EURAMET Key Comparison No. EURAMET.T-K1:
Realisations of the ITS-90 from 2.6 K to 24.5561 K,
using rhodium-iron resistance thermometers
Draft B
Christof Gaiser and Bernd Fellmuth
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)
Abbestrasse 2-12, D-10587, Berlin, Germany
Peter Steur
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM)
Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Torino, Italy
Anna Szmyrka-Grzebyk, Henryk Manuszkiewicz, and Leszek Lipinski
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences (INTiBS)
P.O. Box 1410, 50-950 Wroclaw 2, Poland
Andrea Peruzzi
Dutch Metrology Institute (VSL)
P.O. Box 654, 2600 AR Delft, the Netherlands
Richard Rusby and David Head
National Physical Laboratory (NPL)
Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
January 2016
2
1. Background
In the temperature range from 0.65 K to 24.5561 K the ITS-90 is defined by specified vapour-
pressure equations for 3He (0.65 K to 3.2 K) and
4He (1.25 K to 5.0 K) and interpolation
equations for a constant-volume gas thermometer (ICVGT) using 3He or
4He. The definitions
are given in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the ITS-90 text [1], and methods for realising the scale in
this range are outlined in Chapters 4 and 5 of the Guide to the Realization of the ITS-90
(formerly Supplementary Information for the ITS-90) [2].
Direct realisations of the ITS-90 by these methods require relatively sophisticated apparatus
and time-consuming experiments, and consequently they are rarely carried out. The situation
is acceptable in practice only because rhodium-iron resistance thermometers are available
which, once calibrated, are able to maintain their calibrations reliably for long periods of
time. They are the practical thermometers on which realisations of the ITS-90 are most
accurately maintained, disseminated and compared. The Key Comparison EURAMET.T-K1
is therefore a comparison of calibrated rhodium-iron resistance thermometers (RIRTs).
EURAMET.T-K1 has been coordinated by PTB and is related to the Key Comparison
CCT-K1, which in turn was coordinated by NPL [3]. Its protocol is nearly identical to that of
CCT-K1, see Appendix 1, and has been approved by Working Group 7 “Key Comparisons”
of the CCT in May 2008. Later on EURAMET.T-K1 was registered as EURAMET Project
No. 1147 and as an RMO Key Comparison in the database KCDB of the BIPM
(http://kcdb.bipm.org/), see Appendices 2 to 4.
With the scope to get direct linking with the CCT-K1 comparison, the calibrations of two
RIRTs of INRiM (serial numbers 232324 and B190) and INTiBS (serial numbers 93 and
B178) were compared in 2008 at PTB with the calibrations of the RIRTs of NPL (serial
numbers 221481 and 221485), PTB (serial numbers 229074 and 229075), and VSL (serial
number 226246) that participated in CCT-K1. The RIRTs with serial numbers 229074,
221481 and 221485 were compared again in a second run in 2012 for checking purposes.
2. Participation.
The participating laboratories are those of the listed authors. Most of the RIRTs were
manufactured by H Tinsley and Co Ltd, being Type 5187W (100 at 273 K) [4]. The RIRT
with serial number 93 was manufactured at VNIIFTRI [5]. Inputs to the comparisons
CCT-K1 and EURAMET.T-K1 are summarised in Table 1 and as follows:
NPL
In CCT-K1 the Type 5187W thermometers Nos. 221481and 221485 were used. They were
originally calibrated in 1974 to 1976 in terms of the NPL-75 gas thermometry from 2.6 K to
27.1 K [6], and the Tx1 CMN magnetic thermometry from 0.5 K to 3.1 K [7]. The NPL vapour
pressure realisations were undertaken in 1974 to 1978 and are taken to be equivalent to these
scales over the range 1.0 K to 5.0 K. The two RIRTs took also part in a EUROMET
comparison in 1992 [8].
RIRT No. 221481 is the principal NPL reference thermometer. It has been measured at the
triple points of hydrogen and neon [8], and these measurements were used to define a
quadratic function, which has been added to the NPL-75 calibration to ensure consistency
with the ITS-90 at the specified fixed points. The adjustment amounts to - 0.6 mK at
13.8033 K and - 0.2 mK at 24.5561 K. The same adjustment was applied to RIRT No.
221485. The quadratic function is
3
(T90 – TNPL-75)/mK = 0.54635 - 0.15065 (T90/K) + 0.004897 (T90/K)2.
PTB
Two Type 5187W thermometers, Nos. 229074 and 229075, were submitted. They had
originally been calibrated over the full range at NPL in 1977, and No. 229075 also took part
in the EUROMET comparison [8]. Below 4.8 K the PTB approximation to the ITS-90 is
based on the PTB copies of the NPL scales Tx1 and NPL-75, since direct vapour-pressure
realisations at PTB were not available for CCT-K1. Thermometer 229075 was calibrated by
Luther, Grohmann and Fellmuth using a dielectric-constant gas thermometer (DCGT) above
4.2 K [9]. This calibration has been adjusted to be consistent with realisations of the triple
points of hydrogen and neon, as specified in the ITS-90, and the DCGT interpolation is used
as the PTB approximation to the ITS-90 in the range from 4.8 K to 25 K. Calibration data
were supplied as individual points and as full-range polynomial equations. There were two
equations for Thermometer 229075, using the interpolating DCGT [10] and the NPL scales,
and one for Thermometer 229074, using the NPL scales. Interpolating DCGT (ITS-90
approximation) temperatures for 229074 were calculated by applying the same differences
from the NPL-75 scale as for 229075. The polynomials express temperature as a function of
resistance at specified measuring currents.
VSL
One Type 5187W RIRT, No. 226246, was submitted. This had originally been calibrated at
NPL in 1977 and it was used in the gas thermometry of Steur [11]. Traceability to the ITS-90
between 0.65 K and 4.2 K derives from vapour-pressure measurements made with 3He and
4He, both at VSL and formerly at the Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratorium [12 - 15]. The
calibration data were supplied as VSL polynomial coefficients, in ranges above and below
2.6 K, using the thermometer resistance at the measuring current of 0.3 mA.
INRIM
Two Type 5187W RIRTs, Nos. 232324 and B190, were submitted. They had originally been
calibrated at NPL in 1993 in terms of the NPL-75 gas-thermometry scale. The calibration data
were supplied as polynomial coefficients using the thermometer resistance at the measuring
current of 0.3 mA. Both RIRTs have been measured at the triple points of hydrogen and neon,
and these measurements were used to define a quadratic function, which has been added to
the NPL-75 calibration to ensure consistency with the ITS-90 at the specified fixed points.
The adjustment amounts to - 0.6 mK at 13.8033 K and - 0.1 mK at 24.5561 K for RIRT
No. B190, as well as – 0.5 mK and + 0.3 mK, respectively, for RIRT No. 232324. The
adjustment is different for the two RIRTs primarily because for RIRT No. 232324, the data
has been corrected considering the isotopic composition of the gases contained in the triple-
point cells used. Furthermore, the NPL calibration of RIRT No. 232324 was compared with
the results obtained with the ICVGT of IMGC, which works with a cryogenic pressure
transducer. The differences were published in [16, 17] and fitted with a cubic polynomial.
This polynomial was added as a second correction to the original NPL calibration. Finally,
the resulting data for zero measuring current were described by a polynomial of degree 10.
INTiBS
One Type 5187W RIRT, No. B178, and one VNIIFTRI Type, No. 93, were submitted. RIRT
No. B178 had been calibrated at NPL in 1995 in terms of the ITS-90. The calibration data
were supplied as polynomial coefficients using the thermometer resistance at the measuring
current of 0.3 mA. Both RIRTs were calibrated at the triple points of H2 and Ne, and RIRT
4
No. B178 additionally at the lambda point of 4He. RIRT No. 93 carried only the fixed-point
calibration.
3. Apparatus
The cryostat used for Key Comparison EURAMET.T-K1 is the DCGT cryostat of PTB [18],
see Figure 1. It is a tank cryostat with a liquid nitrogen and liquid helium tank. The system
exhibits a shell structure starting with the outer vacuum chamber (OVC) containing shields,
covered with super insulation, providing the necessary thermal isolation from the outside. In
this chamber the liquid helium and liquid nitrogen tank is situated. All tubes through the
cryostat are placed in vacuum, thermally linked to the two tanks to minimize the heat flow on
the inner vacuum chamber (IVC). This chamber, which can be evacuated separately, is
isolated by an indium sealing from the OVC. On two different planes helium evaporation
cooling stages are installed. On these stages two isothermal gold plated shields are attached to
minimize the radiation heat flow on the experimental cell which is situated inside the lowest
shield. The coolers will be supplied with helium via thin tubes connected to the helium tank,
whereby the flow to each cooler can be regulated by cryogenic needle valves. In addition the
pressure inside the cooler can be regulated by controlling the flow through two pumping lines
via a valve situated on the top of the cryostat. These regulating systems allow for directing the
cryostat to the desired temperature region and provide a rough temperature control. The final
temperature stability of the cooling stages is made via two heaters which are regulated by
commercial temperature controllers. These controllers provide a temperature stability of a
few mK in the treated temperature range from 2.4 K to 25 K. In order to minimize the cool
down time to temperatures below the liquid nitrogen temperature, the cryostat is equipped
with an additionally cooling tube on the upper cooling stage. To start the cool down, liquid
nitrogen is send through this tube in combination with helium as exchange gas inside the
IVC. This procedure allows a cool down below 80 K in two days, followed by one further day
to reach the temperature range treated in this work. This setup has the advantage that once the
cryostat has reached the wanted temperature, even at the lowest temperatures no exchange
gas is needed, and the experimental cell is isolated from the cryogenic liquids. In addition the
whole tubing goes through the vacuum leading to the fact that the liquid level of the tanks has
no influence on the temperature distribution along the tubes. This is a clear advantage
compared to a bath cryostat, where the tubes normally go through the cryogenic liquid,
leading to varying temperature gradients. Also, to reduce the thermal gradients along the
nitrogen and helium tank, they are made of aluminium obeying a larger thermal conductivity
in comparison with the commonly used stainless steel.
The experimental cell has been made of oxygen-free high conductivity copper (OFHC). It
includes not only the capacitors for the DCGT measurement but in addition a CVGT volume
as well as vapour-pressure and triple-point cells. One optimization parameter is the weight of
the experimental cell directly connected to the heat capacity. For copper the heat capacity is
strongly temperature dependent being at 30 K a factor of 40 smaller than at room temperature
but even a factor 100 larger than at 4 K. This extremely non linear behaviour leads to strongly
temperature dependent cooling powers necessary to guarantee an acceptable cool down time.
Another optimization parameter is the thermal flow along the chamber walls, determined by
the thermal conductivity and the wall thickness. A sufficiently high flow guarantees that
gradients along the chambers are small and do not cause measurable errors in the temperature
measurement.
In order to reach temperature stabilization of the experimental cell on the level of a few tenth
of a mK, special efforts have to be made. This was performed with commercially available
5
high-precision temperature controllers and Cernox resistance thermometers exhibiting a very
large sensitivity. Even though the absolute resistance values of these thermometers is of
secondary importance because the temperature of the cell is measured via RIRTs, the sensors
mounted on the cell in combination with the temperature controller should reach a
temperature stability on the level of 50 K. To reach optimal conditions for the temperature
control, the experimental cell is thermally isolated from the lowest cooling stage to minimize
thermal flow to the cell. Therefore, the necessary cooling power has to be injected via a well
defined heat link. This heat link had to be designed under consideration of the temperature
dependent cooling power as well as the temperature dependent change in the heat capacity of
copper. A copper wire was installed. This wire ends on the top of the heater mounted on the
cell. This installation guarantees sufficiently cooling power to allow for a symmetric
temperature control on a reasonable time scale. The combination of sufficient cooling power
and heating power on the cell, a very sensitive sensor and an accurate, self-tuning PID
controller lead to the necessary stability of 50 K.
For the temperature measurement of the experimental cell, a high accuracy transformer bridge
was used. For eliminating the lead resistances, the resistance measurement was performed in
a four terminal configuration. The low-current ac bridge is automated concerning the
balancing procedure as well as the data acquisition. The calibration of the bridge is traceable
to the national standard of PTB with a relative uncertainty of 5 parts in 108 of full scale. The
wiring inside and outside the cryostat to the RIRTs were performed in the twisted pair
technique to minimize influences due to electro-magnetic stray field. In addition all wires
were contacted thermally to the nitrogen and helium tank and each of the different stages
inside the inner vacuum chamber to avoid thermal flow to the RIRT. As reference resistors
two commercially available high-precision standard resistors of nominal values of 10 and
25 were used. These resistors are calibrated at PTB and are therefore traceable to the
national standards of PTB. The RIRTs were placed into holes of the experimental cell having
appropriate inner diameters. The thermal contact between the thermometer sheath and the cell
was improved using grease.
4. Measurements
Run No. 2 in 2008 (0802)
As noted in Table 1, the first comparison run (second low-temperature run performed with the
apparatus in 2008, i.e. run No. 0802) included all 9 RIRTs. The whole run lasted from August
2008 to February 2009. Measurements were made at 28 temperatures in the range from 2.6 K
to 25.9 K At several temperatures measurements were made on more than one occasion to
check the repeatability.
After the cryostat had been cooled to liquid helium temperatures, the helium exchange gas
was pumped away, and the temperature was stabilised. Various trials of the control,
measurement and data-processing were carried out, leading to the first set of comparison
measurements and self-heating checks, using currents of 0.3 mA and 0.3 2 mA. (The widely
used term “self-heating” means the change of the thermometer resistance caused by the
measuring power.)
Automated measurements for all RIRTs at both currents were then made at a number of
temperatures in the range mentioned above. The temperature was stabilised during daytime,
and at the end of the working day the computer program for switching the bridge together
with a multiplexer and for data registration was started. For each RIRT and current, bridge-
6
ratio values were recorded over 30 minutes, and the average over the last 10 minutes was
taken as the result.
In run No. 0802, RIRT No. 221481 was the so-called monitor thermometer. For the monitor
thermometer, the bridge-ratio values were recorded several times during the measurement
campaign at one temperature, namely at the beginning, in between and at the end. This
enabled to correct for the remaining small temperature drifts over the half-day campaign.
Run No. 2 in 2012 (1202)
The second comparison run (second low-temperature run started with the apparatus in 2012,
i.e. run No. 1202) included four of the RIRTs listed in Table 1, namely Nos. 229074, 221481,
221485, and 226246. The whole run lasted from September 2012 to January 2013. In this run,
RIRT No. 229074 was the monitor thermometer. The measurements at 29 temperatures in the
relevant range were performed in the same way as in run No. 0802.
Run No. 1202 was performed only for checking the overall repeatability of the comparison
experiments. For this reason, the location of the RIRTs and the connections to the measuring
leads were different compared with run No. 0802. The comparison results of
EURAMET.T-K1 presented below are exclusively based on the data obtained in run
No. 0802.
