Universities as Science-Companies, Potential for ETH Zurich
R. Boutellier
Collegium Helveticum ETH/Uni ZürichCritical thinking initiative ETH
20. Mai 2016
Prof. emer. Dr. Roman Boutellier ETH / HSG
R. Boutellier
• „We can no longer commit on ravaged Europe as a source of
fundamental knowledge“
• Deficit of 150’000 science and technology graduates
Philosophy: „Progress in the war against disease results from
discoveries in remote and unexpected fields of
medicine and underlying sciences“ The Bell Labs
National Research Foundation (1950)
Vannevar Bush: The birth of “free play of free intellects”Useful results = technology = random spillover
+
30328e
US governmental R+D is heavily driven by defence
R. Boutellier
Total R+D expenditures (PPP)2015
• US $ 470 Billion• PRC $ 350• EU $ 330
R. Boutellier
The social contract for science: USA since 1945, Vannevar Bush separates R from D
Politics
Science
We provide
• money
• freedom of research
We expect
• freely availableinnovations
• Unspecified but useful technology
• Trust in the “common sense” of all agents
• Technology comes as a spillover
• Welfare (and power) are driven by technology
Self-organization and self-correcting
30327e
R. Boutellier
Stevenson-Wydler act 1980: “The end of technology clause of social contract in USA”
• Every major federal lab: Office of Research and Technology Application(ORTA)to licence technologies
• Centre of Federal Technology: One-stop shopping centrefor information about federal technologies
• National Technology Medal: Awarded by President
30341e
Western Nations follow US example
R. Boutellier
Federal R+D Industrial R+D
1953 $ 3 bn $ 3 bn (nominal $)
4.10.1957 Sputnik
2002 $ 78 bn $ 181 bn
1980 - 2000 + 1.1% workforce p.a. (in total economy)+ 4.9% workers in science and engineering
Science: Boom since 1950 in the United StatesBoom of knowledge jobs
Judson, H.F.: The great betrayal, Harcourt, 2005, p.24ff
30329e
CH-Research after WWII: We have a crisisGovernment shall help!
R. Boutellier 34704d
Technische Rundschau, Mai 1943
Swiss National Foundation
Start 1952, 1. AugustBudget 4 Mio
+ 9% p.a.
2013 820 Mio
ETH 1945 ca. 4 Mio
+ 9% p.a.
2016 ca. 1’500 Mio(BIP ~ 3% real p.a.)
R. Boutellier
US: After 20 years, a division of work has been established
Scientist
Public domainmarket work
lab work
TDC
Technology development coordination
• team for every invention
• patenting
• marketing
• licensing
• train scientists (IP)
• screen papers before publication
• assess patent applications
• manage CRADAs
Science / Technology meetings
licensing specialists
paper work
Guston, J.H.: Between Politics and Science, Cambridge, 2000, pp.113-137. (CRADA: Coop R+D Agreement)
30343e
Scientists have no qualms about risks
R. Boutellier 34705d
ETH nuclear powerstation Clausiusstrasse – project1956,Planned but not realized
R. Boutellier
Today’s problems should have been solved in the 1950, but in the 50s we were solving the problems of the 20s and ………
34748e
Sidney Harris 2003 / Paul Feyerabend: 2009
Government: Dilemma
• pushes scienceto get welfare
• protects usagainst side effects
R. Boutellier
Collaboration and co-production of scientific and social order
Science Politics
“The social contract”
“Trust us, we are smart”
Agency problems
• monitoring
• incentives
• whistleblowers
Boundary organizations
Accountability
Office of Research Integrity
ORI
Productivity
Office of Technology Transfer
OTT
Collaborativeassurance
Guston, J.H.: Between Politics and Science, Cambridge, 2000, p.138ff./ETH Guidelines for Research Integrity 2008
30344e
"We have to let the public also into the kitchen" (Claude Bernard)
R. Boutellier 34715e
Adapted from Nowotny et al., The Public Nature of Science under Assault, Springer 2005
Freedom of inquiry
("Wissenschaftsfreiheit")
Science speakes the truthin the name of Nature
• not negotiable• self-correcting• autonomous
"Science in Society"
Freedom of ownership
Science is the handmaiden ofinnovation. It is the source of
• advancement• progress• can sell what it produces
" Society in Science"
Historical perspective of science: "Usefulness is all we need" (Feyerabend)
R. Boutellier
Given status- Knowledge- Methods- Beliefs
New status- Knowledge- Methods- Beliefs
Scientific process:Small, incremental changes
• Accuracy• Breadth of applicability• Consistency• Simplicity
But truth is not correspondence to reality
"Necessary characteristics of any evolutionary process"
Th. Kuhn, The trouble with the historical philosophy of science, Harvard, 1992, p.11,13,14,18
34747e
R. Boutellier 33084d
Needs change: Obesity was a status-symbol in renaissance timeToday: Sickness and health are social constructions
General Alessandro del Borro(† 1656, “Terror of Turks”)
Madonna 2008
Everybody has the right to be healthyGenetical engineering a must?
