkshop.(2)Willbemorecognizantofpartnermissions.

Haveamoreclearconcisemessageandbuildstrongerrelationshipswithinthecommunity.•

Simplynetworkingwiththeotherattendeeswillopenupopportunitiesforinformationsharingwhich • will drastically improve our current environmental education efforts.

ByusingGephiIthinkitwillstronglyhelpidentifywhowearelackingandwhereourgapsneedtobe • tightened.

Notabletoquantifythisatthistime.•

Ithelpstoidentifywhichorganizationshavethemostengagedconnectionsandprovidestoolsto • evaluateeachorganizationsinfluence.

(1)WecanusethecomputerprogramtoassessourcurrentEEpartners.(2)Canexplorenew • partnerships that have the potential to enhance our current environmental education programs.

N/A•

39

Page 43: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 8

What did you like most about this workshop?

Theparticipationandinteractionbroughtonbythepersonalityandfacilitationskillsofthepresenter•Identifyinghoweveryoneisconnected•Excellentspeaker,interestingdespitenotbeinginanEEfield•Presenter•The venue was good•Thespeakerandhisformat•NetworkingwithorganizationsIdon’toftenworkwith•Ireallyenjoyedthetopicbecauseitwaseasytograspandeasytoreplicate•Interactive•Creativethinking•Networking•Interactionbetweenspeakerandattendees•Location•

Workshop II, Question 9

What suggestions do you have for future workshop planners?

Iwouldlikeareviewofpastmeetingsanddiscussionofhowwecanintegrateallofoursessions.•

Moretimeforsharing/networking.•

(1)Allowmoretimeforandencouragenetworking.Itseemedthatalmosteveryoneleftimmediately • aftertheworkshop,soIhadnoopportunitytospeaktoothereducators.

•(2)Iwouldliketoseesomeinformationonhowtoidentifypartners,collaborate,etc.inthe •

ENVIRONMENTALfieldspecifically.Nothingthespeakermentionedwasspecificallyenvironmental- based;itcouldhaveappliedtoalmostanydiscipline.

•(3)Andpleasetrytohavetheworkshopresemblethedescriptionmoreclosely!Iwaslookingforwardto•

learningmoreaboutcollaboratingwithstakeholders,methodsforbettercollaboration,and howtoidentifynon-traditionalpartnerssuchastribalorganizations(astheadmentioned),none ofwhichwasdiscussed.Instead,thespeakerspenttwohoursteachinguselementaryfacts,such asthatweneedtobeawarethatcommunicationlinkagesmaynotbedirectenoughtosuitourneeds,and that there is a software tool for identifying what partners are already connected to other partners, and how to use the tool.

•Alunchoptionwouldhavebeenniceforthoseofustraveling.It’salsoagoodopportunitytotalkwith •

othersandgettoknowpeopleattheworkshop.•

40

Page 44: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop II, Question 9 (con’t.)

(1)Allowforicebreakerorbreaktimetotalktootherparticipants.(2)Largerfontsonpresentations • wouldbeappreciated.

•Reallyencouragethespeakerstoprovideattendeeswith‘deliverables’suchasthenetworkanalysis •

session.•

Have a preview and follow up plan with participants.•

(1)Havelongerworkshops.Half-daylonginsteadoftwohours.(2)Iftheseworkshopswerelonger,we• couldhavemoretimetogettoknowotherconsortiummembersandnetworkwiththem.Idon’t knowmostoftheattendees,soattheveryminimum,weshouldintroduceourselvesatthebeginning.

Ididnotgetanychocolate.•

Iwishtherewouldhavebeenmoretimeforsharing-Iwaslate,somaybeImisseditatthevery • beginning,butseemslikeagoodopportunitytocollaboratewhenweareallintheroomtogether.

Nonetworkingtimesetaside.•

(1)Ididnotlikethefactthatthespeakerbarelycoveredanythingmentionedintheworkshopad(which• iswhatattractedmetotheworkshopatall),andfocusedonsuchabasiclevelofnetworkingthat itseemedlikeitwouldalreadybecommonknowledgetomostpeopleinthediscipline;Ididnot findanyoftheinformationneworuseful.

(2)Itseemedtomethatthefirsthalfoftheworkshopkindoframbledanddidnotpresentanyapplicable• methodsforidentifyingpartnersorfosteringcollaborationamongstakeholders.Infact,therewasreally nothingintheworkshopaboutwaystofostercollaboration.Thesecondhalfoftheworkshopwasalmost entirelyanetworkanalysissoftwarelecture,whichmaybeusefultosomepeople,buttheway thespeakerpresentedit,wouldnotbeusefultomostparticipants.

(3)Ididnotlikethefactthatthespeakerseemedtosuggest(duringthenetworkanalysislecture)that • usefulpartnersarethosethathavethelargestnetworkofotherpartners(amerepopularitymetric,in otherwords).Itmaybetrueinmanycases,butitisnottheonlywaytoidentifypartners.

Didn’tstartontime,seemedrushed,noopportunityforintroductionstoparticipants.•

N/A•

Slow on the technology.•

Toomuchdrivingtimeforsuchashortprogram.Ispentmoretimeinthecarthanatthemeeting.•

Topic•

41

Page 45: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III: EE Capacity & Guidelines for Excellence

July17,2014,EducationCenteratSonocoRecycling,Columbia,SC/20participants

Workshop Description:EECapacityencouragesinnovationinenvironmentaleducationbypromotingtheexchangeofideasamongprofessionalandvolunteerswithdiverseperspectives.We’llcoverprofessionaldevelopmentandnetworkingopportunitiesavailable,includingtrainingintheGuidelinesforExcellenceinEnvironmentalEducation,onlinecourses,andsocialnetworking.We’llalsodiscusswhydiversityisthecoreofEECapacityandhowtheprojectvaluesthefullspectrumofknowledgeandskillsthatmakeupenvironmentaleducation.WorkshopparticipantswillalsohearfromSouthCarolinaStateConsortiaco-leadersLaurenPonderandIanSanchez.LearnhowEECapacityiscreatingchangeatthestatelevelandhowSouthCarolinaisworkingtostrengthenanddiversifyenvironmentaleducationinthestate.Completingsixmonthsatthisjuncture,attendeeswillalsobegivenamid-yearreportofaccomplishmentsandupdatedinformationonsustainabilityefforts.

Presenter Bio:AnneFergusonisthenewNationalCoordinatorfortheEECapacityProject.Inthiscapacityshehasoverallresponsibilityfortheday-to-dayoperationandadministrationoftheproject.AnnebuildscollaborativerelationshipswithprojectpartnersandtheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencywithrespecttopolicy,programplanningandimplementation,evaluation,outreach,andfinances.Annebringstohernewroleover12yearsexperienceworkinginconservationeducation,extension,andtraining.PreviouslysheworkedattheNationalAudubonSocietydevelopingandmanagingtheConservationLeadershipFellowsProgramofTogetherGreen,Audubon’s5-year$20millioninnovative

conservationprograminalliancewithToyota.AsthefirstFellowsProgramManager,sheledtheprogram’sinitialdesignandimplementation,includingtheprogram’sstellarLeadershipInstitute.TheLeadershipInstitutebroughttogethertheinter-disciplinarygroupofFellowsandotherleadersinthefieldofenvironmentaleducation,strategiccommunications,evaluation,conservationplanning,anddiversityandinclusion,tonetworkand learn from each other.

BeforeAudubonsheworkedoverfouryearsattheDepartmentofEnvironmentalandConservationProgramsattheFieldMuseumofChicagoastheInternationalProgramsManagerforeducation.SheorganizedEEtrainingandnaturalresourceuseworkshopsforforestcommunitieswithinanewlyestablishedprotectedareainBolivia’sdiverseAmazonregionthatfocusedonculturalpracticesrelatedtosustainablelivelihoodsandthelinksbetweenqualityoflifeandtheconservationofnaturalresources.HerfirstexperienceswithEEbeganinEcuadorwhereshewasaNaturalResourcesPeaceCorpsVolunteeranddiscoveredthepowerofenvironmentaleducationtoinspirecreativity,learning,andcross-culturalexchange.

42

Page 46: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Workshop III, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Completely dissatisfied

Mostly dissatisfie

d

Somewhat dissatisfied

Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Mostly satisfied

Presenter’s knowledge of the material

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

13 (100.0%)

Organization of the workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

13 (100.0%)

Quality and comfort of the facility

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (15.4%)

10 (76.9%)

Location of workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (23.1%)

10 (76.9%)

Food and accommodations

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (25.0%)

1 (8.3%)

8 (66.7%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Presenter’s  knowledge  of  the  material  

Krgani_aJon  of  the  workshop  

Quality  and  comfort  of  the  facility  

BocaJon  of  workshop   Food  and  accommodaJons  

KFerall\  how  would  you  rate  your  saJsfacJon  with  the  following`  

Iompletely  dissaJsYed   Oostly  dissaJsYed   Homewhat  dissaJsYed  

.either  dissaJsYed  nor  saJsYed   Homewhat  saJsYed   Oostly  saJsYed  

43

Page 47: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 2

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop III, Question 2

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The topics presented at the workshop were of relevance to my future environmental education goals.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

8 (61.5%)

5 (38.5%)

The workshop’s goals were clearly stated.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (38.5%)

8 (61.5%)

This workshop was a positive learning experience.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (38.5%)

8 (61.5%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-on involvement from participants.

0 (0.0%)

2 (15.4%)

2 (15.4%)

4 (30.8%)

5 (38.5%)

The workshop met my expectations.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

6 (46.2%)

7 (53.9%)

I learned something new at this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (38.5%)

8 (61.5%)

Overall, the quality of the workshop was excellent.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

6 (46.2%)

6 (46.2%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshop will be applicable to my career in environmental education.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (23.1%)

5 (38.5%)

5 (38.5%)

I can put into practice the ideas and skills covered in this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

8 (61.5%)

5 (38.5%)

44

Page 48: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop III, Question 3

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The workshop provided ample opportunities to meet and interact with others in my field.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

9 (69.2%)

3 (23.1%)

The workshop provided a forum to interact with other environmental educators that I would not have had without participating in the workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

6 (46.2%)

7 (53.9%)

The networking from this workshop will support future collaboration with environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (53.9%)

5 (38.5%)

I was able to exchange ideas, relevant to my professional future, with other environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (15.4%)

7 (53.9%)

4 (30.8%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

The  workshop  provided  ample  opportuniJes  to  meet  and  interact  with  others  in  my  field.  

The  workshop  provided  a  forum  to  interact  with  other  environmental  educators  that  I  would  not  have  had  without  parJcipaJng  in  the  

workshop.  

The  networking  from  this  workshop  will  support  

future  collaboraJon  with  environmental  educators.  

I  was  able  to  exchange  ideas,  relevant  to  my  

professional  future,  with  other  environmental  

educators.  

Please  rate  how  much  you  agree  with  the  following  statements:  

Strongly  disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly  agree  

45

Page 49: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Workshop III, Question 4

Please rate your LEVEL OF CHANGE in the following skills from before the workshop to after the workshop:

No change Minor change Moderate change

Major change

Develop a shared understanding of EE Capacity goals and activities.

0 (0.0%)

4 (30.8%)

7 (53.9%)

2 (15.4%)

Identify EE Capacity resources and professional development opportunities.

0 (0.0%)

2 (15.4%)

6 (46.2%)

5 (38.5%)

Increase professional networks in SC, especially through State Consortium.

0 (0.0%)

5 (38.5%)

4 (30.8%)

4 (30.8%)

Develop a shared understanding of the South Carolina State Consortium’s goals and activities.

2 (15.4%)

4 (30.8%)

3 (23.1%)

4 (30.8%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Develop  a  shared  understanding  of  EE  Capacity  goals  and  

acJviJes^  

IdenJfy  EE  Capacity  resources  and  professional  

development  opportuniJes^  

Increase  professional  networks  in  SC,  especially  through  State  ConsorJum^  

Develop  a  shared  understanding  of  the  South  Carolina  State  ConsorJumds  

goals  and  acJviJes^  

Please  rate  your  LEVEL  OF  CHANGE  in  the  following  skills  from  before  the  workshop  to  aher  the  workshop`  

No  change   Minor  change   Moderate  change   Major  change  

46

Page 50: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 5

PleaserateyourCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Workshop III, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Develop a shared understanding of EE Capacity goals and activities.

0 (0.0%)

3 (23.1%)

8 (61.5%)

2 (15.4%)

Identify EE Capacity resources and professional development opportunities.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

11 (84.6%)

2 (15.4%)

Increase professional networks in SC, especially through State Consortium.

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

10 (76.9%)

2 (15.4%)

Develop a shared understanding of the South Carolina State Consortium’s goals and activities.

0 (0.0%)

3 (23.1%)

8 (61.5%)

2 (15.4%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Develop  a  shared  understanding  of  EE  Capacity  goals  and  

acJviJes^  

IdenJfy  EE  Capacity  resources  and  professional  development  opportuniJes^  

Increase  professional  networks  in  SC,  especially  through  State  ConsorJum^  

Develop  a  shared  understanding  of  the  South  Carolina  State  ConsorJumds  

goals  and  acJviJes^  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

47

Page 51: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 6

Describetwoexamplesofhowyouwillputintopracticetheskillsandideasfromthisworkshop.•

(1)Iappreciatethebiggerpictureofanationalprogramandthathelpsmestrengthenmypresentationto• otherstakeholders.(2)Iwillbeabletospeakwithauthorityabouttheneedforandthespecifics of recycling.

