Exhibit J – Supporting Documentation

Exhibit J – Supporting Documentation

Page 1 of 60

PDF Creator - PDF4Free v2.0 http://www.pdf4free.com

http://www.pdfpdf.com/0.htm


Page 2 of 60

Excerpts from:

Bluebird: Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatristsby Colin Ross, MD

Introduction page F – “Mind control contractors with TOP SECRET clearance includethe American Psychological Association, Past Presidents of the American PsychiatricAssociation and the Society for Biological Psychiatry, and psychiatrists who havereceived awards from the American Psychological Association and the AmericanPsychiatric Association.”

-------------------------------------

In one of the MKULTRA Subproject 61 documents, Dr, Wolff defines the historicalcontext for the CIA's interest in mind control in general, which is also the context andmotive for military funding of brain electrode implant experiments:

The investigations of the highest integrative functions are fundamentally aimed atincreasing our understanding of the functions of the human cerebral hemispheres inoverall adaptive behavior. They arose out of our laboratory and clinical experiencesduring the past twenty years, and especially out of our interest in the phenomenaexhibited by men exposed to extremely threatening life situations; and they were initiatedduring the period when we were investigating the untoward effects of Communist policeprocedures.

When Dr. Wolff refers to "communist police procedures," he means the brainwashing ofAmerican POWs during the Korean War (see Chapter 4), which probably included thecreation of Manchurian Candidates. Another MKULTRA Subproject related to the goalof "increasing our understanding of the human cerebral hemispheres" was Subproject129, which was entitled. "Computer Analysis of Bioelectric Response Patterns." Thiswas a TOP SECRET cleared project conducted at George Washington University andLeIer University of Georgia.

MKULTRA Subproject 94 involved placing electrodes into the brains of animals in orderto control their behavior. By using a remote transmitter, the doctors could control theanimals' movements and use them for delivery of bombs and biological and chemicalweapons. A CIA MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD dated 18October 1960describes the research:

The purpose of this Subproject is to provide a continuation of investigations on theremote directional control of activities on selected species of animals. Miniaturizedstimulating electrode impIants in specific brain center areas will be utilized... Theultimate objective of this research is to provide an understanding of the mechanismsinvolved in the directional control of animals and to provide practical systems for[whited out] application.




Page 3 of 60

The document describes Subproject 94 as a fine-tuning of extensive prior successfulresearch.

A CIA memorandum for MKULTRA Subproject 142 is included in Appendix C. Itdescribes the use of animals for delivery of biological and chemical weapons, and thecontrol of animals through stimulation of brain electrodes. Various aspects of the overallresearch program were parceled out via different Subprojects under other cryptonymsbesides MKULTRA, but the overall goal was clear; to control the mind and behavior andto create dissociation, through a combination of drugs, sensory isolation, hypnosis, brainelectrode implants, electric shock and beaming different kinds of energy at the brain. Theability to create limited, controlled amnesia through a variety of methods was a primarygoal of the mind control programs.

A MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD for MKULTRA subproject 142 dated 22 May1962 states:

The reason for separating this work financially from the other efforts of [whited out] inthe Agency’s behalf is to allow him to engage in some very practical experiments at somepoint in the work which would present security problems if this effort were handled in theusual way. Some of the uses proposed for these particular animals would involve possibledelivery systems for BW/CW agents or for direct executive action type operations asdistinguished from the eavesdropping application of [whited out].

"Executive action type operations" means human assassination. Brain electrodeexperiments were also conducted in humans, but there is no declassified documentationof the use of the human subjects in field-testing or in actual operations.

Dr. Jose Delgado, a neurosurgeon and professor at Yale, received funding from theOffice of Naval Research, the Air Force 657 1st Aeromedical Research Laboratory(Grant Number F29600-67-C-0058) and the Public Health Service for brain electroderesearch on children and adults.