5. Data processing
Data processing started with correction of the averaged bridge-ratio values concerning
temperature drifts by considering the data obtained for the monitor thermometer. In view of
the very low drifts during the measurement campaigns (the temperature equivalents of the
corrections were at most of order 50 K), a linear interpolation between the different readings
of the monitor thermometer was possible in each case.
The second evaluation step was the determination of the zero-current ratio values (and in turn
of the corresponding resistance values) from the ratios measured with currents of 0.3 mA and
0.3 2 mA, respectively. For checking purposes, the self-heating data were reanalysed by
fitting the function ln((R/)/(P/W)) = ln(a) + b ln(T90/K) to the results for f(T90/K) =
ln((R/)/(P/W)) over the whole temperature range (R is the resistance change due to the
measuring power P). The fitting coefficients for the 9 RIRTs are given in Table 2.
The matrix of zero-current resistance values for each RIRT at temperatures Ti, i = 1, 2, ..., 28,
measured in run No. 0802 was then assembled. These are the primary data of the comparison
The matrix is given in Table 3 together with the corresponding Key Comparison Reference
Values (KCRVs), 𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET, of EURAMET.T-K1 for the temperature on ITS-90. To have a
direct link to CCT-K1, it is desirable to use KCRVs, which are close to those determined in
CCT-K1, 𝑇KCRV,𝑖CCT . The 𝑇KCRV,𝑖
EURAMET values have been, therefore, deduced as follows. For the
five RIRTs included in both comparisons, see Table 1, zero-current resistance values have
been taken from Tables 3 and 5 of the report on CCT-K1 [3]. (Doing this, it had to be
considered that in the evaluation of the CCT-K1 data, near-duplicate temperatures were
averaged, leaving 43 distinct KCRVs.) The resistance and temperature values used here are
listed in Table 4. They were fitted applying an algorithm with orthogonal functions. The
fitting results showed that an order of 12 is sufficient. The coefficients of the polynomials of
order 12 are given in Table 5. Using these five polynomials, temperature values were
calculated from the resistance values contained Table 3, see Table 6. For each temperature
7
above 7 K, the KCRV 𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET is finally the mean of the five calculated values. Below 7 K,
the temperature value for RIRT 221481 was not included in the mean because of systematic
deviations, see Section 7.
Table 6 contains furthermore temperature values for the RIRTs supplied by INRIM and
INTiBS resulting from their input calibration data and the resistance values listed in Table 3.
Where the original calibrations were specified for a non-zero current, the calculation of the
needed resistance values was performed using the self-heating functions, the coefficients of
which are given in Table 2. The deviations from the KCRVs are listed in Table 7.
6. Uncertainties
Uncertainties in the submitted calibrations
NPL in CCT-K1
Uncertainties are calculated at five temperatures above 4.2 K and five below 4.2 K, see [3].
The first is based on the normalisation of the NPL-75 scale to the ITS-90, and includes the
uncertainties in realizing the three fixed points required, with an additional uncertainty for
thermometer stability. The second is an uncertainty analysis of the original vapour pressure
calibrations down to 1 K. Below 1 K the uncertainty is of Tx1 as a representation of the ITS-
90. Again, a component is included for the thermometer stability.
PTB in CCT-K1
Uncertainty budgets for the two PTB thermometers were supplied see [3]. At 4.8 K and
24.6 K the budgets for Thermometer 229075 are based on the direct interpolating DCGT
calibration. That for Thermometer 229074 is derived from the comparison with 229075 as the
reference. The uncertainties are taken to vary linearly between 4.8 K and 24.6 K. Below 4.8 K
the uncertainties are based on the original Tx1 calibrations as maintained at PTB. All budgets
include a component for thermometer stability.
VSL in CCT-K1
The uncertainty is calculated at 2.2 K, see [3]. Variations from this, due to variations in the
thermometer sensitivity, are calculated in a sub-table.
INRIM
The standard uncertainty of the ICVGT calibration of RIRT No. 232324 in the temperature
range from 4.2 K to 24.5561 K has been estimated to be 0.68 mK, see Appendix 5. The
standard uncertainty of the NPL calibrations for both RIRTs is specified to be 0.5 mK.
INTiBS
The standard uncertainty of the NPL calibration for RIRT No. B178 is specified to be
0.5 mK. The fixed-point calibrations have estimated uncertainties of about 10 (lambda
point of 4He), 15 (triple point of hydrogen), and 20 (triple point of neon),
respectively, Appendix 6.
PTB, NPL, VSL calibrations from CCT-K1
For the five RIRTs included both in CCT-K1 and EURAMET.T-K1, the results of CCT-K1
are taken as input data for EURAMET.T-K1, see Section 5. The uncertainty of this data is
mainly determined by the CCT-K1 comparison uncertainties given in the corresponding table
of [3]. Since all five RIRTs were compared in one run, the component “Stability of
thermometer linking Runs 1 and 2”is, therefore, not relevant here. For the temperatures being
8
of interest, the budget is repeated in Table 8. A small additional component considers the
uncertainty of the approximation of the data given in Table 4 by the polynomials, the
coefficients of which are listed in Table 5.
Uncertainties in the EURAMET.T-K1 comparison experiments
The EURAMET.T-K1 comparison standard uncertainties uEURAMET have been estimated as
those of CCT-K1. The estimates are listed in Table 9. The component “Repeatability of
comparison measurements” has been estimated via the standard deviation of the results
obtained in the two comparison runs Nos. 0802 and 1202.
7. Results.
The primary comparison results are presented in Tables 3 and 6. The deviations from the
KCRVs are listed in Table 7 together with their uncertainty. Figures 2 to 6 illustrate the
results. Figures 2 and 3 show the deviations of the readings of RIRTs Nos. 221481 and
221485, respectively, from the KCRVs obtained in the two comparisons runs. (In run
No. 1202, the KCRVs were deduced from the readings of RIRT No. 229074 applying a
cubic-spline interpolation.) The standard deviations of all results obtained in both runs
amount to 0.16 mK (RIRT No. 221481 above 10 K) and 0.10 mK (RIRT No. 221485 in the
whole range), and the differences of the mean deviations to 0.19 mK and 0.13 mK,
respectively. Thus, the results obtained in the two runs corroborate a repeatability of the
measurements of order 0.1 mK.
Figure 4 demonstrates impressively the high stability of the five RIRTs included both in
CCT-K1 and EURAMET.T-K1, and, therefore, the direct link between the two Key
Comparisons. The standard deviation from the KCRVs amounts to 0.18 mK above 7 K, and
excluding RIRT No. 221481 to 0.25 mK in the whole range. Most of the deviations are even
well within the envelope given by the expanded uncertainty (k = 2) of CCT-K1.
Below 7 K, the deviation of the reading of RIRT No. 221481 from the KCRVs increases
systematically with decreasing temperature without changes of other important parameters,
such as the overheating due to the measuring power. As shown in Figure 5, the same effect
was observed for RIRT No. B190. Thus, it is unlikely that the deviation is caused by a simple
instability. One possible explanation could be clustering of iron atoms via diffusion over the
long periods after the fabrication of the RIRTs. Within the clusters, the magnetic moments of
the iron atoms may be pinned, i.e. permanently localised in contrast to the spin fluctuations
being typical for rhodium-iron alloys. Localised magnetic moments are the cause of the
Kondo effect, which results also in an increase of the resistivity with decreasing temperature.
However the stability of RIRTs is generally excellent, as demonstrated by most of the results
obtained. The anomalies seen here with these two RIRTs (one of which was first measured in
1973) are therefore not explained, and need further investigation.
Figure 5 shows the deviation of the readings of eight RIRTs from the KCRVs, and Figure 6
gives the same information only for the three RIRTs not included in CCT-K1.
The deviations of the fixed-point values of RIRTs Nos. B178 and 93 from the KCRVs are
listed in Table 10. The KCRVs were deduced from the readings of RIRT No. 229074
applying a cubic-spline interpolation. The deviations are partly larger than the expanded
uncertainty (k = 2), i.e. partly significant.
9
8. Conclusion and documentation of equivalences.
The level of agreement between participants is seen, in Table 7 and Figure 5, to be mostly
within ± 0.5 mK above 7 K, although there are exceptions. Below 7 K the RIRTs No. 221481
and No. B190 show both increasing systematic deviations with decreasing temperature (see
Section 7). For each temperature in the comparison, the Key Comparison Reference Value,
TKCRV, is the mean of the individual temperature values, Ti, of four (without No. 221481 for
TKCRV < 7 K) or five RIRTs (above 7 K) of the RIRTs, which were included in Key
Comparison CCT-K1, see Section 5. The TKCRV is used as the baseline for the comparison,
but has no special significance with regard to “best estimates” of ITS-90 temperature values
T90, and it is used without uncertainty.
In Figure 4, the results obtained for the RIRTs already included in CCT-K1 are shown,
together with the expanded CCT-K1 comparison uncertainties k = 2 [3]. It is remarkable that
the standard deviation is on the level of 0.2 mK manifesting that these RIRTs remained
extremely stable over a decade.
In Figure 5 it can be seen that RIRT No. B178 shows larger deviations on the level of 0.7 mK
above 13 K, but this is not of statistical significance. The already mentioned deviations below
7 K are of statistical significance. Since these deviations are suspected to be caused by
systematic long-term resistance drifts and not by calibration errors, see Section 7, they are not
considered as “significant unresolved deviations” within the meaning of the MRA Clause T.7
(http://www.bipm.org/en/cipm-mra/cipm-mra-text/). The values for RIRTs No. 221481 and
No. B190 below 7 K are, therefore, not included in Appendix 7, which gives an overview of
the results relevant for Appendix C of the KCDB. The results listed in Table 10 are also not
included in this appendix because they are only supplementary data for checking purposes.
Using the data in Table 6 the degrees of equivalence between all RIRTs have been evaluated
at all temperatures in the comparison. For this purpose, first the difference Di = (Ti – TKCRV)
has been calculated for each RIRT i. The Di values are listed in Table 7 together with the
standard uncertainty estimates, ui, for the Ti values, i.e. the original calibration data. The
uncertainty of Di, u(Di), includes ui and the EURAMET.T-K1 comparison standard
uncertainty, uEURAMET, assessed in Table 9. Then the degree of equivalence between each pair
of RIRTs i and j is given by Dij = (Di – Dj) with an expanded uncertainty (k = 2) of Uij =
2(𝑢𝑖2 + 𝑢𝑗
2 + 𝑢EURAMET2 )
0.5. The obtained degrees of equivalence are presented in Appendix 7
on one page per temperature. Each page shows the input data and a graph of the differences
with uncertainty bars at k = 2. Below this is a matrix which gives the differences Dij and
expanded uncertainties Uij for each pair of RIRTs i and j. Appendix 7 documents that no
“significant unresolved deviations” need to be noted in Appendix C of the KCDB.
Acknowledgement
The pilot authors (CG and BF) wish to acknowledge the assistance they received in the
comparison experiments and the evaluation of the results from their colleagues Norbert Haft
and Bettina Thiele-Krivoi.
10
Appendices
Appendix 1: Protocol for Key Comparison EUROMET.T-K1 (PTB, INRiM, INTiBS, NMi
VSL, NPL): Realisations of the ITS-90, 2.4 K to 24.5561 K, using rhodium-iron resistance
thermometers
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_1.pdf)
Appendix 2: Status Report on RMO Comparison EURAMET.T-K1
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_2.pdf)
Appendix 3: EURAMET Technical Committee Projects: Ref.: 1147, Title: Key Comparison
EUROMET.T-K1: Realisations of the ITS-90, 2.4 K to 24.5561 K, using rhodium-iron
resistance thermometers
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_3.pdf)
Appendix 4: BIPM KCDB: Key and supplementary comparisons – Information:
EURAMET.T-K1
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_4.pdf)
Appendix 5: Final results for INRIM Interpolating Constant Volume Gas Thermometer (with
proper calibration at home-realized fixed points)
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_5.pdf)
Appendix 6: INTiBS reports Nos. 1 to 3
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_6.pdf)
Appendix 7: EUROMET.T-K1 tables and graphs of results, with bilateral degrees of
equivalence
(File EURAMET.T-K1_Appendix_7.pdf)
11
References
1. Preston-Thomas H.: Metrologia, 1990, 27, 3-10 and 107
2. http://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/cct/guide-its90.html
3. Rusby R., Head D., Meyer Ch., Tew W., Tamura O., Hill K. D., de Groot M., Storm A.,
Peruzzi A., Fellmuth B., Engert J., Astrov D., Dedikov Y. and Kytin G.: Metrologia, 2006,
43, 03002, http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/final_reports/T/K1/CCT-K1.pdf
4. Rusby R. L.: in Temperature measurement, Institute of Physics Conference Series Number
26, edited by Billing and Quinn, IOP London, pp 125-130, 1975
5. Kytin G. A., Vorfolomeev S. F., Dedikov Y. A., Ermilova L. N. and Astrov D. N.:
Document CCT/89-7, BIPM 1989
6. Berry K. H.: Metrologia, 1979, 15, 89-115
7. Rusby R. L. and Swenson C. A.: Metrologia, 1980, 16, 73-87
8. Head D. I. and Rusby R. L.: Document CCT/93-15, BIPM 1993
9. Luther H., Grohmann K. and Fellmuth B.: Metrologia, 1996, 33, 341-352
10. Grohmann K., Luther H. and Fellmuth B.: Document CCT/96-24, BIPM 1996
11. Steur P. P. M. (1983): PhD Thesis Determination of Temperatures between 4 K and 100
K with a Gas Thermometer, Leiden University, the Netherlands
12. El Samahy A. E. (1976): PhD Thesis Thermometry between 0.5 K and 30 K, Leiden
University, the Netherlands
13. De Groot M. J., Gibb K., Heimeriks H., Durieux M. (1997): IMEKO Seminar on Low
Temperature Thermometry and Dynamic Temperature Measurement, edited by
A. Szmyrka-Grzebyk; Wroclaw, pp L104-109
14. De Groot M. J., Mooibroek J., Bloembergen P., Durieux M., Reesink A. L., Mao Yuzhu
(1993): TEMPMEKO ’93, Prague, pp 90-96
15. De Groot M. J. (1998): in Toward an International Temperature Scale from 0.65 K to
1 mK, Leiden University, edited by R. L. Rusby and P. Mohandas, NPL, pp 79-84.
