EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized
forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was
institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.
Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of
contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the
implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main
strategy to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary
communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming
them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop
subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened their
commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation of these
subprojects.
The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is in Zamboanga del Sur
and covers 11 barangays within the Municipality of Bayog. Sibugay River which is
responsible for irrigating farmlands of Sibugay Province and Zamboanga del Sur is
also within the Subproject site.
The implementation of the Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
activities stands out among other components as it manifests the People’s
Organization’s zeal and commitment to go beyond targets and work for the success
of the Project. From the original target of 2,020 hectares, the Bayog Watershed
Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc. (BAWARSA, Inc.) was able to develop a
total area of 2,164.09 hectares or an excess of 144.09 hectares without the
benefit of any additional budget for nursery and plantation establishment. For this
achievement, an expansion area was granted to BAWARSA Inc. covering an
additional six barangays with a total area of 2,520 hectares. This, too had been
exceeded as revealed in the final validation showing an excess of 20 hectares to
make the overall accomplishment of 2,540 hectares.
Involvement in CSD activities spelled jobs for members of the communities
as it generated 404, 601 man days as compared to a mere 186, 045 man days before
the Project was implemented.
On the other hand, some PHP 2,214 million was generated by BAWARSA Inc.
for its Capital Build-up/Community Forest Development Funds from which financing
of three livelihood projects were drawn.
In terms of income, employment opportunities as well as involvement in
livelihood opportunities raised the annual average household income of the
community from PHP 42,000.00 before the project to PHP 68,400.00 after the
project or an increase of about 63%.
The farm-to-market road and the hanging bridge on the other hand support
the livelihood projects as they facilitate ease in mobility and transport of livelihood
products to places of commerce.
The success of the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject has become
a household word not only in Zamboanga del Sur but in the entire Region 9 for the
financial and environmental improvement it has wrought on the people and the
ecosystem.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------ i
I. Subproject Description ----------------------------------------------------- 1
1. Purpose/ Objectives
A. Original
B. Modifications
2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
A. Comparison of Original and
Actual Scope and Dimensions
B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification
Of Scope and Dimensions
C. Contribution of Subproject to
Relevant (Sub) Sectors
II. Subproject Implementation ----------------------------------------------- 14
1. Organizations for Implementing
Subproject
2. Implementation Period
3. Subproject Cost
4. Comments on Performance of
AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors
5. Other Matters Relating to
Subproject Implementation
III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------------------------------------ 26
Relating to Recommendation(s)
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance
Of the Subproject Facilities --------------------------------------------- 26
1. Present Condition of Facilities
2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance
3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure
For Operation and Maintenance (by year)
4. Maintenance Method
V. Benefits Derived from the Project --------------------------------------- 35
1. Indirect Effects
VI. Conclusions and Recommendations --------------------------------------- 37
LIST OF TABLES:
Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO -------------------------------------- 38
Table 2 : Subproject Performance -------------------------------------------- 39
Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments ----------------- 40
Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO ------------------------------- 41
Table 5 : Consumer Store and Rice Trading Livelihood Project ------------- 42
Table 5a : Trucking (Service/Hire) Livelihood Project ---------------------- 43
Table 6 : Subproject Status Report ----------------------------------------- 44
Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate per Hectare per activity ---------------------- 45
Table 8 : Cost Estimate for Community Organizing per activity ------------ 46
Table 9a : Agroforestry Cost Estimate per Activity ------------------------- 47
Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation per Activity --------------- 48
Table 9c : Rattan Plantation Cost Estimate per Activity --------------------- 49
Table 9d: Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation per Activity ------------------- 50
Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate per activity ------------ 51
Table 11 : Infrastructure Project --------------------------------------------- 52
Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan ------------------------------------ 53
ANNEXES:
1. Organizational Structure ---------------------------------------------- 57
1a. SMP
1b1-1b2. CO
1c. PO
1d1-1d2-1d3. M & E Contractor
1e. SUSIMO
1f. Infrastructure
2. Pictures --------------------------------------------------------------------- 66
3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------------------------------------------------- 68
1
SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
Of
Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject
Forestry Sector Project
Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135
I. Subproject Description
The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is located in the Municipality
of Bayog, Province of Zamboanga del Sur. It is geographically situated at 123o
02’ 36.60” to 123o 07’ 2.50” east longitude and 7o 50’ 34.96” to 7o 55’ 18.40”
north latitude and falls within the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) No.
86700 – 87600 north and UTM No. 50400 – 51300 east. The Subproject is
bounded on the north by the Municipality of Sindangan,1 Province of Zamboanga
del Norte, on the east by the Municipality of Kumalarang and Lakewood, on the
south by the Municipality of Buug, and on the west by the Municipality of
Diplahan, Siay and Kabasalan, all of Zamboanga Sibugay. With an approved area
of 2,520 hectares for
Comprehensive Site Development
(CSD), accomplishment reached
2,540 hectares covering 11
barangays: Poblacion, Kahayagan,
Balumbunan, Depase, Matun-og,
Kanipaan, Baking, Conacon,
Datagan, Camp Blessing and
Dagum.
The major access to the Subproject site is through the provincial road
connecting the Municipality of Bayog to the nearby municipalities. This road
system connects Barangay Depase, Poblacion, and Kahayagan where some
portions of the Subproject site are located. The main portion of the
Subproject can be reached through a footbridge from Barangays Kahayagan
and Supon. The other portions of the Subproject within Barangay Balumbunan,
Matun-og, Dagum, Camp Blessing, Kanipaan, Conacon and Baking are accessible
through hiking or horse ride from Barangay Supon across the Sibuguey river.
The Subproject is part of the public domain and declared as timberland under
the government’s legal classification status. A Community-Based Forest
Management Agreement (CBFMA) covering a total area of 3,326.53 hectares
was awarded to the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association
(BAWARSA) Inc. on April 02, 2003.
2
1. Purpose/Objectives
A) Original (at the time of appraisal)
a. To develop a total area of 2,020 hectares for reforestation, agro
forestry, rattan plantation and stream bank stabilization using
bamboo by the community people themselves within the five (5)
barangays covered by the subproject;
b. To provide employment and alternative livelihood opportunities
for the subproject participants; and
c. To strengthen the local communities to enable them to manage
the watershed on a sustainable basis.
B) Modification
a. Modified purpose/objectives
a. To develop a total area of 2,520 hectares for reforestation,
agro forestry, rattan plantation and stream bank stabilization
using bamboo by the community people within the 11 barangays
of the Subproject;
b. Reasons for the modification
The target area for CSD was originally pegged at 2,020
hectares. However, BAWARSA Inc. was able to establish
/develop a total area of 2,164.09 hectares or an excess of
144.09 hectares. With this performance, an expansion area of
355.91 hectares was granted to the Association, which led to the
inclusion of another six barangays with a total area of 2,520
hectares.
2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions
a.1. Please check: There has been (revision ad/ or modification or
no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and
dimensions.
ITEM Original Scope and
Dimensions (At the time
of appraisal/Planned)
Revised/Modified
(Actual)
1.REFORESTATION/WATERSHED
/CBFM
3
A. Survey, mapping and Planning
1 Year
B. Community Organizing 1
2 years
C. CSD ( 3 years)
1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL
a. Trail and footpath
Graded Trail
Footpath
Model Farm
2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES 2
a. Agro forestry
b. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo
d.2. Rattan
D.3. Plantation Sp.
3. Inventory of residual forest
4. Income Enhancement
Subproject
2,000 ha
(August 28, 1995-
August 28, 1996)
2,020 ha
(April 10, 1997- April
1999)
* IEC Activities
* Assistance to CSD
activities
* Assistance on
Networking and Linkage
* Organizational
Development and
Capacity Building
* Livelihood Project
implementation
* Monitoring and
Evaluation
2,020 ha (1997-2000)
52,504 meters
52,504 meters
550 ha
53 ha
717 ha
700 ha
N/A
N/A
2,000 ha
(August 28, 1995-
August 28, 1996)
2,020 ha
(October20, 1999-
November 2000)
* IEC Activities
* Assistance to CSD
activities
* Assistance on
Networking and
Linkage
* Organizational
Development and
Capacity Building
* Livelihood Project
implementation
* Monitoring and
Evaluation
2,520 ha (1997-2003)
87,213.50 meters
87,213.50 meters
1 h
a
.
789.06 ha
54.75 ha
720.97 ha
955.22 ha
N/A
N/A
4
5. Infrastructure (CSD)
Bunkhouse
Look-out Tower
Fire lines
Fire Breaks
Hedgerows
Nursery Facilities
Shed House
Stock Room
Water tank
3. INFRASTRUCTURE
COMPONENT
Farm-to-Market Road
Rehab.
Construction of Bridge
Repair of Bridge
C. MONITORING &
EVALUATION
Year 1 (2000)
(Physical Validation)
Year 2
*(Physical Validation
Component)
2 units
4 units
700 ha
700 ha
Inspection Chart
Mapping (ICM)
Inspection Chart
Mapping (ICM)
4 units
5 units
177,995 sq. m
1,555.91 ha
1,000.00 ha
1 unit
1 unit
1 unit
1 unit
6.76 km.
1 unit
1 unit
2,020 ha
Feb.28, 2000-
February 28, 2001
2,520 ha
May 15, 2002-
November 2002
* Verification of
Boundaries,
monuments, and block
corner posts
* Seedling production
inventory analysis
* Survival Counting
with 20% sampling
intensity, including
mapping of developed
areas
* Height and diameter
measurement,
assessment of overall
health/appearance
5
*(Institutional & Project
Benefit Assessment
Component)
2. SUSIMO
Equipment provided to the
Office 3
* Inspection of
Physical infrastructure
2,520 has
December23, 2002-
June 2003
* Assessment on the
overall development of
the PO
* Assessment on the
capability of the PO to
pursue sustainable
resource management
and sustain its
livelihood initiatives
* Identification of
various
issues/problems/const
raints related to the
development and
strengthening of the
PO and the relevant
support systems
* Identification of
immediate benefits of
the project and
evidences that would
indicate the
intermediate and long-
term socio-economic
and environmental
impacts.