Dr. Delgado's research grants from the Office of Naval Research included:

Year Amount Subject1954 $7,950.00 Neurological mechanisms in epilepsy1955 $9,610.00 Neurological behavior in epilepsy and in

group behavior1956 $9,610.00 Neurological behavior in epilepsy and in

group behavior1960 $10,000.00 Neurological mechanisms in epilepsy and

---------------------------------

Dr. Delgado did similar research in monkeys and cats and in one paper describes the catsas "mechanical toys." He was able to control the movements of his animal and human




Page 4 of 60

subjects by pushing buttons on a remote transmitter box. Another case involved an 11-year old boy who under went a partial change of identity upon remote stimulation of hisbrain electrode:

Dr. Delgado wrote a book entitled Physical Control of the Mind: Toward aPsychocivilized Society. In it he described his vision of evolution. Delgado believed thatcontrol of the human brain through remote stimulation of implanted electrodes offeredman another step up the evolutionary ladder. With this technology, man could directlycontrol his own mind, mood and behavior.

He is also quoted as saying:

Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. We need a program ofpsychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of themind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.

We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlledby electric stimulation of the brain. - (Congressional Record, New York Times)

Brain electrode research was also conducted independently at Harvard by Dr. Delgado'sco-authors, Drs. Vernon Mark, Frank Ervin and William Sweet (see Chapter 3 forRadiation Committee testimony of Dr. Sweet). Dr. Delgado supplied brain electrodes tothe Harvard team through an Office of Naval Research contract. Frank Ervin, thepsychiatrist on the team, was trained at Tulane by brain electrode specialist, Dr. RobertHeath. He was later recruited by Dr. Louis Jolyon West to join the UCLA ViolenceCenter (see Chapter 10). One of the plans for the Center was to control criminals throughbrain electrode implants. The Harvard work was described in Mark and Ervin's bookViolence and the Brain; in that book, the authors describe the potential use of brainelectrodes for controlling urban violence. They suggest that this technology might havebeen useful in controlling black riots in Watts, California during the 1960's.

-----------------------------------------

NON-LETHALWEAPONS

The network of mind control doctors, as it existed in the 1950's and 1960's, includedspecialists in non-lethal weapons. Non-lethal weapons is a broad category which includesdevices for beaming various kinds of energy at human targets in order to temporarilyincapacitate them, or to control or affect their behavior. Non-lethal weapons research hasbeen conducted at universities in the United States on contract to the CIA, and hasoverlapped with research on hallucinogens and brain electrode implants. Funding of theexperiments began in MKULTRA.

-----------------------------------------

Through MKULTRA Subproject 54, the CIA gave $62,400.00 to the Office of Naval




Page 5 of 60

Research in 1955. The researcher funded in this project was studying how to produceconcussions from a distance using mechanical blast waves propagated through the air.Under a heading of "POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH FINDINGS,"the contractor says that such concussion "is always followed by amnesia for the actualmoment of the accident." He also states:

The blast duration would be in the order of a tenth of a second. Masking of a noise ofthis duration should not be difficult. It would be advantageous to establish theeffectiveness of both of the above methods as a tool in brain-wash therapy.

MKULTRA Subproject 119 was a literature review which included a summary ofexisting information on "Techniques of activation of the human organism by remoteelectronic means."

This early experimental and scholarly research under MKULTRA was the foundation ofnon-lethal weapons programs that are currently active. According to a report in DefenseElectronics, consideration was given to using non-lethal weapons technology on DavidKoresh during the Branch Davidian siege in the spring of 1993.

A Russian expert on non-lethal weapons, Dr. Igor Smirnov, was brought to thc UnitedStates for a series of meetings in northern Virginia that began on March 17, 1993. Themeetings were attended by representatives of the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency,the FBI, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Civilian attendees included Dr. Richard Nakamura of the National Institute of MentalHealth and Dr. Christopher Green, Director of Biomedical Research at General MotorsCorp.

