Page 1
European Agencyfor Safety and Healthat Work
Version January 2016
Bilbao, 21 May 2018
Our ret: PRU(201 8) D/909
I Contract references
EVALUATION REPORT
Title of contract ESENER 3
Reference: EUOSHN2O1 7IOPIFISEIOO48
Contracting authority: EUOSHA
Type of procedure: Open
2 Working method
The evaluation was performed by an evaluation committee appointed by the responsibleauthorising officer.
The members of the evaluation committee have held meetings according to the followingschedule:
: Date Place Topic discussed
11/04/2018 EUOSHA premises Evaluation of the exclusion and selection criteria
26/0412016 EUOSHA premises Evaluation of award criteria
3 Access to market
The evaluation committee examined whether the tenderers have access to the market of theEuropean Union pursuant to Articles 119 and 120 of the Financial Regulation.
All of them were found to have access to EU public procurement contracts. The results of theverification are as follows:
No Name Place of establishment Access to Commentsor domicile market
I Jegistry(20l8)N9B1 Yes No comments
2 RegistTy(2018)N982 — . Yes No comments
3 (Registry(2018)N983 Yes No commenls
4 —. Registry(2018)N991 — Yes No comments
5 (Registry(2018)A/1050) Yes No comments
4 Verification of exclusion criteria (declaration)
Sanilago de Compostela 12. 5th floor 48003 Bllbao SpainTef +34 944 358 400 Fax +34 944 358 401n(ormation(Eosha europa cu http //osha europa cu
Page 2
Version January 2016
European Agencyfor Safety and Healthat Work
The provision of declarations on honour, dated and signed, stating that the tenderers andsubcontractors as provided in the tender specifications are not in one of the exclusion orrejection situations referred to in Articles 106 and 107 of the Financial Regulation, has beenverified.
The results of the verification of exclusion criteria are as follows:
(Registry(2018)N9B3 Yes
,.Registry(20l 8)N991
(Registty(201 B)N1 050)
S Verification of selection criteria (declaration)
The provision of declarations on honour, signed and dated, stating that the tenderers andsubcontractors as provided in the tender specifications fulfil the selection criteria has beenverified.
As requested in the procurement documents, the following tenderers were asked to provide thefollowing documents for the purpose of verification of selection criteria:
- No 1 PRU(201 8)D1685 request to on 13 April 2018 to provide the duly signed declarationon honour on exclusion and selectbun criteria for consortium partner
The document has been requested by e-mail with the above Adonis number, Tenderers wereasked to provide the document within 7 days.
The following tenderers provided the documents requested in the procurement documents:
- No I REG(2018)A!1 177 from on 18 April2018.
The results of the verification of selection criteria are as follows:
SanUago do Compostoa 12 5th floor -48003 Bbao Sp&nTot •34 944 356 400 Fax +34 944 356 401n?arrnaton4osha europa eu http ,/osha europa eu
ND Name Declaratio Further request Accepted, Commentsn receIved (dale + ARES rejected -
in due reference) orform excluded
Jegistry(2018)A/981 No 13 AprIl 2018 Accepted Thedeclaration of
PRU(2018)D/685 honour fromone of theconsortium
.artners
ihad
nor been dullyfilled in. It wasprovided filledin, signed andstamped viaemail on 18April 2018,REG(201 8)N1‘77
2 RegIstry(2O18)N982 Yes —
3
4
5
Yes
Yes
2
Page 3
Version January 2016
European Agencyfor Safety and Healthat Work
No Name Declaration Further Accepted Commentsreceived in due request or
form [and rejecteddocuments
required in thetender
specifications]
1 Registry(2018)N951 No 13 April Accepted
PRU(2018)0/685
2 (Reglstry(2018)AI982 Yes
3 Registry(2018)N983 Yes
4 (Registry(2018)N991 Yes
S (Reglstry(2018)N1050) Yes
6 Compliance with technical specifications
Compliance of tenders with the tender specifications was checked.
All tenders were found to be compliant with the minimum requirements of the tenderspecifications. The results of the compliance check are as follows:
Tender Name Compliant CommentsNo
1 p(Registsy(2o18)A/9s1 Yes
2 ,Registry(2018)N982 Yes
3 (Registry(2016)N983 Yes
4 egistry(2018)N991 Yes
S 4Registry(2018)N1050) Yes
7 Evaluation of award criteria
Requests for correction of obvious clerical errors have been sent on 30 April 2018 by emailPRU(2018)D1186 in accordance with Article 96(2) of the Financial Regulation to eachconcerned tenderer with a time limit of 7 days to provide a reply.
The following tenderers provided the requested corrections:
- No 3 ‘on 4 May 2018 REG(2018)N1 345
The final tenders were evaluated and ranked on the basis of the announced award criteriawithout modification. Detailed evaluations are attached as an Annex.
8 Abnormally low tender(s)
Santiago de Compostela 12 5th floor 48003 Bilbao SpainTel .34 944 358 400 Fax +34 944 358 401nformation@osha europa cu http llosha europa. Cu
Page 4
Version January 2016
European Agencyfor Safety and Healthat Work
Not applicable
9 Score and ranking
Detailed marks per tender:
Criterion I Criterion 2 Criterion 3Tender Total score Reaches or
Name Max 30 Max 35 Max 35 for quality not minimumNoMm 15 Mm 16 Mm 18
criterIa scores
1 16 20 24 60 Yes(gislry(2018)A/981
2 1,, 18 24 25 57 Yes(Reg;stry(201 8)N982
3 21 29 31 61 Yes(Registry(201 8)N983
4 22 25 27 74 Yes(Regislry(201 8)A1991
5(Regisiry4uIo)A/1050) 27 33 34 94 Yes
The tenders that passed all minimum quality levels are ranked following the formula indicatedin the tender specifications:
Scare for tender = Quality score of the tender*0.70 + (lowest price offerlprice offer oftender) 1 000.30
Total score
Tenderfar quality Score for price
No Name criteria Price of the Finaltender (Financial Rankingsc ore
(Quality score*1 00*0.30)score’0,70)
1(Registry(20I8)A/981 42.00 €3,646,440.00 28.81 70.81 5
2 46,90 €4,229,612.00 24.84 71.74 4(Registry(201 8)A1982
3 -
(Registry(2018)ANb356.70 €3,501,654.80 30.00 86.70 2
4
- C,(egistry(2018)A/991 51.80 €4277630.00 24.56 76.36 3
st50) 65.80 €4,329,100.00 24.27 90.07 1
Sanhago do Compostela 12, 5th floor 48003 Bhbao SpainTel +34 944 358 400 Fox +34 944 358 401informationoshaeuropo cu hop /iosha europa cu
Page 5
Version January 2016
European Agencyfor Safety and Healthat Work
10 Award
Considering the results of the evaluation as described above, the Evaluation Committeeproposes to award the contract to the following tenderer
Tender No 5
Kantar Public
Kantar Deutschland GmbH
Landsberger Strasse 284
80687 Munich
Germany
Price: EUR 3060,700
The proportion of the contract to be subcontracted is estimated to be 70% of the contractvalue.
The above-mentioned tender is compliant with the tender specifications and offers the bestprice quality ratio.
The Early Detection and Exclusion System has been checked.
Sant’aQD de Cornpost&a IZ 5th rocr - 48003 6ba SprTel .349442584&0 Faxt349443584019ñ7rrnator:3csha urooa cu rtt !!osha eurcoa Cu
5
Page 6
Version January 2016
European Agencyfor Safety and Healthat Work
Name, date and signature of the evaluation committee members:
SinIiago d& Conposo!a 12 5th floor 48003 Sbao 5p&’
Tel ‘31 943 358 400 Fax +31 944 358 401
nIormotonosha europa eu fl1p iiosha europa eu0
Page 7
Açj
tncy
)It
sSu
kty
nJ
IItc
hhJ
otwmk
Ope
nte
nd
erp
roce
du
reE
UO
SHN
2OI7
IOP/
F/SE
1004
8—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
CR
ITE
RIO
NC
OM
ME
NT
S
CR
ITE
RIO
N1
EF
FIC
IEN
CY
AN
DQ
UA
LIT
YO
FT
HE
PR
OJE
CT
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
:-
SC
OR
E:
16O
UT
OF
30P
OIN
TS
Str
engt
hs
The
app
roac
hto
proj
ect
man
agem
ent
and
wor
kor
gani
sati
on,
incl
udin
gth
ere
sourc
eal
loca
tion
,th
efe
asib
ilit
yof
the
prop
osed
tim
etab
lean
dth
eco
ntin
genc
ypl
anfo
runfo
rese
enev
ents
orco
mpl
icat
ions
,in
clud
ing
pro
cedure
sfo
rqu
alit
yco
ntro
lan
assu
rance
.(1
0po
ints
)5
Ext
ent
and
qual
ity
ofth
eco
rete
am,
incl
udin
gth
eco
mpo
siti
onin
term
sof
exp
erti
sean
dsk
ills
,al
loca
tion
orro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
ofal
lte
amm
ember
sas
wel
las
reso
urc
eba
ck-u
p(1
0po
ints
)5
The
over
all
appr
oach
topr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
tan
dw
ork
orga
nisa
lion
are
prop
erly
desc
ribe
dal
soin
term
sof
role
san
dre
spon
sibi
liti
esacro
spa
rtne
rs.
The
prop
o5ed
team
isal
loca
ted
tosp
eéif
icta
sks
(que
stio
nnai
re,
desi
gnan
dtr
ansl
atio
n;sa
mpl
ing
and
wei
ghti
ng;
scri
ptin
gan
dàa
tapr
oces
sing
),un
der
the
dire
ctio
nof
aP
roje
ctD
irec
tor
supp
orte
dby
aP
roje
ctL
eade
r:B
oth
P7oj
ect
Dfr
ecto
ran
dP
roje
ctL
eade
rar
eal
sore
spon
sibl
efo
rQ
ualit
yC
ontr
olpr
oced
ures
.
Aco
mpr
ehen
sive
qual
ity
assu
ran
cepl
anis
repoit
ed,
indl
udin
gre
spon
sibi
liti
esan
dqu
ality
indi
cato
rsan
dri
sks.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onw
ould
have
wel
com
edm
ore
clar
ityco
ncer
ning
the
reso
urce
allo
cati
on,
whi
chis
only
pres
ente
dfo
rth
eco
rele
am.
Inad
diti
onto
this
,th
enu
mbe
rof
days
allo
cate
dto
each
core
team
mem
ber
seem
sin
cons
iste
ntw
ithth
ety
pean
ddu
mbe
rof
task
sto
beca
rrie
dou
tan
dth
eov
eral
ldu
rati
onof
the
proj
ect.
Whi
leth
ero
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
ofth
eco
rete
amar
eli
sted
,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
wou
ldha
veap
prec
iate
da
desc
ript
ion
ofth
ere
lati
onsh
ips
betw
een
the
task
-bas
edte
ams.
Con
cern
ing
the
prop
osed
tim
etab
le,
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edfu
rthe
rde
tail
sco
ncer
ning
the
tim
ebe
twee
nth
epi
lot
and
mai
nfi
eldw
ork
(thr
eem
onth
s)as
itm
aypr
obab
lyle
adto
fiel
dwor
kta
king
plac
ein
sum
mer
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edm
ore
deta
ils
onth
eco
ntin
genc
ypl
an.
Whi
leth
equ
ality
assu
rance
isw
ell
expl
aine
d,it
was
foun
dto
bea
bit
stan
dard
and
not
deve
lope
din
view
ofth
enee
ds
ofE
SE
NE
R-3
.
Str
engt
hs
The
offe
rpr
esen
tsa
good
mix
ofsk
ills
inte
rms
ofpr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
t,re
port
ing
and
tech
nica
lex
pert
ise
inte
rms
ofC
AT
I/C
AW
Iim
plem
enta
tion
and
man
agem
ent,
asw
ell
asO
SH
expe
rtis
e.
Page 8
Open
tender
procedure
EU
OS
HN
2O
I7IO
PIF
IS
E1004B
—T
echn
ical
ev
alu
atio
n:
-
Jim
Wet
ym
14H.
oIth
aW
wk
Wea
kn
esse
s
iM
ore
clar
ityw
ould
have
been
wel
com
edas
toth
ero
les
ofth
eco
rete
amm
embe
rsan
dth
ere
lati
onsh
ips
betw
een
them
.
Con
cern
ing
the
com
posi
tion
ofth
eco
rete
am,
grea
ter
expe
rtis
ew
ould
have
been
expe
cted
spec
ific
ally
inth
em
anag
emen
tof
larg
e,in
tern
atio
nal
surv
eys.
The
evat
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pres
sed
conc
ern
over
the
limite
dnu
mbe
rof
days
allo
cate
dto
the
proj
ect
dire
ctor
and
the
proj
ect
man
ager
,w
hich
dono
tse
emap
prop
riat
efo
rth
esp
ecif
icit
ies
ofE
SE
NE
R-3
.
Mor
eex
pert
ise
onsa
mpl
ing
and
wei
ghti
ngw
outd
have
been
expe
cted
and
agr
eate
ral
loca
tion
inte
rms
ofnu
mbe
rof
days
ofth
eap
poin
ted
team
mem
bers
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edde
tail
son
the
allo
cati
onof
num
ber
days
for
the
non-
core
team
mem
bers
.
The
prop
osal
does
not
incl
ude
are
sour
ceba
ck-u
ppl
an.
Str
engt
hs
The
prop
osal
cove
rsal
lth
eco
untr
ies
asre
quir
edin
the
tend
ersp
ecif
icat
ions
thro
ugh
the
subc
ontr
acti
ngto
fiel
dwor
kpr
ovid
er’
whi
chop
erat
esfr
omfo
urhu
bsan
dL
\an
dfo
rea
chhu
ba
Pro
ject
man
ager
and
aFi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
orar
eap
poin
ted.
The
inte
rvie
wer
sar
ena
tive
spea
ker
san
dfo
rea
chco
untr
yth
ere
isa
nati
veev
alua
tor
for
qual
ityco
ntro
lpu
rpos
es.
Qua
tity
ofth
epr
opos
edne
twor
kof
fiet
dwor
kre
sear
chce
ntre
s,th
eT
henu
mbe
rof
CA
TIw
orks
tati
ons
(350
)is
deem
edto
been
ough
for
the
requ
irem
ents
ofth
ena
tion
alpr
ojec
tm
anag
ers
and
the
fiel
dwor
ksu
perv
isor
s(1
0po
ints
)6
-su
rvey
.
Wea
kn
esse
s
Div
isio
nof
resp
onsi
bili
ties
betw
een
the
hubs
nee
ds
tobe
clea
r.T
hesp
litof
inte
rvie
wer
sco
veri
ngth
esa
me
coun
try
acro
ssdi
ffer
ent
loca
tion
sca
nre
sult
inla
ckof
coor
dina
tion
and
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
som
edo
ubts
abou
tit.
The
invo
lvem
ent
ofin
terv
iew
ers
with
two
mon
ths
ofex
peri
ence
isno
tde
emed
tobe
suff
icie
ntfo
rth
ere
quir
emen
tsof
this
proj
ect.
CR
ITE
RIO
N2
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
A:
QU
EST
ION
NA
IRE
AN
DSA
MPL
ING
:-S
CO
RE
:20
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Qua
lity
ofth
epr
opos
alto
the
ques
tion
nair
ere
visi
on,
incl
udin
gth
esu
gges
ted
appro
ach
tone
wto
pics
,th
est
rate
gyto
gath
erin
form
atio
nT
hepr
opos
allo
oks
into
mar
gina
lim
prov
emen
tsin
the
intr
oduc
tion
and
cont
act
phas
eof
the
from
non-r
esponden
tsan
dth
epr
e-te
st(1
0po
ints
)4
surv
eyas
wel
las
onth
ein
stru
ctio
nsfo
rth
ein
terv
iew
ers.
ersa
mfr
ngpf
mic
roes
tabl
ishm
ents
inth
epe-
test
J5ou
tof
the
25
Page 9
Wea
knes
ses
The
prop
osal
toth
equ
esti
onna
ire
revi
sion
was
dee
med
tobe
wea
kby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e,w
ithfe
wde
tail
sgi
ven
beyo
ndth
ecr
iter
iafo
rth
eli
tera
ture
revi
ewfo
rne
wto
pics
and
outc
ome
ques
tion
s.
