+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental...

Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental...

Date post: 19-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: phungkhanh
View: 235 times
Download: 6 times
Share this document with a friend
256
Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating A study of Kosterhavets Marine National Park Joseph Santhi Pechsiri Master of Science Thesis Stockholm 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating

A study of Kosterhavets Marine National Park

J o s e p h S a n t h i P e c h s i r i

Master of Science ThesisStockholm 2009

Page 2: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past
Page 3: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating A study of Kosterhavets Marine National Park

By Joseph Santhi Pechsiri

Advisor: Fedrik Grondahl

Master’s Thesis

M.Sc. Sustainable Technology

Department of Industrial Ecology

Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan

2009

Page 4: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

TRITA-IM 2009:16 ISSN 1402-7615 Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology www.ima.kth.se

Page 5: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Abstract

Koster archipelago is high in diversity; Koster has atleast 200 unique species, and also contains various elements attracting a lot of tourists. Koster archipelago resembles various factors that are highly suitable for recreational boating. However, this may become a massive environmental threat. This study investigates the environmental implications of recreational boating and the factors facilitating the impacts by conducting a systems analysis of recreational boating. The investigation has led to the identification of releases of NOx, COx, HCs, and TBT, among other pollutants. In addition, the investigation have estimated the possible total emissions amounts of boats in Koster, with approximately 850 000 kg CO2, 2500 kg NOx, 256 kg sewage Nitrogen, 32 kg sewage Phosphorous, 126.6 kg, and a minimum of 3.2 kg of TBT released per year.

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction 1

1.1 Location of Study 1 1.2 Prologue 1 1.3 Aims, Objectives, Scopes, and Boundaries 2

2.0 Literature Review 4

3.0 Methodology 20

3.1 Framework overview 20 3.2 Emission Estimation Methodology 28

4.0 Result 35

4.1 Process Inventories Identification Result 35 4.2 Impact Assessment of Recreational Boating Result 36 4.2.5 Emission Estimates Summary 52

5.0 Discussion 54

6.0 Conclusion 63

7.0 Acknowledgement 64

8.0 Reference 65

Appendix A Boats and Ships Registered with the Swedish Transport Agency 68

Appendix B Filtered Data Collected on Registered Boats and Engine Specs 204

Appendix C Fuel Estimation for 805 Boats using Regression and Means 225

Appendix D Questionnaire 245

Page 6: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past
Page 7: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

1.0 Introduction

1

1.1 Location of Study

Koster islands are located to the west coast of Sweden in the vicinity of the Norther Skaggerak Sea. The archipelago consists mainly of 2 islands: the main island Sydkoster (South Koster) and the natural reserved Nordkoster (North Koster). The koster islands will become a marine national park by mid 2009, which include approximately 450 km2 of area, excluding some islands, and would be bordering the to be proposed Ytre Hvaler marine national park over the Norwegian border (Hambrey J., 2008). Kosterhavets Marine National Park map is shown to the right with the red line representing the border of the marine national park.

Fig. 1. Map over Koster provided by personals at Tjarno marine biology laboratory, Goteborg University.

The Kosterhavets Marine National Park covers a variety of terrain. Fjords, terrestrial and marine based ecosystem are within the boundaries of the marine national park with 80% of its area are under water. The park has atleast 200 species of plants and animals that are unique to Koster. There are species of Porifera, Cnidaria, Annelida, Echiura, Arthropoda, Mollusca, Brachiopoda, Bryozoa, Echinodermata, and Chordata, among others (Jonsson L.G. et al, 2004). The underwater profile of Koster vary between several meters deep in the inter-tidal zone up to more than 200 meters deep in the trenches, which also serves as the main shipping route from the South to the North, cutting through the Kosterhavets Marine National Park area, as shown on the dotted line in figure 1 (Bohuslän, 2009). The island itself contains several infrastructures to support the human population with some accommodation available for tourists. The island is almost 100% car free, making the island ideal for outdoor activities, which is appealing for outdoors-loving tourists, especially hikers and cyclers. There is also a daily public ferry service between Koster and Strömstad.

1.2 Prologue

In the past, environmental concerns are mainly due to fishing where unsustainable fishing practices have led to a decline of corals and various marine life in the area. Today, however, Koster has become a symbol of sustainable fisheries, which have been widely practiced, partly due to the ongoing dialogue between fishermen and scientists in the region (Hambrey J., 2008). There is also a marine biology laboratory in the area (in Tjärnö), which will also serve as a visitor center for Kosterhavets Marine National Park. Now those problems regarding fisheries are limited, tourism is the next main environmental threat to be observed.

The archipelago is almost 100% car free, the main pollutant emitters are from households, marine vessels, touristic accommodations and service centers. Since the area is underwater by more than 80% of its total area, the area is highly suitable for boating, especially during

Page 8: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

2

summers (which is the main boating season) when the weather is not too cold and the water is not frozen.

The human population within the area is 24000, with 1000 people living adjacent to the water. There are many summer houses in the area as well. The main vehicles used on the island are bicycles and boats. By Koster being a marine national park, with Norther Koster being a natural reserve and the area covering various types of prestine terrains, in combination with the fact that more than 80% of Kosterhavets Marine National Park’s area is underwater, Koster becomes a perfect boating destination during the summers. Furthermore, the existence of a shipping route and the fact that Koster is very close to Strömstad (a major boating destination) gives Koster the perfect condition to have heavy boat traffic.

There have been very limited studies on the problems of recreational boating. Recreational boating has been seen by many as a not-so-environmental damaging activity, which is made more prominent by the lack of researches found and the need for this study to be conducted using several internet-based sources . Researches done by Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) suggest recreational boating as the main environmental impact contributor of all water based activities towards the biota as a whole. Baden S. et al (2003) suggested causes of the rapid decline of Seagrass in the West coast of Sweden, notably the Skaggerak Sea area, to include recreational boating. Davenport J. and Davenport J.L. (2006) also highlighted the significance of boating when tourists come in mass. Pechsiri J.S. (2006) also emphasizes boating related activities’ impacts on coastal environments. From these findings, it was concluded that the main aim of this project is to investigate the environmental implications of recreational boating, to provide enough information for decision makers to take into consideration of environmental problems of recreational boating when creating policies.

In this study, there are 8 main chapters. The aims and objectives will be discussed in the next in this chapter. Chapter 2 will discuss the framework required to comprehend the environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past works that have studied the environmental impacts of recreational boating. Chapter 3 will demonstrate the main conceptual methodology and framework used in this study. Chapter 4 will show the results of literature searches, data collection, and on site observations to demonstrate the environmental implications of recreational boating. Chapter 5 will discuss the uncertainties and problems that occur in this study and how they can be improved in future studies. The project will finally conclude itself in chapter 6. The acknowledgement, showing the people who have contributed in providing information and expertise for the completion of the project, will be shown in chapter 7. The references can be found in Chapter 8, which is followed by 3 more appendixes that contain necessary information vital to calculations required in this study.

1.3 Aims, Objectives, Scopes, and Boundaries

The ultimate aim of this project is to semi quantitatively investigate the environmental implications of recreational boating. The impacts will not only observe the direct impacts of

Page 9: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

3

recreational boating but identify the causes, the factors that facilitate the impacts which are important for predicting the distribution, the magnitude, and the secondary impacts. In order to fulfill the ultimate aim, several objectives are to be fulfilled. The objectives are as follows:

• To inventory the causes, processes, of impacts that occur due to recreational boat.

• To investigate various emissions or environmental impacts semi quantitatively. If quantitative data becomes unfeasible, then qualitative investigation will be applied.

• It is well established that a lot of boats used internal combustion engines to operate. This often leads the production of NOx, which has many environmental problems. Hence environmental related problems of NOx should be investigated and the quantification of NOx must be achieved, atleast semi quantitatively.

• If there are any uncertainties within the emissions, i.e. differences in emission factors used by various institutions, and if possible then the reason behind the differences should be investigated. This is to promote a clearer perspective of the environmental implications of recreational boating.

• Any emissions are found should be further investigated to understand the environmental implications of that particular emission and how various factors may facilitate the impacts to create other environmental impacts at greater scale.

• Causes of emissions should be thoroughly studied as the factors that lead to the release of emissions govern the amount and contributes in facilitating the impacts in to the environment. By understanding the causes, the mitigation measures may be suggested.

• Since the Baltic Sea is known for its Eutrophication problem and that the Skaggerak Sea connects the flow of water between the Baltic and the North Sea, any factors leading to the loading of nutrients should be investigated and if possible calculated.

• Lastly, because the project is only allowed for a period of 6 months, starting from January until June and this project needs to be submitted within the timeframe as a fulfillment of the Masters program, the project is to be completed by that time.

There are several scopes, boundaries, and assumptions applied in this study. First of all, the study mainly, and will only focus on the Kosterhavets Marine national Park. This means that the study will mainly consider factors within the geographical region (+ - 250 meters) of the national park. The boating season is usually observed to be during the summer season. In this research it is assumed that the boating season lasts 100 days (approximately 3 months of June, July, and August, and a little bit into May and September). Since the boating speed is very hard to be determined, after looking at many boating sales websites, it is assumed that the average speed of boats would be 10 knots, or 18.5 km/h, which is obtainable by most boats. Another assumption made is that each boats traveled will contain 1 person. Although usually there are more than 1 person that conduct boating but the boats often are able to be operated by 1 person. Other assumptions made will be mentioned later in the report.

Page 10: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

2.0 Literature Review

There have been previous researches conducted to understand impacts of recreational boating. However, most of previous works are more focused on interactions of boating on a targeted organism or problem rather than exploring the problems of recreational boating as a whole, which is the aim of this work. In order to achieve the understanding of the environmental implications of boating, previous research frameworks and previous investigated environmental problems of recreational boating are reviewed. Furthermore, various possible frameworks to be applied to this investigation are also reviewed.

2.1 Associated Environmental Problems

A study by Pechsiri J. (2006) in Thailand suggests a variety of recreational activities involving boats, including snorkeling, diving, sea walking, and sightseeing, where only 25% of the tourist believed that coral degradation in the area was influenced by human activities whereas 17% believed the degradation was influenced by heat. In addition boats investigated was seen to be the causes of some emissions and a direct contributor to environmental degradation where the report revealed sightings of people physically harming corals in many ways that involve direct contact. Although whether natural influence or anthropogenic influence is the main contributor to coral degradation was not proven but the study suggests anthropogenic influence to remain a significant contributor. Davenport J. and Davenport J. (2006) revealed that environmental damage due to divers are the result of spear guns usage, collection of benthic organisms like crabs and lobsters, feeding large fish, physical contact of corals, and suffocating sever benthic organisms (i.e. corals) by causing benthic sediment resuspension which mainly compose of silt. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) reviewed several previous studies that have proven disturbances to the environment due to water-based activities, where it is revealed that direct disturbance (i.e. noise and human use of abiotic elements of the ecosystem that is being used as refuge by animals) may be as important as indirect disturbances (i.e. how reduction of primary productivity would impact the whole foodchain). Although some previous studies involving the use of experimental ponds suggest fish production is not affected by the use of outboard motors but emigration, resdistribution, and reproduction failures have been found to result from various environmental disturbances including boating and sounds generated during the boating process. Bellefleur D. et al (2009) revealed disturbances to Marbled Murrelets due to boat traffic where more than 41% of the birds observed react to an incoming boats (11.7% flew and 30.8% dove) with the number of reacted birds increasing inversely with boat-bird distance and that more than 82% of the birds that flew left the feeding area. A study by Buerger R. et al (2000) records the number of impact sites that have been anthropogenically influenced and naturally mitigated. It was noted however that the natural processes which mitigates the impact did not necessary reverse the impacts such that the environmental conditions would return to the previous state but may have altered the impacted environment to a set of new conditions. In addition, the investigation shows the rapidness of the environmental change where 29.3% of the impact areas documented on Masonboro Island was mitigated naturally in 6 months.

4

Page 11: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Sediment resuspension and mixing due to propeller action and boat cruising are one of the impacts due to boating. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) suggested that when propeller action exists near the bottom of a water body, dispersion of sediments occur. Yousef et al (1980) observed how the levels of phosphorous in lakes with limited boat use may be affected by mixing from motor boats. Limited change in dissolved oxygen was recorded as the result of mixing from motorboats but significant differences in chlorophyll a concentrations, phosphorus amounts and turbidity levels were observed. An experiment was undertaken where water samples collected after 2 – 6 hours of mixing by motors showed a 39% increase in total phosphorous (29% increase of total phosphorous under control conditions) and 46 mg/m2 of orthophosphorous resuspended for a 2.55 m. deep lake with low surface area pertaining to oligotrophic and mesotrophic profiles. Meanwhile, results of a 1.5 m. deep lake with larger surface area and pertaining to hypereutrophic profiles showed an increase of total phosphorous by 55% after mixing (which is a 5% increase of total phosphorous under control conditions) and 105 mg/m2 of orthophosphorous resuspension was observed. Apart from sediment resuspension, there are also other problems related to nutrients. Boating activities, such as littering and sewage deposition, have been found to lead to deposition of nutrients and organic compounds. This can become problematic in several senses. According to Boeker E. and Grondelle R.V. (2001), organic substances like carbohydrates would allow bacteria to oxidize these carbon compounds as demonstrated in the following reaction.

Nitrogen is arguably the most important element for plant and microorganism growth. Hence a direct release of ammonia forms of nitrogen, nitrate, or even nitrogen itself would enhance the nitrification and nitrate assimilation (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005). The release of nitrogen and phosphorous lead to increases in nutrient loading amounts. If this trend continues, problems like eutrophication, algae bloom, and regime shifts may arise. (Hakanson L. and Blenckner T., 2008).

Boating in shallow waters, berthing/anchoring, launching, and beaching can also become environmental problems. Anchoring and boating activities have the capacity to degrade coastal environments as portrayed by Pechsiri J.S. (2006), where corals are often damaged by anchoring activities. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) suggested that flora and fauna of the littoral zone will be affected from the abrasions that are caused by berthing, launching, and beaching. Propeller action can also cut through macrophytes, whereas the forces exerted from the propeller can cause uprooting of macrophytes.

Another direct physical impact suggested is also from boat wake, also called boat wash. According to Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980), the cause of waves is due to the power required to move the boat being dissipated on to the adjacent water body. The waves can lead to erosion to abiotic elements in the coastal ecosystem, i.e. cliffs and rocks. These waves can also cause uprooting of macrophytes. The amount of power that is transferred on to the water body depends on many factors, i.e. boat design, engine design and capacity, boat load, among others. If the boat is cruising in the same direction as the water current and that the boat is a transom stern design, large transverse waves maybe generated. The height of the waves and

5

Page 12: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

the energy contained in it is governed by speed, boat design, environmental conditions, and engine design. How these waves affect the shoreline and the sediments remains a complex issue. This complexity was explored by Bishop M.J. (2007) where benthic organism-sediment relationship has been found to be more complex than originally explored, of which it was originally believed that the benthic fauna and flora are affected by the resuspension of fine sediments. The study revealed that the taxonomy assemblage between a wash and no wash zone remained similar with changes in the taxonomy assemblages dynamically changing accordingly with environmental conditions. However Bishop M.J. (2008) suggested that the composition of epifauna changes significantly after boat wake exposure on sea grass. “Five-fold” decrease of the number of amphipods and polychaetes, and other significant decline of invertebrates’ taxa were recorded.

Antifouling processes have been applied to marine transport since ancient history to prevent submerged materials, i.e. boat hulls and fishing gear, from the settlement of organisms. Fouling of organisms began with the process of bacterial driven micro-fouling, and followed by macro-fouling of invertebrates. During the sailing periods, including periods like the 1700s and 1800s, ships were copper or lead bottomed for anti fouling purposes (Melander C. et al, 2009). The modern common practice for antifouling is to use an organo-tin biocide compound known as Tributyl Tin (TBT), which became popular since the 1960s. TBT has been found to leach in to the adjacent water bodies and has been found to be toxic to benthic invertebrates at concentrations between 0.1 to 100 µg/l and effect gastropods’ reproduction at concentrations greater than 0.001 µg/l (Lalli C.M. and Parsons T.R., 2004). Meanwhile, Copper, which is still being used on some vessels in the modern days, is both a necessity as a nutrient and toxic at excessive concentrations (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005).

Estimating emissions from copper and TBT is difficult, especially when Cu and TBT are prohibited from use for recreational boating in most parts of Sweden. Leon L.M. and Warnken J. (2008) estimated the Cu leaching rate to be 8.2 µg/cm2 of submerged antifouled area per day. Eklund B. et al (2008) have experimented on sediment and water samples in Stockholm marinas to determine levels of heavy metals and TBT. Despite the fact that TBT , Cu or Irgarol containing paints are prohibited from use, it was believed that they are being painted over by non TBT containing paint, since sediments sampled found top layers containing concentrations of TBT.

The nature of which these contaminants have on the environment is still an ongoing study due to its complexity. Apart from its toxicity mentioned earlier, Davenport J. and Davenport J.L. (2006) have mentioned a secondary impact that these contaminants may cause. TBT, for example, may have cause a lot of harm to the local biota population, which is the main competitor and pressure for invasive species. The decrease of the local biota population would increase the likelihood for a successful bioinvasion.

Impacts from engines have also been reported. According to Heywood J.B. (1988), internal combustion engines are the main source of noise. Every sequence of the operating cycle of a reciprocating engine emits a certain amount of noise which is generated by aerodynamics, combustion, and mechanical excitations due to combustion. There are several ways to

6

Page 13: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

classify various types of engines for recreational boats. The main types that are observable are outboard engines and inboard engines. However, as evident in Appendix A, some engines used in Sweden are stern drives, shaft drives, sail drives, among others. In this research, these are considered inboards since the majority of these types of engines have its main engine inboard with its propeller shaft outboard. The combustion within these engines depends on various factors, i.e. fuel type and temperature. Combustion is achieved through the transformation of fuel into CO2 and H2O. Under ideal stoichiometric combustion portrayed by Guzzella L. and Onder C.H. (2004), the combustion process is achieved by the following reaction:

or as explicitly demonstrated by Guzzella L. and Onder C.H. (2004) as:

where under the assumption that the air is normally composed of 79% of N2 and 21% O2 Guzzella L. and Onder C.H. (2004) states that:

, where y = a/b

From Heywood J.B. (1988)’s Gasoline and light Diesel formula, which is CnH1.87n and CnH1.8n respectively, it is possible to estimate that the amount of air needed for stoichiometric Gasoline combustion is 14.5 kg and 14.4 kg for light Diesel.

In order to achieve the ideal combustion process, maximum combustion efficiency is required. The combustion efficiency is governed by controlling 3 Ts: Time, Turbulence, and Temperature, where sometimes the amount of input Oxygen is also controlled (Persson P.O., 2005). The 3 Ts mentioned differ accordingly with each engine’s designs. However, since simplicity, high power to weight ratio and high ruggedness are favored for recreational boats’ engines, often the suitable conditions for an ideal combustion process is not achieved, hence resulting in incomplete combustions that lead to emissions of various pollutants, including unburnt hydrocarbons (HCs) and NOx. These NOx can also result in the generation of low altitude ozone (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005). The following reactions show the principal reactions of nitrogen oxides formulation:

It is discussed in Heywood J.B. (1988) that the ratio of NO : NO2 is “negligibly small” for spark-ignition engines, whereas NOx for diesel engines can be as high as 30%. NO2 is said to have formed from NO in the flame zone, following the reaction shown below:

7

Page 14: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

This NO2 can be converted back to NO as follows:

Apart from the mentioned reaction of NOx formation, there are other factors that contribute to the type of Nitrogen compounds formulated in the exhaust. A study by Kowalski J. and Torelko W. (2009) on NOx emissions modeling for 2 stroke engines revealed the involvement of N2O as well. In addition, it is noted that temperature and pressure are the 2 most important parameters that influence the final Nitrogen oxides concentrations. Hence, in reality the following summarizes the reaction achieved through combustion in an internal combustion engine:

In order to understand the general processes of how these emissions are formulated, it is necessary to explore the processes of the engines, how these processes contribute to generating emissions, and what factors should be considered.

Internal combustion engines work in operating cycles (also called strokes). In general, there are 4 operating sequences, the intake stroke, the compression stroke, the power stroke, and the exhaust stroke. A 4 stroke engine would undergo all 4 sequences and requiring 2 crankshaft revolutions to complete a cycle. A 2 stroke engine, under simpler designs, would complete all 4 sequences in 1 crankshaft revolution and hence offer more power when the engine size is relatively similar.

In the intake stroke, the piston travels downwards and the inlet valve opens, drawing in fresh air. The inlet valve then closes and enters the compression stroke. In the compressions stroke, the piston travels up and compresses the air. The combustion then takes place at the end of the compression stroke. The method of combustion depends on if the engine is spark-ignited or compression-ignited. As the crank angle reaches the top dead center and combustion takes place, the power stroke (also known as the expansion stroke) is then initiated. During the power stroke, the combustion process increases the pressure and temperature within the cylinder and pushes the piston downwards. As the crank angle reaches the bottom dead center, the exhaust stroke begins. In the exhaust stroke, the exhaust valve opens and the piston travels upwards until the crank angle reaches the top dead center, expelling the burnt gases. As the crank angle reaches the top dead center, the valve closes and begins the cycle over again (Heywood J.B., 1988).

8

Page 15: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

The 2 stroke engine follows a similar set of sequences in 1 operating cycle, but the nature of completion and initiation of each sequence differs due to the simpler design of 2 stroke engines. The operating cycle for a 2 stroke engines can be divided in to 2 sequences: the compression stroke and the power stroke, where the intake and exhaust of air are processed in parallel. In the compression stroke, the inlet port is closed while the exhaust port is also closed by the position of the piston which is moving upwards, compressing the air. Combustion is initiated when the crank angle reaches the top dead center. The Start of the combustion begins the power stroke. The explosion pushes the piston downwards. As the piston move downwards and the crank angle is going towards the bottom dead center, it first uncovers the exhaust port. The exhaust gases leave the cylinder by the process called the “exhaust blowdown” process. As the crank angle approaches the bottom dead center further, it uncovers the inlet port which takes in new air. The cycle then repeats again (Heywood J.B., 1988).

Inlet Valve

Exhaust Valve

Piston

Crank

Exhaust Valve

Inlet Valve

Piston

Crank

Exhaust Valve

Inlet Valve

Piston

Crank

Exhaust Valve

Inlet Valve

Piston

Crank

Intake Compression Power Exhaust

Fig 2. 4 sequences of 1operating cycle

Fig 3. Operating cycle of a 2 stroke engine

Piston Piston

Piston

Compression Power

9

Page 16: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

From these illustrations, it can be concluded that the 3 Ts are controlled differently under a 2 stroke and a 4 stroke design. Guzella L. and Onder C.H. (2004) have demonstrated in the investigation on spark-ignited engines that an early ignition timing within the cycle would result in better combustion efficiency but would also result in greater NOx output due to increase in peak pressure and burnt gas temperatures. The 4 stroke design would definitely increase the amount of time for combustion, but may lead to thermal NOx generation. The 2 stroke design however has less time for the combustion to take place efficiently, increasing the risk of incomplete combustion which results in higher CO and HC emissions. In addition to the efficiency differences as the result of the stroke design, other design factors to allow the engine to run smoothly also affect the amount of emissions produced. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) pointed out that a special crankcase design is required for a 2 stroke engine to avoid a condition known as “hydraulic lock” and this crank case design have led to losses of fuel. Figures for fuel loss varies from 10% – 20% up to 56%. Davenport J. and Davenport J. (2006) suggested 30% loss from 2 stroke engines used in personal watercraft vehicles. An interview with a mechanic however suggested that these crank casing has already been redesigned to prevent such losses but are only applied for new engines. A 2 stroke engine has a combustion process with a lower temperature profile, which also contributes to lower NOx and higher HCs (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005). Another problem associated with engine design is the use of engine lubricating oil. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) also suggested that often the engine oil are mixed with petrol at the ratios of 1:25 up to 1:50, where these engine oil and petrol contain additives of various elements and compounds including metals, phosphorous, anti-knock agents, and scavengers. The direct contamination of fuel and oil mixture increases the toxicity of the contaminated water as portrayed by Juttner F. et al (1995b), where changing lubricants to environmental friendly lubricants has found no significant difference in terms of toxicity. Juttner F. (1995a) also found no significant differences in NOx, HCs, and CO produced as a result of changing engine lubricant oil. Furthermore, petroleum based lubricant has a higher molar mass and hence would decrease the efficiency in the combustion process (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005). Other environmental problems associated with fuel are the use of additives. Methyl-Tert-Butyl Ether is an example. Brown J.S. et al (2001) observed how MTBE contaminates coastal areas. MTBE is an additive to gasoline that would reduce CO and HC emissions for combustion exhaust.

The method of which the combustion process is initiated within the engine can vary among each engine. Generally there are 2 common ignition systems for internal combustion engine: the Spark Ignition engine (SI engines) and the Compression Ignition engines (CI engines).

The spark-ignition engines have several names. It was primarily called the Otto engine, named after Nicolaus Otto’s single cylinder engine, but is also called gasoline/petrol engines due to its common use with gasoline. For the very same reason, among other previously mentioned reasons, this study will assume that spark-ignited engines (which are the main design for outboard engines) use gasoline despite the fact that they are applicable with other types of fuel.

10

Page 17: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

In spark-ignition engines, the air and fuel are mixed in the Intake sequence of the operating cycle. There are several methods for air and fuel injection. The two common methods is to either use carburetors or a direct fuel injection system. The selection of the fuel and air injection system will influence the nature of the combustion process and the fuel economy per operating cycle. As calculated earlier, the air – fuel ratio should be approximately 14 – 15 to 1 for a reliable combustion. The air used maybe fresh air or air & preheated air mixture. Preheating of the Intake for fuel evaporation enhancement is often favored to increase the uniformity of fuel distribution within the cylinder. The compression sequence then follows, which would increase the pressure within the cylinder while reducing the cylinder’s volume at the same time. This sequence can also lead to a reduction of temperature for the piston, the cylinder head and walls. Just before the crank angle reaches the top center, an electronic discharge is sent to the spark plug, which initiates the combustion process. The spark discharged would lead to the creation of turbulent flames, incinerating the air and fuel mixture throughout the cylinder. As the power stroke nears completion, the exhaust valve then opens, leading to a blowdown process. Then the exhaust stroke is initiated (Heywood J.B., 1988).

Pollutant formation is governed by many factors. The air-fuel ratio influences the concentrations of various emitted pollutants. The generation of HC results from extreme lean conditions while the lack of oxygen would also increase the amount of CO produced. Misfires that occur due to extreme lean conditions can lead to the reduction of temperature within the cylinder and hence lowering the post-combustion oxidation, leading to an increase in HC. The amount of CO, however, may be reduced from misfires since failure of ignition sometime occurs during misfires. Since HC and CO formation are not limited to the combustion process but also the post-combustion processes, other factors that contribute towards post-combustion conditions within the cylinder and the exhaust manifold influence the amount of HC and CO produced (including time and temperature, among others). Other factors that would influence the HC and CO are the air/fuel injection system design and the crank angle of fuel injection. The main nitrogen oxide species emitted from SI engines is NO. NOx formation in SI engines occurs at peak temperatures. Oxygen availability, cylinder pressure, and burnt gas temperature are the main parameters that govern the output NOx amounts. Other factors that influence the NOx output are the ignition timing, the temperature of the piston and cylinder walls, among others. It is noted that almost all engine-system variables is required to determine the output NOx (Guzella L. and Onder C.H., 2004).

Compression-Ignition engines are also known as diesel engines. Unlike the SI engines, the air is injected in to the cylinder before the fuel. For marine applications, the fuel is often preheated and is injected in to the cylinder right before the combustion process (20o before the crank angle reaches the top dead center). This also allows the possibility of load control through controlling the amount of injected fuel. Usually at full load, the injected fuel will make up 5% of the total air in the cylinder. The black smoke generated during combustion often makes injection of more fuel unfavorable, since any more injected fuel will not be burnt efficiently. The air injected during intake, is compressed in the compression sequence, resulting in approximately a pressure of 4 MPa and the temperature of 527 oC. As the fuel is injected, it disperses and evaporates throughout the cylinder. As the pressure and temperature

11

Page 18: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

reaches the fuels ignition point, auto-ignition occurs. When the power stroke initiates, the fuel, air, and burnt gases mixes and continuous combustion is achieved throughout the cylinder. This is then followed by the exhaust stroke and the cycle reinitiates itself (Heywood J.B., 1988).

One of the main causes of emissions for CI engines is due to the choice of fuel: diesel. Diesel by nature has a higher density, has a lower heating value, and gives high amounts of energy (Heywood J.B., 1988). VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J. (2005) described diesel as being lower-graded and higher-boiling when compared to gasoline. These factors led to lower gaseous hydrocarbon emissions. However, the main emissions would probably be found as soot. This is due to the method of fuel injection, where the air-fuel mixture is incomplete, resulting in unburnt carbon particles. In addition, inorganic sulfates emitted from diesel fueled engines are 0.1-0.3% higher than gasoline fueled engines.

Although substantial amount of soot is emitted, the amounts of HCs and CO emitted are substantially low, sometimes almost negligible. The main pollutant for diesel engines is NOx and particulate matter (being soot). The main parameter that governs these emissions is the air-fuel ratio, which in this case varies accordingly with load control. When the load is low, incomplete combustion occurs due to too low and too lean air-fuel conditions within the cylinder and causing some dispersed fuel to be left unburnt. When the load is high, combustion is more complete but there will be areas that is lacking in oxygen, leading to the formation of CO. NOx formations within diesel engines are high and are somewhat complex. This is partly due to the lack of homogeneity of the combustion process and the nature of the local air-fuel ratio. The air-fuel ratio is not uniform throughout the cylinder, leading to inhomogeneous combustion throughout. Some local air-fuel ratio, accompany with the burnt air temperature resulted from the combustion of the specific local air-fuel ratio, lead to conditions suitable for NOx formation. Although NOx formation reactions are reversible, but because the cool down phase that follows the power stroke happens so drastically that the reversing reaction becomes frozen (Guzella L. and Onder C.H., 2004).

The released pollutants may lead to many environmental consequences. Juttner F. et al (1995b) study shows water contaminated by 2 and 4 stroke gasoline engines to remain highly toxic greater than 14 days. A toxicity study by Eklund B. in Cerne o. et al (2008) report shows that a 2 stroke gasoline engine produced exhaust water which are toxic for bacteria, algae, and fish.

NO2 and NO have low health hazards, with NO essentially having no health impacts at all. The main problems lie in the photochemical smog which leads to respiratory anomalies (Boeker E. and Grondelle R.V., 2001). NOx release can lead to secondary impacts however. The nature of impact of NOx is complex and the partitioning of NOx in the environment is still an ongoing study. The combination of HCs and NOx release can lead to the generation of photochemical smog. As the name suggest photochemical smog requires sunlight radiation. The other factor required for the occurrence of photochemical smog is stable atmospheric conditions with cold air remaining in the lower atmosphere. The high density cold air which remained in the lower atmosphere does not rise, causing limiting amounts of air mixed

12

Page 19: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

between the lower and the upper atmosphere and lead pollutants to concentrate and form a haze in the lower atmosphere (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005).

The haze formed is the result of air pollutants and air particles remaining in the lower atmosphere. Photochemical smog is formed afterwards when NO produces more NO2 with the aid of HCs, Oxygen, high inputs of NO and NO2, and sunlight. There are 3 main ways which NO transforms in to NO2. The first is by reacting with O2 as follows:

The second method is through reacting with peroxyl radicals as follows:

The Third method is through reacting with O3. Ozone is also a product of reactions with NO2 and hence the presence of ozone would be continuously released when there are high concentrations of NO2. The reaction between NO and O3 is as follows:

The NOx formed from the reaction with peroxyl radicals absorbs energy from solar radiation to form O and NO as follows:

Oxygen alone is very reactive, especially when third party molecules are available. Once the Oxygen reacted with O2, ozone is formed as follows:

where M is the third party molecule. The ozone then contributes to NO2 formation as demonstrated earlier (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005). NO2 has also been found to contribute in climate change, which would be discussed later. The photochemical smog generation also requires the initiation of another actor: HCs, which is will be discussed later.

Other problems associated with NOx are eutrophication and acid rain. Eutrophication occurs through nitrogen fixation, often by lightning strikes and nitrogen fixing bacteria. Since recreational boats’ engines are water cooled, the exhaust are quenched, resulting in additional direct NOx deposition in to the water and hence would enhance the nitrification process (increase in NOx would result in increase in Nitrogen availability). The third problem with NOx is the increase in acidity in the atmosphere, which increases the likelihood for acid rain. The main contributing reaction regarding NOx towards acid rain is the removal of NO2 after they are generated through reacting with hydroxyl radicals and forming HNO3 or nitric acid, as follows:

The formed nitric acid is then deposited to the surface through wet and dry deposition.

13

Page 20: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

HCs can become a problem in many ways. Since most of these HCs are VOCs, so a lot will enter the atmosphere and is the second main actor to the formation of photochemical smog. The HCs produced from combustion reacts with hydroxyl radicals forming various other compounds, most importantly peroxyacetic nitric anhydride (PAN), as follows:

From the last reaction, it is evident that the PAN is a reservoir of NO2 and ozone. In addition, PANs are the main cause for eye irritation symptoms that occur when there is a photochemical smog in the area (VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J., 2005).

The release of Carbon dioxide also has many environmental consequences. CO2 has a residence time of 500 years, 4 – 5 times of nitrous oxides, and is perceived as the main greenhouse gas that is inducing a global climate change. Although CO2 has a low estimated heat potential over its lifetime, but the increasing amounts are being released in to the atmosphere, in combination with increasing trends of temperature, has made CO2 the primary global focus in combating global climate change. The topic is still highly controversial and is still being debated due to the observed increase in temperatures not reaching the expected amounts, but is widely accepted to hold high creditability. The debate still surrounds the compounds of CO2, SOx, NOx, and soot where some suggest that, in addition to CO2, SOx, NOx, and soot also play an essential role towards climate change by being the main molecules to attract water molecules. A high input of NOx, SOx, and soot would essentially form the “condensation nuclei”, leading to the formation of clouds and increasing the albedo levels. The albedo reflects solar radiation but the clouds would also keep the warm temperature beneath. Hence the increasing temperature effect of climate change would not be easily predictable, especially in areas with high NOx, SOx, and soot inputs (Bush M.B., 2003). Nonetheless, climate change phenomenon holds true and CO2 plays an important role in raising global average temperatures annually. CO2 also impacts the oceanic acidity and CaCO3 availability in marine environments. The main reaction that constitutes this effect involves the dissolution of calcium carbonate, as follows:

where changes in the seawater’s CO2 level is influenced by the atmospheric CO2 (Phinney J.T. et al, 2006).

2.2 Framework

Environmental implications of recreational boating have been reviewed by several past researches. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) and Davenport J. and Davenport J.L. (2006) have attempted to review environmental implications of recreational boating by conducting literature based study on the issue. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) have reviewed the impacts of recreation on freshwater plants and animals. The review conducted

14

Page 21: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

involves studying previous literature studies, experiments, and conduct observations of impacts. Part of the review conducted observed the impacts of boating, since boating has been viewed as the main water-based activity to have caused environmental problems. The main problems regarding boating found by this research include the problems of physical impacts, which often result in damage to fresh water plants, impacts to animals via disturbances and toxic pollutants released from engines. Although the work is focused on freshwater, but its findings are proven to be useful for this study. Similar work has been done by Davenport J. and Davenport J.L. (2006).

Davenport J. and Davenport J.L. (2006) have reviewed the impact of tourism on coastal environments. The work focused on the often neglected problem of tourism activities’ increase in the degree of magnitude when tourists come to a specific location in mass. The work assessed the environmental problems due to the increase in tourists by conducting literature reviews on environmental impacts touristic accommodations and transports as this will likely increase due to an increase in the number of tourists. The paper reviewed critical problems of recreational boating and laws regarding recreational boating. The study found that the prohibition of TBT in many parts of the world have led to a secondary problems, such as bioinvasion of non-indigenous species.

These 2 researches have achieved showing an array of impacts that may occur due to recreational boating through doing an extensive information and literature search. Although lieterature studies review a tantamount of environmental issues related to recreational boating, but it does not ensure a full coverage of recreational boating’s problems. Furthermore, there has been profound lack of studies that covers an overview of the environmental implications of recreational boating. In order to fully perceive impacts of recreational boating, a systematic overview of recreational boating is required. Hence this study plans to investigate environmental implications of recreational boating by applying environmental systems analysis and sustainability assessment techniques.

Singh R.K. et al (2009)’s research on sustainability assessment methodologies have suggested an overview of various methodological approaches of conducting sustainability assessment for various issues. Since the project we are conducting aims to investigate the environmental implications of boating for policy makers to decide how to deal with issues of boating, the environmental indices for policies given by Singh R.K. et al is observed. The research suggested the use of environment quality index where environmental factors to be considered are based on numerical evaluations and the theory on “multiattribute-utility” and producing environmental quality index of 0 – 10. This method requires the understanding of various environmental impacts and the importance of each environmental factor which needs to be weighted in accordingly. However, this approach would have required that the environmental impacts are fully acknowledged and researched by many academic scholars and authorities in the area.

Pechsiri J.S. (2006) have observed environmental impacts of recreational boating by conducting a field observational study, where a transect study is made in the bay of an island to observe the environmental degradability as common tourism activities continued. The

15

Page 22: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

study suggests boating related activities to have caused a great deal of coal degradation in the area. Although the study fully determines the impacts from boating and its related activities through observation, but the study failed to quantify the impacts in comparison to the amount of boats and how the impacts are boating related. In addition, the study observes more of the physical impacts than other impacts and did not focus well on the recreational boating itself.

Håkanson L. and Blenckner T. (2008) have examined the use of bioindicators to help the authoritative body of the society and decision makers when confronted with environmental problems. The research proposes the use of the Effect Load Sensitivity (ELS) analysis model in combination with various bioindicators to determine the ecosystem’s health. The ELS model involves 4 steps: observing the mass balance of a given process or ecosystem, statistically analyse the concentration of related chemicals that may cause specific effects to the affected variable by using correlation and linear regression, indentify the effect on production rates and/or amounts of biomass to identify the effected species in a food chain, and analyse the scenario that resulted from the disturbance of the foodweb and abiotic elements in the environments. The study then observes possible bioindicators that can assist decision makers to use the ELS model that contains the attribute of being low cost and has the ease and simplicity for coastal management use. The bioindicators including observing the mean concentration of toxic substance in predatory fish, chlorophyll a analysis, dissolved oxygen analysis, and secchi disc depth analysis, among others. The problem with this study is the need of laboratory or monitoring stations that can perform these tests or observe these bioindicators which are required for the ELS model. Although the author have successfully created a low cost and simple monitoring method but due to data availiability and funding limitations in this project, conductiong an ELS model on a fullscale would have been too costly. However the concept behind the ELS model can be applied to this project to perceive possible environmental impacts of various emissions.

Håkanson L. and Blenckner T. (2008) wasn’t the only literature to suggest the use of mass balance analysis to predict environmental impacts. Nilsson L. et al (2007) have emphasized the importance of the use of mass balance analysis. The book observes various cleaner production measures that can be applied to industries. One of the chapters explained how a simple mass balance can be beneficial in determining how substances are input and output during each process. Following the thermodynamics’ laws, if the inputs and outputs are not in equilibrium, then they are accumulated somewhere within the process. Accumulation would often result in the process braking down. Quantification and the understanding of processes within are necessary for achieving mass balance analysis. This would require a well monitored environment to obtain data required to perform the mass balance, with a group of experts to perform calculations of various processes. Hence mass balance is only achievable through experimentation in combination with the computation of quantified data by teams of experts related to the issue being computer, which are limited in this study. This project can, however, adapt the mass balance concept in order to perceive the inputs and outputs of a system, and scavenge data from previous studies.

16

Page 23: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

There are several ways to obtain the data. Buerger R. et al (2000) conducted a study on Masonboro island by having an expedition on the island. Pechsiri J.S. (2006) conducted a transect study in the inter-tidal zone to qualitatively identify environmental impacts of recreation. Bellefleur D. et al (2009) conducted the investigation on boat traffic disturbances on birds by taking a boat on a predefined route and observing the birds’ reactions from the boat. The study then uses statistical method to evaluate the impacts. Leon L.M. and Warnken J. (2008) have observed the leachate of Cu and sewage from boats where emissions factors are used in combination with statistical analysis of the boating population to estimate the amount of leachate emissions. Aerial photography has also been used in addition to the statistical analysis used. These methods would require observations made on site and large amounts of data to implement statistical analysis methods. Experimentation can also provide some data required for the mass balance approach.

Eklund B.et al (2008), for example, have observed the impacts of boats by studying the toxic substances released by boats and performing chemical analysis to the samples. Since laboratory work is limited in this project, literature containing experimental studies involving recreational boating must be gathered to provide the understanding and to allow the quantification of emissions. These works discussed above would provide the essential conceptual means of evaluation for environmental implications of recreational boating, where most of the previous works have either focused on a certain issue or a certain organism impacted by boating. By combining these works systematically through mass balance analysis, environmental implications of recreational boating can be fully grasp. However, this would only achieve a more complete perception of impacts from recreational boating. In order to see how these perceived issues effect Koster, integration of these findings to the condition of Koster is mandatory. In addition, environmental systems analysis techniques are needed to be used to capture how these environmental problems have been facilitated by boating and how these impacts will interact with the environment.

The simplest systems analysis that can be applied is the use of cost-benefit analysis. In the cost benefit analysis, all costs are evaluated. This is not only limited to environmental problems but also include financial costs, social costs, and economic costs. Cost benefit analysis would acquire full scale accounting of all inventories, often a monetary value is assigned to each inventory for the accounting of costs. The system is evaluated by balancing the costs and profits. In general, this method does not focus on the factors that facilitate the environment problems and requires high data availability. The method of analysis is also ethically problematic as monetary values are assigned on invaluable objects. However, cost-benefit analysis does give a simple perception of environmental problems which would be well received by the public majority. However, this project observes recreational boating from a broader point of view, where monetary evaluations would have been extremely complex, data unavailability and inaccessibility would have been high, and most of the environmental problems associated with recreational boating is yet unknown. Although various problems have been addressed in the academic field, but not on a broadened scale that could be applicable with coastal marine environments, where most are done with freshwater environments (Hanley N. and Spash C.L., 1993).

17

Page 24: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

In order to focus on environmental problems, a more specialized systems analysis on environmental issues is needed. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a system assessment specialized in observing various scenarios where different alternatives are compared to a scenario where a project or a process is not applied. The assessment would focus on various possibilities rather than the factors that cause the environmental impacts as the practice aims to provide decision makers with a clear policy on how to deal with a certain project or activity. However, in order to perform an SEA, possible environmental problems of the area must be readily studied and addressed (Therivel, R. and Partidario M.R., 1996). Although environmental problems have been considered on Koster in the past, regarding fishing practices and during the setting up phase of the marine Natural Park, problems of recreational boating have not been addressed specifically over Koster.

Environmental Impact assessment (EIA) is a systems analysis study of a project or activity before its initiation phase, but after the decision phase, to consider possible mitigations measures to be implemented with the project. EIA focuses on the environmental effects and the framework which facilitates the environmental problems after the environmental damage has been caused. There are 4 major processes in an EIA. The EIA first observe if the project or activity requires an EIA. The EIA then performs an impact prediction, evaluation, and mitigations study to observe the impacts and various factors that facilitate those impacts. The main objective is to see not only the impacts caused by the project but how widespread is the impact and what other concerns need to be addressed due to those impacts, where mitigation measures should be applied to compensate, remediate, and if possible prevent the impacts from occurring. A full public participation is followed to acknowledge their inputs. Once everyone agrees on the terms and conditions of the project, monitoring and auditing then follows with the objective to monitor the environmental problems that may have been caused by the project, after the project is initiated (Glasson J. et al, 2005). The EIA clearly provide a systematic study of an environmental problem from a project or activity, but does not include a clear method of inventorying the impacts. Hence, an EIA can often lead to a focus on a specific problem while neglecting other problems that are not foresighted.

Life cycle analysis (LCA), on another hand, would fully observe possible influence of the project or activity on to the environment. An LCA observes the whole of life cycle of the project, product, or activity. If a product is observed, for example, the processes that would have been included in the study involves the mining and processing of raw materials required for the specific product, the manufacturing of the product, the distributions of the materials and the products, and how the materials and products be recycled or put to landfill. There are 5 stages to a life cycle: premanufacture, manufacture, product delivery, product use, and refurbishment. Recreational boating would have fit very well in to the product use stage. The LCA framework contains 3 main stages, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and impact analysis. In simple terms, the goal and scope is set upon the life cycle of a product, since often the life cycle is large and would be too costly if the scope is too big. The project then often becomes goal specific. The inventory is then analysed to observe all inventory required to be observed, after which the impacts due to the processing of the inventories are observed (Graedel T.E. and Allenby B.R., 2005). Thus, the impacts of the inventories and the

18

Page 25: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

19

processes are well observed more than the factors that facilitate the impacts after they are made. The life cycle framework is often enhanced by the application of mass balance analysis (also known as materials/substance flow analysis) in order to give a full inventory of each process studied. As mentioned earlier, performing mass balance is often costly, but remains a good fundamental concept overlying the method of inventory and process accounting.

The best possible method for this project would be to apply an integrated sustainability assessment approach with the focus only on the environmental pillar of the 3 bottom line of sustainability. The approach was proposed by weaver P.M. and Rothmans J. (2006) where an interdisciplinary approach is applied through a combination systems analysis performance to meet the demands of various members of the society and environmental requirements. However, since this project focuses on environmental implications of recreational boating, only the environmental demands will be observed. In order to fulfill the investigations, which involves the identification and clarification of environmental demands of recreational boating and observe how will these impacts induce other following impacts that would require the understanding of the factors that facilitate the environmental impacts, this project integrates partial EIA and Partial LCA (partial LCIA in particular). The partial EIA would give a good perception of the environmental impacts while a stage 4 based LCIA would provide a well analyzed inventory for further assessment to be conducted in the partial EIA. The partial LCA would be enhanced through applying the concepts of mass balance analysis, which would provide understanding of the processes where its characteristics may pose an environmental threat. Data collection would follow the integrated sustainability approach, where information would be gathered from various sectors of the society and from various experts on any issues regarding recreational boating.

It was then concluded that the partial LCIA in combination with partial EIA would form up the systematic framework of viewing and processing of the information regarding recreational boating while the conceptual method of evaluating the environmental concerns due to recreational boating will be performed by using data from previous researches and information provided by various members of the society. Following the partial EIA framework and the ELS model provided by Håkanson L. and Blenckner T. (2008), factors that further facilitate the environmental problems can then be assessed to provide a higher coverage of an array of impacts by recreational boating. The end result would be a good coverage of environmental implications that needs to be considered for recreational boating in either a marine or freshwater environments to support decision makers in designing the policies.

Page 26: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

20 

 

3.0 Methodology

3.1 Framework Overview

In this research, recreational boating will be viewed as a major process where its sub processes are running in parallel to each other, causing the release of various substances to the environment while demanding environmental resources in the process. Classification of the subprocesses will be conducted by overservation and online boats’ market studies. Clarification of environmental implications of recreational boating will involve conducting 2 major investigations: “Process Inventories Identification” and “Impact Assessment of Recreational Boating”. The Process Inventories Identification will involve investigating the recreational boating process using partial LCIA approach to reveal the substance input and output of recreational boating, resulting in a semi-quantitative mass-balance-like inventory flow diagram, or the conceptual model, of the recreational boating process. In addition, processes that may lead to biotic and abiotic changes in Kosterhavets marine national park area will be identified. The second investigation, Impact Assessment of Recreational Boating, will involve investigating the environmental concerns towards the use or release of substances identified in the Process Inventories Identification investigation on Kosterhavets marine national park. Partial EIA will be the main approach towards assessing the possible environmental impacts of substances used and released by recreational boating, as well as direct impacts of recreational boating towards the environmental biotic and abiotic elements of the Kosterhavents marine national park. An investigation for possible mitigation or preventive measures will be followed after completing the 2 investigations mentioned above.

3.1.1 Process Inventories identification

Following the laws of thermodynamics, the clarification of environmental implications of recreational boating requires the identification and understanding of the substance flow within the recreational boating process. In order to elaborate a substance flow diagram for recreational boating, LCIA will be used to map out the sub processes and inventory the substances involved in recreational boating. As stated by Graedel T.E. and Allenby B.R. (2003) LCIA process involves the construction of the inventory flow diagram with a design and/or manufacturing team/expert, which requires grasping the concepts of how material and energy flows through a system/process. An LCIA often results in a flow diagram that is similar to a mass-balance where one can identify the material and energy input, output, or accumulated within the system/process. In LCIA, quantitative data is often preferable, but qualitative data is also acceptable under

Page 27: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

21 

 

specific circumstances. However, due to the lack of available data, a semi quantitative approach is used in this research.

In order to ensure a feasible LCIA to be conducted, additional boundaries and assumptions are set prior to conducting the LCIA. In addition to the scope and boundaries set in chapter 1, the LCIA to be conducted in this investigation will only be limited to the recreational boating activity, meaning only stage 4 of the recreational boat’s life cycle will be considered. As mentioned earlier, LCIA often inventory energy and materials. However, energy balances will not be considered in this investigation since the energy consumption will vary greatly between each boat involved in this investigation. In addition, following Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence concept (the concept behind E=mc2) and the Energy Conservation law of Thermodynamics, the emissions that may due to energy consumption in the recreational boating process will be perceived in respect to fuel consumption. It is also assumed that all boats involved are motorized. Furthermore the level of detail will not be set as a boundary to ensure that all possible environmental implications of recreational boating due to the inventory flows are considered.

Performing the LCIA in this research will require 2 major steps:

1. The first step is to identify what are the actual sub processes in recreational boating. Identifying sub processes involved in recreational boating can be done in various ways. Ideally, it is best to work with the designer and the manufacturer of products involved with recreational boating. However, since there is the lack of data availability and personals, identifying the sub processes will be done through using both primary and secondary source data. The primary source data will be obtained from field observations, conducted by visiting areas rich in recreational boating including Stromstad, Koster, Goteborg, and Stockholm to observe how recreational boating is often practiced, i.e. what kinds of boats is used and what are they used for, how many people travel on recreational boats at 1 time, etc. In addition, observations at Koster will be made on how boating is conducted, i.e. the use of boats in shallow waters. The secondary source data that are used to identify the sub processes involved include literature studies, checking the internet for boating affiliated websites, contacting companies, communicating with the appropriate authorities, and interviewing experts regarding elements of boating.

2. Step 2 is then initiated once the sub processes are identified. Step 2 inventories substances and analyze its flow throughout the recreational boating process, which can be accomplished in accompany with figures obtained from literature studies. Although

Page 28: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

22 

 

which substance will be quantified in detailed is not yet certain, but following the assumption that all boats are motorized combustion processes will surely be involved, quantify the magnitude of NOx and other possible forms of Nitrogen released will be conducted. NOx estimation, among other quantifiable pollutants estimations can be achieved by using emission factors obtainable from literature studies that are either the results of laboratory experimentations on processes related to boating or documents used in governmental agencies and organizations regarding emissions estimations. Policy figures involving NOx emissions due to combustion processes of recreational boating will also be considered. However, since emission factors have been found to vary in terms of how it is measured, the emissions released due to combustion will be observed in 2 aspects: emission factors with respect to fuel consumption and with respect to engine horsepower since both may lead to varying emissions estimations to be conducted in the next investigation. Other quantifiable substances would be dealt with in a similar manner. For the substances that lack the data availability for quantification purposes, they will be analyzed either qualitatively or semi quantitatively depending on the nature of data that would be available after the sub process identification step and the nature of the sub processes themselves.

3.1.2 Impact Assessment of Recreational Boating

An EIA framework has 4 main processes: “Scoping and Screening”, “Impact prediction, evaluation, and mitigation”, “Participation, presentation, and review”, and “monitoring and auditing” (Glasson et al., 2005). Since this investigation focuses on assessing the impacts associated with recreational boating and that the third investigation to be conducted in this research involves seeking possible mitigation techniques to environmental problems associated with recreational boating, the impact prediction and evaluation process within the EIA framework will be used as the main approach in this investigation. In the impact prediction process, the magnitude of the changes in the environment is observed. Often a comparison is made between scenarios with the cause of environmental change with the scenario without the cause of environmental change, because the aim of the EIA is to decide whether a project or action is to be allowed to continue with the consideration of the environmental impacts. Since this research focuses on a process that is already occurring, a comparison of different scenarios will be omitted in this investigation. The evaluation process will attempt to assess the seriousness, acceptability, and the significance of the impact. Uncertainties that occur during the investigations will also be evaluated.

3.1.2.1 Emissions Estimation and Impact Prediction

Page 29: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

23 

 

Impact prediction can be accomplished through using various approaches. There are 3 major methodological approaches of impact prediction in an EIA: soft, mixed, and hard. A hard model approach would predict impacts through the integration of various mathematical methods and representations of the fundamental elements that make up the parameters in a given scenario. A mixed model approach applies some mathematical amd/or statistical techniques in combination with qualitative justifications derived from field observations, literature studies, and theoretical understanding. A soft model approach fully embraces the use of qualitative analysis to evaluate possible impacts (Glasson et al., 2005). In this research a mixed model approach will be constructed for quantifiable process’ inventories. Soft-model approach will be applied to inventories that are qualitatively identified in the previous investigations, as well as to processes that caused direct changes to the biotic and abiotic elements of Koster.

3.1.2.1.1 Mixed Model Approach

The mixed model approach for quantifiable emissions will predict the magnitude of emissions by combining the emission factor values with boat properties information and estimates of the total usage time, distance and boat frequencies in 1 year using simulation based on secondary data, under the assumption that 1 year has 1 boating season and 1 boating season contains 100 days where the maximum distance traveled by boats would be 50 km (a possible 1 round trip circulating the islands of the Kosterhavets marine national park). Since the method of estimating emissions varies accordingly with how the emission factors are given, measured, and estimated, the boating behavior (usage time, distance, and boating frequencies) estimation and the emission estimation method for air pollutants due to combustion will be described in this section. The mixed model approach to air emission estimation due to combustion process can be analogously applied with other emissions factors that use similar forms of data. The methods of emission estimations for emission factors that do not follow the method for estimating emissions of combustion will be shortly described within the Result chapter.

Since this research aims to quantify the resulting amount of NOx from the recreational boating process, the mixed model approach to NOx emission estimation will be described. The main sub process of recreational boating that lead to the production of NOx is the combustion occurring within the boat engines, meaning that in order to predict the amount of NOx, one needs to know the boat population, the details of the boats, i.e. engine type, the amount of boat usage, among others, including the NOx emission factors themselves. Predicting the amount of NOx is achievable in 5 steps as follows:

Page 30: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

24 

 

Step 1. Collect the data of boats used in Sweden. Since emission factors for NOx are usually given either in g/litre fuel consumed or g/KwH, the details of boats that would be necessary in predicting the resulting amount of NOx annually would be the engine type, engine horsepower, type of fuel applicable, engine cycle type (stroke) of each boat, with the assumption that each boat has 1 engine. This information must be gathered from a variety of sources and literature studies. Some literature describes the percentage of engine type sold in Sweden in the year 2004, since this data is not yet old it can be later extrapolated in other steps. Meanwhile, there is also a register of Swedish boats. Information on registered recreational boats and ships was obtained through communicating with Katrin Sundholm, whom is the person in contact of the Transportstyrelsen (the Swedish Transport Agency). The information provided includes approximately 2000 boats and 2000 ships registered with length, width, and engine model details (see Appendix A). In order to obtain the engine details required for each engine model, internet search has been made on each engine model, while some information is obtained through personal contact with some of the engine companies and through the companies’ engine databases. Engine details in combination with boat details are then tabulated to further investigate the average rated power and average fuel consumption, assuming the fuel density, where the fuel density of Diesel fuel is 850 g/l and the density for gasoline is 719.7 g/l (Heywood J. B., 1988). The resulted data will then be used for further extrapolation.

Step 2. This step tries to estimate the amount of hours spent in recreational boating (boat hours). This is estimated by obtaining the information on the Swedish boating behavior from literature. The Swedish boating behavior was provided by Wester M. (2009) in a report published for the Nordic Council of Ministers regarding green boating, which includes information on the amount of days that Swedes use recreational boats annually, the amount of distances traveled via recreational boating in Sweden, the attitudes towards environmental friendly boating in Nordic countries, among several others. The report was obtained through personal contact with Misse Wester at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm, Sweden.

Using the information provided, one can give an estimation of the amount of days and the amount of distance traveled. However, because the values were given within several intervals, estimating the amount of days and distances are achieved through simulation within that particular interval. The amount of hours is then obtained by using the speed, distance and time relationship. Since we don’t know the speed, it is required to do an internet search on boats and yachts market places to assume a reasonable speed for recreational boating. For this project, it is assumed that the average boat speed is 18.5

Page 31: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

km/h. An example of how the amount of hours traveled by 100 boats is estimated is shown in the 2 tables below.

The 2 tables above show that if there are 21.8% of the recreational boating population in Sweden that used boats to travel between 1 – 10 days and if there were 100 boats, there will be a total of 22 boats that would travel between 1 – 10 days. Simulation is used to estimate the amount of days and from the 2 tables above one can see that 7 days is estimated within the same class. This means that from the total of 22 boats, each boat travels 7 days. Thus, the total number of days traveled by all 22 boats is 154, or 154 boat days to avoid confusion. The estimation of the number of boat days is the same for all the class, leading to a total of 3400 boat days per season. Since it is assumed that there is only 1 season per year, so from the tables above it can be said that the total amount of days traveled by all boats is 3400 boat days. The second table shows that 21.5% of the total recreational boating population travels between 0 – 5 km per day. Knowing that there is a total of 3400 boat days, and that 21.5% travels 0 – 5 km per day, it can be said that there is a total of 714 boat days where boats traveled between 0 – 5 km. The estimated distance in the interval is simulated. From the table above, 2 km is estimated and under the assumption that the boat is going at the speed of 10 km/h, it will take 0.2 hours to travel 2 km. Hence, the total amount of hours required by 714 boat days to travel 2 km is 142.8 hours. The same method of time estimation is applied to all classes, resulting in a total of 4581.9 hours per year. From this table, it is estimated that 100 boats would travel 4581.9 hour per year.

Table 1. Number of boat days estimated for 100

Table 2. Distance and time estimation for 100 boats.

Step 3. In order to estimate the emissions of recreational boating in Koster, it is mandatory to know the amount of boats used in Kosterhavets marine national park. This information is obtained by using an aerial photograph taken on a random summer day in

25 

 

Page 32: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

26 

 

2006. ArcGIS software is used to assist in counting the amount of boat while recording the length of each boat. According to communications with Katrin Sundholm, “Under Swedish law, vessels (fartyg) are, divided into ships (skepp) and boats (båtar). Ships are vessels, the hull of which has a length over all of not less than twelve metres and a beam of at least four metres. Other vessels are referred to as boats”, making length measurements mandatory. The counted vessels that would be taken in to consideration for further emissions estimations must be less than or equal to 13 meters (in case of errors). Once the amount of boats in Koster is known, the data for engine types and averaged specifications of each type used in Sweden are estimated, resulting in an estimation of the types and amounts of engines used in boats counted from Kosterhavets marine national park. This information obtained in combination with estimation of the number of hours traveled by the boats in Koster, would allow the estimation of total NOx emissions by multiplying these values with NOx emission factors. It is to be noted that although the types of engines can be extrapolated, the manner of which the values are extrapolated also depends on the data available for the emission factors. For example, NOx’s emission factor with respect to Fuel consumption are categorized as Inboard Diesel, Inboard Petrol, and Outboard Petrol whereas the NOx emission factor with respect to engine horse power are categorized as 4 stroke Diesel engine, 2 stroke Petrol engine, and 4 stroke Petrol engine. Hence the manner of which the types of engines are to be extrapolated with its specifications on to the Koster’s boat population depends upon the nature of emission factors available as well.

Step 4. This step attempts to approach emission estimations by generating a model for engine details extrapolation for Koster’s boat population. Multiple Regression is used to generate a fuel consumption model where fuel consumption is dependent upon the boat length, engine rated power (Kw), the engine cycle type (stroke), the type of fuel, and whether the engine is inboard or outboard. Boat length is used to represent the boat size, since the length is obtained both in Step 1 (from the Swedish boat register) and in Step 3 (where the boats in Koster are counted with lengths recorded). The rated power is used to represent the engine design and capacity. The engine stroke governs the combustion process and how the 3 T rule of combustion is controlled. Whether the engine is outboard or inboard helps to categorize the engine design in relations with the boat design type. The fuel type is used since different types of fuel gives different combustion properties; hence the rate consumption should vary considerably. Although these parameters are not the best figures to be used as representations mentioned above, but these parameters are more available to the public than other parameters at low cost. Once the model is made, F- test is made to ensure that the independent parameters significantly determine fuel consumption. T- test and F- test are also used to test if the engines differ significantly by its class, i.e. to test whether gasoline and diesel engines

Page 33: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

27 

 

differ significantly with respect to fuel consumption. If the T- test result and the F- test result disagree, then the Mann-Whitney’s non-parametric 2 independent sample test is used to confirm whether the differences are significant. All of these statistical calculations are made using statistical packaged software.