According to the article, the device was not used on David Koresh because of softwareincompatibility problems. Smirnov could not guarantee its safety. A firm calledPsychotechnologies Corp, based in Richmond, Virginia entered into an agreement withthe Russians to share and develop this technology for American use.

Pasternak described non-lethal weapons research in the 1990's in an article in US Newsand World Report. According to the article, acoustic weapons research is ongoing atScientific Applications & Research Associates, Inc. in Huntington Beach, California,with testing at nearby Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base; Mission Research Corps inAlbuquerque, New Mexico; and the Armstrong Laboratory at Brooks Air Force Base,San Antonio, Texas. From 1980 to 1983, according to Pasternak, the Marine CorpsNonlethal Electromagnetic Weapons project was run by a man named Eldon Byrd, whodid work at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland.Bethesda is the location of the National Institute of Mental Health, a representative ofwhich attended the meetings with Dr. Igor Smirnov in 1993.

There is abundant evidence in the public domain that non-lethal weapons research isongoing and funded annually in the tens of millions of dollars, or more. Given the fact




Page 6 of 60

that chemical and biological weapons, mind control drugs and radiation have been testedon unwitting civilian populations, it is possible that non-lethal weapons have also beentested on unwitting civilians.

As is true for mind control experimentation, physicians must be involved in non-lethalweapons programs. Non-lethal weapons programs therefore pose a problem in medicalethics and require official policies and guidelines from the American MedicalAssociation and the American Psychiatric Association. To date, organized and academicmedicine have acted as if non-lethal weapons do not exist.

------------------------------------------

Dr. Persinger's research on the ability of magnetic fields to facilitate the creation of falsememories and altered states of consciousness is apparently funded by the DefenseIntelligence Agency through the project cryptonym SLEEPING BEAUTY. Freedom ofInformation Act requests concerning SLEEPING BEAUTY with a number of differentintelligence agencies including the CIA and DIA has yielded denial that such a programexists. Certainly, such work would be of direct interest to BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE,MKULTRA and other non-lethal weapons programs.

Schnabel lists Dr. Persinger as an Interview Source in his book on remote viewingoperations conducted under Stargate, Grill Flame and other cryptonyms at Fort Meadeand on contract to the Stanford Research Institute. Schnabel states (p. 220) that, "As oneof the Pentagon's top scientists, Vorona was privy to some of the strangest, most secretresearch projects ever conceived. Grill Flame was just one. Another was code-namedSleeping Beauty; it was a Defense Department study of remote microwave mind-influencing techniques..."

It appears from Schnabel's well-documented investigations that Sleeping Beauty is a real,but still classified mind control program. Schnabel lists Dr. West as an Interview Sourceand says that West was a, "Member of medical oversight board for Science ApplicationsInternational Corp. remote-viewing research in early 1990s."

Brain research related to the work by Dr. Persinger was conducted at UCLA by Dr.William Ross Adey, who was born in Australia on January 31, 1922. Dr. Adey hadalready published in Australia before moving to California in 1954. His research atUCLA has been funded by the Office of Naval Rescarch (ONR Contract 233(91), the AirForce Office of Scientific Rescearch...

-----------------------------------------

Like Dr. Persinger, Dr. Adey also did experiments in which subjects' heads were placedin electromagnetic fields. This work was funded by U.S. Air Force Contract F44620-70-C-0017. Other papers of his were entitled "Prolonged Effects of LSD on EEG RecordsDuring Discriminative Performance in Cat: Evaluation by Computer Analysis and"Autonomic Responses During A Replicable Interrogation; the latter research was funded




Page 7 of 60

by the Office of Naval Research.

Dr. Adey was a member of the MIT Neurosciences Research Program and edited avolume for them entitled Brain Interaction with Weak Electric and Magnetic Fields.Another 1977 volume in the same series was edited by Dr. Robert D. Hall of theWorcester Foundation for Experimental Biology (site of MKULTRA Subproject 8).

