Date post: | 04-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | zhelresh-zeon |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 1/14
1
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Sedimentation
1
Sedimentation: separation of suspended particles thatare heavier than water by gravitational settling
Sedimentation and settling are used interchangeably
Sedimentation basin = sedimentation tank, clarifier,settling basin, settling tank
Accelerated gravity settling: removal of particles insuspension by gravity settling in an accelerated flow field
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Most WW contain solids and many treatment
processes generate solids
- Phosphate precipitation, coagulation,
activated sludge bioxidation
Particle in WW that will settle by gravity within a
reasonable period of time can be removed by
“sedimentation” in sedimentation basins (also
known as clarifiers)
2
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
“Settleable” doesn’t necessarily mean that theseparticles will settle easily by gravity
Some need to be coaxed out of suspension orsolution by the addition of chemicals
(coagulants) or increased gravity (centrifugationor filtration)
Because of high volumetric flow rates in WWTP,gravity sedimentation is the only practical,economical method
3Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Gravity separation can obviously be applied only
to those particles which have density greater
than water
Goals of gravity sedimentation
• Produce a clarified (free of suspended solids)
effluent
• Produce a highly concentrated solid sludge
stream
4
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 2/14
2
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Types of Sedimentation Basins
5
Rectangular tanks Circular tank
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
They are sized in order to have an optimal
sedimentation speed
If sedimentation speed is too high, most
particles will not have sufficient time to settle,
and will be carried with the treated water
If the speed is too low, the tanks will be of an
excessive size
6
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Theory of Gravitational Settling
To separate solids from liquid using the force ofgravity. In sedimentation, only suspended solids
(SS) are removed.
7Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
1. Type I settling (free settling):
• discrete, non-flocculent particles in a dilute
suspension
• settle as separate units, and there is no
apparent flocculation or interaction between
the particles
• settling of sand particles in grit chambers
• Particle settling according to Stoke’s Law
• Design parameter is surface overflow rate
(Q/AS)
8
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 3/14
3
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
2. Type II settling (settling of flocculated
particles):
• settling of flocculent particles in a dilute
suspension
• flocculate during settling and increase in size
and settle at a faster velocity
• settling in primary clarifiers
• Design parameters: surface overflow rate,
depth of tank or hydraulic retention time
9Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
3. Type III settling (zone or hindered settling):
• settling in an intermediate concentration
• the particles are so close together that
interparticle forces hinder the settling of
neighboring particles
• settle at a constant velocity
• settling in secondary clarifiers (upper part)
10
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
4. Type IV settling (compression settling):
• settling in a high concentration
• the particles touch each other and settling can
occur only by compression of the compacting
mass
• settling in secondary clarifiers (lower part)
11Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Zone Settling & Compression
Zone settling occurs when a flocculent suspensions with highconcentration (on the order of 500 mg/L) settles by gravity.
Flocculant forces between particles causes settling as a matrix
(particles remain in a fixed position relative to each other asthey settle)
When matrix sedimentation is constrained from the bottom, itbegins to compress
Such a situation occurs when the matrix encounters thebottom of the tank in which it is settling – this is called Type IVsettling
12
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 4/14
4
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201313
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
The height of the interface (between the
clarified zone and the zone settling zone) versus
time is plotted
Velocity of this interface is steady after some
induction period but changes with time as
compression begins
The slope of the steady interface subsidence
rate represents zone settling velocity (ZSV)
14
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Factors affecting zone settling velocity
• Suspended solids concentration
• Depth of settling column
• Stirring (0.5 – 2 rpm to prevent “arching”)
• Temperature
• Polymer addition (affects matrix structure)
15Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Used to separate solid or liquid particles from a liquid
phase
How? Introduce fine gas (air) bubbles into the liquid
phase• Bubbles attach to the particulate matter - particle to
rise to the surface
• Particles can be collected by skimming operation
Used to remove suspended matter and to concentrate
biosolids
Flotation
16
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 5/14
5
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Flotation vs. sedimentation
Advantages of flotation over sedimentation
• Very small/light particles that settle slowly can beremoved more completely and in a shorter time
• High rise velocity permits small tankage
• Ability to handle variable solids loading (can adjust airflow)
• Can provide high float concentration (good thickening)
• Can remove low density particles which would requirelong settling period
Disadvantages
• Capital, energy, operating costs
17Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Types of Flotation Process
18
1. Dissolved Air Flotation
The removal is achieved by dissolving air in the
wastewater under pressure and then releasing the air at
atmospheric pressure in a flotation tank or basin
The released air forms tiny bubbles which adhere to the
suspended matter causing the suspended matter to float
to the surface of the water where it may then be
removed by a skimming device
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201319
Sometimes polymer is added at the feed to enhance sticking of the bubble
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Recycle
Often recycle is employed because the
flocculent suspended solids are too fragile to be
directly aerated
Larger quantities of air can be introduced since
recycle flow can be greater than feed flow
20
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 6/14
6
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
2. Dispersed (induced) Air Flotation
Also known as induced-air flotation
Seldom used in municipal wastewater treatment, but is
used in industrial apllications for the removal of emulsifiedoil and suspended solids form high-volume waste or
process waters
Air bubbles are formed by introducing the gas phase
directly into the liquid phase through a revolving impeller
(acts as a pump)
Air is induced and dispersed into the liquid by pumping
action21
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201322
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
3. Vacuum Flotation
Waste is saturated with air at 1 atm then a
vacuum is applied to create relative
supersaturation
This results in bubble formation. Because there
is a max of 1 atm pressure difference, there is a
severe limitation on the amount of air available
for flotation
23Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
24
Chemical Unit
OperationsTreatment methods in which the
removal or conversion of pollutants
by the addition of chemicals or by
chemical reactions
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 7/147
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Process Application
Coagulatio n The chemical destabilization of particles in WW to bring
about their aggregation during perikinetic and orthokinetic
flocculation
Disinfection With chlorine, chlorine compounds, bromine, ozone
Control of slime growths in sewers
Control of odors
Neutralizatio n Control of pH
Oxidation Removal of BOD, ammonia
Destruction of microorganisms
Control of odors in sewers, pump stations
Removal of resistant organic compounds
Precipitation Enhancement removal of TSS and BOD in primary
sedimentation facilities
Removal of phosphorus, heavy metals
Corrosion control in sewers due to H2S
25Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Consideration
• A net increase in the dissolved constituents inthe WW
- Chlorine is added, TDS of effluent is increased
• Handling, treatment and disposal of largevolumes of sludge that is produced fromprecipitation
• Cost of the chemicals
26
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Coagulation
All of the reactions and mechanisms involved in thechemical destabilization of particles and in theformation of larger particles through perikineticflocculation (aggregation of particles in the sizerange from 0.01 to 1 mm)
Coagulant – chemical that is added to destabilizethe colloidal particles in WW so that floc formationcan result
Flocculent – a chemical (organic) added to enhancethe flocculation process
27Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Flocculation – the process whereby the size ofparticles as a result of particle collisions
Microflocculation = perikinetic flocculation
particle aggregation is brought about by the
random motion of fluid molecules (Brownianmotion)
Macroflocculation = orthokinetic flocculation
particle aggregation is brought about byinducing velocity gradients and mixing in thefluid and differential settling
28
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 8/148
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
In the treatment…
Water Treatment
• coagulation and flocculation are essential components o f thetreatment processes
Wastewater Treatment
• chemical phosphorus removal
• In overloaded WWTP, coagulant is added to enhance 1o treatment – reducing SS and organic loads from 1o clarifiers
Can be used to remove:
• Natural organic matter – humic substances, woody substances
• Pathogens – Cryptosporidium,Giardia
• Inorganics – arsenic, flouride
• phosphorus
29Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Colloidal particles
Particles which are just big enough to have a
surface which is microscopically observable or
which is capable of adsorption of another phase
30
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
50 – 70% of the organic matter in domestic WW is
composed of colloidal matters
In water treatment, color, turbidity, viruses, bacteria,
algae and organic matter are primarily either in
colloidal form or behave as colloids
Surface area ~ 1 sq. yd. to 1 acre/gram
1-micron colloid – 1 year to settle (by gravity) of 1 foot
Too small to be filtered by standard filtration devices
31Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Measurement of colloid concentration
Surface area might be an excellent measure of
colloid concentration – difficult measurement
Standard suspended solids measurement won’t
work because colloids will pass through filters
The best method is _________________ or the
measurement of light scattered by the colloids
32
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 9/149
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Removal of Hydrophobic Colloids
• Destabilization (or Coagulation)
Reduce the forces acting to keep the particles apart after
they contact each other (i.e. lower repulsion forces)
• Flocculation
Process of bringing destabilized colloidal particles together toallow them to aggregate to a size where they will settle bygravity
