Examining Underinvestment in Agriculture
Jessica KiesselIPA Ghana Country Director
Innovations for Poverty Action
3ie Rome - April 2012
From Research to Policy
A few models of using results:1. Organizations that IPA works with to evaluate a
program scale can scale it up afterwards2. Programs that IPA designed and evaluated are
adopted by implementing organizations in the same country
3. Programs that were evaluated and shown cost-effective are adapted to a different country/context
Examining Underinvestment is an example of the 2nd and in the process has become an iterative research project 2
3
Ghana• Maize farmers, often
intercropped with groundnut
• Light input use– MoFA recommended
package 60 cedis/acre of chemical inputs
– Sample median 7; 25%=0
• Yields– Recommended package
1000 – 1500kg/acre– Sample: 200 kg/acre
4
Why do farmers invest so little?
Typical response from farmers as to why they do not use hybrids + fertilizer?•I don’t have the money : Capital
constraint•It’s too risky – hybrids don’t do well
with too little rain: Risk averse
How can you address these problems? Cash Grants Weather Index Insurance
Examining Underinvestment in Agriculture: Empirical Design
Researchers: Chris Udry, Dean Karlan, Robert Osei, Isaac Osei-Akoto
Why do farmers underinvest in their farm?1. Hypothesis 1:
Farmers are capital constrained
2. Hypothesis 2: Farmers are risk averse
Design• Year 1:
– Capital drops– Free Weather Index
Insurance– Capital + Free Weather
Index Insurance • Year 2:
– Same groups, but price of insurance randomized
Weather Index Product - Takayua
• First weather index insurance product in Ghana
• Designed to cover maize farmers from excess rainfall and drought
• Year 1: FREE • Year 2: 1, 4, 8, 9.5, 12,
14• Capital (2009: 50
GHC/acre, 2010: 300/farmer)
7
Take up of Takayua Insurance 2010
8
0 1 4 8 9.5 12 140%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Price per Acre (GH Cedis)(Act. Fair = 9.5)
Take up of Free insurance in 2009 was 100 percent
EUI – Initial results• Farmers substantially increase their investment in
farming with I, especially with both I and K. There is no evidence that farmers respond to K.
• For a K + I farmers: • Increased cash expenditures for field prep and
chemicals is about half the value of K• Increase household labor substantially• Cultivated land goes up as well, in proportion to
other inputs. Virtually no intensification• Output increases enough to cover the additional
purchased inputs, but not enough to cover the value of additional labor.
9
Implications
• Relaxing the credit constraint alone will not sway farmers to increase farm investments
• Implications for providing capital in cash and/or inputs to farmers• Insurance engenders increased investment and
harvest value• This effects is even higher for those who received
insurance and capital. • Households are willing to pay for insurance despite
the basis risks
The 2010 search for reinsurance:Agricultural Insurance in Ghana
Outreach Activities to share results and lessons learned marketing:
• Conference presentations• Project description, proposals, policy
docs• Meetings
Players:• Ghana Insurers Association• Insurance Companies• The National Insurance Commission
(NIC) • The German International Cooperation
(GIZ)• Ghana Re, Swiss Re
11
Encouraging development of Commercial Agricultural Insurance • Lessons learned on marketing and our
results on take up and encouraged development of commercial agricultural insurance
• 2011 Pilot Drought Index Insurance designed for maize farmers in northern Ghana
• Covered by GIA, Ghana Re and Swiss Re• Sold to banks to cover aggregate loan
portfolios• And just in the knick of time EUI farmers
12
13
GIA: Drought Index Product -Sanzali
GHC 3 GHC 6 GHC 9 01020304050607080 70.1
55.7
37.4
Demand (%) - Tamale & Savelugu
**note – charts have different scales
GHC 3 GHC 6 GHC 982848688909294 93.2
89.3
86.4
Demand (%) - Walewale
• Considerable challenges remain in scaling up insurance• Additional research with GIA is planned to provide
information on:– Willingness to pay – Product performance– Basis risk– Farmer perception of product– Agricultural investment, overall wellbeing
• In 2012: We will test group marketing and variations in education
• In the future: we plan to do an impact evaluations with cost benefit analyses of potentially sustainable models of scaling up
Scaling up Agric Insurance
Examining Underinvestment – Phase 2
Identified constraints to agricultural investment
Tested role of risk
and capital
Shared initial
results
Explore questions
on profitabili
ty• Conducted
focus groups & background research
• Consulted local experts and stakeholders
• Identified central questions
• Worked with informal partners to design treatments
• Provided capital and insurance
• Collected information on investment and yields
• Presented key results – hosted conference, met with stakeholders
• Sought feedback on results
• Identified additional constraints
• Conduct operational pilots on input and education programs
• Work with MoFA to test methods to improve profitability
2009 – 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 – ____
What are the barriers to profitable returns in a context of reduced risk?• Test intensified agric extension and increased access to high return tech• 2012 Operational Pilot - Intensified agricultural extension with MoFA
EUI Team
16