+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With...

Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With...

Date post: 03-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
11
Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitations Barbara E. Weber, MD, MPH, Rochester, New York, Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Pittsburgh, Pemsy/vania PURPOSE: To determine: (1) the etiologies of pal- pitations, (2) the usefulness of diagnostic tests in determining the etiologies of palpitations, and (3) the outcomes of patients with palpitations. PAIIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety consecutive patients presenting with a complaint of palpitations at a university medical center were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients undement a structured clinical interview and psy- chiatric screening. The charts were abstracted for results of the physical exam and tests ordered by the primary physician. Assignment of an etiology of palpitations was based on strict adherence to predetermined criteria and achieved by consensus of the two physician investigators. One-year follow- up was obtained in 96% of the patients. RESULTS An etiology of palpitations was deter- mined in 84% of the patients. The etiology of pal- pitations was cardiac in 43%, psychiatric in 31%, miscellaneous in lo%, and unknown in 16%. Forty percent of the etiologies could be determined with the history and physical examination, an electro- cardiogram, and/or laboratory data. The l-year mortality rate was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [Cl] 0% to 3.4%) and the l-year stroke rate was 1.1% (95% Cl 0% to 2.6%). W&in the first year, 75% of the patients experienced recurrent palpita- tions. At l-year follow-up, 89% reported that their health was the same or improved compared to that at enrollment, 19% reported that their work performance was impaired, 12% reported that workdays were missed, and 33% repotted accom- plishing less than usual work at home. CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of palpitations can of- ten be diagnosed with a simple initial evaluation. Psychiatric illness accounts for the etiology in nearly one third of all patients. The short-term prognosis of patients with palpitations is excellent with low rates of death and stroke at 1 year, but From the Universitv of Prttsburah School of Medicine (WNK), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pi&burgh, Pennsylvania,and the University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry (BEW), St. Mary’s Hosoltal. Rochester. New York. D;. Wikhwa N. Kapoor is a recipient of a Research Career Development Award from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K04L 01899). Requests for reprints should be addressed to Barbara E. Weber, MD, MPH, St. Mary’s Hospital. 89 Genesee Street, Rochester, New York 14611. Manuscript submitted December 29, 1994 and accepted in revised form July 10, 1995. there is a high rate of recurrence of symptoms and a moderate impact on productivity. P alpitations are one of the most common symp- toms in general medical settings, reported by as many as 16% of the patients.’ This symptom may be caused by a variety of disorders, ranging from life- threatening conditions such as ventricular tachycar- dia2 to various psychiatric illnesses.3 As a result, pa- tients with palpitations often undergo a wide variety of diagnostic tests and referrals leading to substan- tial resource utilization.* Currently, clinical experi- ence guides the physician caring for patients with pal- pitations, since there are no prior studies that describe the spectrum of etiologies or the usefulness of diagnostic tests in the evaluation of palpitations. Furthermore, the outcome of patients with palpita- tions has not been well described. In the only retro- spective study of outcomes in patients with palpita- tionq5 cases with palpitations and controls without palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine (1) the etiologies of palpitations, (2) the usefulness of diagnostic tests in determining the eti- ologies of palpitations, and (3) the outcomes of pa- tients with palpitations. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective cohort study of patients pre- senting with palpitations. Palpitations were defined as one or more of the following patient complaints: fast heart beats, skipped heart beats, irregular heart rate, and heart fluttering, racing, or pounding.” Study Entry Criteria Between January 2 and August 30, 1!391, all pa- tients presenting to the emergency department, ad- mitted to the medical and surgical inpatient service, or attending the medical clinics of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center were screened for study eligibility. Patients presenting to the psychiatric emergency department or admitted directly to the psychiatric service were not screened far study eli- gibility. Inclusion criteria were palpitations as a chief complaint for seeking medical care or palpitations as one of the chief complaints during a routine visit to the physician. The symptom must have occurred at least once in the 3 months preceding this index visit. Patients were excluded if their age was less than 18 years, they were known to be aphasic or demented, 138 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine” Volume 100
Transcript
Page 1: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitations Barbara E. Weber, MD, MPH, Rochester, New York, Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Pittsburgh, Pemsy/vania

PURPOSE: To determine: (1) the etiologies of pal- pitations, (2) the usefulness of diagnostic tests in determining the etiologies of palpitations, and (3) the outcomes of patients with palpitations.

PAIIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety consecutive patients presenting with a complaint of palpitations at a university medical center were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients undement a structured clinical interview and psy- chiatric screening. The charts were abstracted for results of the physical exam and tests ordered by the primary physician. Assignment of an etiology of palpitations was based on strict adherence to predetermined criteria and achieved by consensus of the two physician investigators. One-year follow- up was obtained in 96% of the patients.

RESULTS An etiology of palpitations was deter- mined in 84% of the patients. The etiology of pal- pitations was cardiac in 43%, psychiatric in 31%, miscellaneous in lo%, and unknown in 16%. Forty percent of the etiologies could be determined with the history and physical examination, an electro- cardiogram, and/or laboratory data. The l-year mortality rate was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [Cl] 0% to 3.4%) and the l-year stroke rate was 1.1% (95% Cl 0% to 2.6%). W&in the first year, 75% of the patients experienced recurrent palpita- tions. At l-year follow-up, 89% reported that their health was the same or improved compared to that at enrollment, 19% reported that their work performance was impaired, 12% reported that workdays were missed, and 33% repotted accom- plishing less than usual work at home.

CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of palpitations can of- ten be diagnosed with a simple initial evaluation. Psychiatric illness accounts for the etiology in nearly one third of all patients. The short-term prognosis of patients with palpitations is excellent with low rates of death and stroke at 1 year, but

From the Universitv of Prttsburah School of Medicine (WNK), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pi&burgh, Pennsylvania, and the University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry (BEW), St. Mary’s Hosoltal. Rochester. New York.

D;. Wikhwa N. Kapoor is a recipient of a Research Career Development Award from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K04L 01899).

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Barbara E. Weber, MD, MPH, St. Mary’s Hospital. 89 Genesee Street, Rochester, New York 14611.

Manuscript submitted December 29, 1994 and accepted in revised form July 10, 1995.

there is a high rate of recurrence of symptoms and a moderate impact on productivity.

P alpitations are one of the most common symp- toms in general medical settings, reported by as

many as 16% of the patients.’ This symptom may be caused by a variety of disorders, ranging from life- threatening conditions such as ventricular tachycar- dia2 to various psychiatric illnesses.3 As a result, pa- tients with palpitations often undergo a wide variety of diagnostic tests and referrals leading to substan- tial resource utilization.* Currently, clinical experi- ence guides the physician caring for patients with pal- pitations, since there are no prior studies that describe the spectrum of etiologies or the usefulness of diagnostic tests in the evaluation of palpitations. Furthermore, the outcome of patients with palpita- tions has not been well described. In the only retro- spective study of outcomes in patients with palpita- tionq5 cases with palpitations and controls without palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine (1) the etiologies of palpitations, (2) the usefulness of diagnostic tests in determining the eti- ologies of palpitations, and (3) the outcomes of pa- tients with palpitations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective cohort study of patients pre-

senting with palpitations. Palpitations were defined as one or more of the following patient complaints: fast heart beats, skipped heart beats, irregular heart rate, and heart fluttering, racing, or pounding.”