Dr. Adey worked as a consultant for NASA, the Department of Energy and the VeteransAdministration. He was the project leader for the Medical Hazards of MicrowavesExposure, US/USSR Exchange Program beginning in 1976. In the same year he becamea member of the National Academy of Sciences panel on biosphere effects of extremelylow frequency radiation. Both of these subjects are of direct relevance to non-lethalweapons programs.

-----------------

Other related brain work was to have been done at the UCLA Violence Project, whichwas to have been headed by Dr. Louis Jolyon West. Dr. West describes the demise of theProject prior to startup in a chapter entitled "Research on Violence: The EthicalEquation." The book was edited by CIA contractor, Dr. Neil Burch (see Chapter 14).Other contributors to the volume include Dr. Frank Ervin from the Harvard brainelectrode team, and doctors from Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, the NavyMedical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit, San Diego and the Veterans AdministrationHospital, Salt Lake City. Dr. West writes:

Actually Ervin was never involved with the CSRV [UCLA Center for the Study andReduction of Violence] and had no part in its planning or development. Nevertheless, aradical students organization called Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) pounced onthe "UCLA psychosurgery project" in wildly accusatory articles in the _Daily Bruin_ andthe underground press. Politically activist students suddenly began to picket with signsdenouncing "A Clockwork Orange at UCLA," "Stop Psychosurgery at UCLA," "FireFrank Ervin," "Drive West into the Sea" and the like.

At first the staff assumed that the sudden hostile attack on the yet unfunded center wasessentially political. The theme seemed to be, "If Governor Reagan is for it, we areagainst it." However, a small group of much more sophisticated political radicals,including two or three psychiatrists, took over the fight against the establishment of theCSRV. They went to many community groups and organizations, ranging from theAmerican Civil Liberties Union to the Black Panther Party, and persuaded them that theproposed center was in fact racist, sexist, and dangerous to human rights; in fact, nothingless than a government-sponsored program for mind control.

Funding for the UCLA Violence Project had been approved by Ronald Reagan but waswithdrawn in response to public protest. The Project was to have been housed at a usedNike missile site outside Los Angeles. Dr. West states in a footnote to his chapter on the




Page 8 of 60

Project, that Dr. Frank Ervin had recently been recruited to the Department of Psychiatryat UCLA.

Another California project cancelled due to public protest was a proposal to implant brainelectrodes in prisoners at Vacaville State Prison, site of CIA mind control experiments onthe drug pemoline under MKSEARCH. The prisoners were to be monitored by remotetracking technology post-discharge. If they entered a restricted area or exhibited sexualarousal patterns on remote EEG telemetry, a signal would be sent to their brain electrodesimmobilizing them, and law enforcement personnel would be dispatched to apprehendthem.

Dr. Louis Jolyon West was cleared at TOP SECRET for his work on MKULTRA. Hisnumerous connections to the mind control network illustrate how the network wasmaintained; not through any central conspiracy, but by an interlocking network ofacademic relationships, grants, conferences, and military appointments. Some doctors inthe network were not funded directly by the CIA or military, but their work was of directrelevance to mind control, non-lethal weapons development, creation of controlleddissociation and the building of Manchurian Candidates.

Chorover describes another mind control program at Vacaville State Prison which wasaborted because of public protest. A Maximum Psychiatric Diagnostic Unit was set up atVacaville in February, 1972 to deal with selected inmates out of the 700 held in solitaryconfinement in California prisons. A program was approved for this Unit in whichprisoners would have electrodes implanted in their brains to monitor them and controltheir behavior after discharge, using radio transmitters. Due to public protest, theCalifornia Department of Corrections called a press conference on December 30, 1971 toannounce that the project had been "temporarily abandoned for administrative reasons,"repeating the pattern of the Tuskeegee Syphilis Study and the Lafayette Clinic aggressionproject, both of which were run by physicians and shut down due to negative publicreaction.