Once the fuel consumption model is generated, T – test is used to determine significant differences between diesel and gasoline engines with respect to length. The same is applied to inboard/outboard and engine cycle type parameters. The result is to be able to estimate the boat’s engine type from the boat’s length. Through using the recorded length, T – test estimated engine type, and averaged rated power of each engine type, an estimation of fuel consumption is obtainable for each boat counted in Koster.By applying Step 2 with the counted boats while using the regression generated fuel consumption model, total NOx estimation with respect to fuel consumption is obtainable.

Step 5. The NOx emissions calculated from emission factor with respect to fuel consumption, the NOx emissions calculated from emission factor with respect to engine rated power, and the fuel consumption based NOx emissions estimations calculated using the regression model are then compared.

The resulted amounts of NOx are then assessed to see which possible environmental impact they can cause. Identifying possible impacts will be achieved through literature studies. However, there are other emissions that are not resulted from combustion. The method to estimate these emissions’ are similar. See 3.2 for details.

3.1.2.1.2 Soft Model Approach

The substances used and released within the recreational boating process that are not quantifiable or are semi quantitatively described, will be investigated and described qualitatively on how they can become an environmental threat. For other processes that doesn’t lead to substances used or released but can cause direct environmental changes, possible environmental impacts from these processes will be assessed in accompany with field observations. Identifying possible impacts will be achieved through literature studies.

Page 34: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

28 

 

3.1.2.2 Impact Evaluation

The impact evaluation process evaluates the impacts that are investigated in the previous section. In order to see which sub processes of recreational boating can be seen to be more significant in terms of its impact on the biota, the max win voting method is used where the several experts are asked to judge from the emissions investigated in the previous section using questionnaire shown in Appendix D. In addition, the emissions estimated are to be compared with the regulations set by the government, i.e. the EURO IV engine emissions limit and the Swedish regulation on the use of TBT. These investigations will be conducted using literature studies and consulting with experts. For the NOx emissions, comparison with the governmental regulation can be achieved by estimating the NOx emissions following the Mixed Model Approach but using EURO IV emission standards as the emission factors, and see the differences in the amount of total emissions estimated while seeking the answer behind the differences.

3.1.3 Mitigation Measures

From the investigation on the impacts evaluation, one must identify if there needs to be a policy change, if so in which direction can it change. In addition, other mitigation measures that are possible must also be discussed. This can be achieved through literature studies where a combination of many measures will be discussed if they can be applied to mitigate the environmental problems related to recreational boating identified by the previous 2 investigations.

3.2 Emissions Estimation Methodology

From the literature review conducted, several investigations on various emissions need to be investigated. These emissions are the result of various sub processes of elements of recreational boating, i.e. recreational activities.

In order to estimate the emissions and observe possible implications of these impacts, it is necessary to understand the dynamics of diffusion of these emissions and estimate the amount of boat use in Koster first. The study of diffusion involves looking at various aspects of the environmental conditions. Principally the aspects of diffusion involve understanding the flux of a particular substance that is the guest to the environment and the concentration of that particular substance. As demonstrated by Boeker E. and Grondelle R.V. (1999), following Fick’s law, the diffusion of a given substance is as follows:

Page 35: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

where F is the mass of guest particles going through a given area and a given direction. D is the diffusitivity of the guest substance given as diffusion coefficients that is dependent on various factors including temperature, molecular weight, among others. C is the concentration of the substance, defined by the substances’ mass, M, and the volume that contains the substance, V. The interaction between C, M, and V follows the following equation:

As explained above, diffusion of environmental contaminants are dependent on various factors. Hydraulic flows, water and air retention time, and air flow dynamic studies would be required to perform diffusion studies, which an interview with an expert in Tjarno suggest such studies are currently lacking. Hence an emissions’ diffusion study would require more time and resource to investigate and would be kept for further study.

One of the main concerns of recreational activities that causes environmental impacts is the actual human metabolism and human littering. Littering is often a sophisticated problem and would require more time to make a study since littering is depended to the consumable goods available in the area, the nature of those products, and the behavior of the people in the region. Hence littering isn’t quantified in this study. Human metabolisms often lead to sewage production. Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980) assumed that 137 litres of sewage is released per person per day where 10 g of Nitrogen (ammonia form), 0.4 g of Nitrate, 1.5 g of Phosphorous and 6 g of Carbohydrate carbons are released per person per day. Leon L.M. and Warnken J. (2008) study on sewage inputs from recreational vessels used an estimation of 9 – 17.5 g of Nitrogen released per person per day. From these figures, the amount of Nitrogen released per person per day will be assumed as 12.17 g. In addition, phosphorous and carbohydrate released will be assumed equivalent to the figures provided by Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. (1980). These figures will be treated as the nutrient deposition factor. Assuming that one boat has only 1 person, the captain, and these emissions can be estimated as follows:

The number of boat hours is obtainable using the method described in 3.1.2.1.1.

29 

 

Page 36: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

For problems related to antifouling agents, the results of an experimental work conducted by Eklund B. et al (2008) will be used. An accumulated boat wash (from cleaning) sample taken by Eklund B. et al (2008) of over a 3 - 4 months period shows concentrations of organo-tin compounds and metals shown below.

Table 3. Organo-tin compounds and metals obtained from Eklund B. et al (2008)’s results

Although these results represent the water quality after boat cleaning, but it can be assumed the friction between boats’ hull surface and the sea water may result in similar a similar action of cleaning. Furthermore, the waters resulted from boat wash has a high possibility of re-entering the natural water body if boat washing is not conducted within a regulated facility. Hence, the findings of Eklund B. et al (2008) will be used as the main emission factors to estimate the total leachate of antifouling compounds. Therefore, estimations of antifouling compounds can be achieved as follows:

Estimating emissions from boat engines can be achieved as follows:

 

However, estimating emissions from boats engines are more complex due to the idiosyncrasies between each boat engine, the availability and accessibility of various types of fuels, the chemical properties of the fuel, and the large amounts of varieties of engine models. Furthermore, as seen from earlier discussions in 2.1, the factors that have led to various emissions are very complex in nature and modeling these factors would have required more time and resources. Hence it is more suitable and feasible to use experiment results engines that represent the majority, and emission factors used by governmental agencies. Estimating boat hours would have to be done separately for emission investigation of engines as well.

30 

 

Page 37: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Emission factors are given in various means, usually a fuel-based assessment would result in emissions per fuel consumed while an engine assessment would result in emissions per rated power. Since the rated power of the engines are determined by the internal average pressure of the cylinders during various sequences of the operating cycle, the piston’s swept volumn, and the speed of the piston as stated by Schnobert H.H. (1990) in combination with the fact that these parameters are influenced by the engines stroke and ignition designs and combustion conditions as discussed earlier, the emissions factors given in respect to engine rated power is first observed. Cerne O. et al (2008) gave an emission estimation of HC, NOx, and CO for 4 stroke diesel engine based on Volvo’s engineering test report, where is it estimated that an old 4 stroke diesel engine would give 5.6 g/KwH, 0.77 g/KwH, and 0.22 g/KwH of NOx, CO, and HC respectively. Juttner F. et al (1995) made an experiment on 3 outboard engines, 2 of which are 2 stroke gasoline outboard engines and 1 4 stroke gasoline outboard engine, where it is estimated that a 2 stroke gasoline outboard engine gives 0.9 g/KwH, 495 g/KwH, and 267 g/KwH of NOx, CO, and HC respectively. A 4 stroke gasoline outboard engine gives 2.2 g/KwH, 380 g/KwH, and 22 g/KwH for NOx, CO, and HC respectively. Since experiments on gasoline inboard engines are lacking, figures to be estimated will be assumed equivalent to the gasoline outboard engines, following the argument that the main influential parameters come from the type of operating cycle and fuel ignition system (as discussed in earlier in 3.1) and not whether the engine is outboard or inboard. The influence of external temperature should remain similar since, as stated by (Heywood J.B., 1988), both inboard and outboard engines are water cooled. The following table summarizes the emission factors with respect to engine power.

Table 4. Emissions of experimented internal combustion engines with respect to engine power

However, it has been found when estimating emissions in respect to fuel consumption, often the estimation would result in significant difference when compared with emission estimation based on emission estimation values with respect to engine power (Kean A.J. et al, 2000). Explanation for this phenomenon is still lacking. A possibility is due to the efficiency of which the fuel is burnt. However, this should have been taken in to the account since the experiments done by Juttner F. et al (1995) and Cerne O. et al (2008) are operated on old engines that lacked efficiency and uses fuel that is commercially and commonly available for testing. Further study would have been required to look into this matter. For the time being, the emission estimation based on emission factors with respect to fuel consumption will also be used. The National

31 

 

Page 38: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Pollution Inventory of the Australian government have provided the emission factors with respect to fuel consumption, where it is estimated as shown in the following table (NPI, 1999). It is to be noted that NPI (1999) originally gave VOCs estimations but was noted that they were converted from HC estimations; hence the HC figures shown below have been reversely converted from VOC estimates.

Table 5. Emission factors used by the Australian Government to estimate emissions of boating

From this table, one may argue that the estimation did not consider the operation cycles which influences the amount of emissions. However, if a comparison is made between table 4 and table 5, it is evident that the nature of emissions for inboard petrol and outboard petrol engines follow the comparative nature of 4 stroke petrol engines and 2 stroke petrol engines.

Carbon dioxide estimation can be achieved in several ways. The first method would be to estimate the amount CO2 produced from the ideal stoichiometric combustion formula given earlier. However, the problem with this method is, first of all the equation applies when the combustion occurs at 100% efficiency but the combustion process observed in this study is not 100% efficient, resulting in CO, NOx, and HCs. Even if we are to continue using this method, ignoring the problem with efficiency, there is another problem. The determination of the fuel’s chemical composition is difficult. Gasoline, for example, has chemical compositions of alkanes, among various other compounds. The hydrocarbons of gasoline varies from C4 to C10 as suggested by the gas chromatography analysis provided by Bartok W. and Sarofim A.F. (1991), which also shows a composition of 35 different compounds. Hence, extensive review for estimating CO2 emissions from vehicles would have been needed, and this is obtainable from governmental facts and figures. For this study, the figures used by the USEPA are applied. According to USEPA (2005), the carbon content of gasoline and diesel per gallon is 2.42 and 2.78 grams respectively, where the amount of CO2 emitted from combusting 1 gallon of gasoline and diesel is 8.8 kg/gallon and 10.1 kg/gallon respectively. The third method of estimation would be to obtain numbers from experimentation. Cerne O. et al (2008) have acquired CO2 emission results from Volvo’s engineering report of a diesel marine engine. However, because only the result of a diesel 4 stroke engine was obtained, using this method would not give a fair treatment for gasoline engines and hence is not used for estimation calculation in this study. The amount of CO2 emission estimated for diesel and gasoline engines are summarized as follows.

32 

 

Page 39: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Table 6. Fuel’s CO2 emission estimates

There are other specific emissions also, i.e. VOCs, fuel additives, etc., but because some of the information is incomplete for comparison, and others like those found in Cerne O. et al (2008) requires extensive translation, in combination with the fact that the main aim of this study is to quantify NOx and other Nitrogen sources, these data are not being quantified for this study. However, values can be found in Cerne O. et al (2008) and Juttner F. et al (1995a). Cerne O. et al (2008), for example have found PAH compounds, i.e. benzene, in the cooling water. Juttner F. et al (1995a) tested on 2 and 4 stroke gasoline engines and found VOCs including Benzene, Toluene, Formaldehydes and Xylene, among 12 – 13 other VOC species. However it is noted that HC estimation values can be used to estimate VOCs where VOC/HC = 0.971 (NPI, 1999). From this conversion however, one can see that most HCs emitted are VOCs.

As mentioned earlier, the reason for the differences between the engines rated power based emission estimation and the fuel based emission estimation is still lacking. The engine rated power based emission estimation are based on laboratory experiments on old engines, where a common commercially available fuel is used and the engines are tested at full load. Hence, the resulted emissions should already have taken into consideration of combustion inefficiencies. The engine rated power, which basically represented most of the engine design’s contribution to combustion efficiencies, would also have taken into consideration of fuel consumption since, in order to produce the engine rated power, constant input of fuel is needed. However, it is possible that other factors may have effected fuel consumption that has been overlooked, which would result in increases in the amount of fuel combusted and the emissions that follow. Therefore, it is required to see whether other factors contribute to fuel consumption differences.

In order to investigate for possible parameters that may have contributed to fuel consumption apart from engine combustion, analysis of variance is used on the data provided in Appendix B, to see if other parameters that is readily available and feasible to obtain may have contributed to fuel consumption. The test would demonstrate if length, engine power, and engine’s operating cycle, the inboard/outboard factor, and fuel type would significantly determine the rate of fuel consumption. It is also necessary to observe which of these factors significantly contribute to the amount of fuel consumed. T test and F test will be used. Regression analysis will be conducted afterwards on the factors that have been tested with the analysis of variance, which would result in a regression model based equation that will be capable of predicting the fuel consumption.

33 

 

Page 40: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

However, before anything estimation can be conducted regarding combustion of boat engines, it is necessary to collect data on engine specifications for the engines shown in Appendix A. The engine specs that we have looked at are the engine rated power in Kw, fuel consumption in l/hr, torque, engine speed, operating cycle design of the engine, fuel type, and whether the engine is an inboard or an outboard type. However, as evident in Appendix A, some boats registered did not give a clear engine model, some models are out dated and no data is available on the internet. Acquiring data for all registered boats then become impossible, and only a handful of boats can be found through company sites and boat online sales. For these rare-find engines, websites like www.yachtworld.com, where there are large numbers of boat sales, have been observed for boat engine specifications that are sold along with boats. Engine models from Yanmar, Volvo, and Albin have the most available data, since the companies kept and provide online access to the engine databases, especially Volvo where the most extensive database record of engines are kept and provided with most data compare to other engines registered. Yanmar engines require looking up databases of many countries, i.e. Yanmar Norway, Yanmar Australia, and Yanmar Japan. Other companies that have some available data include Yamaha, Honda, Suzuki, Evinrude and Johnson. Some marine engine manufacturing companies have ended its business, i.e. Ford Marine engines. For these companies there are some “remakes” available, with Lancing marine being one of the companies remaking some Ford marine engines and providing the engine specifications on their website. Some engine specifications provided are also incomplete, making it difficult to find the necessary data. For some engines, the fuel consumption is not given in l/hr, but is given by g/rated power per hour. These values are converted using the fuel density and the given crankshaft’s rated power of the engine.

The fuel to be taken in to account in this study will be gasoline and diesel as they are primarily abundant and gas stations for boats. The fuel density of gasoline and diesel are estimated to be 719.7 g/l and 850 g/l respectively (Heywood J.B., 1988).

Fig 4. Picture taken at a gas station for boats showing 2 kinds of fuels available

34 

 

Page 41: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

4.0 Results

4.1 Process Inventories identification Results

After extensive literature studies and field observations, several sub processes have been identified in the recreational boating process. Each sub processes have been found to demand and release a considerable amount of substances. In order to understand the flow and inventory the substances, the mechanism within each sub process is observed.

4.1.1 Electric Power Generation

Several yacht and boat online marketplaces have indicated that some vessels have been designed for overnight traveling and are equipped with electric power generators (not including those for emergency uses). However, since this sub process was identified near the end of the project, obtaining information on how electric is generated from most boats was not achieved. Electric power generation for mobile offshore use can be achieved by various means, i.e. combustion, wind, and solar, among others. More time would be needed to analyze the common process of electric power generation. Hence the substance flow of this sub process was not assessed. Without knowing the actual process, determining substance flows and environmental impacts is not possible

4.1.2 Recreation

Recreation is probably the first sub process of the recreational boating process that is evident to be environmentally damaging. The recreational activities that involve boating vary, i.e. diving, fishing, and boating itself. Literature studies and field observations show high possibilities for sewage deposition which would increase the amount of nutrients

4.1.3 Antifouling

Literature studies show Antifouling as one of the major environment damaging factors of recreational boating as antifouling agents are toxic towards marine organisms. Although the use of substances like TBT has been prohibited and the use of Cu has been limited, it is assumed in this study that the compound are still widespread since it has been pointed out that these compounds are being covered by non toxic paints. These paints wear-off over time and leading to the leaching of the antifouling agents that were formerly existent on the surface. Compounds that are thought to be involved include TBT, DBT, MBT, Cu, Pb, Irgarol, Zn, and Sn.

4.1.4 Combustions within Internal Combustion Engines

The main combustion process in boating is within the engines themselves which is the common mechanism to move boats. Although one may argue that combustion can also be due to onboard cooking or other possible means, but that is omitted in this research since we have not been able to identify such occurrences in the area of study. Engines have several emissions: air pollutants (NOx, HCs, and CO2), noise, among others.

35  

Page 42: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

4.1.5 Process inventory summary

The result of “Process Inventories Identification” investigation has led to the identification of major sub processes occurring in parallel within the recreational boating process. A conceptual model of the recreational boating process is given below.

Fig 5. Conceptual Model summarizing the Recreational Boating Process, sub processes, and inventories

• Recreation • Electric Power Generation • Antifouling • Combustion within boat 

Engines Fuel 

Air 

Biocide 

H2O 

Metals 

SOx HCs  COx NOx

Etc. 

HCs  PM  Metals  Oil Biocide

Etc.

A number of substances shown in the conceptual model have been found to be quantifiable. Impact predictions have been completed by estimating the magnitude of these emissions and identify the possible impacts that these substances may cause following the method described in chapter 3

4.2 Impact Assessment of Recreational Boating Results

The amount of boats is estimated from an aerial photograph taken on a random summer day provided by Tjarno marine laboratory. The total amounts of boats to be considered are those located within the outer boundary of the Kosterhavets marine national park, shown to the right. Boats that are located + and – 250 m. of the boundary are also taken in to consideration, as their geographical closeness to the area would have a high likelihood to cause environmental impacts to the national park’s area. The aerial photograph showed more than 800 boats within the area of study. The locations of these boats are marked on the aerial photo and its length overalls measured. However, it should be noted that there was a technical error during the process, where data of the location for 100 boats mysteriously disappeared. In addition, there are also possible human errors when using the GIS

      = 1 boat       = Area Boundary 

Fig 6. Map of Kosterhavets marine national park with boats’ locations marked.

36  

Page 43: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

software to measure the length overalls of the boat. The total amount of boats considered is 805 boats, and is assumed to be the total number of boats used in Kosterhavets marine national park. Using methods shown in chapter 3, it is estimated that the total amount of time used by 805 boats are as follows.

Table 7. Estimated Total number of days of boat use for 805 boats with-out specific classification

Table 8. Estimated Total number of hours of boat use for 805 boats without specific classification

From the table above, it can be described that there are a total of 805 boats, of which 21.8% travels 9 days per season and resulting in a total of 175 boats that travel for 9 days per season. The total of days traveled by 175 boats is 1575 days. Through estimating in the same manner, a total of 21104 days is estimated to be traveled by 100 boats in 1 season, assuming that 1 year gas 1 boating season. Wester M. (2009) has found that 21% of the total boats traveled, go on a 3 km journey. This means that out of 21104 days traveled, 4431 is the total amount of days that boats go on a 3 km journey. Assuming that the boat speed is 18.5 km/h, the boat requires 0.162 hours to travel 3 km. So, if there are a total of 4431 days that boats travel approximately 3km, this will require a total of 718.541 hours of traveling time. By applying the same estimation approach on boats traveling at various distances, a total of 17378.811 hours of traveling time is estimated for 805 boats.

4.2.1 Emission Estimations and Impacts Observed due to Recreation

From the total amount of days traveled by 805 boats, the total amount of nutrients loaded from sewage can be estimated (shown below). 

  Table 9. Estimated nutrient loading from sewage

 

 

 

37  

Page 44: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

This first investigation also detected possible sediment resuspension from 2 observations. The first is the visual evidence suggesting that sediment resuspension is possible due to the shallowness as seen in the photo below.

Fi

 

 

 

 

 

g. 7 Showing a 2 stroke outboard boat and the shallowness of the water as the benthos are clearly visible.  

Another observation that suggest possible sediment resuspension is the power of the waves generated by boats. It is observable that during cruising often the water would pile up in front of the boat, and declining along the stern with “tangential waves” being generated along the stern. It is also observable that, a boat with an inboard engine has less powerful wave than outboard engines, but if the engine is a stern drive (engine inside the boat but the propeller is outside) without a tunnel for the stern propeller, then the waves generated would be different. This should be furthered experimented as observations made do not take engine power into consideration which ultimately affects the power of waves generated.

Not to Scale

Tangential waves 

Transverse waves 

Fig. 8 Diagram showing the observed tangential wave and transverse wave pattern generated when cruising

The combination of these observations suggest possible sediment resuspension since you require high enough power output in combination with shallow waters to achieve resuspension.

Other impacts associated with recreation are also evident. Several sightings where seagrass patches have been cut through by boats have been sighted, shown in the photo below.

38  

Page 45: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Fig. 9. Benthic seagrass damaged by boat

Other activities that are boating related and may cause damage to the environment has not been recorded from Koster. However, interviews with experts at the Tjarno marine laboratory suggested several activities that may cause environmental damage, i.e. Jet skis. Other sources include a video on youtube where a diver was filming underwater diving experience in the area near Koster. The photo below was taken in Lidingo. Although it is not Koster related, but it suggest possible activities practiced in Sweden that may lead to environmental damage. The photo below shows the use of banana boats.

Fig. 10. showing banana boat mounted on top of the boat.

4.2.2 Emission Estimations of Antifouling Compounds

The estimated contaminations due to antifouling are shown below. It is highly probable that locations with concentrated boat use would have a greater impact on the benthic substrates. In addition to the contamination of TBTs, there are also estimated substantial amounts of metals, i.e. Cu and Pb, which are toxic at high concentrations.

Table 10. Antifouling Contamination Estimates

39  

Page 46: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

4.2.3 Combustion of Engines Emission Estimates Normal Approach

After extensive data collection, various boats are left with incomplete engine specifications and many with no data at all. In order to make the data usable in this study, various parameters have to be abandoned (including Torque and Engine speed) and the data collected from boats need to be filtered such that only those with completed engine specifications are taken into consideration. See Appendix B for the filtered collected data.

Data filtration, however, has led to another problem: the filtered data only contains approximately 600 records, from the 1989 boats registered. Furthermore, according to Cerne O. et al (2008), there are all together 480000 boat engines sold in 2004, with 470000 boats containing these engines. So the Swedish boats registered, only represent a small fraction of the total boat population in Sweden. In order to solve this problem, the recorded percentage of engines sold provided in Cerne O. et al (2008), shown below, are simplified. It is assumed that other types of engines, i.e. sterndrives, and unknown engine sales are inboard engines. The nature of which the engine is simplified depends on the emission factors to be applied. As shown in 3.2, the emission factors with respect to fuel consumption are classed by diesel inboards, gasoline inboards, and gasoline outboards, while emission factors with respect to engine rated power are classed by diesel inboard, 4 stroke gasoline, and 2 stroke gasoline. The simplified engine percentages sold will be used to represent the percentages of engine types of the boating population in Koster. Furthermore, although some boats contain 2 engines, but since the given information on boat sales portrays the total estimated boats with engines are similar to the total engine sold, it is assumed that each boat contains 1 engine.

Table 11. Estimated % of engine sold by type

In order to estimate the emissions due to combustion, the simplified percentages are applied to the boating population in Koster, which is considered to have a total of 805 boats as mentioned at the beginning of 4.2. Emissions due to combustion are first observed with respect to the engine rated power. The 805 boats are classified into subgroups predefined by the simplified percentages from Cerne O. et al (2008). The rated power for each subclass are then assigned by averaging the engine rated power of boats containing the engines that fit in to the criteria of each subclass in Appendix B. The table below summarizes the number of boats divided accordingly with the assigned averaged engine rated power.

40  

Page 47: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Table 12. Boats Classification for emission calculations with respect to engine power

The estimation of days, distances, and time in total traveled by boats in each subclass are then estimated following the method shown in chapter 3. The following figure shows a set of tables of day, distance, and time estimates for each subclass.

Fig 11. Estimated day, distance, and time for boats classified by their rated power and engine type

Once the day, distance, and time estimation is fully established, emission factors given in 3.2 is then applied. By multiplying the emission factors with the total amount of boats per subclass and the total amount of hours traveled by each subclass, a result of total amount of emissions can be achieved. The table below shows the total estimated emissions from combustion with respect to its engine power, per year.

Table 13. Total emission estimated with respect to engine power, per year.

As mentioned in 3.2, there are differences when applying emission estimations with fuel consumption. In addition, by calculating the emissions estimations with respect to fuel consumption, estimating CO2 will also be achieved. First engine percentages given by Cerne O. et al (2008) are simplified in to 3 subclasses: Diesel Inboard, Gasoline inboard, and

41  

Page 48: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Gasoline outboard (following the emission factors for fuel consumed given in 3.2). The 805 boats are then classified following the percentages of their subclasses, with their fuel consumption rates averaged from the engine specifications data provided in Appendix B. The amount of days, distances and hours traveled are then estimated using the method demonstrated in chapter chapter 3. The following figure gives a set of tables showing results of days, distances, and time traveled in total by each subclass.

Fig. 12. Estimated day, distance, and time for boats classified by engine type for fuel consumption estimation

The estimated hours in combination with the classification of boats allow the total fuel consumption required for the boats to travel at estimated distance and time to be calculated. The total amount of fuel consumed is estimated as shown in the following table.

Table 14. Fuel consumption estimation for 805 boats

Once the total fuel consumption estimation is fully established, the emissions factors can then be used to estimate the amount of emissions. By multiplying the emission factors given in 3.2 with the total amount of fuel consumption, a result of total amount of emissions can be achieved. The table below shows the total emissions from combustion with respect to the fuel consumption estimated per year.

42  

Page 49: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Table 15. Total emission estimated from total fuel consumed

Both estimations of show high amounts of released NOx, Cox, and HCs per year. Although the diffusion rates and modeling of pollutant transports are not achieved in this study, data has been collected on natural harbors in combination with the aerial photo used for boat counts (kept at the Tjarno marine lab) suggests the spatial distribution of boats over the area of the Koster islands.

Fig. 13. The map to the left shows a grid drawn map of Koster with the dots representing the boat locations on the aerial photographs. Each square grid represents 1 aerial photograph. The map on the right shows Koster and its depth profile with the dots represents the location of natural harbors observed for several years.

Both maps suggest a fairly distributed pattern of boating locations and its harbors. The map on the left suggest high intensity in boat populations between the North and South Koster, especially at 003014 and 002015. The map to the right suggest natural harbors situating more towards the Southwest of the South Koster island, in the proximity of 003016, 003017, and 003015. The deep areas demonstrated in the map on the right are the shipping routes, with ferries and ships that are greater than 20m long being spotted. Hence the boats traveling in quadrants 004XXX and 005XXX suggest they are traveling to and from the main land. From

43  

Page 50: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

these maps, it is possible to say that these emissions will be likely to distribute over the national park rather than concentrate at a particular location. In addition, the heavy boat traffic to the main island in combination with the fact that the area is open to the Atlantic and is geographically situated near the Arctic Circle, there is a possibility for emissions to be transported elsewhere and creating environmental problems.

4.2.4 Combustion Engine Emission Estimates using Statistical Approach

The analysis of variance revealed a significance score of 0.000 (shown in the figure below), which means that the combination of the length, engine power, and engine’s operating cycle, the inboard/outboard factor, and fuel type would highly determine the amount of fuel to be consumed.

ANOVAb

239513.1 5 47902.625 623.602

.000a

46396.848 604 76.816285910.0 609

RegressionResidualTotal

Model1

Sum ofSquares df Mean Square F Sig.

Predictors: (Constant), In_1_in, kw, Length (m), Ful_1_D, strokea.

Dependent Variable: fuel consumption (l/hr)b. Fig. 14. Analysis of various calculated with the dependent variable being fuel consumption and independent variables being inboard/outboard factor, rated polength, fuel type, and engine’s operating cycle

wer,

The analysis of variance shows that there are possible other factors that may have been overlooked if the engine rated power based emission estimation is used. The result of testing the significant differences between the fuel consumption of 2 stroke and 4 stroke engines is as follows:

Fig. 15. T-test and F-test comparing the fuel consumption of 2 and 4 stroke engines

The test performed showed that the average fuel consumption differences between 2 stroke engines and 4 stroke engines are insignificant with the resulted T-test and F-test significance score of 0.73 and 0.97 respectively. To test if the fuel consumption would significantly differ between the inboard design and the outboard design, T-test and F-test is used as follows:

44  

Page 51: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Fig. 16. T-test and F-test comparing the fuel consumption of inboard and outboard designs. In the table on the top, 0 represent outboard design and 1 represent inboard design.

Group Statistics

13 27.1385 24.02263 6.66268596 13.7129 21.55689 .88300

In_1_in01

fuel consumption (l/hr)N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. ErrorMean

Independent Samples Test

2.970 .085 2.216 607 .027 13.42561 6.05809 1.52825 25.32296

1.998 12.425 .068 13.42561 6.72094 -1.16267 28.01389

Equal variancesassumedEqual variancesnot assumed

fuel consumption (l/hr)F Sig.

Levene's Test forEquality of Variances

t df Sig. (2-tailed)Mean

DifferenceStd. ErrorDifference Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval of the

Difference

t-test for Equality of Means

The test performed showed fuel consumption differences between inboard and outboard designs are significant with the resulted T-test and F-test significance score of 0.027 and 0.085 respectively. To test if the fuel consumption would significantly differ between fuel types, T-test and F-test is used. The result is as follows:

Group Statistics

37 16.7907 22.78184 3.74531572 13.8189 21.61286 .90368

Ful_1_D01

fuel consumption (l/hr)N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. ErrorMean

Independent Samples Test

5.181 .023 .808 607 .419 2.97178 3.67831 -4.25198 10.19553

.771 40.305 .445 2.97178 3.85279 -4.81317 10.75672

Equal variancesassumedEqual variancesnot assumed

fuel consumption (l/hr)F Sig.

Levene's Test forEquality of Variances

t df Sig. (2-tailed)Mean

DifferenceStd. ErrorDifference Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval of the

Difference

t-test for Equality of Means

Fig. 17. T-test and F-test comparing the fuel consumption between fuel types. In the table on the top, 0 represent Gasoline and 1 represent diesel.

The test performed showed fuel consumption differences between fuel types to contain mixed results. The T-test performed showed that the fuel consumption differences between gasoline and diesel is insignificant with significance score of 0.42, whereas the F-test performed showed that the fuel consumption differences between gasoline and diesel is significant with significance score of 0.02. In order to confirm whether fuel consumption differences between fuel types are significant, the non parametric 2 independent sample test is used. The result is as follows.

Test Statisticsa

8885,0009588,000

-1,638,101

Mann-Whitney UWilcoxon WZAsymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

fuelconsumption

(l/hr)

Grouping Variable: Ful_1_Da.

Ranks

37 259,14 9588,00572 307,97 176157,00609

Ful_1_D01

N Mean Rank Sum of Ranksfuel consumption (l/hr)

Total

Fig. 18. Nonparametric 2 independent sample test comparing the fuel consumption of gasoline engines with fuel consumption of diesel engines. In the table on the left 0 represent gasoline and 1 represent diesel

45  

Page 52: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

The nonparametric 2 independent sample test result shows that the fuel consumption between gasoline and diesel engines are significantly different, with significance score of 0.1.

For length and engine rated power, regression analysis will be used since the data is continuous, in accompany with analysis of variance and T-test. The linear regression performed on fuel consumption and length results show that fuel consumption differences are significant for boats at varying lengths, with both analysis of variance and T-test significant scores equal to 0.00. However, since the R Square value obtained is 0.39, the regression analysis showed that less than 10% of the time the length can determine the fuel consumption rate as shown below.

Model Summary

,197a ,039 ,037 21,26972Model1

R R SquareAdjustedR Square

Std. Error ofthe Estimate

Predictors: (Constant), Length (m)a. ANOVAb

11106,886 1 11106,886 24,551 ,000a

274607,4 607 452,401285714,3 608

RegressionResidualTotal

Model1

Sum ofSquares df Mean Square F Sig.

Predictors: (Constant), Length (m)a.

Dependent Variable: fuel consumption (l/hr)b. Coefficientsa

-7,199 4,364 -1,650 ,1002,140 ,432 ,197 4,955 ,000

(Constant)Length (m)

Model1

B Std. Error

UnstandardizedCoefficients

Beta

StandardizedCoefficients

t Sig.

Dependent Variable: fuel consumption (l/hr)a.

Fig. 19. Regression Analysis for Fuel Consumption and length

It may be possible that the R Square may improve if other possible curve fits are observed. Various curves are applied as shown in the graph below.

fuel consumption (l/hr)

Length (m)

20,0015,0010,005,000,00

200,00

150,00

100,00

50,00

0,00

LogisticExponentialGrowthSPowerCompoundCubicQuadraticInverseLogarithmicLinearObserved

Fig. 20. Graph of fuel consumption and length relationship

46  

Page 53: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

The best curve that represents the relationship between fuel consumption and boat length that can be seen from the graph is the cubic curve, where the R Square value obtained from this curve is 0.066 and the relationship is “F = 150.91- 42.24L + 3.94L2-0.11L3” where F = fuel consumption and L= length in meters. However, there are other curves that are able to achieve higher R Square values (with the highest obtainable R Square value is 0.113) including logistic, growth, compound, and exponential curves, suggesting that the fuel and length relationship is exponential as the following equation:

The linear regression performed on fuel consumption and engine power results show that fuel consumption differences are significant for boats at varying engine power, with both analysis of variance and T-test significant scores equal to 0.00. However, since the R Square value obtained is 0.83, the regression analysis showed that approximately 80% of the time the engine power can determine the fuel consumption rate as shown below.

Model Summary

,913a ,834 ,833 8,84947Model1

R R SquareAdjustedR Square

Std. Error ofthe Estimate

Predictors: (Constant), kwa.

ANOVAb

238178,2 1 238178,246 3041,358

  

It may be possible that the R Square may improve if other possible curve fits are observed. Various curves are applied as shown in the graph below.

,000a

47536,064 607 78,313285714,3 608

RegressionResidualTotal

Model1

Sum ofSquares df Mean Square F Sig.

Predictors: (Constant), kwa.

Dependent Variable: fuel consumption (l/hr)b.

Coefficientsa

-1,745 ,458 -3,808 ,000,382 ,007 ,913 55,149 ,000

(Constant)kw

Model1

B Std. Error

UnstandardizedCoefficients

Beta

StandardizedCoefficients

t Sig.

Dependent Variable: fuel consumption (l/hr)a.

Fig. 21. Regression analysis for fuel consumption and engine power

47  

Page 54: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Fig. 22. Graph of fuel consumption and power (Kw) relationship

The best curve that represents the relationship between fuel consumption and boat engine power (in Kw) is the cubic curve, where the R Square value obtained from this curve is 0.872 and the relationship is as follows:

 

Where F = fuel consumption and P = engine power (Kw).

From these statistical tests, it is observable that engine power play the essential role in determining the rate of fuel consumption, but other parameters, including length, fuel type, and inboard/outboard design also contribute in determining the amount of fuel consumed. Other parameters that may affect the amount of fuel consumed also include other dimensions that are more difficult to obtained, i.e. width and height of the boat. However, it would be more efficient to keep with the parameters that are feasibly obtainable within a short period of time. The “length-over-alls” of a ship can be directly measured when observing the amount of boats through satellite imagine and aerial photographs.

These parameters that have been described can help to predict the fuel consumption of a boats using regression analysis on the 5 parameters. The result of regression analysis is as follows:

48  

Page 55: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Model Summary

.915a .838 .836 **********Model1

R R SquareAdjustedR Square

Std. Error ofthe Estimate

Predictors: (Constant), In_1_in, kw, Length (m), Ful_1_D, stroke

a.

Coefficientsa

3.089 7.679 .402

.688-.306 .194 -.028 -1.583

.114

.385 .007 .918 53.683 .0002.020 2.445 .020 .826 .409-.970 1.867 -.011 -.520 .604

-9.228 4.028 -.062 -2.291 .022

(Constant)Length (m)kwstrokeFul_1_DIn_1_in

Model1

B Std. Error

UnstandardizedCoefficients

Beta

StandardizedCoefficients

t Sig.

Dependent Variable: fuel consumption (l/hr)a. Fig. 23. Linear regression Analysis of 5 parameters to predict fuel consumption rates

From the linear regression analysis, it is evident that the 3 most significant parameters for the determination of fuel consumption rates include inboard/outboard design, length, and engine power. The R score of 0.92 suggests that the parameters are highly correlated to fuel consumption and the R Square score of 0.84 ensures the high predictability of fuel consumption using these 5 parameters. Although the fuel type and operating cycle may be significant in predicting the fuel consumption, but these 2 parameters play an important role in determining the characteristics of emissions the engine will produce.

The resulted linear regression model capable of predicting the fuel consumption rate is as follows:

 

Where F = fuel consumption, L = length in meters, P = Engine power (Kw), S = Engine’s operating cycle (stroke), T = fuel type where 0 = gasoline and 1 = diesel, and I = inboard/outboard design where 0 = outboard and 1 = inboard.

In order to see if this model would be able to be applied for emission estimation, the model is applied on to the 805 boats counted at Koster. Since the boats were counted using aerial photographs, lengths measured using GIS software was recorded for the 805 boats. From the lengths recorded, predicting the engine’s operating cycle, inboard/outboard design, and fuel type is achievable using statistical T-test with the data provided in Appendix B. The T-test results to determine the length differences for engines with different amount of engine’s operating cycle are as follows:

 

 

 

 

49  

Page 56: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

  Group Statistics

7 7.1643 1.55022

 

.58593

602 9.9356 1.98022 .08071

stroke2

4

Length (m)N Mean Std. Deviation

St

Me

d. Error

an

Fig. 24. T-test result for stroke estimation from length

 

 

 

 

 

The t-test shows that there is a significant difference in length of boats with 2 stroke and 4 stroke engines. The engines operating cycle is then predicted using the means calculated from the T-test. From the means resulted from the T-test, it is evident that larger boats have 4 stroke engines and smaller boats have 2 stroke engines. In this case, boats smaller than 7.16 meters are 2 stroke, and boats larger than 9.93 meters are 4 stroke. The problem is that there are some boats in between these two lengths. Judging from the standard deviation, the assumption is then made that boats that are less than 8.16 are 2 stroke engines and the rest are 4 stroke engines.

The T-test results to determine the length differences for boats with inboard designs and outboard designs are as follows:

Group Statistics

The t-test shows that there is a significant difference in length of boats with inboard and outboard designs. The inboard/outboard design is then predicted using the means calculated

13 6.9646 1.57580 .43705

596 9.9678 1.95740 .08018

In_1_in0

1

Length (m)N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Mean

Fig. 25. T-test result for inboard/outboard estimation from length

50  

Page 57: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

from the T-test. From the means resulted from the T-test, it is evident that larger boats have inboards and smaller boats have outboards. In this case, boats smaller than 6.96 meters are outboards, and boats larger than 9.98 meters are inboards. The problem is that there are some boats in between these two lengths. Judging from the standard deviation, the assumption is then made that boats that are less than 7.96 are outboards and the rest are inboards.

The T-test results to determine the length differences for boats using diesel and gasoline are as follows:

Group Statistics

37 7.6176 1.47271 .24211

572 10.0516 1.93605 .08095

Ful_1_D0

1

Length (m)N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error

Mean

Fig. 26. T-test result for fuel type estimation from length

The t-test shows that there is a significant difference in length of boats using gasoline and diesel. The fuel type is then predicted using the means calculated from the T-test. From the means resulted from the T-test, it is evident that larger boats use diesel and smaller boats use gasoline. In this case, boats smaller than 7.62 meters use gasoline, and boats larger than 10.05 meters use diesel. The problem is that there are some boats in between these two lengths. Judging from the standard deviation, the assumption is then made that boats that are less than 8.65 are considered to use gasoline and the rest are considered to use diesel.

Since the statistical test showed that the engine rated power is the most essential factor in determining the fuel consumption rate, and they are often available, predicting engine rated power will be achieved by using the engine power averages of boat engines in Appendix B that fits the predicted engine design and fuel type. The Appendix B should have enough models and brand variations to cover a range of engine characteristics. Once the engine power, engine’s operating cycle, inboard/outboard design, and fuel type is predicted, the amount of fuel consumption can then be predicted. The predicted fuel consumption is for each 805 boats can be viewed in Appendix C. Once the fuel consumption is predicted, emission estimation can be fulfilled similar to what has been done in 4.2.3, resulting in the figure shown below.

51  

Page 58: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Fig. 27. Tables summarizing the emissions estimated using statistical assisted approach

4.2.5 Emission Estimates Summary

In summary the amount of NOx, CO, HCs, and CO2 estimated from 3 approaches is shown in the graphs below.

Fig. 28. Graph showing total NOx estimates calculated using different approaches and emission factors.

Fig. 29. Graph showing total CO, HCs, and CO2 estimates calculated using different approaches and emission factors.

52  

Page 59: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

The following diagram summarizes the estimated emissions of a 100 day recreational boating with 805 boats within Kosterhavets marine National park.

53  

Fig 30. Estimated emissions summary

 100 days of recreational boating in Koster, with an estimated 805 boats used in total during the 100 days. 

Fuel (70000 l diesel, 300 000 l gasoline) 

A lot of Air 

Minimum of 3220 mg TBT 

A lot of H2O  

Minimum of 241500 mg Cu

2 800 kg NOx  50 000 kg HCs 850 000 kg CO Etc. 2

Etc. 

A lot of Metals 

Oil

A lot of Biocide 

256.84 kg Nitrogen 

31.68 kg Phosphorous 

126.62 kgC Carbohydrate

Etc.

Etc.

Page 60: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

5.0 Discussion

5.1 Impact Evaluation

Evaluating impacts for the subprocesses of recreational boating is complicated for this project since a lot of impacts are semi-quatitative and highly lacks the required data and resources. However, if one is to compare the results of this study with the regulations, the emissions estimated are significantly high. The TBT and Cu antifouling has been prohibited by the Swedish law to prevent impacts from TBT and Cu leachate from boats. However, as explained in 2.1, and estimated in 4.2.2, TBT and several metals are still found to be depositing on the top sediment layer at toxic levels for invertebrates. This is confirmed by another study conducted by Martinez P.G. (2009)’s study on mussel growth differences in areas with high boat usage intensity. In terms of recreation, physical impacts have been found. However, since the fishing problems in the past have impacted a lot of the benthic communities, especially coral communities, the significance of recreation in terms of direct physical impacts is relatively low but in terms of impacts to the seagrass, recreational boating is considered to be a great threat. Further study needs to be made to confirm this claim. In terms of nutrient emissions, it is unable to determine a quantitative answer of significance, since the problems due to nutrient load can only be addressed after knowing the hydraulic flows in the vicinity of Koster. However, if the water remains confined to Koster, nutrient loading can become highly problematic. The release of carbohydrates can also lead to increase in the usage of oxygen in the water as stated by Boeker E. and Grondelle R.V. (2001). Since many areas of the Baltic and adjacent seas are oligotrophic, which often run a low risk of oxygen depletion and often contains a <70 μg/l of nitrogen and <10 µg/l of phosphorous. An input of 256.84 kg of nitrogen and 31.66 kg of phosphorous in combination of126.62 grams of carbon for carbohydrates could increase algae and growth of microorganism growth and initiate the regime shift from oligotrophic to mesotrophic, depending on the hydraulic flows, the water retention time, and how these nutrients flow within the system.

The most controversial problems of recreational boating is due to the combustion process. If the regulation is reviewed, it would be observable that combustion release the quantity of emissions greater than it would have under EURO IV regulations emissions. This can be observed by setting up a scenario where all boats follow the EURO IV regulations, which a gasoline engine would produce 0.08 g/km, 1 g/km, and 0.1 g/km of NOx, CO, and HCs respectively (Guzella L. and Onder C.H., 2004). The total emissions for boats using gasoline would produce total emissions as follows:

By taking these calculated emission results and compared it with figures given in chapter 4.2, it is evident that the release from combustion in recreational boating is much more than the EURO

54 

 

Page 61: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

IV regulation scenario. In addition, the significance of this issue is also heightened by the fact that the emission factor for high speed marine boats (recreational boats) are comparable to emissions from trucks (see below) as demonstrated by Kean A.J. et al (2000). These factors indicate the seriousness of recreational boating problems and that it should be treated equally to other modes of transport, i.e. trucks and cars.

Comparison of Emission Factors of Various Diesel Engine Uses (Kean A.J. et al 2000) 

Application  NOx (g/kg)  PM10 (g/kg) Trucks  42 ± 5  2.5 ± 0.2 Locomotives  75 ± 9  1.9 ± 0.3 high speed marine vessels  40  1.2 

However, if the emissions estimations of recreational boating are compared to the total CO2 emissions transportation in Sweden, then the emissions from boats in Koster becomes less significant. A figure given by Chris J. (2009) showed Swedish transport sector to produce 22 million tons of CO2 in 1 year in 2004 while the recreational boats in Koster releases 900 tons of CO2 per year (0.004% of the Swedish CO2 released in the transport sector). If a comparison is made with the total amount of marine engines sold in Sweden in 2004, approximately 570000 tons of CO2 can be estimated with the method used in 3.2, which is equivalent to 2.6% of the total CO2 produced by the Swedish transport sector in 2004. This is because of the amount of usage of recreational boats in one year, the nature of how it’s used and the limitations boats have.

From the emissions estimated, there are high amounts of HCs, which as mentioned in 3.2 consists of high amounts of VOCs. The releases of substances like PAH and VOCs have led to ecotoxicological effects. NOx and HCs released may also lead to the generation of photochemical smog, acid precipitation, and eutrophication possibilities. Another problem related to emissions of combustion engines that is required to be discussed is the release of CO and CO2. CO is poisonous to the blood and is a health hazard in itself. This is more of a boat design and health related issues, but high amounts of local CO may affect the wildlife in the area. CO2 however has other important effects. As mentioned earlier, CO2 may lead to increase oceanic acidity, leading to CaCO3 dissolution. The dissolution of CaCO3 means that the organism that relies on CaCO3 formation will be impacted. However, this is also determined by the rate of photosynthesis for primary producers in the system. These problems in combination with increasing trends of boat use lead to the re-determination of the significance of boating impacts for Sweden would need to be further studied but for Koster, where boats are the main means of transportation, emissions due to boating remains highly significant.

Furthermore, there is no available meteorological model and NOx partitioning model available to predict how will the released of pollutants from recreational boating will be dispersed, making it difficult to determine the significance of recreational boating impact. Nonetheless, Koster

55 

 

Page 62: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

islands have very small roads, contain almost no cars, making recreational boating the main source of emissions in the area.

A set of questionnaires have been sent to 5 experts located at Tjarno marine biology laboratory station in Tjarno, which is located near Stromstad and Koster. The questionnaire aims to have their views to see whether which sub-processes of recreational boating should be given the highest priority. By the end of this project, only one has returned, suggesting that recreation and antifouling impacts mostly on marine ecosystem, especially its biota, and greatly effects the human settlements while combustion would heavily effect everything. In total, combustion from internal combustion engines score highest as a precursor to impacts from recreational boating.

5.2 Possible Mitigation Measures

The results shown in 4.2 have shown many precursors to various environmental problems. However, as portrayed in 5.1, the ways of which the policies have been implemented for recreational boats should definitely be revised. There are many possibilities in policy revision. Although boat control would have been difficult, since setting up check points to check up all the boats would have been near impossible, but it is possible to introduce

policies that would have favoured the boaters while controlling the environmental impacts in return. Policies can range from the encouragement for boat registration through giving incentives, i.e. fuel and washing coupons, free paint job etc. Boat free zone can also be set up, with inflatable mechanisms to prevent trespassing and preventing direct impacts that can occur in shallow waters. Other policies may involve the encouragement to use alternative fuels, i.e. ethanol and LPG fuel. However, before implementing alternative fuels like ethanol and LPG fuels, it is necessary to classify which kind of problem is likely to happen. These problems can only be predicted through a study on flow dynamics in the vicinity of Koster. The reasons behind the study requirement of alternative fuels are that often various fuels once applied would have led to a shifting of problem. The use of ethanol base fuel has been found to reduce some amounts of HC species while releasing more formaldehyde (Cerne O. et al, 2008). LPG usage reduces the amount of CO produced in outboard engines while releasing more NOx due to its high heating value (Murillo S. et al, 2005). A better policy would be to limit the use of

Fig 31. Photo showing boat out of the water

56 

 

Page 63: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

fuel-based engines, and instead promote the use of renewable energy sources for powering boats. Electric motors can be used with a possible solar generator onboard perhaps? These issues must be further studied. Although the use of elecgeneration system was not studied, but a contact with the Petroleum Authority of Thailand that had worked with shipping suggested the implementation of “cold ironing”, which observes the possibility of shutting ships power and electricity at ports. Nontheless, the problems of increasing nutrient loading and air pollution would have remained for a very long time.

Other solutions involving the increase of nutrient loading and air emissions would require working with the recreational boating process directly. Encouragement towards the use of newer engine designs that has catalytic deNOx and soot filtration system would reduce the air emission pollutants. However, the emissions of CO2 would be unavoidable. The reduction of the carbon footprint for recreational boats can be implemented in many ways, which is also applicable for other ecological footprint reductions in Koster. Bioregenerative life support systems can be applied to Koster to take up the produced CO2 while releasing back the exact amount O2 required for combustion (Nelson M. et al, 2003). However, this would require many more new researches on mass balances to see the amount of CO2 release of engines and uptake by a particular bioregenerative life support system design, which would often lead to other by products, i.e. food, which can lower other aspects of ecological footprints. This can also be applied to applied problems, i.e. an onboard miniaturized contructed wetland to directly absorb the nutrients released from sewage or miniaturized and simplified agro-ecosystems to take the pollutants released (Nelson M. et al, 1999, and Volk T., 1996). Other concepts of ecological engineering may be applied to have reduce the severity of the impacts, i.e. the use of mussel farming to take up nutrients (Odum H.T., and Odum B., 2003). However, the use of ecological engineering method must be studied carefully with as little use of non-primitive species as possible. In addition, the use of ecological engineering may affect several organisms within the ecosystem. In Koster, the coral recovery is being processed over the area and placing mussel farms may reduce the recovery rates. All of these require further studies.

The problems of antifouling are difficult to address. There are already strict laws prohibiting its use. To prevent further leachate, it may be possible for the government to regulate how boat washing should be processed. An alternative that is observable in the market is having a special none environmentally damaging sheet/fabric attached to buoys for the prevention of fouling. This alternative is already in the market as found on some internet websites. Another simpler alternative is to have the boat out of the water, as in on the photo to the right, but may be complicated for bigger boats.

5.3 Uncertainty Evaluation

The environmental implications identified and the quantification of environmental emissions in the previous chapter clearly shows that the project was able to fulfill its aims to semi quantitatively analyzed the environmental implications of recreational boating, but fail to give a

57 

 

Page 64: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

solid prediction of possible impacts. A lot of limitations in this study were due to the lack of information, problems with data collection, lack of resources, and the instability and complexity of atmospheric and hydraulic conditions of Koster. There has been a lack of information on the boats used in Sweden and Koster alike, since the Swedish recreational boats register does not represent the Swedish population well. There is a lack of knowledge on hydraulic and atmospheric conditions at Koster as well, causing the prediction of impacts on Koster to be soft, and hence, a study on atmospheric and hydraulic modeling over Koster would be appealing for future studies. Another problem is the method of data collection. When aerial photos are used to count boats, with dimensions of boats measured, there are often problems associated to it.

Fig 32. An aerial photo of a harbor in South Koster

Rock 

Rock

For example, the aerial photograph above shows a harbor with several recreational boats, recognized by their shapes. The problem comes when out in the middle of the ocean, an image with the same shape, size, or color can be something else, i.e. rocks. Another problem is due to the boats themselves; some boats do not have engines (picture C), while others have sails which would greatly influence the speed and fuel needed to be consumed (Picture B). Furthermore, it was assumed using statistical methods that boats less than 8 meters used 2 stroke engines, but as seen below (Picture A), boats with its length overalls as short as a car can use a 4 stroke engine.

58 

 

Page 65: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Another problem associated with the aerial photography is the fact that the photo only represented one day, meaning that the average amount of boats over the season could have been either much more than 805 boats or less than 805 boats. Also, the aerial photograph provided by the Tjärnö Marine Laboratory was taken on a summer day in 2006 but was not recorded by which month. This meant that the aerial photograph might have been taken during the month at the beginning of the summer, midsummer, or even the end of the summer. Each temporal difference can either lead to the result conveyed in this study to be either underestimated or over estimated. Furthermore, available information obtained is sometimes wrong. One of the documents that this study has referenced had some discrepancies where a unit of g was mistakenly mistyped as mg.

There is also another problem when the investigations were conducted on boat speed and engines. A direct contact with Volvo claims that the speed of the boat requires testing as boats’ speed are dependent on the engine power, realistic load, and hull design. This project has assumed the speed to be 18.5 km/h, equivalent to approximately 10 knots. Further studies may have to be made a more realistic prediction of speed for boats. A more realistic speed prediction would differentiate the amount of hours estimated in this study and would give a better picture of the emissions released. Furthermore, one of the greatest uncertainties in this project is the prediction of total time used in recreational boating in Koster. It is evident that various figures of total fueled consumed and emissions that resulted from combustion are not consistent. This is due to the use of random simulation of the amount of days and distances traveled, which ultimately affect the magnitude of boat use and its emissions.

Apart from the problems related to the actual execution of the investigation, there are also several uncertainties that should be taken in to consideration when reading the results. First of all, the observation made regarding the power of waves generated by boats’ cruises is questionable. The differences in power are judged by observing the length and size of waves formed. However, this is not accurate as waves generated are governed by other factors including boats. In addition, whether the environmental problems associated with the emissions generated will occur in Koster depends on various factors. As mentioned earlier, factors involving atmospheric conditions and hydrological dynamics play an important role in

4 Stroke outboard

Sails

Fig 33. Boat photos showing boats with sails, outboard engines, and some without engines at all A B C

59 

 

Page 66: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

determining where and how these emissions will be transported. Eutrophication may not be as significant if the water retention time is low but the direction of flow may influence nutrient loading elsewhere. From looking at the meteorological data provided on the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute’s website, where satellite images in June is provided, unstable atmospheric conditions for Kattegat and Skagerrak Sea are observable, which meant that predicting these impacts would be a great challenge for future research.

The hydrological dynamics within the Skagerrak and Kattegat Sea is also complex. The flows are influenced by various inputs of water and the flowing mass of water from the Baltic Sea towards the North Sea. A study of the hydrological conditions of the area would require extensive use of marine vessels, where a fleet of 17 research vessels was required to observe the oceanographic variability of the Skagerrak and Kattegat Sea which have found various variability of nutrient and algae concentrations over the area (Danielssen D.S. et al, 1997). However, the main water mass flow reported over the area where Koster and Stromstad is situated seems to be flowing out towards the North Sea. Since the study was more focused on the Skagerrak and Kattegat Sea, the area of Koster wasn’t extensively covered, and further study would be required to make any appropriate suggestions.

It is, however, necessary to clear out one uncertainty. The fact that the emission factors used with fuel consumption are obtained from an internet source lowers its creditability. Hence the fuel-based emission estimation used in this report will be compared with another source that has been published in a scientific journal. Kean A.J. et al (2000) provided a fuel based estimation for NOx, where 40 g of NOx is estimated to be produced per kg of fuel. From this figure, a comparison is made for boats with diesel engines by applying the method of estimating the amount of fuels consumed and time estimation used in this study. The result is as shown below.

Table 16. Estimated NOx from diesel consumption using (Kean A.J. et al, 2000)’s estimates.

The result of the comparison showed that estimates used in this report (shown in 4.2) is similar to the amount estimated using figures provided by Kean A.J. et al (2000), where the amount of NOx estimated by the method used in this study suggests a total of 2765.86 kg NOx released from diesel engines and the amount of NOx estimated by Kean A.J. et al (2000) suggests a total of 2293.64 kg of NOx released from diesel engines. Thus the emission factors used in this study is creditable enough to be used.

Another uncertainty that requires proving is the issue regarding the inboard and outboard design, and how it may affect the amount of engine rated power to be estimated. This report argued that the main influential parameters for emissions with consideration of engine rated power come from the type of operating cycle and fuel ignition system and not whether the engine is outboard

60 

 

Page 67: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

or inboard. In order to prove this, the statistical T-test and F-test is applied to Appendix B, to see if there would be any differences between the engine rated power of inboard engines and the outboard engines. The T-test revealed a significance score of 0.42 and the F-Test revealed a significance score of 0.65 (shown in the figure below), which means that the differences of the engine rated power between inboard and outboard engines are insignificant.

Group Statistics

13 52.7243 46.46200 12.88624596 40.9111 51.86083 2.12430

In_1_in01

kwN Mean Std. Deviation

Std. ErrorMean

Independent Samples Test

.208 .649 .814 607 .416 11.81319 14.51124 -16.68513 40.31151

.905 12.661 .383 11.81319 13.06016 -16.47859 40.10497

Equal variancesassumedEqual variancesnot assumed

kwF Sig.

Levene's Test forEquality of Variances

t df Sig. (2-tailed)Mean

DifferenceStd. ErrorDifference Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval of the

Difference

t-test for Equality of Means

Fig 34. Statistical test for differences between the engine rated power given for inboard motors and outboard motors. In the table to the top, 0 represents outboard motors and 1 represent inboard motors

One of the main interesting findings of this study is the differences in the emission factors for combustion of boat engines. Statistical assisted approach to emission estimation resulted in calculated estimated emissions that are similar when compared with the results of fuel-based emission factors for combustion. This shows that the statistical model resulted in this chapter can be used to help predict emission estimations in the future while allowing simpler means of data collection. Until now, the statistical tests are able to prove that fuel consumption is not only determined by engine power, but often the engine power is enough to be considered. From the model it can be perceived clearly that the engine power predicted most of the fuel consumption. Nevertheless, one reason to the differences in fuel-based estimated emissions and engine power based estimated emissions are the factors to be considered for fuel consumption estimation. However, should the emission factors used in this study follow the fuel based estimation or engine power based estimation is an interesting issue for future research, since it is now out of the boundary of this project study but this factor will greatly influence on the accuracy of emissions estimated for combustion. This also emphasized the need for further study to improve many inaccuracies in this study. For example in reality some outboard engines are also 4 stroke engines (see Appendix B). In addition, only gasoline and diesel will be taken in to consideration. Furthermore, ethanol fuel should also be considered, among other variety of fuels.

There is a high likelihood that the result presented in this project is under estimated. During the execution of the investigations, it can be recognized that the boundary chosen for the study might be either too confined to the open sea. During the field observations at Koster, most small boats

61 

 

Page 68: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

62 

 

have been noted not to cross the gap between Koster and the main land. Reasons are speculated to be due to the oceanic wave’s sizes and strong oceanic currents. During the investigations using aerial photographs, large proportions of recreational boats (approximately double the amount in Koster) can be found confined to the coastal areas of the main land. This have pointed the limitations of the geographical boundaries set at the beginning of the investigation and has led to underestimation of emissions from boats in Koster. The underestimation of the impacts is not only due to the limitations of the boundary but also the lack of a structured grid observation of the island. This is mainly due to the lack of funding and time. Grid studies would allow a more detailed observation of the island, which would allow a better insight on the impacts of recreational boating on coastal areas of Koster.

In general the main problem of this study lies in the lack of information and data that would have allowed a lot of inaccuracies and uncertainties to improve. However, this led to a good point. Due to the lack of data, the study finds a method for estimating emissions that can cope with the lack of data or the lack of funds to obtain specific details. This can become helpful for management implications and decision makers. The equation formed by using linear regression analysis and T-test analysis based on a general boat data, have shown that only the engine power (often easiest to obtain when compared to other engine specifications) and the length of boat is needed to estimate fuel consumption rates. When applied with the emissions data provided and the boating behavior regarding space and time within Sweden in general, quantifiable emissions estimations are obtainable where various factors of boats are taken in to consideration. The model provided can assist in scenarios studies when various policies are to be determined or when various management practices are to be tested upon.