On
com
para
bili
ty,
the
eval
uali
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
expe
cted
mor
ede
tail
s,pa
rtic
ular
lyre
gard
ing
MS
Es.
Sim
ilarl
y,m
ore
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
onga
ther
ing
info
rmat
ion
from
non-
resp
onde
nts.
The
appr
oach
toth
epr
e-te
stw
asno
tsu
ffic
ient
.T
heev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
expre
ssed
conc
erns
over
carr
ying
out
the
inte
rvie
ws
inE
ngli
shon
ly,
asth
ispr
even
tsfr
omte
stin
gth
ecu
ltur
alco
mpo
nent
san
dth
esp
ecif
icla
ngua
gen
uan
ces.
Str
engt
hs
Qua
lity
ofth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alqu
esti
onna
ires
—w
hile
ensu
ring
inle
rnat
iona
lco
mpa
rabi
lity
-,in
clud
ing
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
asw
ell
asth
epro
pose
dap
pro
ach
totr
ansl
atio
nan
dth
epi
lot
test
(10
poin
ts)
6
Qua
lity
ofth
esa
mpl
ing
stra
tegy
,in
clud
ing
the
prop
osed
bu
sin
ess
reg
iste
rs,
the
sam
plin
gde
sign
invi
ewof
min
imis
ing
sele
ctio
nbi
asan
dth
epo
tent
ial
impa
cts
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
with
ES
EN
ER
-2(1
5po
ints
)10
The
over
all
appr
oach
toth
etr
ansl
atio
n,le
dby
—an
appl
ying
Lhe
TR
AP
Uap
proa
ch,
isde
emed
tobe
very
soun
dan
dre
leva
nt,
inlin
ew
ithth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns.
The
desc
ript
ion
ofth
epr
opos
alto
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
esm
eets
the
requ
irem
ents
ofth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns.
For
the
pilo
tte
st,
atle
ast
10m
icro
esta
blis
hmen
ts(o
utof
30)
are
prop
osed
tobe
inte
rvie
wed
inea
chof
the
coun
trie
s.M
ost
ofth
ein
terv
iew
ers
invo
lved
inth
epi
lot
will
bein
inor
der
tom
inim
ize
the
num
ber
oftr
aini
ngs
and
tole
tth
eco
rete
amli
sten
toth
ep
ilo
flu
esti
on
nai
res.
Wea
knes
ses
The
appr
oach
toth
ena
tion
alad
-hoc
mod
ules
isin
line
with
the
tech
nica
lsp
ecif
icat
ions
but
addi
tion
alde
tail
sw
ould
have
been
wel
com
edby
lhe
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.T
heov
eral
lap
proa
chto
the
pilo
tw
asve
rysu
ccin
ctan
dm
ore
deta
ils
wou
ldha
vebe
enI
appr
ecia
ted
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
Str
engt
hs
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lued
posi
tive
lyth
ege
nera
lap
proa
chto
the
sam
plin
gst
rate
gy,
build
ing
onth
eex
peri
ence
from
ES
EN
ER
-2.
The
reis
are
leva
ntdi
scus
sion
onre
liabi
lity,
whi
chaf
fect
sIh
est
rati
fica
tion
ofna
tion
alsa
mp
les
acro
ssse
cto
ran
dsi
zecl
asse
s.T
hete
nder
erap
pea
rsto
prop
ose
adi
spro
port
iona
test
rati
fica
tion
bysi
zean
dto
have
itto
oby
sect
orin
the
coun
trie
sw
ithle
ssth
an75
0in
terv
iew
s,in
view
ofin
crea
sing
the
relia
bilit
yof
the
find
ings
for
smal
lse
ctor
s.
-E
uic
taA
tiu
y
JI,,
s.I,
,oa
4H
tthh
/ai
Wor
k
Ope
nte
nd
erp
roce
du
reE
UO
SH
N2O
I7IO
PIFI
SEIO
O48
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
prop
osed
. aso
und
roun
dq
go
Ith
ere
qufr
edda
taso
urce
s,in
clu
gan
esti
mat
ion
ofth
e-
Page 10
Lpe
m1L
nEy
Open
tender
pro
cedure
EU
OSH
AI2
OI7
IOPI
FISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hn
ical
eval
uat
ion
:j
i.S0
T.ty
ctd
Ubh
,JQ
IWh
7mis
sing
data
Laes
tim
ate
the
num
ber
ofes
tabl
ishm
ents
,co
mbi
ning
the
SB
San
dth
eL
FS.
A
rele
vant
poin
tis
mad
eon
the
type
ofdi
stri
buti
onfu
ncti
onof
esta
blis
hmen
tsac
ross
size
clas
ses.
The
reis
are
leva
ntap
proa
chto
the
sam
ple
plan
spe
rco
untr
y,ai
min
gto
min
imis
eth
eva
rian
ceof
desi
gnw
eigh
ts.
The
offe
rsar
gues
that
the
min
imum
sam
ple
size
per
coun
try
shou
ldat
leas
tbe
672
(96
x7)
.F
urth
erto
this
,th
eof
fer
prop
oses
toin
clud
eth
eag
eof
the
esta
blis
hmen
tsin
the
wei
ghti
ng.
The
prop
osed
sam
ple
fram
esar
epr
ovid
edby
Sam
ple
Sol
utio
nsan
dar
eat
the
esta
blis
hmen
tle
vel—
whi
chis
posi
tive
—an
dth
eap
proa
chis
cent
rali
sed,
toge
ther
with
The
reis
apr
oper
desc
ript
ion
ofth
eco
mpa
rabi
lity
ofth
epr
opos
edap
proa
ch,
argu
ing
that
the
chan
ges
—sa
mpl
efr
ames
,scr
eeni
ngfo
rno
n-ex
isti
ngnu
mbe
rs,
impr
ovem
ents
inco
ntac
tph
ase
—w
illin
crea
seth
ere
liabi
lity
ofth
efi
ndin
gsan
dhe
nce,
ther
ew
illbe
anef
fect
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
.
-
Wea
kn
esse
s
Whi
leth
epr
opos
alis
rele
vant
,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
wou
ldha
vew
elco
med
mor
ecl
arity
rega
rdin
gth
efi
nal
sam
ple
desi
gnpr
opos
ed.
Inlin
ew
ithth
is,
mor
ein
form
atio
nw
ould
have
been
wel
com
edab
out
the
esta
blis
hmen
tle
vel
sam
ple
fram
espr
ovid
edby
CR
ITE
RIO
N3
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
8:T
RA
ININ
G,
IMPL
EM
EN
TA
TIO
NA
ND
DE
LIV
ER
Y:
-S
CO
RE
:24
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Str
engt
hs
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lued
posi
tivel
yth
eus
eof
ace
ntra
tise
dda
taco
llec
tion
plat
form
r’
both
CA
TIan
dC
AW
I,w
hich
enab
les
the
‘rea
l-tim
e’tr
acki
ngof
the
sam
ple,
reco
rdin
gin
form
atio
non
cont
acts
and
non-
cont
acts
.Si
mila
rly,
the
prop
osed
appr
oach
toth
epr
ogra
mm
ing
ofth
em
aste
rqu
esti
onna
ire
isso
und.
Qua
lity
ofth
est
rate
gyfo
rfi
eldw
ork
prep
arat
ion,
part
icul
arly
the
The
reis
atr
aini
ngse
min
arpr
opos
edw
ithth
eco
repr
ojec
tte
am,
the
dire
ctor
a!op
erat
ions
appro
ach
totr
aini
ngan
dth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gy(o
rre
duci
ngno
n-re
spon
se,
and
the
qual
ityco
ntro
lm
anag
erat
,—
plus
site
man
ager
san
dtw
osu
perv
isor
sfr
om
incl
udin
gth
eon
line
mod
ule
(10
poin
ts)
7ea
chhu
b.A
lso,
two
fiel
dwor
kbr
iefi
ngs
are
envi
sage
d(f
orth
epi
lot
and
the
mai
nfi
eldw
ork)
,he
ldby
am
embe
rof
the
core
team
,si
tem
anag
eran
dna
tive
supe
rvis
or.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
dth
epr
opos
edap
proa
chto
impr
ovin
gth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gy.
Off
erin
g15
call
atte
mpt
s,ov
erdi
ffer
ent
tim
esan
dda
ysan
dta
rget
edto
sect
orpr
acti
ces,
send
ing
the
intr
oduc
tion
lett
erw
hile
onth
eph
one
with
the
gate
keep
eror
resp
onde
nt,
are
rele
vant
prop
osal
s.
For
the
onlin
equ
esti
onna
ire,
the
mo
nil
org
ofin
vila
tion
sse
ntou
tdugfi
eid
work
isw
ell
Page 11
I.,Sc
fVy
D4
Iciw
ca
Open
ten
der
pro
cedure
EU
OSH
A)2
0171
OPI
FISE
IOO
4B—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:
expl
aine
d,w
itha
rem
inde
raf
ter
thre
eda
ys,
and
afo
llow
-up
tono
n-re
spon
seon
day
8.S
ubje
ctto
addi
tion
alqu
ality
cont
rol
mea
sure
s,re
spo
nd
ents
may
beca
lled
back
.
Wea
knes
ses
Qua
lity
ofth
e,p
rop
ose
dfi
eldw
ork
exec
utio
n,de
scri
bing
the
over
all
appro
ach
tog
uar
ante
ehi
gh-q
uali
tyin
terv
iew
san
dm
inim
ise
no
nre
sponse
bias
incl
udin
gth
em
onit
orin
g,co
ntro
lan
dre
port
ing
ofth
efi
eldw
ork
pro
cess
(15
poin
ts)
10
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edm
ore
deta
ils
conc
erni
ngth
etr
aini
ng.
IIw
asd
eem
edto
bege
nera
lfo
rth
ein
terv
iew
erta
sks.
Itis
not
enti
rely
clea
rto
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
hen
CA
WI
isto
beof
fere
d,on
lyas
ala
stre
sort
orbe
fore
—if
the
resp
onde
ntha
sno
ten
ough
tim
eon
the
phon
e.
Str
engt
hs
Fiel
dwor
kis
tobe
carr
ied
out
from
four
mai
nhu
bs,
with
nati
vein
terv
iew
ers.
Inad
diti
onto
this
,na
tive
eval
uato
rsar
eap
poin
ted
for
each
coun
try,
whi
chis
valu
edpo
siti
vely
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
reis
aso
und
appr
oach
tosa
mpl
em
onit
orin
g—
byce
ll—
whi
chis
cent
rali
sed
and
perf
orm
edon
ada
ilyba
sis,
and
envi
sagi
ngan
asse
ssm
ent
whe
n80
%th
resh
old
has
bee
nre
ache
d.T
here
ison
line
acce
ssto
real
-tim
epr
ogre
sspe
rco
untr
y,pl
usw
eekl
yup
date
dre
port
s.
The
reis
ago
od,
cent
rali
sed
appr
oach
toqu
alit
yco
ntro
l,ch
ecki
ng11
-12%
ofal
lin
terv
iew
sco
nduc
ted
and
intr
oduc
tion
conv
ersa
tion
s.D
epen
ding
onth
efi
eldw
ork
phas
eco
ntro
lis
tofo
cus
ondi
ffer
ent
issu
es.
For
CA
WI,
ave
rifi
cati
onca
llis
prop
osed
for
outl
iers
—ex
pect
edfo
r15
-20%
ofC
AW
Iin
terv
iew
s—
,pe
rfor
min
ga
chec
kof
four
ques
tion
s.
Wea
knes
ses
Qua
lity
ofth
eap
pro
ach
toda
tapr
oces
sing
,de
live
ryan
dst
orag
e,in
clud
ing
wei
ghti
ngan
dth
eim
pact
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
with
ES
EN
ER
-2,
asw
ell
asth
ere
port
ing
(10
poin
ts)
7
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edm
ore
clar
ityre
gard
ing
the
loca
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alte
ams
ofin
terv
iew
ers
and
whe
ther
nati
onal
team
sar
esp
read
acro
ssdi
ffer
ent
hubs
Str
engt
hs
The
appr
oach
toda
taco
ding
isco
mpa
tibl
ew
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
and
mat
ches
the
requ
irem
ents
ofth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns.
Whe
reap
plic
able
,co
nsis
tenc
ych
ecks
will
bepr
ogra
mm
edin
the
ques
tion
nair
e.D
ata
vali
dati
onto
bepe
rfor
med
atva
riab
lean
dre
spon
dent
leve
l.T
heof
fer
prop
oses
vali
dati
onru
les
tobe
Inte
grat
edas
part
ofth
eC
AT
Ipr
ogra
mm
ing
plus
anS
PS
Ssy
ntax
tobe
agre
edw
ithE
U-O
SHA
for
post
-hoc
vali
dati
on,
whi
chis
soun
d.T
heev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
valu
edpo
siti
vely
the
poin
ton
the
data
tobe
stor
edin
for
two
year
s.
The
appr
oach
tow
eigh
ting
follo
ws
the
one
adop
ted
inE
SE
NE
R-2
,w
ithth
eus
eof
gene
rali
sed
regr
essi
ones
tim
atio
nrn
ptho
dsfo
rpo
st-s
trat
ific
atio
nw
eigh
ts.
The
auxi
liar
y
Page 12
Jlr
5ofe
Iym
idH
rhh
Jolw
mk
Op
ente
nder
pro
cedure
EU
OS
HA
I2O
I710
P1F1
5E10
048—
Tec
hn
ical
eval
uat
ion
;
vari
able
sar
ees
tabl
ishm
ent
age
and
regi
on.
The
offe
rpr
opos
esto
add
answ
ers
rela
ted
to
the
wil
ling
ness
toco
oper
ate
(per
cept
ion
ofin
terv
iew
erad
ded
atth
een
dof
each
inte
rvie
w).
Adi
scus
sion
ofth
eco
mpa
rabi
lity
betw
een
wei
ghti
ngin
ES
EN
ER
-2an
dE
SE
NE
R-3
is
prov
ided
too,
whi
chth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
appr
ecia
tes.
Wea
kn
esse
s
Whi
leth
eda
tava
lidat
ion,
proc
essi
ng,
stor
age
and
deli
very
are
pres
ente
d,ad
diti
onal
deta
ils
wou
ldha
vebe
enap
prec
iate
dby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e,al
sofo
rth
ew
eigh
ting
appr
oach
and
the
repo
rtin
g.
