+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Exhibit A - American Civil Liberties Union

Exhibit A - American Civil Liberties Union

Date post: 27-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
52
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NASSER Plaintiff, v, BARACK H. OBAMA, et al. Defendants. No, (JDB) DECLARATION OF JONATHAN MANES I, Jonathan Manes, under penalty of perjury declare as follows: 1, I represent PlaintiffNasser al-Aulaqi in this action. 2. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The purpose of this declaration is to bring to the Court's attention an official government disclosure regarding details of the military's policy regarding targeted strikes using lethal weapons. 3, Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of General Counsel, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Targeting Cycle and Damage Estimation Methodology, Nov. 10, 2009. This exhibit is a complete copy of a set of 47 briefing slides that were disclosed to the ACLU in response to a Freedom of Information Act request seeking records relating to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles-commonly known as "drones"-for the purpose of targeted killing. The briefing slides disclose in considerable detail the various steps that are undertaken and considerations that are taken into account when the military engages in targeted strikes.
Transcript

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NASSER AL~AULAQI,.

Plaintiff,

v,

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al.

Defendants.

No, 1O~cv~1469 (JDB)

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN MANES

I, Jonathan Manes, under penalty of perjury declare as follows:

1, I represent Plaintiff Nasser al-Aulaqi in this action.

2. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum in

Support of Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and in Opposition to

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The purpose of this declaration is to bring to the Court's

attention an official government disclosure regarding details of the military's policy

regarding targeted strikes using lethal weapons.

3, Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of General

Counsel, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Targeting Cycle and Damage Estimation

Methodology, Nov. 10, 2009. This exhibit is a complete copy of a set of 47 briefing

slides that were disclosed to the ACLU in response to a Freedom of Information Act

request seeking records relating to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles-commonly

known as "drones"-for the purpose of targeted killing. The briefing slides disclose in

considerable detail the various steps that are undertaken and considerations that are taken

into account when the military engages in targeted strikes.

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a letter

addressed to me from Mark H. Herrington, Associate Deputy Counsel, Department of

Defense Office ofLitigation Counsel. This letter accompanied the disclosure of the

briefing slides attached hereto as Exhibit A. The letter states that "generally speaking,

weapons fired by drones are treated identically to weapons fired by other aircraft" and

indicates that the briefing slides disclosed to plaintiffs counsel (Exhibit A) "describe the

Joint Targeting Cycle including selection and prioritization criteria, no-strike and

collateral damage estimation methodology, and the sensitive target approval and review

(STAR) process."

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my

knowledge and belief. Executed on October 8, 2010.

~~

2

Exhibit A

Gen

eral

Cou

nsel

10 N

ov 2

009

Der

ived

Fro

m: C

JCSI

316

0.01

, CJC

SI 3

122.

06CJo

int T

arge

ting

Cyc

le

and

Col

late

ral D

amag

e Es

timat

ion

Met

hodo

logy

(CD

M)

Brie

fing

is U

ncla

ssifi

ed//F

OU

OA

CLU

DR

ON

ES

JO

INT

STA

FF 0

0000

1

2U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•B

ackg

roun

d•

Ref

eren

ces

•Ta

rget

ing

and

Col

late

ral D

amag

e–

Def

initi

ons

–Ta

rget

ing

Ove

rvie

w–

Targ

etin

g C

ycle

key

ele

men

ts–

Col

late

ral D

amag

e E

stim

atio

n•

Sum

mar

y•

Que

stio

ns/D

iscu

ssio

n

Age

nda

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

002

3U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•D

OD

Dire

ctiv

e 23

11.0

1, 9

May

200

6, “D

oD L

aw o

f War

Pro

gram

”•

CJC

SI 5

810.

01, “

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

DO

D L

aw o

f War

Pro

gram

”•

CJC

SI 3

160.

01, “

No-

Stri

ke a

nd C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Est

imat

ion

Met

hodo

logy

” •

CJC

SI 3

122.

06, “

Sen

sitiv

e Ta

rget

App

rova

l and

Rev

iew

(STA

R)

Pro

cess

”•

Join

t Pub

licat

ion

3-60

, 13

Apr

il 20

07, “

Join

t Tar

getin

g”•

DIA

Inst

ruct

ion

3000

.002

, 15

July

200

8, “U

.S./A

llied

Tar

getin

g A

naly

sis”

•JT

CG

-ME

Pub

licat

ion,

61

JTC

G/M

E-0

5-4,

29

Sep

tem

ber 2

008”