Page 9 of 60

US report foretells of brave new worldBy Nathan CochraneJuly 23, 2002Next MagazineA draft government report says we will alter human evolution within 20 years bycombining what we know of nanotechnology, biotechnology, IT and cognitive sciences.The 405-page report sponsored by the US National Science Foundation and CommerceDepartment, Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance, calls for abroad-based research program to improve human performance leading to telepathy,machine-to-human communication, amplified personal sensory devices and enhancedintellectual capacity.

People may download their consciousnesses into computers or other bodies even on theother side of the solar system, or participate in a giant "hive mind", a network ofintelligences connected through ultra-fast communications networks. "With knowledgeno longer encapsulated in individuals, the distinction between individuals and the entiretyof humanity would blur," the report says. "Think Vulcan mind-meld. We would perhapsbecome more of a hive mind - an enormous, single, intelligent entity."

[They are already creating structures like that. The only form I know about is a kind ofvirtual concentration camp. which on the giving end may seem like something of a hivemind.]

Armies may one day be fielded by machines that think for themselves while devices willrespond to soldiers' commands before their thoughts are fully formed, it says. The reportsays the abilities are within our grasp but will require an intense public-relationseffort to "prepare key organizations and societal activities for the changes madepossible by converging technologies", and to counter concern over "ethical, legaland moral" issues. Education should be overhauled down to the primary-school level tobridge curriculum gaps between disparate subject areas.

[The kindly, beneficent, mind reading aliens from ‘AI: Artificial Intelligence’ are a partof that suggestive public relations effort. What you’re not shown is how the actual reality(on the receiving end at least for an unlucky relative few) is a kind of surveillance andharassment hell on Earth.]...

“Concentrated multidisciplinary research thrusts could achieve crucially importantresults. Among the most promising of such proposed endeavors are the Human CognomeProject to understand the nature of the human mind, the development of a“Communicator”(synthetic telepathy) system to optimize human teams andorganizations, and the drive to enhance human physiology and physical performance.Such efforts probably require the establishment of networks of research centers dedicatedto each goal, funded by coalitions of government agencies and operated by consortia ofuniversities and corporations.”




Page 10 of 60

Maj. Hans PetersenDanish Air Force [ret] Director of IGAP

"When about 25 million Americans make claims of having been abducted, it stands out.Interestingly, reported instances of abductions outside the American Continent - Canada,the US, Central and South America - until lately, did not primarily exist. Yet, about thetime after the last poll, where 10 million Americans indicated their belief in beingabducted, then suddenly claimed abductions began sprouting up elsewhere. So today, itcan be said the 98% of all claimed abductions took place on the American continent,while the last 2% were found elsewhere - typically England and Germany. Whether thereexists some significance or not, coincidentally, these two countries maintain numerousU.S. Military installations."

[That’s apparently how you punish millions for their sins without ever once forcing thedisclosure of either the suspension of presumed Constitutional protections or of thepsychological operations arsenal itself. Brilliant. ‘Abductees’ assist in preserving themystique by rarely if ever revealing why they are punished, when and if they evenunderstand it. Too embarrassing. Although it is sometimes self-evident from thedescriptions of the abductions themselves. Alien anal probe? Hmmm....]...

"In the early years, Russian scientists developed inventions that the Western World couldonly imagine in science fiction novels and movies. This included experimentation withlow frequency radiation broadcast towards the American Embassy in Moscow, whichresulted in serious illness and even death among staff members. The Americans werestunned, but with an incredible concentrated effort and enormous amounts of funds, theyquickly succeeded in matching and surpassing the Russians accomplishments in thisfield."

"Famed Russian physiologist and Doyan of parapsychology, in his article 'CriticalEvaluation of the Hypnogenic Method' detailed experiments by Dr I.F. Tomashevskydescribing remote radio control of the brain from a distance of one or more rooms. Underconditions where the participant would not know or suspect they were beingexperimented with. One such early experiment was conducted from a distance in a parkwhere via posthypnotic mental suggestion, the subject complied with the instruction to goto sleep within one minute."...

