+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Date post: 27-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: trevor-barnett
View: 232 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
30
Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2
Transcript
Page 1: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Ethics in a Computing Culture

Chapter 1Critical Reasoning and Moral

Theory

Day 2

Page 2: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Review: Being a member of a profession usually ____ your ethical responsibilities.

A. DecreasesB. IncreasesC. Does not affect

2Ethics in a Computing Culture

33%33%33%

Page 3: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Review: Which moral theory says it is only appropriate to judge an individual with the standards of his culture?

A. Religious ethicsB. Divine Command

theoryC. Cultural RelativismD. Cultural Rescue

theoryE. No harm, no foul

theory.

3Ethics in a Computing Culture

20% 20%20%20%20%

Page 4: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Ethics as a Meta-Norm

• Ethics is the study of rational choices.• Ethical = Doing the right thing

– How do we define the right thing?– Where we place the value

• Weakness of the previous theories; need to search for theories with universal validity:– Lasting and durable value– Transcends space and time– Intrinsic human goods exist and the moral choices to realize those

goods is possible.– These principles work in diverse cultures

– Ideas from Cyberethics by Spinello, p. 4Ethics in a Computing Culture 4

Page 5: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Ethics

Two dominant theories:

1. Deontological• Duty and rule based

2. Teleological• Consequence/outcome based

Page 6: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

(pages 20-23) Deontology

• Greek word – deon (duty)

• Focus is on the rights, duties, obligations and rules– Looks at intrinsic value of the action, what are you having

to do?• consequences/outcome of the action are secondary, or

to some of these ethicists, completely irrelevant.

• Spinello: deontological ethicists “argue for the priority of the right over the good” … “their rightness or wrongness does not depend in any way in the consequences which they effect.”

Page 7: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Kant - Universalism

• Immanuel Kant looks to what would happen if the action were universal.

• “I shall never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim become universal law.”– Absolutist: always wrong to lie. No exceptions

Page 8: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Kant’s Categorical Imperatives(a.k.a. Absolute Commands)

• Kant’s first formulation:– “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the

same time will that it should become a universal law.”

• For Kant, consider what would happen if everyone did this act all the time?

Page 9: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

According to Kant, it is ethical to make an exception to a rule in order to help someone out.

A. TrueB. False

9Ethics in a Computing Culture

0%0%

Page 10: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Kant’s Categorical Imperatives(continued)

• Kant’s second formulation:– “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in

your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end and never merely as a means to an end.”

Ethics in a Computing Culture 10

Three minute philosophy:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwOCmJevigw

Page 11: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Soup Bowl Scenario

Ethics in a Computing Culture 11

Page 12: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

What would Kant say?

A. Download the software if you want, it’s your choice, and you should be happy.

B. Download the software, give the money you saved to the poor, that makes the most people happy.

C. Purchase the software legally, even if that means you cannot donate to the Soup Bowl, as you should not break a rule.

12Ethics in a Computing Culture

0%0%0%

Page 13: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Two problems with theUniversalism theory

• Rigidity:– Some exceptions to absolute duty would make a lot of common sense.

• Sometimes two duties will conflict. – What to do then?

Page 14: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Another deontological theory

Pluralistic Deontology• WD Ross’ prima facie

duties:• Fidelity• Reparation• Gratitude• Non-injury/harm

prevention• Beneficence• Self-improvement• Justice

Ethics in a Computing Culture 14

Page 15: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Scenario: Annie the student

Annie lives in a poor section of Big Town. Last year, Annie started attending a magnet school. At the magnet school, teachers have high expectations and give lots of homework. Annie needs to use a computer to complete her work, but her family and friends do not have one, nor is there a public library nearby. Her school has resources that she can use immediately after school, but that time conflicts with her part-time job. It happens that her apartment is located next to a small private college. Annie usually walks there at night to the college lab and uses their resources. The signs clearly state “student use only” but there is no log in required.

Ethics in a Computing Culture 15

Page 16: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Would Kant say Annie’s behavior is ethical?

