+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ethics and Science European Commission

Ethics and Science European Commission

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tamra
View: 23 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Ethics and the European Commission. Ethics and Science European Commission. Under existing treaties there is no specific EU competence on ethics – subsidiarity applies The European Constitution project envisioned changes through incorporation of Charter of Fundamental Rights. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
22
1 Ethics and Science European Commission Ethics and the European Commission
Transcript
Page 1: Ethics and Science  European Commission

1

Ethics and Science European Commission

Ethics and the European Commission

Page 2: Ethics and Science  European Commission

2

• Under existing treaties there is no specific EU competence on ethics – subsidiarity applies

• The European Constitution project envisioned changes through incorporation of Charter of Fundamental Rights.

• EU does already address ethical issues in regulations (patents, clinical trials, data protection) and in research programmes.

The EU and Ethics

Page 3: Ethics and Science  European Commission

3

• European Group on Ethics

• Embedding Ethics into EU research through the Science and Society Action Plan

• Ethical review of Framework research proposals

EU activities on ethics and science

Page 4: Ethics and Science  European Commission

4

Facilitation• NEC Forum (European Forum of National

Ethical Councils)• REC Conference (Research Ethics

Committees in EU)• Information Infrastructures• Capacity Building in Developing Countries

Ethics and Science Activities

Page 5: Ethics and Science  European Commission

5

The Forum of National Ethics Councils (NEC Forum)

• an informal, independent platform for exchange of information, experience and best practices on issues of common interest in the field of ethics and science.

• chairpersons and the secretaries of the national ethics councils of Member States.

NEC Forum meetings have taken place, under recent presidencies in Athens, Rome Dublin, Amsterdam and Luxembourg.

FORUM of National Ethics Councils (NEC)

Page 6: Ethics and Science  European Commission

6

• Issues so far discussed: adult stem cell research, research on animals, transplantation, education.

• Next meeting of the Forum - London, next week, 15/16 November.

• Topics to be discussed: Public health, Forensic databases and reinforcement of links between NECs

FORUM of National Ethics Councils (NEC)

Page 7: Ethics and Science  European Commission

7

• 2005 REC Conference in Brussels – Aim: mutual learning and exchange of best practice.

• At the conference, 10 Countries (Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Finland, Germany, Slovak Republic, Switzerland, Slovenia, The Netherlands) joined in a Declaration to set up a European Network of Research Ethics Committees – EUREC.

• 25 countries have now joined this initiative• EU has provided funding of €350.000 to set up this

platform

Research Ethics Committees

Page 8: Ethics and Science  European Commission

8

• To ensure Commission does not fund ethically unsound research

• To raise awareness amongst researchers• For all ethically sensitive FP6 research projects• By independent, multidisciplinary panels• Review requirements must be incorporated into research

contracts• Does not replace need for ethical approval at national or

local level

FP6 Ethical Review

Page 9: Ethics and Science  European Commission

9

•Science•Law

•Philosophy, theology, ethics

•Sociology,

psychology

•Animal welfare

from different countries in Europe and Accession & Candidate countries

Gender balance target (40%)

many involved in ethical review in their own countries

•Medicine

Independent Multidisciplinary Expert Panels

Page 10: Ethics and Science  European Commission

10

• 11% of all funded FP6 projects have undergone an ethical review

• Biomedicine and genetics ~ 45%

• About 10% each for IT, nanotechnology and food and green biotech.

FP6 Ethical Review

Page 11: Ethics and Science  European Commission

11

• Ethics research - €6.5m per yearExamples:• BITE – • REPROGENETICS• ENHANCE• ETHICBOTS• ECD

Promoting research on ethics

Page 12: Ethics and Science  European Commission

12

• Bioethical implications of emerging biometric identification technologies.

Ethical concerns: • Fears about the centralization of biometric identification

information and the potential for misuse of these data • Evolution of information technology is likely to result in

intimate interdependence between human bodies and technology, the so-called informatization of the body. Bioethical implications of emerging biometrics are crucial to determine the future acceptance/refusal of this technology

• Co-ordinator: Emilio Mordini - Centre For Science, Society And Citizenship, Rome

BITEBiometric Identification

Technology Ethics

Page 13: Ethics and Science  European Commission

13

• Should humans develop and use the technical possibility to change the genetic constitution of humans and their descendants?

• Should some new technical possibilities be banned or at least placed under a moratorium no matter how promising they may be?

• Should gene therapy, cloning and stem cell research be guided by ethical and social reflection, or develop through arbitrary and unknown market forces and the private ambition of researchers and research institutes?