"By this time the American Intelligence communities had become involved. In 1992, aformer Pentagon liaison indicated that, 'If you could get a hold of a directory of theAmerican Psychiatric Association in around 1956 -57, you'll be sure to find an enormouspercentage of individuals listed are foreign born. Mostly they came out of Germany andEastern Europe in a big wave. They were called 'Technical Specialists', but really wereworking on these unconventional mind control programs for the U.S. intelligence.'Describing experiments Frankensteinian in nature, 'In one laboratory, subjects werestrapped involuntarily into a chair, their heads bristling with electrodes and transducers.




Page 11 of 60

Any resistance was met with a paralyzing dosage of curare. The subjects brain waveswere beamed into a nearby reception room crammed with voice analyzers, a wirerecorder and radio receivers. The systematic annihilation or 'De-patterning' of thesubject's mind and memory was accomplished. This sometimes was accomplished withdrug over dosage, ECT shocks at 75 times the norm, etc. Psychic driving, the repetitionof a recorded message played for 16 hours a day, reprogrammed the empty mind.'"

"By 1965, Intelligence scientists continued to probe ways to control the human behavior,and they were doing so with space-age technology that made the early days of MK Ultralook like the horse and buggy era. These scientists were advanced in stereotaxis surgery,simplifying the implantation of electrodes in the brain to wipe out a subject’s memory inpreparation for hypnotic re-constructive surgery."

"The same year, the New York Times learned of these obscure electronic experimentsquietly funded by the government, and went tabloid with the front page headline Mindcontrol coming, Scientists Warns." "According to a 1975 issue of Modern People, aIntelligence manual was prepared on the electronic wizardry of Radio-Hypnotic Intra-cerebral Control [RHIC]. When a part of the brain receives a tiny electric impulse foroutside sources, such as vision, hearing, etc, an emotion is produced - for example thesight of a gang of boys beating up on an old woman. The SAME emotion of anger can beCREATED by ARTIFICIAL radio signals sent to your brain by a controller. You wouldinstantly feel the same white-hot anger without any apparent reason."




Page 12 of 60

Dr. William L. Baker (Chief Scientist) and Dr. Eugene J. BednarzAir Force Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate

Dr. Robert L. Sierakowski (Chief Scientist)Air Force Research Laboratory' s Munitions Directorate

Reference document DE-04-01

For the Controlled Personnel Effects capability, the S&T (Science and Technology) panelexplored the potential for targeting individuals with nonlethal force, from amilitarily useful range, to make selected adversaries think or act according to our needs.Through the application of nonlethal force, it is possible to physically influence orincapacitate personnel. Advanced technologies could enable the war fighter to remotelycreate physical sensations such as pressure or temperature changes. A current exampleof this technology is Active Denial, a nonlethal counterpersonnel millimeter wave systemthat creates a skin heating sensation to repel an individual or group of people withoutharm.1 By studying and modeling the human brain and nervous system, the ability tomentally influence or confuse personnel is also possible. Through sensory deception, itmay be possible to create synthetic images, or holograms, to confuse an individual'svisual sense or, in a similar manner, confuse his senses of sound, taste, touch, or smell.Through cognitive engineering, scientists can develop a better understanding of how anindividual' s cognitive processes (pattern recognition, visual conditioning, and differencedetection) affect his decision making processes. Once understood, scientists could usethese cognitive models to predict a person' s behavior under a variety of conditions withthe potential to affect an adversary' s mission accomplishment via a wide range ofpersonnel effects.