16. Steur P. P. M., Pavese F., Peroni I., Ferri D., Pugliese A. (2003): Temperature: Its
Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, Vol. 7, D. C. Ripple et al. (ed.),
Melville, NY, American Institute of Physics, pp. 125-130
17. Steur P. P. M., Giraudi D. (2013): Temperature: Its Measurement and Control in Science
and Industry, Vol. 8, C. W. Meyer (ed.), Melville, New York, American Institute of
Physics, AIP Conference Proceedings Vol. 1552, ISBN 978-0-7354-1178-4, pp. 124-129
18. Gaiser C (2008): PhD Thesis Properties of Helium and Gas Thermometry (Aachen:
Shaker Verlag) ISBN 978-3-8322-7552-5
12
Table 1: Summary of NMIs and RIRTs participating in CCT-K1 (Runs 1 & 2) and EURAMET.T-K1 (Runs 0802 & 1202)
NMI RIRT RUN BASIS OF CALIBRATION INPUT FORMAT REFERENCES
NPL
221481
221485
221483
1 & 2, 0802 & 1202
1, 0802 & 1202
2
NPL-75 with adjustment to ITS-90
Tx1 for T < 2.6 K
Equations for T = f(R)
at 0.1 - 0.3 mA
6, 7
PTB
229075 1, 0802 IDCGT, 4.8 K to 27.0 K
NPL-75/Tx1 for full range
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.06 mA,
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.1 - 0.3 mA
9, 10
229074 1, 0802 & 1202 NPL-75/Tx1 for full range
converted to IDCGT, for T > 4.8 K
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.1 - 0.3 mA,
plus differences above 4.8 K as for 229075
INRIM
232324 0802 ICVGT, 4.2 K to 24.5561 K
NPL-75/Tx1 for full range
Equation for T = f(R) at 0 mA
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.1 - 0.3 mA
16
B190 0802 NPL-75/Tx1 for full range
with adjustment to ITS-90 for T > 4.2 K
Equation for T = f(R)
at 0.1 - 0.3 mA
INTiBS B178 0802
ITS-90 for full range
Lambda point of 4He, triple points of H2, Ne
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.3 mA
Resistance values
93 0802 Triple points of H2, Ne Resistance values
VSL
226246
1, 0802 & 1202
CVGT 2.6 K < T < 24.5561 K 3He and
4He vapour pressures, T < 4.2 K
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.3 mA
Equation for T = f(R) at 0.3 mA
11
12 -15
13
Table 2: Self-heating data for the 9 RIRTs included in EURAMET.T-K1: Coefficients of
the fit functions ln((R/)/(P/W)) = ln(a) + b ln(T90/K)
RIRT a b
PTB 229074 634.83 -1.3981
PTB 229075 4946.21 -1.6976
NPL 221481 4505.91 -1.5118
NPL 221485 2351.52 -1.5465
VSL 226246 4290.01 -1.6697
INRIM 232324 822.37 -1.5207
INRIM B190 4969.95 -1.8273
INTiBS B178 815.89 -1.5139
INTiBS 93 929.08 -1.5044
14
Table 3: Zero-current values of resistance, R(0 mA) in Ohm measured at the KCRVs
𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET
𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET
K
PTB
229074
PTB
229075
NPL
221481
NPL
221485
VSL
226246
INRIM
232324
INRIM
B190
INTiBS
B178
2.693629 6.103451 5.993230 7.380270 6.498638 5.888739 5.756197 5.593681 5.569200
2.599898 6.050212 5.939204 7.322838 6.447764 5.838466 5.708484 5.544670 5.520364
3.000775 6.274470 6.167277 7.564901 6.662022 6.050576 5.909558 5.751712 5.726164
3.095913 6.326487 6.220165 7.620970 6.711611 6.099769 5.956183 5.799722 5.773924
3.401384 6.490383 6.386785 7.797336 6.867615 6.254734 6.103063 5.951369 5.924378
3.799888 6.697018 6.596965 8.019382 7.063900 6.450160 6.288187 6.142408 6.114122
4.201187 6.897140 6.800520 8.234048 7.253589 6.639397 6.467379 6.327445 6.297887
4.487204 7.035041 6.940745 8.381757 7.384130 6.769791 6.590871 6.454969 6.424504
4.997407 7.271589 7.181449 8.634903 7.607756 6.993496 6.802578 6.673786 6.641698
5.496231 7.491797 7.405568 8.870299 7.815663 7.201789 6.999633 6.877553 6.843860
5.975219 7.693696 7.610959 9.085853 8.006023 7.392667 7.180208 7.064308 7.029157
6.570124 7.932222 7.853690 9.340303 8.230732 7.618217 7.393514 7.285050 7.248028
7.180012 8.163772 8.089313 9.587101 8.448729 7.837178 7.600575 7.499330 7.460444
8.273874 8.549567 8.482051 9.998108 8.811627 8.202071 7.945469 7.856433 7.814183
9.465787 8.932193 8.871588 10.405372 9.171290 8.563967 8.287437 8.210603 8.164843
10.770073 9.312489 9.258763 10.809947 9.528563 8.923675 8.627291 8.562662 8.513157
11.771326 9.581047 9.532234 11.095563 9.780785 9.177730 8.867263 8.811303 8.758973
12.277592 9.710009 9.663523 11.232681 9.901862 9.299711 8.982478 8.930690 8.876990
4.200739 6.896894 6.800302 8.233817 7.253394 6.639198 6.467211 6.327265 6.297648
13.772857 10.067144 10.027168 11.612316 10.237127 9.637542 9.301510 9.261353 9.203707
15.471164 10.435631 10.402405 12.003899 10.582947 9.986136 9.630692 9.602505 9.540594
16.979618 10.735447 10.707705 12.322406 10.864310 10.269785 9.898506 9.880099 9.814615
18.571024 11.028770 11.006369 12.633877 11.139424 10.547300 10.160493 10.151759 10.082613
20.274906 11.321622 11.304646 12.944680 11.413982 10.824467 10.422087 10.423073 10.350293
21.556378 11.530438 11.517300 13.166134 11.609608 11.022102 10.608572 10.616585 10.541182
22.673744 11.706236 11.696324 13.352402 11.774169 11.188448 10.765561 10.779518 10.701973
24.463897 11.978781 11.973881 13.640824 12.028945 11.446391 11.008893 11.032259 10.951381
24.944523 12.050551 12.046945 13.716632 12.095928 11.514286 11.072919 11.098795 11.017092
15
Table 4: Zero-current values of resistance, R(0 mA), in Ohm measured at the KCRVs
𝑇KCRV,𝑖CCT . The data is taken from [3].
𝑇KCRV,𝑖CCT
K
PTB
229074
PTB
229075
NPL
221481
NPL
221485
VSL
226246
0.649875 4.854624 4.725238 6.000390 5.281841 4.708061
0.676928 4.872045 4.742804 6.020424 5.299175 4.724571
0.704354 4.889731 4.760712 6.040122 5.316999 4.741162
0.761580 4.926410 4.798252 6.081926 5.353773 4.776029
0.858421 4.988646 4.861282 6.152033 5.415979 4.834792
0.991223 5.073616 4.947326 6.247523 5.500294 4.915077
1.031584 5.099268 4.973439 6.276230 5.525717 4.939371
1.224991 5.221937 5.097910 6.413072 5.646390 5.055306
1.249542 5.237326 5.113564 6.430357 5.661598 5.069921
1.503370 5.396109 5.274709 6.606030 5.816854 5.220075
1.754822 5.551003 5.432016 6.776446 5.967301 5.366461
1.996554 5.697264 5.580650 6.936578 6.108781 5.504796
2.247655 5.846354 5.732149 7.099175 6.252346 5.645790
2.600776 6.050652 5.939773 7.321163 6.448281 5.838965
2.699911 6.106873 5.996922 7.382089 6.502062 5.892146
2.896733 6.216935 6.108893 7.501290 6.607279 5.996283
2.996648 6.272164 6.164963 7.560854 6.659906 6.048428
3.099398 6.328344 6.222094 7.621555 6.713436 6.101551
3.400235 6.489735 6.386183 7.795485 6.867022 6.254133
3.429250 6.505015 6.401743 7.811970 6.881583 6.268619
3.800903 6.697479 6.597508 8.019049 7.064425 6.450662
4.224794 6.908644 6.812265 8.245739 7.264575 6.650292
4.477522 7.030429 6.936152 8.376289 7.379822 6.765401
5.000458 7.272934 7.182907 8.635959 7.609076 6.994790
5.948165 7.682493 7.599597 9.073661 7.995466 7.382128
7.201544 8.171673 8.097486 9.595483 8.456221 7.844724
8.296372 8.557084 8.489790 10.006062 8.818778 8.209219
8.399612 8.591690 8.525014 10.042910 8.851231 8.241913
9.508020 8.945104 8.884795 10.419099 9.183443 8.576192
10.803390 9.321702 9.268239 10.819765 9.537238 8.932381
12.297309 9.714913 9.668576 11.237909 9.906492 9.304360
13.798183 10.072907 10.033088 11.618424 10.242539 9.642990
15.499566 10.441471 10.408410 12.010130 10.588490 9.991687
16.999335 10.739183 10.711565 12.326402 10.867842 10.273350
18.597377 11.033403 11.011198 12.638830 11.143805 10.551760
20.298899 11.325589 11.308730 12.948909 11.417731 10.828225
21.575444 11.533482 11.520448 13.169336 11.612478 11.024963
22.676998 11.706719 11.696871 13.352945 11.774648 11.188916
23.496448 11.832652 11.825107 13.486254 11.892446 11.308094
24.101970 11.924397 11.918522 13.583308 11.978164 11.394914
24.340317 11.960225 11.955040 13.621196 12.011668 11.428828
24.446403 11.976147 11.971241 13.638043 12.026516 11.443906
24.551354 11.991869 11.987234 13.654665 12.041190 11.458765
16
Table 5: Coefficients of the polynomials of order 12, 𝑇 = ∑ 𝑎𝑖[(𝑅 − 𝑐)/𝑑]𝑖12𝑖=0 with
c = (Rmax+Rmin)/2 and d = (Rmax-Rmin)/2, from fits to the data listed in Table 4.
Parameter /
coefficient
PTB
229074
PTB
229075
NPL
221481
NPL
221485
VSL
226246
Rmin 4.8546235 4.725238 6.00039 5.281841 4.7080605
Rmax 11.991869 11.987234 13.654665 12.0411895 11.4587645
a0 7.9045074191 7.912124286439 7.807578792230 7.80887005235 7.906877281010
a1 10.2771046918 10.279145129314 10.261830799599 10.26463273205 10.280555222722
a2 4.4458658558 4.438348428264 4.500332283534 4.49820608506 4.445658325077
a3 1.7358334235 1.733445325816 1.752497539815 1.74833527154 1.727715853501
a4 0.4834707413 0.504319041871 0.506971006482 0.53146365559 0.484563412438
a5 0.0218440496 0.026317985498 0.005350915256 0.02018937170 0.048088186903
a6 -0.2063487640 -0.305079498448 -0.202571076746 -0.31570739743 -0.229189493368
a7 0.2249716780 0.203771786948 0.273974052369 0.23293246214 0.169320194844
a8 0.2333253195 0.429435944433 0.261027689304 0.48485463411 0.289155994776
a9 -0.4623820285 -0.432421689871 -0.509418871903 -0.46462706158 -0.411344696935
a10 -0.4123067477 -0.593391512611 -0.429091694377 -0.63625941026 -0.470155590261
a11 0.1533798402 0.140421401148 0.166573862172 0.14918390975 0.136381510208
a12 0.1521319925 0.214903289625 0.156383829186 0.22928559231 0.173710533507
17
Table 6: Values of temperature given in K and resulting from the input calibration data
and the resistance values listed in Table 3 at the KCRVs 𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET
𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET
K
PTB
229074
PTB
229075
NPL
221481
NPL
221485
VSL
226246
INRIM
232324
INRIM
B190
INTiBS
B178
2.693629 2.693888 2.693477 2.696983 2.693587 2.693564 2.693689 2.695690 2.694067
2.599898 2.600056 2.599807 2.603542 2.599866 2.599862 2.600022 2.602314 2.600285
3.000775 3.000859 3.000765 3.003468 3.000704 3.000771 3.000781 3.002627 3.000980
3.095913 3.095991 3.095899 3.098460 3.095844 3.095920 3.095965 3.097640 3.096116
3.401384 3.401484 3.401330 3.403416 3.401326 3.401395 3.401559 3.403387 3.401551
3.799888 3.799944 3.799857 3.801480 3.799827 3.799926 3.799967 3.801579 3.800060
4.200739 4.200749 4.200722 4.202037 4.200690 4.200795 4.200551 4.202105 4.200916
4.201187 4.201251 4.201160 4.202476 4.201112 4.201225 4.200934 4.202504 4.201447
4.487204 4.487304 4.487088 4.488299 4.487178 4.487248 4.487043 4.488257 4.487546
4.997407 4.997478 4.997339 4.998279 4.997384 4.997429 4.997277 4.998150 4.997821
5.496231 5.496228 5.496207 5.496959 5.496210 5.496279 5.496270 5.496875 5.496616
5.975219 5.975307 5.975145 5.975862 5.975214 5.975210 5.975446 5.975754 5.975619
6.570124 6.570249 6.570051 6.570622 6.570109 6.570088 6.570472 6.570661 6.570444
7.180012 7.180111 7.179792 7.180250 7.180005 7.179904 7.180392 7.180355 7.180200
8.273874 8.273941 8.273700 8.274059 8.273814 8.273855 8.274068 8.273981 8.273904
9.465787 9.465861 9.465626 9.465858 9.465754 9.465837 9.465786 9.465716 9.466012
10.770073 10.770159 10.769854 10.770134 10.770073 10.770147 10.770108 10.770097 10.770608
11.771326 11.771342 11.771159 11.771374 11.771335 11.771420 11.771339 11.771447 11.771843
12.277592 12.277640 12.277385 12.277666 12.277590 12.277678 12.277586 12.277765 12.278195
13.772857 13.772939 13.772689 13.772907 13.772848 13.772903 13.772586 13.773232 13.773658
15.471164 15.471308 15.471092 15.471207 15.471025 15.471188 15.470740 15.471529 15.471994
16.979618 16.979774 16.979451 16.979655 16.979647 16.979565 16.979037 16.979865 16.980530
18.571024 18.571303 18.570716 18.571139 18.571036 18.570927 18.570379 18.571401 18.571775
20.274906 20.275031 20.274723 20.274945 20.274869 20.274963 20.274286 20.275200 20.275673
21.556378 21.556442 21.556166 21.556438 21.556294 21.556551 21.555771 21.556647 21.556998
22.673744 22.673865 22.673561 22.673809 22.673668 22.673817 22.673487 22.674009 22.674596
24.463897 24.463979 24.463750 24.463988 24.463763 24.464007 24.464204 24.464344 24.464742
24.944523 24.944702 24.944416 24.944445 24.944494 24.944560 24.944680 24.944656 24.945232
18
Table 7: Comparison standard uncertainties (uEURAMET, cf. Table 9), KCRVs 𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET, differences from the KCRVs and their laboratory
uncertainties. For RIRTs Nos. 229074, 229075, 221481, 221485, and 226246, the laboratory uncertainties are equal because the input data is
deduced from the results of CCT-K1 (uCCT, cf. Table 8). Uncertainties and differences are given in mK.
