GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA

PLANNING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA,2007

Issued By:ECONOMIC AND STATISTICAL ADVISER

ESTIMATING

IN THE STATE OF INPUTS IN FISHING SECTOR

2003-2004HARYANA

Publication No.859

Seal

GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA

ESTIMATING INPUTS IN FISHING SECTOR

IN THE STATE OF HARYANA

2003-2004

Issued By: ECONOMIC AND STATISTICAL ADVISER

PLANNING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA, 2007

PREFACE The estimates of State Domestic Product (SDP) are important and reliable indicators for measurement of overall growth of the economy and provide a solid base for formulation of development programmes to pursue a sound economic policy. At the National level, the estimates of National Product are prepared and published annually by Central Statistical Organisation (CSO), Govt. of India. Similarly, at the State level, State Domestic Product estimates are regularly prepared and released by Economic & Statistical Organisation, Haryana. While preparing the SDP estimates the information on different parameters is used. In case of certain sectors a number of rates and ratios are also used. The National Statistical Commission (NSC) reviewed Indian Statistical System and suggested measures to improve it where necessary. The NSC observed that some of rates and ratios which are being used in the estimation of SDP are very old and need revision. The NSC recommended to conduct type studies for this purpose. As a result CSO assigned a study titled “Estimating Inputs in Fishing sector in the State of Haryana” to this department. The study has been financed by the CSO. The CSO has also provided technical guidance for conduct of the study. The survey for the study was conducted in the month of November,2004. The study relates to year 2003-04 i.e. from Ist April,2003 to 31st March,2004. The study has come out with the percentage of expenditure on inputs to value of output of the fish production which will be used for preparation of SDP estimates of Fishing Sector. It is hoped that the findings of the study will improve the quality of SDP estimates of Fishing Sector. I am grateful to the Technical Committee, under the Chairmanship of Sh. Vishnu Kumar, Addl. Director General and Dr. Savita Sharma, Member Secretary for suggesting modification and approving the study. I am also grateful to the officers of Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govt. of India, particularly Sh.Ramesh Kolli, Addl. Director General and Sh. Sunil Jain, Director for taking keen interest in the smooth conduct of Study by providing timely financial and technical assistance. I am thankful to Director Fisheries Haryana and his field officers for their cooperation and guidance in conducting the survey. I am also thankful to all District Statistical Officers and their staff for taking interest to timely conduct of the survey. The study has been conducted by Sh. Bir Singh and Sh. Deep Chand, Deputy Economic and Statistical Advisers alongwith Sh.Ishwar Singh Mann and Smt.Gurprit Kaur, Research Officers, Smt. Jaswinder Kaur and Sh. Umed Singh, Asstt. Research Officers, Smt. Geeta Vinayak and Smt. Neelam, Junior Field Investigators and Smt. Sunita Gupta, Sr. Scale Stenographer under the guidance and overall supervision of Sh. R.K. Bishnoi, Addl. Economic & Statistical Adviser to Government of Haryana. Valuable contribution made by my predecessor Sh.Ranvir Gupta, the then Economic and Statistical Adviser to Government , Haryana in this study is highly appreciated. Chandigarh (R. C. SHARMA) Dated: March 26, 2007 Economic & Statistical Adviser to Govt. Haryana.

CONTENTS Chapter No. Contents Page No. Executive Summary (i) - (iii)

I Introduction 1-4

II Implementation of the Scheme 5-6

III Findings of Study 7-21

IV Conclusion 22-23

Annexure-I District wise Quantity, Rate and Value of 24

Fish Produced from Sampled Fish Ponds.

Annexure-II District wise Quantity, Rate and Value of 25

Fish Produced from Total Fish Ponds.

Annexure-III District wise Quantity, Rate and Value of 26

Fish Produced from Lakes and Rivers/Drains.

Annexure-IV Variety wise Quantity, Rate and Value of 27

Fish Produced

Annexure-V List of Selected Ponds and Lakes, Rivers and 28-42

Drains in Haryana.

Annexure-VI Survey Schedule 43-46

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i) Introduction In Haryana, the Government is taking steps to promote pisciculture through

Fish Farmers Development Agencies. The farmers are motivated to adopt fishing in

inland waters and artificial ponds. The Government assists the fish farmers in

arranging loans from financial institutions to promote fish farming and provides

subsidies on the loans arranged for the construction/renovation of ponds/tanks as

well as for purchase of inputs in form of fish seed, fish feed and fertilizers etc. The

fisheries department also provides training to fish farmers and arrange fish seed for

ponds. Under various fisheries development programmes the emphasis is laid in

bringing the available suitable water resources under fish culture by creating a class

of fish farmers amongst the un-employed youths by providing them adequate

technical and financial assistance.

An integrated approach for boosting the fish production by bringing more

water area under fish culture and by increasing productivity through various

incentives/services to fish farmers, is being adopted. Emphasis is laid on

diversification of suitable technologies for utilisation of underground saline

soil/water, sewage and water logged area into economically viable fish/prawn

culture units.

ii) Need of the study The National Statistical Commission (NSC) reviewed Indian Statistical

System and suggested measures to revamp the same. In its report submitted to

the Prime Minister in September 2001,the NSC had recommended improvement of

the existing rates and ratios used in the estimation of State Domestic Product. The

NSC has recommended for conducting type studies in different parts of the country

to update rates & ratios. Accordingly, Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) which

issues guidelines for preparation of estimates of SDP to the States has identified

sector wise rates and ratios where type studies are required to be conducted to

workout latest rates and ratios. One of the studies titled “Estimating Inputs in

Fishing Sector in the State of Haryana” was assigned to Economic & Statistical

Organisation, Haryana. The results of this study will be used for compilation of the

estimates of State Domestic Product from Fishing Sector.

(i)

iii) Objective of the Study The present study is proposed to be carried out to achieve the following

objectives.

1. Value of Output generated from a Fish Pond/River/Lake etc. 2. Value of Inputs used for the above Output. iv) Sample Design

A suitable survey schedule was designed and field tested before finalisation

for carrying out field survey. The study has covered 280 fish ponds, 10 lakes and 29

rivers/drains located in all the 19 districts of Haryana. Ponds have been selected

from each district on random basis from the district wise list of ponds collected from

the field offices of the Fisheries Department. No input is provided in rivers/drains

water. Therefore, only harvest and post harvest charges of fish production of

rivers/drains have been taken into account for the purpose of this study. Lakes,

rivers and drains were surveyed on complete enumeration basis.

v) Main Findings The main findings of the study are as under :

1. There were 3480 fish ponds with water area of 6925.7 Hectares in the State

which were being used for fish farming of which 280 fish ponds (8.0

percent) with water area of 567.8 Hectares (8.2 percent) were selected for

survey.

2. There were 10 lakes with water area of 289 Hectares and 29 rivers/drains

with length of 1137 Kms. which were being used for fish farming in the State.

3. In case of total fish ponds, the expenditure on fish seed was maximum 28.2

percent followed by other charges (on electricity, diesel, etc.) 22.2 percent

and fish feed 20.2 percent of the total expenditure on inputs in the State. The

minimum expenditure was on craft and gears.

4. In case of total fish ponds, in the total value of output in the State, 98.5

percent came from inland fish, 1.0 percent from prawn and 0.5 percent from

others.

5. The expenditure on inputs to value of output from the total fish ponds in the

State was 24.6 percent.

(ii)

6. In case of lakes and rivers/drains, the expenditure on transport etc.

was maximum 42.3 percent followed by expenses on craft and gears 14.8

percentand fish seed 14.5 percent of the total expenditure on inputs in the

State. The minimum expenditure was on other charges (on electricity, diesel,

etc.) 5.7 percent. In case of rivers/drains, there was no expenditure on fish

seed, fish feed and fertilizers/manure.

7. In case of lakes and rivers/drains, the total value of output in the State was

from inland fish . There was no output from prawn and others.

8. The expenditure on inputs to total value of output from the lakes and

rivers/ drains in the State was 19.4 percent.

9. In case of all sources of fish production i.e. fish ponds, lakes and

rivers/drains in the State, the expenditure on fish seed was maximum 28.1

percent followed by expenditure on other charges (on electricity, diesel, etc.)

22.0 percent and fish feed 20.1 percent of the total expenditure on inputs in

the State. The minimum expenditure was on craft and gears 8.1 percent.

10. In case of all sources of fish production i.e. fish ponds, lakes and

rivers/drains, 98.5 percent of the total value of output in the State came from

inland fish, 1.0 percent from prawn and 0.5 percent from others.

11. The expenditure on inputs to total value of output for all sources of fish

production i.e. fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains in the State was 24.6

percent.

vi) Conclusion The overall conclusion derived from the study is that percentage of

expenditure on inputs to total value of output for all sources of fish production i.e.

fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains in the State was 24.6 which should be applied in

preparation of state domestic product estimates from the fishing sector.

(iii)

Chapter-I

INTRODUCTION The importance of fisheries in a balanced diet has become well recognised.

In Haryana, the Government is taking steps to promote pisciculture through Fish

Farmers Development Agencies. The farmers are motivated to adopt fishing in

inland waters and artificial ponds. The Government assists the fish farmers in

arranging loans from financial institutions to promote fish farming. The Government

also provides subsidies on the loans arranged for the

construction/reclamation/renovation of ponds/tanks as well as for purchase of

inputs in form of fish seed, fish feed, fertilizers, manure and preventive measures for

fish diseases etc. The fisheries department is also providing training to fish farmers.

Fish production depends upon the availability of good quality of fish seed.

The Government has set up 21 fish seed farms in the State for this purpose. The

fishing sector contributes only 0.2 percent in the State Domestic Product.