As technology has advanced over recent years, most, if not all, systems are controlled by,or include, some form of computer or electronic components. Within the DominantRemote Control capability, the S&T panel investigated the remote manipulation ofadversarial electronic systems to control vehicles, sensors, communications, andinformation systems. In one scenario, the vision is to take control of enemy offensive anddefensive military systems (a spacecraft, aircraft, or ground vehicle) and use them to ouradvantage. It might be possible to either confuse enemy systems so they would be unableto successfully perform their mission or to take control of enemy systems and remotelymanipulate them. In another application, the control and manipulation of an adversary'scommunications and information streams would cause confusion or provide falseinformation. The ability to disrupt or degrade an adversary' s computers and informationsystems could render them inoperable or insert false information which, in turn, wouldsignificantly impair the enemy' s ability to communicate. If our military commanderscould achieve this dominant remote control capability, all aspects of the enemy'soperations in the battlefield could be controlled to our advantage.




Page 13 of 60

NIH Physician's Statement About Mind ControlApril 11, 2002

The originals of these letters were made available from, and are postedon:Mind Justice Home Page

CORROBORATING STATEMENT by Dr. Eldon Byrd

In the mid to late eighties, while I was a practicing physician, I was working almostexclusively in the field of psycho-neuro-immuno-endocrinology, especially as concernedthe new malady, called Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome. I had becomegood friends, Health and Wellness Advisor, and personal physician to US SenatorClaiborne Pell of Rhode Island. I had also become very close friends with his SpecialLegislative Assistant.

It was in the 1987-88 timeframe that I was introduced to an individual of authority in theUS Government who talked about a strange new phenomenon. This individual wantedme to meet a special investigative reporter who had been devoting all his time toinvestigating this new phenomenon. He thought that with my background in the neuralsciences and some of the esoteric things I had been aware of in the realm of the physicsof consciousness that I might be of assistance both to victims of this phenomenon and tothe investigators of it.

He told me that there was significant evidence that the phenomenon was real and viewedby those involved in trying to understand it as very dangerous. He warned me from theoutset that many of the scientists who had been close to understanding the technologybehind the phenomenon wound up dying from apparent heart attacks. He said that inthe opinion of many who had seriously investigated this phenomenon, that it appeared tobe as dangerous a threat to humanity as anything ever in history, because it was not yettraceable to a specific source, and that it was so malevolent, that it had the potential tolead humanity to its own destruction.

I was also told that it was not uncommon for those investigating the phenomenon tobecome victims of it themselves, and that he considered that I should know the risksbefore volunteering to help. Because of my relationship to the Senator and mycommitment to assist in matters affecting the health and welfare of the nation, I felt it wasmy duty to participate to the best of my ability.

I agreed to meet with the investigative reporter. He came to my office and gave me thefirst briefing on the phenomenon. I wish to preface my account with the fact that throughthe succeeding three or four years, I became convinced of the reality of the phenomenon,and in fact did come under attack, although in a manner not typical. What he describedwas as follows.




Page 14 of 60

The majority of those who were victims of this "technology" would report that they hadsomehow received an implant of a speaker inside their head. Almost incessantly theywould hear noise, as in background noise in a busy room with activity of people andmachinery. They would also hear voices addressing them specifically. Often they wouldbe harangued incessantly with exhortations to commit vile acts, such as inappropriatesexual behaviors from homosexual assaults to heterosexual rape and pedophilic acts.They would also experience the emotional accompaniment of these exhortations as urgesthat were hard to control. Often the urges and thoughts and voices caused the victimto experience tremendous fear and rage. Some of the victims experienced the "loss oftime," in which they would be conscious, but somehow missed what happened to themfor extended periods, ranging from minutes to hours at a time. They could not account forthemselves during these periods.

Some of the victims made the association that these "attacks" coincided with watchingtelevision or from working at their computers. A number of victims learned that if theylost themselves in a crowd, they could frequently interrupt the "transmissions." Thiswould lead them often to wander into crowded places in order to get some peace.

Inevitably these people would seek medical attention. The majority of these people hadno prior history of psychiatric illness. Their experience of the voices had a sudden onset,and they could pinpoint the time or date the first awareness of these events occurred.Although many would be told that they had a psychiatric illness causing them auditoryhallucinations, a number of eminent psychiatrists who studied some of these victims feltthat the ones truly victimized by this "technology" did not fall into any psychiatricdiagnosis, and that they were not experiencing auditory hallucinations. Quite a number ofvictims were successful well-adjusted people prior to the onset of the symptoms.Characteristically, all of the content of the voices, which was so perverse, had noreference to past character development in these people.