uEURAMET 𝑇KCRV,𝑖EURAMET
K
PTB
229074 uCCT
PTB
229075
NPL
221481
NPL
221485
VSL
226246
INRIM
232324 u232324
INRIM
B190 uB190
INTiBS
B178 uB178
0.116 2.693629 0.259 0.113 -0.152 3.354 -0.042 -0.065 0.060 0.500 2.061 0.500 0.438 0.500
0.116 2.599898 0.158 0.114 -0.090 3.645 -0.032 -0.036 0.124 0.500 2.416 0.500 0.387 0.500
0.116 3.000775 0.084 0.110 -0.010 2.693 -0.071 -0.003 0.006 0.500 1.852 0.500 0.205 0.500
0.116 3.095913 0.078 0.109 -0.015 2.546 -0.070 0.006 0.051 0.500 1.727 0.500 0.202 0.500
0.116 3.401384 0.100 0.105 -0.053 2.033 -0.058 0.011 0.176 0.500 2.003 0.500 0.168 0.500
0.115 3.799888 0.056 0.101 -0.032 1.591 -0.062 0.038 0.078 0.500 1.690 0.500 0.172 0.500
0.115 4.200739 0.010 0.096 -0.017 1.298 -0.049 0.056 -0.187 0.650 1.366 0.500 0.177 0.500
0.115 4.201187 0.064 0.096 -0.027 1.289 -0.075 0.038 -0.253 0.650 1.317 0.500 0.260 0.500
0.115 4.487204 0.100 0.098 -0.117 1.094 -0.026 0.043 -0.161 0.650 1.052 0.500 0.342 0.500
0.116 4.997407 0.071 0.100 -0.069 0.872 -0.024 0.021 -0.130 0.650 0.743 0.500 0.414 0.500
0.117 5.496231 -0.003 0.103 -0.024 0.728 -0.021 0.048 0.040 0.650 0.645 0.500 0.385 0.500
0.118 5.975219 0.088 0.105 -0.074 0.643 -0.005 -0.008 0.227 0.650 0.536 0.500 0.400 0.500
0.119 6.570124 0.124 0.108 -0.074 0.498 -0.015 -0.036 0.348 0.650 0.537 0.500 0.319 0.500
0.120 7.180012 0.099 0.111 -0.220 0.238 -0.008 -0.109 0.380 0.650 0.343 0.500 0.188 0.500
0.122 8.273874 0.067 0.117 -0.174 0.185 -0.060 -0.019 0.194 0.650 0.107 0.500 0.030 0.500
0.124 9.465787 0.074 0.123 -0.162 0.071 -0.033 0.050 -0.001 0.650 -0.071 0.500 0.225 0.500
0.143 10.770073 0.086 0.129 -0.219 0.060 -0.001 0.074 0.035 0.650 0.024 0.500 0.534 0.500
0.157 11.771326 0.016 0.135 -0.167 0.048 0.009 0.094 0.013 0.650 0.122 0.500 0.517 0.500
0.164 12.277592 0.048 0.137 -0.207 0.074 -0.002 0.087 -0.006 0.650 0.173 0.500 0.603 0.500
0.186 13.772857 0.082 0.145 -0.168 0.050 -0.009 0.046 -0.272 0.650 0.375 0.500 0.801 0.500
0.186 15.471164 0.144 0.145 -0.072 0.043 -0.139 0.024 -0.424 0.650 0.365 0.500 0.830 0.500
0.186 16.979618 0.156 0.145 -0.167 0.036 0.028 -0.054 -0.582 0.650 0.247 0.500 0.912 0.500
0.186 18.571024 0.279 0.145 -0.308 0.115 0.012 -0.097 -0.645 0.650 0.377 0.500 0.751 0.500
0.186 20.274906 0.125 0.145 -0.183 0.039 -0.037 0.057 -0.620 0.650 0.294 0.500 0.767 0.500
0.186 21.556378 0.063 0.145 -0.212 0.060 -0.084 0.172 -0.607 0.650 0.269 0.500 0.620 0.500
0.186 22.673744 0.121 0.145 -0.183 0.065 -0.076 0.073 -0.257 0.650 0.265 0.500 0.852 0.500
0.186 24.463897 0.081 0.145 -0.147 0.090 -0.134 0.109 0.307 0.650 0.446 0.500 0.844 0.500
0.186 24.944523 0.179 0.145 -0.107 -0.079 -0.029 0.037 0.156 0.650 0.133 0.500 0.709 0.500
19
Table 8: Uncertainty budget for the input data of RIRTs Nos. 229074, 229075, 221481,
221485, and 226246 based on the CCT-K1 comparison uncertainties and an
additional component considering curve fitting (the values are given in mK).
Component 2.6 K 4.2 K 10 K 13.8 K to 24.55 K
Type A
Repeatability of comparison measurements 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.07
Curve fitting 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03
Type B
Resistance bridge linearity 0.009 0.01 0.02 0.05
Corrections to zero current 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.05
Residual temperature gradients 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.10
Combined uncertainty 0.113 0.096 0.123 0.145
Expanded uncertainty (k = 2) 0.227 0.193 0.245 0.290
20
Table 9: EUROMET.T-K1 comparison uncertainties uEUROMET
Component 2.6 K 4.2 K 10 K 13.8 K to 24.55 K
Type A
Repeatability of comparison measurements 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.14
Type B
Resistance bridge linearity 0.009 0.01 0.02 0.05
Corrections to zero current 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.05
Residual temperature gradients 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.1
Combined uncertainty 0.116 0.115 0.124 0.186
Expanded uncertainty (k = 2) 0.233 0.229 0.247 0.372
21
Table 10: Resistance values of RIRTs Nos. B178 and 93 at temperature fixed points of
the ITS-90 and deviations T from the KCRVs together with their standard
uncertainties u(T).
RIRT Triple Point R / u(R) / T / mK uT) / mK
INTiBS B178
H2
9.209984 16 -0.190 0.201
9.210028 13 0.022 0.196
9.210125 15 0.488 0.199
9.210015 20 -0.041 0.209
Ne
10.963950 20 -0.467 0.237
10.963941 20 -0.533 0.237
10.963937 20 -0.562 0.237
10.963941 17 -0.533 0.224
INTiBS 93 H2 10.561831 18 1.338 0.203
Ne 12.469906 26 0.775 0.256
22
Figure 1: The drawing shows the design of the cryostat including the experimental cell.
Starting from the top, the container of the outer vacuum chamber houses the nitrogen tank
situated above the helium tank. Both tanks as well as the inner vacuum can are thermally
isolated via superinsulation. Two evaporation coolers are connected with the helium tank
via tubes containing cryogenic needle valves. Each cooler, equipped with a pumping line,
is located on one of the two thermally isolated stages. Below these stages, inside the
shields, the experimental cell is located.
gas purifier
outer vacuumcan (OVC)
nitrogen tank
helium tank
superinsulation
inner vacuum can (IVC)
cryogenic needle valve
pumping line
2nd shield
evaporation cooler
pressure sensing tube
DCGT supply tube
1st shield
experimental cell (EC)
23
Figure 2: Deviation of the reading of RIRT No. 221481 from the KCRVs obtained in the
two comparison runs Nos. 0802 and 1202.
Figure 3: Deviation of the reading of RIRT No. 221485 from the KCRVs obtained in the
two comparison runs Nos. 0802 and 1202.
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 5 10 15 20 25
T
/ m
K
T / K
T481_Run1202-T_KCRV(Mean)
T481_Run0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
STD T > 10 K
0.16 mK
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 5 10 15 20 25
T
/ m
K
T / K
T485_Run1202-T_KCRV(Mean)
T485_Run0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
STD 0.10 mK
24
Figure 4: Deviations of the readings of RIRTs Nos. 229074, 229075, 221481, 221485,
and 226246 from the KCRVs obtained in the main comparison run No. 0802. The
envelope shows the expanded comparison uncertainty of CCT-K1 [3] centred about the
base line.
Figure 5: Deviations of the readings of 8 RIRTs from the KCRVs obtained in the main
comparison run No. 0802.
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25
T i,R
un
08
02-
T KC
RV
(Me
an) (
mK
)
T / K
T_075_PTB_0802-T_KCVR(Mean)
T_074_PTB_0802-T_KCVR(Mean)
T_481_NPL_0802-T_KCVR(Mean)
T_485_NPL_0802-T_KCVR(Mean)
T_246_VSL_0802-T_KCVR(Mean)
U(CCT-K1)
STD T > 7 K:0.18 mK
STD 0.25 mK( without 481 T < 7 K )
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
T i,R
un
0802
-TKC
RV
(Me
an) (m
K)
T / K
T_075_PTB_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_074_PTB_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_481_NPL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_485_NPL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_246_VSL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_B178_INTIB_NPL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_B190_INRIM_NPL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_324_INRIM_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
25
Figure 6: Deviations of the readings of RIRTs Nos. 232324, B190, and B178 from the
KCRVs obtained in the main comparison run No. 0802.
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Ti,R
un
0802
-TKC
RV
(Mea
n) (m
K)
T / K
T_B190_INRIM_NPL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_324_INRIM_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
T_B178_INTIB_NPL_0802-T_KCRV(Mean)
2007-11-14
Protocol for Key Comparison EURAMET.T-K1 (PTB, INRiM, INTiBS, NMi VSL, NPL)
Realisations of the ITS-90, 2.4 K to 24.5561 K, using rhodium-iron resistance thermometers
The measurement protocol for this regional Key Comparison is essentially the same as that used for CCT-K1, with the substitution of PTB as the pilot laboratory. In the temperature range from 2.4 K to 24.5561 K, the ITS-90 is defined by specifying vapour-pressure equa-tions for 3He (0,65 K to 3,2 K) and 4He (1,25 K to 5,0 K) and interpolation equations for a constant-volume gas thermometer using 3He or 4He. The definitions are given in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the ITS-90 text, and practical methods for realising the scale in this range are out-lined in Chapters 4 and 5 of the “Supplementary Information for the ITS-90”, BIPM 1990.
Realisations of the ITS-90 in this range are generally preserved and disseminated through calibrations of rhodium-iron resistance thermometers (RIRTs). The Key Comparison will be effected by comparing calibrations as have been established at PTB, INRiM, INTiBS, NMi VSL, NPL or in other national measurement institutes around the world. It is a pre-requisite of participation that the RIRTs have been calibrated in terms of an original local realisation of the ITS-90 over at least part of the range.
With the scope to get direct linking with the CCT-K1 comparison, the calibrations of two RIRTs of INRiM (serial numbers 232324 and B190) and INTiBS (serial numbers 93 and B178) will be compared in 2008 at PTB with the calibrations of the RIRTs of NMi VSL (se-rial number 226246), NPL (serial numbers 221481 and 221485), and PTB (serial numbers 229074 and 229075) that participated in CCT-K1. Measurements will be performed at a set of comparison temperatures similar in distribution to the original 31 CCT-K1 comparison tem-peratures in the range from about 2.4 K to 24.5561 K. The results will be recorded at the comparison temperatures as determined by the PTB reference RIRTs. These results will re-main blind until after the measurements are completed.
Resistance values will be reported at zero current, with the self-heating correction determined from measurements made at two different excitation currents at each of the comparison tem-peratures. Measurements at PTB will be made via an ac resistance bridge operating at 25 Hz excitation frequency and calibrated traceably to the national standard. Resistance standards will be traceable to RK-90 via sets of standard resistors traceable to the Quantized Hall Resis-tance.
In addition to the CCT-K1 measurement protocol, optionally an initial series of measurements will be performed at both PTB and the other four institutes to establish stability of the RIRTs. The resistance values will be measured at the triple point of water (TPW) and/or at the triple point of equilibrium-hydrogen (e-H2 TP) prior to their delivery to PTB. Upon delivery, the same initial measurements at the TPW and e-H2 TP will then be performed at PTB prior to performing the full comparison. Upon the return of the RIRTs, the same initial measurements will be performed again at the other four institutes. The resistance values so obtained will be shared by the four institutes and PTB for comparison to establish stability of the RIRTs. All other resistance-temperature data will remain blind until their evaluation is completed.
Within 2007, the ITS-90 interpolation equations appropriate for the RIRTs of INRiM, INTiBS, NMi VSL, and NPL will be forwarded to the pilot together with information relating to the realisation (range, description, report or publication) and the RIRTs (source, construction).
APPENDIX 1
These interpolation equations will be used together with preliminary comparison data to check the stability of the RIRTs prior to performing the full comparison. The full comparison data will then be used to generate TINRiM – TPTB, TINTiBS – TPTB, TNMiVSL – TPTB, and TNPL – TPTB over the comparison range.
The zero-current resistance values, interpolated temperatures, temperature differences, and associated uncertainty budgets corresponding to the template used for CCT-K1 will be re-ported by INRiM, INTiBS, NMi VSL, NPL, and PTB. The Draft A report will be written by PTB, including preliminary analysis on the bilateral degrees of equivalence. Once approved by the participants, the Draft B report will be submitted to CCT-WG7 for inclusion in the BIPM Key Comparison Database, with the results cast in a form suitable for linking with CCT-K1.
Contact information:
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) Dr. Bernd Fellmuth Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49 30 34817224 Fax: +49 30 34817490 E-mail: [email protected]
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM) Dr. Peter Steur Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Torino, Italy Phone: +39 011 3919 740 Fax: +39 011 3919 747 E-mail: [email protected]
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences (INTiBS) Dr. Anna Szmyrka-Grzebyk P.O. Box 1410, 50-950 Wroclaw 2, Poland Phone: +48 71 34 350 21 Fax: +48 71 34 410 29 E-mail: [email protected]
Nederlands Meetinstituut van Swinden Laboratorium (NMi VSL) Dr. Andrea Peruzzi P.O. Box 654, 2600 AR Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31 15 269 1519 Fax: +31 15 261 2971 E-mail: [email protected]
National Physical Laboratory (NPL) Dr. David Head Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom Phone: +44 20 89436111 Fax: +44 20 86140446 E-mail: [email protected]
DOCUMENT JCRB-9/9(1)
Completed copy to be forwarded to a) CCXX Executive Secretary, b) relevant Key Comparison WG Chairman and c) Regional coordinator as appropriate
STATUS REPORT ON RMO COMPARISON EURAMET.T-K1
1. CCT Section/Field: Thermometry 2. CCXX Ref No(to be completed by the BIPM):
3. Type of comparison: CCXX RMO
Key Supplementary Pilot study
4. Subject area: Thermometry
5. Participating institutes (and countries): PTB (Germany), INRiM (Italy), INTiBS (Poland), NMi VSL(Netherlands), NPL (United Kingdom)Bilateral
6. Pilot laboratory: PTB (Germany)
7. Measurand, unit and nominal value(s): Key Comparison EUROMET-K1.1: Realisations of the ITS-90, 2.4 K to 24.5561 K, using rhodium-iron resistance thermometers
8. Description: The measurement protocol for this regional Key Comparison is essentially the same as thatused for CCT-K1, with the substitution of PTB as the pilot laboratory. With the scope to get direct linking with the CCT-K1 comparison, the calibrations of two RIRTs of INRiM (serial numbers 232324 and B190) and INTiBS (serial numbers 93 and B178) will be compared at PTB with the calibrations of the RIRTs of NMi VSL (serial number 226246), NPL (serial numbers 221481 and 221485), and PTB (serial numbers 229074 and 229075) that participated in CCT-K1. Measurements will be performed at a set of comparison temperatures similar in distribution to the original 31 CCT-K1 comparison temperatures in the range from about 2.4 K to 24.5561 K. The results will be recorded at the comparison temperatures as determined by the PTB reference RIRTs. These results will remain blind until the measurements are completed.
