+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Epscor Poster 5 5 09

Epscor Poster 5 5 09

Date post: 20-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: mounttaineer
View: 129 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
1
printed by www.postersession.com Phosphorous is a key nutrient essential to life. Too much however can cause problems in an aquatic system. These problems can include an overload of nutrients that cause turbidity and algae blooms (1). Phosphorous loading into a waterway is caused by a variety of factors, and these factors are in large part due to land use . The three different land types concentrated on in this study were agricultural, impervious ( urban ), and forested. The stream sections were classified based on the predominant surrounding and upstream land uses. Nineteen stream sections from tributaries in the Lamoille River drainage basin were examined in the Summer of 2008 for amounts of total phosphorus and fecal coliform bacterial contamination. Total P concentrations in stream water were generally three times higher during a period of heavy precipitation in late July than during base flow in the middle of June. Some agricultural and impervious sites had total P concentrations comparable to reference forested sites, but impacted agricultural and impervious sites could have total P concentrations two to twenty-fold higher than forested sites during base flow and storm events. The overall trends of the phosphorous concentration indicate that agricultural sites produced the highest amounts, followed by the impervious sites, while the forested sites showed the lowest daily concentration. The results suggest that the source of E. coli in agricultural areas was predominantly from livestock. The source of E. coli in impervious sites was also largely from livestock, but the contribution from human sources increased to one-fourth of the isolates. The source of most isolates of E. coli in forested sites was unable to be determined, possibly because wildlife were not included in the genetic library, but livestock were still the source for one-fourth of the E. coli isolated. Total P was measured on seven occasions from June 13 through August 5. Fecal coliforms were collected on June 23 and 24. 1.Lake Champlain Basin Program, date n/a, http://www.lcbp.org/PHOSPSUM.HTM. Retrieved on 11/1/08 2.Lamoille Valley watershed map taken from www.lcbp.org/Atlas/MapJPEG/nat_lamoille.jpg. Retrieved on 8/5/08. The discharge trends clearly illustrate areas where the state could use more prominent buffer zones, in particularly, the agricultural sites and a number of impervious sites. The frequent occurrence of E. coli from livestock (predominantly cows, goats, horse, and sheep) reflects the pastoral nature of the landscape in Lamoille County. As would be expected, human sources were predominantly associated with human habitation (impervious) sites. Library classification of wild life, and a more extensive human E.coli library would be beneficial, and may happen in the near future in order to help identify the unknown samples acquired this summer and for future studies. ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY Comparison of total phosphorus and sources of fecal coliforms in streams surrounded by forested, agricultural, and impervious land uses in the Lamoille River, VT, drainage basin Greggory A Perry, Timothy R Thurston, and Robert Genter PhD Johnson State College, Johnson VT RIBOTYPING RESULTS PHOSPHOROUS DISCHARGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For funding of our project we thank the NSF and VT EPSCoR. KathiJo Jankowski did an amazing job coordinating the streams project, and the laboratory team at UVM were instrumental in processing our phosphorous samples. Jim Ryan of the Vermont Department of Natural Resources played a vital role in helping us choose our sites. We also thank Farley Ann Brown, Declan McCabe, and Carlos Pinkham for advice and inspiration. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m³/s Concentration μg/l Brown's River AG 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Brewster River F 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Brown's River F 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Brewster River S IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Brewster River IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Deer Brook Ag 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Deer Brook IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l French Hill Brook F 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Brown's River IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Ryder Brook IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Gihon River IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Mill Brook AG 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l North Branch IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Mill Brook AG 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Wild Branch IMP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Wild Branch AG 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Wild Branch F 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l Seymour Brook AG 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Discharge m 3 /s Concentration μg/l North Branch F Sample Collection Collected 1 liter of stream water from each site. Filter Samples were concentrated using a .45 μg membrane filter. Culture Smear of filter plated on McConkey Agar with MUG. Verification Isolated colonies were verified as E. coli using citrate, indole, Voges-Proskauer, and methly red IMViC tests. Ribotyping Isolated E. coli colonies were ribotyped using a Dupont Riboprinter©. ECORI restriction enzyme fragments DNA, and electrophoresis is conducted. DNA is removed from gel via Southern blotting and the membrane is washed by a 16s rDNA, RNA probe. Cluster Analysis Unweighted pair-grouping (UPGMA) Euclidian distance method was used to create a dendogram using Bionummerics© software package. Identification The unknown stream samples were compared to the known human and livestock isolates of E. coli. The highest similarity value of 92 or more indicated a match. The identification was compared to the cluster analysis for confidence and consistency.
Transcript

printed by

www.postersession.com

•Phosphorous is a key nutrient essential to life. Too much however can

cause problems in an aquatic system. These problems can include an

overload of nutrients that cause turbidity and algae blooms (1).