Study Entry Criteria Between January 2 and August 30, 1!391, all pa-

tients presenting to the emergency department, ad- mitted to the medical and surgical inpatient service, or attending the medical clinics of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center were screened for study eligibility. Patients presenting to the psychiatric emergency department or admitted directly to the psychiatric service were not screened far study eli- gibility. Inclusion criteria were palpitations as a chief complaint for seeking medical care or palpitations as one of the chief complaints during a routine visit to the physician. The symptom must have occurred at least once in the 3 months preceding this index visit. Patients were excluded if their age was less than 18 years, they were known to be aphasic or demented,

138 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine” Volume 100

Page 2: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

PATlEriTS WITH PALPITATiONS/WEBER AND KAPOOR

or were unable to speak English. Patients transferred from the inpatient service of another hospital, those admitted only for same-day surgery, and patients with palpitations only elicited on review of systems were also excluded.

Patient Identification Because palpitations are often not the sole diag-

nosis for admission or discharge, and patients with palpitations are often labeled with a more specific di- agnosis, a comprehensive search strategy was used to capture all patients with palpitations. To identify patients eligible for the study, we performed daily re- view of the following lists: emergency department dis- charge diagnoses, hospital admission diagnoses, and outpatient visit discharge diagnoses. If any of the di- agnoses noted in Table I was found, the medical chart was reviewed and the patient’s physician was contacted to ascertain if the chief complaint was pal- pitations. In cases in which this could not be ascer- tained, the patient was contacted for clarification. Patients who met the entry criteria were asked to par- ticipate in the study. Conduct of the study was ap- proved by the institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh.

Patient Evaluation Patients who agreed to participate were inter-

viewed. The structured interview was directed at the following issues: palpitation characteristics, associ- ated symptoms and situations, drug and medication use, and comorbid illness. Medical charts were re- viewed and data were abstracted regarding physical examination findings and results of the diagnostic evaluation. This process was completed by the prin- cipal investigator (BEW) as soon as possible after the patient presented for medical care. Interviews were performed in person with 42% and on the phone with 58% of patients. The mean time in days between event and evaluation was 1.1, evaluation and interview was 3.4, and event and interview was 4.2. The median time in days between event and evaluation was 0, evalua- tion and interview was 2, and event and interview was 2. The physical exam and diagnostic evaluation (ie, electrocardiogram [ECG], laboratory tests, arrhyLh- mia detection) was determined by the individual physician seeing the patient at the index visit. In cases in which tests for arrhythmia detection were not or- dered by the clinician, the investigators made loop monitors available.

To screen for generalized anxiety disorder, panic at- tack, panic disorder, major depression, and somatiza- tion disorder, patients were asked to complete two val- idated self-administered instruments: the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ),7-12 and the somatization screening test of Othmer and DeSouza13 (SOM). The

TABLE I Diagnoses Used to Identify Patients

Anemia Transfusion Anxiety Aortic aneurysm Arrhythmia Specific arrhythmias (ie, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, brady-

cardia, multifocal atrial tachycardia, pre-excitation syndrome, sick sinus syndrome, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation)

Atrial myxoma Cardiomyopathy Chest pain Cocaine abuse Congestive heart failure Dizziness Drug toxicity (ie, amphetamines, theophylline) High output failure Hypoglycemia Pacemaker failure Palpitations Panic attack Pheochromocytoma Rule out myocardial infarction Shunt or fistula (peripheral or cardiac) Syncope Thyrotoxicosis Unstable angina Valvular heart disease

30question GHQ was answered using a 4 point Likert scale and scored with 1 point for each response of 3 or 4, allowing for a maximum score of 30. The 7ques tion SOM was scored with 1 point for each positive re sponse. Patients with a GHQ score14J5 of 25 or a SOM score16 of 23 or in whom these psychiatric illnesses were clinically suspected were further assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS)17Js sections for generalized anxiety disorder, panic attack and dis- order, major depression, and/or somatization disorder. The DIS was adininistered over the telephonelg by a trained certified registered nurse practitioner. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition revised, (DSM-III-R>2O criteria were used to score the DIS. Generalized anxiety disorder, panic attack and disorder, and somatization disorder were considered present if symptoms were present within the last 6 months. Depression was evaluated as a life- time disorder. Depression was considered to be C(F morbid and not etiologic, since palpitations are not listed as a criterion symptom in DSM-III-R.

Assignment of Etiology of Palpitations Diagnostic criteria for the etiology of palpitations

were developed prior to the start of the study after extensive review of the literature (see Appendix). We appraised pertinent articles, case reports, review papers, and cardiology and general medicine text-

February 1996 The American Journal of Medicinea Volume 100 139

Page 3: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

TABLE II Patient Characteristics (N = 190)’

Mean age (yl 46 Range 18-87

Female 61 White 74 21 year of college education 57 Site of presentation

Emergency department 62 Medical clinic 28

Symptom presentation Chief complaint 87 Complaint during a routine visit 13

Admitted to hospital 35 History of prior palpitations 77 History of

Heart disease+ 32 Hypertension 29 Congestive heart failure 13 Diabetes mellitus 7

‘Other than mean age, data shown represent the percentage of patients included. ‘Coronary (ie, history of myocardial infarction, angina, coronary artery by- pass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty), congen- ital, or valvular heart disease, or cardiomyopathy.

books to find disorders associated with the symptom of palpitations. Assignment of an etiology was based on strict adherence to these criteria and achieved by consensus of the two physician investigators.

The diagnostic criteria permitted a simple catego- rization of the etiologies of palpitations. Cardiac eti- ology included arrhythmias, cardiac and extra-car- diac shunts, regurgitant vahular heart disease, pacemaker, prosthetic heart valve, cardiomegaly, mi- tral valve prolapse, hyperkinetic heart syndrome, and atrial myxoma. Psychiatric etiology included panic at- tack, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and somatization disorder. The category of miscella- neous etiology included medications, habits, meta- bolic disorders, high output states, dehydration and orthostatic hypotension, and exertion.

Given the available information (ie, history, physi- cal, diagnostic evaluation, psychiatric testing), the in- vestigators considered each etiology (see Appendix). Because correlation of symptoms with documented arrhythmias was the most concrete example of causality, whenever this occurred the diagnosis of ar- rhythmia was assigned. The remaining etiologies were carefully considered for their presence or ab- sence. This hierarchy always designated cardiac ar- rhythmias as the etiology, although psychiatric or metabolic comorbid conditions may have been pre- sent. Similarly, metabolic disorders were considered to be the etiology, although psychiatric conditions may have been present.