After coagulation/flocculation, gravity sedimentation orfiltration are employed to remove flocculated colloids
33Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Colloidal stability
Colloidal stability can be influenced by the
degree of affinity for the solvent in which colloid
is suspended
Regardless of how the surface charge develops –
which promotes stability – must be overcome if
these particles are to be aggregated
(flocculated) into larger particles with enough
mass to settle easily
34
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Hydrophobic – colloids are (-) charged and
dispersion is stabilized by electrostatic repulsion
e.g. clays, metal oxides, sulfides (chemical
origin)
Hydrophilic – colloids have a great affinity for
the solvent (e.g. water), colloids are slightly
charged, dispersion is stabilized by hydration
e.g. gelatin, starch, proteins (biological origin)
35Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Coagulants
Al3+ and Fe3+ accomplish destabilization of
colloids through
- Adsorption and charge neutralization
- Enmeshment in sweep floc
- Adsorption and interparticle bridging
36
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 10/1410
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Hydrolysis
The hydrolysis products of Al3+ and Fe3+ are responsible
for particle aggregation
Coordination compounds:
Amphoteric: can exist both in strong acids and bases:
6 +
↔ +
6
− ↔ −
37
Proposed hydrolysis of trivalent metal
salts
With addition of enough base
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201338
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201339
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Aluminum Sulfate (Alum)
When alum is added to WW containing Ca, Mg
bicarbonate alkalinity
3 ∙ 18 ↔ 2 3 6 18
40
3 x 100 as CaCO3 666.5
2 x 78 3 x 136 6 x 44 18 x 18
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 11/1411
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Lime
↔ 2
↔ 2 2
A sufficient lime must be added to combine with
all the free carbonic acid and with the carbonic
acid of the bicarbonates to produce CaCO3
41Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Ferrous Sulfate and Lime
Ferrous sulfate must be added with lime to form precipitate:
∙ 7
↔
7
↔
If sufficient alkalinity is not available lime is added in excess:
2 ↔ 2 2
Ferrous hydroxide can be oxidized to ferric hydroxide:
1
4
1
2 ↔
42
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Ferric Chloride
Ferric chloride is used due to problems with ferrous
sulfate
2 3
↔ 2 3 6
If lime is added:
2 3 ↔ 2 3
43Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Ferric Sulfate and Lime
2 3
↔ 2 3
44
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 12/1412
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Factors affecting coagulation
Temperature
• Affect low turbidity water, by shifting theoptimum pH
• Pre-polymerized coagulants (PACl), polyferricsulfate can be less sensitive to changes
Sequence of chemical addition
• pH correction>metal coagulant>flocculant aid
• The best sequence can be determined by Jar Test
45Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Jar Test
• Simulate the coagulation/flocculation process
in a batch mode• A series of batch test are run to get optimal
dosage = lowest residual turbidity
– pH
– coagulant type and dosage
– coagulant aid
46
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201347
Water samples Various dosages rapid
mixing (coagulation)
gently stirred (flocculation) stop stirring
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Phosphorus Removal
Excess calcium ions will react with phosphate to
precipitate hydroxylapatite
10+ 6+ 2− ↔
Phosphate with aluminum/iron:
+ −
↔ +
+ −
↔ +
48
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 13/1413
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201349
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 201350
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Factors affecting the choice of chemical for
phosphorus removal:
• Influent phosphorus level
• WW suspended solids
• Alkalinity
• Chemical cost (transportation)
• Reliability of chemical supply
• Sludge handling facilities
• Ultimate disposal methods
• Compatibility with other treatment processes
51Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Strategies for Phosphorus Removal
Precipitation – chemicals added to raw WW and PO4 isremoved with 1o sludge
Co-precipitation – chemicals added to form precipitatesthat are removed along with waste biological sludge
- effluent from 1o sedimentation, mixed liquor, effluentfrom biological treatment process before 2o
Post-precipitation – chemicals added to effluent 2o sedimentation and removed in separate sedimentationfacilities or effluent filters
52
8/13/2019 ESC3204+5
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/esc32045 14/1414
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Metal salt addition
- 1o sedimentation tanks
- 2o treatment
- 2o clarifiers (+ polymer)
Lime
- 1o sedimentation tanks
- Following 2o treatment
- Effluent filtration
53Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Removal of NOM
• Humic substances from the aqueous
extraction of living woody substances, soilorganic matter
• Removed due to:
– Color
– Transport for toxic substances/micro-pollutants
– React with chlorine
54
Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
• Removal is effective with aluminum sulfate,
ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, polyaluminum
chloride, acid alum (aluminum sulfate with 1-
15% H2SO4)
• TOC or NOM reductions depend on:
– Type and dosage of coagulant – pH, temperature, water quality
– NOM characteristics
• Optimum pH for:
– Ferric salts: 3.7 – 4.2
– Aluminum sulfate: 5.0 – 5.5
55Faculty of Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia 2013
Removal of Pathogens
• USEPA requires 99.9% (3-log) Giardia removal
and 99% (2-log) removal of Cryptosporidium
• WTP with coagulation, flocculation,
sedimentation, filtration – 2.5-log Giardia
56