2 units GPS
2 units Forester
Transit
3 units Bruton Compass
3 units Binoculars
3 units Abney hand
level
1 unit Rain Gauge
3 units Radio
Transceiver
1 unit Printer
1 unit Typewriter
6
Equipment Locally Purchased
Researches Conducted
SUSIMO:
Trainings Conducted 4
Manual
1 unit GIS Maptitude
1 unit UPS
1 unit Computer
1 unit Generator
1 unit Polar Planimeter
2 units handheld Radio
1 unit Base Radio
2 units Steel Tape
Nylon
1 unit Charger
1 unit Service Truck
KIA
Office Tables w/
chairs
Drafting Table
Camera Cannon
Steel Cabinet
Tape Recorder
Medicine Cabinet
Fire fighting Equipment
Brush Cutter
Gasullete Lamp
Flashlight
Calculator
Triangular Scale
T-Square
Lettering Set
Diameter Tape
Steel Tape
Steadler Pen
Triangle
NONE
1. Orientation
Course for
SUSIMO staff
of Watershed
Subproject
Sites
2. Orientation
Workshop on
7
Others:
Infrastructure Facilities
Turned-Over to DENR-
SUSIMO
Others
the
implementation
of a Capital
Build-up System
for CBFMP
3. Watershed and
Mangrove
Orientation
Course and
other related
guidelines on
FSP
4. FSP-
Orientation
Course
5. On-The-Job
Training on
GIS/GPS
Operation
6. FSP Phase
out/Phase in
Planning
workshop
1 unit Camera
1 unit Air
conditioner
1 unit Dining Table
3 units Office
Tables
9 units Monobloc
Chairs
1 unit Bamboo Bed
1 unit Bed Foam
1 unit Gas Range
1 unit Gasul Tank
1 unit SUSIMO
Office 1 Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs
2 Table 2 Details the subproject performance in terms of area planted
3 Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO
4 Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO staff
B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions
8
b.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope
and dimensions.
Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc.)
Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate
Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost
Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical
condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil
condition, etc.)
Natural disaster/unseasonable weather
Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing
Agency
Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned
(e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies,
etc.)
Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency,
fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)
Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems
Procurement problems
Performance of contractor/supplier
Performance of consultant
Change in construction period
Others
B.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)
Revision of the superior plan
Comprehensive Site Development:
The establishment and development of additional areas by the PO in excess
of original target of 144.91 hectares triggered changes not only in the CSD
scope but in almost all subcomponents as well. The excellent performance
achieved without any additional budget in nursery and plantations
establishment, was rewarded with the grant of additional expansion area of
355.91 hectares or a total revised target area of 2,520 hectares. However,
during the final validation and survey of the established plantations, it was
found out that the PO had even exceeded the revised target area with its
accomplishment of 2,540 hectares or an excess of 20 hectares.
Consequently, other targets of infrastructures like bunkhouses, look-out
towers, graded trails and footpaths were increased for better monitoring and
protection of plantation. Likewise, activities perceived necessary in the
Subproject were also established such as fire lines and model farm for fire
protection.
9
Community Organizing:
There were changes in the contractor for CO. The two-year CO contract was
originally awarded to the Technological Advocates for Agro Forest Programs
Association or TAFPA. However, it was cancelled/terminated due to non-
compliance with the provisions of the contract. The CO contract was then
rewarded to ZAMBAYUGMI for the continuation of the remaining activities
left out by TAFPA. The remaining activities were completed in November
2000.
Infrastructure (added component of FSP):
When the NFDO together with the Technical Assistance team conducted an
assessment of each subproject in 2000, they assessed that inclusion of the
infrastructure support project especially livelihood development within
Forestry Sector Project will provide great help to the PO. This finding led to
the addition of the said component.
SUSIMO Creation
The Project Management Office initiated the Creation of SUSIMO to
provide effective and efficient management of the Subproject on the
field/ground level. The issuance of Department Administrative Order (DAO)
No. 2000-65 entitled “ Guidelines Governing the Creation of Subproject Site
Management Office and its Institutionalization in the Forestry Sector
Project Implementation”, mandated the Regional and the Field Offices to
install the SUSIMO for each subproject site and be manned by competent
DENR permanent personnel. The SUSIMOs were provided with facilities and
other equipment as well as capability building trainings for its staff for
better subproject administration.
Substantial revision of design due to the unpredictable physical condition
at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.)
Some of the identified and recommended species in the original plan were
changed to species preferred by the members of the community themselves
because of suitability of chosen species to the area and economic viability.
Under the reforestation component, Eucalyptus Camaldulensis and Gmelina
species were changed to Mahogany. For the Agro forestry Component, Mango
and Jackfruit species were changed to Durian and lanzones.
C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)
c.1. (Sub) Sector (s) to which the Subproject belongs
10
Electric power and Gas Telecommunication Social services
(Multipurpose) Dams Telecommunication Water supply
Power Plants Broadcasting Sewerage
Transmission lines Education
Distribution Systems Irrigation and Flood control Health
Gas Irrigation Tourism
Others Flood control
Transportation Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Roads Agriculture and Forestry
Bridges Fisheries
Railways
Airport Mining and Manufacturing
Ports Mining
Marine Transportation Manufacturing
Others (Foot Bridge and employment)
c.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)
Item Description
1. Subproject Development Plan
2. Livelihood Projects
Through the Socio-Institutional and
Bio-physical Components of the
Subproject, local communities will
become partners and active
developers in the enhancement and
protection of the watershed
through various activities.
Relatively, improvement in
vegetative cover within the area will
enhance the good quality and yield
of water resources within and
adjacent areas.
Involvement of the community in
plantation establishment will provide
them immediate employment thus
eliminating destructive activities
that contribute to the
deforestation of the watershed
area.
Implementation of viable livelihood
projects will result to an increase in
the household income of the
community. A PO will be organized
and capacitated to establish
11
3. Provision of Community Based
Forest management Agreement as a
Land Tenure Right over the area.
4. Irrigation System Support
linkages with other government and
non-government organizations to
enhance the livelihood projects as
additional source of income while
waiting for the harvest of forest
and non-forest products.
Sense of ownership over the
awarded CBFM area would
encourage active participation of
the community members in deterring
illegal activities and cutting of tree
species within the area. Moreover,
there would be ripple effects as
surrounding communities get
inspired with the showcase and
would want to embark on similar
undertakings. It will create
environmental awareness in adjacent
communities.
Irrigation Systems, downstream key
production areas, farm lands
households, industrial and
commercial establishments will be
serviced by the watershed in terms
of supplying their water
requirements. This will create
positive impact to the community,
thus create awareness and prod
communities to pursue the
protection and continuous
development of the watershed.
c.3. Present situation and outlook for the future
Item Description
1. The community and its Tenurial
Instrument.
BAWARSA, Inc. was organized
primarily to manage and develop the
Bayog Watershed Subproject. During
its implementation, the members were
taught proper management and
sustainable development of the
watershed with the help of DENR-
SUSIMO and NGOs. They were
12
2. Livelihood Projects implemented
by the Association of
BAWARSA5
3. BAWARSA Women’s
Organization
4. Infrastructure
provided several trainings and
workshops on technology aspects,
financial management, livelihood
establishment and effective
organizational management. These
skills are also meant to guide them in
the proper management of their
resources in the future as they were
already awarded with CBFMA area
giving them the right to manage and
develop a total area of 3,326.53
hectares for 25 years and renewable
for another 25 years.
The PO established three livelihood
projects; Consumers Store, Rice
Trading and Transportation Services
with a total CFDF/CBU amounting to
PHP 2,214,987.75. The PO is inspired
to implement other viable livelihood
projects in the future that will ensure
high rate of employment generation
within the community.
The women sector of the subproject
was organized last November, 2003
and registered with the Department
of Labor and Employment (DOLE) on
January 19, 2004 to implement other
possible livelihood. The creation of
Women’s Organization is envisioned to
create more employment opportunities
within the community and it is also
envisioned to conduct community
services like; non-formal education,
information dissemination, facilitate
trainings, among others.
The development of infrastructure
projects (Farm to Market Road and
Hanging Bridge) greatly improved the
mobility and facilitated ease in
transporting agricultural and livelihood
products of the PO to the nearby
market and municipalities.
13
5. Support of LGU
6. Project Development
The support and services rendered by
the Provincial and Municipal LGU to
the Subproject give an assurance that
the project of the PO will be sustained
in the future. Moreover, with the
support, it is envisioned that
maintenance of the farm-to-market
will be sustained.
All activities set forth in the approved
contract and WFP of the PO were
completed and have exceeded the
target especially in the reforestation
component. With a high survival rate
of the established plantation, it is
expected that the water yield and
quality will improve as a result of good
vegetative cover; thus, further
reducing the risk of flashfloods, soil
sedimentation and soil erosion. It will
also provide enough supply of water to
support irrigation system for
downstream communities. Currently,
the Project supports a newly
constructed irrigation dam of the
National Irrigation Administration
(NIA) for farmlands within the
municipality of Bayog and its adjacent
places.
The construction of CSD
infrastructures more than the
required target shows a strong
commitment of the PO to make the
project successful.
With the continuous maintenance and
protection of their established
tree/reforestation, agro-forestry,
rattan and bamboo plantations, it is
expected that high plantation yield
and sustainability of the project will
be attained in the future.
5 Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood project being implemented by the POs
14
II. Subproject Implementation
1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject
Function in the Name of Organization Reasons for
Subproject
Implementation
(1) Original (2) Changed Change
1.NGO for SMP
2.AO for CO
3.Assisting
Professional
(AP)
4.PO for CSD
5.NGO for M&E
(Physical&
Institutional
Components)
Year 2
(Physical
Component)
Tungawan
AgroForest
Planters
Association, Inc.