9. Progress: (Please note date and tick appropriate box to indicate current status)
Date Status Pilot Supplementary Key
2008-04-22 Proposed to CCT-WG7 X X 2008-05-22 Accepted and registered X X
2008-04-22 Protocol submitted to CCT-WG7 X X
2007-11-14 Protocol agreed X X
Measurements in progress
2013-01-15 Measurements completed X X
2013-01-15 Report in progress X Draft A Draft A X
Draft B Draft B
Report submitted to CCXX
Results approved
Approved for Equivalence
Progression to Key Comparison
Abandoned
Comments: Start of the measurements delayed due to technical problems
Publication reference: EURAMET Ref. No. 1147
10. Measurement start date:2010-03-01
11. Expected measurement completion date:2012-12-31
APPENDIX 2
DOCUMENT JCRB-9/9(1)
Completed copy to be forwarded to a) CCXX Executive Secretary, b) relevant Key Comparison WG Chairman and c) Regional coordinator as appropriate
12. Contact person’s name: Dr. Christof GaiserAddress: Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Telephone: + 49 30 34817349 Fax: + 49 30 34817490 e-mail [email protected] Web address: WWW.PTB.de
13. Contact Person’s signature: Dr. Christof Gaiser 14. Date: 2013-01-15
EURAMET Technical Committee ProjectsThe Technical Committees are the forum for scientific and technical cooperation in the respective fields.
The types of cooperation are:
• Cooperation in research
• Comparison in measurement standards
• Traceability• Consultation between members
Participation in EURAMET PROJECTS is open to all EURAMET members and associates in accordance with the EURAMET Eligibility Criteria for Participation in EURAMET TC Projects.
EURAMET Eligibility Criteria for Participation in EURAMET TC Projects: pdf version for download
Ref. 1147
Title Key Comparison EUROMET.T-K1.1: Realisations of the ITS-90, 2.4 K to 24.5561 K, using rhodium-iron resistance thermometers
Description The measurement protocol for this regional Key Comparison is essentially the same as that used for CCT-K1, with the substitution of PTB as the pilot laboratory. With the scope to get direct linking with the CCT-K1 comparison, the calibrations of two RIRTs of INRiM (serial numbers 232324 and B190) and INTiBS (serial numbers 93 and B178) will be compared at PTB with the calibrations of the RIRTs of NMi VSL (serial number 226246), NPL (serial numbers 221481 and 221 485), and PTB (serial numbers 229074 and 229075) that participated in CCT-K1.
Measurements will be performed at a set of comparison temperatures similar in distribution to the original 31 CCT-K1 comparison temperatures in the range from about 2.4 K to 24.5561 K. The results will be recorded at the comparison temperatures as determined by the PTB reference RIRTs. These results will remain blind until after the measurements are completed.
Collaboration Type comparison
Subjects Thermometry (T)
Seite 1 von 2EURAMET: European Association of National Metrology Institutes: TC Project Dat...
2014-12-10http://www.euramet.org/index.php?id=tc-projects&no_cache=1&tx_nneurametctcp_p...
APPENDIX 3
Back to listPlease note that the search engine is connecting search terms with 'AND'.
Project Forms
Project Form 'Proposal'
Project Form 'Proposal for Traceability Projects'
Project Form 'Report'© EURAMET e.V. - Last modified: 2014-08-08
Status agreed
Starting date 2010-02-28
Coordinating Institute PTB (Germany)
Participating Partners INRIM (Italy)
INTiBS (Poland)
NPL (United Kingdom)
VSL (Netherlands)
Proposer / Coordinator Dr Christof Gaiser
Phone +49 30 3481 7349
Fax +49 30 3481 7490
E-Mail [email protected]
Seite 2 von 2EURAMET: European Association of National Metrology Institutes: TC Project Dat...
2014-12-10http://www.euramet.org/index.php?id=tc-projects&no_cache=1&tx_nneurametctcp_p...
Home Key and supplementary comparisons Calibration and Measurement Capabilities - CMCs
Home > Comparisons Search > Information
Key and supplementary comparisons - Information
EURAMET.T-K1• Information
• Pilot / Contact
• Participants
• Results
• Print out
Related links• KCDB Statistics
• KCDB FAQs
• KCDB Reports
• CIPM MRA
• JCRB
• Find my NMI
• Metrologia
Contact us• [email protected]
EURAMET.T-K1
Information
Metrology area, branch Thermometry, Standard Platinum Resistance Thermometers
Description Realizations of the ITS-90 from 2.4 K to 24.6 K
Time of measurement 2008 - 2012
Status Report in progress, Draft A
Reference(s) EURAMET.T-K1 registration and progress formEURAMET.T-K1 Technical Protocol
Measurand Temperature: 2.4 K to 24.6 K
Transfer device(s) Rh-Fe resistance thermometers
Comparison type Key comparison
Consultative Committee
CCT (Consultative Committee for Thermometry)
Conducted by EURAMET (formerly EUROMET) (European Association of National Metrology Institutes)
Other designation(s) EURAMET Project No 1147
Top of the page
Seite 1 von 1The BIPM key comparison database
2014-12-10http://kcdb.bipm.org/appendixB/KCDB_ApB_info.asp?cmp_idy=1290&cmp_cod=E...
APPENDIX 4
Final results for INRIM Interpolating Constant Volume Gas Thermometer (with proper calibration at home-realized fixed points)
Introduction In 2003 the results obtained with the IMGC Interpolating Constant Volume Gas Thermometer, with a cryogenic pressure transducer, were published. These results, however, relied for the calibration points on the temperatures supplied by Rhodium-Iron thermometer nr 232324, carrying a NPL calibration. In order to become independent of the NPL calibration the thermometer was, still inside the ICVGT, calibrated at 4,2 K, which validated the NPL calibration to within 0.1 mK. Successively, the thermometer was mounted inside the “Multicells”-cryocooler, for calibration at the other specified fixed points, e-H2 and Ne. During 2006, it was discussed with PTB to carry out a comparison of our RhFe with the master thermometer of PTB, enabling us to extend our calibration capabilities to below the triple point of Neon, by means of the ICVGT. Together with the participation of INTiBS (PL), NPL (UK), CNAM (FR) and NMi-VSL (NL) this project became Euromet Project 1174. In 2007 this project became regional key comparison Euromet.T-K1.1 with its protocol approved by CCT-WG7, thereby linking with CCT-K1 (through PTB, NMi-VSL and NPL). Still in 2006, thermometer 232324 was hand-carried to PTB, together with a second thermometer (B190) not related to the ICVGT. However, due to the heavy involvement of PTB in the International Boltzmann Project, the comparison was postponed until 2009. At the end of that year the thermometers were hand-carried back to INRIM. First checks at the triple point of water indicated that thermometer 232324 had remained stable during transport to within 0.1 mK, after comparison with the TPW measurements at PTB shortly before transport, and to within 0.33 mK with respect to the 2006 INRIM value. In the mean time doubts had arisen about the quality of the initial calibration of thermometer 232324 at the fixed point of hydrogen and neon (not communicated to PTB), because those measurements had been carried out with a version of the data-acquisition program still in development, and many of the checks implemented later on for the Neon-Project (Euromet 770) were still lacking. It was then agreed with PTB that INRIM would repeat the measurements at the three fixed points, for increased reliability.
2010/11 Measurements: Rhodium-Iron Thermometer nr 232324, used with the IMGC-ICVGT, has been calibrated:
- at a temperature close to 4.2 K, using the 4He Vapour Pressure Equation, performed in an apparatus prepared for this purpose, since the ICVGT is not available anymore;
- at the temperature of the e-H2 triple point with three plateaux realized in cell Ec1H2 with known deuterium content (participated in the Intl. Project on the dependence of the hydrogen triple point on deuterium content), in the “MULTICELLS” cryocooler and with the latest version of the data-acquisition software, and
- at the temperature of the Neon triple points with three plateaux realized in cell Ec2Ne of known isotopic composition, in the same cryocooler and the same software..
Procedure and results:
Initial calibration: In 2005, with thermometer 232324 still mounted inside the ICVGT, the 4.2 K 4He vapour pressure point was realized by liquefying some gas inside the gas bulb, just below the pressure transducer.
APPENDIX 5
The same equipment (pressure, capacitance, resistance) was used as for the ICVGT. The difference between the vapour pressure realization and the NPL calibration, TVP – TNPL, was found to be -0.09 mK, with an uncertainty (k=2) of 0.12 mK. Then, the thermometer was transferred to the “MULTICELLS” cryocooler where it was measured at the hydrogen and neon fixed points using the heat pulse method. The resistance value obtained at the hydrogen point was corrected for the known isotopic composition of the gas. In the absence of a CCT approved correction function for the isotopic composition of neon, no such correction has been applied, even though the isotopic composition of the gas is known, allowing to perform the correction after its formalization in the Technical Annexe to the mise en pratique of the kelvin.. The resistance values, at melted fraction F=1, were found to be R(e-H2) = 9.307746 Ω and R(Ne) = 11.021173 Ω. However, both values were affected by a rather high uncertainty of about 0.3 mK. Subsequently, some bugs were found in the data-acquisition program (then still under development), rendering these values unreliable. Just before carrying the thermometer to PTB, its resistance value at the TPW was determined as (90.489124 ± 0.000027) Ω. All INRIM and PTB measurements at the TPW include both the immersion and isotopic composition correction. All uncertainties given with ‘±’ are for k=2. November 2009, just before returning the thermometer to INRIM, PTB measured the resistance value at the TPW as (90.489200 ± 0.00030) Ω, and on its return to INRIM, at the end of 2009, its resistance value at the TPW was determined to be (90.489240 ± 0.000027) Ω. The difference between the two INRIM values is equivalent to (0.33 ± 0.11 mK), showing the stability of the thermometer during travel and mounting/dismounting for measurement. In 2010, the measurements at the ICVGT fixed points were repeated, with the difference that the 4He vapour pressure measurement was not performed in the former ICVGT bulb but in a separate apparatus, immersed directly in a helium dewar discharging to the atmosphere. Pressure measurements were performed with a RUSKA 7220, declared to be independent of the measuring gas. The RUSKA 7220 was compared in air with an older, calibrated, RUSKA 6200. The two instruments agreed to within the reading uncertainty. The13.8 K results were corrected for isotopic composition. The 2010 difference between the 4.2 K vapour pressure realization and the NPL calibration, TVP – TNPL, was found to be -0.01 mK, with an uncertainty (k=2) of 0.20 mK. Evidently, the calibration of thermometer 232324 has remained remarkably stable. Using the same cryocooler and the same sealed cells, but with the present version of the data-acquisition program and procedure, R(e-H2) and R(Ne) were found to be 9.307763 Ω and 11.021165 Ω, respectively. For as much the 2006 values were considered unreliable, the differences between the 2010 values and those of 2006 turned out to be within 0.08 ± 0.30 mK and 0.06 ± 0.35 mK, respectively, where the uncertainty values reflect mainly the repeatability of the plateaux.. Construction of the calibration function: After calibration, the differences in temperature at the INRIM fixed points with the original NPL calibration were then used to generate a quadratic polynomial dTcal(T), see Fig.1. The differences found for the hydrogen and neon point are mainly due to the different isotopic composition for these fixed points at INRIM and NPL. The temperature differences between the INRIM ICVGT and the NPL calibration (published in TMCSI 7 p. 125-1301), where the fixed points were taken from the NPL calibration, were fitted with a cubic polynomial, dTICVGT(T), see Fig.2.
1 In TMCSI the differences were given as T(NPL)-T(ICVGT).
The quantity [dTICVGT(T) - dTcal(T)] was then added to the original NPL calibration function of degree 10, to yield the final INRIM ICVGT calibration. The resulting values (R,T) were fitted with a polynomial of the same degree, see Fig.3.
The polynomial has the form ( )∑
−Ω
= 100
//
i
i BARcKT with coefficient values:
A 9 B 3 C0 12.35609 C6 –1.28777C1 13.47556 C7 -1.41377 C2 5.95298 C8 –0.05572C3 1.97411 C9 0.81367 C4 0.27622 C10 0.36226 C5 –0.43130
Fig.1 The correction function due to the calibration at the fixed points, dTcal(T), after return to INRIM, with respect to the original NPL function of RhFe232324.
Calibration correction function (INRIM-NPL)
-0.40
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
T / K
d T /
mK
Fig.2 The fit, dTICVGT(T), to the published data TICVGT-TNPL.
(T ICVGT-T NPL)/mK
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
T , K
d T,
mK
Fig.3 The net change due to the INRIM ICVGT results and the INRIM calibration at the fixed points, added to the original NPL calibration function (=dTICVGT(T) - Tcal(T)) to arrive at the INRIM calibration.
T ICVGT-T NPL
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
T / K
d T /
mK
Uncertainty budget: The main part of the ICVGT budget, as published, is retained, with the exception of the item ‘thermometer calibration’ since the fixed-point calibration is now obtained with INRIM-realized fixed points. The as-published value for this item of 0.25 mK is thus substituted by the actual uncertainty pertaining to the INRIM fixed point realization.
Table 1.Uncertainty budget as published, without fixed point contribution (k=1) / mK: Contribution Density = 300 mol/m3 Density = 184 mol/m3 Transducer 0.28 0.41 Pressure balance calibration 0.11 0.11 Masses calibration 0.02 0.02 Residual Pressure 0.01 0.01 Hydrostatic head 0.08 0.14 Transducer calibration 0.28 0.46 Gas purity 0.13 0.13 Capacitance standard 0.01 0.02 Capacitance bridge 0.13 0.20 Capacitance noise 0.10 0.16 Temperature control 0.20 0.20 Resistance bridge 0.01 0.01
TOTAL 0.51 0.73
TOTAL (k=2) 1.02 1.46
Considering the densities of the working gas applied (three runs out of four at close to 200 mol/m3), an overall uncertainty for the ICVGT measurements of 1.30 mK (k=2) seems appropriate.
