Evaluations Update

General Administrators Dr. Glenn Maleyko.

February 27, 2014

Timelines Have Changed

All Evaluation Documents must be submitted to HR by May 10th. This is to comply with board of education policy on layoff and recall.

Goal Deadlines Moved upGoals for Subsequent Year Should be

discussed and teachers should create them with data from year-end evaluations

A Google Calendar with Evaluation Deadlines was created.

Teacher Evaluation Committee

Bill Tucker                      Mark Palise                 Jill Chochol                  Shannon Peterson                 Andrew Denison           Linda Salamey                 Fatme Faraj                 Robert Seeterlin                 Hassane Jaafar            Gail Shenkman                 Julia Maconochie         Chris Sipperley                 Wyatt David Steve Salah     

Glenn Maleyko Nicole Chubb

Weighted Formula75% will be based on Observation

Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching.

 This includes observations (formal and

not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards.

25% Growth Data

5% District growth based on state accountability measures

10% Building Growth based on state or building or district common assessments

10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments,

10% Building Growth Data Elementary -SRI, DRA & DRA task analysis, Star

Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments.  

Middle School -SRI, DRA, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments, and Explore.

High School- Explore, Plan, MME, MEAP, SRI, Star Math, Common Assessments, AP exams, and Departmental Assessments.

10% Classroom Growth Data

10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments, District Common Assessments or Classroom Assessments  (ex. Performance or product measures or other formative assessments, pre and post tests are required).

Teachscape

We have 59 Administrators that have passed the assessment. 14 started in a new cohort this year.

Proposed Legislation in Lansing

House Bill 5223 (MCL 380.1249 & 380.1531j) would revise current evaluation requirements for teachers, and require that school districts meet new requirements for school administrator evaluations, as described in detail in House Bill 5224.

Weighted Evaluation Timeline HB 5223

Percentage remain at 25 percent during the next three academic years: 2014-2015; 2015-2016; and 2016-2017.

Then in 2017-2018 school year, the student growth component would be raised to 50 percent.

Student Growth

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18

ObservationGrowth Data

Multiple Observations

Require that a teacher be observed at least 2 times each year

unless the teacher had received a rating of effective or highly effective on the two most recent evaluations.

One observation must be unannounced

Ineffective Teacher DismissalsCurrently, school districts and

charter schools must dismiss teachers rated as ineffective on 3 consecutive year-end evaluations. House Bill 5223 would retain this provision,

Continued

but specify that it would apply only if the evaluations were conducted using the same evaluation framework and under the same performance evaluation system.

HB 5223 Student Growth and Assessment Must

Consist of

State student growth and assessment measurement standards,

And a local student growth assessment, and may also include school-level

Weighting of Student Growth and Assessment

Data40 Percent Based on State

Assessment if available in Content Area

Other Teachers State Provided Data or Local Assessments

State Deadline

Require the State Student Growth and Assessment Data by March 1, 2014.

Practice Component of Evaluations & Teacher Observations

80% of practice component must be based on observations.

4 choices

Charlotte Danielson's Framework for

Teaching; the Marzano Teacher EvaluationThoughtful Classroom Five Dimensions.

HB 5224 Administrator Evaluation 3 Choices

The school advance administrator evaluation instrument developed by

Reeves and McNeill for the Michigan Association ofSchool Administrators;

the Reeves Leadership Performance Rubric;

or the Marzano Framework