(TAFPA)/Rep.
Danilo Delos
Santos
Technological
Advocates for
Agro-forest
Programs
Association,
Inc.(TAFPA)/Rep.
Danilo Delos
Santos
Evangeline Vidal
Bayog Watershed
Rehabilitation
Subproject
Association, Inc.
Summer
Developer's
Association,
Inc./Rep. Remus
Bersamin
Agro-Forestry
Technology
Zamboanga
(Bayog) Unified
Green
Movement,
Inc./Rep. Felipe
Calipusan
Eduardo
Torralba
Terminated/
Cancelled
Contract expired/
none renewal
15
(Institutional
Component)
6. NGO for
Infrastructure
Services
Association
(AFTECH)
(Rep.Antonio Lao)
Greenshield
Association Inc.
(Rep. Reynaldo F.
San Antonio)
YSL Builder Inc.
(Rep.Joseph Lim)
Please state:
1.1 Reasons for the change
A. For Community Organizing
Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject was organized by two (2) groups
of community organizer. The first Community Organizing activities was
awarded to Technological Advocates for Agro-forest Programs Association
Inc. (TAFPA) represented by Mr. Danilo Delos Santos on April 10, 1997. The
contract was terminated due to non-compliance with stipulated provisions and
abandonment of his obligation as a contractor. The remaining CO activities
were then awarded to a qualified bidder based on the criteria set for CO
contract, the Zamboanga (Bayog) Unified Green Movement Inc.
(ZAMBAYUGMI) represented by Mr. Felipe Calipusan on September 30, 1999.
All activities set forth in the approved WFP of the second AO contractor
were undertaken and accomplished.
B. For Assisting Professional
Two Assisting Professionals (AP) were initially hired by the PO to assist the
SUSIMO in ensuring effective and efficient implementation of the
Subproject components. However, the expired contract service of the first
AP, Evangeline Vidal was not renewed due to attitude problem which resulted
to unsatisfactory performance as complained by the PO and SUSIMO. Mr.
Eduardo Torralba was immediately hired by DENR thru OIDCI whose
expertise is on livelihood development. This time, the second AP successfully
assisted the PO in the implementation of the identified livelihood projects.
1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results
Problems arising during the subproject implementation:
16
A. For Community Organizing
(1) The Assisting Organizing (AO) TAFPA failed to comply with the provisions
stipulated in their contract.
The DENR-Central Office terminated the contract of the AO (TAFPA)
and re-awarded another contract to the qualified AO based on the
criteria set forth in DENR MC 97-03 for the continuation of the
remaining CO activities. As a result, the POs’ knowledge and skills in
project management has improved.
(2) The AO failed to establish linkages with other agencies or organizations in
providing technical and additional financial assistance particularly for the
livelihood project to sustain the Association while waiting for the
harvestable products in the Subproject area.
SUSIMO and PO coordinated with the LGU and other government
agencies particularly with the Department of Agriculture (DA) to provide
assistance to the PO’s livelihood projects. As a result, the PO was given a
warehouse building, which is used as PO office, incinerator, and Solar
Drier worth Php 2.2 million by Governor Aurora Cerilles (Province of
Zamboanga del Sur).
(3) PO’s Lack of understanding regarding their responsibilities and
objectives during the early stage of project implementation.
The DENR, from top management down to field level facilitated and
assisted the PO in reviewing and reiterating the functions and
responsibilities of the PO BOT’s, Officers and member. As a result,
functions and responsibilities of the PO were clearly understood.
B. For Assisting Professional
The AP assigned in the area was not well versed on the objectives and
concept of the FSP Subproject, particularly the CBFMP.
The AP was invited and requested to attend every IEC activity conducted
in the Subproject. Likewise, leveling off meeting with the concerned AP
was facilitated by the SUSIMO. As a result, FSP and CBFMP concept
were fully understood by the assigned AP.
C. For Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
Occurrence of El Niño phenomenon between 1997 and 1998 resulted to
the poor plantation survival rate. The PO in coordination with the DENR
17
formulated strategies and counter measures to address the said
problems, such as follows:
Organized an internal quality inspection committee composed of Board
of Trustees and PO Technical Staff to conduct the quarterly
inspection, monitoring and supervision of the plantation.
Conducted training on proper ways of handling/transporting seedlings,
site preparation and planting particularly hole digging with a minimum
diameter equal to thrice the diameter of plastic bag and depth.
Due to far distance and terrain of sites, backyard nurseries were
allowed aside from the main and sub nurseries with close monitoring
and supervision of the technical staff of the association.
Intensive IEC activities were conducted per barangay.
The PO requested the DENR for change of suitable species preferred
by the community.
With the above strategies, the survival rate went up and the quality of
the plantations improved. The PO even exceeded the required target by
144.09 hectares, thus, resulted to the approval of the additional
expansion area of 355.91 hectares or a total revised target of 2,520
hectares from the original target of 2,020 hectares. However, during
the final survey of total plantation area, it was found out that the PO
has again exceeded the revised target by 20 hectares. Said excess
plantations were no longer paid by the DENR. The Association now
garnered a weighted average survival rate of 90.39%.
1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation
of the Subproject is ( attached or not available).
Organizational charts are attached as Annex 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 1g, 1h
and 1i for Tungawan Agro-Forest Planner Association, Inc. (SMP
contractor), Technological Advocates for Agro-Forest Programs
Association, Inc. (CO Contractor), Zamboanga-Bayog Unified Green
Movement, Inc. (CO Contractor), Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation
Subproject Association, Inc. (CSD Contractor), Summer Developers
Association, Inc. (M&E Contractor), Agro-Forestry Technology Services
Association (M&E Contractor), Greenshield Association, Inc. (M&E
Contractor), SUSIMO- Bayog, and YSL Builders (Infrastructure
Contractor), respectively.
2. Implementation Period
A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period
18
ITEM
ORIGINAL SCHEDULE
ACTUAL PERIOD
1.Survey, Mapping and
Planning
2.Contract of AO for CO
3.Contract of PO for
CSD
4.Contract of NGO for
M&E
5.Contract of
Infrastructure
Component
Completion
(Completion of
Subproject)
August 28, 1995-August
28, 1996
April 10, 1997 – April 10,
1999
September 22, 1997 to
December 30, 2000
February 2000-May 2003
February 11, 2002- May
16, 2003
December 2000
August 28, 1995-
August 28, 1996
October 20, 1999 to
November 2000
September 22, 1997 to
June 30, 2003
February 2000- June,
2003
February 11, 20002 –
October 15, 2003
October 15, 2003
Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report
Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion
ceremony or final disbursement or other than the above.
The completion date was scheduled for December 30, 2000 (at the time
of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.
B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion
b.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from
the following list and check.
Change in scope/dimensions
Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g.
Earthquake, typhoon, etc.)
Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate
Problems in procurement
Inflation
Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the
Executing Agency
Structural and organizational problems of the
19
Agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate
Coordination with other agencies, etc.)
Legislative matters
Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems
Performance of contractor/supplier
Performance of consultant
Others (M&E report improvement)
b.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion
Performance of contractor/supplier
On Community Organizing
The original contract for CO was only for two years covering the period
from April 1997 to April 1999.The completion of Community Organizing
activities as planned was delayed due to non-compliance of the former CO
contractor (TAFPA) to the provisions stipulated in their contract and
abandonment of his obligation as a CO contractor that resulted to
termination of contract.
Change in scope/dimension
Comprehensive Site development Contract (CSD)
During the early implementation of the Project, the established
plantation suffered from high rate of mortality due to the EL Niño
phenomenon that occurred between 1997 and 1998. This has led to the
extension of the contract duration as approved by the JBIC for the FSP
to improve the quality of plantations and to attain a greater survival rate.
The PO intensified the maintenance activities such as: ring weeding,
cultivation, establishment of firebreaks and fire lines, application of
fertilizer and patrol work.
Structural and organizational problems of the
Agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate
Coordination with other agencies, etc.)
During the early stage of implementation, one site coordinator was
assigned in the Subproject area to assist, facilitate, monitor and evaluate
the performance of the AO, PO, and M&E contractor. Assistance to the
AO and the PO’s performances were ineffective, resulting to backlogs and
low survival rate of the established plantation. In the same manner, the
created Composite Inspection Committee (CIC) was loaded with multiple
20
functions in their respective offices resulting to delays in the conduct of
monitoring and evaluation on the accomplishments of contractors.
Change in scope/dimensions
Infrastructure Component
The completion of the infrastructure project was extended due to the
inclusion of an additional 1.3 kilometers as requested by the LGU. And also
because of the financial management problem of the contractor who had
no sufficient resources to pay its workers. These two situations caused
delay in the completion of the infrastructure project.
Others (M&E report improvement)
After the completion of M&E activities on May 2003, the concerned M&E
contractors facilitated the submission of respective reports to the
Regional Office and NFDO. However, evaluation showed that there were
some vital information not reflected in the final report and rectification
based on the recommendation made by the Regional Office and NFDO was
suggested. This led to the one-month extension for the
rectification/improvement of M&E report.
C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay
Community Organizing
TAFPA’s incompetence led to the immediate termination of its contract.
The remaining activities were awarded to a qualified contractor and the
DENR adhered strictly with the existing guidelines for Community
Organizing contract. Likewise, close monitoring and supervision of the
DENR personnel helped in the accomplishment of the remaining activities
and expected outputs.
Comprehensive Site Development
Pursuant to MC 2000-19 related revision of the WFPs and amendment of
the CSD contracts to update the cost was undertaken.
