+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ethics and the characteristics of unethical behavior

Ethics and the characteristics of unethical behavior

Date post: 26-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
56
Ethics and the characteristics of unethical behavior Friday, December 1, 2017 Ryan Gamble – Partner, Kansas City Tax Practice Leader Grant Thornton's Year End taxGuide Event Amanda Richardson – Senior Manager
Transcript

Ethics and the characteristics of unethical behavior

Friday, December 1, 2017

Ryan Gamble – Partner, Kansas City Tax Practice Leader Grant Thornton's Year End taxGuide Event

Amanda Richardson – Senior Manager

© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 2

Presenters

Ryan GamblePartner

[email protected] 412 2440

Amanda Richardson Senior Manager

[email protected] 412 2624

© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 3

Learning Objectives

Recognize the common characteristics that often lead to unethical behavior

Standard of Care -Accounting Profession

4

5© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

.300 Principles of Professional Conduct 0.300.010 Preamble .01 Membership in the American Institute of Certified Public

Accountants is voluntary. By accepting membership, a memberassumes an obligation of self-discipline above and beyond the requirements of laws and regulations.

.02 These Principles of the Code of Professional Conduct of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants express the profession’s recognition of its responsibilities to the public, to clients, and to colleagues. They guide members in the performance of their professional responsibilities and express the basic tenets of ethical and professional conduct. The Principles call for an unswerving commitment to honorable behavior, even at the sacrifice of personal advantage. [Prior reference: ET section 51]

AICPA Code of Professional Conduct 5

6© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

0.300.030 The Public Interest .01 The public interest principle. Members should accept the obligation to

act in a way that will serve the public interest, honor the public trust, and demonstrate a commitment to professionalism.

.02 A distinguishing mark of a profession is acceptance of its responsibility to the public. The accounting profession’s public consists of clients, credit grantors, governments, employers, investors, the business and financial community, and others who rely on the objectivity and integrity of members to maintain the orderly functioning of commerce.

.04 Those who rely on members expect them to discharge their responsibilities with integrity, objectivity, due professional care, and a genuine interest in serving the public. They are expected to provide quality services, enter into fee arrangements, and offer a range of services—all in a manner that demonstrates a level of professionalism consistent with these Principles of the Code of Professional Conduct.

AICPA Code of Professional Conduct 6

7© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Kansas Oath 7

8© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

8

9© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

9

10© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

The Hidden Costs of Unethical Behavior- The Josephson Institute of Ethics (2003)

10

11© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Harms Sales

According to a Wirhlin Worldwide survey, 80 percent of people said they decide to buy a firm's goods or services partly on their perception of its ethics.

11

12© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Worsens The Risks From Scandal

Civil Charges- Bad publicity and large payouts. An ethics program can help to identify and

halt misconduct early.

Criminal Charges- Possibility of fines up to $500M. A judge can reduce fines up to 95% as well as

jail time for executives if a firm has an ethics program in place. (U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations.)

Indelible Stain- Public's lack of trust is likely permanent.

Bankruptcy- Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing. Companies that went bankrupt morally

before financially.

12

13© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Worsens Employee Fraud

Cost firms $600 billion a year or 6% of GDP. - (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2002 Report to the Nation on

Occupational Fraud and Abuse)

Nearly twice as common as consumer fraud.- (KPMG Fraud Survey 2003)

Worsening rapidly.- At the time of this publication payroll fraud had quadrupled, theft of company

assets more than doubled and expense-account abuse nearly tripled since 1998. (KPMG Fraud Survey 2003.

Would drop if managers were better role models.- According to 58% of workers surveyed. (Ernst & Young, in the The CPA Letter,

October 2002)

13

14© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Worsens Productivity

Companies without a code of ethics do worse. - Decline in average return on capital employed, while those with a code showed

a 50% increase. (Simon Webley and Elise More, Does Business Ethics Pay?: Ethics and Financial Performance, Institute of Business Ethics, London 2003)

Lack of commitment to ethics leads to worse profits/turnover rations.- As much as 15% lower than others (Webley and More, 2003)

14

15© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

15

16© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Worsens Communication

It reduces the incidence of reporting misconduct. - 39% of employees report at firms with no ethics program. - 52% of employees report at firms with ethical standards alone.- 67% of employees report at firms with standards and ethics training or

advice line.- 78% of employees report at firms with all three.

