+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Executive Summary for Ogden: Instructional Improvement … SIP 14-16.pdf · Executive Summary for...

Executive Summary for Ogden: Instructional Improvement … SIP 14-16.pdf · Executive Summary for...

Date post: 06-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: trinhdiep
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
29
Executive Summary for Ogden: Instructional Improvement Plan • Students will be highly engaged at least 90% of the time. • Staff will intentionally communicate with students, the school and classroom daily expectations for movement, interaction, and learning weekly. • Students will develop leadership skills by utilizing Covey's 7 Habits of Happy Kids. • Teachers will utilize researched based instructional strategies in the design of their lesson plans as related to the newly devised Standard Course of Study 100% of the time. • Teachers will select appropriate instructional technology as a tool to enhance student learning weekly. • Teachers will develop essential questions as a part of their instructional planning in reading and math, daily. • Teachers will design differentiated instruction and learning opportunities that are reflective of student learning styles and needs 80% of the time. • Teachers will implement relevant, meaningful, and rigorous instruction 90% of the time • Teachers will clearly identify essential questions and criteria for success for every reading and math lesson 90% of the time. • Students will be engaged in project based learning utilizing technology at least twice during the year. • Teachers will facilitate differentiated instruction in a variety of instructional settings. • Teachers will ask questions reflective of the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to promote critical thinking and problem solving daily. •Teachers will implement research-based vocabulary instruction weekly. •Grades 3-5 will implement Cluster Grouping model • Teachers will utilize a variety of quick and informal assessments to assess the impact of researched based strategies to guide daily instruction at least 95% of the time. • Teachers will utilize 21st century technology as part of their formative assessment plan, monthly. • Teachers will develop and utilize common formative assessments to guide instructional planning at least two times each quarter. COMMUNITY BUILDING: CONTENT PLANNING: INSTRUCTION: ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING: 9/25/2014
Transcript

Executive Summary for Ogden: Instructional Improvement Plan

• Students will be highly engaged at least 90% of the time.

• Staff will intentionally communicate with students, the school and

classroom daily expectations for movement, interaction, and learning

weekly.

• Students

will develop leadership skills by utilizing Covey's 7 Habits of Happy Kids.

• Teachers will utilize researched based instructional strategies in the

design of their lesson plans as related to the newly devised Standard

Course of Study 100% of the time.

• Teachers will select appropriate instructional technology as a tool to

enhance student learning weekly.

• Teachers will develop essential questions as a part of their instructional

planning in reading and math, daily.

• Teachers will design differentiated instruction and learning opportunities

that are reflective of student learning styles and needs 80% of the time.

• Teachers will implement relevant, meaningful, and rigorous instruction

90% of the time

• Teachers will clearly identify essential questions and criteria for success

for

every reading and math lesson 90% of the time.

• Students will be engaged in project based learning utilizing technology

at least twice during the year.

• Teachers will facilitate differentiated instruction in a variety of

instructional settings.

• Teachers will ask questions reflective of the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

and Webb's Depth of Knowledge

to promote critical thinking and problem solving daily.

•Teachers will implement research-based vocabulary instruction weekly.

•Grades 3-5 will

implement Cluster Grouping model

• Teachers will utilize a variety of quick and informal assessments to

assess the impact of researched based strategies to guide daily

instruction at least 95% of the time.

• Teachers will utilize 21st century technology as part of their formative

assessment plan, monthly.

• Teachers will develop and utilize common formative assessments to

guide instructional planning at least two times each quarter.

