Date post: | 23-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | colin-tueck |
View: | 77 times |
Download: | 0 times |
European Quality AssuranceRegister for Higher Education
EQAR and its Expectationsof the Reviews of Agencies
ENQA Training of Agency ReviewersLjubljana, 22 September 2016
Colin Tück
European Quality Assurance Registerfor Higher Education (EQAR)
Mission: enhancetransparency and trust in QA
EHEA's official register ofQAAs that complysubstantially with the ESG
Registration and periodicrenewal based on externalreview
Decisions by independentRegister Committee QA experts nominated by
ENQA, ESU, EUA, EURASHE,BusinessEurope, EducationInternational
43 registered QAAs
Governmental memberswithout registered agency
Further monitoring
Registration based on external review of agency
Annual updates on reviews and countries
Substantive change reports
Third-party complaints
Periodic renewal every 5 years
Reviews for EQARregistration
ENQA; 32
GermanAccred-itationCouncil;8
Others; 3
Review coordinators Requirements Independent coordinator Panel representing various
perspectives Interviews with all
stakeholders Access to all evidence
Economic model Reviews with dual purpose,
e.g. ENQA and EQAR, orGAC and EQAR
Changes in applicationprocess (2015)
New Old
Application Before review After review
Check of eligibility First step of process Prior check optional
External review Follows eligibility check Before application
Flags No longer used In approval decision
Publication policy: Full documentation Decision only
Relevant documents forreviewers
General
Policy on Use andInterpretation of the ESGfor the European Register To be read in conjunction with
the full text of the ESG Replaces “Practices and
Interpretations” New element: “Reports
should at least demonstrate”
Procedures for Applicationsand specific policies
https://eqar.eu/documents/official.html
For each agency
Eligibility confirmationletter(via ENQA)
Previous decision(EQAR website)
Substantive ChangeReports(EQAR website)
Complaints(if any, EQAR website)
Coverage of reviews
All external QA activities within the scope of the ESG Obligatory and voluntary Within the EHEA and outside the EHEA See eligibility confirmation letters to agencies
International/cross-border activities Clear procedures and criteria
Activities “discovered” during review Analyse if potentially relevant
Consultative activities Clear separation needed Transparency: different nature, what is ESG and what is not
Review report
Clarity Link between evidence and conclusions Avoid vague statements Separate ESG compliance and further recommendations Dissenting opinion if major disagreement
Specifically address different activities under ESG 2.1 – 2.7 Subheadings are useful Demonstrate that all activities comply with the ESG Conclusion could differ between activities
Standard 2.1 Link between agency's standards and ESG 1.1 – 1.10
Decision-making
Conclusions for each standard Overall judgement
Review panel
Substantially compliant
Not substantially compliant
either ...
… or
Register Committee decision
Full compliance
Substantial compliance
Partial compliance
Non-compliance
Compliance (full or substantial)
Partial compliance
Non-compliance
All standards
One or more
One or more → holistic judgement
Clarification requests to panel chair if needed If conclusion differs from panel, explained in public decision