- (National Business Ethics Survey 2003)

16

17© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

17

18© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Worsens Retention and Recruiting

Ethical firms have lower turnover and thus tend to hold onto important skills and waste less time training new employees.

Companies with the highest employee retention have the highest customer retention. (Bain and Co., cited in "The Success of the Socially Responsible Business and Investment Movements," speech given by Gordon Davidson at the World Future Society Conference, July 2003).- Just a 5% improvement in customer retention consistently

improves profits by 25-100%. (Frederick Reichheld, Bain and Company, The Loyalty Effect, Harvard Business School Press, 1996)

Turnover is expensive. The average company loses approximately $1 million with every 10 managerial and professional employees who leave the organization. (J. Fitz-enz, "It's Costly to Lose Good Employees," Workforce 50, 50, 1997.)

18

19© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Unethical Behavior Worsens Sabotaging Behavior

Underdelivering Overpromising Turf-guarding Goal lowering Budget twisting Sharp-penciling Fact hiding Detail skipping Praise pinching Credit hogging Blame buffering Scapegoating

- Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science

19

Worst Accounting Scandals of All Time(www.accounting-degree.org/scandals)

20

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

Enron Scandal (2001)

21

Ken Lay Jeff Skilling

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

Company: Houston-based commodities, energy and service corporation

What happened: Shareholders lost $74 billion, thousands of employees and investors lost their retirement accounts, and many employees lost their jobs.

Main players: CEO Jeff Skilling and former CEO Ken Lay.

How they did it: Kept huge debts off balance sheets.

How they got caught: Turned in by internal whistleblower SherronWatkins; high stock prices fueled external suspicions.

Penalties: Skilling got 24 years in prison. The company filed for bankruptcy. Arthur Andersen was found guilty of fudging Enron's accounts.

22

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

WorldCom Scandal (2002)

23

Bernie Ebbers

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

Company: Telecommunications company; now MCI, Inc.

What happened: Inflated assets by as much as $11 billion, leading to 30,000 lost jobs and $180 billion in losses for investors.

Main player: CEO Bernie Ebbers

How he did it: Underreported line costs by capitalizing rather than expensing and inflated revenues with fake accounting entries.

How he got caught: WorldCom's internal auditing department uncovered $3.8 billion of fraud.

Penalties: CFO was fired, controller resigned, and the company filed for bankruptcy. Ebbers sentenced to 25 years for fraud, conspiracy and filing false documents with regulators.

24

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

Freddie Mac (2003)

25

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

David Glenn Vaughn Clarke

Company: Federally backed mortgage-financing giant. What happened: $5 billion in earnings were misstated. Main players: President/COO David Glenn,

Chairman/CEO Leland Brendsel, ex-CFO Vaughn Clarke, former senior VPs Robert Dean and Nazir Dossani.

How they did it: Intentionally misstated and understated earnings on the books.

How they got caught: An SEC investigation. Penalties: $125 million in fines and the firing of Glenn,

Clarke and Brendsel.

26

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

Tesco (2014)

27

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

John Scouler Carl Rogberg Christopher Bush

Company: Tesco What happened: Inflated profits by $331M Main players: John Scouler, Carl Rogberg Christopher Bush How they did it: Coercion and false accounting. How they got caught: Finance personnel reported concerns to

HR both resigning shortly thereafter. Penalties: $160M fine and $109M investor compensation

scheme. Currently at trial with the three former executives charged with fraud by false accounting and fraud by abuse of power.

(Business Insider, "'The current environment has broken me': Tesco accounting scandal 'compromised' staff and sparked resignations", Thomas Colson, Oct. 3, 2017)

28

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

29

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

30© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

So what causes these smart, successful people to get wrapped up in illegal activities and unethical behavior?

Dr. Muel Kaptein of the Rotterdam School of Management tackled this question in a paper about why good people do bad things:

Business Insider - Emmie Martin Dec. 15, 2016

Why do good people do bad things?