COMMUNITY BUILDING: CONTENT PLANNING:

INSTRUCTION: ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING:

9/25/2014

Vision:

Mission:

School Vision and Mission Statements for Ogden

At Ogden Elementary School we provide a nurturing environment committed to achieving excellence. All students are challenged to reach

their maximum potential through individualized education that addresses their unique learning styles. We create a safe and positive learning

environment which is student centered, facilitated by teachers and supported by families and the community. Every student is provided the

tools needed to live responsible, creative and productive lives in a global society

Ogden Elementary School is striving to provide the ultimate 21st century educational experience for all learners. Teachers stay abreast of the latest

educational trends, are continual learners, and pilot programs in order to maintain a rigorous curriculum and facilitate critical thinking for all students. We seek

to sustain a safe, caring, engaging environment, where students are excited about learning and take pride and ownership of their learning. We establish

cohesive partnerships with parents, and maintain open lines of communication to ensure student success.

We continue to build relationships throughout the community, striving to involve local businesses in order to expand community partnerships and build the

community around us. We produce diligent, responsible citizens, equipped with the necessary problem solving and communication skills to play an active role

in a 21st century global society.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

LEA or Charter Name/Number:

School Name/Number:

School Address:

Plan Year(s):

Date prepared:

Committee Position* Committee Position*

Principal

Assistant Principal Representative

SIT Chair Person

Teacher Representative, Kindergarten

Teacher Representative, 1st Grade

Teacher Representative, 2nd Grade

Teacher Representative, 3rd Grade

Teacher Representative, 4th Grade

Teacher Representative, 5th Grade

Teacher Representative, Enhancements

Special Education Representative

Teacher Assistant Representative

Parent Representative

Parent Representative

Parent Representative

Parent Representative

* Add to list as needed. Each group may have more than one representative.

Cheryl Keck

Margurite Martin

Dustin Bienias

Christina Dowe

Lisa Ryan

Helen Bell

Christie Johnson

Kristi Harper

Stephanie Washington

Maggie Matthews

Matt Uckert

Cynthia Gallagher

Michael Cobb

School Improvement Team Membership

Date

Tammy Bruestle

Annmarie Edwards

Timothy McAuliffe

From GS §115C-105.27: “The principal of each school, representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants assigned to

the school building, and parents of children enrolled in the school shall constitute a school improvement team to develop a school improvement plan to improve student performance.

Representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants shall be elected by their respective groups by secret ballot....Parents

serving on school improvement teams shall reflect the racial and socioeconomic composition of the students enrolled in that school and shall not be members of the building-level staff.”

Name

Date

New Hanover County Schools - 650

Ogden 650356

3637 Middle Sound Loop Road

2014-2016

Aug-14

Principal Signature:

Local Board Approval Signature:

Name

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

English Language Arts 80 84.8 4.8

AllAmerican

IndianAsian Black Hisp

2 or more

racesWhite EDS LEP SWD AIG

3rd Grade 84.8 66.7 88.3 59.1 16.7 >95

4th Grade 82.2 81.5 85.7 20.0 >95

5th Grade 72.6 74.7 58.8 12.6 >95

AllAmerican

IndianAsian Black Hisp

2 or more

racesWhite EDS LEP SWD AIG

3rd Grade 87.3

4th Grade 84.7

5th Grade 75.1

Priority Goal 1 and Associated Strategies

School Goal 1: The proficiency of Ogden students will increase by a minimum of 2.5% in English Language Arts (ELA). Using CCR Composite

Growth

Supports this district goal:

SMART Goal (one- to three-

year projection)

New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by EOG and EOC test results within the next 3-5 years.

Strengths: Overall reading proficiency is 84.8% as

measured by CCR Composite and even higher using

state scores. Profiency increases each year. Teachers

continue to use research based practices to teach ELA.

Teachers use formative assessment to monitor growth

and progress and guide instruction.

By June of 2014, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by EOG

tests.

Opportunities For Improvement: Teachers will

participate in Professional Learning Communities

geared toward improving vocabulary instruction.

Information/Data needed that you do not have

2013-2014 ELA Percent Proficient by Subgroup

Percent Proficient

2014-2015 ELA Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup

What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)

Pla

n/D

oP

lan

/Do

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Measure(s)

Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.

Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.