Skill-biased technical change: Relative demand for skilled labour increases
R. Boutellier
• Since 1990s employment does not recover after recessions
• Demand falls for routine tasks• Labour share of GDP falling,
6% in 10 years
Plutarch:“An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatalailment of all republics.”
Brynjolfsson 2014, The second machine age
R. Boutellier
E. Q. Wilson, Consilience, Knopf 98, p.273
Natural selection
Social choice
„ The most profound intellectual and ethical choice.humanity has ever faced “
Progress needs a new definition, too many technical possibilities
Genetics Molecular Biology
31723e
Bypass! Bypass!
R. Boutellier
Technology and the idea of progress go in parallel
1 m B.C.
1600
1850
Technology as a tool to make life easierProgress is no choice, man has to survive
Technology as a tool to drive scienceProgress = Understanding
Science drives technologyProgress = Technical progress
“Technopoly”Humanity drivenby technology
2000
31706e
Neil Postman Technopoly
Ecole Polytechnique Paris: Too many top down targetsRational strategy
R. Boutellier
• Improve ratings• More women• More students from «lower classes» (Diversity)• Bachelor and Masters, not only engineers• More international faculty and “élèves”• More third party money• Integration into UPS• New campus outside Paris• More innovation targeted research
Oxford: Vision, Priorities, Core Strategies, Enabling StrategiesA framework, for communication, setting priorities
R. Boutellier
Vision • The University of Oxford aims to lead the world in research and education
• …that no potential student should be deterred from applying to Oxford by financial or other barriers …
• To contribute effectively to the cultural, social and economic life of the cityof Oxford
• …ensure that under-represented groups have equal opportunity ….
Priorities• Global reach• Networking, communication, and interdisciplinarity
Swiss research starts with topics, not questions
R. Boutellier
• Demography• Innovation-driven economy• Mass customization• Globalization of «thinking and working»• Realization of «Masseneinwanderungsinitiative» ( Migration )• Reorganization of energy system
Source BFI 3129
Swiss Research-Principles ( as presented to parliament )Inconsistent?
R. Boutellier
• Partnership• Bottom-up• Autonomy, Competition, Excellence• Long-term-targets, need-driven• Synergies• Efficiency
Source BFI
Targets• New generation of academics for economy and society• Sharpen profiles ( of Universities )• Financing according competitive principles
R. Boutellier
Kann sich der Mensch am eigenen Schopf aus dem Sumpf ziehen?
“Man wird aber den künftigen Menschen umbauen,die Schöpfung pfuscherisch nachvollziehen können.Und wenn man es tun kann, wird es auch getan.”
versus
“Gelenkter Fortschritt wäre kein Fortschritt mehr”
33314d
Peter Noll, Diktate über Sterben und Tod, pendo 1984, p 120, F.A. von Hayek, Die drei Quellen menschlicher Werte
Baron von MünchhausenWissenschaftsfreiheit gepaart
mit Verantwortung
Science is only one of the many tools to rule nature
Science has made many big errors
The theoretical authority of science is much smallerthan anticipated
The societal authority is so high that it has to be controlled by politics
R. Boutellier
Feyerabend, Paul, 1924-1994, Prof. ETHZ: Wider den Methodenzwang, Suhrkamp, 1983, p.290
“Time is more than ripe to let the separation of church from state follow a separation of science from state“
30338e