The Economic and Statistical Organisation (ESO), Haryana prepares

estimates of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP), Net State Domestic

Product(NSDP) and Per Capita Income of Haryana annually both at current and

constant prices. Besides various information used for preparation of estimates of

State Domestic Product, certain rates and ratios are also used in preparation of

estimates of some sectors. Presently, the estimates of SDP for fishing sector are

prepared by adopting production approach. The data on output of fish and average

wholesale prices obtained from fisheries department are used to work out value of

the fish production. To arrive at gross product, deduction on account of repairs,

maintenance and other operational cost is made. In the absence of any data

regarding repairs and maintenance and other operational costs, it is assumed as 10

percent of the total value of output as suggested by CSO on the basis of information

provided by State Fisheries Departments. But this rate is very old.

The National Statistical Commission(NSC)reviewed Indian Statistical

System and suggested measures to revamp the same. In its report submitted

to the Prime Minister in September 2001, the NSC had recommended improvement

of the existing rates and ratios used in the estimation of State Domestic Product.

So the NSC has recommended for conducting type studies in different parts of

the country to update rates & ratios. Accordingly, Central Statistical Organisation

(CSO) which issues guidelines for preparation of estimates of SDP to the States

has identified sector wise rates and ratios where type studies are required to be

conducted to workout latest rates and ratios. One of the studies titled “Estimating

Inputs in Fishing Sector in the State of Haryana” was assigned to ESO Haryana.

The results of this study will be used for compilation of the estimates of State

Domestic Product from Fishing Sector. The proposal for the study has been

approved by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Govt. of

India, New Delhi. The CSO, apart from financing the study, has also guided

Economic & Statistical Organisation, Haryana in technical matters relating to the

study.

Objective of the Study The objective of the study is to update the present rate of inputs in fishing

sector in comparison to the fish output. The broad objective of the study is to find

out value of inputs used for a particular output of fish. The present study is

proposed to be carried out to achieve the following objectives.

1. Value of Output generated from a Fish Pond/River/Lake etc.

2. Value of Inputs used for the above Output.

Scope of the Study The study has been conducted by Economic & Statistical

Organisation, Haryana through its field offices. The study has covered 280 fish

ponds, 10 lakes and 29 rivers/drains located in all the 19 districts of Haryana. Ponds

have been selected from each district on the basis of random sampling. No input is

provided in rivers/drains water. Therefore, only harvest and post harvest charges of

fish production of rivers/drains have been taken into account for the purpose of this

study. Methodology The study is based on the analysis of Primary data collected by the

investigator through personal interview method from the sampled fish farmers.

Fish farming is done by the owner of the pond/lake/river/drain or the person who

has taken pond on lease. Hence, the owner/lease holder was taken as respondent

and information was collected by the investigator directly from the owner/lease

holder of the pond/lake/river/drain.

2

An appropriate schedule was designed in consultation with representatives of

Fisheries Department and pre-tested before finalisation. A training workshop of

persons associated with the survey work at field and Head Quarter level was also

held. The list of ponds surveyed was prepared randomly from the district-wise list of

ponds collected from the Fisheries Development Officers/Fish Farmers

Development Agencies through the District Statistical Officers. Lakes, rivers and

drains were surveyed on complete enumeration basis.

Sample Design Stratified proportional sampling has been done in such a way that all the area

as well as the sizes of ponds in the State got representation in the sample. Land

conditions as well as quality and quantity of water for irrigation in the State differ

from area to area. Some area are canal irrigated, some are rain fed and some area

fall in arid zone. Like wise, underground water in some parts of the State is sweet

where as in other parts it is brackish/saline etc. It is because the rate of inputs

provided for a certain output may vary from area to area in the State. So, for the

purpose of random sampling, a district has been taken as a strata and the sample

selection has been done at the district level.

There were 3480 ponds in the State as on 31.3.2003 in which fish farming

was being carried out as per list of ponds received from Fisheries Development

Officers/Fish Farmers Development Agencies. A sample of about 8 percent of the

total ponds at the district level has been drawn at random and in all 280 ponds were

selected for survey. Apart from this, there were 10 lakes and 29 rivers/drains in the

State. These lakes/rivers/drains were surveyed on complete enumeration basis.

In case of non-availability of a particular identified fish farmer at the time of

survey the next fish farmer from the list was contacted by the investigator for the

purpose. This process was repeated again in case of non-availability of next

respondent. The same procedure was adopted in case the identified pond cease to

be used for fish farming.

Reference Period

Reference period of the study was taken financial year 2003-2004.

The sample was drawn from latest list of district-wise fish farmers/ponds/rivers/lakes

available with the field offices of the Fisheries Department, Haryana. The survey

was conducted in November, 2004.

3

Limitations of the Study

The study is exclusively based on the information provided by the fish

farmers/lease holders to the investigators at the time of personal contact.

4

Chapter-II

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME

Fisheries Development Programmes are implemented in the State by the

Fisheries Department Haryana. Fish Farmers Development Agencies have been

set up by the Government for implementation of Fisheries Development

Programmes. Funds are also provided by the Central Government under Centrally

Sponsored Schemes to boost the programmes with a view to provide nutrient food

to the people and increase income of the persons engaged in fish farming.

The emphasis is laid on bringing the available suitable water resources under

fish culture by creating a class of fish farmers amongst the un-employed youths by

providing them adequate technical and financial assistance.

An integrated approach for boosting the fish production by bringing more

water area under fish culture and by increasing productivity through various

incentives/services to fish farmers, is being adopted. Emphasis is laid on

diversification of suitable technologies for utilisation of underground saline

soil/water, sewage and water logged area into economically viable fish/prawn

culture units. Following incentives/services are provided to promote fish farming in

the State.

1. Loan is sanctioned by the banks on the recommendation of Fisheries

Department/Fish Farmers Development Agency for excavation/renovation of

ponds to make these suitable for aquaculture. The banks also sanction loan

for inputs such as fish seed, fish feed, cow dung, chemical fertilizers and oil

cakes etc. used in the production of fish.

2. Certain subsidies are provided by the Government on the loan sanctioned by

the banks such as:-

i) Subsidy towards renovation/reclamation of ponds with the provision of

inlet and outlets for fish culture.

ii) Subsidy towards cost of inputs like fish seed, fish feed, fertilizers,

manure and preventive measures for fish diseases.

iii) Subsidy towards construction of new ponds. In order to achieve self

sufficiency in fish seed production, the Department of Fisheries

has identified the fish seed production in the Government Fish

Seed Farms as the core activity of the department.

5

Perspective fish farmers are trained by the Department in fish culture. The

Fish Farmers Development Agencies have set up Fish Seed Hatcheries in the

State to provide fish seed of better quality and different varieties in desired quantity

to the fish farmers for stocking in ponds. The department plays an important role in

efficient marketing of the fish produced by the fish farmers.

Besides, the Department of Fisheries has made significant stride in prawn

farming during 2003-04. In order to boost the production of aquaculture in the State

and keeping in view the potential employment generation in aquaculture, steps are

afoot to implement programmes like development of saline soil for fish/prawn

culture, development of waterlogged area into aquaculture estate and development

of fresh water prawn culture. Steps are afoot to utilise natural water bodies like

river and canals, lakes and bunds for fish production.

6

Chapter-III

FINDINGS OF STUDY A survey of ponds, lakes, rivers and drains was carried out in the month of

November, 2004 to study the percentage of expenditure on inputs to value of output

in Fishing Sector in Haryana. In the survey main emphasis was laid on to contact

fish farmers personally to get information about output from fish farming during the

year 2003-04 and the expenditure on inputs used for this output. The main inputs

used in fish framing are as under:

1. Fish Seed Fish seed of different varieties of fish is made available to the fish farmers by

the Fisheries Department. The fish seed is produced in the Fish Seed Hatcheries

set up for the purpose. Apart from Government Seed Farms, the fish seed is also

procured from private seed farms and other states and supplied to the farmers.

The fish farmers are supplied fried or finger fish seed. The survival rate of finger

fish seed which is about one and half month old is more than 90 percent. Fried fish

seed is of about one week old and its survival rate is about 50 percent.

2. Fish Feed After applying fish seed to a fish pond, fish feed in the form of oil cakes, rice

bran etc. is provided regularly for survival and growth of the fishes.

3. Fertilizers/ Manure etc. Like fish feed other inputs in the form of lime, urea, NPK, cow dung,

medicines and chemicals is also necessary for the survival and protecting the fish

from diseases .

4. Craft and Gears A boat is generally used for applying of fish seed, fish feed, fertilizers/manure

and for other similar works in a fish pond. Net is required to harvest fishes from fish

pond. Aerator is used for supply of fresh air in pond for breathing the fish. It is not

necessary for each farmer to purchase these items. The same can be taken on

rent. These items once purchased are used in the subsequent years. Hence there

is no need to purchase the same every year.

5. Water and Other Charges Sufficient quantity of water in fish pond is necessary for the survival of

7

fishes in the absence of which the fishes are bound to destroy. Rain water is main

source of water which is received from the nature free of cost. But in absence of

sufficient rain other sources of water like canals/rivers, tube wells/pump sets are

used to fill up pond from time to time. The fish farmer has to spend funds for

purchase of diesel and payment of electric charges etc. on this account.

6. Marketing/Transport and Other Charges After harvesting of fish crop from the pond, it is important to transport them to

market for sale without delay. Any delay in marketing can destroy the fish crop as

fish farmers have generally no facility to preserve them. Those farmers who have

facilities to preserve the harvested fish have to get them sundrying, salting and

packing. By taking these measures the fish can be preserved till marketing.