3. Implement interventions with help of Instructional Coach and Interventionist to raise comprehension proficiency

1. Use TRC to measure comprehension K-3 and as needed in 4-5

2. Use comprehension data to differentiate instruction

Action steps:

1. Use DIBELS to measure fluency K-3 and as needed in 4-5

2. Use fluency data to differentiate instruction

Strategy: Seek proficient reading fluency

3. Implement interventions with help of Instructional Coach and Interventionist to raise fluency proficiency

Strategy: Seek proficient reading comprehension

BOY, MOY, EOY

Action steps:

Reported When Summative MeasuresReported When

C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the

overall goal was met (Impact)

Formative Measure(s)

Strategy 2 and 3: BOY,

MOY, EOY

Strategy 1: Quarterly

Strategy 2 and 3: Use of

DIBELS and TRC fidelity

checklist.

Pla

n/D

o

Strategy 2:

Strategy 3:

Strategy 1:

Strategy: Emphasize academic vocabulary in all reading instruction.

1. Focus Professional Learning Communities on vocabulary instruction

2. Vocabulary instruction included in plans weekly

3. Learning-focused vocabulary strategies present in classrooms (word walls, Frayer models, etc.)

Action steps:

Act D. If not successful, what

changes will be made?

.Strategy 1: Lesson plans will include

vocabulary instruction 85% of the time

Strategy 2 and 3: Fluency and comprehension homework for students scoring below the benchmark goal will be included in weekly lesson plans.

NC EOG Proficiency Scores Jun-15

Strategy 2 and 3: Baseline will be BOY

DIBELS and TRC, then benchmark

data from MOY and EOY.

Strategy 1: If plans are not implemented, further training will be made available on vocabulary instruction as well as sample lesson plans. The

principal will work one-on-one with teachers who need assistance with following the plan for Goal 1

DIBELS/TRC data

Check

A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine

if the strategy was implemented/completed

(Completion Data)

Reported When

Strategy 1: Quarterly

Strategy 2 and 3: BOY,

MOY, EOY

Strategy 1: Observation

of teacher lesson plans

B. List the measure(s) the team will use to

determine if the strategy was implemented

correctly (Fidelity)

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Mathematics 80.2 82.2 2

AllAmerican

IndianAsian Black Hisp

2 or more

racesWhite EDS LEP SWD AIG

3rd Grade 77.6 50.0 80.2 59.1 16.7 >95

4th Grade 84.2 85.9 71.4 40.0 >95

5th Grade 85.8 89.5 64.7 25.0 >95

AllAmerican

IndianAsian Black Hisp

2 or more

racesWhite EDS LEP SWD AIG

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

By June of 2014, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by EOG tests.

Priority Goal 2 and Associated Strategies

Pla

n/D

oSchool Goal 1: The proficiency of ABC students will increase by a minimum of 2.5% in Math. Using CCR Composite

Supports this district goal: New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by EOG and EOC test results within the next 3-5 years.

SMART Goal (one- to three-

year projection)

Pla

n/D

o

Percent Proficient Growth

What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)

2013-2014 ELA Percent Proficient by Subgroup

2014-2015 ELA Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup

Strengths: Protected instructional time as well as

common planning time, differentiated instruction, and

small group instruction have aided our improved math

achievement.

Opportunities For Improvement: Staff will

incorporate their vocabulary instruction into math

focusing on academic math vocabulary.

Information/Data needed that you do not have: We have

sufficient measurement instruments to measure data needed for

this goal.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Measure(s)

Act D. If not successful, what

changes will be made?

Strategy 1: If plans are not implemented, further training will be made available on vocabulary instruction as well as sample lesson plans. The

principal will work one-on-one with teachers who need assistance with following the plan for Goal 1.

Strategy 2: Professional development will be made available to those needing further assistance on implementing said programs. Interventionist

will work closely with classroom teachers to provide interventions for students not performing satisfactorily.

