+ All Categories

EWA_PPR

Date post: 30-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: atul-as-streetwarrior
View: 239 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
39
EarlyWatch Alert - PETL ECC Landscape 1 Service Summary Note: All recommendations provided in this report are based on our general experience. We advise that you test our recommendations before using them in your production system. Note that EarlyWatch Alert is an automatic service. Section Overview Note: For more information about EarlyWatch Alert, a sample EarlyWatch Alert report with explanations is available in the Media Library on SAP Service Marketplace ( EWA ). This provides an overview of the check rating strategy and the KPIs that trigger the alerts in this service. Alert Message Overview The service data were collected starting at 01.10.2012 04:19:37 taking 23 minutes. Note: If you need help investigating the alerts listed, order an EarlyWatch contract by contacting your local support organization or by creating a customer message in component SV-BO. If you already have such a contract, a detailed analysis can be performed during the next Service Session. Address the topic during preparation for the session. E - Mail Hint: to search, select this document and choose Ctrl+F Date: 01.10.2012 Report: PPR, Unknown CO-OM BC- CCM BC MM FI PP PY LE SD CO LO QM PM Installation: 0020677209 Session: 1000000001529 During this EarlyWatch Alert Session, we detected issues that could potentially affect your system. We recommend that you take corrective action as soon as possible. System Configuration System Performance Workload Distribution SAP System Operating Database Settings Database Administration Authorization Checks Rating Checked Area Medium There are security issues in your system. New Medium We found many ABAP dumps in your system. New Priority Description New Alert Page 1 of 39 Report 05-Oct-12 saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html
Transcript
Page 1: EWA_PPR

EarlyWatch Alert - PETL ECC

Landscape

1 Service Summary

Note: All recommendations provided in this report are based on our general experience. We advise that you test our recommendations before using them in your production system. Note that EarlyWatch Alert is an automatic service.

Section Overview

Note: For more information about EarlyWatch Alert, a sample EarlyWatch Alert report with explanations is available in the Media Library on SAP Service Marketplace ( EWA ). This provides an overview of the check rating strategy and the KPIs that trigger the alerts in this service.

Alert Message Overview

The service data were collected starting at 01.10.2012 04:19:37 taking 23 minutes.

Note: If you need help investigating the alerts listed, order an EarlyWatch contract by contacting your local support organization or by creating a customer message in component SV-BO. If

you already have such a contract, a detailed analysis can be performed during the next Service Session. Address the topic during preparation for the session.

E-Mail Hint: to search, select this document and choose Ctrl+F

Date: 01.10.2012

Report: PPR, Unknown CO-OM BC-CCM BC MM FI PP PY LE SD

CO LO QM PMInstallation: 0020677209

Session: 1000000001529

During this EarlyWatch Alert Session, we detected issues that could potentially affect your

system. We recommend that you take corrective action as soon as possible.

System Configuration

System Performance

Workload Distribution

SAP System Operating

Database Settings

Database Administration

Authorization Checks

Rating Checked Area

Medium There are security issues in your system. New

Medium We found many ABAP dumps in your system. New

Priority Description New Alert

Page 1 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 2: EWA_PPR

Note: If you experience serious performance problems, create a customer message on component SV-BO with the priority "high" or "very high".

2 Performance Indicators for PPR

The following table shows the relevant performance indicators in various system areas.

3 System Configuration

3.1 Hardware Configuration

The table below shows the detected hardware configuration:

System Performance Active Users 147 up

Avg. Response Time in Dialog Task

817 ms up

Max. Dialog Steps per Hour 26599 up

Avg. Response Time at Peak

Dialog Hour951 ms up

Avg. Availability per Week 99 % steady

Database PerformanceAvg. DB Request Time in Dialog Task

479 ms up

Avg. DB Request Time in Update

Task247 ms steady

Database Space Management

DB Size627.98 GB

steady

Last Month DB Growth 2.58 GB down

Area Indicators Value Trend

To ensure optimal support of your SAP system, the SAP components, database, and operating system used must all be supported. Detailed information about SAP's platform support is available on SAP Service Marketplace at http://service.sap.com/platforms.

Hardware Configuration

Software Configuration

Service Preparation

Rating Check

Application Server

PECCCIHP-UX

11.31 N/A N/A

Database Server PECCDBHP-

UX11.31 4 N/A

Hardware Configuration

Server Type Server OSOS Version

Number of CPUs

Memory [MB]