These diagnoses were considered definite, with only three exceptions. Diagnoses involving medications or

TABLE Ill Etiologies of Palpitations

No. Percent Cardiac 82 43.2

Atrial fibrillation 19 10.0 Supraventricular tachycardia 18 9.5 Premature ventricular beats 15 7.9 Atrial flutter 11 5.8 Premature atrial beats 6 3.2 Ventricular tachycardia 4 2.1 Mitral valve prolapse 2 1.1 Sick sinus syndrome 2 1.1 Pacemaker failure 2 1.1 Aortic insufficiency 2 1.1 Atrial myxoma 1 0.5

Psychiatric 58 30.5 Panic attack or disorder plus anxiety 20 10.5 Panic attack alone 17 8.9 Panic disorder alone 14 7.4 Anxiety alone 6 3.2 Panic plus anxiety plus somatization 1 0.5

Miscellaneous 19 10.0 Medication 5 2.6 Thyrotoxicosis 5 2.6 Caffeine 3 1.6 Cocaine 2 1.1 Anemia 2 1.1 Amphetamine 1 0.5 Mastocytosis 1 0.5

Unknown 31 16.3

habits were considered to be definite, probatble, or pos- sible, adapted from the literature on adverse drug ef- fects.*l Arrhythmias (only supraventricular tihycar- dia and ventricular tachycardia) and anxiety were considered definite or probable. Only 5.8% of the pa- tients had etiologies that were considered probable or possible. As this is the first study to explore the eti- ologies for the symptom of palpitations, our focus was on the spectrum of etiologies; therefore, for the analy- ses presented here, the categories of definite, proba- ble, and possible were combined. These diamostic cri- teria allowed patients to be assigned to only one etiology category, but could have more than one diag- nosis within that category (ie, premature ventricular contraction and premature atrial contraction, cocaine and caffeine, but not supraventricular tachycardia and anxiety).

Follow-Up All patients were contacted by phone at 3 and 6

months, and for final follow-up at 9 and/or 12 months. Responses to standard questions regarding recur- rences, new cardiovascular events, and mortality were obtained from the patient, the family, or care- giver; interviewers were trained to avoid leading ques- tions and to be specific with respect to morbidity re- lated only to palpitations. All interviews were completed by October 28, 1992; over 90% of inter-

140 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine* Volume 100

Page 4: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

PATIENTS WITH PALPITATlONS/WEBER AND KAPOOR

TABLE N Selected Significant Variables and Their Relationship to Etiology’

Cardiac Psychiatric Miscellaneous Unknown Demographic

Mean (y) age 50 41 46 47 Male sex (%I 51 29 26 32 White (%) 85 67 74 58

Comorbidity History of heart disease (%I 45 19 16 32

Symptom characteristics Irregular heart beat (%) 34 21 50 Duration >5 minutes (%I :: 51 67 50 Total number of symptoms @I!-131 3.5 5.3 4.3 2.9

'P do.05 (analysis of variance for age and number of symptoms and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables). One or more of the etiology categories is different from the others.

views were performed by the same physician’s assis- tant. Whenever follow-up events occurred, attempts were made to obtain further details from the primary physician and medical chart. The cause of death was assigned on the basis of information obtained from the patient’s family and the medical chart.

Statistical Analyses Standardized forms for entry of clinical, laboratory,

and outcome data were utilized. Data management and analyses were conducted with the use of RBase (Microrim Inc, Seattle, Washington),22 BMDP (UC Press, Berkeley, California),23 StatXact (Cytel Corp, Cambridge, Massachusetts),24 and ROCFIT (University of Chicago, Chicago, Illin~is)~~ software packages. Statistical tests included the &i-square, Fisher’s exact, and analysis of variance tests to evaluate differences between groups. Logistic regression analysis (BMDP LRa) was used to test for independence among pre- dictors of a cardiac etiology of palpitations. Our intent was to create a clinical prediction model that incor- porated variables readily available in the initial history. All variables tested were dichotomous, including the composite variable ‘history of heart disease’, which was considered present if any of the following was pre- sent: histow of angina, myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery, percutaneous lxansluminal coronary angio- plasty, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart fail- ure, and va,lvular or congenital disease. To evaluate this prediction model, a receiver-operatingxharacteristic (ROC) curve25 was constructed based on the number of multivariate predictors of cardiac etiology present. One-year mortality and stroke rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.26

RESULTS Entry criteria were met by 229 patients. Thirty-nine

patients were not enrolled due to patient or physician refusal. Therefore, 83% agreed to participate. Those agreeing to participate did not differ in age, race, or

gender from those who refused. Selected features of the 190 enrolled patients are shown in Ttible Il.

Etiologies An etiology for palpitations was assigned in 159

[84%) patients. The specific etiologies are listed in Table III. Overall, 43% of the patients had1 a cardiac etiology, 31% had a psychiatric etiology, 10% had mis- cellaneous etiologies, and 16% were unknown. For the subgroup of patients presenting to the medical clinic, the etiology was cardiac in Zl%, psychiatric in 45%, miscellaneous in 696, and 28% unhewn. For the sub- group of patients presenting to the emergency de- partment, the etiology was cardiac in 47%, psychiatric in 27%, miscellaneous in 13%, and 13% unknown. There was a significant difference in etiology by site of presentation (P <0.002). The distribution of eti- ologies was not statistically different when those with prior palpitations were compared to those without prior palpitations (P = 0.24).

Twenty-four patients were assigned more than one etiology: 21 were coexisting psychiatxic illnesses (eg, generalized anxiety disorder and panic disordler), 2 had both symptomatic premature atrial and ventricular beats, and 1 had coexisting cocaine and ctieine use.

Of the 159 patients for whom an etiology could be determined, 148 were definite, 10 were probable, and 1 was possible. In the miscellaneous category, there were 4 probable medication and habit etiologies and 1 possible medication/thyrotoxicosis etiology. In the psychiatric category, there were 3 probable anxiety etiologies. In the cardiac category, there were 3 prob- able arrhythmias. (See Methods section for specific definitions).

Table IV lists selected variables (ie, demographic, historical, and symptom characteristic) and their re- lationship with the four categories of etiology. The cardiac group had the highest mean age and the great- est percentage of males, and its patients were more likely to describe an irregular heart beat and report

February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine’ Volume X00 141

Page 5: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

TABLE V Multivariate Predictors of Cardiac Etiology

Odds 95% Confidence Ratio Interval

Male sex 2.6 1.2 to 5.4 Description of an irregular beat 3.2 1.5 to 6.8 History of heart disease 3.5 1.6 to 7.8 >5minute duration of 5.7 2.4 to 13.7

palpitation event

TABLE VI Evaluation Methods and the Number of Patients for

Whom Each Test Revealed the Etiology of Palpitations

Initial database History and physical alone 13 Electrocardiogram’+ 43 Laboratory alone 5 History and physical plus laboratory 3 Diagnosis suggested by history and physical 4

Diagnostic Interview Schedule 55 Monitoring’

Telemetry 12 Halter monitor 8 Loop monitor 3 Telemetry plus Holter 2

Dthert Electrophysiologic study 3 Echoaardiogram 1 Aortogram 1 Pacemaker evaluation 1 Previous diagnosis or evaluation 5

Total 159s ‘The number of tests performed for arrhythmia detection was as follows: 166 electrocardiograms, 79 radioelectrocardiograms (telemetty), 53 Hotter mom itors, 10 loop monrtors, 10 electrophysiologtc studies, and 2 pacemaker eval- uations. ‘Pacemaker evaluation plus electrocardiogram was diagnostic in 1 patient. $The number of selected other tests performed was as foltows: 93 chest roentgenograms, 48 echocardiograms, 16 exercise treadmill tests, 9 car- diac catheterizations, and 6 muitigated angiograms. §An etiology could not be determined in 31 patients.

the duration of their palpitation event as greater than 5 minutes. The highest mean number of associated symptoms was reported by patients in the psychiatric group. One variable that did not distinguish the eti- ologies was a history of prior palpitations.