, C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Est

imat

ion

(CD

E) T

able

Dev

elop

men

t”•

JTC

G-M

E A

ccre

dite

d C

DE

Tab

les,

9 J

anua

ry 2

009

Ref

eren

ces

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

003

4U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Join

t Tar

getin

g D

efin

ition

s and

Pro

cess

es

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

004

5U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•Ta

rget

ing:

the

proc

ess

of s

elec

ting

and

prio

ritiz

ing

targ

ets

and

mat

chin

g th

e ap

prop

riate

resp

onse

to th

em, c

onsi

derin

g op

erat

iona

l req

uire

men

ts

and

capa

bilit

ies

–Th

e pu

rpos

e of

targ

etin

g is

to in

tegr

ate

and

sync

hron

ize

fires

into

join

t op

erat

ions

–Ta

rget

ing

supp

orts

the

proc

ess

of li

nkin

g de

sire

d ef

fect

s of

fire

s to

ac

tions

and

task

s at

the

join

t for

ce c

ompo

nent

leve

l

•Fi

res:

the

use

of w

eapo

n sy

stem

s to

cre

ate

a sp

ecifi

c le

thal

or n

onle

thal

ef

fect

on

a ta

rget

(JP

1-0

2)

Targ

etin

g an

d F

ires

Def

initi

ons

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

005

6U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Targ

et: A

n en

tity

or o

bjec

t con

side

red

for p

ossi

ble

enga

gem

ent o

r oth

er a

ctio

n

Iden

tifie

d fo

r pos

sibl

e ac

tion

to s

uppo

rt th

eco

mm

ande

r’s o

bjec

tive,

gui

danc

e, a

nd

inte

nt

Are

aC

ompl

ex

Inst

alla

tion

Forc

e Eq

uipm

ent

Cap

abili

tyFu

nctio

n Sy

stem

Entit

yIn

divi

dual

Beh

avio

r

Targ

et D

efin

ition

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

006

7U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

OD

esig

ned

to p

rovi

de a

mea

ns to

sup

port

ach

ieve

men

t of J

FC’s

obj

ectiv

es …

. JP

3-60

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

Are

we

acco

mpl

ishi

ng

our

goal

?

Wha

t is o

ur g

oal?

Wha

t tar

gets

mus

t we

effe

ct

to a

chie

ve o

ur g

oal ?

Bes

t mea

ns to

eff

ect

the

targ

et

Com

pone

nt

targ

etin

g an

d en

gage

men

ts

App

rova

lJoin

t Tar

getin

g C

ycle

(JTC

)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

007

8U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

•G

uida

nce:

–G

roun

d R

ules

/Pol

icie

s–

Est

ablis

hes

Sco

pe/R

estri

ctio

ns–

Driv

es s

ubse

quen

t pha

ses

of

the

targ

etin

g cy

cle

•C

omes

Fro

m:

–P

res/

SE

CD

EF,

CoC

om, J

FC–

Law

of A

rmed

Con

flict

–R

ules

of E

ngag

emen

t

Wha

t is o

ur g

oal?

Prov

ides

the

criti

cal l

ink

to M

ilita

ry N

eces

sity

End

Sta

te a

nd C

omm

ande

r’s O

bjec

tives

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

008

9U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Wha

t tar

gets

mus

t we

enga

ge

to a

chie

ve o

ur g

oal ?

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

•Ta

rget

Vet

ting

–C

olle

ctiv

e ef

fort

of th

e In

telli

genc

e C

omm

unity

–E

xam

ines

•Ta

rget

Iden

tific

atio

n, lo

catio

n,

func

tion,

des

crip

tion,

si

gnifi

canc

e, c

ritic

al e

lem

ents

, ta

rget

exp

ecta

tion,

func

tiona

l ch

arac

teriz

atio

n/co

llate

ral

obje

cts

of c

once

rn, i

ntel

ga

in/lo

ss–

IC v

otes

and

pro

vide

s ad

vice

on

each

targ

et

•Ta

rget

Val

idat

ion

–C

ompl

ianc

e w

ith c

omm

ande

r’s

obje

ctiv

es–

Law

Of W

ar (L

OW

)/Law

Of A

rmed

C

onfli

ct (L

OA

C) a

nd R

ules

of

Eng

agem

ent (

RO

E)

•Ta

rget

’s re

leva

ncy

with

in th

e ta

rget

sys

tem

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent a

nd P

rior

itiza

tion

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

009

10U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

TD

N R

evie

w

Targ

et N

omin

atio

n:

“Her

e’s

a po

ssib

le ta

rget

Targ

et R

evie

w:

“Is th

is ta

rget

dev

elop

ed?”

Inte

l Rev

iew

: “D

oes

the

inte

llige

nce

supp

ort?

Effe

cts

and

Lega

l Rev

iew

: “W

ill ta

rget

eng

agem

ent f

urth

er th

e C

DR

’s

obje

ctiv

es?”

Targ

et L

istin

g:

“Whi

ch C

DR

’s o

bjec

tive

(s) a

pply

?”

