Date post: | 15-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | august-godby |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
European Mortgage Markets after the Credit Crisis
Plenary Session 3ENHR Toulouse
7 July 2011
Kath ScanlonLondon School of Economics
Mortgage industries in the boom
•Mortgage market deregulation: new entrants, more competition
•New funding models
•Rising house prices ↓ (↑)•Proliferation of new mortgage
products
↓•Higher household indebtedness
The traditional mortgage
• Annuity (each payment contains both principal and interest)
• 20- to 25-year term• Maximum 80% loan-to-value ratio (in
some countries lower)• Maximum loan amount determined by
borrower income (2.5 to 3x annual income OR payment less than 30% of monthly income)
New products• Interest-only• Longer terms• Foreign currency• High loan-to-value ratios• High loan-to-income ratios• Self certification
All achieve lower monthly payments
Funding of mortgage lenders
Traditional• Retail deposits• Bonds
Innovative• Money markets
(inter-bank loans)
• Securitization (the norm in USA, less so elsewhere)
Consequences of changes in products and funding
• Eased affordability problems for borrowers
• Fuelled house-price increases• New products added to risk,
especially in combination• New funding models vulnerable
to credit market conditions
Outlook• If house prices continued to rise
and general economy remained healthy: Good
• If house prices fell and general economy deteriorated: Poor
Crisis timeline
• 2006: Housing transactions begin to fall in some countries
• 2007: House prices begin to fall in most countries
• 2008: Lehman Brothers collapse closes inter-bank lending markets
Banking & development industries after 2007
• Bank crisis and restructuring, including nationalisations, in many countries
• Not necessarily involving mortgage lenders or domestic housing markets—but reflecting new more globalised funding patterns
• Decline in housing starts and completions, leading to financial problems for developers.
Mortgages post-2007• Increases in defaults/arrears as job
losses hit• Borrowers could not remortgage
because of declines in house values and tighter lending criteria
• Lenders could not get funding so tightened credit availability
• Rollbacks/elimination of innovative products
Gross new residential mortgage lending: 07 to
08 Number of loans Value
Country Period 2007 month
or quarter
2008 month
or quarter
% change
Currency unit
2007 month
or quarter
2008 month
or quarter
% change
Ireland
Q4- Q4 37,719 18,706 - 50
Euros mn 8,282 3,359 - 59
Iceland Aug-Aug 1,347 653 - 52
Icelandic kroner mn 12,300 5,976 - 51
Russia Q4- Q4 395,000 (year)
386,300 (year) - 2.2
Russian rubles bn 192.6 96.3 - 50
Denmark* Dec-Dec
Danish kroner bn 84 43 - 49
UK Nov-Nov 80,500 33,000 - 59
UK pounds mn 22,160 12,000 - 46
Sweden** Nov-Nov
Swedish kroner mn 29,270 16,469 - 44
Portugal Nov-Nov
Euros mn 1,719 982 - 43
USA
Q4- Q4
US $ bn 481 277 - 42
Spain Dec-Dec 1,347,888 970,785 - 29
Euros mn 135,576 83,780 - 38
Australia Nov-Nov 65,842 49,810 - 24
Aus $ bn 15.5 12.6 - 19
Government policies: Dealing with effects
Developers• Financial assistance
to prevent bankruptcy and protect jobs
Low interest rates help both
Borrowers• Help with
mortgage payments
• Bans/limits on repossessions
• Sale/rent-back programs
The post-crisis period: 2009 onwards
• National experiences diverge• Some countries (Ireland, Spain)
still struggling• Others show signs of recovery
New residential mortgage lendinglate 2009 & late 2010
Number of loans Value
Country Period 2009 month/
qtr
2010 month/
qtr
%
Δ
Currency unit
2009 month/
qtr
2010 month/
qtr
%
Δ
Russia Nov-Nov 15,000 34,000 127% Russian rubles mn
7 42 541%
France Nov-Nov Euros bn 89 158 77% Belgium Nov-Nov 23,195 33,156 43% Euros mn 2,053 2,961 44% Poland Annual 189,000 230,000 22% Zlotys bn 39 48 23% Finland Nov-Nov Euros mn 1,383 1,679 21% Czech Nov-Nov 39,385 45,390 15% CZK bn 65,901 75,738 15% Sweden Nov-Nov SEK bn 1,839 2,002 9% Denmark Nov-Nov DKK bn 26 27 5% Slovenia Nov-Nov Euros mn 92 92 0% UK Nov-Nov 58,000 47,000 -19% UK £ mn 12,324 11,362 -8% Portugal Nov-Nov Euros mn 837 727 -13% Australia Nov-Nov Australian $ mn 24,243 20,385 -16% Ireland Q4-Q4 9,946 5,624 -43% Euros mn 1,760 982 -44% Spain Sept-Sept 702,714 585,070 -17%
Housing market transactions 2006=100
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Australia
Belgium
Czech
Denmark
Ireland
Finland
France
Netherlands
Norw ay
Portugal
Russia
Spain
Sw eden
UK
Changes in mortgage availability: market driven
Australia: Subprime mortgages no longer offered
UK: Lenders much more conservative—requiring higher down payments and documents verifying income
Ireland, Spain: Lenders have tightened criteria
Poland: Sharp change in domestic banks’ perception of exchange rate risk and credit risk for housing loans
Portugal: Higher-risk loan types less available; LTVs down
What should governments do?
• Has the market self-corrected? (CML: yes)• Is the answer better information?
(Shiller: yes)• Or do behavioural biases mean
consumers should be protected from themselves?
National regulations in placeInformation
Finland: Stress tests for borrowers at 6% interest rate, inform them about consequences of higher rates
Poland: More information for borrowers in foreign currencies
Lending practices
Netherlands: Tighter rules on loan-to-income ratios
Ireland: No loans to households in negative equity (subsequently loosened)
Sweden: LTVs capped at 85%
Poland: Increased collateral required for foreign-currency loans
EU proposal: Directive on Credit Agreements Relating to Residential Property
• Information to be provided through examples & info sheets, but also in a ‘personalised manner’
• Lenders should assess creditworthiness—member states invited to limit LTVs or LTIs
• Borrowers must be permitted to repay loans early, but lender may be entitled to ‘fair and objectively justified’ compensation
• Intermediaries & non-credit institutions to be licensed
Conclusions (1)
• Post-crisis developments depended on institutional and cultural factors in each country, as well as on global financial trends
• Mortgage lending is now growing again in most countries, especially eastern Europe, but continues to fall in some
Conclusions (2)• Lenders have become significantly
more conservative in their lending practices
• Governments (national and EU) have become more interventionist. New regulations 1. Limit ‘risky’ product types and loan
features2. Require lenders to provide more
information to consumers