+ All Categories
Home > Documents > eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of...

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of...

Date post: 26-Aug-2020
Category:

Documents
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Download Report this document
Share this document with a friend
181
eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design & Manufacturing Process Course Level: All Instructor: Shivakumar Raman Section Size: All Question Level Mean Response Median Response Standard Deviation ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank 16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 45 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.44 11.11 84.44 70.97 76.67 DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59 COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.66 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83 33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice INDIVIDUAL 4.15556 4 0.79646 46 2.17 2.17 4.35 58.70 30.43 2.17 37.14 44.00 DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19 COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.11 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77 Shivakumar Raman 4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class INDIVIDUAL 4.30612 4 0.87092 49 2.04 4.08 2.04 44.90 46.94 0.00 42.86 43.33 DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98 COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.11 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58 6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities INDIVIDUAL 4.79167 5 0.54415 48 0.00 2.08 0.00 14.58 83.33 0.00 83.33 81.22 DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22 COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.53 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21 7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.51020 5 0.76710 49 2.04 0.00 4.08 32.65 61.22 0.00 63.89 60.22 DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85 COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.35 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44 Response Key 4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable 6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable 7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable 16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable 33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable Page 1 of 1
Transcript
Page 1: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63

Section Title: Design & Manufacturing Process Course Level: All

Instructor: Shivakumar Raman Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 45 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.44 11.11 84.44 70.97 76.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.66 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.15556 4 0.79646 46 2.17 2.17 4.35 58.70 30.43 2.17 37.14 44.00DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.11 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Shivakumar Raman

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.30612 4 0.87092 49 2.04 4.08 2.04 44.90 46.94 0.00 42.86 43.33DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.11 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.79167 5 0.54415 48 0.00 2.08 0.00 14.58 83.33 0.00 83.33 81.22DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.53 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.51020 5 0.76710 49 2.04 0.00 4.08 32.65 61.22 0.00 63.89 60.22DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.35 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 2: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 2303-002 / I E 2303-002 Total Enrollment: 58

Section Title: Design & Manufacturing Process Course Level: All

Instructor: Mrinal Saha Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.70711 24 0.00 0.00 4.17 12.50 4.17 79.17 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.75000 4 0.73721 24 0.00 4.17 29.17 54.17 12.50 0.00 14.29 17.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.30 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Mrinal Saha

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.91667 4 0.82970 24 0.00 8.33 12.50 58.33 20.83 0.00 20.00 23.89DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.27 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.87500 4 0.74089 24 0.00 4.17 20.83 58.33 16.67 0.00 25.00 17.13DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.47 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.37500 4 1.05552 24 8.33 12.50 16.67 58.33 4.17 0.00 16.67 14.37DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.66 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 3: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 2533-001 Total Enrollment: 57

Section Title: Dynamics Course Level: All

Instructor: Kurt Gramoll Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.00000 2 1.00000 30 3.33 3.33 3.33 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 2.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.85 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.39286 3 1.13331 32 3.13 15.63 31.25 18.75 18.75 12.50 5.71 8.57DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.67 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kurt Gramoll

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.53125 4 1.01550 33 3.03 12.12 27.27 39.39 15.15 3.03 11.43 15.00DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.65 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.28125 4 1.11397 33 6.06 21.21 18.18 42.42 9.09 3.03 0.00 2.76DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 1.12 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 2.65625 3 1.40528 33 30.30 15.15 18.18 24.24 9.09 3.03 0.00 3.32DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 1.29 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 4: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 2533-900 Total Enrollment: 49

Section Title: Dynamics Course Level: All

Instructor: Kurt Gramoll Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.26 0.00 94.74 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.31579 4 1.52944 20 20.00 10.00 10.00 30.00 25.00 5.00 2.86 6.29DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.75 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kurt Gramoll

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.15789 4 0.95819 19 0.00 5.26 21.05 26.32 47.37 0.00 37.14 36.11DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.03 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.70000 4 1.41793 20 10.00 15.00 10.00 25.00 40.00 0.00 13.89 11.60DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.66 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.35000 4 1.49649 20 20.00 5.00 25.00 20.00 30.00 0.00 11.11 12.71DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.68 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 5: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 2623-900 Total Enrollment: 30

Section Title: Circuits and Sensors Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.87500 5 1.55265 14 7.14 7.14 0.00 14.29 28.57 42.86 25.81 37.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.11 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.35714 4 0.49725 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.29 35.71 0.00 57.14 61.71DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.32 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 1.11270 15 0.00 13.33 6.67 13.33 66.67 0.00 45.71 44.44DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.14 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 1.04654 15 6.67 0.00 0.00 6.67 86.67 0.00 72.22 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.53333 5 0.91548 15 0.00 6.67 6.67 13.33 73.33 0.00 66.67 60.77DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.37 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 6: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3103-013 Total Enrollment: 40

Section Title: Disc-AME 3103-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: James Baldwin Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 97.14 93.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

James Baldwin

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 62.86 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 55.56 53.59DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 7: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3122-010 Total Enrollment: 77

Section Title: Heat Trans/Fluid Mechanics Lab Course Level: All

Instructor: Sezin Kadioglu Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.20000 4 1.12648 30 10.00 16.67 23.33 43.33 6.67 0.00 16.13 14.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.74 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.77778 4 0.80064 29 3.45 0.00 20.69 58.62 10.34 6.90 17.14 18.29DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.27 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Sezin Kadioglu

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.16667 3 1.14721 30 13.33 10.00 30.00 40.00 6.67 0.00 5.71 7.22DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 1.01 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.60000 4 1.10172 30 10.00 3.33 16.67 56.67 13.33 0.00 2.78 7.18DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.77 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.06667 3 1.08066 30 6.67 26.67 26.67 33.33 6.67 0.00 8.33 9.39DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.93 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 8: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3173-001 Total Enrollment: 48

Section Title: Heat Transfer Course Level: All

Instructor: Takumi Hawa Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 15 0.00 0.00 6.67 0.00 0.00 93.33 9.68 8.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.73684 4 0.80568 19 0.00 0.00 47.37 31.58 21.05 0.00 11.43 16.57DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.32 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Takumi Hawa

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.45000 4 0.51042 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 45.00 0.00 60.00 52.78DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.25 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.95000 4 0.75915 20 0.00 5.00 15.00 60.00 20.00 0.00 27.78 18.23DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 0.80131 20 0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 0.00 47.22 43.09DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.16 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 9: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3173-900 Total Enrollment: 46

Section Title: Heat Transfer Course Level: All

Instructor: Wilson Merchan-Merchan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.75000 3 0.95743 20 0.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 80.00 3.23 5.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.90000 4 0.55251 21 0.00 0.00 19.05 66.67 9.52 4.76 22.86 24.57DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.15 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Wilson Merchan-Merchan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.40909 5 0.66613 22 0.00 0.00 9.09 40.91 50.00 0.00 54.29 49.44DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.21 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.45455 4 0.50965 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.55 45.45 0.00 47.22 47.51DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.16 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 4 0.78376 21 0.00 4.76 4.76 47.62 42.86 0.00 44.44 40.88DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.15 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 10: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3333-001 Total Enrollment: 27

Section Title: Flight Mechanics Course Level: All

Instructor: Prakash Vedula Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.81650 13 0.00 0.00 23.08 30.77 23.08 23.08 28.57 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Prakash Vedula

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.78571 4 1.18831 14 7.14 0.00 35.71 21.43 35.71 0.00 17.14 21.67DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.40 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.85714 4 0.94926 14 0.00 7.14 28.57 35.71 28.57 0.00 22.22 16.58DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.49 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.35714 3 1.00821 14 0.00 21.43 35.71 28.57 14.29 0.00 13.89 13.26DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.67 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 11: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3353-001 Total Enrollment: 42

Section Title: Design-Mechanical Components Course Level: All

Instructor: Harold Stalford Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.26 94.74 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.55000 5 0.51042 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 55.00 0.00 77.14 76.00DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.52 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Harold Stalford

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.10000 4 1.02084 20 5.00 0.00 15.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 34.29 34.44DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.09 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.90000 5 0.30779 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 90.00 0.00 88.89 87.29DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.65 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.35000 5 1.13671 20 5.00 5.00 5.00 20.00 65.00 0.00 52.78 46.41DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.21 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 12: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3353-002 Total Enrollment: 40

Section Title: Design-Mechanical Components Course Level: All

Instructor: Kuang-Hua Chang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00 91.67 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 0.98473 13 0.00 7.69 7.69 23.08 53.85 7.69 48.57 57.71DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.29 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kuang-Hua Chang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.56250 5 1.03078 16 6.25 0.00 0.00 18.75 75.00 0.00 80.00 63.33DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.36 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.56250 5 0.51235 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.75 56.25 0.00 66.67 60.22DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.28 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.81650 16 0.00 6.25 0.00 31.25 62.50 0.00 55.56 53.59DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 13: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3523-001 Total Enrollment: 24

Section Title: Aerospace Structural Analysis Course Level: All

Instructor: Peter Attar Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.90909 4 1.22103 12 8.33 0.00 16.67 33.33 33.33 8.33 25.71 25.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.14 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Peter Attar

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.41667 4 0.51493 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.33 41.67 0.00 57.14 50.00DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.22 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.75000 5 1.48477 12 8.33 16.67 16.67 8.33 50.00 0.00 16.67 12.71DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.61 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.04447 12 0.00 8.33 25.00 25.00 41.67 0.00 27.78 27.62DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 14: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 3623-001 Total Enrollment: 21

Section Title: Embedded Real-Time Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Andrew Fagg Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.33 91.67 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.46667 5 0.63994 15 0.00 0.00 6.67 40.00 53.33 0.00 68.57 69.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.43 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Andrew Fagg

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.73333 5 0.45774 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.67 73.33 0.00 88.57 80.00DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.53 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.75955 14 0.00 0.00 14.29 21.43 64.29 0.00 50.00 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.63246 15 0.00 0.00 6.67 26.67 66.67 0.00 72.22 65.19DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.43 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 15: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4283-900 / AME 5283-900 Total Enrollment: 18

Section Title: Concurr Design & Manufacturing Course Level: All

Instructor: Kuang-Hua Chang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 12.50 75.00 64.52 68.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.52705 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 71.43 70.29DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.46 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kuang-Hua Chang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.70000 5 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 85.71 77.78DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.50 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.97183 10 0.00 10.00 0.00 20.00 70.00 0.00 50.00 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 55.56 53.59DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 16: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4373-001 / AME 5373-001 Total Enrollment: 23

Section Title: Aerospace Systems Design II Course Level: All

Instructor: Alfred Striz Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.75277 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 50.00 33.33 0.00 40.00 45.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.12 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Alfred Striz

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 1.36626 6 16.67 0.00 0.00 66.67 16.67 0.00 14.29 17.22DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.52 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 1.36626 6 16.67 0.00 0.00 66.67 16.67 0.00 8.33 9.39DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.70 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.83333 4 1.47196 6 16.67 0.00 0.00 50.00 33.33 0.00 25.00 23.76DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.25 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 17: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4553-001 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Design Practicum Course Level: All

Instructor: Zahed Siddique Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.00000 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 4 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 62.86 64.57DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.36 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Zahed Siddique

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.57735 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 62.86 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 69.44 62.43DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.32 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.83666 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 38.89 37.02DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.08 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 18: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4553-002 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Design Practicum Course Level: All

Instructor: Zahed Siddique Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 77.42 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.77778 5 0.44096 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 77.78 0.00 88.57 89.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.75 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Zahed Siddique

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.72648 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 22.22 66.67 0.00 77.14 62.78DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.36 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.77778 5 0.44096 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 77.78 0.00 80.56 80.66DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.51 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.72648 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 22.22 66.67 0.00 69.44 61.88DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.39 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 19: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4553-004 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Design Practicum Course Level: All

Instructor: Harold Stalford Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.70711 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 60.00 22.58 20.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.46 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.51640 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 33.33 0.00 48.57 57.71DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.29 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Harold Stalford

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 4 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 33.33 16.67 51.43 47.78DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.20 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.51640 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 33.33 0.00 50.00 43.65DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.19 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 20: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4553-005 Total Enrollment: 16

Section Title: Design Practicum Course Level: All

Instructor: Li Song Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 0.00 66.67 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 4 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.14 42.86 0.00 65.71 66.29DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.39 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Li Song

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 0.88641 8 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 0.00 40.00 40.00DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.06 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.70711 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 50.00 37.50 0.00 41.67 34.25DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.06 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.51755 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.50 62.50 0.00 77.78 67.40DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.45 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 21: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4593-001 / AME 5593-001 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Space Systems & Mission Design Course Level: All

Instructor: Thomas Lear Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.62500 4 0.74402 8 0.00 12.50 12.50 75.00 0.00 0.00 8.57 13.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.43 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Thomas Lear

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.25000 4 1.28174 8 12.50 12.50 25.00 37.50 12.50 0.00 8.57 8.33DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.93 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.62500 4 1.30247 8 12.50 0.00 25.00 37.50 25.00 0.00 5.56 8.29DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.75 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.37500 4 1.40789 8 12.50 12.50 25.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 16.67 14.37DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.66 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 22: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4802-010 Total Enrollment: 25

Section Title: Robotics Laboratory Course Level: All

Instructor: David Miller Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.70000 5 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 67.74 76.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.65 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.77778 5 0.44096 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 77.78 0.00 88.57 89.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.75 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

David Miller

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.52705 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 62.86 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 86.11 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.54 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.51640 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 72.22 65.19DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.43 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 23: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4832-010 Total Enrollment: 10

Section Title: Micro and Nanomaterials Lab Course Level: All

Instructor: Mrinal Saha Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.16667 4 1.72240 6 33.33 0.00 0.00 50.00 16.67 0.00 12.90 13.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.77 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 4 1.54919 6 33.33 0.00 0.00 66.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.43DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 1.07 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Mrinal Saha

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 2.66667 3 1.86190 6 50.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 16.67 0.00 0.00 2.22DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 1.50 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 1.36626 6 0.00 33.33 0.00 33.33 33.33 0.00 8.33 9.39DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.70 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 2.66667 3 1.50555 6 33.33 16.67 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 2.78 3.87DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 1.28 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 24: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4971-001 / AME 5971-001 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Seminar Course Level: All

Instructor: Farrokh Mistree Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 0DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 0DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Farrokh Mistree

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 25.71 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 30.56 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 27.78 27.62DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 25: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4980-002 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Undergraduate Research Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Wilson Merchan-Merchan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 74.19 79.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.70 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 85.71 88.00DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.72 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Wilson Merchan-Merchan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 97.14 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.67 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 97.22 90.06DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 26: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4980-006 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Undergraduate Research Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Subramanya Gollahalli Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Subramanya Gollahalli

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 30.56 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 27.78 27.62DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 27: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4980-013 Total Enrollment: 2

Section Title: Undergraduate Research Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Harold Stalford Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Harold Stalford

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 25.71 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 30.56 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 27.78 27.62DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 28: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 4980-021 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Undergraduate Research Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Jerry Holmes Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 97.14 93.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jerry Holmes

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 97.14 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.67 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 97.22 90.06DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 29: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5740-001 Total Enrollment: 10

Section Title: Applied Combustion Course Level: All

Instructor: Charles Baukal Jr. Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.83333 5 0.40825 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 83.33 0.00 94.29 91.43DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.81 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Charles Baukal Jr.

