+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Evidence for the centrality of experience. Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L....

Evidence for the centrality of experience. Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L....

Date post: 29-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: bernadette-cummings
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
Evidence for the centrality of experience
Transcript
Page 1: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Evidence for the centrality of experience

Page 2: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Evidence for the centrality of experience Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment

Catherine L. Harris (1997) Constrains on Statistical learning

Jenny R. Saffran (2002)

Page 3: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Outline of Lecture The big picture Idiom-level representation Collocation level representation Statistical learning Conclusions

Page 4: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

The big picture

• Psycholinguistics

• Computation

Page 5: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Evidence for the Centrality of Experience Entrenchment Statistics Performance

Page 6: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Entrenched expressions Words (Carr 1986) Common word combinations (collocations) Multi word idioms

Page 7: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Does “Idiom Level” of Representation exist ? (Harris 1997)

Priming Semantic priming

Spreading activation Semantic integration

Great minds think alike Great minds alike Minds think alike

Page 8: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Idiom levelGreat minds think alike

42 - 4 words idiom Contiguous with target Noncontiguous with target

30 – first two words best eliciting 12 – middle two words best eliciting.

Associative and Semantic trios baby, cradle -> bottle -semantic ear, foot -> mouth -associative doctor, nurse -> surgeon -both

Page 9: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Results Degree of priming

Semantic – 57 Associated – 42 Both - 65 Idioms – 44

No difference between the groups

Page 10: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Results

0102030405060708090

First two(30/42)

Middle Two(12/42)

First two

Middle two

Prime was:

Best elicited idioms

Page 11: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Conclusions so Far… Idiom Level of Representation exist Syntactic schema

Page 12: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Does Collocation Level of Representation exist ? (Harris 1997)

Is priming good enough? Cradle -> baby

Processing letters Word Superior Effect -Carr(1986)

Random word pairs vs. collocation

Page 13: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Collocation

TAX BILL

X

G

Page 14: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

CollocationSingle word

CollocationCollocation neighbor

Non-collocation

letters

TaxTax billTax bellTax deepX G

NightNight clubNight clueNight wallN E

worldFree worldTree worldOpen worldR U

Page 15: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Collocation Letter detection was better in the

collocation than in other stimuli. “sophisticated guessing” Collocation “friends”

Bog down/bow down Superiority of detection of words in

collocation remains

Page 16: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Collocation Are collocations activated in response to

partial input? Trick items

Tag bill Eight club

Accuracy impaired 65% trick condition 90% collocation condition

Page 17: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Conclusions so Far… Idiom Level of Representation exist Syntactic schema Collocation level representation exist

Polysemous words interpretation Child language acquisition Computation

Page 18: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Constraints on Statistical Learning (Safran 2002) Predictive dependencies affect learnability

of sequential structures Domains

Page 19: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Constraints on Statistical Learning (Safran 2002) Combinatorial explosion Source of the constraints Linear input to Nonlinear structure

(the professor (graded (the exam)) Innate knowledge Dependency relations between categories

Page 20: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Word categories

Page 21: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Language P vs. Language N

Page 22: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Rules for both languages

Page 23: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

ResultsSequential/ simultaneously

StimuliLinguistic?result

SequentialAuditoryYes/no P>n>½

SequentialVisuallyYes/noP=n>½

simultaneouslyVisuallyYes/noP>n>½

Page 24: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Results Adults p > n Children p>n Other domains

Page 25: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Conclusions Language evolved to fit the human learner Similarities among human languages may

reflect constrains to fit human learner Bridge between nature and nurture

Page 26: Evidence for the centrality of experience.  Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment Catherine L. Harris (1997)  Constrains on Statistical learning.

Summary Entrenchment

Representation of idioms Representation of collocations Representation of words

Statistics Between words Between word categories Phonemes Letters

Performance Acquiring predictable language using idioms or collocations


Recommended