+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Epa (ccac november 2012)

Epa (ccac november 2012)

Date post: 13-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: esthhub
View: 409 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
Strategies for Controlling HFC E i i D ti R i l d Emissions: Domestic, Regional and International Approaches NEAR-TERM CLIMATE PROTECTION AND CLEAN AIR FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 31 October – 2 November 2012 Bogota, Colombia Elisa Rim, Economist Stratospheric Protection Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Transcript
Page 1: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Strategies for Controlling HFC E i i D ti R i l dEmissions: Domestic, Regional and

International ApproachesNEAR-TERM CLIMATE PROTECTION AND CLEAN AIR FOR LATIN

AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN31 October – 2 November 2012

Bogota, Colombia

Elisa Rim, EconomistStratospheric Protection Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Page 2: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Scope of Presentation

• HFCs: Why Address Them Now?D ti & R i l A h• Domestic & Regional Approaches

• International Approaches• Overview of CCAC HFC Focal Area

Page 3: Epa (ccac november 2012)

HFCs: Used in Various SectorsSame sectors as ODS

Page 4: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Recent HFC Growth Dramatic and Increasing

Source: UNEP 2011 4

Page 5: Epa (ccac november 2012)

D o m e s t i c / R e g i o n a l M e a s u r e s

to Reduce Emissions

• U.S. ODS programs address alternatives (HFCs)Emissions Reduction Regulations– Emissions Reduction Regulations

• Prohibits intentional releases of ODS & substitutes (HFCs)(HFCs)

• Service practices for motor vehicle a/c (e.g., HFC-134a) • Voluntary Partnerships go beyond regulations

– End-of-life safe appliance disposal – foams & refrigerant– Sector-specific program to reduce emissions

• Other approaches include:– Australian SSG

EU F G l– EU F-Gas rule5

Page 6: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Identifying Safer Alternatives

U.S. EPA’s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program • Globally Unique: evaluates substitutes that reduce overall risk y q

to human health & environment in industrial sectors– e.g., Refrigeration, A/C, Foams, Fire Suppression, Aerosols, etc.

• Menu of Options: 400+ substitutes considered: – ODP, GWP, flammability, toxicity, local air quality, ecosystem effects,

occupational & consumer health/safetyoccupational & consumer health/safety

• Alternatives include:– Alternative chemicals/blends – Alternative technologies (e.g., thermoelectric)

• Next Generation Alternatives

6

– Alternatives for ODS & high-GWP HFCs

Page 7: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Coupling Domestic & RegionalCoupling Domestic & Regional Approaches with International Action:

Amending the Montreal Protocol

Page 8: Epa (ccac november 2012)

HFCs: Potential Growth If Unmitigated

• HFC growth directly li k d M l linked to Montreal Protocol’s ODS phaseout and expanding availability of refrigeration & air conditioning

• HFC emissions could reach 19% of projected global CO2 emissions by 2 y2050 if left unchecked

Page 9: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Taking Action for Sound ODS Phaseout

• HFC Growth is direct result of ODS phaseoutp

• Montreal Protocol experience and success on HFC-sectors

• Montreal Protocol already heavily involved in addressing HFCs- As the phaseout of HCFCs is implemented, MP’s

Multilateral Fund incentivizes transition to climate-friendly, Low-GWP alternatives- Up to 25% additional funding

- Montreal Protocol’s Technical and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) provides global expertise

9

- Science Assessment Panel (SAP) provides information on alternatives

Page 10: Epa (ccac november 2012)

2012 North American Proposal to Amend Montreal Protocol

• Establishes Baseline and Obligations for all countries– Developing Countries: later and with financial assistance p g

• Phases down 21 HFCs, uses GWP-weighting

• Recognizes MPRecognizes MP institutions –expertise

• Coordinates with HCFC Phaseout

• Does not alter any UNFCCC obligations

Page 11: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Climate Benefits: 2012 North American Proposal

• Significant climate benefits: over 96 GtCO2eqC b fit ffi i b i t• Co-benefits: energy efficiency by equipment upgrades, better materials

Near term actions are meaningful Near term actions are meaningful

Cumulative HFC Reductions (MMTCO2eq)  2016 through 2050

Non‐Article 5  42,100 

Article 5  42,900 

Byproduct Controls (HFC‐23)  11,300 

11

World Total  96,300 

Page 12: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Momentum Growing

• Declaration with 108 Parties favoring addressing HFCs under Montreal ProtocolHFCs under Montreal Protocol

• 2nd Declaration (Bali) more forward-leaning, over 90 signatures to date – open until end of 2012 MOPg p

• Numerous studies link HFCs to protecting the climate system and ozone layer

• Many countries incorporating low GWP options in their transition plansoptions in their transition plans

• New alternatives entering the market

Ri 20 t d l HFC h d f• Rio+20 supports gradual HFC phasedown of production & consumption

Page 13: Epa (ccac november 2012)

HFC Focal Area:Since Focal Point Launch• The United States chairing, working closely with UNEP, Canada, UNDP, Italy, Mexico …

• Near-term actions include:• Capacity building

• July Bangkok Technology ConferenceJuly Bangkok Technology Conference• December Commercial Refrigeration Tech Forum

• Inventories• 5 8 Countries Start with production/imports build on sector• 5-8 Countries – Start with production/imports, build on sector

expertise • Case Studies

• Develop information by sector• Develop information by sector• More to come!

• Demonstration projects• Commitments

Page 14: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Successful Technology Conference

•Over 400 people from more than 60 countries • Popularity demonstrates need for information

•Low GWP fluorinated and non-fluorinated alternatives for high GWP HFCs: refrigeration, air conditioning and foams

•Speakers from: US, Europe, China, Japan, India, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, etc.

•Companies: DuPont, Honeywell, Whirlpool, Coca-Cola, Mayekawa, Gree, Carrier, Daikin, AHT, etc.

•Exhibits with cutting edge technologies

Page 15: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Summary

• Commercially manufactured HFCs are short-lived• Suite of known alternatives technologies and better• Suite of known alternatives, technologies, and better

handling can significantly reduce HFC consumption in near and long termg

• Considering ODS and HFCs together allows for focus on the sectors, rather than chemicals– Avoid need for multiple transitions

• Substitutes for many sectors available or under development but there are barriers to their uptake

• CCAC Taking action to overcome barriers!– Enable technologies, promote standard reform, capacity

building

Page 16: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Questions and Comments

• Thank You!

• Elisa Rim, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyElisa Rim, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency– [email protected]

• For More Information:Cindy Newberg, John Thompson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Department of [email protected] [email protected]

Page 17: Epa (ccac november 2012)

Information on Alternatives

17


Recommended