Page 2 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 3: EWA_PPR

3.2 Software Configuration

3.2.1 Support Package Maintenance

PECCDB ORACLE 10.2.0

Database System

Database Server Database System Current Version

EA-APPL 600 13 SAPKGPAD13SAP R/3 Enterprise PLM, SCM, Finance

EA-DFPS 600 13 SAPKGPDD13SAP R/3 Enterprise Defense Forces & Public Security

EA-FINSERV 600 13 SAPKGPFD13SAP R/3 Enterprise Financial Services

EA-GLTRADE 600 13 SAPKGPGD13SAP R/3 Enterprise

Global Trade

EA-HR 600 42 SAPKGPHD42SAP R/3 Enterprise Human Resources

EA-HRCAR 600 0

EA-HRCAT 600 0

EA-HRCAU 600 0

EA-HRCBE 600 0

EA-HRCBR 600 0

EA-HRCCA 600 0

EA-HRCCH 600 0

EA-HRCCN 600 0

EA-HRCDE 600 0

EA-HRCDK 600 0

EA-HRCES 600 0

EA-HRCFI 600 0

EA-HRCFR 600 0

EA-HRCGB 600 0

EA-HRCHK 600 0

EA-HRCID 600 0

EA-HRCIE 600 0

EA-HRCIN 600 0

EA-HRCIT 600 0

EA-HRCJP 600 0

EA-HRCKR 600 0

EA-HRCMX 600 0

EA-HRCMY 600 0

EA-HRCNL 600 0

EA-HRCNO 600 0

Support Packages

SAP

Component

SAP Component Version

Patch

LevelSupport Package

Component

Description

Page 3 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 4: EWA_PPR

EA-HRCNZ 600 0

EA-HRCPH 600 0

EA-HRCPT 600 0

EA-HRCRU 600 0

EA-HRCSE 600 0

EA-HRCSG 600 0

EA-HRCTH 600 0

EA-HRCTW 600 0

EA-HRCUS 600 0

EA-HRCVE 600 0

EA-HRCZA 600 0

EA-HRGXX 600 0

EA-HRRXX 600 0

EA-IPPE 400 13 SAPKGPID13

SAP R/3 Enterprise

Integrated Product and Process Engineering

EA-PS 600 13 SAPKGPPD13SAP R/3 Enterprise Public Services

EA-RETAIL 600 13 SAPKGPRD13SAP R/3 Enterprise

Retail

ECC-DIMP 600 13SAPK-60013INECCDIMP

ERECRUIT 600 13SAPK-60013INERECRUIT

SAP E-Recruiting

FI-CA 600 13 SAPK-60013INFICA

FI-CAX 600 13SAPK-60013INFICAX

FINBASIS 600 13SAPK-60013INFINBASIS

SAP R/3 Enterprise FINBASIS

INSURANCE 600 13SAPK-60013ININSURANC

IS-CWM 600 13SAPK-60013INISCWM

IS-H 600 14 SAPK-60014INISH

IS-M 600 13 SAPK-60013INISM

IS-OIL 600 13SAPK-

60013INISOIL

IS-PS-CA 600 13SAPK-60013INISPSCA

IS-UT 600 13 SAPK-60013INISUT

LSOFE 600 13SAPK-

60013INLSOFE

PI_BASIS 2005_1_700 18 SAPKIPYJ7ISAP R/3 Basis Plug-In

SAP_ABA 700 18 SAPKA70018SAP Application Basis

Support Packages

SAP

Component

SAP Component Version

Patch

LevelSupport Package

Component

Description

Page 4 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 5: EWA_PPR

SAP_AP 700 15 SAPKNA7015

SAP_APPL 600 13 SAPKH60013 SAP R/3 Standard

SAP_BASIS 700 18 SAPKB70018SAP Basis Component

SAP_BW 700 20 SAPKW70020SAP Business Information Warehouse

SAP_HR 600 63 SAPKE60063SAP R/3 Standard HR

SAP_HRCAR 600 0

SAP_HRCAT 600 0

SAP_HRCAU 600 0

SAP_HRCBE 600 0

SAP_HRCBR 600 0

SAP_HRCCA 600 0

SAP_HRCCH 600 0

SAP_HRCCN 600 0

SAP_HRCDE 600 0

SAP_HRCDK 600 0

SAP_HRCES 600 0

SAP_HRCFI 600 0

SAP_HRCFR 600 0

SAP_HRCGB 600 0

SAP_HRCHK 600 0

SAP_HRCID 600 0

SAP_HRCIE 600 0

SAP_HRCIN 600 0

SAP_HRCIT 600 0

SAP_HRCJP 600 0

SAP_HRCKR 600 0

SAP_HRCMX 600 0

SAP_HRCMY 600 0

SAP_HRCNL 600 0

SAP_HRCNO 600 0

SAP_HRCNZ 600 0

SAP_HRCPH 600 0

SAP_HRCPT 600 0

SAP_HRCRU 600 0

SAP_HRCSE 600 0

SAP_HRCSG 600 0

SAP_HRCTH 600 0

SAP_HRCTW 600 0

SAP_HRCUN 600 0

SAP_HRCUS 600 0

Support Packages

SAP

Component

SAP Component Version

Patch

LevelSupport Package

Component

Description

Page 5 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 6: EWA_PPR

3.2.2 SAP Kernel Release

Your SAP kernel release (release 700, patch level 179) is not up-to-date.

Without the latest kernel patch level, you do not have the latest error corrections and improvements SAP offers to its customers.

You might encounter errors or performance issues that have already been fixed.

Recommendation: Ensure that you are using the SAP kernel recommended together with the latest SAP Stacks of your product.

Refer to SAP Service Marketplace for detailed information: http://service.sap.com/sp-stacks

SAP releases Support Package Stacks including kernel patches on a regular basis (generally 2-4 times a year). Therefore, we also suggest you create a strategy for periodically applying these stacks.

In special cases, you might need to use a more recent kernel patch than the one shipped

with the latest Support Package Stack for your product. SAP Support should inform you if this is the case.

3.2.3 Implemented SAP Notes via SAP Notes Assistant

SAP_HRCVE 600 0

SAP_HRCZA 600 0

SAP_HRGXX 600 0

SAP_HRRXX 600 0

SEM-BW 600 13 SAPKGS6013 SAP SEM Server

ST-A/PI 01L_ECC600 0 SAPKITAR7D

SAP Service Tools

for Applications Plug-In

ST-PI 2005_1_700 6 SAPKITLQI6SAP Solution Tools

Plug-In

Support Packages

SAP

Component

SAP Component Version

Patch

LevelSupport Package

Component

Description

0001706872 0003 PY-INPY-IN: Union Budget Changes for Year

2012

0001575366 0001 PY-INHINCALC0:Tax calculation inconsistent in case of invalid PAN

0001572614 0005 PY-INTax calculations inconsistent for emp. without a vaild PAN

0001568264 0005 PY-IN Budget Changes 2011

0001562761 0003 XX-CSC-IN-MMRun time error due to m/y overflow in Credit Transfer- J2I8

0001558475 0005 PY-INAmendments to IT calculation notified under circular:08/2010

0001493450 0003 FI-GL-FLReversal not poss. due to missing values in required field

SAP Note Version Component Description

Page 6 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 7: EWA_PPR

3.3 Service Preparation

System PPR is not fully prepared for service delivery.

For a detailed analysis, refer to the checks below. For general information about service preparation, see SAP Note 91488 (SAP Support Services: Central Preparation Note). Ensure that all functionality mentioned in this SAP Note is up-to-date, especially connections, collectors, and service tools.

0001455469 0003 XX-CSC-INDuties not displayed under correct column in RG23C part2

0001406960 0012 PA-PM-CPNo commitment references when transferring payroll result

0001405087 0002 XX-CSC-INDuties not displayed under correct column in RG23A part2

0001382528 0004 FI-SL-SLFI general ledger: Performance of FI

data selectn processes

0001350822 0007 PA-PM-CPFinancing not adjusted for periods that are not integrated

0001336899 0002 PA-PM-CPSystem does not update change history for PBC documents

0001332905 0002 PA-PM-CPRetroactive accounting date not set in spite of switch RECAL

0001329216 0003 FI-AA-AAFixed asset is incorrectly flagged as

incomplete

0001327534 0002 PA-PM-CPDocuments not created in the sequence of their due date

0001307798 0001MM-IV-LIV-CRE

MIRO: Balance is not updated

0001299997 0003BC-CCM-BTC-RUN

Message D01 in system log with reference to message BT 510

0001295661 0003 XX-CSC-IN-SDADC appear as AED(GSI) for monthly

utilized document in J2I9

0001283823 0005 XX-CSC-IN-MMChanges in heading and display of duty column for RG1 report

0001272102 0003 PA-PM-CP Error corrections for document closing

SAP Note Version Component Description

Service Data Control Center

Service Preparation Check (RTCCTOOL)

ST-PI and ST-A/PI Plug-Ins

Missing Function Modules

Errors in Data Collection

SAP OS Collector

Workload Monitor (ST03)

Rating Performed Check

SAP OS Collector Version

SAP OS collector version could not be determined.

Review SAP Note 1075827.

Check not Performed

Hint Recommendation

Page 7 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 8: EWA_PPR

3.3.1 Service Preparation Check (RTCCTOOL)

The last run of report RTCCTOOL was 00.00.0000, more than 30 days ago.

Recommendation: Run report RTCCTOOL, as described in SAP Note 91488, to check the latest

recommendations. If missing add-ons, transports, or SAP Notes are detected by RTCCTOOL, implement the recommendations provided by the tool.

3.3.2 Errors in Data Collection

The following exceptions were raised during data collection:

Recommendation: Review the SDCC(N) data collection log for this session. For function modules with an exception, check whether a help text is available when you double-click this exception. If you have access to SAP Notes, search for these errors and the corresponding short dumps or system log entries.

If you cannot resolve the problem, open a message in SV-SMG-SDD.

3.3.3 SAP OS Collector

3.3.3.1 Quality of Collected Data

The analysis below is based on the information in ST06 -> Detail analysis menu -> Compare recent days.

SAPOSCOL data quality is insufficient to perform hardware capacity checks in the SAP standard services. Check whether SAPOSCOL is active and stores data correctly (see SAPNote 189072 ).

If required, open a message on component BC-CCM-MON-OS to investigate any of the items below.

Days not Collected

Recommendation: Check whether SAPOSCOL is running and storing data correctly on

the above servers. Also check the SAPOSCOL version.

PECCCI GET_FSYS_SINGLE SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCDB GET_FSYS_SINGLE SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCCI GET_MEM_ALL SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCDB GET_MEM_ALL SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCCI GET_CPU_ALL SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCDB GET_CPU_ALL SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCCI FILL_SNAPSHOT_DATA SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

PECCDB FILL_SNAPSHOT_DATA SHARED_MEMORY_NOT_AV

Host Function Name Exception

PECCCI 24.09.2012-30.09.2012

PECCDB 24.09.2012-30.09.2012

Host Name Days not Collected

Page 8 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 9: EWA_PPR

3.3.4 Info: Active SAP Application Servers

The following information can be found in transaction SM51:

4 Performance Overview PPR

The following table shows the average response times for various task types:

4.1 Current Workload

The following table lists the number of current users (measured from our workload analysis) in your system.

4.2 Performance Evaluation

The measured times are compared against reference times to provide a rating.

- If the number of dialog steps in an hour is less than 1000 this hour is not considered.

- If the total number of transaction steps is less than 24000, the rating for the task is not performed and a blue line is entered in the table.

PECCCI_PPR_02 PECCCI

PECCDB_PPR_01 PECCDB

SAP Application Server SM51 Host Name

The performance of your system was analyzed with respect to the average response times and total workload. We did not detect any major problems that could affect the performance of your system.