TO
TA
L6
00
UT
OF
IOD
Sig
ned
by:
Page 13
‘6JI;I
!nn
A&
n[y
3fe
,StF
.rynd
11.4
thI
wW
c,k
Ope
nte
nd
erpro
cedure
EU
OSH
AI2
OI7
IOP/
F/SE
IOO
4B—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:—
CR
ITE
RIO
NC
OM
MEN
TS
CR
ITE
RIO
NI
EFF
ICIE
NC
YA
ND
QU
AL
ItY
OF
THE
PRO
JEC
TM
AN
AG
EMEN
T:-
SCO
RE
:18
OU
TO
F30
POIN
TS
Str
engt
hs
The
reis
ade
tail
edde
scri
ptio
nof
the
appr
oach
toth
ew
ork
orga
nisa
tion
and
the
proj
ect
man
agem
ent,
whi
chis
deem
edso
und
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
prop
osed
tim
etab
lese
ems
feas
ible
and
inlin
ew
ithle
nder
requ
irem
ents
The
app
roac
hto
proj
ect
man
agem
ent
and
wor
kor
gani
sati
on,
incl
udin
gth
ere
sou
rce
allo
cati
on,
the
feas
ibil
ity
ofth
epr
opos
edti
met
able
and
the
con
tingen
cypl
anfo
runfo
rese
enev
ents
orco
mpl
icat
ions
,in
clud
ing
pro
cedure
sfo
rqu
alit
yco
ntro
lan
das
sura
nce
.(1
0po
ints
)6
Ext
ent
and
qual
ity
ofth
eco
rete
am,
incl
udin
gth
eco
mpo
siti
onin
term
sof
exper
tise
and
skill
s,al
loca
tion
orro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
ofal
lte
amm
ember
sas
wel
las
reso
urc
eba
ck-u
p(1
0po
ints
)6
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
eco
ntin
genc
ypl
an,
with
ade
scri
ptio
nof
the
reso
urce
back
-ups
.T
here
isa
soun
dan
dde
tail
edap
proa
chto
qual
ity
cont
rol,
incl
udin
gth
eap
poin
tmen
tof
aqu
alit
ydi
rect
or,
and
alon
gIh
ecr
iter
iaof
the
ES
S,
with
ade
tail
edqu
alit
yas
sura
nce
plan
cove
ring
the
risk
asse
ssm
ent
and
miti
gatin
gac
tion
per
task
,in
clud
ing
resp
onsi
bili
ties
for
deli
vera
bles
and
qual
ityin
dica
tors
.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
ere
isa
clea
rde
scri
ptio
nof
the
role
sof
the
supp
orti
ngpa
rtne
rsls
ubco
ntra
ctor
s—
and
‘,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
wou
ldha
vea
red
ated
mor
ecl
arity
asto
the
spec
ific
role
san
dre
spon
sibi
liti
esw
ithin
the
core
team
(an
d
a-
Fur
ther
toth
is,
itw
ould
have
been
wel
com
eto
have
mor
ede
tail
son
the
rela
tion
ship
betw
een
the
task
-bas
edsu
bte
ams
and
the
resL
Con
cern
ing
the
reso
urc
eal
loca
tion
,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
expre
ssed
som
edi
ffic
ultie
sto
asse
ssth
enu
mbe
rof
days
allo
cate
dto
each
team
mem
ber
and
whe
ther
they
are
cons
iste
ntw
ithth
ety
pean
dnu
mbe
rof
task
sto
beca
rrie
dou
t.T
hein
form
atio
nis
prov
ided
per
task
rath
erlh
anin
divi
dual
team
mem
ber.
Whi
leth
eri
skas
sess
men
tis
very
deta
iled
,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
has
expre
ssed
som
eco
ncer
nsab
out
itsco
vera
geof
the
spec
iflc
itie
sof
ES
EN
ER
-3.
Str
engt
hs
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lued
posi
tive
lyth
eex
tent
and
expe
rtis
eof
the
core
team
,pa
rtic
ular
lyin
term
sof
proj
ect
man
agem
ent,
asw
ell
asth
epr
opos
edre
sour
ceba
ck-u
p.
Page 14
Op
ente
nd
erpro
cedure
EU
OSH
A12
OI7
/OP1
F/SE
/004
8—T
ech
nic
alev
alu
atio
n:
—.
6tS
d,ty
onil
itdi
h.J
niwmb
Wea
kn
esse
s
As
poin
ted
out
abov
e,m
ore
clar
ityw
ould
have
been
wel
com
eby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ere
gard
ing
the
allo
cati
onof
days
for
each
team
mem
ber.
Som
eco
ncer
nsw
ere
exp
ress
edab
out
the
mix
ofsk
ills
inth
epr
opos
edte
am,
whi
chw
asde
emed
very
stro
ngfo
rth
epr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
t,th
epr
e-te
stan
dth
etr
ansl
atio
n.H
owev
er,
high
erex
pert
ise
wou
ldha
vebe
enap
prec
iate
din
term
sof
surv
eyde
sign
,m
anag
emen
tan
dan
alys
is,
asw
ell
asth
emat
ickn
owle
dge
ofO
SH
.
Str
engt
hs
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
eco
vera
geof
all
the
coun
trie
sas
requ
ired
inth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
nsfr
omth
efo
urhu
bsan
dth
eap
poin
tmen
tof
apr
ojec
tm
anag
eran
dfi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
orin
each
ofth
ehu
bs.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
aco
untr
yco
ordi
nato
ran
dan
oper
atio
nsm
anag
erar
eap
poin
ted
too,
whi
chis
valu
edpo
sitiv
ely
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
num
ber
ofw
orks
tati
ons
isab
out
350,
whi
chis
cons
iste
ntw
ithth
enu
mbe
rof
inte
rvie
ws
tobe
carr
ied
out
and
the
timel
ine
prop
osed
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
posi
tive
lyth
eC
lE
ngli
shle
vel
ofth
epr
ojec
tm
anag
ers
Qua
lity
ofth
epr
opos
edne
twor
kof
fiel
dwor
kre
sear
chce
ntre
s,th
ean
dfi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
ors,
and
the
depl
oym
ent
ofna
tive
spea
king
inte
rvie
wer
sof
all
the
nati
onal
proj
ect
man
ager
san
dth
efi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
ors
(10
poin
ts)
Bla
ngua
ges
cove
red.
Wea
kn
esse
s
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
appr
ecia
ted
mor
ede
tail
sto
this
spec
ific
crite
rion
.M
ore
clar
ityw
ould
have
been
help
ful
rega
rdin
gth
elo
cati
onof
the
man
ager
san
dsu
perv
isor
san
dw
hile
thei
rex
peri
ence
isve
ryre
leva
nt,
mor
ede
tail
sas
tow
how
illbe
cove
ring
wha
tco
untr
yw
ould
have
been
appr
ecia
ted.
Ats
o,th
eap
proa
chto
qual
ityco
ntro
lat
—is
very
thor
ough
but
mor
eta
ilori
ngto
the
spec
ific
itie
sof
ES
EN
ER
-3w
ould
have
been
appr
ecia
ted.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
som
eco
ncer
nsas
toth
epa
rtic
ipat
ion
ofin
terv
iew
ers
with
two-
mon
thex
peri
ence
.
CR
ITER
ION
2W
OR
kPA
CK
AG
EA:
QU
EST
ION
NA
IRE
AN
DSA
MPL
ING
:-S
CO
RE
:24
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Qua
lity
ofth
epr
opos
alto
the
ques
tion
nair
ere
visi
on,
incl
udin
gth
eS
tren
gths
sugges
ted
appro
ach
tone
wto
pics
,th
est
rate
gyto
gath
erin
form
atio
nT
heap
proa
chto
revi
seth
equ
esti
onna
ire,
prop
osin
gth
equ
esti
onna
ire
appr
aisa
lsy
stem
,fr
omnon-r
esponden
tsan
dth
epr
o-te
st(1
0po
ints
)7
seem
edre
leva
ntto
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.S
ugge
stio
nsto
revi
seth
equ
esti
onna
ire
alon
gth
elin
esof
the
tend
ersp
ecif
icat
ions
are
pres
ente
dan
dex
tens
ivel
yex
plai
ned.
Page 15
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
dth
epr
opos
als
tore
view
the
ques
tion
nair
ein
orde
rto
incr
ease
the
resp
on
sera
te,
part
icul
arly
look
ing
atth
esu
rvey
intr
oduc
tion
text
.Si
mila
rly,
the
ques
tion
sto
ask
tono
n-re
spon
dent
san
dth
eju
stif
icat
ion
ofth
epr
opos
alto
focu
son
OS
Hm
anag
emen
tqu
esti
ons
(bea
ring
inm
ind
resp
onse
leve
lsin
ES
EN
ER
-2)
was
posi
tive
lyva
lued
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
reis
also
ago
odun
ders
tand
ing
ofsu
rvey
ing
smal
lest
esta
blis
hmen
ts,
adap
ting
the
intr
oduc
tory
text
and
sugg
esti
ngso
me
inte
rvie
wer
hint
sfo
rso
me
spec
ific
item
s.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lued
the
poin
ton
focu
sing
the
effo
rts
inre
achi
ngth
eta
rget
resp
onde
ntas
soon
aspo
ssib
lein
stea
dof
prov
idin
gm
any
deta
ils
togat
ekee
per
s.T
heap
proa
chto
the
defi
nitio
nof
new
ques
tion
sw
asd
eem
edso
und.
with
acl
earl
yde
fine
dcr
iter
ia,
and
tobe
vali
date
din
the
cogn
itiv
epr
e-te
st.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eco
nsid
ered
rele
vant
the
cons
ider
atio
nsm
ade
conc
erni
ngth
ein
clus
ion
ofou
tcom
equ
esti
ons,
tryi
ngto
gath
eras
muc
hin
form
atio
nas
poss
ible
over
the
phon
e,of
feri
ngth
epo
ssib
ilit
yto
com
plet
eth
em
issi
ngin
form
atio
non
line
.T
heap
proa
chto
the
pre-
test
isde
emed
stro
ng,
incl
udin
gth
etr
ansl
atio
nby
as
wel
las
the
sug
ges
ted
coun
try
cove
rage
.T
horo
ugh
desc
ript
ion,
incl
udin
gth
ean
alyt
ical
fram
ewor
kte
mpl
ate,
pro
cess
carr
ied
out
byex
peri
ence
dre
sear
cher
str
aine
db
y•
via
web
inar
.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
eap
proa
chto
the
pre-
test
isco
nsid
ered
tobe
stro
ng,
furt
her
deta
ils
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
me
onw
how
illbe
inte
rvie
wed
and
how
resp
on
den
tsw
illbe
appr
oach
ed.
Whi
leth
ecr
iter
iato
defi
nene
wqu
esti
ons
isre
leva
nt,
the
spec
ific
exam
ples
toth
ene
wqu
esti
ons,
whi
char
ein
line
with
the
ones
incl
uded
inth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns,
are
deem
eda
bit
vagu
e.T
hetw
oad
diti
onal
topi
cson
nano
mat
eria
lsan
dgr
een
jobs
are
appr
ecia
ted
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
but
som
eco
ncer
nw
asex
pre
ssed
abou
tth
epr
opos
edfo
rmul
atio
nof
the
ques
tion
s.
Str
engt
hs-
Qua
lity
ofth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alqu
esti
onna
ires
—w
hile
ensu
ring
inte
rnat
iona
lco
mpa
rabi
lity
-,in
clud
ing
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
asw
elt
asth
epro
pose
dap
pro
ach
totr
ansl
atio
nan
dth
epf
lol
test
(10
poin
ts)
9
The
over
all
appr
oach
toth
etr
ansl
atio
n,le
dby
subc
ontr
acto
r—
and
appl
ying
the
TR
APO
appr
oach
,is
deem
edto
beve
ryso
und
and
rele
vant
,in
line
with
the
tech
nica
lsp
ecif
icat
ions
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lued
posi
tive
lyth
epr
opos
alto
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
with
am
axim
umdu
rati
onof
two
min
utes
and
are
com
men
dati
onto
have
them
atth
een
din
whi
chw
oudaf
fect
corn
para
bfli
y,T
cp.p
i!.t
9i!
roduce
the
Cut
o*on
Agt
a.y
J(a
,So
f.tg
and
Hnh
bJ
aTW
ab
Ope
nte
nd
erpro
cedure
EU
OSH
N2O
I7IO
PIF!
SE10
048—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:
Page 16
Open
tender
pro
cedure
EU
OS
HN
2OI
TIO
P/F1
SEIO
O48
—T
ech
nic
alev
alu
atio
n:
Jfaa
Sd.:y
aa4
H.ah
Sat
Wk
mod
ule1
part
icul
arly
ifth
ere
are
repe
titi
ons
with
core
ques
tion
s,is
appr
opri
ate.
The
aim
san
dap
proa
chof
the
pilo
tte
star
ere
leva
ntan
dpo
sitiv
ely
valu
edby
the
eval
uati
on
com
mit
tee.
30in
terv
iew
spe
rco
untr
yco
veri
ngal
lse
ctor
s,si
zes
—ov
ersa
mpl
ing
ofth
em
icro
esta
blis
hmen
ts-
with
avi
ewto
test
the
func
tion
ing
ofC
AT
WCA
WI,
the
ques
tion
nair
e,no
n-
resp
onse
,th
ein
form
atio
nfr
omno
n-re
spon
dent
s,ou
tcom
equ
esti
ons,
inte
rvie
wer
san
d
qual
ityco
ntro
l.R
esul
tsto
beus
edfo
ran
yre
quir
edch
anges
toth
equ
esti
onna
ire.
Wea
kn
esse
s
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eco
nsid
ered
that
invi
ting
the
Foc
alPo
inL
sto
the
web
inar
s,w
hile
bein
ga
reas
onab
leid
ea,
ispr
obab
lyno
tve
ryre
alis
tic.
Str
engt
hs
The
offe
rspr
ovid
esa
list
ofsa
mpl
ing
fram
esby
coun
try,
upda
ted
from
thos
eus
edin
ES
EN
ER
-2,
prop
osin
gso
me
chan
ges,
whi
chis
posi
tivel
yva
lued
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
reIs
aso
und
intr
oduc
tion
tosa
mpl
ing,
base
don
the
Tot
alE
rror
Mod
el,
acco
unti
ngfo
rso
me
ofth
em
ain
issu
es.
The
offe
rpr
opos
esa
mul
tist
rati
fied
rand
omsa
mpl
ing:
26st
rata
(4si
zecl
asse
sx
7se
ctor
grou
ps)
asin
ES
EN
ER
-2bu
tpr
ovid
esan
alte
rnat
ive,
whi
chw
ould
have
bene
fite
dfr
omQ
uali
tyof
the
sam
plin
gst
rate
gy,
incl
udin
gth
epr
opos
edbu
sine
ssm
ore
deta
ils
and
acr
itica
las
sess
men
tfo
ra
prop
erev
alua
tion
.re
gist
ers,
the
sam
plin
gde
sign
invi
ewof
min
imis
ing
sele
ctio
nbi
asan
d—
fl--—
-—
——
--—
----—
--—
-—
-----—
-—
—---—
--—
-—
—--—
—-
---
----—
--
--
--
the
pote
ntia
lim
pact
son
com
para
bili
tyw
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
(15
poin
ts)
8-
Wea
kn
esse
s
As
poin
ted
out
abov
e,th
esa
mpl
ing
desi
gnw
asno
ten
tire
lycl
ear
alth
ough
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eun
ders
tood
that
the
tend
erer
initi
ally
sugges
tsto
follo
wth
esa
me
appr
oach
than
-th
eon
ein
ES
EN
ER
-2.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pres
sed
conc
erns
over
the
scre
enin
gpr
oced
ure
tose
lect
one
esta
blis
hmen
tin
mul
ti-un
itco
mpa
nies
.T
hesu
gges
ted
appr
oach
,sn
owba
llin
g,(a
skin
gco
mpa
nies
tose
lect
the
esta
blis
hmen
tto
bein
terv
iew
ed),
can
lead
tosi
gnif
ican
tbi
as,
asit
isa
non-
rand
ompr
oced
ure.
Mor
ede
tail
sw
ould
have
been
wel
com
eon
the
com
para
bili
tyw
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
.
CR
ITE
RIO
N3
WO
RK
PA
CK
AG
ES
:T
RA
ININ
G,
IMPL
EM
EN
TA
TIO
NA
ND
DE
LIV
ER
Y:
-S
CO
RE
:25
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Qua
lity
ofth
est
rate
gyfo
rfi
eldw
ork
prep
arat
ion,
part
icul
arly
the
Str
engt
hs
appro
ach
totr
aini
ngan
dth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gyfo
rre
duci
ngno
n-re
spon
se.
The
over
all
appr
oach
tofi
eldw
ork
prep
arat
ion
ispo
siti
vely
valu
edby
the
eval
uati
on
incl
udin
glh
eon
line
mod
ule
(10
poin
ts)
7co
mm
itte
e.T
heus
eof
asi
ngle
soft
war
efo
rm
anag
ing
the
sam
ple,
cont
acti
ngth
eun
its,
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
prog
ram
min
gth
ecA
T!
and
CA
WI
ques
tionnai
res
and
reco
rdin
ath
eda
ta,
acro
ssal
l
Page 17
tu.p
nn
oniy
Jfa
rSaI
.ryaa
dfir
dib
i,IW
mk
Ope
nte
nd
erp
roce
dure
EU
OSH
N2O
I7!O
P/FI
SEIO
O48
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
coun
trie
san
dfo
rth
ew
hole
surv
eyis
very
rele
vant
.