JTC

Pha

se 3

, 4, 5

Join

t Tar

getin

g C

oord

inat

ion

Boa

rd (J

TCB

)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

010

11U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•E

valu

ate

avai

labl

e ca

pabi

litie

s vs

. de

sire

d ef

fect

s to

det

erm

ine

optio

ns–

Effe

ctiv

enes

s &

effi

cien

cy o

f for

ces

–E

stim

ate

the

effe

cts

of a

ttack

s (k

inet

ic &

non

-kin

etic

)–

Wei

ghs

avai

labl

e fo

rces

w/ C

OA

s–

Inlin

e w

ith J

FC’s

Obj

ectiv

es•

Wea

pone

erin

g:–

Wea

pon/

syst

em to

ach

ieve

effe

ct–

Effi

cien

t & e

ffect

ive

use

of re

sour

ces

–O

bjec

tives

and

des

ired

effe

cts

•C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Est

imat

ion:

–U

nint

ende

d or

inci

dent

al d

amag

e to

pe

rson

s or

obj

ects

not

the

inte

nded

ta

rget

and

are

not

law

ful t

arge

tsB

est m

eans

to e

ngag

e th

e ta

rget

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

Cap

abili

ties A

naly

sis

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

011

12U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•C

ritic

al s

tep

in tr

ansi

tioni

ng p

lans

to

exe

cutio

n•

Rev

iew

pre

viou

s st

eps

for

exec

utio

n•

Valid

ate

targ

et li

st c

hang

es•

Con

solid

ate

targ

et d

evel

opm

ent

and

capa

bilit

ies

anal

ysis

resu

lts•

Col

late

ral d

amag

e de

cisi

ons

and

Stri

ke A

ppro

vals

–Ve

rify

auth

oriti

es—

seek

hig

her

appr

oval

•A

ssig

n re

spon

sibi

litie

s fo

r en

gage

men

tA

ppro

val

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Cdr

’s D

ecis

ion

and

For

ce A

ssig

nmen

t

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

012

13U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

DY

NA

MIC

TA

RG

ET

ING

TAR

GE

T

FIX

ASS

ESS

EN

GA

GE

TR

AC

K

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

g an

d F

orce

Exe

cutio

n

Com

pone

nt ta

rget

ing

and

enga

gem

ents

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

•Det

aile

d pl

anni

ng c

ondu

cted

by

tact

ical

leve

l for

ces

-Bas

ed o

n co

mm

ande

r’s g

uida

nce/

orde

rs-F

acili

tate

d by

ope

n ac

cess

to p

lann

ers

at th

e op

erat

iona

l & s

trate

gic

leve

l

•Exe

cutio

n is

con

tinua

lly m

onito

red

for

-How

the

adve

rsar

y re

spon

ds/c

hang

es-A

chie

vem

ent o

f effe

cts

& C

dr’s

obj

ectiv

es-P

erfo

rman

ce o

f for

ces

-Cha

nges

in th

e op

erat

iona

l env

ironm

ent

FIN

D

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

013

14U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•M

easu

res

prog

ress

tow

ard

achi

evin

g th

e co

mm

ande

r’s o

bjec

tives

–M

OP

/ MO

E

•P

rovi

des:

–S

tatu

s–

Ben

chm

ark

for v

alid

atin

g ac

tions

–M

uniti

ons

effe

cts

asse

ssm

ent

–C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Ass

essm

ent

•G

ener

ally

the

leve

l at w

hich

a

spec

ified

ope

ratio

n, ta

sk, o

r act

ion

is

plan

ned

and

exec

uted

sho

uld

be th

e le

vel a

t whi

ch s

uch

activ

ity is

as

sess

ed.

Are

we

acco

mpl

ishi

ng o

ur g

oal?

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Com

bat A

sses

smen

t

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

014

15U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•C

omm

ande

rs m

ust c

ondu

ct a

pro

per p

ropo

rtion

ality

ana

lysi

s to

use

the

amou

nt o

f fo

rce

requ

ired

to a

chie

ve a

dire

ct a

nd c

oncr

ete

mili

tary

adv

anta

ge

•C

DE

Met

hodo

logy

pro

vide

s th

e pr

oces

s to

pre

dict

and

miti

gate

col

late

ral d

amag

e fro

m c

onve

ntio

nal,

non-

nucl

ear k

inet

ic s

trike

s

–Fa

cilit

ates

risk

est

imat

ion

and

miti

gatio

n

–Id

entif

ies

targ

et e

ngag

emen

t’s s

ensi

tivity

and

ass

ocia

ted

risks

–R

equi

red

on e

very

targ

et in

acc

orda

nce

with

Rul

es o

f Eng

agem

ent

–Ta

rget

is w

eapo

neer

ed to

bal

ance

acc

ompl

ishi

ng th

e m

issi

on w

ith th

e ris

ks to

U

.S. f

orce

s an

d th

e ris

k fo

r col

late

ral d

amag

e

Col

late

ral D

amag

e E

stim

atio

n (C

DE

)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

015

16U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

All

Mun

ition

s Te

chni

cal D

ata

is b

ased

on:

–Th

e Jo

int M

uniti

ons

Effe

ctiv

enes

s M

anua

l (JM

EM

) Wea

pon

Sys

tem

(J

WS

)–

Dat

a ap

prov

ed b

y th

e Jo

int T

echn

ical

C

oord

inat

ing

Gro

up/M

uniti

ons

Effe

ctiv

enes

s (J

TCG

/ME

) •

Dat

a up

date

d ev

ery

6 m

onth

s–

The

CD

E M

etho

dolo

gy d

oes

not

acco

unt f

or:

–W

eapo

n M

alfu

nctio

n–

Ope

ratio

nal D

eliv

ery

Err

ors

–A

ltere

d ta

ctic

s–

Unk

now

n Tr

ansi

ent N

on-

Com

bata

nt P

erso

nnel

and

/or

Pro

perty

CD

E M

etho

dolo

gy -

Tech

nica

l Fac

ts

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

016

17U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

CD

E m

etho

dolo

gy is

five

que

stio

ns to

be

answ

ered

bef

ore

enga

ging

a ta

rget

:

1.C

an I

PID

the

obje

ct I

wan

t to

affe

ct?