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 62.86 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.67 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.83333 5 0.40825 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 83.33 0.00 94.44 86.19DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.64 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 30: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5740-900 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Design of Energy Eff HYAC Course Level: All

Instructor: Li Song Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.00000 3 0.00 0.00 33.33 33.33 33.33 0.00 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 80.00 82.86DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.64 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Li Song

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 33.33 0.00 45.71 44.44DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.14 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.67 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 80.56 70.72DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 31: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5750-001 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Vibrating Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: James Baldwin Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 45.71 49.71DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.21 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

James Baldwin

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.15470 4 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 25.71 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.57735 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 41.67 37.57DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.12 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 32: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5763-001 / CEES 5763-001 Total Enrollment: 40

Section Title: Intro to Finite Element Method Course Level: All

Instructor: Alfred Striz Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.28571 4 1.38013 20 5.00 5.00 5.00 15.00 5.00 65.00 19.36 17.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.66 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.86364 4 0.94089 23 4.35 4.35 8.70 60.87 17.39 4.35 20.00 22.86DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.19 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Alfred Striz

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.95652 4 1.14726 23 0.00 17.39 13.04 26.09 43.48 0.00 22.86 25.56DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.23 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.31818 5 1.17053 22 9.09 0.00 0.00 31.82 59.09 0.00 44.44 38.67DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.01 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.78261 4 1.20441 23 8.70 4.35 17.39 39.13 30.43 0.00 22.22 23.20DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.29 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 33: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5803-900 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Principles of Heat Transfer Course Level: All

Instructor: Fengchyuan Lai Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 80.00 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.75277 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 50.00 33.33 0.00 40.00 45.14DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.12 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Fengchyuan Lai

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.51640 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 82.86 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 5 1.16905 6 0.00 16.67 0.00 33.33 50.00 0.00 38.89 30.39DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.15 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.51640 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 80.56 70.72DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 34: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5890-007 Total Enrollment: 2

Section Title: Guided Individual Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Zahed Siddique Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Zahed Siddique

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 35: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: AME 5903-001 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Fundamental Fluid Dynamics Course Level: All

Instructor: Ramkumar Parthasarathy Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.41421 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 81.82 29.03 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.82203 4 1.06096 584 2.05 1.71 9.42 15.41 11.82 59.59COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.35714 4 0.49725 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.29 35.71 0.00 57.14 61.71DEPARTMENT 3.96328 4 1.03888 739 4.33 4.06 15.29 39.24 32.88 4.19COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.32 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Ramkumar Parthasarathy

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.93333 5 0.25820 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.67 93.33 0.00 94.29 91.67DEPARTMENT 4.10714 4 1.04738 820 3.29 5.85 12.20 33.29 44.39 0.98COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.73 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.48795 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 72.22 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.03832 4 1.05997 819 3.91 5.86 12.58 36.63 39.80 1.22COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.48795 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 80.56 70.72DEPARTMENT 3.88821 4 1.20517 821 6.33 9.38 11.94 32.89 38.61 0.85COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 36: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: BIOE 5970-001 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Seminar in Biomedical Engr Course Level: All

Instructor: David Schmidtke Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 82.67DEPARTMENT 5.00000 5 0.00000 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.27273 4 0.64667 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 50.00 33.33 8.33COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

David Schmidtke

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 2.12132 4 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 11.11DEPARTMENT 4.69231 5 0.48038 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.77 69.23 0.00COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.68 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.69231 5 0.48038 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.77 69.23 0.00COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.69231 5 0.48038 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.77 69.23 0.00COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 37: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1313-010 Total Enrollment: 136

Section Title: Programming for Non-Majors Course Level: All

Instructor: Thomas Palmer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.15385 4 0.85397 82 0.00 4.88 13.41 39.02 37.80 4.88 58.07 58.07DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.07 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Thomas Palmer

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.25301 5 0.97334 83 0.00 7.23 15.66 21.69 55.42 0.00 51.61 51.61DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.10 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.46988 5 0.70430 83 0.00 1.20 8.43 32.53 57.83 0.00 64.52 64.52DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.25 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.20482 4 0.83752 83 0.00 2.41 19.28 33.73 44.58 0.00 41.94 41.94DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.01 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.37349 5 0.82212 83 0.00 3.61 10.84 30.12 55.42 0.00 48.39 48.39DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.13 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 38: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1313-011 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Disc-C S 1313-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Thomas Palmer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.46154 4 0.51887 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 42.86 7.14 90.32 90.32DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.42 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Thomas Palmer

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.07692 4 0.95407 14 0.00 7.14 14.29 35.71 35.71 7.14 25.81 25.81DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.07 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.53846 5 0.51887 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 50.00 7.14 74.19 74.19DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.33 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.84615 4 0.98710 14 0.00 7.14 28.57 28.57 28.57 7.14 12.90 12.90DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.41 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.30769 4 0.63043 14 0.00 0.00 7.14 50.00 35.71 7.14 32.26 32.26DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.06 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 39: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1313-012 Total Enrollment: 32

Section Title: Disc-C S 1313-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Thomas Palmer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.85714 4 0.94926 18 0.00 5.56 22.22 27.78 22.22 22.22 16.13 16.13DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.26 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Thomas Palmer

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 3.55556 4 1.14903 18 0.00 27.78 11.11 38.89 22.22 0.00 12.90 12.90DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.60 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.94444 4 0.87260 18 0.00 5.56 22.22 44.44 27.78 0.00 25.81 25.81DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.39 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.55556 4 1.14903 18 0.00 22.22 27.78 22.22 27.78 0.00 6.45 6.45DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.73 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.72222 4 1.01782 18 0.00 16.67 16.67 44.44 22.22 0.00 12.90 12.90DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 0.57 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 40: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1313-013 Total Enrollment: 34

Section Title: Disc-C S 1313-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Thomas Palmer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.15000 4 0.67082 20 0.00 0.00 15.00 55.00 30.00 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.07 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Thomas Palmer

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.61905 5 0.66904 21 0.00 0.00 9.52 19.05 71.43 0.00 87.10 87.10DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.48 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 21 0.00 0.00 4.76 23.81 71.43 0.00 90.32 90.32DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.49 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 0.79582 21 0.00 0.00 19.05 28.57 52.38 0.00 51.61 51.61DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.13 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.52381 5 0.67964 21 0.00 0.00 9.52 28.57 61.90 0.00 87.10 87.10DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.29 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 41: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1313-014 Total Enrollment: 33

Section Title: Disc-C S 1313-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Thomas Palmer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.06250 4 0.85391 17 0.00 0.00 29.41 29.41 35.29 5.88 41.94 41.94DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.03 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Thomas Palmer

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.05882 4 0.89935 17 0.00 5.88 17.65 41.18 35.29 0.00 19.36 19.36DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.09 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.23529 4 0.75245 17 0.00 0.00 17.65 41.18 41.18 0.00 45.16 45.16DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.04 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.88235 4 0.92752 17 0.00 5.88 29.41 35.29 29.41 0.00 16.13 16.13DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.37 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.17647 4 0.88284 17 0.00 5.88 11.76 41.18 41.18 0.00 19.36 19.36DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 0.08 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 42: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1323-010 Total Enrollment: 114

Section Title: Intro to Computer Programming Course Level: All

Instructor: Deborah Trytten Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.34884 5 0.84187 43 0.00 4.65 9.30 32.56 53.49 0.00 83.87 83.87DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.29 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Deborah Trytten

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.24444 5 0.93312 45 0.00 6.67 13.33 28.89 51.11 0.00 45.16 45.16DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.10 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.58603 45 0.00 0.00 4.44 35.56 60.00 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.35 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.72474 45 0.00 2.22 6.67 24.44 66.67 0.00 83.87 83.87DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.37 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.37778 5 0.88649 45 0.00 6.67 6.67 28.89 57.78 0.00 51.61 51.61DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.13 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 43: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1323-011 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Lab-C S 1323-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Deborah Trytten Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.27273 4 0.90453 11 0.00 9.09 0.00 45.45 45.45 0.00 74.19 74.19DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.20 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Deborah Trytten

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.09091 4 1.13618 11 0.00 18.18 0.00 36.36 45.45 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.06 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.54545 5 0.52223 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.45 54.55 0.00 77.42 77.42DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.34 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.72727 5 0.46710 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.27 72.73 0.00 96.77 96.77DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.56 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.45455 5 0.82020 11 0.00 0.00 18.18 18.18 63.64 0.00 77.42 77.42DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.21 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 44: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1323-012 Total Enrollment: 40

Section Title: Lab-C S 1323-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Deborah Trytten Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.78881 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 61.29 61.29DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.12 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Deborah Trytten

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 0.82327 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 0.00 58.07 58.07DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.15 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.84327 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 60.00 0.00 58.07 58.07DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.16 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.69921 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 40.00 50.00 0.00 61.29 61.29DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.20 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 0.82327 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.05 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 45: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 1323-013 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Lab-C S 1323-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Deborah Trytten Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.90000 4 1.10050 10 0.00 10.00 30.00 20.00 40.00 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.21 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Deborah Trytten

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 1.25167 10 10.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 58.07 58.07DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.15 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 67.74 67.74DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.28 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 5 1.13529 10 0.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 60.00 0.00 35.48 35.48DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.02 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.96609 10 0.00 10.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.15 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 46: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 2334-010 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Programming Struc/Abstractions Course Level: All

Instructor: Dean Hougen Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.85714 4 1.02711 14 7.14 0.00 14.29 57.14 21.43 0.00 16.13 16.13DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.26 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Dean Hougen

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.35714 5 0.74495 14 0.00 0.00 14.29 35.71 50.00 0.00 67.74 67.74DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.21 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.78571 4 0.57893 14 0.00 0.00 28.57 64.29 7.14 0.00 12.90 12.90DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.58 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 5 0.64621 14 0.00 0.00 7.14 42.86 50.00 0.00 64.52 64.52DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.23 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.98561 15 0.00 6.67 13.33 13.33 66.67 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.15 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 47: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 2334-011 Total Enrollment: 16

Section Title: Lab-C S 2334-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Dean Hougen Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 2.25000 2 1.50000 4 50.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 2.07 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Dean Hougen

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 1.29099 4 0.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 9.68 9.68DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.66 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.25000 4 1.70783 4 25.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 3.23 3.23DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 1.23 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.75000 4 0.95743 4 0.00 0.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 9.68 9.68DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.51 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.25000 4 1.70783 4 25.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 3.23 3.23DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 1.07 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 48: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 2334-012 Total Enrollment: 21

Section Title: Lab-C S 2334-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Dean Hougen Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 4 0.75593 7 0.00 0.00 14.29 42.86 42.86 0.00 77.42 77.42DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.22 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Dean Hougen

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 4 0.75593 7 0.00 0.00 14.29 42.86 42.86 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.14 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.71429 4 0.75593 7 0.00 0.00 42.86 42.86 14.29 0.00 9.68 9.68DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.67 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 4 0.75593 7 0.00 0.00 14.29 42.86 42.86 0.00 45.16 45.16DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.08 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 4 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.14 42.86 0.00 64.52 64.52DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.19 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 49: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 2413-001 Total Enrollment: 44

Section Title: Data Structures Course Level: All

Instructor: Sridhar Radhakrishnan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.21739 4 0.73587 23 0.00 0.00 17.39 43.48 39.13 0.00 67.74 67.74DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.14 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Sridhar Radhakrishnan