30

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

31© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

31The Galatea Effect

32© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

32Social Bond Theory

33© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

33The Powers of Names

34© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

34Environmental influence

35© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

35The Compensation Effect

36© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

36Acceptance of Small Theft

37© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

37Reactance Theory

38© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

38Tunnel Vision

39© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

39The Blinding Effect of Power

40© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

40Broken Window Theory

41© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

41Time Pressure

42© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

42The Free-Rider Problem

43© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

43Cognitive Dissonance and Rationalization

44© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Remedy?

44The Pygmalion Effect

Common Misconduct in Organizations

Misrepresenting hours worked Employees lying to supervisors Management lying to employees, customers,

vendors or the public Misuse of organizational assets Lying on reports/falsifying records Sexual harassment Stealing/theft Accepting or giving bribes or kickbacks Withholding needed information from employees,

customers, vendors or public

45

“Whistleblower’s” Reluctance

Didn’t believe action would be taken.

Feared retaliation from management.

Didn’t trust confidentiality.

Feared not being a team player.

Feared retaliation from co-workers.

Didn’t know who to contact.

Nobody cares, why should I?

46

Ethical Tips for Organizations

Develop a code of ethics. Communicate code and bake it into culture top-

down. Treat ethics as a process. Create open lines of communication. Set good examples. Educate employees – frame issues through

storytelling. Value forgiveness.

47

Benefits of Managing Ethics in the Workplace

Improves society.

Maintains a moral course in turbulent times.

Cultivates employee teamwork, productivity, morale and development.

Acts as an insurance policy.

48

Benefits of Managing Ethics in the Workplace (cont’d)

Establishes values for quality management, strategic planning and diversity management.

Promotes strong public image.

It is the RIGHT thing to do!

49

50© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Legal but Unethical Work Behavior

For a manager to share your resignation letter with your coworkers. For a coworker to refuse to speak to you. For a manager to tell your coworker that she plans to write you up. To fill a job without advertising it and giving other people a chance to

apply for it. For an employer to reveal your salary to your coworkers. To hold employees to different standards than others – favoritism. For your boss to ask you to pick up his lunch. For a manager to yell. To make you stay at the office and work if you decline to go on the

company cruise/outing. To share your performance stats with your coworkers. To have a random coworker deliver the message that you're fired. For your boss to require you to read a self-help book and test you on

it.

50

51© 2017 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved | U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd

Legal but Unethical Work Behavior (Cont.)

To ban sugary foods from the office. For your employer to give your cell phone number to other employees. To fire you for companioning about something that is not illegal. To not hire someone because you dislike their relatives. To hire a family member over a more qualified unrelated candidate. For HR to forward your confidential emails to other people. To fire someone via email. To be a jerk. For your boss to require you to put little bags of wedding favors

together.

- Ethics Alarms.com, November 5, 2013

51

Ethical Dilemmas CaseBy Carnegie Mellon Tepper School of BusinessAugust 1, 2002

52

http://public.tepper.cmu.edu/ethics/AA/acctmini.htm

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

53Booking the BudgetRevenue Recognition

Maria and Andy have organized and are responsible for the accounting system of the HMO.

Bob and Connie, executive officers of the HMO, are mainly concerned with rosy sales results.

Financial sales accruals have been recorded for numbers that are closer to budget projections than actual sales.

Auditors reviewing the financial figures will require adjustments to the inflated sales accruals.

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

54Survive the YearAsset Valuation/Write-Downs

The company for which Chris is controller is facing financial difficulties and needs a bank loan to continue in existence.

Chris and Robin, the CEO, know a material receivable is probably uncollectable, but no adjustment to the allowance account has yet been made.

Robin, the CEO, fears that booking the allowance adjustment will cause the auditor to report the construction company’s shaky financial position in the audit report.

Without a clean audit opinion, the bank will likely refuse the loan, and the construction company may fail.

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

55zzCinemaInternal Control/Segregation of Duties

Diana is new on the job. Diana suspects William of siphoning off the extra sales revenue. She has no proof to back up her suspicions. William has been consuming conspicuously. John may not suspect William of wrongdoing. Poor internal control and a lack of segregation of duties exist. Evidently, franchise owners are not aware of the problem or trust John, who

is their agent.

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved

Questions?

56

©� 2016 Grant Thornton LLP | All rights reserved


Recommended