After the noncardiac etiologies were combined and compared to the cardiac etiology group, we found six clinically meaningful variables that were significant univariate predictors of a cardiac etiology of palpita- tions (P ~0.05). These variables were older age (con- tinuous), male sex, description of an irregular heart beat, history of heart disease, duration of palpitation event >5 minutes, and fewer number of associated symptoms (continuous variable). When these vari- ables were entered into a multivariate logistic regres- sion model, male sex, description of an irregular heart beat, history of heart disease, and event duration of >5 minutes were found to be independent predictors

of a cardiac etiology (Table V). Although~ univa,ria~~ analysis revealed that presentation to the emergency de- partment compared with the medical clinic ‘was associ- ated with a cardiac etiology of palpitations (P <0.002), this was not a significant multivariate predictor of car- diac etiology (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 5.4). None of the 17 patients with 0 predictors had a cardiac etiology, 13 (26%) of the 50 pa,tients with 1 predictor had a cardiac etiology, 28 (48%)) of t.he 58 patients with 2 predictors had a cardiac etiology, 22 (71%) of the 31. patients with 3 predictors had a car- diac etiology, and 9 (90%) of the 10 patients with all 4 predictors had a cardiac etiology. Twenty fcmr patients with missing data were excluded from this analysis. The area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.79 (standard deviation of the area = 0.04).

Diagnostic Testing Table VI describes the evaluation of Ipatients in

terms of the types of tests ordered, as well as the num- ber of patients for whom a diagnostic test led to the etiology of palpitations. The basic patient evaluation consisted of a history and physical (completed in loo%?), psychiatric screening with the GHQ (completed in 76%), and arrhythmia detection (ECG completed in 87%, prolonged electrocardiographic monit80ring com- pleted in 64%). The performance of history and physi- cal examination, ECG, and prolonged electrocardio graphic monitoring was not significantly different (P >0.2) between patients who had a known etiology of palpitations and those who had unknown etiology.

Of the 159 patients for whom a diagnosis could be made, 64 (40%) were accomplished with either the his- tory and physical e xamination, an ECG, and/or labo- ratory data The laboratory data that was diagnostic in 8 patients included thyroid function studies and serum theophylline level and hematocrit determinations.

Cardiac arrhythmia etiologies were detected by ECG in 43 patients and by prolonged electrocardio- graphic monitors in 25 patients; of the remlaining 122 patients, 110 (90%) underwent electrocardiography or prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring, how- ever, none of these tests revealed the etiology of pal- pitations. There was no evidence for gender, age, or racial bias in the performance of ECG or monitoring. There was no evidence for bias in the performance of monitoring based on site of presentation. An ECG was more likely to be performed if the patient pre- sented to the emergency department (94:0/o), rather than any other site (78%); conversely, an ECG was less likely to have been performed if the patient pre- sented to the medical clinic (70?), rather than any other site (95%) (P ~0.01).

Psychiatric screening instruments were completed by 144 (76%) patients. A GHQ score 25 and/or SOM score 23 was found in 73 individuals. The DIS was ad-

142 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine” Volume 100

Page 6: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

PATIENTS WITH PALPITATiONS/VVEBER AND KAPOOR

ministered to these 73 patients and to an additional 23 patients with clinical features suggestive of a pos- sible psychiatric illness. Of the 96 patients assessed by the DIS, one or more psychiatric illness was diag- nosed in 78 patients (for a total of 154 diagnoses). Additionally, 4 other patients were felt to have clini- cally significant psychiatric illness (3 with anxiety, 1 with depression and suicidal ideation). The diagnoses made by DIS were panic attack and/or disorder (n = 69), generalized anxiety disorder (n = 39), somatiza- tion disorder (n = l), and depression (n = 45). The majority of patients (52 of 78) had 2 or more coex- isting psychiatric illnesses; most frequently, depres- sion accompanied one of the other disorders (n = 41). There were significantly more DIS performed in non- white (65%) than white (45%) patients (P ~0.02).

Ultimately, 58 of these 82 patients (55 with a positive DIS, 3 with a clinical diagnosis) were assigned to the psychiatric etiology group (Table Ill); 5% (29/55) of these patients were also depressed, however depres- sion was considered to be comorbid and not etiologic.

There were 19 patients with a positive DIS in whom the psychiatric illness was considered to be comor- bid and not etiologic. The assigned etiologies in these patients were: arrhythmias in 14, medications in 2, thyrotoxicosis in 1, and unknown in 2. These 2 pa- tients were categorized as unknown etiology instead of psychiatric etiology because one had coexisting al- coholism and the second had a remote history of the psychiatric disorder.

Follow-Up By October 28, 1992, follow-up was completed in

98% of the patients. At least l-year follow-up (365 days + 14 days) was available for 96% of the patients. Table VII details the outcomes at final follow-up. All reports of stroke were confirmed by the medical record.

Mortality was documented in 3 patients; none of the deaths was sudden. One death was due to a sub- arachnoid hemorrhage in a patient taking warfarin fol- lowing aortic valve replacement for aortic insuffi- ciency. The second death was due to congestive heart failure and renal failure in a patient following a stroke. The third death was due to severe congestive heart fail- ure in a patient with cell&is and soft-tissue abscess. There were 2 patients with new arrhythmias docu- mented in follow-up; it is probable that these were re- sponsible for the original palpitations. One patient, originally in the unknown category, had symptomatic correlation of palpitations with premature ventricular beats upon repeat presentation. Another patient with increasing symptoms, originally in the psychiatric cat- egory, had documentation of symptomatic correlation of palpitations with supraventicular tachycardia.

The percent with recurrent palpitations varied by etiology; however, this difference was only significant

TABLE VII

Outcomes at Final Follow-Up

Mortalitv 1%) Stroke 1%) -. . - Cardiac (n = 82) 1 (1.2) 1 (1.2) Psychiatric (n = 58) l(1.7) 0 Miscellaneous (n = 19) 1 (5.3) 1 (5.3) Unknown (n = 31) 0 0 Total’ (n = 190) 3 (1.6) 2 (1.1) ‘One-year mortakty and stroke rates were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% confidence interval for the total mortality rate was 0% to 3.4% and for the total stroke rate was 0% to 2.6%. Mean and median follow-up times for both stroke and death exceeded 365 days.

at the first follow-up when recurrent symptoms were experienced by 61% of the psychiatric group, 53% of the cardiac group, 17% of the miscellaneous group, and 48% of the group with an unknown etiology (P ~0.02). By the last follow-up, 75% of all patients re- ported recurrent symptoms. This rate of recurrent symptoms varied by history of prior palpitations; 79% of the patients with and 61% of the patients without a prior history of palpitations had recurrent events within the follow-up period (P ~0.03).

