Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | anthony-cabrera |
View: | 27 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ERASMUS Centralised ActionsOverview of Selection Results 2007
Gilles GERVAIS EACEA
Brussels, February 25 and 26, 2008
2
First LLP Call 2007 / Number of Applications by Action
Multilateral Actions
53 (42%) ECD
28 (23%) EVC
23 (19%) EMHE
20 (16%) ECUE
3
*including ineligible applications
First LLP Call 2007 / Number of Applications by Action
4
First LLP Call 2007 – Applications by Coordinating CountryMultilateral Actions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
N° of Applicant Organisations 8 14 2 1 1 13 3 1 15 11 6 3 4 1 10 1 5 4 4 6 4 4 2 6
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
Thematic Networks
0
1
2
3
4
N° applicant organisations 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
5
First LLP Call 2007 – Applications by Partner Country
Multilateral Actions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
No Partner Organisations 21 30 19 3 16 56 16 18 46 49 42 22 30 11 2 52 2 18 3 7 5 30 6 29 21 35 14 14 12 12 39
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
Thematic Networks
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
N° of Partner Organisations 8 25 9 4 14 24 10 9 16 15 16 13 12 12 5 37 1 9 5 11 3 19 7 11 17 9 10 4 11 17 26
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
ECD ECUE EMHE EVC EAM ENW
First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Action
7
Multilateral Actions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
N° of applications received 8 14 2 1 1 13 3 1 15 11 6 3 4 1 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 4 4 6 0 4 4 2 6
N° of applications selected 4 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 3 2 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 2 0 3 1 0 3
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Country
8
Networks
Applications received: BE, CZ, GR, IT, LT, NL, RO, SE, UK
Networks selected: GR, IT, NL, RO, SE, UK
First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Country
9
Average Size of the Consortium/Network
5,5 7 6,3 7,114,8
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
ECD ECUE EMHE EVC EAM ENW
Average Size of Partnership/Network
10
Well covered - To improve the quality and to increase the volume
of multilateral cooperation between HEI in Europe (62%)
- To support the realisation of a European Higher Education Area (48%)
Less well covered - To reinforce the contribution of HE and advanced
vocational education to the process of innovation (22%) - To increase the degree of transparency and
compatibility between HE and advanced vocational education qualifications gained in Europe (21%)
First LLP Call 2007 – Priority Coverage
11
Curriculum Development
Well covered - Developing or revising integrated
programmes covering a complete cycle of study (55%)
Less well covered - Curricula which actively promote
multilingualism, linguistic diversity, interculturalism in European Society (27%)
12
Cooperation HEIs - Enterprises
Well covered - Developing strategies for cooperation
between higher education and enterprises which has to include a clear concept of guidance and counselling (60%)
Less well covered - Stimulating cooperation between regions
and sectors with little history with cross-border contacts (0%)
13
Modernisation of Higher Education
Well covered - Enhance the quality of the performance,
contribute to the accountability and enhance their
attractiveness (67%)
Less well covered - Develop pro-active funding strategies,
matching the diversity of the institutional profiles with the variety of funding sources (0%)
14
Virtual CampusesWell covered - Providing open educational resources online
ensuring that organisational, technical and quality related issues are addressed in order to share content and make it easily accessible at European level (64%);
- Testing innovative E-learning concepts (64%)
Less well covered - Conducting a systematic critical review of
existing experience or projects on virtual mobility (42%)
15
Networks
Well covered - Define and update generic and subject
specific competences using the same method as the pilot project “Tuning Educational Structure in Europe” (63%)
- Develop standards for quality assurance in their particular field (Bologna Process) (63%)
Less well covered - Address issue relating to governance and
diversification of higher education institutions (13%)
16
Accompanying Measures
Well covered- Communication and valorisation
activities (83%)
Less well covered- Thematic monitoring of projects (33%)