+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to...

Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to...

Date post: 24-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: randell-heath
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
Evaluation Methods
Transcript
Page 1: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Evaluation Methods

Page 2: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Objectives

• Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM.

• Demonstrate the role of these methods in supporting ACSM evaluation.

Page 3: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Evaluation of Treatment Support Program

Quantitative

Patient data from 10 TB clinics.

_____________________________

•How many patients left treatment early.

•How many weeks of treatment were completed.

•% default by gender, ethnicity, age.

Qualitative

Interviews with 20 patients who left treatment early.

_____________________________

•What they experienced during treatment.

•Why they left treatment.

•Ideas for improving the treatment support system.

Page 4: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

What are Quantitative Methods?

• Analyze numerical data.

• Use standard tools (e.g., questionnaires).

• Need precision and reliability!

• Often use large sample sizes with sophisticated methods to select participants.

• Results are generalized to a population.

Example: The TB prevalence survey planned for Nigeria will include 49,000 people selected from 700 clusters representing six zones.

Page 5: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

What are Qualitative Methods?

• Provide in-depth, detailed information on behavior, opinions, ideas, etc.

• Analyze text, words, pictures, or interview transcripts instead of numbers.

• Use open-ended data collection tools.

• Usually smaller sample sizes.

Page 6: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Quantitative Methods

• Analysis of routine surveillance and NTP data.

• Analysis of program or project data.

• Simple surveys.

• Population-based surveys:

− KAP, prevalence.

Page 7: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Method: Analysis of Routine Surveillance and NTP Data

• Existing Ministry of Health reporting system data:

− Vital registration data.

− Routine reports from disease-specific programs.

− Hospital data.

• Data usually available; no special data collection needed.

• Quality may be a concern: completeness, timeliness, accuracy may not be good.

Page 8: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Examples: Routine Surveillance

• Number of deaths due to TB in State B in 2010.

• Prevalence of TB/HIV co-infection by age and gender.

• Number of TB cases reported in 2012.

• Percentage of MDR-TB cases among new reported cases in 2012.

Page 9: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Using NTP Data to Prioritize ACSM

Quarterly review of SS+ case notification

• Which districts report an increase in SS+ case notification?

• Which district reported the highest number of retreatment cases?

• Where is TB/HIV co-infection the highest?

Page 10: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Method: Analysis of ACSM Program Data

• Collect and analyze key output and outcome indicators over the life of the project.

• Data come directly from your project.

• Quantitative indicators and sources:

− Advocacy.

− Communication.

− Social mobilization.

Page 11: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.
Page 12: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

TB Screening Referrals from Community Health Workers, District X, 2011

40%

55% 57%

8% 18% 20% 15%

Page 13: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Contribution of Community Health Workers to TB Case Notification in District X, 2011

Quarter

Number of TB cases

diagnosed after referral

Total number of TB cases notified in

district

Contribution of referral network to

case notification

Jan – Mar 8 60 13%

Apr – Jun 9 73 12%

Jul – Sept 12 85 14%

Oct – Dec 10 93 11%

Page 14: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Give Your Data Meaning and Importance • Interpret results within a larger context.

• Link project data with routine/NTP data to show contribution.

• Monitoring: How many did we refer and how many were diagnosed with TB?

• Evaluation: How much did our referrals ultimately contribute to overall case notification in the district?

Page 15: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Method: Population-Based Surveys

• Provide data on priority indicators that can be generalized to a population.

− % of adults 15 years and older who correctly identify chronic cough as a TB symptom.

• Usually requires a large research team, specialized expertise, and a full-time survey manager.

− Nigeria 2011/2012 prevalence survey includes 49,000!!!

Page 16: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

What is a KAP Survey?

• KAP = knowledge, attitudes, and practices

• Population-based survey—very large sample size!

• Face-to-face interviews with standard tool.

• Provides summary data on KAP.

− Averages, percentages, totals, ranges, etc.

Page 17: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

What does a KAP survey tell us?

• What does the population know about TB?

• What myths or misinformation are common?

• What stigmas are related to TB?

• Where do people seek care?

• What media channels are used by this population?

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices

Page 18: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Essential Components: KAP Survey

• Appropriate sampling strategy

• Standardized, pre-tested questionnaire

• Field protocol and manual

• Trained, UNBIASED data collection team

• Data analysis plan

• Data use strategy

• BUDGET!

Page 19: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Method: Simple Surveys

• Information from a smaller, targeted sub-group:− Village surveys.− Basic questionnaires.− Polls.

• Faster and easier, but less scientifically rigorous than KAP surveys.

• Cannot generalize the results to a larger population.

Page 20: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Qualitative Methods

• Focus group discussions

• Key informant interviews

• Exit interviews

• Media scans

Page 21: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Method: Focus Group Discussions

• Small group (6–10 people).

• Gather opinions, insights, thoughts, and feelings about a topic.

• Led by a moderator; assisted by a notetaker.

• Semi-structured guide with key questions.

• May be recorded, transcribed, formally analyzed with software.

• Useful for pre-testing communication materials.

Page 22: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Method: Key Informant Interviews

• Face-to-face interview with critical individuals:− Policymakers, opinion leaders.− Those who represent key stakeholders (e.g., NGO

directors, association leaders).− Marginalized, vulnerable populations who do not want

to participate in groups.

• Good for collecting sensitive, personal, or confidential information.

• Limited perspectives.

Teri Gilleland Scott
Inserted "Method:" to be consistent with the other slides.
Page 23: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Interviews or Focus Groups?

• What do patients think of a new brochure on treatment adherence?

Focus Group

• How can we get the directors of TB clinics and HIV centers to collaborate more?

Interviews

• What do HIV-positive injection drugs users know about TB symptoms and diagnosis?

Focus Group or Interviews

Page 24: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Exit Interviews

• Evaluate short-term outcomes of changes to service delivery.

• Standardized instrument used to gather data on patient experiences with a clinic or specific provider.

• Can measure patient satisfaction and monitor provider behavior after training.

Page 25: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Media Scans

• Search media for how a specific topic is covered:− What are the most common messages

about TB? − How often is TB discussed in the

media? Is it a “hot” topic?− Is the information about TB accurate?− Are the messages stigmatizing?

• Useful to evaluate interventions with journalists.

• Formal or informal.

Page 26: Evaluation Methods. Objectives Describe the most common quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate ACSM. Demonstrate the role of these methods.

Q&A/Resources

Teri Gilleland Scott
Added "(now FHI 360)", so participants can find them more easily on the Internet.

Recommended