At 1 year, 95% of the patients were satisfied with the care they received for their palpitations. Eighty- nine percent reported that their health was the same or improved compared to 1 year before. Of those working outside of the home (52% of the cohort), work performance was impaired in 19%, and workdays were missed by 1%. Because of palpitations, 33% reported accomplishing less than usual work at home.

DISCUSSION Although palpitations are a common symptom,

there are very limited descriptive, etiologic, or prog- nostic data for nonreferred patients on this subject. This is the first study that describes the etiologies of palpitations and the outcomes of patients in a cohort of patients presenting for care at a university-based medical center.

We found that (1) an etiology could be dletermined in 84% of the cohort, (2) 40% of those etiologies could be determined with the history and physical exami- nation, an ECG, and/or laboratory data, 113) psychi- atric illnesses were common causes of palpitations, and (4) the prognosis was excellent except that most patients continued to have recurrent symptoms.

Our finding that only 16% of patients had no clear etiology for their palpitations differs from research on other common symptoms in primary care. In a 3- year incidence study analyzing the probable etiology of 14 common symptoms in 1,000 internal medicine outpatients, Kroenke and Mangelsdorf?!7 reported that the percent of each symptom with an unknown etiology ranged from 47% for insomnia to 100% for constipation.

February 1996 The American Journal of Medicinea Volume 100 143

Page 7: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

A wide variety of etiologies were diagnosed in this population of patients with palpitations. Previous re- ports of the etiology of palpitations are limited to stud- ies of patients referred for ambulatory electrocardio- graphic monitoring. 2a42 These studies report the arrhythmias recorded by ambulatory electrocardio- graphic monitoring, however not all studies indicate the relationship between symptoms reported and ar- rhythmias detected. The reported yield of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in the detection of symptomatic arrhythmias ranges from 13% to 69%..“541,@ However, referral bias and the inclusion of patients with symptoms other than palpitations in most of these studies raise concerns about the generalizabil- ity of these findings. The prevalence of the various eti- ologies of palpitations may also be misrepresented by case series of patients with specific diseases associ- ated with the symptom of palpitations.44

Psychiatric illness was frequently diagnosed and was associated with the highest rate of recurrent symptoms at 3 months. Palpitations are one of the DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for panic attack, gener- alized anxiety disorder, and somatization disorder.20 Although depression may be a comorbid illness, we did not consider this to be an etiology of palpitations. Previously published data from our own general med- ical clini~,~~@ documented a 9.2% prevalence of major depressive disorder and 1.7% prevalence of panic dis- order in primary care populations. Depressed patients had more physical illness, somatic symptoms, and dis- ability than nondepressed patients. It is likely that de- pression may result in palpitations, but 41 of 45 of our patients with depression had other coexisting psychi- atric illness. Thus, we were unable to clarify the role of depression in leading to palpitations. As suggested by Bar~ky,~ further studies of the relationship between common symptoms such as palpitations and psychi- atric illness are needed, since there is evidence for sig- nificant unrecognized psychiatric morbidity in ambu- latory care patients with common medical symptoms. Based on our findings, assessment for generalized anxiety, panic, and somatization disorders and de- pression should become an important focus of evalu- ation of patients with palpitations.

We identified four variables that were independent predictors of a cardiac etiology of palpitations. This model performed better than chance, as demonstrated by the area under the ROC curve. However, the pre- diction of a cardiac etiology must be interpreted with caution because (1) assignment to the cardiac etiol- ogy group does not necessarily imply a higher mor- tality, (2) further testing beyond the initial database may not be required to make this diagnosis, and (3) diverse etiologies were included in the cardiac group.

Palpitations were associated with low mortality and cardiac morbidity. Despite the high prevalence of

cardiac disease, mortality was documented in only 3 women over the age of 70. None of the (deaths was sudden or directly related to the original etiology of palpitations. In the only other study of outcomes in patients with palpitations5 the proportion experienc- ing a cardiac endpoint (ie, myocardial infarction, ven- tricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, or death) in 5 years was similar between cases with palpitations (6.4%) and clinic-based controls (7.2%). In only 4 patients was ventricular t,achycardia responsible for the symptom of palpitations. The l- year mortality rate of 1.6% in patients with palpita- tions is in striking contrast to our experience with syncope, where there is a 28% mortality ;md 15% in- cidence of sudden death at 1 year in patients with car- diac etiologies.47

In contrast, the morbidity from palpitations was substantial. Although 77% had prior palpitations, it was surprising that the majority of patients with and without a history of prior palpitations had recurrent symptoms. This is in contrast to the 35% of syncope patients with recurrent symptoms at 5 years.“7 The re- currences appeared to have substantial effect on qual- ity of life since at least one third of the patients re- ported accomplishing less than usual work in the home and a smaller fraction had impaired work per- formance or missed work. These data suggest that this common symptom has characteristics similar to a chronic disease with exacerbation and remission of symptoms over time.

Limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, we did not assemble an inception co‘hort by lim- iting our patient enrollment to those with new onset of palpitations because patients often could not define the first onset of this symptom. Despite this limitation, our findings are relevant to the patients seen with pal- pitations since the vast majority of patients present with chronic symptomatology. Second, not all patients underwent all diagnostic tests. Specifically, the DIS was performed less frequently in patients for whom an etiology could not be determined. We believe this is not a major limitation since, surprisingly, an etiology could be determined in the majority of the patients.

Based on this study, we suggest the following strat- egy for a practical evaluation of patients with palpi- tations. A careful history, physical examination, and ECG along with selective use of laboratory tests will identify the etiology of palpitations in close to half of the patients. In the remaining patients, a major focus should be screening (with the GHQ) for psychiatric disorders to detect generalized anxiety, panic, and de- pression. In those without a diagnosis who have heart disease, palpitations lasting longer than 5 minutes, or irregular beats, prolonged cardiac monitoring may show an etiology of palpitations. Since symptomatic correlation is critical in determining whether an ar-

PATIENTS WITH PALPITATIONS/WEBER AND KAPOOR

144 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine@ Volume 100

Page 8: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

rhythmia is the etiology of palpitations, event moni- toring appears to be well suited for diagnostic evalu- ation of this symptom.31 Electrophysiologic testing should be reserved for specific high-risk groups such as patients with accessory pathways or when therapy of documented arrhythmias is needed.@

