Date post: | 14-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | csiporg-slide- |
View: | 420 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Athipat Athipongarporn, Adisak Plitponkarnpim, Chatchai Im-arom, Ratchaneewan Sinitkul,
Sakda Arj-ong Vallipakorn
Department of Pediatrics Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital
Mahidol University
Lead
Toxic substance
Cognitive impairment
CDC and AAP recommend blood lead levels (BLL) <10 μg/dl among children in the US.
American Academy of Pediatrics. 2005
Binns HJ, et al 2007 Bornschein et al 1997
Interior paint
Interior dust Exterior soil
and dust
Community sources
Home products •Hands •Toys •Food •Mouthable objects
Exterior paint
In 2012, Ramathibodi Hospital An 8-m-old girl presented with status epilepticus Her family lived in the recycling factory near Ban
Nong Had Yai school, Samutsakorn Blood lead level (BLL) 166 μg/dl (level of concern
>10 μg/dl)
August 2012 (N=165)
Kindergarten
Grade1-3
Grade4-6
BLL<10mcg/dl
12 26
35
Children with high BLL 73/165 =44.2%
92 73
BLL≥ 10 μg/dl
BLL< 10 μg/dl
Primary objective
To identify the environmental risk factors associated with high blood lead level (BLL)
Secondary objective
To study prevalences of low IQ and LD among children with BLL ≥ 15 μg/dl
Study design Case-control study
Study population Students at Ban Nong Had Yai School ▪ Cases: Students with BLL ≥ 10 μg/dL (High BLL) ▪ Controls: Students with BLL < 10 μg/dL
Matching criteria Classroom: Kindergarten 1-2, Grade 1-3, Grade 4-6 Gender
Match case and control group (67 pairs)
Environmental investigation
Questionnaire 19 risk factors
6 Specimen collection
2 Paint 2 Dust 2 Soil
Data analysis
Distance from home to factory
BLL ≥ 15 mcg/dl (N=25)
BLL < 10 mcg/dl (N=43)
BLL ≥ 10 mcg/dl (N=43)
Screening IQ,LD
Lose follow up Migration
Case (N=73)
1st: Rapport. February, 2013
2nd : Interview by pilot questionnaire. February, 2013
DELTA Lead Paint Handheld XRF Analyzer (OLYMPUS)
3rd : Record environmental lead level, interview and informed lead intoxication in children for parents and teachers, IQ test & WRAT test
Demographic data Risk factors
School and Home duration Father’s and mother’s
occupation Home products Interior and exterior paint Playground Industry
Program STATA 13
Univariate analysis & Multivariate logistic regression analysis
p-value
Odds ratio (95 % Confidence Interval)
Factors Blood lead levels (mcg/dl) Odds ratio (95%CI)
p-value ≥10, n (%) < 10, n (%)
School duration ≥4 years
31 (65) 17 (35) 3.95 (1.5-10.4)
< 0.01
Home duration ≥6 years
31 (61) 20 (39) 2.97 (1.2-7.6)
0.02
Father’s occupation related to lead
23 (62) 14 (38) 1.91 (0.8-4.9)
0.049
Mother’s occupation related to lead
12 (55)
10 (45)
1.28
(0.5-3.4)
NS
Factors Blood lead levels (mcg/dl) Odds ratio (95%CI)
p-value ≥10, n (%) < 10, n (%)
Home and Industrial waste < 500 m
10 (67) 5 (33) 2.30
(0.7-7.6)
NS
Home and Industrial factory < 500 m
31 (60) 21 (40) 2.71
(1.1-6.8)
0.03
Home and Garage < 30 m
7 (50) 7 (50) 1.00 (0.3-3.2)
NS
Interior paints
Enamel wall, window, door frame
Peeled wall, window, door frame
Exterior paints
Enamel wall, gate
Peeled wall, gate
Home product
Peelable items: Toys, Tables, Toothbrushes
Lead containing: Repaired Tank and pot
Metallic odor water
P > 0.05
Factors Blood lead levels Odds ratio (95%CI)
p-value ≥10*n(%) < 10*n(%)
Paint (≥100 ppm) 22 (51) 18 (42) 1.34 (0.6-2.8)
NS
Dust (≥400 ppm) 12 (28) 14 (33) 0.79 (0.4-1.8)
NS
Soil (≥400 ppm) 2 (5) 1 (2) 1.50 (0.3-9.4)
NS
Factors
Coefficient
Odds ratio
95% CI
p-value
School duration ≥ 4 years
1.6 4.9 1.8-13.0 <0.01
Father’s occupation related with lead
1.0 2.8 1.0-7.4 0.04
Distance between home and factory < 500 m
1.1 3.00 1.1-7.9 0.03
OK international.2012
Zhejiang, China 2011
Sichuan, China 2010
Uruguay in 2001 This research
- Poison worker
- Distance 800 meters from factory
- Cottage industries -lead paints - Occupational lead exposure
- Father’s occupation -Distance between home and industry < 500 m.