Performance Evaluation

Rating Check

DIALOG 1108524 816,8 168,6 5,1 2,0 479,4 134,6

RFC 1139720 653,8 37,6 43,5 2,5 357,8 0,0

UPDATE 67209 301,0 46,1 4,3 4,1 247,3 0,0

UPDATE2 52315 66,7 18,0 0,7 1,0 43,4 0,0

BATCH 2003890 380,7 206,9 6,0 2,4 111,6 0,0

SPOOL 29525 1187,2 34,6 2,0 0,3 9,7 0,0

Task type

Dialog Steps

Avg.

Resp. Time in ms

Avg.

CPU Time in ms

Avg.

Wait Time in ms

Avg.

Load Time in ms

Avg.

DB Time in ms

Avg.

GUI Time in ms

Measured in

System12 52 95 159

UsersLow Activity

Medium Activity

High Activity

Total Users

Page 9 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 10: EWA_PPR

The table below shows that no problem is expected on the application or database servers.

The ratings in the table above are determined by comparisons against the reference table below.

If the dialog response times are very poor, it will cause a RED rating for the entire check.

4.3 Transaction Profile Check

The following tables show the response times and the number of dialog steps for the transactions that cause the highest workload in your system. NOTE: A business transaction normally consists of more than one dialog step. As a rough estimate, the actual number of business transactions

that are executed in your system is approximately one third of the total dialog steps shown. (Transaction CPIC/RFC is not taken into account.)

4.3.1 Transactions by Total Workload

The following tables list the activities with the highest contribution to the total workload.

Dia 1107728

Upd 67209

HTTP 0

Task StepsApplication Server Performance

Database Server Performance

Dia07-08

1213 1678 191 1355

Rating Task Time StepsAvg. Response Time (ms)

Avg. CPU Time (ms)

Avg. Database Time (ms)

Dia 1200 600

Upd 2400 1200

HTTP 1200 600

TaskReference for Avg. Response Time (ms)

Reference for Avg. DB time (ms)

Total 1175633 100,0 787,4 161,6 466,1 134,6

ZMM_DOCFLOW DIA 993 7,6 70736,6 20522,1 48182,8 732,7

SESSION_MANAGER DIA 76802 7,3 876,0 126,4 309,6 259,8

ZRECON DIA 139 5,1 341117,4 113934,0 186879,8 313,9

ZSO_PND DIA 9035 4,7 4859,4 1956,7 2288,3 512,4

MIRO DIA 36128 4,2 1080,3 194,3 688,3 192,4

F-58 DIA 8462 2,8 3102,0 37,5 3042,9 7,0

CO02 DIA 25733 2,6 923,8 85,2 767,4 77,8

FAGLL03 DIA 12373 2,6 1916,8 122,0 1660,1 51,4

Workload by Transaction (Dialog/Update)

Transaction TypeDialog Steps

Total Resp. Time

in %

Avg. Resp. Time in

ms

Avg. CPU Time in

ms

Avg. DB

Time in ms

Avg. GUI

Time in ms

Page 10 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 11: EWA_PPR

19.9% of the "Total Resp. Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.

37.7% of the "Total Resp. Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.

4.3.2 Transactions by DB Load

The following transaction profiles list the transactions that have the greatest share in the database load, sorted by percentage of total database access times.

ZSR DIA 9190 2,5 2530,8 688,7 1340,2 516,4

FBZ5 DIA 1451 2,4 15083,8 50,9 15007,7 15,3

Workload by Transaction (Dialog/Update)

Transaction TypeDialog Steps

Total

Resp. Time in %

Avg.

Resp. Time in ms

Avg.

CPU Time in ms

Avg. DB Time in

ms

Avg. GUI Time

in ms

Total 2033081 100,0 385,6 201,8 107,8

ZSD_PENDING_ORDER BTC 352 25,4 564759,5 469301,8 94054,2

RKO7CO88 BTC 4 14,1 27605370,3 19731215,0 6805230,0

RSBTCRTE BTC 658917 10,4 123,3 85,2 7,7

RSDBAJOB BTC 28 8,0 2249139,5 78,9 118,0

ZMM_MATERIAL_AGEING_NEW3_2130 BTC 2 7,8 30711751,0 24221470,0 6458233,5

ZDOCFLOW_MM BTC 29 4,5 1219454,5 109425,9 1115051,5

(BATCH) BTC 678829 3,2 37,3 10,3 12,9

SAPF124 BTC 28 3,1 855588,6 708393,9 233553,5

RSARFCSE BTC 648074 2,7 33,3 12,0 7,8

PPIO_ENTRY BTC 28 2,2 618153,3 119487,9 517053,6

Workload by Transaction (Batch/Spool)

Transaction TypeDialog Steps

Total Resp. Time in %

Avg. Resp.

Time in ms

Avg. CPU

Time in ms

Avg. DB

Time in ms

Total 1175633 100,0 466,1

ZMM_DOCFLOW DIA 993 8,7 48182,8

ZRECON DIA 139 4,7 186879,8

F-58 DIA 8462 4,7 3042,9

MIRO DIA 36128 4,5 688,3

SESSION_MANAGER DIA 76802 4,3 309,6

FBZ5 DIA 1451 4,0 15007,7

ZSO_PND DIA 9035 3,8 2288,3

FAGLL03 DIA 12373 3,7 1660,1

CO02 DIA 25733 3,6 767,4

MB25 DIA 438 3,5 43976,3

Database Load by Transactions (Dialog/Update)

Transaction TypeDialog

Steps

Total DB Time

in %

Avg. DB Time in

ms

Page 11 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 12: EWA_PPR

17.2% of the "Total DB Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.

43.5% of the "Total DB Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.

5 Workload Distribution PPR

5.1 Workload by Application Module

The following graphics or tables show how each application module contributes to the total system workload. Two workload aspects are shown:

- CPU time: Total CPU load on all servers in the system landscape - Database time: Total database load generated by the application The 'unknown' section contains all programs that cannot be assigned to a standard SAP application module (for example, customer programs, an industry solution, or a third-party add-

on development).

Total 2033081 100,0 107,8

ZSD_PENDING_ORDER BTC 352 15,1 94054,2

ZDOCFLOW_MM BTC 29 14,7 1115051,5

RKO7CO88 BTC 4 12,4 6805230,0

PPIO_ENTRY BTC 28 6,6 517053,6

ZMM_MATERIAL_AGEING_NEW3_2130 BTC 2 5,9 6458233,5

RSBTCDEL BTC 21 4,9 511424,8

ZDOCFLOW_MM_FIX_LAY BTC 7 4,6 1436537,0

SAPKKA07 BTC 1 4,1 8883681,0

(BATCH) BTC 678829 4,0 12,9

ZDOCFLOW_MM_FIX_LAY1 BTC 7 3,2 998660,9

Database Load by Transactions (Batch/Spool)

Transaction TypeDialog Steps

Total DB Time in

%

Avg. DB Time in ms

The performance of your system was analyzed with respect to workload distribution. We did not detect any major problems that could affect the performance of your SAP System.

Workload by Application Module

DB Load Profile

Rating Check

Page 12 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 13: EWA_PPR

Unknown 48,1

CO-OM 12,3

BC-CCM 10,0

BC 9,8

MM 5,7

FI 4,8

PP 3,6

PY 1,7

Module CPU Time in %

Module DB Time in %

Page 13 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 14: EWA_PPR

5.2 DB Load Profile

The following table or diagram shows the DB load caused by dialog, RFC, and background tasks

over different timeframes.

The data provided in the table represents the average number of database processes occupied by each task type in the database during the specified timeframes.

These statistics are calculated as a weekly average, which means the average values over six working days with a unit of one hour. Periods between 00:00-06:00 and 21:00-24:00 contain an average value per hour. 24-hour monitoring can be enabled by implementing SAP Note 17750.

By comparing the load profiles for dialog and background activity, you can gain an overview of the volume of background activity during online working hours.

BC 33,5

Unknown 23,4

MM 12,5

FI 9,5

PP 8,5

CO-OM 2,6

BC-CCM 2,4

LE 2,1

QM 2,0

LO 1,2

CO 1,1

Module DB Time in %

Page 14 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 15: EWA_PPR

The graph above indicates that the CPUs can handle the database load. Therefore, the check is rated green.