• A comparative analysis of the ethical aspects of hot issues in gene therapy and cloning, study of ambiguities and inconsistencies in current law and theory and aiming to strengthen them,

• Co-ordinator: Guido van Steendam - International Forum For Biophilosophy , Leuven, Belgium

REPROGENETICS. “The ethics of men making

men”

Page 14: Ethics and Science  European Commission

14

• Use of new technologies to both heal and relieve suffering and disability but also to improve human feeling, mental and physical performance (technological change of humanity)

• Documentation of current and imminent scientific and technological advances that may enhance human cognition, mood, physical performance and ageing.

• To evaluate these from philosophical, ethical and social perspectives

• To provide and facilitate policy responses to new, emerging and converging “dual-use” technologies in these areas

• To promote public understanding and discussion of new dual use technologies and the surrounding ethical debate.

• Co-ordinator: Henk ter Meulen: Bristol University, Bristol, UK

ENHANCEEnhancing Human Capacities,

Ethics, Regulation and European Policy

Page 15: Ethics and Science  European Commission

15

• Brain science will change the way we see ourselves and enable use to improve the way the brain functions

• What do European citizens believe constitutes an improvement of the brain?

• How do they perceive their own image as human beings? • How will new findings in brain science affect that perception? Citizen’s Deliberation• assessing research developments and ethical and socio-political

aspects of brain science• delivering a set of recommendations relevant to policy-makers

and the wider scientific and research communities • Co-ordinator: Tinne Vandensande, King Badouin

Foundation, Brussels

ECD European Citizens Deliberation

on Brain Science

Page 16: Ethics and Science  European Commission

16

Technology crossover – new ethical implications– Human enhancement (physical, cognitive, mood and

ageing - through gene therapy, ICT, silicon implants, robotics, nanotechnology etc.)

– Impact of ICT research and its potential applications on personal privacy and human dignity

– Use of animals (including NHPs) for non-medical research– Use of chimeric embryos– Cross-linking of databases and privacy and confidentiality

implications– Dual use - increased risk to e.g. security, privacy and

discrimination

Challenges of new and converging technologies

Page 17: Ethics and Science  European Commission

17

• Further awareness raising of ethics amongst researchers – particularly for the new technologies

• Ensuring ethical analysis develops rapidly enough to be taken into account in policy development and research governance.

• How do we handle new emerging ethical issues?

Future Challenges

Page 18: Ethics and Science  European Commission

18

The 6th EC Framework ProgramArticle 3 of the FP6 states that:

“All the research activities carried out under the SixthFramework Program must be carried out in compliance with

fundamental ethical principles.In order to implement this article the European Commission

has introduced an ethical review for proposals raisingsensitive ethical issues into the evaluation process”

(…)

Page 19: Ethics and Science  European Commission

19

EC Action Plan “Science and Society”The principles leading the decision making and everyday behaviour of

the Europeans are governed by the respect for:a) human life,b) human dignityc) integrity of the persond) democracye) the rule of lawf) cultural, religious and linguistic diversityg) the freedom of arts and researchh) health carei) consumer protectionj) the right of the child, the elderly and the handicappedk) environmentl) privacym) liberty and security.

Page 20: Ethics and Science  European Commission

20

Strategic Science-Society Integration Goals • Raising awareness and understanding of researchers

about techno-ethical issues; • Providing ethical monitoring of emerging robotic,

bionic, and AI technologies; – Fostering better integration of Science and Society, by – promoting responsible research; – developing the capability of researchers to communicate in

understandable ways to citizens and special groups, including policy makers.

http://www.filosofia.unina.it/corsoperf/corsoperf05/lezione_tamburrini_20_mag_file/frame.htm#slide0143.htm

Page 21: Ethics and Science  European Commission

21

• Research and Societal Engagement (European Research Advisory Board)

• Scientific Publication: Policy on Open Access (European Research Advisory Board)

• Ethical issues in EU research proposals – checklist

• European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies

• The European Conference of National Ethics Committees (COMETH)

• Academic freedom and university autonomy - Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1762 (2006) (Council of Europe)

Page 22: Ethics and Science  European Commission

22

• Academic freedom and university autonomy - Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1762 (2006) (Council of Europe)

• Code of conduct for responsible nanotech research (European Commission)

• Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: an action plan for Europe 2005-2009. First Implementation Report 2005-2007 (European Commission)

• The PRISM Principles (The Partnership for Research Integrity in Science and Medicine)


Recommended