2.A

re th

ere

prot

ecte

d or

col

late

ral o

bjec

ts, c

ivili

an o

r non

com

bata

nt

pers

onne

l, in

volu

ntar

yhu

man

shi

elds

, or s

igni

fican

t env

ironm

enta

l co

ncer

ns w

ithin

the

effe

cts

rang

e of

the

wea

pon

I wou

ld li

ke to

use

to

atta

ck th

e ta

rget

?3.

Can

I m

itiga

te d

amag

e to

thos

e co

llate

ral c

once

rns

by a

ttack

ing

the

targ

et

with

a d

iffer

ent w

eapo

n or

with

a d

iffer

ent m

etho

d of

eng

agem

ent,

yet s

till

acco

mpl

ish

the

mis

sion

?4.

If no

t, ho

w m

any

civi

lians

and

non

com

bata

nts

do I

thin

k w

ill b

e in

jure

d or

ki

lled

by th

e at

tack

?5.

Are

the

colla

tera

l effe

cts

of m

y at

tack

exc

essi

ve in

rela

tion

to th

e ex

pect

ed

mili

tary

adv

anta

ge g

aine

d an

d do

I ne

ed to

ele

vate

this

dec

isio

n to

the

next

le

vel o

f com

man

d to

atta

ck th

e ta

rget

bas

ed o

n th

e R

OE

in e

ffect

?

The

5 B

asic

Que

stio

ns o

f CD

E

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

017

18U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Col

late

ral D

amag

eM

issi

on/F

orce

Pro

tect

ion

•C

omm

ande

rs a

re re

spon

sibl

e to

eva

luat

e an

d ba

lanc

e m

issi

on re

quire

men

ts a

nd

thre

at to

frie

ndly

forc

es w

hile

taki

ng a

ll re

ason

able

step

s to

miti

gate

the

pote

ntia

l fo

r Col

late

ral D

amag

e.

•Th

e C

DE

Met

hodo

logy

cod

ifies

and

sta

ndar

dize

s th

e co

llate

ral d

amag

e es

timat

e pr

oces

s su

ppor

ting

the

Com

man

der’s

Eva

luat

ion

of R

isk

in th

e M

ilita

ry D

ecis

ion

Mak

ing

Pro

cess

(MD

MP

).

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

018

19U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

CD

M P

roce

ssG

uide

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

019

20U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•N

ever

bef

ore

has

a na

tion

take

n su

ch m

easu

res

and

reso

urce

s to

redu

ce th

e lik

elih

ood

of

civi

lian

casu

altie

s–

Our

pro

cess

es a

nd p

roce

dure

s ar

e rig

orou

s–

The

met

hodo

logy

is d

eriv

ed fr

om p

hysi

cs b

ased

com

pute

r mod

elin

g ba

cked

up

by

wea

pons

test

ing

data

and

dire

ct c

omba

t obs

erva

tions

–E

stim

ates

are

app

lied

by c

omm

ande

rs e

xerc

isin

g in

form

ed ju

dgm

ent t

o m

itiga

te c

ivilia

n ca

sual

ties

whi

le b

alan

cing

thei

r res

pons

ibilit

y to

acc

ompl

ish

the

mis

sion

whi

le d

efen

ding

th

emse

lves

and

thei

r for

cesSu

mm

ary

of C

DE

in J

oint

Tar

getin

g

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

020

21U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Que

stio

ns/D

iscu

ssio

n

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

021

22U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Bac

k-U

p(V

igne

tte)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

022

23U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•H

igh

Val

ue T

arge

t: A

targ

et th

e en

emy

com

man

der r

equi

res

for t

he

succ

essf

ul c

ompl

etio

n of

the

mis

sion

. The

loss

of h

igh-

valu

e ta

rget

s w

ould

be

expe

cted

to s

erio

usly

deg

rade

impo

rtant

ene

my

func

tions

.

•H

igh

Pay

off T

arge

t: A

hig

h va

lue

targ

et w

hose

loss

to th

e en

emy

will

si

gnifi

cant

ly c

ontri

bute

to th

e su

cces

s of

the

frien

dly

cour

se o

f act

ion.

