+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH...

Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH...

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: sophie-bryan
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
38
Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015
Transcript
Page 1: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by

Neurologic Criteria?

Neil Wenger MD, MPH

UCLA Health Ethics Center

January 18, 2015

Page 2: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Case

• A man in his 50s battled a life-threatening illness and credited his rabbi’s intensive assistance with helping him to do better than the physicians expected. The patient viewed his treatment as a combination of the surgery, radiation and chemotherapy provided by his physicians and a dedicated religious effort undertaken with his rabbi.

• In the midst of this illness, he presented to the hospital with a large stroke that required mechanical ventilation and agents to sustain blood pressure.

• Despite maximal therapy, he developed complete loss of all brain function proven by several clinical tests as well as a blood flow analysis.

• The man was declared dead by neurologic criteria.

Page 3: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Case (cont.)

• The man’s wife requested that the ventilator and blood pressure agents be continued until their children could come to see their father later that evening.

• When the children, ages 5 and 9, arrived six hours later, she led them to the bedside and told them that their father was doing fine. They should go home to sleep. They could return to see their father, who would be better, in the morning.

Page 4: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Case (cont.)

• The patient’s wife and family then related to the physicians that the rabbi had instructed that all life-sustaining treatments should be maintained and any additional needed treatments be added to keep the patient “alive” for another 15 hours.

• According to his emissaries, the rabbi was aware that the doctors had declared the patient dead, but he rejected that contention.

• The family insisted that treatment continue anticipating the effect of the rabbi’s prayer. Life-sustaining treatment could be withdrawn at noon the following day. The family insisted that the patient would want this.

Page 5: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Case (cont.)

• At noon the next day, family and rabbinic representatives gathered at the bedside to watch as the ventilator was withdrawn.

Page 6: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.
Page 7: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria is Unusual • 1-2% of all in-hospital deaths

• 10,000 – 15,000 per year

• Canadian study:– 1% of deaths in hospitals w/o trauma centers– 4.5% of death in hospitals w trauma centers

• Small hospital: 1-5/year

• Large academic hospital: ~25/year

-Cloutier R, Baran D, Morin JE, et al. Brain death diagnoses and evaluation of the number of potential organ donors in Quebec hospitals. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:716-21.

Page 8: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Death by Neuro Criteria Declining

Proportion of patients in Calgary ICUs with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage or anoxic brain injury who progressed to neurologic death, 2002-2012.

-Kramer AH, Zygun DA, Doig CJ, Zuege DJ. Incidence of neurologic death among patients with brain injury. CMAJ. 2013. DOI:10.1503 /cmaj.13027

Page 9: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Complicated Process to Declare Death by Neurologic Criteria

…after Dorothy and her house fell on the Wicked Witch of the East…

Mayor: As mayor of the Munchkin City, In the county of the Land of Oz, I welcome you most regally.

Barrister: But we’ve got to verify it legally. To see...

If she... Is morally, ethic’ly

City Father 1: Spiritually, physically

City Father 2: Positively, absolutely

All City Fathers: Undeniably and reliably DEAD!

Coroner (with death certificate): As Coroner, I must aver, I thoroughly examined her, And she’s not only MERELY dead, She’s really, most SINCERELY dead.

Mayor: The Wicked Old Witch ... is dead!

-Shaner DM, Orr RD, Drought T, Miller RB, Siegel M. Really, most SINCERELY dead: Policy and procedure in the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria. Neurology. 2004;62:1683-6.

Page 10: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Checklist for Determination of Death by Neurological Criteria

• Prerequisites– Coma, irreversible and cause known– Neuroimaging explains coma– No CNS depressant or paralytic drug effect– No severe acid-base or endocrine abnormality– Temperature normal (> 36°C), Blood pressure ≥ 100, RR = 0

• Examination– Pupils nonreactive– Reflexes absent: Corneal, Oculocephalic, Oculovestibular, Gag, Cough

– No facial or limb movement to noxious stimuli • spinal reflexes permissible

-American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 2010;74:1911-8.