A. Yes, because she is completing her assignments as her teacher instructed.

B. Yes, because she is improving herself.

C. No, because her behavior is like lying and she is breaking the rules.

D. A and B are true

16Ethics in a Computing Culture

0% 0%0%0%

Page 17: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Opinion: Would fellow deontologist Ross reach the same conclusion about Annie as Kant?

A. YesB. Maybe not

17Ethics in a Computing Culture

0%0%

Page 18: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Opinion: Annie & Pluralistic deontology;

What duty might be the most important here?

A. BeneficenceB. ReparationC. Self-improvementD. Fidelity

18Ethics in a Computing Culture

25% 25%25%25%

Page 19: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Soup Bowl Scenario: What would Ross say?

A. Purchase the software legally, even if that means you cannot donate to the Soup Bowl, as you should not break a rule.

B. Download the software if you want, it’s your choice, and you should be happy.

C. Download the software, give the money you saved to the poor, that makes the most people happy.

D. Figure out the most important duty to meet. It may help other people, but it is not clear that you should break the law.

19Ethics in a Computing Culture

25% 25%25%25%

Page 20: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Teleological Ethics: Consequentialismpages 15- 20

• Telos: Greek for end or purpose• Actions evaluated by their consequence.

– Consequentialism: the consequence of an action, not the motivation behind the action, makes an action good or bad

– Guiding principle: to increase happiness, a.k.a. utility (satisfies needs and values)

– Utilitarianism: an action is good if it causes more happiness than a potential, alternative decision*

*Look at the net consequence of behaviors.

Page 21: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Consequentialism/Utilitarianism’s Calculus

• Predictive

• Greatest good for the greatest number, including “depth” of happiness, p. 17 ex.

• Looking at the net consequences:

– Spinello’s summary: without being arbitrary, utilitarianism requires a “moral calculus”… “using all the possibilities” to find “the greatest net expectable utility”

Ethics in a Computing Culture 21

Page 22: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Utilitarianism Ethicists

• Theory: correct course of action maximizes expected utility &/or minimizes expected negative utility for humans

• Leading theorists are Jeremy Bentham & John Stuart Mill

• Bentham looks for what promotes “the general good”:

• "An act is right from an ethical point of view if, and only if, the sum total of utilities produced by that act is greater than the sum total utilities produced by another act the agent could have performed in its place."

Bentham (1748-1832)

Mill (1806-1873)

Page 24: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Suppose you had to classify Luther. Where would you put him?

A. Deontology with Kant

B. Deontology with Ross

C. Cultural RelativismD. UtilitarianE. I’m not sure

24Ethics in a Computing Culture

20% 20%20%20%20%

Page 25: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Utilitarianism variants

• Act Utilitarianism: the concept of performing an action that maximizes happiness– Act Utilitarianism & Officer Schmidt’s dilemma page 17

25Ethics in a Computing Culture

Page 26: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Utilitarianism variants cont’d

• Rule Utilitarianism: the concept of adopting a set of rules, and only violating them in the case where compelling evidence indicates that utility is increased by such a violation.– See Gert’s rules, p. 19

• Be familiar with Gert’s rules

– Rule Utilitarianism & Officer Schmidt’s dilemma, page 19

Ethics in a Computing Culture 26

Page 27: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Comparing Deontology to Teleological Ethics

• Deontological ethics theories differ from teleological/consequentialist theories– the intention behind the action is considered more

important than the end result– focuses on rights, duties, obligations, and rules– assumes that the result will end badly if these rules are not

met

27Ethics in a Computing Culture

Page 28: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

Soup Bowl Scenario

Ethics in a Computing Culture 28

In-class discussion: Talk through in small groups the possible positions of _______ on this.

• Act Utilitarian• Rule Utilitarian

Page 29: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.
Page 30: Ethics in a Computing Culture Chapter 1 Critical Reasoning and Moral Theory Day 2.

When Calvin says “I don’t mean for everyone, you dolt, just me!” Calvin is

showing himself to be a(n)

A. DeontologistB. Act UtilitarianC. Rule UtilitarianD. Egoist

30Ethics in a Computing Culture

0% 0%0%0%


Recommended