5.3 RFC Communication

The performance of your system was analyzed with respect to the average call times and the workload created by remote function calls between the current system and other SAP and non-SAP systems. The following tables show statistics about RFCs. Note: Internal RFC communication (that means communication between the instances of the

analyzed system) is not shown in the tables. However, it is included in the 'Total' line.

6 SAP System Operating PPR

ARFC_RUN_NOWAIT 574450 97306,40 169 847288609 1350121055

QDEST_RUN_DESTINATION 10754 86092,23 8006 1070388422 58639453

SAPXPG_END_XPG 31 62919,09 2029648 4247 225525

SALT_TOOLSET_STARTER 148 9244,36 62462 70302466 952376

GOS_EXECUTE_SERVICE 203 6557,74 32304 199328 102072

RSAP_TRFC_SEND 77 6006,27 78004 6935386895 33572

ARFC_DEST_SHIP 661 2702,64 4089 69242144 166912

SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE 7 2125,68 303669 23387 301779

RSAP_IDOC_SEND 195 1697,01 8703 665859 151125

Outgoing function call CallsTotal call

time, s

Average

call time, ms

Bytes sentBytes received

QDEST_RUN 4457 347697,74 78012 0 1437250

ARFC_RUN_NOWAIT 669497 116145,48 173 2533991139 949703796

ZTEST 2917 89927,68 30829 0 1403077

QDEST_RUN_DESTINATION 19160 42848,56 2236 67396678 1326638128

SALT_TOOLSET_STARTER 151 9240,00 61192 1041916 71731775

SWNC_COLLECTOR_STARTER 668 7406,50 11088 0 196392

GOS_EXECUTE_SERVICE 196 6556,49 33451 102072 180236

RSAP_TRFC_SEND 83 6006,26 72365 86403 7149347957

PRGN_SHOW_EDIT_AGR 92 3468,89 37705 0 54920

Incoming function call CallsTotal call time, s

Average

call time, ms

Bytes sentBytes received

Your system was analyzed with respect to daily operation. We detected some problems that

may impair system operation and stability. To ensure system stability, you should take corrective action as soon as possible.

Table Reorganization

Rating Check

Page 15 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 16: EWA_PPR

6.1 Update Errors

In a system running under normal conditions, only a small number of update errors should occur.

To set the rating for this check, the number of active users is also taken into consideration. The following table contains the number of update errors detected.

We did not detect any problems.

6.2 Table Reorganization

When analyzing your database, we detected large or rapidly growing tables or indexes.

Recommendation: Implement the SAP Notes listed below to reduce the size of some of these tables or indexes. Background: For more information about SAP Data Volume Management, see SAP Service

Marketplace at service.sap.com/dvm

6.3 Transports

Transports were not found in the period analyzed.

6.4 Program Errors (ABAP Dumps)

363 ABAP dumps have been recorded in your system in the period 24.09.2012 to 30.09.2012.

ABAP dumps are generally deleted after 7 days by default. To view the ABAP dumps in your

ARFCSSTATE 1664,0 375566

BALDAT 7936,0 195157

Table / Index

Name

Size of Table / Index

[MByte]

Recommended SAP

Note

Page 16 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 17: EWA_PPR

system, call transaction ST22 and choose Selection. Then select a timeframe.

7 Authorization Checks

24.09.2012 94

25.09.2012 61

26.09.2012 120

27.09.2012 7

28.09.2012 45

29.09.2012 2

30.09.2012 34

Date Quantity of Dumps

MESSAGE_TYPE_UNKNOWN 3 PECCDB_PPR_01 RPG5003316 24.09.2012 12:34:16

TSV_TNEW_BLOCKS_NO_ROLL_MEMORY 2 PECCDB_PPR_01 ES5015065 25.09.2012 10:31:14

DYNPRO_MSG_IN_HELP 2 PECCDB_PPR_01 GS5002059 25.09.2012 11:01:16

CALL_FUNCTION_SYSCALL_ONLY 9 PECCDB_PPR_01 SAPSYS 25.09.2012 12:08:23

SYSTEM_CORE_DUMPED 1 PECCDB_PPR_01 GS5002059 25.09.2012 12:11:10

PERFORM_NOT_FOUND 1 PECCDB_PPR_01 SMM5040693 25.09.2012 14:38:49

TABLE_INVALID_INDEX 1 PECCDB_PPR_01 ASW5040688 26.09.2012 11:32:52

CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_LOGIN_REJ 18 PECCDB_PPR_01 PETLBASIS 27.09.2012 15:20:44

SYSTEM_ON_COMMIT_INTERRUPTED 1 PECCDB_PPR_01 KKO5030139 28.09.2012 12:31:09

LIST_TOO_MANY_LPROS 2 PECCDB_PPR_01 JKP5040684 28.09.2012 12:31:48

OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED 1 PECCDB_PPR_01 BS5022143 29.09.2012 13:29:15

SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC 1 PECCDB_PPR_01 SAD5040660 30.09.2012 09:27:05

DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR 2 PECCCI_PPR_02 NK5002104 30.09.2012 09:37:25

DYNPRO_FIELD_CONVERSION 279 PECCCI_PPR_02 UPL5022144 30.09.2012 12:21:32

RAISE_EXCEPTION 6 PECCCI_PPR_02 MMA5030067 30.09.2012 13:58:46

TIME_OUT 23 PECCDB_PPR_01 SP5024025 30.09.2012 16:56:43

MESSAGE_TYPE_X 2 PECCDB_PPR_01 SSK5040571 30.09.2012 17:54:35

TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED 9 PECCDB_PPR_01 SP5030228 30.09.2012 22:26:56

Name of runtime Error(s)

Total of Error(s)

Server (e.g.) User (e.g.)Date (e.g.)

Time (e.g.)

Critical security issues were detected in your system. See the information in the following checks.

Users Authorized to Display all Tables

Users Authorized to Start all Reports

Users Authorized to Debug / Replace

Users Authorized to Display Other Users Spool Request

Users Authorized to Administer RFC Connections

Users Authorized to Reset/Change User Passwords

Rating Check

Page 17 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 18: EWA_PPR

When checking the authorization checks, the system deems it critical if multiple users have the respective checked authorization in a client. In the context of these checks, critical means:

* More than 75 users are authorized in a client

* More than 10% of the users (at least 10) have the checked authorization in a client. (That is, an absolute figure of 10 or fewer users is ignored by the rating.)

As soon as this limit is exceeded in at least one client, the system assigns a yellow rating to the

check. This does not include clients 000 and 066. A red rating is not assigned.

We offer a Security Optimization Self-Service. This service is provided free of charge in the current version of SAP Solution Manager. We recommend that you make use of this service.

For more information, see SAP Service Marketplace at http://www.service.sap.com/SOS .

For further information about these checks (for example, about rating rules) refer to SAP Note 863362 .

7.1 Users Authorized to Display all Tables

Unauthorized access to sensitive data is possible if too many users have this authorization. The mentioned number of users for each client has the checked authorization.

Evaluated Risk - High

Recommendation: Use the Profile Generator (PFCG) to correct roles and/or transactions

SU02 (Maintain Profiles) / SU03 (Maintain Authorizations) to correct profiles and authorizations, depending on your environment. With the authorization info system (SUIM), you can check the results. For this check, you should take a look at the roles or profiles that include the authorization objects listed below.

Authorization objects: Object 1: S_TCODE with TCD=SE16, TCD=SE16N, TCD=SE17, TCD=SM30, or TCD=SM31 Object 2: S_TABU_DIS with ACTVT = 03 or 02 and DICBERCLASS = *

7.2 Users Authorized to Start all Reports

With this authorization, critical functions and reports that do not contain own authorization checks can be executed. The mentioned number of users for each client has the checked authorization.

Evaluated Risk - High

001 2 3

300 29 173

310 10 11

Client User Count Valid Users Rating

001 2 3

300 44 173

310 10 11

Client User Count Valid Users Rating

Page 18 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 19: EWA_PPR

Recommendation: Use the Profile Generator (PFCG) to correct roles and/or transactions SU02 (Maintain Profiles) / SU03 (Maintain Authorizations) to correct profiles and authorizations, depending on your environment. With the authorization info system (SUIM),

you can check the results. For this check, you should take a look at the roles or profiles that include the authorization objects listed below.