Page 11: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Checklist for Determination of Death by Neurological Criteria

• Apnea testing

• Ancillary testing: only 1 needed. To be ordered only if clinical examination cannot be fully performed due to patient factors, or if apnea testing inconclusive or aborted. – Cerebral angiogram– HMPAO SPECT– EEG– Transcranial doppler

-American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 2010;74:1911-8.

Page 12: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Hospital Policy Variation in Testing for Death by Neurological Criteria

-Greer D, Varelas P, Haque S, Wijdicks E. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology. 2008;70:284-9.

Compliance with American Academy of Neurology guidelines for preclinical testing for death by neurological criteria (%).

Page 13: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Hospital Policy Variation in Testing for Death by Neurological Criteria

-Greer D, Varelas P, Haque S, Wijdicks E. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology. 2008;70:284-9.

Compliance with American Academy of Neurology guidelines for clinical testing for death by neurological criteria (%).

Page 14: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Hospital Policy Variation in Testing for Death by Neurological Criteria

-Greer D, Varelas P, Haque S, Wijdicks E. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology. 2008;70:284-9.

Compliance with American Academy of Neurology guidelines for apnea testing for death by neurological criteria (%).

Page 15: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.
Page 16: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

WHAT, EXACTLY, IS BRAIN DEATH?

• What is the difference between someone in a coma, who may or may not improve, and someone who is truly brain dead and may be a candidate to donate their organs? Brain death is the irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the all-important brain stem that houses the RAS and the mechanism that controls our breathing. Dead is dead. Brain death isn't a different type of death, and patients who meet the criteria of brain death are legally dead.

-Richard Senelick. Nobody Declared Brain Dead Ever Wakes Up Feeling Pretty Good. The Atlantic. Feb 27 2012.

Page 17: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

WHAT, EXACTLY, IS BRAIN DEATH?

• It can be difficult to predict a person's outcome after a severe brain injury, but it can be said with certainty that a brain dead individual is dead.

-Richard Senelick. Nobody Declared Brain Dead Ever Wakes Up Feeling Pretty Good. The Atlantic. Feb 27 2012.

Page 18: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Getting back to Dorothy and the Wicked Witch of the East….

This scene illustrates that the process of declaring death is no mere footnote, but must be legal, moral, dignified, spiritual, certain, transparent, ceremonial, and sincere.

-Shaner DM, Orr RD, Drought T, Miller RB, Siegel M. Really, most SINCERELY dead: Policy and procedure in the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria. Neurology. 2004;62:1683-6.

Page 19: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Choreography of a Diagnosis of Death by Neurological Criteria

Recognize possible death by neuro criteria

Prepare family

Perform diagnostic testing

Declare death

Discuss possible organ donation

Withdraw machinesReasonably accommodate

Page 20: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Preparing the Family

• Breaking bad news– S – SETTING up the discussion– P – Assessing the family’s PERCEPTION– I – Obtaining family’s INVITATION– K – Providing KNOWLEDGE in small chunks– E – Empathetically addressing EMOTIONS– S – STRATEGY and SUMMARY

• Educating about death by neurological criteria

Page 21: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Educational Materials

Page 22: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.
Page 23: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.
Page 24: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.
Page 25: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.
Page 26: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Case 2

• In February 2014, an 18yo M with a gunshot wound to the head was transported to the Neuro ICU.

• Despite emergency surgery, neurologic status deteriorated and the physicians suspected that the patient – on a ventilator and receiving pressors – had died.

• Family refused the apnea test to diagnose death.

Page 27: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Evaluation of death by neurological criteria not optional• Impossible to appropriately treat a patient

unless clinician knows whether patient is alive.– Dead patients do not benefit from treatment

• If patient is not to be transferred elsewhere to receive treatment, then brain death evaluation must be performed.

• Thus, consent is not needed– But best practice is to inform family

Page 28: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Disclosing Death

• Directness, clarity, and veracity enhance communication.