Uncertainty budget for the fixed point measurements:
Table 2. 2005 4He vapour pressure point near 4.2 K (k=1), in mK: Contribution Value
RUSKA pressure balance (0.32 Pa) 0.003 Non-linearity room-temperature pressure transducer (0.40 Pa) 0.004 Readings room-temperature pressure transducer (0.11 Pa) 0.001 Zero stability room-temperature pressure transducer (0.0003 Pa) 0.000 Hydrostatic head (3 Pa) 0.030 Resistance measurement 0.050
Total (k=1) 0.06 Expanded (k=2) 0.12
Because of the unreliability of the 2005/6 values at the hydrogen and neon fixed points, no uncertainty budget is given for these.
Table 4. 2010 4He vapour pressure point near 4.2 K (k=1), in mK: Contribution Value
pressure reading/calibration 0.005 Hydrostatic effect (liquid) 0.070 Hydrostatic effect (gas) 0.040 Delay due to pressure change (atmospheric pressure) 0.050 Resistance measurement 0.020 Standard resistor calibration 0.020 Selfheating 0.020
Total (k=1) 0.10 Expanded (k=2) 0.20
Table 5. 2010 calibration at the e-H2 fixed point (k=1), in mK: Contribution Value
Plateau reproducibility 0.011 Ortho-para conversion 0.010 Thermal exchange with the shield 0.015 Impurity 0.030 Isotopic composition 0.006 Hydrostatic effect 0.003 Resistance measurement 0.010 Standard resistor calibration 0.020
Total (k=1) 0.043 Expanded (k=2) 0.09
Table 6. 2010 calibration at the Ne fixed point (k=1), in mK: Contribution Value
Plateau reproducibility 0.014 Thermal exchange with the shield 0.015 Impurity 0.075 Isotopic composition (scale definition) 0.140 Hydrostatic effect 0.019 Resistance measurement 0.010 Standard resistor calibration 0.020
Total (k=1) 0.163 Expanded (k=2) 0.32
Table 7. Total uncertainty budget (k=2) / mK: ICVGT as published (TMSCI 7, 125-130), from Table 1 1.30 Calibration a 4.2 K, from Table 4 0.20 Calibration at 13.8 K, from Table 5 0.09 Calibration at 24.6 K, from Table 6 0.32
TOTAL (using max contribution from propagation)
1.31
Fig.4 The propagation of the uncertainty deriving from the fixed point calibration
Additional information for thermometer 232324 (NPL certificate) for T< 2.6 K: x = ((R - 4.557101) - (5.713564 - R)) / (5.713564-4.55101)
T = 4th order polynomial in x with coefficients: C0 1.52899342 C1 1.03707949 C2 0.03557204 C3 0.00808965 C4 0.00001244
For T> 2.6 K the certificate gives: x = ((R - 5.713564) - (11.355637 - R)) / (11.355637-5.713564)
T = 10th order polynomial in x with coefficients: C0 10.40161756 C1 11.06574693 C2 4.49545720 C3 1.46898635 C4 0.24849810 C5 0.08345290 C6 -0.00178366 C7 -0.52204378 C8 -0.48889039 C9 0.14515427 C10 0.19615699
Propagation of (k =2) uncertainty from the fixed point calibration
0.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.35
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
T / K
dT /
mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 2.600056 0.114 0.158 0.326 PTB 229075 2.599807 0.114 -0.090 0.326 NPL 221485 2.599866 0.114 -0.032 0.326 VSL 226246 2.599862 0.114 -0.036 0.326
INRIM 232324 2.600022 0.500 0.124 1.027 INTiBS B178 2.600285 0.500 0.387 1.027
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 2.599898 0.116
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.248 0.461 0.190 0.461 0.194 0.461 0.034 1.077 -0.229 1.077
PTB 229075 -0.248 0.461 -0.058 0.461 -0.054 0.461 -0.214 1.077 -0.477 1.077
NPL 221485 -0.190 0.461 0.058 0.461 0.004 0.461 -0.156 1.077 -0.419 1.077
VSL 226246 -0.194 0.461 0.054 0.461 -0.004 0.461 -0.160 1.077 -0.423 1.077
INRIM 232324 -0.034 1.077 0.214 1.077 0.156 1.077 0.160 1.077 -0.263 1.452
INTiBS B178 0.229 1.077 0.477 1.077 0.419 1.077 0.423 1.077 0.263 1.452
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 2.60 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
APPENDIX 7
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 2.693888 0.113 0.259 0.324 PTB 229075 2.693477 0.113 -0.152 0.324 NPL 221485 2.693587 0.113 -0.042 0.324 VSL 226246 2.693564 0.113 -0.065 0.324
INRIM 232324 2.693689 0.500 0.060 1.027 INTiBS B178 2.694067 0.500 0.438 1.027
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 2.693629 0.116
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.411 0.459 0.301 0.459 0.324 0.459 0.199 1.077 -0.179 1.077
PTB 229075 -0.411 0.459 -0.110 0.459 -0.087 0.459 -0.212 1.077 -0.590 1.077
NPL 221485 -0.301 0.459 0.110 0.459 0.023 0.459 -0.102 1.077 -0.480 1.077
VSL 226246 -0.324 0.459 0.087 0.459 -0.023 0.459 -0.125 1.077 -0.503 1.077
INRIM 232324 -0.199 1.077 0.212 1.077 0.102 1.077 0.125 1.077 -0.378 1.452
INTiBS B178 0.179 1.077 0.590 1.077 0.480 1.077 0.503 1.077 0.378 1.452
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 2.69 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 3.000859 0.110 0.084 0.320 PTB 229075 3.000765 0.110 -0.010 0.320 NPL 221485 3.000704 0.110 -0.071 0.320 VSL 226246 3.000771 0.110 -0.003 0.320
INRIM 232324 3.000781 0.500 0.006 1.027 INTiBS B178 3.000980 0.500 0.205 1.027
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
3.000775 0.116
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.094 0.452 0.155 0.452 0.087 0.452 0.078 1.075 -0.121 1.075
PTB 229075 -0.094 0.452
0.061 0.452 -0.007 0.452 -0.016 1.075 -0.215 1.075
NPL 221485 -0.155 0.452 -0.061 0.452
-0.068 0.452 -0.077 1.075 -0.276 1.075
VSL 226246 -0.087 0.452 0.007 0.452 0.068 0.452
-0.009 1.075 -0.208 1.075
INRIM 232324 -0.078 1.075 0.016 1.075 0.077 1.075 0.009 1.075 -0.199 1.452
INTiBS B178 0.121 1.075 0.215 1.075 0.276 1.075 0.208 1.075 0.199 1.452
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 3.00 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 3.095991 0.109 0.078 0.318 PTB 229075 3.095899 0.109 -0.015 0.318 NPL 221485 3.095844 0.109 -0.070 0.318 VSL 226246 3.095920 0.109 0.006 0.318
INRIM 232324 3.095965 0.500 0.051 1.027 INTiBS B178 3.096116 0.500 0.202 1.027
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
3.095913 0.116
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.093 0.450 0.148 0.450 0.072 0.450 0.027 1.075 -0.124 1.075
PTB 229075 -0.093 0.450
0.055 0.450 -0.021 0.450 -0.066 1.075 -0.217 1.075
NPL 221485 -0.148 0.450 -0.055 0.450
-0.076 0.450 -0.121 1.075 -0.272 1.075
VSL 226246 -0.072 0.450 0.021 0.450 0.076 0.450
-0.045 1.075 -0.196 1.075
INRIM 232324 -0.027 1.075 0.066 1.075 0.121 1.075 0.045 1.075 -0.151 1.452
INTiBS B178 0.124 1.075 0.217 1.075 0.272 1.075 0.196 1.075 0.151 1.452
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 3.10 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 3.401484 0.105 0.100 0.313 PTB 229075 3.401330 0.105 -0.053 0.313 NPL 221485 3.401326 0.105 -0.058 0.313 VSL 226246 3.401395 0.105 0.011 0.313
INRIM 232324 3.401559 0.500 0.176 1.027 INTiBS B178 3.401551 0.500 0.168 0.313
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 3.401384 0.116
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.153 0.443 0.158 0.443 0.089 0.443 -0.076 1.073 -0.068 1.073
PTB 229075 -0.153 0.443 0.005 0.443 -0.064 0.443 -0.229 1.073 -0.221 1.073
NPL 221485 -0.158 0.443 -0.005 0.443 -0.069 0.443 -0.234 1.073 -0.226 1.073
VSL 226246 -0.089 0.443 0.064 0.443 0.069 0.443 -0.165 1.073 -0.157 1.073
INRIM 232324 0.076 1.073 0.229 1.073 0.234 1.073 0.165 1.073 0.008 1.452
INTiBS B178 0.068 1.073 0.221 1.073 0.226 1.073 0.157 1.073 -0.008 1.452
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 3.40 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 3.799944 0.101 0.056 0.306 PTB 229075 3.799857 0.101 -0.032 0.306 NPL 221485 3.799827 0.101 -0.062 0.306 VSL 226246 3.799926 0.101 0.038 0.306
INRIM 232324 3.799967 0.500 0.078 1.026 INTiBS B178 3.800060 0.500 0.172 1.026
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 3.799888 0.115
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.088 0.433 0.118 0.433 0.018 0.433 -0.022 1.071 -0.116 1.071
PTB 229075 -0.088 0.433 0.030 0.433 -0.070 0.433 -0.110 1.071 -0.204 1.071
NPL 221485 -0.118 0.433 -0.030 0.433 -0.100 0.433 -0.140 1.071 -0.234 1.071
VSL 226246 -0.018 0.433 0.070 0.433 0.100 0.433 -0.040 1.071 -0.134 1.071
INRIM 232324 0.022 1.071 0.110 1.071 0.140 1.071 0.040 1.071 -0.094 1.451
INTiBS B178 0.116 1.071 0.204 1.071 0.234 1.071 0.134 1.071 0.094 1.451
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 3.80 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 4.200749 0.096 0.010 0.300 PTB 229075 4.200722 0.096 -0.017 0.300 NPL 221485 4.200690 0.096 -0.049 0.300 VSL 226246 4.200795 0.096 0.056 0.300
INRIM 232324 4.200551 0.650 -0.187 1.320 INTiBS B178 4.200916 0.500 0.177 1.026
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 4.200739 0.115
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.027 0.425 0.060 0.425 -0.046 0.425 0.198 1.354 -0.167 1.069
PTB 229075 -0.027 0.425 0.032 0.425 -0.073 0.425 0.170 1.354 -0.195 1.069
NPL 221485 -0.060 0.425 -0.032 0.425 -0.106 0.425 0.138 1.354 -0.227 1.069
VSL 226246 0.046 0.425 0.073 0.425 0.106 0.425 0.244 1.354 -0.121 1.069
INRIM 232324 -0.198 1.354 -0.170 1.354 -0.138 1.354 -0.244 1.354 -0.365 1.672
INTiBS B178 0.167 1.069 0.195 1.069 0.227 1.069 0.121 1.069 0.365 1.672
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 4.2007 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 4.201251 0.096 0.064 0.300 PTB 229075 4.201160 0.096 -0.027 0.300 NPL 221485 4.201112 0.096 -0.075 0.300 VSL 226246 4.201225 0.096 0.038 0.300
INRIM 232324 4.200934 0.650 -0.253 1.320 INTiBS B178 4.201447 0.500 0.260 1.026
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
4.201187 0.115
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.091 0.425 0.139 0.425 0.026 0.425 0.317 1.354 -0.196 1.069
PTB 229075 -0.091 0.425
0.048 0.425 -0.065 0.425 0.226 1.354 -0.287 1.069
NPL 221485 -0.139 0.425 -0.048 0.425
-0.113 0.425 0.178 1.354 -0.335 1.069
VSL 226246 -0.026 0.425 0.065 0.425 0.113 0.425
0.291 1.354 -0.222 1.069
INRIM 232324 -0.317 1.354 -0.226 1.354 -0.178 1.354 -0.291 1.354 -0.513 1.672
INTiBS B178 0.196 1.069 0.287 1.069 0.335 1.069 0.222 1.069 0.513 1.672
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 4.2012 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 4.487304 0.098 0.100 0.302 PTB 229075 4.487088 0.098 -0.117 0.302 NPL 221485 4.487178 0.098 -0.026 0.302 VSL 226246 4.487248 0.098 0.043 0.302
INRIM 232324 4.487043 0.650 -0.161 1.320 INTiBS B178 4.487546 0.500 0.342 1.026
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 4.487204 0.115
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.217 0.427 0.126 0.427 0.057 0.427 0.261 1.354 -0.242 1.070
PTB 229075 -0.217 0.427 -0.091 0.427 -0.160 0.427 0.044 1.354 -0.459 1.070
NPL 221485 -0.126 0.427 0.091 0.427 -0.069 0.427 0.135 1.354 -0.368 1.070
VSL 226246 -0.057 0.427 0.160 0.427 0.069 0.427 0.204 1.354 -0.299 1.070
INRIM 232324 -0.261 1.354 -0.044 1.354 -0.135 1.354 -0.204 1.354 -0.503 1.672
INTiBS B178 0.242 1.070 0.459 1.070 0.368 1.070 0.299 1.070 0.503 1.672
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 4.49 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 4.997478 0.100 0.071 0.307 PTB 229075 4.997339 0.100 -0.069 0.307 NPL 221485 4.997384 0.100 -0.024 0.307 VSL 226246 4.997429 0.100 0.021 0.307
INRIM 232324 4.997277 0.650 -0.130 1.321 INTiBS B178 4.997821 0.500 0.414 1.027
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 4.997407 0.116
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.140 0.434 0.095 0.434 0.050 0.434 0.201 1.356 -0.343 1.071
PTB 229075 -0.140 0.434 -0.045 0.434 -0.090 0.434 0.061 1.356 -0.483 1.071
NPL 221485 -0.095 0.434 0.045 0.434 -0.045 0.434 0.106 1.356 -0.438 1.071
VSL 226246 -0.050 0.434 0.090 0.434 0.045 0.434 0.151 1.356 -0.393 1.071
INRIM 232324 -0.201 1.356 -0.061 1.356 -0.106 1.356 -0.151 1.356 -0.544 1.673
INTiBS B178 0.343 1.071 0.483 1.071 0.438 1.071 0.393 1.071 0.544 1.673
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 5.00 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 5.496228 0.103 -0.003 0.312 PTB 229075 5.496207 0.103 -0.024 0.312 NPL 221485 5.496210 0.103 -0.021 0.312 VSL 226246 5.496279 0.103 0.048 0.312
INRIM 232324 5.496270 0.650 0.040 1.321 INTiBS B178 5.496616 0.500 0.385 1.027
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 5.496231 0.117