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.43478 4 0.58977 23 0.00 0.00 4.35 47.83 47.83 0.00 70.97 70.97DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.29 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.34783 4 0.71406 23 0.00 4.35 0.00 52.17 43.48 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.10 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.34783 5 0.88465 23 0.00 8.70 0.00 39.13 52.17 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.14 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.36364 4 0.72673 22 0.00 4.55 0.00 50.00 45.45 0.00 45.16 45.16DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.12 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 50: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 2603-001 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Applied Logic-Hard- & Software Course Level: All

Instructor: Dean Hougen Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 4 0.44721 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 12.90 12.90DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.33 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Dean Hougen

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.46 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.00000 5 0.00 0.00 40.00 20.00 40.00 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.32 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.83666 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 35.48 35.48DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.02 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 90.32 90.32DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.37 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 51: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 2813-001 Total Enrollment: 45

Section Title: Discrete Structures Course Level: All

Instructor: Krishnaiya Thulasiraman Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.21429 3 1.18831 18 5.56 16.67 22.22 22.22 11.11 22.22 3.23 3.23DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.99 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Krishnaiya Thulasiraman

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 3.04762 3 1.39557 21 14.29 28.57 14.29 23.81 19.05 0.00 3.23 3.23DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 1.12 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.80952 4 0.98077 21 0.00 14.29 14.29 47.62 23.81 0.00 16.13 16.13DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.55 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.19048 4 1.24976 21 14.29 14.29 19.05 42.86 9.52 0.00 3.23 3.23DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 1.13 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.28571 4 1.34695 21 14.29 14.29 19.05 33.33 19.05 0.00 6.45 6.45DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 1.04 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 52: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 3113-001 Total Enrollment: 29

Section Title: Intro to Operating Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Sudarshan Dhall Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.58333 4 1.50504 13 15.38 7.69 7.69 30.77 30.77 7.69 9.68 9.68DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.57 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Sudarshan Dhall

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 2.76923 2 1.58923 13 30.77 23.08 0.00 30.77 15.38 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 1.40 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.15385 3 1.46322 13 15.38 23.08 15.38 23.08 23.08 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 1.35 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 2.92308 3 1.32045 13 15.38 23.08 30.77 15.38 15.38 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 1.42 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 2.76923 3 1.53590 13 30.77 15.38 15.38 23.08 15.38 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 1.59 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 53: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 3323-001 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Princ-Programming Languages Course Level: All

Instructor: Qi Cheng Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.66667 19 0.00 0.00 21.05 57.89 21.05 0.00 32.26 32.26DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.10 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Qi Cheng

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 3.15789 3 0.95819 19 0.00 31.58 26.32 36.84 5.26 0.00 6.45 6.45DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 1.01 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.57895 4 0.90159 19 0.00 10.53 36.84 36.84 15.79 0.00 6.45 6.45DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.83 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.15789 4 1.06787 19 5.26 0.00 15.79 31.58 47.37 0.00 32.26 32.26DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.07 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.63158 4 1.21154 19 5.26 15.79 15.79 36.84 26.32 0.00 9.68 9.68DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 0.67 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 54: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 4273-001 Total Enrollment: 21

Section Title: Software Engineering II Course Level: All

Instructor: Rex Page Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.88889 4 1.26930 9 11.11 0.00 11.11 44.44 33.33 0.00 25.81 25.81DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.23 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Rex Page

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.44096 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.78 22.22 0.00 38.71 38.71DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.07 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.44096 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.78 22.22 0.00 38.71 38.71DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.05 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.44444 4 0.52705 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.56 44.44 0.00 67.74 67.74DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.25 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.70711 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 44.44 44.44 0.00 38.71 38.71DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.08 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 55: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 4323-001 Total Enrollment: 30

Section Title: Compiler Construction Course Level: All

Instructor: Changwook Kim Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.12500 4 0.71880 16 0.00 0.00 18.75 50.00 31.25 0.00 48.39 48.39DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.04 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Changwook Kim

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.50000 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.50 62.50 0.00 90.32 90.32DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.48 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.56250 5 0.51235 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.75 56.25 0.00 87.10 87.10DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.36 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.12500 4 0.80623 16 0.00 0.00 25.00 37.50 37.50 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.10 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.43750 4 0.51235 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.25 43.75 0.00 70.97 70.97DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.19 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 56: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 4613-001 / ECE 4613-001 Total Enrollment: 26

Section Title: Computer Architecture Course Level: All

Instructor: Ronald Barnes Jr Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.57735 13 0.00 0.00 15.38 69.23 15.38 0.00 32.26 32.26DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.10 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Ronald Barnes Jr

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.30769 4 0.63043 13 0.00 0.00 7.69 53.85 38.46 0.00 64.52 64.52DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.16 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.92308 4 1.03775 13 0.00 15.38 7.69 46.15 30.77 0.00 22.58 22.58DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.42 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.30769 4 0.63043 13 0.00 0.00 7.69 53.85 38.46 0.00 48.39 48.39DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.10 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.30769 4 0.48038 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.23 30.77 0.00 32.26 32.26DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.06 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 57: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5013-001 / C S 4013-001 Total Enrollment: 41

Section Title: Artificial Intelligence Course Level: All

Instructor: Amy McGovern Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.10345 4 0.55709 29 0.00 0.00 10.34 68.97 20.69 0.00 45.16 45.16DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.01 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Amy McGovern

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.06667 4 0.82768 30 0.00 3.33 20.00 43.33 33.33 0.00 22.58 22.58DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.08 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.90000 4 0.92289 30 3.33 3.33 16.67 53.33 23.33 0.00 19.36 19.36DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.44 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.44828 5 0.68589 30 0.00 3.33 0.00 43.33 50.00 3.33 70.97 70.97DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.25 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.26667 4 0.73968 30 0.00 3.33 6.67 50.00 40.00 0.00 25.81 25.81DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.01 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 58: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5083-001 Total Enrollment: 10

Section Title: Data Mining Course Level: All

Instructor: Amy McGovern Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 4 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 30.00 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.24 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Amy McGovern

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.10000 4 0.56765 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 70.00 20.00 0.00 32.26 32.26DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.05 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.81650 10 0.00 0.00 30.00 40.00 30.00 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.32 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.52705 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 77.42 77.42DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.31 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.69921 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 40.00 50.00 0.00 54.84 54.84DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.15 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 59: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5113-900 / C S 4113-900 Total Enrollment: 7

Section Title: Operating Systems Theory Course Level: All

Instructor: Sudarshan Dhall Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.44721 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 20.00 0.00 61.29 61.29DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.12 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Sudarshan Dhall

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.46 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.44721 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 93.55 93.55DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.65 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 19.36 19.36DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.24 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.83666 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 22.58 22.58DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 0.06 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 60: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5413-900 Total Enrollment: 21

Section Title: Computational Complexity Course Level: All

Instructor: Changwook Kim Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 1.08711 12 8.33 0.00 41.67 33.33 16.67 0.00 6.45 6.45DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.66 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Changwook Kim

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.62158 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 58.33 33.33 0.00 48.39 48.39DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.10 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.85280 12 0.00 8.33 8.33 58.33 25.00 0.00 29.03 29.03DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.32 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.60302 12 0.00 0.00 16.67 66.67 16.67 0.00 19.36 19.36DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.24 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.52223 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.26 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 61: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5433-001 / C S 4433-001 Total Enrollment: 25

Section Title: Comput Methods-Discrete Optimz Course Level: All

Instructor: Krishnaiya Thulasiraman Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 3.86667 4 1.06010 17 5.88 0.00 17.65 41.18 23.53 11.76 22.58 22.58DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 0.25 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Krishnaiya Thulasiraman

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 3.94444 4 0.87260 18 0.00 5.56 22.22 44.44 27.78 0.00 16.13 16.13DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 0.21 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.54832 18 0.00 0.00 5.56 66.67 27.78 0.00 38.71 38.71DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 0.05 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.05882 4 1.08804 18 5.56 0.00 16.67 33.33 38.89 5.56 25.81 25.81DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 0.17 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.11111 4 1.07861 18 5.56 0.00 16.67 33.33 44.44 0.00 16.13 16.13DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 0.15 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 62: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5823-001 / C S 4823-001 Total Enrollment: 13

Section Title: Cryptography Course Level: All

Instructor: Qi Cheng Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.83333 9 0.00 0.00 22.22 33.33 44.44 0.00 70.97 70.97DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.15 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Qi Cheng

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.66667 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 55.56 33.33 0.00 38.71 38.71DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.07 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.72648 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 22.22 66.67 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.35 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.72648 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 22.22 66.67 0.00 83.87 83.87DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.37 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.44444 5 1.01379 9 0.00 11.11 0.00 22.22 66.67 0.00 74.19 74.19DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.20 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 63: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5970-001 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Visual Analytics Course Level: All

Instructor: Christopher Weaver Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.79772 12 0.00 0.00 16.67 16.67 66.67 0.00 93.55 93.55DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.46 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Christopher Weaver

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.63636 5 0.50452 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 58.33 8.33 93.55 93.55DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.49 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.67420 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 33.33 58.33 0.00 67.74 67.74DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.28 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.65134 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 16.67 75.00 0.00 93.55 93.55DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.49 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.90453 12 0.00 8.33 0.00 25.00 66.67 0.00 80.65 80.65DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.26 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 64: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: C S 5970-002 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Mobile Manipulation Course Level: All

Instructor: Andrew Fagg Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

27. This course increased your ability to use currenttechniques, skills, and tools necessary for computingpractice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.83666 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 16.67 66.67 0.00 93.55 93.55DEPARTMENT 3.62405 4 1.20938 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20COLLEGE 3.62405 4 1.20938 -0.46 547 6.95 8.41 27.79 23.22 29.43 4.20

Andrew Fagg

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 5 1.30384 6 0.00 16.67 0.00 16.67 50.00 16.67 35.48 35.48DEPARTMENT 4.10826 4 1.01696 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45COLLEGE 4.10826 4 1.01696 -0.05 553 2.53 7.23 9.22 37.61 41.95 1.45

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.51640 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 33.33 0.00 51.61 51.61DEPARTMENT 4.30545 5 0.89999 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08COLLEGE 4.30545 5 0.89999 -0.08 556 1.80 3.06 9.53 33.27 51.26 1.08

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 77.42 77.42DEPARTMENT 4.05525 4 1.06291 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99COLLEGE 4.05525 4 1.06291 -0.31 554 3.43 5.23 16.43 30.32 42.60 1.99

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 0.81650 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 33.33 50.00 0.00 38.71 38.71DEPARTMENT 4.08197 4 1.06650 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08COLLEGE 4.08197 4 1.06650 -0.08 555 3.24 7.21 11.35 33.51 43.60 1.08

Response Key

3. Instructor gave a clear presentation of the material 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

27. This course increased your ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 65: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 1000-001 Total Enrollment: 120

Section Title: CEES Seminar Course Level: All

Instructor: Randall Kolar Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 3 1.09545 35 0.00 0.00 8.57 0.00 5.71 85.71 46.15 33.33DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.18 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.96362 37 2.70 2.70 10.81 37.84 24.32 21.62 29.03 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Randall Kolar

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.59459 5 0.59905 38 0.00 0.00 5.26 28.95 63.16 2.63 76.47 69.44DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.40 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.58824 5 0.55692 39 0.00 0.00 2.56 30.77 53.85 12.82 67.65 61.88DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.31 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.65465 39 0.00 0.00 7.69 30.77 53.85 7.69 67.65 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 66: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 2153-001 Total Enrollment: 55

Section Title: Mechanics of Materials Course Level: All

Instructor: Tohren Kibbey Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.75000 4 0.95743 33 0.00 0.00 6.06 3.03 3.03 87.88 42.31 32.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.23 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.21212 4 0.73983 33 0.00 0.00 18.18 42.42 39.39 0.00 54.84 48.57DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.17 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Tohren Kibbey

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.58140 5 0.58686 43 0.00 0.00 4.65 32.56 62.79 0.00 73.53 67.22DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.38 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.45455 5 0.76111 44 0.00 2.27 9.09 29.55 59.09 0.00 58.82 47.51DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.16 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.70455 5 0.50942 44 0.00 0.00 2.27 25.00 72.73 0.00 88.24 77.35DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.52 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 67: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 2153-003 Total Enrollment: 48

Section Title: Mechanics of Materials Course Level: All

Instructor: Kianoosh Hatami Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.86 2.86 94.29 80.77 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.66227 41 0.00 0.00 9.76 43.90 41.46 4.88 70.97 57.71DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.29 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kianoosh Hatami

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.71739 5 0.50169 46 0.00 0.00 2.17 23.91 73.91 0.00 88.24 79.44DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.52 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.36957 5 0.79885 46 0.00 2.17 13.04 30.43 54.35 0.00 52.94 41.99DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.07 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.67391 5 0.55993 46 0.00 0.00 4.35 23.91 71.74 0.00 79.41 75.14DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.50 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 68: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 2223-001 Total Enrollment: 69

Section Title: Fluid Mechanics Course Level: All

Instructor: Keith Strevett Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.37931 5 0.86246 31 0.00 3.23 12.90 22.58 54.84 6.45 77.42 64.00DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.34 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Keith Strevett

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.52941 5 0.56329 34 0.00 0.00 2.94 41.18 55.88 0.00 61.77 60.56DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.33 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.64706 5 0.48507 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.29 64.71 0.00 76.47 66.30DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.37 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.69697 5 0.63663 33 0.00 3.03 0.00 21.21 75.76 0.00 82.35 76.24DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.52 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 69: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 2323-001 Total Enrollment: 25