7. Labour Charges Generally only fish farmer can not do all the works necessary for fish farming.

He has to hire manpower for filling the pond with water, for applying seed, feed,

fertilizers and medicines and for harvesting and marketing of fish crop. This job can

be assigned to family members of the fish farmers. If sufficient family members are

not available for the job then fish farmer is bound to hire manpower/labour on

paying charges for their services.

ANALYSIS

i) Occupation The Analysis based on the information collected in the survey is as under :-

Table 3.1 Occupation of Fish Farmers/Lease Holders (Percent)

Occupation Ponds Lakes/Rivers/Drains

i)Primary Occupation

49.6 68.8

ii)Secondary Occupation

50.4 31.2

The above table 3.1 reveals that in case of fish ponds out of 280 fish

farmers contacted during survey, 49.6 percent fish farmers were having the

fish farming as primary occupation and 50.4 percent as secondary occupation.

But in case of lakes/rivers/drains, 68.8 percent of fish farmers were having

fish farming as primary occupation and 31.2 percent as secondary occupation.

8

Interestingly fish farmers who have the fish farming as secondary occupation have

mostly primary occupation as agriculture.

ii) Educational Status Table 3.2 Educational Qualification of Fish Farmers

(Percent)

Educational Qualification Ponds

Lakes/Rivers/ Drains

i) Illiterate 17.5 15.6

ii) Below Matric 31.8 68.8

iii) Matric & above 40.0 12.5

iv) Graduates & above 10.7 3.1

The above table 3.2 reveals that in case of fish ponds, 10.7 percent of the

fish farmers/ lease holders were graduates and above, 40.0 percent were matric

and above, 31.8 percent under matric and 17.5 percent illiterates. But in case of

lakes/drains/rivers 3.1 percent of the fish farmers were graduates and above, 12.5

percent matric and above, 68.8 percent under matric and 15.6 percent illiterates.

Iii) Source of Water

Table 3.3 Source of Water for Ponds (Percent)

Source of water Ponds Lakes

i) Natural source 5.7 60.0

ii)Natural with other sources

94.3 40.0

The above table 3.3 reveals that in case of fish ponds, the main source of

water was the natural water. 5.7 percent of the fish farmers were using natural

water only and remaining 94.3 percent fish farmers were using natural water

along with other sources such as tube well, river etc. In case of lakes, 60.0 percent

were depending upon natural water and 40.0 percent were depending upon natural

water along with other sources.

9

iv) Fish Ponds and Their Area Table 3.4 No. of Fish Ponds and Their Area

Sr.No.

District Total No.of Fish

Ponds

Area (Hect.)

Ponds Selected

Area (Hect.)

1 Ambala 226 365.1 17 14.82 Bhiwani 41 84.1 5 12.43 Faridabad 619 779.6 48 78.34 Fatehabad 108 252.2 9 26.15 Gurgaon 275 645.0 21 34.46 Hisar 147 395.6 11 40.27 Jhajjar 135 469.0 11 40.18 Jind 21 51.5 5 14.59 Kaithal 101 259.3 7 19.5

10 Karnal 321 437.0 25 44.611 Kurukshetra 28 45.9 5 4.312 Mahendragarh 39 55.9 5 6.513 Panchkula 56 137.3 5 13.414 Panipat 173 462.2 13 35.415 Rewari 96 93.8 8 13.716 Rohtak 148 491.5 11 23.517 Sirsa 98 215.5 8 18.318 Sonipat 619 1469.4 48 111.119 Yamuna Nagar 229 215.8 18 16.7

Total 3480 6925.7 280 567.8

The above table 3.4 reveals that out of total 3480 fish ponds, the maximum

fish ponds were in district Sonipat and Faridabad which have 619 fish ponds each

followed by Karnal (321 ponds), Gurgaon (275 ponds), Yamuna Nagar (229 ponds)

and Ambala (226 ponds). The total area of these fish ponds in the State was 6925.7

Hectares. The number of ponds selected to be surveyed in each district were in

accordance to the total number of ponds in each district. 280 fish ponds were

selected for survey which covered 567.8 Hectares of water area. Number of ponds

selected were 8.0 percent of the total fish ponds and the water area covered by the

selected ponds was 8.2 percent of the total area of the fish ponds.

10

v) Lakes and Rivers/Drains Surveyed and their Area

Table 3.5 No. of Lakes and Rivers/Drains Surveyed and their Area

No. of lakes/rivers/drains surveyed and their area Sr.No. District Lakes Rivers/Drains

No. Area (Hect.)

No. Length (Kms)

1 Ambala - - 1 252 Faridabad 2 69 7 5333 Fatehabad - - 2 2704 Gurgaon 6 177 15 1315 Kaithal - - 1 226 Karnal 1 3 - -7 Kurukshetra - - 1 528 Panchkula 1 40 - -9 Panipat - - 2 104

Total 10 289 29 1137

The above table 3.5 reveals that in all there were 10 lakes having area of 289

Hectares and 29 rivers/drains having length of 1137 Kms in which fish farming was

being conducted. District Gurgaon has the maximum number of lakes and drains. It

has 6 lakes with water area of 177 Hectares and 15 drains with 131 Kms length.

District Faridabad has 2 lakes with area of 69 Hectares and 7 rivers/drains with

length of 533 Kms. and Karnal and Panchkula have one lake each with water area

of 3 Hectares and 40 Hectares respectively. District Ambala, Kaithal and

Kurukshetra have one river each with length of 25 Kms, 22 Kms and 52 Kms.

respectively. District Fatehabad and Panipat have 2 rivers each with length of 270

Kms. and 104 Kms. respectively. Remaining 10 districts have no lake or

river/canal/drain in which fish farming was conducted. Contract for fish farming in a

river/drain is given as per district boundary. So a river/drain may be covered in more

than one district. vi) No. of Workers

In case of ponds, the number of full time/part time family members and hired

workers engaged in fish farming were 5476 and 4189 respectively. This number in

case of lakes and rivers was 36 and 77 respectively. In all according to the study for

ponds, lakes and rivers/drains, the number of full time/part time family members

and hired workers engaged in fish farming were 5512 and 4266 respectively.

11

Expenditure Incurred on Inputs and Value of Output from Sampled Fish Ponds, Total Fish Ponds, Lakes and Rivers/Drains Analysis on the Basis of Sampled Fish Ponds

District wise quantity, rate and value of fish produced from sampled fish

ponds is given at Annexure-I Table 3.6 Expenditure on Inputs Used in Sampled Fish ponds

Inputs (Rs. Lakh) S.No

District No of

Pon-ds

Area (Hect.)

FishSeed

FishFeed

Fertili- zers/

Manure

Craft&Gears

Other Char-ges

Exps. on Tra-nsport

etc.

Total Inputs

1 Ambala 17 14.8 0.89 1.47 0.47 - 0.78 0.05 3.662 Bhiwani 5 12.4 0.49 1.19 1.07 0.04 0.41 0.14 3.343 Faridabad 48 78.3 4.93 4.08 2.81 1.30 10.72 3.73 27.574 Fatehabad 9 26.1 1.07 2.97 1.25 0.05 0.21 0.91 6.465 Gurgaon 21 34.4 2.42 2.64 2.31 1.14 4.19 0.07 12.776 Hisar 11 40.2 6.20 4.43 1.59 0.44 2.88 0.49 16.037 Jhajjar 11 40.1 2.54 0.19 0.16 1.15 0.61 0.16 4.818 Jind 5 14.5 0.94 0.36 0.25 0.08 0.47 1.21 3.319 Kaithal 7 19.5 6.12 1.29 0.46 1.55 0.9 2.10 12.4210 Karnal 25 44.6 2.59 2.19 1.18 0.49 1.98 0.44 8.8711 Kurukshetra 5 4.3 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.5112 M.Garh 5 6.5 0.30 0.09 0.45 0.03 0.17 0.07 1.1113 Panchkula 5 13.4 0.31 2.09 0.88 0.03 1.37 0.11 4.7914 Panipat 13 35.4 4.03 3.09 1.40 0.10 1.34 1.53 11.4915 Rewari 8 13.7 0.61 0.87 0.86 0.49 0.13 0.07 3.0316 Rohtak 11 23.5 2.81 1.87 1.93 1.14 2.97 1.43 12.1517 Sirsa 8 18.3 1.36 0.29 0.12 0.40 0.32 0.61 3.1018 Sonipat 48 111.1 4.74 2.25 2.05 4.25 5.48 2.46 21.2319 Y. Nagar 18 16.7 2.52 1.52 0.46 - 0.73 0.03 5.26 Total 280 567.8 45.01 33.00 19.86 12.69 35.70 15.65 161.91 Percentage 27.8 20.4 12.3 7.8 22.0 9.7 100.0

The above table 3.6 gives the district-wise as well as itemwise expenditure

incurred on inputs by the fish farmers for all the sampled fish ponds. In the sampled

fish ponds the expenditure incurred on fish seed, fish feed, fertilizers/manure, craft

and gears, other charges (on diesel, electricity, etc.) and expenses on transport

etc. to the total expenditure on inputs was 27.8 percent, 20.4 percent,12.3 percent,

12

7.8 percent, 22.0 percent, and 9.7 percent respectively. The maximum

expenditure was on fish seed followed by expenditure on other charges(on diesel,

electricity, etc.) and fish feed. Expenditure of craft and gears was minimum 7.8

percent.