Check

Strategy 2: Benchmark will be

BOY data from K-2 mClass Math

and 3-5 timed quizzes and

progress monitoring data

Strategy 2: BOY, MOY,

EOY

Strategy 2: Benchmark

and progress monitoring

data

Strategy 1: Lesson plans will

include specific math vocabulary

instruction 85% of the time.

NC EOG Proficiency Scores

A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine

if the strategy was implemented/completed

(Completion Data)

Reported When

Strategy 2: BOY, MOY,

EOY

Strategy 1: QuarterlyStrategy 1: Observation of

adherence and sample

lesson plans available

Strategy 1: Quarterly

Jun-15

mClass Math grades K-2 BOY, MOY, EOY

Reported When Summative MeasuresFormative Measure(s)

C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the

overall goal was met (Impact)

Strategy: Use data collection tools (ie. ScootPad K-5 and SchoolNet 3-5) to monitor and measure concept knowledge

2. Differentiate instruction based on performance

Reported When

Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.

B. List the measure(s) the team will use to

determine if the strategy was implemented

correctly (Fidelity)

Pla

n/D

oStrategy: Emphasize academic math vocabulary

Action steps:

1. Intentional vocabulary instruction during math lessons

1. Use mClass Math K-2 and timed quizzes 3-5 to monitor math fluency

2. Professional Learning Teams focused on vocabulary instruction

Action steps:

1. Create assignments based on objectives

2. Use fluency data to differentiate instruction

3. Assign fluency homework/interventions to students not meeting benchmarks

Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.

3. Inclusion of vocabulary instruction in weekly lesson plans

Strategy 2:

Strategy: Math fluency

Strategy 1:

Strategy 3:

Action steps:

3. Apply interventions to those not performing satisfactorily

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Science 76.3 82.1 5.8

AllAmerican

IndianAsian Black Hisp

2 or more

racesWhite EDS LEP SWD AIG

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade 82.1 86.3 70.6 12.5 >95

AllAmerican

IndianAsian Black Hisp

2 or more

racesWhite EDS LEP SWD AIG

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

By June of 2014, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by EOG tests.

Priority Goal 3 and Associated Strategies

Pla

n/D

oSchool Goal 1: The proficiency of ABC students will increase by a minimum of 2.5% in Science. Using CCR Composite

Supports this district goal: New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by EOG and EOC test results within the next 3-5 years.

SMART Goal (one- to three-

year projection)

Pla

n/D

o

Percent Proficient Growth

What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)

2013-2014 ELA Percent Proficient by Subgroup

2014-2015 ELA Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup

Strengths: Protected instructional time as well as

common planning time, differentiated instruction, and

small group instruction have aided our improved science

achievement.

Opportunities For Improvement: Staff will

incorporate their vocabulary instruction as well as

Discovery Education into lessons.

Information/Data needed that you do not have: We have

sufficient data tools to monitor this measure.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Measure(s)

Act D. If not successful, what

changes will be made?

Strategy 1: If plans are not implemented, further training will be made available on vocabulary instruction as well as sample lesson plans. The principal will work one-on-one with teachers who need assistance with following the plan for Goal 1

Strategy 2: Additional professional development on Discovery Education will be made available if needed.

Check

Strategy 2 Teachers will regularly

assign and maintain assignments

in Discovery Education

Strategy 2- Quarterly Strategy 2- Teacher created asssessments and progress in Discovery Education

Strategy 1 Lesson plans will

include explicit science vocabulary

instruction 85% of the time

A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine

if the strategy was implemented/completed

(Completion Data)

Reported When

Strategy 2- Quarterly

Strategy 1- Quarterly

Strategy 1- Observation

of adherence and sample

lesson plans available

Strategy 1- Quarterly NC EOG Proficiency Scores Jun-15

Reported When Summative MeasuresFormative Measure(s)

C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the

overall goal was met (Impact)

Reported When

Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.