Section Title: Envir Transport & Fate Process Course Level: All

Instructor: Mark Nanny Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.66667 3 1.50555 8 25.00 12.50 0.00 37.50 0.00 25.00 3.85 4.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.23 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.53452 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 75.00 12.50 0.00 29.03 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Mark Nanny

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.81650 10 0.00 10.00 0.00 70.00 20.00 0.00 32.35 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.81650 10 0.00 10.00 0.00 70.00 20.00 0.00 29.41 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.10000 4 1.28668 10 10.00 30.00 10.00 40.00 10.00 0.00 11.77 9.95DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.90 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 70: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 3243-010 Total Enrollment: 52

Section Title: Water/Waste Treatment Design Course Level: All

Instructor: Keith Strevett Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.08000 4 1.03763 25 4.00 4.00 12.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 57.69 57.33DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.08 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.36000 4 0.75719 25 0.00 4.00 4.00 44.00 48.00 0.00 74.19 62.86DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.32 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Keith Strevett

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.44000 5 0.65064 25 0.00 0.00 8.00 40.00 52.00 0.00 55.88 51.67DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.24 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.68000 5 0.55678 25 0.00 0.00 4.00 24.00 72.00 0.00 85.29 72.93DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.41 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.56000 5 0.65064 25 0.00 0.00 8.00 28.00 64.00 0.00 73.53 62.98DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.39 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 71: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 3243-011 Total Enrollment: 26

Section Title: Lab-CEES 3243-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Keith Strevett Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.96609 10 0.00 10.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 76.92 66.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.37 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.52705 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 80.65 70.29DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.46 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Keith Strevett

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.70000 5 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 85.29 77.78DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.50 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 91.18 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.54 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 94.12 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 72: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 3243-012 Total Enrollment: 26

Section Title: Lab-CEES 3243-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Keith Strevett Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.83333 9 0.00 0.00 22.22 33.33 44.44 0.00 73.08 63.33DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.21 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.70711 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 50.00 37.50 0.00 58.07 49.71DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.21 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Keith Strevett

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.75593 8 0.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 0.00 32.35 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.70711 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 44.44 44.44 0.00 50.00 39.23DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.03 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.44444 5 0.72648 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 33.33 55.56 0.00 58.82 50.83DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.29 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 73: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 3774-010 Total Enrollment: 45

Section Title: Struct Design--Concrete/Steel Course Level: All

Instructor: Christopher Ramseyer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.17143 4 0.85700 38 2.63 0.00 10.53 44.74 34.21 7.89 65.39 62.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.15385 4 0.84413 39 2.56 2.56 5.13 56.41 33.33 0.00 51.61 43.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.11 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Christopher Ramseyer

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.95238 4 0.98655 42 4.76 0.00 21.43 42.86 30.95 0.00 29.41 25.00DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.24 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.45238 5 0.77152 42 2.38 0.00 2.38 40.48 54.76 0.00 55.88 46.96DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.16 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.09524 4 0.87818 42 2.38 2.38 11.90 50.00 33.33 0.00 41.18 34.81DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.02 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 74: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 3774-011 Total Enrollment: 45

Section Title: Lab-CEES 3774-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Christopher Ramseyer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 5 1.08233 16 0.00 12.50 6.25 25.00 50.00 6.25 69.23 62.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.19 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.26667 4 0.70373 16 0.00 0.00 12.50 43.75 37.50 6.25 64.52 54.29DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.23 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Christopher Ramseyer

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.13333 4 0.74322 16 0.00 0.00 18.75 43.75 31.25 6.25 44.12 35.00DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.06 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 4 0.72627 15 0.00 0.00 13.33 40.00 40.00 6.67 44.12 37.57DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.02 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.26667 4 0.70373 16 0.00 0.00 12.50 43.75 37.50 6.25 47.06 39.78DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.13 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 75: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 4123-001 Total Enrollment: 13

Section Title: Open Channel Flow Course Level: All

Instructor: Randall Kolar Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.44 55.56 88.46 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.54545 5 0.68755 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 27.27 63.64 0.00 87.10 75.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.51 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Randall Kolar

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.54545 5 0.68755 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 27.27 63.64 0.00 64.71 62.22DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.35 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.63636 5 0.67420 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 18.18 72.73 0.00 73.53 65.19DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.36 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.45455 5 0.68755 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 36.36 54.55 0.00 61.77 51.38DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.30 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 76: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 4243-001 Total Enrollment: 26

Section Title: Water Technol Emerging Regions Course Level: All

Instructor: David Sabatini Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.96609 17 0.00 5.88 23.53 29.41 35.29 5.88 29.03 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

David Sabatini

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.48507 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 79.41 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 18 0.00 0.00 11.11 27.78 61.11 0.00 61.77 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.35294 5 0.78591 17 0.00 0.00 17.65 29.41 52.94 0.00 50.00 46.96DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.21 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 77: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 4333-001 Total Enrollment: 33

Section Title: Foundation Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Wassim Tabet Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.79 84.21 88.46 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.85714 4 1.01419 21 4.76 4.76 14.29 52.38 23.81 0.00 22.58 22.29DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.19 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Wassim Tabet

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.09524 4 0.94365 21 0.00 9.52 9.52 42.86 38.10 0.00 41.18 33.89DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.10 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.95238 4 1.11697 21 0.00 14.29 19.05 23.81 42.86 0.00 26.47 18.79DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.61905 4 1.24403 21 9.52 4.76 28.57 28.57 28.57 0.00 29.41 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.44 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 78: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 4903-001 Total Enrollment: 30

Section Title: Civil Engineering Capstone Course Level: All

Instructors: Gerald Miller / Vinay Thottunkal Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.70711 15 0.00 0.00 6.67 6.67 0.00 86.67 15.39 20.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.46 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.29412 4 0.68599 17 0.00 0.00 11.76 47.06 41.18 0.00 67.74 56.00DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.25 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Gerald Miller

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.76696 18 0.00 5.56 0.00 50.00 44.44 0.00 52.94 44.44DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.14 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.29412 4 0.77174 18 0.00 0.00 16.67 33.33 44.44 5.56 47.06 38.12DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.01 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.47059 4 0.51450 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.94 47.06 0.00 64.71 53.04DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.32 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Vinay Thottunkal

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.76696 18 0.00 5.56 11.11 61.11 22.22 0.00 32.35 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.27778 4 0.66911 18 0.00 0.00 11.11 50.00 38.89 0.00 41.18 37.02DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.03 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.94444 4 0.41618 18 0.00 0.00 11.11 83.33 5.56 0.00 35.29 25.97DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.15 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 79: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 4913-001 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Environmental Sci Capstone Course Level: All

Instructors: Robert Knox / Robert Nairn Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 1.00000 4 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 80.77 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 96.77 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Robert Knox

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 91.18 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 94.12 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 97.06 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Robert Nairn

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 94.12 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 97.06 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 80: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 4993-001 Total Enrollment: 11

Section Title: Arch Engineering Capstone Course Level: All

Instructors: Gerald Miller / Vinay Thottunkal Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 90.32 78.29DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.54 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Gerald Miller

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 67.65 63.89DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.37 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 71.43 0.00 88.24 74.59DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.44 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 76.47 63.54DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.40 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Vinay Thottunkal

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 67.65 63.89DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.37 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 64.71 60.77DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.29 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 4 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.14 42.86 0.00 55.88 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.28 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 81: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 5020-031 Total Enrollment: 10

Section Title: Constitutive Modeling Course Level: All

Instructor: Kanthasamy Muraleetharan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 87.50 88.46 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 10.00 93.55 82.86DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.64 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kanthasamy Muraleetharan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 97.06 85.56DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.60 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 10.00 79.41 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.70000 5 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 85.29 76.80DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.52 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 82: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 5021-001 Total Enrollment: 27

Section Title: Technical Communications Course Level: All

Instructor: Robert Knox Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 16 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.00 0.00 93.75 7.69 8.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.68750 4 1.40089 19 10.53 5.26 15.79 21.05 31.58 15.79 6.45 14.86DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.37 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Robert Knox

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.19048 5 1.32737 21 9.52 4.76 4.76 19.05 61.90 0.00 47.06 37.78DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.00 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 4 1.32188 20 10.00 5.00 20.00 25.00 40.00 0.00 17.65 14.92DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.55 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.04762 5 1.39557 21 14.29 0.00 4.76 28.57 52.38 0.00 38.24 33.15DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.06 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 83: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 5244-001 Total Enrollment: 9

Section Title: Physicochem Water Treatmt Proc Course Level: All

Instructor: David Sabatini Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.70711 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 16.67 0.00 66.67 15.39 20.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.46 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.86603 9 0.00 0.00 33.33 33.33 33.33 0.00 29.03 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

David Sabatini

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 79.41 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 79.41 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.55556 5 0.52705 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.44 55.56 0.00 70.59 61.88DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.39 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 84: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 5493-001 / RCPL 5493-001 Total Enrollment: 7

Section Title: Transportation & Land Develop Course Level: All

Instructor: Kathleen Wieters Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 96.77 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kathleen Wieters

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 91.18 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 94.12 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 91.18 79.56DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.56 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 85: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CEES 5823-900 Total Enrollment: 8

Section Title: GIS Apps in Envirmntl Modeling Course Level: All

Instructor: Baxter Vieux Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 88.46 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.05687 4 1.05856 471 1.49 2.97 5.94 15.50 18.90 55.20COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 5 1.73205 3 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00 66.67 0.00 29.03 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.12689 4 0.91009 562 2.49 2.85 10.14 43.24 35.23 6.05COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Baxter Vieux

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.83666 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 50.00 38.33DEPARTMENT 4.34872 5 0.86885 593 1.52 3.37 6.75 34.57 52.45 1.35COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.01 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 70.59 62.43DEPARTMENT 4.37931 5 0.86832 592 1.86 2.20 7.60 31.59 54.73 2.03COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.32 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 4 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 52.94 48.62DEPARTMENT 4.22680 4 0.95155 592 2.03 5.07 8.45 35.81 46.96 1.69COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.25 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 86: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 2033-001 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Chemical Engr Fundamentals Course Level: All

Instructor: Brian Grady Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 3 1.15470 12 0.00 0.00 16.67 0.00 8.33 75.00 28.57 29.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.31 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.91287 13 0.00 7.69 15.38 46.15 30.77 0.00 21.43 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Brian Grady

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.69231 4 1.03155 13 0.00 15.38 23.08 38.46 23.08 0.00 21.43 18.89DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.49 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.23077 4 0.72501 13 0.00 0.00 15.38 46.15 38.46 0.00 28.57 32.60DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.08 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.53846 4 1.19829 13 7.69 7.69 30.77 30.77 23.08 0.00 21.43 17.68DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.51 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 87: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 2313-001 Total Enrollment: 85

Section Title: Structure & Properties of Mats Course Level: All

Instructor: Daniel Resasco Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.33333 3 1.52753 32 0.00 3.13 3.13 0.00 3.13 90.63 14.29 18.00DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.62 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.21053 4 0.66405 39 0.00 0.00 12.82 51.28 33.33 2.56 50.00 48.00DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.17 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Daniel Resasco

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.76744 5 0.42746 43 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.26 76.74 0.00 92.86 84.44DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.57 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.76190 5 0.43108 42 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.81 76.19 0.00 92.86 79.56DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.50 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.62791 5 0.65550 43 0.00 2.33 2.33 25.58 69.77 0.00 85.71 69.06DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.45 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 88: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 3333-001 Total Enrollment: 81

Section Title: Separation Processes Course Level: All

Instructor: Vassilios Sikavitsas Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.70 0.00 96.30 64.29 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.26471 4 0.66555 36 0.00 2.78 2.78 55.56 33.33 5.56 64.29 53.71DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.22 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Vassilios Sikavitsas

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.37838 4 0.63907 37 0.00 0.00 8.11 45.95 45.95 0.00 57.14 47.22DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.18 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.40541 4 0.55073 37 0.00 0.00 2.70 54.05 43.24 0.00 57.14 44.20DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.11 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.45946 5 0.73009 37 0.00 2.70 5.41 35.14 56.76 0.00 57.14 52.49DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.31 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 89: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 3432-001 Total Enrollment: 20

Section Title: Unit Operations Laboratory Course Level: All

Instructor: Matthias Nollert Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.87500 4 0.83452 8 0.00 0.00 37.50 37.50 25.00 0.00 57.14 37.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.11 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.51755 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.50 62.50 0.00 100.00 81.71DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.59 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Matthias Nollert

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.46291 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 85.71 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.87500 5 0.35355 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 87.50 0.00 100.00 86.19DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.62 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.87500 5 0.35355 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 87.50 0.00 100.00 88.95DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.67 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 90: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 3432-002 Total Enrollment: 19

Section Title: Unit Operations Laboratory Course Level: All

Instructor: Steven Crossley Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.40825 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.33 16.67 0.00 92.86 58.67DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.83666 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 16.67 66.67 0.00 85.71 70.29DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.46 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Steven Crossley

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 64.29 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 64.29 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 64.29 53.59DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 91: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 3432-003 Total Enrollment: 20

Section Title: Unit Operations Laboratory Course Level: All

Instructor: Friederike Jentoft Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.08333 4 0.66856 12 0.00 0.00 16.67 58.33 25.00 0.00 85.71 58.00DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.08 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.45227 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 57.14 49.71DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.21 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Friederike Jentoft