Table 3.7 Value of Output from Sampled Fish Ponds

Output (Rs. Lakh) S.No. District Inland Fish Prawn Others Total Output

Percentage toTotal Output

1 Ambala 16.41 - 0.06 16.47 2.52 Bhiwani 17.13 - - 17.13 2.53 Faridabad 106.10 - - 106.10 15.94 Fatehabad 24.63 - - 24.63 3.75 Gurgaon 37.66 2.64 0.44 40.74 6.16 Hisar 63.57 - 0.95 64.52 9.77 Jhajjar 18.43 - - 18.43 2.88 Jind 24.51 - 1.07 25.58 3.89 Kaithal 35.36 - - 35.36 5.310 Karnal 42.40 - 1.25 43.65 6.511 Kurukshetra 2.57 - - 2.57 0.412 Mahendragarh 4.09 - - 4.09 0.613 Panchkula 12.70 - - 12.70 1.914 Panipat 41.57 - - 41.57 6.215 Rewari 13.72 - - 13.72 2.016 Rohtak 38.70 - - 38.70 5.817 Sirsa 10.54 - - 10.54 1.618 Sonipat 126.92 3.75 - 130.67 19.619 Yamuna Nagar 20.75 - - 20.75 3.1 Total 657.76 6.39 3.77 667.92 100.0

Percentage 98.4 1.0 0.6 100.0

The above table 3.7 gives the district-wise value of output of inland fish,

prawn and others from the sampled fish ponds. In the sampled fish ponds, the

maximum 19.6 percent fish output was from district Sonipat followed by Faridabad

15.9 percent, Hisar 9.7 percent and Karnal 6.5 percent. District Kurukshetra was

having the minimum output of 0.4 percent. It is also noticed here that 98.4 percent

of total value of output was from inland fish farming, 1.0 percent from prawn

farming and 0.6 percent from other sources. The income from other sources was

the income from sale of fish seed.

13

Table 3.8 Percentage of Expenditure on Inputs to Output in Sampled Fish Ponds

Total (Rs. Lakh) Sr.No. District Inputs Output

Percentage of Inputs to

Output 1 Ambala 3.66 16.47 22.22 Bhiwani 3.34 17.13 19.53 Faridabad 27.57 106.10 26.04 Fatehabad 6.46 24.63 26.25 Gurgaon 12.77 40.74 31.36 Hisar 16.03 64.52 24.87 Jhajjar 4.81 18.43 26.18 Jind 3.31 25.58 12.99 Kaithal 12.42 35.36 35.1

10 Karnal 8.87 43.65 20.311 Kurukshetra 0.51 2.57 19.612 Mahendragarh 1.11 4.09 27.113 Panchkula 4.79 12.70 37.714 Panipat 11.49 41.57 27.715 Rewari 3.03 13.72 22.116 Rohtak 12.15 38.70 31.417 Sirsa 3.10 10.54 29.418 Sonipat 21.23 130.67 16.219 Yamuna Nagar 5.26 20.75 25.4 Total 161.91 667.92 24.2

The above table 3.8 reveals that in the sampled ponds, the percentage of

expenditure on inputs to the value of output in the districts was ranging from 12.9 to

37.7 . It was highest i.e. 37.7 percent in district Panchkula and lowest i.e. 12.9

percent in district Jind. This percentage of expenditure on inputs to the output for all

the sampled ponds was 24.2.

Analysis on the Basis of Total Number of Fish Ponds District wise quantity, rate and value of fish produced from total fish ponds is

given at Annexure-II. As discussed earlier in chapter- I, the fish ponds to be surveyed were

selected at random at the district level from the total number of fish ponds. To arrive

at the total expenditure on inputs and value of output for the State as a whole

from the sampled expenditure on inputs and value of output, multiplier has been

applied. This multiplier is equal to the total number of fish ponds in a district

divided by the number of fish ponds selected in that district. This multiplier has been

developed for each district. In this way total expenditure on inputs and value of

output for each district has been worked out by applying the multiplier. By summing

14

the district level expenditure on inputs and value of output, the total expenditure on

inputs and value of output for the total fish ponds in the Haryana State has been

obtained. Table 3.9 Expenditure on Inputs Used in the Total Fish Ponds in the State

Inputs ( Rs. Lakh ) S. No

District No.Of

Ponds

Area (Hect.)

Fish Seed

Fish Feed

Fertili-zers/Man-ure

Craft&Gears

Other Char-ges.

Exps.on

Trans-port etc.

Total Inputs

1 Ambala 226 365.1 11.81 19.57 6.26 0.00 10.33 0.64 48.612 Bhiwani 41 84.1 4.00 9.77 8.80 0.33 3.35 1.11 27.363 Faridabad 619 779.6 63.53 52.59 36.18 16.82 138.28 48.13 355.534 Fatehabad 108 252.2 12.83 35.66 14.99 0.54 2.46 10.97 77.455 Gurgaon 275 645.0 31.72 34.53 30.25 14.94 54.84 0.94 167.226 Hisar 147 395.6 82.79 59.23 21.28 5.87 38.49 6.55 214.217 Jhajjar 135 469.0 31.22 2.28 1.92 14.17 7.51 1.99 59.098 Jind 21 51.5 3.95 1.49 1.07 0.34 1.97 5.10 13.929 Kaithal 101 259.3 88.30 18.54 6.59 22.29 13.01 30.33 179.0610 Karnal 321 437.0 33.30 28.11 15.18 6.32 25.45 5.59 113.9511 Kurukshetra 28 45.9 0.76 0.65 0.89 0.05 0.22 0.22 2.7912 M.Garh 39 55.9 2.34 0.70 3.54 0.27 1.35 0.55 8.7513 Panchkula 56 137.3 3.45 23.43 9.87 0.29 15.34 1.18 53.5614 Panipat 173 462.2 53.63 41.18 18.57 1.26 17.88 20.31 152.8315 Rewari 96 93.8 7.32 10.46 10.31 5.82 1.56 0.84 36.3116 Rohtak 148 491.5 37.85 25.15 26.00 15.38 39.96 19.16 163.5017 Sirsa 98 215.5 16.72 3.52 1.48 4.92 3.90 7.50 38.0418 Sonipat 619 1469.4 61.17 28.98 26.43 54.87 70.67 31.75 273.8719 Y. Nagar 229 215.8 32.07 19.39 5.79 - 9.28 0.39 66.92 Total 3480 6925.7 578.76 415.23 245.40 164.48 455.85 193.25 2052.97 Percentage 28.2 20.2 12.0 8.0 22.2 9.4 100.0

The above table 3.9 gives the district-wise as well as item wise total

expenditure incurred on inputs by the fish farmers for all the ponds being used for

fish farming in the State. It is found that the expenditure on fish seed, fish feed,

fertilizers/manure, craft & gears, other charges (on diesel, electricity, etc.) and

expenses on transport etc. constituted 28.2 percent, 20.2 percent,12.0 percent,

8.0 percent, 22.2 percent, and 9.4 percent respectively of the total

expenditure on inputs. The maximum expenditure was on fish seed which

was followed by expenditure on other charges (on diesel, electricity, etc.) and

fish feed. Minimum expenditure was incurred on craft and gears. More or less the

same trend has been followed at district level.

15

Table 3.10 Value of Output from the Total Fish Ponds in the State Sr.No. Output (Rs. Lakh)

District Inland Fish

Prawn Others Total Output

Percent-age to Total

Output 1 Ambala 218.14 - 0.86 219.00 2.62 Bhiwani 140.46 - - 140.46 1.73 Faridabad 1368.30 - - 1368.30 16.44 Fatehabad 295.51 - - 295.51 3.55 Gurgaon 493.23 34.57 5.76 533.56 6.46 Hisar 849.53 - 12.70 862.23 10.47 Jhajjar 226.17 - - 226.17 2.78 Jind 102.94 - 4.49 107.43 1.39 Kaithal 510.20 - - 510.20 6.1

10 Karnal 544.39 - 16.05 560.44 6.711 Kurukshetra 14.38 - - 14.38 0.212 Mahendragarh 31.90 - - 31.90 0.413 Panchkula 142.24 - - 142.24 1.714 Panipat 553.15 - - 553.15 6.615 Rewari 164.64 - - 164.64 2.016 Rohtak 520.68 - - 520.68 6.317 Sirsa 129.18 - - 129.18 1.618 Sonipat 1636.75 48.36 - 1685.11 20.219 Yamuna Nagar 263.95 - - 263.95 3.2

Total 8205.74 82.93 39.86 8328.53 100.0 Percentage 98.5 1.0 0.5 100.0

The above table 3.10 gives the district-wise value of output from

inland fish, prawn and others for all the ponds in the State. As in case of sampled

fish ponds, the maximum output 20.2 percent was from district Sonipat followed by

Faridabad 16.4 percent, Hisar 10.4 percent and Karnal 6.7 percent. District

Kurukshetra was again having the minimum output of 0.2 percent. In the total output

from fish ponds in the State the maximum 98.5 percent output was from Inland fish.

The value of output from prawn and others is almost negligible which has contributed

1.0 percent and 0.5 percent respectively to the total output. Under the heading

others, the value of output was from sale of fish seed which was found in the districts

of Ambala, Gurgaon, Hisar, Jind and Karnal. Prawn was found in the districts of

Gurgaon and Sonipat.