•Incorporateenvironmentalstewardshiptopicsintomyclassroomlectures.•

•I’vejoinedtheUrbanEEgrouponFacebook;thiswillhopefullygivemesomeideasabouthowto •

implementEEinurbansettingsintheMidlands.•

(1)Sharingofthisknowledge.(2)Usingitwhenputtingtogetherlessonplans.••

Online education opportunities.••

Imightlookupsomeofthetrainingopportunitiesbuthonestlydon’tknowthatIwouldbeabletofind • the time to participate in any of the courses.

Workshop III, Question 7

Describetwoexamplesofhowspecificskillsandideasfromthistrainingmightimpactdevelopmentandimplementation of your environmental education program.

(1)ThedetailedknowledgeabouthowrecyclingactuallyhappenswillhelpmeasIshowthe • degradationofriparianareasinourstate.(2)Icanspeakknowledgeablyaboutthepurposeforrecycling and help develop programs to do it properly.

•Movingforwardknowingthereisspecificinformationouttheretoreferenceonanationallevel.•

•Passalongtrainingopportunitiestoothereducatorsinthearea.•

48

Page 52: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop III, Question 8

Whatdidyoulikemostaboutthisworkshop?

The virtual tour of Sonoco.•Veryorganized.•Newresourcepresentedwithlotsofdetail.•Learningabouttheresourcesavailablethroughthewebsite.•Ease of presenter.•Theopportunitytohearaboutnationallevelsupportforenvironmentaleducationandvisitingthe •

Sunoco facility.Meetingnewpeopleinmyfield•Excellentpresenter;goodopportunitytonetwork.•

Workshop III, Question 9

Whatsuggestionsdoyouhaveforfutureworkshopplanners?

Trytohaveasmuchhands-oninteractiveparticipationduringthepresentation.•Hardtofindbuttrytogetspaceconfiguredtonumberofpeople.Perhapsaddanactivityofsharing •

specificsofhowattendeesdelivereducationintheirroles.Ithoughttheplasticjugwaschocolatemilk.•Cramped setup.•Alittlecrampedbutitwascozytotalkwitheveryone.•Limitedtimetonetworkandchat.•Itwascoldandcrowdedintheroom.Therewasgreatstadiumseatingbutweweresquishedintotables•

too close to the presentation screen.

49

Page 53: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV: Developing Creative Environmental Lesson Plans & Teaching Controversial Issues

August15,2014,FarmBureauAuditorium,Caycee,SC/23participants

Workshop Description: EducatorsfromtheUNCSuperfundProgramResearchTranslationCoreandtheUNCInstitutefortheEnvironmentwillsharestrategies,tipsandresourcesfordevelopingtimelyandrelevantlessons,includingthosethatfeaturecontroversialorsensitiveenvironmentalissues,suchasenvironmentaljustice.Thisworkshop-stylesessionwillenableyoutonetworkwithcolleagueswhileconsideringlocalenvironmentalissuesthat can serve as the foundation for lessons designed to effectively engage others around a topic and promote environmental literacy.

Presenter Bio:DanaBrownHaine,MS,istheK-12ScienceEducationManagerfortheUniversityofNorthCarolinaatChapelHill’sInstitutefortheEnvironmentandisascienceeducatorforUNC’sSuperfundResearchProgramResearchTranslationCore.Danacreatescurriculaanddeliverslearningexperiencestogrades6-12teachers,studentsandinformaleducatorsthataredesignedtoprovideaccesstocurrentscientificinformationandrelevantresourcestohelpmakeinformeddecisionsaboutenvironmentalsciencetopics.SheservedontheNCEnvironmentalEducationAdvisoryCouncilfrom2007-2011andtheNCEnvironmentalLiteracyPlanWorkingGroupfrom2009-2011.Previously,shewasascienceeducatorforDESTINY,UNC’sTravelingScienceLearningProgram,andfrom1998-2003shewasasciencefacultymemberat

CentralPiedmontCommunityCollegeinCharlotte,NC.DanaearnedherMSinBiologyfromWakeForestUniversityandherBSinBiologyfromAppalachianStateUniversity.

Presenter Bio:SarahYelton,MS,EnvironmentalEducationCoordinatorfortheUNCInstitutefortheEnvironment’sEnvironmentalResourceProgram,engagesK-12teachers,universitystudentsandotherlayaudiencesontopicssuchasenvironmentalhealth,waterquality,hazardouswaste,climatechange.BeforecomingtoUNC,SarahmanagedthePreK-12EnvironmentalEducationProgramfortheNCOfficeofEnvironmentalEducationandPublicAffairs.SarahearnedherMSinNaturalResources-EnvironmentalEducationfromtheUniversityofWisconsin-StevensPointandreceivedherBAdegreefromtheUniversityofNorthCarolinaatChapelHill.SheisaCertifiedEnvironmentalEducatorandwinneroftheNCOutstandingEarthScienceEducatorAwardbytheNCGeologicalSurvey.

50

Page 54: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Workshop IV, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Completely dissatisfied

Mostly dissatisfie

d

Somewhat dissatisfied

Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Mostly satisfied

Presenter’s knowledge of the material

1 (5.9%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

15 (88.2%)

Organization of the workshop

1 (5.9%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (29.4%)

11 (64.7%)

Quality and comfort of the facility

1 (5.9%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (17.7%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

11 (64.7%)

Location of workshop

1 (5.9%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (5.9%)

2 (11.8%)

12 (70.6%)

Food and accommodations

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

0 (0.0%)

9 (52.9%)

4 (23.5%)

3 (17.7%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Presenter’s  knowledge  of  the  material  

Krgani_aJon  of  the  workshop  

Quality  and  comfort  of  the  facility  

BocaJon  of  workshop   Food  and  accommodaJons  

KFerall\  how  would  you  rate  your  saJsfacJon  with  the  following`  

Iompletely  dissaJsYed   Oostly  dissaJsYed   Homewhat  dissaJsYed  

.either  dissaJsYed  nor  saJsYed   Homewhat  saJsYed   Oostly  saJsYed  

51

Page 55: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 2

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop IV, Question 2

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The topics presented at the workshop were of relevance to my future environmental education goals.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

5 (29.4%)

10 (58.8%)

The workshop’s goals were clearly stated.

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (5.9%)

5 (29.4%)

10 (58.8%)

This workshop was a positive learning experience.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

5 (29.4%)

11 (64.7%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-on involvement from participants.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (23.5%)

4 (23.5%)

9 (52.9%)

The workshop met my expectations.

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

2 (11.8%)

4 (23.5%)

9 (52.9%)

I learned something new at this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

5 (29.4%)

10 (58.8%)

Overall, the quality of the workshop was excellent.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (23.5%)

4 (23.5%)

9 (52.9%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshop will be applicable to my career in environmental education.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (17.6%)

6 (35.3%)

8 (47.1%)

I can put into practice the ideas and skills covered in this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (23.5%)

5 (29.4%)

8 (47.1%)

52

Page 56: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop IV, Question 4

Please rate your LEVEL OF CHANGE in the following skills from before the workshop to after the workshop:

No change Minor change Moderate change Major change

Exploring strategies for teaching controversial issues to your target audience and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

1 (5.9%)

3 (17.7%)

10 (58.8%)

3 (17.7%)

Dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

1 (5.9%)

4 (23.5%)

11 (64.7%)

1 (5.9%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Exploring  strategies  for  teaching  controversial  issues  to  your  target  audience  and  uJli_ing  them  as  posiJve  

pedagogical  opportuniJes.  

Dealing  with  controversial  issues  and  the  challenges  they  raise.  

Please  rate  your  LEVEL  OF  CHANGE  in  the  following  skills  from  before  the  workshop  to  aher  the  workshop`  

No  change   Minor  change   Moderate  change   Major  change  

53

Page 57: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Workshop IV, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Applying a framework for investigating environmental issues.

2 (11.8%)

2 (11.8%)

9 (52.9%)

4 (23.5%)

Applying strategies for teaching controversial issues to your target audience and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

1 (5.9%)

2 (11.8%)

8 (47.1%)

6 (35.3%)

Dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

1 (5.9%)

4 (23.5%)

9 (52.9%)

3 (17.7%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Applying  a  framework  for  invesJgaJng  environmental  issues.  

Applying  strategies  for  teaching  controversial  issues  to  your  target  audience  and  uJli_ing  them  as  

posiJve  pedagogical  opportuniJes.  

Dealing  with  controversial  issues  and  the  challenges  they  raise.  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession:  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

54

Page 58: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 5

PleaserateyourCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Workshop IV, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Applying a framework for investigating environmental issues.

2 (11.8%)

2 (11.8%)

9 (52.9%)

4 (23.5%)

Applying strategies for teaching controversial issues to your target audience and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

1 (5.9%)

2 (11.8%)

8 (47.1%)

6 (35.3%)

Dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

1 (5.9%)

4 (23.5%)

9 (52.9%)

3 (17.7%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Applying  a  framework  for  invesJgaJng  environmental  issues.  

Applying  strategies  for  teaching  controversial  issues  to  your  target  audience  and  uJli_ing  them  as  

posiJve  pedagogical  opportuniJes.  

Dealing  with  controversial  issues  and  the  challenges  they  raise.  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession:  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

55

Page 59: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 6

Describetwoexamplesofhowyouwillputintopracticetheskillsandideasfromthisworkshop.

Greatdemonstrationonresponsibility--Icouldseeusingthatinaprogramordiscussion.••

(1)WilltrytocorrelatelessonswithNGSS.(2)WilllookupHungerfordVolkreference.••

(1)Trytohavepeoplerealizethatthecontroversyisusuallysocialandthatthesciencebehindclimate • changeissolid.(2)TrynottomakepeoplefeellikeIamsayingtheyareabsolutelywrong.

•(1)IamcurrentlyexploringagrantbytheOceanProjecttoengagestudentsinenvironmentalissues •

withourocean.(2)Wecurrentlydonothaveprogramstargetingmiddleandhighschoolstudents. Especiallyonethatrequirescriticalthinking.Iwouldliketocreateaprogrambasedaroundstate standards and environmental issues.

•(1)Iwillusetheexerciseonassigningresponsibilityfortheprincessesdeathtoteachcollegestudents •

aboutthecomplexityofenvironmentalissues.(2)Iwillusethechecklistfordevelopinglesson plans around a controversial environmental topic in training college students to develop lesson plans.

•Incorporatingcontroversialenvironmentalissuesintoprogramsforadults?•

•(1)Engagewithstudentsandgeneralvisitorsabouttheeffectsofclimatechangeandevolution.(2) •

Promoteenvironmentaljusticeandtheprosecutingofenvironmentalinjustice.

56

Page 60: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 7

Describetwoexamplesofhowspecificskillsandideasfromthistrainingmightimpactdevelopmentandimplementation of your environmental education program.

(1)Understandingthatthecontroversyispoliticalandsocial,notscientificisimportantwhenplanning • programsthatdealwithcontroversy.(2)I’mencouraged/motivatedtodevelopmoreprograms formiddleandhighschoolerssowecantalkaboutcontroversialissues.

•(1)IwillusetheNOAAmaplinkthatwasemailed.(2)Iwilladdmoreclimatechangefocusingonhow•

it really is not controversial.•

Iwillbrainstormandpracticewaystointeractwithallkindsofresponses(denyingclimatechangeto • denyingevolution).

•TheframeworklaidoutinthePowerPointpresentedseemslikeitwillbeveryeasytodevelopand •

implement a new program.•

(1)Iwilltrytoidentifytheteachingstylebestsuitedforeachaudience.(2)Whenteachingabout • specificissuesgothroughthestagesofhowaneventevolvesintoproblems,issues,andhopefully solutions.

•Theonebigtakeawayformewasthediscussionabouthowsayingnotoonethingmeanssayingyesto •

another.Itisveryeasytogetgreenwashedandjumponbandwagonswithoutdoinganyotherresearch.I hope that pointing out some of these examples will have the same impact on the students as it did on me.

•(1)Canfocusonhowachangingclimatewillimpactusduringsummercamp.(2)Candiscuss •

adaptation and other aspects of evolution during tours.

57

Page 61: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop IV, Question 8

Whatdidyoulikemostaboutthisworkshop?

Presenterhadgreatideasandtheorybutalsopracticalapplicationsandexamples.•Topic.•Thecollaboration.•Room wasn’t cramped.•The focus on how to structure lesson plans and frame issues•(1)Networkingopportunities;(2)Gotmethinkingaboutwhatenvironmentalissuesexistatmysiteand•

howIaddress/interpretthemtothepublic.(3)Ididn’trealizethatGeorgiaandNChad qualityEEprogramsandthatSCwassoenvironmentallyilliterate.(4)Ialsolearnedsomenew termssuchasenvironmentaljustice.

IenjoyedthetrainingandIlikedthatthespeakerwasfromauniversity.Ithinkcollegesareagreat • resource for training.

Interactivecomponentandthefriendliness/expertiseofthespeaker.•

Workshop IV, Question 9

Whatsuggestionsdoyouhaveforfutureworkshopplanners?