Infrastructure Component
In the case of Infrastructure, the site engineer together with ISTaF
closely monitored and supervised the activities implemented by the
contractor based on the approved work plan. Corrections on the
contractor’s activities were noted and listed under the watch or punch list
21
to which the contractor agreed to rectify. Likewise, monthly kick-off
meetings were undertaken to immediately address the problems and
issues encountered. Further, remedies and strategies were done in order
to accomplish all activities as set within the given period. One strategy
was the financial assistance extended by PO-BAWARSA to concerned
contractor by lending some amount and guarantees to the suppliers of
materials for the contractor to accomplish all activities as scheduled.
Monitoring and Evaluation
A one-month extension was given to respective M&E contractors for the
rectification of their final reports based on the existing guidelines of
M&E.
3. Subproject Cost
A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by
Component)
Item
Original Cost
(Based on appraisal)
(In M pesos)
Actual Expenditures
(In M pesos)
Survey, Mapping
and Planning
Community
Organizing
Comprehensive
Site Development
Monitoring
and Evaluation
Infrastructure
Dev’t
Subproject
Coordinating
Office
TOTAL
1.350000
5.559378
25.549460
3.471560
19.013561
2.283240
57.227199
1.350000
2.908091
58.495256
3.463480
19.013561
2.283240
87.513629 Please refer to Tables 7,8,9, 10 for the details on cost of SMP, CO, CSD, and M&E.
List of Infra project/s with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 11
22
B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual
Expenditure
Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural
disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)
Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction
Period
Increase or decrease arising from inflation
Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange
rate
Increase or decrease arising from a change in the
scope/work volume of the Subproject
Decrease arising from keen competition in tender
Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing
Agency
Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems
Others
b.1. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background
Increase or decrease arising from a change in the
Scope/work volume of the Subproject
For Comprehensive Site Development
There was an increase in the estimated cost and actual expenditure of
the CSD component due to the expansion area given to the PO for
attaining a remarkable performance and exceeding the original target.
Likewise, the cost increased due to current change in the economic
situation of the country whereby there was an urgent need to adjust the
cost of establishing, maintaining and protecting the established
plantations in the subproject. Thus, MC 2000-19 “Guidelines Governing the
Updating of Cost Estimates and Intensification of Plantation Maintenance
and Protection Activities for DENR” for FSP Watershed Subprojects
under JBIC funding was adopted. This resulted to increase in unit cost of
various activities of different components as well as increase in frequency
of ringweeding, cultivation, application’s of fertilizer, patrolling and
establishment of additional targets for infrastructures; such as
footpaths, graded trails, bunkhouses, look out towers and fire lines.
Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the
Executing Agency (Performance of the Contractor)
23
For Community Organizing
Due to termination of the TAFPA contract, the contractor filed a case in
the court against the DENR. The amount intended for the activities under
the contract of TAFPA was excluded in the total contract cost of the new
AO, tapped by the DENR to continue the CO activities of the subproject.
The intended amount was retained at the Regional Office.
Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results
A revision of the WFP for the CSD components was carried out and
approved due to the additional plantation target and volume of work for
the infrastructure. A supplemental contract was made and approved to
support the changes/revisions made. The additional amount was allotted
and obligated to effect the payment for the accomplishments.
C. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure
(by Year)
Calendar
Year
Original Cost
(based on appraisal)
(in M pesos)
Actual Expenditures
(in M pesos)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1.350000
-
18.296078
7.229630
3.659751
3.915578
0.470000
2.197360
1.095240
1.350000
-
0.523343
2.772433
8.159079
14.379005
17.108166
24.992024
18.229578
Total 57.227199 87.513629 Please refer to Table 12 for the details of Annual Work and Financial Plan.
4. Comments on Performance of Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP), Assisting
Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations
(POs), M&E and Infrastructure contractors.
Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the
item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.
24
A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (If
any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and Infrastructure contractors
a.1. Overall performance Design
Contract administration Construction supervision
Expertise Staff qualifications
Coordinating ability Compliance with Contracts
Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if
any.
Others
a.2 Description (in detail)
Overall Performance
Survey, Mapping and Planning
Tungawan Agro-Forest Planner Association Inc. (TAFPA), represented
by Mr. Danilo Delos Santos, conducted the Survey, Mapping and Planning
Component of the project. It was contracted on August 28, 1995 with a
total contract cost of P1, 350,000.00 covering an area of 2000
hectares. All activities stipulated in the approved contract and WFP
were completed and accepted by the DENR, Regional Office on May 06,
1996. Performance of the contractor was satisfactory for accomplishing
all the activities based on the approved contract.
Assisting Organizations
The first AO contractor TAPFA was rated unsatisfactory for not
complying with the conditions stipulated in his contract and CO
guidelines contained in DAO 97-03, resulting in the termination of its
contract. The performance of the assisting organization ZAMBAYUGMI
was rated satisfactory since all activities stipulated in the approved
WFP were undertaken. AO staff deployed in the Subproject were
foresters and experienced in community organizing and other related
activities. Although some activities like networking and linkages,
assistance in the implementation of identified livelihood were not fully
imparted to POs, the AO exerted efforts in working closely with all the
key actors in order to convey the real objectives of their activity in
relation to Subproject implementation.
Assisting Professionals
There were two Assisting Professionals deployed to assist the
Subproject implementation. Both had the capability to facilitate
technical assistance to PO. The former had expertise in organizational
25
management while the latter’s expertise was on livelihood development
and implementation. The latter AP had assisted and facilitated the
implementation of the identified livelihood of PO and now operating
successfully.
Peoples Organization
The accomplishment of BAWARSA on CSD activities showed a
remarkable performance in attaining the target based on the approved
contract and WFP. The overall performance of the Association was
rated very satisfactory for completing and exceeding its target.
Technically, the PO now possessed all the necessary skills, knowledge
gained from training/seminars conducted. They are now qualified as
forestry skilled leaders and stakeholders in terms of expertise in
implementing CSD activities.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The performance of the contractors for M & E, both Physical and
Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment was satisfactory. Target
activities were accomplished. As to the capability of contractors, most
of the staff/members are technically-equipped and knowledgeable in the
contracted activities.
Infrastructure Contractor
The performance of the contractor was not satisfactory, in the sense
that the scheduled programs of work were not attained as expected
based on the approved contract.
5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation
Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any
comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and
results in (B) below.
A. Technical Financial Institutional Economic
Social/Distributional Others
B. Description (in detail)
Technical
Selection of Personnel to man the project implementation
Monitoring and evaluation of the SUSIMO staff over project
implementation was previously insufficient because some of the staff
26
assigned in the SUSIMO lacked dedication in their work although they
possessed technical knowledge and skills. On this, a special order was
issued by the Secretary to replace the concerned SUSIMO staff. As a
result, the new SUSIMO team worked effectively and efficiently.
III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)
1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO
SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The
recommendations are given in Annex – I herewith or not
applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the
Subproject).
2. Action Taken and Results
Recommendations Action Taken
by AO’s
Action Taken
by PO’s
Results
Development of
skills and
knowledge of the
PO officers and
members through
trainings on
technical,
financial and
management
aspect.
SUSIMO and
APs conducted
different
trainings and
workshops like
financial system
and
management
seminar,
project
management,
re-orientation
on CBFMP, Fire
brigade
training, among
others.
PO members
and officers
participated
actively in all
trainings and
workshops
that were
conducted to
improve their
management
skills over the
Subproject.
Improvement of
PO’s knowledge and
skills as regards
financial and
project
management were
observed.
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities
1. Present Condition of Facilities
A. Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or not
applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial
operation started). If there have been any problems, please check the
relevant space in the Table
27
For the SUSIMO
Item
Status
Initial
Operation
Maintenance
Management
Others
1. ) GPS
2. ) Compass
3. ) Binocular
4. ) Topographic
OSk
5. ) Rain Gauge
Digital Rain
Wise
6.) Radio
Transceiver
7.) Printer
8.) Typewriter
9.) GIS
10.) UPS
Gamatronic
Compact
11.) Personal
Computer
12.) Generator
13.) Polar
Planimeter
14.) Hand held
15.) Steel Tape
16.) Charger
17.) KIA Ceres
18.) Working
Animals
19.) Truck (KIA
-2700)
20.) Motorcycle
Serviceable
Serviceable
Stolen
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Stolen
Serviceable
Stolen
Unserviceable
Stolen
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Unserviceable
Unserviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
/
/
/
/
/
For the PO
Item
Status
Initial
Operation
Maintenance
Managemen
t
Others
1.) Bunkhouse
2.) Look-out
Serviceable
Serviceable
/
/
28
Tower
3.) Incinerator
4.) Solar Tunnel
Drier
5.) PO Building
6.)
Communication
Equipments
7.) Motorcycle
8.) Truck
9.) Computer
10.) Printer
11.) Air
conditioner
12.) Filing/Steel
Cabinet
13.) Minolta-EP
1054 Copier
14.) Video
Camera
15.) Nursery
Facilities
16.) Electric Fan
17.) Type Writer
18.) Water pump
19.) Television
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
Serviceable
/
/
/
/
/
B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following
reason(s).
Technical Financial Institutional Economic
Social/Distributional Others
C. Description (in detail)
For the SUSIMO
ITEM ORIGINAL PLAN ACTUAL OPERATION
1 Global Positioning
System (GPS)
For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
2 Compass (Forester
Transit)
For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
29
3 Compass (Brunton
Compass)
For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
4 Binoculars (7x50) For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
5 Abney Hand Level For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
6 Rain Gauge For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
7 Radio Transceivers For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
8 Steel Tape For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
9 Handheld Radio Battery
Charger
For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
10 Printer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
11 Type writer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
12 GIS Maptitude For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
13 UPS For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
14 Personal Computer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
15 Generator For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
16 Two Tunner Truck For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
17 Motorcycles For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
18 Polar Planimeter For the SUSIMO (Downloaded
from NFDO)
For the SUSIMO
19 VHS Player Player For the AO (Assisting
Organization)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
20 Television For the AO (Assisting
Organization)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
21 Tables For the AO (Assisting
Organization)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
22 Petronas Gasul (gas
stove)
For the Infra Contractor (YSL
Builders)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
30
23 Air Conditioner For the Infra Contractor (YSL
Builders)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
24 Beddings For the Infra Contractor (YSL
Builders)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
25 Trash Can For the Infra Contractor (YSL
Builders)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
26 Office Building For the Infra Contractor (YSL
Builders)
Turned-over to DENR-
SUSIMO-Bayog
27 Camera For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
28 Tape Recorder For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
29 Steel Cabinet For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
30 Office Tables For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
31 Fire Fighting Equipment For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
32 Chairs (9 pcs. Office
chairs and 10 pcs.