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.18182 4 0.87386 12 0.00 8.33 0.00 50.00 33.33 8.33 35.71 37.22DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.01 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.08333 4 0.79296 12 0.00 0.00 25.00 41.67 33.33 0.00 21.43 27.62DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.24 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.57735 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 66.67 25.00 0.00 35.71 36.46DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.05 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 92: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 3432-004 Total Enrollment: 16

Section Title: Unit Operations Laboratory Course Level: All

Instructor: Matthias Nollert Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 4 1.31656 10 10.00 10.00 0.00 50.00 30.00 0.00 42.86 33.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.18 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.70711 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 40.00 40.00 10.00 78.57 57.71DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.29 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Matthias Nollert

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 1.05935 10 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 60.00 0.00 42.86 42.22DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.11 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 1.26491 10 10.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 70.00 0.00 50.00 43.09DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.10 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.69921 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 70.00 0.00 78.57 65.19DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.43 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 93: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 4273-001 Total Enrollment: 66

Section Title: Advanced Process Design Course Level: All

Instructor: Miguel Bagajewicz Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 1.83333 1 1.32916 22 18.18 0.00 4.55 4.55 0.00 72.73 7.14 1.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2.01 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.33333 4 1.16369 33 12.12 9.09 21.21 48.48 9.09 0.00 14.29 6.86DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.73 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Miguel Bagajewicz

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 2.67647 3 1.12062 34 17.65 26.47 29.41 23.53 2.94 0.00 14.29 3.89DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 1.49 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.38235 4 1.10137 34 8.82 11.76 20.59 50.00 8.82 0.00 14.29 4.42DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 1.01 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 2.29412 2 1.24388 34 38.24 17.65 23.53 17.65 2.94 0.00 14.29 1.66DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 1.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 94: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 5243-900 / BIOE 5243-900 Total Enrollment: 29

Section Title: Biochemical Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Roger Harrison Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 90.00 64.29 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.15470 12 0.00 16.67 0.00 33.33 33.33 16.67 21.43 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Roger Harrison

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.58333 5 0.51493 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.67 58.33 0.00 71.43 67.78DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.38 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 0.88763 12 0.00 8.33 0.00 41.67 50.00 0.00 42.86 39.23DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.03 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.65134 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 50.00 41.67 0.00 42.86 43.65DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.19 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 95: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 5463-001 Total Enrollment: 22

Section Title: Polymer Processing Course Level: All

Instructor: Robert Shambaugh Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 0.57735 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 22.22 0.00 66.67 28.57 29.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.31 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 0.82327 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 0.00 71.43 56.57DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.26 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Robert Shambaugh

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.30000 5 0.82327 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 0.00 42.86 42.22DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.11 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.72727 5 0.46710 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.27 72.73 0.00 85.71 76.80DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.46 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.45455 5 0.82020 11 0.00 0.00 18.18 18.18 63.64 0.00 50.00 51.38DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.30 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 96: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 5480-001 Total Enrollment: 11

Section Title: Indust/Envir Transprt Process Course Level: All

Instructor: Dimitrios Papavassiliou Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 100.00 68.00DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.57735 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 20.00 85.71 70.29DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.46 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Dimitrios Papavassiliou

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.44721 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 100.00 85.56DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.60 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 71.43 62.43DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.32 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.44721 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 92.86 81.77DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 97: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: CH E 5643-900 Total Enrollment: 25

Section Title: Natural Gas Utilization Course Level: All

Instructor: Richard Mallinson Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.00000 7 0.00 0.00 14.29 14.29 14.29 57.14 64.29 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.61386 4 1.19139 366 2.19 2.19 7.10 8.74 7.38 72.40COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.09091 5 1.30035 12 8.33 0.00 16.67 16.67 50.00 8.33 35.71 40.57DEPARTMENT 4.04922 4 0.92173 460 2.39 3.70 13.48 44.78 32.83 2.83COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Richard Mallinson

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.83333 4 1.19342 12 8.33 0.00 25.00 33.33 33.33 0.00 28.57 22.78DEPARTMENT 4.12154 4 1.05619 487 3.08 6.37 10.88 31.42 44.56 3.70COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.35 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 1.05529 12 0.00 8.33 16.67 16.67 58.33 0.00 35.71 34.25DEPARTMENT 4.18026 4 0.97810 486 2.47 5.14 8.44 36.42 43.42 4.12COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.06 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.83333 4 1.26730 12 8.33 0.00 33.33 16.67 41.67 0.00 28.57 23.76DEPARTMENT 3.95772 4 1.18889 487 6.16 8.21 9.03 33.88 39.84 2.87COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.25 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 98: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 2713-001 Total Enrollment: 35

Section Title: Digital Signals and Filtering Course Level: All

Instructor: Joao Cruz Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.81250 3 1.32759 19 15.79 21.05 21.05 15.79 10.53 15.79 0.00 7.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.10 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.89474 4 0.80930 19 0.00 5.26 21.05 52.63 21.05 0.00 19.15 24.00DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.15 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Joao Cruz

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.47368 5 0.69669 19 0.00 0.00 10.53 31.58 57.89 0.00 42.55 53.33DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.28 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 0.76696 18 0.00 0.00 16.67 33.33 50.00 0.00 27.66 39.23DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.03 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.36842 4 0.59726 19 0.00 0.00 5.26 52.63 42.11 0.00 38.30 47.51DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.22 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 99: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 2723-001 Total Enrollment: 43

Section Title: Electrical Circuits I Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 30 0.00 0.00 6.67 0.00 0.00 93.33 2.44 8.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.55172 5 0.50612 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.63 50.00 9.38 59.58 76.57DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.52 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.79412 5 0.47860 34 0.00 0.00 2.94 14.71 82.35 0.00 74.47 85.00DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.59 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.70588 5 0.52394 34 0.00 0.00 2.94 23.53 73.53 0.00 63.83 74.03DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.44 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.85294 5 0.35949 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.71 85.29 0.00 78.72 87.29DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.65 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 100: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3113-001 Total Enrollment: 35

Section Title: Energy Conversion I Course Level: All

Instructor: Ning Jiang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.41421 24 0.00 0.00 4.17 0.00 4.17 91.67 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.30000 3 1.17429 23 8.70 8.70 30.43 26.09 13.04 13.04 2.13 5.71DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.76 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Ning Jiang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.62500 4 1.01350 24 4.17 8.33 25.00 45.83 16.67 0.00 10.64 16.67DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.56 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.70196 24 0.00 0.00 16.67 50.00 33.33 0.00 23.40 30.39DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.15 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.37500 3 1.05552 24 4.17 12.50 41.67 25.00 16.67 0.00 8.51 14.37DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.66 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 101: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3223-001 Total Enrollment: 57

Section Title: Microprocessor System Design Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.73684 5 0.45241 43 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.63 32.56 55.81 73.17 78.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.69 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.56818 5 0.62497 45 0.00 2.22 0.00 35.56 60.00 2.22 63.83 77.71DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.53 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.60870 5 0.71424 46 0.00 2.17 6.52 19.57 71.74 0.00 57.45 71.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.41 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.65217 5 0.52567 46 0.00 0.00 2.17 30.43 67.39 0.00 55.32 67.40DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.38 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.80435 5 0.45312 46 0.00 0.00 2.17 15.22 82.61 0.00 74.47 84.53DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 102: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3323-001 Total Enrollment: 35

Section Title: Intro-Solid State Elec Devices Course Level: All

Instructor: Patrick Mc Cann Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.67 93.33 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.15789 4 1.06787 19 5.26 0.00 15.79 31.58 47.37 0.00 34.04 44.57DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.11 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Patrick Mc Cann

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.68421 5 0.47757 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.58 68.42 0.00 63.83 77.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.48 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.84211 5 0.50146 19 0.00 0.00 5.26 5.26 89.47 0.00 74.47 84.53DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.58 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.42105 5 0.96124 19 0.00 5.26 15.79 10.53 68.42 0.00 40.43 49.72DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.27 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 103: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3613-900 Total Enrollment: 31

Section Title: Electromagnetic Fields I Course Level: All

Instructor: Fares Beainy Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.88 11.76 82.35 65.85 75.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.62 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 4 0.64676 19 0.00 0.00 10.53 52.63 31.58 5.26 36.17 49.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.18 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Fares Beainy

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.15000 4 0.93330 20 0.00 10.00 5.00 45.00 40.00 0.00 27.66 35.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.04 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.52632 5 0.51299 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.37 52.63 0.00 42.55 58.56DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.24 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.15000 4 0.67082 20 0.00 0.00 15.00 55.00 30.00 0.00 31.92 35.36DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.03 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 104: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3723-001 Total Enrollment: 36

Section Title: Electrical Circuits II Course Level: All

Instructor: John Dyer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.15470 17 0.00 0.00 11.76 0.00 11.76 76.47 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.52632 5 0.69669 19 0.00 0.00 10.53 26.32 63.16 0.00 57.45 74.86DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.49 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

John Dyer

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.59091 5 0.66613 22 0.00 0.00 9.09 22.73 68.18 0.00 53.19 68.89DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.39 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.63636 5 0.65795 22 0.00 0.00 9.09 18.18 72.73 0.00 53.19 65.19DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.36 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.63636 5 0.65795 22 0.00 0.00 9.09 18.18 72.73 0.00 55.32 69.61DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.46 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 105: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3773-010 Total Enrollment: 41

Section Title: Elec/Comp Engr Circuits Lab Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.78947 5 0.53530 21 0.00 0.00 4.76 9.52 76.19 9.52 78.05 80.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.73 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.61111 5 0.60768 19 0.00 0.00 5.26 26.32 63.16 5.26 72.34 81.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.58 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.65000 5 0.58714 20 0.00 0.00 5.00 25.00 70.00 0.00 59.58 72.78DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.45 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.55000 5 0.68633 20 0.00 0.00 10.00 25.00 65.00 0.00 44.68 59.67DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.27 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.65000 5 0.58714 20 0.00 0.00 5.00 25.00 70.00 0.00 57.45 70.17DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.47 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 106: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3773-011 Total Enrollment: 16

Section Title: Lab-ECE 3773-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 71.43 0.00 68.29 76.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.66 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.44721 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 66.67 16.67 85.11 90.29DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.77 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 48.94 63.89DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.37 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 76.60 85.08DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.60 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 80.85 87.85DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.66 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 107: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3773-012 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Lab-ECE 3773-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 71.43 0.00 68.29 76.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.66 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 71.43 0.00 80.85 86.86DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.68 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 80.85 89.44DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.65 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 108: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3773-013 Total Enrollment: 13

Section Title: Lab-ECE 3773-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.74402 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 12.50 75.00 0.00 63.42 74.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.58 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.74402 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 12.50 75.00 0.00 74.47 81.71DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.59 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.70711 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 0.00 87.50 0.00 68.09 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.74402 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 12.50 75.00 0.00 51.06 64.64DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.35 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.74402 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 12.50 75.00 0.00 53.19 67.40DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.45 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 109: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3793-001 Total Enrollment: 38

Section Title: Signals and Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Sesh Commuri Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 1.00000 22 0.00 4.55 4.55 4.55 0.00 86.36 2.44 8.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 4 0.89443 22 0.00 13.64 4.55 59.09 13.64 9.09 14.89 19.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.25 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Sesh Commuri

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 4 0.59761 21 0.00 0.00 4.76 47.62 47.62 0.00 38.30 51.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.23 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 1.01183 22 0.00 22.73 18.18 45.45 13.64 0.00 2.13 6.08DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.88 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.59091 4 0.90812 22 0.00 18.18 13.64 59.09 9.09 0.00 10.64 18.79DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.46 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 110: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3813-001 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Introductory Electronics Course Level: All

Instructor: Clifford Fitzmorris Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.75593 31 0.00 0.00 6.45 6.45 32.26 54.84 60.98 74.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.53 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.45455 5 0.71111 34 0.00 0.00 11.76 29.41 55.88 2.94 46.81 67.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.42 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Clifford Fitzmorris

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.70270 5 0.66101 37 0.00 0.00 10.81 8.11 81.08 0.00 65.96 78.89DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.50 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.72222 5 0.65949 37 0.00 0.00 10.81 5.41 81.08 2.70 68.09 76.24DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.45 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.81081 5 0.51843 37 0.00 0.00 5.41 8.11 86.49 0.00 76.60 85.08DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.62 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 111: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3873-910 Total Enrollment: 45

Section Title: Elec/Comp Engr Electronics Lab Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.54545 5 0.66572 33 0.00 0.00 9.09 27.27 63.64 0.00 58.54 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.51 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.56250 5 0.66901 33 0.00 3.03 0.00 33.33 60.61 3.03 61.70 77.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.53 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.60606 5 0.60927 33 0.00 0.00 6.06 27.27 66.67 0.00 55.32 70.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.41 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.60606 5 0.70442 33 0.00 3.03 3.03 24.24 69.70 0.00 48.94 64.09DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.33 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.78788 5 0.48461 33 0.00 0.00 3.03 15.15 81.82 0.00 68.09 81.22DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.60 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 112: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3873-911 Total Enrollment: 22

Section Title: Lab-ECE 3873-910 Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.46667 5 0.63994 15 0.00 0.00 6.67 40.00 53.33 0.00 51.22 67.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.43 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.46667 4 0.51640 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.33 46.67 0.00 51.06 69.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.43 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.73679 15 0.00 0.00 13.33 33.33 53.33 0.00 36.17 47.78DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.20 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.48795 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 57.45 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.48795 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 59.58 70.72DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 113: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 3873-912 Total Enrollment: 23