The
reis
ade
tail
edde
scri
ptio
nof
the
scri
ptin
gof
the
mas
ter
ques
tion
nair
ean
dth
etr
ansl
ated
vers
ions
(inC
AT
Ian
dC
AW
I),
prov
idin
gE
U-O
SHA
the
poss
ibil
ity
tote
stth
esc
ript
,w
hich
isw
elco
me
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
data
reco
rdin
gm
atri
xte
mpl
ate
with
all
surv
ey-r
elat
edda
taan
dpa
rada
tais
prop
osed
tobe
the
sam
eas
inE
SE
NE
R-2
.
The
appr
oach
totr
aini
ngis
pres
ente
dw
ithsu
ffic
ient
deta
ils
and
incl
udes
two
sem
inar
sfo
rm
anag
ers
and
supe
rvis
ors
inE
ngli
sh,
plus
grou
pbr
iefi
ngfo
rin
terv
iew
ers
(one
for
each
lang
uage
).In
terv
iew
ers
are
also
trai
ned
toco
nver
tre
fusa
lsan
dre
duce
non-
resp
onse
L(con
tact
stra
tegy
),w
Nch
isva
lued
posi
tive
lyby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
eov
eral
lap
proa
chto
trai
ning
isso
und,
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
efo
und
the
prop
o5ed
trai
ning
sem
inar
sto
beto
osh
ort.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eto
oex
pre
ssed
som
edo
ubts
asto
the
opti
onfo
rre
spo
nd
ents
tovi
sual
tyfo
llow
the
ques
tion
nair
eon
thei
rsc
reen
duri
ngth
ein
terv
iew
,as
itm
aybe
mor
eco
nfus
ing
thai
clar
ifyi
ng.
Con
cern
ing
the
offe
rof
the
onli
nesu
rvey
opti
on,
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
asno
ten
tire
lyco
nvin
ced
abou
tth
epr
opos
al,
sugg
esti
ngto
inte
grat
eit
asa
refu
sal
conv
ersi
onst
rate
gyra
ther
than
ala
stop
tion
for
non-
resp
onde
nts.
-
Qua
lity
ofth
epro
pose
dfi
eldw
ork
exec
utio
n,de
scri
bing
the
over
all
Fiel
dwor
kis
tobe
carr
ied
out
byfr
omfo
urhu
bs:
—L
aan
dap
pro
ach
toguar
ante
ehi
gh-q
uali
tyin
terv
iew
san
dm
inim
ise
non-
JThe
offe
rp
rese
nts
mea
sure
sfo
rfi
eldw
ork
qual
ity
cont
rol,
incl
udin
gth
em
onit
orin
gre
sponse
bias
incl
udin
gth
em
onit
orin
g,co
ntro
lan
dre
port
ing
ofth
eof
inte
rvie
wer
s—
with
the
use
ofan
inte
grat
edto
olfo
rfi
eldw
ork
mon
itori
ng-,
wee
kly
repo
rts,
fiel
dwor
kp
roce
ss(1
5po
ints
)10
feed
back
sess
ions
inca
seof
nega
tive
resu
lts
plus
ase
ries
ofm
easu
res
tom
axim
ise
resp
on
sera
tes,
whi
chha
vebe
ende
scri
bed
too
unde
r‘F
ield
wor
kpr
epar
atio
n’an
dar
ede
emed
tobe
rele
vant
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
est
rate
gyto
redu
ceno
n-re
spon
se,
spec
ific
ally
the
man
agem
ent
ofth
esa
mpl
e(s
ampl
ere
leas
esby
coun
try,
bas
edon
resp
onse
rate
s)an
dfo
cusi
ngef
fort
son
the
hard
erto
reac
h,w
hich
isso
und.
The
cont
act
stra
tegy
isre
leva
ntto
o,in
clud
ing
the
calli
ngti
mes
,th
e10
cont
act
atte
mpt
spe
run
it(w
ithtw
oex
cept
ions
,w
hich
are
reas
onab
le),
plus
the
info
rmat
ion
emai
lan
dth
ew
ebpa
ge.
Reg
ardi
ngth
ere
fusa
lco
nver
sion
stra
tegi
es,
ther
eis
afa
irpo
int
mad
eon
the
limite
din
form
atio
nco
llec
ted
onth
ere
asons
for
refu
sals
inE
SE
NE
R-2
and
the
poss
ible
reas
ons,
with
way
sto
over
com
eth
em,
whi
chis
soun
dan
dre
leva
nt.
Page 18
Ope
nte
nder
pro
cedure
EU
OSH
N2O
I7/O
PIF/
SEIO
O4B
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
jkr
Soi
Hyd
H,d
th.J
&W
wk
Wea
kn
esse
s
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
efu
rthe
rde
tail
sto
the
prop
osed
appr
oach
tofi
eldw
ork
exec
utio
n.T
hem
easu
res
desc
ribe
dto
incr
ease
resp
onse
rate
s,w
hile
reas
onab
le,
wer
ede
emed
tobe
abi
tst
anda
rd.
The
reis
lack
ofcl
arity
rega
rdin
gth
eal
loca
tion
ofw
ork
and
inte
rvie
wer
sac
ross
the
four
hubs
inte
rms
ofco
untr
yco
vera
ge.
The
reis
also
som
eco
nfus
ion
conc
erni
ngth
ela
ngua
geco
vera
gepe
rco
untr
y,w
hich
does
not
com
ply
with
the
requ
irem
ents
set
inth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns.
Str
engt
hs
The
use
ofa
sing
lesc
ript
and
cent
ral
data
colle
ctio
npl
atfo
rmis
posi
tivel
yva
lued
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
asal
lin
terv
iew
data
are
acce
ssib
lein
stan
tly.
Con
cern
ing
data
vali
dati
on,
the
use
ofa
cent
ral
scri
ptre
duce
spa
rtof
data
clea
ning
but
the
offe
rpr
esen
tsad
diti
onal
chec
ks,
such
asin
terv
iew
dura
tion
(too
shor
t/lo
ng),
doub
lein
terv
iew
s,st
raig
htlin
ing,
cons
iste
ncy,
item
non-
resp
onse
(<40
%),
outl
iers
,en
gage
men
t,..,
whi
char
ede
emed
tobe
rele
vant
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
appr
oach
tow
eigh
ting
isso
und
and
wel
lde
scri
bed,
incl
udin
gth
eim
pact
on
com
para
bili
ty.
Qua
lity
ofth
eap
proa
chto
data
proc
essi
ng,
deli
very
and
stor
age,
incl
udin
gw
eigh
ting
and
the
impa
cton
com
para
bili
tyw
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
,as
Dat
apr
oces
sing
proc
ess
incl
udes
asc
reen
ing
phas
e,di
agno
stic
phas
ean
dtr
eatm
ent
wel
las
the
repo
rtin
g(1
0po
ints
)B
phas
e,w
ithth
esu
bmis
sion
ofa
data
file
with
allca
ses
whi
chfa
iled
the
qual
itych
eck
proc
edur
es.
Ago
odpo
int
ism
ade
onth
eEU
Gen
eral
Dat
aP
rote
ctio
nR
egul
atio
n.
The
appr
oach
toth
ede
live
rabl
es,
the
repo
rtin
gan
dm
eeti
ngs
isde
tail
edan
dth
orou
gh,
inlin
ew
ithte
nder
requ
irem
ents
.
Wea
kn
esse
s
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pres
sed
som
eco
ncer
nsas
toth
eap
proa
chof
the
codi
ngof
the
activ
ityse
ctor
,w
hich
isau
tom
ated
usin
gke
ywor
dsaf
ter
tran
slat
ion
into
Eng
lish
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
ede
tail
son
the
data
stor
age.
TO
TA
L67O
UT
OF
IOO
Page 19
-0-c
U)CC)
U)
0.
D
0
‘Ix—,
Page 20
,i
t.Luy
JcI
Ww
I
Open
ten
der
pro
ced
ure
EU
OS
HN
2OI7
10PI
FISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hn
ical
eval
uat
ion
:
CR
ITE
RIO
NC
OM
ME
NT
S
CR
ITE
RIO
N1
EF
FIC
IEN
CY
AN
DQ
UA
LIT
YO
FT
HE
PR
OJE
CT
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
:-
SC
OR
E:
21O
UT
OF
30P
OIN
TS
Str
engt
hs
The
appro
ach
topr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
tan
dw
ork
orga
nisa
tion
,in
clud
ing
the
reso
urc
eal
loca
tion
,th
efe
asib
ilit
yof
the
prop
osed
tim
etab
lean
dth
eco
ntin
genc
ypl
anfo
run
fore
seen
even
tsor
com
plic
atio
ns,
incl
udin
gpro
cedure
sfo
rqu
alit
yco
ntro
lan
das
sura
nce
.(1
0po
ints
)7
The
reis
acl
ear
desc
ript
ion
ofth
eor
gani
sali
ons
invo
lved
inth
eof
fer
and
the
diff
eren
tte
ams
that
will
beta
king
care
ofth
eta
sks.
The
reis
ale
adpr
ojec
tm
anag
erap
poin
ted
toco
ntac
tw
ithE
U-O
SHA
and
coor
dina
teth
e
core
team
and
the
nati
onal
part
ners
.A
dditi
onal
lyth
ere
isa
pers
onin
char
geof
qual
ity
cont
rol
and
risk
asse
ssm
ent.
Mos
tof
the
units
are
loca
ted
inIt
aly
and
the
appr
oach
to
proj
ect
man
agem
ent
iscl
ear
and
quit
ece
ntra
lise
d,w
hich
isva
lued
posi
tive
lyby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.
The
prop
osed
tim
etab
leis
gene
rall
yin
line
with
the
requ
irem
ents
set
inth
ete
chni
cal
3spe
cifi
cati
ons.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
eap
proa
chto
proj
ect
man
agem
ent
iscl
ear,
mor
ede
tail
sw
ould
have
been
wel
com
edon
how
the
diff
eren
tun
its
will
liai
seam
ong
each
othe
r.
The
prop
osed
timel
ine
isfe
asib
lebu
tth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
exp
ress
edco
ncer
nsov
er
carr
ying
out
fiel
dwor
kov
erth
esu
mm
er.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
efo
und
the
appr
oach
toqu
ality
cont
rol
reas
on
able
but
itw
ould
have
expe
cted
itto
bem
ore
embe
dded
inth
epr
opos
al.
Mor
ede
tail
and
tailo
ring
toth
e
spec
ific
need
san
dch
alle
nges
ofE
SE
NE
R-3
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
the
appr
oach
tori
skas
sess
men
tan
dth
eco
ntin
genc
ypl
anco
uld
have
been
expa
nded
.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
appr
ecia
ted
deta
ils
onda
tapr
otec
tion
.
Str
engt
hs
Ext
ent
and
qual
ity
ofth
eco
rete
am,
incl
udin
gth
eco
mpo
siti
onin
term
sof
exper
tise
and
skil
ls,
allo
cati
onor
role
san
dre
spon
sibi
liti
esof
all
team
mem
ber
sas
wel
las
reso
urc
eba
ck-u
p(1
0po
ints
)7
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
very
posi
tive
lyth
em
ixof
skill
san
dex
pert
ise
ofth
eco
re
team
.T
here
isve
ryhi
ghex
pert
ise
onsu
rvey
met
hodo
logy
,sa
mpl
ing
and
data
anal
ysis
,as
wel
las
ling
uist
ics,
with
anap
poin
ted
expe
rtto
read
thro
ugh
the
fina
lre
port
s.
The
reis
are
ason
able
allo
cati
onof
reso
urc
es(in
term
sof
days
)ac
ross
all
envi
sage
dta
sks,
whi
chis
inlin
ew
ithth
ete
chni
cal
requ
irem
ents
.
Page 21
Open
tender
pro
ced
ure
EU
OS
HN
2OI7
IOPI
F1SE
IOO
48—
Tec
hnic
alev
alu
atio
n:
)I,,
Salsy
wIl
sthh
_I
,JW
k
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
conc
erns
abou
t(h
ela
ckof
reso
urce
back
-ups
.
Whi
leth
eex
tent
and
qual
ityof
the
core
team
was
foun
dto
beve
rygo
od,
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
eda
grea
ter
OSH
expe
rtis
ean
din
volv
emen
t.
The
min
imum
Eng
lish
leve
lre
quir
edfo
rth
ose
liais
ing
with
EU
-OSH
Ais
Cl,
whi
chis
not
the
case
ofth
equ
ality
man
ager
and
the
sam
ple
desi
gnan
dw
eigh
ting
lead
ers.
Str
engt
hs
The
offe
rpr
esen
tsfo
urhu
bs,
cove
ring
all
lan
gu
ages
and
coun
trie
s.T
here
are
two
—__ca
llce
ntre
sin
and
plus
two
part
ner
hubsm
aan
d
Inea
chhu
ba
proj
ect
man
ager
and
afi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
orm
anag
erar
eap
poin
ted.
The
latt
erre
port
toth
efo
rmer
and
lead
the
coun
try
supe
rvis
ors,
who
then
liai
sew
ithth
ein
terv
iew
ers.
The
sam
eso
ftw
are
(is
tobe
used
for
all
inte
rvie
ws
acro
ssal
lco
untr
ies.
The
tend
erer
offe
rsa
cent
rali
sed
appr
oach
,ex
plai
ning
clea
rly
itsbe
nefi
tsin
term
sof
cons
iste
ncy
and
harm
onis
atio
n,w
hich
isde
emed
tobe
reas
onab
leby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.Q
uali
tyof
the
prop
osed
netw
ork
offi
eldw
ork
rese
arch
cent
res,
the
The
tend
erer
can
offe
r40
0C
ATI
wor
ksta
tion
s,ap
prop
riat
efo
rth
ete
chni
cal
requ
irem
ents
ofna
tion
alpr
ojec
tm
anag
ers
and
the
fiel
dwor
ksu
perv
isor
s(1
0po
ints
)7
ES
EN
FR
-3.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
som
eco
ncer
nsab
out
the
conc
entr
atio
nof
fiel
dwor
kin
one
ofth
ehu
bs(
cove
ring
upto
18co
untr
ies.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
the
sam
ere
sou
rces
are
allo
cate
d—
inte
rms
oflo
cal
proj
ect
man
ager
and
fiel
dwor
ksu
perv
isor
man
ager
days
-ac
ross
all
four
hubs
,de
spit
eth
edi
ffer
ent
num
ber
ofco
untr
ies
cove
red.
Mor
ede
tail
son
the
coor
dina
tion
with
the
non
-hub
sw
ould
have
been
wel
com
ed.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
som
edo
ubts
abou
tth
eex
pert
ise
of—
—w
hich
--
-ap
pea
rsto
conc
entr
ate
mor
eon
tele
mar
keti
ng,
dire
ctm
arke
ting
and
mar
ket
inve
stig
atio
n.
CR
ITE
RIO
N2
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
A:
QU
EST
ION
NA
IRE
AN
DSA
MPL
ING
:-S
CO
RE
:29
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Qua
lity
ofth
epr
opos
alto
the
ques
tion
nair
ere
visi
on,
incl
udin
gth
eS
tren
gths
sug
ges
ted
appro
ach
tone
wto
pics
,th
est
rate
gyto
gath
erin
form
atio
nT
heap
proa
chto
the
ques
tion
nair
ere
visi
onis
very
thor
ough
and
wel
lde
scri
bed
inge
nera
l.It
from
non-r
esponden
tsan
dth
epr
e-te
st(1
0po
ints
)7
Icon
sist
sof
thre
eco
nsec
utiv
est
eps:
(1)
in-d
epth
lite
ratu
rere
view
toid
entif
ypo
tent
ial
new
I-
Page 22
Ope
nte
nder
pro
ced
ure
EU
OSH
AI2
OI7
IOPI
FISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:‘D
lS
oeI
wid
H.o
hhtt
W,k
whe
ther
toad
dqu
esti
ons.