Although, currently the emissions of boats in total in Koster and Sweden are relatively small when compared to the total emissions from the transport sector as a whole, boat engines’ emissions are relatively equivalent to trucks and would become an environmental problem as the number of boats grew. A study of the growth in boating population would need to be further study in order to predict impact growths in the future.

Page 69: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

6.0 Conclusion

This project has conducted 3 main investigations on recreational boating with the objective to understand possible environmental implications of recreational boating. The first investigation involved performing a life cycle inventory analysis of recreational boating, where recreational boating is seen as a major process with subprocesses including Recreation, Electric Power Generation, Antifouling, and Combustion from boat engines. Each subprocesses have various environmental implications. The impacts from electric power generation weren’t investigated since the process was identified at the end of the project and hence would require more time and resources. Environmental implications due to recreation involved nutrient loading and physical impacts of boating related activities. Although littering have been left out in this investigation, but signs of littering are not so high. In addition, there were garbage sites near harbors for litter deposits, and has been often found to be in constant use. Hence littering in to the ocean was assumed to be unlikely at most times, but in order to claim whether littering will become a problem require a detailed study where extensive observations and questionnaire would be involved. Boating and its related activities can also cause physical damages to benthic and inter-tidal ecosystems. This can be prevented through zoning management. Antifouling on the other hand has a more complex situation where the use of TBT is prohibited, but are still leaching from boats after boat wash. Solutions to this would involve the monitoring and providing guidelines for boat cleaning businesses. Environmental Implications due to combustion is complex in many ways. The complexity is due to the nature of which the combustion takes place within each engine, the types of available engines. In addition, there are myriads of fuel types available for consumption. The complexity is enhanced by the fact that often a solution to a problem of engine’s combustion would often lead to a new problem. In addition, sometimes the use of environmental friendly products may not help the environment at all. In general, environmental implications of recreational boating are similar to other types of automobiles where the release of NOx, HCs, COx, VOCs, and fuel additives is the main environmental concern.

In Conclusion, there are many environmental implications of recreational boating. These include a variety of environmental problems ranging from release of toxic contaminants to urban air pollution problems. The study was able to semi quantitatively analyzed the emissions from recreational boating and environmental concerns involved but predicting environmental impacts became a challenge. Data collection was made mainly through literature search in text books and scientific journals, and through various contacts at many levels of the society. The environmental impacts involved have been considered by looking up various theories related to the emissions involved and the processes leading to the emissions obtained. The result of this study has led to a simple fuel consumption prediction model that can be implemented by various members of the society. In general, it is concluded that there are many environmental problems related to recreational boating but its significance has been clouded. This is however a great concern since Koster is a marine national park as of 2009, hence may lead to a possible increase in the number of visitors and leading to increase in the amount of pollutions emitted. Thus, making recreational boating a significant issue to be determined and should not be ignored by the authoritative body of Koster.

63

Page 70: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

7.0 Acknowledgement

This project would not have been possible without the aid of various persons and institutions. This project would like to credit KTH for assisting in providing resources, materials, and some financial support in the process of making this project, Göteborg University and Tjärnö Marine biology laboratory for their resources and aerial photos, Stockholm University’s toxicity findings, The Swedish Environmental Institute (MVL) tests on engines and Far Eastern company for their financial support. This project would not have succeeded without the advices provided by Associate Professor and supervisor, Fredrik Gröndahl. Various information and data have been collected through various contacts from various parts of the society. Advices on environmental problems regarding Koster have been obtained through working with a marine biologist, Paulina Garza Martinez, Mahidol University’s Laird Allan, Assistant Professor Kobkaew Manomaipiboon and Dr. Wayne N. Phillips, and direct contacts with Lisbeth Jonsson, Per Nilsson, Tomas Lundälv, Anita Tullrot, Andrea Morf, Gunilla Trot and Martin Larsvik from Göteborg University. Data collection regarding the boating behavior in Sweden was obtainable through contacts with Misse Wester from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Experimental results on toxicity have been provided by Associate Professor Britta Eklund from Stockholm University’s Department of Applied Environmental Sciences, whom has also provided the MVL’s engine tests’ report. The information regarding Koster would have not been possible without the assistance of the municipality of Strömstad. Information regarding boats’ register is obtained through direct contact with the Swedish sjöverket’s Katrin Sundholm. The Petroleum Authority of Thailand (PTT), which had worked with shipping and logistics industries, have provided assistance in providing information on how the company have assisted other companies in more environmental friendly methods at ports, and information on problems regarding petroleum’s chemical composition. This is done through contacting an employee named Kobkaeo Damri. Others whom have assisted in providing information regarding petroleum chemicals and other chemical engineering related issues include Thai Royal Army’s Dr. Soraj Pechsiri, chemical engineer Pennapa Jansongsri, chemical engineer Orelie Mahot and Construction Engineer Urmat Makulov from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Mechanical related issues have been observed with the consulting of 2 mechanical engineers: Amir Sattari, and Sawayos Jaynutapong from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). This project would not have been succeeded without the assistance of Associate Professor Chaveevan Pechsiri from Dhurakijphundit University, whom have consulted in computer related issues and issues regarding data manipulation (especially when there is a lack of data), and Associate Professor Rapepun Piriyakul from Ramkhamhaeng University, whom provided consultancy on Statistical related issues. Consultations regarding mass balance analysis have been made with Associate Professor Bjorn Frostell and Lennart Nilsson. Observations and transportation was achievable through the assistance of the local ferry of Strömstad, and the region’s tourism industry which have provided information on Koster. Data on Volvo engines are obtained directly from the company’s contact. Lastly, consultations regarding Swedish translation and computer techniques are made with Ronja Kriche, Cristobal Viedma, and Nisarath Santisukdamrong from the KTH. Additional thanks to friends and family for their support.

64

Page 71: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

8.0 Reference

• Baden S., Gullström M., Lunden B., Pihl L., and Rosenberg R. 2003. ”Vanishing Seagrass (Zostera marina, L.) in Swedish Coastal Waters”. Royal Swedish Academy of Science, Ambio vol.32 No.5 August 2003.

• Bartok W. and Sarofim A.F. 1991. “Fossil Fuel Combustion : A Source book”. John Wiley & Sons Inc. : USA

• Bellefleur D. Lee P. and Ronconi R.A. 2009. “Impact of Recreational Boat Traffic on Marbled Murrelets (Branchyramphus Marmoratus)”. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009) 531-538.

• Bishop M.J. 2007. “Impacts of Boat-generated Waves on Macroinfauna: Towards a Mechanistic Understanding”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology (2007) 187-196.

• Bishop M.J. 2008. “Displacement of Epifauna from Seagrass Blades by Boat Wake”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 354 (2008) 111-118.

• Boeker E. and Grondelle R.V. 1999. “Environmental Physics: second edition”.John Wiley & Sons Ltd.:England.

• Boeker E. and Grondelle R.V. 2001. “Environmental Science Physical Principles and Applications”.John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Great Britain.

• Bohuslän. 2009. “Kosterhavet – a new national park developed with sustainable tourism”. The official Swedish website of the west coast of Sweden – retrieved from http://www.bohuslan.com/templates/article____21179.aspx on 10 June 2009.

• Brown J.S., Bay S.M., Greenstein D.J., and Ray W.R. 2001. “Concentrations of Methyl-Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) in Inputs and Receiving Waters of South California”. Marine Pollution Bulletin Vol. 42 No. 10 pp. 957-966.

• Buerger R., Hill J., Herstine J., and Taggart J. 2000. “The Impact of Recreation on Barrier Islands: A Case Study on Masonboro Island”. Coastal Management, 28:249-259, 2000.

• Bush M.B. 2003. “Ecology of a changing planet: third edition”. Prentice-Hall Inc: United States of America.

• Cerne O., Strandberg J., Fridell E., Peterson K., Allard A., Rydberg T., Vaske B., Jägersten C., Östman N., and Eklund B. 2008. ”Rapport Rena Turen – Utvärdering av Miljöanpasade Bränslen i Fritidsbåtar” . Report produced by IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet (Swedish Environmental Institute), Sweden.

• Chris J. 2009. “Energy for Tomorrow: Powering the Planet, collector’s edition”. National Geographic Society: USA.

• Danielssen D.S., Edler L., Fonselius S., Hernroth L., Ostrowski M., Svendsen E., and Talpsepp L. 1997.“Oceanic Variability in the Skagerrak and Northern Kattegat, May – June, 1990” .ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54: 753-773. 1997.

• Davenport J. and Davenport J.L. 2006. “The Impact of Tourism and Personal Leisure Transport on Coastal Environments: A Review”.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 67 (2006) 280-292.

• Eklund B., Elfström M., and Borg H. 2008. “Tributyltin Originates from Pleasure Boats in Sweden in Spite of Firm Restrictions”.Open Environmental Sciences, 2008, 2, 124-132

• Glasson J., Therivel R., and Chadwick A. 2005. “Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment”. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: Great Britain.

• Graedel T.E. and Allenby B.R. 2005. “Industrial Ecology: second edition”.Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc.: United States of America.

65

Page 72: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

• Guzzella L. and Onder C.H. 2004. “Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems”. Springer-Verlag: Germany.

• Håkanson L. and Blenckner T. 2008. “A review on operational bioindicators for sustainable coastal management – Criteria, motives and relationships”. Ocean & Coastal Management 51 (2008) 43-72.

• Hambrey J. 2008. “Case study 3 - Kosterhavets proposed Marine National Park, Sweden”. Scottish Natural Heritage Research, Annex to Commissioned Report No. 271 – Available online at http://www.snh.org.uk/strategy/CMNP/sr-adnp01.asp

• Hanley N. and Spash C.L. 1993. “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment”. Edward Elgar: England.

• Heywood J.B. 1988. “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals”. McGraw Hill Internal Editions, Automotive Technology Series: Singapore.

• Jonsson L.G., Nilsson P.G., Floruta F., Lundälv T. 2004. ”Distributional patterns of macro- and megafauna associated with a reef of the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa on the Swedish west coast”. Marine Ecology Progress Series vol. 284: 163-171, 2004.

• Juttner F., Backhaus D., Matthias U., Essers U., Greiner R., and Mahr B. 1995a. ”Emissinos of Two- and Four-Stroke Outboard Engines – I. Quantification of Gases and VOC”. Water Research, A Journal of International Water Association (IWA), Vol.29 No.8 pp. 1976-1982.

• Juttner F., Backhaus D., Matthias U., Essers U., Greiner R., and Mahr B. 1995b. ”Emissions of Two- and Four-Stroke Outboard Engines – II. Impact on Water Quality”. Water Research, A Journal of International Water Association (IWA), Vol.29 No.8 pp. 1983-1987.

• Kean A.J., Sawyer R.F., and Harley R.A. 2000. “A Fuel-Based Assessment of Off-Road Diesel Engine Emissions”. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association vol. 50 pp. 1929-1939

• Kowalski J. and Tarelko W. (2009). “NOx emission from a two-stroke ship engine. Part I: Modeling aspect”. Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (2009) 2153-2159.

• Lalli C.M. and Parsons T.R. 2004. “Biological Oceanography An Introduction: Second Edition”.Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: China.

• Leon L.M. and Warnken J. 2008. “Copper and Sewage Inputs from Recreational Vessels at Popular Anchor Sites in semi-enclosed Bay (Qld, Australia): Estimates of Potential Annual Loads”. Marine Pollution Bulletin 57 (2008) 838-845.

• Liddle M.J. and Scorgie H.R.A. 1980. “The Effect of Recreation on Freshwater Plants and Animals: A Review”. Biological Conservation 17 (1980) 183-206.

• Martinez P.G. 2009. "Mytilus Edulis as Bioindicator for Coastal Zone Environmental Assessment ". Master’s Thesis: Department of Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.

• Melander C., Moeller P.D.R., Ballard T.E., Richards J.J., Huigens III R.W., and Cavanagh J. 2009.“Evaluation of Dihydrooroidin as an Antifouling Additive in Marine Paint”. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 63 (2009) 529 – 532.

• Nelson M., Allen J., Alling A., Dempster W.F., and Silverstone S. 2003. “Earth Applications of Closed Ecological Systems: Relevance to the Development of Sustainability in our Global Biosphere”. Advances in Space research vol. 31 No. 7 pp. 1649 – 1655.

• Nelson M., Finn M., Wilson C., Zabel B., Thillo M.V., Hawes P., and Fernandez R. 1999. “Bioregenerative recycling of wastewater in Biosphere 2 using a constructed wetland: 2-year results”. Ecological Engineering 13 (1999) 189 – 197.

66

Page 73: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

67

df

• Nilsson L., Persson P.L., Ryden L., Darozhka S., and Zaliauskiene A. 2007. “Cleaner Production Technologies and Tools for resource Efficient Production: book 2 in a series on environmental management”. Baltic University Press: Sweden.

• NPI. 1999. “Emissions Estimation Technique Manual for Aggregated Emissions from Commercial Ships/Boats – Version 1.0”. Report copyright protected by the Commonwealth of Australia, Reported by the National Pollutant Inventory of Australia for the Environment Australia, Prepared in conjunction with the Australian States and Territories according to the National Environment Protection measure. [Retrieved on 15 May 2009 from http://www.npi.gov.au/handbooks/aedmanuals/pubs/shipping.p ]

• Odum H.T. and Odum B. 2003. “Concepts and methods of ecological engineering”. Ecological Engineering 20 (2003) 339 – 361.

• Pechsiri J.S. 2006. ”Coral Reef Degradation Study of Koh Sak in the Gulf of Thailand”. Thesis produced for Mahidol University International College, Thailand.

• Persson P.O. 2005. "Miljöskyddsteknik - Strategier och teknik för ett hållbart miljöskydd" Industrial Technology, KTH, Sweden.

• Phinney J.T., Skirving W., Kleypas J., and Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2006. ”Coral Reefs and Climate Change: Science and Management (Coastal and Estuarine Studies)”. American Geophysical Union: USA.

• Schnobert H.H. 1990. “The Chemistry of Hydrocarbon Fuels”. Butterworth & Co.: England.

• Singh R.K., Murty H.R., Gupta S.K., and Dikshit A.K. 2009. “An Overview of Sustainability Assessment Methodologies”. Ecological Indicators 9 (2009) 189-212.

• SMHI. 2009. “Polar Orbiting Satellite Image”. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Sweden. [Retrieved from http://www.smhi.se/ on 13th June 2009]

• Therival R. and Partidario M.R. 1996. “The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment”. Earth Scan: England.

• USEPA. 2005. “Emission Facts: Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel”. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, United States Environmental Protection Agency. [Obtained from http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/420f05001.htm 23 May 2009]

• VanLoon G.W. and Duffy S.J. 2005. “Environmental Chemistry: A Global Perspective second edition”. Oxford University Press: United States of America.

• Volk T. 1996. “Considerations in miniaturizing simplified agro-ecosystems for advanced life support”. Ecological Engineering 6 (1996) 99 – 108.

• Weaver P.M. and Rothmans J. 2006. “Integrated Sustainability Assessment, What? Why? How?” . Matisse working paper, www.natisse-project.net/projectcomm/ accessed on 10 December 2007.

• Wester M. 2009. "Green Boating: Nordic boat owners' attitudes towards boating in the Baltic Sea" . Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark.

• Yousef A Y. Mclellon W.M., and Zebuth H.H. 1980. “Changes in Phospherous Concentrations due to Mixing by Motorboats in Shallow Lakes”. Water Research Vol. 14 pp. 841 to 852.

Page 74: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

68 

 

Appendix A Boats and Ships Registered with the Swedish Transport Agency

Boats: 1989 vessels ordered by type and length

Call sign  Name Width (m) 

Length (m)  Machinery  Type of ship 

SFC‐7506  ANIARA  3.70  11.50  Ford 2725 E ‐83  Fritidsegelmotorbåt SFC‐8622  MARMAR  3.35  11.28  Yanmar 3JH2TE Diesel  Fritidsegelmotorbåt SFC‐8110  KASTRUP II  3.90  11.51  Volvo Penta LB‐100B, 1965  Fritidsfiskemotorbåt SFB‐9256  BRITT  3.00  8.40  Volvo Penta TAMD 31  Fritidsfiskemotorbåt SFB‐7538  JERRY  3.00  8.20     Fritidsfiskemotorbåt SFC‐7915  ELIDA  2.60  7.50  Penta 2030, 2001  Fritidsfiskemotorbåt SFC‐8623  SIGNE  2.60  7.10  Honda 90, 2008  Fritidsfiskemotorbåt SFC‐5984  HILMA  2.53  6.07  Ducati  Fritidsfiskemotorbåt SFC‐7429  GOLUB  3.72  22.75  SCANIA DCI 11 ‐75  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4471  SANTA MARIA  3.90  21.30  2 Scania D816  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6383     3.80  21.00  Diesel 3D6  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7789  VALEN  3.95  19.50  Ford 2710 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4763  EKOLN  3.70  18.52     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4827  NAJADEN II  3.66  18.38  Volvo Penta MD 67C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5128  SLUG  3.50  17.93  Volvo Penta MD96B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7218  MUNTER  3.63  17.75  AB.Penta‐297 MD 96  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8334  ÖRNEN  3.53  17.58  Scania DSI‐II, 1963  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3432  TUMLAREN  3.96  17.50  Scania DSI10  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4725  HURTIG  3.85  17.50  Volvo Penta MD96 1960  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8893  CRI‐MA‐HE  3.96  17.50  Perkins  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7202  RAGNHILD  3.85  17.16  Scania DS 11, 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6673  BOLLSTA  3.76  16.90  Cat P 342 T  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3646  SVK 1  3.90  16.90  Scania Vabis  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7168  ÅRÅS  3.86  16.53  Seffle S10BF, 1951  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 75: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

69 

 

SFB‐4780  KUNGSHOLM  3.31  15.58  Albin  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5470  ASTRIDA  3.71  15.56  Albin Diesel 1957 6 cyl  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5758  DIANA  3.56  15.53  2 Scania Vabis DSI10 1961  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7068  VALEN  3.60  15.30  Ford 6 cyl 2714E, 1972  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7748  ATLAVIK RE‐159  3.93  15.28  Scania DSI‐11, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6807  FAXE  3.56  15.13  Volvo Penta TMD96  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6368  TOY  3.80  15.08  Volvo Penta TMD96  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8951  HJORTEN  3.30  15.00  Ford Mermaid,turboplus 88  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6501  MYRA  3.99  15.00  Volvo D47  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4787  SKOGHALL I  3.78  14.98  Volvo Penta TMD96B 1957  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5339  MÄLARÖ  3.85  14.91  Säffle 3 cyl 327 EV  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6726  EBBA  3.40  14.69  Scania 6‐cyl  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4765  BJÖRN  3.87  14.66  Bolinder‐Munktell 1951  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6634  NALLE  3.97  14.56  Volvo Penta TMD96 Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5597  STORSJÖN  3.60  14.50  Volvo MD67C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6356  MY NANGIJALA  3.40  14.40  Volvo Penta 100A, 1967  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5734  DRAGÖN  3.17  14.40  Skandia 265 C 1954  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7052  SPJUTET  3.40  14.30  2 x TAMD70C, 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6534  TUNSTA  3.18  14.18  Scania Vabis  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8636  INKA  3.00  14.00  Cummins, 1991  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3227  MIDNIGHT SUN  3.40  14.00  2 GM Detroit  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5138  JUNGFRUN  2.96  13.85  Ford Marin diesel 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5858  VINGOLF  3.97  13.70  Volvo TAMD 120B 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9066  NAUTILUS  3.90  13.50  Bolinder‐Munktell  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8289  YASURAGI  3.85  13.47  2 x Volvo Penta IPS600  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4611  ALKA IV  3.70  13.40  2 Volov Penta TMD70 1970  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7263  VIDAR  3.30  13.40  MD67 Snr 0443  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8572  ERIKA II  3.91  13.29  Mercedes 352  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4682  CORCAT  3.70  13.20  Ford Lehman  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 76: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

70 

 

SFC‐6301  EVY LINN  3.97  13.20  2 Scania  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8611  LILLA B  3.73  13.15  2 st VP TAMD74P  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5533     3.60  13.11  Perkins 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3839  GORM  3.92  13.05  Volvo Penta TAMD  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8771  ANKAN  3.80  13.04  2 x Volvo Tamd 75 P, Diesel, 2003   Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3749  MEATBALL III  3.98  13.00  2 Volvo Penta KAD42 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7921  EIAN  3.34  13.00  2 BMC Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7458  THIAL  3.90  12.95  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 75 P  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7652  LOMEN  3.95  12.85  Volvo Penta TMD70B 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3757  LELITA AF HUDIKSVALL  3.96  12.84  2 Detroit Diesel 1968  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5947  ARGUS  3.20  12.50  2 Volvo Penta AD40  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3561  LUDVIG  3.90  12.40  2 Volvo Penta TAMD6  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5259  MIRAMIS II  3.80  12.30  2 Volvo Penta KAD42 1997  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5843  MALAMBO  3.96  12.29  Cummins 1994  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7333  PANDORA  3.35  12.27     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4793  SANDRINA  3.96  12.25  2 Volvo Penta TAMD60B 81  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6907  QUEEN S  3.84  12.20  2xKAD 300 EDC/DP ‐ G  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8041  ALBERTA  3.50  12.20  Peugeot, DTP 106  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8825  REGINA  3.90  12.20  Volvo Penta, 2006  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6107  CRYSTAL CRUISER  3.95  12.15  2 VP TAMD 70B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8122  FRAGANCIA  3.91  12.09  2xVolvoPenta TAMD70E  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5827  BAHAMA MAMA  3.91  12.09  TAMD 71A VP, 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7155  CUBA LIBRE  3.91  12.04  Volvo Penta GJP, 2003  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5995  CHRISTINA  3.75  12.00  Volvo Penta MD 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5298  LINA  3.70  12.00  Perkins range 4, 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3945  HEUREKA  3.75  12.00  2 Volvo TAMD60 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7966  VIKING  3.85  12.00  2 Volvo TMD45 1970  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7763  REBECKA  3.55  12.00  Volvo TD 70  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6543  BJÖRN I  3.35  12.00  Volvo Penta MD70 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 77: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

71 

 

SFC‐7120  KAJENNE  3.76  11.98  Volvo AQ41A, 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4363  RELAX  4.27  11.96  2 Volvo Penta TAMD61  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6512  SAVONA  3.97  11.95  Tempest sealord 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8650  ÄLGSKÄR  3.50  11.90  2 KAD 300, 2003  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7353  JIANELI  4.43  11.90  2xVolvo Tamd 74P,2001  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6369     3.20  11.90  2 Mercruiser, 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4744  SUNFIRE  3.04  11.88  2 Mercruiser INU  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5082  YVETTE  3.50  11.85  Volvo Penta TMD40 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4091  LAURA  4.18  11.85  Scania D442E3751 1965  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3897  KENILU  3.85  11.80  Mercedes 180 diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3563  LA PETITE  3.80  11.80  2 Volvo Penta TAMD41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8400  OLLE  3.00  11.80  Scania DSI 10 1969  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3401  JONICA  3.50  11.75  Volvo Penta MD‐30  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8730  WHITE LADY  3.50  11.60  DAAF, 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8704  POLARIS  3.50  11.52  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6326  TOFFI  3.95  11.51  2 Volvo Penta TAMD  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4133  LACOM III  4.27  11.47  2 Volvo Penta 61A 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8604  TRACY  4.50  11.40  Hundestedt 1971  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5783  NORVIK  3.65  11.40  Perkins 4.236 Marin 1966  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5249  FREEDOM  3.86  11.23  2 John Deer 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8887  LILLY MAJ  3.60  11.20  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 40 B, 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7785  FOLLY  3.60  11.20  TAMD 42A, 1993  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5202  INDIGO  2.60  11.20  Bolinder 2053 1961  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3584  NN  3.60  11.20  2 Volvo Penta TAMD41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4423  TONGA  4.20  11.20  Volvo Penta MD67  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2307  FANNY ALBA  3.96  11.15  Volvo Penta TMD70 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3263  DO UT DES  3.71  11.07  2 John Deere 404  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4077  CONTOY  3.80  11.00  Volvo Penta MD47B 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4178  GERIK II  3.90  11.00  Twin Cummings 6BT5.9  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 78: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

72 

 

SFC‐5422  CITO IV  5.45  11.00  Volvo Penta KAD42A 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8335  KATALIN  3.05  10.97  Volvo Penta TMD 40 A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5655  ANNIKA  3.84  10.97  Ford Tempest diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8372  TRINDA  3.10  10.94  Perkins  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2591  BATAVIA 2  3.35  10.94  Volvo AQD32A/280  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8014  DOLCE VITA  3.40  10.94  2 VolvoPentaKAD300,2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8204  SVK 02  2.80  10.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8205  SVK 03  2.80  10.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8071  OCEAN STAR  3.50  10.85  Ford 2720  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7295  NJORD  3.50  10.85  Perkins Range 4 M135,1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2486  SALOFSIE  3.50  10.85  Ford 703‐F8582 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4776  WILMO  4.48  10.82  Albin  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8419  NORTECH 3600  3.60  10.80  2 x MRD  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6524  MARNAT  3.50  10.80  2 OMC‐460, 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2275  CRESTON  4.50  10.80  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6589  SEA GULL  3.80  10.80  2 X Volvo Penta TAMD60,80  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7159  SAZY  3.05  10.76  VP2003, 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7229  NIAN  3.50  10.75  Yanmar,6LY2A‐STP,‐04  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7054  PRINCESS EVA  3.68  10.74  Cummins TA 358, 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6882  KORPEN  2.83  10.70  Volvo MD 40, 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8100  MARLENE  3.50  10.68  VP TAMD 61 A, 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6198  BLUEBONNET  3.37  10.67  Twin Ford Lehman diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6924  PHILEAS  3.80  10.62  VP 2003, 1993  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6466     3.53  10.60  2 Mercruiser 5,0EFI 2002  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3860  TRANSIENT  8.00  10.60     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4336  KOH‐I‐NOOR  3.50  10.60  Ford 2.715‐E 6 cyl.  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6287  FAIR LADY  3.80  10.60  Volvo Penta 271 87  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6539  JUNO III  3.55  10.60  2 X KAD 300, 2002  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3713  RONJA II  3.55  10.60  2 Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 79: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

73 

 

SFC‐8701  WOLF  3.97  10.57  Hino250, 1995  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3655  RASSY BRAVO  1.63  10.54  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3672  PATRICIA  3.50  10.50  Volvo Penta TAMD60  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3935  DAPHNE  3.70  10.50  2 Volvo Penta TAMD40  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7185  MICA  3.18  10.44  Perkins 4.236 diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6281  GITTE  3.73  10.42  Volvo Penta TMD100A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7114  SANDRA  3.30  10.40  Volvo MD47, 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6847  DHAMMA  3.20  10.35  2xTAMD60B, 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3879  MADAME OTT  3.50  10.35  2 Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3906  LADY S  3.20  10.35  Volvo Penta TMD41MS4 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2952  GOING  3.20  10.35  2 Perkins 1973, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8436  LADY GE  3.20  10.35  2 Perkins T6 354M, 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9049  SORAYA   4  3.30  10.35  Volvo Penta PAMD 60  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4809     3.77  10.23  Volvo Penta TAMD41B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4420  MARINA  3.90  10.20     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8258     3.19  10.19  VP AQAD40B, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7293  LAGUN  3.85  10.18  Ford Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6677  LIMANDA  3.20  10.15  Perkins V 8 510 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7004     4.05  10.10  Ford diesel NG6‐2715 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4074  FELICIA AF LIMHAMN  3.81  10.10     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5436  SISU  3.41  10.06  Cummins diesel 1996  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7450  SURVIVAL  3.40  10.06  Volvo Penta 40B ‐84  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4043  TRENTO  3.30  10.00  Volvo Penta MD40  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3580     3.20  10.00  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4155  INGEGÄRD  3.50  10.00  Bolinder  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5220  ARNLJOT II  3.40  10.00  Volvo Penta PRO 41/290DP  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6614  CARPE DIEM  3.30  10.00  Volvo Penta TMD31,1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8112  FREJA  3.30  10.00  2 Volvo Penta AD41B,1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4428  ANITA  3.60  10.00  Volvo Penta D 67  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 80: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

74 

 

    SFB‐4412  BRITT  3.60  10.00 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7441  MARIA  3.60  10.00  Albin O 41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6825  JUANITA  3.00  9.95  NanniDiesel 3.75HE,1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4056  ANITA  3.60  9.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2944  SONETTE  3.60  9.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8046  IOR  4.00  9.85  Mercury, 2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7045  SUN BRIS  3.35  9.85  Cummins 6BTA59m2,1991  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5236  ERNA‐MARI  3.60  9.80  Sabb F4 254 MVP 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8386  DEMITE  2.45  9.80  ATM‐TD, 2003  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7400  INGA  3.30  9.79  Yanmar 6LY‐UTE, 1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5537  KINGSTON  2.83  9.78  Hundestedt  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6654  ALEXANDRA  3.58  9.75  2 X Volvo Penta, 1996  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5588  OFFA  3.40  9.70  Volvo Penta KAD 44P 1998  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2617  CAROLINE  3.18  9.62  2 PRO 40 Volvo  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9979  HELGA  3.50  9.60  Volvo Penta MD30 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8340  GURKAN  3.23  9.60  Volvo Penta AQAD 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4333  ANDROS  3.30  9.60     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2706  NAUTILUS 31  3.50  9.60  BMW D 50 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7163  MY TOY  3.25  9.50  2 Volvo, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8354  SWEET LANA  2.87  9.47  Volvo KAD300, 2005  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7121  PÄRLAN II  3.00  9.45  Yanmar 3GM, 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4435         3.40  9.40 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2941  ZENITA  3.70  9.30  Volvo Penta 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3842  ORCA  3.20  9.30  AQAD40B 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4986  NINA  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta TAMD40A 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7266  TIGER NILES  3.20  9.30  TMD 40  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6749  @CE VENTURA  3.20  9.30  2 Inombords, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8377  KONTES  3.35  9.27     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7185     2.71  9.26  Marna M2, 1959  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 81: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

75 

 

SFC‐3838  BOUMIAN  2.70  9.26  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3524  MIRO  3.20  9.20  Volvo Penta TAMD41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6993  FALKEN  3.36  9.20  Tempest 6 cyl  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6791  GALENE  3.00  9.20  Volvo AD41A290DP,‐90  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2563  ACAPPELLA  3.00  9.20  AQAD41/290DP 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5414  JUNE  3.10  9.15  TAMD70 1997  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6581  TOVA  3.18  9.15  Bolinder Munktell  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7167  BUBBLE GUM  3.23  9.14  Mercury, 2003  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4631  BARTMANN  2.57  9.14  Volvo Penta TMD31  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4626  SEA RAY 270 DA  2.59  9.12  Mercruiser 4,3L  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3434  SOL‐GUN  2.65  9.10  Volvo Penta MD50A 1967  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4202  SIV  3.30  9.10  Albin Marin AD‐2 1962  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4057  HELENA  4.00  9.00  Säffle  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2744     3.40  9.00  Ford  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3656         4.15  9.00 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6479  DROTT  2.53  9.00  BMC Commander  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2732  MARIA  3.60  9.00  Skandia diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2798  WESTÖ  3.15  9.00  BMC Sea Lord 82  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3649  KALLE  2.83  9.00  Volvo Penta D50A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3386  SEA FOR TWO  2.85  9.00  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3652  SYDÖ  3.10  9.00  Perkins  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5258  FLOURICH  3.00  9.00  MD 42 A 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2096         3.00  9.00 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5824  MARICA  3.50  9.00  Volvo Penta 6152MD3B 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3465  FLICWA IV  2.80  8.99  2 Volvo Penta AQ271C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2477  POPEYE  2.70  8.96  Volvo Penta TMD40 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2969  SILVIA  2.70  8.90  Albin  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8925  LADY LUSTA  3.20  8.90  2 st Volvo Penta 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2969  BERIT  2.90  8.90  TAMD 31 1989  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 82: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

76 

 

SFC‐4895  ALPHA  2.43  8.90  Mercruiser 4,7l  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8197  BIANCA  3.00  8.90  Volvo Penta KADYY P‐6,‐02  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9513  LINDA  3.00  8.85  Isuso, 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6234  SIRENE  2.67  8.85  Perkins T6354 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3661  FRIDA  3.65  8.85  Perkins  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9631     2.70  8.80  Mercedes, 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7945  INGEBORG  3.27  8.80  Yanmar 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4047  GLITTRAN  3.50  8.80  Bolinder‐Munktell  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3634  CHESS  3.28  8.80  Volvo Penta AQAD‐40B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3521  LA ROSSA  2.60  8.78  2 Riva 350 CV  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5026  JENNY  3.40  8.75  Ford 1968  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3517     3.20  8.75  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3615  ZABA  3.00  8.75  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3687  TERESIA  3.00  8.75  Volvo Penta AD41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2067  BILLAN  3.33  8.75  BSM Skandia  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6398  SUNNSKÄR  3.05  8.75  Ford Diesel 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7162  AMMY  3.40  8.75  BMW D 50 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3333  LIRBERTY  2.70  8.71  Wizeman 36  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4951  MERCI  3.70  8.70  Hundested  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6107  RIMMON  3.05  8.70  Volvo Penta MD40 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6851  VÅGEN  3.27  8.70  Yanmar 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6149     3.00  8.70  BM diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4021  SOLENA  2.98  8.70  Cummins V8185M 1969  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8319  ELLA  3.15  8.66  Ford Sabb, 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3760  DUGA  3.00  8.65  Sabb 4JHR ‐81  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7268  JESSICA  2.98  8.62  2 x Volvo Penta‐KAD42  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3769  MARIANNE  2.75  8.60  Ford 2722E  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3772  OBELIX  2.70  8.60  Volvo‐Penta MD4 1968  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7462  EVAMARI  2.75  8.60  Ford  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 83: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

77 

 

SFB‐7760  EFFENDI  2.75  8.60  Ford 2712E 4 cyl 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6296  SEA WIND  3.10  8.60  Yanmar 6LPSTE  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7032  JOHANNA II  3.04  8.56  VP KAD 44 P‐C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8773         2.59  8.53 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4195  MERIT  2.82  8.52  Volvo MD32 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5807     3.00  8.50  Yanmar 2 SM 20 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2153  YVETTE  2.80  8.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2158  GITSY  3.00  8.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4383  RANHI  3.30  8.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2595  RULLANGÅR  3.00  8.50  Bolinder M 62511022 1958  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4993     3.10  8.50  Säffle 1952 diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2674  KAJSA  2.75  8.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4183  VICTORIA  2.90  8.50  Volvo Penta KAD 42 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4038  ELINA AF MÖJA  3.10  8.50  Ford Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7906  LA CAOTICA  2.70  8.45  6LPA‐STZP, 2002  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7371  MARIA  2.85  8.45  Perkins H 108M 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7442  SJÖGLIMT  2.85  8.45  TAMD 31 Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5567  CAVATINA  3.05  8.41  Cobra 460OMC  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9992  DEMITRA  3.00  8.40  Mercedez Benz 190 1965  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8206  ANDREA  3.20  8.40  Mitsubishi S6E2  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8863  JOY  2.55  8.40  Singel Volvo Penta KAD 44, 2000  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8746  AUSI  3.00  8.40  Volvo Penta TAMD30 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7232  LINDA  3.00  8.40  Sabb 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3516     3.20  8.40  Yanmar 4JH2DTE  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8182  MJOLNER  2.95  8.36  Iveco 8141, 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4399  BIRGIT  2.70  8.30  Yanmar diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6278  VIKING  3.40  8.30  Volvo Penta MD17C Hydro  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2813  MALIN  2.85  8.30  Volvo TAMD41/MS4  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3636  RAMONA  3.10  8.30     Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 84: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

78 

 

         SFB‐4130 2.60  8.30 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4851  LOVISA III  2.93  8.30  Mercruiser Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5358  HARD‐NUT  2.97  8.30  2 Aifo Fiat 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3585     2.59  8.28  Mercruiser  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3660  FIFTY‐FIFTY  3.00  8.25  Volvo Penta TAMD40  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7608  DEBBIE  3.00  8.25  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8890  VEGA 912  2.46  8.25  Volvo Penta 2010, 1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4060  GINNIE  3.05  8.25  Volvo Penta TAMD41A 1989  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8738  PILEN  2.46  8.25  BETA MARINE BZ 48Z, 2007   Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3508  TERESA  2.59  8.23  OMC Cobra Stern  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9028  SUSA I  2.80  8.20  Volvo Penta MD 21 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6782  ORION  2.90  8.20  Perkins 4‐108 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6963  MERITA  3.00  8.20  MD47A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7097  VIGGEN  2.90  8.20  Ford 2712 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8555  ALCHEMY  3.00  8.20  Volvo Penta D3, 2005  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5558  XIPHOIDEA  3.12  8.20  Perkins M 20, 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8837  RIMSÖ  3.00  8.20  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8863  SVALAN 3  3.15  8.20  Bukh DV36 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8075  RIO  2.70  8.20  Penta MD 19 1970  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5604  JESSICA AF TORSÖ  3.30  8.20  Yanmar 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4391  TÄRNÖ  3.30  8.20  Västervik  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4392  RAUKEN  3.30  8.20     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7770     3.15  8.15  Yanmar 2QM20 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4281  NIMBA  3.10  8.15  Volvo Penta MD40 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7881  ALFHILD  2.75  8.15  MD 17C, 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5730  SENAPSON  2.85  8.10  Yanmar 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5455  CALVIN  2.55  8.10  Mercruiser D‐Tronic 250  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4720         2.70  8.10 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7858  STENSKÄR  3.00  8.10  Volvo Penta TMD30  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 85: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

79 

 

SFB‐9084  ERICA  2.65  8.10  Volvo Penta TDM 40  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8769  ELVIRA  3.00  8.10  Volvo Penta MD40 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9603  EVELIN  3.15  8.10  Bolinder 1114BR  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7016  MALIN  3.10  8.10  Sabb 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4654     2.98  8.10  Volvo Penta MD40 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3109  ANNIKA  3.03  8.05  BM 1052E11361  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6804     2.76  8.03  Yanmar 2GM20F  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8633  BRENDAN  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD 2010 C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5036  MARIA  2.80  8.00  Volvo Penta 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3967  FRAM  3.00  8.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2083     3.00  8.00  Seffle FV 17  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2591  RIMMON  3.80  8.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2655  ANNE  2.50  8.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3486  SABBINA  2.80  8.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3493  LATIKA  3.00  8.00  Seffle  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9456  CARPE DIEM  3.00  8.00  Sabb diesel 2JHVP  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9503  JESSICA  2.85  8.00  Volvo Penta MD 31  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3264  GLAUCUS  2.40  8.00  Albin AD21  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8117  TERESA  2.80  8.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7684  MANDA  2.85  8.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7759  SIROCCO  2.80  8.00  Volvo Penta TMD30  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4598  MAJVOR  2.80  8.00  Volvo Penta 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3709         2.50  8.00 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2560  ULSTER  2.40  8.00  Volvo Penta MD4 081638  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7765  HELENE  2.65  8.00  Volvo Penta MD3  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8451     2.80  8.00  Volvo Penta TMD30  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3204  TREO  3.01  8.00  Sabb Marin 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2878  HURTIG  2.80  8.00  Volvo Penta TAMD31B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7523  VINITA  1.50  8.00  16 H Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 86: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

80 

 

SFB‐8996  BARON  2.80  8.00  Perkins 4108 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2855     3.00  8.00  Albin diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6109  SOFIA  2.85  8.00  Perkins 4108  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3826  FLIPPER  2.70  8.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7761  DELFIN  2.59  7.98  2 Mercruiser V6 175,1989  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3659  SIROCCO  2.75  7.95  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8002  LOUISE  2.90  7.95  OMCT72407, 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3277  RONJA  2.60  7.95  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8614  ANGEL STAR  2.59  7.92  Mercruiser, 2007  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2815  SYLVIA  2.74  7.92     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4431  SANNA  3.00  7.92  Volvo  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5145  LOVA  2.53  7.91  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9589  ORION  3.00  7.90  Skandia, 1952  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6087  MARITA  2.75  7.90  Lister luftkyld diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5278     2.59  7.86  Volvo Penta 200/280 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5243  MARIANNE  2.59  7.86  Volvo Penta 200D 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6655  NORDÖ  2.83  7.85  Perkins 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7964  RÅÖ  2.85  7.85  Volvo Penta MD29  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5943  BJÖRN  3.00  7.85  Mercedes  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5880  INGER  2.75  7.80  Perkins 4.108 M diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7015  KOOKABURRA  2.75  7.80  VP MD17HD 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3865  AURORA FRANSSON  2.60  7.80  Yanmar 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2243  BIRGIT  2.65  7.80  Volvo MD3 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7495  ALDEBARAN  3.00  7.80  Sabb diesel 2 cyl 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3697         2.55  7.80 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5548  ERMA  3.20  7.80  Yanmar Diesel 77  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6151  LINDÖ  2.80  7.80  Perkins 4.108 M 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6193  RAMONA  2.60  7.80  Volvo Penta 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5721  BESSIE  2.99  7.78  Lister  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 87: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

81 

 

SFB‐9505  MÅSEN  2.65  7.75  Yanmar 2QM20, 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5013  ARCONA  2.70  7.70  Volvo Penta MD21A 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2523  SALTSKÄR  2.65  7.70  Volvo Penta MD21A 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6366  EVY  2.70  7.65  FM DA 22 1963  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5199  LOVA  2.90  7.65  Volvo Penta AQAD40B 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6282  HANNA  2.78  7.62  Volvo Penta MD3 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2837  SVALAN  3.00  7.62  Albin diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3487  NÄCKEN  3.20  7.61  BMC Marin 1500  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6549  MAY BE III  2.60  7.60  Volvo Penta MD 2030 1994  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4978  FISKAREFLICKAN  2.90  7.60  Mercruiser 95  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3024  LOLA  2.80  7.60     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4759  EMMA II  2.65  7.60  Volvo‐Penta MD 21  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4381         2.40  7.60 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6365  ÅSA  3.20  7.60  Volvo Penta MD17  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3157  NUNNE  2.60  7.60  Yanmar 4JH‐DTE30679 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4399  FRIDA  2.30  7.60  Merzedes OM314 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3948  ARÖ  2.85  7.60  Mercedes Benz  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8740  BOITE A SAVON  2.60  7.60  MD 17C, 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6172  ANN  2.54  7.55  Volvo Penta BB30F 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3292  VIPAN  2.60  7.50  Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3265  ICE  2.60  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3507     2.80  7.50  Lister  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2374  MIRENO  2.96  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2381  MARITA  2.75  7.50  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3111  MATILDA  2.00  7.50  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9953  KÄMPE  2.85  7.50  Perkins 4‐108 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8805  SPLIT  2.89  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4661     2.65  7.50  TMD22 1995  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5438  SAVOY  2.60  7.50  Volvo Penta MD21 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 88: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

82 

 

    SFC‐7254 2.45  7.50  Yanmar 4LHA‐STP  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6051  LILY  2.90  7.50  2 Volvo Penta AQ151A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4533  MARIANA  2.85  7.50  Säffle Semidiesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5512  DAHLIA II  2.40  7.50  Sleipner 1968  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3331  ANNA‐KARIN  2.80  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9689  MITZI  2.45  7.50  Yanmar 81545  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8817  PIA  2.85  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6891     2.85  7.50  Perkins 4.108  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3438  ELLA LYKKE  2.90  7.50  Volvo Penta AQAD41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6312  ANITA  3.00  7.50  Yanmar 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3827  BODIL  2.00  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4307  CLIPPER  3.00  7.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3795  YVONNE  2.80  7.50  Skandia  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8824  MADAM MOET  2.85  7.47  Mercruiser 4,2 L  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4428  PACHAMAMA  2.54  7.47  Yamaha utombord 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7074  ELISABETH  2.52  7.46  MD 21 A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9552  BELFI  2.65  7.45  Volvo Penta TAMD 30A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5963     2.35  7.45  Wikström W‐3 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8311  DANIARA  2.75  7.45  Vetus Diesel, 2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7899  ROBIN HOOD  2.54  7.42  Volvo Penta D 3 SX  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7124  LOVISA I  2.80  7.40  VP290A  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7114  EMMA  3.00  7.40  Volvo Penta MD11C 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8124         3.30  7.40 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5343  ANNA  2.60  7.40  Yanmar QM3‐30  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8166  SILVANA  2.80  7.40  Volvo Penta MD17 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2132  ORCA  2.50  7.40     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5737  ANNA  3.00  7.33  Volvo Penta 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6704  VESTAN  2.80  7.30  Yanmar 2 Q M 20 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5826  BLIXTEN  2.60  7.30  Yanmar 3 cyl 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 89: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

83 

 

SFB‐8165  CAROLINE  2.70  7.30  Yanmar 2QM20 diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5611     2.80  7.30  MD 17 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6357     2.45  7.30  Seffle S15 BF 1958  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9151  HELENA  2.50  7.30  Sabb Diesel 1962  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2820  JENNY  2.80  7.30  JQM 30 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4307  GUNILLA  3.60  7.30  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2355  ÖSKÄR  3.02  7.28  Säffle  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8291  LILLAN  2.85  7.28  Volvo Penta 17M Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8551  TRYGG  2.40  7.27  Honda BF200AXL, 2007  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5462  OUT OF THE BLUE  2.59  7.26  Mercruiser  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3570  BEAUT N  2.50  7.25  Mercruiser 57L  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3597  SORCERER  2.43  7.25  OMC 1989  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6507  WHITESNAKE  2.45  7.20  Optimax Mariner 225/2002  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6773     2.60  7.20  Västervik  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9259  MOBY DICK  2.95  7.20  Mercedes 190 1965  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8817  ARCHIBALD HADDOCK  2.40  7.20  SUZUKI DF 150, 2007  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7855  ÄCKERÖ  2.85  7.20  Sabb 2 G, 1964  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2402  JANETA  2.45  7.20  BMC Commander diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3754  ZITA  2.50  7.20  Volvo Penta MV 2 B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6879  SIESTA  2.67  7.20  Volvo Penta AQ 145/280  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6971  MARION  2.70  7.20  SABB 2H 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9245  MONICA  2.45  7.20  Albin 0‐41  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2099  MAGGAN  2.40  7.20  Volvo Penta 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7561     3.05  7.20  Yanmar 80625 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8684  NEMO  2.67  7.20     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6173     2.60  7.15  Sabb 2H 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7606     2.40  7.15  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5197  OCEAN  3.00  7.10  Sabb 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2447  ROCKAN  2.72  7.10  M4 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 90: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

84 

 

    SFB‐5045 2.72  7.10  Yanmar Diesel 2QM20  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4161  PÄRLAN  2.55  7.10  Scania  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3803  AVANCE  2.72  7.03  Volvo Penta AD31/DP 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8183  VIRUS VIII  2.55  7.01  Mercruiser 4,3L MPI Alpha  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2135  JENNY  2.75  7.00  Albin Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3128  ERNA  2.50  7.00  Sabb 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5991  OSSIE  2.50  7.00  Sabb 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4694  MARGARETA  2.60  7.00  Volvo Penta Diesel 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3068  LISBETH  2.40  7.00  Yanmar 4JHTE 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4625  ANJA  2.50  7.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5621  BÅDEN  2.30  7.00  Yanmar 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9154  DINO III  2.80  7.00  Marna diesel 1971  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5023  KAJSA  2.60  7.00  Albin AL 23  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5337  INA  2.75  7.00  Saab diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5846     2.65  7.00  BMC Captain 1969  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4653  GRAM  2.00  7.00  Sabb Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3260  CARINA  2.80  7.00  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2162  LIV  2.65  7.00  Yanmar 2QM20 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3281  SEA SONG  2.50  7.00  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9104  NINA  2.40  7.00  Sabb 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9124     2.10  7.00  MD 2 B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8500  LEX  2.50  7.00  Sabb diesel 1972  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4857  KATARINA  2.60  7.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4397  ANNA‐MARIA  2.60  6.95  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5191  HERMON  2.60  6.95  Volvo Penta Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5814  WINDÖ  2.65  6.90  SABB 1969  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3865  INGER  2.30  6.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3209  DICK  2.80  6.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3290  EVY  2.80  6.90     Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 91: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

85 

 

    SFC‐2685 2.60  6.90  Albin AD‐2 1968  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5192  LADY GULL  2.30  6.90  Volvo Penta MD2B 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7140  COMPANY  2.40  6.88  Yamaha, 2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5291  RÅNÄS  2.80  6.85  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5318  CHARLOTTA  2.60  6.80  MD 3 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5005  SKÄRELÄJA  2.40  6.80  MD2B Penta 1971  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4914     2.35  6.80  Volvo Penta 250SP 1993  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3682  GUNEA  NULL  6.80  Johnson  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4335  HORISONT  2.80  6.80  Yanmar 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3715         1.90  6.80 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5004  ANNELIE  2.40  6.80  MD2B 1971  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5120  KAMI  2.60  6.80  Yanmar 2QM20  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4924  MILLAN  2.40  6.80  Yamaha  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7104     2.60  6.80  Volvo Penta MD3B 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2425  VIKINGEN  2.60  6.80  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2287  ULLA  2.50  6.80     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7786  MARI  2.60  6.80  MD17C 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3395     2.40  6.80  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3362  MARLENE  2.55  6.75  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7955  MARIEL  2.80  6.75  Saab diesel 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4913  SEABIRD  2.45  6.75     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7996  AARTI  2.25  6.75  AQ 140 A, 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7459     2.25  6.75  FORD 2614 E  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8054  KONDOR  2.55  6.75  Yanmar 2QM20 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5128  HANNA  2.24  6.70  MD 11C 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6194  LILLAN AF SVARTLÖGA  2.35  6.70  Yamaha AETO  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8142  ALBERTINA  2.41  6.70  OMC 985288, 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5671  BUSTER  2.47  6.70  Volvo Penta AQD40 280DP  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7240  GERDA  2.00  6.70  Volvo MD 1 1969  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 92: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

86 

 

    SFB‐5006 1.85  6.60  Vikström 1972  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6157  MALIN  2.45  6.60  Yanmar 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3421  GUNNAREN  2.40  6.60  Lister Diesel 3 cyl  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2701     1.80  6.60  Johnson 45 SL  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3481  GEMINI  2.70  6.60  Volvo Penta MD3B 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4721  MIMMI  2.50  6.60  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7398  GROGGEN  2.27  6.60  Albin 021 1964  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2422  ACHALANTIS  2.50  6.60  Sabb 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2552  ZULEIKA  2.40  6.60     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5731  TERESE  2.50  6.55  Volvo Penta 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8420  ODD  2.60  6.55  Yanmar 2QM20 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7457  PRINCESS II  2.59  6.55  Mercruiser ‐03  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4940  MALIN  2.50  6.50  Lister  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4354  KULING  2.50  6.50  Volvo MD  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3420  META  2.50  6.50  Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4381  KARLSÖ  2.25  6.50  Volvo Penta 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9270  MARIO  2.50  6.50  Volvo Penta AQAD41 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7426  FÅGEL  2.50  6.50  Diesel AQD21 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7583  SVEA  2.20  6.50  Volvo Penta D3, 2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5946  EMMA  2.40  6.50  Yanmar SB12  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2848     2.44  6.50  Seffle  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3473         2.20  6.50 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4337  INGELA  2.20  6.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2282     2.00  6.50  Skandia 10 B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3249  TTO PEPE  2.40  6.50  Chrysler  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8083  MAGDALENA  2.61  6.47  Mercruiser 5.0, 1994  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3916  MISSTRESS  2.45  6.45  Mercruiser  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7478     2.45  6.45  Sabb nr 888 1970  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2995     2.32  6.41  Bolinder  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 93: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

87 

 

    SFB‐5705 2.30  6.40  Albin 0‐2  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9947     2.20  6.40  Yanmar 2QM15  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3462     1.80  6.40  Merkure 265  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4298  ÅSA  2.40  6.40  Volvo Penta MD2 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6358  MISTRAL  2.35  6.40  Yahmar E11295, 1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6201  TAILA  2.50  6.40  Yanmar 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2973     2.40  6.40  Yanmar 8 KW 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8221     2.35  6.40  Yanmar 4JM‐TE 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4624  BULLIT  2.44  6.38  OMC V8 5L EFI 1993  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9481  INGRID  2.46  6.35  Yanmar, 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3272     2.11  6.30  Interceptor 215  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5516  INGA‐MAJ  2.30  6.30  Sabb 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5278  GÖTILDA  2.30  6.30  Sabb 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2646  MYRAN  2.20  6.30  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4221     2.45  6.30  Volvo Penta MD 2  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3291  HAMA  2.30  6.30  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3763  SIAM  2.40  6.30     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3040     2.55  6.30  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5991  YOANNE  2.60  6.30  Yamaha 85 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9557  SAGA  2.25  6.30  Volvo Penta, 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5562  HOLMÖN  2.22  6.30  Sabb diesel 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5578  DUX  2.30  6.30  Yanmar 2QM20  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6063  GUN‐MARIE  2.30  6.30  Albin AD2  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6799  RANA  2.30  6.30  Sabb Diesel‐G 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2193  ANNE MARIE  2.50  6.30  Sabb Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3762  JULLAN  2.10  6.30     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3773  LIBERTY  2.40  6.30     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4955     2.30  6.30  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4861     2.20  6.30  Saab  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 94: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

88 

 

    SFB‐2485  ANNA  2.25  6.30 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3966  WINDY  2.40  6.30     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5983  TORA  2.54  6.27  Evinrude utombord 2000  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7093  MAJ  2.45  6.25  Ducati IS 16  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3690  PELLA  2.10  6.20  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2085     2.20  6.20  Mercury 1974 utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9957     2.45  6.15  Volvo Penta 1988  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4357  ANNIKA  2.30  6.15     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6603  NANNA  2.28  6.15     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2166  DEBORA  2.50  6.15  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8735     2.45  6.14  Mercury 115 ELPTO S.nr OP194114   Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8749  FRANK  2.29  6.14  V6‐4200 ,kb,  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9996     2.33  6.14  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6943  ELIN  2.38  6.14  Sabb 2H 1971  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7451  PAULA  2.31  6.14  Mercruiser, 1994  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8299     2.39  6.13  Mercruiser 5,0 MPI  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4862  KOS  1.80  6.12  Utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4393  LELA  2.20  6.10  Yamaha 30 DEOL 1989  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4597  LOLLO  2.50  6.10  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9939     2.05  6.10  Yanmar 3 HM 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9753     2.44  6.10  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9178         1.95  6.10 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8701  MARIANA  2.20  6.10  Yanmar 3GM 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8322     2.20  6.10  Volvo Penta MB10, 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6485  DANA  2.40  6.10  Volvo Penta MD 17 C  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6639  LILLAN  2.40  6.10  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8293  ARGO  2.40  6.10  Volvo Penta MD11A 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4463     2.08  6.10  Suzuki 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4500  SNIPAN  2.25  6.10  Volvo Penta 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 95: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

89 

 

    SFC‐3476 2.05  6.10  BJ45RSLU  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6327  IAN  2.30  6.10  Yanmar YSE 12 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7948     2.40  6.10  Suzuki 4‐takt, 2003  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2433  LENA  2.10  6.10  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7730     1.95  6.10  Sabb diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4261  ANNA  2.30  6.08  Volvo Penta MD11 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2234     2.00  6.05  Utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4730  LYNGÖ  2.20  6.05  Utombord 1994  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6970  KARIN  2.45  6.05  Yanmar 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9477  KRISTINA  2.20  6.05  Monark 3 cyl, 1974  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4510  TÄRNAN  2.00  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2822  MI  2.38  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3532     2.20  6.00  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7011  LA RIVE  2.35  6.00  Yamaha 90, 1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3443  LOTTA  2.35  6.00  Volvo Penta 2002  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3120  TUTTAN  2.10  6.00  Skandia 6 1965  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2255     2.20  6.00  1988 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2687  VIKTORIA  2.35  6.00  Utombord YAMAHA 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9163  BRITT  2.30  6.00  Volvo, diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7372  ANNA  2.20  6.00  Buch diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4942  DEA  2.50  6.00  Diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3912  SIGNAL  2.35  6.00  Yamaha utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3632  CREAM LADY  2.05  6.00  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7902  KNÖLSVANEN  2.50  6.00  Saab 1979  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐7554     2.10  6.00  Mariner 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3027  LABBEN  2.50  6.00  Mariner 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3730  LISSA  2.00  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3741  EVY  2.25  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3776  SPERO  2.44  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 96: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

90 

 

SFB‐3359  RAN  2.50  6.00  Saab diesel 1981  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3680  NN  2.48  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3854  SABINA  2.00  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4351  RAMNÖ  2.20  6.00  Sefle  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4621  ERIK  2.35  6.00     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4325  NINA  2.00  6.00  Utombordsmotor  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4894  MARINE  2.20  6.00  Mercrusier 1996  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4182     2.40  6.00  Yanmar SB8 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4989  TREAN  2.40  6.00  Sabb  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4301  EOR 21  2.08  5.98  Lister SL2 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7402  STARCROSS  2.40  5.95  Evinrude  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9681  DILFINEN  2.20  5.90  Sabb 1973  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9859     2.10  5.90  Sabb HG 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4147     2.02  5.90  Utombord 1980  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3756  GRODAN  2.12  5.90  Yamaha 1993  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8376  SEABIRD  2.44  5.90  Yamaha, 1997  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5269     2.30  5.85  Suzuki 1991  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4265  OLIVIA  2.00  5.85  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2680  DOLLY  2.40  5.85  Kubota diesel  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4400  ELIN  1.90  5.80  Mariner  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8084  LINDA  2.35  5.80  MD 6 B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4548     2.05  5.80  Yamaha 60FEOL 1992  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5098     2.25  5.75  Yamaha 1991, bensin  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7924     2.18  5.74  F80BETL, 2005  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8753  NATALIJA  2.20  5.73  Suzuki DF140/14001885222, 2008  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4344  SIW  2.00  5.72  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐6417  AMAZON  2.20  5.70  Yamaha Saltwater Series  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4295  MALIN  2.00  5.70  Yanmar YSE12 1978  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3661  SANDRA  2.20  5.70  Mercury  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 97: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

91 

 

SFB‐5898  ANNA  2.10  5.70  Saab  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9887     2.26  5.70  Sabb typ GG 1970  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4679  LENA  2.30  5.70     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5646  ATHENA  2.20  5.65  Mariner  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4464         2.05  5.65 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3697  OTELLO  2.21  5.64  Force 1254 8A M  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4119  LARITA II  2.20  5.60  Suzuki  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐8170  ANNETTE  2.40  5.60     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2000     2.10  5.60  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9264  RAYON  2.20  5.60  Yamaha  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3224  LAHÄLL II  2.05  5.60     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8296  BRITA  2.17  5.60  Yamaha, 2007  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐5221  REGINA  2.25  5.60  Yanmar YSE 12 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4454         2.10  5.60 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9781     2.15  5.60  Jonsson 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9415  LÄSJÖ  1.85  5.60  Volvo Penta 200  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4469  EVA  1.70  5.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2648  WALLY  2.12  5.50     Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐4588  CARMENCITA  2.00  5.50  Volvo‐Penta  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2466     1.85  5.50  MD 1  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6163     2.65  5.50  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2824  SAGA  1.80  5.49     Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3028     2.20  5.45  Yamaha  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9528     2.20  5.45  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐6183     2.03  5.40  Evinrude 1977  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2257     2.15  5.40  Johnson 1983  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4383  ÖRNVIK  2.00  5.40  Johnson 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9185     1.95  5.36  Johnson utomb. 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9937     1.89  5.36  Evinrude  Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 98: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

92 

 

    SFC‐2244 1.89  5.36  Mercury 40E 1975  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8404  LINNÉA  2.11  5.35  Mercruiser 3,0L  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9731     1.90  5.33  Albin bensin  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4539     2.05  5.30  Yamaha utombord 1986  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8905  FANNY  2.05  5.30  Yamaha, 2008  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5325  AMOBILE  2.24  5.30  Mercruiser, 1990  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4191     1.75  5.30  Utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2487  DAGNY  2.15  5.30  MD 1  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7103     2.10  5.25  Mercury  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2233     1.77  5.23  Yanmar 1GM 1982  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4317     2.35  5.20  Jonson  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7571  ALKYONEUS  2.20  5.20  Tohatsu M40D,utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7901  SILVER VIKING  2.07  5.20  Mercury E50, 2000  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9230  UTTERN 520  2.10  5.20  Mercury 45ELO 1987  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2044         2.05  5.20 Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9527  JAPPE  1.78  5.15  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2628  ELLEONOR  1.70  5.15  30ECS 1989  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8759  DCM 69  2.02  5.12  Mercury 70, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4804  SOFIA WEST  1.85  5.10  Johnsson  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9526  GULINGEN  1.80  5.10  Johnsson, 1979/80  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9422     2.20  5.10  Evinrude  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3845         1.90  5.10 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7038  PÄRLAN  1.95  5.10  Evinrude utombordare,‐69  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3410     1.65  5.10  Monark  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9414  GULLSJÖ  1.80  5.07  Volvo Penta 200  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐2727     1.95  5.05  Yamaha 1989  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐9918     1.92  5.05  Mercury 500 1976  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4429  SAFIR  2.00  5.00  Johnson utombord  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐3692  BRIS  1.80  5.00     Fritidsmotorbåt 