B. List the measure(s) the team will use to

determine if the strategy was implemented

correctly (Fidelity)

Pla

n/D

oStrategy: Emphasize academic vocabulary

Action steps:

1. Intentional vocabulary instruction during science lessons.

1. Maintain assignments and explorations in Discovery Education 3-5

2. Professional learning teams focused on vocabulary instruction

Action steps:

2. Incorporate hands-on activities in science lesson plans quarterly

3.

Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.

3. Inclusion of vocabulary instruction in quarterly science plans

Strategy 2:

Strategy: Implement Discovery Education with hands-on activities from the science kits

Strategy 1:

Strategy 3:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Statement of Responsibility for the School District Superintendent

The district superintendent is responsible for coordinating adoption and implementation of this plan, evaluating the principal's

performance with respect to school safety, monitoring and evaluating implementation of this plan at the school-level, and

coordinating with local law enforcement and court officials as appropriate.

New Hanover County Schools District Safety/Emergency Operations Plan is available at: (http://www.nhcs.net/crisisplan/)

Safe School Plan for Ogden Elementary

State Law SL 2011-145 (HB 200) Appropriations Act of 2011, and SL 2011-391 (HB 22) Technical corrections to the

Appropriations Act of 2011, requires a school safety plan be developed by each school. The school-level plan must address any

safety and discipline concerns of the school.

Name and role of person(s)

responsible for implementing this

plan:

Chris Hanson (chair), Michael Cobb (administration), Christie Johnson, Holly Parks, Dee

Colenda, Annmarie Edwards, Maggie Matthews, Vickie Lapp, Kristen Gambill, Matt

Uckert, Andrea Zwally, Lisa Miskech, Caress Clegg, Lisa Ryan, Rene Biddix, Sheryll

Cook, Valerie Willetts, Yasmin Bratcher

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

The school principal is responsible for restoring, if necessary, and maintaining a safe, secure, and orderly school environment.

The duties of the principal with respect to this include exhibiting appropriate leadership for school personnel and students,

providing for alternative placements for students who are seriously disruptive, reporting all criminal acts, and providing

appropriate disciplinary consequences for disruptive students.

Statement of the Roles of Other Administrators, Teachers, and Other School Personnel

School personnel are tasked as follows with restoring, if necessary, and maintaining a safe, secure, and orderly school

environment:

Assistant Principal(s): Michael Cobb

Statement of Responsibility for the School Principal

Teachers: All certified staff

Teacher Assistants: All classified staff

Services for At-risk Students

The following procedures are used to identify and serve the needs of students at-risk of academic failure, or of engaging in

disruptive or disorderly behavior, or both.

MTSS, Mindset Training/re-certification (annually), Individual Education Plans, 504 documents: Student progress is tracked using

classroom data (DIBELS, TRC, formative assessments, clasroom observation, etc). Concerning performance will initiate the

MTSS model and will involve parents, student, and staff. Documentation and progress monitoring will be regular and consistent.

The Seven Habits of Happy Kids program will be implemented school-wide as an appropriate behavior model. Severe

behavior/emotional concerns will be addressed by school administration, school psychologist, and guidance counselor in

conjunction with families and applicable community services.

Other School Staff:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

The following services are provided to students assigned to an alternative school or an alternative learning program.

Hospital Homebound and Lake Forest Academy

The following mechanisms are used for assessing the needs of disruptive and disorderly students who are at risk of academic

failure, providing these students with services to assist them in achieving academically and modifying their behavior, and for

removing them from classrooms when necessary.

Individual behavior plans for all student exhibiting disruptive behaviors are in place and monitored regularly by staff and parents.

If a child's behavior escalates to the point of being removed from the classroom, administration notifies parents.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Goal:

Target:

Goal:

Target:

Goal:

Target:

Target:

Target:

Target:

Professional Development Planned/Completed

The following measures are used to determine the effectiveness of the school's efforts to assist at-risk students, including

effectiveness of procedures. (Alternative Learning Programs).