Authorization objects: Object 1: S_TCODE with TCD=SE38 or TCD=SA38 or TCD=SC38 Object 2: S_PROGRAM with P_ACTION=SUBMIT P_GROUP=*

7.3 Users Authorized to Debug / Replace

This authorization provides access to data and functions, since any authorization check that is built in ABAP can be bypassed. In addition, you can change data during processing, which may lead to inconsistent results. The mentioned number of users for each client has the checked

authorization.

Evaluated Risk - High

Recommendation: Use the Profile Generator (PFCG) to correct roles and/or transactions SU02 (Maintain Profiles) / SU03 (Maintain Authorizations) to correct profiles and

authorizations, depending on your environment. With the authorization info system (SUIM), you can check the results. For this check, you should take a look at the roles or profiles that include the authorization objects listed below.

Authorization objects: Object 1: S_DEVELOP with ACTVT=02 (change) and OBJTYPE=DEBUG

Note: If you do not want to disable development in your system, you have to exclude the

OBJTYPE=DEBUG with ACTVT=02 from the profile and allow any other object type for S_DEVELOP. This means that development and debugging with visualization is still possible. You can achieve this by linking 2 authorizations to the object S_DEVELOP: one with all object

types (except for "DEBUG") and all activities, and another for the object type DEBUG only and all activities (except for 02).

8 Hardware Capacity

9 Database Settings

001 2 3

300 50 173

310 10 11

Client User Count Valid Users Rating

We have checked your system for potential CPU or memory bottlenecks and found that the hardware of your database and application servers is sufficient for the current workload.

PECCCI 50 06.09.2012 0 0

ServerMax. CPU load [%]

Date RatingRAM [MB]

Max. Paging [% of RAM]

Date Rating

Page 19 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 20: EWA_PPR

9.1 Load per user

The following table provides an overview of the load caused by different database users.

Listed for each database user is the: (a) Percentage of executed statements (b) Number of block reads from disk (indicative for the I/O load caused by this database user) (c) Number of buffers accessed

(d) Number of records returned as obtained from the shared pool (Oracle view V$SQL) at the time of the download

The first line with the name TOTAL indicates the total number of (a), (b), (c) and (d) for all the user names.

9.2 Database Parameters for PPR

We noticed that the following database parameters, which are currently active in your system, do not follow our standard recommendations. These standard recommendations cannot take into account possible special aspects for your system. Deviations from those standard recommendations may be necessary in your case. We therefore advise you to discuss theses

parameter settings in your next Service session.

9.2.0.1 Database Parameters

We have detected some problems with the settings of the database. These settings may affect performance.

Missing Indexes

Database Key Performance Indicators

Setup of the Temporary Tablespace

Database Parameters

Optimizer Statistics

Automatic stats creation

Rating Check

total (not a user name!)

128525900 2146638046 5949837482 1403846087

SAPSR3 99% 100% 99% 100%

OPS$PPRADM 0% 0% 1% 0%

SYS 1% 0% 0% 0%

ORACLE_OCM 0% 0% 0% 0%

Load per user (percentages)

User name Executions Disk reads Buffer getsRows

processed

Note for Oracle parameter settings

Note number Description

Page 20 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 21: EWA_PPR

See SAP Notes 830576 and 651060 to confirm the correct configuration of

PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS. If it is configured correctly, then ignore the yellow rating for this parameter.

If you use replication in your system do not change the setting of parameter

1238487 Update of threshold values of database system check

830576 Parameter recommendations for Oracle 10g

Note for Oracle parameter settings

Note number Description

_fix_controlBug fix control parameter

5705630:ON, 5765456:3,

6221403:ON, 6329318:ON, 6399597:ON, 6

Please check SAP note 830576

max_dump_file_size

Maximum size of the optimizer

trace file

UNLIMITEDPlease check SAP note 830576

optimizer_index_cachingAdjust the usage of

nested loops

0Please check SAP note

830576

optimizer_index_cost_adj

Percentage of the

calculated index costs

100Please check SAP note 830576

parallel_execution_message_size

Parallel Query: Size of messages for parallel

execution

2152Please check SAP note 830576

parallel_max_servers

Parallel Query:

Maximum number of parallel execution

servers

65Please check SAP note 830576

Parameters DescriptionCurrent

value

Recommended

value

parallel_threads_per_cpu

Number of parallel execution processes/threads per CPU

2Please check SAP note

830576

processes

Maximum number of database shadow/background

processes

80

Please check

SAP note 830576

replication_dependency_trackingProduce information for the Replication

Server

TRUEPlease check SAP note

830576

Parameters DescriptionCurrent value

Recommended value

Page 21 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 22: EWA_PPR

'replication_dependency_tracking', otherwise you can switch it off.

9.2.0.2 Parameter EVENT

To provide special functionality or control system behavior, Oracle has a number of events. These can be activated in the configuration file and/or dynamically in the server manager or sqlplus.

In general, these events and parameters should be activated on request only. When they are no longer needed, they should be removed. However, it might be necessary to activate some events during normal database operation.

The following table displays the values for the parameter "event" as found in your system:

The following table lists events that may have to be activated. Please check the mentioned SAP Notes for details.

The following table lists events we found to be activated in your system, but which should only

be activated in special circumstances. Please check whether there are special reasons to set these events. If they are no longer needed, they should be removed.

sessions

Maximum number

of concurrent database sessions

96Please check SAP note 830576

shared_pool_reserved_size

Part of Shared

Pool for large statements

278132686Please check SAP note 830576

Parameters DescriptionCurrent value

Recommended value

event 10027 trace name context forever, level 1

10028 trace name context forever, level 1

10142 trace name context forever, level 1

10183 trace name context forever, level 1

10411 trace name context forever, level 1

10629 trace name context forever, level 32

10891 trace name context forever, level 1

38068 trace name context forever, level 100

14532 trace name context forever, level 1

38068 trace name context forever, level 100

38085 trace name context forever, level 1

38087 trace name context forever, level 1

44951 trace name context forever, level 1024

Parameter Current Value

10191 128221Increased memory consumption with Oracle >8.0.X

10162 977319 Incorrect values in Oracle 10.2 (II)

EventNote number for Event

Description

Event

Page 22 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 23: EWA_PPR

10 Database Administration

10.1 Database Growth

The following figure shows the development of the size of your database in GB.

An overview of the freespace development of your database in GB is shown here.

10142

10411

38085

44951

Event

In the checks performed, problems regarding the administration of your database were found.

Database Growth

Backup Frequency

Archive Frequency

Freespace in Tablespaces

Space Critical Objects

brconnect -f check (sapdba -check) schedule

Multibyte Character Sets

Rating Check

Page 23 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 24: EWA_PPR

The following table shows you the current size and the monthly growth of your database in GB.

10.2 Freespace in Tablespaces

We checked your system for tablespaces that may overflow in the near future.

10.2.1 Tablespaces - Autoextend Limit

You have set the 'autoextend' option for some tablespaces to a limited value. More than 80% of the limited size is already used.

31.10.2011 555,46 5,44

30.11.2011 561,01 5,55

30.12.2011 564,76 3,75

31.01.2012 569,89 5,13

29.02.2012 575,72 5,83

31.03.2012 580,51 4,79

30.04.2012 588,99 8,48

31.05.2012 602,56 13,57

30.06.2012 610,18 7,62

31.07.2012 615,92 5,74

31.08.2012 625,40 9,48

30.09.2012 627,98 2,58

Date Current Size in GB Monthly Growth in GB

PSAPSR3 630824960 52308608 1454695 91 1,547,444,224 37

Tablespace Size (KB)Free

(KB)

Avg. Chg/Week (KB)

%-

UsedAutoExt

%-Used

after AutoExt

Page 24 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 25: EWA_PPR

Recommendation: Increase the limit, or use SAPDBA to add a new data file to the tablespaces of the table above. Implementation: To determine the size needed, consider the tablespaces' history of storage

usage. Once a data file has been added, back up the extended tablespace. This ensures that the new state of the database can be recovered.