Page 99: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

93 

 

SFC‐8897  DAMPES RI  2.00  5.00  Utombordsmotor, Zuzuki  Fritidsmotorbåt SFB‐2930  REBECKA  2.00  5.00  Johnsson  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8255  BB 845  2.03  4.88  Yamaha, 2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8437  CASA  1.80  4.85  Johnson, 1985  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7994     2.10  4.85  Mercury ELPTO 50, ‐95  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7479     1.90  4.77  Mercury OT765S75, 2003  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8754  BELAFONTE  1.91  4.76  Mercury F60, 2008  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7944  MILICA  2.37  4.67  Mercury 50, 2006  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8399  SMUNKEN  1.82  4.66  Evinrude, 1972  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8422     1.85  4.60  Tohatsu  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8803  SAGA  1.85  4.58  Mariner 55E, 1984  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5547     1.68  4.42  Evinrude  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐4460     1.85  4.25  Johnson 1993  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐3334  BOSS  1.80  4.25  Mercury  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐5807     1.64  4.05  Evinrude 35 Elan QL  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7123     1.95  3.99  Yamaha F25AES, 2004  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7443     1.52  3.40  Yamaha, 1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8713  MARIJO  1.17  3.22  Yamaha, 2005  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐7530  KENNETH PETTERSSON  1.25  3.15  66 D, 1999  Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8310         1.50  3.10 Fritidsmotorbåt SFC‐8710  KVAST‐HILDA  3.30  15.45  Lombardini LDW220YM, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8679  MARY AF RÖVARHAMN  3.68  14.50  Perkins 4.108, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7512  ELLINOR  3.89  14.44  Volvo TMD 31A, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8587  OHANA  3.94  14.32  Yanmar 4 PHME  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5352  NADIR  3.97  14.20  Volvo Penta MD96 1959  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7092  INGURA  3.98  14.00  Mercedes Benz, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6786  CAROLINA IV  3.96  14.00  Yanmar 4JH3 TBE  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8706  SERENADE  3.80  13.80  Volvo Penta MD3B, 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7043  EJA AF SLUSSEN  3.80  13.75  Lombardini 1503, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 100: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

94 

 

SFC‐2121  ZEDNA  3.70  13.65  Ford Lehman 6  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7749  FREJA  3.47  13.53  Volvo MD 11  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8040  MARIANNE III  3.98  13.50  Yanmar 4JH3‐TBE 2,6  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8150  RAUK  3.95  13.50  Kubota, 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5159  SOFI  3.58  13.45  Ford Diesel 2712E 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7549  FULL MOON  3.81  13.41  Perkins 5/236, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7849  CAJOLA  3.95  13.40  Volvo MD22L, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7050  OLYMPIA  3.95  13.40  MD22L Volvo, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8593  SIGRID  3.95  13.40  Volvo Penta D55  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7885  RONJA  3.97  13.39  Yanmar 4JH3‐TBE, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8176  NOATUN  3.98  13.37  Perkins 4‐108, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8138  COMEDIE  3.95  13.22  VolvoPenta TMD31L‐A, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5733  LADY ESS  3.70  13.20  Ford 2715E 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7141  ANNFIE  3.90  13.09  Yanmar 4JH3E, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7314  ABRA KADABRA  3.90  13.09  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8180  CULOTTE BLEUE  3.90  13.09  Yanmar 4JH4E, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8769  DON'T LOOK BACK  3.90  13.09  Yanmar 4JH4E, 2005   Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8653  SHIRAZ  3.90  13.09  Volvo D‐2‐55, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6828  STORA BLÅ  3.73  13.05  Volvo Penta 2030, 1994  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6297  ESS & GEE  3.90  13.00  MD 32A, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7546  HOKUS POKUS 2  3.82  13.00  Volvo Penta MD31, 1994  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6872  VÄLFARE  3.95  13.00  Ford 2712E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8520  ASYNJA  3.10  13.00  Volvo Penta MD17, 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7444  HEUREKA II  3.99  12.99  Volvo MD2003T, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8336  KAROLINA  3.95  12.95  Ford 2712E, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3744  MA DONNA  3.88  12.95  Volvo Penta TMD 31 B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6724  CASTA DIVA  3.78  12.93  Volvo Penta MD21,1981  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7110  QUINTAMARE  3.90  12.90  Yanmar 3 JH3CE, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7031  MAYA  3.98  12.80  Perkins Prima ‐94  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 101: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

95 

 

SFC‐7356  ENGLA  3.95  12.80  Perkins 4,108 diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4996  BARAVARA  3.98  12.80  Yanmar diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7871  STORM  3.55  12.70  Yanmar 4JH3E, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4557  HEDDA AF FORSNÄS  3.70  12.70  Volvo Penta MD31 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐2816  AKKA THE GOOSE  3.72  12.70  Volvo Penta MD31A 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8652     3.96  12.67  Ford 2725E 6.2l,1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8692     3.95  12.67  Yanmar 4JH3E, E24652  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3495  SIV  2.60  12.65  Volvo TD47  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8739  BOHEMIA  3.95  12.60  Volvo MD22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8700  JIVA  3.26  12.50  Yanmar 3QM3  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7017  LOVA  3.60  12.50  Volvo Penta MD 21 A, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6761  STIMULANTIA  3.20  12.50  Yanmar 3 HM, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7357  AITUTAKI  3.70  12.49  2030 Volvo, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8523     3.90  12.45  Yanmar 3JH2E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7134  LADY ANN  III  3.90  12.45  Yanmar, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐6493  MIDNIGHT EXPRESS  3.92  12.40  Perkins 4108, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7433  METHANA  3.87  12.30  Volvo Penta 2030, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7151  OYZO 15  3.98  12.25  Perkins Prima M50  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8261  SONGONI III  3.76  12.24  Yanmmar  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7810  YMER  3.92  12.23  Volvo D2‐55 5102965641  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5994  AURORA  3.90  12.20  Perkins M50 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8748  CIRCE  3.95  12.20  Yanmar 54 HK 4Jh4E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8818  SWEET DREAMS  3.95  12.20  Yanmar diesel, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7355  LAMPONIA II  3.83  12.20  MD 2040‐DBT  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7334  NORDIC STAR  3.95  12.20  Yanmar 4JH4‐E, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7866  AZIZA  3.95  12.20  Yanmar E02019, ‐05  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8113  RUBICON  3.70  12.20  Volvo Penta 2003T, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8306  MILENA  3.83  12.20  Volvo Penta D2‐40,2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7903  DAWN  3.85  12.18  Vetus 425H253  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 102: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

96 

 

SFC‐8302  YASMINE  3.91  12.15  Yanmar 3JH4E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8165  MAROUSCHKA V  3.97  12.14  Volvo Penta D55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8895  WINDJAMMER  3.97  12.14  Volvo Penta D2 55, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7943  ELLEN AF LYSEKIL  3.83  12.10  Volvo Penta MD22P  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7923  ANTIGONE  3.80  12.10  Volvo Penta 2003T, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6464  NOOMI  3.83  12.10  Yanmar HJH3E 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8069  RANDIVÅG  3.83  12.10  Yanmar 4JH36B4E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8262  WILDA  3.48  12.10  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7559  FRENJA  3.55  12.05  VP D2‐55, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8573  FOGELN  3.57  12.00  Volvo Penta MD 22 L,  2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6324  SAVANNA  3.90  12.00  Volvo D50, 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7838  JAMBALAYA  3.80  12.00  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8546  MARTINETTE  3.75  12.00  Status marine  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8240  HARMONI II  3.96  12.00  Perkins M50, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7531  ARCTURUS II  3.81  12.00  Volvo Penta MD2‐55  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8586  FROGGY  3.96  11.98  Yamaha 4JH4E, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7360  AKKA  3.80  11.97  Perkins M35, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7007  FREJA  3.87  11.95  Yanmar 3JH2E, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8275  AIKA  4.00  11.90  Ford Lehman SP90, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6744  AURORA  3.95  11.90  Perkins 4.108  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8284  ELIONOR  3.82  11.86  Ford diesel typ 2711 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6954  NIRVANA  3.85  11.85  Volvo Penta MD 2030,1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7048  SOCI  3.58  11.85  Diesel Universal 5444  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7148  FRI  3.30  11.85  Volvo Penta 01‐55,2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3483  CARMEN  3.84  11.85  Volvo Penta MD50A  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7063  AYLA  3.87  11.83  Volvo Penta D2‐55,2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7087  STILL FREELANCE  3.76  11.82  Yanmar 3GM, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8513  ST GRAIUS  3.83  11.81  Yanmar 3 HMF 30  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3497  ELLY  4.60  11.80  Volvo Penta MD50A  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 103: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

97 

 

SFC‐7262  MISS ELLIE  3.40  11.80  Ford 2715 E, 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8634  SEAMILES  3.85  11.79  Volvo Penta MD 2040 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5178  MODER  4.14  11.78  Scandia 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8092  PANACEA  3.50  11.75  Volvo Penta MD30, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7872  ROBBI  3.60  11.75  Yanmar 4JH4 200  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6737  VIDFARE  3.50  11.75  Volvo Penta MD31, ‐94  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8270  SURYA  3.99  11.75  Volvo Penta MD22L, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8852  IKAROZ  3.90  11.72  Volvo Penta D2‐40, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8892  OTTILIA II AF PETERSBURG  3.67  11.70  Volvo P2 40  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3619  TITTI IV  3.11  11.70  BMC Captain  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7891  VENTI  3.82  11.67  Volvo Penta, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8235  INSPIRO  3.85  11.65  Yanmar,1987  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8516  SVEA  3.74  11.64  Volvo Penta D55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8199  OCTAV  3.20  11.60  MD17C, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7430  THE SPICE  II  3.65  11.60  MD 21 B, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7837  LENA  3.65  11.60  Volvo Penta MD21B,1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7840  SPIRIT OF  3.76  11.60  Yanmar 3 HMF  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7937  FORTUNA  3.48  11.57  Volvo Penta MD22, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7255  SWINGLISH  3.65  11.55  Yanmar 4JH4‐E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7296  BIFROST  3.38  11.55  Volvo Penta MD31A, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7264  PINELLA  3.68  11.55  Volvo Penta 2030C, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7468  EGGSKÄR  3.68  11.55  Volvo Perkins MD2030,‐01  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7841  SPRAY  3.65  11.55  Yanmar 4JH4‐E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7829  GARM  3.50  11.50  3 cyl.Perkins, 1970  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8792  DIVAN  3.54  11.50  VP D2‐4, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4935  WANNABE  3.40  11.50  Volvo Penta MD29 1969  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8443  LEVANA  3.50  11.50  Ford, 1967  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3378  SOUTH SEA  3.50  11.50  Ford 2712E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8140  CALYPSO  3.40  11.42     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 104: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

98 

 

SFC‐7579  JUSTINE  3.60  11.40  Yanmar 3JH4E, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5632  NORDWIND  3.65  11.40  Perkins 4236 4 cyl  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8414  NEMO  3.40  11.40  Volvo Penta MD3B, 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8514  CYGNE BLEU  3.60  11.40  Volvo Penta 2030, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8509  BLÅTUNGA  3.93  11.37  Volvo MD30, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8603  TINGELING  3.75  11.35  Yanmar 3JH4E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8158  ANNA SOFIA  3.48  11.35  Diesel, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8662  ANNIARA  3.80  11.35  Volvo Penta D2‐40B, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7473  TRAMONTANA  3.80  11.35  ED3321‐U‐600240K,1984  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8766  ALTAIR  3.48  11.35  Yanmar 3JH, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8356  AMANDA FRISCO  3.80  11.35  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8914  MIRAGE II  3.65  11.33  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6767  CRUSADER  3.55  11.31  Volvo Penta MD22, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3722  LADY MONTANA  3.30  11.30  Perkins 4.108 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐7914  AKAIA  3.66  11.30  Ford Diesel 27/11 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7411  IRONI  3.60  11.30  VP MD 17 C, diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7046  GALEJAN  3.65  11.30  Yanmar 4JH3‐BE  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7791  RANI  3.60  11.30  Yanmar 3614, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8170  VIRGO  3.65  11.28  Volvo MD 2030, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8560  COQUELICOT  3.86  11.20  Perkins 4108, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7806  CADENCIA  3.45  11.20  VP 2003 T, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7768  AVATARA 2  3.45  11.20     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8821  SEA WIND  3.45  11.20  Yanmar 4JH2E, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8681  LINN  3.80  11.20  Volvo Penta DI‐30  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6841  BORITA II  3.48  11.19  Penta MD22L, 1994  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7415  BALP  3.35  11.10  Volvo Penta MD 31  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7534  HALINA  3.80  11.10  Yanmar 3GM30F, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7868  MADAME  3.35  11.10  Yanmar, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8392  ELLINOR  3.84  11.10  Yanmar 2GM 20, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 105: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

99 

 

SFC‐7853  ARKONA II  3.16  11.08  VolvoPenta MD11/110S,1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8230  ATHENA  3.63  11.07  Yanmar 3HM35HP  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8751  MAGNOLIA  3.13  11.07  MD IIC, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7932  LA SIRENA  3.13  11.07  Yanmar 3HM, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7230  ARWEN  3.95  11.05  VP MD21A, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6783  PADDINGTON  3.95  11.05  VP MD 22L ‐01  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5074  CATTIE  3.25  11.05  Ford 2712E  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8433  BORAGO  2.44  11.04  Yamaha, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7065  VILDRENEN  3.60  11.03  Yanmar 3GM30FC, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7780  MAIKEN  3.20  11.00  Yanmar Diesel, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8019  PELICAN BOTER  3.60  11.00  Ford 2725 E, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7554  STERNA  5.40  11.00  2 x Volvo 2020, 94  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8870  JOSHUA  3.65  11.00  MD 2003, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8975  ELIZABETH  3.63  11.00  Yanmar 3QM30 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8220  EMILY ROSE  3.70  10.95  VP 2030 Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8317  VÅGSPEL  3.15  10.94  Yanmar, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7954  TERPSICHORE  3.36  10.90  Mercedes OM636, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7010  DOBEDO  3.40  10.90  Merceders OM 636  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8539  PRIMA DONNA  3.40  10.90  VP D2‐40, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8008  RESOLUTA  2.74  10.88  Volvo Penta 2003, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7180  GREIP  2.74  10.88  Lombardini LW1003M, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7131  MÉDOC 3  3.50  10.85  Yanmar 3GM30,‐87  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐7780  VIKTORIA  3.50  10.85  Mercedes Benz  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6613  MARI  3.50  10.85  Bedford 330M, 1973  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7091  LA FOLIA  3.06  10.84  Volvo Penta MD11C 33391  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7399  TESLA  2.75  10.80  VP MD7A 110‐S, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7533  ADALALSA  3.30  10.80  Ford Lehman 2722E 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7417  GARMA  3.48  10.80  Volvo PentaND 2030, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7325  EMMI  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta 2003 T  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 106: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

100 

 

SFC‐6821  HILDA  3.40  10.75  MD11C, 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7777  PHILULA III  3.40  10.75  Nanni 4.150SD, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8511  MY NOW  3.49  10.75  Yanmar 3YM30, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8567  JOHELINA  3.20  10.74  VP Md22, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7284  ELVIRA  3.30  10.72  VP 2030, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7024  CHRISTINA  3.30  10.72  Volvo Penta Diesel, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6835  LOVA NOVA  3.20  10.70  Yanmar 3GH30F 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7310  ALENE  3.30  10.70  Volvo Penta MD11D  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7101  ZORBA  3.60  10.70  MD 11C, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7912  CALETA  3.56  10.70  Yanmar 3JH2E, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8665  CLAUDIE  3.25  10.70  Yanmar 3cyl. serienr 11940  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7371  M.J. SISTER  3.30  10.67  Volvo MD2, 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6807  KYOUNG‐SOOK  3.10  10.65  Perkins 4.108  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7080  MASCOT  3.40  10.65  Volvo Penta BT2003 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8159  ACANTHA  3.40  10.60  Yanmar 27 PS, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3925  MINANDRA  3.13  10.60  Perkins dielse 4.236M  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5203  FORTUNA  3.12  10.60  Perkins 4.236 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐7151  HELLEN  3.13  10.60  Perkins diesel 4.236 1970  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8908  LADY ANN  3.38  10.54  VP D2‐55, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7570  MISS BLUE  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD 21 B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6738  MARIA HONUNGSHÖST  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD22L, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8106  AQUILA  3.38  10.54  VP 2003T, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6817  CARMEN  3.45  10.54  MB 21 Volvo Penta ‐80  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8682  GERONIMO  3.14  10.51  VP MD2020, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7214  TONIKA  3.05  10.50  Perkins 4.107  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6784  CONSTANZIA  3.05  10.50  MD22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7763  IMPULS  3.38  10.50  Volvo Penta 2003, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8876  EMBLA  3.05  10.50  Yanmar 3JH2E, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7291  ANEMOS  II  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21, 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 107: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

101 

 

SFC‐4968  NIKONIKA  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21 1973  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4461  ANGELICA  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8207  SKRUBBEN  3.10  10.45  VP MD3B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7020  XAVITA IV  3.10  10.45  Volvo Penta MD17C, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7476  KALLISTE  3.10  10.45  VolvoPenta MD17C, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7113  BEATA  3.50  10.40  Volvo Penta, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7382  GRÅGÅS  3.40  10.40  Lombardini 1404M, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8502  TUULIKKI  3.15  10.40  Volvo Penta MD3  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3408  COLONEL  3.00  10.40  Volvo Penta MD2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7364  HENNY  3.02  10.36  Volvo Penta MD47 B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8318  JENNIFER  3.40  10.35  Yanmar 3GM 30F, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7988  AVANTI  3.40  10.35  Yanmar 3YM20,2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7836  AMILLIA  3.40  10.35  VP 2020, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7773  JEANETTE  3.29  10.30  Yanmar E 24421, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7086  AYSIN  3.35  10.30  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7016  NIGHT  3.10  10.30  Volvo Penta MD3B, 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7239  LENA  3.35  10.30  Volvo Penta MD2020, ‐04  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3485  LINUS II  2.90  10.30  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8869  SOMMARVIND  3.00  10.30  Yanmar 2GM  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7186  NOCTILUCA  3.42  10.28  Volvo Penta MD2030,‐02  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6834  FREJA  3.33  10.28  VP 2003, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6753  WINDÖGA  3.42  10.28  Volvo 2030, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8025  ACAMAR  3.00  10.28  Yanmar 3GM30F, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7888  WILMA  2.95  10.25  Yanmar 3JH3GBE, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5119  MESSIMERI  2.95  10.25  Volvo Penta MD21 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6532  BON BON  3.21  10.21  Volvo Penta MD11 110S  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7946  APOLLONIA  3.51  10.21  Yanmar 3YM30  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8530  KOF  3.48  10.20  Volvo Penta MD2030, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7037  HOLIDAY  3.48  10.20  Volvo Penta MD2040  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 108: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

102 

 

SFC‐6591  RONJA  3.40  10.20  Volvo Penta 2003T, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6733  TYRWILD  3.33  10.20  Volvo Penta MD 17 D  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7452  MANDALAY  3.33  10.20  Volvo Penta MD17, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7900  SECOND LIFE  3.48  10.20  Volvo Penta, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8186  AWAPUHI  3.26  10.10  Ford marine diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8407  NOATUNE  3.25  10.10  Ford 2712E, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5735  GRILLAN  3.25  10.10  Volvo Penta MD47 1961  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6012  CATJA  3.26  10.10  Perkins diesel 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6220  ECHO IV  3.25  10.10  Volvo Penta MD40A  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5933  MARTINA  3.26  10.10  MD 47  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4032  LADY MARIA  3.26  10.10  Tempest Commodore 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6681  MEJJA  3.35  10.10  Beta Marine BD 722 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4828  AURORA  3.25  10.10  Sealord 5,7 1970  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7126  MOON CAT  3.35  10.10  Ford 2712 E, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8172  GRETA GARBO  3.30  10.10  VolvoPenta MD 2030 DBT  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8175  BLUE DREAM  3.25  10.10  Perkins 4236, 1971  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8657  RINA  3.30  10.10  VP MD11, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8787  MADAM  3.26  10.10  FORD  2712, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7982  X‐ON LINE  3.30  10.06  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8020  CABRIMA  3.45  10.00  3GM30, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8174  SAKANA  3.40  10.00  Volvo Penta 2030S, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7532  BLUE DUCK  3.00  10.00  Bukh 3869, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐7563  ETERNITY  3.05  10.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1971  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8917  YTIC  3.15  10.00  Volvo MD32 1969  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7176  JOHANNA  3.30  10.00  Yanmar 3 HM 35  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6827  RAHMANI  3.60  9.99  Volvo 2 DB  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐6619  BLUE MARLIN  3.35  9.99  Highpowermarine JAM1210  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8297  COYOTE  6.25  9.99  Yamaha 9,9  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7029  NAUSIKAA  3.26  9.98  MD 2030  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 109: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

103 

 

SFC‐7354  LINNÉA  3.18  9.90  Nanni diesel, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7015  MÅNSTRÅLEN  3.25  9.90  Volvo Penta 2002/1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6731  JAJJA  3.25  9.90  VP MD 2030 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7851  ALETEIA  3.18  9.89  VolvoPenta MD17D,1983  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8093  KAIROS  3.18  9.89  MD2B, 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8103  HULDA  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta DI‐30, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5977  LA VIATA  3.20  9.87  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7856  VICKI  3.27  9.85  Yanmar diesel 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7190  SOMMERWIND  3.15  9.83  MD 2030, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7088  VIRGO  3.33  9.81  V.P.2003, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7125  KALLA  2.88  9.81  Lombardini LDW 1003 M  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6748  NORTHERN DUCK  3.33  9.81  Yanmar 3JH 3E, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8206  MOBY DICK  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 36M30, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7327  LÄRKAN  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2040‐DBT,03  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8683  ENISE  3.23  9.75  Volvo Penta MD 11 C, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8786  PACIFIC SPIRIT  3.35  9.75  Universal M40, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6816  NADA  2.88  9.71  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8121  SEA QUILL  3.20  9.70  Yanmar, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7269  MARELD  3.10  9.65  Yanmar 2GM, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3578  STORMFÅGELN  3.13  9.65  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8830  TEKLA  3.30  9.62  Volvo Penta D1‐20  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7309  ALFRIDA III  3.00  9.58  Volvo penta MD11C, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8597  TINDRA II  3.00  9.56  Volvo Penta MD 2030, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8640  CARPE DIEM  3.05  9.55  Yanmar 3JH 4BE  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6762  CALISTA  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD 17C 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8598  ISETTE  2.98  9.55  Volvo Penta MD II C  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8532  YVONNE  2.90  9.55  IVECO M40, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8181  TAMBUKA  3.20  9.54  Volvo Penta S‐drive,2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8383  MYC 4  3.27  9.50  Volvo Penta 2002/1990  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 110: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

104 

 

SFC‐7796  LEJOHANNA  3.20  9.50  Lombardini, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6772  MY LIFE  3.10  9.50  Yanmar 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8242  GUNGNER  3.20  9.50  Vetus diesel 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7378  ANNIE  2.80  9.50  Volvo Penta MD6B, 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8897  FIA  3.10  9.50  Volvo 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8385  NELLY MORGAN  2.65  9.50  VP 2030, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4979  LASANNA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7816  MEJA  3.29  9.45  Volvo Penta DI‐20,‐05  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7869  SELMA  2.65  9.41  Yanmar 2GM20F, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8556  CARPE VENTUM  3.20  9.40  Volvo Penta 2020, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8004  MILONGA  6.84  9.40  Yamaha, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7236  NANOQ  3.05  9.40  Volvo 2003T, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7302  VAGABOND  3.05  9.40  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8060  ARRANDIR  3.05  9.40  Volvo Penta MD7  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8375  KARIN LINNEA  2.00  9.40     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6355  VIRGO  3.20  9.38  Volvo Penta 2002 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6743  MIMER II  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 11 C, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7519  LUCCA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8225  WINDY  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 11C  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8273  PÄRLAN  3.07  9.35     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8396  INGA‐LÅN II  2.78  9.33  VETUS D 13,2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7184  SHAG  2.78  9.33  Yanmar Diesel, 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7019  ALLIE  2.76  9.33  Yanmar YSB12 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8798  WINDHOVER  3.00  9.30  Yanmar 3GM30, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5493  NJORD  2.76  9.25  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8050  RAAN  2.96  9.20  Sole Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8146  TODELO  2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta 2002, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6729  TONITA  2.96  9.14  VolvoPenta 2002 BBT 94  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8643  MARY‐ANNE  2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6A, 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 111: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

105 

 

SFC‐6778  ARVIDA  3.18  9.10  VP MD 2030‐D, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6879  TESSA IV  3.00  9.07  Yanmar YSN 12 gr  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8149  YVETTE  3.02  9.02  OZecoDrive, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8668  ARCTICA  2.80  9.00  Volvo Penta 2002, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6788  WIRGO II  2.80  9.00  Volvo Penta MD 7A, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7322     2.60  8.86  Yanmar Y5B8G ‐ 293/1976  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8367  INO  2.60  8.86  Solé Diesel MINI‐17,1992  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7362  ISIS  2.50  8.80  Honda, utombordare  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8001  SPINIFEX  2.60  8.80  Yanmar Diesel, 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4930  MADRE MIA  2.80  8.80  Volvo Penta MB10A  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8423  GLORY  3.22  8.75  Yanmar, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐4304  PINGA WINGA  3.25  8.75  Volvo Penta 2003 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐3645  AIDA  3.05  8.75  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐2038  MI 1  3.01  8.72  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8861  PIERINA  2.93  8.57  Yanmar 2YM15 E00382  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7772  LELISE  2.84  8.56  GM 10, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7981  GLÖMSAN  2.05  8.55  Thohatsu  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7332  CARRIGALOE  2.95  8.54  MD 7115, 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8610  ELISE 2  3.05  8.50  Mercedes  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8745  KARIAM OF GLENCOE  3.00  8.47     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5736  DAFNE  2.90  8.40  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5749  STELLA MARIS  3.00  8.35  D50 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8211  SISKA  2.50  8.34  Yanmar, 1 cyl, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7079  MARE  2.65  8.30  Solé Mini 17, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7282  VIOLA  2.65  8.30  IVECO AIFO 4021 M 20/04  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8721  GRACE  2.18  8.28  Yamaha  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8722  BEAGONVILLE  2.46  8.25  Albin 021, 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8694  IDA  2.46  8.25  Yanmar 2GM, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8785  DORY  2.46  8.25  Perkins M20  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 112: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

106 

 

SFC‐8298  IKTORIA  2.46  8.25  Volvo Penta MDGA,1975  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7979  ON THE ROCKS  2.46  8.25  Albin 0‐22 kombi, 1970  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7369     2.46  8.25  Albin 021 Kombi  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8658     2.46  8.25  Volvo‐Penta MD7A  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8382  MAJA  2.46  8.25  MDBA, 1973  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8411  HUNK  2.46  8.25  Albin 021, 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7049  MAKAI  2.33  8.23  Yanmar YSM12G 82  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8406  SÅNGMÖN  2.80  8.15  Diesel Volvo MD2B, 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8578  SOLAN II  2.80  8.15  Volvo Penta MD, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐8557  EIDERN II  2.23  8.08  Sabb diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐7481  PRIMO ROSA  2.85  8.05  Volvo Penta MD2B 1973  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7370  AHKKA  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD2020, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8762  LA BONITA  2.76  8.03  Kubota ZL‐600, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8430  RASTAREN  2.49  8.00  Mercury, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7919  WAIKIKI  2.80  8.00  MD 7 B, 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6747  LA BLANCHE  2.76  8.00  Lombardini LDW702, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐5595  STENYA  2.60  8.00  Yanmar 15QM20 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7586  CISSI  4.60  7.92  Yamaha 4AC  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8286  ARKEN  2.39  7.87  Suzuki  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7193  GALADRIEL  2.39  7.87  Suzuki  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7237  LION  2.39  7.87  Mercury, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6146  CARA MIA  2.95  7.85  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7827  ALMAZ  2.25  7.85  Evinrude B006 200  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐6459  CARPE DIEM  2.95  7.85  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8134  ENZO  2.60  7.80  Volvo‐Penta MD5A, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7576  DYNING  2.65  7.80  Yanmar 2GM20  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐6854  VICTORIA  2.50  7.70  Yanmar SB8G, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8090  WINDCHASER  2.50  7.50  Yanmar HDAC402741,1976  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐8826  SOPRANO  2.30  7.35  Volvo Penta MD 5B, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt 

Page 113: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

107 

 

SFC‐8832  REGINA  2.61  6.90  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7950  ANDREA  2.20  6.30     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7175  INSHALLAH  2.16  6.09  Utombordsmotor  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7905  JAZZVA  2.50  6.00  Jamaha, utombordare  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFB‐6508  BOHEME  2.20  6.00  Mercury  Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SFC‐7886  SJÖJUNGFRUN  3.55  11.32  Yanmar 4JH4E, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelbåten SFC‐8793  ARCTIC  4.03  11.99  Perkins 4154, 1990  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐8791  SEABORN  3.11  11.13  Perkins M25, 1991  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐6830  EVA IV  3.80  10.62  Yanmar 1995  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐8813  KAJSA  3.38  10.54  VOLVO PENTA 2003T, 86  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐3717  COBACA  3.30  10.20     Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐6670  HAGUMACA  3.33  10.20  Volvo Penta MD 17 D  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐8912  NUKA  3.46  9.99  Volvo Penta MD 2020  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐7545  EMELIN  2.88  9.88     Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐6656  DAPHNE  3.05  9.40  Volvo MD 7B  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐8922  CANTARE  2.78  9.33  Yanmar ,1977  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐8617  TUA TUA II  2.50  8.34  Nanni Diesel 2,45 E10, 2000  Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐3350  SKUM II  2.20  7.85     Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐3566  LILLA BLÅ  2.00  6.00     Fritidssegelbåt 

SFB‐7281 GARVARN AV KAPPELSHAMN  1.84  5.86     Fritidssegelbåt 

SFC‐3309  LILLE ORM  1.75  5.34     Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐3824  BRIS  1.60  4.80     Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐7590  YRVIND  0.96  4.10     Fritidssegelbåt SFC‐6253  CACHEETAH  4.76  11.75  Perkins  Fritidssegelkatamaran SFB‐8223  MARIA  3.76  16.50  Scania D11 1965  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3295  FAST LANE  3.00  16.00  Volvo Penta MD11D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6165  ZILVER  3.30  15.45  Volvo Penta 2003T 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5026  GRISONE  3.50  15.05  Volvo Penta MD21 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 114: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

108 

 

SFB‐7359  DAPHNE  3.65  14.90  Perkins Diesel 1961  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8663  LYNX  3.26  14.40  Volvo Penta MD17D 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6183  EMMA  3.78  14.13  Volvo Penta MD30 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4507  MAJOKA  3.30  14.10  Isuzu UMC24  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3368  SALSA  3.00  14.00  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3698  ELENA  3.95  13.85  Ford  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3364  TREVILJOR  3.00  13.85  Volvo Penta MD17  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5008  SMILE  3.87  13.71  Ford diesel 2712 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6573  FRIDEBORG  3.70  13.70  Volvo Penta MD31A, 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5081  CAPELLA  3.89  13.62  Volvo Penta TMD31 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4860  MARILI  II  3.95  13.50  Ford 6 cyl. diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3245  TWILIGHT  3.96  13.40  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6686  DESTINY  3.97  13.39  Yanmar 4JH3‐TBE  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5365  GALATEA  3.96  13.38  Volvo Penta MD22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6505  LOVINA  3.99  13.36     Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4858  TIME OUT  3.90  13.35  Volvo Penta 3002T‐88  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3817  AMARANT II  3.99  13.30  Volvo Penta TMD31A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5495  STORMPETREL  3.30  13.30  Mercedes 621  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7870  MAGNUM BONUM  3.82  13.25  Perkins 4.236 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6357  AKVILEJA  3.95  13.22  Volvo Penta TMD 22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3383  CHARLOTTA  3.60  13.20  Perkins 4236M  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5228  CEKRITITO  3.83  13.16  Volvo Penta MD22L 1997  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3921  ELISABETH  3.90  13.10  Ford diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3471     3.90  13.10  Ford 2712E  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6366  YANA  3.60  13.00  Perkins 4‐108, 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4651  OFF COURSE  3.90  12.95  Volvo Penta MD21B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5481  LADY ALLI CAT  3.78  12.93  Volvo Penta TMD22A 1997  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3800  CLASSTRE  3.78  12.93     Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6420  ALBATROSS  3.78  12.93  Volvo Penta MD31A, 1988  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 115: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

109 

 

SFC‐3774  SCARLETT O'HARA  3.90  12.85  MD29 1970  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5925  EBI  3.90  12.85  Mercedes 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3464  COOL  3.80  12.80  Volvo Penta MD30A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3325  ALPHA OF SWEDEN  3.09  12.80  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5919  RAFFLES  3.89  12.80  Yanmar 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8512  TINTOMARA  2.50  12.75  Kermath 1960  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6270  PELA  3.76  12.73  Westerbeke 46, 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4069  SIGERLINN  3.60  12.70  MD17C 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3241  KATALIA IV  3.70  12.70  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3793  LINNEA  3.10  12.70  MDIIC  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4632  NIKE  3.82  12.60  Perkins diesel Prima 50  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3266     3.82  12.52  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6177  HXYACHT  3.90  12.51  Volvo Penta 2003T 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6503  AZZURRA  3.90  12.51  Yanmar 3JH3E, 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6966  DUDE  3.90  12.51  Yanmar Diesel, 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4475  WINDFALL  3.60  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21A 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4501  KARIN AF NÄSKE  3.95  12.50  Volvo Penta 2003 Turbo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4022  JO‐JO IX  3.60  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3525  JULIA  3.60  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21 A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7209  PHNATTAPOO  2.50  12.50  Volvo MB10A 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5177  ISMINI  3.94  12.50  Perkins 4.108 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6541  ETOILE DU NORD  3.60  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21A, 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6483  PHILING  3.99  12.48  VPMD22L, 2001  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8498  RESTLESS  3.12  12.40  Ford diesel 1974  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5865  IRREANTUM  3.70  12.40  Kobta universal 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3822  MYRAX  3.60  12.40  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3433  HULDAS KARIN  3.50  12.40  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐8687  CITRON BLEU  3.90  12.31  VPMD22L, 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8432  FREEDOM  3.65  12.30  Volvo MD 40 A, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 116: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

110 

 

SFC‐3747  CANDELA  3.85  12.30  Perkins 4108 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5762  GATHENHIELM  3.85  12.30  Perkins 4108 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6000  LI  3.76  12.30  Yanmar 4JH2‐TBE 1997  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5763  KRYSSAREN  3.85  12.30  Perkins 4108  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6411  BLUE MOON  3.76  12.22  Volvo Penta MD22, 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3533  VIKTORIA  3.50  12.20  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3595  SHEILA IV  3.70  12.20  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5927  BOREA  3.87  12.19  Volvo Penta MD22L 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4900  MOANA  3.85  12.19  Perkins diesel 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5324  SWEDWIND  2.55  12.19  Volvo Penta MD 6, 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3328  MYOPTION  3.96  12.19  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5892  LAMPRIS  3.97  12.13  Perkins 6.354  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4693  NOON MOON  3.85  12.10  Perkins 4.108 diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5157  SAHARAH  3.54  12.10  Volvo Penta MD22A 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6499  ANNA  V  3.65  12.10  Kubota KTT3000, 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8689  FIREFLY  3.50  12.10  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3593  GINGER  3.75  12.10  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6578  MARINENE  3.70  12.10  Volvo MD21, 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3276  CRUSANDER  3.75  12.10  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3706  NEREIA  3.55  12.08  Ford 2700/S841116  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3885  FELICIA  3.68  12.07  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4640  MONIQUE  3.20  12.00  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3306  ACARA  3.50  12.00  BMW D50  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6029  XENA  3.67  12.00  Solé 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5702  THE TEMPTRESS  3.80  12.00  Mercedes 240 diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐2170  FRAGANCIA  3.89  11.99  Perkins 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3622  BLUES  3.89  11.99  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3560  HOLIDAY  3.89  11.99  Perkins MD50  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6523  OLIVIA  3.83  11.98  Yanmar 4JHE 2000  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 117: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

111 

 

SFB‐8743  XANADU  4.35  11.97  Volvo Penta TMD50B 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6461  DIVING FROG  3.60  11.95  Perkings Diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6185  SAILAWAY  3.60  11.92  Volvo Penta 2040 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3730  SPICE  3.62  11.92  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4263  SAHLEYA  3.62  11.92  Volvo Penta 2003 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5507  ULVINNA  4.05  11.91  Perkins 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐8871  THINK TWICE  6.50  11.90  Yanmar 3YM30C, 2004  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3818  ZI‐ZI  3.95  11.90  Yanmar 36M  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3265  BLUE PETER  3.62  11.89  Mercedes Benz  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3668  SEA ANN  3.62  11.89  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4086  ALBERTINA  3.62  11.89  Volvo Penta MD17C 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6509  MODUS VIVENDI  IV  3.62  11.89  VP MD 17 C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3690  SEA KING  3.62  11.89  Volvo Penta 2003 T  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3456  NAIM  3.35  11.88  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3259  ELIONOR  3.82  11.86  Ford  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6060  SEFIR  3.76  11.85  Volvo Penta MD22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3951  VARUNA  4.35  11.85  Mitsubishi S4E2 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7211  PINTA  4.05  11.85  GM‐72  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5916  VILJA  3.76  11.85  Volvo Penta MD22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5806  WIRAKON  3.81  11.82  Volvo Penta MD3 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3875  ANNA  3.00  11.80  Yanmar diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5721  YEMANJA  3.85  11.80  Volvo Penta MD17 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6249  SUSANNA OF CROUCH  3.43  11.78  Perkins 4236M  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3530  LINNEA  4.48  11.77  Volvo Penta D47  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8754  AHNRI  3.40  11.76  Peugeot XD3 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6548  SEA SON  3.85  11.75  Perkins 4.108m 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3909  TINGELING  3.50  11.75  Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5641  SANDSTORM  3.90  11.75  Perkins 4108M 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3825  LADY  3.90  11.75     Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 118: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

112 

 

SFC‐5084  ELIDA  3.85  11.74  Perkins 4108  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6374  KERMIT  4.29  11.73  Perkins M90 1996/1997  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8342  LA CLE  3.60  11.72  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3247  ÄLVAN  3.97  11.70  Volvo BM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4023  NOOMI  3.70  11.70  Perkins 4‐236M 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3768  FERNET BRANCA  3.54  11.66  Volvo Penta 2003T  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5256  JETTE  3.46  11.66  Yanmar 3GM30F4449  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3513  DELIGHT  3.90  11.65  Perkins diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3396  SPLIT PASSION  3.90  11.65  Volvo Penta 2003 Turbo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5450  XTRA  3.65  11.65  Volvo Penta MD21B 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐2109  XANADU  3.90  11.65  Perkins Prima  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3406  NJORD  3.15  11.60  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3549  KIAMA III  3.40  11.60  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4066  PETINA  3.65  11.60  Volvo Penta MD21 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3460  LOUISE  2.70  11.60  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3487  SAE GULL  3.60  11.60  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7491  NORDIC LADY  3.65  11.60  Yanmar 4JH3CE, 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6069  ANCHEE III  3.65  11.58  Yanmar 3QM3FG 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3625  ALVICLARA  3.48  11.57  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3337  FRAGANCIA  3.48  11.57  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7014  HAVSVIND  3.48  11.57  Volvo Penta MD21B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3827  AMANDA  3.54  11.57  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3317  SURPRISE  3.89  11.56  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8398  PEPPELI  3.20  11.55  Feriman  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5619  DAPHNE  3.55  11.55  Bukh DV24ME 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4256  CHIQUITITA  3.57  11.53  Volvo Penta MD3 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3783  FREYA X  2.40  11.50  Mercruiser 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3709  OCTAVIA  3.90  11.50  Perkins Prima  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3640  HELENE  3.90  11.50  Perkins 50PRIMA  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 119: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

113 

 

SFC‐3320  MERETE  3.90  11.50  Perkins 4108  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3332  HELENA  3.90  11.50  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7619  INDRA  3.50  11.50  BMC diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4886  GRANDESSA  3.90  11.50  Perkins 1987/1988  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6137  STORNOWAY  3.70  11.50  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7165  ARIEL  2.73  11.50  Volvo Penta MDIIB  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3613  SHASA  3.70  11.50  Volov Penta MD17D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5985  CORA  3.70  11.48  Peugot diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3357  KOLIJOX  3.50  11.46  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4187  AVALON  3.70  11.46  Yanmar 3QM30 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3412  NITCHEVO  3.60  11.45  Perkins Marind  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6506  HALLôJA  3.50  11.45  Yanmar 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8859  ALBATROSS  3.32  11.43  Volvo Penta MD17 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3453  CRUSADER  3.20  11.40  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4957  ARGO NAVIS  3.24  11.40  Yanmar 3GM30F 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5678  LINNéA  3.00  11.40  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐8839  JASMIN  3.60  11.40  Volvo MD 2030, 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8745  REFANUT  3.00  11.35  Sabb Diesel 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5552  BRYNHILD  3.76  11.32  Perkins Prima M 50, 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6280  TURANDOT  3.55  11.31  Volvo Penta MD22P, 2000  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4639  NOA‐NOA II  3.55  11.31  Volvo Penta MD22 1995  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3470  MILES AHEAD  3.24  11.30  Volvo Penta MD11  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5370  ATTUTTALÖR  3.50  11.30  Volvo Penta MD17C 16277  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5893  VAGABOND  3.50  11.30  Perkins 4‐108 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5714  BLESSING  3.30  11.30  Volvo Penta MD 11 C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6180  WILLROSE  3.50  11.30  Volvo Penta MD21B 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5170  EOS  3.48  11.25  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6554  APHRODITE  3.59  11.25  Volvo MD2040, 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5820  MORNING SUN II  3.66  11.23  Mazda Diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 120: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

114 

 

    SFC‐3424  JAI ALAI  3.35  11.20 Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4008  NAVICULA'S  3.50  11.20  Volvo Penta MD21 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6239  CORONA  3.50  11.20  Volvo Penta 2003T  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6715  CHARUMA III  3.50  11.20  Volvo Penta MD22L, ‐97  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8014  BOJAN  3.45  11.20  Universal Atomic M 5444  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6560  ALEGRIA  3.50  11.20  Volvo Penta MD 22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6597  ALTERA EA  3.45  11.20  Yanmar 4JH2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6443  IRO‐ERI  3.50  11.20  YANMAR 3HM 35SD30  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6412  LINDISFARNE  3.48  11.20  MD22, 1995  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6460  UNICORN  3.50  11.20  Volvo Penta 2003T, 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7001  ELLINOR  3.45  11.20  Yanmar 4JH2BE, ‐95  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5095  STRESSLESS  3.45  11.20  Volvo Penta MD17C 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4880  FLAVIA  3.45  11.20  Volvo Penta MD17C 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5938  SOLITUDE  3.45  11.20  Yanmar 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3716  THALATTA  3.45  11.20  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3670  GENUINE  3.45  11.20  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3608  VIMANAS  3.59  11.20  Mercedes  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4052  TALISMAN  3.45  11.20  MD17D 85  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5364  GALAPAGOS  3.60  11.15  Yanmar 36M‐30FC‐SD20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7285  SARA TVÅ  3.29  11.13  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3226  CARPE DIEM  3.13  11.12  Volvo MD17C 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7139  VILMA  3.70  11.11  Ford 2715 E, 1974  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5917  ELIDANTE  3.20  11.10  Yanmar 3HM35F 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3656  FANTASI  3.35  11.10  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3499  ANNIE  3.35  11.10  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8685  RED LABEL  3.13  11.07  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6161  OANA  3.13  11.07  Volvo Penta MD17D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5180  SHANGRI LA III  3.13  11.07  Volvo Penta MD11C/100S 77  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6855  ELVINA  3.13  11.07  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 121: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

115 

 

SFC‐3589  ENDORFINA  3.13  11.07  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8308  TUSSEN  3.13  11.07  Volvo MD17D 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3399  ISA  4.00  11.05  Volvo Penta MD21B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5480  IMAGE  3.95  11.05  Volvo Penta MD21B 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5416  STORMPIPPI  3.60  11.05  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4999  BAKBRUS OF SWEDEN  3.97  11.05  Volvo Penta MD21A 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3346  MOTVIND II  3.20  11.05  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3754  BETELGEUZE  3.60  11.04  Volvo Penta 2003 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3901  WIGGEN  2.44  11.04  Yamaha utombord 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7219  TINTOMARA II  3.13  11.04  Volvo MD11C,1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3489  MARIE LOUISE  3.60  11.03  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3494  KRAKA  3.60  11.03  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3857  FLAMENCO  3.80  11.00  Yanmar 3GM7297  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4035  LIVA  3.20  11.00  Yanmar 2QM20 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5368  MARTHA  3.80  11.00  Yanmar 3GM 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3297  NEREIDE  6.70  11.00  2 Volvo Penta MB2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3451     3.30  11.00  Yanmar 3GM30FC  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3345  CREYOLA  2.95  11.00  Volvo Penta 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3449  LIONHEART  3.65  11.00  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4037  CHARLOTTE  3.20  11.00  Volvo Penta MD 11  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3881  INDEPENDENCE  3.30  11.00  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7298  TARANTELLA  2.98  11.00  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3260  MEGABUCK  3.80  11.00  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5785  ISIS  3.20  11.00  Thornycroft 1500D 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6765  AURORA BOREALIS  3.25  11.00  Ford NG27RE 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3636  VORE  3.35  11.00  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5403  ESTELLE  3.65  11.00  Volvo Penta MD2003 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5738  LOUNETTE  3.36  10.99  3GM30F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5691  COCKTAIL  3.50  10.97  Volvo Penta 2003T 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 122: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

116 

 

SFC‐5428  VINDROSA  3.50  10.97  Volvo Penta MD22L 1995  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3405  DON QUIJOTE  3.50  10.97  Volvo Penta  2003 Turbo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4159  MARIA KRISTINA  3.40  10.95  Volvo Penta MD11C 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4039  TETTINA III  3.36  10.95  Yanmar 3GM 1988  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3922  APHRODITE  3.50  10.93  Yanmar 3GMC diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7309  KABRIFOL  3.50  10.93  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3707     3.40  10.90  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3237  GOOD RUN  3.35  10.90  Ford 2712E  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3710  BACCINA  2.80  10.90  Volvo Penta MD11D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3429  SHEBA  3.45  10.90  Yanmar 2QM15GH  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3255  WINDA V  3.38  10.90  Buch DV20ME  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3890  VAGABONDO  3.35  10.90  Ford 4 cyl 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3696  SALOME  3.30  10.90  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5526  TEHLIKELI  3.45  10.90  Volvo Penta MD2030B 1996  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3459  SIMURG  2.74  10.88  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4034  BIET  2.74  10.88  Volvo MD11  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5509  CINDERELLA  3.55  10.87  Volvo Penta MD22 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6682  NEFERTITI  3.55  10.87  VPMD22A, 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5431  VAHINE  3.10  10.85  Perkins A4 270  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3529  MADELEN II  3.50  10.85  Volvo Penta MD32A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5819  BOLD VENTURE  3.55  10.84  Perkins Diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6481  QUANDARY  3.48  10.80  Volvo Penta MD 2030,2000  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3288  SAMPIZ III  3.40  10.80  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3657  STORASYSTER  3.48  10.80  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7946  VICTORIA  3.48  10.80  Yanmar 2 QM 20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6314  FORGANCIA  3.38  10.80  VP 2003/1205, 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3304  NANDI  3.63  10.80  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4508  SOMMARFÅGEL  3.48  10.80  Volvo Penta MD7A 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3703  ELIDA  3.30  10.80  Ford  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 123: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

117 

 

SFC‐3284  FRU LARSSON  3.30  10.80  Perkins MD20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6895  ZENDA VÄSTERVIK  3.82  10.80  BMC‐Tempest Sea Lord  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5246  VIOLA  3.30  10.80  Volvo Penta 2002 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6448  ACAPELLA  3.40  10.80  Volvo Penta 2040‐C 2001  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5234  CHRISTINA  3.42  10.80  Volvo Penta 2003T 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6190  MAY  3.80  10.78  Volvo Penta 2040 B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6275  MAH JONG  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta MD11C, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5231  CHINOOK  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta MD2003T 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5712  ANDREA  3.40  10.75  Volvo 2003T, 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5680  SEAQWEST  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta MD22L 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5444  ONYX  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta MD21B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3641  KADIRA  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta MD11D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4002  HARMONY  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta MD21 110S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5216  DA CAPO  3.40  10.75  Volvo Penta 2003 Turbo 89  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5954  HYBRIS  3.30  10.72  Yanmar 2QM20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3663  POSEIDON  3.60  10.72  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6003  INFERNO  3.28  10.71  Yanmar 4JH2E 1997  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5384  BEAUTEN  5.00  10.70  Mercury utombord  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3762  ANNA  3.15  10.70  Volvo Penta MD29  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3545  WILMA  3.50  10.70  Ford  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3587  ILO  3.30  10.70  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8677  GARBO  4.70  10.70  Johnson 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3705  EXIL AF ÖSMO  3.49  10.69  Perkins Perma M35  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3575  GRÅTRUT  3.50  10.65  Mercedes  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5494  ATTINA  3.45  10.65  Yanmar 4KH2‐GBE 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4848  ELAIDA V  3.16  10.65  Volvo Penta 2003 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3510  GAIA  3.10  10.65  Bukh  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6192  MARIA  3.80  10.62  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5235  CIKORIA  3.55  10.60  Volvo Penta MD17 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 124: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

118 

 

SFC‐5923  GANESHA  3.40  10.60  36M30  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5939  MATILDA  3.35  10.60  Volvo Penta MD17  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5888  TWINGO  6.04  10.60  Yanmar utomb. diesel 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐8808  YAJA  3.25  10.60  MD‐17, 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐9043  AROS BEST  3.10  10.60  Yanmar diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5076  BABY BREEZE  3.35  10.58  Yanmar 1996  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3280  TURTLE  3.47  10.57  Volvo Penta MD71  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3653  AMALIE  3.40  10.55  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3574  MISS X  3.25  10.55  Volvo Penta MD7B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3310  PEJA  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3312     3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3637  LA BAMBA  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3681  ADA  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD2003T  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3927  SHENANDOAH  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5153  SAIFON  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta 3T 1988  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5772  PETINA  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta 2003 Turbo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6846  DOLPHIN  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B,‐79  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6988  BARACUDA  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B,‐82  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4270  HELENA  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8020  INCREDIBLE  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8870  AKKA PINN PINN  3.38  10.54  Volvo Penta MD  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3639  DIANA  3.60  10.51  Perkins Perama  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐2587  JAVADOS  3.60  10.51  Perkins diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3233  SNOWBIRD  3.50  10.50  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3617  WINDRUSH  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4280  AYA  2.14  10.50  Utombord  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7177  PASSION  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta 22 L, ‐94  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6726  NABOB  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta P2‐55, 2001  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6746  SERENAD  3.05  10.50  VolvoPenta MD222,‐99  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 125: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

119 

 

SFC‐4859  TELLINA  3.05  10.50  Mercedes‐Benz diesel 1972  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3559  MIROMA II  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3643  FREYJA  3.00  10.50  Vesterbeke  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3988  MAMAMI  3.07  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3742  GING‐GING III  3.38  10.50  Volvo Penta 2003 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3340  SOLITUDE  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8913  MORNING SUN  3.05  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A 1974  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8228  MARY READ  3.05  10.50  Perkins 4.107  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6839  ESCAPADE III  3.05  10.50  Perkins 4108  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3354  PUSAN  3.04  10.46  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5996  LIBERTY  3.10  10.45  Volvo Penta MD17C 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6577  MATANZAS  2.62  10.45  Volov Penta MD 5 A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6123  FELICIA  3.10  10.45  Volvo Penta MD22, 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5049  BALOO  3.20  10.44  Yanmar 3 cyl diesel 1996  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4802  SOLEADO  2.84  10.42  Volvo Penta MD2B 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3370  KARIN  2.84  10.42  Yanmar YSE8391  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3694  ELIN  3.37  10.40  Volvo Penta 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6561  JUDITH  3.15  10.40  Volvo Penta MD17C, 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5226  L'AMIE  3.40  10.40  Volvo Penta 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6033  FELICIA II  2.80  10.40  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6462  EMMA AF TROSA  3.40  10.40  Volvo Penta MD17‐110S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4653  MATHILDA  3.50  10.40  Volvo Penta 2003 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3556  DELFIN  3.00  10.40  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3526  WHITE LADY  3.30  10.40  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5197  MATE  3.35  10.36  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5064  ELLINOR  3.10  10.35  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7453  ZINGOALLA  3.50  10.35  Perkins 4.108  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7555  HORISONT  3.37  10.30  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3528  HELENA  3.10  10.30  Volvo Penta MD35917  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 126: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

120 

 

SFB‐8729  KUMA  3.10  10.30  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8416  HELIA  3.10  10.30  BMC Captain 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6254  MIGHTY QUINN  3.50  10.30  Yanmar Diesel 3GM30F 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3915  MAROUSCHKA IV  3.43  10.30  Yanmar 3GM 30 FG EU, 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3732  JOILGIMO  3.10  10.30  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3840  KEVITA  3.10  10.30  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8752  LINA CARLSKRONA  3.33  10.28  Yanmar 3HM 5794 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5645  JULIETTE  3.42  10.28  Volvo Penta 2030 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3869  NIRVANA  3.10  10.26  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3409  ANNICA  2.71  10.25  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3455  EBREZZA II  3.05  10.21  Universal QM25  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3444  EOS  3.30  10.20  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3292  PANTERN  2.25  10.20  Honda  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3624  WII  2.98  10.20  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3854  LAZER  3.48  10.20  Volvo Penta MD2MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6433  LOVISA  3.40  10.20  2003 Turbo, 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3751  LINA  3.33  10.20  Volvo Penta MD22L 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6527  AMARANT  3.48  10.20  Beta 28, 2000  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5102  TAIFUN  3.05  10.18  Perkins 4.108 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3859  LINDA  3.43  10.16  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3375  LA CLE  3.43  10.16  Yanmar 3GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3740  4 SAIL  3.30  10.10  Volvo Penta 2003 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6367  CARAMELLE  3.30  10.10  Volvo Penta MD11D, 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7743  KALEVALA  3.25  10.10  Ford 0807051 FJK  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3372  PANTA REI  3.40  10.08  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5016  ODYSSEY  3.50  10.06  D 2983‐90 Torncraft 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8645  ORKESTERN  2.81  10.05  Diesel Bukh Dvm 20 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8599  GIRO  3.00  10.00  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8720  IDUN  3.00  10.00  Yanmar diesel 2QM20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 127: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

121 

 

SFC‐3248  SEAQUESTER  3.60  10.00  Volvo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3665  MIO  3.00  10.00  Volvo Penta MD11D 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6719  ÖSTANVIND  3.20  10.00  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3633  AMIE DEUX  2.50  10.00  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3229  PRIDE  3.70  10.00  Volvo Penta MDIIB  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3576  JOHN  3.80  10.00  International BD281  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3447  AURORA  2.98  9.98     Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5990  WILD ROSE  3.40  9.98  Volvo Penta 2003B‐BT 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5198  EL CORDERO  3.40  9.95  Volvo Penta 2003HEBT 1995  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3648  CARAMBA  3.00  9.95  Volvo Penta MD2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6187  SUNBEAM  3.26  9.95  Volvo Penta 2003 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3225  ANNA PERENNA  3.00  9.94  Volvo Penta MD7B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4881  RED BLAZE  3.23  9.92  Yanmar YSM12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5553  TJORVEN  3.23  9.90  Volvo Penta 2003 S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3862  VIRGIN  3.23  9.90  Volvo Penta 2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8742  SLABANG III  3.25  9.90  Volvo Penta 2002S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4551  MARINA  3.23  9.90  Volvo Penta 2003T 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6145  PRIMULA VERIS  3.23  9.90  Volvo Penta 2003 S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3514  MIANCA  3.25  9.90  Volvo Penta 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3539  ACHILLES  2.65  9.90  BMC Leyland  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3567  MUCKLE FLUGGA  3.10  9.90  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3234  CURACAO  3.00  9.90  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3398  EMMA  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3552  TAPTO  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8680  BLÅSUT  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD3B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3236  UHURU  3.33  9.89  Volvo Penta MD3  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7651  BELLA  3.18  9.89  Beta 1505, 1996  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5935  BALOO  3.18  9.89  Yanmar 3JH2E  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3507  MILANKA II  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD2003  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 128: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

122 

 

SFC‐3371  APRILIA  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3330  LADY DAY  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6039  HELENA  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3991  SAYONARA  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11D 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3677  ANIARA  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MDIIB 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3686  OCEAN SPIRIT  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3381  KAVAT  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3531  RAMNOE  3.18  9.89  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3496  VAGANT  3.18  9.89  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8684  LEVANT  3.18  9.89  Volvo MD211C 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6310  MANANA  3.18  9.89  Yanmar 2QM20, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3588  CASA‐NOVA  3.16  9.87  Yanmar 2GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3293  LADY BÄVER II  3.33  9.87  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5072  SOFIA  3.15  9.87  Yanmar, 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3250  VISNA  3.18  9.86  Volvo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3238  ANJO  3.15  9.85  Mercedez OM636  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6042  SCHARONA  3.27  9.85  Yanmar 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6825  FRIDA  2.89  9.84  Yanmar 2QM2081008 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4517  MALAIKA  3.33  9.83  Volvo Penta 2003 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4502  LELI  2.88  9.82  Volvo Penta MD2B 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4385  ARGO  2.88  9.82  Perkins MD30 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3240  MORNING STAR  2.88  9.82  Sabb 2HG  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7003  YEN  2.98  9.82  Volvo Penta MD2B 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6759  AMIGA MIA  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8395  EASY II  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐9026  LAGOM  2.88  9.81  Perkins MD30  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3458  IVRAREN  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 3GM30  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3351  AKKA  3.33  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3243  ALIZé  2.88  9.81  Perkins M30  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 129: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

123 

 

SFC‐5315  SOLVIK  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11B 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5508  SHANTY  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta 2003T 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3262  CHARLOTTA  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3348  AMADEA  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3478  MOBY DICK  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6315  ORCA  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7092  GORMLAITH  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8259  HAVSSULAN  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8653  RÖDE ORM  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 3HM 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8904  TOPEA  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8355  HAZEL  2.88  9.81  Yanmar USE 12G78 Diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8627  DUNDI  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8241  CORONA AQ  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 3HMF 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7332  MARIA  2.83  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2C 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6575  SKAI TO  3.33  9.81  Volvo MD 26 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4642  FRIDA  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3914  DISCOVERY  3.33  9.81     Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4046  YOLANDA  3.33  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20H 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4025  BLUE BITCH  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3728  SVASUD III  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3651  SARANG  2.88  9.81  BMW  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3852  ANNARELLA  2.88  9.81  Yanmar YSM12G  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3837  LEONI  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3599  BALOO  2.85  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3582  TOVE  3.33  9.81  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3491  UNDA MARIS  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 3GM30F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3551  FRIDA  2.88  9.81  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3428  TRUD  3.33  9.81  Yanmar 3GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3338  MULLIGAN  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 130: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

124 

 

SFC‐5628  VINDILA  3.33  9.81  Lister‐Petter LPW/S2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5591  OONA  3.33  9.81  Sale 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4888  ELIN  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 3GM30F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5430  ANNA  3.33  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6463  MARION HOOD  3.33  9.81  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6535  TRUSTY  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20, 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3918  CHARLOTTA  2.88  9.81  Yanmar 2QMdiesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3666  MOLLY  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3612  BANJO  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3669  BLÅVALEN  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MS11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3538  GASTON  2.88  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6023  MONA‐MI  3.33  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5707  JANITA II  2.80  9.80  Izusu 1997  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7351  TAI  2.88  9.80  Sachs diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3486  BIRD ON THE WING  3.20  9.80  Yanmar YSB12GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3658  HORISONT  2.88  9.80  MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6257  MANANNAN  3.33  9.80  Yanmar 2QM20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3379  RENESSAN  3.10  9.80  Yanmar 3GM30F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6989  IRIZ  2.90  9.75  Yanmar diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6350  JOSEFINE  3.05  9.75  Perkins 4236  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5272  CAMILLA II  2.88  9.71  Volvo Penta MD2B 1972  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3461  ANJA  2.84  9.70  Albin 022 Kombi  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3810  POLAR BEAR  3.00  9.70  Volvo MD3 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5751  LINNéA  3.20  9.70  Volvo Penta 3002 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6468  MARINA  3.16  9.60  IVECO aifo 4141M48 2001  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3517  TUATARA  3.00  9.60  Isuzu  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7825  CROWN II  3.01  9.60  Bukh DV20SMF, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3307  THETIS  3.60  9.60  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3349  TRAVEL  3.03  9.60  Yanmar 2GM20 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 131: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