H

igh-

payo

ff ta

rget

s ar

e th

ose

high

-val

ue ta

rget

s th

at m

ust b

e ac

quire

d an

d su

cces

sful

ly a

ttack

ed fo

r the

suc

cess

of t

he fr

iend

ly c

omm

ande

r’s

mis

sion

.

•Ti

me

Sen

sitiv

e Ta

rget

: A jo

int f

orce

com

man

der d

esig

nate

dta

rget

re

quiri

ng im

med

iate

resp

onse

bec

ause

it is

a h

ighl

y lu

crat

ive,

flee

ting

targ

et o

f opp

ortu

nity

or i

t pos

es (o

r will

soo

n po

se) a

dan

ger t

o fri

endl

y fo

rces

.

Targ

et V

alue

Ana

lysi

s Def

initi

ons

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

023

24U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

OMISSION RISK

CD

E Le

vel

1

2

3

4

5

CD

Ris

kM

anag

emen

t

•C

DE

1:

Targ

et V

alid

atio

n / I

nitia

l Ass

essm

ent

•C

DE

2:

Gen

eral

/ Ta

rget

Siz

e A

sses

smen

t•

CD

E 3

: W

eapo

neer

ing

Ass

essm

ent

•C

DE

4:

Ref

ined

Ass

essm

ent

•C

DE

5:

Cas

ualty

Ass

essm

ent

Stru

ctur

al D

amag

eN

ON

ON

ON

OY

ES

Cas

ualti

esN

ON

ON

ON

OY

ES

Tact

ical

Res

trict

ions

NO

NE

Wea

pon

Wea

pon/

Fuse

Wea

pon/

Fuse

/Del

iver

y H

eadi

ng

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t & C

DE

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

024

25U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•La

wfu

l Mili

tary

Obj

ectiv

es–

Con

tribu

te to

the

enem

y’s

war

fight

ing/

war

sus

tain

ing

effo

rt an

dits

de

stru

ctio

n w

ould

con

stitu

te a

def

inite

mili

tary

adv

anta

ge–

Four

ele

men

ts th

at a

llow

targ

ets

to b

e la

wfu

l mili

tary

obj

ectiv

es:

•N

atur

e•

Loca

tion

•P

urpo

se•

Use

Each

targ

et is

ass

esse

d ho

listic

ally

on

thes

e el

emen

ts

Crit

ical

Ana

lytic

al C

ompo

nent

in C

DE

Met

hodo

logy

Law

ful M

ilita

ry O

bjec

tives

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

025

26U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

“It is

an

inhe

rent

resp

onsi

bilit

y of

all

com

man

ders

, obs

erve

rs, a

ir ba

ttle

man

ager

s, w

eapo

ns d

irect

ors,

atta

ck c

ontro

llers

, wea

pons

sys

tem

s op

erat

ors,

in

telli

genc

e an

alys

ts, a

nd ta

rget

ing

pers

onne

l to

(CJC

SI 3

160.

01):

–E

stab

lish

Pos

itive

Iden

tific

atio

n (P

ID) a

nd to

acc

urat

ely

loca

te ta

rget

s co

nsis

tent

with

cur

rent

mili

tary

obj

ectiv

es a

nd m

issi

on s

peci

fic R

ules

of

Eng

agem

ent.

–P

ID is

def

ined

as

the

reas

onab

le c

erta

inty

that

a fu

nctio

nally

and

geo

spat

ially

de

fined

obj

ect o

f atta

ck is

a le

gitim

ate

mili

tary

targ

etin

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Law

of W

ar a

nd a

pplic

able

Rul

es o

f Eng

agem

ent.

–Id

entif

y po

tent

ial c

olla

tera

l con

cern

s pr

ior t

o m

uniti

ons

rele

ase

and

targ

et

enga

gem

ent (

prov

ide

func

tion

and

geos

patia

l del

imita

tions

if a

ble)

App

ly th

e C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Met

hodo

logy

(CD

M) w

ith d

ue d

ilige

nce

to

mis

sion

obj

ectiv

es, f

orce

pro

tect

ion,

and

col

late

ral d

amag

e.”

Posi

tive

Iden

tific

atio

n

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

026

27U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•Ta

rget

s ch

arac

teriz

ed a

s ha

ving

bot

h a

mili

tary

and

civ

ilian

pur

pose

/func

tion

are

cons

ider

ed d

ual-u

se.

•In

mos

t cas

es, d

ual-u

se T

arge

ts c

onsi

st o

f fac

ilitie

s/st

ruct

ures

ass

ocia

ted

with

pr

ovid

ing

supp

ort t

o th

e ci

vilia

n po

pula

tion

and

the

mili

tary

effo

rt (e

g. s

enio

r go

vern

men

tal l

evel

com

man

d an

d co

ntro

l, m

edia

cen

ters

, pub

lic u

tiliti

es)