10.3 Oracle Release

We recommend that you install the latest Oracle patch set as soon as possible (see SAP Note

415900). Check SAP Note 871735 regularly for the latest patch set for Oracle 10.2.0. Note that in addition to the patch set, further bug fixes may be available and recommended. Refer to the following SAP Note(s):

11 Database server load from

expensive SQL statements - PPR

The table above shows the cumulative load of the problematic statements identified. If the database has been inactive for at least one day before the analysis is performed, the information

provided may not be accurate.

If the rating in the table is RED, we detected expensive SQL statements that cause a high load on your SAP system.

If the rating in the table is YELLOW, we detected some expensive SQL statements.

If the rating in the table is GREEN, the analysis of your system's SQL statement cache detected no significant problems.

The following table lists the load of each expensive SQL statement individually. The load of the

statement is evaluated against the current load in the database and the total load since startup. A more technical explanation is available in SAP Note 551646. The database administrator should conduct a detailed analysis, or you may prefer to order an EarlyWatch or Remote Performance analysis with focus "SQL Statement optimization".

The Technical Performance Optimization service is also available. This service is available within an

SAP Support Engagement only.

10.2.0 871096Oracle Database 10g - Patchsets/Patches for 10.2.0

Patch set

SAP Note number

Description

The expensive SQL statements that we have identified cause a significant load on the database server. This results in performance problems not only for the transactions that execute these statements but also for other users.

For further details on the rating of this check, refer to SAP Note 551646.

30 26 31

Database Load From Expensive Statements

Rating Buffer Load [%] Disk Load [%] CPU Load [%]

Page 25 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 26: EWA_PPR

Note: If an object name in this table contains the character "/", it may be a statement to a join. If an object does not exist in the ABAP dictionary (transaction SE12) with the listed object name, check for each part of the join (items separated by "/").

11.1 Analysis of DB SQL CACHE on

11.1.1 Access on WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2

Statement Data:

SELECT

"MBLNR" , "MJAHR" , "BUDAT" , "CPUTM" , "USNAM" , "TCODE2" , "VGART" , "XABLN" , "BKTXT" , "ZEILE_I" , "BWART_I" , "SOBKZ_I" , "MATNR_I" , "WERKS_I" , "LGORT_I" , "LIFNR_I" , "MENGE_I" , "MEINS_I" , "DMBTR_I" , "WAERS_I" , "EBELN_I" , "EBELP_I" , "LFBNR_I" , "LFBJA_I" , "SMBLN_I" , "SJAHR_I" , "XAUTO_I"

FROM

"WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "WERKS_I" = :A1 AND "BWART_I" IN ( :A2 , :A3 , :A4 , :A5 , :A6 , :A7 , :A8 , :A9 , :A10 , :A11 ) AND "SOBKZ_I" IN ( :A12 , :A13 )&

Execution Plan

(From: V$SQL_PLAN addr= C000000249BAE898 hash= 793605046 sql_id 7nuw4xwrnuw

SELECT STATEMENT Estimated Costs= 201,456 Estimated Rows= 0 Optimizer: ALL_ROWS

5 HASH JOIN

Estimated Costs= 201,456 Estimated Rows= 90,406 Access predicates:

WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2 0 1 8 57 13187401

WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2 1 0 6 71798 17340181

TRFCQOUT 17 25 4 16934 126625838

BSAS 0 0 4 226 1720

TRFCQOUT 11 0 4 32908 126626272

ATP_RESB 1 0 3 107360 12857322

JEST 0 0 2 397762 23234601

Expensive SQL Statements Overview

Object NameCPU Load [%]

I/O Load [%]

Elapsed

Time [%]Executions

Records

Processed

VIEW 57 11027173 40977042 17244209 13187401

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer Gets

Records Processed

Page 26 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 27: EWA_PPR

"T0002"."MANDT"="T0001"."MANDT" AND "T0002"."MBLNR"="T0001"."MBLNR" AND "T0

002"."MJAHR"="T0001"."MJAHR" Estim. Bytes: 14,916,990

Estim. CPU-Costs = 4,615,012,309 Estim. IO-Costs = 200,691

Estim. Temp. Space: 10,314,000 Last WorkArea Mem kB: 85,890,048

3 INLIST ITERATOR

2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID MSEG

Estimated Costs= 187,224 Estimated Rows= 90,406 Filter predicates:

(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("T0002"."SOBKZ") AND "T0002"."MANDT"=:A0)

Estim. Bytes: 9,221,412

Estim. CPU-Costs = 2,035,271,777 Estim. IO-Costs = 186,887

1 INDEX RANGE SCAN MSEG~ZSU

Estimated Costs= 11,596 Estimated Rows= 180,812

Filter predicates: "T0002"."WERKS"=:A1 Access predicates:

(("T0002"."BWART"=:A2 OR "T0002"."BWART"=:A3 OR "T0002"."BWART"=:A4 OR "T00

02"."BWART"=:A5 OR "T0002"."BWART"=:A6 OR "T0002"."BWART"=:A7 OR "T0002"."B

WART"=:A8 OR "T0002"."BWART"=:A9 OR "T0002"."BWART"=:A10 OR "T0002"."BWART"

=:A11)) AND "T0002"."WERKS"=:A1 Search Columns: 2

Estim. CPU-Costs = 584,004,677 Estim. IO-Costs = 11,499

4 TABLE ACCESS FULL MKPF

Estimated Costs= 11,282 Estimated Rows= 2,383,400

Filter predicates: "T0001"."MANDT"=:A0 Estim. Bytes: 150,154,200

Estim. CPU-Costs = 1,991,797,632 Estim. IO-Costs = 10,952

Program Data:

003280 SELECT mblnr mjahr budat cputm usnam tcode2 vgart xabln bktxt 003281 zeile_i bwart_i sobkz_i 003282 matnr_i werks_i lgort_i 003283 lifnr_i menge_i meins_i dmbtr_i waers_i 003284 ebeln_i ebelp_i lfbnr_i lfbja_i 003285 smbln_i sjahr_i xauto_i 003286 INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE wt_inittab 003287 FROM wb2_v_mkpf_mseg2

ZDOCFLOW_MM 3280 KABIR PETLABAP 11.08.2010

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name Line Created By Last Changed By Last Changed On

Page 27 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 28: EWA_PPR

003288 WHERE matnr_i IN s_matnr 003289 AND werks_i = s_werks-low 003290 AND lgort_i IN s_lgort 003291 AND bwart_i IN r_total 003292 AND sobkz_i IN r_sobkz.

11.1.2 Access on WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2

Statement Data:

SELECT

"MBLNR" , "ZEILE_I" , "MJAHR" , "BUDAT" , "BWART_I" , "MATNR_I" , "WERKS_I" , "MENGE_I" , "SOBKZ_I" , "SHKZG_I" , "EBELN_I" , "EBELP_I" , "KZBEW_I" , "UMSOK_I" , "KZVBR_I"

FROM

"WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "MATNR_I" = :A1 AND "WERKS_I" = :A2 AND "BUDAT" <= :A3 OR "MANDT" = :A4 AND "MATNR_I" = :A5 AND "WERKS_I" = :A6 AND "BUDAT" <= :A7 OR "MANDT" = :A8 AND "MATNR_I" = :A9 AND "WERKS_I" = :A10 AND "BUDAT" <= :A11 OR "MANDT" =:A12 AND "MATNR_I" = :A13 AND "WERKS_I" = :A14 AND "BUDAT" <= :A15 OR "MANDT" = :A16 AND "MATNR_I" = :A17 AND "WERKS_I"= :A18 AND "BUDAT" <= :A19&

Program Data:

000724 * 000725 SELECT MBLNR ZEILE_I MJAHR BUDAT BWART_I MATNR_I WERKS_I 000726 MENGE_I SOBKZ_I SHKZG_I ebeln_i ebelp_i kzbew_i UMSOK_I KZVBR_I 000727 FROM WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2 000728 INTO TABLE IT_MSEG1 000729 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_FINAL 000730 WHERE MATNR_I = IT_FINAL-MATNR AND 000731 WERKS_I = IT_FINAL-WERKS AND 000732 BUDAT LE S_BUDAT.