Section Title: Lab-ECE 3873-910 Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.65044 15 0.00 0.00 6.67 33.33 53.33 6.67 53.66 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.46154 4 0.51887 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.67 40.00 13.33 48.94 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.43 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.41404 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.75 75.00 6.25 76.60 85.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.60 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.73333 5 0.45774 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 68.75 6.25 70.21 77.90DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.47 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.41404 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.75 75.00 6.25 70.21 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 114: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4273-001 Total Enrollment: 21

Section Title: Digital Design Laboratory Course Level: All

Instructor: Erik Petrich Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 5 1.41421 6 0.00 16.67 16.67 0.00 50.00 16.67 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.41421 7 14.29 0.00 0.00 42.86 42.86 0.00 21.28 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Erik Petrich

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.71429 5 1.88982 7 28.57 0.00 0.00 14.29 57.14 0.00 14.89 20.00DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.14286 5 1.46385 7 14.29 0.00 0.00 28.57 57.14 0.00 21.28 29.83DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.18 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 5 1.11270 7 0.00 14.29 0.00 28.57 57.14 0.00 36.17 40.88DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.15 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 115: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4523-001 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Intro to Communication Theory Course Level: All

Instructor: Joao Cruz Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.50 50.00 12.50 65.96 78.29DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.54 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Joao Cruz

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.87500 5 0.35355 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 87.50 0.00 80.85 86.19DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.62 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.46291 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 65.96 79.56DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.56 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 116: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4773-900 Total Enrollment: 37

Section Title: Laboratory (Special Projects) Course Level: All

Instructor: Gerald Crain Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.16667 4 1.40346 21 9.52 9.52 9.52 19.05 9.52 42.86 9.76 13.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.77 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.43478 3 1.07982 23 4.35 13.04 34.78 30.43 17.39 0.00 4.26 9.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.63 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Gerald Crain

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.77273 4 1.10978 23 4.35 8.70 17.39 39.13 26.09 4.35 17.02 21.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.41 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.95652 4 1.18622 23 4.35 13.04 4.35 39.13 39.13 0.00 12.77 19.89DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.38 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.04348 4 1.42950 23 21.74 17.39 8.70 39.13 13.04 0.00 4.26 8.84DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.95 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 117: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4813-001 Total Enrollment: 15

Section Title: Electronics Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.53452 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 53.66 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.70711 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 44.44 44.44 0.00 40.43 57.71DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.29 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.44444 4 0.52705 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.56 44.44 0.00 40.43 52.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.25 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.70711 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 11.11 77.78 0.00 57.45 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 118: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4823-001 Total Enrollment: 29

Section Title: Engr Principles of Human Body Course Level: All

Instructor: Hong Liu Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.93333 4 0.96115 16 0.00 12.50 6.25 50.00 25.00 6.25 24.39 38.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.06 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.61237 18 0.00 0.00 16.67 61.11 16.67 5.56 21.28 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Hong Liu

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.35294 5 0.86177 17 0.00 5.88 5.88 35.29 52.94 0.00 34.04 46.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.16 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.44444 5 0.61570 18 0.00 0.00 5.56 44.44 50.00 0.00 31.92 46.41DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.15 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.27778 5 0.89479 18 0.00 5.56 11.11 33.33 50.00 0.00 34.04 40.33DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.14 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 119: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4973-960 / ECE 5973-960 Total Enrollment: 7

Section Title: Rf/Microwave Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Yan Zhang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 21.28 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Yan Zhang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 44.68 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 34.04 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 19.15 27.62DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 120: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4973-961 Total Enrollment: 23

Section Title: Optical Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: James Sluss Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.27273 4 0.64667 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 54.55 36.36 0.00 38.30 54.86DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.23 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

James Sluss

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.58333 5 0.66856 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 25.00 66.67 0.00 51.06 67.78DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.38 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.58333 5 0.51493 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.67 58.33 0.00 46.81 61.33DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.30 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.67420 12 0.00 0.00 8.33 33.33 58.33 0.00 42.55 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 121: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 4990-013 Total Enrollment: 2

Section Title: Special Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: John Fagan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 89.36 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

John Fagan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 122: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5223-900 Total Enrollment: 11

Section Title: Estimation and Identification Course Level: All

Instructor: Thordur Runolfsson Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 65.96 78.29DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.54 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Thordur Runolfsson

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 61.70 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.70711 9 0.00 0.00 11.11 44.44 44.44 0.00 27.66 39.23DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.03 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 59.58 70.72DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 123: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5273-900 Total Enrollment: 25

Section Title: Digital Image Processing Course Level: All

Instructor: Joseph Havlicek Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.43 78.57 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.48795 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.41 58.82 11.76 76.60 82.86DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.64 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Joseph Havlicek

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.52941 5 0.62426 17 0.00 0.00 5.88 35.29 58.82 0.00 46.81 60.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.33 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.76471 5 0.56230 17 0.00 0.00 5.88 11.76 82.35 0.00 72.34 80.11DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.50 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.70588 5 0.58787 17 0.00 0.00 5.88 17.65 76.47 0.00 63.83 77.90DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.52 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 124: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5343-001 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Opto-Electronics II Course Level: All

Instructor: Rui Yang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 21.28 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Rui Yang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 34.04 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 125: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5413-001 Total Enrollment: 8

Section Title: Control Theory Course Level: All

Instructor: Choon Yik Tang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 87.23 92.00DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.83 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Choon Yik Tang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 76.60 85.08DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.60 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 126: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5663-900 / METR 4663-900 / ECE 4663-900 / METR 5663-900 Total Enrollment: 10

Section Title: Radar Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Tian-You Yu Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.60000 4 1.51658 7 14.29 0.00 0.00 42.86 14.29 28.57 21.95 28.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.37 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.70000 5 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 78.72 86.29DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.67 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Tian-You Yu

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.90000 5 0.31623 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 90.00 0.00 82.98 90.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.70 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 34.04 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.51640 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 60.00 0.00 51.06 65.19DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.43 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 127: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5973-013 / ECE 4973-013 Total Enrollment: 20

Section Title: Measurement & Automation Course Level: All

Instructor: John Fagan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 5 1.16905 6 0.00 16.67 0.00 33.33 50.00 0.00 46.34 58.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 53.19 70.29DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.46 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

John Fagan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 4 0.75593 7 0.00 0.00 14.29 42.86 42.86 0.00 31.92 41.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.09 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.48795 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 71.43 0.00 65.96 74.59DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.44 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 48.94 63.54DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.40 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 128: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5973-900 / ECE 4973-900 / BIOE 5970-900 Total Enrollment: 7

Section Title: Biomedical Signals & Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Lei Ding Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.00000 3 0.00 0.00 33.33 33.33 33.33 0.00 21.28 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Lei Ding

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 68.09 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 5 1.41421 4 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 0.00 19.15 27.62DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 129: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5973-961 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Optical Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: James Sluss Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 21.28 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

James Sluss

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 21.28 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 25.53 34.25DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.06 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 19.15 27.62DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 130: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5973-980 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: RF/Microwave Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Yan Zhang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 0.95743 4 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 0.00 48.78 64.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.23 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 82.98 88.00DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.72 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Yan Zhang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 68.09 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.57735 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 42.55 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 131: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5973-981 Total Enrollment: 11

Section Title: Optical Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: James Sluss Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 37.50 50.00 75.61 79.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.70 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.60000 5 0.69921 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 70.00 0.00 70.21 80.57DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.57 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

James Sluss

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 76.60 85.56DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.60 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.70000 5 0.48305 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 70.00 0.00 61.70 73.48DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.43 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 30.00 60.00 0.00 42.55 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 132: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5990-006 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Special Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Yan Zhang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 89.36 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Yan Zhang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 133: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5990-032 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Special Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Ning Jiang Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 89.36 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Ning Jiang

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 134: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 5990-981 Total Enrollment: 2

Section Title: Special Studies Course Level: All

Instructor: Hazem Refai Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 89.36 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Hazem Refai

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 21.28 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 135: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 6813-001 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Advanced Topics-Biomed Engr Course Level: All

Instructor: Hong Liu Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 80.49 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 89.36 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Hong Liu

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 82.98 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 136: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ECE 6833-001 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Advanced VLSI Design & Applic Course Level: All

Instructor: Jon Bredeson Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 0.00 66.67 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 4 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.67 33.33 0.00 40.43 57.71DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.29 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jon Bredeson

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 21.28 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 14.89 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 0.00 14.89 21.00DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.40 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 137: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 1410-020 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Freshman Engr Orientation Course Level: All

Instructor: Pakize Pulat Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 16.67 8.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 9.52 3.43DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 1.07 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Pakize Pulat

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 73.91 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.30 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 86.96 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 138: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 1411-001 Total Enrollment: 60

Section Title: Freshman Engineering Exper Course Level: All

Instructor: Jacob Henderson Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.39286 5 0.87514 32 3.13 0.00 3.13 34.38 46.88 12.50 77.78 66.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.37 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.18750 4 0.73780 32 0.00 0.00 18.75 43.75 37.50 0.00 71.43 46.86DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.14 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jacob Henderson

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.63333 5 0.85029 31 3.23 0.00 3.23 16.13 74.19 3.23 69.57 72.22DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.43 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.37500 5 0.97551 32 3.13 3.13 6.25 28.13 59.38 0.00 43.48 42.54DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.07 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.83280 32 3.13 0.00 3.13 18.75 75.00 0.00 69.57 67.40DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.45 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 139: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 1411-020 Total Enrollment: 60

Section Title: Freshman Engineering Exper Course Level: All

Instructor: Pakize Pulat Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.18818 28 3.57 3.57 10.71 17.86 28.57 35.71 50.00 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.96296 4 0.93978 28 0.00 7.14 21.43 35.71 32.14 3.57 42.86 26.86DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.09 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Pakize Pulat

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.74180 28 0.00 3.57 3.57 25.00 67.86 0.00 60.87 63.89DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.37 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.48148 5 0.75296 27 0.00 0.00 14.81 22.22 62.96 0.00 60.87 49.72DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.19 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.67857 5 0.61183 28 0.00 0.00 7.14 17.86 75.00 0.00 73.91 75.69DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.50 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 140: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 1510-001 Total Enrollment: 17

Section Title: Mep-Orientation Course Level: All

Instructor: Lisa Morales Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 0.95743 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 12.50 25.00 50.00 72.22 64.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.23 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 0.88641 8 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 0.00 76.19 49.71DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.21 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Lisa Morales

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.62500 5 0.51755 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.50 62.50 0.00 65.22 71.67DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.43 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 4 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.14 42.86 0.00 47.83 44.75DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.13 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.37500 5 0.74402 8 0.00 0.00 12.50 37.50 50.00 0.00 56.52 48.07DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.23 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 141: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 1510-002 Total Enrollment: 27

Section Title: Mep-Orientation Course Level: All

Instructor: Lisa Morales Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.70711 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 16.67 0.00 66.67 38.89 20.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.46 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.63246 6 0.00 0.00 16.67 66.67 16.67 0.00 47.62 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Lisa Morales

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.30 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.83333 5 0.40825 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 83.33 0.00 78.26 83.98DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.57 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 86.96 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 142: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2002-001 Total Enrollment: 57

Section Title: Professional Development Course Level: All

Instructor: Matthew Green Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.75000 3 1.25831 18 5.56 0.00 11.11 5.56 0.00 77.78 11.11 5.33DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 2.57895 3 1.16980 19 26.32 15.79 31.58 26.32 0.00 0.00 4.76 1.14DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 1.50 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Matthew Green

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.36842 4 1.34208 19 15.79 5.26 26.32 31.58 21.05 0.00 8.70 9.44DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.81 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.44444 4 1.33823 18 11.11 16.67 11.11 38.89 22.22 0.00 4.35 5.53DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.94 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 1.37437 19 26.32 0.00 31.58 31.58 10.53 0.00 4.35 6.08DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.99 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 143: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2002-002 Total Enrollment: 63

Section Title: Professional Development Course Level: All

Instructor: Matthew Green Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 1.50000 2 0.70711 27 3.70 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.59 0.00 0.67DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2.32 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 2.41379 2 1.23974 30 30.00 20.00 30.00 10.00 6.67 3.33 0.00 0.57DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 1.67 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Matthew Green

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.10000 4 1.09387 30 13.33 13.33 23.33 50.00 0.00 0.00 4.35 6.67DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 1.07 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.32258 4 1.27507 31 9.68 22.58 9.68 41.94 16.13 0.00 0.00 3.32DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 1.08 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 2.64516 3 1.37957 31 32.26 16.13 9.68 38.71 3.23 0.00 0.00 2.76DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 1.30 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 144: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2002-003 Total Enrollment: 50

Section Title: Professional Development Course Level: All

Instructor: Matthew Green Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 1.58114 13 7.69 7.69 7.69 7.69 7.69 61.54 16.67 8.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.23077 4 1.53590 13 23.08 7.69 15.38 30.77 23.08 0.00 19.05 5.14DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.83 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Matthew Green

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.07692 4 0.75955 13 0.00 0.00 23.08 46.15 30.77 0.00 30.44 32.78DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.11 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.53846 5 0.66023 13 0.00 0.00 7.69 30.77 61.54 0.00 73.91 59.12DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.25 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.58333 4 1.08362 13 7.69 0.00 30.77 38.46 15.38 7.69 17.39 18.23DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.47 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 145: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2002-004 Total Enrollment: 61