•C

omm

ande

rs a

re re

spon

sibl

e to

det

erm

ine

the

pred

omin

ant f

unct

iona

lity

of

LOW

Pro

tect

ed S

truct

ures

, bas

ed o

n cu

rren

t int

ellig

ence

, and

dec

ide

if th

e ta

rget

is d

ual-u

se o

r not

.•

RO

E p

rovi

des

the

auth

oriz

atio

ns a

nd p

rohi

bitio

ns re

gard

ing

targ

etin

g D

ual-

Use

Fac

ilitie

s.•

Reg

ardl

ess

of th

e R

OE

in e

ffect

, civ

ilian

per

sonn

el w

orki

ng w

ithin

the

boun

dary

of d

ual-u

se ta

rget

s m

ust b

e co

nsid

ered

as

nonc

omba

tant

cas

ualti

es

for t

he p

urpo

ses

of c

asua

lty e

stim

atio

n

Dua

l-Use

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

027

28U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•C

omba

tant

Com

man

ders

iden

tify,

dev

elop

, mai

ntai

n, a

nd d

istri

bute

to

subo

rdin

ate

and

supp

ortin

g co

mm

ands

a li

st o

f No-

Stri

ke O

bjec

ts fo

r eac

h C

ount

ry w

ithin

Are

a of

Res

pons

ibili

ty (A

OR

) and

eac

h O

PLA

N/O

PO

RD

A

reas

of O

pera

tion

(AO

)

•Th

e N

atio

nal I

ntel

ligen

ce C

omm

unity

will

sup

port

and

assi

st th

e C

OC

OM

s w

ith N

o-S

trike

Obj

ect r

esea

rch,

dev

elop

men

t, an

d pr

oduc

tion;

val

idat

e ad

ditio

ns to

CO

CO

M g

ener

ated

No-

Stri

ke L

ists

(NS

L)

•A

NS

L is

a li

st o

f all

iden

tifie

d ob

ject

s w

ithin

a s

peci

fied

geog

raph

ic a

rea

(Cou

ntry

or A

O) f

unct

iona

lly c

hara

cter

ized

as

non-

com

bata

nt /

civi

lian

in

natu

re.

Upd

ated

and

dis

sem

inat

ed d

aily

No-

Stri

ke P

olic

y

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

028

29U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•C

ateg

ory

1:–

Dip

lom

atic

Fac

ilitie

s–

Rel

igio

us/C

ultu

ral/

His

toric

al–

Non

-Gov

ernm

enta

l Org

s.–

Med

ical

Fac

ilitie

s–

Publ

ic E

duca

tion

Faci

litie

s–

Civ

ilian

Ref

ugee

Cam

ps–

Pris

oner

of W

ar (P

OW

) Cam

ps–

Faci

litie

s with

Env

ironm

enta

l Con

cern

s–

Dam

s and

dik

es

•C

ateg

ory

2:–

Non

-Mili

tary

Bill

etin

g (H

ousi

ng,

Hot

els/

Mot

els)

–C

ivili

an M

eetin

g Pl

aces

(Are

nas,

Thea

ters

, Par

ks, S

tadi

ums,

Mar

kets

, C

onve

ntio

n C

ente

rs)

–Pu

blic

Util

ities

(Pow

er, W

ater

, El

ectri

c, G

as, F

ire &

Pol

ice

Stat

ions

, B

anks

, etc

.)–

Agr

icul

tura

l Sto

rage

or P

roce

ssin

g Fa

cilit

ies

–Fa

cilit

ies w

hose

func

tiona

lity

is

unkn

own

Cat

egor

ies o

f Col

late

ral (

No

Stri

ke) O

bjec

ts

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

029

30U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

PID

Bou

ndar

yST

AR

T

Yes

No

STO

P

LOW

/R

OE☯ Dual-U

seYe

sN

o

CB

R

Plum

e H

azar

dEn

viro

nmen

tal

Haz

ard

CD

E 1

CH

A A

sses

smen

t Pro

cess

Cas

ualty

Est

imat

ion

Valid

ates

targ

ets

Nat

ure

Loca

tion

Pur

pose

Use

Initi

al C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Est

imat

e (C

DE

)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

030

31U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

CD

E 1

Co

llate

ral

Haza

rd A

rea (

CH

A)

CD

E 1

CER

*

Do

min

an

t H

aza

rd =

Fra

gm

en

tati

on

to

Sta

nd

ing

Pers

on

nel

Measu

red

fro

m T

arg

et

Faci

lity

Bo

un

dary

CDE 1 CER

If C

ollate

ral

Co

nce

rn i

sIn

the C

HA

,C

DE =

HIG

H

If C

ollate

ral

Co

nce

rn i

sO

ut

of

the C

HA

,C

DE =

Lo

w

*CER

= C

olla

tera

l Effe

cts

Rad

ius

CD

E L

evel

1

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

031

32U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

CD

E 1

Col

late

ral H

azar

d A

rea

(CH

A)

CD

E 1

CER

Dom

inan

t Haz

ard

= Fr

agm

enta

tion

to S

tand

ing

Pers

onne

l

CDE 1 CER

CER

mea

sure

d fr

om

indi

vidu

al a

impo

ints

Col

late

ral C

once

rns

CD

E 2

Low

, PG

M-U

nita

ry

CD

E 2

Hig

h

Con

tinue

to C

DE

3

CD

E L

evel

2

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

032

33U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

CD

E 1

Col

late

ral H

azar

d A

rea

(CH

A)

