+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.

ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: theresa-stanley
View: 216 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
24
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8
Transcript

ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction

ESEA Flexibility:Gap Reduction

Maryland Accountability ProgramPresentation 5 of 8

Lillian M. Lowery, Ed.D.State Superintendent of Schools

Dr. Charlene M. DukesPresident, Maryland State Board of Education

Martin O'MalleyGovernor

Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D.Assistant SuperintendentDivision of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems

Maryland State Department of EducationDivision of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems200 West Baltimore StreetBaltimore, Maryland 21201410.767.0073MarylandPublicSchools.org2

2Maryland Accountability Program3School ProgressReduce by half the percentage of students in the all students group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years School Progress IndexAchievementGap ReductionGrowthCollege & Career ReadinessDifferentiated RecognitionRewardPriority Focus

3DRAFT

33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (Algebra/Data Analysis HSA)33.3%- English Proficiency (English HSA)33.3%- Science Proficiency (Biology HSA)Achievement*40%Gap*College-and Career-Readiness**40%20%60%- Cohort Graduation Rate 40%- College and Career Preparation (CCP)Advanced PlacementCareer and Technology Education (CTE) Concentrators College Enrollment

Gap between lowest subgroup and highest subgroup within a school:20%- Mathematics Proficiency (Algebra/Data Analysis HSA)20%- English Proficiency (English HSA)20%- Science Proficiency (Biology HSA)20%- Cohort Graduation Rate20%- Cohort Dropout Rate

Gap*40%

33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA)33.3%- Reading Proficiency (MSA)33.3%- Science Proficiency (MSA)50%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA)50%- Reading Proficiency (MSA)Gap between lowest subgroup and highest subgroup within a school:Achievement*30%Growth*30%33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA)33.3%- Reading Proficiency (MSA)33.3%- Science Proficiency (MSA)Percent of students making one years growth:*ALT-MSA is included in the index component**Revised 9/17/2012: To be submitted to USDE for Approval

Maryland School Progress Index**Grades 9-12Grades PreK-8Meeting Performance Targets (AMO)Meeting Performance Targets (AMO)4

SPI Indicator: Gap ReductionDecrease in the performance gap between the highest and lowest performing subgroupsGap Score calculated for each subgroup category in each measured areaMathematicsReading ScienceCohort Graduation Rate (high school only)Cohort Dropout Rate (high school only)Applies to Elementary, Middle, and High Schools

5

Subgroup Categories10 Subgroup Categories for each measured areaSeven Racial DesignationsHispanicAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsianBlack or African AmericanNative Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderWhiteMultiple RacesSpecial EducationLimited English ProficientFree and Reduced Price Meals

6

Establishing Targets: Content Areas Reading, Math and Science50% Reduction of gap between highest and lowest performing subgroups by 2017

Target increases in equal increments for 6 years

20102011 assessment results used as the baseline year for setting AMOs

For the purpose of calculating an overall index score, the Current Year and Baseline Year % Proficient for Gap is defined as 1 Gap percentage

Minimum count of 20 students7

7Establishing the Targets: Content Areas Reading, Math and Science - CalculationsGoal for 2017=100%2011 % Proficient =Gap Score22Gain Per Year=Goal for 201762012 Target=2011 % Proficient+Gain Per Year8

Gap Score CalculationDetermine populationIdentify subgroup populations for each measured areaRemove subgroups with less than 20 studentsDetermine Percent Proficient for remaining subgroupsSelect subgroups with Highest and Lowest Percent ProficientCompare subgroups with the Highest Percent Proficient for this year, with the Percent Proficient for Prior YearCalculate difference between the Highest and Lowest Percent Proficient9

Determine Population: Contents Reading, Math and ScienceMinimum group size (n) = 20

AYP rules applyFull Academic YearSpecial Education ExitedLimited English Proficient Exited1% and 2% rule is applied

NonparticipantsAre NOT included as Basic within the denominator

10

Keeping in mind10Determine Percent Proficient for remaining subgroupsNumeratorDenominatorAdvanced and ProficientAdvanced, Proficient and Basic==Proficient CountTest Takers=Percent ProficientElementary and middle: MSA/ModMSA/Alt MSAHigh School: HSA/ModHSA/Alt MSA

Nonparticipants are NOT included in aggregation11

Example Gap Calculation:Contents Reading, Math and ScienceSubgroupPrior YearCurrent YearProfCountMember CountProf RateProfCountMember CountProf RateHispanic10110.90918200.900Asian790.7781213NABlack931000.93078850.918White951000.950921000.920Multiple Races38400.95028300.933SE18220.81824260.923LEP460.66734NAFaRMS83910.91281890.91012

Need to revise numbers to next slide12Example Gap Calculation:Elementary Math ProficiencySelect subgroups with Highest and Lowest Percent ProficientHighest Multiple = 0.933Lowest Hispanic= 0.900Compare subgroups with the Highest Percent Proficient for this year, with the Percent Proficient for Prior YearHighest MultipleCurrent Year= 0.933Prior Year = 0.950Replace CY value with PY valueCalculate difference between the Highest and Lowest Percent Proficient0.950 0.900 = 0.050 = GAP% Proficient = 1-GAP = 1.0 - 0.050 = 0.950