Ifeellikewedon’tgetenoughnetworkingtime.•Providefoodorsometimetosocializeandnetwork.Facilityshouldhavedrinkingwaterandaccessible •

Wi-Fi.Concrete examples.•Focusingonhowtotranslatescienceandmotivatestudents•(1)Sometimebuiltinforustogettoknowotherconsortiummembers.(2)Sincealotofustravela •

gooddistancetogettothemeeting,Iwouldrathertheybehalf-dayinlengthandallowustime to interact more with other attendees.

Forfuture,preferfewerbutfulldayworkshopsratherthanfrequentshortworkshops.It’stoughwhenI • amdrivingmorethanIamactuallyattheworkshop.Ittakesalotofmytime,especiallywhen it’srequiredsofrequently.ItwouldbeeasyifyoulivedinColumbia,butwhenyouliveoutside, it’staxing.Especiallytonothavefood,waterandWi-Fihandy.

58

Page 62: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V: Building Synchronicity

September15,2014,GlendaleOutdoorLeadershipSchool,Glendale,SC/34participants

Workshop Description: Dr.DrewLanham,keynotespeakerattheInternationalConferenceonEnvironmentalEducationinOttawathisOctober,willaddressconnectingwithnatureandthebroaderimpactsofthissuccinctembodiment.BenTuretzkywillspeakonculturalhandicapsovercomeworkingwithFOLKS(FriendsofLakeKeowee)asa21yearold501c3watershedprotectionorganization.Lessonslearnedfromgrantimplementation,potentialsourcesoffundingforyourorganization,realtimeexamplesofworkingwithgovernmentagencies,theoutcomesofpersistenceandtheveryactiveroleFOLKSplayedintheRelicensingofLakeKeowee.Alsoincludedwillbetheprocessandthechallengesthatlayahead.SeemoreonFOLKSandthepresentationbelow.

Presenter Bio:Dr.J.DrewLanhamisanativeofEdgefield,SouthCarolinawithaB.AandM.S.inZoologyandPhDinForestWildlifeEcologyfromClemsonUniversity.HeisanawardwinningfacultymemberandwasnamedasDistinguishedAlumniProfessorandMasterTeacherathisalmamaterin2012.Dr.LanhamisaCertifiedWildlifeBiologistandanactiveboardmemberinseveralorganizationsincludingtheSouthCarolinaWildlifeFederation,AldoLeopoldFoundationandBirdNote.Heisawidelypublishedessayistandendeavoringpoetwhohascontributedtoseveralanthologieswithpiecesfocusingonapassionforplaceandintrospecitvesontheinternalandsocietalconflictsthat

sometimesputethnicityandpassionfornatureatodds.Hismostrecentwork“9RulesfortheBlackBirdwatcher”wasfeaturedinOrionMagazineandonNPR’s“AllThingsConsidered.”

Drew’sfirstsolowork,TheHomePlace,MemoirsofaColoredMan’sLoveAffairwithNature(MilkweedEditions),isduetobepublishedlatein2014-early2015.AmemberoftheinauguralAudubon/ToyotaTogetherGreenFellowsclassandamemberoftheWholeThinkingCommunityatKnollFarm,heviewshisprofessionalpassionandpersonalmissionsconvergingtodefineenvironmentalsustainabilityandconservationinnewways.AmajorfocusofthiseffortistotellthestoriesofBlack-AmericanconnectionstonatureintheSoutheastandbeyond.Drewisalifelongbirder,naturalistandavidhunterlivingintheUpstateofSouthCarolinawithhiswifeJanice.Theyhavetwoadultchildren;KimberlyAlexisandDonovanColby.

59

Page 63: Environmental Education Report 2014

Presenter Bio:BenTuredzkyreceivedhisBSinChemicalEngineeringfromMITin1961andaMSinChemicalEngineeringin1963fromStevensInstitute.HeandhiswifeReggie,havemovedaroundtheUSinthecourseofhis38yearcareerinsyntheticrubberandthetirebusiness.HestartedwiththeTexasUSChemicalCompany,ajointventureofTexacoandUniroyal,continuedwiththeUniroyalGoodrichTireCompanyandendedwithMichelinwhereheretiredin1999.OverthecourseofhiscareerheservedasPresidentoftheUniroyalGoodrichTextileDivisioninWinnsboroSC,MichelinVice-PresidentofSalesandMarketing–PrivateBrandsandhislastassignmentwastheconsolidationandredesignofthe

MichelinNorthAmericaReplacementTireCustomerServiceorganizationinGreenville.HeisaPastPresidentandcurrentlyservesasExecutiveDirectorofFOLKS.BenandhiswifeReggiehavetraveledtheworldforbusinessandpleasureovertheir53yearsofmarriage.

FOLKS Description:FOLKSwasstartedbySCDHECandClemsonUniversityfollowingtheestablishmentoftheLakeHartwellAssociationandtheLakeMurrayAssociation.In1993theonlyrelativelylargeestablishedlakesidenewcomercommunitywasKeoweeKeysothemembershipstartedasMidwesternretirees.Fromthestarttherewasanefforttoinvolveallmembersinoneortwoactivities.ThesewereLakeSweepstocleantheshorelinetwiceayearandtomakeverybasicwaterclaritymeasurements.Themembershipgrewastheshorelinebecamemorepopulated;weformedamutualassistancepackwithClemsonUniversity;developedgrant-writingcapabilities;workedcloselywithSCDHECandbetween1999andthepresentimplementedover$700,000inFederalCleanWaterAct319Grantstoremediateimpairedstreams.

FOLKShasreacheddiverseaudiencesasanintegralpartofbuildingrelationshipstomoveforwardandhasmadesmallinroadsinEnvironmentEducationestablishedintheschoolsystemandhigherlearningenvironmentsengagingthelocalUniversityoutdoorclassroominitiative,summerinternshipsandthelike.ThesetacticswillbediscussedandcorrelatebacktotheEPAgrantfocusofStrengtheningandDiversifyingEnvironmentalEducationAcrossSouthCarolinaandtheroleofFOLKSindoingjustthatfromalocalandstateperspective.

60

Page 64: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Workshop V, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Completely dissatisfied

Mostly dissatisfied

Somewhat dissatisfied

Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Mostly satisfied

Presenter’s knowledge of the material

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

2 (11.8%)

14 (82.4%)

Organization of the workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

6 (35.3%)

10 (58.8%)

Quality and comfort of the facility

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

6 (35.3%)

10 (58.8%)

Location of workshop

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (5.9%)

2 (11.8%)

11 (64.7%)

Food and accommodations

1 (5.9%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

2 (11.8%)

5 (29.4%)

7 (41.2%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Presenter’s  knowledge  of  the  

material  

Krgani_aJon  of  the  workshop  

Quality  and  comfort  of  the  facility  

BocaJon  of  workshop   Food  and  accommodaJons  

KFerall\  how  would  you  rate  your  saJsfacJon  with  the  following  

Iompletely  dissaJsYed   Oostly  dissaJsYed   Homewhat  dissaJsYed  

.either  dissaJsYed  nor  saJsYed   Homewhat  saJsYed   Oostly  saJsYed  

61

Page 65: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 2

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop V, Question 2

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The topics presented at the workshop were of relevance to my future environmental education goals.

0 (0.0%)

3 (17.7%)

4 (23.5%)

8 (47.1%)

2 (11.8%)

The workshop’s goals were clearly stated.

0 (0.0%)

4 (23.5%)

5 (29.4%)

5 (29.4%)

3 (17.7%)

This workshop was a positive learning experience.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

10 (58.8%)

5 (29.4%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-on involvement from participants.

1 (5.9%)

3 (17.7%)

4 (23.5%)

3 (17.7%)

6 (35.3%)

The workshop met my expectations.

1 (5.9%)

3 (17.7%)

6 (35.3%)

3 (17.7%)

4 (23.5%)

I learned something new at this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

3 (17.7%)

5 (29.4%)

7 (41.2%)

Overall, the quality of the workshop was excellent.

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

3 (17.7%)

9 (52.9%)

3 (17.6%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshop will be applicable to my career in environmental education.

0 (0.0%)

2 (12.5%)

6 (37.5%)

7 (43.8%)

1 (6.3%)

I can put into practice the ideas and skills covered in this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

4 (23.5%)

4 (23.5%)

6 (35.3%)

3 (17.6%)

62

Page 66: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop V, Question 3

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The workshop provided ample opportunities to meet and interact with others in my field.

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

2 (11.8%)

5 (29.4%)

8 (47.1%)

The workshop provided a forum to interact with other environmental educators that I would not have had without participating in the workshop.

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

4 (23.5%)

5 (29.4%)

7 (41.2%)

The networking from this workshop will support future collaboration with environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

5 (29.4%)

6 (35.3%)

4 (23.5%)

I was able to exchange ideas, relevant to my professional future, with other environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

2 (12.5%)

8 (50.0%)

3 (18.8%)

3 (18.8%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

The  workshop  provided  ample  opportuniJes  to  meet  and  interact  with  others  in  

my  field.  

The  workshop  provided  a  forum  to  interact  with  other  environmental  educators  that  I  would  not  have  had  without  parJcipaJng  in  the  

workshop.  

The  networking  from  this  workshop  will  support  

future  collaboraJon  with  environmental  educators.  

I  was  able  to  exchange  ideas,  relevant  to  my  professional  

future,  with  other  environmental  educators.  

Please  rate  how  much  you  agree  with  the  following  statements:  

Strongly  disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly  agree  

63

Page 67: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Workshop V, Question 4

Please rate your LEVEL OF CHANGE in the following skills from before the workshop to after the workshop:

No change Minor change Moderate change Major change

Learning about the importance of Duke Energy Lakes.

3 (18.8%)

4 (25.0%)

6 (37.5%)

3 (18.8%)

Learning more about others. 2 (12.5%)

5 (31.3%)

7 (43.8%)

2 (12.5%)

Learning about grantsmanship. 7 (43.8%)

5 (31.3%)

4 (25.0%)

0 (0.0%)

Learning about septic system regulations.

3 (18.8%)

5 (31.3%)

4 (25.0%)

4 (25.0%)

Gaining a greater sense of how to connect people with nature.

2 (12.5%)

5 (31.3%)

9 (56.3%)

0 (0.0%)

Learning a different way to collect and interpret data.

3 (18.8%)

5 (31.3%)

6 (37.5%)

2 (12.5%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Learning  about  the  importance  of  

Duke  Energy  Lakes.  

Learning  more  about  others.  

Learning  about  grantsmanship.  

Learning  about  sepJc  system  regulaJons.  

Gaining  a  greater  sense  of  how  to  connect  people  with  nature.  

Learning  a  different  way  to  collect  and  

interpret  data.  

Please  rate  your  LEVEL  OF  CHANGE  in  the  following  skills  from  before  the  workshop  to  aher  the  workshop`  

No  change   Minor  change   Moderate  change   Major  change  

64

Page 68: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 5

PleaserateyourCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Workshop V, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Learning about the importance of Duke Energy Lakes.

5 (31.3%)

3 (18.8%)

6 (37.5%)

2 (12.5%)

Learning more about others. 0 (0.0%)

7 (43.8%)

6 (37.5%)

3 (18.8%)

Learning about grantsmanship. 1 (6.3%)

8 (50.0%)

6 (37.5%)

1 (6.3%)

Learning about septic system regulations.

4 (25.0%)

5 (31.3%)

5 (31.3%)

2 (12.5%)

Gaining a greater sense of how to connect people with nature.

0 (0.0%)

3 (18.8%)

10 (62.5%)

3 (18.8%)

Learning a different way to collect and interpret data.

1 (6.3%)

2 (12.5%)

12 (75.0%)

1 (6.3%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Learning  about  the  importance  of  

Duke  Energy  Lakes.  

Learning  more  about  others.  

Learning  about  grantsmanship.  

Learning  about  sepJc  system  regulaJons.  

Gaining  a  greater  sense  of  how  to  connect  people  with  nature.  

Learning  a  different  way  to  collect  and  interpret  data.  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

65

Page 69: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 6

Describetwoexamplesofhowyouwillputintopracticetheskillsandideasfromthisworkshop.

(1)Talkingtoouroperationsstaffaboutouruseofwateratthemuseumandhowtheparkinglotsdrain • andareerodingournaturetrailandstreamand(2)whatplandotheyhavetostopthatfromcontinuing.

•(1)“CreateaNatureJournal”workshop.(2)InvestigateseptictanksonthepropertyIworkon.•

•(1)Plantousetheseskillstoexplaintoothersabouttheprogramandencouragetheirinvolvement.(2) •

Alsoplantousetheskillstocontributetoaconsortiumrequirementforpublicoutreach.•

(1)Encouragemytargetaudiencestoseebeyondscientific“data”todevelopconnectionswiththe • naturalworld.(2)Writemoreaboutthenaturalworld,andencourageotherstodothesame.

•(1)Iwillbrainstormwaystohelpprogramparticipantsmakeaconnectionbetweentheirheadandheart•

bymakingmoreemotionalconnectionstotheinformationIpresent.(2)ImaysharetheinformationI learnedfromthe“FOLKS”speakerwithourFriendsGrouptohelpthemstrengthentheirorganization.

•(1)Iwillusephotosasdata.(2)Iwillconnectwithlocal“friendsoflakes.”•

•Notsure•

•IwasexpectingaWildParentingworkshop.Understandably,theworkshopneededtobechangedat •

thelastminute.Ialreadyhavemuchofmyheartintheenvironmentandinconservation,so thatissomethingIalreadydo.Ididnotrealizeallthatgoesintomaintainingtheman-madelakesinour area.However,Idon’tgettotalkaboutthatmuch,ifatall,atthemuseum.

