Date post: | 01-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | cambree-jones |
View: | 30 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Evaluation Tools and ModelsNorthern Plains CCC Program
Comprehensive Cancer Control2008 Annual Grantee Meetings
May 14th, 2008Atlanta, GA
Northern Plains Comprehensive Cancer Control Program Logic Model
Inputs OutputsParticipationActivities
Outcomes - ImpactShort Term Medium Term Long Term
Funding – CDC and other resources
Staff: ~2 full time
Coalition and Partners
Current data and research
Conference calls and meetings with Coalition and partners
Educate community
Create Strategic Plan
Improve cancer data
Engage tribal community for support
Tribal Leadership
Health Professionals
Cancer Organizations
Cancer Survivors
Tribal Health Workers
Media
State Cancer Programs
Increased knowledge and awareness of cancer prevention and control
Increased numbers of cancer activities in tribal communities
1-3 years 4-6 years 7-10 years
Increased skills and capacity to address cancer
Increase in cancer screening accessibility
Change in risk factors for cancer
Increased cancer treatment resources and support
Increase in cancer survivor and caregiver support systems
Increase in treatment follow-up
Decreased Cancer Incidence Rates
Decreased Cancer Mortality Rates
Increase in Quality of Life for Cancer Patients
Implement cancer control activities/interventions
Indian Health Service employees
Cancer Researchers
Increase in cancer screening rates
Improved data and surveillance
Increased support from key partners
Improved cultural sensitivity/competency
Strategies• Tracking Data of Coalition and Partnerships
(meeting participation, agendas, rosters, etc.)
• Partnership Satisfaction and Needs Assessments
• Pre and Post Assessments • Cancer Burden and Risk Factor
Surveillance• Evaluate absolutely every activity or
intervention…– somehow….if we can…
Tools• Audience Response System (ARS)
• Online Evaluation Database
Sample Question:What do you like most
about this meeting?
1. Presentations from my peers and colleagues
2. Poster Session3. Free candy and pens4. Doing the chicken dance5. I don’t know/I’m not sure
How we are using ARS?
• Short-term Outcome: Increased knowledge and awareness of cancer prevention and control– Cancer 101 Workshops – Education Conference– Community Colorectal Cancer Workshop– Family Caregiver Workshop
ARS Advantages• Knowledge, Attitude, Belief,
Satisfaction outcomes from workshops, meetings, etc.
• Efficient data collection, analysis, reporting
• Better response rate than paper surveys
• Mostly well-received in communities• Can help facilitate group processes
ARS Disadvantages
• Cost….?• Technology• Portability (ARS unit
and staff)– Community Grant
Example
• Does not measure knowledge retention or outcome in behavior
Online Evaluation Database
Online Evaluation Database
• Password protected system
• Upload ARS, tracking, evaluation data
• Automatically generate reports and summarize data
• Tabs for different inputs: Committees, Partnerships, Products, Dissemination, etc.
Presentation / Outreach / Inservice Your Products: Articles Brochures Vide os Curricula Etc.
Other (e.g. radio, cable, PSA)
Figure 3. Schematic of the Dissemination Tab.
Dissemination
Presentations
Workshops
Training
OtherÕs Products: Articles Brochures Videos Curricula Etc.
Online Evaluation Database Advantages
• Provides external consultants/partners access
• Easier to generate reports
• Uniform measures and comparison
• Partners information/data?
» ……at least we hope……
Online Evaluation DatabaseDisadvantages
• Technology
• You only get what you put in…– Cancer Burden Data
• Time and resources to upload data and maintain site
• Appropriate data-sharing
• What will we miss?
Evaluation Plans
• Update and Revise Evaluation Plan
• Continue to improve use of ARS
• Tailor and begin using Online Database
• Northern Plains Cancer Data Improvement Initiative