13

SPI Calculation Example: Elementary SchoolVariableAchievementGapGrowthAssessmentMathReadSciMathReadSciMathRead% Proficient CY0.9200.9300.8600.9500.9900.980.6200.820Target0.9540.9450.8720.9270.9270.8630.5970.945% Prof of Target0.9640.9840.9861.0251.0681.1361.0390.868Content Weight0.3300.3300.3300.3300.3300.330.5000.500Weighted % Prof of Target0.3180.3250.3250.3380.3520.3750.5200.434Indicator Weight0.300.400.30Indicator Contribution0.2910.4260.286School Index1.00314% Prof of Target = % Proficient CY TargetWeighted % Prof of Target= % Prof of Target x Content WeightIndicator Contribution= (Math + Read + Sci) x Indicator WeightSchool Index= (Achievement + Growth + Gap)

Italicized variables are computed14Establishing Targets: Cohort Rates (Grad and D/O)50% Reduction of gap between highest and lowest performing subgroups by 2020 using goal of 95% proficiency

Target increases in equal increments for 9 years

20102011 4-year rates used as the baseline year for setting targets (same cohort used for AMO Progress)First Time 9th Graders 2007

Minimum count of 20 students15

15Establishing the Targets: Cohort RatesGoal for 2020=95%2011 Cohort Rate2Gain Per Year=Goal for 202092012 Target=2011 Cohort Rate+Gain Per Year16

Example Gap Calculation:Cohort Graduation RateSubgroupPrior YearCurrent YearGraduateCountCohort CountCohort RateGraduateCountCohort CountCohort RateHispanic10110.90918200.900Asian790.7781213NABlack931000.93078850.918White951000.950941000.940Multiple Races38400.9528300.933SE18220.81824260.923LEP460.66734NAFaRMS83910.91281890.91017

Need to revise numbers to next slide17Example Gap Calculation:Cohort Graduation RateSelect subgroups with Highest and Lowest Graduation RatesHighest White= 0.940Lowest Hispanic= 0.900Compare subgroups with the Highest Graduation Rate for this year, with the Graduation Rate for Prior YearHighest WhiteCurrent Year= 0.940Prior Year = 0.950Replace CY value with PY valueCalculate difference between the Highest and Lowest Graduation Rate0.950 0.900 = 0.050 = GAP% Proficient = 1-GAP = 1.0 - 0.050 = 0.950

18

SPI Calculation Example: High School VariableGapAssessmentMathReadSciGradDrop% Proficient CY0.9500.9900.9800.9500.949Target0.9270.9270.8630.9270.950% Prof of Target1.0251.0681.1361.0250.999Content Weight0.2000.2000.2000.2000.200Weighted % Prof of Target0.2050.2140.2270.2050.200Indicator Weight0.40Indicator Contribution0.420School Index19% Prof of Target = % Proficient CY TargetWeighted % Prof of Target= % Prof of Target x Content WeightIndicator Contribution= (Math + Read + Sci) x Indicator WeightSchool Index= (Achievement + Growth + Gap)

Italicized variables are computed19Example Gap Calculation:Cohort D/O RateSubgroupPrior YearCurrent YearD/OCountCohort CountCohort RateD/OCountCohort CountCohort RateHispanic1110.091010NAAsian090.000013NABlack81000.08071000.070White71000.07071000.070Multiple Races3200.1502210.095SE2220.0912260.077LEP060.00034NAFaRMS4910.0445890.05620

Need to revise numbers to next slide20Example Gap Calculation:Cohort Dropout RateSelect subgroups with Highest and Lowest D/O RatesHighest Multiple = 0.095Lowest FaRMs= 0.056Compare subgroups with the Lowest D/O Rate for this year, with the D/O Rate for Prior YearLowest FaRMsCurrent Year = 0.056Prior Year = 0.044Replace CY value with PY valueCalculate difference between the Highest and Lowest D/O Rate0.095 0.044 = 0.051 = GAP% Proficient = 1-GAP = 1.0 - 0.051 = 0.949

21

SPI Calculation Example: High School VariableGapAssessmentMathReadSciGradDrop% Proficient CY0.9500.9900.9800.9500.949Target0.9270.9270.8630.9270.950% Prof of Target1.0251.0681.1361.0250.999Content Weight0.2000.2000.2000.2000.200Weighted % Prof of Target0.2050.2140.2270.2050.200Indicator Weight0.40Indicator Contribution0.420School Index22% Prof of Target = % Proficient CY TargetWeighted % Prof of Target= % Prof of Target x Content WeightIndicator Contribution= (Math + Read + Sci) x Indicator WeightSchool Index= (Achievement + Growth + Gap)

Italicized variables are computed22Maryland Accountability Program23School ProgressReduce by half the percentage of students in the all students group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years School Progress IndexAchievementGap ReductionGrowthCollege & Career ReadinessDifferentiated RecognitionRewardPriority Focus

Overview of MAPRefresher from last weekSPI is a component of MAP23Questions?Please forward questions and comments to:

Doug Strader, [email protected]

24


Recommended