Monobloc Chairs)
For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
33 Brush Cutters For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
34 Gasulette Lamp For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO
For the PO
Item Original Plan Actual Operation
1.) Bunkhouse
2.) Look-out Tower
3.) Incinerator
4.) Solar Tunnel Drier
5.) PO Building
6.) Communication
Equipments
7.) Motorcycle
8.) Truck
9.) Computer
10.) Printer
11.) Air conditioner
12.) Filing/Steel Cabinet
13.) Minolta-EP 1054
Copier
14.) Video Camera
15.) Nursery Facilities
16.) Electric Fan
17.) Type Writer
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For The PO
For The PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
For the PO
31
18.) Water pump
19.) Television
2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance
A. Name of PO
a.1. Please give the name of PO and/or Body in charge of O/M.
PO: Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc.
(BAWARSA, Inc)
SUSIMO: SUSIMO Bayog- Administrative Support Unit (ASU)
a.2. Please check:
The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject
facilities is (attached or not available).
The operation and maintenance of Subproject facilities and equipment of
the PO were done by the organization itself. In case of malfunctions and
loss, it is the organization that will be in charge for the repair and
procurement of such equipment. For the SUSIMO, it is the Administrative
and Support Unit (ASU) that is in charge of the maintenance of SUSIMO
equipment and facilities.
a.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state
the reason.
B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and
Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.
PO (BAWARSA): 18
SUSIMO (Bayog): 2
C. Please check and explain the following.
c.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or insufficient).
If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum
number of staff and your plan for providing them.
c.2. Average employment period of the present staff:
PO (BAWARSA): 2 to 3 years
SUSIMO (Bayog): 4 years
32
c.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of
the staff, its contents and expected effects.
None
3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance
(by Year)
A. Original Expected Expenditure
For the SUSIMO
(Unit: Mil Pesos)
Item
Calendar year
Maintenance Operation Total
2001
2002
2003
Total
0.144628
0.195973
0.240050
0.580651
0.433884
0.587919
0.480101
1.501904
0.578511
0.783892
0.720151
2.082554
For the PO
Item
Calendar year
Maintenance Operation Total
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
TOTAL
0.114248
0.003770
-
0.030460
0.037884
0.081390
0.124217
-
0.391969
0.342744
-
0.028550
0.060920
0.113649
0.244168
0.372651
0.001270
1.163952
0.456990
0.003770
0.028550
0.091379
0.151531
0.325558
0.496866
0.001270
1.555921
B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure
For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos)
Item
Calendar year
Maintenan
ce
Operation Maintenance
(For
expanded
&
Operation
portion)
Total
2001
1. Office
2. Motorcycle
3. KIA-Ceres
0.113067
0.030826
0.113067
0.030826
33
2002
1. Office
2. Motorcycle
3. KIA-Ceres
2003
1. Office
2. Motorcycle
3. KIA-Ceres
4. KIA-4x4
2004
TOTAL
0.227080
0.035962
0.282796
0.011400
0.018718
0.720000
0.148750
0.148750
0.026250
0.026250
0.227080
0.035962
0.282796
0.011400
0.018718
0.180000
0.900000
For the PO
Item
Calendar year
Maintenance Operation Maintenance
(For
expanded
&
Operation
portion)
Total
1997
Office
1998
Office
1999
Office
2000
Office
Computer
Typewriter
2001
Office
2002
Office
Computer
Typewriter
Communication
Equipments
2003
Truck
Motorcycle
Water pump
0.001370
0.246510
0.087771
0.103165
0.090627
0.028099
0.028550
0.034350
0.151532
0.029845
0.023251
0.136080
0.028099
0.029920
0.280860
0.239303
0.029845
0.126416
0.226707
34
Office
2004
Cell phones
Video Camera
TOTAL
0.529443
0.027807
0.495514
0.027807
1.024957
Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or
any other improvement purposes
Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for
the same.
No amount was given for the expanded portion of maintenance and operation of
facilities for the PO. Cost provided was based on actual disbursement. In the
case of SUSIMO, facilities were maintained depending on the fund allocation
downloaded by the NFDO. However, it will be the responsibility of the
concerned CENRO to oversee and maintain these facilities when it will be
turned over to their custody. Maintenance cost could be sourced out from the
DENR regular funds.
4. Maintenance Method
A. Content of Method
B. Frequency
For the SUSIMO
Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency
1. 2-ton truck Repair/replacement of defective
parts,
Change oil,
Wheels rotation
As the need arises
Every 2 months
As the need arises
2. Motorcycle Repair/replacement of defective
parts,
Change oil
As the need arises
Every moth
For the PO
Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency
Computer * Change of defective lightning As the need arises
Copier * Procurement of office supplies Every Month
Typewriter (Bond papers, ink for typewriter &
Printer Computer, folders, etc.)
Lightings * Payment of Electric and Water Every Month
Bills
35
Shovel, Bolo, * Procurement in case of loss or As the need arises
Water pump, among Wreckage
Others * Repairs of defective equipment As the need arises
PO Building/Office * Improvements As the need arises
* Repair of defective parts
Communication
Equipments
* Repair in case of wreck
As the need arises
* Load for Cell phone Every 1 or 2 Months
Truck * Change oil Every 3 months
* Change of tires As the need arises
* Repair and Improvements As the need arises
* Tune up Every 3 months
Motorcycle * Change oil Every month
* Tune up Every Month
C. Others, if any.
V. Benefits derived from Subproject
1. Indirect Effects
A. Please choose and check the item(s), which are dealt with this Article
by you.
Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the
Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)
Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the
sector(s) after completion)
Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region)
Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or
the region concerned
B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.
Employment Generation
During the implementation of the CSD, participating communities availed
of job opportunities especially plantation establishment, seedlings
production and maintenance activities of the watershed subproject. In
the implementation of the subproject, it generated employment
opportunities to project participants registering 404,601 man-days. As
of now, employment generation programs of the PO are still on-going thru
their established livelihood projects. Livelihood training opportunities are
still being participated in by the communities.
36
Income Raising
Increase in income of the project beneficiaries is the outcome of
employment opportunities generated by implementation of the project as
well as the livelihood projects. At the time of appraisal, the annual
average household income of the community was PHP 42,000.00. After the
project implementation, the annual average household income increased to
PHP 68,400.00 or 63% increased based on the final validation for
Institutional Project Benefit Assessment (IPBA) conducted by Green
shield Association. Indicators of socio-economic improvement can be
observed in the community such as improvement of individual houses,
availing of education opportunities for their children even up to college
level, procurement of household facilities/equipment and implementation
of backyard livelihood income generating projects such as African “hito”
catfish and shrimp culture.
37
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject’s overall
implementation is very satisfactory. News about its positive socio-
economic and environmental impacts has created awareness not only in
the province of Zamboanga del Sur but has spread in the entire region.
The dedication and commitment of the SUSIMO personnel, LGUs and
most especially BAWARSA, Inc. played a great role in the Subproject’s
success.
It is recommended that policy changes regarding the project must be
consulted with the field personnel down to the PO inasmuch as they are
the primary beneficiaries of any changes.
SUSIMO personnel and Community Organizing contractors should be
deployed in assigned areas at the initial and final phase of the project to
ensure clear interpretation of instructions to be carried out.
The DENR should be strict with the NGO for community organizing on
the matter of staff deployment to ensure that only those with the
necessary knowledge and skills are fielded to satisfactorily develop and
enhance the technical and social capabilities of the POs.
Causes of delay in the implementation of the project should be
immediately addressed and people who are responsible for such should
be meted immediate sanctions and /or be reprimanded.
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 1. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE PEOPLES ORGANIZATION
TRAINORS# OF
PARTICIPANTSINCLUSIVE DATES
1 Pre-Membership Seminar AO 42 Nov. 26-28, 19992 Seminar on Community
Based Forest Management and Comprehensive Site Development on Protection and Maintenance
AO 85 Jan. 7, 2000
3 Sloping Agricultural Land Technology (SALT)
AO 51 May 1-2, 2000
4 Value Formation AO PO Officers/members
June 21-22, 2000
5 Forest Fire Protection, Central Management Seminar
AO PO Officers/members
Oct. 17, 2000
6 Computer Operation and Preventive Maintenance
AO 15 N/A
7 Seminar/Lecture on Community Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP)
AO 44 16-May-97
8 A Training on Initial Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
AO 46 5-Apr-97
9 Workshop on TNA and Livelihood Opportunities
AO 33 Jun 3-11, 1997
10 Re-echo Orientation on the Creation of SUSIMO
SUSIMO 49 Jan. 23-24, 2001
11 Financial System and Management Seminar
SUSIMO 35 March 22-24, 2001
12 Project Management SUSIMO 49 26-Mar-0113 Fire Bridgade Training SUSIMO 45 June 26-28, 200114 Workshop on Livelihood
Project Monitoring and Evaluation
SUSIMO 115 May14-15, 2003
15 Seminar on Forest Fire Control and Management
SUSIMO PO Officers/members
Sept. 10, 2002
16 Seminar/Workshop on Value Formation and Team Building of SUSIMO staff and PO Officers and Stakeholders of BAWARSA, Inc.
