+ All Categories
Home > Documents > EPO e Ferro in Emodialisi: Il PBM al suo esordio Lucia Del ......Adapted from Kausz AT, et al. Dis...

EPO e Ferro in Emodialisi: Il PBM al suo esordio Lucia Del ......Adapted from Kausz AT, et al. Dis...

Date post: 02-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
36
EPO e Ferro in Emodialisi: Il PBM al suo esordio Lucia Del Vecchio Divisione di Nefrologia e Dialisi Ospedale A. Manzoni, ASST Lecco PATIENT BLOOD MANAGEMENT DALLA TEORIA ALLA PRATICA 16 FEBBRAIO 2018
Transcript
  • EPO e Ferro in Emodialisi: Il PBM al suo esordio

    Lucia Del Vecchio

    Divisione di Nefrologia e DialisiOspedale A. Manzoni, ASST Lecco

    PATIENT BLOOD MANAGEMENT DALLA TEORIA ALLA PRATICA16 FEBBRAIO 2018

  • Perché i malati con CKD sviluppano anemia?

    • Primary cause– Low erythropoietin production

    • Secondary cause– Iron deficiency– Hyperparathyroidism– Chronic inflammation– Infection– Nutritional deficiency– Bleeding

  • Anemia Worsens as Kidney Function Declines

    Hb = hemoglobin Adapted from Kausz AT, et al. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2002;10:505-513.

    14% 20%43%

    62%

    5%8%

    8%

    15%

    9%

    17%

    15%

    10%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

    100%

    < 2 2.0–2.9 3.0–3.9 ≥ 4

    Prev

    alen

    ce o

    f Ane

    mia

    (%)

    Serum Creatinine Level (mg/dL)

    Hb = 11–12 g/dL (n = 181)Hb = 10–11 g/dL (n = 105)Hb < 10 g/dL (n = 315)

    Hb Levels

  • Anemia treatment in CKD patientsESAIron

    Both

    Blood transfusions

  • Lawler ev et al Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 667–672, 2010.

    Transfusion rates by Hb level according to thetreatment status

    • 97,636 patients with CKD not on dialysis and anemia• Retrospective analysis between 2002 and 2007

    < 7 7-7.9 8-8.9 9-9.9 10-10.9 11-11.9 12+

    Prob

    abili

    ty o

    f tra

    nsfu

    sion

    (%)

    Hemoglobin (g/dl)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70 No therapyIron

    ESA

    ESA + Iron

  • The 'lucky 13' first chronic haemodialysis patientsRoyal Free Hospital, January 1st 1965

    The early times of dialysisLocatelli F, Del Vecchio L. Am J Nephrol 2010;31(6):557-60

    http://renux.dmed.ed.ac.uk/EdREN/Unitbits/historyweb/HomeHD.html

  • Early ninetiesrHuEPO become available in everyday clinical practice

    Label indication: “Treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal

    failure, including patients on dialysis (end stage renal disease) and

    patients not on dialysis.”

  • Volume 328, Issue 8517, 22 November 1986, Pages 1175-1178

    EFFECT OF HUMAN ERYTHROPOIETIN DERIVED FROM RECOMBINANT DNA ON THE ANAEMIA OF PATIENTS MAINTAINED BY CHRONIC HAEMODIALYSIS

    Winearls CG et al.

    ABSTRACT

  • Fattore di rischio ?Marker di comorbidità?

  • P=0.06

    1.22

    P=0.84

    1.02

    Ref

    1

    P=0.45

    0.9

    RR overall = 0.94 per1g/dl higher Hb

    Relative Risk of Death

    1.4

    1.2

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    RR

    < 10 >1211-11.910-10.9N = 1671 N = 947 N = 763 N = 639

    Haemoglobin (g/dl) at study entry

    Mortality and hospitalisation risks and anemia

    Locatelli et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 108-120

  • Hemoglobin target and ESA

    The higher the better?

