European Thematic Network on Assistive Information andon Assistive Information andCommunication Technology
Third Workshop Creation of an ontology of
ICT-based assisitive productsTaastrup, Denmark, January 25-26, 2012
Danish Center for Assistive Technology
Index of the presentation
Overview of the ETNA progressThe Map or resourcesThe User-Rating prototype
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 - Meetings
DoneKick-off meeting (Webinar, January 14, 2011)1st Workshop (Milano, March 24-25, 2011)2nd Workshop (Maastricht, August 29-30, 2011)
In progress3rd Workshop (Copenaghen January 25-26 2012)3rd Workshop (Copenaghen, January 25 26, 2012)
Planned4th Workshop (Linz, July 10, 2012)5th Workshop (somewhere, 1st semester 2013)6th Workshop (Portugal, satellite AAATE 2013, 19-22 Sept 2013)
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 – Deliverables
DoneDel 1.1 > ETNA dissemination brochure (March 31)Del 1 2 > Thematic network website 1st rel (March 31)Del 1.2 > Thematic network website 1st rel (March 31)Del 2.1 > Proceedings of the WP2 workshop (May 13)Del 2.2 > Synopsis of the information needs (June 17)y p ( )Del 3.1 > Proceedings of the WP3 workshop (October 20)Del 3.2 > Synopsis of the existing resources (December 6)
Coming soonDel 1 3 > Thematic network website 2nd relDel 1.3 > Thematic network website 2nd relDel 1.4 > Annual Report #1Del 8.1 > Archive of the ETNA Webinars #1
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 - Webinars
DoneExperience of FDG and AIAS (June 8, 2011)p ( , )Experience of CNR and TUKE (September 14, 2011)Experience of TECNALIA and SU/DART (December 14, 2011)
PlannedExperience of DLF and TNTU (February 8, 2012)Experience of DN and JKU (March 14 2012)Experience of DN and JKU (March 14, 2012)Experience of IWKOELN and FAIDD (April 11, 2012)Experience of THL and EASPD (May 9, 2012)Experience of HZ and CEAPAT (June 13, 2012)
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 - Milestones
AchievedMS1 > Map of information needs (due June 30, 2011)p ( , )MS2 > Map of existing resources (due December 31, 2011)
NextMS3 > Ontology of “products” (due August 31, 2012)MS4 > Ontology of “components” (due December 31, 2012)MS5 > EASTIN 2 0 Portal 1st release (due December 31 2012)MS5 > EASTIN 2.0 Portal, 1st release (due December 31, 2012)MS6 > EASTIN 2.0 Portal, 2nd release (due December 31, 2012)MS7 > EASTIN 2.0 Portal, 3rd release (due December 31, 2012)
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 – Assembly and Board
Assembly of partners (twice a year)AP1 > Kick-off meetinggAP2 > Maastricht August 30
Board (four times a year)MC1 > coinciding with Kick-off meetingMC2 > Milan, March 24MC3 > Maastricht August 30MC3 > Maastricht, August 30MC4 > Webinar, December 21, 2011
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 – External relations
DoneATIS4All Workshop 1 (Madrid, March 14-15, 2011)p ( , , )ATIS4All Workshop 2 (Prague, September 8-9, 2011)ETNA/ATIS4All Technical Meeting (Madrid, September 21, 2011)AEGIS Conference (Brussels, November 29-30, 2011)
Coming soonComing soonATIS4All Workshop 3 (Madrid, 12-13 March 2012)ETNA/ATIS4All Technical Meeting (....)European Seminar on AT Service Delivery Systems (Copenaghen 21-22 May 2012)
European Regional
Review
n. 23 Dec 2011
ETNA progress 25.01.2012 – Upcoming challenges
Administrative1st year Review (Brussels, March 27-28)y ( , )Reconfirming Consortium partners for the 2nd year
Technical The TN Website: the “user rating prototype” The ATIS4All community and its relation with ETNAThe ATIS4All community and its relation with ETNA“products” Vs “components” ontology (WP4 Vs WP5)
Map of resources: objectives
To define criteria for:
classifying resources – according to their contents and format –that are candidate for inclusion in the Thematic Network Portal
linking them in an effective, reliable and sustainable manner
deciding on their inclusion or exclusion
identifying possible quality indicators that could be helpful to the Portal users.
Map of resources : classification
Any resource is composed ofA dataset > ontologygyAssociated files > repository
12 types of resources:Product recordsSoftware applications (Apps)
FAQs (freq.asked questions)Projects (links)Software applications (Apps)
Software source codesArticles
Projects (links)ForumsRegulations
Case studiesIdeas
NewsReferences
Map of resources: product record
Software applications and software source codesare files in the repository, associated to a product record
Map of resources: articles
Map of resources: Case Studies
Map of resources: Ideas
Map of resources: FAQs, Projects, Regulations
Map of resources: Forums, News, References
Map of resources: Linking strategies
Map of resources: Linking strategies
Lookup all providers for possible additional information
Map of resources: inclusion criteria
Process-related criteria (only providers)E li it it t ( id A B) th i ti ( id C)Explicit commitment (providers A, B) or authorisation (providers C)
Technology-related (both providers and resources)Technology related (both providers and resources)Providers A: developing Eastin-compliant webservicesProviders B, C: uploading resources according to Eastin standard
Contents related (only resources)f lli ithi th ETNA d ifalling within the ETNA domain
“experience-based evidence of effectiveness in overcoming functional limitations of persons with disabilities”
f i id d i lInformation provided in a EU languageDate of last update available
Map of resources: quality indicators
Elements that may contribute to quality assessmentAccessibilityS i tifi idScientific evidencePeer reviewUsabilityUsabilityMeeting information needAppreciation by the audience
The user rating prototype
GoalTo allow users to express their personal views on each productTo meet search profile “Rating”Different from “Participating” and “outcome assessing”
The chosen instrument QUEST (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with AT)Q (Q )© L. Demers, R. Weiss-Lambrou & B. Ska, 2000), with permission
Why QUESTInternationally validated instrument for AT customer satisfactionEasy to use well received by users available in many EU languagesEasy to use, well received by users, available in many EU languagesThe scoring system (1 to 5) is language-independent
QUEST 2.0
The standardstandard paper form
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
User rating prototype
Needed improvements
Introductory question, e.g. The following eight questions from the QUEST questionnaire (Quebec UserEvaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology) are intended to expressEvaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology) are intended to express your satisfaction with this product by means of a 1 sto 5 score, where:•1 means “not satisfied at all”2 means “not very satisfied”•2 means “not very satisfied”
•3 means “more or less satisfied”•4 means “quite satisfied”•5 means “very satisfied”.For instance: if item “ease of use” is scored “4”, this means that you are “quitesatisfied with the ease-of-use of this product.p
Credit to QUEST Authors• (© L. Demers, R. Weiss-Lambrou & B. Ska, 2000), with permission)
User rating prototype
Introducing the 4 QUEST Q“Service Item”
In this case we needIn this case we needto know the user’s geographical location and how long isand how long ishis/her experiencewith the device
Thanks for your kind attention!