66

Page 70: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 7

Describetwoexamplesofhowspecificskillsandideasfromthistrainingmightimpactdevelopmentandimplementation of your environmental education program.

Iwillusetheimprovedknowledgebaseaboutsepticsystemsinmyclassroomontheriver.••

N/A••

(1)IreallyenjoyedthepoeticjournalingideasfromthefirstspeakerMr.Landum,andIwillusethatin • myhomeschoolprogramandpossiblyotherprograms,likesummercamps.(2)Itwasgoodtoget informationthatwasnotdirectlyrelatedtomyfield--septicsystemsandwaterrunoff,etc. abouttheriversandlakesintheupstateandbykayakingitIhadatotallynewimpression of its importance and its affect to our area in the piedmont.

•(1)Incorporateartmoreindesigningscienceprograms.(2)Keepcurrentonpublishedscholarlyjournals•

relatedtomysite’sflora,fauna,geographyetc.•

Itwillimpacthighschoolgroupswhoareabletofullyunderstandandcomprehendthematerialsand • contributetodatacollection.

•Iamgoingtotrytoincludemoreemotionalconnectionsinmyprograms.•

•Iwilltakemorepictures!•

67

Page 71: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop V, Question 8

Whatdidyoulikemostaboutthisworkshop?

Theartistryofthefirstpresenterandtheknowledgeofthesecond.•Networkingwithotherattendees.•ThehikingtourandseeingtheMillruins.•Thefirstspeaker,whowasverygiftedandreallyraisedthebarforustobemoreheartorientedinour •

educationnotjustfactualanddisconnected.Headvocatesmindtoheartconnectionsandthatis so important.

The activities afterwards were a great way to meet other educators and exchange ideas.•Thespeakerswereverydynamicandknewtheirsubjectswell.•Meetingothereducators.•Seeing the gardens at the Environmental Center.•Theafternoonhike,becauseforthefirsttimeatthesemeetingsIreallygottoconnectwithsomeofthe •

other attendees.Meetingtheguestspeakers,visitingtheGOLSsinceIhadneverbeentherebefore,networkingandthe •

afternoon activity options.Ilikedthefirsttalk-itwasenjoyablebutdidn’treallychangemyknowledgebase.Ididenjoythewalk•

tothecreekandtourofthenaturecenter.Location.•Greatstaffandsupportstaff.Enjoyedeverything!Thanks!•Ireallylikehavethemeetingatanaturecenter/EEfacilitysothatafterthetalkwecanmovearoundand•

exploreandseewhatotherEEfacilitiesarelike/whattheyaredoing.

Workshop V, Question 9

Whatsuggestionsdoyouhaveforfutureworkshopplanners?

Morehands-onandbeinginthefield.•N/A•Ithinkwhathappenedonthisonewasverysad...weallspenttimepreparingandreadingthebookand •

didnotgettoheartheLauraBlindspeak,butwedidappreciatethehardworkofthosethathadtocome upwithanewprogramtoreplacethecancellation.Itwaswelldone!

Informusoflunchchoicesaheadoftime.•Planmoretimeforlunch.•Morebuilt-insocialtimetogettoknowmyotherconsortiummembers.•Ireallywouldhavelikedtohearfromtheoriginalpresenters.Ithinktheotherpresentersweregreat,but•

Ifeltthattheydidn’treallycoversubjectsthatreallypertainedtomywork.The2ndpresenterdidnotreallyapplytothetopicthatwasadvertised.HewasgoodbutIwasn’tableto•

connectittotheworkshoptopic.

68

Page 72: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI: Learning to Communicate More Effectively with Reluctant or Resistant Parties

October2,2014,USCDiscoveryIBuilding,Columbia,SC/25participants

Workshop Description: JoinDr.GeoffScottattheUniversityofSouthCarolinaforawell-plannedworkshoponcommunicatinganddisseminationofinformationtoreluctantorresistantparties.Whenitcomestoenvironmentalissuesitisimportanttonotoffendanyone,makesureeveryonecanunderstand,andthatinformation is communicated in a way that will not incite outrage or resistance to a changing environmental paradigm.Translatingthetechnical,economic,social,andpossiblelegalaspectsofenvironmentaltopicsintoanunderstandablelanguage(i.e.,EE)isbothanartandascience(paraphrasedfromFranMarshall,formerSCToxicologist).SpeakersandTeachersmustknowwhatquestionswillbeasked,shouldbeasked,andhowtocraftaclear,accurate,conciseresponse.Inthisseminarwewillcover:

Perceivedrisksversusactualrisksandhowtoeffectivelycommunicatethedifferencestotheaudience•Threetypesofeffectivecommunicationwithreluctantparties:Precautionadvocacy,outrage •

management, and crisis communicationDevelopingtrustandcredibilitywiththeaudience•Threekeysforcommunicatingtechnicalinformationeffectivelytonon-technicalparties•Usingclimatechangeasatopicofdiscussiontodeterminehoweacheducatormaytailortheirstrategies•

in

Presenter Bio:GeoffScottistheChairoftheDepartmentofEnvironmentalHealthSciencesintheArnoldSchoolofPublicHealthatUniversityofSouthCarolina.Hisresearchinterestsfocusonenvironmentaltoxicology,marineecotoxicology;marinemicrobiologyrelatedseafoodsafety;endocrinedisruptionininvertebrates;Researchhasfocusedontheeffectsofurbanandagriculturalnonpointsourcerunoffonestuarine ecosystem health. This has included research which has assessed boththelethalandsublethaleffectsofchemicalcontaminantsandmethodsto discern impacts from ecosystem process changes versus chemical contaminanteffectsandlinkinglanduseactivitieswithenvironmentalwaterqualityindicators.

69

Page 73: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Workshop VI, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Completely dissatisfied

Mostly dissatisfied

Somewhat dissatisfied

Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Mostly satisfied

Presenter’s knowledge of the material

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

12 (85.7%)

Organization of the workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

1 (7.1%)

0 (0.0%)

12 (85.7%)

Quality and comfort of the facility

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (15.4%)

11 (84.6%)

Location of workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

1 (7.1%)

0 (0.0%)

11 (78.6%)

Food and accommodations

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

6 (46.2%)

2 (15.4%)

4 (30.8%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Presenter’s  knowledge  of  the  

material  

Krgani_aJon  of  the  workshop  

Quality  and  comfort  of  the  facility  

BocaJon  of  workshop   Food  and  accommodaJons  

KFerall\  how  would  you  rate  your  saJsfacJon  with  the  following  

Iompletely  dissaJsYed   Oostly  dissaJsYed   Homewhat  dissaJsYed  

.either  dissaJsYed  nor  saJsYed   Homewhat  saJsYed   Oostly  saJsYed  

70

Page 74: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 2

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop VI, Question 2

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The topics presented at the workshop were of relevance to my future environmental education goals.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

5 (35.7%)

8 (57.1%)

The workshop’s goals were clearly stated.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

6 (42.9%)

6 (42.9%)

This workshop was a positive learning experience.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

4 (28.6%)

9 (64.3%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-on involvement from participants.

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

5 (35.7%)

4 (28.6%)

3 (21.4%)

The workshop met my expectations.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

5 (35.7%)

6 (42.9%)

I learned something new at this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (28.6%)

10 (71.4%)

Overall, the quality of the workshop was excellent.

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.7%)

2 (15.4%)

3 (23.1%)

7 (53.9%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshop will be applicable to my career in environmental education.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

7 (50.0%)

I can put into practice the ideas and skills covered in this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

5 (35.7%)

7 (50.0%)

71

Page 75: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop VI, Question 3

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The workshop provided ample opportunities to meet and interact with others in my field.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

2 (14.3%)

5 (35.7%)

The workshop provided a forum to interact with other environmental educators that I would not have had without participating in the workshop.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

4 (28.6%)

The networking from this workshop will support future collaboration with environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

5 (35.7%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

I was able to exchange ideas, relevant to my professional future, with other environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

5 (35.7%)

2 (14.3%)

4 (28.6%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

The  workshop  provided  ample  opportuniJes  to  meet  and  interact  with  others  in  my  field.  

The  workshop  provided  a  forum  to  interact  with  other  environmental  educators  that  I  would  not  have  had  without  parJcipaJng  in  the  

workshop.  

The  networking  from  this  workshop  will  support  

future  collaboraJon  with  environmental  educators.  

I  was  able  to  exchange  ideas,  relevant  to  my  

professional  future,  with  other  environmental  

educators.  

Please  rate  how  much  you  agree  with  the  following  statements  

Strongly  disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly  agree  

72

Page 76: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Workshop VI, Question 4

Please rate your LEVEL OF CHANGE in the following skills from before the workshop to after the workshop:

No change Minor change Moderate change

Major change

Understanding what constitutes environmental risk and risk management.

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

6 (42.9%)

6 (42.9%)

Differentiating and understanding the importance of framing what risks associated with a certain environmental issue are.

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

5 (35.7%)

7 (50.0%)

Understanding the importance of "Sound Science" in framing risks and risk management discussions and communications with the public.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

7 (50.0%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Understanding  what  consJtutes  environmental  risk  and  risk  

management.  

WiferenJaJng  and  understanding  the  importance  of  framing  what  risks  

associated  with  a  certain  environmental  issue  are.  

Understanding  the  importance  of  "Sound  Science"  in  framing  risks  and  risk  management  discussions  and  communicaJons  with  the  public.  

Please  rate  your  LEVEL  OF  CHANGE  in  the  following  skills  from  before  the  workshop  to  aher  the  workshop`  

No  change   Minor  change   Moderate  change   Major  change  

73

Page 77: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 5

PleaserateyourCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Workshop VI, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Understanding what constitutes environmental risk and risk management.

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

6 (42.9%)

7 (50.0%)

Differentiating and understanding the importance of framing what risks associated with a certain environmental issue are.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (50.0%)

7 (50.0%)

Understanding the importance of "Sound Science" in framing risks and risk management discussions and communications with the public.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (50.0%)

7 (50.0%)

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

Understanding  what  consJtutes  environmental  risk  and  risk  

management.  

DiferenJaJng  and  understanding  the  importance  of  framing  what  risks  

associated  with  a  certain  environmental  issue  are.  

Understanding  the  importance  of  "Sound  Science"  in  framing  risks  and  risk  management  discussions  and  communicaJons  with  the  pu;lic.  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession:  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

74

Page 78: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 6

Describetwoexamplesofhowyouwillputintopracticetheskillsandideasfromthisworkshop.

Increasetheuseofgraphicswhendescribingclimatechange(especiallythegraphicthatshowshow • eachUSstate’scurrentweatherwillchangeasclimatechangecontinuestohappen).

•Probesarealreadybeingdevelopedforourprograms.•

•(1)Bettercommunicationwithstakeholders’concerns.(2)Rememberingtoputsciencefirst.•

•Inpromotingpositiveenvironmentalhealthbehaviorsinpresentationsandwrittencommunication.•

•Ireallylikedthelasttenminuteswhenhefinallygottoclimatechangeandcanusesomeofthedatahe •

gave there in my classes.....•

Iwillusetheseskillswhentalkingtomysororityanddormaboutsustainablepractices.••

(1)Useinundergraduate/graduatecourseforscienceteachers.(2)Useindevelopingargumentsand • evidence for environmental issues.

•(1)Assessingmyaudience’sopinionsandbackgroundswhendiscussingissueslikeclimatechange.(2) •

Learnwhentoeducateandwhentolisten.

Workshop VI, Question 7

Describetwoexamplesofhowspecificskillsandideasfromthistrainingmightimpactdevelopmentandimplementation of your environmental education program.

(1)Trytousethecurrentclimatechangedocumentsthatwerementioned.(2)Trytomentionclimate • changeissuestoyouthwhenandwhereapplicable.

•Withthelittletimewehavewithstudents,theseprobeswillhelpustogagewherethestudentsareand •

wecanadjustwhatapproachweusetoreinforcewhattheyhavelearnedinschool.•

(1)Findingwaysthroughoureducationalpartnerstogetsocialmediaexposuretoourmessagesand • programs.(2)Findingexamplesthatresonatewithouraudiencesofactualvs.perceivedriskstoairand waterqualityfromvariouspollutants.

•Itwillhelpmecommunicatewithmysisters.•

•(1)ClimatechangedatafromNOAAinAsheville,NCcanbeintroducedtomystudents.(2) •

Distinguishingbetweentimetolistenandwhentoeducatewasanimportantdistinctiontomake for responding to environmental events.

75

Page 79: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VI, Question 8

Whatdidyoulikemostaboutthisworkshop?

The presenter.•Greatlocationandgreatspeaker,Ilikedthatwewereoncampussothatstudentscouldjoininifthey •

wanted to.Speakerwasawesome!•Presenterwasextremelyknowledgeableandhowgreatexamples.•The energy and expertise of the presenter.•Theclimatechangeinfo,wouldlikealotmoreofthat,howtogetfolkstounderstandthatitisn’treally •

controversialVeryinteresting,notjustalecture.•Knowledgeofthepresenter.•Climatechange-specificdialogueandconversation.•

Workshop VI, Question 9

Whatsuggestionsdoyouhaveforfutureworkshopplanners?