• Avoidance of euphemisms and jargon

• A family needs to hear that their loved one has died.

• Disentangle from organ donation– Linkage by family, not clinician

Adapted from: Shaner DM, Orr RD, Drought T, Miller RB, Siegel M. Really, most SINCERELY dead: Policy and procedure in the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria. Neurology. 2004;62:1683-6.

Page 29: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Spirituality and Ceremony

Page 30: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Study of Family Requests for Extended Mechanical Support after DDNC

• 13 ethics consults at the Cleveland Clinic for family requests of continuation of physiologic support after death by neurologic criteria

• Evaluation of patient characteristics, reason for request, time of accommodation and outcome

-Flamm AL, Smith ML, Mayer PA. Family members' requests to extend physiologic support after declaration of brain death: a case series analysis and proposed guidelines for clinical management. J Clin Ethics. 2014;25:222-37.

Page 31: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Ethics Consults for AccommodationAge Sex Dx Request Hrs Outcome

47 F Suicide Family gather 18 Heart stopped

47 M MOSF Family gather <6 Withdrawal p arrival

31 F Stroke Decide re: donation 29 Withdrawal unilateral

64 M Stroke Disbelieve DDNC 45 “usual procedures”

65 M Tumor Disbelieve dx <4 Eventual agreement

87 M Stroke Family gather 6-8 Withdrawal p arrival

54 F Stroke Disbelieve DDNC <10 Heart stopped

45 F MOSF Family gather 5 Withdrawal p arrival

26 F Found down Disbelieve DDNC >75* Transferred

31 F C-sect emb Anger 72 Eventual agreement

14 F Post op Isc Disbelieve DDNC 125* Transferred

73 F Cardiac Son disbelieved DDNC 3 Withdrawal

17 M TBI Awaiting miracle 22 Eventual agreement

* DNC not performed

Page 32: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Absurd Proposition

Permit use of “life support machines” in death to “reasonably

accommodate” but refuse to permit use of life support to

maintain patients in permanent vegetative state.

Page 33: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Types of Requests for Accommodation

• Finite-goal accommodations – usually emotionally driven and practically achievable (<24 hours)– Family arrival– Emotional closure

• Indefinite accommodations – usually beliefs, trust and anger (often >24 hours)– Not accepting death

Page 34: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Balancing “Reasonable Accommodation”

• Respect patient’s beliefs

• Reduce family grief

• Address emotional needs

• Professional standards

• Moral distress• Respect for dead• Care and

resource needs of other patients

Page 35: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Case 3

• 82yo F sustained a massive stroke not amenable to treatment. Over 2 days she progressed to DDNC.

• Family asked that ventilator be maintained until family arrives from Asia in 1 week.

• Medical team explained that this would be attempted. Patient had Medicare so charges would accrue to the family starting the next day.

Page 36: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Approach to Accommodation

• Address accommodation at the outset– Discuss what is “reasonable” and set limits– Clearly disclose hospital policy

• Intensive support of family

• Include all medical team members in plan

• No ethical justification for continued physiologic support of dead person without finite goal

Page 37: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Choreography of a Diagnosis of Death by Neurological Criteria

Recognize possible death by neurological criteria

Prepare family

Perform diagnostic testing

Declare death

Discuss possible organ donation

Withdraw machines

• Empathic breaking of bad news• Foreshadowing• Written materials

• Rigorous testing per guidelines must be performed

• Forthright disclosure• Anticipate accommodation• Separate organ donation from

death declaration• Set plan for withdrawal

Page 38: Ethical Issues in Interacting with Families about Death by Neurologic Criteria? Neil Wenger MD, MPH UCLA Health Ethics Center January 18, 2015.

Reprise of Case 1

• Little doubt that the patient would have wanted treatments maintained and escalated to permit the chance for a miracle

• Finite request of < 24 hours

• However continuing physiologic support:• Served no medical purpose• Harmed the children• Compromised professional standards• Grievously disturbed nursing staff• Led to a crisis of faith when the man did not breath when

extubated at noon.


Recommended