SUSIMO PO Officers/members
Nov. 24-28,2003
17 Re-echo orientation Course on the concept of CBFMA, livestock production & DAO 2000-65
SUSIMO 15 19-Jun-03
TRAINING
FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135
Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival(Has) (%)
1998 Reforestation Gmelina 7.19 91.67Mahogany 40.11 91.55Narra 3 91.29
Agroforestry Mango 2.54 89.85Lanzones 63 90.47Jackfruit 2.69 84.92Coffee 32.03 89.27
Rattan Palasan 70.8 91.19
Sub-Total 221.36 90.02
1999 Reforestation Gmelina 19.05 91.69Mahogany 697.88 90.55Narra 87.99 91.29
Agroforestry Mango 197.46 89.85Lanzones 88. 69 90.47Jackfruit 97.31 84.92Coffee 69.43 89.27
Rattan Palasan 650.17 91.19
Bamboo Bamboo 54.75 91.11Sub-Total 1,962.73 90.04
2001 Reforestation Narra 40 91.29Mahogany 80 90.55
Agroforestry Durian 215.91 91.42Rambutan 20.00 91.22
Sub-Total 355.91 91.12Grand Total 2,540.00 90.39Note: During the final validation and survey of the established plantations, the PO hasestablished a total developed area of 2,540 ha with 20 ha excess as compared to the total revised target of 2, 520 ha
Table 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE
FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT
LOAN NO. PH-P 135
ProcuredDate/year procured
1 Global Positioning System (GPS) 2 units (SN-3F302477, SN-3E302237
Global Positioning System (GPS) 2 units (SN-3F302477, SN-3E302238
2 3/28/2001 210,000.00
2 Compass (Forester Transit) Ushikata Model S2-75 (made in Japan) 2 units
Ushikata Model S2-75 (made in Japan)2 units
2 21-May-01 65,680.00
3 Compass (Brunton Compass) Kataoka Brand, Model BCD-90, 4 units
Kataoka Brand, Model BCD-90, 4 units 4 3/28/2001 19,552.00
4 Binoculars (7x50) 3 units (7x50) 3 3/28/2001 12,168.00 5 Abney Hand Level (Model OSK 17251) 4
units(Model OSK 17251) 4 units 4 5/21/2001 9,568.00
6 Rain Gauge (Digital Rainwise made in USA) 1 set
(Digital Rainwise made in USA) 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00
7 Lettering Set Leroy Set 1 5/28/2001 4,992.00 8 Radio Trancievers (Handheld SN-018-73,
Handheld VHF/FM ICOM model 07822) 2 units
(Handheld SN-018-73, HandheldVHF/FM ICOM model 07822)
2 1/12/2001 29,933.28
9 Steel Tape (Nylon Tape/50 meters long) 2 units
(Nylon Tape/50 meters long) 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00
10 Handheld Radio Battery Charger (ICOM Brand) 2 units
(ICOM Brand) 2 _ _
11 Printer (Inkjet Hawlette Pachard: SN-MX 087IBIF2, LX-300) 2 units
(Inkjet Hawlette Pachard: SN-MX087IBIF2, LX-300)
2 4/27/2001 5,811.52
12 Type writer (Manual, 18 carriage Olivetti Brand) 1 unit
(Manual, 18 carriage Olivetti Brand) 1 28-Mar-01 8,309.60
13 GIS Maptitude (Combination of Software and Geographic date: SN-04-202616) 1 unit
(Combination of Software andGeographic date: SN-04-202616)
1 3/28/2001 44,460.00
14 UPS (Gamatronic Compact: SN-221372) 1 unit
(Gamatronic Compact: SN-221372) 1 4/15/2001 5,720.00
15 Personal Computer (HP Brio PC: SN 10771780) 1 set
(HP Brio PC: SN 10771780) 1 2/20/2001 70,850.00
16 Generator (Gasoline engine: SN 74326) 1 unit
(Gasoline engine: SN 74326) 1 4/23/2001 44,096.00
17 Two Tunner Truck (KIA Crosstruck 4x4 engine: No. J2-3027839) 1 unit
(KIA Crosstruck 4x4 engine: No. J2-3027839)
1 9/30/2002 680,000.00
18 Motorcycles (TS SUSUKI) 3 units (TS SUSUKI) 3 n/a n/a 19 Polar Planimeter (with optical tracer-OSKK,
Koizumi brand) 1 unit(with optical tracer-OSKK, Koizumibrand)
1 10/26/2001 7,800.00
Icom Base Radio Model 01822 Icom 1 _ 64,789.92 20 VHS Player Player (Sony Brand) 1 unit (Sony Brand) 1 n/a n/a 21 Television (Sony Colored TV 21") 1 unit (Sony Colored TV 21") 1 n/a n/a 22 Tables (Office Tables) 2 units n/a 2 n/a n/a 23 Petronas Gasul with Gas Tank 1 set n/a 1 n/a n/a 24 Air Conditioner (National Brand) 1 unit (National Brand) 1 n/a n/a 25 Beddings (Dio Foam Brand) 1 set (Dio Foam Brand) 1 n/a n/a 26 Trash Can (Plastic) 1 unit n/a 1 n/a n/a 27 Office Building (Contractor Office) 1 unit (Contractor Office) 1 n/a n/a 28 Camera (Cannon Prima Jr. and Cannon with
zoom lens) 2 units
(Cannon Prima Jr. and Cannon with zoom lens) 2 n/a n/a
29 Tape Recorder 3 units n/a 330 Steel Cabinet 4 units n/a 4 n/a n/a31 Office Tables 15 pcs. n/a 15 n/a n/a32 Fire Fighting Equipment 1 set n/a 1 n/a n/a33 Chairs (9 pcs. Office chairs and 10 pcs.
Monobloc Chairs) n/a 19 n/a n/a
34 Brush Cutters 2 units n/a 2 n/a n/a35 Gasulette Lamp 4 units n/a 4 n/a n/a
* n/a (no available records)
Table 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTS
Cost (PhP)ITEM Specifications Qty
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE SUSIMO
TRAINING TRAINORS# OF
PARTICIPANTS
INCLUSIVE DATES
1 Orientation Course of SUSIMO staff of Watershed Subproject Sites
NFDO/TA Team 5 Nov. 14-16,2000
2 Orientation Workshop on the implementation of a Capital-Build up System for CBFMP
NFDO/TA Team 4 Dec. 14, 2000
3 Watershed and Mangrove Orientation and other related guidelines on FSP
NFDO/TA Team 4 Aug. 18, 2001
4 FSP Re-Orientation Course NFDO/TA Team 4 March 19-21, 20025 FSP Phase-out/Phase-in Planning
WorkshopNFDO/TA Team 4 Dec. 10-13, 2002
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 5a. Livelihood Projects Established
Name of Livelihood Project : Consumer Store and Rice Trading
Implementor
:
No. of Beneficiaries : 441 members
Amount of investment : Php 470, 000.00
Date of Feasibility Study : Apr-02
Date started : Dec. 18, 2002
Status : On-Going
Net Income : Php 120, 000.00
CFDF : Php 2, 214, 987.75
Linkages Developed : Local Businessman/Proprietor
Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association-Multi-purpose Cooperative (BAWARSA-MULCO)
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 5b. Livelihood Projects Established
Name of Livelihood Project : Trucking Services (For Hire)
Implementor
:
No. of Beneficiaries : 441 members
Amount of investment : Php 574, 625.50
Date of Feasibility Study : N/A
Date started : Dec. 2003
Status : On-Going
Net Income : Php 120, 000.00
CFDF : Php 2, 214, 987.75
Linkages Developed: N/A
Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association-Multi-purpose Cooperative (BAWARSA-MULCO)
FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135Table 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT
SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA
9Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject
2,520.00 85,230,389.00 c c c c c
PROJECT AREA (ha)
PROJECT COST (mil. Peso)
STATUS OF PROGRESS(O:on going C: Completion)Region
NAME/LOCATION OF THE SUBPROJECT
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 7. SMP Cost Estimate per Activity
ACTIVITIESTARGET OUTPUT
UNIT OF MEASURE
UNIT COST TOTAL COST
I. SURVEY AND MAPPING
a. Perimeter survey, area computation, site characterization and map preparation 2,000.00 has 425.0000 850,000.00
b. Field Section and Blocking 2,000.00 has 150.00000 300,000.00
c. Present Land Use Survey and Mapping
d. Topographic Survey & Mapping
e. Soil/Land Capability Survey and Mapping
f. Agro-socio economic studies (ave. 3 household/ ha)
g. Climate, geology and water resourced survey
SUB-TOTAL 1,150,000.00
II. PLANNING 2,000.00 has 100.00 200,000.00
a. Data Synthesis and analysis
b. Report Writing
SUB-TOTAL 200,000.00
GRANDTOTAL 2,000.00 has 675.00 1,350,000.00
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135
ACTIVITIES TARGET
1. Social Investigation 2,020.00 Has. 82.88 167,418.00
2. Information and Education Campaign
2,020.00 Has. 151.55306,127.00
3. Documentation Process
4. Identification of Possible CBFMA
2,020.00 Has. 18.2236,805.00
5. Organizing Activities 2,020.00 Has. 477.72 964,996.50
6. Community Activities 2,020.00 Has. 322.4 651,245.50
7. Project Management 2,020.00 Has. 386.88 781,498.90
Total 2,020.00 has 1,439.65 2,908,090.90
UNIT of MEASURE
UNIT COST TOTAL COST
Table 8. Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135
MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITYUNIT OF MEASURE
TARGET OUTPUT
Unit Cost TOTAL COST
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 789.06 6,714.14 5,297,862.28 a. Nursery Site Preparationb. Planting Stockc. Bags d. Soil Collectione. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 5,297,862.28 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 789.06 3,940.11 3,108,981.72
a. Strip brushing/clearingb. Staking c. Hole Diggingd. Haulinge. Planting
SUB-TOTAL 3,108,981.72 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 789.06 4,340.29 3,424,749.54
a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizerb. Replantingc. Patrol Worksd. Tools and materials
SUB-TOTAL 3,424,749.54 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION
a. First and Second Year has 789.06 597.61 471,549.35 b. Third Year has 789.06 251.30 198,291.14 c. Fourth Year has 789.06 632.14 498,793.32 d. Fifth Year has 789.06 922.53 727,930.69 d. Sixth Year has 789.06 387.25 305,563.88
SUB-TOTAL 2,202,128.38 G R A N D T O T A L has 789.06 17,785.37 14,033,721.92
Table 9a. Cost Estimate For Agroforestry Per Activity
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135
MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITYUNIT OF MEASURE
TARGET OUTPUT
Unit Cost TOTAL COST
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 54.75 3,399.92 186,145.85 a. Nursery Site Preparationb. Planting Stockc. Bags d. Soil Collectione. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 186,145.85 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 54.75 8,649.06 473,535.92
a. Strip brushing/clearingb. Staking c. Hole Diggingd. Haulinge. Planting
SUB-TOTAL 473,535.92 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 54.75 7,001.88 383,352.89
a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizerb. Replantingc. Patrol Worksd. Tools and materials
SUB-TOTAL 383,352.89 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION
a. First and Second Year has 54.75 6,707.38 367,228.95 b. Third Year has 54.75 1,716.35 93,970.19 c. Fourth Year has 54.75 129.58 7,094.49 d. Fifth Year has 54.75 3,265.94 178,810.20 e. Sixth Year has 54.75 632.30 34,618.56
SUB-TOTAL 681,722.39 GRAND T O T A L has 54.75 31,502.41 1,724,757.05
Table 9b. Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135
MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITYUNIT OF MEASURE
TARGET OUTPUT
Unit Cost TOTAL COST
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 720.97 4,987.88 3,596,110.64 a. Nursery Site Preparationb. Planting Stockc. Bags d. Soil Collectione. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 3,596,110.64 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 720.97 3,754.39 2,706,802.56
a. Strip brushing/clearingb. Staking c. Hole Diggingd. Haulinge. Planting
SUB-TOTAL 2,706,802.56 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 720.97 7,463.70 5,381,100.27