16

Table 3.11 Percentage of Inputs to Output for the Total Fish Ponds in the State

Total (Rs. Lakh) Sr.No. District

Inputs Output Percentage of Inputs to

Output 1 Ambala 48.61 219.00 22.22 Bhiwani 27.36 140.46 19.53 Faridabad 355.53 1368.30 26.04 Fatehabad 77.45 295.51 26.25 Gurgaon 167.22 533.56 31.36 Hisar 214.21 862.23 24.87 Jhajjar 59.09 226.17 26.18 Jind 13.92 107.43 13.09 Kaithal 179.06 510.20 35.1

10 Karnal 113.95 560.44 20.311 Kurukshetra 2.79 14.38 19.412 Mahendragarh 8.75 31.90 27.413 Panchkula 53.56 142.24 37.714 Panipat 152.83 553.15 27.615 Rewari 36.31 164.64 22.116 Rohtak 163.50 520.68 31.417 Sirsa 38.04 129.18 29.418 Sonipat 273.87 1685.11 16.319 Yamuna Nagar 66.92 263.95 25.4

Total 2052.97 8328.53 24.6

The above table 3.11 gives the district-wise expenditure incurred on inputs ,

the corresponding output and percentage of expenditure on inputs to the value of

output for all the fish ponds in the State. It is found that the percentage of total

expenditure on inputs to the total value of output for the State as a whole was 24.6

.At district level the expenditure on inputs to value of output was maximum in

district Panchkula 37.7 percent and minimum in district Jind 13.0 percent. The

information given in the above table reveals that total expenditure on various inputs

was to the tune of Rs.2052.97 lakh whereas total output generated from the fish

production was amounting to Rs.8328.53 lakh.

Analysis on the Basis of Lakes and Rivers/Drains in the State. District wise quantity, rate and value of fish produced from lakes and rivers/drains is

given at Annexure-III

17

Table 3.12 Expenditure on Inputs Used in Lakes and Rivers/Drains in the State. Sr. Category No. Area Input (Rs.Lakh)

(Hect.) FishSeed

FishFeed

Fertili-zers/

Manure

Craft &

Gears

Other Char-ges.

Exps.on

Tran- sport etc.

Total Inputs

1 Lakes 10 289 3.00 2.21 2.48 0.74 0.95 1.41 10.79

2 Rivers/ 29 1137* - - - 2.32 0.22 7.31 9.85 Drains Total 39 - 3.00 2.21 2.48 3.06 1.17 8.72 20.64 Percentage 14.5 10.7 12.0 14.8 5.7 42.3 100.0

*Length in Kms. The above table 3.12 reveals that in case of lakes and rivers/drains the

expenditure on inputs such as fish seed, fish feed, fertilizers/manure, craft & gears,

other charges (on diesel, electricity, etc.) and expenses on transport etc. was 14.5

percent, 10.7 percent, 12.0 percent, 14.8 percent, 5.7 percent and 42.3 percent

respectively. The maximum expenditure was on transport etc. which was followed

by expenditure on craft and gears and fish seed. Minimum expenditure was

incurred on other charges (on diesel, electricity etc.). In case of rivers/drains, there

was no expenditure on fish seed, fish feed and fertilizers/manure.

Table 3.13 Value of Output From Lakes and Rivers/Drains in the State. Sr. No.

Category No.

Area (Hect.)

Output (Rs.Lakh) Inland Prawn Others Total Fish

Percentageto Total Output

1 Lakes 10 289 38.83 - 38.83 36.5

2 Rivers/Drains 29 1137* 67.54 - - 67.54 63.5 Total 39 - 106.37 - - 106.37 100.0 Percentage 100.0 100.0

*Length in Kms. The above table 3.13 gives the value of output for all the 10 lakes and 29

rivers/drains in the State. The total value of output was from inland fish. There was

no output from prawn and others.

Table 3.14 Percentage of Inputs to Output for Lakes and Rivers/Drains in State Sr. Category Total (Rs.Lakh) Percentage of inputs No. Inputs Output to output 1 Lakes 10.79 38.83 27.8

2 Rivers/Drains 9.85 67.54 14.6 Total 20.64 106.37 19.4

18

From the table 3.14 it is found that in case of lakes, the percentage of inputs

to value of output was 27.8 and for that of rivers/lakes it was 14.6. In all for lakes

and rivers/drains it was 19.4. The total expenditure incurred on inputs for lakes and

rivers/drains was Rs. 20.64 lakh and the corresponding value of output from these

lakes and rivers/drains was Rs.106.37 lakh.

Analysis on the Basis of Total Ponds, Lakes and Rivers/Drains in the State. Variety wise quantity, rate and value of fish produced from total ponds, lakes and

rivers/drains is given at Annexure-IV Table 3.15 Expenditure Incurred on Inputs Used in Ponds,Lakes and

Rivers/Drains

Inputs (Rs. Lakh)

Sr. No.

Category No. Area (Hect.)

Fish Seed

Fish Feed

Fertil-izers/Man-ure

Craft &

Gears

Other Char-ges

Exps.on

Tran-sport etc.

Total Inputs

1 Ponds 3480 6925.7 578.76 415.23 245.40 164.48 455.85 193.25 2052.97

2 Lakes 10 289 3.00 2.21 2.48 0.74 0.95 1.41 10.79

3 Rivers/Drains 29 1137* - - - 2.32 0.22 7.31 9.85 Total 3519 - 581.76 417.44 247.88 167.54 457.02 201.97 2073.61 Percentage 28.1 20.1 12.0 8.1 22.0 9.7 100.0

• Length in Kms.

The above table 3.15 gives the total expenditure incurred on inputs for

all the sources of fish production i.e. for fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains. It is

found that the expenditure on fish seed, fish feed, fertilizers/manure, craft and

gears, other charges (on diesel, electricity, etc.) and expenses on transport etc. for

all the sources was 28.1 percent, 20.1 percent,12.0 percent, 8.1 percent, 22.0

percent and 9.7 percent respectively. In all the maximum expenditure was on fish

seed followed by other charges(on diesel, electricity, etc.) and fish feed. The

Minimum expenditure has been incurred on craft and gears.

19

Table 3.16 Value of Output from Ponds, Lakes and Rivers/Drains

Output (Rs.Lakh) Sr. No.

Category No. Area (Hect.)

Inland Fish

Prawn Others Total Percent-age to Total

Output 1 Ponds 3480 6925.7 8205.73 82.93 39.87 8328.53 98.7

2 Lakes 10 289 38.83 - - 38.83 0.5

3 Rivers/Drains 29 1137* 67.54 - - 67.54 0.8 Total 3519 - 8312.10 82.93 39.87 8434.90 100.0 Percentage 98.5 1.0 0.5 100.0

* Length in Kms

The above table 3.16 gives the total value of output from fish farming from

ponds, lakes and river/drains in the State. In the total value of output 98.7 percent

came from fish ponds, 0.5 percent from lakes and 0.8 percent from rivers/drains.

The contribution of the inland fish in the total value of output was 98.5 percent, from

prawn 1.0 percent and others 0.5 percent. The value of output from others was the

income from sale of fish seed. Table 3.17 Percentage of Expenditure on Inputs to Value of Output for

Ponds, Lakes and Rivers/Drains in the State

Total (Rs.Lakh) Sr. No.

Category Inputs Output

Percentage of inputs to

output 1 Ponds 2052.97 8328.53 24.6 2 Lakes 10.79 38.83 27.8 3 Rivers/Drains 9.85 67.54 14.6

Total 2073.61 8434.90 24.6

The above table 3.17 reveals that the total value of output and expenditure

on inputs from fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains in Haryana State was Rs. 8434.90

lakh and Rs. 2073.61 lakh respectively.

The percentage of expenditure on inputs to value of output in case of fish

ponds, lakes and river/drains was 24.6, 27.8 and 14.6 respectively. The overall

percentage of expenditure on inputs to value of output for all these sources of fish

production was 24.6 in the Haryana State.

20

List of selected ponds/lakes/rivers/drains with owner/lease holder’s name

and address and their water area is appended at Annexure-V and a copy of

Questionnaire Schedule at Annexure-VI.

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Percentage Share of Various Inputs in the Total Inputs

Percentage 28.1 20.1 12.0 8.1 22.0 9.7

Fish Seed Fish Feed Fertilizer/Manure Craft & Gears Other Charges Expenses on Transport, etc.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Percentage Share of Output according to Fish Type

Percentage 98.5 1.0 0.5Inland Fish Prawn Others

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

Percentage of Inputs to Output

Percentage 24.6 27.8 14.6 24.6Ponds Lakes Rivers/Drains Total

Chapter-IV

CONCLUSION The study "Estimating Inputs in Fishing Sector in the State of Haryana" has been

conducted to work out the percentage of expenditure on inputs to value of output from

fish farming in Haryana. This survey has been conducted in the month of November,

2004 and reference period of the survey was 2003-04. The findings of the survey are

as under:

1. There were 3480 fish ponds with water area of 6925.7 Hectares in the State

which were being used for fish farming of which 280 fish ponds with water area of

567.8 Hectares were selected for survey.

2. The number of fish ponds selected for survey were 8.0 percent of the total fish

ponds and water area covered was 8.2 percent of the total water area of the fish

ponds under pisciculture.

3. There were 10 lakes with water area of 289 Hectares and 29 rivers/drains with

length of 1137 Kms. which were being used for fish farming in the State.

4. In case of sampled fish ponds 49.6 percent of fish farmers were having fish

farming as primary occupation and 50.4 percent were having as secondary

occupation. In case of lakes/rivers/drains, 68.8 percent were having fish farming

as primary occupation and 31.2 percent as secondary occupation.

5. In case of sampled fish ponds, 17.5 percent fish farmers were illiterate, 31.8

percent below matric and 50.7 percent matric and above. In case of

lakes/rivers/drains, 15.6 percent fish farmers were illiterate, 68.8 percent below

matric and 15.6 percent matric and above.

6. In the sampled fish ponds, 5.7 percent fish farmers were using natural water only

and remaining 94.3 percent were using natural water alongwith other sources of

water such as tube well, river etc. In lakes, 60.0 percent were depending upon

natural water and 40.0 percent were depending upon natural as well as other

sources of water.