Increase by 100% by September 2014

The following measurable (goals) for improving school safety and order are in place. (Copy as needed depending upon number of

goals.)

Implement Ident-a-kid as a safety measure for monitoring and tracking visitors.

The following planned or recently completed professional development aligns with the goals of our safe school initiative:

Increase by 100% by August 2014

Update all Crisis Notebooks to current information and completeness

Mindset Training

Monthly Fire Drills

Completed

Tornado Drill Planned

Lockdown Drill Planned

Students identified by the MTSS model receive differentiated instruction daily during Intervention/Enrichment time

Instructional coach is monitoring implementation and fidelity of interventions school-wide

Completed

Planned

Crisis Team Training Planned

MTSS paperwork Training

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Program or Strategy Being Funded Amount of Funding

Funding Uses and Sources – At-risk and Alternative Learning Schools and Programs

Source of Funding

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Title I School-wide Compliance Review and Plan

A comprehensive school improvement plan must address all of the components defined in the Elementary and Secondary Education

Act (Section 1114(b) of Title I) . Each required component is described below, with an explanation of how each contributes to the

creation of a successful schoolwide program. The goals and strategies you've already developed may fulfill many of these requirements.

Schoolwide reform strategies: Instructional strategies and initiatives in the comprehensive plan must be based on scientifically based

research, strengthen the core academic program, increase the quality and quantity of learning time, and address the learning needs of

all students in the school.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school is addressing the need for schoolwide reform in the following ways, in addition to our focus on the priority goals

listed in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Our school is addressing the need for highly qualified teachers in the following ways, in addition to our focus on the priority

goals listed in this plan:

Instruction by highly qualified teachers: High poverty, low-performing schools are sometimes staffed with disproportionately high

numbers of teachers who are not highly qualified. To address this disproportionality, the ESEA requires that all teachers of core

academic subjects and instructional paraprofessionals (employees of a LEA who provide instructional support) in a schoolwide program

school meet the qualifications required by section 1119. Student achievement increases in schools where teaching and learning have

the highest priority, and students achieve at higher levels when taught by teachers who know their subject matter and are skilled in

teaching it.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

High-quality and ongoing professional development: Teachers and other staff in schoolwide program schools must be equipped to

face the challenge of helping all students meet the State’s academic achievement standards. To do this, they must be familiar with the

goals and objectives of the schoolwide plan, and receive the sustained, high-quality professional development required to implement

them. The statute requires that professional development be extended, as appropriate, to those who partner with teachers to support

student achievement, such as principals, paraprofessionals, and parents.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school provides high quality, on-going professional development in the following ways, in addition to our focus on the

priority goals listed in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to high-need schools: Although recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers is

an on-going challenge in high poverty schools, low-performing students in these schools have a special need for excellent teachers.

Therefore, the schoolwide plan must describe the strategies it will use to attract and retain highly qualified teachers.

Our school uses the following strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to our high-need schools, in addition to our

focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Strategies to increase parental involvement: Research continues to demonstrate that successful schools have significant and

sustained levels of parental involvement. Therefore, it is important that schoolwide plans contain strategies to involve parents in the

school community. Additionally, state law requires parent representation on every school's improvement team, and federal

requirements specify that each school must develop: 1) an approach for communication with parents, 2) activities to involve parents,

and 3) an approach for training parents to better understand how to help their children excel in school.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school uses the following strategies to increase parental involvement, in addition to our focus on the priority goals listed

in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary

schoolwide programs: This component emphasizes the value of creating a coherent and seamless educational program for at-risk

students. Early childhood programs, including Early Reading First and others, provide a foundation for later academic success, and

effective schoolwide programs capitalize on this strong start.