(1)Maybea2hourworkshop,lunchwithparticipants(eachpayingtheirownbill)andthenanoptional • 1-2hourtoursomewherenearby(forinstance,atthislocation,itcouldhavebeenatourofthe LEEDcertifiedbuildingnextdoortotheworkshoplocation).(2)Moretraining/experiences/networking inonedaymighthelpjustifytosuperiorswhyweneedtodrivelongdistancesforatraining.

Coffee/snacks=timeforinteraction.•CorrectaddressandparkinginformationfortheworkshopsothatGPSusagewillwork.•Donuts.•Itwasperfect.•Havingasandwichboardorsignoutsidethebuildingoratleastneartheelevatortoassurethe •

participantsthattheyareinthecorrectbuilding.Hewasveryentertaining.Ihadafewissueswithsomeofhisstats,butmaybehejusthaditeroded •

wrong on ppt slide.Addressanddirectionsgiveninannouncementwerenotcorrectandittookmealmost40minutestofind•

the venue.Saiditbeforeandwillsayitagain-Iwishwehadtimebuiltintotalktoandcollaboratewithothersat •

themeeting.Abreak,exercise,orpost/optionallunchwouldhavebeenwonderful.

76

Page 80: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar: Developing Creative Environmental Lesson Plans & Teaching Controversial Issues

October28,2014,Webinar/27participants

Workshop Description: InresponsetotheoverwhelmingresponsefromtheirAugustpresentation,DanaHaineandSarahYeltonwillpresentawebinarontipsfordevelopingnewandcreativeenvironmentallessonplans&teachingcontroversialissues.EducatorsfromtheUNCSuperfundProgramResearchTranslationCoreandtheUNCInstitutefortheEnvironmentwillsharestrategies,tipsandresourcesfordevelopingtimelyandrelevantlessons, including those that feature controversial or sensitive environmental issues, such as environmental justice.Thisworkshop-stylesessionwillenableyoutonetworkwithcolleagueswhileconsideringlocalenvironmental issues that can serve as the foundation for lessons designed to effectively engage others around a topic and promote environmental literacy.

Presenter Bio:DanaBrownHaine,MS,istheK-12ScienceEducationManagerfortheUniversityofNorthCarolinaatChapelHill’sInstitutefortheEnvironmentandisascienceeducatorforUNC’sSuperfundResearchProgramResearchTranslationCore.Danacreatescurriculaanddeliverslearningexperiencestogrades6-12teachers,studentsandinformaleducatorsthataredesignedtoprovideaccesstocurrentscientificinformationandrelevantresourcestohelpmakeinformeddecisionsaboutenvironmentalsciencetopics.SheservedontheNCEnvironmentalEducationAdvisoryCouncilfrom2007-2011andtheNCEnvironmentalLiteracyPlanWorkingGroupfrom2009-2011.Previously,shewasascienceeducatorforDESTINY,UNC’sTravelingScienceLearningProgram,andfrom1998-2003shewasasciencefacultymemberat

CentralPiedmontCommunityCollegeinCharlotte,NC.DanaearnedherMSinBiologyfromWakeForestUniversityandherBSinBiologyfromAppalachianStateUniversity.

Presenter Bio:SarahYelton,MS,EnvironmentalEducationCoordinatorfortheUNCInstitutefortheEnvironment’sEnvironmentalResourceProgram,engagesK-12teachers,universitystudentsandotherlayaudiencesontopicssuchasenvironmentalhealth,waterquality,hazardouswaste,climatechange.BeforecomingtoUNC,SarahmanagedthePreK-12EnvironmentalEducationProgramfortheNCOfficeofEnvironmentalEducationandPublicAffairs.SarahearnedherMSinNaturalResources-EnvironmentalEducationfromtheUniversityofWisconsin-StevensPointandreceivedherBAdegreefromtheUniversityofNorthCarolinaatChapelHill.SheisaCertifiedEnvironmentalEducatorandwinneroftheNCOutstandingEarthScienceEducatorAwardbytheNCGeologicalSurvey.

77

Page 81: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Webinar, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Completely dissatisfied

Mostly dissatisfied

Somewhat dissatisfied

Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Mostly satisfied

Presenter’s knowledge of the material

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (12.5%)

14 (87.5%)

Organization of the workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (12.5%)

14 (87.5%)

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

Presenter’s  knowledge  of  the  material   Krgani_aJon  of  the  worksho(  

KFerall\  how  wo:ld  Go:  rate  Go:r  saJsfa>Jon  with  the  following`  

Iom(letelG  dissaJsYed   OostlG  dissaJsYed  

Homewhat  dissaJsYed   .either  dissaJsYed  nor  saJsYed  

Homewhat  saJsYed   OostlG  saJsYed  

78

Page 82: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 2

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Webinar, Question 2

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The topics presented at the workshop were of relevance to my future environmental education goals.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (13.3%)

6 (40.0%)

7 (46.7%)

The workshop’s goals were clearly stated.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (46.7%)

8 (53.3%)

This workshop was a positive learning experience.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (6.7%)

5 (33.3%)

9 (60.0%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-on involvement from participants.

0 (0.0%)

1 (6.7%)

6 (40.0%)

5 (33.3%)

3 (20.0%)

The workshop met my expectations.

0 (0.0%)

1 (6.7%)

2 (13.3%)

6 (40.0%)

6 (40.0%)

I learned something new at this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (6.7%)

8 (53.3%)

6 (40.0%)

Overall, the quality of the workshop was excellent.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

7 (46.7%)

8 (53.3%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshop will be applicable to my career in environmental education.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

8 (53.3%)

7 (46.7%)

I can put into practice the ideas and skills covered in this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (6.7%)

9 (60.0%)

5 (33.3%)

79

Page 83: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Webinar, Question 3

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The workshop provided ample opportunities to meet and interact with others in my field.

1 (7.1%)

2 (14.3%)

7 (50.0%)

3 (21.4%)

1 (7.1%)

The workshop provided a forum to interact with other environmental educators that I would not have had without participating in the workshop.

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

2 (14.3%)

7 (50.0%)

1 (7.1%)

The networking from this workshop will support future collaboration with environmental educators.

1 (7.1%)

4 (28.6%)

4 (28.6%)

3 (21.4%)

2 (14.3%)

I was able to exchange ideas, relevant to my professional future, with other environmental educators.

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

2 (14.3%)

4 (28.6%)

4 (28.6%)

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

The  workshop  provided  ample  opportuniJes  to  meet  and  interact  with  others  in  my  field.  

The  workshop  provided  a  forum  to  interact  with  other  environmental  educators  that  I  would  not  have  had  without  parJcipaJng  in  the  

workshop.  

The  networking  from  this  workshop  will  support  future  

collaboraJon  with  environmental  educators.  

I  was  able  to  exchange  ideas,  relevant  to  my  

professional  future,  with  other  environmental  

educators.  

Please  rate  how  much  you  agree  with  the  following  statements:  

Strongly  disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly  agree  

80

Page 84: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Webinar, Question 4

Please rate your LEVEL OF CHANGE in the following skills from before the workshop to after the workshop:

No change Minor change Moderate change

Major change

Knowing a framework for investigating environmental issues.

0 (0.0%)

4 (28.6%)

8 (57.1%)

2 (14.3%)

Knowing strategies for teaching these issues to your target audience, and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

0 (0.0%)

5 (35.7%)

4 (28.6%)

5 (35.7%)

Reflecting upon our role as educators in dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

2 (14.3%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

5 (35.7%)

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

Knowing  a  framework  for  invesJgaJng  environmental  

issues.  

Knowing  strategies  for  teaching  these  issues  to  your  target  

audience\  and  uJli_ing  them  as  (osiJve  (edagogical  

o((ortuniJes.  

UelecJng  u(on  our  role  as  educators  in  dealing  with  controversial  issues  and  the  

challenges  they  raise.  

Please  rate  your  LEVEL  OF  CHANGE  in  the  following  skills  from  before  the  worksho(  to  aher  the  worksho(`  

No  change   Minor  change   Moderate  change   Major  change  

81

Page 85: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 5

PleaserateCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Webinar, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Applying a framework for investigating environmental issues.

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

5 (35.7%)

5 (35.7%)

Applying strategies for teaching these issues to your target audience, and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

6 (42.9%)

5 (35.7%)

Dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

1 (7.1%)

1 (7.1%)

8 (57.1%)

4 (28.6%)

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

Applying  a  framework  for  invesJgaJng  environmental  

issues.  

Applying  strategies  for  teaching  these  issues  to  your  target  

audience\  and  uJli_ing  them  as  posiJve  pedagogical  

opportuniJes.  

Dealing  with  controversial  issues  and  the  challenges  they  raise.  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession:  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

82

Page 86: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 6

Describetwoexamplesofhowyouwillputintopracticetheskillsandideasfromthisworkshop:

(1)Maybehavingseminarsatourcentertoaddresssomeissues.(2)Suggestingateacherworkshopon • thissubject.

•WheneverIgettheopportunitytoteachIwillapplytheskills.•

•Howtosetmylessonstobegradelevelspecificformystudents.•

•(1)Utilizingmorediverseresources.(2)Teachingasaimpartialchairperson.•

•(1)Willusetheoutdoorenvironmenttohavestudentsdecidewhichissuetheywanttoinvestigate.(2) •

Activatetheirplanofactiononsite.•

WillreferencetheinformationinthiswebinarwhenteachingenvironmentalissuesandifIeverhadany• questionsInowknowtwopeoplethatmaybeabletoassist(DanaandSarah).

•Currentcurriculumwriting,thoughtstotakeintofutureworkshops.•

•(1)Trainingvolunteersatmyinstitution.(2)Teachingcontroversialissues.•

•(1)Oxfamresourceswithstudents.(2)Sharetheframeworkpresentedsograduatestudentscanwork •

with grade school students.

83

Page 87: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 7

Describetwoexamplesofhowspecificskillsandideasfromthistrainingmightimpactdevelopmentand implementation of your environmental education program.

•(1)Enforcingstudentstocriticalthinkofresolutionstoenvironmentalissues.(2)Iwouldalsoencourage•

creativity from the students.•

Organization of lesson plans and how to implement topics in an age appropriate fashion.••

Ideally,willallowdifferentpeopletoseeandheardifferentviewpointsandwillallowcompromise • agreements/program/etc.tobecreated-betterthansolelyoneviewpointfollowed.

•(1)Usetheconceptmaptoprogressfromideatostudytoactionplan.(2)Listtheimpactofclimate •

changeonEasternNorthCarolinaandtheninvestigatehowtheywouldimpactlocally. •(1)Usingtheframeworkdiscussedinthiswebinartomakesureallaspectsofanenvironmentalissue •

arecoveredand(2)Utilizingsomeofthesupportmaterialthatwasmentionedtoconstructan age appropriate lesson.

•Newinformationtoinvestigate.•

•(1)Iwouldliketodevelopamodulebasedaroundteachingenvironmentalissues.(2)Ilovedtheideaof•

thedifferentrolesateachercanplayintheclassroom(Ihadn’tthoughtaboutthatbefore).

Webinar, Question 8

Whatdidyoulikemostaboutthisworkshop?

Webinarformat•Experiencingmyfirstwebinar•Theframeworkthatwassharedattheworkshop.•Theopen-endeddiscussion•Webinar•Didn’thavetotravel!•Theopportunitytoaskquestionsandsee/hearcomments•Webinarformat•Wellorganizedandhelpful,newinformation.•Verywellorganized;greatspeakingvoicesforbothspeakers;aestheticallypleasingslides;greatuseof •

references and provided new sources of information to attendees.Pleaseoffermore!•

84

Page 88: Environmental Education Report 2014

Webinar, Question 9

Whatsuggestionsdoyouhaveforfutureworkshopplanners?

Earlier time frame•Idon’thaveanysuggestions.•Igotalotoutofthetwoorthreespecificexamplesofhowteachershavecoveredcontroversialissues •

thatweregiveninthe10minutesofquestionsafterthepresentationwasover.Morespecificprojects exampleslaidoutintheframeworkwouldhavebeenhelpful.

Keepcomingupwithexamplesthatcanbeusedatthesecondarylevel•N/A•Hadexperiencedthefearofthefuturethatinvestigatingsomeoftheseproblemsbringoutforstudents.•

Wouldlikeopendiscussionofhowtodealwiththis.Howtoknowenoughtounderstandbut keepapositiveoutlookforthefuture.

Possiblymorethanoneexample(ratherthanjustclimatechange)•Someofthesequestionsmadenosenseforthiswebinar.•Greatworkshop,wouldlovetoattendmore...e.g.,usingnatureconnectednesstechniquesinthe •

classroom.

85

Page 89: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII: What are the Steps for Developing a System for Continual Programmatic Improvement and Capturing your Success?

December5,2015,Caw-CawInterpretiveCenter,RavenelSC/21participants

Workshop Description: Thisworkshopwillintroducetheconceptofadaptivemanagementandexaminethesteps that are necessary to develop an internal system for continual programmatic improvement and a culture of learning. One aspect of successful evaluations and adaptive management systems is a commitment to gauge outcomes and to investigate the relative effectiveness of different aspects of educational programs. Through a facilitatedprocess,participantswillbeprovidedpracticalexercisesthatwillaidthedevelopmentorrefinementofanevaluationsystem.Itisthoughtthatasystemofevaluationisnecessaryforenvironmentaleducationtomeetlong-termgoals,toaddresschangingsocialandeconomicchallenges,andtoproducemeaningfuleducational and conservation outcomes.

