+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ET - Exam Reports

ET - Exam Reports

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: david-selva
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 32

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    1/32

    Emerging Themes

    Examiner ReportSeptember 2009

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    2/32

    Grade ProfileSep 2009

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    3/32

    Grade ProfileDec 2009

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    4/32

    Grade A candidate will generally have:

    Completed all task s.

    Completed all elemen tswithin each tasks (e.g. providing equal

    weight ingto both the macro & meso emerging themes) and focused

    clearly on the task.

    Demonstrated an excel lent k now ledgeof relevant theory within the

    syllabus for this unit.

    Demonstrated a st rong und erstandingof the sector/industry they have

    investigated through the use of up-to-date evidence.

    Demonstrated conf idenceand creativity in their answer.

    Presented their assignment in an excel lent professio nalmanner.

    Grade Differentiation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    5/32

    Grade B candidate will generally have:

    Completed all task s.

    Completed al l or mos t elementswithin each tasks (e.g. providing

    equal weight ingto both the macro & meso emerging themes) and

    focused clearly on the task.

    Demonstrated an goodknowledge of relevant theory within the syllabus

    for this unit.

    Demonstrated a goodunderstanding of the sector/industry they have

    investigated through the use of up-to-date evidence.

    Used appropr iateformat & presentation .

    Demonstrated competence in their answer.

    Grade Differentiation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    6/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    7/32

    Grade D candidate will generally have:

    Completed most tasks.

    Completed most or some of the elementswithin tasks (i.e. may haveonly covered a macro or meso theme)

    Demonstrated a weak knowledg e of relevant theorywithin the

    syllabus for this unit.

    Demonstrated a weak und erstanding of the sectoror one that is notbased on any evidence.

    Formatis poor.

    Grade Differentiation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    8/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    9/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    10/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    11/32

    Justification for the choice of themes in the contextof the industry / sector:

    The themes chosen should be contemporary, in the context of

    the industry / sector.

    The appropriateness of the theme needed to be evidenced.

    (Backed up by national statistics, or other suitable sources, such

    as academic journal material).

    Not all candidates clearly articulated the link between macro &

    meso themes.

    A good working knowledge of the sector was demonstrated.

    Issues Regarding Interpretation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    12/32

    Production of a short-list of the most suitable potentialpublications for the article & critical evaluation for the potential

    publication of the article:

    All candidates attempted to provide criteria to make some sort of short-

    list (such as subject coverage, circulation figures, etc,).

    Not all candidates made reference to the publications editorial policy,

    which would have helped provide a case for fit between content of the

    article & potential publication.

    Brief justification as to why one of the publishers shouldpublish the article, as such, would be suitable for inclusion in a

    covering letter in support of their application:

    This was completed by all candidates, but the better answers referred to

    the publications editorial policy.

    Issues Regarding Interpretation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    13/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    14/32

    Forecast of the implications of these change on organizations

    within the chosen sector, giving due consideration to the

    application of an appropriate business strategy: :

    All candidates made an attempt, but many did not focus on any one

    particular business strategy.

    Many candidates tended to talk vaguely about lots of different approaches

    (segmentation, niche marketing, strategic alliances, digital marketing etc.

    The better candidates applied one strategy (e.g. cost leadership) in a logical

    way.

    many candidates did not make use of published academic theory to

    substantiate their answer or even cite the appropriate theorist behind the

    strategies they were discussing. (e.g. Michael Porter)

    Issues Regarding Interpretation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    15/32

    Prediction of the future of the marketing professional within the

    chosen industry/sector, paying particular attention of how theskills, attitudes & behaviors of marketing professionals will have

    to change:

    Not all candidates made explicit reference to marketing professionals

    talking more generally about making instead.

    Many did give a creative and insightful response to this part of the

    assessment, but , this was lacking in evidence.

    Format & Presentation

    To article needs to conform to CIMs protocols with regards to referencing

    etc, even if this does not meet with the publishing criteria of the journal or

    periodical.

    Issues Regarding Interpretation

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    16/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    17/32

    Confident and visionary writing style.

    Equal attention paid to both themes.

    Analysis of themes based on theory/literature.

    Clear application of themes to sector.

    Thorough application of a recognized business/marketing

    strategy.

    Explanation of impact of strategy on sector.

    Well presented and accurately referenced.

    Dedicate enough attention to tasks where the majority of

    potential marks could be awarded.

    Comments on Strengths

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    18/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    19/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    20/32

    Making Citations Within the Text

    All statements, opinions, conclusions, etc taken from anoth er author 's

    workmust be cited, whether the work is direct ly quo ted, paraphrased

    or s umm arised. Cited publications are referred to in the body of an

    essay by giving the author's surname and the year of publication in one

    of the forms below.

    Example:The author has also discussed the implications of these

    results on the advertising industry in another paper (Ward, 1999).

    Example:Other writers have commented on related issues, notably

    Murray (1998, 1999) and Smith (1997).

    Example:Turner (1999) argued in favour of the marketing industry

    becoming more ethical in general.

    Harvard Referencing

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    21/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    22/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    23/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    24/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    25/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    26/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    27/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    28/32

    A book by two authors:

    Lancaster, G. and Massingham, L. (1999) Essentials of marketing: text

    and cases. 3rd edition. London, McGraw Hill.

    A book by more than two authors:

    McDonald, M. et al(2006) Marketing due diligence: reconnectingstrategy to share price. Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann.

    A book by a corporate author:

    HMSO (2000) Interpreting statistics successfully. London, HMSO.

    An edited book:

    Baker, M. (ed) (1995) Companion encyclopedia of marketing. London,

    Routledge.

    Harvard Referencing

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    29/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    30/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    31/32

  • 7/30/2019 ET - Exam Reports

    32/32


Recommended