Whi
leth
ere
are
nopr
opos
als
mad
e,th
eof
fer
incl
udes
som
e
exam
ples
,w
hich
are
rele
vant
.
The
reis
ave
ryso
und
appr
oach
toga
ther
ing
info
rmat
ion
from
non-
resp
onde
nts,
argu
ing
the
need
for
ast
rong
com
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
,m
akin
gan
emph
asis
onth
ein
itial
cont
acL
The
re
isa
deta
iled
desc
ript
ion
ofth
ein
form
atio
nto
beob
tain
ed,
eith
erin
the
inte
rvie
wor
via
web
sear
ches
,an
dho
wto
use
duri
ngth
ees
tim
atio
nphas
eor
duri
ngth
eco
nstr
ucti
onof
the
sam
pte
wei
ghts
,in
view
ofco
rrec
ting
the
bias
inth
ede
sign
wei
ght
indu
ced
byth
em
issi
ng
resp
onse
s.T
heev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
valu
edth
ispr
opos
alve
rypo
sitiv
ely.
The
pre-
test
rega
rds
16in
-dep
thfa
ce-t
o-fa
cein
terv
iew
s,ac
ross
four
diff
eren
tse
ctor
san
d
thre
esi
zecl
asse
s.T
here
isa
good
mix
ofco
untr
ies
prop
osed
:B
elgi
um,
Est
onia
,F
ranc
e
and
Ital
y.—
_—
——
——
——
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
eap
proa
chto
aski
ngth
eou
tcom
equ
esti
ons
isex
plai
ned
inde
tail
,w
ithre
leva
ntco
nsid
erat
ions
mad
e,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
exp
ress
edso
me
conc
erns
abou
tas
king
thes
equ
esti
ons
befo
reth
ein
terv
iew
and
the
disc
oura
ging
effe
ctit
may
have
onre
spon
dent
s.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
asno
ten
tire
lyco
nvin
ced
abou
tth
ede
mog
raph
icin
form
atio
n
abou
tth
ees
tabl
ishm
ent
owne
r—
who
may
not
alw
ays
beth
ere
spon
dent
toth
esu
rvey
-an
d
the
use
tobe
mad
eof
ii
The
rew
asa
deta
iled
and
soun
ddi
scus
sion
mad
eon
com
para
bili
tybu
tit
focu
sed
onsa
mpl
ing
and
wei
ghti
ngis
sues
and
not
som
uch
onth
ech
alte
nge5
toth
eco
gnit
ive
unde
rsta
ndin
gof
the
ques
tion
nair
eac
ross
diff
eren
tse
ctor
san
dsi
zecl
asse
s.
Mor
ede
tail
sw
ould
have
been
wel
com
edab
out
the
met
hodo
logy
ofth
epr
e-te
st,
incl
udin
gth
eis
sues
toco
ver.
The
reis
ave
ryso
und
and
deta
iled
prop
osal
totr
ansl
atio
n(w
hich
will
beca
rrie
dou
tby
Cap
stan
),in
line
with
the
requ
irem
ents
set
inth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
nsan
dfo
llow
ing
the
TR
APD
appr
oach
.
Ath
ree-
step
appr
oach
toth
ena
tion
alad
-hoc
mod
ules
ispr
opos
ed,
focu
sing
mos
tly
onth
e
man
agem
ent
ofth
ejx
oces
s.T
hepr
opos
alis
soun
d,ra
isin
gre
leva
ntpo
ints
.
The
pilo
tte
sts
envi
sage
s60
inte
rvie
ws
per
coun
try,
mai
nly
inC
AT
t,w
itha
larg
een
ough
num
ber
ofm
icro
esta
blis
hmen
tsin
terv
iew
ed.
CA
WI
tobe
test
edto
o.T
heai
ms
ofth
epi
lot
are
rele
vant
and
its_
orga
nisa
lion
isw
ell
desc
ribe
d.
Qua
lity
ofth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alqu
esti
onna
ires
—w
hile
ensu
ring
inte
rnat
iona
lco
mpa
rabi
lity
-,in
clud
ing
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
asw
ell
asth
epr
opos
edap
proa
chto
tran
slat
ion
and
the
pilo
tte
st(1
0po
ints
)9
Page 23
Open
tender
pro
ced
ure
EU
OS
HA
I2O
I7IO
PIF
/SE
1004
8—T
echnic
alev
alu
atio
n:
3iw
W,I
yoad
H.th
h.J
oIW
k
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
eap
proa
chto
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
ew
asso
und,
mor
ede
tail
sw
ould
have
bee
nw
elco
med
abou
tth
eIn
clus
ion
ofth
equ
esti
ons.
Str
engt
hs
The
reis
ave
rygo
odan
dde
tail
edap
proa
chto
sam
plin
gde
sign
.
The
proc
ess
isto
bem
anag
edce
ntra
lly
and
pre
sen
tsa
prob
abili
tysa
mpl
est
rate
gyto
redu
cese
lf-s
elec
tion
bias
,ad
opti
ngsp
ecif
ices
tim
ator
sth
atex
ploi
tau
xilia
ryva
riab
les
(suc
has
gene
rali
sed
regr
essi
ones
tim
ator
sor
cali
brat
edes
tim
ator
s),
whi
leai
min
gto
incr
ease
resp
on
sera
te,
with
use
ofhi
ghqu
ality
sam
ple
fram
esan
dst
rong
com
mun
icat
ion
phas
e.
Str
atif
icat
ion
in48
stra
tais
prop
osed
(fou
rm
acro
sect
ors
xfo
ursi
zecl
asse
sx
thre
ere
gion
s)in
ever
yco
untr
y,ne
xtth
eal
loca
tion
met
hod
isde
fine
dw
ithsi
xpl
anne
ddo
mai
ns,
thre
eat
coun
try
leve
lan
dth
ree
atth
eE
Ule
vel.
Tar
gets
per
stra
tum
are
tobe
defi
ned
inor
der
toen
sure
the
desi
red
leve
lof
relia
bilit
yin
each
ofth
esi
xdo
mai
ns,
and
will
bech
ose
nin
adva
nce
fixi
nga
valu
efo
rth
eco
effi
cien
tof
vari
atio
n(C
V).
Thi
sis
very
rele
vant
and
inte
rest
ing.
Qua
lity
ofth
esa
mpl
ing
stra
tegy
,in
clud
ing
the
prop
osed
busi
ness
The
reis
the
defi
nitio
nof
incl
usio
npr
obab
ilit
yan
dsa
mpl
eex
trac
tion
,w
itha
rand
omre
gist
ers,
the
sam
plin
gde
sign
invi
ewof
min
imis
ing
sele
ctio
nbi
asan
dse
lect
ion
ofun
its
with
vari
able
prob
abil
ity
sam
plin
g(P
roba
bili
tyP
ropo
rtio
nal
toS
ize)
.th
epo
tent
ial
impa
cts
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
with
ES
EN
ER
-2(1
5po
Ints
)13
follo
wed
byth
ees
tim
atio
nph
ase,
whi
chis
very
wel
lde
scri
bed
and
expl
aine
d.E
stim
ates
will
bepr
oduc
edre
ferr
ing
toal
lco
untr
ies,
the
EU
and
each
coun
try,
both
for
esta
blis
hmen
tsan
dw
orke
rs.
Cal
cula
tion
ofth
esa
mpl
ing
erro
rfo
rea
ches
tim
ate
will
bede
fine
din
the
proj
ect,
linke
dto
cali
brat
edes
tim
ator
s.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
edi
scus
sion
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
and
the
impa
ctth
epr
opos
edch
ang
esto
the
sam
plin
gst
rate
gyw
illha
ve.
Wea
knes
ses
The
size
ofth
ein
itial
sam
ple
rele
ase
was
dee
med
tobe
too
high
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
Mor
ede
taU
sw
ould
have
bee
nw
elco
med
abou
tth
efe
asib
ility
and
chal
leng
esof
usin
gof
ficia
lre
gist
ers.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
the
alte
rnat
ive
prop
osal
toop
tfo
rth
esa
me
com
mer
cial
bu
sin
ess
regi
ster
acro
ssal
lco
untr
ies,
Bur
eau
Van
Dijk
.w
asno
tco
nvin
cing
.
CR
ITE
RIO
N3
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
B:
TR
AIN
ING
,IM
PLE
ME
NT
AT
ION
AN
DD
ELIV
ER
Y:
-S
CO
RE
:31
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Qua
lity
ofth
est
rate
gy
for
fiel
dwor
kpr
epar
atio
n,pa
rtic
ular
lyth
eS
tren
gths
appro
ach
totr
aini
ngan
dth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gyfo
rre
duci
ngno
n-re
spon
se,
The
reis
anin
tegr
ated
CA
TII
CA
WI
syst
emJ
whi
chen
com
pas
ses
ques
tion
nair
ein
clud
ing
the
onli
nem
odul
e(1
0po
ints
)pr
ogra
mm
ing,
sam
ple
man
agem
ent
and
mon
itor
ing.
Thi
sis
valu
edpo
siti
vely
byth
e
Page 24
Lw
cpnnA
Qcn
syJ
k,W
nyaq1H
,dh
JQ
IWI
Open
tender
pro
ced
ure
EU
OSH
AI2
OI7
IOPI
FISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hn
ical
eval
uat
ion
:
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.
Qua
lity
ofth
epr
opos
edfi
eldw
ork
exec
utio
n,de
scri
bing
the
over
all
appro
ach
tog
uar
ante
ehi
gh-q
uali
tyin
terv
iew
san
dm
inim
ise
non-
resp
on
sebi
asin
clud
ing
the
mon
itor
ing,
cont
rol
and
repo
rtin
gof
the
fiel
dwor
kpro
cess
(15
poin
ts)
15
Atr
aini
ngse
min
arbe
fore
fiel
dwor
kst
arts
isen
visa
ged,
follo
wed
bysp
ecif
ictr
aini
ngto
inte
rvie
wer
sin
each
coun
try
—by
the
nati
onal
proj
ect
man
ager
and
fiel
dwor
ksu
perv
isor
man
ager
inea
chof
the
hubs
.F
urth
erm
ore,
brie
fing
sat
coun
try
leve
lw
illbe
held
too.
The
re
isal
soa
poin
tof
the
tran
slat
ion
offi
eldw
ork
mat
eria
ls,
whi
chgo
esa
bit
beyo
ndth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns.
The
over
all
appr
oach
isde
emed
tobe
reas
on
able
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
appr
oach
toth
ere
duct
ion
ofno
n-re
spon
sei5
rele
vant
and
thor
ough
,w
ithw
ell-
just
ifie
d-
mea
sure
spr
opos
ed,
such
asse
ndin
gea
rly
lett
ers
-joi
ntly
sign
edby
the
resp
ecti
vena
tion
alst
atis
tics
inst
itut
e-,
usin
gex
peri
ence
din
terv
iew
ers
toco
nver
tre
fusa
ls,
havi
nggo
odqu
ality
regi
ster
s,in
crea
sing
the
num
ber
ofpo
tent
ial
cont
act
atte
mpt
san
ddr
afti
ngan
appr
opri
ate
•co
mm
unic
atio
nst
rate
gyfo
rco
ntac
t,am
ong
othe
rs.
On
the
cont
act
stra
tegy
,th
ere
are
upto
:15
call
sre
gard
ed(a
tdi
ffer
ent
tim
es)
befo
redi
scar
ding
aco
mpa
ny.
The
offe
ris
criti
cal
ofm
ixed
mod
esan
dw
ould
only
offe
rth
eon
line
mod
ule
inth
ose
coun
trie
sw
ithve
rylo
wre
spo
nse
rate
spl
usto
thos
ees
tabl
ishm
ents
that
wer
eun
reac
habl
evi
aph
one.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
efo
und
the
prop
osal
wel
lju
stif
ied
and
inte
rest
ing.
Wea
knes
ses
Mor
ede
tail
son
the
trai
ning
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
Itvm
sun
clea
rto
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eho
wm
any
adva
nce
lett
ers
will
bese
nt.
Str
engt
hs
The
four
hubs
are
clea
rly
defi
ned
inte
rms
ofth
eir
coun
try
cove
rage
,w
ithna
tion
alte
ams
inth
esa
me
plac
e,w
hich
isva
lued
posi
tive
lyby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.C
ount
rysu
perv
isor
sar
ena
tive
spea
ker
sof
the
lang
uage
.
The
reis
flex
ibili
typr
opos
edin
term
sof
inte
rvie
win
gti
mes
and
good
asse
ssm
ent
ofth
em
inim
uman
dm
axim
umnu
mbe
rof
inte
rvie
ws
per
inte
rvie
wer
.The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
elco
mes
the
stra
tegi
esto
redu
cein
terv
iew
turn
over
,w
itha
key
initi
alse
lect
ion
and
ade
fini
tion
ofa
type
ofco
ntra
ctgr
anti
ngco
ntin
uity
.
Ade
tail
edlis
tof
qual
itych
ecks
,pe
rfor
med
byth
epr
ojec
tm
anag
eran
dth
efi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
orm
anag
er,
ispr
ovid
ed.
Fiel
dwor
kw
eekl
yre
port
s,w
ithda
tabr
oken
dow
nby
coun
try,
are
tobe
prod
uced
.E
U-O
SHA
isw
elco
me
tovi
sit
the
hubs
and
will
begr
ante
dac
cess
toth
efi
eldw
ork
plat
form
.
Wea
knes
ses
No
evid
ent
wea
knes
ses
wer
eid
entif
ied
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
Page 25
J!a
,54(d
yc,
MHc
vjth
_I
IWL
TI
Ope
nte
nder
pro
ced
ure
EU
OS
HN
2OI7
IOPI
FISE
IOO
4B—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:
Str
engt
hs
Qua
lity
ofth
eap
proa
chto
data
proc
essi
ng,
deli
very
and
stor
age,
incl
udin
gw
eigh
ting
and
the
impa
cton
com
para
bili
tyw
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
,as
wel
las
the
repo
rtin
g(1
0po
ints
)8
The
over
all
appr
oach
toda
tapr
oces
sing
isso
und.
Ago
odpo
int
ism
ade
onth
eim
port
ance
ofsc
ript
ing,
asa
key
stag
eof
data
vali
dati
on,
ensu
ring
rule
san
dco
ndit
ions
are
the
sam
eac
ross
all
fiel
dwor
kce
ntre
s.T
esti
ngof
the
ques
tion
nair
esc
ript
ing
isen
visa
ged,
with
exam
ples
ofth
ety
pes
ofte
sts
usua
lly
perf
orm
edby
-Dat
ava
lida
tion
isto
beco
mpl
eted
with
post
-che
ckin
gac
tivi
ties
.
The
only
open
ques
tion
isth
ede
scri
ptio
nof
the
activ
ityse
ctor
,fo
rw
hich
codi
ngag
ents
will
beus
ed.
The
reis
aso
und
appr
oach
tow
eigh
ting
—us
eof
cali
brat
ion
esti
mat
ors-
,w
hich
isve
rylin
ked
toth
esa
mpl
ing
stra
tegy
,w
itha
deta
iled
desc
ript
ion
ofth
epr
oced
ure
tode
fine
them
inth
ree
step
s.T
heev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
valu
esit
very
posi
tivel
y.W
hen
itco
mes
toth
eco
mpa
rabi
lity
with
ES
EN
ER
-2,
the
offe
rar
gues
that
both
proc
edur
esle
adto
unbi
ased
resu
lts,
the
only
diff
eren
cebe
ing
the
relia
bilit
yof
esti
mat
es.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
appr
ecia
ted
mor
ein
form
atio
non
the
sto
rag
eof
the
data
.
Whi
leth
ede
live
rabl
esar
ein
line
with
the
requ
irem
ents
,m
ore
deta
ils
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
byth
eev
atua
tion
com
mit
tee.
TO
TA
L81
OU
TO
F10
0
pa.