    Complete anemia correction did not give

    the awaited results

  • Probability of death or first non - fatal myocardial infarction

    Normal versus low haematocrit

    0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 300

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Months after randomization

    Prim

    ary

    end

    poin

    ts %

    Besarab A et al. N Engl J Med 1998 ; 339 : 584 - 90

    Hct 42 % Age 65 ± 12

    Hct 30 % Age 64 ± 12

    N = 1233

    Clinical evidence of congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease

  • Pfeffer MA et al. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2019-32

    The TREAT StudyCardiovascular composite end point (ITT)

    Months since randomization

    Placebo

    Hazard ratio, 1.05 (95% CI, 0.94 – 1.17)P = 0.41 Darbepoetin alfa

    Patie

    nts

    with

    eve

    nts

    (%)

    0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 480

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    4,044 pts with type 2 diabetes, eGFR 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and Hb< 11 g/dL

    http://www.google.it/imgres?imgurl=http://cdn.everyjoe.com/files/2009/03/1006530_broken_glass.jpg&imgrefurl=http://everyjoe.com/sports/former-nfl-player-komlo-killed-in-crash/&usg=__5pe-DhQuEGkkBUu_O6oBkGY2tag=&h=300&w=225&sz=28&hl=it&start=16&zoom=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=k8yG6oET0hdHIM:&tbnh=116&tbnw=87&prev=/images?q=broken+glass&um=1&hl=it&tbm=isch&ei=UpOlTdvZLofUsgan-YmsBw

  • Pfeffer MA et al. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2019-32

    The TREAT Study: Secondary end-points

    Fatal or non fatal stroke

    Placebo

    Hazard ratio, 1.92 (95% CI, 1.38 – 2.68)P < 0.001

    Darbepo. alfa

    Placebo: 53/2026 (2.6%), 1.1 per 100 patient-years

    Darbepoetin alfa: 101/2012 (5.0%), 2.1% per 100 patient-years

  • Pfeffer MA et al. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2019-32

    Morte per tutte le cause (P=0.13 al log-rank test)

    Darbepoetina alfa Placebo60 su 188 (31.9%) 37 su 160 (23.1%)

    Sottogruppo: 348 pazienti con storia di pregressa neoplasia

    Criteri di esclusione:Pazienti con neoplasia attiva (eccetto basalioma o Ca spinocellulare localizzato)

    Morte per neoplasia (P=0.002 al log-rank test)

    Darbepoetina alfa Placebo14 su 188 (7.4%) 1 su 160 (0.06%)

    Popolazione globale: 20.5% Popolazione globale : 19.5%

    Lo studio TREATAnalisi secondaria sulle neoplasie

  • KDIGO CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE

    FOR ANEMIA IN CKD

    - ESA- Hb

    +FERROTRASFUSIONI

  • USE OF ESAs AND OTHER AGENTS TO TREAT ANEMIA IN CKD

    KDIGO CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR ANEMIA IN CKD

    In general, we suggest that ESAs not be used to maintain Hb concentration above 11.5 g/dl (2C)

    8.00 9.00 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0Hb g/dl

    11.5

    ESA MAINTENANCE THERAPY

  • The ERBP position statement about KDIGO guidelines on anaemia

    ESA MAINTENANCE THERAPY

    Locatelli F, Bárány P, Covic A, De Francisco A, Del Vecchio L, Goldsmith D, Hörl W, London G, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W; ERA-EDTA ERBP Advisory Board Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Jun;28(6):1346-59.

    8.00 9.00 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0Hb g/dl

    12 10

  • Da 6,2% a 18.8%

    22%

    64%

    63%%

  • Grande spinta alla terapia marziale ……

    TREAT Study

  • The ERBP position statement about KDIGO guidelines on anaemia management in chronic kidney disease

    There is absolute iron deficiency (TSAT < 20% and serum ferritin < 100 ng/ml)

    ORAn increase in Hb concentration or a decrease in ESA dose are desired

    ANDTSAT is < 25% (

  • Intervention arms:Optimal → 100-200 mg IV iron per week Suboptimal → < 100 mg per week

    IV iron and ESA in haemodialysis:A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Of the 28 RCTs identified, 7 met the criteria for inclusion

    Roger SD et al. Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Oct 3

    -23% OVERALLrange -7% to -55%

    Weighted average percentage reduction in ESA dose/week

  • Available et: http://www.dopps.org/DPM/

    40% con ferritina ≥ 800 ng/ml

    50% con ferritina ≥ 800 ng/ml

  • Hazard ratio (95% CI) of mortality across the ferritin categories using time-averaged cox regression analyses in MHD patients without polycystic kidney disease.