Presenter Bio:Dr.BobPowellistheDirectorofInstituteforParksatClemsonUniversity.HeisalsoAssociateProfessorintheDepartmentofParks,Recreation,andTourismManagement,CollegeofHealth,Education,andHumanDevelopment;andSchoolofAgriculture,Forest,andEnvironmentalSciences,CollegeofAgriculture,ForestryandLifeSciencesatClemsonUniversity.Dr.PowellreceivedaB.A.inInterdisciplinaryStudiesfromtheUniversityofNorthCarolina,ChapelHill,hisMastersinEnvironmentalManagementfromYaleUniversity,SchoolofForestryandEnvironmentalStudiesandhisPh.D.inForestryandEnvironmentalStudies,alsofromYaleUniversity.

Dr.Powell’sresearchandoutreachprogramfocusesoninterpretationandenvironmentaleducation,protectedareamanagementandecotourism,andintegratedlandscapescaleplanning.Aspartofhiscurrentresearchprogram,Bobiscurrentlyinvestigating:theeffectivenessofcommunity-basedconservationprojectsfortheNationalAudubonSocietyandtheToyotaFoundation;bestpracticesforInterpretation,Education,andVisitorOrientationfortheU.S.NationalParkService;andthebarriersandfacilitatorstoeffectivetransboundaryplanningandmanagementforconservation.PastEnvironmentalEducationprojectsincludeevaluationsforGreatSmokyMountainsInstituteatTremont,NorthBay,GreatSmokyMountainsNationalPark,EvergladesNationalPark,LeaveNoTraceandTreadLightly!outdoorethicseducationprograms,andtouroperatorsinAntarctica,theGalapagosIslands,andtheColoradoRiverthroughGrandCanyonNationalPark.

86

Page 90: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Workshop VII, Question 1

Overall, how would you rate your satisfaction with the following:

Completely dissatisfied

Mostly dissatisfied

Somewhat dissatisfied

Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Mostly satisfied

Presenter’s knowledge of the material

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

14 (100.0%)

Organization of the workshop

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

2 (14.3%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

9 (64.3%)

Quality and comfort of the facility

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

10 (71.4%)

Location of workshop

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

11 (78.6%)

Food and accommodations

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

0 (0.0%)

12 (85.7%)

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

Presenter’s  knowledge  of  the  

material  

Krgani_aJon  of  the  workshop  

Quality  and  comfort  of  the  facility  

BocaJon  of  workshop   Food  and  accommodaJons  

KFerall\  how  would  you  rate  your  saJsfacJon  with  the  following`  

Iompletely  dissaJsYed   Oostly  dissaJsYed   Homewhat  dissaJsYed  

.either  dissaJsYed  nor  saJsYed   Homewhat  saJsYed   Oostly  saJsYed  

87

Page 91: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 2

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop VII, Question 2

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The topics presented at the workshop were of relevance to my future environmental education goals.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

10 (71.4%)

The workshop’s goals were clearly stated.

1 (7.1%)

1 (7.1%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (35.7%)

7 (50.0%)

This workshop was a positive learning experience.

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

9 (64.3%)

The sessions and activities encouraged hands-on involvement from participants.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (28.6%)

10 (71.4%)

The workshop met my expectations.

2 (14.3%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

9 (64.3%)

I learned something new at this workshop.

1 (7.1%)

1 (7.1%)

2 (14.3%)

2 (14.3%)

8 (57.1%)

Overall, the quality of the workshop was excellent.

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

0 (0.0%)

4 (28.6%)

8 (57.1%)

The topics and materials presented in the workshop will be applicable to my career in environmental education.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

2 (14.3%)

11 (40.0%)

I can put into practice the ideas and skills covered in this workshop.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

10 (71.4%)

88

Page 92: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 3

Pleaseratehowmuchyouagreewiththefollowingstatements:

Workshop VII, Question 3

Please rate how much you agree with the following statements:

Strongly disagree

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

The workshop provided ample opportunities to meet and interact with others in my field.

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

2 (14.3%)

7 (50.0%)

3 (21.4%)

The workshop provided a forum to interact with other environmental educators that I would not have had without participating in the workshop.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

2 (14.3%)

5 (35.7%)

4 (28.6%)

The networking from this workshop will support future collaboration with environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

3 (21.4%)

5 (35.7%)

5 (35.7%)

I was able to exchange ideas, relevant to my professional future, with other environmental educators.

0 (0.0%)

3 (21.4%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

4 (28.6%)

89

Page 93: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 4

PleaserateyourLEVELOFCHANGEinthefollowingskillsfrombeforetheworkshoptoaftertheworkshop:

Workshop VII, Question 4

Please rate your LEVEL OF CHANGE in the following skills from before the workshop to after the workshop:

No change Minor change Moderate change Major change

Adaptive management. 2 (14.3%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

5 (35.7%)

Understanding the need for monitoring/evaluation.

5 (38.5%)

1 (7.7%)

4 (30.8%)

3 (23.1%)

Logic modeling. 3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

3 (21.4%)

4 (28.6%)

Developing measurable indicators. 4 (28.6%)

2 (14.3%)

3 (21.4%)

5 (35.7%)

Understanding the difference between outputs, outcomes, and impacts

4 (28.6%)

2 (14.3%)

2 (14.3%)

6 (42.9%)

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

90%  

100%  

The  workshop  provided  ample  opportuniJes  to  meet  and  interact  with  others  in  my  field.  

The  workshop  provided  a  forum  to  interact  with  other  environmental  

educators  that  I  would  not  have  had  without  parJcipaJng  in  the  

workshop.  

The  networking  from  this  workshop  will  support  

future  collaboraJon  with  environmental  educators.  

I  was  able  to  exchange  ideas,  relevant  to  my  

professional  future,  with  other  environmental  

educators.  

Please  rate  how  much  you  agree  with  the  following  statements:  

Strongly  disagree   Disagree   Neutral   Agree   Strongly  agree  

90

Page 94: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 5

PleaserateyourCONFIDENCEinapplyingthefollowingskillsinyourprofession:

Workshop VII, Question 5

Please rate your CONFIDENCE in applying the following skills in your profession:

Not confident Neither confident nor not confident

Somewhat confident

Very confident

Adaptive management. 0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

10 (71.4%)

4 (28.6%)

Understanding the need for monitoring/evaluation.

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

5 (35.7%)

9 (64.3%)

Logic modeling. 0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

6 (42.9%)

7 (50.0%)

Developing measurable indicators. 0 (0.0%)

1 (7.1%)

4 (28.6%)

9 (64.3%)

Understanding the difference between outputs, outcomes, and impacts

0 (0.0%)

2 (14.3%)

4 (28.6%)

8 (57.1%)

0  10  20  30  40  50  60  70  80  90  100  

!dapJ

ve  managem

ent.    

Understanding  th

e  need  for  

monito

ringPevaluaJon.  

Logic  modeling.  

Developing  measurable  

indicators.  

Understanding  th

e  difference  

between  outputs,  outcomes,  

and  impacts  

Please  rate  your  CONFIDENCE  in  applying  the  following  skills  in  your  profession:  

Not  confident   Neither  confident  nor  not  confident   Somewhat  confident   Very  confident  

91

Page 95: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 6

Describetwoexamplesofhowyouwillputintopracticetheskillsandideasfromthisworkshop:

Revisit logic modeling and evaluation measures currently in place for existing programs.••

(1)Improvingevaluationbysharinglogicmodelingwithourstaff.2)Incorporatingsomeadaptive • managementprinciplesatourworksite.

•Ialreadyemployadaptivemanagementandlogicmodeling.•

•(1)Createneedsassessmenttoexplainwhylocalschoolsdon’tcometoourcenterveryoften.(2)Find •

betterwaystoevaluatethesuccessofourcurrentprograms.•

(1)Developingwaystotestprogramswillbecomeanintegralofprogrammingbeginningatthe • developmentstage.(2)Iwillgobackanddeveloptestingforoldprogramswhichwillallowme tocritiquethem.

•(1)Iwillusethelogicmodelwhendevelopingprograms.(2)Iwillconsiderevaluationwhenstarting •

any new program.•

(1)Icanbetterstategoalsvsobjectivesandoutputversusoutcome.(2)Ihadn’tdonelogicmodels • beforebutwilltrytheminfuture.

•(1)Grantwriting.(2)Programdevelopment.•

92

Page 96: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 7

Describetwoexamplesofhowspecificskillsandideasfromthistrainingmightimpactdevelopmentandimplementation of your environmental education program:

(1)Creatingmeasurableindicatorsthatdirectlyrelatetothegoalsandobjectivesofprogramming.(2) • Takingastepbackandlookingathowindividualprogramsfeedintooverarchingagencygoals.

•(1)Continuetotrainnewstaffontheprinciplesofevaluationbutincludelogicmodellingintheir •

training.(2)Beclearerabouttheimpactsweareworkingforinourprogramsostaffcandevelop programswithoutcomesthatsupportourgoal(s).

•ImightconsiderchangingsomeofthelanguageIusebuttheresearchonbestpracticesthatwas •

discussedissomethingIwilldelveinto.•

Resultsfromtestingwillgivemeinformationoniftheprogramshouldbeeditedordoneawaywith • altogether.

•(1)Thelogicmodelwillhelpinthedesignofprogrammingforspecificoutcomes.(2)Evaluationwillbe•

consideredandimprovedasaresultofskillslearnedatthisworkshop.•

(1)It’soktotrysomethingandfail,youhavetocontinuallyevaluateandreviseandtweakand • reevaluate,soIwilltryalotmorethingsandnotworrysomuchaboutfailure.(2)Alsowon’twaittill end for eval.

•(1)Understoodthedifferencebetweenoutputandoutcome.(2)Overall,betterlogicmodeldevelopment.•

93

Page 97: Environmental Education Report 2014

Workshop VII, Question 8

Whatdidyoulikemostaboutthisworkshop?

The presenter.•Dr.Powellwasawesome!Greatspeaker!•Networking.•Informalityofitall.Feltverycomfortabletoshareinformation.•Dynamicpresenter.•Thespeakerwasawesome.Iwishhewouldhavespokenmoreabouthispersonalexperiencewith •

evaluation, and discussed types of evaluation. Learningabouttherecentliteraturesurvey.•Interactiveandapplicabletomywork.•Locationwasbeautiful.•Interactingwithotherenvironmentaleducatorsandsharingideas.•Goodspeaker,goodpace,moreinteractive.•Contentofspeaker.•

Workshop VII, Question 9

Whatsuggestionsdoyouhaveforfutureworkshopplanners?

Ibelievethislastworkshopwasthemostproductiveandisagoodmodelforfutureworkshops.Allowed• for more interaction.

ThetwoworkshopsthatIattendedthisyearweremoresuitedtobeginnersinenvironmentaleducation • andIaminterestedintrainingsformoreveteraneducatorsaswellaseducationprogrammanagers.

Writtenagendatoshowtheflowofwhatweweregoingtodo.Onlineregistrationofsomesortandthen• workshopreminders.

Maybesomemorecontentbasedpresenters?E.g.thesciencebehindclimatechange;whatdoesclimate• changemeanforSouthCarolina;waterqualityissues,etc.

EveryworkshopIhaveattendeddiscusseslogicmodelsandpreparingforevaluation,butIhaveyetto • attendaworkshopthatdiscussestheactualprocessofcarryingouttheevaluation.Itwouldbegreatto haveaworkshopthatgaveexamplesoftypesofevaluation,discussedwhentousethesetypesof evaluation, and how to analyze your data.

Iwouldliketoseeusdiscusspossibletopicsanddevelopworkshopsaroundtheneedsofthegroup.•Ithoughtthatthediscussionwehadaboutplanningfor2015wasexcellent.Thethoughts/opinionsof •

othersinthegroupmirroredbyown.Itwaschilly.IwishIhadmoretimetoexplorethelocation.•Leavetimeforfurther,informalnetworking•Ilikethesuggestionoftheopenformat,nosetagendauntilgroupmeetsandthendecidestopicsforthe •

day.Moretimefornetworking.Also,startingontime.•

94

Page 98: Environmental Education Report 2014

Final Comprehensive Survey to All Participants

FinalSurvey,Question1

Pleaseindicatewhichworkshopsyouhaveattended.

Final Comprehensive Survey to All Participants

Final Survey, Question 1

Please indicate which workshops you have attended.

Workshop Respondent Attendance

Database Training 10 (30.3%)

The “How’s and Why’s” of Developing Sustainable Networks and Dynamic Partnerships

11 (33.3%)

EE Capacity & Guidelines for Excellence 8 (24.2%)

Developing Creative Environmental Lesson Plans & Teaching Controversial Issues

15 (45.5%)

Building Synchronicity 6 (18.2%)

Learning to Communicate More Effectively with Reluctant or Resistant Parties 7 (21.2%)

Webinar: Developing Creative Environmental Lesson Plans & Teaching Controversial Issues

11 (33.3%)

What are the Steps for Developing a System for Continual Programmatic Improvement and Capturing your Successes?