7. In case of total fish ponds, the number of full time/part time family members

and hired workers engaged in fish farming were 5476 and 4189 respectively.

This number in case of lakes and rivers/drains was 36 and 77 respectively.

8. Multiplier, based on total number of fish ponds and selected fish ponds at

district level has been applied to the expenditure on inputs and value of output of

22

the sampled ponds to work out total expenditure on inputs and value of output.

9. In case of total fish ponds, the expenditure on fish seed was maximum 28.2

percent followed by other charges (on electricity, diesel, etc.) 22.2 percent and

fish feed 20.2 percent of the total expenditure on inputs in the State. The

minimum expenditure was on craft and gears.

10. In case of total fish ponds, in the total value of output in the State, 98.5 percent

came from inland fish, 1.0 percent from prawn and 0.5 percent from others.

11. The expenditure on inputs to value of output from the total fish ponds in the

State was 24.6 percent.

12. In case of lakes and rivers/drains, the expenditure on transport etc. was

maximum 42.3 percent followed by expenses on craft and gears 14.8 percent

and fish seed 14.5 percent of the total expenditure on inputs in the State. The

minimum expenditure was on other charges (on electricity, diesel, etc.) 5.7

percent. In case of rivers/drains, there was no expenditure on fish seed,

fish feed and fertilizers/manure.

13. In case of lakes and rivers/drains, the total value of output in the State was from

inland fish . There was no output from prawn and others.

14. The expenditure on inputs to total value of output from the lakes and rivers

/drains in the State was 19.4 percent.

15. In case of all sources of fish production i.e. fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains in

the State, the expenditure on fish seed was maximum 28.1 percent followed by

expenditure on other charges (on electricity, diesel, etc.) 22.0 percent and fish

feed 20.1 percent of the total expenditure on inputs in the State. The minimum

expenditure was on craft and gears 8.1 percent.

16. In case of all sources of fish production i.e. fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains,

98.5 percent of the total value of output in the State came from inland fish, 1.0

percent from prawn and 0.5 percent from others.

17. The expenditure on inputs to total value of output for all sources of fish

production i.e. fish ponds, lakes and rivers/drains in the State was 24.6 percent.

23

Sr. District Others TotalNo. Quantity Rate Value Quantity Rate Value Value Output

(Qtl.) (Rs./Kg) (Rs.Lakh) (Qtl.) (Rs./Kg) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh)1 Ambala 593.5 27.65 16.41 - - - 0.06 16.472 Bhiwani 390.1 43.91 17.13 - - - - 17.133 Faridabad 3351.0 31.66 106.10 - - - - 106.104 Fatehabad 961.0 25.63 24.63 - - - - 24.635 Gurgaon 1095.6 34.37 37.66 12.0 220.00 2.64 0.44 40.746 Hisar 2055.5 30.93 63.57 - - - 0.95 64.527 Jhajjar 658.5 27.99 18.43 - - - - 18.438 Jind 749.0 32.72 24.51 - - - 1.07 25.589 Kaithal 1174.0 30.12 35.36 - - - - 35.3610 Karnal 1502.5 28.22 42.40 - - - 1.25 43.6511 Kurukshetra 101.8 25.25 2.57 - - - - 2.5712 Mahendragarh 128.0 31.95 4.09 - - - - 4.0913 Panchkula 456.0 27.85 12.70 - - - - 12.7014 Panipat 1446.7 28.73 41.57 - - - - 41.5715 Rewari 480.0 28.58 13.72 - - - - 13.7216 Rohtak 1504.8 25.72 38.70 - - - - 38.7017 Sirsa 415.0 25.4 10.54 - - - - 10.5418 Sonipat 5013.5 25.32 126.92 15.0 250.00 3.75 - 130.6719 Y.Nagar 734.5 28.25 20.75 - - - - 20.75

Total 22811.0 28.84 657.76 27.0 236.67 6.39 3.77 667.92

24

ANNEXURE-IDistrict wise Quantity,Rate and Value of Fish Produced from Sampled Fish Ponds

Inland Fish Prawn

Sr. District Others TotalNo. Qty. Rate Value Qty. Rate Value Value Value

(Qtl.) (Rs. / Kg.) (Rs.Lakh) (Qtl.) (Rs./ Kg.) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh)1 Ambala 7890.0 27.65 218.14 - - - 0.86 219.002 Bhiwani 3198.8 43.91 140.46 - - - - 140.463 Faridabad 43213.8 31.66 1368.30 - - - - 1368.304 Fatehabad 11532.0 25.63 295.51 - - - - 295.515 Gurgaon 14347.1 34.37 493.23 157.1 220.00 34.57 5.76 533.566 Hisar 27468.9 30.93 849.53 - - - 12.70 862.237 Jhajjar 8081.6 27.99 226.17 - - - - 226.178 Jind 3145.8 32.72 102.94 - - - 4.49 107.439 Kaithal 16939.2 30.12 510.20 - - - - 510.2010 Karnal 19292.1 28.22 544.39 - - - 16.05 560.4411 Kurukshetra 570.1 25.25 14.38 - - - - 14.3812 Mahendragarh 998.4 31.95 31.90 - - - - 31.9013 Panchkula 5107.2 27.85 142.24 - - - - 142.2414 Panipat 19252.2 28.73 553.15 - - - - 553.1515 Rewari 5760.0 28.58 164.64 - - - - 164.6416 Rohtak 20246.3 25.72 520.68 - - - - 520.6817 Sirsa 5083.8 25.41 129.18 - - - - 129.1818 Sonipat 64653.1 25.32 1636.75 193.4 250.00 48.36 - 1685.1119 Y.Nagar 9344.5 28.25 263.95 - - - - 263.95

Total 286124.9 28.68 8205.74 350.6 236.55 82.93 39.86 8328.53

25

ANNEXURE-II

District wise Quantity, Rate and Value of Fish Produced from Total Fish Ponds

Inland Fish Prawn

Sr. District Others TotalNo. Quantity Rate Value Quantity Rate Value Value Output

(Qtl.) (Rs./Kg) (Rs.Lakh) (Qtl.) (Rs./Kg) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh)Lakes

1 Faridabad 465.0 26.88 12.50 - - - - 12.502 Gurgaon 339.2 24.55 8.33 - - - - 8.333 Karnal 200.0 26.00 5.20 - - - - 5.204 Panchkula 400.0 32.00 12.80 - - - - 12.80

Total 1404.2 27.65 38.83 - - - - 38.83

1 Ambala 950.0 25.00 23.75 - - - - 23.752 Faridabad 360.0 28.00 10.08 - - - - 10.083 Fatehabad 500.0 23.00 11.50 - - - 11.504 Gurgaon 269.0 27.39 7.37 - - - - 7.375 Kaithal 80.0 25.00 2.00 - - - - 2.006 Kurukshetra 35.0 30.00 1.05 - - - - 1.057 Panipat 459.6 25.65 11.79 - - - - 11.79

Total 2653.6 25.45 67.54 - - - - 67.54

26

District wise Quantity,Rate and Value of Fish Produced from Lakes and

Inland Fish Prawn

Rivers/Drains

ANNEXURE-III

Rivers / Drains

Sr. Category Others TotalNo. Qty. Rate Value Qty. Rate Value Value Value

(Qtl.) (Rs. / Kg.) (Rs.Lakh) (Qtl.) (Rs./ Kg.) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh) (Rs.Lakh)

1 Ponds 286124.9 28.68 8205.74 350.6 236.55 82.93 39.86 8328.53

2 Lakes 1404.2 27.65 38.83 - - - - 38.83

3 Rivers/Drains 2653.6 25.45 67.54 - - - - 67.54

Total 290182.7 28.64 8312.11 350.6 236.55 82.93 39.86 8434.90

27

ANNEXURE-IV

Variety-wise Quantity, Rate and Value of Fish Produced from

Inland Fish Prawn

Total Fish Ponds, Lakes and Rivers/Drains

Sr. Village/Town Name of AreaNo. Fish Farmer (Hect.)