125 

 

SFC‐3253  TILIA  2.88  9.60  Volvo  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3638  AURORA BOREALIS  2.55  9.60  Yanmar YSE8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5524  ZULIKA  2.98  9.60  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4824  FRISCO  3.20  9.60  Volvo Penta 2002 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3326  MÄSCHA  3.00  9.58  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3604  IDA‐LINA  3.00  9.56  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4589  MOONBA  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6164  P.S.  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3493  LOKE  2.98  9.55  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4085  BOTTIN II  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3287  SJÖFÅGEL  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8881  LUNKENTUSS  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6231  CINDERELLA  3.05  9.55  Yanmar 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8630  MANI  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C/15560  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3534  CAPRICHO  3.05  9.55  Volvo Penta MD3  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3377  BIANCA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3621  ALEXANDRA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3718  MYC 5  3.27  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3738  GITSI II  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6196  ORION  3.20  9.50  Volvo 2020, 2000  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6241  KIKE  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3467     3.30  9.50  Volvo Penta 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3445  MOONLIGHT  3.25  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3537  CASCADE  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4016  LITORINA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3794  MISCHA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11c 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3466  IRRWIND  3.27  9.50  Volvo Penta 2002  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3546  SIRENA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3586  MIDNAIGHTS ANN  3.27  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 132: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

126 

 

SFC‐3439  GALATEA  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6835  MAXIMANT  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6173  HERMES  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD2B 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6232  MYSING  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta 2030 2001  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5484  DELTA HARMONI II  3.20  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6856  INCH BY WINCH  3.27  9.50  Volvo Penta 2002, 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3611  SIRéNE  3.27  9.50  Volvo Penta 2002S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4026  FLEX  3.27  9.50  Volvo MD11C 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4608  CARISMA  3.11  9.48  Yanmar 2GMF 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3673  FLAMMAN  3.11  9.48  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3423  LI  2.70  9.46  Albin 021  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3911  RUSTICA  2.76  9.46  Saab 2HSP371  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3767  UNICORN AF SÖLVESBORG  2.88  9.45  Perkins M5OBA  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6248  TRYGGA RÄKAN  4.50  9.45  Lombardini TMD 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3302     3.00  9.45  Yanmar 2GM20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3752  CANTUS  2.98  9.45  Volvo Penta D2003 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3699     3.10  9.45  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7970  HAFSORKESTERN  3.29  9.45  Volvo Penta D1‐20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5171  MEHETIA  5.48  9.44  Yanmar SB8G  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6508  TRINE  3.00  9.44  VP2001S, 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6256  FELICIA  2.95  9.43  Volvo MD11, 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3629  ARMADA  2.95  9.43  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3940  MANANA  3.08  9.42  Volvo Penta MD11S120  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3289  BEL AIR  3.00  9.42  Yanmar 1GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3512  ALLO ALLO 2  3.20  9.41  Yanmar YSB12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3536  MALENA  3.20  9.41  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5746  XAVANTE  3.20  9.41  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6238     3.14  9.40  Yanmar 2QM20 1988  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5866  KAJSA  3.05  9.40  Yanmar 3GM30F 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 133: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

127 

 

SFC‐5265  KURTISAN  3.25  9.40  Volvo Penta MD17  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6482  ALMA  3.05  9.40  Volvo 2002 nr1554, 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6811  MAY4US  3.25  9.40  Volvo Penta 1988  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5189  MARELD  2.70  9.40  Volvo Penta MD2B, 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5464  RUNAWAY  3.05  9.40  Volvo Penta 2002 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3296  FIREFLY  3.20  9.40  Volvo Penta MD7  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3359  BEDA  3.25  9.40  Volvo Penta MD17  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3352  VITESSE  3.08  9.40  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3591  JOAR II  2.75  9.40  Perkins MD20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4967  LA BRIQUE  3.20  9.40  Volvo Penta MD11C 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5418     3.20  9.40  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8783  JANTAR  2.70  9.40  Volvo Penta MD1  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3413  JOSEFIN  3.05  9.40  Yanmar 2GM20F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8356  CAYA  2.75  9.40  Volvo Penta MD2 1967  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7943  AVEC TOI  3.22  9.37  Volvo Penta MB10 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3684  CULEX  3.20  9.37  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3700  ADELé  3.05  9.36  Yanmar 2QM20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5988  ZARINA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6373  BIANCA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6932  ISI  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6223  NUEVA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 11 C, 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3271  BRISA MEDIA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3394  MARIANA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3535  GALICIA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3541  HAVSULAN  3.05  9.36  Yanmar 3QM30  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4153  NAVICULA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2030 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4092  ERATO  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7551  ELISABETH  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B 1974  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7850  ATOLL II  3.05  9.36  Volvo Penta MD17 Diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 134: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

128 

 

SFC‐5236  PEACE III  3.05  9.36  Yanmar 3HM35  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5204  ANEMONE  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5114  SOLBRIS  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4956  FRIDA  2.87  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4943  WISA  3.15  9.35  Yanmar GM3 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3515  NESHA  2.95  9.35  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3572  JASMIN  3.07  9.35  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3600  DANCING GIRL  3.04  9.35  Yanmar SGM09556  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3403  MALGORZATA  3.07  9.35  Yanmar YSM12G80  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3331  JOY TOY  3.07  9.35  Yanmar YSM12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8971  ERATO DE LUND  2.95  9.35  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3558  CILLA II  2.85  9.35  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3402  LENA  2.78  9.33  Yanmar YSB212G  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4088  FANDAGO  2.78  9.33  Yanmar 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3654     2.78  9.33  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6608     2.78  9.31  Yanmar, 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6498  PRO EN CONTRA  2.96  9.30  BUKH DV24ME, 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3244  WENONAH  2.70  9.30  Lloyd  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3715  ANNIKEN AF SKÄLDERVIKEN  3.00  9.30  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3500  CHARLOTTA  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5860  MANASSE AV STRÄNGNÄS  3.00  9.30  Volvo Penta MD3 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5945  MARE  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta MD7B 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5542  FRIDA  3.00  9.30  Yanmar YSB 12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3968  BERTA II  2.70  9.30  Volvo Penta 2002 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3731  ISIS  2.70  9.30  Volvo Penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3376  HIPPO III  2.80  9.30  Volvo Penta MD21  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3336  COOL  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta 2003 1989  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3365  GOVINDA  2.50  9.30  Inombord, diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3577  BANTAR EJ  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 135: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

129 

 

SFC‐3505  ANNKRISTIN  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3550  BEATRICE  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3547  CARIOCA III  3.20  9.30  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3294  ANDROMEDA  2.80  9.25  Yanmar 12TR16  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5726  WINNIE  3.20  9.20  Yanmar 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3502  RUDOLF  2.85  9.20  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3298  BONNIE LEE  3.20  9.20  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5745  LIBRA  2.70  9.20  Bukh 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3267  KULING  2.96  9.17  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3581  THETIS  2.96  9.16  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3688  MINDANAO  2.96  9.15  Volvo Penta MD7  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6456  FRU MUSICA  2.98  9.15  Volvo Penta 2020‐C 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7333  SAMARIA  2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3430  LADY 2  2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4099  PETRA  2.98  9.14  Yanmar YSE8 GO 1470  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3683     2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3623  DIGNITY  2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5169  CHAKINA  2.96  9.14  Nanni 3.75HE 1996  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5688  MARIE CLAIRE  2.96  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6472  UHURU  4.30  9.10  Honda EF25, 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3609  ARESCHENUT III  3.05  9.10  Volvo Penta MD7D  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3878  HOBO  3.05  9.10  Yanmar diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8294  CARMEN  2.95  9.10  Volvo Penta 2002 MS2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5859  FAUVE  3.05  9.10  Volvo Penta MD 7B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3311  RUFFINA  2.90  9.10  Renault  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8861  KAMI  3.05  9.10  Yanmar 3GM 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3548  EXPLORER OF SWEDEN  3.28  9.09  Yanmar 1GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3532  FELICIA  3.03  9.09  Volvo Penta MB10  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3327  SEUTE DEERN II  3.00  9.07  Yanmar2GM20F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 136: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

130 

 

SFC‐4872  ANIA  3.00  9.07  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3427  JASMINE  2.55  9.05  Yanmar YSE8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3999  STINA  2.35  9.04  Perkins Perama MD20 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3569  CONCORDIA  2.08  9.03  Yanmar YSB12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5907  PIRELLA  3.02  9.00  Volvo Penta 2002 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5140  TANOE II  2.75  9.00  BMW LloydLM400 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6710  ANJIN  2.80  9.00  Volvo Penta MD11, 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3382  LABANA  3.00  9.00  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3421  SILENTIUM  3.20  9.00  Faryman 28S 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3469  MONA‐LISA  3.08  9.00  Volvo Penta 2002BT  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3242  MANANA  2.80  9.00  Yanmar YSE10/12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6504  PAULINA  2.80  9.00  Penta 2002 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5274  ORACABESSA  2.85  9.00  Faryman 31R30M0051  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8770  BONNE CHANCE  2.76  8.95  Volvo Penta MD 7/110 S  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4870  ANGUILLA  2.84  8.95  IGM10  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5143  MELANIE  3.00  8.90  Yanmar YSE8G 1974  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7439  HATI SENTOSA  3.90  8.90  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3540  PELLINA  2.83  8.90  Volvo Penta MD7B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3360  OPTIMIST  2.83  8.90  Volvo Penta MD7B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3620  LADY  2.50  8.89  Yanmar IGM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7989  BARINA  2.76  8.88  Perkins M20  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3269  JOHANNA  2.60  8.86  Yanmar 2GM  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8628  NATASJA  2.60  8.86  Yanmar YSE8 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3251  AVOSETTA  2.60  8.86  Faryman  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5601  MARIA  2.60  8.86  Yanmar USE8 1974  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3389  MAJONG  2.65  8.85  Volvo Penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6351  LANA III RÅÅ  2.50  8.81  Albin 0‐22, 1970  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3708  CARAMELL  2.70  8.80  Volvo Penta MD6a  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4006  LARUS  2.60  8.80  Yanmar YSB‐12 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 137: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

131 

 

SFC‐4017  SAMANTA  2.70  8.80  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7444  EXUMA  2.70  8.80  Volvo MD6A 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3278  PÅLLIANNA  2.60  8.80  Faryman  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3554  TONA  2.70  8.80  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐7999  EEKAROS  2.50  8.80  Yanmar YSE8, 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3853  OYA  2.40  8.77  Volvo Penta MD1  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8270  LIANA  3.06  8.72  Sabb Typ G 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6437  JOHANNA  3.00  8.70  VP 2002, 1990  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5230  TURI  2.75  8.70  Yanmar 2GM20F 1987  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4959  ORCA  3.80  8.65  BMW D50‐2 diesel 1986  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8113  MARLIN  2.63  8.64  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3523  TALISMANA  2.35  8.64  Albin 021  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3431  TAKA TAKA  2.92  8.62  Volvo Penta 2001  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6586  RUSALKA  2.70  8.60  Volvo Penta MD 6B 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3910  TARONA  2.97  8.56  Volvo Penta MD7B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3452  AGNES  2.50  8.50  Yanmar YSE8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3335     2.70  8.50  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4658     2.30  8.50  Volvo Penta 140300298 87  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3856  CHRISTINA  2.85  8.50  Volvo Penta MD5  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3832  YETTAN  3.00  8.50  Couach, bensin  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6406  JOSEPHINE  2.43  8.43  Yanmar SB8, 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3607  RUT  2.65  8.40  Yanmar YSE8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3520     2.20  8.40  Yamaha  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6863  FRILLAN  2.55  8.40  Yanmar diesel 4SE8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3380  ZENIA  2.93  8.40  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3519  MIA  2.95  8.40  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7347  DIONE  2.90  8.40  Volvo Penta MD7C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3590  HULDA  2.50  8.35  Volvo Penta MD1  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3356  GERONIMO  2.50  8.35  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 138: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

132 

 

SFC‐3647  ESCAPAD  2.75  8.35  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3833  ARJUNA  2.50  8.34  Volvo Penta MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3583  LAUR‐ANN  2.50  8.34  Yanmar SB8G  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3274  AMMEFANT  2.50  8.34  Volvo Penat MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5448  SHEHERAZADE  2.50  8.34  Volvo Penta 2001 1992  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3303     2.50  8.34  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3441  ALBA NOVA II  2.83  8.34  Volvo Penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6934  TUA‐TUA  2.50  8.34  Farymann FK 2 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7315  NONAME  2.50  8.34  Yanmar SB8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7500  YELLOW ROSE  2.50  8.34  Volvo Penta MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7642  MICASA III  2.40  8.30  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3321  GOLIF III  2.50  8.30  Yamaha 668L  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5154  ARTEMISIA  2.44  8.25  Volvo Penta MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5651  MISS LINNéA  2.46  8.25  Albin 022  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8048  BIRGITTA  2.46  8.25  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3353  WILMA  2.46  8.25  Volvo Penta combi  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3390  NINNA  2.40  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5397  NICKAN  2.46  8.25  Alvin 022  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3874  MILNA  2.46  8.25     Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3702  VISAN  2.46  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5932  KIPPIS  2.46  8.25  Volvo MD 7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7445  KICK  2.46  8.25  Albin O‐21 bensin 1969  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8076  NAVIGO  2.46  8.25  Albin 0,21 1969  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3626  SIROCCO  2.46  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4249  SCILLA II  2.46  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6A 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4403     2.46  8.25  Albin 021‐67  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8547  TWILIGHT  2.63  8.23  Bukh DV20ME 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3454  MERISKI  2.60  8.22  Volvo Penta MD5C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3605  WACK  2.76  8.20  Yanmar 2GM20F  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 139: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

133 

 

SFC‐4911  HAVGRIM  3.12  8.20  Volvo Penta MD 6  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3739  DIOMEDES  2.78  8.13  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3882  SOLLAN  2.74  8.12  Volvo Penta MD5A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3601     2.76  8.05  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3254  AQUARIUS  2.77  8.05  Yanmar YSB8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3579  HIME  2.75  8.04  Yanmar YSM8G  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4934  ANIMA  6.70  8.04  Yamaha 9.9AE 1991  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4896  LITORINA  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5535  AYLA  2.76  8.03  Yanmar YSB8G 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5207  ANNA  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4064  RISSA  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5118  SENORITA  2.76  8.03  Yanmar 8/1980 diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5529  JEMIMA  2.78  8.03  BMW D12 1983  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3358  BLÅNUS  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta, Suzuki  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3385  AZUR  2.80  8.03  Volvo Penta MD4A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3367     2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD6  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7618  CALYPSO  2.76  8.03  Yanmar SB8G 1981  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8582  AKKJA  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD1 1973  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7314  HELENICA  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD1  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7152  ANNA III  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD1 B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3492  MARIE  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD6B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8915  ALFRIDA  II  2.76  8.03  Yanmar YSE12 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐9105  MOONSHINE  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta 779 1973  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5976  LAXEN  2.76  8.03  Volvo Penta MD5B 1970  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3275  MAY BE II  2.76  8.03  Yanmar IGM10  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8933  BORODA  2.78  8.03  Volvo Penta MD 7 A 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3344  MARIA  2.76  8.00  Volvo Penta MD7A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3416  THOYA  2.20  8.00  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7524  SHAMAN  2.76  8.00  Yanmar I GM 1982  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 140: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

134 

 

SFC‐3557  ALEXANDRA  2.50  8.00  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5915  STARDUST  2.60  8.00  Yamaha 1999  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7875  PEA II  2.76  8.00  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3426  MONZUN  2.60  8.00  Volvo Penta MD3  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3553  HANNIKAP  2.80  8.00  Yanmar YM8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3884     2.50  8.00  Volvo Penta MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3861  INGA  2.30  8.00     Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4625  AMANDA  3.04  7.97  Volvo Penta MD2B 1969  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3733  CHARLES II  2.95  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3518  RELAX  2.51  7.95  Yanmar YSE8E  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3342  SARA  2.68  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4262  MEDUSA  2.68  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5A110S 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8609  WIND SONG  2.68  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3282  SAGITTA  2.68  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8578  RITA III  2.40  7.90  Volvo Penta MD2A 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5229  HYGGE MYS  2.50  7.90  Volvo Penta MD5B 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3509  TAO  2.66  7.90  Yanmar 1GM10  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3506  SUN FLOWER  2.20  7.86  Johnson  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3628  MIMMI  2.25  7.85  Johnson Sailmaster  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐8921  SAXIFRAGA  2.20  7.85  Johnson 1976  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3522  BLUE  2.25  7.85  Mercury 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3841  ROMANCE  2.95  7.80  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6826  TAI‐FUN  2.28  7.80  Chrysler 3337 1970  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6866  CYRANO DE BERGERAC  2.70  7.80  Yanmar Diesel YSB 12  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3473  CLOWN  2.50  7.70  DT8  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3388  FILIBUSTER  2.35  7.70  2 Volvo Penta MD5C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4537  KEHAAR  2.50  7.70  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4673  TURTLE  2.70  7.70  Volvo Penta MD6A, 1975  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3711  MAROUSCHKA III  2.50  7.70  Volvo Penta MD5A  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 141: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

135 

 

SFC‐3888  BLUE PI  2.60  7.70  Volvo penta MD5B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5565  ARIA  2.50  7.70  Mercury 9,9 1996  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4076  CARAMBA  2.40  7.65  Volvo Penta MD5B 1980  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3913  HAMBO  2.52  7.64  Albin 0‐22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4949  CORINNE  2.40  7.60  Volvo Penta MD2 1766  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3844  WIRGO  2.40  7.60  Volvo Penta MD2B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3415  MANUELA  2.40  7.60  Volvo Penta MD11C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3232  CASSIOPEJA  2.40  7.60  Volvo Penta MD2  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3397  MARINA  2.50  7.50  Perkins  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3829  AFRODITE  2.50  7.50  Volvo Penta 2001 diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3606  NADINA  2.25  7.35  Suzuki DT5  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6028  SASKIA  2.30  7.35  Zuzuki utombord  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3995  GONDWA  2.30  7.35  Yamaha utombord  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3404  SAMMI  2.80  7.30  Volvo Penta MD17C  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6075  AMI  2.25  7.30  Mariner  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4662  LEDIGA STUNDER  2.50  7.30  Vire 1985  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3425  BLACK PEARL  2.64  7.25  Volvo Penta MD22  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐7125  AALTO  2.36  7.10  Färe‐Göta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3616     2.25  7.05  Mariner  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3369  PASSEPARTOUT  2.50  7.00  Seagull  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6001     2.39  6.90  Yamaha utombord 1998  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐6984  GALADRIEL  2.08  6.80  Suzuki  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6271  WAYLANY  2.38  6.71  Kubota, 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3391  MONICA  2.22  6.70  Johnson,  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6038  ANNA LAVINIA  1.81  6.70  Utombord 1993  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3488  TELEMACHOS II  1.80  6.64  Johnson  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3644     2.45  6.50  Evinrude  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐6903  MOROLINE  2.26  6.50  Johnson  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4997  PETER PAN  1.80  6.50  Yamaha  Fritidssegelmotorbåt 

Page 142: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

136 

 

SFC‐5458  AVA  2.20  6.00  Volvo Penta MD1  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3484  SKIDBLADNER  2.20  6.00  Volvo Penta MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3997  AMANDA II  2.20  6.00  Albin 011‐69  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3831  DARLING DUCK  2.20  6.00  Johnson  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4659  NJORD  2.20  6.00  Vira 1984  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3366  GOODWIN II  2.20  6.00  Volvo Penta  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFB‐5481  TIN HAU  2.20  6.00  Färe Göta 6BR  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5922  SPRIGG II  2.20  6.00  Yanmar SB8G 1977  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4937  TUA  2.20  6.00  Albin 0 11  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐4162  KRISTINA  2.20  6.00  Göta F‐typ 6BRE  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3835  LAKI ANTARI  2.20  6.00  Johnson, bensin  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3685  AMANDA  2.20  6.00  Volvo Penta MD1B  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5301  LIV  2.20  5.95  Volvo Penta MD 7A, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3610  LINNEA  2.15  5.80  Mariner  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3315  AMIB  2.41  5.70  Yamaha  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3339  NYMUE  1.99  5.64  Suzuki  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3468     1.99  5.63  Mercury  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3828  ROUFY III  2.40  5.52  Yanmar diesel  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3384  PATRICIA  2.00  5.40  Yanmar  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐5290  STEFAN  2.05  4.80  Yamaha 40TL 1994  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐3261  LE CANARD III  2.00  4.75  Suzuki DT9 9M  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SFC‐8231  LUKA 145  2.16  5.50  VP 30, 2005  Fritidssmotorbåt SFC‐6766  BORGSUND  2.60  9.10  Ångmaskin 2000  Fritidsångbåt  

Ships: 1909 vessels ordered by type and length

Call sign  Name Width (m) 

Length (m)  Machinery  Type of ship 

SHIN  HELGE  5.60  18.75  Volvo Penta TMD 96B 1966  Fritidsarbetsmotorskepp

Page 143: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

137 

 

SEYG  IDOG  3.80  23.10  Seffle råoljem. BF121  Fritidsmotorbåt SHDW  REYMERSHOLM NR   1  3.90  15.72     Fritidsmotorbåt SDOL  BRITTY  5.08  11.43     Fritidsmotorbåt SHXG  HÅLLIDEJ  3.21  11.35     Fritidsmotorbåt SJYO  PIANDELLE  3.80  11.15     Fritidsmotorbåt SHVK  VÅGEN  4.55  11.13     Fritidsmotorbåt SETZ  ELEONORE  2.79  10.94     Fritidsmotorbåt SEBZ  PINGVINEN  4.55  10.94     Fritidsmotorbåt SHTK  TAI‐PAN  3.85  10.93     Fritidsmotorbåt SHGD  LEIF  4.50  10.90     Fritidsmotorbåt SIVP  FYLGIA  4.53  10.63     Fritidsmotorbåt SIWX  AMANDA AF LYSEKIL  3.65  10.04  Ford Marin N.G. 6  Fritidsmotorbåt SICW  MON AMI  3.06  9.62     Fritidsmotorbåt SJZE  MABICO  3.06  9.62     Fritidsmotorbåt SILW  MONITA III  3.05  9.06     Fritidsmotorbåt SFBV  TÄRNSKÄR  3.57  8.86     Fritidsmotorbåt SIVO  FASTER KERSTIN  2.80  8.32     Fritidsmotorbåt SENB  SAMUEL BENJAMIN  2.46  7.81     Fritidsmotorbåt SFJO  JOLIMA  3.28  14.07     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SIFK  JULIET  3.66  12.51     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SEOJ  ANDANTE  3.54  10.59     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SIXK  MARITIM III  3.01  10.45     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SICK  PRIVAT  2.78  8.90     Fritidsmotorsegelbåt SEKV  DE NELLY  5.95  34.36  DAF 1160, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBOE  NORNA  5.44  28.11  Industri 3 cyl 1959  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKED  MARIANN AV DONSÖ  6.98  27.09  Volvo Penta D12, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKOU  SAN  6.90  26.82     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHZK  GARPEN  6.39  26.80  Scania D10R80 1963  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIVW  HULDA  6.70  25.36     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 144: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

138 

 

SHOK  AGNES  6.30  25.21  Volvo Penta MD 96 A  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLHK  SOLSKEPP  6.90  24.79  Ford 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCLI  IL MORO DI VENEZIA III  6.24  24.32  Iveco Aifo 8061SM06,1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEFK  FANTASY  4.15  24.00  NANNI 6.280 HE 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKBJ  CYGNUS MONTANUS II  5.98  23.72  Perkins Sabre M225TI,‐01  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMKB  REBELL AF STOCKHOLM  5.60  23.42  Scania D11 1967  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFPR  VERNADIA  6.20  23.30     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJVK  TRAVEL V  5.83  23.30  Mercedes MG 507, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEOI  SJÖSTRÖM  6.49  23.27  Cummins, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDVT  TWEE GEBROEDERS  4.81  22.84  DAF 6 CYL. DS 575 M 1961  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHEO  KAJSA  6.60  22.64     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDUW  DEODAR  5.89  22.39  Volvo TIMD 96B 1959  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHUA  MARIA SOFIA  6.32  22.26  Scania DS 11 R80 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJZU  TÄRNAN  5.86  22.04  Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDHX  CATHARINA UHRWEDER  4.46  21.56  Volvo TMD 96C 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIPD  MAYANGSARI  5.42  21.55  Perkins Sabre M225 Ti ‐94  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLBX  TALISMAN 1920  4.10  21.46  Iveco 8061M, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLAH  CARMEN AF KARLSTAD  5.40  21.41  B&W ALPHA  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIEU  KNUDSINE AF VEJLE  5.93  21.24     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDAX  LUDMILA  5.46  21.00     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKRE  ADRIENNE II  5.33  20.89  Perkins M215C 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIPM  GUNHILD AV LIDINGÖ  6.57  20.87  Albin G‐62  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJZO  MINDE  5.83  20.86  Albin diesel G 61  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMTB  WELLAMO  5.68  20.83  Scania Vabis 6 cyl.  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMPT  MÄLAR BALDER  5.51  20.46  Perkins M135, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJDM  LEON  5.90  20.06     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEZL  EUREKA  5.21  19.98  Albin Diesel G62  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDNH  PATRIA  5.24  19.96     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHYL  EVA VII AF VAXHOLM  4.97  19.81  Volvo MD40, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 145: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

139 

 

SKCQ  WHO VALLEY  4.97  19.81  Perkins 6.354M 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLKV  DANNEVIRKE  5.46  19.78  Albin G62 1962  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCWE  HVITE SWAN  4.20  19.65     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKQX  AVANT  5.82  19.65  Volvo MD 100, 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIGF  DAWNBREAKER  5.15  19.63  Yanmar 4LH‐DTE, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGPZ  AVANT OF SWEDEN  5.20  19.61  Yanmar, 4JH2M‐TE, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHTL  LIBERTY  6.08  19.56  Volvo TMD 96 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKJI  CONDOR  4.70  19.51  Ford 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLQV  FREJA AF VALHALL  5.38  19.51  Dong Feng, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBNE  ARIADNE AV STOCKHOLM  5.12  19.47  DAF 825, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBCE  ROYAL EAGLE  5.18  19.44  Volvo Penta MD ‐32 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMTV  MERENGUE  5.18  19.44  Volvo Penta MD32 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDCU  GRAN TIBURON  5.10  19.43  Caterpillar 3208V8, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCIL  BALLAD  4.27  19.38  GM diesel 1949  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHZU  ARKADASIM DENIZ  5.48  19.37  2 MAN, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBVI  WINDCATCHER  5.15  19.34  Yanmar, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHCM  CHARLOTTE OF VARBERG  5.20  19.04  Volvo Penta TAMD 63L,2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMVQ  YAGHAN  5.20  19.04  Volvo Penta TAMD 63M,2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SITN  BAMSEN 4  5.20  19.04  Volvo Penta TMD 62, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBXV  OCEANUS  4.61  19.02  GM 6071E, 1961  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLED  SYLVIANA  5.22  18.71     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHYM  ELLEN  5.35  18.67     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEBF  WALBORG  5.50  18.63     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKDT  TILDA  4.63  18.45  Ford Sabre 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLZW  INVISIBLE  5.01  18.42  Volvo TMD41 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMIG  KAJSA JOHANNA  5.05  18.40  Caterpilar 3406B,1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEXZ  LAKOTA  15.10  18.33  Volvo MD 2030, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJNP  LEADBELLY  5.40  18.25  Perkins M135  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKEH  ROSE GLUDBAEK  5.18  18.20  DAN‐NORMO 1965  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 146: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

140 

 

SEVI  JUSTUS  5.51  18.06  Volvo Penta TMD 96B  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHYA  OCEAN VIKING  4.62  18.02  Ford‐Sabre Diesel 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKCU  LA‐VIE  5.00  18.00  Volvo Penta TMD 40  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJWT  DIONE  5.04  17.98  Perkins 6.354, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIQA  OCEAN OVATION  4.63  17.95  Ford Sabre, 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEQB  CARENCY  5.92  17.95  Ford diesel 6cyl 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJTD  AMBER  6.18  17.89     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIVF  FRI  5.63  17.89     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLKC  DOUBLE YOU  4.50  17.63  Volvo Penta TMD100A 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDKE  NERTHUS  4.42  17.60  Mercedes  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCXA  PALAWAN  4.43  17.53  Cummins 6B5.9M 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCNX  SHOGUN  4.80  17.52  Perkins 4,236 M  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHTR  EMMA  5.80  17.50     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBLC  ZINA  5.05  17.50  Yanmar 4LH‐HTE, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBIT  TRAVESSIA  4.80  17.50  PERKINS, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIWF  VICTORY TOO  5.05  17.50  Yanmar Diesel 4LHHTE,‐02  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBHV  ATINELLO  4.73  17.44  Scania D 5, 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKWV  SOUVENIR  4.02  17.35  Volvo MD67 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCHT  BENTE‐DORTE  4.83  17.28  Daimler‐Benz AG 410 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLOB  VIKING AV GILLINGE  5.02  17.20  Yanmar 4LHAHTP, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKMA  DUEN  4.82  17.12  Volvo Penta TMD 96  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGHX  HELLAS  4.90  17.10     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGAM  TRIFT  4.76  17.02  Volvo Penta D4‐180, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJTO  PELLE V  4.76  17.02  Volvo Penta D‐4 180,2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBAY  SOLVÅG V  4.76  17.02  Volvo Penta D4‐180, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFMZ  ELLIPS  4.95  16.94  Ford Diesel 2704ET,1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMTY  LIBERTIN  4.93  16.94  DAF 1160 DKT, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKMR  FRIDAN  4.22  16.80  Ford D 70 1964  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKGY  SANNA  4.22  16.80  Ford diesel 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 147: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

141 

 

SCJD  LADY FOX  4.50  16.76  Ford diesel 2712E 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLTV  NAVIGARE  4.40  16.60  Yanmar Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBJY  FAIRWINDS  4.88  16.60  Perkins, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGWT  FILIA MARIS  4.62  16.58  Volvo TAMD 41, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJAH  NELLAN AF NACKA  4.90  16.58  Perkins M92, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMUR  KATSUMOTO  5.10  16.58  Ford 2715E, 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEVO  CARAMELLE  4.64  16.58  Volvo Penta TAMD 41‐H, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHQC  PANDORA AF GÖTEBORG  4.64  16.58  Volvo Penta TAMD 41, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDEL  LASSE‐MAJA  4.62  16.58  Volvo Penta TAMD 41, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHML  BAMSEN  II  4.62  16.58  Volvo Penta TAMD 41HD  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBAO  MALINDA IV  4.05  16.55  Mercedes OM617, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCNJ  FRIÖ  4.72  16.54  Scania D8 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLQO  GINSKÄR  5.20  16.51  IVECO 8061 M14, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGYA  CATALINA III  4.75  16.48  Volvo, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHNQ  VITAMIN  4.36  16.48  Volvo Penta 2003 Turbo 88  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDZH  STARCROSS AF LINKÖPING  4.89  16.35  Yanmar 4JH4‐HTE, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLNH  ANNE AF GÖTEBORG  4.89  16.35     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJGP  ELVIRA  5.24  16.34  Albin Diesel H3  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMEX  IRON MAIDEN  5.08  16.30  Mercedes Benz OM 352,1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFVJ  AURORA  5.22  16.26  Skandia 1939  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGJM  SALSA  4.89  16.19  Volvo TMD 31 B, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKPU  BIG MOUSE  4.38  16.13  Ford Leyman, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMEY  SHELA  4.88  16.11  Yanmar, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHMJ  AMAT BERANI  II  4.40  16.10  Detroit Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLKM  SINDBAD  4.02  16.09  Bukh, 1953  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBVZ  THETIS  4.30  16.08  Perkins 4.236  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKWC  AMFITRITE  4.56  16.08  GM Bedford 466M 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFBY  SELMA  4.35  16.07  Volvo Penta TMD31A 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEJK  VINDARNAS NOMAD  4.87  16.05  Volvo D50  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 148: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

142 

 

SMLJ  JOYRIDE  4.87  16.05  Volvo Penta TD50A  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMBK  WILD LADY  4.35  16.00  Volvo Penta TMD 31, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKTL  AMELIA  4.60  15.97  Perkins Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBEN  LORNA  4.60  15.97  Volvo Penta TAMD 22P,‐03  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBVF  LADY ANNILA  4.60  15.97  VolvoPenta TMD22B, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDYX  TINTO III  4.60  15.97  Yanmar 4JH3 HTE, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDON  CHANTALLE  4.70  15.91  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDTB  SANNSIPAPP  4.70  15.91  Yanmar 4LHM‐HTP  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKDW  GUNSAN  4.88  15.89  Yanmar 4JH4HTE, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIQG  IKARUS  4.66  15.85  Volvo Penta TMD 22B, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKRC  EXCALIBUR  4.30  15.85  Ford 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJCW  REBULA  4.47  15.84  Ford 4‐cyl, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIKU  PAN  4.60  15.84  Volvo Penta TAMD 70, 1971  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDAM  IRON LADY  4.71  15.82  Iveco, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBTW  ISA  4.62  15.82  Scania D11, 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIGQ  NORYEMA  4.23  15.80  FIAT, AIFO 85 Cv, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCMR  ARIANE AF STOCKHOLM  4.74  15.80  Perkins 4.236  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKDG  ODELFINA  4.30  15.80  Volvo MD 22 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKYR  SARITA  4.36  15.80     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDMI  NANDI  4.01  15.79  Volvo Penta TMD47  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDAI  LAYA  4.53  15.78  Volvo Penta TAMD 31 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCGT  OM II AF GÖTEBORG  4.56  15.75  YANMAR 4 JH2DTE, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKMV  WASAHOF  4.70  15.73  Albin G‐62 1962  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEVX  WETSERA  5.55  15.72  Scania Vabis diesel 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBYD  BETTINA  4.63  15.71  Volvo TMD 100A, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKUX  GALEJAN AF BASTMORA  5.05  15.69  Perkins T6 354, 1971  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFCN  NORDIC SAGA  4.45  15.67  Ford Lehman, 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBFU  LADY SWAN  4.52  15.65  Perkins 4.236M 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKFB  MAGIC  4.52  15.65  Perkins 4.236M 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 149: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

143 

 

SMUT  CHRISTINA AF VRESTABY  4.48  15.65  Scania DS9 5061687, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEZP  CéLESTE  4.52  15.65  Yanmar 4JH2‐DTH, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDER  TRUE LOVE V  4.42  15.63  Volvo Penta TAM 41 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDGA  FUNNY  4.42  15.63  Volvo Penta TAMD41 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKWP  MICAROLA III  4.60  15.60  Ford 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCTF  COVER GIRL IV  4.50  15.56  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBFE  LOUISE II  4.50  15.56  Volvo Penta D3, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCWD  MALEHA NUI  4.30  15.50  Ford Lehmann 2712E,1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMKC  BISAYA  4.60  15.40  Volvo Penta MD100 1967  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKCA  HÄGRING  4.85  15.39  Scania DS 11 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKCF  STUGA  4.85  15.39  Scania DS11 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFHG  NJORDEN  5.27  15.38  Volvo Penta D 96  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBLD  WINDA II  4.60  15.35  Yanmar 4LH‐DTE,1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDNI  NIEVE  4.60  15.35  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKCV  ZONDA  4.75  15.34  Ford marindiesel 6 cyl  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCNQ  MARY‐ANN  4.93  15.33  Volvo D47B 1955  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHQT  THE BELLE CATTE  4.20  15.32  Perkins Diesel 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMEK  SARA BELLE  4.57  15.32  Perkins 4236 Diesel 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFZN  ELSA AV STOCKHOLM  5.91  15.32  Albin Diesel G‐62T 1961  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLNU  LADY H  4.30  15.30  Yanmar 72, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKBV  FINNESEJ  4.14  15.28     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLJR  ATLANTIS  4.02  15.27  Yanmar 4JH‐HTE, 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEJI  TELMA  4.70  15.26  Perkins LD14, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCQH  XIT  4.75  15.26  Perkins 4236, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDGY  WAVE  4.75  15.26  Perkins 4236, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCFN  NANUK  4.41  15.26     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCMT  FAIRY  4.70  15.26  PERKIIN 4236, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBHJ  WOOLLOOMOOLOO  4.75  15.26  Perkins 4236  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBOD  BABAR  4.74  15.26  Perkins 4236 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 150: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

144 

 

SBWD  MISS RUSTIS  4.75  15.26  Perkins 4236 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFZC  GERTRUD  4.09  15.25  Volvo Penta TAMD 31 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBAL  CARICIA  4.48  15.25  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2007   Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGUI  TABASCO AF STOCKHOLM  4.48  15.25  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGHV  ANASTASIA AV GÖTEBORG  4.57  15.25  Yanmar Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBRW  IRONOS  5.00  15.25     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGWH  KIA ORA  4.20  15.25  Nanni Diesel 5.250TDI,‐06  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKLB  IMPULS  4.48  15.25  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTBE, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDJI  SPIRIT  4.34  15.24  Volvo MD55, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SENJ  SHADDOCK  4.62  15.24     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDMU  FREE WIND  4.30  15.24  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2008   Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMQW  JENNIFER  4.75  15.24  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCWG  TORD  4.68  15.23  Volvo TAMD 31 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCWI  BILLY A  4.68  15.23  Volvo TAMD 31 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMZP  SEA OTTER  4.41  15.22  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFYN  BAROQUE  4.11  15.22  Lister HR3, 1969  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFUO  ANNE  4.66  15.20  Volvo TMD 100 AK 1976  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHIJ  BLUE ODYSSEY  4.45  15.16  Volvo TMD22, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBDN  MARTINA AF GÖTEBORG  4.20  15.15  Thorny Craft 6 Diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKTB  CAROLINA BLUE  4.49  15.10  Volvo Penta TMD 40  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLYM  BALTIC QUEEN II  4.49  15.10  Volvo Penta TMD 40 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBWU  TINA PRINCESS  4.49  15.10  Volvo Penta TAMD41B, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLAE  AMFITRITE  4.49  15.10  Volvo Penta MD40D 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIEX  AMAZING RACE  4.34  15.10  Volvo Penta TMD 31 B,1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBNI  NATIBOU  7.90  15.10  2 Vetus M417, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGJF  IRIS‐DIANA  4.60  15.10  Perkins M90, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLIV  SYBILLAE  4.85  15.09  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMGR  XAVANTE  4.85  15.09  Yanmar 4JH‐2DTE, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJHZ  ANASTATICA  4.60  15.07  Ford RPM‐HD 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 151: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

145 

 

SKLX  RAVEN X  4.90  15.04  Perkins T 6.354 M, 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBJA  LAS  BRISAS  4.50  15.03  Volvo Penta D3‐110, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGPO  CASTELLANUS  II  4.50  15.03  Volvo Penta D3‐110, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCVG  RASSKER VI  4.50  15.03  Volvo‐Penta D3‐110,2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAQ  CASCADE AF VÄRMDÖ  4.50  15.03  Volvo Penta D3‐110, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFYB  ATHLON  4.05  15.02  Volvo MD 32, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDQL  ARCADIA  4.52  15.00  Yamnar Marindiesel, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFJA  DINA II  4.52  15.00  Yanmar 4JH3GE‐HTBE3.3,‐05  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGBW  IL BACIO  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGRC  NICE V AF GÖTEBORG  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta D2.75, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMDB  BEDA AF GÖTHEBORG  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMFR  SESSAN AV SALTSJÖBADEN  4.58  14.99     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMDE  ADA AF GÖTHEBORG  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMOW  HELENA AF NACKA  4.58  14.99  Volvo, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDKU  AKU‐AKU  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta TMD 22B, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEZN  BRAVARAI  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHZF  SPIRIT OF PIRAEUS  4.58  14.99  Volvo Penta MD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMQX  ATLIAJAT  II  4.58  14.99  Volvo D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEKI  KLEFVA  4.58  14.99  Volvo TAMD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAL  MIREILLE  4.48  14.98  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBGF  BLUES  4.48  14.98  Yanmar 4JH2DTE, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBXO  GICA  4.48  14.98  Volvo TMD 22  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHCE  STELLA AF GÖTEBORG  4.49  14.98  Perkins M65, 2003   Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKOP  INKA  4.73  14.97     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDGQ  QUO VADIS  4.62  14.97  Ford Tempest Sea Lord ‐75  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLQX  CHARLAINE  4.24  14.94  Ford 2701 E 1969  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEWT  MINDFULNESS  5.00  14.93  Ford 2725 T  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBOR  PETRUS  4.50  14.92  Ford 1964  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMFW  STOCKHOLMS GALATEA  4.32  14.90  Volvo MD 22A, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 152: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

146 

 

SKFJ  CHAMPIONS  4.25  14.89  Perkins 6354, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHLE  VEJDE  4.53  14.89  Volvo D2‐75, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGOZ  ANASTASIA AV STOCKHOLM  4.25  14.89  Perkins Diesel, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFTY  MONSUN AF EKERÖ  4.98  14.89  Ford 6 cyl diesel, 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHYR  ENJOY II  4.08  14.85  Nanni 6.280 HE, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAZ  AMORESS 2 AF KULLAVIK  4.32  14.83  Volvo Penta MD 22, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJKG  CATALINA II  4.32  14.83  Volvo MD 22 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGMR  KATY C  4.57  14.81  Perkins Range 4 M 135,‐88  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBKP  OLGA‐ELIDA  4.95  14.80  Vetus D64, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFJY  WONDERWORLD  4.35  14.78  Volvo TMD 31, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGMC  BORN FREE AF GÖTEBORG  4.40  14.78  Volvo Penta D3, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCHM  MAYFLOWER II  4.40  14.78     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJKM  SANNA V AF STRÄNGNÄS  4.40  14.78  Volvo Penta TMD 31 L 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKZV  MATHILDA IV  4.40  14.78  Volvo Penta TMD 31L 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDQG  OLYDIA  II  4.40  14.78  Yanmar 4 LH‐TE, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBEZ  DUNETT  4.40  14.78  Yanmar 4LHTE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFPK  NADINE  4.40  14.78  Volvo Penta TMD31L‐A1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBAM  IMAGINE  4.11  14.78  Ford‐Lehman 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMWR  BARCARES  4.33  14.75  Yanmar 4 JH 2‐HTE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLBO  BALTAZAR  4.40  14.75  Perkins, 1983  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJKT  ROXANNE AF STOCKHOLM  4.33  14.75  Yanmar 4 JH2‐HTE 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJBK  UTOPIA  4.14  14.75  Nanni 6.280 HE, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLMX  GRACE AF TROSA  4.33  14.75  Yanmar 4JH2, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBFZ  CHILL OUT  4.49  14.75  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDYR  L'HEURE BLEUE  4.33  14.75  Yanmar 4 SH3‐TE, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBNQ  VICTORIA AF PITEÅ  4.49  14.75  Yanmar 4JH3HTE, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKJQ  BLUE DAME  4.54  14.73  Yanmar 4JA4‐HTE, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDZQ  DELIGHT  4.05  14.67  Yanmar 4JH‐3TE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHKX  LA DEÉSSE  4.51  14.66  Yanmar 4JH3TE, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 153: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

147 

 

SLXG  CARLA AF STOCKHOLM  4.51  14.66  Yanmar 4JH3TE  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJGR  CORNELIA‐SVERIGE  4.48  14.64  Volvo Penta TMD 31B 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCQN  SOLA LONE  4.96  14.64  Hundersted 1962  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMXH  MARIA HELENA  4.39  14.63  Volvo Penta TMD40 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMBJ  FAROUCHE II  4.19  14.62  Volvo Penta MD21A  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKUR  BEATRICE AF GRAVARNE  4.19  14.60  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKYE  CHESNOCK  4.23  14.60  Yanmar 4JH2DTB, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBPE  AQUARISMA  4.40  14.55  Perkins 4154 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJIA  METTE  4.43  14.55  Bolinder V7 1936  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIWY  EMBLA  4.56  14.54  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIQE  AMANDA OF SWEDEN  4.06  14.54  Volvo Penta TMD31B 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDVB  TOLLY  5.94  14.52  Skandia 2‐cyl råoljem.‐59  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDMZ  SEVENTH WAVE  4.49  14.50  Yanmar 4J HBTE  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJHG  KIRRIBILLI  4.49  14.50  Volvo TMD 22, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMHZ  BLÅ MÄRTA  4.49  14.50  Yanmar 43H3TE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIGR  MARELD  4.49  14.49  Volvo Penta MD 22  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDIJ  YDALIR II  4.12  14.45  Nanni Diesel XO401‐214,01  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMWN  REBECKA‐CHRISTINE  4.12  14.45  Yanmar 4JH3 HTBE, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLAX  HELGA AF ÄLLMORA  4.12  14.45  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTBE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBYL  ZEPHYR JÄRNLADYN  4.30  14.45  Perkins 4108 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKVJ  EDEN  5.57  14.43  Volvo Penta TMD 96B 1950  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJWG  ANTILIA  4.47  14.43  Perkins M60, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCUE  MISS AV BREVIKSNÄS  4.20  14.43  Volvo Penta D2‐75,2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFLR  ALBI  4.20  14.43  Volvo Penta D2‐55,2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGMJ  L' AVALANCHE  4.20  14.43  Volvo TMD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHGK  MERMAID  4.31  14.40  Yanmar 4JH4‐HTE, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCHX  MIDNIGHT SUN  4.31  14.40  Yanmar, 4JH3HTE, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFUL  NJORD  4.31  14.40  Yanmar 4JH3 HTE, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGOP  SEDNA AV NOTHOLMEN  4.31  14.40  Yanmar 4JH3 HTE,2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 154: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

148 

 

SBTM  TUMBLING DICE  4.31  14.40  Volvo TAMD 22, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFNT  QUEENIE II  4.23  14.40  VP TMD 22P, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKFY  BETZY GRABLE  4.31  14.40  Volvo MD 22, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGMU  SVEA TIGER  4.31  14.40  Volvo Penta MD 22  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGIL  NEW MOON  4.23  14.40  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SDMQ ELISABETH AV SALTSJÖBADEN  4.23  14.40  Volvo Penta TMD22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SBKX  WEST MONSUN  4.37  14.40  Volvo Penta D67C 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHFU  LAXEN  5.56  14.37  Scania‐Vabis diesel 1960  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMXQ  TICKET III  4.62  14.37  Yanmar 4JH3HTE, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMKG  BLÅKLINT  4.41  14.36  Perkins 4 154M, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLRJ  JOSEPHINE AF GÅSHAGA  4.41  14.36  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SELO  SEABIRD  4.08  14.35  Arona  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHCV  FELICIA  4.49  14.35  Volvo Perkins TMD22, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKIE  BARA‐VARA  4.49  14.35  Volvo D2‐55,2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDQJ  FORTUNE LIGHT  4.49  14.35  Yanmar 4JH2, 1994  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAF  DOLOROSA  4.49  14.35  Volvo MD22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMTU  OSIBOVA  4.49  14.35  Volvo TAMD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBJZ  SOFIA AF SALTSJÖBADEN  4.48  14.31  YANMAR JH3‐TE, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAC  NOA AF STOCKHOLM  4.25  14.28  Volvo TD, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIHE  BALTIC ROSE  4.12  14.26  Nanni 6280HE, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLPX  SINGOALLA AF VINÖ  4.44  14.25  Perkins Typ 234 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBIM  JADE  4.62  14.25  Ford 2712 E  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SITK  CARIB  4.04  14.25  Yanmar 4JH2‐DTBE, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKLN  TINTO II  4.04  14.25  Yanmar 4JH2‐DTBE, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBYR  ADELA  4.35  14.24  Volvo Penta TMD 31A 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBXA  ELBIA  4.35  14.24  Volvo Penta TMD31 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCJR  LADY ANN  4.35  14.24  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKHG  LINDA AF STOCKHOLM  4.25  14.22  Ford 2712E 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 155: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

149 

 

SGMH  ILE DE BORA BORA  4.51  14.21  Ford 2714 E  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGAW  NORDLAND AF GÖTEBORG  4.67  14.20  British Leiland, 1973  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLVW  AQUAVIT  4.20  14.20  Volvo D2‐75, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLUR  BLÅDÅREN  4.20  14.20  Volvo D2‐75, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMBO  DAYNA  4.25  14.20  Perkins M60, 1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIHU  SMILLA  4.22  14.20  Yanmar 4JH2‐DTE  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHUE  REFANETTE  4.18  14.20  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKMC  FLYKT  4.25  14.20  Ford 4:254 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGUJ  OLOMIA  4.20  14.20  Ford diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGUX  CEMONIA  4.20  14.20  Volvo Penta MD 47  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLCD  FIRST AMBER  4.34  14.20  Perkins 4.108 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMBF  ESMERALDA OF SWEDEN  4.17  14.20  Volvo TD 50 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SDTI CHAMPAGNE AF STOCKHOLM  4.46  14.19  Yanmar 4JH4, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SLNC  SAGA AF GÖTEBORG  4.26  14.18  Nanni 5.250 TDI, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMWO  ELLEN WESTERBERG  4.26  14.18  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGNT  CILLE  4.26  14.18  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE,E20940,01  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFWB  TORDMULEN  5.55  14.17  Volvo Penta MD 47A‐9328  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIHQ  SVENSSONS  4.35  14.15  Volvo Penta MD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBIP  VIVE LA MER  4.20  14.15  Yanmar 4JH4C, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHID  L'INDIENNE  4.35  14.15  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFQT  SALT AV ÖSTERSKÄR  4.20  14.15  Yanmar 4JH4AE, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBMH  GRACE II  4.20  14.15  VolvoPenta MDD2‐55,2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMVE  MILLA  4.20  14.15  Volvo D2 55, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKNQ  ALOHA  4.35  14.15  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBWE  SCIROCCO  4.04  14.12  Yanmar 4JH3, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFVB  VILLOU  4.04  14.12  Yanmar 4JH3 TBE, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMCO  MISS U II  4.08  14.12  Leyland SW400 M, 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBHW  CHERIMIE  4.12  14.10  Yanmar4JH3‐HTE,E21404,‐03  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 156: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

150 

 

SHYX  TIMA AV LIDKÖPING  4.26  14.09  Volvo Penta MD50, 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMQH  ANDROMEDA OF SWEDEN  4.02  14.08  Volvo Penta MD21A 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFGE  AMORE DI MARE II  4.22  14.06  Ford Lehman, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLTJ  KENAVO  4.49  14.05  Yanmar, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGDF  WINDWARD STAR  4.57  14.02  Perkins 4‐154, 1977  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGBF  ARIANNA AF SIMRISHAMN  4.42  14.01  Yanmar 4JH2, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAN  AMITA  4.15  14.00  Volvo D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEFW  RIKITIN  4.15  14.00  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLUH  PRIMA  4.15  14.00  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLGT  CORINNE AF VÄSTERÅS  4.82  13.99  2 Yanmar 4JH4E, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBNF  MISS FORTYSIX  4.35  13.99  Volvo D2 55,2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMBG  PAM  4.35  13.99  Volvo Penta D2 55C, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHLA  LOUVIC  4.35  13.99  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMNZ  GALATEA AF STOCKHOLM  4.35  13.99  Volvo D2‐55, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIHP  LIV 1  4.05  13.97     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDXT  NIKITA OF KYRKBACKEN  4.48  13.96  Yanmar nr 36646  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMGB  LIXA  4.48  13.96  Yanmar T.D. 4JH2‐UTE,1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKEW  GIM‐KI  4.12  13.95  Yanmar JH4‐UTBE 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJZA  MISS BOOP  4.35  13.94  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFRX  AGGERUD  4.10  13.93  Ford 2715 E  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJTV  ENVISHETEN  4.81  13.92  Volvo D‐96 1963  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBGH  SOLITUDE OF SWEDEN  4.37  13.91  Yanmar 4JHTE, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJLH  NIGHTWISH  4.25  13.90  Yanmar 4JH2A‐HTE, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIWV  MAJOSA II  4.30  13.90  Perkins 4.108, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBLN  NORRSKEN AV GÖTEBORG  4.25  13.90  Perkins Prima  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJIZ  KARIBU  4.17  13.90  Perkins M6‐354 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMAV  IRIS  4.32  13.90  Perkins 4.108 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGZM  CRUX  4.34  13.88  Perkins 4.108, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SECQ  ALFHILD  5.73  13.88  Valmet Turbo  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 157: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

151 

 

SLKW  SVANEFLU  4.50  13.83  Volvo Penta TMD 96 1969  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMXV  CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS V  4.46  13.83  Ford 4/2720, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEYL  STORMVOGEL  4.46  13.83  Volvo TMD 40A, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFAU  INDIGO  4.25  13.81  Yanmar JH2‐DTE 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIHK  STING  4.25  13.81  Volvo Penta TAMD 22, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKPM  RONJA OF SWEDEN  4.25  13.81  Volvo Penta TMD 22, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDML  EMMA AF STOCKHOLM  4.25  13.81  Yanmar 4JH2TE, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGWX  ANNABEL LEE  4.57  13.80  Ford Lehman 2715E, 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKEQ  NO WORRIES  4.30  13.78  Perkins 4236, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCFJ  ANTARES AV GÖTEBORG  4.02  13.75  Volvo Penta TAMD30 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGIN  SAUVAGE  4.18  13.74  Volvo Penta MD22, 1994  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKMO  SUN CHASER  4.20  13.74  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLXN  STUNDOM  4.04  13.72  Perkins 4236, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SIMC LA CONDESA AV SKÄLDERVIKEN  4.36  13.72  Volvo Penta MD 32  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SCMQ  MBOLO  4.18  13.70  Yanmar  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLTP  PATIENCE  4.30  13.70  Yanmar, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBXU  LA SKVALL  4.28  13.68  Volvo Penta MD 22, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLXF  NYMPH ERRANT  4.05  13.68  Ford 1971  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBFV  FREDRIKA AV ORUST  4.10  13.67  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIAH  GLITTRA  4.05  13.67  Volvo Penta TMD22C, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHWV  CASTELLANUS  4.05  13.67  Volvo Penta TMD 22, ‐01  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJKH  ELIN AF STOCKHOLM  4.05  13.67  Volvo Penta TMD22,2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJNX  THERICA  4.05  13.67  Volvo Penta D2‐55,2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJNZ  MERIBELLE  4.05  13.67  Volvo Penta MD55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIAJ  LA BAMBA  4.10  13.67  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SELX  BEJOELLE  4.10  13.67  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJMF  SALLY  4.09  13.67  Volvo Penta D2‐55,2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCLB  LOTOSLAND  4.05  13.67  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 158: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

152 

 

SCWZ  BELLA LUNA  4.05  13.67  Yanmar 43H3‐TE, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJMR  ELISABETH III  4.25  13.66  Perkins Prima M50 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHOY  KLÖS  6.30  13.65  2 Yamaha utombordare, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBIZ  VAGGSÅNG  4.05  13.65  Volvo Penta TAMD30 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLWV  CHANEL  4.19  13.64  Volvo AD 55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBMU  ROSE  4.45  13.64  Perkins 6.3544, 1980  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCPO  LADY B  4.19  13.64  Volvo Penta D‐55, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJMN  HÄXAN  4.16  13.62  Volvo Penta, 1996  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKCB  MAJA AF GÖTEBORG  4.16  13.62  Yanmar 4JH2CE, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKRQ  XELÄNS  4.16  13.62  Yanmar 4JH3E‐SD31 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJIT  XARA  4.16  13.62  Yanmar 4JH2E‐SD  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBFN  VIOLI AF GÖTEBORG  4.16  13.62  Yanmar 4JH3E, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGXY  NORTHERN STAR  4.16  13.62  Yanmar 4JH2CE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMGF  CILLA II  7.70  13.61     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDOX  ZIPPI  7.70  13.61  2 Volvo Penta D2‐55,2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMEV  STORMVÅG  5.73  13.61  Ford 2713E 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDZJ  VINDHEIM  4.54  13.60  Hundersted A/S AA/L 2078  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCFU  PEARL  4.17  13.60  Volvo D2‐55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJUB  PACIFIC WIND  4.25  13.60  Volvo D2‐55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKQF  BONNIE AF STOCKHOLM  4.10  13.56  Deutz MWM D 226‐6,1993  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBGA  AMARONE  4.26  13.55  Volvo D2‐55, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMZD  KRAKA  4.24  13.53  Volvo Penta MD22L, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBMN  LONE  4.08  13.53  Volvo Penta MD40 1979  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJRC  MARC O'POLO  4.24  13.52  Volvo Penta MD 17 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKUC  SWEJA  4.06  13.52  Peugeot 505, 1973  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLPJ  MIMMI  4.02  13.50  Perkins 4108 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJIX  FAST FRIEND  4.25  13.48  Nannidiesel 6.280 HE 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJEH  AGNES LINNEA  4.03  13.46  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGNA  LEEWAY  4.03  13.46  Volvo Penta D2 75‐S, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 159: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

153 

 

SCJY  MODESTY II  4.03  13.46  Volvo Penta D2 75‐S, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBVG  MICHAELA AF UPSALA  4.21  13.43  Yanmar 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLJC  KLARA  5.48  13.42  Volvo MD 70 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SENX  FILOSOFI II  4.26  13.41  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDHT  MISS FINE  4.26  13.41     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCIP  JEANNE  4.37  13.41  Yanmar 4JH4‐TE75LV, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKFX  AMORTINA AF STOCKHOLM  4.26  13.41     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKGJ  STORA VIT AF SVINNINGE  4.26  13.41     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIJB  GRAND LARGE  4.26  13.41  Volvo D2 75 150S, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBHK  SEA PEARL  4.26  13.41  Volvo Penta D2,75,2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKXE  SWALLOW  4.10  13.40  Perkins 4‐236  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGKL  SANCH  II  4.37  13.38  Yanmar 4JH3TE, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLFA  CUTTY SARK  4.37  13.38  Yanmar 4JH3TE, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIGV  SALT AF LANDSKRONA  4.37  13.38  Yanmar 4JH3TE, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIAX  FILOSOFI  4.12  13.37  Iveco 4141 SRM 82, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEUL  ALOHA AF VÄSTERVIK  4.08  13.37  Ford  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMQO  VIKING AF OXELÖSUND  4.15  13.35  Volvo Penta MD47  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBOG  DOLPIN  5.76  13.33  Skandia 161 A 1935  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBXM  MIRANDA  4.36  13.32  Foden F4 diesel, 1964  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKVW  CANDOR  4.20  13.31  Perkins 4:236 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCNW  ISABELLE AF STOCKHOLM  4.12  13.30  Volvo D2‐55, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMCH  DECLEOR  4.12  13.30  Volvo D‐2 55, 2001  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKRI  ALDARION  4.12  13.30  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDXM  LOCURA  IX  4.12  13.30  Volvo MD 22, 1995  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDTN  DIVA  4.40  13.30  Perkins diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLEF  SAYONARA  4.08  13.28  Ford 2712 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKZP  MADELEINE AF STOCKHOLM 4.26  13.28  Volvo Penta TMD 22  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHUJ  TREASURE  4.43  13.25  Yanmar, diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBUL  MALIN  4.00  13.25  Volvo Penta TMD31 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 160: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

154 

 

SBIR  HERO II AF VÄSTERVIK  4.11  13.24  Volvo Penta 2003TR 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJKF  LOTTA   2  4.22  13.24  Scania diesel 1970  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGJQ  JOY  4.11  13.24  Volvo 2003T, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJPE  TARSIA III  4.76  13.20  Chrysler‐Nissan CN 6‐33  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEKL  VALKYRIA  4.97  13.20  Volvo‐Penta MD 67 1971  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGTW  MOBITEX  4.21  13.19  Volvo Penta 2003T 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCKY  LISA AV LUGNET  4.07  13.19  Volvo MD50, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKDN  IANTHI  4.25  13.16  Perkins Prima, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGFH  ALVA SOFIA  4.25  13.16  Perkins M50 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBTJ  SHARDIK  4.08  13.14  Yanmar 4JHBE 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBVM  CHIC  4.08  13.14  Yanmar 4JHBE 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBOU  ANOMALI  4.08  13.14  Yanmar 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKFL  KRITSANA  4.20  13.13  Perkins  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBZN  EXIT ONE  4.26  13.11  Perkins Prima 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCMK  WINDJAMMER  4.26  13.11  Perkins 4,20  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEUH  SWEET  4.26  13.11  Perkins Prima M50, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCFP  THEA  4.19  13.11  Yanmar 3JH4CE, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SILA  APOLLO  4.09  13.10  Perkins Prima 50BHP,1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFXA  JOUIR‐VITAMIN  4.06  13.10  Yanmar 4HJHTE NR21631,‐87  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLVJ  L'ESKARGOT  4.51  13.07  Volvo Penta BM 1113‐B  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBVY  ALTAI  4.05  13.05  Yanmar 4JH‐HTE 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMQC  AINA ELFINA  4.83  13.02  Volvo D70 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKTN  PANGEA  4.12  13.02  Perkins 4.108 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLOI  ELINA AV GÖTEBORG  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBIY  AGDA AURORA  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐76, 2004  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKZD  ELEONORA AV DALARÖ  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKZF  ARGO NAVIS  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMIE  LADY D'OR  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMIQ  ISOLDE OF LIMHAMN  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 161: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