In conclusion, the etiology of palpitations can of- ten be diagnosed with a simple initial evaluation. Psychiatric illness accounts for the etiology in nearly one third of all patients with palpitations. The short- term prognosis of patients with palpitations is excel- lent; however, the recurrence rate is high. Future studies are needed to develop interventions that may decrease recurrent symptoms in these patients and improve their quality of life.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT We are Indebted to Nancy Brant Miller, CRNP, for the administration of the DIS, Karen Brich, PA-C, for completing patient follow-up, Barbara Hanusa, PhD, for statistical assrstance, Terry Sefcik, MSc, for data management guidance, Lisa Joseph for data entry, and Roberta Eckman for manuscript preparation

REFERENCES 1. Kroenke K. Arrington ME, Mangelsdorff AD. The prevalence of symptoms in medical outpatients and the adequacy of therapy. Arch intern Med. 1990;150:168~1689. 2. Braunwald E. The history. In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medrcine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:1-12. 3. Barsky AL Palpitabons, cardiac awareness, and panic disorder. Am J Med. 1992;92:31s-34s. 4. Jones GE, Dinoff BL, Jones KR, Leonberger FT. Survey of cardiac awareness in rehabilitated cardiac patients. Psychophysiology. 1983;20:450-451. 5. Knudson MP. The natural history of palpitations in a family practice. J Fam Pratt. 1987;24:357-360. 6. Degowrn CL, Degowin RL. Bedside diagnostic exam. 4th ed. New York: Macmillan Publrshrng Co., 1981. 7. Goldberg DP. The detecbon of psychiatric illness by questionnarre: a technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness. London: Oxford University Press, 1972. 8. Berwick DM, Budman S, DamicoWhite J, et al. Assessment of psychological morbidity in primary care: explorations with the General Health Queshonnaire. J Chron Dis. 1987;4Ofsuppl 1):71s-79s. 9. Huppert FA, Walters DE, Day NE, Elliott BJ. The factor structure of the General Health Quesbonnaire (GHQ30). A reliability study on 6317 communrty residents. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;155:178-185. 10. Vieweg BW, Hellund JL. The General Health Questionnatre (GHQ): A comprehensive revrew. 1 Operational Psychiatry. 1983;14:74-81. 11. vonAmmon Cavanaugh S, Weftstern RM. Emotional and cognitkre dysfunction assocrated with medical disorders. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33:505-514. 12. Finlay-Jones RA, Murphy E. Severity of psychiatric disorder and the 30iitem General Health Quesbonnaire. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:609-616. 13. Othmer E, DeSouza C. A screening test for somatizatron disorder. Am J Psych. 1985;142:1146-1149. 14. Newman SC, Bland RC, Om H. A comparison of the methods of scoring the General Health Questionnaire. Compr Psychiatry. 1988;29:402-408. 15. Goldberg DP, Rrckels K, Downing R, Hesbacher P. A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. Br J Psychiatry. 1976;129:61-67. 16. Smith GR, Brown F. Screening indexes in DSM-IIIR somatrzation disorder. Gen Hasp Psychiatry. 1990;12:148-152. 17. Helzer JE, Robins LN. The dragnostic interview schedule: its development, evolution, and use. Sot Psychratr Epidemiol. 1988;23:6-16. 18. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcllff KS. National lnstttute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characterishcs, and validity. Arch Gen Psychratry. 1981;38:381-389.

PATIENTS WITH PALPITATlONS/WEBER AND KAPOOR

19. Paulsen AS, Crowe RR, Noyes R, Pfohl B. Rehabrlity of the telephone intervrew in diagnosing anxiety disorders. Arch ‘C;en Psychiatry. 1988;45:62-63. 20. American Psychiatric Association, Committee on nomenclature and statistics. Diagnosbc and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed, revised. Washington, DC: Amerrcan Psychiatric Association, 1987. 21. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reacbons. Bn Pharmacol Jher. 1’381;30:239-245. 22. Rbase data management software. Microrim Inc., 1987. 23. BMDP statistical software manual. Volumes 1 & 2. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988. 24. Statxact, Version 2. Cambndge, MA: CMEL Corp., 1991. 25. Metz CE, Shen J, Wang P, Kronman HB. ROCFIT, Chicago: University of Chicago, 1989. 26. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation form incomplete observations. JAm Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481. 27. Kroenke K, Mangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. Am J Med. 1989;86:262-266. 28. Gooch AS, Rahim A, McKerthen R. Exercise testing alnd portable ECG recording in arrhythmias-prone patients. Angiofogy. 1976;27:133-137. 29. Ringqvrst I, Jonason T, Nilsson G, Khan AR. Dragnosbc value of longterm ambulatory ECG in patients with syncope, dizziness or palpitatrons. Ch Physiol. 1989;9:47-55. 30. Tabatznik 8. Halter recording stakes out three clinical areas. C/in Trend Cardiol. 1976;6:6-7. 31. Brown AP, Dawkrns KD, Davies JG. Detecbon of arrhythmias: use of a patient-activated ambulatory electrocardrogram devrce with a solid state memory loop. Br Heart J. 1987;58:251-253. 32. Camm AJ, Ward DE, Spurrell RAJ. Arrhythmias in ambulatory persons. Biotelemetry and Pabent Monitoring. 1978;5:167-181. 33. Judson P, Holmes DR, Baker WP. Evaluation of outpatIent arrhythmias using transtelephonic monitoring. Am Heart J. 1979;97(6):759-761. 34. Lrpskr J, Cohen L, Esprnosa J, et al. Value of bolter monitoring in assessing cardiac arrhythmias in symptomatic patients. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:102-107, 35. Diamond TH, Smith R, Myburgh DP. Halter monitoring-a necessity for the evaluation of palpitations, S Afr MedJ. 1983;63:5-7. 36. Goldberg AD, Raftery EB, Cashman PMM. Ambulatory elec:rocardrographic records in patients with transrent cerebral attacks or palpitabon. BMJ. 1975;4:569-571. 37. Grodman RS, Capone RJ. Most AS. Arrhythmia surverllance by tran- stelephonic monitoring: comparison w&h bolter monitoring n symptomatic ambulatory pabents. Am Heart J. 1979;98:459-464. 38. Hasin Y, David D, Rogel S. Dragnosbc and therapeutic assessment by telephone electrocardiographrc monrtoring of ambulatory patients. BMJ. 1976;2:609-612. 39. Kunz G, Raeder E, Bruckhardt D. What does the symptom “palpitahon” mean?-Correlation between symptom and the presence of cardiac arrhythmias in the ambulatory ECG. ZKardiol. 1977;66:138-141. 40. Thomas LE, Shapiro LM, Perkins EJ, Fox KM. Detection of arrhythmia: limited usefulness of patient actrvated recording devices. BMJ. 1984;289: 1106-1107. 41. Zeldis SM, Levine BJ, Mrchelson EL, Morganroth J. Cardiovascular complaints: correlation wrth cardiac arrhythmias on 24.hour electro- cardiographic monrtonng. Chest. 1980;78(3):456461. 42. Barsky AJ, Cleary PD, Coeytaux RR, Ruskin JN. Psychratric disorders in medical outpatients complaining of palpitations. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9: 306-313. 43. DrMarco JP, Philbrick JT. Use of ambulatory electrocardiographic (Halter) monitoring. Ann Int Med. 1990;113:53-68. 44. Bravo EL, Gifford RW. Pheochromocytoma: Diagnosis, localization and management. NEJM. 1984;311f20):1298-1303. 45. Schulberg HC, Saul M, McClelland M, et al. Assessing depres,sion in primary medical and psychiatric pracbces. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42 1164-l 170. 46. Coulehan JL, Schulberg HC, Block MR, et al. Medical comorbrdity of major depressive disorder In a primary medical practice. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(111:2363-2367.