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.021 0.441 0.018 0.441 -0.051 0.441 -0.043 1.357 -0.388 1.073
PTB 229075 -0.021 0.441 -0.003 0.441 -0.072 0.441 -0.064 1.357 -0.409 1.073
NPL 221485 -0.018 0.441 0.003 0.441 -0.069 0.441 -0.061 1.357 -0.406 1.073
VSL 226246 0.051 0.441 0.072 0.441 0.069 0.441 0.008 1.357 -0.337 1.073
INRIM 232324 0.043 1.357 0.064 1.357 0.061 1.357 -0.008 1.357 -0.345 1.673
INTiBS B178 0.388 1.073 0.409 1.073 0.406 1.073 0.337 1.073 0.345 1.673
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 5.50 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 5.975307 0.105 0.088 0.316 PTB 229075 5.975145 0.105 -0.074 0.316 NPL 221485 5.975214 0.105 -0.005 0.316 VSL 226246 5.975210 0.105 -0.008 0.316
INRIM 232324 5.975446 0.650 0.227 1.321 INTiBS B178 5.975619 0.500 0.400 1.027
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 5.975219 0.118
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.162 0.447 0.093 0.447 0.096 0.447 -0.139 1.359 -0.312 1.075
PTB 229075 -0.162 0.447 -0.069 0.447 -0.066 0.447 -0.301 1.359 -0.474 1.075
NPL 221485 -0.093 0.447 0.069 0.447 0.003 0.447 -0.232 1.359 -0.405 1.075
VSL 226246 -0.096 0.447 0.066 0.447 -0.003 0.447 -0.235 1.359 -0.408 1.075
INRIM 232324 0.139 1.359 0.301 1.359 0.232 1.359 0.235 1.359 -0.173 1.674
INTiBS B178 0.312 1.075 0.474 1.075 0.405 1.075 0.408 1.075 0.173 1.674
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 5.98 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 6.570249 0.108 0.124 0.322 PTB 229075 6.570051 0.108 -0.074 0.322 NPL 221485 6.570109 0.108 -0.015 0.322 VSL 226246 6.570088 0.108 -0.036 0.322
INRIM 232324 6.570472 0.650 0.348 1.322 INTiBS B178 6.570444 0.500 0.319 1.028
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
6.570124 0.119
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.198 0.455 0.139 0.455 0.160 0.455 -0.224 1.360 -0.195 1.077
PTB 229075 -0.198 0.455
-0.059 0.455 -0.038 0.455 -0.422 1.360 -0.393 1.077
NPL 221485 -0.139 0.455 0.059 0.455
0.021 0.455 -0.363 1.360 -0.334 1.077
VSL 226246 -0.160 0.455 0.038 0.455 -0.021 0.455
-0.384 1.360 -0.355 1.077
INRIM 232324 0.224 1.360 0.422 1.360 0.363 1.360 0.384 1.360 0.029 1.674
INTiBS B178 0.195 1.077 0.393 1.077 0.334 1.077 0.355 1.077 -0.029 1.674
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 6.57 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 7.180111 0.111 0.099 0.327 PTB 229075 7.179792 0.111 -0.220 0.327 NPL 221481 7.180250 0.111 0.238 0.327 NPL 221485 7.180005 0.111 -0.008 0.327 VSL 226246 7.179904 0.111 -0.109 0.327
INRIM 232324 7.180392 0.650 0.380 1.322 INRIM B190 7.180355 0.500 0.343 1.028 INTiBS B178 7.180200 0.500 0.188 1.028
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 7.180012 0.120
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.319 0.463 -0.139 0.463 0.107 0.463 0.208 0.463 -0.281 1.362 -0.244 1.079 -0.089 1.079
PTB 229075 -0.319 0.463 -0.458 0.463 -0.212 0.463 -0.111 0.463 -0.600 1.362 -0.563 1.079 -0.408 1.079
NPL 221481 0.139 0.463 0.458 0.463 0.246 0.463 0.347 0.463 -0.142 1.362 -0.105 1.079 0.050 1.079
NPL 221485 -0.107 0.463 0.212 0.463 -0.246 0.463 0.101 0.463 -0.388 1.362 -0.351 1.079 -0.196 1.079
VSL 226246 -0.208 0.463 0.111 0.463 -0.347 0.463 -0.101 0.463 -0.489 1.362 -0.452 1.079 -0.297 1.079
INRIM 232324 0.281 1.362 0.600 1.362 0.142 1.362 0.388 1.362 0.489 1.362 0.037 1.675 0.192 1.675
INRIM B190 0.244 1.079 0.563 1.079 0.105 1.079 0.351 1.079 0.452 1.079 -0.037 1.675 0.155 1.454
INTiBS B178 0.089 1.079 0.408 1.079 -0.050 1.079 0.196 1.079 0.297 1.079 -0.192 1.675 -0.155 1.454
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 7.18 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 8.273941 0.117 0.067 0.338 PTB 229075 8.273700 0.117 -0.174 0.338 NPL 221481 8.274059 0.117 0.185 0.338 NPL 221485 8.273814 0.117 -0.060 0.338 VSL 226246 8.273855 0.117 -0.019 0.338
INRIM 232324 8.274068 0.650 0.194 1.323 INRIM B190 8.273981 0.500 0.107 1.029 INTiBS B178 8.273904 0.500 0.030 1.029
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
8.273874 0.122
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.241 0.478 -0.118 0.478 0.127 0.478 0.086 0.478 -0.127 1.365 -0.040 1.083 0.037 1.083
PTB 229075 -0.241 0.478
-0.359 0.478 -0.114 0.478 -0.155 0.478 -0.368 1.365 -0.281 1.083 -0.204 1.083
NPL 221481 0.118 0.478 0.359 0.478
0.245 0.478 0.204 0.478 -0.009 1.365 0.078 1.083 0.155 1.083
NPL 221485 -0.127 0.478 0.114 0.478 -0.245 0.478
-0.041 0.478 -0.254 1.365 -0.167 1.083 -0.090 1.083
VSL 226246 -0.086 0.478 0.155 0.478 -0.204 0.478 0.041 0.478 -0.213 1.365 -0.126 1.083 -0.049 1.083
INRIM 232324 0.127 1.365 0.368 1.365 0.009 1.365 0.254 1.365 0.213 1.365 0.087 1.676 0.164 1.676
INRIM B190 0.040 1.083 0.281 1.083 -0.078 1.083 0.167 1.083 0.126 1.083 -0.087 1.676 0.077 1.456
INTiBS B178 -0.037 1.083 0.204 1.083 -0.155 1.083 0.090 1.083 0.049 1.083 -0.164 1.676 -0.077 1.456
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 8.27 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 9.465861 0.123 0.074 0.349 PTB 229075 9.465626 0.123 -0.162 0.349 NPL 221481 9.465858 0.123 0.071 0.349 NPL 221485 9.465754 0.123 -0.033 0.349 VSL 226246 9.465837 0.123 0.050 0.349
INRIM 232324 9.465786 0.650 -0.001 1.323 INRIM B190 9.465716 0.500 -0.071 1.030 INTiBS B178 9.466012 0.500 0.225 1.030
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 9.465787 0.124
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.236 0.493 0.003 0.493 0.107 0.493 0.024 0.493 0.075 1.369 0.145 1.088 -0.151 1.088
PTB 229075 -0.236 0.493 -0.233 0.493 -0.129 0.493 -0.212 0.493 -0.161 1.369 -0.091 1.088 -0.387 1.088
NPL 221481 -0.003 0.493 0.233 0.493 0.104 0.493 0.021 0.493 0.072 1.369 0.142 1.088 -0.154 1.088
NPL 221485 -0.107 0.493 0.129 0.493 -0.104 0.493 -0.083 0.493 -0.032 1.369 0.038 1.088 -0.258 1.088
VSL 226246 -0.024 0.493 0.212 0.493 -0.021 0.493 0.083 0.493 0.051 1.369 0.121 1.088 -0.175 1.088
INRIM 232324 -0.075 1.369 0.161 1.369 -0.072 1.369 0.032 1.369 -0.051 1.369 0.070 1.677 -0.226 1.677
INRIM B190 -0.145 1.088 0.091 1.088 -0.142 1.088 -0.038 1.088 -0.121 1.088 -0.070 1.677 -0.296 1.457
INTiBS B178 0.151 1.088 0.387 1.088 0.154 1.088 0.258 1.088 0.175 1.088 0.226 1.677 0.296 1.457
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 9.47 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 10.770159 0.129 0.086 0.386 PTB 229075 10.769854 0.129 -0.219 0.386 NPL 221481 10.770134 0.129 0.060 0.386 NPL 221485 10.770073 0.129 -0.001 0.386 VSL 226246 10.770147 0.129 0.074 0.386
INRIM 232324 10.770108 0.650 0.035 1.331 INRIM B190 10.770097 0.500 0.024 1.040 INTiBS B178 10.770608 0.500 0.534 1.040
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
10.770073 0.143
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.305 0.545 0.026 0.545 0.087 0.545 0.012 0.545 0.051 1.386 0.062 1.109 -0.448 1.109
PTB 229075 -0.305 0.545
-0.279 0.545 -0.218 0.545 -0.293 0.545 -0.254 1.386 -0.243 1.109 -0.753 1.109
NPL 221481 -0.026 0.545 0.279 0.545
0.061 0.545 -0.014 0.545 0.025 1.386 0.036 1.109 -0.474 1.109
NPL 221485 -0.087 0.545 0.218 0.545 -0.061 0.545
-0.075 0.545 -0.036 1.386 -0.025 1.109 -0.535 1.109
VSL 226246 -0.012 0.545 0.293 0.545 0.014 0.545 0.075 0.545 0.039 1.386 0.050 1.109 -0.460 1.109
INRIM 232324 -0.051 1.386 0.254 1.386 -0.025 1.386 0.036 1.386 -0.039 1.386 0.011 1.689 -0.499 1.689
INRIM B190 -0.062 1.109 0.243 1.109 -0.036 1.109 0.025 1.109 -0.050 1.109 -0.011 1.689 -0.510 1.471
INTiBS B178 0.448 1.109 0.753 1.109 0.474 1.109 0.535 1.109 0.460 1.109 0.499 1.689 0.510 1.471
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 10.77 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 11.771342 0.135 0.016 0.414 PTB 229075 11.771159 0.135 -0.167 0.414 NPL 221481 11.771374 0.135 0.048 0.414 NPL 221485 11.771335 0.135 0.009 0.414 VSL 226246 11.771420 0.135 0.094 0.414
INRIM 232324 11.771339 0.650 0.013 1.337 INRIM B190 11.771447 0.500 0.122 1.048 INTiBS B178 11.771843 0.500 0.517 1.048
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 11.771326 0.157
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.183 0.585 -0.032 0.585 0.007 0.585 -0.078 0.585 0.003 1.400 -0.106 1.127 -0.501 1.127
PTB 229075 -0.183 0.585 -0.215 0.585 -0.176 0.585 -0.261 0.585 -0.180 1.400 -0.289 1.127 -0.684 1.127
NPL 221481 0.032 0.585 0.215 0.585 0.039 0.585 -0.046 0.585 0.035 1.400 -0.074 1.127 -0.469 1.127
NPL 221485 -0.007 0.585 0.176 0.585 -0.039 0.585 -0.085 0.585 -0.004 1.400 -0.113 1.127 -0.508 1.127
VSL 226246 0.078 0.585 0.261 0.585 0.046 0.585 0.085 0.585 0.081 1.400 -0.028 1.127 -0.423 1.127
INRIM 232324 -0.003 1.400 0.180 1.400 -0.035 1.400 0.004 1.400 -0.081 1.400 -0.109 1.699 -0.504 1.699
INRIM B190 0.106 1.127 0.289 1.127 0.074 1.127 0.113 1.127 0.028 1.127 0.109 1.699 -0.395 1.482
INTiBS B178 0.501 1.127 0.684 1.127 0.469 1.127 0.508 1.127 0.423 1.127 0.504 1.699 0.395 1.482
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 11.77 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 12.277640 0.137 0.048 0.428 PTB 229075 12.277385 0.137 -0.207 0.428 NPL 221481 12.277666 0.137 0.074 0.428 NPL 221485 12.277590 0.137 -0.002 0.428 VSL 226246 12.277678 0.137 0.087 0.428
INRIM 232324 12.277586 0.650 -0.006 1.341 INRIM B190 12.277765 0.500 0.173 1.052 INTiBS B178 12.278195 0.500 0.603 1.052
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
12.277592 0.164
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.255 0.605 -0.026 0.605 0.050 0.605 -0.039 0.605 0.054 1.407 -0.125 1.136 -0.555 1.136
PTB 229075 -0.255 0.605
-0.281 0.605 -0.205 0.605 -0.294 0.605 -0.201 1.407 -0.380 1.136 -0.810 1.136
NPL 221481 0.026 0.605 0.281 0.605
0.076 0.605 -0.013 0.605 0.080 1.407 -0.099 1.136 -0.529 1.136
NPL 221485 -0.050 0.605 0.205 0.605 -0.076 0.605
-0.089 0.605 0.004 1.407 -0.175 1.136 -0.605 1.136
VSL 226246 0.039 0.605 0.294 0.605 0.013 0.605 0.089 0.605 0.093 1.407 -0.086 1.136 -0.516 1.136
INRIM 232324 -0.054 1.407 0.201 1.407 -0.080 1.407 -0.004 1.407 -0.093 1.407 -0.179 1.704 -0.609 1.704
INRIM B190 0.125 1.136 0.380 1.136 0.099 1.136 0.175 1.136 0.086 1.136 0.179 1.704 -0.430 1.488
INTiBS B178 0.555 1.136 0.810 1.136 0.529 1.136 0.605 1.136 0.516 1.136 0.609 1.704 0.430 1.488
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 12.28 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 13.772939 0.145 0.082 0.472 PTB 229075 13.772689 0.145 -0.168 0.472 NPL 221481 13.772907 0.145 0.050 0.472 NPL 221485 13.772848 0.145 -0.009 0.472 VSL 226246 13.772903 0.145 0.046 0.472
INRIM 232324 13.772586 0.650 -0.272 1.352 INRIM B190 13.773232 0.500 0.375 1.067 INTiBS B178 13.773658 0.500 0.801 1.067
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 13.772857 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.250 0.667 0.032 0.667 0.091 0.667 0.036 0.667 0.354 1.432 -0.293 1.167 -0.719 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.250 0.667 -0.218 0.667 -0.159 0.667 -0.214 0.667 0.104 1.432 -0.543 1.167 -0.969 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.032 0.667 0.218 0.667 0.059 0.667 0.004 0.667 0.322 1.432 -0.325 1.167 -0.751 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.091 0.667 0.159 0.667 -0.059 0.667 -0.055 0.667 0.263 1.432 -0.384 1.167 -0.810 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.036 0.667 0.214 0.667 -0.004 0.667 0.055 0.667 0.318 1.432 -0.329 1.167 -0.755 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.354 1.432 -0.104 1.432 -0.322 1.432 -0.263 1.432 -0.318 1.432 -0.647 1.722 -1.073 1.722
INRIM B190 0.293 1.167 0.543 1.167 0.325 1.167 0.384 1.167 0.329 1.167 0.647 1.722 -0.426 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.719 1.167 0.969 1.167 0.751 1.167 0.810 1.167 0.755 1.167 1.073 1.722 0.426 1.509
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 13.77 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 15.471308 0.145 0.144 0.472 PTB 229075 15.471092 0.145 -0.072 0.472 NPL 221481 15.471207 0.145 0.043 0.472 NPL 221485 15.471025 0.145 -0.139 0.472 VSL 226246 15.471188 0.145 0.024 0.472
INRIM 232324 15.470740 0.650 -0.424 1.352 INRIM B190 15.471529 0.500 0.365 1.067 INTiBS B178 15.471994 0.500 0.830 1.067