a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizerb. Replantingc. Patrol Worksd. Tools and materials
SUB-TOTAL 5,381,100.27 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION
a. First and Second Year has 720.97 658.17 474,520.18 b. Third Year has 720.97 279.15 201,261.97 c. Fourth Year has 720.97 359.19 258,962.52 d. Fifth Year has 720.97 474.90 342,385.46 e. Sixth Year has 720.97 72.83 52,504.95
SUB-TOTAL 1,329,635.08 G R A N D T O T A L has 720.97 18,050.19 13,013,648.55
Table 9c. Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135
MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITYUNIT OF MEASURE
TARGET OUTPUT
Unit Cost TOTAL COST
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 955.00 4,557.22 4,352,142.87 a. Nursery Site Preparationb. Planting Stockc. Bags d. Soil Collectione. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 4,352,142.87 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 955.00 3,952.74 3,774,862.70
a. Strip brushing/clearingb. Staking c. Hole Diggingd. Haulinge. Planting
SUB-TOTAL 3,774,862.70 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 955.00 11,913.63 11,377,519.25
a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizerb. Replantingc. Patrol Worksd. Tools and materials
SUB-TOTAL 11,377,519.25 4. CSD Infrastructure
a. Graded Trail meters 87,213.50 1.13 98,611.76 b. Footpath meters 87,213.50 1.13 98,611.76 c. Bunkhouse units 4.00 94,350.00 377,400.00 d. Lookout Tower units 5.00 10,680.00 53,400.99 e. Fireline/firebreak sq.m/has 177,955 sq. m/ 403,362.48
1,555.91 has.SUB-TOTAL 1,031,386.99 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION
a. First and Second Year has 955.00 478.15 456,633.00 b. Third Year has 955.00 192.02 183,375.57 c. Fourth Year has 955.00 5,025.78 4,799,624.11 d. Fifth Year has 955.00 2,759.67 2,635,485.44 d. Sixth Year has 955.00 262.75 250,924.51
SUB-TOTAL 8,326,042.63 G R A N D T O T A L has 955.00 30,221.94 28,861,954.44
Table 9d. Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation Per Activity
Forestry Sector Project
Loan No. Ph-P 135
UnitACTIVITIES of
Measure Physical Validation Component
2,520.00 has 37.02 93,300.00
3. Seedling Production/Inventory Analysis 2,520.00 has 50.04 126,100.00
2,520.00 has 846.75 2,133,800.00
5. Institutional/environmental impacts/project management cost and report preparation 2,520.00 has 355.27 895,280.10
S U B T O T A L 3,248,480.10
Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment
1. Preparatory activities 2,520.00 has 7.94 20,000.00
2,520.00 has 47.62 120,000.00
3. Documentation/Reports 2,520.00 has 29.76 75,000.00
S U B T O T A L 215,000.00 G R A N D T O T A L 2,520.00 has 1,374.40 3,463,480.10
Total Cost
Table 10. Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity
Target Output
Unit Cost
1. Development of appropriate tools for participatory M&E
4. Survival Inventory (height and diameter measurements and related observations per area/components and parcels
2. Verification of Boundaries, UTM monuments and block corner post
2. Primary data collection and preliminary assessment
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 11. Infrastructure Project
Infrastructure Project : Farm to Market Road, 1 unit Hanging Bridge and Repair of 1 Hanging Bridge(Matun-og)
Location : Brgy's. Kahayagan, Supon, Kanipaan, and Matun-og, Bayog, Zamboanga, Del Sur
Contractor : YSL Builders
Contract Cost : Php 19, 013, 561.20
Contract Duration : February 11, 2002 to May 11, 2003
Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 11-Feb-02
Expected Completion date : 30-Jun-03
Revised Completion date : 30-Aug-03
Date of MOA with LGU : 15-Oct-03
Brief description : The infrastructure project implemented is Farm to Market Road Rehabilitation from Barangay's Kahayagan, Supon and Kanipaan, having a length of 6.76 Km., Construction of 1 unit hanging bridge at Barangay Kanipaan (Sitio Licanan) and Repair of 1 unit existing Hanging Bridge at Barangay Matun-og with a total lenght of 100 and 70 meters, respectively. The contract of YSL Builders (Infrastructure Contractor) was extended three (3) times due to negative slippage and Backlogs (due to rainy season). The contract was extended first on June 30, 2003, second on July 27, 2003, and third and last is on August 30, 2003. Finally it was turned-over to LGU on October 15, 2003.
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) 675.00 1,350,000.00 675.00 1,350,000.00 B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 2,752.17 5,559,378.00 1,439.65 2,908,091.90 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 252,577.20
1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 608,596.96 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path
c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 6,625.40 3,643,970.40 17,785.37 14,033,721.92 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo 28,019.79 1,485,048.76 31,502.41 1,724,757.05 d.2. Rattan 14,085.60 10,099,378.40 18,050.19 13,013,648.55 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 14,744.37 10,321,062.44 28,537.73 28,861,954.44 e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project
Sub-Total 12,648.25 25,549,460.00 23,029.63 58,495,256.12 D. Infrastructure Component 19,013,561.20 19,013,561.20 E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1
b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total 1,718.59 3,471,560.00 1,374.40 3,463,480.10
II. SUSIMO 2,283,240.00 2,082,553.92 Equipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings
Others
Sub-Total 2,283,240.00 2,283,240.00 GRAND TOTAL 57,227,199.20 87,513,629.32
Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total CostACTIVITIESPlanned Actual
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP)B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2)C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path
c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project
Sub-TotalD. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1
b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total
II. SUSIMOEquipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings
Others
Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL
ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00
1,350,000.00 1,350,000.00
Planned Actual Planned Actual19961995
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP)B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2)C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path
c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project
Sub-TotalD. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1
b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total
II. SUSIMOEquipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings
Others
Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL
ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
2,020.00 2,181,600.00 2,020.00 523,343.30 2,020.00 478,369.00 252,577.20
550.00 2,197,948.32 437.47 1,217,283.00 100.26 890,711.92
53.00 826,083.08 39.75 512,042.79 54.75 126,489.57 717.00 6,927,501.32 441.75 2,058,211.08 70.80 486,518.99
700.00 6,162,945.36 575.00 3,442,093.67 50.30 537,767.00
2,294,064.68
18,296,078.08 523,343.30 7,229,630.54 2,772,433.68
Actual Planned ActualPlanned1997 1998
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP)B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2)C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path
c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project
Sub-TotalD. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1
b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total
II. SUSIMOEquipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings
Others
Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL
ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
2,020.00 1,454,400.00 2,020.00 168,980.00 2,020.00 1,923,378.00 2,020.00 1,376,956.10
517,484.00
112.51 228,739.08 452.89 834,899.87 1,219,064.89
13.25 146,922.89 414,520.54 809,319.27 275.25 1,113,666.00 650.17 4,485,055.33 3,714,350.74
125.00 716,023.41 804.92 2,255,623.25 5,113,709.57
7,990,098.99 11,373,928.47
2,020.00 1,636,200.00 2,020.00 1,628,120.10 356, 000.00
356,000.00 3,659,751.38 8,159,078.99 3,915,578.00 14,379,004.67
Planned ActualPlanned20001999
Actual
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP)B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2)C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path
c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project
Sub-TotalD. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1
b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total
II. SUSIMOEquipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings
Others
Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL
ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
360,443.50
235.91 4,492,346.71 5,476,450.57
53,763.11 1,602,315.68 2,040,666.58
120.00 9,953,890.73 6,898,138.65
16,102,316.23 14,415,255.80 8,105,620.94
2,520.00 1,620,360.00 2,520.00 1,620,360.00 470, 000.00 645,406.09 577, 000.00 850,787.66
470,000.00 645,406.09 577,000.00 850,787.66 470,000.00 17,108,165.82 2,197,360.00 24,992,024.40
Planned2001 2002
Actual Planned Actual
Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan
I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP)B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2)C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)
1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path
c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation
d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project
Sub-TotalD. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1
b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total
II. SUSIMOEquipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings
Others
Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL
ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,020.00 5,559,378.00 2,020.00 2,908,091.90
252,577.20 91,112.96 608,596.96
1,120,247.96 550.00 3,643,970.40 789.06 14,033,721.92
320,664.56 53.00 1,485,048.76 54.75 1,724,757.05 684,741.23 717.00 10,099,378.40 720.97 13,013,648.55
4,102,825.24 700.00 10,321,062.44 955.22 28,861,954.44
6,319,591.95 2,020.00 25,549,460.00 2,520.00 58,495,256.12 10,907,940.26 19,013,561.20 19,013,561.20
215,000.00 215,000.00 2,020.00 3,471,560.00 2,520.00 3,463,480.10 880, 240.00 787,046.25 2,283,240.00 2,082,553.92
880,240.00 787,046.25 2,283,240.00 2,283,240.00 1,095,240.00 18,229,578.46 57,227,199.20 87,513,629.32
Actual (TOTAL)Planned (TOTAL)2003Planned Actual
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AGRO-FORESTRY TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, INC.