Section Title: Professional Development Course Level: All

Instructor: Matthew Green Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.33333 3 1.03280 25 0.00 4.00 12.00 4.00 4.00 76.00 27.78 18.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.62 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.33333 3 1.03775 27 3.70 18.52 29.63 37.04 11.11 0.00 23.81 6.86DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.73 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Matthew Green

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.57143 4 1.03382 29 3.45 6.90 37.93 27.59 20.69 3.45 13.04 15.56DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.61 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.21429 4 0.73822 29 0.00 3.45 6.90 51.72 34.48 3.45 26.09 32.04DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.10 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.35714 4 1.28277 29 6.90 24.14 13.79 31.03 20.69 3.45 13.04 13.26DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.67 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 146: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2411-920 Total Enrollment: 67

Section Title: Applied Engineering Statics Course Level: All

Instructor: Laura Wesson Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.47140 11 0.00 0.00 9.09 72.73 9.09 9.09 47.62 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Laura Wesson

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.23077 4 0.59914 13 0.00 0.00 7.69 61.54 30.77 0.00 39.13 39.44DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.04 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.23077 4 0.59914 13 0.00 0.00 7.69 61.54 30.77 0.00 30.44 32.60DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.08 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.15385 4 0.37553 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 84.62 15.38 0.00 34.78 35.91DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.03 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 147: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2431-910 Total Enrollment: 137

Section Title: Electrical Circuits Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.75277 36 0.00 0.00 2.78 8.33 5.56 83.33 66.67 58.67DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.97468 42 4.76 2.38 9.52 52.38 28.57 2.38 47.62 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.16279 4 1.08957 43 6.98 0.00 9.30 37.21 46.51 0.00 34.78 36.67DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.03 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.95238 4 1.05812 43 4.65 2.33 20.93 34.88 34.88 2.33 8.70 18.79DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.25581 4 1.02569 43 4.65 4.65 0.00 41.86 48.84 0.00 39.13 39.23DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.12 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 148: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 2531-920 Total Enrollment: 71

Section Title: Electrical Circuits II Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.33333 4 0.81650 27 0.00 3.70 7.41 11.11 0.00 77.78 27.78 18.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.62 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.85185 4 0.71810 28 0.00 7.14 10.71 67.86 10.71 3.57 38.10 21.71DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.20 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.15470 28 3.57 10.71 10.71 32.14 42.86 0.00 21.74 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.76980 28 0.00 3.57 17.86 53.57 25.00 0.00 13.04 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.96429 4 0.96156 28 0.00 10.71 14.29 42.86 32.14 0.00 30.44 27.07DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.13 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 149: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 3410-001 Total Enrollment: 16

Section Title: Engr Orientation-Transfer St Course Level: All

Instructor: Pakize Pulat Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 0.00 83.33 50.00 39.33DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 0.81650 6 0.00 0.00 50.00 33.33 16.67 0.00 28.57 13.71DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.39 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Pakize Pulat

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 52.17 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 65.22 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.54772 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 60.87 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 150: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 3431-920 Total Enrollment: 122

Section Title: Electromechanical Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Chad Davis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.57143 3 1.09237 83 1.20 4.82 15.66 9.64 10.84 57.83 44.44 26.67DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.40 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.84418 91 1.10 2.20 20.88 43.96 28.57 3.30 47.62 27.43DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chad Davis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.05319 4 0.89643 94 1.06 5.32 14.89 44.68 34.04 0.00 26.09 32.22DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.14 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.23404 4 0.76798 94 0.00 2.13 13.83 42.55 41.49 0.00 34.78 33.70DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.08 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.95699 4 1.00989 93 2.15 7.53 17.20 38.71 34.41 0.00 26.09 26.52DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.14 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 151: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 3510-100 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Career Exploration for Engr Course Level: All

Instructor: Richard Dubler Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Richard Dubler

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.30 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 65.22 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 86.96 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 152: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 3511-001 Total Enrollment: 78

Section Title: Engr Orientation Trans Student Course Level: All

Instructor: Pakize Pulat Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.06250 5 0.99791 36 0.00 0.00 19.44 2.78 22.22 55.56 61.11 56.67DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.06 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.78125 4 1.21109 38 2.63 13.16 15.79 21.05 31.58 15.79 33.33 18.86DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.27 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Pakize Pulat

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.28947 5 0.95600 40 2.50 2.50 10.00 30.00 50.00 5.00 43.48 41.67DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.10 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.36842 5 0.91300 40 2.50 2.50 5.00 32.50 52.50 5.00 39.13 41.44DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.07 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.34211 5 0.99394 40 2.50 2.50 12.50 20.00 57.50 5.00 52.17 45.86DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.20 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 153: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4003-900 Total Enrollment: 2

Section Title: Engineering Practice II Course Level: All

Instructor: Jeffrey Moore Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 94.44 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 95.24 93.14DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jeffrey Moore

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.30 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.30 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 86.96 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 154: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4510-013 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Measurement/Automatn Course Level: All

Instructor: John Fagan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.00000 2 0.00000 1 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.56 2.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.85 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.52 3.43DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 1.07 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

John Fagan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 2.00000 2 0.00000 1 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 2.16 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 13.04 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.35 6.08DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.99 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 155: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4510-025 Total Enrollment: 60

Section Title: Leadership/Organization Mgt Course Level: All

Instructor: Jerry Holmes Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.05 78.95 94.44 82.67DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.57895 5 0.76853 24 0.00 4.17 0.00 20.83 54.17 20.83 85.71 80.00DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.55 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jerry Holmes

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.64550 25 0.00 4.00 0.00 8.00 88.00 0.00 82.61 85.56DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.60 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.91667 5 0.40825 25 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 92.00 4.00 82.61 88.40DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.67 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.84000 5 0.62450 25 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 92.00 0.00 78.26 86.74DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.64 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 156: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4510-026 Total Enrollment: 59

Section Title: Leadership/Organization Mgt Course Level: All

Instructor: Jerry Holmes Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.44721 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.35 17.39 78.26 88.89 81.33DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.74 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.45000 5 0.75915 28 0.00 0.00 10.71 17.86 42.86 28.57 80.95 66.86DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.41 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jerry Holmes

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.93103 5 0.25788 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.90 93.10 0.00 86.96 91.11DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.73 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.93103 5 0.25788 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.90 93.10 0.00 86.96 88.95DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.68 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.93103 5 0.25788 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.90 93.10 0.00 82.61 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.72 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 157: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4510-027 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Internship-Engr Course Level: All

Instructor: Mary Delaney Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 95.24 93.14DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Mary Delaney

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 52.17 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 1.41421 2 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 13.04 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 60.87 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 158: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4510-900 Total Enrollment: 6

Section Title: Robotic Design Course Level: All

Instructor: John Fagan Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 90.48 82.86DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.64 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

John Fagan

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 73.91 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 91.30 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 1.15470 3 0.00 0.00 33.33 0.00 66.67 0.00 47.83 43.65DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.19 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 159: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: ENGR 4510-901 Total Enrollment: 28

Section Title: Intro To Air Quality Course Level: All

Instructors: Evelyn Wilke / Michael Webb Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.11 11.11 77.78 83.33 68.00DEPARTMENT 3.83000 4 1.06721 855 2.11 3.04 9.47 18.25 13.92 53.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.09091 4 1.22103 11 9.09 0.00 9.09 36.36 45.45 0.00 66.67 40.57DEPARTMENT 3.67730 4 1.13935 932 6.22 7.30 18.99 35.30 22.96 9.23COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Evelyn Wilke

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.92857 4 1.07161 14 7.14 0.00 14.29 50.00 28.57 0.00 17.39 24.44DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.26 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 5 0.64621 14 0.00 0.00 7.14 42.86 50.00 0.00 47.83 44.75DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.13 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.92857 4 1.07161 14 7.14 0.00 14.29 50.00 28.57 0.00 21.74 24.86DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.17 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Michael Webb

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.35714 5 0.74495 14 0.00 0.00 14.29 35.71 50.00 0.00 47.83 46.67DEPARTMENT 4.27103 4 0.86288 969 1.34 3.20 9.49 38.49 46.85 0.62COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.16 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.42857 5 0.93761 14 0.00 7.14 7.14 21.43 64.29 0.00 47.83 44.75DEPARTMENT 4.18947 4 0.92038 970 1.65 3.81 12.58 36.19 43.71 2.06COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.13 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 5 0.91387 14 0.00 7.14 7.14 35.71 50.00 0.00 43.48 40.88DEPARTMENT 4.13929 4 0.95657 969 2.37 4.23 12.49 38.29 41.90 0.72COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.15 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 160: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 2303-003 / AME 2303-003 Total Enrollment: 58

Section Title: Design & Manufacturing Process Course Level: All

Instructor: Shivakumar Raman Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.16667 4 0.75277 23 0.00 0.00 4.35 13.04 8.70 73.91 57.14 58.67DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.16 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.28000 4 0.73711 25 0.00 4.00 4.00 52.00 40.00 0.00 61.91 55.43DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.24 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Shivakumar Raman

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.53846 5 0.70602 26 0.00 0.00 11.54 23.08 65.38 0.00 66.67 61.67DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.34 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.72000 5 0.45826 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.92 69.23 3.85 76.19 75.69DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.45 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.53846 5 0.64689 26 0.00 0.00 7.69 30.77 61.54 0.00 61.91 61.33DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.38 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 161: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 2311-001 Total Enrollment: 25

Section Title: Cad & Graphics Lab for I E Course Level: All

Instructor: Binil Starly Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.52223 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 42.86 14.29 71.43 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.47 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.46154 5 0.66023 14 0.00 0.00 7.14 35.71 50.00 7.14 80.95 68.00DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.43 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Binil Starly

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.64621 14 0.00 0.00 7.14 28.57 64.29 0.00 71.43 63.89DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.37 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.46667 4 0.51640 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.33 46.67 0.00 52.38 49.17DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.17 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.71429 5 0.46881 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 71.43 0.00 76.19 78.45DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.53 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 162: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 2311-002 Total Enrollment: 28

Section Title: Cad & Graphics Lab for I E Course Level: All

Instructor: Binil Starly Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.83333 5 0.38925 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 71.43 14.29 78.57 82.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.77 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.73333 5 0.45774 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.67 73.33 0.00 90.48 87.43DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.70 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Binil Starly

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.31250 5 1.07819 16 6.25 0.00 6.25 31.25 56.25 0.00 42.86 43.89DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.12 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 1.12122 16 6.25 0.00 6.25 18.75 62.50 6.25 42.86 43.09DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.10 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 1.03280 16 6.25 0.00 0.00 25.00 68.75 0.00 52.38 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 163: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 3293-001 Total Enrollment: 71

Section Title: Applied Engineering Statistics Course Level: All

Instructor: Kash Barker Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 3 1.09545 31 0.00 0.00 9.68 0.00 6.45 83.87 35.71 33.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.18 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.09375 4 0.77707 35 0.00 2.86 14.29 45.71 28.57 8.57 33.33 41.71DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kash Barker

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.41860 5 0.76322 43 0.00 2.33 9.30 32.56 55.81 0.00 52.38 50.56DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.22 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.46512 5 0.76684 43 0.00 2.33 9.30 27.91 60.47 0.00 47.62 48.62DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.17 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 5 1.06578 42 4.76 2.38 9.52 26.19 57.14 0.00 38.10 40.88DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.15 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 164: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 4393-001 Total Enrollment: 20

Section Title: Capstone Design Project Course Level: All

Instructor: Stephen Genheimer Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.44721 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 95.24 90.29DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.77 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Stephen Genheimer

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 4 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 47.62 47.78DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.20 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.83666 5 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 38.10 31.49DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.12 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 4 0.54772 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 40.00 0.00 47.62 48.62DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.25 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 165: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 4563-900 / I E 5563-900 Total Enrollment: 48

Section Title: Quality & Reliability Engineer Course Level: All

Instructor: Jindan Zhou Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 2.66667 3 1.52753 18 5.56 0.00 5.56 5.56 0.00 83.33 0.00 4.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 1.23 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 2.95238 3 1.24403 22 13.64 27.27 9.09 40.91 4.55 4.55 0.00 2.86DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 1.12 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Jindan Zhou

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 2.63636 3 1.25529 22 27.27 13.64 31.82 22.73 4.55 0.00 0.00 1.11DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 1.53 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 2.77273 3 1.30683 22 27.27 4.55 40.91 18.18 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 1.68 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 2.13636 2 1.16682 22 31.82 45.45 4.55 13.64 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.55DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 1.75 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 166: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 4633-001 Total Enrollment: 30

Section Title: Probabilistic Systems Models Course Level: All

Instructor: Hillel Kumin Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 0.57735 13 0.00 0.00 7.69 15.38 0.00 76.92 21.43 29.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.31 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.76923 4 0.92681 13 7.69 0.00 7.69 76.92 7.69 0.00 14.29 17.71DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.28 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Hillel Kumin

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.67937 14 0.00 0.00 21.43 57.14 21.43 0.00 28.57 26.11DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.19 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.07692 4 0.95407 14 0.00 7.14 14.29 35.71 35.71 7.14 19.05 27.07DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.25 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.07143 4 0.82874 14 0.00 0.00 28.57 35.71 35.71 0.00 23.81 33.70DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.04 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 167: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 4804-010 Total Enrollment: 29

Section Title: Ergonomics in Systems Design Course Level: All

Instructor: Randa Shehab Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 5 1.30931 10 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 20.00 42.86 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.10000 4 0.56765 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 70.00 20.00 0.00 38.10 42.29DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.06 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Randa Shehab