155 

 

SBMK  PIM PIM  4.21  13.01  Volvo D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBMZ  PANDORA  4.21  13.01  Volvo D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGEN  NOIR DUNDER  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGNC  TINJA  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHLG  IMPRESSION 434  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75 C, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFPC  ELSA AF SKÄRHAMN  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCAP  FESTINA LENTE  4.21  13.01  Volvo Penta D2‐75 C, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMGD  NEMO AF SMÖGEN  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo Penta D6‐435,2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHKF  RAZZLE DAZZLE  4.00  13.00  Volvo 2003, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFLZ  TIKAI  4.15  13.00  Perkins 4.108  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJZX  SANTA‐MARIA  4.75  13.00  Volvo 1961  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCLW  RAFIKI  4.03  12.99  Yanmar 4jh2dte  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBUA  QUEEN RANE  4.22  12.98  Ford Lehman 2722E 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLMI  SIGMA  4.22  12.98  Ford 2722 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKVO  TUSAN  4.22  12.98  Ford Lehman, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJUZ  SANTANA II  4.22  12.98  Ford Lehman 2722 E, 1984  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLAQ  FRENESI AF ÖREGRUND  4.22  12.98  Ford 2723, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMNX  LAURA AF MALMÖ  4.45  12.97  Volvo Penta D2‐75, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEBO  ECLIPSE  4.30  12.95  2 Perkins M80T, 1991  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKEL  Q‐COON  4.04  12.90  Deutz OT43, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMUI  LADY CHEKEDA  4.26  12.86  Yanmar 4JH3‐E, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKDX  ADVENTURE   2  4.01  12.86  Perkins 4108M 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKCX  SAFARI  4.06  12.85  Perkins 4.108 1981  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCNO  FÅGEL FENIX  4.20  12.85  Volvo DA 55, 2003  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMIZ  ALOUETTE  4.19  12.85  Yanmar 4JH3, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJBZ  JANA  4.20  12.85  Yanmar 4TE 3GM, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDYG  MOON RIVER  4.20  12.85  Yanmar 4JH3TE, 2000  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBYP  SHADOW  4.06  12.80  Perkins 4.108  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDAV  JAMMEN  4.07  12.77  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 162: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

156 

 

SKOX  IDROTT  4.07  12.75  Albin H3 1940  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDOT  NICESMILE  4.12  12.75  Yanmar, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDVG  ELVIN A  4.07  12.70  Thornycraft T98, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDEJ  GOSI  4.04  12.70  Volvo D2‐55, 2002  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMOG  BLUE FILOU  4.15  12.69  Volvo Penta MD 22, 1997  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLCV  MANDALAY  4.15  12.68  NEWAGE‐BMC 57VD, 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBIX  SANDRA‐MARIA  4.24  12.65  Perkins Prima 50, 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBKL  MADAME TOPI  4.24  12.65  Perkins Prima 50,1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLZF  KISMET  4.22  12.65  Perkins Prima 4108, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKRT  EILEAN OF RHU  4.06  12.65  Perkins 4.236  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJAP  THALIA  4.24  12.65  Perkins Prima 50 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLOQ  ALEGRIA  4.22  12.65  Perkins 4,108M 4cyl,1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDOY  JOSEPHINE SUN  4.22  12.65  Perkins Prima M50, 1990  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEYC  THERIA  4.22  12.65  Perkins, 1986  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMFV  CONDOR OF SWEDEN  4.22  12.63  Perkins 4.108 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMHR  MONIQUE  4.22  12.63  Perkins Prima 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLDX  TAAROA  6.15  12.63  Volvo‐Penta 1975  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHDX  MILJON  4.04  12.62  Perkins Diesel 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDBG  FRENCH KISS  4.18  12.62  Yanmar 4JH4‐E, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCHY  MIRAGE  4.18  12.62  Yanmar, 2006  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJYK  SUPERBE  4.18  12.62  Yanmar 4JH4‐E, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCIF  KALYPSO  4.18  12.62  Yanmar 4JH4‐E, 2007  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCMH  CRISTINA AF GÅSHAGA  4.18  12.62  Yanmar 4JH4‐HTE, 2008  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFHD  SO LONG AV NACKA  4.16  12.60  Volvo, D2‐55  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLCX  ALIDA  4.04  12.60  Yanmar 4LH, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SFRP  FRISSE  4.60  12.56  Ford Bowman FH 220 1972  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHTB  ROYAL TREAT  4.11  12.53  Perkins 4‐108, 1985  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKPQ  GEFION AV LIMHAMN  4.08  12.50  Volvo Penta D2‐55, 2005  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SIFZ  SOFIA CHARLOTTA  4.56  12.50  BMW diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

Page 163: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

157 

 

SGLV  JOSEFIN  4.09  12.49  NG6 Ford  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDJX  RONJA AF KÖPING  4.61  12.48  Volvo MD 67C 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SEQN  GURU  6.45  12.45  Volvo Penta MD19 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDBC  PINTA  4.46  12.35  Ford 592, 1955  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLPG  CAROLINA JOOS  4.05  12.33  Volvo Penta 2040 MD, 1998  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SJOX  NIKE AV STOCKHOLM  4.73  12.32  Herkules 1952  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLIB  CRAZY JANE AGAIN  4.08  12.30  Yanmar 4JH3E, 1999  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCGR  LAURA  4.64  12.29  Marna M4 1969  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SCIZ  POWDER  4.18  12.29  JSUZU 3 kc 1989  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLUQ  NOMAD  4.40  12.27  Volvo Penta MD27 1968  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SHYU  OZ  4.10  12.24     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDPC  NORDKOSTER  4.63  12.22  Volvo Penta MD40, 1992  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLQD  FAST FOOD SALLY  4.04  12.20  Yanmar 5250  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGLK  GODDAHA  4.37  12.19  Ford 2712E 1974  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKPL  CARISMA  4.12  12.17  Leyland 160‐24‐311 1966  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBDX  LITORINA AF HELSINGBORG  4.05  12.10  Cubota KTT 3000 1987  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SLGV  NEW PATRICIA  4.04  12.08  Chrysler‐Nissan SD33 1978  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SDCB  ANIARA AF SPACE  4.07  12.07  2 Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SGHR  BELLIS  4.00  12.06  Perkins diesel 4.108  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SMUX  FOAM  4.39  12.03     Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SKND  ROYAL VIKING  4.34  12.02  Perkins 4.236M 1982  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBCN  SEACAT  39  5.95  12.01  Volvo Penta MD 2002 1988  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp SBQM  ANASTHASIA V  4.00  12.01  Ford Lehman  Fritidsmotorsegelskepp 

SHGO  LINNEA  6.12  14.67    Fritidsmotorsegelskepp jakt 

SLGX  ST LOUIS  9.28  54.72  Mirless Blackstone  Fritidsmotorskepp SJTR  SKREDSVIK  8.50  49.90  Hedemora 16V  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNP  ZABULL  7.90  44.93  2 Mercedes Benz  Fritidsmotorskepp SBIK  ARKÖ  7.90  44.93  2 Mercedes‐Benz 820Gb1958  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 164: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

158 

 

SCDM  BLIDÖ  7.90  44.93  2 Mercedes‐Benz 820Gb1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SCDF  STYRSÖ AV SÖDERTÄLJE  7.88  44.93  2 Mercedes Benz 820GB  Fritidsmotorskepp SKEN  MADAME LOUISIANA  11.19  38.85  2 Scania DSI 14, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SCRU  VIVE LA VIE  5.07  38.77  Badovin 80CV, 1951  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SKYF MONA GREEN AF GÖTEBORG  6.77  38.20  Jönköpings motorf. 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SGMV  DOLORES  6.65  37.90  404 VO Alpha Diesel 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBU  KLARA AF STOCKHOLM  6.21  37.30  2 Scania  Fritidsmotorskepp SGBJ  MYSING AF NYNÄSHAMN  6.32  36.62  2 Scania V8 141, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SLON  UNITED SPIRIT  4.84  34.20  2 MTU 396V8 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SION  ALBATROSS IMPERIUM  6.72  34.08  Scania DSI 11 1969  Fritidsmotorskepp SKMH  HERI  5.52  33.56  Hundested 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SKLH  BELLA  6.82  33.02  Cummins VT171OM, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SKPN  WILJO  5.70  33.00  DAF 1160 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SHFD  TAMPA  7.00  32.03  Busch‐Sulzer St Louis 44  Fritidsmotorskepp SFNJ  GULLVOR  6.97  32.02  Scania DSI 14 48 M23, 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SGZI  AILA AF KARLSTAD  6.88  31.97  Cummins NVH12 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SBZG  FÄLLAREN  6.30  31.93  2 Volvo Penta MD100 1984  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNW  LINNEA BLADNER  6.28  31.93  2 scania D11 R81 1971  Fritidsmotorskepp SDEM  ARGO  6.80  31.86  Volvo Penta TAMD 120A  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBY  CERMONA  6.34  31.85  Industrie 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SDME  LÅNGÖ  II  5.39  31.82  Skandia 285B 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SJUK  VIEILLE MONTAGNE  6.87  31.70  J Munktell typ MB 1951  Fritidsmotorskepp SERM  SVANEFJORD  6.86  31.69     Fritidsmotorskepp SCAV  SKRAMSÖSUND  7.42  31.20  2 Scania DSI 11 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHI  BACKE  5.58  31.16  Triple exp. Akers MV 1910  Fritidsmotorskepp SHLR  RAGVALD  5.69  30.53  Mercedes 617, 1981  Fritidsmotorskepp SFKJ  FIRST EDI  4.33  30.50     Fritidsmotorskepp SELK  GRUNO  5.40  30.47  Volvo TMD 100  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 165: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

159 

 

SEWD  TRESOR  6.30  30.32  Volvo TMD 100 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SDCA  SANDY HOOK  6.30  30.32  Scania Vabis DSI 11 1984  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVI  STEGE  6.30  30.10  Volvo‐Penta TAMD120 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SLEB  GÄLNAN  6.07  29.30  June Munktell 1943  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJR  KARLIZA  5.23  29.28  2 Cummins NTA 855, 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SFDB  GERDA  6.60  29.27  Volvo Penta TD 100, 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SLAN  VEINO  5.52  29.26  B & W Alpha 342V 1945  Fritidsmotorskepp SBQE  HOOP OP ZEGEN  5.41  29.25  Brons 1624 1929  Fritidsmotorskepp SEPM  BLOMÅS  5.82  29.18  Normo, 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKD  BALTIC LADY  5.23  29.13  2 Scania DSI 11 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SKVM  MORMOR  6.82  28.88  Man/B&W‐Alpha 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKR  CONATUS  5.40  28.87  Volvo Penta TMD100, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SIYO  MOA AF HARG  6.02  28.64  Scania DSI14MO1SF 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SJOI  ODEN AV HJO  6.80  28.64  Volvo Penta TMD 96 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SLJW  BILLIE PILGRIM  6.58  28.39  Scania D 10 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZU  NICA AF GOTHENBURG  6.48  28.29  Scania D11, 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SLCY  ILDERIM IV  4.90  28.22     Fritidsmotorskepp SFQR  MONIKA  6.30  28.20  Scania DSI 11, 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBR  DAGNY  7.31  28.11     Fritidsmotorskepp SCIM  EMM XXIII  5.00  28.03  2 Scania DSI 11 R82A 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SBZU  DORIAN GREY  5.02  27.86  2 Scania DSI11 1975/1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SJLQ  THERON  5.03  27.75  2 Kockums diesel 1942  Fritidsmotorskepp SBZP  IDSKÄR AF NORRTÄLJE  5.17  27.70  2 Scania DS 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SBZO  DAS BOOT WISBY  5.17  27.70  2 Scania DS11  Fritidsmotorskepp SDMG  VILJAN  5.22  27.49  Volvo TAMD 120 B,1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SHAL  SHIP HOTEL SJÖHÄSTEN  5.67  27.37  Atlas Polar K45E/ASEA LE  Fritidsmotorskepp SJRQ  BENITA  7.05  27.16  Alfa 343 F 1951  Fritidsmotorskepp SMYH  JÄRN  5.29  27.14  2Volvo‐PentaTAMD100A 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SLCM  ANNA‐EVA AF LJUSTERÖ  5.82  27.00  Wichmann 3 ACAT 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 166: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

160 

 

    SGPJ  JULIANE  5.49  26.97 Fritidsmotorskepp SHFO  LADY ANNE III  7.02  26.91  Scania DSI 11, 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SGRX  LEO  7.25  26.61  Busch‐Sulzer 6DFMT‐17  Fritidsmotorskepp SKCI  VERTROUWEN  5.02  26.50  Albin G‐62 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SMCD  TIGER  7.26  26.24  Clark Bros Co diesel,1944  Fritidsmotorskepp SMZR  FALKLAND  6.74  26.22  Motorw.Mannheim MWM ‐60  Fritidsmotorskepp SJZB  ROYAL SUND  5.22  26.15  2 st Scania DS11 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SFCZ  PETER  6.90  26.06  Scania Vabis diesel 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SJVM  SOLAMIT  6.26  25.90  Volvo Penta TMD96B1 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SKUD  GUNNAREN  6.58  25.75  Volvo Penta RMD 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SEVU  ANDIAMO  6.12  25.72  2 MTU  Fritidsmotorskepp SECO  FLOTTISTEN  5.33  25.51  Volvo Penta TMD100 6 cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp SHMR  JAGAREN  4.86  25.47  2 st G.M. 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SKLM  MINUT  6.13  25.42  Scania D11 diesel 1981  Fritidsmotorskepp SFGP  SAGITTA  5.03  25.23  Scania Vabis Turbo 1940  Fritidsmotorskepp SHYB  FREEDOM  5.56  25.18  Volvo‐Penta TMD100A 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SKUY  MIO  5.10  25.17  2st Volvo Penta MD96,1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SCQA  REBECKA  5.22  25.16  2 Volvo TMDA  Fritidsmotorskepp SFTV  REMI  5.10  25.12  2 Scania DSI‐11 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SFIG  SJÖKRONAN  5.22  25.11  2 DS 10 Scania Vabis 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SDAF  ARGUS  4.73  25.10  Volvo Penta VDF6  Fritidsmotorskepp SBYZ  ANDEN  5.05  25.10  2 Scania D815 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SMCW  AMIGO  5.05  25.10  2 Scania D815  Fritidsmotorskepp SDKR  DRAGA  6.74  25.03  11 SCANIA DSI 14, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SFBZ  BENJAMIN  5.90  25.00  SACM/Poyaud 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SCWA  EJDERN AF STOCKHOLM  4.77  24.98  BUDA 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SMWQ  TRESNO  6.62  24.95  Grenå diesel 6cyl,1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SKXG  KARIN  4.98  24.88  Volvo Penta TMD100AK 1969  Fritidsmotorskepp SHLW  CLIPTON  6.61  24.85  Lister Blackstone 6 cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 167: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

161 

 

SGXV  LÄCKÖ  6.54  24.81  Alpha diesel 40626VO 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SMCI  LIWUMI  6.02  24.78  MWM TRHS 526 A 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHP  MEGRUNDET  5.38  24.62  2 Lister Blackstone 1944  Fritidsmotorskepp SKXW  WANDERLUST  5.01  24.61  Albin G‐62 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SCNA  RAMBO  5.19  24.59  2 Valmet 815 D11 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SCMX  OLD GROGG  5.53  24.46  Volvo Penta TMD 100  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGM  CANDIDA  6.68  24.42  Volund 250 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SLVU  BJARMI  6.01  24.39     Fritidsmotorskepp SDAC  AGE I  4.81  24.38  June Munktell 11MV 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SEXO  SINGAPORE  6.43  24.32  Jönköpings motorf. 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SHDJ  ANDROMEDA  6.60  24.32  Caterpillar 6cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp SGPU  ELLINOR  5.22  24.26  Bergsund MV 1927  Fritidsmotorskepp SCAI  BLACKAN  6.56  24.20  Scania DSI 14, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SEZT  ANDASU  6.19  24.14  Grenaa 6F24T 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBQ  MOANA  4.50  24.12  2 MWM V12  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHN  NYMPHE  6.41  24.11  Deutz SF 16M 716, 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SCAJ  DÄMMAN  6.49  24.10  Scania DSI 14, 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SCDO  RÖDLÖGA AV BOHUS  6.56  24.08  Scania DS 14, 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SIDZ  FANÖ  6.60  24.08  Jönköpings Motorf.6TFD  Fritidsmotorskepp SHVF  SANA  6.39  24.05  Modag SRB 55 1951  Fritidsmotorskepp SGNI  HILDUR  5.29  24.05  B&W, Lathrop D‐155‐v,1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SKXO  SVK09 DALARÖ  5.06  24.05  MTU 8V 396 TB 83 ‐83 m.fl  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFV  SVK11 ÖSTHAMMAR  5.06  24.05  MTU 8V 396 TB 83, 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SFMD  ELECTRA III  6.10  23.99  2 Carterpillar 3412E,2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SCAH  HISINGEN  6.46  23.99  Scania DSI 14,1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SGMF  WHATS THE RUSH  6.42  23.96  J‐M diesel 6TFD 260MVH 64  Fritidsmotorskepp SGVN  QROOZ 01  5.01  23.92  2 Volkswagen SDI 75‐5  Fritidsmotorskepp SHNX  SUECIA  6.44  23.87  Detroit diesel 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SLRW  CECILIA  4.41  23.87  Paxman Pacardo 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 168: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

162 

 

SFKD  SENTOSA  5.00  23.85  De Laval Råoljemotor 1941  Fritidsmotorskepp SKLC  SPERANZA  5.28  23.78  Wickman 4 DCT 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRE  SJÖSTJERNAN  4.64  23.68  Volvo‐Penta TMD 120 AK  Fritidsmotorskepp SFNR  RYA  4.06  23.65  Penta MD96 diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJG  SAGAN AF MÄLAREN  6.80  23.63  Caterpillar V8 D 379  Fritidsmotorskepp SLPM  TELL  5.03  23.56  Scania‐Vabis DS10R01 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SBIO  FEDDE HENDRIKA  4.44  23.34  Peugot 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SMAX  T 46  6.07  23.27  3 Isotta‐Franschini 184C  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBJ  CHABLIS  6.07  23.27  3 st Scania 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SFZG  NIMA  4.74  23.22     Fritidsmotorskepp SDNA  BIG ENOUGH  6.00  23.20     Fritidsmotorskepp SHPZ  MARSTRAND  5.84  23.16  2 Scania DS 11 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SHNP  SANDRA AF CARLSHAMN  6.52  23.15  M V M diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SGTZ  VÄINÖ  5.05  23.10  Wikström Special 1 Marin  Fritidsmotorskepp SGQB  CROSSBY  6.40  23.08  6 cyl. diesel 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SIQD  GONDUL  6.52  23.08  Volvo‐Penta 6 cyl diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SKUQ  RETSINA ONE  5.55  23.06     Fritidsmotorskepp SKAZ  SHARK  5.20  23.05  2 Scania DSI‐11‐R80 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SHGX  ASTRAL DREAM  5.20  23.05  Scania DS1 10 R 80  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNV  CAPELLA  5.52  23.00  Volvo TMD 100 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SIOE  XENIA ONATOPP  4.04  23.00  Rysk Detroit K161M2 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRH  TINGVALLA  5.30  22.97  Seffle 547‐FV, 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SFEW  ELAINE  6.49  22.89  MGO diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBR  KRISTIN  6.53  22.87  2 Volvo TMD 100, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SFZJ  BORKA  6.38  22.80  Skandiaverken 5cyl diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SJRI  BO  5.39  22.75     Fritidsmotorskepp SFRC  HÅRSFJÄRDEN  5.80  22.67  Scania Vabis DS11, 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SGWM  TAAVI  4.47  22.52  Cummins 685.9N, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SDIM  THOR AF STOCKHOLM  5.54  22.49  Alpha Diesel 404 R 1942  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 169: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

163 

 

SGJX  REX  6.03  22.47  2 cyl semidiesel 502MV  Fritidsmotorskepp SMXI  HANGÖ  6.05  22.41  Scania Vabis diesel 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SLBF  SICILIA IV  5.70  22.38  2xCaterpillar C30, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SJXY  ORSA  4.90  22.37  Scania‐Vabis 6 cyl 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SMWU  MOSKUS  5.06  22.31  Wichman, 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SHAU  STRÖMÅKAREN  4.54  22.29  Scania DSI11, 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHG  FIX  5.18  22.29  3 Penta TMD 96B1 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SLKH  ZEN  4.30  22.24  2 Scania DSI 11 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SEFI  VIGOR  5.00  22.23  Skandia råoljemotor 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SFIH  OLD‐SPERO  6.19  22.23  Skandia råoljemotor 1949  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLH  HAMMARÖ  6.17  22.19  Alfa diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SFOH  SILVERVÅG AV STOCKHOLM  6.46  22.18  Grenå 6F24T 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SJWQ  GÖTA KANAL I  5.42  22.18     Fritidsmotorskepp SHCZ  FORSS I  5.26  22.17  Volvo TAMD120, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SJAM  JONNY  6.28  22.12  Albin diesel 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SMRW  AZEB  6.17  22.11  Caterpillar 3408DITA 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SHZE  HAFBORG  5.41  22.10  Caterpillar D353TA, 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SGDV  DUNDERHONUNG  6.11  22.09  Scania‐Vabis DSI 14M 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SDNX  ASTRID AV TIMMERNABBEN  6.28  22.04  Scania 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SJQE  THREE SEASONS  5.71  22.04  2 MAN D2842LE406, 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SIWH  HJERNET  5.15  21.95  Albin 6cyl G‐62 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SGDO  EDA  4.50  21.94  Scania Vabis D814 8 cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp SGZP  ÖSTERÖ AF VÄSTERÅS  6.52  21.93  2 Detroit  Fritidsmotorskepp SIFL  KLIPPVIK  6.28  21.88  Grenå Diesel 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZM  ISDRONNINGEN  6.95  21.79  Cummins KT‐1150‐N  Fritidsmotorskepp SLJB  ALTARSKÄR  4.82  21.76  3 Scania DSI 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SMRV  BJÖRG  6.12  21.69  Caterpillar D 353 1943  Fritidsmotorskepp SFAE  ESCORPION  5.20  21.68  Volvo Penta MD100A 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SKJH  YGGDRASIL  5.54  21.63  Volvo‐Penta TMD100A 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 170: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

164 

 

SEWX  ENSKÄR  6.23  21.56  Volvo‐Penta TAMD121C 1984  Fritidsmotorskepp SIWO  STANLEY  6.10  21.55     Fritidsmotorskepp SGVR  MIEN  5.31  21.52  Jönköpings Motorf. 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGE  CARMEN AF STOCKHOLM  5.08  21.52  Ahlström Compound 1915  Fritidsmotorskepp SMNO  MÄLAREN  6.06  21.51  Mercedes‐Benz MD896A6‐66  Fritidsmotorskepp SGVK  MARY  5.02  21.50  General Motors diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SJOV  BALTIC SEA  4.02  21.46  Scania D 10  Fritidsmotorskepp SFOC  KATTEGATT  6.02  21.45  Volvo Penta TMD 100, 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SHPK  SONJA  4.05  21.41     Fritidsmotorskepp SDJH  TORSKÄR  4.86  21.40  3 Volvo Penta TMD96B1 66  Fritidsmotorskepp SBEI  ÖRSKÄR  4.86  21.40  3 Scania DSI 11, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SFTI  KARMINA  4.62  21.39  Volvo 96 BI 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJA  SEA BREEZE  4.24  21.38  3 Scania DSI 11 1974/76  Fritidsmotorskepp SLZY  NORMANDIE  4.24  21.38  3 Scania D815 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SMAY  PRO DIVER  4.24  21.38  3 Scania D816  Fritidsmotorskepp SMAU  BEACH BOY  4.24  21.38  3 Scania D816 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SMRF  MARINESHOP 1  4.24  21.38  Scania Vabis DSI 11 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKQ  TORNADO  4.24  21.38  3 Scania D816  Fritidsmotorskepp SFCQ  SVK 248  4.27  21.38  3 Scania DS 11, 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SJVR  MARTHA AF STOCKHOLM  5.51  21.37  Shottel Navigator, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGH  TVÅHUNDRASJUTTIOSEX  4.24  21.36  3 Scania DS11,1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHC  TVÅHUNDRAFEMTIOSJU  4.28  21.36  3 Scania DSI 11, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SDAQ  TVÅHUNDRAFJORTON  4.28  21.36  3 Scania DSI 10, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SDEW  SAINT X  4.28  21.36  Scania DC11  Fritidsmotorskepp SDFW  IOWA CCLV  4.28  21.36  3 Scania DSI 11, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SDAY  TVÅHUNDRASEXTON  4.28  21.36  3 Scania DSI 10, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SDQN  TRIBEL  4.28  21.36  3 Volvo TMD 100A 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLJ  LOMMEN AV MUSKÖ  4.82  21.36     Fritidsmotorskepp SFJT  VINCENT  5.98  21.36  Volvo diesel P96B 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 171: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

165 

 

SFMK  VÄDERÖ AF FISKETÅNGEN  5.92  21.35  General Motor V12 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SEWU  HUGIN  5.02  21.33  Mercedes‐Benz  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SLHE CHARLOTTA AV STOCKHOLM  6.10  21.30  Volvo Penta 120ACC, 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SBEP  FLAGGSKÄR  4.82  21.30  3 Scania DSI 11,1987/1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SGVQ  NALINA  4.27  21.30  2 Volvo TAMD 120  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNA  NOTOS  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SDKA  TPBS 222  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11M01,1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SDUH  TPBS 233  4.27  21.30  2 Volvo TAMD122A,1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SEHA  TPBS 256  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11R82,1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SEHR  TPBS 259  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11R82,1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SEIO  OCTAVIA AF CALMARE  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11R82,1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SERN  TPBS 268  4.27  21.30  3 Volvo TAMD100A,1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SETM  TPBS 277  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11M01,1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJC  TPBS 213  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11M01,1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SEGU  TPBS 253  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11R82,1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SDVF  TPBS 249  4.27  21.30  3 Scania DSI11R82,1971  Fritidsmotorskepp SEWF  DYKAREN  4.27  21.30  3ScaniaDSI11R82A,1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SMOQ  GLIMTEN  4.27  21.30  2 Volvo TAMD 122A  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLB  JOFFSKÄR  4.27  21.30     Fritidsmotorskepp SFMR  TRÄFFEN  4.27  21.30     Fritidsmotorskepp SHDG  NAUTICA  4.21  21.29  Scania Vabis DSI 10 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SCUA  SEALODGE  5.43  21.27  2 Detroit 12V71T1,1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SMYN  LADY FONTAINE  6.06  21.25  Scania‐Vabis DS 11 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SMFX  BLAU MALIN  5.51  21.25  Alpha diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SGQP  EGGSKÄR  4.83  21.24  2 Scania DSI 11 82 A 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SHRF  STOLT III  5.40  21.22  2 M:T:U:12V 183 TE 93,98  Fritidsmotorskepp SBED  JAKO  4.82  21.21  Volvo‐Penta TAMD 163 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SDAE  EKEN AV TYRESÖ  4.83  21.20  Scania DSI 11R82ASF, 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 172: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

166 

 

SKRO  NOVA BERGSMAN  4.65  21.20  2 Wola‐Henschel 28H12A 76  Fritidsmotorskepp SKJM  SKIFTESKÄR  4.82  21.20  3 Scania DSI11 40M20S ‐88  Fritidsmotorskepp SCHQ  STEINTJE  4.12  21.19  DAF D575/6 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SJVB  TERMIK  5.23  21.18  2 MAN D284‐LE406, 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVQ  DEHRA DUN  5.23  21.18  2 MAN 2842 LE, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SIFA  US SKUTSJE  4.34  21.14  Mercedes OM67/8 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLY  HISPANO  6.10  21.10  Caterpillar D343 6cyl ‐77  Fritidsmotorskepp SKQW  TAJFUN  4.65  21.10  2 Wola‐Henschel 28H12A 74  Fritidsmotorskepp SKTZ  PONTUSA  4.65  21.10  2 Wola‐Henschel 28H12A‐77  Fritidsmotorskepp SFXV  SVANLAND AV GÖTEBORG  6.53  21.09  Scania DSI 14 61M41T 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFT  ALINE  4.84  21.08  3 Scania DSI 11, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SHPY  FALKE  5.74  21.03  Volvo Penta TMD100 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SKJG  LINDOS  5.43  20.98  Gardner 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SGXI  NELLA  4.70  20.86  2 Scania Vabis D 11 R 81  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFC  NIMIS  6.43  20.85  Scania D7, 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZO  MORRAN  4.99  20.84  Leyland 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SFJR  OCEAN PEARL  4.95  20.79  2 Scania DSI 10, 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SFUH  CANNING  5.93  20.76  Volvo Penta TMD 96, 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SHPI  OCEANMOON  6.11  20.72  Volvo Penta 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SDNT  JENS KIIL  5.24  20.70  Kromhout Tv8 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLU  ASTA   2  6.28  20.66  Scania Vabis DSI 10R80  Fritidsmotorskepp SEFM  HAMNESKÄR  4.66  20.65  Klöckner‐Hamboldt Deutz  Fritidsmotorskepp SDCN  ANNA HUDSON  6.10  20.63  Skandia tändkulem. 1950  Fritidsmotorskepp SFXJ  ATHENE  4.72  20.60  Skandia 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SDMK  ATLE  4.36  20.57     Fritidsmotorskepp SLDZ  DAWN OF DAY  5.28  20.51  Wickman 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SIEO  ELSA  5.08  20.49  Scania D11R01 6 cyl, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SIKO  FORTUNA  6.25  20.48  Penta MD96 diesel 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SIDR  DYNÄS II  4.36  20.47  Skandia 465C 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 173: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

167 

 

SHBQ  ÖRN  4.28  20.45  Skandia 395C 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SLIM  MAHAL KITA  5.43  20.43  MAN  Fritidsmotorskepp SHDR  GESAR  4.39  20.41  Scania DSI 14  Fritidsmotorskepp SLTI  ARTICI  6.00  20.39  Volvo Penta TAMD 120A  Fritidsmotorskepp SFQC  ARIEL AF SÖDERHAMN  6.08  20.38  Volvo Penta TMD120A 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SFJZ  VILDAND  6.30  20.36  Deutz diesel 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHP  KAROLINA ÅLAND  4.65  20.33  Albin G 62  Fritidsmotorskepp SLUN  ANNE‐MARIE AF VÄSTERVIK  5.23  20.31  2 MAN 820, 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SDMA  SEAESTA  5.23  20.31  2 Volvo Penta TAMD162  Fritidsmotorskepp SCHE  PRINCESS ELISABETH  5.23  20.31  2 st Volvo‐Penta TAMD 162  Fritidsmotorskepp SBCO  BIANCA II  5.07  20.22  2 CRM 18 DSS, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SLAU  TOLVAN  4.73  20.20     Fritidsmotorskepp SELW  MILOS  4.73  20.16  Skandiaverken 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SGJW  FANZY  4.95  20.14  Albin G‐62  Fritidsmotorskepp SGNP  TÅNGÖ  6.02  20.10  Alpha 4‐cyl diesel, 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SEYU  INGEBORG  4.88  20.09  Scania D625 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SMKU  HÄLLEVIKSSTRAND  5.93  20.07     Fritidsmotorskepp SHCI  KORSHOLMEN  7.17  20.02  Volvo Penta MD100A 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SGCZ  ALEX  4.82  20.00  Volvo TD 47 år 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRY  ELIN AF WISBY  6.02  20.00  Volvo TMD 120,  1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SFPO  ANNA‐MAJ  5.90  19.98  Volvo‐Penta TAMD 120A ‐73  Fritidsmotorskepp SFXL  K.A. WALLENBERG  6.03  19.95  2 Scania Vabis DSI 10R 80  Fritidsmotorskepp SBCU  BENLI  5.40  19.93  Hundestedt 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SFBQ  ELISABETH  6.05  19.92  Alpha Diesel405 5cyl 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SMWJ  GERDA AF SÖRLEVIKEN  5.85  19.92  Scania DSI 11, 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SMOL  CHIRUNDO  5.10  19.92  2 Caterpillar 3406, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SFGB  ULVEN  6.00  19.87  Caterpillar D333B 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SLXQ  MIDGAARD  5.26  19.87  Hundested 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SMRE  LIZZIE  6.02  19.80     Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 174: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

168 

 

SLPN  LARUS  4.39  19.80  Volvo TD 70B, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SMLZ  VIKING AF STOCKHOLM  5.03  19.79     Fritidsmotorskepp SLMZ  CRUSCO IV  6.10  19.77  Scania DSI 11 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SJRT  ALEXANDRA  5.02  19.74  2 GM 12‐V 71N 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SITE  ISBJÖRN AV STOCKHOLM  5.10  19.73  Volvo Penta VDF 175 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SDWK  ÅLFORS  4.50  19.73  Volvo Penta MD 100 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLG  PILOT 67  5.09  19.73  Wola Henschel 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SFKU  PILOT 61  5.88  19.73  Wola Henschel 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SCOV  SICILIA  III  5.05  19.72  2 MAN D2842 LE404, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SHWQ  WILLY AF SÖDERTELGE  4.54  19.70  Nohab‐Polar 1945  Fritidsmotorskepp SDTE  VIOLET  5.94  19.63  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHN  WET ASSET  5.52  19.60  Volvo Penta TAMD61A,1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SENP  AVANCE N:O  15  4.69  19.58  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SKFE  THE FLYING MUCHACHOS  5.21  19.55  Hundested GGL 330 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNX  SINGOALLA  5.57  19.55  Grenå 2.38T 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SHBK  ALFRED  4.80  19.53  Werkspor 1942  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBL  WHITE CAT  4.96  19.43  2 MWM D232 V12 1969  Fritidsmotorskepp SKPD  ZIROCCO  4.67  19.42  2 Fiat V8 8280 SRM 1981  Fritidsmotorskepp SJVP  AKTIV AV FLÅSJÖN  4.53  19.41  Deutz SA 8 M 517 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SLUO  PLOMBEN III  4.91  19.37  2 Volvo Penta MD30A 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SKOY  CLAUS‐PIA  5.38  19.35  Grenå Diesel 1426 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SHUD  VALDE  4.65  19.32     Fritidsmotorskepp SHDK  UNDINE AF LULEÅ  4.60  19.30  Caterpillar diesel, 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SIDF  NEMO  4.44  19.29  GM diesel 1945  Fritidsmotorskepp SJLZ  HVITFELDT  5.24  19.29  Albin Diesel 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SMGU  LADY  5.24  19.29  Gardner, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SGLP  SÖDERÖ   1  5.93  19.26  Volvo‐Penta TMD120A, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SERI  TUNIA  5.15  19.26  June‐Munktell 402 MD 1939  Fritidsmotorskepp SERD  CAPRICE  6.07  19.25  Scania DS11 C03, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 175: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

169 

 

SGLE  EVELINA  5.24  19.23  Scania D645 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SGBV  ZAIDA  5.85  19.22  June Munktell 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SFZV  ANNIKA  4.80  19.20     Fritidsmotorskepp SMLE  NORDFORS  5.92  19.18  Alpha diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SGNV  GUNVOR  6.27  19.18     Fritidsmotorskepp SGZK  SILJAN  6.09  19.17  Skandia tändkulemotor1943  Fritidsmotorskepp SCDA  CECILIA AV SÄFFLE  5.20  19.13  2 Volvo  Fritidsmotorskepp SHCD  TEKLA  4.32  19.12  Penta TMD 96 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SMJE  ELIANA  5.97  19.10  Volvo‐Penta TAMD 120BCC  Fritidsmotorskepp SMNG  JUNO   2  5.99  19.06  Volvo‐Penta TAMD 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SHTM  LÖFUDDEN  4.48  19.00     Fritidsmotorskepp SMUF  RIVAGE  5.25  19.00  2 Detroit 12V71TI, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SKAY  ÖRING  4.81  18.99  Penta Diesel TMD 96 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SMOU  VENUS AF STOCKHOLM  6.00  18.95  Skandia diesel 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SICQ  NORMANDIA  6.00  18.93  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SKZU  GIT GAY  5.32  18.90  Zaklady Mechaniczne 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRF  TANANGER  6.09  18.87  Vichmann 4 DCT 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SJPD  SVEN  5.06  18.87  Jönköpings Motorf. 5cyl, 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SLJQ  LÄVIK  4.36  18.86  Scania 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SICR  CIRCE  5.04  18.86  GM, 12V 71, 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SETG  CHELONIA  6.00  18.85  Hundersted 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKT  LAPYCOS  4.01  18.83  2st MWM D232 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SKCZ  CHAR MAR  5.85  18.80  2 Rolls‐Royce C8TFL, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SBPW  KASKEN  5.06  18.79  Detroit Diesel V71 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SCPA  LANGESUND  6.01  18.79  Wichman 4 DCT s4 1971  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBQ  MALORCA  5.54  18.78  Scania‐Vabis DSI 10 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SHJB  SILVERSKÄR  6.05  18.78  Cummins diesel NHRS‐6‐M  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIF  LORELEI  4.72  18.71  2 st GM diesel 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SHZC  PIRAYA  4.58  18.70  2 st Volvo TD 96B  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 176: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

170 

 

SHLM  T 18  4.58  18.70  2 Volvo Penta MD 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SLNR  BARRACUDA  4.70  18.70  2 Volvo Penta TMD 96 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SBUQ  MONA  4.86  18.65  Callesen 425DO 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SLRT  TUA  4.93  18.64  Detroit, 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SGDW  ALPHA  5.29  18.63  Scania Vabis D821 1952  Fritidsmotorskepp SFBN  TYRA  4.22  18.54  Bolinder VA40M25, 1952  Fritidsmotorskepp SMPG  ALTANA  6.20  18.53  Volvo Penta TAMD 120 A  Fritidsmotorskepp SHQU  SAMARKAND  5.26  18.51  2 MAN D2840 LE 401, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SDIP  BALOO  5.31  18.51  2 MAN D2840 LE403EDC,2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SBTN  LIBERAE  5.31  18.51  2 Scania DI 14, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SITW  HELGA  5.94  18.50     Fritidsmotorskepp SENI  BORE  4.78  18.49  Saab‐Scania DS11 01MO1 SF  Fritidsmotorskepp SDRN  DANORA  4.94  18.47  2 Volvo D12/700,2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SKGF  GARM  5.73  18.46  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGJ  SASKIA  5.20  18.45  2 Volvo TAMD 71A, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SECU  STORA LE 2  4.41  18.44  Volvo‐Penta MD 96  Fritidsmotorskepp SHZN  DAN WIKING  5.48  18.43  Skandia 285 B  Fritidsmotorskepp SIJG  THUNDER  4.85  18.32     Fritidsmotorskepp SGDY  HAMNERÖ  6.04  18.31  June Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SKPO  DRUMMER  4.80  18.30  MAN D2848,1997 m.fl.  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKA  JENS KRISTIAN  5.18  18.29  DAF BK, 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SJYL  VICTORIA AF BERGSUND  4.12  18.26  Volvo, MD 47 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SDKP  VESIKKO  4.20  18.26  Scania D8, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SHUB  ISBJÖRN AF WISBY  4.64  18.23  Albin G‐62 TK 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SKUB  YRSA  5.04  18.18  Säffle  Fritidsmotorskepp SHTX  VANGUARD  5.80  18.16  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SEGN  ESEA  4.87  18.08  2 Caterpillar C15, 2008  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBL  MERANDA  6.05  18.03  Volvo‐Penta TMD100A 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SGNB  BRÖDERNA  6.03  18.02  Volvo‐Penta TMD 100 6cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 177: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

171 

 

SEHU  TOVE  5.05  18.02  Volvo Penta TMD100 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SFAI  SAMANTA  4.30  18.02  Detroit V71, 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SFCJ  SLÄNDAN  5.84  18.00  Volvo Penta diesel 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SFJP  PINERO  6.02  17.98  June Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SFQJ  PIERINA IV  6.11  17.97  2 Volvo Penta D70 1971  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZT  FRIGG AF STOCKHOLM  4.09  17.97  Scania 1969  Fritidsmotorskepp SHIC  WANGARATTA  6.00  17.92  Albin G 62 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SCLD  AILOS  4.70  17.92  Scania D11, 1971  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVE  SAGALILL  4.44  17.90  Volvo Penta 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SDPR  SEXAN  5.03  17.88  Albin Motor G62 diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SENW  BUNKEROIL  5.77  17.88  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorskepp SGJV  BRANDY  5.79  17.79  Volvo Penta Tmd 120  Fritidsmotorskepp SHQD  TAKE OFF II  4.49  17.75  2 Volvo D‐12, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SKDV  REBEL  4.49  17.75  2 Volvo Penta D12 EVC, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SFGX  VERDANDI  6.15  17.74     Fritidsmotorskepp SEQU  TOP HAT  5.46  17.73  2 Detroit Diesel 6‐7 IN, 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SDGI  ALONA  5.26  17.72  June‐Munktell MB 25 1935  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKZ  AMONA  5.97  17.68  Jönk. Motorf. typ 752  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHG  STROMBOLI  5.78  17.68  Volvo Penta TMD 96 B 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SHGQ  BRITTANA AF STOCKHOLM  6.13  17.68  Albin Motor 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SHBE  JOY ROYAL  4.59  17.68  2 MAN D2848LE420, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHR  BITCHES BREW  4.59  17.68  2 Volvo D12‐715, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SKIL  NORDIC SPIRIT  5.63  17.68  2 Volvo DI2, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWA  BLUE PRINCESS  4.30  17.68  2 Volvo AQAD 31A, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SMEN  KONSTANTIN  5.91  17.68  Mercury 200 EFI, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SKWO  AVA MARIA  4.72  17.67  2 MAN 680, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SJRL  MOBILE LADY  4.72  17.67  2 MAN D2848 LE401, 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SHTP  MATILDA  5.99  17.67  June Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SGAU  FEELING  5.25  17.67  Volvo‐Penta 96B 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 178: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

172 

 

SFBD  MARCONIA  5.95  17.62  Scania‐Vabis 8‐cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp SMVC  INDEPENDENCE  4.56  17.61  2 Volvo Penta TMD50 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SMWX  FARALLON  5.19  17.58  L Gardner & Sons Ltd 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SENU  NIRVANA AF STOCKHOLM  4.90  17.57  Ford Turbo Diesel, 1984  Fritidsmotorskepp SFYV  SUN VIKING III  4.85  17.57  2 Volvo D12‐700 EDC II,01  Fritidsmotorskepp SGQH  CLOUDE NINE  4.85  17.57  2 Volvo D12, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SBQP  BON VIVANT  4.85  17.57  2 Volvo Penta D12‐800, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SGCP  QUEEN MARIMAR  4.85  17.57  VolvoPenta D12‐800, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SCQU  SMULAN AF STOCKSUND  4.85  17.57  2 Volvo D 12 EDC, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SDPV  FRIDHEM  6.00  17.54  Volvo Penta MD 966 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SGMK  GUSTAFSHÖG  4.38  17.49  Diesel GM 2T 6 cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp SEFU  GREPEN  6.62  17.49  Volvo MD 96, 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNP  NINA AF LILJEDAL  4.56  17.48  Caterpillar 3208 TA, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SFWO  TURISTEN  4.40  17.47  Albin Marin G‐6D 1952  Fritidsmotorskepp SMVI  WINGAFJORD  5.97  17.47     Fritidsmotorskepp SHLD  PIA I  4.75  17.41     Fritidsmotorskepp SGFC  CLYFTON  6.02  17.40  Volvo Penta TMD 96B1  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIQ  HAVHELD  4.76  17.37  Wickman AB 60 1944  Fritidsmotorskepp SGJO  FREE FOUR LIFE  4.72  17.37   2 Caterpillar 3196, 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SHDV  FRODE  4.47  17.35  MG‐4 NOHAB 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SFJD  HILLEVI  5.88  17.35  Volvo‐Penta TMD 100 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SDWZ  ZARITZA  6.12  17.34     Fritidsmotorskepp SDOG  MINANDRA  5.00  17.28  Penta diesel D 96 M 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SKWZ  PASS  5.40  17.27  Volvo MD96 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SHOM  FELICIA AF SKUM  5.96  17.25     Fritidsmotorskepp SFYU  TRAFIK  4.77  17.23  Jönköpings Motorf. 1934  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJQ  MELINGSVÅG  4.86  17.23  Gardner 6 L X 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SDUY  SVANLAND  6.00  17.19  Seffle motorv. 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SGQO  JARL  4.23  17.18  Säffle tändkulem. 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 179: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

173 

 

SCMP  MAGNUM  4.83  17.16  2 MTU 8v183 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SMQP  ITAPOA  II  4.60  17.15  2 Volvo MD70 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SHGF  ANITA  6.10  17.15  Seffle 332 FV 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVC  MARTINA  5.80  17.15  Volvo Penta TMD 100 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SGUP  MODIG AV STOCKHOLM  5.12  17.15  Ford diesel 6‐cyl.  Fritidsmotorskepp SHJL  SYDLAND  5.34  17.15  ScaniaVabisDSI11R82SF,84  Fritidsmotorskepp SLZH  FABIOLA  4.83  17.15  2 Volvo Penta D‐12, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SIVK  YASUMI  4.83  17.15  2 VolvoPentaD12‐715, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SINT  LIBERTY YSTAD  5.95  17.14  Scania Vabis DSI‐11‐R80  Fritidsmotorskepp SGVX  INGA‐LILLY  5.70  17.13  Tändkulem. 2LD350 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZF  MARIA II  4.75  17.12  Kromhout TS 117 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBX  FLATGARN  7.04  17.10  Schottel 9/200 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJM  HERA  4.41  17.08  Volvo‐Penta T‐D 96B 1969  Fritidsmotorskepp SLNP  VÅR VIND  4.93  17.07  Hundested Semidiesel, ‐60  Fritidsmotorskepp SFZE  SÄLÖ  5.85  17.05     Fritidsmotorskepp SGKF  LÄPPEN  4.80  17.04  2 Scania DIO 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SJQT  DOVRE  4.30  17.00  Scania d 814 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SBWO  LILO  4.75  17.00  2 MAN D2842 LE423, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SIEW  MEKA  4.92  16.98  Bolinder diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SHXA  BLIXT  4.24  16.98  Mercedes‐Benz MB 836 B6  Fritidsmotorskepp SEPC  PASSAD  4.04  16.97     Fritidsmotorskepp SLVM  GRAND LADY  5.00  16.97  2 Caterpillar 3208, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SGVB  MIMMA  6.02  16.96  Scania DSI 14MO1SF 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SCIH  NEPP LADY  5.10  16.96  2 MAN diesel 12V, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SGBR  HILDA  4.24  16.94  Volvo‐Penta TMD100 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SGRB  GEFION AV STOCKHOLM  4.16  16.94  Volvo Penta TMD 96 B 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWD  RINGHOLM 1  6.20  16.94  Volvo, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SFWT  MONITOR  4.78  16.90  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122  Fritidsmotorskepp SMJW  WALONA AF VÄSTERVIK  6.00  16.89  Volvo Penta 6 cyl 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 180: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

174 

 

SKLF  SAM II  4.45  16.88  Deutz 514 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SKLD  NORMY  6.00  16.85  Scania DSI 11 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SHZX  INGEBORG  6.10  16.85  Volvo Penta TAMD 120,1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SHBO  AIGLE  4.62  16.85  2 Scania DSI14 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SHAM  LORD MANFRED  4.26  16.84  Volvo Penta TAMD 120A  Fritidsmotorskepp SIGB  EKESKÄR  5.73  16.83  Volvo Penta TMD 120 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWZ  LYDIA  5.98  16.82  Volvo Penta TMD100A‐CC 78  Fritidsmotorskepp SHEY  CLIPTON  5.92  16.79  Jönköpings Motorfabrik  Fritidsmotorskepp SGTV  MORE MADNESS  4.60  16.79  2 MAN D2848, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SEVQ  EMIL  4.25  16.78  Bolinder‐Munktell 1951  Fritidsmotorskepp SGYL  BERTINA  5.88  16.77  Hundested diesel 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SJHQ  SYDVIK  5.74  16.75  Scania DS 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGB  INGRID  5.15  16.75     Fritidsmotorskepp SGZC  AMBER AF UDDEVALLA  4.65  16.73  2VolvoTAMD122P EDC,‐00  Fritidsmotorskepp SMKZ  JOY AV LANDSKRONA  4.65  16.73  2VolvoPentaTAMD122PEDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SDIV  CALIBUR  5.15  16.73  DAF 575, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SKHV  RIM  4.30  16.71  AB Penta TMD 96 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SERC  CORIOLA  5.91  16.71     Fritidsmotorskepp SHXF  BLIDA  4.05  16.70  Perkins Diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWQ  GJÖA  5.15  16.70  Scania 642 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SKBF  AMBER MOON  5.79  16.70  2 Detroit Diesel V6,1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SEMD  BJÖRN III  4.74  16.67     Fritidsmotorskepp SMZW  OTTERÖN  6.10  16.67  Volvo Penta MD96 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SEQZ  CHRISTIN  6.00  16.65  Albin diesel 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SKZY  AVONTUUR  5.35  16.64  2 Detroit Diesel, 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SFYD  TELLO  4.04  16.63  Volvo Penta MD 96 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SCGY  RAN OF STENKULLA  4.50  16.62  2 Cummins NTA855 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJM  MUNKTELL  6.11  16.61  Bolinder  Fritidsmotorskepp SHLO  RAGNA  6.00  16.60     Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 181: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

175 

 

SEMY  ASTOR  6.09  16.60  Volvo Penta TAMD100 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SLKE  ARVE  4.05  16.59  Scania DSI 11 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SJUQ  ERNST  4.41  16.58  Volvo Penta TMD 96 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SGFB  MEGASEA  4.79  16.56     Fritidsmotorskepp SBAU  CHIARA DI SALTSJÖBADEN  4.70  16.55  2 MAN ASD 12L, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SJLK  ÄRNA  6.05  16.54     Fritidsmotorskepp SMVY  VAGABOND  4.70  16.54  Scania DSI11R82 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SKER  CASITA  4.88  16.52  2 Caterpillar 3126B, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SEYV  VÄDERÖ  5.80  16.48     Fritidsmotorskepp SFCP  ELSA  6.10  16.48  Volvo‐Penta TD96 6‐cyl,65  Fritidsmotorskepp SFTZ  CALMA  5.82  16.48  Säffle Semidiesel 332FV  Fritidsmotorskepp SHEW  KAMA  4.62  16.48     Fritidsmotorskepp SING  ALMA  5.10  16.48  Ford NG 4 2712 E 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SDOC  KASKELOT  4.47  16.47  Volvo‐Penta TMD100AK,‐71  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNA  TORSTEN  4.39  16.46  Crossley ESLA 1949  Fritidsmotorskepp SIFE  NAIMA  6.04  16.45  Skandia 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SHXM  ELLA AV KNIPPLA  5.83  16.45  Skandia tändkulemotor  Fritidsmotorskepp SKOT  ÖRNEN  4.39  16.44  Lundby MV comp.ångmaskin, 1903  Fritidsmotorskepp SGYJ  PRÅM 1820  6.15  16.44  Suzuki  Fritidsmotorskepp SFZT  HAPPY HOUR  4.78  16.43  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71A  Fritidsmotorskepp SCFM  EMANUELLA  4.78  16.43  Volvo TAMD 122D 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBCL  MADAME II  4.78  16.43  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71,1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SHNB  LOU PARADOU  4.27  16.39  2 Mercedes  Fritidsmotorskepp SJOM  ROLF  4.40  16.38  Seffle Semidiesel 1949  Fritidsmotorskepp SILE  LINNEA  6.08  16.38     Fritidsmotorskepp SFJW  HOLMÖ  5.72  16.36  Volvo Penta TMD96B 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SGMX  MANNE  4.22  16.36  Volvo‐Penta MD 67A 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SFUB  KAREN MARIE  4.24  16.35  Tuxham Typ M.e.1 nr 2304  Fritidsmotorskepp SCPE  SANCERRE AV GÖTEBORG  4.89  16.35  Volvo TAMD31S, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 182: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

176 

 

SFJB  SONETTE  4.57  16.34  Volvo Penta D12, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SMDI  DAGA  6.00  16.34     Fritidsmotorskepp SBQD  VITTFARI  4.59  16.33  2st Volvo Penta D12,2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SHAZ  ULRIKA VIII WERMDÖ  4.59  16.33  2 Volvo Penta D12‐700,02  Fritidsmotorskepp SICY  VIA NOVA AF STOCKHOLM  4.59  16.33     Fritidsmotorskepp SIFN  NOT FOR SAIL  4.59  16.33  2 Scania D 12, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SGXJ  KIARA  4.59  16.33  2 Volvo D12, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SBME  VICTORIA I  4.27  16.32  2VolvoPenta D12C‐A,2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SGKY  MALOO  4.68  16.31  Caterpillar 3196, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SBTC  SOVEREIGN II  4.78  16.30  2 Volvo TAMD 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBWZ  DIKMAR  4.56  16.30  DAF diesel DS 575 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SFTB  LENNART  4.27  16.29  Scania‐Vabis DSI 10R80, 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SEXF  BRISHAV  6.04  16.26  Volvo Penta TAMD 120AK  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRG  EMELIE AF STOCKHOLM  5.80  16.26  Penta MD 47 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SKBW  JIDELCHA  4.82  16.26  2 Iweco 8281 SRM07  Fritidsmotorskepp SFUY  EMMA BUSY II  4.57  16.26  2 Volvo D12‐800  Fritidsmotorskepp SEAM  VICTORIA SOFIE  4.53  16.25  Tuxham, 1956  Fritidsmotorskepp SEIU  SNOBBEN  4.20  16.25  GM 6cyl diesel 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SEYI  RIVÖFJORD  5.96  16.24  Volvo Penta TD‐100  Fritidsmotorskepp SHYO  NOVA AURORA  4.80  16.21  2 Volvo TAMD 122D, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SIVN  RENDEZ‐VOUS  4.80  16.21  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122  Fritidsmotorskepp SBDR  GO II  4.80  16.21  2 Volvo 122, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SBYO  MELODY AF BJÖRSUND  4.80  16.21  2 Caterpillar, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SKDH  BYBLOS  4.82  16.18  2 Detroit 8V71TI 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRQ  SYMBOL I  4.96  16.18  2 TAMD 71B 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SKXH  HEDVIG  4.21  16.18     Fritidsmotorskepp SJFG  JEAN  4.80  16.17  2 Caterpillar 3208 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SJYH  CORNELIA AF UMEÅ  4.80  16.17  2 Caterpillar, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKO  FANTASY AF WAXHOLM  4.80  16.17  2 Volvo TAMD 122D, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 183: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

177 

 

SDTL  RAMSKÄR  5.71  16.16  Säffle  Fritidsmotorskepp SLHB  LISNEA  5.12  16.15  Scania DSI14 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SLCF  BOOMERANG  4.30  16.12  Volvo TD 50 A 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SELJ  ANNE MON  5.96  16.11  Detroit 110 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SFDL  VINDIA II  4.88  16.11  Yanmar 4JH36‐HTBE, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SKYZ  ENDLESS SUMMER  4.88  16.11  Yanmar Diesel, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SGLA  STYRBJÖRN ÖRSUNDSBRO  4.08  16.10  2 Scania Vabis 814D 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SJED  JUM  4.46  16.05  Atlas Polar M46EF  Fritidsmotorskepp SDVC  TVÅ BRÖDER  5.60  16.04  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SLOX  BENE MERITUS  4.45  16.02  2 Volvo D12‐800, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SMNK  DEEP PURPLE  4.45  16.02  2 Volvo D12‐800, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SLVB  BOXÖ  6.04  15.98  Scania‐Vabis D11‐C07 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SBJN  TANT PRUSELIUS  4.70  15.97  Scania DSII 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SCVB  CHIHIRO  4.60  15.94     Fritidsmotorskepp SHOJ  MAGNA  4.62  15.89  2 MAN D2840  Fritidsmotorskepp SKMF  BYLGIA  4.07  15.89  Volvo‐Penta MD67C 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SLQT  ERHOLMEN  5.39  15.87  B & W Alpha 343V 1953  Fritidsmotorskepp SMOZ  RÖDE ORM  6.15  15.84  Volvo AQ271C/DP290A 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SGHO  MAUD  4.52  15.83  Leyland 2T/SW680/197, ‐87  Fritidsmotorskepp SKAQ  ESAB  IV  4.00  15.81  Volvo‐Penta TMD 100 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SDLX  ROMANCE  4.40  15.80  2 Volvo TAMD 122D, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SBTZ  SIGNE AV SKAFTÖ  4.43  15.79  2 Caterpillar 3208 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SLYV  BORN FREE  4.74  15.78  2 st Volvo Penta TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp SFBA  MARICHA AF STOCKHOLM  4.74  15.78  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SMUQ  WAIT AND SEE  4.30  15.77  2 Volvo TAMD 122 P, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SHQY  ROYAL BLUE  4.30  15.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD122PEDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBF  CONTIKI  4.63  15.75  2 Volvo TAMD 122 Diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SDVA  QUEEN ELIZABETH III  4.63  15.75  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122  Fritidsmotorskepp SDGE  EXCALIBUR II  4.63  15.75  2 Volvo Penta TAMD122 ‐92  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 184: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

178 

 

SJZY  SUSSIE II  4.66  15.75  Volvo Penta D70B/750 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SKYP  CRANCHI  4.40  15.75  2xVolvo Penta D9, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SMXU  GALATEA  5.90  15.74  Skandia tändkula 1945  Fritidsmotorskepp SIMP  MIDNIGHT DREAM  4.26  15.73  2 VolvoD12 800EVC,2006  Fritidsmotorskepp SEHO  MINAS TIRITH  4.26  15.73  2 Volvo D12 800 EVC  Fritidsmotorskepp SLYF  CAMPDEN LADY  4.55  15.72  2 Volvo TAMD 122 P EDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SFQW  SAWAN II  4.55  15.72  2 Volvo D12, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SDVP  IZA MARIE  4.55  15.72  Volvo D12, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SEIK  OLIVIA  6.07  15.72     Fritidsmotorskepp SDKV  FLORISSE  4.60  15.67  2 Volvo Penta TAMD122D 90  Fritidsmotorskepp SEMZ  ASTREA  6.09  15.64     Fritidsmotorskepp SFRY  ST. JORAN  4.88  15.62  2 Volvo 121C, 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SGMI  MARY JOSEFINA  5.72  15.61  Scania Vabis DSI 11 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SEIT  MÄRSGARN  5.09  15.58  Scania DSI11, 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SGMT  SJU NOLL TRE  5.09  15.58  Scania DS 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SJWC  JULIET AV STOCKHOLM  4.80  15.58     Fritidsmotorskepp SFDQ  XANTé  5.90  15.56  Volvo Penta diesel 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SLOZ  HATTIE BEAU  4.63  15.54  VolvoPenta TAMD12PEDC,‐99  Fritidsmotorskepp SHBI  SHAMAL  4.63  15.54     Fritidsmotorskepp SHKL  THOR AF DJURGÅRDEN  4.63  15.54  2 Caterpillar  Fritidsmotorskepp SKUV  SIAM AF HÄLSÖ  4.38  15.52     Fritidsmotorskepp SGQX  INGER AF GRAVARNE  5.75  15.52  Scania DIO RO1 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SHBA  CAMPARI  5.75  15.50  Scania 640/0611 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SGIA  DAISY AV MARSTRAND  4.43  15.50  2VolvoPentaTAMD122P,2000  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SDIW FISKETÅNGEN AF SUNNINGEN  4.43  15.50  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122‐99  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SCNV  WILA  4.43  15.50  2 Volvo Penta TAMD122PEDC,1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SEQC  CARITA  5.65  15.48  Scania Vabis D11R26  Fritidsmotorskepp SDUQ  STELLA MARIES  5.20  15.47  Skandia tändkule  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 185: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

179 

 

