+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 2. Part one Mapping ethics.

Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 2. Part one Mapping ethics.

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: cynthia-pearson
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
13
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 2
Transcript

Ethics

LL.B. STUDIES 2015LECTURE 2

Part one

Mapping ethics

Mapping ethics

What is our main moral concern?

To live a good life.

To do right things.

Mapping ethics

Deontology (morality) vs. Teleology (ethics)Greek: beauty vs. good

Public ethics vs. Individual ethics

Mapping ethics

Basic streams of moral philosophy:

TELEOLOGY DEONTOLOGY

UTILITARIANISM

VIRTUE ETHICS

ETHICS OF RIGHTS

CONTRACTUALISM

DISCOURSE ETHICS

ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY

POSTMODERN ETHICS

Part two

Consequentialism

(Utilitarianism)

General description

'Consequentialist theories regard the moral value of actions, rules of conduct, and so on, as dependent on their consequences. […] This end, which conveys value to actions and states of affairs, is itself regarded as intrinsically good, good as such, desirable for its own sake.'

O. Kuusela, Key Terms in Ethics

Classical utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill

- empirical theory of morality

Four principles of utilitarianism1) Principle of consequences

Moral value of the act depends solely on expected consequences of this act.

2) Principle of utility

When evaluating possible consequences of the act, the criterion is utility - the good that the act brings.

3) Principle of hedonism (pleasure)

The good that an act should bring is a pleasure (happiness)

4) Social principle

What counts in moral considerations is not only an individual pleasure of an agent, but a happiness of every potentially involved person – 'the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people'

Principles of consequences and utility

1. How to calculate desirable and undesirable consequences?

2. Which consequences should we consider?Utilitarism seems to establish an infinite responsibility

Principle of hedonism

Empirical ground for utilitarian ethics

How to define pleasure? The problem of a blank nature of this concept

Quantitative vs. qualitative concept of pleasure

The problem of injustice

May we avoid acts of injustice in the name of desirable consequences?

To Torture or Not to Torture?


Recommended