1 2 3 4

1 Saba Pur Gajje Singh 0.6

2 Bihta Abrar Ahmad 1.2

3 Bihta Anil Kumar 3.0

4 Dubli Naresh Kumar 1.0

5 Dukheri Punchayati 0.5

6 Chaurmasatpur Kaka Singh 0.5

7 Khera Raju 0.4

8 Gaganpur Punna Ram 1.2

9 Kambar Kulwant Singh 0.8

10 Bharog Rajesh Kumar 1.0

11 Prail Naresh Kumar 0.6

12 Bhurewala Laskar Singh 0.5

13 Dehar Ram Kumar 0.6

14 Bhadholi Madan Pal 1.0

15 Dera Roshan Ali 1.0

16 Kathe Majra Yadvinder Singh 0.5

17 Kherki Manglore Babu Ram 0.4

Total 14.8

1 Mitathal Sarwar 1.7

2 Manheru Om Parkash 1.0

3 Sanwar Gurdayal Singh 3.0

ANNEXURE -VList of selected Ponds/Lakes/Rivers/Drains in Haryana

2. Bhiwani

1. Ambala

Ponds

28

1 2 3 44 Pairtawaskalan Azad Mohemad 5.0

5 Imlota Anup Singh 1.7

Total 12.4

1 Dakora Karnail Singh 1.2

2 Likhi Devi Ram 2.0

3 Mehluka Rafiq 1.6

4 Bhurja Naseer 1.0

5 Jajru Dharambir 0.4

6 Sikrona Roop Chand 1.0

7 Ateli Faqrudin 2.0

8 Mahesh Pur Ismail 0.6

9 Ghangot Ratti Khan 1.0

10 Firozepur Bharat Pal 3.0

11 Patli Khurd Naseer 1.8

12 Asavata Dilip 1.0

13 Softa Haneef 1.0

14 Jathola Vijay Chopra 2.0

15 Bamni Khera Arvind 1.5

16 Sevali Ramotar 2.0

17 Siloti Hasan Mohd 5.0

18 Karman Vijin 0.8

19 Tumasra Majeed 3.0

20 Khambi Hasan Mohd. 0.5

21 Likhi Devi Ram 4.0

22 Karimpur Shahabuddin 1.0

23 Bahinpur Famaij 5.0

3. Faridabad

29

1 2 3 424 Mindkola Jafarudeen 0.4

25 Mindkola Amru 1.0

26 Durachi Ali Mohd. 2.0

27 Ransika Najir 1.8

28 Pahari Jumma 2.0

29 Kondal Vijay Pal 1.0

30 Mathapur Samsu 2.0

31 Ransika Mudli 0.6

32 Digraka Sher Mohd. 1.0

33 Goh pur Harun Mohd. 1.0

34 Ribid Tahir 3.0

35 Hathin Ghasita 2.0

36 Vidya-wali Harun 0.8

37 Roop Nagar Deenu 0.4

38 Khiluka Jumma 0.5

39 Kalsada Mahinder 2.0

40 Ponfri Fajru 1.6

41 Dheeranki Mahajan 2.0

42 Madnaka Jafrudin 1.0

43 Kondal Brij Bhushan 2.0

44 Kheri Kalan Tariq 3.0

45 Agwanpur Payara Lal 2.0

46 Alipur Ashok Yadav 1.0

47 Ladhiapur Dayud 0.8

48 Kishorpur Kanwarpal 1.0

Total 78.3

30

1 2 3 4

1 Bhodia Khere Charangi 3.0

2 Manawali Charangi 2.0

3 Lahrian Hira Lal 3.5

4 Bhattu Dhan Raj 4.5

5 Dhani Dult Kuldeep Singh 2.5

6 Ali Kam Satpal 2.2

7 Babanpur Anil Kumar 0.4

8 Chander Khurd Darshan 4.5

9 Laloda Amarjeet Singh 3.5

Total 26.1

1 Salemba Mehmooda 2.0

2 Akeda Sofat Ali 4.0

3 Bai Suleman 1.0

4 Chandeni Nasruddin 1.5

5 Shamsabad Aslam 1.0

6 Bichhor Harun 2.0

7 Nawalgarh Asgar 2.0

8 Jadoli Rehman 1.5

9 Hilapur Om Pal 2.2

10 Dhenkli Noor Mohd 1.5

11 Chhachhera Fatima 1.6

12 Dhankli Samsu 1.6

13 Noshera Jamaluddin 2.0

14 Kewal Ki Dhani Barham Parkash 1.0

15 Nariala Abdula 1.4

5. Gurgaon

4. Fatehabad

31

1 2 3 4

16 Ghosh Garh Sameen 1.6

17 Aklimpur Khursheed 2.0

18 Lahariari Nurudeen 1.0

19 Sultanpur Puhnama Ajijkhan 1.0

20 Alal Pur Nuh Imotyaj Khan 1.5

21 Singal Heri Bassi 1.0

Total 34.4

1 Shingwa Khas Suresh 6.0

2 Kaimri Jagdev Godara 4.2

3 Shekhpura Anoop Kumar 4.0

4 Ghirari Sajjan 4.0

5 Kumbha Sunder Singh 10.0

6 Mirkan Ami Chand 2.0

7 Raj Pura Wazir Singh 2.0

8 Bhaklana Anoop Singh 1.0

9 Cadwa Sanjay Thakral 2.0

10 Satrod Kdan Ram Niwas 1.0

11 Balak Satayman 4.0

Total 40.2

1 Parnala Ramesh 3.5

2 Daboda Kalan Sandeep 3.0

3 Guddha Noordeen 5.0

4 Dhakla Sayed Mohamad 2.0

5 Babepur Ashok 4.0

7. Jhajjar

6. Hisar

32

1 2 3 4

6 Raipur Shripal 3.5

7 Rohad Krishan Kumar 4.0

8 Kablana Shamsher Singh 3.0

9 Marot Joginder 3.5

10 Achej Devinder 4.5

11 Dharana Attar Singh 4.1

Total 40.1

1 Retouli Madan 3.0

2 Gharokhurd Rattan Singh 2.5

3 Pipaltha Sanjeev 2.5

4 Dumarkha Kalan Vijender 4.0

5 Budain Rattan Singh 2.5

Total 14.5

1 Ramana Ramuni Birbal 4.5

2 Rasina Pehru Ram 1.0

3 Dhons Nihal Singh 5.0

4 Ahmad Pur Rajesh 2.0

5 Saran Ram Sarup 2.0

6 Kultarn Pala Ram 2.0

7 Chosula Chalu Ram 3.0

Total 19.5

1 Nabipur Om Parkash 1.2

2 Gashi Birbal Sham Lal 1.6

3 Padha Harderia 0.8

8. Jind

9. Kaithal

10. Karnal

33

1 2 3 4

4 Gudha Bindu 0.8

5 Begampur Lal Chand 1.0

6 Kalron Kanwar Paul 0.8

7 Shakhpura Krishan Lal 1.8

8 Vazidpur Balbir Singh 1.0

9 Kheri Sarfali Baldev Singh 2.0

10 Gogripur Madan Lal 5.0

11 Uplana Vikram Singh 5.5

12 Munak Hazi Iqbal 3.0

13 Khijrobad Pala Singh 0.4

14 Agondh Jasvir Singh 2.5

15 Bassi Rohtas Singh 1.6

16 Kalampura Karan Singh 1.5

17 Raison Ramdas 2.5

18 Pingli Kali Ram 0.6

19 Pakhana Yogesh 0.6

20 Gholpura Baljit Singh 1.0

21 Anupur Padam Singh 0.8

22 Koer Jagdish 1.0

23 Butana Sultan 3.0

24 Islam Nagar Vinod Kumar 1.6

25 Barsalu Ram Kumar 3.0

Total 44.6

1 Bir Mathane Saurav Bathla 1.7

2 Bahri & Haripur Vijay Kumar 0.5

3 Dau Majra Raj Pal 0.4

11. Kurukshetra

34

1 2 3 4

4 Duda Amal Kumar 0.5

5 Dhianfa Rameswar Das 1.2

Total 4.3

1 Dongre Ahir Rakesh 1.5

2 Maddllana Bhoop Singh 2.0

3 Rai Malik Pur Suresh 1.0

4 Mai Umed Singh 1.0

5 Bhakri Ram Kumar 1.0

Total 6.5

1 Bhareli Parveen Kumar 2.0

2 Rehawar Bizan Kumar 0.8

3 Bilwali Salim Khan 7.0

4 Saketri Matu Singh 0.6

5 Mouli Laxman Singh 3.0

Total 13.4

1 Nariana Ariqu Sawani 2.0

2 Ahar Rajender 1.0

3 Naultha Tara Chand 4.0

4 Brahaman Majra Ramesh 2.0

5 Gwalra Mahipal 3.25

6 Mehrana Lalan 1.6

7 Karkoli Satpal 1.5

8 Lohari Roop Chand 6.0

9 Kalkha Pale Ram & 2.0Balwan Singh

13. Panchkula

14. Panipat

12. Mahendragarh

35

1 2 3 4

10 Quawi Manjeet Singh 2.5

11 Kait Satpal 1.5

12 Risalu Jaipal 4.0

13 Sutana Kapura 4.0

Total 35.4

1 Kumroda Om Parkash 0.5

2 Nain Sukhpura Om Parkash 3.0

3 Nangal Parthana Deepak 0.8

4 Kosli Dalip 2.0

5 Jadra Isha 1.6

6 Banipur Phul Singh 2.2

7 Naya Gaon Mahender Singh 1.8

8 Pavti Isha 1.8

Total 13.7

1 Asan BalwanSingh 2.5

2 Rithal Surajmal 2.3

3 Mungan SurajBhan 2.5

4 Polaugi Hari Ram 1.2

5 Bhagwatipur Hawa Singh 1.5

6 Mokhra Ravinder Singh 3.0

7 Bedva Ranveer Singh 1.0

8 Sundana Raj Kumar 2.0

9 Sundana Ombir 2.5

10 Gugaheri Naseeb Singh 2.0

11 Garhi Sampla Sunil 3.0

Total 23.5

15. Rewari

16. Rohtak

36

1 2 3 4

1 Mirpur Puran Singh 1.0

2 Jalalana Sukhdev Singh 1.4

3 Nuhiyan wali Raju 2.0

4 Bhatinda Resham Singh 3.5

5 Pohrake Bakhatabar 2.0

6 Chhatriya Amar Singh 1.4

7 Pir Khera Ram Kishan 3.0

8 Kumharia Subhash 4.0

Total 18.3

1 Hassanpur Prem Chand 1.4

2 Manauli Veer Pal 1.6

3 Bindrols Nafe Singh 0.6

4 Ghasoly Om Parkash & 1.0Radhey Shayam

5 Nasirpur Rajesh Kumar 1.2

6 Jatt Joshi Kamal 1.0

7 Mandori Azad Singh 2.0

8 Kurar Sham Malhotra 1.0

9 Chhatera Navain Singh 1.6

10 Kheri Tagga Om Parkash 1.2

11 Bhainswal Mithan Birender 4.8

12 Issapur Kheri Pinky 3.0

13 Kohla Dharamvir 5.5

14 Salarpur Majra Baljit Singh 4.2

16 Rabara Jagbir 10.0

17 Bhawar Hawa Singh 24.0

17. SIRSA

18. Sonipat

37

1 2 3 4

18 Tihar Malik Jai Bhagwan 3.0

19 Mahra Mukesh 2.5

20 Dubheta Mahavir 1.5

21 Moi Prem 2.5

22 Bajana Kalan Rajbir 2.0

23 Gumar Jamshed 1.0

24 Naya Bans Wazir 1.8

25 Sardhana Sandeep 1.4

26 Bhanvar Naresh 1.0

27 Sitawali Telu Ram 1.0

28 Rehmana Suresh 1.0

29 Bhatgaon Balwan Singh 0.8

30 Thihar Khurd Prem Chand 1.2

31 Rajlugarhi Kaptani 1.2

32 Udeshipur Balwan 0.8

33 Uldepur Rajender 0.4

34 Nizampur Majra Satbir 0.8

35 Chitana Satish 3.5

36 Salimsur Majra Krishan Kumar 3.0

37 Raj Pur Kanwar S 1.6

38 Maujam Nagar Virender 1.6

39 Nasirpur Cholka Ravinder 1.2

40 Kundal Sanjay 1.2

38

1 2 3 4

41 Thana Kalan Subhash 1.6

42 Bhadana Suresh 1.4

43 Sehri Kuldeep 1.4

44 Bidhlan Raj Kumar 1.2

45 Khurampur Babu Lal 1.0