11.1.3 Access on TRFCQOUT

Statement Data:

VIEW 71798 6602175 34099091 72260730 17340181

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer Gets

Records Processed

ZMM_MATERIAL_AGEING_NEW3 725 PETLABAP PETLABAP 05.09.2012

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name LineCreated By

Last Changed By

Last Changed On

Page 28 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 29: EWA_PPR

SELECT

*

FROM

"TRFCQOUT"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "QSTATE" IN ( :A1 , :A2 , :A3 , :A4 , :A5 ) AND "DEST" = :A6&

Execution Plan

(From: V$SQL_PLAN addr= C000000249BAE898 hash= 793605046 sql_id 7nuw4xwrnuw

SELECT STATEMENT Estimated Costs= 8,428 Estimated Rows= 0 Optimizer: ALL_ROWS

1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TRFCQOUT

Estimated Costs= 8,428 Estimated Rows= 699,256 Filter predicates:

("DEST"=:A6 AND "MANDT"=:A0 AND INTERNAL_FUNCTION("QSTATE"))

Estim. Bytes: 114,677,984 Estim. CPU-Costs = 1,461,277,974 Estim. IO-Costs = 8,186

Program Data:

000160 select * from trfcqout 000161 into table err_queue 000162 for all entries in err_qstate 000163 where qstate = err_qstate-qstate 000164 and dest = qdestlist-dest.

11.1.4 Access on BSAS

Statement Data:

SELECT

TABLE 16934 531757806 20893142 1020936423 126625838

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer GetsRecords Processed

LQOWKU06 160 SAP SAP 24.12.2008

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name Line Created By Last Changed By Last Changed On

TABLE 226 7418436 20179206 16040122 1720

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer Gets

Records Processed

Page 29 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 30: EWA_PPR

"MANDT" , "BUKRS" , "HKONT" , "AUGDT" , "AUGBL" , "ZUONR" , "GJAHR" , "BELNR" , "BUZEI" , "BUDAT" , "BLDAT" , "WAERS" ,"XBLNR" , "BLART" , "MONAT" , "BSCHL" , "SHKZG" , "GSBER" , "MWSKZ" , "FKONT" , "DMBTR" , "WRBTR" , "MWSTS" , "WMWST" ,"SGTXT" , "PROJN" , "AUFNR" , "WERKS" , "KOSTL" , "ZFBDT" , "XOPVW" , "VALUT" , "BSTAT" , "BDIFF" , "BDIF2" , "VBUND" ,"PSWSL" , "WVERW" , "DMBE2" , "DMBE3" , "MWST2" , "MWST3" , "BDIF3" , "RDIF3" , "XRAGL" , "PROJK" , "PRCTR" , "XSTOV" ,"XARCH" , "PSWBT" , "XNEGP" , "RFZEI" , "CCBTC" , "XREF3" , "BUPLA" , "PPDIFF" , "PPDIF2" , "PPDIF3" , "BEWAR" , "IMKEY" , "DABRZ" , "INTRENO" , "GRANT_NBR" , "FKBER" , "FIPOS" , "FISTL" , "GEBER" , "PPRCT" , "BUZID" , "AUGGJ" , "UZAWE" , "SEGMENT" , "PSEGMENT" , "FIPEX" , "PRODPER" , "QSSKZ" , "PROPMANO"

FROM

"BSAS"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "BUKRS" = :A1 AND "AUGBL" = :A2&

Execution Plan

(From: V$SQL_PLAN addr= C000000249BAE898 hash= 793605046 sql_id 7nuw4xwrnuw

SELECT STATEMENT Estimated Costs= 22,978 Estimated Rows= 0 Optimizer: ALL_ROWS

2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BSAS

Estimated Costs= 22,978 Estimated Rows= 5 Estim. Bytes: 1,535

Estim. CPU-Costs = 448,100,612 Estim. IO-Costs = 22,904

1 INDEX RANGE SCAN BSAS~0

Estimated Costs= 22,977 Estimated Rows= 5 Filter predicates: "AUGBL"=:A2

Access predicates: "MANDT"=:A0 AND "BUKRS"=:A1 AND "AUGBL"=:A2 Search Columns: 3

Estim. CPU-Costs = 448,085,140 Estim. IO-Costs = 22,903

Program Data:

002776 002777 SELECT * 002778 INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab_bsas 002779 FROM bsas " Accounting Document Segment 002780 WHERE bukrs = l_zbukr 002781 * AND belnr <> l_belnr.

11.1.5 Access on TRFCQOUT

Statement Data:

ZRFFORI01 2777 SUBHASISH ABAP 13.08.2009

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name Line Created By Last Changed By Last Changed On

Page 30 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 31: EWA_PPR

SELECT DISTINCT

"MANDT" , "QNAME" , "DEST"

FROM

"TRFCQOUT"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "DEST" = :A1 AND "NOSEND" = :A2&

Execution Plan

(From: V$SQL_PLAN addr= C000000249BAE898 hash= 793605046 sql_id 7nuw4xwrnuw

SELECT STATEMENT Estimated Costs= 2,776 Estimated Rows= 0 Optimizer: ALL_ROWS

2 HASH UNIQUE

Estimated Costs= 2,776 Estimated Rows= 424 Estim. Bytes: 8,480

Estim. CPU-Costs = 836,534,281 Estim. IO-Costs = 2,637

1 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN TRFCQOUT~3

Estimated Costs= 2,727 Estimated Rows= 349,628

Filter predicates: ("DEST"=:A1 AND "NOSEND"=:A2 AND "MANDT"=:A0)

Estim. Bytes: 6,992,560 Estim. CPU-Costs = 540,412,876 Estim. IO-Costs = 2,637

Program Data:

000143 000144 * Ermittlung der qRFC-Queues 000145 select distinct mandt qname dest 000146 from trfcqout 000147 into table qview 000148 where qname like qid_dbwcard 000149 and dest = qdestlist-dest 000150 and nosend = space.

11.1.6 Access on ATP_RESB

Statement Data:

TABLE 32908 86843 19510240 664517041 126626272

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer Gets

Records Processed

LQOWKU06 145 SAP SAP 24.12.2008

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name Line Created By Last Changed By Last Changed On

Page 31 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 32: EWA_PPR

SELECT

*

FROM

"ATP_RESB"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "MATNR" = :A1 AND "WERKS" = :A2 AND "XLOEK" = :A3 AND "KZEAR" = :A4 AND "BDTER" < :A5 AND "BDART" <> :A6 AND "SOBKZ" IN ( :A7 , :A8 ) AND "BDMNG" > "ENMNG" AND "TXTPS" = :A9 AND "SCHGT" = :A10 AND "DBSKZ" = :A11 AND ( "VORAB" IS NULL OR "VORAB" = :A12 )&

Execution Plan

(From: V$SQL_PLAN addr= C000000249BAE898 hash= 793605046 sql_id 7nuw4xwrnuw

SELECT STATEMENT Estimated Costs= 5 Estimated Rows= 0 Optimizer: ALL_ROWS

2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID RESB

Estimated Costs= 5 Estimated Rows= 1 Filter predicates:

("T0001"."TXTPS"=:A9 AND "T0001"."BDART"<>:A6 AND "T0001"."BDMNG">"T0001"."

ENMNG" AND INTERNAL_FUNCTION("T0001"."SOBKZ") AND "T0001"."SCHGT"=:A10 AND

"T0001"."DBSKZ"=:A11 AND ("T0001"."VORAB"=:A12 OR "T0001"."VORAB" IS NULL))

Estim. Bytes: 150 Estim. CPU-Costs = 39,462 Estim. IO-Costs = 5

1 INDEX RANGE SCAN RESB~M

Estimated Costs= 4 Estimated Rows= 1 Access predicates:

"T0001"."MANDT"=:A0 AND "T0001"."MATNR"=:A1 AND "T0001"."WERKS"=:A2 AND "T0

001"."XLOEK"=:A3 AND "T0001"."KZEAR"=:A4 AND "T0001"."BDTER"<:A5

Search Columns: 6 Estim. CPU-Costs = 28,686 Estim. IO-Costs = 4

Program Data:

000030 SELECT * 000031 FROM atp_resb 000032 INTO atp_resb

VIEW 107360 2860652 15833036 38297948 12857322

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer Gets

Records Processed

LATP2FR1 30 SAP SAP 13.03.2006

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name Line Created By Last Changed By Last Changed On

Page 32 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 33: EWA_PPR

000033 WHERE matnr = atpmat-matnr 000034 AND werks = atpmat-werks 000035 AND xloek = space 000036 AND kzear = space 000037 AND bdter < atpmat-endwz 000038 AND bdart <> skbed 000039 AND sobkz IN (space, sobkzk) 000040 AND bdmng > atp_resb~enmng 000041 AND txtps = space 000042 AND schgt = space 000043 AND dbskz = space 000044 AND ( vorab IS NULL 000045 OR vorab = space ).