13 (39.4%)

0  5  

10  15  20  25  30  35  40  45  50  

Database  Training  

The  “How’s  and  Why’s”  of  Developing  Sustainable  Networks  and  

Dynamic  Partnerships  

EE  Capacity  &  Guidelines  for  Excellence  

Developing  CreaJve  

Environmental  Lesson  Plans  &  Teaching  Controversial  

Issues  

Building  Synchronicity  

Learning  to  Communicate  

More  EfecJvely  

with  Reluctant  or  Resistant  ParJes  

Webinar:  Developing  CreaJve  

Environmental  Lesson  Plans  &  Teaching  Controversial  

Issues  

What  are  the  Steps  for  

Developing  a  System  for  ConJnual  

ProgrammaJc  Improvement  and  Capturing  

your  Successes?  

Please  check  all  workshops  you  have  a[ended  in  the  series  qaQ  

95

Page 99: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question2

Thefollowingskillsweretaughtintheworkshopseries.Pleaseindicatehowoftenyouappliedanyoftheskillsinyourjobsincetheworkshop:

Final Survey, Question 2

The following skills were taught in the workshop series. Please indicate how often you applied any of the skills in your job since the workshop:

Often Sometimes Seldom Never N/A Learning a different way to collect and interpret data.

6 (23.1%)

13 (50.0%)

1 (3.9%)

2 (7.7%)

4 (15.4%)

Understanding what constitutes environmental risk and risk management.

6 (22.2%)

10 (37.0%)

3 (11.1%)

1 (3.7%)

7 (25.9%)

Differentiating and understanding the importance of framing what risks associated with a certain environmental issue are.

6 (22.2%)

11 (40.7%)

2 (7.4%)

1 (3.7%)

7 (25.9%)

Understanding the importance of "Sound Science" in framing risks and risk management discussions and communications with the public.

7 (25.9%)

12 (44.4%)

1 (3.7%)

1 (3.7%)

6 (22.2%)

Knowing a framework for investigating environmental issues.

5 (18.5%)

14 (51.9%)

1 (3.7%)

3 (11.1%)

4 (14.8%)

Knowing strategies for teaching these issues to your target audience, and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

5 (18.5%)

14 (51.9%)

1 (3.7%)

3 (11.1%)

4 (14.8%)

Reflecting upon our role as educators in dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

11 (40.7%)

8 (29.6%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (11.1%)

5 (18.5%)

96

Page 100: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question2(con’t.)

Thefollowingskillsweretaughtintheworkshopseries.Pleaseindicatehowoftenyouappliedanyoftheskillsinyourjobsincetheworkshop:

Final Survey, Question 2 (cont.)

The following skills were taught in the workshop series. Please indicate how often you applied any of the skills in your job since the workshop:

Often Sometimes Seldom Never N/A Identify potential partners. 7

(31.8%) 12

(54.5%) 0

(0.0%) 1

(4.5%) 2

(9.1%) Define communities within networks of partners.

6 (28.6%)

7 (33.3%)

3 (14.3%)

1 (4.8%)

4 (19.1%)

Form connections among traditional and non-traditional partners.

6 (28.6%)

9 (42.9%)

2 (9.5%)

1 (4.8%)

3 (14.3%)

Ability to effectively diffuse information to other partners within my network.

3 (13.6%)

11 (50.0%)

3 (13.6%)

1 (4.5%)

4 (18.2%)

Improve coordination of activities among partners.

2 (9.1%)

12 (54.5%)

3 (13.6%)

1 (4.5%)

4 (18.2%)

Develop a shared understanding of EE Capacity goals and activities.

1 (4.5%)

12 (54.5%)

5 (22.7%)

1 (4.5%)

3 (13.6%)

Identify EE Capacity resources and professional development opportunities.

3 (13.6%)

10 (45.5%)

5 (22.7%)

1 (4.5%)

3 (13.6%)

Increase professional networks in SC, especially through State Consortium.

5 (22.7%)

8 (36.4%)

4 (18.2%)

1 (4.5%)

4 (18.2%)

97

Page 101: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question2(con’t.)

Thefollowingskillsweretaughtintheworkshopseries.Pleaseindicatehowoftenyouappliedanyoftheskillsinyourjobsincetheworkshop:

Final Survey, Question 2 (cont.)

The following skills were taught in the workshop series. Please indicate how often you applied any of the skills in your job since the workshop:

Often Sometimes Seldom Never N/A Develop a shared understanding of the South Carolina State Consortium’s goals and activities.

3 (13.6%)

9 (40.9%)

3 (13.6%)

3 (13.6%)

4 (18.2%)

Using the framework for investigating environmental issues.

2 (9.1%)

9 (40.9%)

6 (27.3%)

2 (9.1%)

3 (13.6%)

Exploring strategies for teaching controversial issues to your target audience and utilizing them as positive pedagogical opportunities.

5 (22.7%)

10 (45.5%)

4 (18.2%)

1 (4.5%)

2 (9.1%)

Dealing with controversial issues and the challenges they raise.

3 (13.6%)

12 (54.6%)

4 (18.2%)

1 (4.5%)

2 (9.1%)

Learning about the importance of Duke Energy Lakes.

1 (4.5%)

9 (40.9%)

1 (4.5%)

4 (18.2%)

7 (31.8%)

Learning more about others. 7 (31.8%)

9 (40.9%)

2 (9.1%)

1 (4.5%)

3 (13.6%)

Learning about grantsmanship.

3 (14.3%)

7 (33.3%)

5 (23.8%)

3 (14.29%)

3 (14.3%)

Learning about septic system regulations.

1 (4.6%)

5 (22.7%)

4 (18.2%)

6 (27.3%)

6 (27.3%)

Gaining a greater sense of how to connect people with nature.

10 (45.5%)

5 (22.7%)

3 (13.6%)

1 (4.5%)

3 (13.6%)

98

Page 102: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question3

Pleaseprovideanexample(s)ofhowyouhaveappliedanyoftheskillstaughtintheworkshopseriestoyourjob.

AlwaysreachingouttoorgsinthesustainablenetworktosupportourB2Ceducationcontent.•Incorporaterisksintomylessonsalongwithsepticregulations.•Increasedthenumberofstatewidepartners.•IwouldliketoapplyskillsIhavelearnedinworkshopstomyjobbutIdidnotacquireanynewskills •

duringtheworkshopsIparticipatedin.Ionlyattendedoneworkshop.•Usinggraphicstohelpexplainglobalclimatechangeandusingpowerpointasanartisticbackground •

while doing a program to increase participants attention and aid in connecting with them.Help develop a lesson plan dealing with an environmental lesson.•ThequestionprioraskshowoftenIusetheseskillswhichisoftenbutIalreadyusedmanyoftheseskills•

inmyjobonadaytodaybasis.Honestly,manyoftheseworkshopsservedasgoodrefreshersbutdid not have a lot of new content.

logic modeling•N/A.TheoneworkshopIattendeddidnotactuallyteachmeanyusefulskills.TheskillsIlistedabove •

ashavingappliedinmyjob,Iemployedmyself,basedonpreviousexperience,knowledgeandtraining.Ididn’tattendanddidn’tgettoviewrecordingyet.•Expanding program evaluation and teaching logic modeling to more staff.•Developingnewwaystoincorporatecontroversialenvironmentalissuesintolessons.•NotenoughtimetorespondtothisquestionsincetheDecember5thworkshop.•

FinalSurvey,Question4

Provideanybarriersorconstraintstoyouapplyingtheskillstaughtintheworkshopseriestoyourjob.

Time•None•Idon’tfeelthatIgainedanynewskills.•Noproblemsnoted.•Timeandlackofsupportstaff•Time and money .....•Someapplicationofskillsisconstrained,limitedorpreventedbasedonworkenvironment•Approvalfrommanagement•Weneedmorestaffinordertoexpandourprogramminginordertoapplysomeoftheskills•Publicopinion•N/A•

99

Page 103: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question5

Towhatextenthaveyousharedtheinformationandskillslearnedfromtheworkshopstoothercoworkersandteammembers?

FinalSurvey,Question6

Provideanybarriersorconstraintstosharing/teachinginformationandskillsfromtheworkshopstocoworkersandteammembers.

None•N/A•Time constraints•Noproblemsnoted.•Time and apathy on their part.•Mostskillslearnedintheworkshoparenotapplicabletomycoworkersand/orteammembers,soIhave•

not found it necessary or useful to share them.Time;makingitapriorityforeveryoneonourteam•Sometimes not receptive to new ideas•Isolatedindepartment,•N/A•

100

Page 104: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question7

Often Sometimes Seldom Never N/A To what extent have you used the EEinSC.org Database to promote your EE information?

0 (0.0%)

4 (22.2%)

6 (33.3%)

4 (22.2%)

4 (22.2%)

To what extent do you use the EEinSC.org Database as a resource for EE information and events?

0 (0.0%)

4 (22.2%)

9 (50.0%)

3 (16.7%)

2 (11.1%)

 

101

Page 105: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question8

HaveyouputinformationontheEEinSC.orgDatabase?

FinalSurvey,Question9

Provideanysuggestionsonhowtoimprove,market,makeaccessibleEEinSC.orgdatabase.

Attachinglinkstomoresites...alinktoeeinsc••

Ineedtofindsomeoneinourorganizationwhowilltakeitonasaresponsibility.Ithinkthedatabaseis• excellent

•Asthedatabasebecomesmorepopulated,Ithinkitwillbemorevaluable.•Nosuggestions.•

•IthinkthereshouldbeanEEinSCfacebookgroup.Facebookgroupsascomparedtoanorganization •

pagemakescommunicationeasierwithinagroupandhavingitasanopengroupmightencourageother SCEEpeopletojointhegroup.Theywillthenlearnaboutthedatabaseandhopefullyaddtheir organization’s information and events.

•Atoolkitforwaystopresenttoorganizationalleaderswouldbehelpfulsincetheyhavetoapprove •

content.•

(1)Ifoundsomereallyusefulinformationaboutgrantprogramsthere--isthereawaytoincludemoreof• that?(2)Isthereawaytoreceivealerts;notificationwhennewresources,events,orprograms areadded?

•Havesomethingtangibletohandoutduringeventsorworkshopswiththedatabaselink.•

102

Page 106: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question10

Approximately,howmanynewpartnershipshaveyouformedthroughparticipationintheworkshopseries?

FinalSurvey,Question11

Provideanexampleofanewpartnershipformedfromtheworkshopseries.

CentralinaCOG,SCWildlifeFederation,ULI,andCarolinaLiving.com•Wecertificationinsc•Outdoor adventure companies in low country•ProjectLearningTree,WoodMagic,TeachersTour•Foundaneworganizationinmyareaandpartneredtoprovidenewresourcesforunderservedkids.•amnowonE.V.Bell’seecertificationsteeringcommittee•StrongerconnectiontoSCDNRandotherNAIInterpreters•N/A•

FinalSurvey,Question12

Pleaseindicatehowmuchyoudesiretheworkshopseriestochangenextyear:

103

Page 107: Environmental Education Report 2014

FinalSurvey,Question13

Provideexamplesorideasofhowthetheworkshopseriescanbeimprovedorchangedfornextyear.

Longerworkshopwithworkinglunch••

Moreadvancedworkshopsforexperiencededucatorandcoordinatorsofeducationprograms.••

Nosuggestions••

Somethingtangibletoleavewith--notjustsomeconceptsofideasonatopic.Nothinggroundbreaking • orreallythatnewwaslearned,andcertainlynotangibleactionplanorideasweregained.

•(1)Iliketheideaofspendingmoretimeononedayforaworkshopandhavingthemlessoften.(2)An •

ideawasbroughtupwhilewewerebrainstormingideasfornextyear’ssessions.Iliketheidea ofuspayingforlunchbutIthink$15issteep.Wouldapersonbeabletopackalunch?

•(1)Examinethetargetaudience.Therewereanumberofveryexperiencededucatorsintheroomand •

somefolksthatwerehearingthingsforthefirsttime.Also,theattendeesranthegamutbetween classroomteacherstonon-profitswithfewprograms.Iwouldprefertoseeofferings tailoredforaspecificset(interpretivemanagers,neweducators,non-profits,classroomee professionals,etc.)(2)Asmentionedinthelastworkshop,maketimefornetworkingand try to use different learning styles in the presentations.

•Fewer,longer,includesoutdooractivityandhotchocolate.•

•(1)Pleasemakesureworkshopcontentisaccuratelydescribedand/orcontentpresentedbyspeaker •

matchesworkshopdescription.(2)Also,Iwouldliketoseeworkshopsonhowtoaddresscertaintarget audiencesmoreeffectively,e.g.K-12education,adulteducation,publicoutreachtechniques.

•Lessworkshops,morenetworkingopportunities,moreinformation/updatesastowhattheconsortiumis•

doingoutsideoftheworkshops•

Maybesomecontentbasedworkshops--climatechange,waterpollution,etc.••

Moreexamples••

Onlineofferings,morefieldbasedopportunities,partnerinvolvementwithhosting(notplanning)the • workshops.