(M & E Contractor)
ANTONIO T. LAO
President
CELERINO H. ESTEMO
Vice-President
MEMBERS
AUDITOR TREASURER SECRETARY PUBLIC
RELATION
OFFICER
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART SUMMER DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
(M & E Contractor)
REMUS B. BERSAMIN
Operation Manager
SECRETARY
ANTONIO T. LAO
Assistant Operation
Manager
RITA GENTILLES
Auditor
JULIET B. BERSAMIN
Treasurer
Project ID &
Selection Unit
Organizing
Unit
Project
Supervision
Unit
Project
Monitoring
Unit
OFFICE STAFF
LABOR FORCE
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART TECHNOLOGICAL ADVOCATES FOR AGRO-FORESTS PROGRAMS
ASSOCIATION, INC.
(CO Contractor)
Board of Directors
Legal Consultant
Executive Director/President
Executive Assistant
Technical
Support Staff
Administrative
Support Staff
Training Support
Staff
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
MANAGERS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
COORDINATORS
Community
Organizing-FLMA
Survey, Mapping and
Planning (SMP)
Community Based
Forest
Management
Program
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE TUNGAWAN AGRO-FOREST PLANTERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
(SMP Contractor)
Board of Directors
Legal Consultant
Executive Director/President
Executive Assistant
Technical
Support Staff
Administrative
Support Staff
Training Support Staff
Project Development
Managers
Project Development
Coordinator
CO-FLMA SMP CBFMP
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART BAYOG WATERSHED REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT ASSOCIATION,
INC. (BAWARSA, INC.)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
PO President
PO Vice-President
Fin. & Appr.
Com.
Education
Com.
Seedlings
Com.
Infra.
Com.
CPO Fund
Com.
Fire Prot.
Com.
Board of Trustees
(Per Barangay)
For. Prot.
Com.
Grievance
Com.
Livelihood
Com.
M & P Com.
CBU fund
Com.
CFDF Com.
Administrative Unit Technical Unit
Technical Head Admin. Officer
Secretary Auditor Treasurer
Bookkeeper Encoder
Utility Security Guard
Survey Team Mon. & Eval.
Team
Survey Aide
BAWARSAMULCO
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ZAMBOANGA (BAYOG) UNIFIED GREEN MOVEMENT, INC.
(CO Contractor)
Project Manager
Assistant Project Manager
Community Organizing
Supervisor
Community
Organizer
Community
Organizer
Secretary
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE YSL BUILDERS
(Infrastructure Contractor)
ERNESTO A. MONDARTE
Project Manager
ARNOLD CUIZON
Surveyor/Quantity
Engineer
ROY JOSE S. QUIMADA
Administrative Officer
REMEGIO QUIMADA
Safety Engineer
NELSON DAIS
Equipment
Supervisor
NOEH PATALINGHUG
Project/Material
Engineer
Operators/Drivers ARMANDO TAC-AN
Chief Mechanic
Materials Lab.
Technicians
Skilled/Semi-Skilled
Laborers
Unskilled Laborers
Helpers Helpers
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE GREENSHIELD ASSOCIATION, INC.
(M & E Contractor)8
Board of Directors
Internal Auditor Board Secretary
Board Treasurer
President
Administrative Staff Executive Secretary
Research, IEC
& Evaluation
CO &
Livelihood
Networking
and Linkages
Special
Concerns
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE (SUSIMO)
Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject
CELERINA D. FLORES
Subproject Management Officer
LEO VILLARUBEN
COSU-HEAD
ROMEO PAGENTE
SDMU-HEAD
MARCELINO MALUNOC
VBU-HEAD
JOEL REALIZA
SDMU-STAFF
YULBRANDO YLLAYA
VBU-STAFF
EFLIDA ROMERO
VBU-STAFF
MYRNA VILLARUBEN
ASU-HEAD
RAMON FABIAN
SUSIMO-DRIVER
IEC conducted in Poblacion and Kahayagan, Bayog, Zamboanga del Sur
New completed Hanging Bridged Rehabilitation of Farm to Market Road with the installation of steel
reinforcement and box culvert.
Rattan Plantation at Brgy. Dagum Gmelina plantation inspected by DENR inspection team.
Lookout tower located at Brgy. Kanipaan.
Consumer Store of BAWARSAMULCO.
Mahogany plantation Agroforestry Plantation
Ring weeding and Fertilizer application conducted by PO personnel.
Sampling activity conducted by Re-gional personnel and SUSIMO staff
Corner DISTANCE (meter)
1-2 N 1 ° 35 ' W 1,302.75
2-3 N 35 ° 9 ' E 857.89
3-4 N 47 ° 51 ' W 336.10
4-5 S 36 ° 16 ' W 223.01
5-6 N 60 ° 24 ' W 1,520.12
6-7 N 30 ° 49 ' W 783.60
7-8 N 37 ° 39 ' E 668.11
8-9 N 9 ° 55 ' E 933.78
9-10 N 24 ° 27 ' E 972.02
10-11 N 24 ° 45 ' E 2,101.52
11-12 N 33 ° 7 ' E 946.85
12-13 S 33 ° 34 ' E 340.24
13-14 N 80 ° 32 ' E 271.15
14-15 N 21 ° 38 ' W 435.99
15-16 N 20 ° 49 ' E 816.73
16-17 N 16 ° 4 ' E 818.83
17-18 N 25 ° 9 ' E 513.76
18-19 N 87 ° 22 ' E 232.06
19-20 N 41 ° 50 ' E 370.32
20-21 S 82 ° 29 ' E 369.07
21-22 S 56 ° 42 ' E 454.47
22-23 S 8 ° 29 ' E 549.33
23-24 S 5 ° 39 ' E 995.89
24-25 S 57 ° 13 ' E 558.31
25-26 S 13 ° 4 ' W 224.26
26-27 S 19 ° 29 ' E 517.76
27-28 S 4 ° 27 ' W 472.16
28-29 S 33 ° 8 ' W 342.78
29-30 S 9 ° 49 ' W 411.77
30-31 S 20 ° 54 ' E 404.63
31-32 S 11 ° 15 ' W 419.86
32-33 S 13 ° 51 ' E 422.32
33-34 S 33 ° 2 ' W 678.30
34-35 S 9 ° 15 ' W 1,090.31
BEARING
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Bayog Watershed Subproject
Corner DISTANCE (meter)BEARING
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Bayog Watershed Subproject
35-36 S 88 ° 54 ' W 352.42
36-37 S 22 ° 55 ' W 390.27
37-38 S 9 ° 33 ' E 909.25
38-39 S 12 ° 26 ' W 691.77
39-40 S 21 ° 35 ' W 733.56
40-41 S 24 ° 41 ' W 1,190.34
41-42 S 64 ° 13 ' W 891.92
42-43 S 24 ° 15 ' E 269.43
43-44 S 43 ° 4 ' W 1,094.54
44-45 S 55 ° 42 ' W 863.44
45-46 S 4 ° 22 ' E 856.36
46-47 N 85 ° 2 ' W 396.75
47-48 S 28 ° 33 ' W 346.74
48-49 S 71 ° 32 ' E 552.49
49-50 S 18 ° 46 ' W 519.76
50-51 S 45 ° 36 ' W 971.14
51-52 S 12 ° 13 ' W 1,416.26
52-53 S 72 ° 56 ' W 482.16
53-54 S 82 ° 6 ' W 586.21
54-55 S 76 ° 31 ' W 672.04
55-56 N 52 ° 57 ' W 780.74
56-57 S 87 ° 24 ' W 803.53
57-58 S 15 ° 29 ' W 168.88
58-59 N 34 ° 6 ' W 487.39
59-60 N 60 ° 4 ' W 272.49
60-61 N 0 ° 52 ' E 582.38
61-62 N 24 ° 47 ' E 817.70
62-63 N 27 ° 52 ' E 897.97
63-61 N 38 ° 59 ' E 900.59
64-65 N 48 ° 12 ' E 844.81
65-66 N 65 ° 29 ' E 627.11
66-67 S 86 ° 43 ' E 311.12
67-68 N 44 ° 19 ' E 873.77
Corner DISTANCE (meter)BEARING
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Bayog Watershed Subproject
68-69 S 78 ° 4 ' E 344.44
69-70 N 50 ° 44 ' E 580.09
70-1 N 67 ° 50 ' E 986.75
Reference point:
Corner 1: long-X 123 ° 5 ' 20 "lat-Y 7 52 ' 49 "