Our school uses the following pre-school-to-elementary transition strategies, in addition to our focus on the priority goals

listed in this plan:

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school uses the following strategies for developing teacher skills in formative assessment, in addition to our focus on

the priority goals listed in this plan:

Measures to include teachers in decisions regarding the use of academic assessments: In addition to State assessment results,

teachers need current and ongoing assessment data that describe student achievement. These data often come from less formal

assessments, such as observation, performance assessments, or end-of-course tests. The schoolwide program should provide

teachers with professional development that increases their understanding of the appropriate uses of multiple assessment measures

and how to use assessment results to improve instruction.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Our school uses the following differentiation strategies, in addition to our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty attaining proficiency receive effective and timely additional

assistance: The schoolwide program school must identify students who need additional learning time to meet standards and provide

them with timely, additional assistance that is tailored to their needs. This assistance must be available to all students in the school who

need it.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Coordination and integration of Federal, State, and local services and programs: Schoolwide program schools are expected to

use the flexibility available to them to integrate services and programs with the aim of upgrading the entire educational program and

helping all students reach proficient and advanced levels of achievement. In addition to coordinating and integrating services,

schoolwide program schools may combine most Federal, State and local funds to provide those services. Exercising this option

maximizes the impact of the resources available to carry out the schoolwide program.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school uses the following strategies to coordinate and integrate federal, state, and local services and programs, in

addition to our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Compliance Review and Plan for Schools in Title I School Improvement

Each school identified for Title I School Improvement must, no later than three months after notification that the school is in Title I School

Improvement, develop or revise its school plan. This plan must be developed in consultation with parents, school staff, the local

education agency serving the school, and outside experts. The plan must cover a two-year period.

Professional development requirements: Schools in Title I School Improvement must 1) provide assurance that the school will spend

not less than 10 percent of its Title I funds each year for high quality professional development, 2) specify how these professional

development funds will be used to remove the school from school improvement status, and 3) incorporate a teacher mentor program.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school is addressing these three additional professional development requirements in the following ways, in addition to

our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Notification to parents: Schools in Title I School Improvement must describe specifically how the school will provide written notice

about the identification of the school as a Title I School Improvement school to the parents of each student enrolled in the school.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school is providing written notification to parents in the following manner:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

School, district and state agency responsibilities: Schools in Title I School Improvement are required to clearly define the

responsibilities of the school, LEA, and SEA in implementing improvement strategies. LEAs are minimally required to offer technical

assistance in the form of data analysis, budget analysis, and identification and implementation of improvement strategies. State-level

assistance may include provision of a state-wide system of support, including allocation of funding and other technical assistance.

Our school, the school district, and the state education agency are supporting improvement of our school in the following

ways:

School:

LEA:

SEA:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Strategies to increase parental involvement: Research continues to demonstrate that successful schools have significant and

sustained levels of parental involvement. Therefore, it is important that targeted assistance programs develop strategies to involve

parents of Title I students in the school community. Additionally, state law requires parent representation on every school's

improvement team, and federal requirements specify that each school must develop: 1) an approach for communication with parents, 2)

activities to involve parents, and 3) an approach for training parents to better understand how to help their children excel in school.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school uses the following strategies to increase parental involvement, in addition to our focus on the priority goals listed

in this plan:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

Our school uses the following strategies to coordinate and integrate federal, state, and local services and programs, in

addition to our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:

Coordination and integration of Federal, State, and local services and programs: Targeted assistance program schools are

expected to coordinate and integrate services, with other Federal, State and local programs and services.

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Date Revised: 9/25/2014

Priority Goal 1 Priority Goal 2 Priority Goal 3

Strategy 1

Strategy 2

Strategy 3

This school improvement plan

addresses this requirement.

Please see the priority goals and

strategies noted to the right:

Our school uses the following strategies to support and coordinate with the regular education program, in addition to our

Plans must support and coordinate with regular education programs: Effective targeted assistance programs capitalize on strong

support and coordination with regular education programs. This component emphasizes the value of creating a coherent and seamless

educational program for at-risk students. This may include transitioning students from early childhood programs such as Early Reading

First and others to provide a foundation for later academic success.

Date Revised: 9/25/2014


Recommended