February 1996 The American Journal of Mediiine” Volume 100 145

Page 9: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

47. Kapoor WN. Evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope. Medicine.

1990;69:160-175. 48. Reid P. Indications for intracardiac electrophysiologic studies in patients with unexplained palpitations. Circulation. 1987;75(4 pt 2):lll 154-160.

APPENDIX Diagnostic Criteria Used for the Categorization of the Etiologies of Palpitations

Arrhythmias. Any new deviation from normal si- nus rhythm or a significant change in the rate of a sta- ble arrhythmia (eg, atrial fibrillation) can cause the symptom of palpitations.

Definite: Symptomatic correlation of palpitations with the arrhythmia recorded on electrocardiographic monitoring.

&oba&: Greater than 5 beats of supraventricular tachycardia or ventricular tachycardia in the absence of symptomatic correlation.

Increased Stroke Volume. Stroke volume may be increased with cardiac and extracardiac shunts13 or regurgitant valvular heart disease.4 Palpitations may be noted at different stages, so general guidelines were used to determine causality.

0 Cardiac and extra-cardiac shunts. A cardiac shunt was considered causal if there was either echocar- diographic or cardiac catheterization documentation of moderate to severe shunt flow in a patient with palpitations. Any extra-cardiac arteriovenous fistula in a patient with palpitations was considered causal if no other etiology was present.

0 Regurgitant valvular heart disease. Valvular heart disease such as mitral regurgitation and aortic insuf- ficiency was considered causal if there was either echocardiographic or cardiac catheterization docu- mentation of moderate or severe regurgitant flow in a patient with constant palpitations and no concur- rent arrhythmia.

Pacemaker. Paced beats or intercostal muscle and diaphragmatic flutter may be sensed by the patient with a pacemaker. Pacemaker syndrome may also be associated with palpitations5 To be considered causal, the sensed beats must have been correlated with the paced beats.

Prosthetic Heart Valve. Each heart beat in a pa- tient with a prosthetic heart valve may be sensed and reported as constant palpitations.4 To be considered causal, the sensed beats must have been correlated with the normal heart rhythm.

Cardiac Disease. Various cardiac diseases have been associated with palpitations in the absence of arrhythmias or other causes for palpitations. These reports were interpreted to define causality.

0 Cardiomegaly. The enlarged cardiac silhouette can cause palpitations, probably on the basis of in- creased cardiac output or contractility. This was con- sidered causal if there was chest radiographic evi-

dence of at least moderate cardiomegaly in a patient with palpitations.

l Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP). Although the liter- ature reports series of patients with MVP in whom there is symptomatic correlation of arrhythmias on ambulatory monitoring, there are also patients with symptoms in the absence of arrhythmias.fi-8 For the patient with clinical (ie, classic murmur or click) or echocardiographic evidence of mitral valve prolapse and palpitations, MVP was considered causal in the absence of symptomatic arrhythmias. Patients in whom symptomatic arrhythmias were documented were classified as an arrhythmia etiology.

l Hyperkinetic heart syndrome. Classification into this category was limited to young males -with a sys- tolic murmur and a hyperdynamic precordium and pulse, in the absence of any other etiology for a hy- peradrenergic state.gJO

l Atrial myxoma Although this entity is rare, there have been reports of atrial myxoma presenting with palpitations. l1 For the patient with echocardiographic evidence of atrial myxoma and palpitations, the myx- oma was considered causal in the absence of symp- tomatic arrhythmias.

Psychiatric Disease. Palpitations commonly oc- cur in patients with panic attack and disorder, gen- eralized anxiety disorder, and somatization disorder and are included in their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third edition, Revised (DSM-IILR) deftitions.12

Definite: A diagnosis of one or more of’ these dis- orders was made if the patient met DSM-III-R crite- ria as diagnosed with Diagnostic Interview Schedule @IS).‘3J4 and there was no other signiticant medical comorbidity or etiology for palpitations.

Probable: When the DIS was not administered but there was strong clinical evidence, the investigators considered a category of probable anxiety to fit the DSM-III-R category of generalized anxiety disorder that was not otherwise specified.

Cmorbid: In cases in which any other etiology for palpitations existed, the psychiatric disorder was not considered as the etiology.

Medications. Palpitations occurring with a tem- poral relationship to the use of medications such as sympathomimetic agents, vasodilatom, anticholiner- gics, or during withdrawal from S-blockers are well recognized.15 Each potential etiologic medication must have been reported to cause palpitations as a possible adverse effect. Criteria were devised to jus- tify causality, similar to previous reports on adverse drug reactions. l6

Definite: (1) Palpitations following a temporal se- quence after the medication was introduced or reached an abnormal level, (2) resolving after with- drawal of the medication or normalization of the

146 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine@ Volume 100

Page 10: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

blood concentration, and (3) having no other appar- ent etiologic factor.

Probable: Two of the three factors listed above. Possible: One of the three factors listed above OR

two of the three factors listed above in the presence of another etiologic factor.

Habits. Palpitations occurring with a temporal re- lationship to the use of cocaine17-1g and ampheta- mines,15 caffeine,2@23 and nicotine15 have been re- ported. Criteria have been developed to define this association.

0 Cocaine or amphetamines Definite: (1) Palpitations temporally related to co-

caine or amphetamine use, (2) with resolution after discontinuation of the drug, and (3) no other appar- ent etiology.

Probable: Palpitations temporally related to co- caine or amphetamine use and one of the other two factors listed above.

Possible: Palpitations temporally related to co- caine or amphetamine use, but other possible eti- ologies exist.

0 Caffeine Definite: (1) Palpitations temporally related to caf-

feine intake of greater than 4 cups of coffee (or equiv- alent) per day, (2) with resolution after discontinua- tion of caffeine, and (3) no other apparent etiology.

Probable: Palpitations temporally related to caffeine intake of greater than 2 cups of coffee (or equivalent) per day and one of the other two factors listed above.

Possible: Palpitations temporally related to any caf- feine intake, but other possible etiologies exist.

0 Nicotine Definite: (1) Palpitations temporally related to

nicotine product use, (2) with resolution after cessa- tion, and (3) no other apparent etiology.

Probable: Palpitations temporally related to nico- tine product use and one of the other two factors listed above.

Possible: Palpitations temporalIy related to nico- tine product use, but other possible etiologies exist.

Metabolic Disorders. Several metabolic disor- ders have been reported to be associated with palpi- tations and are often accompanied by a sinus tachy- cardia. These abnormal metabolic states are often recognized by other characteristic associated signs and symptoms.