SJFT  TRUBBNOS  4.58  15.46  Volvo MD 96, 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SINW  IGEN  4.20  15.46  Ford 330 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SLKO  ZELONA  4.62  15.44  Volvo Penta TMD‐96 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SHAW  STUFVAREN I  4.16  15.44  Cummins NTCE 365, 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIP  NORDHAV  4.50  15.44  NORMO 71 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SLRU  GOTHIA  4.64  15.43  Volvo Penta MD 96 B 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SFPZ  CASSANDRA  4.44  15.43  2 Catepillar 3196, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SKIW  DYNAMIC ONE  4.44  15.43  2 MAN D 2876, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SDUA  KARIN AV RINDÖ  4.60  15.42  Volvo Penta TMD 100  Fritidsmotorskepp SHGR  PAMELA E‐SON EDWARDS  5.80  15.41  Albin G‐62 T  Fritidsmotorskepp SMNU  YEMANJA II  4.61  15.41  2 Volvo D‐9 500i, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SIMJ  ÄLVAN  4.60  15.40  Volvo Penta MD100  Fritidsmotorskepp SHJF  SEASONG  4.54  15.39  2 Man V10, 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SJZP  JUVELEN  5.80  15.39  Volvo‐Penta TMD 120  Fritidsmotorskepp SFWN  ROSPIGGEN AF STOCKHOLM 4.54  15.35  Volvo Penta MD 100  Fritidsmotorskepp SLXZ  KESS  4.96  15.35  Gardner diesel 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGD  MARCONY  4.54  15.35  Volvo TMD 96, 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SFLN  MARITA AV SORUNDA  5.71  15.32  Volvo Penta D‐96 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKC  MEVIND  6.03  15.32  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SKYL  VON ARX  4.13  15.30  Volvo MD96 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SBLZ  SUNSET BLVD.  4.47  15.30  2VolvoPenta TAMD122P,96  Fritidsmotorskepp SCLH  LASATA  4.59  15.30  2 Volvo TAMD122, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SKVU  DROTTNING ESTER  4.47  15.30  2 Volvo 122 EDC 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SJQR  LIANA  5.83  15.28  Volvo MD 96  Fritidsmotorskepp SGEP  ELLA  5.80  15.27  Caterpillar  Fritidsmotorskepp SHFZ  ALFEN  4.20  15.25  Volvo‐Penta TMD 96 B1  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWK  PRINCESS MISTY  4.38  15.24  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72 ‐94  Fritidsmotorskepp SDIF  PIRI‐PIRI  4.38  15.24  Catepillar 3708, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SLOF  CHAPTER IV  4.60  15.24  2 VolvoPenta TAMD122D,‐91  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 186: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

180 

 

SGRI  DAISY AV KARLSTAD  5.98  15.23  Volvo D 96 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SGTM  KVICK  4.44  15.23  AB Bolinder‐Munktell 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SCRP  CHIVIVA  4.62  15.23  2 Caterpillar 3208 TA  Fritidsmotorskepp SEOC  BILLY  6.15  15.21     Fritidsmotorskepp SJYN  LELIE  4.95  15.21  Volvo Penta TMD 100 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SHAJ  SPLENDID  4.72  15.20  Volvo Penta TAMD31A 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJF  KULING  4.06  15.20  Scania D640 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SFAM  LINDA IV LIMHAMN  4.44  15.20  2 Volvo Penta D12 715 EVC, 2006   Fritidsmotorskepp SKVL  SHARK AF STOCKHOLM  4.47  15.19  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122 D  Fritidsmotorskepp SKJL  DOLLY  5.85  15.19  Volvo‐Penta MD 96 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SFOV  LEIA II  4.30  15.16  2 Volvo D12, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SFMU  NOBLESS II  4.63  15.15  Volvo Penta MD96B  Fritidsmotorskepp SFXN  JYLLAND  4.35  15.14  Hundestedt semidiesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SBYA  ANN‐CHARLOTTE  4.63  15.13  2 Volvo Penta TAMD122  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVY  ZENITA AF STOCKHOLM  5.70  15.13  Penta Diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SDXH  ZESTFUL  4.38  15.13  2 VolvoPentaTAMD73PEDC,98  Fritidsmotorskepp SGEV  DANDY SCOTT  4.38  15.13  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 73P, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SENO  EBERON  4.63  15.12  GM serie 71 1947  Fritidsmotorskepp SMUW  LIVIA  4.95  15.12  Modag 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SMLV  PARAGON  4.18  15.11  Volvo Penta AQAD 41 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SDKZ  SNAPPER  5.86  15.11  Volvo‐Penta MD 96 B  Fritidsmotorskepp SBJX  ANNA‐SOFIA  4.27  15.10  Mercedes Diesel 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SCGZ  JATEKA  4.47  15.10  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122 D  Fritidsmotorskepp SCHW  JASMINE II  4.47  15.10  2 VP TAMD 122D 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SCLY  VERONICA STOCKHOLM  4.47  15.10  2 Volvo Penta 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SGAE  ROYAL GRACE  4.47  15.10  2 MAN D2840 LX V10 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SCVZ  ALBATROSS AF RATAN  4.88  15.10  Scania D11 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SGXD  LASTRINA  4.47  15.10  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122D  Fritidsmotorskepp SHCT  MARKISINNAN AF SJUHALLA  4.47  15.10  2 MAN V10, 1991/92  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 187: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

181 

 

SMCA  PAPILLON AF SKÄRHAMN  4.60  15.08  2 VolvoPentaTAMD71A, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SKDI  GREY LADY  4.60  15.08  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SKWY  MADONNA  4.92  15.07  Volvo D47B, F82 1960/1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SEBW  REANA  5.04  15.06  Volvo Penta 6 cyl 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SJHR  CLARA STENUNGSUND  4.60  15.06  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122D  Fritidsmotorskepp SCDX  JUST THE BUSINESS  4.60  15.06  2Volvo Penta TAMD 71A,‐88  Fritidsmotorskepp SMKV  HOT ICE  4.60  15.06  2VolvoPenta TAMD122D,‐90  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIN  FANNY  4.24  15.03  Volvo Penta TMD96B1  Fritidsmotorskepp SCIE  ONDINA  4.58  15.01  2 Volvo TAMD 71 B 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SJHY  FISKMÅSEN SMÖGEN  5.77  15.00  Penta MDF6  Fritidsmotorskepp SDIE  KTHANGA  5.98  14.99  Ford Marin 2715 E 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SCHZ  ÖSTERÖ  4.80  14.99  Volvo‐Penta TAMD 120  Fritidsmotorskepp SCMN  SHEHERAZADE  4.30  14.99  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp SFDP  KRISTINA AF VÅRBY  4.65  14.99  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SLER  SPICE TOO  4.53  14.98  2 Volvo D2‐55 c, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SLAY  MAGDA  5.55  14.97  Säffle 227 FV 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SJHN  EURICA  5.58  14.94  Albin G‐01 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBZ  QUEEN OF SHEEBA  4.40  14.94  2 Volvo Penta D12‐715, 2008  Fritidsmotorskepp SMIA  MISS SOPHIE  4.36  14.93  2 Caterpillar Diesel,1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SCNK  LA PETITE II  4.55  14.92  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 718  Fritidsmotorskepp SCIG  CHOISIE  4.55  14.92  2 Volvo TAMD71B 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SFUM  PAX  4.63  14.91     Fritidsmotorskepp SDQB  GUN  5.43  14.91  Scania D 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHJ  SJÖGREI  5.30  14.88  Scania DIO RO1 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SEUA  LA MER  4.60  14.84  Ford 380 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SEPX  BLUE O WHITE  4.63  14.83  GM‐diesel 3 cyl  Fritidsmotorskepp SLEZ  MYKA  4.47  14.83  Volvo DP‐575, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SHMG  SIRU‐AVE  4.47  14.83  2 Volvo D12‐675, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRV  MOONLIGHT II  4.47  14.83  2VolvoPentaTAMD74, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 188: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

182 

 

SGUQ  SUNNY  4.47  14.83  2 Volvo Penta D12, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SJWL  PRINCESS OF LAGOON  4.47  14.83  2 Volvo TAMD 74P EDC,2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SLHI  XANTIPPA  4.47  14.83  2 Volvo D12, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SMTD  ALL TINA  4.47  14.83  2 VolvoPentaD12 675, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SLNM  JOOS  4.45  14.81     Fritidsmotorskepp SEHW  UTE  4.22  14.80  2 Volvo 72A, 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SCJP  AQUILA  4.72  14.80  2 Caterpillar 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SDBM  MARY AV GÖTEBORG  4.51  14.79  Bolinder 1959  Fritidsmotorskepp SJWF  AGDA  5.96  14.79  Bolinder‐Munktell 1936  Fritidsmotorskepp SGRD  HEIMDAL  4.83  14.76  Volvo Penta TMD96B1 1968  Fritidsmotorskepp SDWP  VIRGINIA  5.90  14.76  Skania diesel 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SEUT  ARIANA  4.50  14.75  2 Caterpillar 3208 TAS  Fritidsmotorskepp SKBP  GABRIELLE  4.71  14.75  2 Caterpillar 3208Ti 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SKGL  FRAMÅT  5.52  14.73  Albin diesel G 62 TK 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBI  AMICA  4.22  14.71  2 Cummins VT 903, 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBV  FAR NIENTE  4.24  14.70  2 MTU 6R 183 TE93, 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKR  OCTOPUSSY  4.54  14.69  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71  Fritidsmotorskepp SDMJ  BANCO  5.65  14.67  June Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SKJB  ESTER  5.80  14.66  Scania‐Vabis D‐644  Fritidsmotorskepp SHUL  LAGUN AV LULEÅ  4.65  14.64  Scania DS11, 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SGRW  JUDIT  5.83  14.61  Scania Vabis DSI 11, 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SEWC  BELE  5.77  14.61  Caterpillar  Fritidsmotorskepp SCXY  FJORD  4.90  14.61  Volvo TAMD120B, 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SIWL  LA GITT  5.56  14.58     Fritidsmotorskepp SFON  WESTVIND AF GÖTEBORG  5.64  14.58  Volvo‐Penta MD 100, 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SLGQ  BEMA  4.36  14.55  2 Volvo Penta KAD75,‐04  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFK  CYTHERA  4.36  14.55  2 VolvoPenta TAMD75,2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SHUW  VIRGO II  5.85  14.54     Fritidsmotorskepp SLZK  JIROCA  4.66  14.52  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 189: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

183 

 

SBDJ  MISSLOPER  4.02  14.47  2 Volvo TAMD 75, 2003  Fritidsmotorskepp SJDW  FREEDOM OF VÄRMDÖ  4.38  14.47  2VolvoPentaTAMD72PEDC,96  Fritidsmotorskepp SLNA  SOL Y MAR  4.47  14.47  2 Volvo TAMD122, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SLNW  MIDNIGHT SUN  4.47  14.47  Volvo 122D, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SBWY  ARION  4.91  14.45  2 Volvo 122 TAD 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SDUT  DINA AF SOLVIK  5.55  14.45  Albin G 41 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SKRN  FÅGELN  5.60  14.45  Albin G‐61 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJB  ANELIDA  4.64  14.42  2 Ford Marine NG 4 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SGDI  LISS  4.63  14.41  Volvo Penta MD 96 B  Fritidsmotorskepp SJGN  REGINA  4.26  14.41  Scania D 814 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SHXV  MONTANA  5.70  14.40     Fritidsmotorskepp SDEB  QUARTETTO  4.30  14.40  2 Cummins 6BTAS 9‐MI  Fritidsmotorskepp SCLZ  KERSTIN HALMSTAD  4.49  14.37     Fritidsmotorskepp SCRW  MERLION  4.54  14.37  Twin Caterpillar 3208T  Fritidsmotorskepp SDEF  SEA LADY  4.05  14.36  2 John Deere 6404DF 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SHPC  VÄSTKUSTEN  5.33  14.36  Säffle 322 Fv  Fritidsmotorskepp SHOG  RUNE  4.92  14.35  Volvo Penta MD67A 1950  Fritidsmotorskepp SINK  HANNAH AF KARLSHILL  4.02  14.35  2 Volvo D9 575 EVC, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp SGAC  VÅGASKÄR  4.02  14.35  2 Volvo D9, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKI  CAPTAIN TOM CORLEY  4.31  14.35  2 Cummins 6BTA5.9‐M2, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SHGA  SANS SAIL  4.50  14.35  2 Caterpillar 3208 TA, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNO  SUSPICIOUS  4.35  14.34  Caterpillar SB, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBMV  SURPRISE  4.35  14.34  2 Caterpillar 3208,‐90  Fritidsmotorskepp SEPV  BLÅVALEN  4.76  14.34  Penta 6cyl diesel 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SDLZ  UNITED DREAM  4.35  14.32  2 Cummins 3208, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBUJ  LADY KERI  4.27  14.32  2 Caterpillar 3116, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SFHL  VIRGO  5.33  14.31  Penta  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SJXI HELGOLAND AF HUMMELVIK  5.56  14.31  Säffle, 1921  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 190: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

184 

 

    SHQI  TIARA  4.47  14.28 Fritidsmotorskepp SJTZ  DYKBÅT 1309  4.25  14.28  Volvo MD 70 C, 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SHNE  SANDÖ AF STOCKHOLM  5.58  14.27  Scania D 624  Fritidsmotorskepp SEGI  CONTESSA  4.63  14.26  2 st Scania DS I 11  Fritidsmotorskepp SBUH  RAMI  4.75  14.25  Volvo TMD100  Fritidsmotorskepp SJQA  SAWAN  4.22  14.25  2 Volvo TAMD 73P, 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SJGD  TRULSA  4.22  14.25  2 Volvo Penta TAMD EDC 98  Fritidsmotorskepp SEYT  ANGI  4.22  14.25  2 VP TAMD73 PEDC, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SGRT  STRÖMMING  4.80  14.25  2 Cummins QSC83, 2008  Fritidsmotorskepp SHVA  JENNA  4.22  14.25  2 Volvo Penta TAMD73,1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SMDG  SEA STAR  4.65  14.24  Scania DS11 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SMTJ  MARIMA  4.28  14.21  2 Scania DS 11R 80  Fritidsmotorskepp SMKL  COMPASS ROSE  4.40  14.20  2 Volvo Penta TMD 70AB  Fritidsmotorskepp SLEQ  SIC  4.20  14.20  Volvo Penta MD 70 B  Fritidsmotorskepp SFTD  LINA  4.68  14.20  Normo T 2‐8017 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKB  EMILY AF MUSKÖ  4.96  14.20  Scania Vabis  Fritidsmotorskepp SJMX  SEACEROON  4.50  14.19  2 st SABRE FH 420 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SJWK  CINDY  4.14  14.18  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorskepp SCPI  JALIBA  4.29  14.18  Yanmar 4JH3‐HTE, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SFIN  LORELEI II  4.07  14.17  2 Scania D634/D645  Fritidsmotorskepp SJHC  MISS PATRICIA  4.40  14.14  2 st GM 8 V 71 TI  Fritidsmotorskepp SEDR  KRAKA AF GRÄNNA  4.20  14.14  2 Volvo TAMD 74, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SGJK  WILMA OF SWEDEN  4.40  14.14  2 Detroit Diesel GM8V71T1  Fritidsmotorskepp SHZQ  FRANSESCA  4.20  14.14  2 Volvo Penta TAMD74,2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SBZF  INDRA  4.04  14.12  2 Caterpillar 3208TA  Fritidsmotorskepp SKCO  MY WAY  4.79  14.11  Scania D10R80 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SCQY  GREAT ESCAPE  4.27  14.11  2 Volvo TAMD, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SFIY  GISELLE  4.14  14.10  2 VolvoPentaTAMD74PEDC,01  Fritidsmotorskepp SIKH  CATHARINA II  4.64  14.10  2 MAN D 2566 MTE, 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 191: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

185 

 

    SHIE  MAJA  5.68  14.10 Fritidsmotorskepp SMPC  GRIPEN AF SÖDERTÖRN  4.88  14.09  Scania DS11 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SBAJ  RATZEPUTS  4.36  14.08  2 Caterpillar 3208TA 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SJYG  HELFRID  5.60  14.08  Perkins V8 51OM, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SIEH  TAPASYA  4.42  14.07  2 Caterpillar 3116TA 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SHUM  VIKING  5.65  14.06     Fritidsmotorskepp SDQZ  LISÖ  5.69  14.05  Volvo TD 96 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SBQG  MECA V  4.47  14.05  Volvo Penta TAMD 122 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKH  VIA NOVA  4.47  14.05  2 Volvo TAMD71A 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SBDL  DUCHESSE  4.47  14.05  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 122  Fritidsmotorskepp SMAJ  MIRAMAR  4.47  14.05  2 Volvo‐Penta TAMD 71A  Fritidsmotorskepp SJPY  MAINSTAR  4.60  14.05  2 Volvo 122C, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SJYD  BROSUN  4.18  14.05  2st VolvoPenta TAMD74PEDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SBIV  LA STRAVAGANZA  4.18  14.05  2 Volvo Penta 74P‐EDC,03  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBR  ZIGLET  4.34  14.03  2 Cummins VT8 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SIKP  WILMA  5.80  14.03     Fritidsmotorskepp SLXR  DOLLYETTE  5.94  14.02  Scania Vabis DS 10 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNG  RIVIERA AF LIDINGÖ  4.27  14.02  2 Caterpillar 3208TA 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SMEJ  DUNDRET  4.32  14.02  2 Volvo TAMD 74p EDC 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SIQW  JOSEPHINE AV HÅTÖ  4.32  14.02  2 x Volvo TAMD74PEDC 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SFWX  BRILLIANT  4.32  14.02  2 Volvo TAMD 74,2001  Fritidsmotorskepp SGKU  BARBARA J  4.32  14.02  2 Ford Sabre 6D380, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SJZK  PHANTOM 46  4.32  14.02  2 Volvo TAMD75P, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SIDH  NATALIE  4.24  14.00  2 x Cummins, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SCUY  SVARTKLUBBEN  4.46  14.00  Volvo TMD 120A, 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SFMW  BEATRICE  4.34  14.00  Bedford 330, 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SHEB  RAPALLO  4.24  14.00  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SLDR  BRITT‐G  4.50  14.00  2 Perkins T 6 354M 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SGYB  LILIAN  4.11  14.00  Ford Tempest diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 192: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

186 

 

SLKG  MÄRTA  5.85  14.00  Volvo Penta diesel 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIY  FERDINAND  4.31  13.99  Säffle 217 BF 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFW  LA RITA  4.50  13.99  Caterpillar 3208 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SMIY  BISCAYA AV VINDALSÖ  4.10  13.99  Volvo Penta MD21A, 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIL  NIO  5.84  13.98  June‐Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SMIV  ARIANA AV EKERÖ  4.37  13.96  2 Volvo TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJU  MISH MASH  4.18  13.95  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SHDY  ZENOBIA  5.65  13.95  Volvo‐Penta TAMD70B 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SDVL  VALE  5.60  13.94  Volvo turbodiesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SFKR  LISELOTT  5.43  13.91  Volvo Penta MD 96 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SGLT  ORCA AF LIMHAMN  4.42  13.91  2 Detroit Dies 4‐53N, ‐77  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SGAD ALBATROSS AV KÖPMANHOLMEN  4.90  13.90  Volvo TMD 96, 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SDTZ  SAGA  4.76  13.89  Volvo Penta MD96 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SHQW  SVEALAND AF STOCKHOLM  5.24  13.89  Scania Vabis D 10, 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVO  LA PALOMA  4.32  13.84     Fritidsmotorskepp SLPQ  PASSION TWO III  4.35  13.84  2 Caterpillar 3126 TA,96  Fritidsmotorskepp SHPE  SO‐LONG II  5.60  13.82     Fritidsmotorskepp SLAO  ERICA  4.24  13.82  Detroit Diesel LD 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SGIR  TWINS CREW  4.55  13.82  2 Hino US Marine Diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SMLB  MADAM AF PITEÅ  4.55  13.82  US Marine diesel 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNJ  JENNIE II AF GREBBESTAD  4.55  13.82  2 HINO EN700 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRN  NANO  4.55  13.82  2 Hino 6‐393TJ 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SHOE  LADY CHRISTINA  4.22  13.81  2 Volvo TAMD72P EDC, 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SMOA  CARPE DIEM II  4.22  13.81  2 Volvo TAMD 74, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRO  GLAMOUR  4.22  13.81  2 Volvo TAMD 72 P, 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SBOW  TROUBLE‐SHOOTER  4.22  13.81  2 Volvo TAMD 72,1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SBNZ  MISS FLEXI  4.22  13.81  2VolvoPentaTAMD72EDC,‐96  Fritidsmotorskepp SKMP  CHOJAMARU III  4.14  13.78  2 st Scania, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 193: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

187 

 

SLDO  GILDA VI  4.14  13.78  2 Scania D19 59M, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SBWI  EMOS  4.14  13.78  2 Scania D19, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SIFJ  YVONNE  4.27  13.77  2 Cummins 6BTA5.9, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SHQE  ELINOR V  4.12  13.75  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 63P  Fritidsmotorskepp SIFU  ADELE AV SALTSJÖBADEN  4.22  13.75  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SCFQ  GRETAS TORP  4.55  13.73  2 Marine EH700 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SLCP  Q‐RAGE  4.55  13.73  2 Heino, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SHTD  SCORPION  4.55  13.73  2 Hino, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SCNU  SCANDINAVIAN QUEEN  4.55  13.73  2 HINO, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SBPL  COXTOLSTOJ  4.34  13.72  2 Caterpillar 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SDMX  LIZZIE AV DONSÖ  5.87  13.72  Scania Vabis diesel 1972  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNT  ERLY  5.55  13.70     Fritidsmotorskepp SBKN  THE QUEEN OF OAXEN  4.30  13.68  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SMDH  NOX  4.68  13.68  2 Caterpillar 3208 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SCEV  KOSTER EXPRESS  4.33  13.68  2 Volvo 70E, 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SIKL  ERIANHE  4.05  13.67  Volvo D2‐55, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SHOZ  FALKVÅG  4.84  13.67  Volvo Penta TAMD 121 C,1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SLRV  HANNA  4.12  13.65  2 Volvo‐Penta TMD‐40  Fritidsmotorskepp SCVA  AEOLUS  4.26  13.65  2 Volvo MD 70, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SCJO  EVELINE  4.19  13.64  Volvo D2‐55, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SJQX  RIVALEN  4.15  13.63  2 Cummins 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SFKC  MAYA PIRAYA  4.32  13.62  2 Caterpillar V8 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SIPO  SANTO DOMINGO  4.30  13.60  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SGCO  POSIDONKEN  4.68  13.60  Ford 2704ET 1981  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWX  PRINCESS LIZYMAR  4.30  13.60  2 Volvo TAMD 70 E 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SBQA  MOONLIGHT  4.30  13.60  2 Caterpillar 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SMDY  PIRR V  4.30  13.60  2 Volvo Penta TAMD70 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SEQT LA DOLCE VITA AF ÖSTERÅKER  4.30  13.60  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 194: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

188 

 

SMKF  SOPHIA AF VIDEBERG  4.36  13.59  Volvo TMD 100 1971  Fritidsmotorskepp SEAK  MISS ELLE  4.22  13.59  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBL  LADY BLISS  4.04  13.58  2 Volvo TAMD 60  Fritidsmotorskepp SIYU  CAVA  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo 71A, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBI  SASCHA  4.30  13.58  2Caterpillar 3208,1990/95  Fritidsmotorskepp SGFZ  SAFIR AF KÖPING  4.33  13.58  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 70  Fritidsmotorskepp SLEW  MARIANNA III  4.30  13.58  2 Caterpillar 3208,1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJE  JUMOTI  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo TAMD71A,1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SLOH  PITZY DEE  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo, 1984  Fritidsmotorskepp SCEW  DREAM OF THE SUN  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo TAMD71A, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIV  MIDAH  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo TAMD 61 A, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SDUV  SALADAENG  4.04  13.58  2 Volvo TAMD 71B, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SMFO  QUINNA OF SWEDEN  4.30  13.58  Volvo Penta TAMD 70E 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SLZM  MISTRESS  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71A  Fritidsmotorskepp SMAK  BLUE HEAVEN  4.30  13.58  Volvo Penta TAMD61 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SLIG  JAZZ III  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo Penta TAMD70E,‐85  Fritidsmotorskepp SCMZ  INDUS  4.52  13.58  Volvo Penta TMD96 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SBVJ  PACIFIQUE  4.30  13.58  Caterpillar 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBWG  CARPE DIEM AF LOMMA  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo‐Penta TMD70C 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SENT  CAPRICE AF HÖGANÄS  4.04  13.58  2 Volvo TAMD61 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SLAR  CELINE AF TROSA  4.30  13.58  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 70E  Fritidsmotorskepp SFJC  SELENE  4.07  13.57  Ford E 2715 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SKBR  BLUE BIRD  5.08  13.55  Scania D 10R80 1961  Fritidsmotorskepp SBOQ  VITANA  5.35  13.55  Volvo Penta MD47 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SEAD  AJA II  4.96  13.54  Volvo Penta MD 96 1957  Fritidsmotorskepp SCGV  SAYONARA CAPRI  4.54  13.53  2 Detroit Diesel, 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SDRC  LÄRKAN  5.45  13.51  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorskepp SDFG  ALBATROSS  5.56  13.51  Bolinder‐Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SDWB  LILL SNURK  5.61  13.50     Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 195: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

189 

 

SCQF  BALDERSON  7.43  13.50  2Volvo AQD70B/750,1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SBLJ  CUCUSINA  4.20  13.50  2 Volvo TAMD 74  Fritidsmotorskepp SKLA  NINTI  4.44  13.48  Scania 6 cyl diesel 1949  Fritidsmotorskepp SMFG  PORFIN  4.40  13.46  2 Caterpillar 3208,1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SMWD  OTIUM  4.35  13.44  2 Ford Lehman, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SFQZ  WINDY  5.60  13.44  Albin G‐62TH 1960  Fritidsmotorskepp SGFR  ANNE LETH  5.55  13.44  Volvo Penta diesel 1964  Fritidsmotorskepp SELZ  ANNIE AF GÖTEBORG  5.32  13.43  Volvo Penta TMD 96 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SJWZ  BONITA  4.12  13.42  Skandia 1cyl semidiesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SDXF  KAMALA II  4.60  13.42  2 Volvo TAMD 70 C, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SBWF  SAX II  4.42  13.42  2 Cummins, 1978  Fritidsmotorskepp SGJE  MERKUR  4.70  13.40  Scania Vabis D 622  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBG  SOLITUDE  4.37  13.40  2 Caterpillar 3208 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SDTX  RITA  5.22  13.36  Detroit‐Allison 71 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SDOJ  ULLA‐BRITTA  5.50  13.35  Volvo Penta TMD 96B  Fritidsmotorskepp SHFE  FRIDA AV SKÅNE  4.94  13.33  Volvo Penta MD 70A 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SHJM  NEPTUN  5.30  13.32     Fritidsmotorskepp SLBY  ANTARES  4.27  13.32  2 Caterpillar 3208 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SEMR  TABASCO  4.07  13.31  2 Iveco M14.01, 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SGNQ  MUSTIQUE  4.27  13.28  2 Cat 3208,1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SMIK  CREAM  4.27  13.27  2 Volvo TAMD 74P, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SGRA  MAGNIFIQUE AF KULLAVIK  4.27  13.27  2X VolvoPentaTamd74P,‐02  Fritidsmotorskepp SMCL  NORDIC CROWN  4.27  13.27  2 Volvo D9‐500, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SBHU  POEM  4.27  13.27  2 Volvo D9‐500, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SDPX  FOR FEELING  4.27  13.27  2 Volvo Penta D9‐500, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp SHFG  BELLA AF CARLSTAD  4.27  13.27  2 Volvo Penta D9, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SBJT  DUNDERKLUMPEN  4.80  13.26  2 Caterpillar C12, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRB  INGEBORG AF ÅKERSBERGA  4.67  13.26  Albin 43  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKE  TYKO  4.88  13.23  Volvo Penta TAMD 70  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 196: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

190 

 

SGCE  ELINA  4.12  13.22  Perkins 4,236, 1985  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJA  SUSETTE  4.09  13.20  Perkins 4108M  Fritidsmotorskepp SJZF  GRILL  5.50  13.20  Scania‐Vabis 6‐cyl 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SLWI  ATHENA AF SVINNINGE  4.44  13.20  2 Mercedes WM 240, 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SFNK  AVENTURA  4.44  13.20  2 Hino, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SLBH  LABARRACA  4.14  13.19  2 Scania D 19M, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SJME  JOHANNA AF STOCKHOLM  4.14  13.19  2 Scania DSI 9,1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SDAN  SCOTS N WATER  4.29  13.19  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1977  Fritidsmotorskepp SHEQ  KATTY  5.02  13.19  Scania D11 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SJGL  LILLA JUNGFRUN  5.55  13.18  Skandia 1935  Fritidsmotorskepp SMIF  AMPHION  4.11  13.18  Volvo MD 70B 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SJYZ  SEA CAT  4.12  13.16  Ford MD 2715E 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SJLY  LOLA AF VINDÖN  4.20  13.16  Volvo Penta TAMD 73 P‐ED, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SLKT  REFLECTION  4.12  13.16  2 Scania DSI 9, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SLKN  CARUSO CARLSCRONA  4.14  13.15  2 Scania DI9, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SGWA  DIAMOND  4.14  13.15  2 Caterpillar 3126 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SIJN  CAMURUS  4.14  13.15  2 Volvo Penta TAMD73P‐EDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SLQI  MY SUPPORT 2  4.14  13.15  Scania D19 59M, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SDYE  DEWLISH  4.14  13.15  2 Scania DI 9, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SLYC  HILDA ROSS  4.01  13.15  Ford 6 cyl diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SIAQ  ETHEL  4.14  13.15  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 63P  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRK  CIRRUS  4.34  13.15  2 Caterpillar 3208TA 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SCFZ  CICI LA VIE  4.47  13.12  Volvo Penta TAMD70 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SBQJ  USCHI  4.47  13.12  Volvo Penta TAMD 706  Fritidsmotorskepp SEDW  FRIDOLF  4.60  13.12  Lister Marin 35 JK 6ME9  Fritidsmotorskepp SDVJ  TÖSEN  4.94  13.12  Volvo Penta MD 100B, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SKTJ  INVERNESS CREAM  4.12  13.11  2 Sabre 300 typ 2581 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SDCX  MYTOY  4.20  13.11  2 st Volvo TAMD 72 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SJVY  ANDANTE  4.25  13.11  2 Volvo 61 A, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 197: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

191 

 

SCJA  ENEDINA  4.28  13.10  2 Volvo TAMD 61A 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBYC  SUNQUEST  4.28  13.10  Volvo TAMD 61 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBGV  DOLLAR  4.30  13.09  2 Detroit 8V‐92TI 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SBLR  LADY ARIADNE  4.12  13.08  2 Caterpillar 3208 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SJBA  SEA QUEEN II  4.14  13.08  2 Scania DSI 9 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SJBG  JOSEFINA IV  4.14  13.08  2 Volvo TAMD 73P‐EDC 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SJBD  LADY SUN  4.14  13.08  2 Scania DSI 9, 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SLDT  SJÖLILJAN  4.14  13.08  2 Scania D19 59M  Fritidsmotorskepp SBFL  LOUISE TROLLHÄTTAN  4.70  13.06  2 Caterpillar 3208 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SFNM  MASKEN AF TYRESÖ  5.03  13.05  Skandiaverken 1945  Fritidsmotorskepp SKEM  MILLIS  4.17  13.05  2 Volvo Penta TAMD63P,‐99  Fritidsmotorskepp SKMW  LUCKY LEON  4.17  13.05  2 Volvo 73P 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SFKB  NAJA  4.36  13.05  2 Volvo TAMD 70C, 1975  Fritidsmotorskepp SBJV  PETILLANT  4.17  13.05  2VolvoPentaTAMD63P,1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SEOA  MY DREAM  4.17  13.05  2 Volvo TAMD 63P, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SLRZ  KAMA II  4.36  13.05  2 Volvo TAMD 70, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SCEQ  PARADISA  4.20  13.03  2 Volvo TAMD 71, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SKMY  CATCHA  4.20  13.03  2 Volvo TAMD72 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SFIL  ELITE  4.20  13.03  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71, 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SIJF SPIDER NERO AV STOCKHOLM  4.11  13.03  2 Volvo IPS, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SJZH  LADY DIANE  4.20  13.03  2 Volvo 75 P  Fritidsmotorskepp SBJR  ESTRELLITA  4.25  13.03  2 Ford Lehman 2715E, 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SMJF  KARMA  4.25  13.03  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SLQW  SHA‐SHA III  4.25  13.03  2 Ford 1970  Fritidsmotorskepp SCJM  SUNDANCE  4.05  13.03  2 John Deere Ammarine 404  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBO  MICRO LAMBDA  4.20  13.03  2 Volvo Tamd 72P EDC1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SHDQ  ELIN  5.10  13.02  Skandia 255 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SLHD  LADY CORNER  4.06  13.02  2 Scania DSI9,1999  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 198: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

192 

 

SIPW  PRINCESS EMELIE  4.01  13.01  Volvo Penta TAMD120A 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SGQE  PRINCESS OF SIGTUNA  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo TAMD 74 L, 2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SGPY  CHABLIS AF GEFLE  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo TAMD 74L, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SHUI  SUMMERTIME  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo TAMD 74L, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SJUN  VICTORY  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo TAMD 75P, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp SKZW  EKAN III  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo TAMD 75P, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp SCLX  ALVA  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo D6 435, 2008  Fritidsmotorskepp SBGY  BIRDIE  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo D6‐435, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SGUV  EZ2 SEA  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo D6‐435  Fritidsmotorskepp SCMO  SMILLA AF BROMMA  4.14  13.00  2 Volvo D6‐435, 2008  Fritidsmotorskepp SGTB  NO HURRY  4.48  12.99  2 Caterpillar 3208, 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SGFA  MUM'S  4.16  12.99  2 Caterpillar 385CV, 1998  Fritidsmotorskepp SFRJ  CONTENTEZZA  4.16  12.99  2 Caterpillar 3126‐385  Fritidsmotorskepp SEVG  SUN AF STOCKHOLM  4.16  12.99  2 Caterpillar 3126‐385,01  Fritidsmotorskepp SMTE  FRANCE  4.16  12.99  2 Caterp. M3126DITA, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SJDO  TAYANA  4.23  12.98  2 Ford Lehman, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SMLW  ESMERALDA II  4.22  12.98  2 Caterpillar 3208NA 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SFGW  PLEASURE  4.21  12.98  2VolvoTAMD74L EDC,2004  Fritidsmotorskepp SKFW  SHERIDAN  4.21  12.98  2 Volvo D6‐435, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SCIV  SEALINA AF RESARÖ  4.21  12.98     Fritidsmotorskepp SHRG  SÄLEN  4.83  12.98  Volvo Penta MD96B 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SGNY  JAJA  4.21  12.97  2Volvo Penta TAMD 71B ‐91  Fritidsmotorskepp SMXL  SMULAN AV SVARTSJÖ  4.21  12.97  Volvo TAMD 71, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRI  MAGDALENA  4.29  12.96  2 Cummins diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SLHM  MISS BEHAVEN  4.06  12.95  2 Volvo TAMD 60B 1983  Fritidsmotorskepp SGYP  CHAPMAN AF STOCKHOLM  5.05  12.95  Albin diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SHDO  ALEXANDRA AF FALSTERBO  4.28  12.95  2 Volvo Penta IPS 500, 2007   Fritidsmotorskepp SFKO  AQUANOVA  4.28  12.95  2 Volvo Penta D6 IPS500, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKT  ANAGADA  4.19  12.94  Volvo TAMD 72 P EDC, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 199: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

193 

 

SJMH  GARFIELD  4.19  12.94  2 Volvo 72 A, 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SFOW  LINNEA III AF STOCKHOLM  4.19  12.94  Volvo Penta TAMD72, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SKYM  FLYING RUG  4.19  12.94  Volvo TAMD 72, 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SKCT  SUNSHINE  4.20  12.94  2 Volvo TAMD70 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SBIL  ANCYLUS AV LOVÖN  4.20  12.94  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBFO  PROTEUS  4.20  12.94  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZC  SAMLINE  4.19  12.94  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72EDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SDWA  EL COMMANDANTE  4.20  12.94  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SFUV  AFRODITE AF VAXHOLM  4.20  12.94  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SFMA  B & I  4.20  12.94  2 Caterpillar 3208TA  Fritidsmotorskepp SDWJ  GEMMA  4.20  12.94  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SCGM  LA REGINA  4.20  12.94  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBX  SANNALINA  4.20  12.94  2 Caterpillar 3208, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBXG  SIRENA DE MAR  4.20  12.92  2 Volvo Penta TMD70 1984  Fritidsmotorskepp SFDZ  SISCA  4.17  12.91  2 VolvoPenta TAMD72EDC 96  Fritidsmotorskepp SHKY  LYN  5.08  12.91  Skandia 125, 1930  Fritidsmotorskepp SIVL  FYLGIA  5.13  12.90     Fritidsmotorskepp SMUP  PUFFIN  4.30  12.90  2 Volvo‐Penta TAMD 41A  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJO  JOLIE  4.18  12.90  2 Volvo TAMD 72, 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SBJD  STARLITE EXPRESS  4.49  12.88  Volvo Penta TAMD 71A  Fritidsmotorskepp SEVM  LUCKY STAR  4.49  12.88  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71 A  Fritidsmotorskepp SERA  SOUL MATES  4.77  12.87  2 Caterpillar 3126, 2001  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SJOQ WHITE LADY AF OXELÖSUND  4.17  12.86  Volvo Penta MD 70 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SDQH  MARIA AV UDDEVALLA  4.10  12.85  Volvo Penta diesel  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHA  SEA‐STAR AV GÖTEBORG  4.01  12.85  2 Volvo Penta TAMD70 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SMEQ  UNICA I  4.33  12.84  2 Volvo Penta TAMD61 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SGAV  ALL INCLUSIVE  4.11  12.84  2 Volvo TAMD 72A, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SDYJ  SOLIETTE  4.11  12.84  2 Volvo TAMD 72, 1997  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 200: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

194 

 

SCEB  AMETIST  4.11  12.84  2VolvoPentaTAMD72EDC,1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SHVT  SLICK  4.18  12.83  2 Volvo TAMD 71 B, 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SERG  MY SUN  4.18  12.83  2 Volvo TAMD 63  Fritidsmotorskepp SMOJ  NEPTUNE AF STOCKHOLM  4.99  12.79  Scania 135A 1952  Fritidsmotorskepp SBHO  MEDIANTE  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD61 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBHN  EVITA AF DJURSHOLM  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBDQ  CASSIOPEIA  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD71 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SBPC  THE PRINCE & I  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD 71A 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SEQI  AQUA QUEEN  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp SBZE  VICTORIA AF VÄTÖ  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBYT  LA SIRENE  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD61 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SGUT  EL MAR  4.18  12.78  2xVolvo TAMD 71B, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SJOA  AQUILEIA  4.24  12.78  2 Volvo TAMD 71B,1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SJCN  SVANEN AV DJURSHOLM  4.05  12.77  Volvo TAMD 72 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SCRQ  DREAM GIRL  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SDBL  PRITHIKA  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SDCH  HEJ DU  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72  Fritidsmotorskepp SCWH  SANDY LAINE  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72  Fritidsmotorskepp SEAT  BEDA AV DANDERYD  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD75EDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SFUR  FIRST LADY  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72EDC  Fritidsmotorskepp SEQV  LENITA  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72  Fritidsmotorskepp SGCY  GOURMET  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp SFOE  MARI II  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72 ‐92  Fritidsmotorskepp SDJT  ALIMAR  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72 A  Fritidsmotorskepp SIHR  BONA VITA  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72  Fritidsmotorskepp SIHC  BELVIRIA  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72  Fritidsmotorskepp SHVX  SAYONARA AF HÖRVIK  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72  Fritidsmotorskepp SHEN  GIRL III  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72  Fritidsmotorskepp SGXC  ROYAL PARK  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 72  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 201: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

195 

 

SGZQ  JASMINE  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72 1992  Fritidsmotorskepp SHCA  SUPERNOVA  4.05  12.77  2 Volvo Penta TAMD72  Fritidsmotorskepp SGPN  GRÖNSKÄR  4.03  12.77  Saab‐Scania D8A01 1974  Fritidsmotorskepp SDHK  ANNA  5.15  12.76  Volvo Penta MD 67  Fritidsmotorskepp SBOZ  TINGARA STOCKHOLM  4.67  12.75  2 Caterpillar W/MG 507‐1  Fritidsmotorskepp SEFD  ALBION  4.67  12.73  2 Caterpillar 3208‐TA  Fritidsmotorskepp SCNI  SHALVA  4.24  12.73  2 Volvo‐Penta TAMD71 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SCBA  BUMBLE‐BEE  4.24  12.73  2 Volvo TAMD 71 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBXI  JOYSEA  4.24  12.73  2 Volvo TAMD71 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SJYB  FEM  4.12  12.72  Mercury Big Foot, 2002  Fritidsmotorskepp SDYU  HILDEGARD  4.52  12.71  Cummins Turbo Diesel,1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SHQR  EMILY AF SALTARÖ  5.40  12.68  Bolinder Munktell  Fritidsmotorskepp SEXW  SVARTLIEN  4.86  12.67  Albin  Fritidsmotorskepp SIDN  MUZZE‐LINA  4.52  12.67  2 Cummins diesel, 2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SDXO  MOA III AV UDDEVALLA  4.08  12.65  Penta diesel MD 96  Fritidsmotorskepp SIAC  LÅGLAND  4.50  12.64  Marinmotor Hundersted  Fritidsmotorskepp SMQZ  NEPTUNUS AF TÄBY  4.04  12.64  2 Volvo TAMD 70C 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SLNE  MAYA PICASSO  4.03  12.64  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 63P  Fritidsmotorskepp SCIT  BAD HABIT I SUNDBYBERG  4.03  12.64     Fritidsmotorskepp SMPX  BLUEBERRY  4.03  12.64  2 Volvo TAMD 63 P, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SBDY  LADY SOFT  4.50  12.61  2 Volvo 41A 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SCKN  BADHOTELLET II  4.50  12.61  2 Caterpillar 3208TA 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNI  MARSEHOLM  4.20  12.61  Leyland VE 400 1982  Fritidsmotorskepp SDPB  JOHANNA‐SOFIA  4.21  12.60  Grenaa  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFY  BIANCA  4.02  12.60  Volvo Penta TMD40 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SLVY  JOYA MIA  4.29  12.60  2 Caterpillar, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SMKW  SUPREME  4.01  12.59  Volvo Penta TAMD 70D 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SKDO  ÅLEN  4.45  12.58  Volvo Penta MD 70 A 1966  Fritidsmotorskepp SLZN  TIRAMISU  4.09  12.58  2 VolvoPentaTAMD 61,1991  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 202: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

196 

 

SDFN  PRAETOR  4.18  12.57  Volvo Penta TMD70  Fritidsmotorskepp SDPL  THE SECOND RABBIT  4.75  12.57  Skandia tändkulemotor  Fritidsmotorskepp SFCY  TIAN  5.11  12.56  Albin motor G62 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SBLA  PARTNERSHIP  4.20  12.56  2 Cummins 3 2 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SLDK  JAN MAYEN  4.10  12.55  2 Ford IM 6‐2715‐PRM  Fritidsmotorskepp SFML  MILLENNIUM  4.60  12.55  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 70 C  Fritidsmotorskepp SKJV  LISA II  4.07  12.55  Perkins diesel 1976  Fritidsmotorskepp SEVR  RANÖ  5.11  12.55  Scania Vabis 1963  Fritidsmotorskepp SMDV  SPRUTTEN IV  4.50  12.55  2 Volvo TAMD 74PEDC 2000  Fritidsmotorskepp SICO  SIMPLICITY  4.14  12.54  2 Volvo Penta TAMD63 1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SBEA  SHALIMAR AF WISBY  4.14  12.54  2VolvoPenta TAMD63P,1995  Fritidsmotorskepp SCQI  MELODY  4.14  12.54  2 Volvo TAMD63P,1997  Fritidsmotorskepp SKIP  TEACHER  4.07  12.53  2 st Perkins TV 8 K  Fritidsmotorskepp SCFO  MONIQUE MOON  4.27  12.51  2 RWC Crusander 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SGTD  WHITE DIAMONDS  4.30  12.50  Detroit Diesel 53, 1999  Fritidsmotorskepp SEYP  CAPRI  4.61  12.49  Skandia  Fritidsmotorskepp SHGL  EDIT  4.65  12.48  Säffle motorverkstad 1955  Fritidsmotorskepp SFNI  HANINA AF HAMBURGÖ  4.74  12.48  Volvo Penta MD 96 1958  Fritidsmotorskepp SBAE  SJÖULFEN  4.28  12.46  2 Caterpillar 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SFPX  PÄRLAN  4.27  12.45  2 Volvo TAMD 61  Fritidsmotorskepp SFCB     4.21  12.44  2 Cummins T380 Q58, 2008  Fritidsmotorskepp SFXM  SVEA AF GÖTEBORG  4.94  12.42  Munktell 4FD 135 MB 1954  Fritidsmotorskepp SFWM  SEAVIEW 147  4.20  12.41  2 Volvo Penta IPS 500, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp SCZF  VINDFAXE  4.61  12.40  Bolinder‐Munktell 1965  Fritidsmotorskepp SJLU  CABO FRIO  4.77  12.40  Volvo Penta  Fritidsmotorskepp SJQG  ZELENA  4.00  12.40  Volvo Penta TMD 100  Fritidsmotorskepp SMBN  KENITRA  4.26  12.40  2 Caterpillar 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SFME  MUNKEN  5.00  12.38     Fritidsmotorskepp SHVO  ZIVA  5.26  12.38     Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 203: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

197 

 

SIBD  MAGNIFIQUE  4.10  12.35  2 Volvo TAMD 62 1993  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SGAZ TENDER ONE AV STOCKHOLM  4.57  12.35  2 Volvo D6‐350DP, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SDYL  MY FAIR LADY  4.09  12.34  2 Volvo TAMD 1994  Fritidsmotorskepp SDXE  NIRVANA  4.28  12.32  2 Caterpillar 3208 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SFVN  RAN AF GÖTEBORG  4.56  12.31  Volvo Penta MD 96B 1967  Fritidsmotorskepp SMUC  FALSTERBO  4.42  12.31  Volvo Penta MD 100 B 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SJIC  NORDSTIERN  4.46  12.31  Scania Vabis D 10 1962  Fritidsmotorskepp SCJH  CONTE DI MONTECRISTO  4.30  12.30  2 Detroit 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SFKZ  BRUNNTE 40  4.35  12.28  Volvo TMD 102  Fritidsmotorskepp SFOR  SNOWHITE  4.21  12.27  2 Volvo Penta TAMD61A  Fritidsmotorskepp SMRH  MARET  4.21  12.27  2 Volvo TAMD71 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SMDZ  DISCOVERY AF SOLLENTUNA 4.21  12.27  2 Volvo TAMD 61 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SMIP  SESSAN  4.21  12.27  2 Volvo MD70 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHK  CIRCUS  4.21  12.27  2 st Volvo TAMD 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SBKM  ISIS AV HOVENÄSET  4.21  12.27  2 Volvo TAMD60, 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SBDZ  RENÉE II  4.21  12.27  2 Volvo‐Penta TAMD71 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SLHG  KRISTINA AF WAXHOLM  4.21  12.27  2 Volvo TAMD61, 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SBHL  NO MO SNO  4.19  12.26  2 Cummins Turbo diesel, , 01  Fritidsmotorskepp SBRZ  CHAGANZA  4.21  12.26  2 Volvo TAMD 61 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SDZY  KROMOSOM  5.54  12.26  Volvo MD 60  Fritidsmotorskepp SJTK  BORÖ AF ARKÖSUND  4.47  12.25     Fritidsmotorskepp SHTU  CAPRICORN  4.38  12.25  2 Perkins, 1973  Fritidsmotorskepp SKNR  THALATTA  4.22  12.24  Volvo Penta MD70A 1969  Fritidsmotorskepp SDRZ  SEA PRINCESS  4.21  12.22  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 61 A  Fritidsmotorskepp SBMA  MON AMI AF VÄSTERÅS  4.21  12.22  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71  Fritidsmotorskepp SMCU  JOSSAN  4.24  12.22  2 Ford‐Lehman 1986  Fritidsmotorskepp SGWB  GANÖN  4.48  12.20  Scania DSI 11 MO1 SF 1800  Fritidsmotorskepp SFYG  CHRISTINA AV ÄNGELHOLM  4.09  12.20  2 Volvo Penta KAD42DP,‐97  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 204: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

198 

 

SEZF  SPIRIT OF MIMOSA  4.09  12.20  2Caterpillar Diesel, 1996  Fritidsmotorskepp SMHX  SEVENTH WAVE  4.32  12.20     Fritidsmotorskepp SMKN  LOVISA AV STOCKHOLM  7.02  12.19  2VolvoPenta2003BT/1201988  Fritidsmotorskepp SFQY  NERAIDA  4.02  12.15  Yanmar 4LHA/HTE  Fritidsmotorskepp SKEX  LA DéESSE  4.14  12.15  2 Volvo TAMD 61A, 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SMJI  ZARINA  4.03  12.15  2 Volvo TAMD 60A, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SLFI  KATINA ANNE  4.18  12.15  2 Volvo TAMD 71B 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SCWL  CHAMSIN  4.18  12.13  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SIAR  ACCESS  4.18  12.13  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71,1991  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SELH CONTESSA AF SALTSJÖBADEN  4.18  12.13  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 71A  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SDXB  ZIVA  4.78  12.12     Fritidsmotorskepp SCTD  SUNDAY  4.27  12.12  2 Scania D8, 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp SLDF  LILLJUNGFRUN  4.48  12.10  Volvo MD96  Fritidsmotorskepp SCJF  KÅRE  4.37  12.09  Volvo MD96B 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SHMV  TERESA AV STOCKHOLM  4.48  12.08  2 Volvo D9‐500,2005  Fritidsmotorskepp SKZR  CHARLOTTA AV VIKSNÄS  4.48  12.08  2 Volvo D9‐500, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp SCPD  BRUMMBÄR  4.30  12.07  Ford Lehman 2715E, 1979  Fritidsmotorskepp SJNW  MY LADY  4.07  12.07  2 Volvo Penta VP TAMD 71B  Fritidsmotorskepp SCMU  NICE  4.07  12.07  2 VP TAMD 71B 1990  Fritidsmotorskepp SEJR  EASY  4.07  12.07  2 Volvo TAMD 718, 1991  Fritidsmotorskepp SDKX  VAGABOND AF ÖREGRUND  4.07  12.07  2 Volvo Penta TAMD71A  Fritidsmotorskepp SBGZ  SHALIMAR AF DALARÖ  4.08  12.05  2 Volvo Penta TAMD61 1988  Fritidsmotorskepp SIBU  BONNY II  4.08  12.05  Volvo TAMD 61, 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SBWP KAP HORN AV SALTSJÖBADEN  4.16  12.01  2 Volvo D6, 2006  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SBFA  SILJE  4.35  12.01  2 Caterpillar 3208 1989  Fritidsmotorskepp SMRL  RELAX  I  4.27  12.01  2 Volvo Penta TAMD61 1987  Fritidsmotorskepp SJVI  BRITT  4.50  12.00  Volvo MD 70 1980  Fritidsmotorskepp 

Page 205: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

199 

 

SLYA  DOLCE VITA  4.14  12.00  2 Volvo D6‐435, 2007  Fritidsmotorskepp 

SDPA  ROSENBERG  7.30  26.55  MAK 1968 Fritidsmotorskepp, husbåt 

SJUP  MELLSKÄR  4.82  19.18  Volvo Penta MD100 A 1966 Fritidsmotorskepp, husbåt 

SDQM  ARKEN AF ASKEN  9.83  14.55  Mariner 1987 Fritidsmotorskepp, husbåt 

SITO  XARIFA III  2.50  12.50     Fritidssegelbåt SJCK  VICTORIA  3.27  11.13     Fritidssegelbåt SHWO  SJU GLAS  2.83  10.90     Fritidssegelbåt SIUE  DANSKA LILJAN  3.08  10.65     Fritidssegelbåt SHXE  NICLA III  3.04  10.46     Fritidssegelbåt SJBO  CARIOCA II  2.86  9.81     Fritidssegelbåt SJBW  JUSTINA  2.86  9.81     Fritidssegelbåt SJDG  VINDKULE  2.87  9.69     Fritidssegelbåt SJLD  GIGEL  2.95  9.48     Fritidssegelbåt SJYR  MOLLY  2.85  9.40     Fritidssegelbåt SJGO  POULALU  2.85  9.40     Fritidssegelbåt SIUG  CADACCA  3.16  9.37     Fritidssegelbåt SIUR  CONTENTA  3.16  9.37     Fritidssegelbåt SJOW  MIRAMIS  2.76  9.33     Fritidssegelbåt SJOU  PILENA  2.94  9.19     Fritidssegelbåt SIXE  BLUE LADY  2.94  9.19     Fritidssegelbåt SIYK  JEANETTE  2.94  9.19     Fritidssegelbåt SHXK  BALLADETT  2.94  9.19     Fritidssegelbåt SIOG  PUELLA II  3.03  9.04     Fritidssegelbåt SJZD  FRIDA  2.60  8.86     Fritidssegelbåt SJHW  NEREIDEN II  2.50  8.78     Fritidssegelbåt SIGK  JOHANNA  2.50  8.78     Fritidssegelbåt 

Page 206: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

200 

 

    SHXR  TRAPPER  2.58  8.59 Fritidssegelbåt SDOP  CAMILLA  3.68  12.15  Turham tändkulemotor  Fritidssegelmotorbåt SLYE  RIANDE  6.25  32.41  GM 671 1962  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCJQ  LIBRA AF STOCKHOLM  6.14  26.10  Caterpillar 353D, 1969  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SEPW  MAGDALUS SECONDO  6.13  25.76  2 Caterpillar 3208 DITA  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SFEA  VESTA AF STOCKHOLM  6.84  24.36     Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBLT  KLARA LUST  4.68  22.48  Kromhout  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SILG  ELSE NORA  4.22  20.72  DAF, 1996  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDAZ  DEA MARIS  6.20  20.10     Fritidssegelmotorskepp SEVA  LELANTA  4.45  19.98  Detroit diesel 1979  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCKA  BLUE MARLIN  5.25  19.90  Cummins 6 BT 5 9M 1991  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SKPT  TRAVEL  4.97  19.81  Perkius 115 1979  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDVK  BRUDEN II  5.15  19.75  Perkins 4 HD76  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SKTX  ELIXIR  4.62  19.60  Scania D8 1965  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBLX  WINDY LADY  4.51  19.15  Cummins 359/5.9, 1991  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDZP  AEGIR  6.25  18.88  DSI 11 Scania 6 cyl  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDUN  WESTWARD  4.98  18.62  VolvoPentaMD96281,1961  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SHKO  EXPLORER OF SWEDEN  5.05  17.75  Iveco Aifo 8361SRM32 1995  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCNL  MAXIMUM  4.75  17.39  Volvo D 70  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBGK  VICTORIA MARIE  4.56  17.01  Volvo TMD100A 1971  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SGXP  MYJOY  4.58  16.96  Perkins M135 1993  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SFDV  BLUE CHARISMA  4.90  16.76  Perkins 1988  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLRD  STORMPRINCE  4.34  16.37  Scania D11  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SEDA  EXET  4.34  16.36  Volvo Penta TAMD 31P  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SGNL  AMIBO  4.35  16.35  Volvo TAMD 63  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBYW  LION HEART  4.35  16.07  Volvo Penta TMD31 1990  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMNH  ARISTOCAT  4.60  15.60  Ford‐Lehman 2725E 1988  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCNT  ETHER  5.00  15.56  Leyland Delphine 6cyl1984  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SJMK  STENO  5.09  15.40  Volvo MD 96 1964  Fritidssegelmotorskepp 

Page 207: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

201 

 

SIJV  ALIDA  4.32  15.36  Volvo Penta MD 47 1976  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SFAY  PEPPELI  4.70  15.32  Mercedes OM352, 1965  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBOK  HANNA AF ÖCKERÖ  4.58  15.30  Volvo Penta MD100A 1966  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCOR  ATON  4.06  15.20  Mercedes, 1979  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCMA  ACQVA‐RUS  4.45  15.05  Volvo Penta TAM 41 1991  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SEQA  TRADE WIND  4.47  15.01  2 Bedford 330 IAL2063‐PT  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLBW  ROYAL SALUTE  4.52  15.00  Yanmar 4JH3G‐HTBE 2.6 ‐00  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDEG  BARCAROLE V  4.66  14.88  Yamaha 4JH‐DTH 1990  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLJM  HONEYSUCKLE  4.13  14.79  Volvo Penta MD30 1984  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCNE  TALISMAN  4.57  14.78  Perkins 4154  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLQC  ELEONOR AF OXELÖSUND  5.85  14.67  Volvo Penta MD67C 1967  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMKE  SABINE  4.30  14.30  Venus P4.25 1988  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCHR  MORGONSOL  4.35  14.24  Volvo Penta TMD 31 A 1991  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SHOC  ALMA AF GRÄDDÖ  4.30  14.18  Perkins 4:236 1995  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMPQ  SÅNGMÖN  4.23  14.17  Volvo Penta MD21A 1979  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLPE  ÄLSKLING  4.60  14.00  Perkins 80 CV 1983  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLNB  CHERIE  5.24  13.91  Volvo Penta MD67 1959  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDIQ  WE DO  4.12  13.90  Ford 6.380 1976  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SHMP  DECISION  4.30  13.90  Perkins 4108, 1983  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBGD  COLUMBINE  4.46  13.83  Volvo Penta MD30 1986  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SKGW  CHARLATAN  4.03  13.70  Volvo‐Penta MD 17 1978  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SGOC  NAUSIKA II  4.12  13.62  Perkins 6.354, 1981  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SHLC  GLADAN AF WESTERVIK  7.70  13.61  2 Volvo D2‐55, 2008   Fritidssegelmotorskepp SHON  DISCOVERY  4.36  13.60  Perkins diesel H6 354M  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SGKQ  BELLONA DE SERENA  4.18  13.54  Volvo MD 47  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLYI  HERO‐BRAVA  4.15  13.44  Perkins 4.108 1980  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLTH  MALOLELEI  4.00  13.24  Perkins 4236 1976  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMWC  MIN MIO  4.00  13.23  V.P. 2003 TS  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBYX  APHOS  4.08  13.14  Yanmar 4 JHB 1990  Fritidssegelmotorskepp 

Page 208: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

202 

 

SGXL  BUKSTINA  4.01  13.10  Perkins diesel 4108 1978  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCHU  GANTIKA  4.24  13.08  Ford NG4 2722E, 1984  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SFVU  PANDORA III AF GEFLE  4.22  12.98  Ford 2722 1983  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SHJK  PINK LADY  6.68  12.95  2 Evinrude, 1985  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SLJD  TYPHOON  4.03  12.80  Perkins 4.108 1985  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMRD  JENINA  4.00  12.65  Volvo Penta MD30 1985  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMNJ  JUST FOR FUN  4.00  12.65  Volvo Penta MD 40 1983  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SDXW  CANTELLA 2  4.00  12.65  Kubota Diesel, 1986  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBTG  OF COURSE  5.80  12.45  Färe Göta 3 cyl 1975  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SGXA  KALEA  4.04  12.41  Volvo MD17, 1983  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SCIU  ANNE‐MARIE AV RÅÅ  4.35  12.18  Perkins diesel 4.236 1980  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SBAN  SECOND LIFE  4.07  12.10  Volvo MD21B 1986  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SMLF  DIANA AF WERMDÖ  4.16  12.02  Yanmar 1988  Fritidssegelmotorskepp SGPL  TRE KRONOR  5.52  22.66     Fritidssegelskepp SLQF  SOFIA LINNEA  6.62  20.10     Fritidssegelskepp SLFZ  BLUE ADVENTURE  5.34  19.54  Daimler Benz, 1986  Fritidssegelskepp SMGX  BONDEVENNEN  5.27  17.14     Fritidssegelskepp SEFT  FIESTA  4.18  14.74  Volvo MD 21 A  Fritidssegelskepp SCGO  SOIR  4.63  13.82     Fritidssegelskepp SLJG  ISIS  8.36  12.93     Fritidssegelskepp SKHY  LAZY DUCK  4.26  12.84  Volvo D2 55C, 2006  Fritidssegelskepp SMFT  HAVAIKI  5.86  12.19     Fritidssegelskepp SMIR  CATANIA  6.60  25.99     Fritidsskepp SMVX  BORD‐ELLEN  6.00  22.61     Fritidsskepp SDFI  TVÅHUNDRAFEMTIOFYRA  4.28  21.36     Fritidsskepp SDET  UGGLAN  4.28  21.36     Fritidsskepp SDEC  TVÅHUNDRATJUGOFYRA  4.28  21.36     Fritidsskepp SDEP  TVÅHUNDRAFYRTIOTVÅ  4.28  21.36     Fritidsskepp SIVZ  VALENCI AF BERGSUND  6.11  17.15     Fritidsskepp 

Page 209: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

203 

 

    SIJX  COCKNEY SPIRIT  4.55  12.70 Fritidsskepp SBLP  SVEGUN  5.08  23.98     Fritidsskepp (pråm) SGDH  BJÖRNEN  8.14  27.10  CD Holmes & Co Ltd 1941  Fritidsångskepp SKFN  GÖRAN  5.00  22.39     Fritidsångskepp SDZL  ELFDALEN  4.96  22.37  Ljusne Compoundångm. 1888  Fritidsångskepp SGLX  SILJAN  4.70  21.99  Comp. ångm. Sjöström 1904  Fritidsångskepp SGUR  STARK‐OTTER  5.50  20.15  Compound ångmaskin 1901  Fritidsångskepp SGEM  CAMA III  5.21  19.94  Bolinder‐Munktell 1947  Fritidsångskepp SIYR  FLOTTISTEN  4.12  19.54  Ångmaskin Härnösand 1890  Fritidsångskepp SHUG  VENUS AV VÄDDÖ  4.20  18.47     Fritidsångskepp SHPU  STRÖMFÄRJAN   1  4.94  18.46     Fritidsångskepp SJLT  KURIREN  4.06  16.79  Wennbergs comp‐ångm. 1915  Fritidsångskepp  

Page 210: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

204 

 

Appendix B Filtered Data collected on Registered Boats and its Engine Specifications.