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
15.471164 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.216 0.667 0.101 0.667 0.283 0.667 0.120 0.667 0.568 1.432 -0.221 1.167 -0.686 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.216 0.667
-0.115 0.667 0.067 0.667 -0.096 0.667 0.352 1.432 -0.437 1.167 -0.902 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.101 0.667 0.115 0.667
0.182 0.667 0.019 0.667 0.467 1.432 -0.322 1.167 -0.787 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.283 0.667 -0.067 0.667 -0.182 0.667
-0.163 0.667 0.285 1.432 -0.504 1.167 -0.969 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.120 0.667 0.096 0.667 -0.019 0.667 0.163 0.667 0.448 1.432 -0.341 1.167 -0.806 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.568 1.432 -0.352 1.432 -0.467 1.432 -0.285 1.432 -0.448 1.432 -0.789 1.722 -1.254 1.722
INRIM B190 0.221 1.167 0.437 1.167 0.322 1.167 0.504 1.167 0.341 1.167 0.789 1.722 -0.465 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.686 1.167 0.902 1.167 0.787 1.167 0.969 1.167 0.806 1.167 1.254 1.722 0.465 1.509
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 15.47 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 16.979774 0.145 0.156 0.472 PTB 229075 16.979451 0.145 -0.167 0.472 NPL 221481 16.979655 0.145 0.036 0.472 NPL 221485 16.979647 0.145 0.028 0.472 VSL 226246 16.979565 0.145 -0.054 0.472
INRIM 232324 16.979037 0.650 -0.582 1.352 INRIM B190 16.979865 0.500 0.247 1.067 INTiBS B178 16.980530 0.500 0.912 1.067
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 16.979618 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.323 0.667 0.120 0.667 0.128 0.667 0.210 0.667 0.738 1.432 -0.091 1.167 -0.756 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.323 0.667 -0.203 0.667 -0.195 0.667 -0.113 0.667 0.415 1.432 -0.414 1.167 -1.079 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.120 0.667 0.203 0.667 0.008 0.667 0.090 0.667 0.618 1.432 -0.211 1.167 -0.876 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.128 0.667 0.195 0.667 -0.008 0.667 0.082 0.667 0.610 1.432 -0.219 1.167 -0.884 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.210 0.667 0.113 0.667 -0.090 0.667 -0.082 0.667 0.528 1.432 -0.301 1.167 -0.966 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.738 1.432 -0.415 1.432 -0.618 1.432 -0.610 1.432 -0.528 1.432 -0.829 1.722 -1.494 1.722
INRIM B190 0.091 1.167 0.414 1.167 0.211 1.167 0.219 1.167 0.301 1.167 0.829 1.722 -0.665 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.756 1.167 1.079 1.167 0.876 1.167 0.884 1.167 0.966 1.167 1.494 1.722 0.665 1.509
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 16.98 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 18.571303 0.145 0.279 0.472 PTB 229075 18.570716 0.145 -0.308 0.472 NPL 221481 18.571139 0.145 0.115 0.472 NPL 221485 18.571036 0.145 0.012 0.472 VSL 226246 18.570927 0.145 -0.097 0.472
INRIM 232324 18.570379 0.650 -0.645 1.352 INRIM B190 18.571401 0.500 0.377 1.067 INTiBS B178 18.571775 0.500 0.751 1.067
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
18.571024 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.587 0.667 0.164 0.667 0.267 0.667 0.376 0.667 0.924 1.432 -0.098 1.167 -0.472 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.587 0.667
-0.423 0.667 -0.320 0.667 -0.211 0.667 0.337 1.432 -0.685 1.167 -1.059 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.164 0.667 0.423 0.667
0.103 0.667 0.212 0.667 0.760 1.432 -0.262 1.167 -0.636 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.267 0.667 0.320 0.667 -0.103 0.667
0.109 0.667 0.657 1.432 -0.365 1.167 -0.739 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.376 0.667 0.211 0.667 -0.212 0.667 -0.109 0.667 0.548 1.432 -0.474 1.167 -0.848 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.924 1.432 -0.337 1.432 -0.760 1.432 -0.657 1.432 -0.548 1.432 -1.022 1.722 -1.396 1.722
INRIM B190 0.098 1.167 0.685 1.167 0.262 1.167 0.365 1.167 0.474 1.167 1.022 1.722 -0.374 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.472 1.167 1.059 1.167 0.636 1.167 0.739 1.167 0.848 1.167 1.396 1.722 0.374 1.509
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 18.57 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 20.275031 0.145 0.125 0.472 PTB 229075 20.274723 0.145 -0.183 0.472 NPL 221481 20.274945 0.145 0.039 0.472 NPL 221485 20.274869 0.145 -0.037 0.472 VSL 226246 20.274963 0.145 0.057 0.472
INRIM 232324 20.274286 0.650 -0.620 1.352 INRIM B190 20.275200 0.500 0.294 1.067 INTiBS B178 20.275673 0.500 0.767 1.067
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
20.274906 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.308 0.667 0.086 0.667 0.162 0.667 0.068 0.667 0.745 1.432 -0.169 1.167 -0.642 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.308 0.667
-0.222 0.667 -0.146 0.667 -0.240 0.667 0.437 1.432 -0.477 1.167 -0.950 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.086 0.667 0.222 0.667
0.076 0.667 -0.018 0.667 0.659 1.432 -0.255 1.167 -0.728 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.162 0.667 0.146 0.667 -0.076 0.667
-0.094 0.667 0.583 1.432 -0.331 1.167 -0.804 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.068 0.667 0.240 0.667 0.018 0.667 0.094 0.667 0.677 1.432 -0.237 1.167 -0.710 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.745 1.432 -0.437 1.432 -0.659 1.432 -0.583 1.432 -0.677 1.432 -0.914 1.722 -1.387 1.722
INRIM B190 0.169 1.167 0.477 1.167 0.255 1.167 0.331 1.167 0.237 1.167 0.914 1.722 -0.473 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.642 1.167 0.950 1.167 0.728 1.167 0.804 1.167 0.710 1.167 1.387 1.722 0.473 1.509
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 20.27 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 21.556442 0.145 0.063 0.472 PTB 229075 21.556166 0.145 -0.212 0.472 NPL 221481 21.556438 0.145 0.060 0.472 NPL 221485 21.556294 0.145 -0.084 0.472 VSL 226246 21.556551 0.145 0.172 0.472
INRIM 232324 21.555771 0.650 -0.607 1.352 INRIM B190 21.556647 0.500 0.269 1.067 INTiBS B178 21.556998 0.500 0.620 1.067
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
21.556378 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.275 0.667 0.003 0.667 0.147 0.667 -0.109 0.667 0.670 1.432 -0.206 1.167 -0.557 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.275 0.667
-0.272 0.667 -0.128 0.667 -0.384 0.667 0.395 1.432 -0.481 1.167 -0.832 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.003 0.667 0.272 0.667
0.144 0.667 -0.112 0.667 0.667 1.432 -0.209 1.167 -0.560 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.147 0.667 0.128 0.667 -0.144 0.667
-0.256 0.667 0.523 1.432 -0.353 1.167 -0.704 1.167
VSL 226246 0.109 0.667 0.384 0.667 0.112 0.667 0.256 0.667 0.779 1.432 -0.097 1.167 -0.448 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.670 1.432 -0.395 1.432 -0.667 1.432 -0.523 1.432 -0.779 1.432 -0.876 1.722 -1.227 1.722
INRIM B190 0.206 1.167 0.481 1.167 0.209 1.167 0.353 1.167 0.097 1.167 0.876 1.722 -0.351 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.557 1.167 0.832 1.167 0.560 1.167 0.704 1.167 0.448 1.167 1.227 1.722 0.351 1.509
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 21.56 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 22.673865 0.145 0.121 0.472 PTB 229075 22.673561 0.145 -0.183 0.472 NPL 221481 22.673809 0.145 0.065 0.472 NPL 221485 22.673668 0.145 -0.076 0.472 VSL 226246 22.673817 0.145 0.073 0.472
INRIM 232324 22.673487 0.650 -0.257 1.352 INRIM B190 22.674009 0.500 0.265 1.067 INTiBS B178 22.674596 0.500 0.852 1.067
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
22.673744 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.304 0.667 0.056 0.667 0.197 0.667 0.048 0.667 0.378 1.432 -0.144 1.167 -0.731 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.304 0.667
-0.248 0.667 -0.107 0.667 -0.256 0.667 0.074 1.432 -0.448 1.167 -1.035 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.056 0.667 0.248 0.667
0.141 0.667 -0.008 0.667 0.322 1.432 -0.200 1.167 -0.787 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.197 0.667 0.107 0.667 -0.141 0.667
-0.149 0.667 0.181 1.432 -0.341 1.167 -0.928 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.048 0.667 0.256 0.667 0.008 0.667 0.149 0.667 0.330 1.432 -0.192 1.167 -0.779 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.378 1.432 -0.074 1.432 -0.322 1.432 -0.181 1.432 -0.330 1.432 -0.522 1.722 -1.109 1.722
INRIM B190 0.144 1.167 0.448 1.167 0.200 1.167 0.341 1.167 0.192 1.167 0.522 1.722 -0.587 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.731 1.167 1.035 1.167 0.787 1.167 0.928 1.167 0.779 1.167 1.109 1.722 0.587 1.509
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 22.67 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 24.463979 0.145 0.081 0.472 PTB 229075 24.463750 0.145 -0.147 0.472 NPL 221481 24.463988 0.145 0.090 0.472 NPL 221485 24.463763 0.145 -0.134 0.472 VSL 226246 24.464007 0.145 0.109 0.472
INRIM 232324 24.464204 0.650 0.307 1.352 INRIM B190 24.464344 0.500 0.446 1.067 INTiBS B178 24.464742 0.500 0.844 1.067
TKCVR / K
ucomp / mK
24.463897 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij
/ mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.228 0.667 -0.009 0.667 0.215 0.667 -0.028 0.667 -0.226 1.432 -0.365 1.167 -0.763 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.228 0.667
-0.237 0.667 -0.013 0.667 -0.256 0.667 -0.454 1.432 -0.593 1.167 -0.991 1.167
NPL 221481 0.009 0.667 0.237 0.667
0.224 0.667 -0.019 0.667 -0.217 1.432 -0.356 1.167 -0.754 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.215 0.667 0.013 0.667 -0.224 0.667
-0.243 0.667 -0.441 1.432 -0.580 1.167 -0.978 1.167
VSL 226246 0.028 0.667 0.256 0.667 0.019 0.667 0.243 0.667 -0.198 1.432 -0.337 1.167 -0.735 1.167
INRIM 232324 0.226 1.432 0.454 1.432 0.217 1.432 0.441 1.432 0.198 1.432 -0.139 1.722 -0.537 1.722
INRIM B190 0.365 1.167 0.593 1.167 0.356 1.167 0.580 1.167 0.337 1.167 0.139 1.722 -0.398 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.763 1.167 0.991 1.167 0.754 1.167 0.978 1.167 0.735 1.167 0.537 1.722 0.398 1.509
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 24.46 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK
EURAMET.T-K1 table and graph of results, with bilateral degrees of equivalence
Thermometer Ti / K ui / mK Di / mK Ui / mK PTB 229074 24.944702 0.145 0.179 0.472 PTB 229075 24.944416 0.145 -0.107 0.472 NPL 221481 24.944445 0.145 -0.079 0.472 NPL 221485 24.944494 0.145 -0.029 0.472 VSL 226246 24.944560 0.145 0.037 0.472
INRIM 232324 24.944680 0.650 0.156 1.352 INRIM B190 24.944656 0.500 0.133 1.067 INTiBS B178 24.945232 0.500 0.709 1.067
TKCVR / K ucomp / mK 24.944523 0.186
Matrix of equivalences Differences and uncertainties: Dij = (Ti – Tj) and Uij (k = 2) in mK
Thermometer Lab, S/N j
PTB 229074 PTB 229075 NPL 221481 NPL 221485 VSL 226246 INRIM 232324 INRIM B190 INTiBS B178
Lab, S/N i Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij Dij Uij / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK / mK
PTB 229074 0.286 0.667 0.258 0.667 0.208 0.667 0.142 0.667 0.023 1.432 0.046 1.167 -0.530 1.167
PTB 229075 -0.286 0.667 -0.028 0.667 -0.078 0.667 -0.144 0.667 -0.263 1.432 -0.240 1.167 -0.816 1.167
NPL 221481 -0.258 0.667 0.028 0.667 -0.050 0.667 -0.116 0.667 -0.235 1.432 -0.212 1.167 -0.788 1.167
NPL 221485 -0.208 0.667 0.078 0.667 0.050 0.667 -0.066 0.667 -0.185 1.432 -0.162 1.167 -0.738 1.167
VSL 226246 -0.142 0.667 0.144 0.667 0.116 0.667 0.066 0.667 -0.119 1.432 -0.096 1.167 -0.672 1.167
INRIM 232324 -0.023 1.432 0.263 1.432 0.235 1.432 0.185 1.432 0.119 1.432 0.023 1.722 -0.553 1.722
INRIM B190 -0.046 1.167 0.240 1.167 0.212 1.167 0.162 1.167 0.096 1.167 -0.023 1.722 -0.576 1.509
INTiBS B178 0.530 1.167 0.816 1.167 0.788 1.167 0.738 1.167 0.672 1.167 0.553 1.722 0.576 1.509
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
PTB
229
074
PTB
229
075
NPL
221
481
NPL
221
485
VSL
2262
46
INR
IM 2
3232
4
INR
IM B
190
INTi
BS
B17
8
Di
/ mK
EURAMET.T-K1 : Nominal temperature, T90 = 24.94 KDegrees of equivalence, Di, and expanded uncertainties (k = 2), Ui, in mK