Date post: | 26-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Environment |
Upload: | sam-rushing |
View: | 41 times |
Download: | 0 times |
COPRODUCT
FindingOpportunitiesforCarbonDioxideRevenuesBy Sam Rushing
A few years ago. a primary source of refined camon
dioxide (C02) was as a byproduct produced during
the manufacture of anhydrous ammonia. In fact.
only a handful of primary sources of raw C02 were refined
and liquefied from ethanol for the merchant CO2 industry.
While a majority of anhydrous ammonia is traditionally ded-
icated to the agriculture sector, many plants are closed or
going through restructuring and bankruptcy largely due to
ramped-up production from mega-sized facilities in LatinAmerica. the Caribbean. China and Russia. These countries
and regions have cheaper labor and extremely cheap natural
gas feedstocks.
The result of the drastic reduction of domestic anhy-
drous ammonia manufacturing has been a shift in the loca-
tions of C02 facilities. forcing the relocation of merchant
C02 production in the United States.Another factor affecting the domestic market is that it's
not economically feasible to produce unsubsidized merchant
C02 from flue gas derived from power plants. CO2 volume in
the raw flue gas is often 3 percent to 15 percent versus up to
99 percent in ethanol and ammonia plant coproducts.
Table 1 represents the primary sources of today's raw
C02 feedstock. Just a few years ago the percentage of C02
derived from anhydrous ammonia plants was up to 40 per-cent of the total C02 from all forms of manufacturing
processes. At the same time. the percentage of C02 derivedfrom ethanol production was in the teens.
Some ethanol-sourced C02 has replaced ammonia-
sourced C02. particularly in regions of the Midwest. In fact.
many Midwest areas are flooded with C02 from ethanol proj-
ects. creating a regional oversupply. Moreover, C02 is usually
transported via truck. limiting the distribution radius to about
200 miles from the source. The balance is often shipped via
rail. However. it's becoming more difficult to negotiate bene-
208
T~'S<o..(~ of (0, ,~W h.d51.xk '" fio'lt'e AA'lic'I'(o)
1II
Ir th.\t)01
N}hyd,.)u,> ~mMOn.'\(10.I~r.).~n';~i.d(lll"'~
N.\1\ IIwdl:..'{W' ,>"p-',...UonHhyl...ne .~ld../tJl um <S.)xld..
flu.. gas
n2020,q62
ficial rail rates for many commodities in part due to over-
loaded rail capacities from ethanol feedstocks. product and
coproducts.
Coproduct revenues are essential to the long-term suc-
cess of any ethanol project. Developing the C02 aspect of a
project "later on" is a dire mistake since making C02 ventures
work on a first-served basis is essential. especially with so
many new projects on the drawing board.
C02 Source TargetsThe North American C02 merchant market is estimated
to be about 10 million short tons per year and growing at an
average annual rate of 3 percent. Existing ethanol projects
largely fulfill the raw feedstock requirements of the Com
Belt and select regions of the greater Midwest. However. it's
possible to develop specific. over-the-fence. captive or
sequestration C02 targets even in the well-supplied Com
Belt. Examples include enhanced oil recovery. chemical feed-stock usage and enhanced coal-bed methane projects. Such
ETHANOLPRODUCERMAGAZINEAUGUST2007
Agri-SystemsPICKUPJuly07 EPM page 93Size: 2/3VColor:4/cbuilding2thirds010406
ETHANOL PRODUCER MAGAZINE AUGUST 2007
COPRODUCT
projects are found adjacent toviable oilfields, or cbemical manu-
facturing and coal production proj-
ects, and require distribution infra-structure. The food processing
industry is also a possible market.
Markets having large concentrated
poultry projects use cryogenic
freezing that utilizes fluids sucb as
C02 to replace mecbanical refriger-ation.
Selling C02 to gas companiesvia direct, over-the-fence raw mar-
keting, a joint venture, or possible
equity position for refinement and
liquefaction, would supply the mer-cbant markets sucb as food proces-sors. This is the wholesale version
of supply to the mercbant markets.For under-supplied regions
that import C02, ethanol projectscan benefit the local CO2 industry.
Those regions include markets inthe West, Southwest, Middle
South, Middle Atlantic, Florida and
New England. Some Canadian
markets, including the Pacific andAtlantic regions, as well as specific
areas of populated provinces, are
better targets for the wholesale ver-sion of C02 sales.
A proper evaluation should be
conducted to devise sucb captive
marketing to the oil or chemical
sector. The same goes for selecting
the best gas company to purchaseand refine C02 on a wholesalelevel.
The possibility also exists for
refining and liquefying C02 for saleto the direct consumer market,
something some ethanol firmshave achieved. Of course, this
form of marketing involves the
greatest amount of risk. However,it also holds the greatest profit
potential.
An EnvironmentalPerspective
Since the United States isn't
party to the Kyoto Protocol or
209
CENTRYSISPICK UP
July EPM Page 68Size: 1/3VColor: 4/cNew & Used Centri.
210
COPRODUCT
..