Daniel Renfrew1.2009
Compare risk factors mass lead poisoning
-Home duration ≥ 6 Y -School duration ≥ 4 Y
IQ test (N=25)
Mean IQ This group 99.6
Samutsakorn 103.7
BKK & perimeter 119.7±14.7
IQ N (%)
< 90 Low normal Borderline MR
5 (20) 4 (16) 0 (0) 1 (4)
Duangduan Chinrungrat.2009 สถาบนัสขภาพจติเด็กและวยัรุน่ราชนครนิทร.์2010
LD ≥ grade3 (N=17)
Prevalence of LD in Thailand 5 - 29.3%
Group N (%)
Learning disability Reading Writing Mathematic
9 (53) 6 (35) 9 (53) 7 (41)
Lieven Lagae.2008
Duangduan Chinrungrat. 2009
Winadda Piyasil. 2006
High blood lead level among children associated with
School duration
Father’s occupation
Distance between home and factory
Prevalences of low IQ and LD were higher than average of Thai children
Different time of collection
Blood sampling
Environmental sampling
Insufficient information of manufacturing in the study area
Screening BLL among children in industrial area
Raise community awareness in lead poisoning by the research evidences for Thailand policy and future researches
All students and teachers in Ban Nong Hat Yai School
The psychologists Boonrananives Foundation Olympus Company, Lead Paint Handheld XRF
Analyzer
Factory
School
100m
The major pathway of exposure for children is from deteriorated lead-based paint and lead-contaminated dust in the home that is ingested during normal hand-to-mouth behavior.
Binns HJ, et al. Interpreting and managing blood lead levels. Pediatrics 2007; 120:e1285–e1298. Bornschein et al. Lanphear, Pathways of Lead Exp Residential Env, 1997
Low IQ, Hearing, Growth
Encephalopathy Nephrotoxic
Encephalopathy Anemia
DEAD
www.aafp.com
Neurological disorder that difficult to reading, writing or calculate
The children cannot do it more than 2 levels of classroom
Reading disabilty
Writing disability
Calculate disability
www.rcpsycht.org
Factors Group Odds ratio (95%CI) p-value
Blood lead level ≥10 μg/dl n(%)
Blood lead level < 10 μg/dl n(%)
Age < 5 years old 5 – 10 years old > 10 years old
8 (38.1)
16 (57.1) 19 (51.4)
13 (61.9) 12 (42.9) 18 (48.6)
1
2.16 (0.66-7.12) 1.72 (0.57-5.21)
NS
Education Preschool Primary school
4 (57.1)
39 (49.4)
3 (42.9)
40 (50.6)
1
1.37 (0.28-6.58)
NS
Class (2013) grade 1 grade 2 grade 3 grade 4 grade 5 grade 6
2 (40.0) 3 (30.0) 4 (40.0) 9 (75.0)
13 (76.4) 8 (32.0)
3 (60.0) 7 (40.0) 6 (60.0) 3 (25.0) 4 (23.6)
17 (68.0)
1
1.05 (0.13-8.41) 1.00 (0.10-9.66)
4.50 (0.40-50.74) 3.90 (0.43-35.16) 0.75 (0.10-5.64)
NS
Interior paint and exterior paint Factors Group Odds ratio
(95%CI) p-value
Blood lead level ≥10 μg/dl n(%)
Blood lead level < 10 μg/dl n(%)
Interior paint
Enamel wall paints 6 (75.0) 2 (25.0) 0.30 (0.06-1.63) NS
Enamel window/door frame
31 (52.5) 28 (47.5) 0.72 (0.29-1.82) NS
Peeled wall 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5) 1.75 (0.39-7.96) NS
Peeled window/door frame
4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 2.10(0.36-12.35) NS
Exterior paint
Enamel wall 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4) 1.24 (0.50-3.07) NS
Enamel gate 23 (60.5) 15 (39.5) 2.15 (0.88-5.22) NS
Peeled wall 16 (48.5) 17 (51.5) 0.91 (0.38-2.17) NS
Peeled gate 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0) 1.00 (0.13-7.53) NS
Factors BLL Odds ratio (95%CI)
p-value
≥10 μg/dl n(%) < 10 μg/dl n(%)
Toy* 19 (55.9) 15 (44.1) 1.48 (0.61-3.56) NS
Table* 6 (60.0) 4 (40.0) 1.58 (0.41-6.12) NS
Toothbrush* 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 1.00 (0.19-5.31) NS
Plate* 38 (50.7) 37 (49.3) 1.23 (0.34-4.43) NS
Repaired Tank** 0 (0.0) 0.00 ** **
Repaired Pot** 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 2.00(0.35-11.55) NS
Metallic odor Water 3 (42.7) 4 (57.1) 0.73 (0.15-3.52) NS
* Peelable color ** Lead containing