46 Fatehpur Jaswant 1.2

47 Chhanoli Baljit 0.4

48 Kanwali Manoj Kumar 0.8

Total 111.1

1 Mamli Partap Singh 0.8

2 Manak Pur Roshan Lal 0.6

3 Dhanu Pura Vijay Paul 0.6

4 Kanri Kalan Thatu Singh 0.4

5 Bhoot Majra Amar Nath 0.6

6 Guglon Ashok Kumar 1.2

7 Rasul Pur Jagdish Chander 1.2

8 Antawa Bhagwan Dass 0.4

9 Jathlana Vinod Kumar 1.2

10 Dudla Rijwan Khan 0.6

11 Brouli Majra Rajender Singh 0.5

12 Dharam Kot Desh Raj 4.0

13 Salampur Bangar Kavita Rani 0.8

14 Rampur Hydeam Ram Kumar 0.4

19. Yamuna Nagar

39

1 2 3 415 Gayana Wala Pala Devi 1.0

16 Tala Kour Sanjeev Kumar 0.4

17 Peru Wala Chander Mohan 1.0

18 Ratalli Nawab Ali 1.0

Total 16.7

40

S. Village/ Name of District Name of the Area No. Town Fish Farmer Lake (Hect.)

1 Sultan Pur Inspector Gurgaon National Park 70.00 Wild Life

2 Damdama Ranjeet S. Gurgaon Damdama Lake 60.00

3 Damdama FishriesFarm Gurgaon G.F.F. Damdama 5.00Manager

4 Kotla Arvind Gurgaon Kotla 12.00

5 Ujina(Aakera) Arvind Gurgaon Ujjina Akera 10.00

6 Chadeni Balesar Gurgaon Chadeni Lake 20.00

7 Faridabad Jhorudhin Faridabad Badkhal 22.80 Lake

8 Faridabad Virender K. Faridabad Bhoj Bundh 45.71

9 Tikkar Tals Ramesh K. Panchkula Tikkar Tals 40.00Lake

10 Uchana Lake Karambir S. Karnal Uchana Lake 3.00

Total 288.51

S. Village/ Name of District Name of the LengthNo. Town Fish Farmer Drain Kms.

1 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Nuh Drain 31.75

2 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Ujina Drain 34.98

3 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Kotla Drain 9.75

4 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Chandeni Drain 16.21

5 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Kamera Drain 4.35

6 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Rai Sina Drain 2.13

7 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Nathu Pur Drain 1.11

8 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Mohmadpur Drain 0.45

Total 100.73

Lakes

Drains/Link Drains

41

S. Village/ Name of District Name of the LengthNo. Town Fish Farmer Drain Kms.

1 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Chandeni Link 3.04 Drain

2 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Khedli Link Drain 9.75

3 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Aaluka Link Drain 7.70

4 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Indri Link Drain 2.70

5 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Ter Link Drain 4.72

6 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Neem Khera Link 0.90 Drain

7 Allawalpur Nasruddin Gurgaon Pinagoan Link 1.00Drain

Total 29.81

S. Village/ Name of District LengthNo. Town Fish Farmer Kms.

1 Narur Kitab Singh Kaithal 22.00

2 Chand Pura Vijay Kumar Fatehabad 210.00

3 Chand Pura Vijay Kumar Fatehabad 60.00

4 Yamuna Bal Kishan & Panipat 72.00Jahid Karana

5 Yamuna Jahid Hussain Panipat 32.00

6 Antehri Rameshwar Kurukshetra 52.27 Dass

7 Ambala Muzibar Ambala 25.00Rehman

8 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad 533.20

9 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad

10 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad

11 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad

12 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad

13 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad

14 Mohru Nagla Shabuddin Faridabad

Total 1006.47

Link Drains

Rivers

42

ANNEXURE-VI Economic & Statistical Organisation, Planning Department, Haryana

“ Inputs in Fishing Sector in Haryana-A Study” Survey Schedule

Rural/Urban Category-Pond/Lake/River Block-I Identification Particulars 1.1 Name of Fish Farmer /Lease holder ________________________ 1.2 Age ________________________ 1.3 Village/Town ___________ District ________________________ 1.4 Name of Pond/Lake/River, if any _____________________ 1.5 (a) Occupation of Fish Farmer/Lease holder

(i) Primary ________________________ (ii) Secondary ________________________

(b) Total Income from all sources ________________________ during 2003-04 (Rs.)

1.6 Educational Qualification of the Fish Farmer/ _________________________ Lease holder 1.7 Year in which Fish Farming adopted _____________________________

1.8 Average number of workers engaged

(i) Self (ii) Hired

1.9 Present status of pond/river/lake

(i) Being used for fish farming _________________________ (ii) Not being used for fish farming _________________________

Block-II Information about Fish Pond/Lake/River 2.1 Area of Fish Pond/ River/Lake (Hectare) ________________________ (Kms. in case of River) 2.2 Year of excavation and (a) Year ______________________ amount spent (b) Amount Spent (Rs.) ______________________ 2.3 Are you Owner of the Fish Pond/River/Lake Yes/No ________________________ 2.4 If not whether taken on lease Yes/No ________________________ 2.5 Amount of lease for the year ________________________ 2003-04 (Rs.)

43

2.6 What is source of water i) Natural _________________________ ii) Tubewell/Pump set _________________________ iii) Canal/River _________________________ iv) Others _________________________

Block-III

Inputs Used During 2003-04 _________________________________________________________________________________________ S.No. Name of Input Unit Quantity Rate (Rs.) Value (Rs.)__ 3.1 Fish Seed No. Lakh

3.2 Fish Feed i) Oil Cakes Kgs

ii) Rice Bran Qtls.

iii) Others(Specify) Kgs.

Sub-total- 3.2 - -

3.3 Fertilizers/Manure etc.

i) Lime Kgs.

ii) Urea Kgs.

iii) Single Super Kgs. Phosphate. iv) Potash Kgs.

v) Nitrate Kgs.

vi) Phosphate Kgs

vii) Cow Dung Kgs.

viii) Medicines/ Rs. - - Chemicals

ix) Others(Specify) Rs. - -

Sub-total-3.3 - -

3.4 Craft and Gear

i) Boat* Rs. - -

ii) Net* Rs. - -

iii) Aerator* Rs. - -

iv) Repairs and Rs. - - Maintenance v) Others(Specify) Rs. - -

Sub-total-3.4 - - * Expenditure towards its use only such as rent etc. is to be given and not value of the

assets.

44

S.No. Name of Input Unit Quantity Rate Value (Rs.) (Rs.) 3.5 Other Charges

i) Diesel Ltrs.

ii) Electricity Units (KWH)

iii) Water Kilo litres

iv) Renovation/ Rs. - - Maintenance of ponds Sub-total 3.5 - -

3.6 Expenses on account of:-

i) Sun drying Rs. - -

ii) Salting Rs - -

iii) Packing Rs. - -

iv) Freezing Rs. - -

v) Transport Rs. - -

vi) Marketing Charges/ Rs. - - Taxes vii) Others (Specify) Rs - -

Sub-total 3.6 - -

3.7 Labour Charges, if any

i) Pre harvesting Rs. - -

ii) Harvesting Rs. - -

iii) Post harvesting Rs. - -

iv) Watch and Ward Rs.

__________________________________________________________________________

Sub-Total : 3.7____________________________________________________________ Total Inputs (Sub-total 3.1 to 3.7) Whether any loan taken Yes/No during the year (2003-04)

If yes loan amount -

Repayment during the year -

a) Loan b) Interest

45

Block-IV

Output /Fish Production During 2003-04

S.No. Particulars Unit Quantity Rate Total Value (Rs.) (Rs.)

4.1 Fish Production during the year2003-04 :- i). Inland Fish Qtls. ii). Prawns/Shrimps Qtls. 4.2 Other Income from Fish Farming (specify) Rs. - - Total Output (4.1+ 4.2 ) - - Signatures D.S.O ________________ Supervisor___________ Investigator_______ Name _________________ Name_______________ Name____________ Designation___________ Designation_______ Date________________ Date________________ Date_____________

46