CD

E 1

CER

Dom

inan

t Haz

ard

= Fr

agm

enta

tion

to S

tand

ing

Pers

onne

l (U

nmiti

gate

d)Ej

ecta

to S

tand

ing

Pers

onne

l (M

itiga

ted)

CDE 1 CER

CER

mea

sure

d fr

om

indi

vidu

al a

impo

ints

Col

late

ral C

once

rns

Con

tinue

to C

DE

4

CD

E 3

Low

(Miti

gate

d)

CD

E 2

Low

CD

E 3

Hig

h(U

n-M

itiga

ted)

CD

E 3

Hig

h(M

itiga

ted)CD

E L

evel

3

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

033

34U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

CD

E 1

Col

late

ral H

azar

d A

rea

(CH

A)

CD

E 1

CER

Dom

inan

t Haz

ard

= B

last

to S

truc

ture

s

CDE 1 CER

CER

mea

sure

d fr

om

indi

vidu

al a

impo

ints

Col

late

ral C

once

rns

CD

E 3

Low

(Miti

gate

d)

CD

E 2

Low

CD

E 4

Low

STO

P

CD

E L

evel

4

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

034

35U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•C

asua

lty E

stim

atio

n is

not

an e

xact

sci

ence

—pa

ttern

of l

ife a

ssis

ts•

Ther

e ar

e no

prec

ise

mea

ns to

pre

dict

non-

com

bata

nt d

emog

raph

ics

•C

omba

tant

Com

man

ders

are

resp

onsi

ble

to d

evel

op e

stim

ated

non

-com

bata

nt

dem

ogra

phic

fact

ors

–Fa

ctor

s fo

r Day

and

Nig

htar

e ba

sed

on s

ocia

lized

cul

tura

l nor

ms

for t

he

appl

icab

le A

OR

/Cou

ntry

•C

asua

lty E

stim

ates

are

com

pute

d ba

sed

on th

ree

key

fact

ors

–A

ffect

ed A

rea

of c

olla

tera

l con

cern

s–

Est

imat

ed P

opul

atio

n D

ensi

ty o

f the

effe

cted

col

late

ral c

once

rns

–C

asua

lty F

acto

r (M

ultip

lier)

CD

E L

evel

5

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

035

36U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Targ

et (B

ridge

)

Socc

er S

tadi

um

Out

door

Col

late

ral

Con

cern

Restaurant G

arag

e

CD

E 3

(Un-

Miti

gate

d) C

ERC

DE

3 (M

itiga

ted)

CER

Inne

r Ann

ulus

Out

er A

nnul

us

½ C

DE

3 (M

itiga

ted)

CER

1.0

1.0

0.25CD

E L

evel

5 (c

ont’d

)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

036

37U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Popu

latio

n D

ensi

ty T

able

s

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

037

38U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•Th

e C

DE

Met

hodo

logy

(CD

M) s

uppo

rts th

e id

entif

icat

ion

of “s

ensi

tive

targ

ets”

•S

ensi

tive

Targ

ets

are

thos

e w

hose

eng

agem

ent p

rese

nt:

–th

e po

tent

ial f

or d

amag

e an

d/or

inju

ry to

non

-com

bata

nt p

rope

rty

and

pers

ons,

pote

ntia

l pol

itica

l con

sequ

ence

s,

–or

oth

er s

igni

fican

t effe

cts

estim

ated

to e

xcee

d pr

edet

erm

ined

, si

tuat

ion-

spec

ific

thre

shol

d cr

iteria

.

•S

ensi

tive

Targ

ets

are

norm

ally

thos

e as

sess

ed a

s C

DE

5 H

igh

or th

ose

desi

gnat

ed b

y th

e P

resi

dent

or S

ecre

tary

of D

efen

se w

hose

eng

agem

ent

pres

ent u

nacc

epta

ble

stra

tegi

c ris

k.

•S

ensi

tive

(STA

R) T

arge

ts re

quire

app

rova

l by

eith

erP

resi

dent

or S

ecre

tary

of

Def

ense

. Sens

itive

Tar

get A

ppro

val a

nd R

evie

w P

roce

ss

(STA

R)

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

038

39U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Ope

rati

ons

Inte

llige

nce

Met

hods

to p

reve

nt c

ivili

an c

asua

lties

per

mea

tes

the

cycl

e

JOIN

TTA

RG

ET

ING

CY

CL

E

End

Sta

te a

nd

Com

man

der’

s O

bjec

tives

Com

man

der’

s Dec

isio

nan

d Fo

rce A

ssig

nmen

t

Targ

et D

evel

opm

ent

and

Prio

ritiz

atio

nA

sses

smen

t

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

gan

d Fo

rce

Exe

cutio

nC

apab

ilitie

s Ana

lysi

s

CO

LLAT

ERA

L D

AM

AG

EA

SSES

SMEN

T

Pla

nsC

DE

in th

e Jo

int T

arge

ting

Cyc

le

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

039

40U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Effe

ctD

elay

Fuz

ing

Prox

imity

Fu

zing

Shie

ldin

gD

eliv

ery

Hea

ding

Aim

poin

t O

ffset

Frag

.√

√√

Bla

st√

√√

Deb

ris√

√√

Pen.