    Iron indices and survival in maintenance HD patients with and without polycystic kidney disease

    Hatamizadeh P et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28(11): 2889–2898

    2969 MHD patients with and 128 054 without PKD from 580 outpatient HD facilities between July 2001 and June 2006.

    Ferritin (ng/ml) categories

    HR

    of a

    ll-ca

    use

    mor

    talit

    y

  • Associations between IV iron dose and clinical outcomes in 32,435 HD patients in 12 countries from 2002 to 2011 in the DOPPS Study

    HR 1.1395% CI 1.00–1.27

    HR 1.1895% CI 1.07–1.30

    All-cause mortality

    Average montly IV iron dose (mg/month)

    Haza

    rdra

    tio (9

    5% C

    I)

    Kidney Int 2015 Jan;87(1):162-8

  • IV iron therapy

    Traditional iron molecules

  • Parenteral Iron TherapyTraditional molecules

    HMV iron dextranLMV iron dextran

    Iron sucroseIron gluconate

    Hypersensitivity reactionsNeed of resuscitation Team and medications

    HypotensionLow dosesRepeated administration

  • New iron molecules

    Ferric carboxymaltose

    Ferumoxytol

    Iron Isomaltoside

  • Possible advantages:No free ironLarge dose, rapid infusionLower number of administrations

    Ferric carboxymaltose

    Good safety

    IN DIALISI DOSE MASSIMA DA SCHEDA TECNICA 200 MG

    Ferric hydroxide molecules

    Ribbon-like carboxymaltose

  • Onken JE et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013 Aug 20. [Epub ahead of print]

    2584 ND-CKD patients

    FCM 750 mg2 doses in one week

    Iron sucrose 200 mgup to five inf. in 14 days

    Primary efficacy endpoint

    Mean change to highest Hb from baseline to Day 56

    All-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, unstable angina, CHF, arrhythmias and hyper- and hypotensive events

    Primary composite safety endpoint

  • The REPAIR-IDA trialProportion of subjects with an increase in Hb ≥1.0 g/dL between baseline and Day

    56 or time of intervention (modified intent-to-treat population)

    FCM (n = 1249)607/1249 (48.60%)

    Iron sucrose (n = 1244)510/1244 (41.00%)

    7.60% (3.63 to 11.57%)

    Treatment difference (95% CI)

    Onken JE et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Apr;29(4):833-42

  • Onken JE et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Apr;29(4):833-42

    The REPAIR-IDA trialComponents of the primary composite safety endpoint (safety population)

  • Troppo basso a volte non funziona!!

    Grazie per l’attenzione

    Diapositiva numero 1Perché i malati con CKD sviluppano anemia?Anemia Worsens as Kidney Function DeclinesDiapositiva numero 4Diapositiva numero 5Diapositiva numero 6Diapositiva numero 7Diapositiva numero 8Diapositiva numero 9Diapositiva numero 10Diapositiva numero 11Diapositiva numero 12Diapositiva numero 13Diapositiva numero 14Diapositiva numero 15Diapositiva numero 16Diapositiva numero 17Diapositiva numero 18Diapositiva numero 19Diapositiva numero 20Diapositiva numero 21Diapositiva numero 22Diapositiva numero 23Diapositiva numero 24Diapositiva numero 25Diapositiva numero 26Diapositiva numero 27Diapositiva numero 28Diapositiva numero 29Diapositiva numero 30Diapositiva numero 31Diapositiva numero 32Diapositiva numero 33Diapositiva numero 34Diapositiva numero 35Diapositiva numero 36


Recommended