11.1.7 Access on JEST

Statement Data:

SELECT

*

FROM

"JEST"

WHERE

"MANDT" = :A0 AND "OBJNR" IN ( :A1 , :A2 , :A3 , :A4 , :A5 )&

Execution Plan

(From: V$SQL_PLAN addr= C000000249BAE898 hash= 793605046 sql_id 7nuw4xwrnuw

SELECT STATEMENT Estimated Costs= 31 Estimated Rows= 0 Optimizer: ALL_ROWS

3 INLIST ITERATOR

2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID JEST

Estimated Costs= 31 Estimated Rows= 44 Estim. Bytes: 1,408

Estim. CPU-Costs = 326,432 Estim. IO-Costs = 31

1 INDEX RANGE SCAN JEST~0

Estimated Costs= 8 Estimated Rows= 44 Access predicates:

"MANDT"=:A0 AND (("OBJNR"=:A1 OR "OBJNR"=:A2 OR "OBJNR"=:A3 OR "OBJNR"=:A4

OR "OBJNR"=:A5)) Search Columns: 2

Estim. CPU-Costs = 151,829 Estim. IO-Costs = 8

TABLE 397762 2265410 8246947 21640375 23234601

Cache Statistics

Object Type

Total Executions

Disk Reads

Buffer Gets

Records Processed

Page 33 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 34: EWA_PPR

Program Data:

000110 SELECT * FROM JEST CLIENT SPECIFIED 000111 APPENDING TABLE JEST_BUF 000112 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN OBJNR_TAB 000113 WHERE MANDT EQ CLIENT 000114 AND OBJNR = OBJNR_TAB-OBJNR.

11.1.8 Auxiliary Storage Quality Information

The following table shows the top tables (max. 20) that have an average record length of less than 4000 bytes, more than 100 chained rows in total, and a number of chained rows that is

over 5% of the total number of rows in the table (based on the available CBO statistics).

The following table shows the top "regular" (not partitioned, empty, index organized) tables (max. 20) that have more than 1000 blocks with the lowest storage quality (based on the available CBO statistics).

The following table shows the top "type normal" indexes (max. 20) that have more than 1000 blocks with the lowest storage quality (based on the available CBO statistics).

LBSVAU14 110 SAP SAP 09.12.2004

Origin of ABAP coding

Program Name Line Created By Last Changed By Last Changed On

SNAP 40093 1558 3123752 21900735 61040 21839695

ACCTIT 14769600 561 4127316 28936758 8105972 20830786

FAGLFLEXA 38723800 224 3826040 26824501 8508647 18315853

MSEG 11138000 678 3172858 22245019 7385451 14859568

BSIS 14756000 303 2364689 16578918 4380688 12198230

RFBLG 3430600 1250 1740659 12203821 4191094 8012727

ARFCSDATA 6578400 1841 2654197 18608668 11833411 6775258

COEP 9744433 330 1292586 9062366 3149812 5912554

ACCTCR 29481600 50 760627 5332783 1468322 3864461

AUFM 4499067 205 637867 4472108 905086 3567022

CKMI1 5066300 120 425084 2980279 598655 2381624

VBDATA 31983 483 335060 2349117 15117 2334000

BSIM 4940467 78 269588 1890091 381149 1508942

QAMV 910830 488 171380 1201551 434957 766594

ALALERTDB 296720 415 118217 828824 120543 708281

APQD 17558900 734 1873649 13136219 12603312 532907

RESB 7359933 595 683774 4793964 4283711 510253

PPOIX 5592567 130 163196 1144173 715455 428718

NAST 3354067 274 179564 1258930 900750 358179

LIPS 391830 960 85577 599983 367723 232260

Tables with Fragmentation

Table Name

Rows

Average

Row Length

Blocks Kb UsedKb Needed

Kb Wasted

Page 34 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 35: EWA_PPR

All the information in this section is based on the Oracle CBO statistics. Thus if statistics are old, the data displayed may not be accurate.

12 Trend Analysis

This section contains the trend analysis for key performance indicators (KPIs). Diagrams are built week by week after activating the EarlyWatch Alert Service.

Historical data for "Transaction Activity" and "System Performance" is taken directly from workload monitor ST03 if data for less than 20 sessions has been accumulated. In this report, historical data

is taken directly from workload monitor ST03.

12.1 System Activity

The following diagrams show the system activity over time.

The "Transaction Activity" diagram below depicts transaction activity in the system over time.

- Total Activity: Transaction steps performed each week (in thousands) - Dialog Activity: Transaction steps performed in dialog task each week (in thousands)

- Peak Activity: Transaction steps (in thousands) during the peak hour; this peak hour is calculated as the hour with the maximum dialog activity in the ST03 time profile divided by 5 working days per week.

(Peak Activity is absent if "Activity Data" is taken from ST03 data directly).

TEMSGU~DAT 1275 17 265 1871 21 1

AGR_USERS~U 807 24 134 946 19 2

UST04~0 1017 36 153 1080 36 3

PLAF~0 64243 24 6237 44035 1506 3

KBKO~0 64797 26 7700 54364 1645 3

SHP_IDX_GDSI~0 1378 24 108 763 32 4

VEPVG~A 4022 24 297 2097 94 4

BSID~2 9153 22 446 3149 197 6

VBBE~0 20209 38 1558 11000 750 7

EBAN~0 69837 31 3793 26780 2114 8

BSID~5 9153 41 613 4328 366 8

KBED~1 228230 32 12600 88959 7132 8

RSEUINC~1 13935 21 460 3248 286 9

VEPVG~0 4022 76 455 3212 299 9

ARFCSSTATE~05 3222200 34 138267 976200 106987 11

KBED~0 247170 42 13560 95737 10138 11

VBMOD~0 31632 46 1798 12694 1421 11

VBDATA~0 31660 50 1816 12821 1546 12

EQBS~0 25215 26 700 4942 640 13

MDTC~0 338380 32 10900 76957 10574 14

Indexes with low Storage Quality

Index Name RowsAverage Row Length

Leaf

Blocks

Kb

Used

Kb

Needed

Storage Quality (%)

Page 35 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 36: EWA_PPR

Historical data for "Transaction Activity" is obtained directly from ST03 transaction data.

The "User Activity" diagram below shows the user activity on the system over time.

- Total Users: Total users that logged on in one week.

- Active Users: Users who performed more than 400 transaction steps in one week.

12.2 Response Times

The following diagrams show how the response time varies over time.

Page 36 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 37: EWA_PPR

The "System Performance" diagram below shows the average response time in dialog tasks for the previous week.

Historical data for "System Performance" is obtained directly from ST03 transaction data.

The "Database Performance" diagram below shows the average DB response time in dialog tasks.

The "Top 5 transactions" diagram below show the average response time in dialog tasks for the top 5 transactions.

Page 37 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 38: EWA_PPR

The "Transaction Code" table below shows the load percentage caused by the top 5 transactions.

12.3 System Operation

The following diagram or table shows important KPIs for system operation.

Note: The column 'Availability' is filled for systems with SAP Basis 4.6 and higher.

ZMM_DOCFLOW 7.6

SESSION_MANAGER 7.3

ZRECON 5.1

ZSO_PND 4.7

MIRO 4.2

Transaction Code Load (%)

Page 38 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html

Page 39: EWA_PPR

12.4 Hardware Capacity

Page 39 of 39Report

05-Oct-12saphtmlp://htmlviewer.sap.com/uWweYNUAKV6D9G0cLNwC0G/index.html


Recommended