104

Page 108: Environmental Education Report 2014

CONSORTIUM AND WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES

TheSouthCarolinaEnvironmentalEducationConsortiumhashadaproductiveandsuccessfulfirstyearinallaspectsoftheirgoalsandactivities.Someoftheirkeyachievementsinclude:

Building network capacityDefinedtheirmessage,mission,andshortandlong-termgoals•Createdtheenvironmentaleducationdatabaseandtaughtandpromotedhowtoutilizeit•Completed a needs assessment of environmental education in SC•Starteddevelopmentofastate-wideenvironmentalliteracyplan•Presentedandattendednumerousanddiversemeetingsandconferences•FormalandinformalpartnershipshavebeenformedthroughtheConsortiumandcontinuetoexpandthe•

EEnetworkwithinandoutsidethestate

Training and professional developmentConductedeightenvironmentaleducationworkshopsincludingawebinarthatfocusedonspecificskills,•

strategies, and practicesConductedresearchtodevelopacertificationprogramandhavecurrentlyformedcommitteesforthe •

next phase

Evaluation ConductedacomprehensiveevaluationoftheConsortium’sfirstyearofactivitiesandfacilitated •

planning meetings to strengthen next year’s Consortium activitiesTakingstepstolearnfromotherestablishedconsortiumsandtosharelessonsandteachotherstateshow•

to develop an environmental education consortium

AstheConsortiumcontinuestoevolveintoitssecondyear,therearealsosomeareastoimproveandstrengtheninthevariousactivities.Basedonthefeedbackprovidedintheindividualsurveysandtheplanningmeetings,the next section of the report offers insight for Consortium planners.

105

Page 109: Environmental Education Report 2014

OUTREACH AND PRESENTATIONS

Radio and Interviews

SCETVRadioShow–DougKeel(SpeakingofSchools–http://etvradio.org/rss)•

TalkingwithDougKeelonSpeakingofSchools,wediscussedtheeffortsoftheSCEnvironmentalEducationConsortiumandourinitiativesfor2014.Mostimportantlyforteacherswhomayhavebeenlisteningtothepodcast,thepotentialforCertifiedEducationalUnits(CEUs).ThroughournewlyformedpartnershipwithSCETV,wewereabletoturnourenvironmentaleducationworkshopseriesintoanenvironmentaleducationmoduleonSCETV’swebsitewhereteachersfromacrossSouthCarolinaturntoforfurtheringeducationandrecertification.ThisEEModulewillbeavailableinFebruary2015.

YourDay–ClemsonUniversityJune4thtoairJune30thandAugust15th• (http://yourdayradio.com/archives/YDAudioarch/YD140804/140804b.mp3)

SpeakingonYourDayatClemsonUniversitywithhostDonnaLondonoftheJimSelfCenterontheFuture,we discussed our statewide initiative of South Carolina’s Great Outdoors. This initiative ultimately led to our applicationtotheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencygranttobeginastatewideinitiativeonEnvironmentalEducationinanattempttocreateawarenessofournaturalresources.Onthissegment,wewereabletopromotetheworkshopseriesandcreateresourcesforourinitiative.

Presentations

UniversityofSouthCarolina,SocialWorkSeries–GreeningofSocialWork,February2014, • Columbia,SouthCarolina

EEASCConference,April2014,SeabrookIsland,SouthCarolina•ProjectLearningTree,March,2014,Columbia,SouthCarolina•EdTechConference,October2014,Greenville,SouthCarolina•RuralResourceCoalition-StateBoardMeeting&AnnualMeeting,August2014,Allendale,South •

CarolinaSoutheasternScienceCouncil,July2014,Columbia,SouthCarolina•SustainableSC–UniversityofSouthCarolina,May2014,Columbia,SouthCarolina•SustainableMidlands,April2014,Columbia,SouthCarolina•SCEconomicDevelopmentConference,August2014,Charleston,SouthCarolina•SCSquaredConference,October2014,MyrtleBeach,SouthCarolina•STEMConference,September2014,Spartanburg,SouthCarolina•BluewaysStakeholderMeeting,June2014,Columbia,SouthCarolina•SCNature-BasedTourismAssociation,August2014,Charleston,SouthCarolina•NorthAmericanAssociationofEnvironmentalEducation,October2014,Ottawa,Canada•RuralResourceCoalitionAnnualStateMeeting,Columbia,SouthCarolina,December2014•

106

Page 110: Environmental Education Report 2014

FivemembersoftheSCEEConsortiumrecievedscholarshipstoattendtheNorthAmericanAssociationEnvironmentalEducationConferenceinOttawa,Canada,October2014.

107

Page 111: Environmental Education Report 2014

SUSTAINING PROJECTS2015 Planning SessionDecember5,2014

Workshop Series:

One open conference methodology as a way for meeting•Onlyfourworkshopsperyearwithmorecontacttimeateach•Outdoor activities at each•Moreopportunitiestonetworkateach•Consortiummembertosponsoreach;givethemtimetoshowcasetheirspace;helpprovidespeaker•Chargea$15forlunch;remainderofmoneywouldbegiventohostmemberorganization•Aweekendeventmightgiveopportunityforthosethatwouldnototherwisemakeit•

HousevideosonEEinSC.orgforaccessibilityinpotentialtraininghourswhichinclude:• NationalAssociationforInterpretationDNR:MarineResourceDivision;Wildlife&FreshwaterFisheriesDivision•SCRecreation&ParksAssociation•

PartnerwithSCETVagainforEnvironmentalEducationCEUModule•Alwaysgiveupdateofwherewearewith2015objectives•Encourage attendees to forward information to at least ten people•Haveanotherdatabasetrainingworkshop•

Database (www.EEinSC.org)

Goalwouldbetogetastaffperson•Sendoutdatabasecheatsheet•Monthlyemailreminderstoeveryoneinthedatabase•SendoutGoogleAnalyticstoeveryoneinthedatabase–moreamenabletousing•Researching‘self-promote’linkonhomepage•Potentialtospotlightanorganizationonthehomepage•Encouragememberstosolicitatleasttenorganizations•

Department of Education

SetmeetingwithStateDepartmentofEducationandotherstateagencies(DNR,SCPRT,etc.)inorderto• stress importance of Environmental Education for South Carolina Schools and economy

EncourageSciencestaffatDepartmentofEducationtodistributeStateandNationalupdateswhich • couldincludebutnotlimitto:

NextGeneration•Standards•TeacherWorkshops•

108

Page 112: Environmental Education Report 2014

SUSTAINING PROJECTS

Environmental Literacy Plan (ELP)

WorkwithDepartmentofEducationforwhatversionwouldsuitSouthCarolina•NoChildLeftInside:iffundingavailable,willnotreceiveunlessstatehasELP•Compilationofexamplestate’sELPs(Maryland,NorthCarolina,NewMexico)•SetmeetingwithStateDepartmentofEducationandotherstateagencies(DNR,SCPRT,etc.)inorderto•

stress importance of Environmental Education for South Carolina Schools and economy in order for an ELP

Hispanic Outreach

MeetwithProjectLearningTreetolookatpossibilityofoutreachcollaboration•PartnerwithDepartmentofNaturalResourcesastheyhaveanewlycreatedpositionforHispanic •

outreachResearch Spanish Emersion Schools across South Carolina•PartnerwithCollegeofCharleston’sSpanishDepartment•PartnerwithUniversityofSouthCarolina’sCenterforSustainabilitytosecureintern•Secure funding from Hispanic Outreach Grants •

Strength & Sustainability

Encourage participants to add Consortium information to anything they are presenting•EncourageparticipantstopartnerwithSCNHCongrantssupportingEnvironmentalEducation•Encourage participants to showcase the 2014 SC Environmental Education Consortium Evaluation•Multiplegrantshavebeenwrittenandwewillknowinfirstquarter2015iftheywereawarded.•

109

Page 113: Environmental Education Report 2014

110

Page 114: Environmental Education Report 2014

IMPACT SHARING

The following passages illustrate the direct and indirect impacts the Consortium’s activities have had on participants and their respective institutions.

Email 1 from Kim Bailey, EE in GeorgiaThe“newlook”youmadeforSCinspiredTNtoalsoupdatetheirbanner.Westillhaveafewtweakstomake,buthere’sapeakatwhattheyhaveinprogress-http://review.eeintennessee.org/.

Email 2:ThanksforincludingusontheworkshopeventattheEdventure.Fascinating.

Yesterday,wewereencouragedto“signup”atthissite.Wewanttobesupportiveofyourmissionandarenowregistered! The mission is to showcase facets of the Carolinas and educate local and national audience. Thesitecarries25articlesonthefactorsofgreenhomeandsustainablelivingonlineplusaglossaryofterms.And,viatheNCandSCWildlifeFederations,wearemounting12articlesfortheCOMPASSeNewsandsitethatwilldescribethreatenedandendangeredCarolinaspecies.Andofcourse,thereareatonofvisitorfeaturesonthelikesofGardens,Trails,History,etc. BeopentoinsightfulcontentonSCGOthemes.Coachus. Lauren,inaddition,youmentionedharnessingmediatocommunicatetheSCGreatOutdoorslaunch.Soabout33%ofourbrowser/readeraudienceislocal.Theremainderarepotentvisitorcandidates.Ifyoufeelouraudience/toolswillbeappropriatetocarrytheSCGOmessage,let’stalk. Thanks.Yourworkispowerful.

Email 3 from Peter Phillips, Jenkins InstituteTheworkoftheSouthCarolinaEnvironmentalEducationConsortiumhasimpactedtheworkoftheJenkinsInstituteinthefollowingways:

AwarenessTheworkoftheConsortiumhasinspiredonanindividualandorganizationlevelJenkinsInstitute’seducationandawarenessofenvironmentaleducationasatoolforchange.Thisisevidencedandhasbeenreinforcedbyactionsandactivitiesthatsupportthemaintenanceofanoncampusvegetableandflowergarden,introducingfarm animals to manage the land and exploring opportunities to open access to waterways on our property.

CollaborationWhilstcollaborationhasbeenanintegralpartofJenkins180yearhistory,theconsortiumhasofferedbothnewpartnersandnewopportunitiesforworkingwitholdpartnersinnewways.Newpartnershavebeenimpressedwiththepotentialofour50plusacresontheAshleyRiverandthepossibleoptionsforcommunityaccessandeconomicdevelopment.Wehavebeenchallengedtolookatourresourcesinnewwaysbyexploringcollaborativearrangementwithfarmersmarkets.

111

Page 115: Environmental Education Report 2014

ProgrammingIntegratingthisnewlearningandcollaborationinourworkdirectlywithyoungpeopleandtheirfamiliesoffersopportunitiesforalastingimpactthatwehopetoleverageaswetakethisworkforward.AtoneofConsortiummeetingsarelationshipwasestablishedwithSouthCarolinaAquariumwhoofferedtosponsoranaquariumvisitforyouthatJenkinsInstitute.

Going ForwardAswelooktothefutureandthelessonsfromthisyear,andasweconsiderwhatourcontributioncouldbe,theopportunitiesfornewlessonsandgrowthisclear.ThisisbestcapturedintheLIFElinediscussiondocumentproposedbyPeterPhillipswhichprovidesafocusforcollaborativepartnershipsseekingtodevelopinnovativeand integrated solutions through environmental education which would promote:

CommunityDevelopment•YouthLeadership•EconomicDevelopment•Cultural Competence•

Consortium Member Impacts

I think this sums up our consortium. “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.” –Aristotle We can work and work and work to educate South Carolina but a single entities, we won’t get very far. By coming together, we can move forward and create change quicker and longer lasting than we could ever do alone. Laura Kirk, SCPRT

This is my first workshop as I just learned about the consortium. However, my hope is to inject forestry education in the EE process. Calvin Bailey, SC Forestry Commission

Having participated twice with the SCNHC/EEASC I felt that my interaction with these workshops helped me with networking with like-minded resources and learning from them. Also learned processes which would assist me with WILD in SC in which being an active part of the EE learning community serves this organization. Nancy Thompson, WILD in SC

I work with pre-service teachers and in-service teachers specializing in ‘Children of Poverty’. The Consortium hammered home the message that EE is so necessary for our children. It’s not just fun, it is academically, socially and psychologically crucial that we get children outside in natural areas (not playgrounds). As teachers, we can put the information learned into practice. Lisa Pike, Francis Marion University

The Consortium allowed me to link with other EE organizations in South Carolina for engaging and promoting our similar goals. Matthew Johnson, Audubon South Carolina

The EE Consortium has been a great opportunity to meet other environmental educators from around the state and exchange ideas. Our organization has started to use the database and will share it with other organizations in the area. Hope Matthews, City of Rock Hill

The Consortium has been a great start to bridging the gap and connecting environmental educators and their programs and resources across the state. This is a much needed network in SC! Sara Pachota, Clemson University

I believe the workshops will help organizations throughout the state, raise their knowledge, best practices, and better communication with each other and our audiences. Whit McMillan, SC Aquarium

112

Page 116: Environmental Education Report 2014

“Public lands are not just about recreation. They are about nature’s intrinsic value. Wilderness promotes humility, suggesting that we don’t know it all and never will. In

wilderness are answers to questions we’ve not yet learned to ask. Wilderness is also about accommodatingnon-humanlifethat’sfreetoevolveinwildplaceslikethosethatshaped

their genetic heritage. There’s a growing population of 318 million Americans driving machinesnearlyeverywhereandradicallyalteringnearlyeveryhabitat.AsEdwardAbbey

wrote, ‘We have a right to be here, yes, but not everywhere, all at once, and in such great numbers’ Let’s leave as much as possible for the wild things.

And for the wildness within us humans too.” – Howie Wolke, outdoor guide and vice President or Wilderness Watch. Source:

BlueRidgeOutdoors.com, July 2014.

113


Recommended