&

Cra

terin

g√

Ther

mal

√√

CB

R√

√√

Del

iver

y Er

ror

√√

Miti

gatin

g W

eapo

n E

ffect

s

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

040

41U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Wea

pon

Effe

cts

& R

isks

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

041

42U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

1.C

DE

Met

hodo

logy

Pro

gram

of I

nstru

ctio

n –

Ove

rvie

w

(1 h

r )

2.C

DE

Met

hodo

logy

-In

trodu

ctio

n(3

hrs

)3.

Mea

surin

g an

d M

itiga

ting

Wea

pons

’ Effe

cts

(4 h

rs)

4.C

DE

Lev

el 1

–Ta

rget

Val

idat

ion

/ Ini

tial A

sses

smen

t(2

hrs

)5.

CD

E L

evel

2 –

Gen

eral

/ Ta

rget

Siz

e A

sses

smen

t(2

hrs

)6.

CD

E L

evel

3 –

Wea

pone

erin

g A

sses

smen

t(2

hrs

)7.

CD

E L

evel

4 –

Ref

ined

Ass

essm

ent

(2 h

rs)

8.C

DE

Lev

el 5

–C

asua

lty E

stim

atio

n / A

sses

smen

t(4

hrs

)9.

CD

E A

utom

atio

n –

JAD

OC

S C

DE

Wiz

ard

(4 h

rs)

10.

Pra

ctic

al E

xerc

ises

(8 h

rs)

11.

CD

E M

etho

dolo

gy -

Rev

iew

(4 h

rs)

12.

Exa

min

atio

n(4

hrs

)

CD

E P

rogr

am o

f Ins

truc

tion

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

042

43U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Find Fix

Find Fix

Enga

geEn

gage

Bet

ter i

ntel

ligen

ce a

nd p

ropo

rtion

alpr

ecis

ion

enga

gem

ent a

llow

s us

to b

ette

r dis

crim

inat

eva

lid m

ilita

ry o

bjec

tives

from

civ

ilian

pop

ulat

ion

20th

Cen

tury

21st

Cen

tury

Res

ourc

e Allo

catio

n –

Fin

d/F

ix v

ersu

s Eng

age

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

043

44U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

•R

ules

of E

ngag

emen

t giv

e th

e ap

prop

riate

per

mis

sion

s to

app

rove

stri

kes

base

d on

C

olla

tera

l Dam

age

Est

imat

ion

(CD

E) c

all a

nd ta

rget

type

•A

ppro

vals

, Rul

es o

f Eng

agem

ent,

and

Col

late

ral D

amag

e E

stim

atio

n (C

DE

) for

st

rikes

in A

fgha

nist

an a

re d

riven

by

natio

nalit

y of

the

sele

cted

stri

ke p

latfo

rm:

–U

nite

d S

tate

s R

ules

of E

ngag

emen

t app

ly to

all

U.S

. ass

ets

whe

n us

ed to

st

rike

targ

ets

–O

ther

Rul

es o

f Eng

agem

ent a

pply

to a

ll no

n-U

S a

sset

s w

hen

used

to s

trike

ta

rget

s

USC

EN

TCO

M S

trik

e A

ppro

val A

utho

ritie

s

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

044

45U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

STA

RT:

(Tar

get I

dent

ified

)

USC

ENTC

OM

TA

RG

ETS

Cel

l*C

AO

C

TAR

GET

S C

ell

*CA

OC

ISA

F/U

SFO

R-A

TA

RG

ETS

Cel

l

REQ

UES

TER

Com

mun

icat

ion

link

esta

blis

hed

with

effe

cted

uni

ts

Com

man

der

brie

fed

on s

trik

e

Com

man

der

App

rove

s/D

isap

prov

es

strik

e

Com

man

der’s

ap

prov

al re

laye

d to

all

part

ies

*CA

OC

= C

ombi

ned

Air

and

Spac

e O

pera

tions

Cen

ter

STO

P

Col

late

ral

Dam

age

Estim

atio

n

Rea

ch b

ack

to

Inte

llige

nce

Com

mun

ity

(IC) w

hen

nece

ssar

y

Col

late

ral D

amag

e Es

timat

ion

Ana

lysi

s C

ompl

ete

Col

labo

rativ

e C

DE

Pro

cess

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

045

46U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Mis

sion

Pla

nnin

g an

d F

orce

Exe

cutio

n

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

046

47U

NC

LASS

IFIE

D//F

OU

O

Dyn

amic

Tar

getin

g C

ycle

AC

LU D

RO

NE

S J

OIN

T S

TAFF

000

047

Exhibit B


Recommended