0 Hypoglycemia. 24 Hypoglycemia was documented in association with palpitations that resolved with restoration of normal glucose levels.

0 Thyrotoxicosisz5 Palpitations were associated with the clinical presence of thyrotoxicosis, con- firmed by laboratory tests.

0 Pheochromocytoma. 26 Palpitations were associ- ated with the clinical presence of pheochromocy- toma, confiied by laboratory tests.

l Mastocytosis. 27 Palpitations were associated with the clinical presence of mastocytosis, confirmed by laboratory tests.

l Scombroid food poison&g.2x Palpitations follow- ing ingestion of scombroid fish.

0 Idiopathic flushing. 2g The clinical scenario was consistent with idiopaQic flushing and other disor- ders were excluded (ie, diagnosis by exclusion).

High Output States. Increased cardiac output can be responsible for the symptom of palpitations. The conditions listed below are known causes of a high output state. The following definitions were used to relate the palpitations to the high output state:

0 Anemia1n30 There is no clear level of hemoglobin at which the cardiac output rises. Symptoms vary with the rate of onset of anemia and the underlying comorbidity of the patient. For the purpose of this study, anemia was considered causal if palpitations occurred in a patient with a hemoglobin < 100 g/L and resolved after correction of the anemia.

0 Pregnancy.31 Peak cardiac output occurs between the 20th and 24th week of gestation. Palpitations in a pregnant woman after the 20th we(3k of gestation were attributed to the high output state of pregnancy when no other etiology was present.

0 Paget’s disease.1B32 Cardiac output rises .when more than 15% of the skeleton is involved with active Paget’s disease. For the purpose of this study, Paget’s disease was considered causal in a patient with pal- pitations if there was active disease of at least two skeletal locations and no other etiology was present.

0 Fever.33 There is a linear relationship between rise in temperature above normal and the heart rate. As baseline heart rate varies among individuals, so will the appearance of tachycardia Fever was con- sidered causal when palpitations were temporally re- lated to a new temperature of 238” C, with resolution after defervescence, if no other etiology was present.

Dehydration and Orthostatic Hypotension. Palpitations occurring in the patient with dehydration or orthostatic hypotension are generally believed to be related to a physiologic (compensatory) sinus tachycardia. These were considered present in the ap- propriate clinical setting if clinical or laboratory signs of dehydration or symptomatic orthostatic hypoten- sion existed.%

Exertion. Exertional palpitations are related to an increased stroke volume. Exertion was considered causal if historical data confirmed physical exertion for that $iividual, in the absence of another etiology of palpitations.

REFERENCES 1. Braunwald E, Grossman W. Clinical aspects of heart failure. III: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:45%462.

PATIENTS WITH PALPITATIONS/WEBER AND KAPOOR

February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine@ VOlUml? 100 147

Page 11: Evaluation and Outcomes of Patients With Palpitationssites.tufts.edu/imlib/wp-content/blogs.dir/1976/... · palpitations experienced similar rates of cardiac end- points. The purpose

2. Dedichen H, Thalow E, Naess A. Traumatic arteriovenous fistula. Case Report. Acta Chir Stand. 1989;155:297-300. 3. Holman E. Abnormal arteriovenous communrcations. Great variability of effects with particular reference to delayed development of cardiac failure. Circulation. 1966;32:1001-1008. 4. Braunwald E. Valvular heart disease. In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:1007-1065. 5. Ausubel K, Furman S. The pacemaker syndrome. Ann fnt Med. 1985;103:420-429. 6. Kramer HM, Kligfield P, Devereux RB, et al. Arrhythmias in mitral valve prolapse: effect of selection bias. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:2360-2364. 7. Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, Kligfield P. Mitral valve prolapse: causes, clinical manifestations, and management. Ann Int Med. 1989;111:305-317. 8. DeMaria AN, Amsterdam EA, Vismara LA, et al. Arrhythmias in the mitral valve prolapse syndrome. Ann Int Med. 1976;84:656-660. 9. Gillum RF, Teichjolz, Herman MV, Gorlin R. The idiopathic hyperkinetic heart syndrome: clinical course and long-term prognosis. Am Heart J. 1981;102: 728-734. 10. Gorlin R. The hyperkinetic heart syndrome. JAMA. 1962;182:823-829. 11. Awang Y, Sallehuddin A. Surgical experience with cardiac tumours at the General Hospital. Med J Malaysia. 1991;46:28-34. 12. American Psychiatric Association, Committee on nomenclature and statistics: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987. 13. Helzer JE, Robins LN. The diagnostic interview schedule: its development, evolution, and use. Sot Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1988;23:6-16. 14. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Inter-view Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38:381-389. 15. Physician’s Desk Reference. 46th ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Data; 1992. 16. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:239-245. 17. Petronis KR, Anthony JC. An epidemiologic investigation of marijuana and cocaine-related palpitations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1989;23:219-226. 18. Cregler LL, Mark H. Medical complications of cocaine abuse. NEJM. 1986:315:1495-1500.

19. Rich JA. Singer DE. Cocaine-related symptoms in patients presenting to an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:616-621. 20. Greden KF. Anxiety or caffernism: a diagnostic dilemma. .Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:1089-1092. 21. Myers MG. Caffeine and cardiac arrhythmias. Ann ht Med. 1991;114: 147-150. 22. Prineas RJ, Jacobs DR, Crow RS, Blackburn H. Coffee, tea and VPB. J Chronic Dis. 1980;33:67-72. 23. Shirlow MJ, Mathers CD. A study of caffeine consumption and symptoms: indigestion, palpitations, tremor, headache and insomnia. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14:239-248. 24. Cryer PE, Gerich JE. Glucose counterregulation, hypoglycemia, and intensive insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus. NEJM. 1985;313:232-241. 25. Klein I. Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. Am J Med. 1990;88:631-637. 26. Bravo EL, Gifford RW. Pheochromocytoma: diagnosis, localization and management. NE&f. 1984;311:1298-1303. 27. Tharp MD. The spectrum of mastocytosis. Am J Med Sci. 1985;289: 117-132. 28. Merson MH, Baine WB, Gangarosa EJ, et al. Scombroicl fish poisoning: outbreak traced to commercially canned tuna fish. JAMA. 1974;228: 1268-1269. 29. Aldrich LB, Moattari AR, Vinik Al. Distinguishing features of idiopathic flushing and carcinoid syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:2614-2618. 30. Rosenthal DS, Braunwald E. Hematological-oncological disorders and heart disease. In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:1742-1744. 31. Elkayam U. Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease. In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 4th red. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992:1790-l 793. 32. Arnalich F, Plaza I, Sobrino JA, et al. Cardiac size and function in Paget’s disease of bone. Int J Cardiol. 1984;5:491-505. 33. Dinardello CA, Wolff SM. Fever. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett JE, ed. Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Liiingstone; 1990:464-467. 34. Thomas JE, Schirger A, Fealey RD, Sheps SG. Orthostatic hypotension. Mayo C/in Proc. 1981;56:117-125.

148 February 1996 The American Journal of Medicine@ Volume 100


Recommended