Sig
ned
by:
PR
U
Page 26
Ope
nte
nder
pro
ced
ure
EU
OSH
A)2
0171
0P/F
ISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:I
irW
.yandK
,cH
_J
iUk
CR
ITE
RIO
NC
OM
ME
NT
S
CR
ITE
RIO
NI
EF
FIC
IEN
CY
AN
DQ
UA
L1Y
OF
TH
EP
RO
JEC
TM
AN
AG
EM
EN
T:
-S
CO
RE
:22
OU
TO
F30
PO
INT
S
Str
engt
hs
The
offe
rp
rese
nts
ade
tail
edan
dso
und
appr
oach
topr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
t,de
mon
stra
ted
to
beef
fect
ive
inca
rryi
ngou
tsi
mil
aras
sign
men
tsIn
the
past
.
The
prop
osed
team
isor
gani
sed
inta
sk-b
ased
sub-
team
s(p
roje
ctm
anag
emen
t;
ques
tion
nair
e,su
rvey
desi
gnan
dtr
ansl
atio
ns;
sam
plin
gan
dw
eigh
ting
;sc
ript
ing
and
dat
a
proc
essi
ng),
unde
rth
edi
rect
ion
ofa
Pro
ject
Lea
der
supp
orte
dby
aD
eput
yP
roje
ctL
eade
r,
who
are
both
supp
orte
dby
two
Pro
ject
Exe
cuti
ves.
Aqu
ality
dire
ctor
,su
ppor
ted
bya
Del
iver
yM
anag
erar
ein
clud
edin
the
team
toen
forc
equ
ality
arra
ngem
ents
.T
hepr
opos
alis
suff
icie
ntly
dea
ran
dro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
are
expl
aine
dsa
tisf
acto
rily
.
The
num
ber
ofda
ysal
loca
ted
toea
chte
amm
embe
rar
ege
nera
lly
cons
iste
ntw
ithth
ety
pe
and
num
ber
ofta
sks
tobe
carr
ied
out.
The
appr
oach
topr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
tan
dw
ork
orga
nisa
tion
,in
dudi
ngT
hepr
opos
edti
met
able
seem
sfe
asib
lean
din
tine
with
tend
erre
quir
emen
ts,
incl
udin
ga
the
reso
urc
eal
loca
tion
,lh
efe
asib
ilit
yof
the
prop
osed
tim
etab
lean
dth
ere
flec
tion
onth
etig
htsc
hedu
le,
whi
chth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
valu
espo
sitiv
ely.
cont
inge
ncy
plan
!or
unfo
rese
enev
ents
orco
mpl
icat
ions
,In
dudi
ngE
lem
ents
for
aqu
ality
and
assu
rance
plan
are
exte
nsiv
ely
desc
ribe
d,in
clud
ing
proc
edur
es(o
rqu
alit
yco
ntro
lan
assu
ran
ce.
(10
poin
ts)
8re
spon
sibi
liti
esfo
rdel
iver
able
san
dex
ampl
esof
qual
ity
indi
cato
rsan
dri
sks.
The
reis
ave
ry
rele
vant
poin
tm
ade
onth
ene
edCo
mee
tth
eob
liga
tion
sun
der
EG
DT
Ran
dho
wth
ete
nder
eris
curr
entl
yre
view
ing
thei
rco
mpa
nypro
cess
esan
dpo
lici
esac
cord
ingl
y.
Ris
kas
sess
men
tan
dco
ntin
genc
iesl
rem
edia
lac
tion
sar
ere
port
ed.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
epr
opos
edti
met
able
isre
ason
able
,th
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
expre
ssed
som
edo
ubts
over
carr
ying
out
fiel
dwor
kin
July
.
Als
o,th
ere
sour
ces
and
time
devo
ted
totr
ansl
atio
nap
pea
red
tobe
inex
cess
ofth
ere
quir
emen
tsin
the
tech
nIca
lsp
ecif
icat
ions
,w
itha
five
-mon
thdu
rati
onof
the
tran
slat
ion
phas
ean
d14
5da
ysal
loca
ted
tolh
etr
ansl
atio
nm
anag
er(i
nad
diti
onof
the
wor
kca
rrie
dou
tby
the
subc
ontr
acte
dco
mpa
ny,
Str
engt
hs
Ext
ent
and
qual
ity
ofth
eco
rete
am,
incl
udin
gth
eco
mpo
siti
onin
term
sof
The
reis
ave
ryex
pert
cent
ral
coor
dina
tion
team
,pr
esen
ting
ago
odm
ixof
skill
san
dex
pert
ise
and
skill
s,al
loca
tion
orro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
ofal
lte
amex
peri
ence
,pa
rtic
ular
lyin
term
sof
man
agem
ent
ofsi
mila
rpr
ojec
ts,
surv
eyde
sign
,an
dm
embe
rsas
wel
las
reso
urc
eba
ck-u
p(1
0po
ints
)7
stat
isti
cs.
The
allo
cati
onof
days
isva
lued
posi
tive
lyby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e,ge
nera
lly
cons
iste
nt
Page 27
Ope
nte
nd
erp
roce
dure
EU
OSH
N2O
I7IO
PIFI
SEIO
O4B
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
jlW
.iyfl
Ihth
b_.i
d1k
wfth
the
task
sto
beca
rrie
dou
t.
The
reis
ave
ryex
tens
ive
back
-up
plan
,w
ithal
loca
ted
back
-up
staf
f.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
ere
are
two
expe
rts
prop
osed
for
the
ques
tionn
aire
desi
gn,
the
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
wou
ldha
vew
elco
med
addi
tiona
lex
pert
ise
onO
SH.
Mor
ecl
arity
wou
ldha
vebe
enap
prec
iate
dco
ncer
ning
the
defin
ition
ofm
anag
emen
tan
dex
ecut
ive
role
sw
ithin
the
cent
ral
coor
dina
tion
team
.
Inlin
ew
ithth
is,
the
com
mun
icat
ion
betw
een
(1)
the
sam
plin
gan
dw
eigh
ting
team
and
(2)
the
data
proc
essi
ngte
amco
uld
have
been
mor
ede
taile
d.
Stre
ngth
s
The
reIs
acl
ear
desc
ript
ion
ofth
ene
twor
kof
field
wor
kre
sear
chce
ntre
s,en
suri
nga
cove
rage
ofal
l cou
ntri
es,
asre
quir
edin
the
tech
nica
lsp
ecif
icat
ions
.Fo
reac
hlo
cal
part
ner
the
nam
eof
the
Proj
ect
man
ager
and
ofth
eFi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
orar
ere
port
ed,
with
rele
vant
Qua
lity
cith
epr
opos
edne
twor
kof
field
wor
kre
sear
chce
ntre
s,th
eex
peri
ence
.na
tiona
lpr
ojec
tman
ager
san
dth
efie
ldw
ork
supe
rvis
ors
(10
poin
ts)
7_
__
_-
_.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
wou
ldha
vew
elco
med
deta
ilson
(he
num
ber
ofw
orks
tatio
ns.
Som
eco
ncer
nsw
ere
expr
esse
dab
out
the
proj
ect
man
ager
and
field
wor
ksu
perv
isor
[or
Lux
embo
urg
nse
thi
any
ofth
eof
ficia
lJanuagof
the
pyij
y,.
CR
ITE
RIO
N2
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
kQ
UES
TIO
NN
AIR
EA
ND
SAM
PLIN
G:-
SCO
RE
:25
OU
TO
F35
POIN
TS
Stre
ngth
s
The
offe
rse
tsth
ege
nera
lpr
inci
ples
for
the
ques
tionn
aire
revi
sion
,with
sugg
esti
ons
alon
gth
elin
esof
the
tech
nica
lre
quir
emen
ts.
The
reIs
apr
opos
alto
test
the
surv
eyin
trod
ucto
ryte
xt,w
hich
was
posi
tivel
yva
lued
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mitt
ee.
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
appr
ecia
tes
the
them
atic
area
spr
esen
ted
for
new
topi
csan
dQ
ualit
yof
the
prop
osal
toth
equ
estio
nnai
rere
visi
on,
incl
udin
gth
eso
me
sugg
estio
nspr
ovid
edon
Impr
oved
scal
esan
dth
eex
ampl
esof
whe
reit
wou
ldbe
sugg
este
dap
proa
chto
new
topi
cs,
the
stra
tegy
toga
ther
info
rmat
ion
rele
vant
tore
view
the
ques
tionn
aire
wor
ding
for
MSE
s.G
ood
prop
osal
toha
vea
glos
sary
from
non-
resp
onde
nts
and
the
pre-
test
(10
poin
ts)
7fo
rsm
alle
mpl
oyer
s.
The
reis
are
leva
ntpo
int m
ade
onth
e•la
nd
the
info
rmat
ion
notic
eon
the
cons
ent
topa
rtic
ipat
e.
The
reis
aso
und
appr
oach
toth
ein
clus
ion
ofou
tcom
equ
estio
ns,
com
bini
ngCA
TIan
dC
AW
I,w
hich
Isw
ell
desc
ribe
d,in
clud
ing
rele
vant
sugg
estio
ns.
Con
cern
ing
non-
resp
pnde
nts,
the
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
valu
espo
siU
v&yt
hepr
opos
ed
Page 28
_I
ciw
.,k
Op
ente
nder
pro
cedure
EU
OSH
AJ2
OI7
/OP/
F1SE
JOO
48—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:I
appr
oach
thro
ugh
the
mod
ific
atio
nof
the
scre
ener
,ai
min
gto
capt
ure
the
info
rmat
ion
imm
edia
tely
from
the
gat
ekee
per
sIn
case
they
are
not
part
icip
atin
gin
the
surv
ey.
The
pre-
test
isge
nera
lly
wel
lex
plai
ned,
cove
ring
alt
the
requ
ired
area
san
dca
rrie
dou
tby
rese
arch
ers
not
Inte
rvie
wer
s,In
clud
ing
tran
slat
ion
follo
win
gth
eT
RA
PD
appr
oach
.T
here
is
apr
oper
sam
plin
gpl
ansu
gg
este
dan
dde
brie
fing
sess
ions
with
rese
arch
ers
are
envi
sage
d
atco
untr
yle
vel
afte
ra
smal
lnu
mbe
rof
Inte
rvie
ws
have
been
com
plet
ed,
enab
ling
ongo
ing
and
iter
ativ
efe
edba
ck.
The
reIs
aso
und
prop
osal
toth
ere
port
ing
and
use
ofre
sult
sof
the
cogn
itiv
epr
e-te
sl.
Rel
evan
tco
nsid
ej’a
tion
sar
egi
ven
conc
erni
ngth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
equ
esti
onna
ire
for
the
onli
nem
ode,
Wea
knes
ses
Qua
lity
ofth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alqu
esti
onna
ires
—w
hile
ensu
ring
inte
rnat
iona
lco
mpa
rabi
lity
-,in
clud
ing
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
asw
ell
asth
epr
opos
edap
proa
chto
tran
slat
ion
and
the
pilo
tte
st(1
0po
ints
)9
Whi
leth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
appr
ecia
tes
the
them
atic
area
spr
esen
ted
for
new
topi
cs,
spec
ific
exam
ples
orm
ore
deta
iled
ques
tion
prop
osal
sw
ould
have
bee
nw
elco
med
.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
asno
ten
tire
lyco
nvin
ced
abou
tth
epr
opos
alto
rand
omis
eor
phor
itis
eop
tion
alm
odul
eson
05F
fis
sues
.
The
rew
ere
som
edo
ubts
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
conc
emin
gth
eco
untr
yco
vera
geof
the
pre-
test
asw
ell
asth
euse
ofm
onet
ary
ince
ntiv
es.
Str
engt
hs
The
offe
rspr
esen
tsa
very
soun
dpr
opos
alfo
rth
equ
esti
onna
ire
tran
slat
ion,
follo
win
gth
eT
RA
POap
proa
chan
dca
rrie
dou
tby
asp
ecia
lise
dco
ntra
ctor
(CA
PST
AN
).
The
appr
oach
toth
ena
tion
alad
-hoc
mod
ules
isin
line
with
the
tech
nica
lsp
ecif
icat
ions
,th
eof
fer
mak
ing
apo
int
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
issu
esan
dsu
gges
ting
topl
ace
the
mod
ule
atth
een
dof
the
ques
tion
nair
e.
The
pilo
tte
stIs
wel
lex
plai
ned
and
inlin
ew
ithth
ete
chni
cal
requ
irem
ents
,ca
rryi
ngou
t30
quot
a-co
ntro
lled
inte
rvie
ws
per
coun
try
and
with
asp
ecif
icai
mto
test
the
scre
enin
g,in
clud
ing
info
rmat
ion
inca
seof
non-
resp
onse
,w
hich
isve
ryre
leva
nt.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
eap
proa
chto
the
mon
itor
ing,
the
outl
ook
ofth
epi
lot
repo
rtan
dth
ede
scri
ptio
nof
how
the
pIlo
twill
beus
edto
info
rmth
ede
velo
pmen
tof
the
fina
lqu
esti
onna
ire.
Page 29
Ope
nte
nd
erpro
ced
ure
EU
OSH
N2O
I7IO
PIFI
SEIO
O48
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
1uS
d,I7
rHw
ith
.3cik
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
expr
esse
dso
me
doub
tsab
out
the
use
ofa
ques
tion
bank
for
the
natio
nal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
whi
chco
uld
then
beta
ilore
dto
the
natio
nal
need
s.
Whi
leth
eap
proa
chto
the
pilo
tis
deem
edto
beve
ryst
rong
and
wel
lex
plai
ned,
lhe
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
wou
ldha
veex
pect
edth
atit
wou
ldte
stth
eC
AW
Iqu
estio
nnai
reto
o.
Stre
ngth
s
The
reis
aso
und
roun
dup
ofsa
mpl
ing
issu
esin
asu
rvey
like
ESE
NE
R,
rais
ing
som
eco
ncer
nsab
outr
each
ing
the
max
imum
sam
ple
size
inth
egi
ven
timel
ine,
part
icul
arly
insm
allc
ount
ries
.
The
offe
rpr
esen
tsth
esa
mpl
efr
ames
byco
untr
yan
dty
peof
sam
plin
gun
it(e
stab
lishm
ent
vsco
mpa
ny)
that
have
been
iden
tifie
dto
beof
bette
rqu
ality
asco
mpa
red
toth
ose
used
for
Qua
lity
ofth
esa
mpl
ing
stra
tegy
,in
clud
ing
the
prop
osed
busi
ness
ESE
NE
R2.
regi
ster
s,th
esa
mpl
ing
desi
gnin
view
ofm
inim
isin
gse
lect
ion
bias
and
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
valu
edpo
sitiv
ely
the
prop
osal
toin
clud
eca
ses
with
noph
one
the
pote
ntia
lim
pact
son
com
para
bilit
yw
ithE
SEN
CR
-2(1
5po
ints
)9
and
size
clas
sin
form
atio
n.
The
appr
oach
toth
ere
fere
nce
stat
istic
sth
atwi
llbe
used
Ispr
esen
ted
and
issi
mila
rto
the
one
adop
ted
inE
SEN
ER
-2
The
sam
plin
gst
rate
gyfo
llow
sth
eE
SEN
ER
-2ap
proa
chto
ala
rge
exte
ntan
dis
info
rmed
byth
ete
chni
cal
asse
ssm
ent
ofth
epr
evio
usro
und
ofth
esu
rvey
.R
elev
ant
poin
tsar
em
ade
onth
est
ratu
mju
mpe
rs,
and
how
the
sam
plin
gw
illbe
base
don
the
resp
onse
rate
sIn
ESE
NE
R-2
inor
der
tom
inim
ise
use
ofst
oppi
ngru
le.
Page 30
Ope
nte
nder
pro
cedure
EU
OSH
N2O
I7/O
PIFI
SE!0
048—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:i
IiiW
iryti
Woik
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edad
diti
onal
deta
ils
onth
esa
mpl
ing
appr
oach
.It
issi
mil
arto
the
one
adop
ted
inE
SE
NE
R-2
,w
itha
focu
son
the
use
ofst
oppi
ng
rule
san
dth
est
ratu
mju
mpe
rs,
whi
char
eve
ryim
port
ant,
but
mor
epr
opos
als
addi
ngto
the
sam
plin
gde
sign
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
.