Data of Boats Specifications with complete information (all units are given per engine) Call sign  Length (m)  Machinery  kw  stroke Fuel  fuel consumption (l/hr)  in/outboardSFC‐8611  13.15  2 st VP TAMD74P  358.08 4  diesel  197.15 inboard SFC‐4611  13.40  2 Volov Penta TMD70 1970  111.90 4  diesel  59.24 inboard SFC‐5947  12.50  2 Volvo Penta AD40  115.63 4  diesel  26.00 inboard SFC‐8112  10.00  2 Volvo Penta AD41B,1992  123.09 4  diesel  30.00 inboard SFC‐3749  13.00  2 Volvo Penta KAD42 1992  171.58 4  diesel  56.50 inboard SFC‐5259  12.30  2 Volvo Penta KAD42 1997  171.58 4  diesel  56.50 inboard SFC‐3388  7.70  2 Volvo Penta MD5C  7.09 4  diesel  5.07 inboard SFC‐8887  11.20  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 40 B, 1986  117.87 4  diesel  83.20 inboard SFC‐7458  12.95  2 Volvo Penta TAMD 75 P  343.90 4  diesel  188.54 inboard SFC‐3935  10.50  2 Volvo Penta TAMD40  117.87 4  diesel  83.20 inboard SFC‐3563  11.80  2 Volvo Penta TAMD41  126.82 4  diesel  71.62 inboard SFC‐3584  11.20  2 Volvo Penta TAMD41  126.82 4  diesel  71.62 inboard SFC‐4793  12.25  2 Volvo Penta TAMD60B 81  164.86 4  diesel  89.61 inboard SFC‐4363  11.96  2 Volvo Penta TAMD61  170.09 4  diesel  90.05 inboard SFC‐3945  12.00  2 Volvo TAMD60 1975  164.86 4  diesel  89.61 inboard SFC‐7966  12.00  2 Volvo TMD45 1970  67.14 4  diesel  35.58 inboard SFC‐6107  12.15  2 VP TAMD 70B  111.90 4  diesel  59.24 inboard SFC‐7052  14.30  2 x TAMD70C, 1975  111.90 4  diesel  59.24 inboard SFC‐6589  10.80  2 X Volvo Penta TAMD60,80  164.86 4  diesel  89.61 inboard SFC‐7268  8.62  2 x Volvo Penta‐KAD42  171.58 4  diesel  56.50 inboard SFC‐8771  13.04  2 x Volvo Tamd 75 P, Diesel, 2003   343.90 4  diesel  188.54 inboard SFC‐6847  10.35  2xTAMD60B, 1982  164.86 4  diesel  89.61 inboard SFC‐7353  11.90  2xVolvo Tamd 74P,2001  358.08 4  diesel  197.15 inboard SFC‐8122  12.09  2xVolvoPenta TAMD70E  157.40 4  diesel  57.41 inboard SFC‐8020  10.00  3GM30, 2001  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐5738  10.99  3GM30F  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard 

Page 211: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

205 

 

SFC‐7218  17.75  AB.Penta‐297 MD 96  94.74 4  diesel  26.45 inboard SFB‐6063  6.30  Albin AD2  11.94 4  diesel  3.67 inboard SFC‐2685  6.90  Albin AD‐2 1968  11.94 4  diesel  3.67 inboard SFC‐3264  8.00  Albin AD21  16.41 4  diesel  4.71 inboard SFB‐5023  7.00  Albin AL 23  11.19 4  diesel  4.24 inboard SFB‐4202  9.10  Albin Marin AD‐2 1962  11.94 4  diesel  3.67 inboard SFC‐3842  9.30  AQAD40B 1984  115.63 4  diesel  26.00 inboard SFC‐2563  9.20  AQAD41/290DP 1990  149.20 4  diesel  30.00 inboard SFC‐8406  8.15  Diesel Volvo MD2B, 1974  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐7789  19.50  Ford 2710 1973  71.62 4  diesel  10.00 inboard SFC‐8071  10.85  Ford 2720  106.68 4  diesel  22.46 inboard SFC‐3769  8.60  Ford 2722E  106.68 4  diesel  22.46 inboard SFC‐7506  11.50  Ford 2725 E ‐83  106.68 4  diesel  22.46 inboard SFC‐8019  11.00  Ford 2725 E, 1996  106.68 4  diesel  22.46 inboard SFC‐8652  12.67  Ford 2725E 6.2l,1989  106.68 4  diesel  22.46 inboard SFB‐7914  11.30  Ford Diesel 27/11 1978  71.62 4  diesel  10.00 inboard SFB‐8284  11.86  Ford diesel typ 2711 1976  71.62 4  diesel  10.00 inboard SFC‐4870  8.95  IGM10  6.71 4  diesel  2.30 inboard SFC‐7382  10.40  Lombardini 1404M, 2001  29.84 4  diesel  11.23 inboard SFC‐7125  9.81  Lombardini LDW 1003 M  22.38 4  diesel  7.66 inboard SFC‐6747  8.00  Lombardini LDW702, 2000  14.92 4  diesel  5.44 inboard SFC‐7180  10.88  Lombardini LW1003M, 2001  22.38 4  diesel  7.66 inboard SFB‐5128  6.70  MD 11C 1976  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐7101  10.70  MD 11C, 1979  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3658  9.80  MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFB‐5004  6.80  MD2B 1971  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐5005  6.80  MD2B Penta 1971  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐8093  9.89  MD2B, 1978  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐6963  8.20  MD47A  52.97 4  diesel  15.12 inboard SFC‐7263  13.40  MD67 Snr 0443  64.16 4  diesel  17.71 inboard 

Page 212: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

206 

 

SFC‐7295  10.85  Perkins Range 4 M135,1988  100.71 4  diesel  28.00 inboard SFC‐2969  8.90  TAMD 31 1989  82.06 4  diesel  21.72 inboard SFC‐7442  8.45  TAMD 31 Volvo Penta  82.06 4  diesel  21.72 inboard SFC‐5827  12.09  TAMD 71A VP, 1987  162.63 4  diesel  41.71 inboard SFC‐5414  9.15  TAMD70 1997  157.40 4  diesel  28.70 inboard SFC‐7266  9.30  TMD 40  87.28 4  diesel  31.83 inboard SFC‐4178  11.00  Twin Cummings 6BT5.9  91.01 4  diesel  23.40 inboard SFC‐6791  9.20  Volvo AD41A290DP,‐90  123.09 4  diesel  30.00 inboard SFC‐6882  10.70  Volvo MD 40, 1988  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFC‐7371  10.67  Volvo MD2, 1978  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐8509  11.37  Volvo MD30, 2004  41.78 4  diesel  14.74 inboard SFC‐7114  10.40  Volvo MD47, 1980  52.97 4  diesel  15.12 inboard SFC‐5597  14.50  Volvo MD67C  70.87 4  diesel  19.67 inboard SFC‐6356  14.40  Volvo Penta 100A, 1967  99.22 4  diesel  26.91 inboard SFC‐3687  8.75  Volvo Penta AD41  123.09 4  diesel  30.00 inboard SFC‐5199  7.65  Volvo Penta AQAD40B 1983  115.63 4  diesel  26.00 inboard SFC‐3438  7.50  Volvo Penta AQAD41  149.20 4  diesel  30.00 inboard SFB‐9270  6.50  Volvo Penta AQAD41 1981  149.20 4  diesel  30.00 inboard SFC‐4183  8.50  Volvo Penta KAD 42 1992  343.16 4  diesel  113.00 inboard SFC‐5422  11.00  Volvo Penta KAD42A 1992  343.16 4  diesel  113.00 inboard SFC‐5714  11.30  Volvo Penta MD 11 C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6743  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 11 C, 1977  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6223  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 11 C, 1978  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐8683  9.75  Volvo Penta MD 11 C, 1979  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐8225  9.36  Volvo Penta MD 11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐4827  18.38  Volvo Penta MD 67C  70.87 4  diesel  19.67 inboard SFC‐3362  6.75  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5977  9.87  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3589  11.07  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5416  11.05  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard 

Page 213: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

207 

 

SFC‐3346  11.05  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐7298  11.00  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3657  10.80  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3587  10.70  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3354  10.46  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3371  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3330  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3381  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3478  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐7092  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3338  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3326  9.58  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3493  9.55  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3718  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3445  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3537  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3546  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3586  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5484  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3699  9.45  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6373  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3271  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐4956  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐8971  9.35  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3500  9.30  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3550  9.30  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3547  9.30  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3841  7.80  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3415  7.60  Volvo Penta MD11C  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐4159  10.95  Volvo Penta MD11C 1975  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard 

Page 214: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

208 

 

SFC‐6241  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1976  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐4967  9.40  Volvo Penta MD11C 1977  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5204  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C 1977  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐7114  7.40  Volvo Penta MD11C 1978  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐6759  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1978  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐4016  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1978  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3599  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1979  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐4979  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6146  7.85  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐6459  7.85  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐6835  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5418  9.40  Volvo Penta MD11C 1980  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5170  11.25  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐8904  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐8627  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6023  9.81  Volvo Penta MD11C 1981  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐3794  9.50  Volvo Penta MD11c 1981  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6039  9.89  Volvo Penta MD11C 1984  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐7091  10.84  Volvo Penta MD11C 33391  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐7519  9.36  Volvo Penta MD11C, 1979  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐6275  10.75  Volvo Penta MD11C, 1979  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐7309  9.58  Volvo penta MD11C, 1980  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFC‐5180  11.07  Volvo Penta MD11C/100S 77  14.92 4  diesel  9.50 inboard SFB‐6365  7.60  Volvo Penta MD17  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3364  13.85  Volvo Penta MD17  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5939  10.60  Volvo Penta MD17  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5265  9.40  Volvo Penta MD17  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3359  9.40  Volvo Penta MD17  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐8166  7.40  Volvo Penta MD17 1982  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5721  11.80  Volvo Penta MD17 1983  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard 

Page 215: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

209 

 

SFB‐8859  11.43  Volvo Penta MD17 1983  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5235  10.60  Volvo Penta MD17 1983  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐7850  9.36  Volvo Penta MD17 Diesel  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐7452  10.20  Volvo Penta MD17, 1981  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐8520  13.00  Volvo Penta MD17, 1988  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐6462  10.40  Volvo Penta MD17‐110S  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3368  14.00  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3487  11.60  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3489  11.03  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5197  10.36  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3444  10.20  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3372  10.08  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3398  9.89  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐8881  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐3404  7.30  Volvo Penta MD17C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5370  11.30  Volvo Penta MD17C 16277  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5095  11.20  Volvo Penta MD17C 1979  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐5996  10.45  Volvo Penta MD17C 1979  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐4085  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C 1979  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐4880  11.20  Volvo Penta MD17C 1981  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐4086  11.89  Volvo Penta MD17C 1984  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐6164  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C 1984  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐6278  8.30  Volvo Penta MD17C Hydro  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐6561  10.40  Volvo Penta MD17C, 1976  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐7020  10.45  Volvo Penta MD17C, 1979  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐4589  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C, 1979  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐8630  9.55  Volvo Penta MD17C/15560  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐6161  11.07  Volvo Penta MD17D  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐8663  14.40  Volvo Penta MD17D 1984  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFB‐3690  6.20  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard 

Page 216: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

210 

 

SFC‐3453  11.40  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐3304  10.80  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFB‐8599  10.00  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐3515  9.35  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐3558  9.35  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFB‐8113  8.64  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐3416  8.00  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐3232  7.60  Volvo Penta MD2  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐4949  7.60  Volvo Penta MD2 1766  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFB‐8356  9.40  Volvo Penta MD2 1967  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFC‐4298  6.40  Volvo Penta MD2 1975  11.56 4  diesel  3.65 inboard SFB‐3260  7.00  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐2425  6.80  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐7838  12.00  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4461  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3485  10.30  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3325  12.80  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4022  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3533  12.20  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3337  11.57  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3827  11.57  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3499  11.10  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐7309  10.93  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3312  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3559  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3376  9.30  Volvo Penta MD21  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4002  10.75  Volvo Penta MD21 110S  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐7563  10.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1971  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4968  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21 1973  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐5026  15.05  Volvo Penta MD21 1976  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard 

Page 217: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

211 

 

SFC‐5438  7.50  Volvo Penta MD21 1980  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4008  11.20  Volvo Penta MD21 1980  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐7684  8.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1983  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4066  11.60  Volvo Penta MD21 1983  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐8117  8.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1984  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐5119  10.25  Volvo Penta MD21 1984  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4857  7.00  Volvo Penta MD21 1985  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3525  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21 A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐7291  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21, 1976  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐6724  12.93  Volvo Penta MD21,1981  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3433  12.40  Volvo Penta MD21A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐8689  12.10  Volvo Penta MD21A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3617  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3988  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3340  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐8729  10.30  Volvo Penta MD21A  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐8913  10.50  Volvo Penta MD21A 1974  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐5013  7.70  Volvo Penta MD21A 1976  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4475  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21A 1977  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4999  11.05  Volvo Penta MD21A 1979  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐2523  7.70  Volvo Penta MD21A 1980  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐6541  12.50  Volvo Penta MD21A, 1977  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4651  12.95  Volvo Penta MD21B  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐7014  11.57  Volvo Penta MD21B  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3399  11.05  Volvo Penta MD21B  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐5444  10.75  Volvo Penta MD21B  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3310  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐5480  11.05  Volvo Penta MD21B 1979  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐4270  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B 1980  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐3927  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B 1982  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard 

Page 218: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

212 

 

SFC‐5450  11.65  Volvo Penta MD21B 1983  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFB‐8020  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B 1983  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐6180  11.30  Volvo Penta MD21B 1984  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐7837  11.60  Volvo Penta MD21B,1985  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐6846  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B,‐79  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐6988  10.54  Volvo Penta MD21B,‐82  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐5365  13.38  Volvo Penta MD22  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6060  11.85  Volvo Penta MD22  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5916  11.85  Volvo Penta MD22  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐3425  7.25  Volvo Penta MD22  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5509  10.87  Volvo Penta MD22 1991  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐4639  11.31  Volvo Penta MD22 1995  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6767  11.31  Volvo Penta MD22, 1995  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6411  12.22  Volvo Penta MD22, 1998  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6123  10.45  Volvo Penta MD22, 1999  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐7937  11.57  Volvo Penta MD22, 2000  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5157  12.10  Volvo Penta MD22A 1991  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐3751  10.20  Volvo Penta MD22L 1993  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5927  12.19  Volvo Penta MD22L 1994  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5428  10.97  Volvo Penta MD22L 1995  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5228  13.16  Volvo Penta MD22L 1997  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐5680  10.75  Volvo Penta MD22L 1998  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐8270  11.75  Volvo Penta MD22L, 1999  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6738  10.54  Volvo Penta MD22L, 2001  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6715  11.20  Volvo Penta MD22L, ‐97  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐7943  12.10  Volvo Penta MD22P  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFC‐6280  11.31  Volvo Penta MD22P, 2000  44.01 4  diesel  4.00 inboard SFB‐7964  7.85  Volvo Penta MD29  68.63 4  diesel  22.73 inboard SFC‐3762  10.70  Volvo Penta MD29  68.63 4  diesel  22.73 inboard SFC‐4935  11.50  Volvo Penta MD29 1969  68.63 4  diesel  22.73 inboard 

Page 219: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

213 

 

SFB‐8578  7.90  Volvo Penta MD2A 1978  11.56 4  diesel  3.68 inboard SFB‐6163  5.50  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐8832  6.90  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐4640  12.00  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐8685  11.07  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3459  10.88  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3567  9.90  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3531  9.89  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐8395  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3262  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐6315  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3538  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3604  9.56  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3621  9.50  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3629  9.43  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3394  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3535  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐4092  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3505  9.30  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐3844  7.60  Volvo Penta MD2B  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐4625  7.97  Volvo Penta MD2B 1969  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐5272  9.71  Volvo Penta MD2B 1972  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐7481  8.05  Volvo Penta MD2B 1973  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐5192  6.90  Volvo Penta MD2B 1974  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐7551  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B 1974  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐7003  9.82  Volvo Penta MD2B 1975  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐4802  10.42  Volvo Penta MD2B 1976  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐5114  9.36  Volvo Penta MD2B 1976  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐4502  9.82  Volvo Penta MD2B 1977  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFC‐6173  9.50  Volvo Penta MD2B 1977  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard 

Page 220: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

214 

 

SFC‐5189  9.40  Volvo Penta MD2B, 1977  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐7332  9.81  Volvo Penta MD2C 1975  17.16 4  diesel  5.15 inboard SFB‐7765  8.00  Volvo Penta MD3  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐8502  10.40  Volvo Penta MD3  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3236  9.89  Volvo Penta MD3  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3534  9.55  Volvo Penta MD3  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3426  8.00  Volvo Penta MD3  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐5806  11.82  Volvo Penta MD3 1975  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFB‐6282  7.62  Volvo Penta MD3 1979  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐4256  11.53  Volvo Penta MD3 1982  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐5860  9.30  Volvo Penta MD3 1984  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3401  11.75  Volvo Penta MD‐30  41.78 4  diesel  14.74 inboard SFC‐6183  14.13  Volvo Penta MD30 1986  41.78 4  diesel  14.74 inboard SFB‐9979  9.60  Volvo Penta MD30 1987  41.78 4  diesel  14.74 inboard SFC‐8092  11.75  Volvo Penta MD30, 1989  41.78 4  diesel  14.74 inboard SFC‐3464  12.80  Volvo Penta MD30A  41.78 4  diesel  14.74 inboard SFC‐4557  12.70  Volvo Penta MD31 1989  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐7546  13.00  Volvo Penta MD31, 1994  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐6737  11.75  Volvo Penta MD31, ‐94  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐2816  12.70  Volvo Penta MD31A 1991  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐6420  12.93  Volvo Penta MD31A, 1988  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐7296  11.55  Volvo Penta MD31A, 1990  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐6573  13.70  Volvo Penta MD31A, 1991  46.25 4  diesel  15.24 inboard SFC‐3529  10.85  Volvo Penta MD32A  51.47 4  diesel  16.96 inboard SFC‐5493  9.25  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3645  8.75  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3406  11.60  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐5064  10.35  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3732  10.30  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3840  10.30  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard 

Page 221: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

215 

 

SFB‐8680  9.89  Volvo Penta MD3B  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐3481  6.60  Volvo Penta MD3B 1976  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFB‐7104  6.80  Volvo Penta MD3B 1977  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐8414  11.40  Volvo Penta MD3B, 1974  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐8706  13.80  Volvo Penta MD3B, 1975  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐7016  10.30  Volvo Penta MD3B, 1975  26.86 4  diesel  7.84 inboard SFC‐2560  8.00  Volvo Penta MD4 081638  29.09 4  diesel  12.02 inboard SFC‐4043  10.00  Volvo Penta MD40  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFB‐8769  8.10  Volvo Penta MD40 1977  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFB‐6107  8.70  Volvo Penta MD40 1979  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFC‐4281  8.15  Volvo Penta MD40 1982  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFC‐4654  8.10  Volvo Penta MD40 1983  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFC‐6220  10.10  Volvo Penta MD40A  58.93 4  diesel  21.49 inboard SFC‐5735  10.10  Volvo Penta MD47 1961  52.97 4  diesel  15.12 inboard SFC‐7364  10.36  Volvo Penta MD47 B  52.97 4  diesel  14.78 inboard SFC‐4077  11.00  Volvo Penta MD47B 1976  52.97 4  diesel  14.78 inboard SFC‐3385  8.03  Volvo Penta MD4A  29.09 4  diesel  12.02 inboard SFC‐3856  8.50  Volvo Penta MD5  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3483  11.85  Volvo Penta MD50A  70.12 4  diesel  21.01 inboard SFC‐3497  11.80  Volvo Penta MD50A  70.12 4  diesel  21.01 inboard SFC‐3434  9.10  Volvo Penta MD50A 1967  70.12 4  diesel  21.01 inboard SFC‐3882  8.12  Volvo Penta MD5A  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3342  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5A  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3711  7.70  Volvo Penta MD5A  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐4262  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5A110S 1979  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3731  9.30  Volvo Penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3389  8.85  Volvo Penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3441  8.34  Volvo Penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3733  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFB‐8609  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard 

Page 222: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

216 

 

SFC‐3282  7.95  Volvo Penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3888  7.70  Volvo penta MD5B  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐5976  8.03  Volvo Penta MD5B 1970  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐5229  7.90  Volvo Penta MD5B 1980  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐4076  7.65  Volvo Penta MD5B 1980  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐3454  8.22  Volvo Penta MD5C  5.59 4  diesel  1.97 inboard SFC‐5688  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3367  8.03  Volvo Penta MD6  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFB‐4423  11.20  Volvo Penta MD67  52.22 4  diesel  14.41 inboard SFC‐3267  9.17  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3581  9.16  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3683  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3708  8.80  Volvo Penta MD6a  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3554  8.80  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3335  8.50  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3390  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3626  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6A  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐4249  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6A 1976  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐8643  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6A, 1974  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐4673  7.70  Volvo Penta MD6A, 1975  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFB‐7333  9.14  Volvo Penta MD6B  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3702  8.25  Volvo Penta MD6B  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐3492  8.03  Volvo Penta MD6B  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐7378  9.50  Volvo Penta MD6B, 1976  7.46 4  diesel  2.63 inboard SFC‐8060  9.40  Volvo Penta MD7  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3296  9.40  Volvo Penta MD7  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3688  9.15  Volvo Penta MD7  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFB‐6543  12.00  Volvo Penta MD70 1977  92.65 4  diesel  26.89 inboard SFC‐5736  8.40  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐5524  9.60  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard 

Page 223: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

217 

 

SFC‐3673  9.48  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3536  9.41  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3298  9.20  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3430  9.14  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3623  9.14  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3380  8.40  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3356  8.35  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐4896  8.03  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐5207  8.03  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3344  8.00  Volvo Penta MD7A  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐5746  9.41  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐4017  8.80  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐4064  8.03  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐4537  7.70  Volvo Penta MD7A 1978  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐4508  10.80  Volvo Penta MD7A 1981  9.70 4  diesel  3.19 inboard SFC‐3574  10.55  Volvo Penta MD7B  12.68 4  diesel  4.22 inboard SFC‐3225  9.94  Volvo Penta MD7B  12.68 4  diesel  4.22 inboard SFC‐3540  8.90  Volvo Penta MD7B  12.68 4  diesel  4.22 inboard SFC‐3360  8.90  Volvo Penta MD7B  12.68 4  diesel  4.22 inboard SFC‐3910  8.56  Volvo Penta MD7B  12.68 4  diesel  4.22 inboard SFC‐5945  9.30  Volvo Penta MD7B 1981  12.68 4  diesel  4.22 inboard SFC‐5352  14.20  Volvo Penta MD96 1959  94.74 4  diesel  26.45 inboard SFC‐4725  17.50  Volvo Penta MD96 1960  94.74 4  diesel  26.45 inboard SFC‐5128  17.93  Volvo Penta MD96B  94.74 4  diesel  26.00 inboard SFB‐9552  7.45  Volvo Penta TAMD 30A  78.33 4  diesel  25.34 inboard SFB‐9256  8.40  Volvo Penta TAMD 31  82.06 4  diesel  21.72 inboard SFB‐8746  8.40  Volvo Penta TAMD30 1986  78.33 4  diesel  25.34 inboard SFC‐2878  8.00  Volvo Penta TAMD31B  82.06 4  diesel  21.72 inboard SFC‐3660  8.25  Volvo Penta TAMD40  110.41 4  diesel  38.32 inboard SFC‐4986  9.30  Volvo Penta TAMD40A 1982  110.41 4  diesel  38.32 inboard 

Page 224: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

218 

 

SFC‐3524  9.20  Volvo Penta TAMD41  126.82 4  diesel  35.81 inboard SFC‐4060  8.25  Volvo Penta TAMD41A 1989  126.82 4  diesel  35.81 inboard SFC‐4809  10.23  Volvo Penta TAMD41B  126.82 4  diesel  35.81 inboard SFC‐3672  10.50  Volvo Penta TAMD60  143.23 4  diesel  38.76 inboard SFB‐9084  8.10  Volvo Penta TDM 40  104.44 4  diesel  34.40 inboard SFC‐6357  13.22  Volvo Penta TMD 22  58.19 4  diesel  4.50 inboard SFC‐3744  12.95  Volvo Penta TMD 31 B  74.60 4  diesel  22.82 inboard SFC‐8335  10.97  Volvo Penta TMD 40 A  87.28 4  diesel  31.83 inboard SFC‐6281  10.42  Volvo Penta TMD100A  196.94 4  diesel  51.25 inboard SFC‐5481  12.93  Volvo Penta TMD22A 1997  58.19 4  diesel  4.50 inboard SFB‐7858  8.10  Volvo Penta TMD30  64.16 4  diesel  22.27 inboard SFB‐7759  8.00  Volvo Penta TMD30  64.16 4  diesel  22.27 inboard SFB‐8451  8.00  Volvo Penta TMD30  64.16 4  diesel  22.27 inboard SFC‐4631  9.14  Volvo Penta TMD31  74.60 4  diesel  22.82 inboard SFC‐5081  13.62  Volvo Penta TMD31 1990  74.60 4  diesel  22.82 inboard SFC‐6614  10.00  Volvo Penta TMD31,1990  74.60 4  diesel  22.82 inboard SFC‐3817  13.30  Volvo Penta TMD31A  74.60 4  diesel  22.82 inboard SFC‐5082  11.85  Volvo Penta TMD40 1982  104.44 4  diesel  34.40 inboard SFC‐2477  8.96  Volvo Penta TMD40 1983  104.44 4  diesel  34.40 inboard SFC‐3906  10.35  Volvo Penta TMD41MS4 1988  111.90 4  diesel  35.54 inboard SFB‐8743  11.97  Volvo Penta TMD50B 1982  89.74 4  diesel  27.32 inboard SFB‐2307  11.15  Volvo Penta TMD70 1978  126.82 4  diesel  35.00 inboard SFB‐7652  12.85  Volvo Penta TMD70B 1973  116.37 4  diesel  30.80 inboard SFB‐6807  15.13  Volvo Penta TMD96  119.36 4  diesel  22.59 inboard SFB‐6368  15.08  Volvo Penta TMD96  119.36 4  diesel  22.59 inboard SFB‐6634  14.56  Volvo Penta TMD96 Diesel  119.36 4  diesel  22.59 inboard SFB‐4787  14.98  Volvo Penta TMD96B 1957  119.36 4  diesel  22.59 inboard SFC‐5858  13.70  Volvo TAMD 120B 1986  253.64 4  diesel  63.26 inboard SFC‐2813  8.30  Volvo TAMD41/MS4  126.82 4  diesel  35.81 inboard SFC‐8258  10.19  VP AQAD40B, 1984  115.63 4  diesel  26.00 inboard 

Page 225: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

219 

 

SFC‐6509  11.89  VP MD 17 C  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐7411  11.30  VP MD 17 C, diesel  26.11 4  diesel  7.58 inboard SFC‐7230  11.05  VP MD21A, 1977  33.57 4  diesel  11.12 inboard SFC‐8100  10.68  VP TAMD 61 A, 1992  170.09 4  diesel  45.02 inboard SFC‐3289  9.42  Yanmar 1GM  5.59 4  diesel  1.90 inboard SFC‐3548  9.09  Yanmar 1GM  5.59 4  diesel  1.90 inboard SFC‐2233  5.23  Yanmar 1GM 1982  5.59 4  diesel  1.90 inboard SFC‐3509  7.90  Yanmar 1GM10  6.71 4  diesel  2.30 inboard SFC‐8869  10.30  Yanmar 2GM  11.19 4  diesel  3.79 inboard SFC‐3588  9.87  Yanmar 2GM  11.19 4  diesel  3.79 inboard SFC‐3269  8.86  Yanmar 2GM  11.19 4  diesel  3.79 inboard SFC‐8392  11.10  Yanmar 2GM 20, 1999  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐8694  8.25  Yanmar 2GM, 1983  11.19 4  diesel  3.79 inboard SFC‐7269  9.65  Yanmar 2GM, 1991  11.19 4  diesel  3.79 inboard SFC‐7576  7.80  Yanmar 2GM20  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐3302  9.45  Yanmar 2GM20  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐3349  9.60  Yanmar 2GM20 1986  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐6804  8.03  Yanmar 2GM20F  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐3413  9.40  Yanmar 2GM20F  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐3605  8.20  Yanmar 2GM20F  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐5230  8.70  Yanmar 2GM20F 1987  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐7869  9.41  Yanmar 2GM20F, 1998  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐4608  9.48  Yanmar 2GMF 1990  11.19 4  diesel  3.79 inboard SFB‐9947  6.40  Yanmar 2QM15  11.19 4  diesel  3.71 inboard SFC‐3429  10.90  Yanmar 2QM15GH  11.19 4  diesel  3.71 inboard SFB‐5120  6.80  Yanmar 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐5578  6.30  Yanmar 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐5954  10.72  Yanmar 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐3351  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐6257  9.80  Yanmar 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard 

Page 226: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

220 

 

SFC‐3700  9.36  Yanmar 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐7770  8.15  Yanmar 2QM20 1976  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐8420  6.55  Yanmar 2QM20 1977  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐4035  11.00  Yanmar 2QM20 1977  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐4642  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20 1977  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐2162  7.00  Yanmar 2QM20 1979  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐8259  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20 1979  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐8054  6.75  Yanmar 2QM20 1980  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐5430  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20 1980  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐6238  9.40  Yanmar 2QM20 1988  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐8165  7.30  Yanmar 2QM20 diesel  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐6535  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20, 1977  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐6310  9.89  Yanmar 2QM20, 1979  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐9505  7.75  Yanmar 2QM20, 1980  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐6825  9.84  Yanmar 2QM2081008 1976  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐4046  9.81  Yanmar 2QM20H 1980  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐8861  8.57  Yanmar 2YM15 E00382  10.15 4  diesel  3.50 inboard SFB‐9939  6.10  Yanmar 3 HM 1984  22.39 4  diesel  7.24 inboard SFC‐7176  10.00  Yanmar 3 HM 35  25.36 4  diesel  8.36 inboard SFC‐6761  12.50  Yanmar 3 HM, 1984  22.38 4  diesel  7.24 inboard SFC‐6835  10.70  Yanmar 3GH30F 2002  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐3915  10.30  Yanmar 3GM 30 FG EU, 2002  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐8318  10.35  Yanmar 3GM 30F, 2003  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐3458  9.81  Yanmar 3GM30  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐8798  9.30  Yanmar 3GM30, 2003  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐7131  10.85  Yanmar 3GM30,‐87  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐3491  9.81  Yanmar 3GM30F  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐4888  9.81  Yanmar 3GM30F  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐3379  9.80  Yanmar 3GM30F  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐5866  9.40  Yanmar 3GM30F 1985  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard 

Page 227: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

221 

 

SFC‐4957  11.40  Yanmar 3GM30F 1987  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐6816  9.71  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1988  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐6719  10.00  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1994  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐7302  9.40  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1998  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐6137  11.50  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1998  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐6855  11.07  Yanmar 3GM30F, 1999  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐7534  11.10  Yanmar 3GM30F, 2000  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐8025  10.28  Yanmar 3GM30F, 2002  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐5256  11.66  Yanmar 3GM30F4449  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐3451  11.00  Yanmar 3GM30FC  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFC‐7065  11.03  Yanmar 3GM30FC, 1999  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFB‐8653  9.81  Yanmar 3HM 1982  22.38 4  diesel  7.24 inboard SFC‐6443  11.20  YANMAR 3HM 35SD30  25.36 4  diesel  8.36 inboard SFB‐8752  10.28  Yanmar 3HM 5794 1982  22.38 4  diesel  7.24 inboard SFC‐7932  11.07  Yanmar 3HM, 1987  22.38 4  diesel  7.24 inboard SFC‐5236  9.36  Yanmar 3HM35  25.36 4  diesel  8.36 inboard SFC‐5917  11.10  Yanmar 3HM35F 1993  25.36 4  diesel  8.36 inboard SFC‐8230  11.07  Yanmar 3HM35HP  25.36 4  diesel  8.36 inboard SFC‐8640  9.55  Yanmar 3JH 4BE  29.09 4  diesel  8.20 inboard SFC‐8622  11.28  Yanmar 3JH2TE Diesel  33.57 4  diesel  9.79 inboard SFC‐8302  12.15  Yanmar 3JH4E  29.09 4  diesel  8.00 inboard SFC‐8603  11.35  Yanmar 3JH4E  29.09 4  diesel  8.00 inboard SFC‐7579  11.40  Yanmar 3JH4E, 2005  29.09 4  diesel  8.00 inboard SFC‐7988  10.35  Yanmar 3YM20,2005  15.67 4  diesel  5.40 inboard SFC‐7946  10.21  Yanmar 3YM30  21.71 4  diesel  7.00 inboard SFC‐8511  10.75  Yanmar 3YM30, 2005  21.71 4  diesel  7.00 inboard SFC‐8871  11.90  Yanmar 3YM30C, 2004  21.71 4  diesel  7.00 inboard SFC‐6786  14.00  Yanmar 4JH3 TBE  53.71 4  diesel  16.09 inboard SFC‐8069  12.10  Yanmar 4JH36B4E  39.54 4  diesel  11.22 inboard SFC‐7046  11.30  Yanmar 4JH3‐BE  39.54 4  diesel  11.22 inboard 

Page 228: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

222 

 

SFC‐6686  13.39  Yanmar 4JH3‐TBE  53.71 4  diesel  16.09 inboard SFC‐8040  13.50  Yanmar 4JH3‐TBE 2,6  53.71 4  diesel  16.09 inboard SFC‐7885  13.39  Yanmar 4JH3‐TBE, 2003  53.71 4  diesel  16.09 inboard SFC‐7255  11.55  Yanmar 4JH4‐E  41.03 4  diesel  11.90 inboard SFC‐7841  11.55  Yanmar 4JH4‐E  41.03 4  diesel  11.90 inboard SFC‐7334  12.20  Yanmar 4JH4‐E, 2005  41.03 4  diesel  11.90 inboard SFC‐8769  13.09  Yanmar 4JH4E, 2005   41.03 4  diesel  11.90 inboard SFC‐8180  13.09  Yanmar 4JH4E, 2006  41.03 4  diesel  11.90 inboard SFC‐7886  11.32  Yanmar 4JH4E, 2006  41.03 4  diesel  11.90 inboard SFC‐3157  7.60  Yanmar 4JH‐DTE30679 1987  57.44 4  diesel  16.31 inboard SFC‐7254  7.50  Yanmar 4LHA‐STP  171.58 4  diesel  50.00 inboard SFC‐8748  12.20  Yanmar 54 HK 4Jh4E  40.28 diesel  0.00 inboard SFC‐6296  8.60  Yanmar 6LPSTE  223.80 4  diesel  69.00 inboard SFC‐7400  9.79  Yanmar 6LY‐UTE, 1999  261.10 4  diesel  70.00 inboard SFB‐5045  7.10  Yanmar Diesel 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFB‐8720  10.00  Yanmar diesel 2QM20  16.41 4  diesel  4.05 inboard SFC‐6254  10.30  Yanmar Diesel 3GM30F 1991  20.14 4  diesel  6.63 inboard SFB‐7524  8.00  Yanmar I GM 1982  5.59 4  diesel  1.90 inboard SFC‐3620  8.89  Yanmar IGM  5.59 4  diesel  1.90 inboard SFC‐3275  8.03  Yanmar IGM10  6.71 4  diesel  2.30 inboard SFC‐5946  6.50  Yanmar SB12  7.46 4  diesel  2.67 inboard SFB‐7315  8.34  Yanmar SB8  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐4182  6.00  Yanmar SB8 1978  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐6406  8.43  Yanmar SB8, 1982  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐5171  9.44  Yanmar SB8G  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐3583  8.34  Yanmar SB8G  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐5922  6.00  Yanmar SB8G 1977  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFB‐7618  8.03  Yanmar SB8G 1981  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐6854  7.70  Yanmar SB8G, 1977  5.22 4  diesel  1.98 inboard SFC‐4881  9.92  Yanmar YSM12  7.46 4  diesel  2.59 inboard 

Page 229: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

223 

 

SFC‐3331  9.35  Yanmar YSM12  7.46 4  diesel  2.59 inboard SFC‐3852  9.81  Yanmar YSM12G  7.46 4  diesel  2.59 inboard SFC‐7049  8.23  Yanmar YSM12G 82  7.46 4  diesel  2.59 inboard SFC‐3403  9.35  Yanmar YSM12G80  7.46 4  diesel  2.59 inboard SFC‐3579  8.04  Yanmar YSM8G  5.22 4  diesel  1.81 inboard SFC‐7229  10.75  Yanmar,6LY2A‐STP,‐04  261.10 4  diesel  90.00 inboard SFC‐3327  9.07  Yanmar2GM20F  13.43 4  diesel  4.55 inboard SFC‐3297  11.00  2 Volvo Penta MB2  5.59 4  gasoline  3.00 inboard SFC‐4937  6.00  Albin 0 11  3.73 4  gasoline  1.63 inboard SFB‐8076  8.25  Albin 0,21 1969  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐3997  6.00  Albin 011‐69  3.73 4  gasoline  1.63 inboard SFB‐5705  6.40  Albin 0‐2  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐3423  9.46  Albin 021  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐3523  8.64  Albin 021  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFB‐7398  6.60  Albin 021 1964  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐7369  8.25  Albin 021 Kombi  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐8722  8.25  Albin 021, 1968  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐8411  8.25  Albin 021, 1972  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐4403  8.25  Albin 021‐67  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐5651  8.25  Albin 022  8.95 4  gasoline  4.17 inboard SFC‐3913  7.64  Albin 0‐22  8.95 4  gasoline  4.17 inboard SFC‐3461  9.70  Albin 022 Kombi  8.95 4  gasoline  4.17 inboard SFC‐7979  8.25  Albin 0‐22 kombi, 1970  8.95 4  gasoline  4.17 inboard SFC‐6351  8.81  Albin 0‐22, 1970  8.95 4  gasoline  4.17 inboard SFB‐9245  7.20  Albin 0‐41  17.90 4  gasoline  8.00 inboard SFB‐7441  10.00  Albin O 41  17.90 4  gasoline  8.00 inboard SFB‐7445  8.25  Albin O‐21 bensin 1969  7.46 4  gasoline  3.27 inboard SFC‐5397  8.25  Alvin 022  8.95 4  gasoline  4.17 inboard SFC‐8623  7.10  Honda 90, 2008  67.14 4  gasoline  70.40 outboard SFC‐8551  7.27  Honda BF200AXL, 2007  149.20 4  gasoline  66.81 outboard 

Page 230: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

224 

 

SFC‐6472  9.10  Honda EF25, 1999  18.65 4  gasoline  4.50 outboard SFC‐8183  7.01  Mercruiser 4,3L MPI Alpha  164.12 4  gasoline  46.18 inboard SFC‐8299  6.13  Mercruiser 5,0 MPI  193.96 4  gasoline  71.17 inboard SFC‐8083  6.47  Mercruiser 5.0, 1994  193.96 4  gasoline  71.17 inboard SFC‐8817  7.20  SUZUKI DF 150, 2007  111.90 4  gasoline  49.78 outboard SFC‐8753  5.73  Suzuki DF140/14001885222, 2008  104.44 4  gasoline  37.48 outboard SFC‐4393  6.10  Yamaha 30 DEOL 1989  22.38 2  gasoline  13.00 outboard SFC‐7586  7.92  Yamaha 4AC  2.98 2  gasoline  2.20 outboard SFC‐4548  5.80  Yamaha 60FEOL 1992  44.76 2  gasoline  23.00 outboard SFC‐5991  6.30  Yamaha 85 1981  63.41 2  gasoline  34.50 outboard SFC‐8297  9.99  Yamaha 9,9  7.39 2  gasoline  5.10 outboard SFC‐4934  8.04  Yamaha 9.9AE 1991  7.39 2  gasoline  5.10 outboard SFC‐7011  6.00  Yamaha 90, 1999  67.14 2  gasoline  34.50 outboard SFC‐7123  3.99  Yamaha F25AES, 2004  18.65 4  gasoline  6.43 outboard 

 

Page 231: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

225 

 

Appendix C Fuel Estimation for 805 Boats using Regression&Means

Count ID  length Est. 

inboard/outboard Est. Fuel type 

Est. Power (Kw) 

Est. Stroke 

Est. Fuel  Consumption (l/hr) 

1  6.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.57 2  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 3  2.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.53 4  2.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.81 5  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.14 6  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.83 7  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.89 8  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.97 9  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.42 10  2.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.72 11  2.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.79 12  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.06 13  7.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.25 14  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 15  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.09 16  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.16 17  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.16 18  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.06 19  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.89 20  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.49 21  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 22  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 23  3.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.40 24  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.22 25  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.13 26  2.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.70 27  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.88 28  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.87 29  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 30  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 31  3.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.24 32  2.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.60 33  11.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.52 34  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.76 35  12.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.06 37  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 38  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.48 39  9.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.95 

Page 232: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

226 

 

40  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.14 41  10.1  1  1  41.35  4  13.80 42  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 43  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 44  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 45  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.45 46  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 47  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.03 48  3.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.23 49  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.61 50  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 51  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.94 52  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.89 53  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 54  10.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.65 55  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.20 56  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.12 57  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.86 58  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 59  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.85 60  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.21 61  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.00 62  2.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.79 63  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.35 64  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.06 65  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 66  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.10 67  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 68  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.13 69  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.67 70  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.10 71  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.60 72  6.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.31 73  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 74  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.37 75  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 77  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.16 78  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 79  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 80  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 81  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.21 82  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.86 

Page 233: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

227 

 

83  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 84  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 85  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.07 86  10.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.62 87  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.41 88  12.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.07 89  9.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.87 90  9.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.93 91  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.21 92  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.00 93  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.85 94  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.98 95  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.45 96  10.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.55 97  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 98  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.15 99  11.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.35 100  9.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.85 101  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 102  12.9  1  1  41.35  4  12.95 103  9.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.88 104  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.78 105  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.78 106  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.82 107  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.39 108  10.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.66 109  9.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.97 110  10.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.63 111  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.16 112  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 113  2.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.73 114  8.5  1  0  30.38  4  11.05 115  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.11 116  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 117  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 118  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.65 119  7.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.27 120  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.18 121  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.69 122  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.85 123  6.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.34 124  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.94 

Page 234: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

228 

 

125  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.69 126  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.20 127  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.64 128  2.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.82 129  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 130  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 131  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  11.02 132  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.45 133  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.71 134  3.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.40 135  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 136  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 137  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.09 138  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.40 139  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.95 140  3.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.34 141  2.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.56 142  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.91 143  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.51 144  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.39 145  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.74 146  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.61 147  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.48 148  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.12 149  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.11 150  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 151  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 152  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.11 153  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.03 154  9.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.88 155  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.06 156  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 157  12.8  1  1  41.35  4  12.97 158  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.75 159  11.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.46 160  9.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.95 161  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.75 162  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 163  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 164  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.64 165  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.03 166  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.77 

Page 235: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

229 

 

167  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 168  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 169  11.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.39 170  7.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.05 171  9.1  1  1  41.35  4  14.11 172  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 173  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.77 174  9.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.98 175  12.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.15 176  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 177  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 178  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 179  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.28 180  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.01 181  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.22 182  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.00 183  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 184  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.19 185  5.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.79 186  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 187  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.15 188  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 189  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 190  11.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.32 191  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.91 192  3.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.25 193  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.92 194  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.13 195  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.24 196  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 197  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.98 198  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 199  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 200  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.67 201  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.73 202  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.12 203  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.86 204  2.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.67 205  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.04 206  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.95 207  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.37 208  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 

Page 236: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

230 

 

209  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.75 210  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 211  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.34 212  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 213  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.50 214  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.29 215  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.70 216  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 217  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.95 218  3.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.34 219  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 220  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.80 221  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.09 222  6.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.52 223  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.73 224  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.63 225  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.62 226  2.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.55 227  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.19 228  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.11 229  6.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.32 230  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 231  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.07 232  10.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.63 233  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 234  12.1  1  1  41.35  4  13.19 235  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.44 236  11.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.29 237  9.1  1  1  41.35  4  14.09 238  7.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.05 239  12.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.11 240  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 241  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.19 242  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 243  9.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.96 244  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.09 245  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.22 246  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.74 247  10.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.66 248  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.00 250  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.88 251  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.11 

Page 237: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

231 

 

252  11.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.30 254  10.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.65 255  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 256  10.1  1  1  41.35  4  13.79 257  11.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.46 258  11.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.31 259  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.39 260  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.41 261  10.1  1  1  41.35  4  13.81 262  10.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.71 263  2.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.82 264  1.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.89 265  1.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.88 266  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.00 267  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.28 268  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.30 269  3.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.43 270  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 271  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.94 272  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 273  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.21 274  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.85 275  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 276  2.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.73 277  8.2  1  0  30.38  2  7.10 278  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.06 279  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.16 280  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.95 281  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.00 282  2.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.78 283  10.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.63 284  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.46 285  7.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.14 286  7.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.12 287  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.70 288  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.08 289  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 290  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  10.99 291  6.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.33 292  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 293  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.12 294  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.35 

Page 238: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

232 

 

295  2.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.58 296  6.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.55 297  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.22 298  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.24 299  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 300  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.11 301  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.18 302  7.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.06 303  6.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.55 304  7.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.25 305  7.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.25 306  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.09 307  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.19 308  7.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.06 309  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.15 310  3.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.24 311  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.18 312  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 313  3.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.39 314  3.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.24 315  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.94 316  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.09 317  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.15 318  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.12 319  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 320  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.38 321  9.1  1  1  41.35  4  14.10 322  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  11.01 323  9.1  1  1  41.35  4  14.10 324  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 325  12.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.07 326  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  11.02 327  3.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.39 328  10.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.72 329  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 330  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 331  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.69 332  10.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.63 333  2.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.61 334  2.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.64 335  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.15 336  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.28 

Page 239: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

233 

 

337  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.09 338  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.28 339  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.19 340  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 341  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 342  10.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.56 343  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.60 344  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.23 345  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 346  3.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.49 347  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.39 348  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 349  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.09 350  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.19 351  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.24 352  7.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.26 353  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.66 354  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.21 355  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.00 356  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 357  2.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.56 358  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 359  5.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.77 360  9.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.91 361  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 362  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.18 363  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 364  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.06 365  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.18 366  3.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.38 367  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 368  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.28 369  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.74 370  12.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.13 371  9.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.89 372  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.30 373  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 374  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 375  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.31 376  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.19 377  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.09 378  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.40 

Page 240: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

234 

 

379  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.63 380  6.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.34 381  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.49 382  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.87 383  2.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.60 384  3.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.49 385  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.97 386  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 387  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.69 388  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.13 389  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.49 390  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 391  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.07 392  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.07 393  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.19 394  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.19 395  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 396  8.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.00 397  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.28 398  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.87 399  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.26 400  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 401  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.94 402  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.89 403  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 404  2.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.54 405  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.30 406  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.01 407  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.02 408  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.29 409  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.74 410  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 411  6.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.36 412  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 413  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 414  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.15 415  6.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.53 416  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 417  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.23 418  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 419  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.87 420  9.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.98 

Page 241: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

235 

 

421  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 422  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.71 423  6.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.35 424  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 425  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.08 426  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.18 427  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.19 428  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 429  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 430  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 431  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 432  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 433  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.00 434  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 435  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 436  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 437  3.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.33 438  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.30 439  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 440  2.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.63 441  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.62 442  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 443  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.07 444  2.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.57 445  8.1  1  0  30.38  2  7.12 446  2.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.82 447  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 448  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.15 449  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 450  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.13 451  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 452  2.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.66 453  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 454  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 455  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 456  3.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.42 457  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.14 458  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 459  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 460  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 461  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 462  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 

Page 242: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

236 

 

463  6.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.53 464  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.62 465  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 466  5.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.78 467  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 468  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 469  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 470  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 471  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 472  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 474  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 475  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 476  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 477  10.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.56 478  11.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.31 479  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 480  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 481  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 482  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  11.01 483  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 484  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 485  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.65 486  6.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.53 487  3.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.45 488  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 489  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.65 490  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 491  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.07 492  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 493  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 494  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 495  11.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.46 496  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 497  12.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.01 498  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 499  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.10 500  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.41 501  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 502  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.74 503  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.15 504  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 505  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 

Page 243: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

237 

 

506  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 507  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 508  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.36 509  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 510  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.36 511  5.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.87 512  3.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.45 513  3.9  0  0  52.72  2  26.23 514  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.01 515  3.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.45 516  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 517  7.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.04 518  10.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.68 519  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 520  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.40 521  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 522  9.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.86 523  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 524  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 525  12.1  1  1  41.35  4  13.19 526  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 527  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 528  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 529  9.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.89 530  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 531  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 532  6.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.32 533  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.62 534  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.71 535  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.74 536  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 537  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 538  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 539  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 540  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 541  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 542  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 543  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 544  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 545  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 546  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 547  8.5  1  0  30.38  4  11.04 

Page 244: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

238 

 

548  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 549  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 550  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.01 551  9.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.98 552  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 553  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.01 554  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.07 555  7.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.07 556  6.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.56 557  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.41 558  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.19 559  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 560  9.1  1  1  41.35  4  14.11 561  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.40 562  12.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.16 563  11.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.46 564  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.15 565  9.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.98 566  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.19 567  7.1  0  0  52.72  2  25.26 568  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 569  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 570  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.74 571  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.74 572  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 573  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 574  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 575  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 576  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 577  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 578  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 579  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 580  3.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.33 581  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.38 582  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 583  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 584  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 585  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 586  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 587  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.71 588  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.38 589  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 

Page 245: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

239 

 

590  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.10 591  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  11.01 592  7.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.13 593  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 594  6.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.32 595  9.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.95 596  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 597  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.23 598  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 599  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 600  5.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.78 601  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 602  7.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.04 603  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 604  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 605  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 606  10.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.56 607  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 608  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.14 609  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 610  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.62 611  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 612  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 613  4.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.08 614  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.30 615  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 616  3.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.36 617  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 618  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 619  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.14 620  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 621  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.65 622  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.39 623  5.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.62 624  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 625  8.9  1  1  41.35  4  14.17 626  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 627  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.13 628  10.8  1  1  41.35  4  13.59 629  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 630  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.14 631  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 

Page 246: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

240 

 

632  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 633  5.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.78 634  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 635  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 636  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 637  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.50 638  5.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.68 639  6.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.35 640  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 641  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 642  3.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.42 643  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 644  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 645  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 646  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 647  7.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.13 648  9.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.92 649  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 650  10.9  1  1  41.35  4  13.56 652  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 653  11.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.46 654  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.77 655  11.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.31 656  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 657  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 658  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 659  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.08 660  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 661  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 662  11.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.37 663  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.07 664  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 665  11.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.53 666  11.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.53 667  12.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.13 668  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 669  8.4  1  0  30.38  4  11.07 670  11.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.53 671  7.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.13 672  4.2  0  0  52.72  2  26.14 674  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 675  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 

Page 247: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

241 

 

676  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 677  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 678  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 679  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 680  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.13 681  6.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.50 682  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 683  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 684  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.15 685  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 686  3.4  0  0  52.72  2  26.39 687  2.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.60 688  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.30 689  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 690  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 691  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 692  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 693  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 694  7.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.22 695  8.5  1  0  30.38  4  11.04 696  7.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.07 697  6.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.38 698  13.0  1  1  41.35  4  12.91 699  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 700  9.2  1  1  41.35  4  14.08 701  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 702  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 703  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 704  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 705  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 706  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.13 707  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 708  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 709  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.77 710  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 711  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 712  3.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.51 713  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 714  6.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.32 715  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 716  5.2  0  0  52.72  2  25.84 717  4.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.99 

Page 248: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

242 

 

718  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 719  9.7  1  1  41.35  4  13.92 720  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 721  7.7  0  0  52.72  2  25.07 722  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 723  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 724  5.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.65 725  8.0  1  0  30.38  2  7.15 726  3.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.33 727  11.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.37 728  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 729  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 730  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 731  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 732  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 733  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 734  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 735  5.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.74 736  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 737  11.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.53 738  11.1  1  1  41.35  4  13.50 739  9.0  1  1  41.35  4  14.14 740  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 741  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 742  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 743  3.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.42 744  4.3  0  0  52.72  2  26.11 745  3.7  0  0  52.72  2  26.30 746  3.8  0  0  52.72  2  26.27 747  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.74 748  7.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.10 749  7.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.19 750  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 751  10.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.74 752  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 753  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 754  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 755  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.23 756  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.41 757  8.8  1  1  41.35  4  14.20 758  11.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.40 759  9.4  1  1  41.35  4  14.02 

Page 249: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

243 

 

760  12.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.10 761  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 762  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.01 763  8.2  1  0  30.38  4  11.13 764  4.5  0  0  52.72  2  26.05 765  10.4  1  1  41.35  4  13.71 766  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 767  11.5  1  1  41.35  4  13.37 768  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 769  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 770  11.3  1  1  41.35  4  13.43 771  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 772  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 773  7.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.13 774  5.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.71 775  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 776  5.3  0  0  52.72  2  25.81 777  6.6  0  0  52.72  2  25.41 778  6.5  0  0  52.72  2  25.44 779  5.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.78 780  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.01 781  7.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.01 782  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 783  10.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.77 784  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 785  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 786  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 787  12.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.16 788  7.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.04 789  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 790  11.6  1  1  41.35  4  13.34 792  11.2  1  1  41.35  4  13.46 793  6.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.32 794  8.3  1  0  30.38  4  11.10 795  9.1  1  1  41.35  4  14.11 796  10.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.83 797  7.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.29 798  6.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.59 799  7.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.16 800  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 801  8.6  1  0  30.38  4  11.01 802  6.4  0  0  52.72  2  25.47 

Page 250: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

244 

 

803  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 804  9.3  1  1  41.35  4  14.05 805  4.9  0  0  52.72  2  25.93 806  4.6  0  0  52.72  2  26.02 807  4.0  0  0  52.72  2  26.20 808  4.1  0  0  52.72  2  26.17 809  12.0  1  1  41.35  4  13.22 810  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 811  5.0  0  0  52.72  2  25.90 812  4.8  0  0  52.72  2  25.96 813  8.7  1  1  41.35  4  14.23 

 

Page 251: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Appendix D: Questionnaire This questionnaire will be used in accompany with several others to collect expert opinions in order to determine which kind of recreational boating impacts on Kosterhavets National park the government should give the highest priority. Please note that 1 boating season is assumed 100 days. And all boats are considered to be using either gasoline or diesel. Please have a look at the summary of recreational boating processes, possible emissions, and possible impacts assessed in the project. This will then be followed by a table. In this table, a scoring is to be given. The rest of the instructions will be given in each section. Please reply electronically if possible. The diagrams and data shown in this questionnaire is a replica from the project’s report. Once the project is completed, the report is available upon request. Section A - Boating Process Recreational boating includes boats that are less than 12 meters long. However, in case of errors when studying the length overalls of boats, all boats in Koster that have been counted are less than 13 meters long. The amount of boats is estimated from an aerial photograph taken randomly on a summer day. Below is the conceptual diagram of boating processes and its subprocesses with their emissions.

Fig y. Conceptual Model summarizing the Recreational Boating Process, sub processes, and inventories

• Recreation • Electric Power Generation • Antifouling • Combustion within boat

Engines Fuel

Air

Biocid

H2O

Metals

SO HC CO NO

Etc.

HC PM Metals Oil Biocid

Etc.

The 4 subprocesses include Recreation, Electric Power Generation, Antifouling, and Combustion.

• Recreation – This is the boating itself and other activities associated with boating. The use of motor powered PWCs (i.e. jet skis) are not considered.

• Electric power generation – this is the means of power generation on yachts for electronical devices. Since this process has just been recently founded, not much data on it is obtained.

• Antifouling – the use of antifoulants on boats • Combustion – This is mainly from the engines creating various environmental

problems

245

Page 252: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

Section B – Environmental Impact Summary Recreation There are various environmental impacts associated with recreational activities. This include disturbance to the wild population, where studies in North America have found relocation of habitats to be a possible result of disturbance. Other physical impacts vary from erosion via boat waves to the propeller action which can cut macroalgae and cause severe uprooting and its side effects. Boat waves can also remove epifauna living on seagrass. Evidences have shown boat outboard motors cutting through seagrass areas. Other emissions are from human sewage. The table below summarizes the estimated amount of N, P, and carbohydrate release due to recreation in 1 season. These may lead to the likelyhood increase of eutrophication.

Electric Power Generation Total Calculated Sewage Release 

Emission  Total (kg) 

Nitrogen  193,02

Phospherous  23,79

Carbohydrates  95,16

For this process, nothing much can be said since the process has just been recently found through various yacht and boat sales. Various means of generating electricity on board exists and further study on this matter is required.

Antifouling The use of TBT and Cu as antifoulants have been prohibited by the Swedish law. However, recent experimental studies from Stockholm University has found levels of TBT and Cu on top sediment layers in Stockholm. It is assumed that this is probably because people painted over the TBT and Cu layer, which is released during boat cleaning at the end of the season. An estimate of TBT and other metal leachates for Koster per season is given in the table to the right. These are toxic to various marine life at high concentrations.

Antifouling Contamination 

Contaminants  Total (mg) 

MBT  104,65 

DBT  644 

TBT  3220 

Irgarol  2334,5 

Cu  241500 

Zn  805000 

Pb  2415 

Sn  5635  Combustion Combustion releases various pollutants. If we follow the ideal stoichiometric combustion, a lot of CO2 would result, which in itself has problems with climate change and ocean acidification. However, because the efficiency of combustion is not 100%, NOx, COx, and HCs are also being emitted. Total estimates of these emissions are given in the table below. Furthermore, the engine design and the nature of the combustion process also creates loud noises which enhances further disturbances in recreational boating.

Total Nox (kg)  Total CO (kg)  Total HC (kg)  Total CO2 (kg) 

3151,73  116065,49  36055,73 867937,63

NOx and HCs lead to generation of photochemical smog and acid rain. A majority of HCs are VOCs and some are released with the water exhaust which has been found to be highly toxic for marine life.

246

Page 253: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

247

Section C – Scoring In this section, please give a score to which process do you think should be given highest priority for Kosterhavets Marine National park. The scoring is given by rank, where a 4 is given if the matter should be given the highest priority and 1 for the least priority in according to various kinds of impacts. It is considered that all of these impacts should be given priority but it is the objective of the project to determine which subprocess of boating should be given the highest priority. The reason behind this is because the nature of the problem varies accordingly. Electric power Recreation Antifouling Combustion Marine environments

Air Quality Biota Nearby environments , i.e. Goteborg archipelagos, Stromstad, Tjarno, and the Norwegian Coast

Page 254: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past
Page 255: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past
Page 256: Environmental Implications of Recreational Boating413159/FULLTEXT02.pdf · environmental implications of recreational boating through making past literature reviews, and observe past

TRITA-IM 2009:16 ISSN 1402-7615 Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology www.ima.kth.se


Recommended