Date post: | 29-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | conrad-greenwood |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Eurocean November 2009 1/14
Marine knowledge in integrated maritime policy
Iain Shepherd European Commission
General Objective
To create the optimal conditions for the sustainable use of the oceans and seas, as well as the sustainable growth in maritime sectors and
coastal regions through the promotion of coherent and integrated decision making in
relation to the seas coastal regions and maritime industries.
Eurocean November 2009 2/14
Indicators
• GDP in maritime industries• meeting requirements of Marine Strategy
Framework Directive• Unemployment in coast
Eurocean November 2009 3/14
Specific Objective 1
To drive forward the shift from sectoral to holistic decision making in maritime
affairs at sea basin, Member state regional and international level, through the promotion of integrated governance
and spatial planning .
Eurocean November 2009 4/11
• Plans for• Arctic• Baltic• Mediterranean
Specific Objective 2
To increase operational efficiency, stimulate innovation and reduce uncertainty for those working on marine and maritime matters by
developing tools which cut across sea or coastal related sectoral policies, including the integration of cross-border and cross-sectoral surveillance activities through a
common information sharing environment and facilitating the sharing, re-use and
dissemination of marine data and knowledge to industry, public authorities
and the research community. Eurocean November 2009 5/14
EIONET, Guy Fawkes 2009 6/19
spending on marine monitoringorganisation turnover Data spend
SHOM 75 mil 24.8 mi
INSU CNRS n/a n/a
IRD 219 mil 6mil
IPEV 23 mil 20.7 mil
CNES 1423 mil 15 mil
CLS 24.54 mil n/a
IFREMER 230 mil 70 mil
E-SURFMAR 0.82million 0.13 mil
CETMEF 0.335 mil 0.134 mil
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris 34 mil 7.69 mil
SOMLIT n/a 1.3 mil
CNRS University de Perpignan 0.3million n/a
Université de la Rochelle, CRMM n/a n/a
Bureau Gravimetrique Int’l 0.15 mil 0.1125 mil
Total 1811.15 mil 139.9 mil
EIONET, Guy Fawkes 2009 7/19
What do they use it for?
reason private authority research otherbehaviour of the planet 8 18 62 35coastal protection 39 36 23 20exploit resources 42 15 17 15inform the public 8 40 29 45marine management 26 46 62 65national defence 0 10 1 0new developments 47 33 22 18promote or support tourism 0 3 1 5regulatory requirement 18 26 13 28safe navigation 32 31 4 10teaching students 8 4 23 8
EIONET, Guy Fawkes 2009 8/19
why marine data is underused
• Discovery of Data. – Especially difficult outside your own community
• Access to data. – Confidentiality – Desire of owners to exploit added-value themselves
• Use of data.– Often restricted to “research”
• Cost of data. – Landsat fiasco
• Coherence of Data. – Especially cross-disciplinary and cross-border
• Quality of Data. – Data unaccompanied by precision estimates is useless
• Quantity of Data. – Are we undersampling?
Marine Knowledge Objectives
• to reduce operational costs– private industry – public decision-making – marine scientific research
• to increase competition• to reduce uncertainty
Eurocean November 2009 9/14
GMES MyOcean 6 November 2009 10/9
what is going on now
Parameter collection assembling Application
bathymetry ur-EMODNET WISE marine
geology ur-EMODNET
physics GMES (space) GMES (except near coast) GMES
fisheries (including fisheries economy)
Data Collection Regulation JRC ICES
Chemistry ur-EMODNET WISE-Marine
biology ur-EMODNET WISE Marine
human activity (other than fisheries)
WISE Marine
coastal and maritime economy (except fisheries)
Eurostat
EIONET, Guy Fawkes 2009 11/19
tentative architectureAccredited data centres
1. the secure, long term, curation of key marine data sets 2. make available clear, searchable information on their data holdings.
European Disciplinary Groups
1. access to all raw observations held at data centres within that discipline
2. data layers indicating density of observation, quality of data, 3. seamless (gridded or polygon) data layers over whole sea basins.
Sea-Basin Checkpoints
1. check these data layers,2. ensure that the data from each disciplinary group are mutually
compatible 3. define priorities for further observations based on interaction with
local
Steering Committee
assemble the sea-basin priorities to draw up a set of overall priorities for further action
Secretariat 1. prepare meetings,2. manage contracts with the disciplinary groups and sea-basin
checkpoints, 3. ensure deadlines are met 4. prepare an annual report of activity to the Commission.
impact
IMPACT Cost or benefit assembling + collection
Reduced operational costs benefit €250 million
Increased competition benefit €60 million -
€200 millionReduced uncertainty benefit €220 million
Increased implementation costs
Cost €20 million €10million- €90million
Eurocean November 2009 12/14
Next steps
November 2009 Impact assessment BoardFebruary 2010 Commission Communication
Eurocean November 2009 13/14
• objectives – raise awareness– forge sea-basin identity– clarify spatial dimension of EU policies
• web-based• first version April 2010
Eurocean November 2009 14/11