Con
cern
ing
the
use
ofre
fere
nce
stat
isti
cs,
addi
tion
also
urce
sbe
yond
the
LFS
orex
ampl
es
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
som
edo
ubts
abou
tno
ten
visa
ging
anop
enen
ded
ques
tion
for
the
righ
tal
loca
tion
ofth
eac
tivity
sect
or.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
expe
cted
mor
ede
tail
son
pote
ntia
lis
sues
affe
ctin
g
com
para
bili
ty.
CR
ITE
RIO
N3
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
B:T
RA
ININ
G•
IMPL
EM
EN
TA
TIO
NA
ND
DE
LIV
ER
Y:
-S
CO
RE
:27
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Str
engt
hs
The
appr
oach
tofi
eldw
ork
prep
arat
ion
isva
lued
posi
tivel
yby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.T
he
inte
grat
ion
betw
een
CA
TIan
dC
AW
Iis
wel
lex
plai
ned,
with
the
prop
osal
tous
ea
sing
le
plat
form
acro
ssal
lco
untr
ies,
SP
SS
Dim
ensi
ons
assc
ript
ing
soft
war
e.T
his
enab
les
appl
ying
cons
iste
ncy
chec
ksw
hich
late
rre
duce
the
need
for
clea
ning
and
edit
ing.
The
appr
oach
totr
aini
ngis
pres
ente
dw
ithsu
ffic
ient
deta
ilan
dfo
cuse
son
the
trai
ning
of
trai
ners
(tra
inin
gof
coun
try
team
lead
ers)
,w
how
illbe
inch
arge
citr
aini
ngth
ein
terv
iew
ers.
Qua
lrty
ofth
est
rate
gyfo
rfi
eldw
ork
prep
arat
ion,
part
icul
arly
the
The
mat
eria
lto
beus
ed(o
rth
efi
eldw
ork
and
for
the
trai
ning
will
bepr
ovid
edby
the
tend
erer
appr
oach
totr
aini
ngan
dth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gyfo
rre
duci
ngno
n-re
spon
se,
inal
lth
ela
ngua
ges
ofth
elo
cal
part
ners
.in
clud
ing
the
onli
nem
odul
e(1
0po
ints
)9
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lued
posi
tivel
yth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gypr
opos
edto
redu
ceno
n-
resp
on
se,
incl
udin
gth
eof
feri
ngan
dfo
llow
upof
the
CA
WI
inte
rvie
w.
The
cont
act
prot
ocol
s
incl
ude
am
inim
umof
seve
nph
one
call
sin
diff
eren
tti
mes
and
days
over
ape
riod
of14
days
and
deal
ing
with
the
wro
ngnu
mbe
rs,
aim
ing
toIn
crea
seth
eco
ntac
tra
teup
to90
%.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eex
pre
ssed
som
eco
ncer
nsre
gard
ing
the
use
ofw
eblin
kto
the
mai
nsu
rvey
plat
form
inab
out
14of
the
36C
ATI
loca
tion
s.
Qua
lity
ofth
epr
opos
edfi
eldw
ork
exec
utio
n,de
scri
bing
the
over
all
Str
engt
hs
appr
oach
toguar
ante
ehi
gh-q
uali
tyin
terv
iew
san
dm
inim
ise
non-
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
ein
volv
emen
tof
high
lysk
illed
and
wel
l-tr
aine
d
resp
on
sebi
asin
clud
ing
the
mon
itor
ing,
cont
rol
and
repo
rtin
gof
the
inte
rvie
wer
s.
fiel
dwor
kp
roce
ss(1
5po
ints
)11
The
mon
itori
ng,
cont
rol
and
repo
rtin
gar
ew
ell
pres
ente
d.W
eekl
yfi
eldw
ork
prog
ress
repo
rts
tobe
deli
vere
dea
chT
uesd
ay,
follo
wed
upby
are
view
mee
ting
with
EU
-OSH
Aon
Page 31
Vk
,l,
Ope
nte
nder
proc
edur
eE
UO
SHN
2O1
7IO
PIFI
SEIO
O48
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
onf
Wed
nesd
ayor
Thu
rsda
y.A
cces
sto
surv
eyan
dpr
ogre
ssda
tais
prop
osed
too
with
ada
shbo
ard
tom
onito
rin
terv
iew
san
dov
eral
l,th
ere
isa
soun
dap
proa
chto
chec
king
qual
ityis
sues
.T
heev
alua
tion
com
mitt
eeva
lued
posi
tivel
yth
epr
opos
alto
prov
ide
the
inte
rvie
wer
sw
ithfe
edba
dkon
thei
rpe
rfor
man
ce.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
wou
ldha
vew
elco
med
mor
ede
tails
toth
eap
proa
chon
field
wor
kex
ecut
ion.
Som
esu
btas
ksun
der
field
wor
kpr
epar
atio
nw
ere
pres
ente
dun
derf
ield
wor
kex
ecut
ion
and,
beyo
ndth
eap
proa
chto
mon
itori
ng,c
ontr
olan
dre
port
ing
ofth
efie
ldw
ork
proc
ess,
the
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
felt
ther
ew
aslit
tlede
tail
give
n.
Stre
ngth
s
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
appr
ecia
tes
the
appptm
ent
ofa
data
man
ager
asw
ell
asth
epo
intm
ade
onda
tase
curi
tyan
dth
eus
eof
The
appr
oach
toda
tava
lidat
ion,
proc
essi
ng,
deliv
ery
and
stor
age
are
wel
lpr
esen
ted
and
are
gene
rally
inlin
ew
ithth
ete
nder
requ
irem
ents
,as
the
repo
rtin
gan
dde
liver
able
sfo
rese
enin
the
prop
osal
.T
heev
alua
tion
com
mitt
eepa
rtic
ular
lyva
lued
the
appr
oach
toda
ta
Qua
lity
ofth
eap
proa
chto
data
proc
essi
ng,
deliv
ery
and
stor
age,
valid
atio
n,w
ithits
prop
osed
Inte
grat
ion
into
the
scri
ptan
dth
ein
volv
emen
tof
the
data
incl
udin
gw
eigh
ting
and
the
impa
cton
com
para
bilit
yw
ithE
SEN
ER
-2,
asm
anag
erth
roug
hout
the
diff
eren
tsur
vey
stag
es.
wel
las
the
repo
rtin
g(1
0po
ints
)7
The
appr
oach
tow
eigh
ting
issi
mila
rto
that
inE
SEN
ER
-2an
dth
ere
isa
rele
vant
poin
ton
the
com
pari
son
ofsa
mpl
esan
dun
iver
ses.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uatio
nco
mm
ittee
wou
ldha
veap
prec
iate
dm
ore
clar
ityan
dde
tails
rega
rdin
gth
eap
proa
chto
wei
ghtin
g.T
heof
fer
prop
oses
calib
ratio
ndu
eto
the
incl
usio
nof
regi
onan
dho
wca
libra
tion
wei
ghts
wou
ldbe
equi
vale
ntto
one
ofth
ew
eigh
ting
fact
ors
used
inE
SEN
ER
-2(e
stex
)bu
tm
ore
deta
ilsw
ould
have
been
wel
com
ed.
TOTA
L74
OU
TO
F10
0
Page 32
ItUC
UwF-
4CC£130LI..
2I’rCC’d
0CDLu
•0U01aI0tC0+2
Ca,a0
D
a.
D
.0-o0C03U,La
Page 33
/Euiu
pec
nA
gem
yO
pen
ten
der
pro
cedu
reE
UO
SHN
2OI7
IOP/
FISE
/004
8—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:’
jin
,Sni
nty
and
Ihth
hJ
otW
k
CR
ITE
RIO
NC
OM
ME
NT
S
CR
ITE
RIO
N1
EF
FIC
IEN
CY
AN
DQ
UA
LIT
YO
FT
HE
PR
OJE
CT
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
:-
SC
OR
E:
27O
UT
OF
30P
OIN
TS
Str
engt
hs
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
ecl
ear
desc
ript
ion
ofth
eap
proa
chto
the
proj
ect
man
agem
ent
and
wor
kor
gani
sati
on,
whi
chis
foun
dto
beve
ryre
leva
ntan
dap
prop
riat
efo
rth
epu
rpos
eof
the
surv
ey.
The
reso
urce
allo
cati
onof
the
core
team
isde
emed
good
and
inlin
ew
ithth
ere
quir
emen
ts-
.of
the
tech
nica
lsp
ecif
icat
ions
.T
heap
pro
ach
topr
ojec
tm
anag
emen
tan
dw
ork
orga
nisa
tion
,in
clud
ing
the
reso
urc
eal
loca
tion
,th
efe
asib
ilit
yof
the
prop
osed
tim
etab
lean
dth
eT
heti
met
able
pres
ente
dis
reas
on
able
and
take
sac
coun
tof
the
tight
sche
dule
ofth
eco
ntin
genc
ypl
anfo
runfo
rese
enev
ents
orco
mpl
icat
ions
,In
clud
ing
{sur
vey,
whi
chis
very
rele
vant
pro
cedure
sfo
rqu
alit
yco
ntro
lan
assu
rance
.(1
0po
ints
)9
The
appr
oach
toth
equ
ality
cont
rol,
miti
gatio
nm
easu
res
and
risk
asse
ssm
ent
isex
plai
ned
inde
tail
and
very
thor
ough
ly.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
iLte
eva
lues
itve
rypo
siti
vely
asit
ispr
oper
lyta
ilor
edto
the
nee
ds
ofE
SE
NE
R-3
.
Wea
knes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
appr
ecia
ted
addi
tion
alin
form
atio
nre
gard
ing
the
reso
urce
allo
cati
onof
the
mem
bers
outs
ide
the
core
team
.
Str
engt
hs
-T
hero
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
ofth
eco
rete
amm
embe
rsar
ecl
earl
yde
fine
d.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
posi
tive
lyth
esk
ills
and
expe
rtis
eof
the
prop
osed
core
team
mem
bers
,w
ithst
rong
expe
rtis
ein
nati
onal
and
inte
rnat
iona
lO
SH
surv
eys.
Fur
ther
toE
xten
tan
dqu
alit
yof
the
core
team
,in
clud
ing
the
com
posi
tion
inte
rms
ofth
is,
the
reso
urc
eal
loca
tion
toth
epr
opos
edta
sks
isd
eem
edto
beve
rygo
od.
exper
tise
and
skil
ls,
allo
cati
onor
role
san
dre
spon
sibi
liti
esof
all
team
..
..
.-
mem
ber
sas
wel
las
reso
urc
eba
ck-u
p(1
0po
ints
)8
Inlin
ew
ithth
is,
the
appo
intm
ent
ofan
inte
rnal
advi
sory
boar
dto
act
asa
qual
ity
cont
rol
team
isco
nsid
ered
tobe
very
rele
vant
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
IW
eaknes
ses
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
wel
com
edad
diti
onal
deta
ils
onth
epa
rtic
ipat
ion
ofso
me
core
team
mem
bers
,as
wel
las
thei
rre
spec
tive
back
-ups
.
Str
engt
hs
Qua
lity
ofth
epro
pose
dne
twor
kof
fiel
dwor
kre
sear
chce
ntre
s,th
eT
heev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee
appr
ecia
tes
the
deta
iled
info
rmat
ion
abou
tth
epr
ojec
tm
anag
ers
nati
onal
proj
ect
man
ager
san
dth
efi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
ors
(10
poin
ts)
10an
dfi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
ors
acro
ssal
lfi
eldw
ork
cent
res
and
wel
com
esth
eir
high
expe
rtis
e.
Fiel
dwor
kis
plan
ned
via
ane
twor
kof
cent
res
acro
ssal
lco
untr
ies
—ex
cept
for
Irel
and
and
Mon
tene
gro.
with
ace
ntra
lin
fras
truc
ture
for
sam
ple
man
em
ent
mo
nit
qp
gan
dst
eeri
ng
Page 34
Open
tender
pro
cedure
EU
OSH
AI2
OIT
IOPI
F1SE
IOO
4S—
Tec
hn
ical
eval
uat
ion
:
JIc
,ScIM
yc4
Iltb
hci
Wwk
offi
eldw
ork.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eap
prec
iate
sth
ech
ang
esim
plem
ente
d
inth
ene
twor
kof
loca
lpa
rtne
rs,
bas
edon
the
expe
rien
ceof
ES
EN
ER
-2,
amon
got
her
fact
ors.
The
reis
ago
odnu
mbe
rof
CA
TIw
orks
tati
ons
for
the
prop
osed
task
s.
Wea
knes
ses
No
evid
ent
wea
knes
ses
wer
eid
entif
ied
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
CR
ITE
RIO
N2
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
A:
QU
EST
ION
NA
IRE
AN
DSA
MPL
ING
:-S
CO
RE
:33
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Str
engt
hs
The
appr
oach
toth
equ
esti
onna
ire
revi
sion
isde
emed
tobe
very
stro
ngby
the
eval
uati
on
com
mit
tee,
Itis
info
rmed
byth
eT
otal
Sur
vey
Err
or(T
SE
)ap
proa
ch,
aim
ing
tofo
cus
on
accu
racy
and
relia
bilit
yam
ong
the
diff
eren
tqu
ality
dim
ensi
ons.
The
prop
osal
isto
limit
the
num
ber
ofch
ange
sto
the
ques
tion
nair
e,w
hich
isve
ryw
ellj
usti
fied
and
bear
ing
inm
ind
com
para
bili
ty.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
ther
eis
asi
gnif
ican
tpo
int
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
ofth
efi
ndin
gsby
coun
try,
activ
ityse
ctor
and
size
clas
sw
hich
isve
ryre
leva
nt.
The
reis
ago
odap
proa
chto
the
outc
ome
ques
tion
san
dth
eco
llec
tion
ofou
tcom
e
indi
cato
rs.
The
reis
aso
und
prop
osal
tom
odif
yth
esc
reen
ing
part
,fo
llow
ing
atw
o-st
epap
proa
chfo
rse
ctor
and
size
iden
tific
atio
n,w
ithau
tom
ated
codi
ngdu
ring
the
inte
rvie
w.
Qua
liLy
ofth
epr
opos
alto
the
ques
tion
nair
ere
visi
on,
incl
udin
gth
eT
here
isa
very
rele
vant
appr
oach
toga
ther
ing
info
rmat
ion
from
non-
resp
onde
nts,
sugg
este
dap
proa
chto
new
topi
cs,
the
stra
tegy
toga
ther
info
rmat
ion
ackn
owle
dgin
gth
ese
nsit
ivit
yof
the
issu
ean
dth
ene
edfo
rin
tens
ive
pre-
test
ing.
The
aim
is
from
non-r
esponden
tsan
dth
epr
e-te
st(1
0po
ints
)8
toas
kth
ree
ques
tion
s,on
eon
size
and
two
onO
SH
(sug
gest
edqu
esti
ons
incl
uded
inth
eof
fer)
plus
the
reas
ons
for
refu
sal,
The
reis
ave
rygo
odpo
int
onth
eus
eof
the
find
ings
and
the
impa
ctth
eyw
illha
veon
wei
ghti
ng.
The
pre-
test
envi
sage
s36
face
tofa
cein
terv
iew
sin
thre
eco
untr
ies
(Ger
man
y,L
atvi
aan
dth
eN
ethe
rlan
ds)
and
isto
cove
rth
ew
hole
ques
tion
nair
e(n
eed
ofco
ntex
t)bu
tfo
cus
only
onth
ene
w!m
odif
ied
item
s.T
here
isa
very
deta
iled
desc
ript
ion
ofth
epr
oces
s,w
hich
will
beca
rrie
dou
tby
rese
arch
ers
invo
lved
inth
equ
esti
onna
ire
deve
lopm
ent,
with
aha
ltha
lfw
ayth
roug
hto
impl
emen
tch
ang
esif
need
ed.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
the
prop
osal
posi
tivel
y.
Wea
knes
ses
Add
ition
alde
tail
sab
out
how
the
cogn
itiv
epr
e-te
stw
illfe
edth
equ
esti
onna
ire
wou
ldha
vebe
enw
elco
med
.