Phosphorous loading into a waterway is caused by a variety of factors,

and these factors are in large part due to land use .

•The three different land types concentrated on in this study were

agricultural, impervious ( urban ), and forested. The stream sections were

classified based on the predominant surrounding and upstream land uses.

•Nineteen stream sections from tributaries in the Lamoille River drainage

basin were examined in the Summer of 2008 for amounts of total

phosphorus and fecal coliform bacterial contamination.

•Total P concentrations in stream water were generally three times higher

during a period of heavy precipitation in late July than during base flow

in the middle of June. Some agricultural and impervious sites had total P

concentrations comparable to reference forested sites, but impacted

agricultural and impervious sites could have total P concentrations two to

twenty-fold higher than forested sites during base flow and storm events.

•The overall trends of the phosphorous concentration indicate that agricultural sites produced the highest

amounts, followed by the impervious sites, while the forested sites showed the lowest daily concentration.

•The results suggest that the source of E. coli in agricultural areas was predominantly from livestock.

• The source of E. coli in impervious sites was also largely from livestock, but the contribution from

human sources increased to one-fourth of the isolates.

•The source of most isolates of E. coli in forested sites was unable to be determined, possibly because

wildlife were not included in the genetic library, but livestock were still the source for one-fourth of the E.

coli isolated.

• Total P was measured on seven occasions from June 13 through

August 5.

•Fecal coliforms were collected on June 23 and 24.

1.Lake Champlain Basin Program, date n/a, http://www.lcbp.org/PHOSPSUM.HTM. Retrieved on 11/1/08

2.Lamoille Valley watershed map taken from

www.lcbp.org/Atlas/MapJPEG/nat_lamoille.jpg. Retrieved on 8/5/08.

• The discharge trends clearly illustrate areas where the state could use more

prominent buffer zones, in particularly, the agricultural sites and a number of

impervious sites.

•The frequent occurrence of E. coli from livestock (predominantly cows,

goats, horse, and sheep) reflects the pastoral nature of the landscape in

Lamoille County. As would be expected, human sources were predominantly

associated with human habitation (impervious) sites.

•Library classification of wild life, and a more extensive human E.coli library

would be beneficial, and may happen in the near future in order to help

identify the unknown samples acquired this summer and for future studies.

ABSTRACT

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Comparison of total phosphorus and sources of fecal coliforms in streams surrounded by

forested, agricultural, and impervious land uses in the Lamoille River, VT, drainage basinGreggory A Perry, Timothy R Thurston, and Robert Genter PhD

Johnson State College, Johnson VT

RIBOTYPING RESULTS

PHOSPHOROUS DISCHARGE

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

For funding of our project we thank the NSF and VT EPSCoR. KathiJo Jankowski

did an amazing job coordinating the streams project, and the laboratory team at UVM were

instrumental in processing our phosphorous samples. Jim Ryan of the Vermont Department

of Natural Resources played a vital role in helping us choose our sites. We also thank Farley

Ann Brown, Declan McCabe, and Carlos Pinkham for advice and inspiration.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

³/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

Brown's River AG

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Brewster River F

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

Brown's River F

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

Brewster River S IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Brewster River IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

Deer Brook Ag

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Deer Brook IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

French Hill Brook F

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Brown's River IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

Ryder Brook IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Gihon River IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Mill Brook AG

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l North Branch IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Mill Brook AG

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Wild Branch IMP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Wild Branch AG

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l Wild Branch F

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

Seymour Brook AG

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dis

char

ge m

3/s

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n µ

g/l

North Branch F

Sample Collection

Collected 1 liter of stream water from each

site.

FilterSamples were concentrated using a .45 µg

membrane filter.

CultureSmear of filter plated on McConkey Agar

with MUG.

VerificationIsolated colonies were verified as E. coli

using citrate, indole, Voges-Proskauer, and

methly red IMViC tests.

RibotypingIsolated E. coli colonies were ribotyped

using a Dupont Riboprinter©. ECORI

restriction enzyme fragments DNA, and

electrophoresis is conducted. DNA is

removed from gel via Southern blotting and

the membrane is washed by a 16s rDNA,

RNA probe.

Cluster Analysis Unweighted pair-grouping (UPGMA)

Euclidian distance method was used to

create a dendogram using Bionummerics©

software package.

IdentificationThe unknown stream samples were

compared to the known human and livestock isolates of E. coli. The highest similarity value of 92 or more indicated a match. The identification

was compared to the cluster analysis for confidence and consistency.

Recommended