+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ERNA & SAREN

ERNA & SAREN

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: hjh-saren-green
View: 225 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 24

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    1/24

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    2/24

    Krashens monitor model (1982)derived

    form Chomskys nativist account of L1

    acquisition and beyond.

    For classroom purposes

    The Natural Approach to teaching a

    second language.

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    3/24

    Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

    Input Hypothesis (Comprehensible input)

    Affective Filter Hypothesis

    Natural Order Hypothesis Monitor Hypothesis

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    4/24

    Acquisition: Subconscious process

    Learning: Conscious effort

    Conscious rules: Act as monitor or editor

    Acquisitionto communicate naturallyand fluently

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    5/24

    By understanding messages ; extra

    linguistic context., knowledge of the

    world, previous linguistic competence.

    i + 1

    Language input learner received must

    be just beyond or a little more difficult

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    6/24

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    7/24

    Claims that speaking per se does not cause

    language acquisition.

    It emerges through obtaining

    comprehensible input (listening and

    reading)

    Silent periodbuilding competence in the

    second language

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    8/24

    Claims that comprehensible input, though

    necessary, still not sufficient for SLA.

    Input understood but does not mean it will

    reach LAD

    Low motivation, high anxiety, low self-

    esteemhigh affective filter

    Young childrenlow affective filter

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    9/24

    People acquire the rules of language in

    a predictable natural order

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    10/24

    Monitor attending to form.

    Conditions:

    a. Learner must have sufficient time

    b. Focus on form, not on meaning

    c. Learner must know the rule.

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    11/24

    Do you think his hypotheses make sense?

    In what way?

    Can you relate your own experience inacquiring the second language?

    I h Cl

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    12/24

    In the Classroom:

    The Natural Approach

    Teachers must distinguish

    between acquisition and

    learning activities.

    Acquisition activitiesprovide

    comprehensible inputdevoted

    to topics of interest, not

    grammatical structures

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    13/24

    In the Classroom:

    The Natural Approach

    Learning lessons - separate

    lessons, focus on form.

    Teachers must provide a lot of

    comprehensible input i + 1 level.

    Teachers to speak slowly, use

    simpler words, pictures etc)

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    14/24

    Learners:

    Listening to comprehensible input

    never force to speak

    silent period

    Start speaking when ready

    Teachers:

    create friendly and relaxed

    classroom atmosphere

    No overt correction

    acknowledge and respond

    learners message.

    In the Classroom:

    The Natural Approach

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    15/24

    Grammatical mistakes -acquisitionactivities.

    Indirect feedback on mistakes

    by re-phasing andmodeling the correct form

    Expand discussion and

    commenting on

    what the learners try to convey and

    draw out more responses from them

    In the Classroom: The Natural

    Approach

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    16/24

    A More Positive View of Errors :the Notion of Interlanguage

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    17/24

    Cognitivists view L2 errors positively.

    Source of errors - not necessarily

    learners L1.

    Error Analysis

    learner errors cannot be explained infeatures of their L1

    Instead evidence for and against nativisttheories

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    18/24

    Nativist view errors as:

    part of an interlanguage

    Changes & evolves

    Learners acquire more rule of L2

    By identifying L2 learners : gaininsights into the learners

    development.

    Consistent patterns of error : notisolated mistakes

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    19/24

    Analysing Learner Errors- Brown(1994)

    1. Interlingual transfer Source of Error- L1, because learner is

    using L1 to produce L2.

    Behaviorist - L1 interference

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    20/24

    Analysing Learner Errors- Brown(1994)

    2. Intralingual transfer Learner overgeneralizes an L2 rule

    Eg -taked or teached instead of

    took or taught

    - two gooses instead of two geese

    - many waters instead much water

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    21/24

    Analysing Learner Errors- Brown(1994)

    3. Context of Learning Make errors because they are taught

    that way.

    Learn formally but fail in informalspoken english

    Not know that the language is not

    suitable in all situation or occasions.

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    22/24

    Analysing Learner Errors- Brown(1994)

    4. Communication Strategies Make errors because learners are trying

    to make up for their lack of knowledge in

    L2

    To maintain communicatioon

    Very useful & learner who employ can

    be praised Praising help learners to achieve their

    purpose

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    23/24

    Conclusion

    Cognitivism tells us not to justsee errors as problems to be

    eradicated but regard them as ameans to find out what ishappening in the mind of the

    learners

  • 8/3/2019 ERNA & SAREN

    24/24

    DISCUSSION

    What kind of learners errorcan you identify in your

    classroom?

    How do you solve the

    problems?


Recommended