The CO2 storage bullet is on the rig~ side of the phoro of Quad County Com Processors in Galva,Iowa. The CO2 plant is the low-Iying building.
other laws that urilize collection or
sequestration of CO2 from fermenta-tion. there is no immediate mandate
to do so. However. all indications are
that sequestration or consumption of
C02 from high emitting sources. such
as power projects and la.:ge fermenta-
tion projects. will inevitably takeplace. The question is when and howwill this occur.
Trading carbon credits isn't appli-
cable to the ethanol industry todayand isn't a true solution to a net
reduction of C02 emissions. One of
the only domestic formats which rep-resents C02 trading is the Chicago
Climate Exchange (CCX). which
doesn't yet deal with industrial chem-
ical or ethanol projects. However. theCCX has used a C02 trade value of
about $4 per ton. a mechanism that
may be established broadly some day.
Let's say a state. such asCalifornia. wishes to reduce C02emissions. If such a case mandates a
net reduction of emissions from an
ethanol plant. a project would utilize
true sequestration or find specificC02 markets. In the case of markets.
a chemical manufacturer or oilfield
project could receive the product andthen be considered a means of reduc-
ing C02 via combining or consuming
it in a product or project. C02 in the
service of enhanced oil recovery proj-
ects may not be considered truesequestration since some of the C02
is brought back to the surface during
oil recovery.
With respect to serving the mer-chant C02 markets. some of the C02
sold via a gas company or directly to
a consumer is only displaced, not
sequestered As a result. the questionof an exclusive answer for C02 reduc-
tion remains extensive. extremely
challenging and somewhat unknown.
Recovering C02 from new or existing
ethanol projects. as the industrygrows and political and environmen-
tal sectors close in on requirements toreduce emissions. will become
increasingly important.
An understanding of C02 mar-
kets. possible sequestration targetsand the costs associated with trans-
porting C02 should be in the hip
pocket of the ethanol developer.
ETHANOL PRODUCER MAGAZINE AUGUST 2007
Further data will be required beyondthe immediate knowledge of themost profitable and beneficial meansof C02 marketing from the ethanolproject.
ConclusionsThe United States holds per-
haps 40 percent of the approximatetotal of 20 million metric tons of
global merchant C02. The balance
of North America is approximately
another 2 million tons per year in
consumption. Western Europe andJapan are the other significant mer-
chant markets, while developing
economies are largely solely bever-
age carbonation markets. Developed
economies are highly diversified in
terms of the broad application of
C02, including agricultural, solvent
technologies, cryogenic freezing,
food preservation, metallurgical
applications, oil and gas applications,plus many usages in the chemicaland water treatment industries.
The dynamics for C02 usage
continues to change, as would the
source types found in some regions,such as that described with the fertil-
izer ammonia production sector nowreplaced in part by C02 off the fer-mentation sector.
C02 continues to be a relatively
routine and simple process for
purification when derived from dry-
grind, continuous fermentation
ethanol operations. It is essential to
understand the costs and require-
ments for production of C02 inorder to factor it into a clear under-
standing of the value of C02 when
sold over the fence to the gas refin-
er, or when selling direcdy to the
markets at large.
There remain many targetopportunities for C02 in numerous
regions of North America and inter-
nationally. However, to understand
the impact, competition, costs,
requirements and essential market
values, a proper evaluation of these
ETHANOL PRODUCER MAGAZINE AUGUST 2007
COPRODUCT
elements is necessary to yield the great-
est dollar value to the ethanol project.
Even $1 or $2 per ton variation over
many years represents a great deal of
money.
There will continue to be a growingpush to control and reduce C02 emis-
sions from all emitters, whether a singlefamily car, an ethanol project, or the
mega-sized coal-fired power plant. In the
long term, C02 recovery, sequestration,
or another form of C02 management
will direcdy affect the growing ethanolindustry.
More information is available atwww.carbondioxideconsultants.com.
Sam Rushing is president of AdvancedCryogenics Ltd" a carbon dioxide con-sulting firm based in Tavernier, Fla.Reach him at [email protected] or(305) 852-2597.
CrossCommodityMarginNetting
IJ
I ., ;Tci11~~'ino~Y~~~' '."1~!./"~,~.: ..,>~~:>'. i' ~.<:.:t,';/;;;?' ,(.'li':.,lr.:!.,;::.:"~.I ,I;', ,.:J ,',
, 'H~rifo1((J1TreY '."" AnoaWJrd I. :: " i; j! ",'::.': I I:'N;rtu~' G:l5SuPPt# "Rali!W;)tJle Fuels RJ5kM;:mj'~effientJn.j Rn.nce':.: "..!i .. ~.. .' .' . " " ,I. ! r.' ) !'. ,. I'" ,',., I' ,''', ,,'f' "",, I, 'c.'.!," '. P ",'
.Mzqu.r1eCoIIEnergr ., /OI;n:quJIE8.Jnkl:.1rT1tB::1REpresentllNeorl1l:E, ... '." ,.TetJ(3'H])7&92W'. Telr{l11)EU89 " !,'. ':::.,
,:1'"_" ,.'- "r':" :'-, " . '. , , " 'I' . ., I: I:.,
211