Page 35
Open
ten
der
pro
ced
ure
EU
OS
HN
2OI7
IOPI
FISE
IOO
4B—
Tec
hnic
alev
aluat
ion:
JI,
5ohi
yaJ
HrJ
ihJ
ttWoâ
appr
oach
asin
ES
EN
ER
-2bu
tai
min
gto
inte
rvie
wth
ree
unit
sin
stea
dof
two.
The
reis
anes
tim
atio
nof
the
sam
ple
need
ed,
look
ing
atth
eco
oper
atio
nra
tefo
rth
edi
ffer
ent
stra
ta,
with
som
epr
opos
als
mad
eon
cell
targ
ets.
As
long
asth
esa
mpl
efr
ame
info
rmat
ion
allo
ws,
the
tend
erer
prop
oses
anev
enfi
ner
diff
eren
tiat
ion
ofth
esa
mpl
ing
mat
rix
for
the
nati
onal
sam
plin
gpl
ans
(85
NA
CE
Rev
2.2
x4
size
clas
ses=
340
stra
ta).
Thi
sm
atri
xis
tobe
used
for
sam
ple
orde
rsfr
omre
gist
ers
but
not
tost
eer
fiel
dwor
k.F
orth
is,
an8
x4
mat
rix
ispr
opos
ed,
sim
ilar
toE
SE
NE
R-2
,w
here
asfo
rre
achi
ngta
rget
s,a
3x
4cc
lim
atri
xis
prop
osed
.
Som
eve
ryso
und
poin
tsar
em
ade
onth
est
ratu
mju
mpe
rsan
dth
eus
eof
the
stop
ping
rule
,w
hich
isex
pect
edto
beus
edle
ssfr
eque
ntly
than
inE
SE
NE
R-2
with
the
prop
osed
chan
ges
.
The
reis
apo
int
mad
eon
the
com
para
bili
tyw
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
argu
ing
that
sinc
eth
esa
me
pro
cess
esw
illbe
appl
ied,
resu
ltsh
ould
beco
mpa
rabl
e.T
head
iust
men
tpr
opos
edsh
ould
incr
ease
the
prec
isio
nof
ES
EN
ER
-3(n
arro
wer
conf
iden
cein
terv
als)
.-
-.
-
Wea
knes
ses
No
evid
ent
wea
knes
ses
wer
eid
entif
ied
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
CR
ITE
RIO
N3
WO
RK
PAC
KA
GE
B:
TR
AIN
ING
,A
ND
DE
LIV
ER
Y:
-S
CO
RE
:34
OU
TO
F35
PO
INT
S
Str
engt
hs
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
the
effo
rts
mad
eto
chan
gena
tion
alpa
rtne
rsth
atth
eco
ntra
ctor
iden
tifie
dto
have
suff
ered
from
perf
orm
ance
issu
esin
the
pasL
The
expe
rien
ceof
the
inte
rvie
wer
sis
very
good
and
rele
vant
for
the
surv
eyan
dth
etr
aini
ngpr
opos
edis
soun
d.T
wo
sem
inar
sar
een
visa
ged
for
the
nati
onal
proj
ect
man
ager
san
dfi
eldw
ork
supe
rvis
ors
(at
the
laun
chof
the
proj
ect
and
fiel
dwor
k,re
spec
tive
ly)
inw
itha
real
isti
can
dre
leva
ntdu
rati
on.
Qua
lity
ofth
est
rate
gy
for
fiel
dwor
kpr
epar
atio
n,pa
rtic
ular
lyth
eB
ased
onth
ese
sem
inar
s,w
ritte
nin
stru
ctio
nsw
illbe
prep
ared
for
the
trai
ning
ofap
pro
ach
totr
aini
ngan
dth
eco
ntac
tst
rate
gy
for
redu
cing
non-
resp
onse
,in
terv
iew
ers
atth
eco
untr
yle
vel,
inth
eir
nati
onal
lang
uage
.in
clud
ing
the
onli
nem
odul
e(1
0po
ints
)9
Asi
ngle
plat
form
ispr
opos
edfo
rC
ATI
and
CA
WI
whi
chfa
cili
tate
sst
anda
rdis
edco
ding
and
the
inte
grat
ion
ofco
nsis
tenc
yan
dpl
ausi
bilit
ych
ecks
inth
eC
All
ques
tion
nair
e.T
here
isa
thor
ough
desc
ript
ion
ofth
esc
ript
ing
ofth
equ
esti
onna
ire
(inc
ludi
ngth
etr
ansl
ated
vers
ions
)us
ing
aso
ftw
are
appl
icat
ion
for
NIP
O.
The
reis
apo
int
mad
eon
the
cont
act
stra
tegy
and
asu
ppor
tfo
rth
esa
me
appr
oach
inge
nera
las
inE
SE
NE
R-2
,w
hich
isw
ell
just
ifie
d.
Wea
knes
ses
Whi
leth
eus
eofa
shig
çpla
tforr
nfo
rC
ATI
and
CA
WI
isd
eem
edto
bere
leva
nt,
the
Page 36
Ope
nte
nd
erp
roce
du
reE
UO
SHA
I2O
17I
OPI
FISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:Lw
SoLe
!jcn
dH
hh
Jci
Wo.
k
Str
engt
hs
The
over
all
appr
oach
toth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alqu
esti
onna
ires
isve
ryre
leva
nt.
Con
cern
ing
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
ther
eis
are
ason
able
poin
tm
ade
plac
ing
them
at
the
end
ofth
equ
esti
onna
ire
but
bein
gaw
are
ofth
eim
pact
onth
ege
nera
lqu
esti
onna
ire
flow
.
The
prop
osal
for
the
tran
slat
ion
follo
ws
the
TR
APD
asre
ques
ted
inth
ete
chni
cal
spec
ific
atio
ns,
whi
chis
wel
lde
scri
bed,
incl
udin
gth
etr
aini
ngfo
rtr
ansl
ator
san
dth
equ
alit
y
cont
rol
plan
for
the
tran
slat
ion.
Itw
illin
clud
ea
tran
slat
abil
ity
asse
ssm
ent
afte
rth
eco
gnit
ive
test
ing
and
befo
rela
unch
ing
the
tran
slat
ions
for
the
pilo
tte
st.
The
reis
aso
und
appr
oach
toth
epi
lot
test
,in
terv
iew
ing
upto
40es
tabl
ishm
ents
inth
ose
coun
trie
sw
ithm
ore
than
one
lang
uage
and
aim
ing
tote
stth
eun
ders
tand
ing
ofth
esu
rvey
—
both
byth
ere
spon
dent
san
dth
ein
terv
iew
ers
—,
the
tech
nica
lfu
ncti
onin
g,th
edu
rati
on,
the
cont
act
ph
ase
and
the
outc
ome
ques
tion
sas
wel
las
the
ques
tion
sto
non-
resp
onde
nts.
Itw
asap
prec
iate
dby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eth
atth
epi
lot
test
isco
nsid
ered
tobe
anin
stru
men
tfo
rth
em
ain
fiel
dwor
kin
itse
lfai
min
gto
have
min
imal
chan
ges
afte
rwar
ds.
The
orga
nisa
tion
ofth
epi
lot
ispl
anne
dto
besi
mil
arto
that
ofth
em
ain
fiel
dwor
kbu
tw
ithso
me
diff
eren
ces,
part
icul
arly
the
freq
uenc
yof
the
list
enin
g-in
s.
Wea
knes
ses
No
evid
ent
wea
knes
ses
wer
eid
entif
ied
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
Str
engt
hs
The
sam
plin
gst
rate
gyis
wel
lpr
esen
ted,
follo
win
gth
esa
me
gene
ral
appr
oach
toth
atin
ES
EN
ER
-2bu
tw
ithso
me
impr
ovem
ents
.
The
reis
ago
odin
lrod
ucti
onto
the
sam
plin
gch
alle
nges
ofE
SE
NE
R,
focu
sing
onth
eun
itof
enqu
iry
and
the
avai
labi
lity
ofna
tion
alst
atis
tics
,as
wel
las
are
leva
ntde
scri
ptio
nof
the
bu
sin
ess
regi
ster
sto
beus
ed.
The
offe
rpr
opos
esto
use
anan
tici
pato
rysa
mpl
eal
loca
tion
Qua
lity
ofth
esa
mpl
ing
stra
tegy
,in
clud
ing
the
prop
osed
bu
sin
ess
desi
gnba
sed
onth
eir
expe
rien
cew
ithE
SE
NE
R-2
.
The
choi
ceof
the
best
avai
labl
esa
mpl
ing
fram
esis
wel
lex
plai
ned.
The
tend
erer
prop
oses
adi
spro
port
iona
test
rati
fied
sam
plin
gde
sign
,as
inE
SE
NE
R-2
,bu
tsh
iftin
gth
ew
eigh
tm
ore
toth
ees
tabl
ishm
ents
(vs.
the
empl
oyee
s).
Inor
der
toin
form
the
fina
lde
cisi
on—
tobe
agre
edw
ithE
U-O
SHA
—,
the
offe
rsu
gges
tsid
entif
ying
five
cent
ral
mea
sure
son
whi
chto
carr
you
tth
ean
aly
ses
and
use
the
resu
lts
asa
basi
sfo
rth
ede
cisi
on,
whi
chis
very
rele
vant
.
The
reis
ave
ryso
und
revi
ewof
the
scre
enin
gp
roce
ssfo
rm
ulti-
site
com
pani
es,
runn
ing
thro
ugh
the
app
roac
hes
inE
SE
NE
R-1
and
ES
EN
ER
-2an
dju
stif
yinq
tofo
llow
the
sam
e
Qua
lity
ofth
ead
apta
tion
ofth
ena
tion
alqu
esti
onna
ires
—w
hile
ensu
ring
inte
rnat
iona
lco
mpa
rabi
lity
-,in
clud
ing
the
nati
onal
ad-h
ocm
odul
es,
asw
elt
asth
epr
opos
edap
proa
chto
tran
slat
ion
and
the
pilo
tte
st(1
0po
ints
)10
Page 37
Au
i,y
Jta
rSaf
etycd
H.@
hhJ
oiW
a4
Ope
nte
nd
erpro
cedure
EUO
SKA
I2O
I7IO
P1FI
SEIO
O48
—T
echn
ical
eval
uati
on:
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
ew
ould
have
appr
ecia
ted
mor
ede
tail
son
the
defi
nitio
nof
CA
WI.
Str
engt
hs
The
reis
ave
ryde
tail
edap
proa
chto
mon
itor
ing
ofin
terv
iew
ers
and
fiel
dwor
k,w
hich
isIc
onsi
dere
dto
beve
rygo
odby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.A
tth
ela
unch
ofth
esu
rvey
mon
itor
ing
isex
pect
edto
bem
ore
inte
nse
than
Lhe
10%
offe
red
thro
ugho
utth
ere
stof
fiel
dwor
k,w
itha
high
ernu
mbe
rof
supe
rvis
ors
invo
lved
.
The
prop
osed
coun
try
repo
rts
are
very
deta
iled
and
accu
rate
.
Qua
lity
ofth
epro
pose
dfi
eldw
ork
exec
utio
n,de
scri
bing
the
over
all
appro
ach
tog
uar
ante
ehi
gh-q
uali
tyin
terv
iew
san
dm
inim
ise
non-
resp
onse
bias
incl
udin
gth
em
onit
orin
g,co
ntro
lan
dre
port
ing
ofth
efi
eldw
ork
pro
cess
(15
poin
ts)
15
The
reis
ave
ryso
und
appr
oach
tow
ards
redu
cing
non-
resp
onse
.Fo
llow
ing
ave
ryre
leva
ntth
eore
tica
tre
view
onw
here
tofo
cus
the
effo
rts,
the
offe
rpr
opos
esto
conc
entr
ate
oncl
ose
cent
ral
mon
itor
ing,
alim
ited
initi
alsa
mpl
ean
dst
agg
ered
addi
tion
alre
leas
es,
plus
ase
ries
ofad
diti
onal
mea
sure
sw
hich
are
all
very
wel
lex
plai
ned
and
that
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
posi
tivel
y.
The
reis
ago
odap
proa
chto
the
offe
rof
the
CA
WI
opti
on,
only
toC
ATI
refu
sers
.S
peci
fic
trai
ning
will
bepr
ovid
edto
inte
rvie
wer
sin
orde
rto
avoi
dus
ing
CA
WI
asan
easy
esca
pe.
Fur
ther
toth
is,
upto
four
rem
inde
rsw
illbe
sent
,th
ela
stov
erth
eph
one,
whe
reC
ATI
will
beof
fere
dag
ain.
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
posi
tive
lyth
eap
proa
chto
the
onli
nem
odul
e.
Wea
knes
ses
No
evid
ent
wea
knes
ses
wer
eid
entif
ied
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee.
Str
engt
hs
Qua
lity
ofth
eap
pro
ach
toda
tapr
oces
sing
,de
live
ryan
dst
orag
e,in
clud
ing
wei
ghti
ngan
dth
eim
pact
onco
mpa
rabi
lity
with
ES
EN
ER
-2,
asw
ell
asth
ere
port
ing
(10
poin
ts)
10
The
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
eva
lues
posi
tive
lyth
eap
proa
chto
data
proc
essi
ng,
deli
very
and
stor
age,
whi
chis
expl
aine
dve
rycl
earl
y.T
heda
tach
ecki
ngsy
ntax
will
bede
velo
ped
inS
PS
Sfo
rth
epi
lot
test
and
will
bere
vise
dfo
rth
em
ain
fiel
dwor
k.T
hech
ecki
ngan
dva
lida
tion
will
beca
rrie
dou
tat
vari
able
and
resp
onde
ntle
vel,
with
som
esh
ort
exam
ples
and
sugg
esti
ons
prov
ided
,w
hich
are
rele
vant
.
Inte
rim
data
chec
ksar
een
visa
ged
afte
r5%
ofin
terv
iew
sha
veb
een
carr
ied
out
toen
sure
data
are
bein
gco
llec
ted
asin
tend
ed,
wee
kly
chec
kth
erea
fter
.A
dditi
onal
ly,
cros
s-ta
bula
tion
sw
ithin
teri
mda
taar
eto
bepe
rfor
med
afte
rco
mpl
etio
nof
10%
and
50%
ofin
terv
iew
sto
chec
kfo
rre
sponse
rate
san
dco
nten
tre
late
dda
ta.
Thi
sis
cons
ider
edto
beve
ryin
tere
stin
gby
the
eval
uati
onco
mm
itte
e.
The
reis
aso
und
desc
ript
ion
ofth
ero
utin
ean
dpl
ausi
bilit
ych
ecks
alte
rfi
eldw
ork
com
plet
ion,
with
the
mea
sure
sre
gard
ed,
whi
chin
som
eca
ses
incl
ude
re-c
onta
ctin
ges
tabl
ishm
ents
conc
erne
d.
One
open
-end
edqu
estio
nis
cons
ider
ed,
onth
eac
tivity
sect
orof
the
esta
blls
hmen
t,an
d
Page 38
Loaç
tcn
*Otf
lrf
JIra
Wtt
ydH
r&ib
2cl
wrt
k
Ope
nte
nder
pro
cedu
reE
UO
SHN
2OI7
IOPI
FISE
IOO
48—
Tec
hnic
alev
alua
tion
:
Sig
ned
by:
only
tobe
used
inca
seth
ein
form
atio
nfr
omth
eb
usi
nes
sre
gist
eris
wro
ng.
The
appr
oach
tow
eigh
ting
isve
ryso
und,
deta
iled
and
accu
rate
,w
ithan
inte
rest
ing
disc
ussi
onof
the
use
ofth
ege
nera
tise
dre
gres
sion
esti
mat
ion
(GR
EG
)ap
proa
ch,
whi
chth
eypr
opos
e,vs
.th
eit
erat
ive
prop
orti
onal
fitti
ngap
proa
ch.
Wea
knes
ses
No
evid
ent
wea
knes
ses
wer
eid
entif
ied
byth
eev
alua
tion
com
mit
tee. T
OT
AL
O4O
UT
OF
100
RU
PRU
NE
TP
RU