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 90.48 85.56DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.60 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 90.48 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.54 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 85.71 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 168: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 4804-011 Total Enrollment: 9

Section Title: Lab-I E 4804-010 Course Level: All

Instructor: Randa Shehab Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.25000 3 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 15.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.69 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.57735 4 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 4.76 9.71DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.56 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Randa Shehab

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 1.29099 4 0.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 9.52 11.11DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.68 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.81650 4 0.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 0.00 14.29 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 1.29099 4 0.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 4.76 16.02DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.54 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 169: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5393-001 / BIOE 5393-001 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Intro-CAD Tissue Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Binil Starly Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.28571 5 1.49603 8 12.50 0.00 0.00 12.50 62.50 12.50 64.29 65.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.27 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.12500 5 1.35620 8 12.50 0.00 0.00 37.50 50.00 0.00 42.86 42.86DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.08 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Binil Starly

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 1.38873 8 12.50 0.00 0.00 25.00 62.50 0.00 38.10 40.00DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.06 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.12500 5 1.35620 8 12.50 0.00 0.00 37.50 50.00 0.00 28.57 28.73DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.20 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 5 1.38873 8 12.50 0.00 0.00 25.00 62.50 0.00 33.33 37.57DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.12 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 170: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5523-900 Total Enrollment: 14

Section Title: Applied Probabilistic Models Course Level: All

Instructor: Hillel Kumin Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 3 1.15470 10 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 10.00 70.00 21.43 29.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.31 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 4 0.51640 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.55 36.36 9.09 76.19 64.57DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.36 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Hillel Kumin

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.90909 4 1.13618 11 9.09 0.00 9.09 54.55 27.27 0.00 23.81 23.33DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.28 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.72727 5 0.46710 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.27 72.73 0.00 80.95 76.80DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.46 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.72727 5 0.46710 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.27 72.73 0.00 80.95 79.01DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.54 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 171: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5643-001 Total Enrollment: 20

Section Title: Engineering Optimization Course Level: All

Instructor: Theodore Trafalis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 90.00 42.86 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.20000 4 0.67612 15 0.00 0.00 13.33 53.33 33.33 0.00 47.62 47.43DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.16 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Theodore Trafalis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.66667 4 0.97590 15 0.00 13.33 26.67 40.00 20.00 0.00 14.29 17.22DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.52 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 4 1.08233 15 6.67 0.00 26.67 40.00 26.67 0.00 9.52 14.92DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.55 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.93333 4 0.79881 15 0.00 6.67 13.33 60.00 20.00 0.00 19.05 25.41DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.16 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 172: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5753-900 Total Enrollment: 20

Section Title: Organization Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Babur Pulat Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.46291 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 52.38 49.71DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.21 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Babur Pulat

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 80.95 73.33DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.47 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 61.91 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.50000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 66.67 70.72DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 173: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5803-010 Total Enrollment: 3

Section Title: Ergonomics-Complex Systems Course Level: All

Instructor: Randa Shehab Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.00000 3 1.41421 2 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 8.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 4.76 9.71DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.56 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Randa Shehab

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 57.14 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 57.14 50.28DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 0.70711 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 52.38 53.59DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.34 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 174: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5863-001 Total Enrollment: 10

Section Title: Product Usability Course Level: All

Instructor: Chen Ling Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 5 1.54919 6 16.67 0.00 0.00 33.33 50.00 0.00 28.57 27.43DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.05 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Chen Ling

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.50000 5 1.22474 6 0.00 16.67 0.00 0.00 83.33 0.00 57.14 53.89DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.30 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.51640 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 61.91 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.33333 5 1.63299 6 16.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.33 0.00 42.86 43.65DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.19 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 175: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5970-020 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Stat Analysis for System Desig Course Level: All

Instructor: Kash Barker Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.25000 4 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 0.00 52.38 49.71DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.21 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Kash Barker

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 85.71 80.56DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.55 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.75000 5 0.50000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 85.71 78.45DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.48 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 90.06DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.78 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 176: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 5970-900 Total Enrollment: 12

Section Title: Systems Engineering Course Level: All

Instructor: Janet Allen Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.37500 4 0.51755 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.50 37.50 0.00 71.43 63.43DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.34 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Janet Allen

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.75000 4 0.88641 8 0.00 12.50 12.50 62.50 12.50 0.00 19.05 20.56DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.44 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.12500 4 0.99103 8 0.00 12.50 0.00 50.00 37.50 0.00 28.57 28.73DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.20 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.75000 4 1.03510 8 0.00 12.50 25.00 37.50 25.00 0.00 14.29 22.10DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.32 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 177: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 6663-001 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Advanced Simulation Topics Course Level: All

Instructor: Floyd Grant Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.71 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 85.71 82.86DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.64 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Floyd Grant

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 61.91 67.96DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.39 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.66667 5 0.57735 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 0.00 66.67 70.72DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.49 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 178: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: I E 6673-001 Total Enrollment: 9

Section Title: Support Vector Machines Course Level: All

Instructor: Theodore Trafalis Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 66.67 85.71 82.67DEPARTMENT 4.23711 4 0.96580 214 1.40 1.40 4.21 16.36 21.96 54.67COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.93 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 100.00 92.00DEPARTMENT 4.23381 4 0.81458 285 1.05 2.46 9.82 43.51 40.70 2.46COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.83 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Theodore Trafalis

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.57143 5 0.53452 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.86 57.14 0.00 71.43 63.89DEPARTMENT 4.28049 5 0.88859 338 1.18 3.55 10.65 33.14 48.52 2.96COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.37 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 89.50DEPARTMENT 4.39024 5 0.76236 337 0.30 2.08 8.61 34.72 51.63 2.67COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.76 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.85714 5 0.37796 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29 85.71 0.00 95.24 87.85DEPARTMENT 4.24398 4 0.93479 339 2.06 4.13 8.85 35.69 47.20 2.06COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.66 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 179: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: TCOM 5543-980 / ECE 5543-980 Total Enrollment: 5

Section Title: Telecomm Network Design & Mgt Course Level: All

Instructor: Szeming Cheng Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 3.50000 4 0.70711 4 0.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 50.00 14.63 20.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 0.46 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 3.60000 4 0.89443 5 0.00 20.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 10.64 12.57DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 0.46 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Szeming Cheng

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 3.80000 4 0.83666 5 0.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 20.00 0.00 19.15 22.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 0.39 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 3.20000 4 1.30384 5 20.00 0.00 20.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 1.21 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 3.60000 4 0.89443 5 0.00 20.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 12.77 19.34DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.46 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 180: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: TCOM 5563-980 / ECE 5563-980 Total Enrollment: 14

Section Title: Computer & Communcatn Security Course Level: All

Instructor: Pramode Verma Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 0.00 77.78 26.83 39.33DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 -0.00 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 4.40000 5 0.69921 10 0.00 0.00 10.00 40.00 50.00 0.00 44.68 64.57DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.36 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Pramode Verma

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 4.22222 5 1.09291 9 0.00 11.11 11.11 22.22 55.56 0.00 29.79 38.89DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.03 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.90000 5 0.31623 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 90.00 0.00 82.98 87.29DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 -0.65 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.80000 5 0.42164 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 80.00 0.00 70.21 81.77DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 -0.61 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1

Page 181: eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012 College of Engineering Course: AME 2303-001 / I E 2303-001 Total Enrollment: 63 Section Title: Design

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2012College of Engineering

Course: TCOM 5960-980 Total Enrollment: 4

Section Title: Readings in Telecommunications Course Level: All

Instructor: Pramode Verma Section Size: All

Question LevelMean

ResponseMedian

ResponseStandardDeviation

ZScore Responses Percent #1 Percent #2 Percent #3 Percent #4 Percent #5 Percent #6 Dept Rank College Rank

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in thecourse material/topics

INDIVIDUAL 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00DEPARTMENT 4.33484 5 0.85605 376 0.80 0.80 7.71 18.09 31.38 41.22COLLEGE 3.96840 4 1.05603 2,866 1.78 2.23 7.96 15.84 16.36 55.83

33. This course increased your ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 89.36 93.14DEPARTMENT 4.25791 4 0.83617 437 1.37 2.29 8.70 40.05 41.65 5.95COLLEGE 3.98788 4 1.01075 -0.98 3,415 3.63 4.33 13.91 40.03 32.33 5.77

Pramode Verma

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequatepreparation for class

INDIVIDUAL 5.00000 5 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 85.11 92.22DEPARTMENT 4.33187 5 0.92552 463 1.73 4.54 7.13 30.89 54.00 1.73COLLEGE 4.23588 4 0.94856 -0.79 3,670 2.07 4.44 9.65 34.31 47.96 1.58

6. Instructor related course material to real life situationsand fostered development of your analysis and/or designabilities

INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 14.89 20.44DEPARTMENT 4.45197 5 0.81754 468 0.64 3.63 5.77 28.63 59.19 2.14COLLEGE 4.23670 4 0.93891 0.34 3,672 2.04 4.00 9.99 34.48 47.28 2.21

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively INDIVIDUAL 4.00000 4 0.00000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 19.15 27.62DEPARTMENT 4.22993 5 1.05049 469 2.77 6.40 9.59 26.23 53.30 1.71COLLEGE 4.09437 4 1.06661 0.10 3,677 3.73 6.31 10.55 34.32 43.65 1.44

Response Key

4. Instructor was well organized and made adequate preparation for class 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

6. Instructor related course material to real life situations and fostered development of your analysis and/or design abilities 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

7. In general, the instructor taught this course effectively 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

16. The lab exercises increased your interest in the course material/topics 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

33. This course increased your ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Applicable

Page 1 of 1


Recommended
CIS 2303 LO3 Process Modeling

CIS 2303 LO3 Process Modeling

Technology

FY-2303 honet

FY-2303 honet

Documents

eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 · eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 Expository Writing Course: EXPO 1213-001 / EXPO 1223-001 Total Enrollment: 13 Section Title: Myth and

eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 · eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 Expository Writing Course: EXPO 1213-001 / EXPO 1223-001 Total Enrollment: 13 Section Title: Myth and

Documents

A presentation on SUPR CRITICAL DGR 2303.pdf

A presentation on SUPR CRITICAL DGR 2303.pdf

Documents

Morgan Flaving 49 (2303) 25191 - 0 Telefax 49 (2303) …morgan-flaving.de/fileadmin/Downloads/Prospekte/... · 2014-06-12 · Automatikgetriebe _____3.980 € Automatikgetriebe mit

Morgan Flaving 49 (2303) 25191 - 0 Telefax 49 (2303) …morgan-flaving.de/fileadmin/Downloads/Prospekte/... · 2014-06-12 · Automatikgetriebe _____3.980 € Automatikgetriebe mit

Documents

1 EE 2303 Intro to Electrical Engineering Orientation .

1 EE 2303 Intro to Electrical Engineering Orientation .

Documents

CE 2303 Railways RADH Two Mark Questions & Answers

CE 2303 Railways RADH Two Mark Questions & Answers

Documents

eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 · eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 College of Journalism and Mass Communication Course: JMC 0123-001 Total Enrollment: 13 ... Response Standard

eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 · eValuate Report (Public) - Fall 2010 College of Journalism and Mass Communication Course: JMC 0123-001 Total Enrollment: 13 ... Response Standard

Documents

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2014...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2014 College of Liberal Studies Course: LSAL 3113-001 Total Enrollment: 24 Section Title: Leadership in Organizations

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2014...eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2014 College of Liberal Studies Course: LSAL 3113-001 Total Enrollment: 24 Section Title: Leadership in Organizations

Documents

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2016€¦ · eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2016 Honors College Course: HON 2970-001 Total Enrollment: 4 Section Title: The Academic Habit (HONORS)

eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2016€¦ · eValuate Report (Public) - Spring 2016 Honors College Course: HON 2970-001 Total Enrollment: 4 Section Title: The Academic Habit (HONORS)

Documents

FOR LEASE—RESTAURANT 2303 E. Washington …

FOR LEASE—RESTAURANT 2303 E. Washington …

Documents

Certificate in Computer-aided Engineering Competences (2303) · Certificate in Computer-aided Engineering Competences (2303) Qualification Handbook November 2006 Version 1.0 . ...

Certificate in Computer-aided Engineering Competences (2303) · Certificate in Computer-aided Engineering Competences (2303) Qualification Handbook November 2006 Version 1.0 . ...

Documents

Recursion and Function Implementation CS-2303, C-Term 20101 Recursion and Implementation of Functions CS-2303 System Programming Concepts (Slides include.

Recursion and Function Implementation CS-2303, C-Term 20101 Recursion and Implementation of Functions CS-2303 System Programming Concepts (Slides include.

Documents

“Regula” model 2303

“Regula” model 2303

Documents

IT DALAM PENDIDIKAN JAN 2015 2303.doc

IT DALAM PENDIDIKAN JAN 2015 2303.doc

Documents

PL-2303 Mac OS X Driver Installation Guide

PL-2303 Mac OS X Driver Installation Guide

Documents

1 EE 2303 Intro to Electrical Engineering EE 2303 Intro to Electrical Engineering Orientation .

1 EE 2303 Intro to Electrical Engineering EE 2303 Intro to Electrical Engineering Orientation .

Documents

Cis 2303 lo1 part 1_weeks_1_2 - student ver

Cis 2303 lo1 part 1_weeks_1_2 - student ver

Documents