This reporter, who we will call M, told me that quite by chance, when one physician hadprescribed a phenothiazine called Haldol without telling the patient what it was, thevoices stopped almost immediately. However, when the patient found out the name of themedicine, the voices resumed. They tried this on a number of other patients, and foundthe same thing happened. It was as if there was something physiologically relevant to theaction of the "transmission" that interfered with it, but if the monitoring agent behind thetechnology found out what the interfering drug was, it somehow could abort the efficacy.

[Undoubtedly a reasonable, though false theory – the deliberate cultivation of falsetheories.]

One has to say, as a skeptic, that an initial placebo effect was eliminated once the patientdiscovered that the medicine was used for psychiatric patients with hallucinations orpsychosis. Yet, one has to wonder why, when Haldol is very effective in eliminatinghallucinosis with or without the patient's knowledge, why there seemed to be thisreproducible escape of efficacy, once the name of the medicine was introduced toconsciousness of the victim.




Page 15 of 60

Another attribute of the attackers according to M was their ability to learn of the victim'spast medical history. One of the manifestations of the attack often was the reproductionof acute symptomatology that clinically resembled perfectly attacks of genuine diseaseconditions, such as acute abdominal pain associated with appendicitis, or chestpain associated with myocardial ischemia, of abdominal pain associated with pelvicinflammatory disease. When these people would seek medical attention for thesesymptoms, however, there would be absolutely no evidence clinically that anything trulypathologic was happening. Again, this would contribute to the judgment of the healthprovider that the victim was a "crock," meaning that it was all some form ofpsychosomatic neurosis.

M declared that his investigation of this phenomenon had taken him around the world. Hehad interviewed individuals in Soviet agencies, Israeli intelligence, our own CIA, NSA,and Naval Intelligence organizations. He found that many agencies in other countries hadbecome aware of this and other similar phenomena, and although they acknowledgedworking on technology that could influence thought and feeling of human beings, madethe distinction between their efforts and this phenomenon.

M stated that he was not able to get those assurances from the people he interviewed atNSA. I remember a specific instance in which M had gained possession of a copy of atransmission recorded from a victim's television set that was submitted to NSA foranalysis. Prior to its submission, other scientists had verified that a very unusual signalhad been received by some very special device they employed to monitor this victim'sTV set. I was not told the nature of the signal nor was I told anything about the recordingdevice. What he told me however, was that upon submitting it to the NSA, they werenever able to get the recording back, nor were they able to ascertain from the NSAofficial what their findings revealed about the transmission. M was making theassociation that the victimization process itself could be propagated from person toperson. He stated that he felt that even through telephone lines, one victim talking toanother person could result in the person to whom the victim was talking become avictim themselves. He also reported that regarding his investigation, it seemed that as hegot closer to answers, that the people he would speak to would irrationally shut him off,even after being initially engaged, interested and even participating in the investigation.He believed that the controlling entity or entities could sense when to interfere andactually cause people to block their own perceptions and awareness. M actually came tobelieve that the scope of interference could actually lead people to do things that weredestructive to themselves, like cause their own automobile accidents.

He believed that Senator Pell had himself become an unaware victim of the manipulationof this force. He made this conclusion because of times at which Pell would be seriouslyengaged with M, it was as if a switch had been pulled and suddenly Pell woulddisengage, seeming to forget what the conversation was about or that he had any interestin what M was presenting at all. Yet later Pell would again invite M back for furtherdiscussion, only to have the discussion interrupted again in the same way. M wasconvinced it was not simply a distraction caused by being too busy or preoccupied with




Page 16 of 60

other things. M also took note of the fact that some of the others he had met along theway with insight into this phenomenon had simply suddenly forgotten its importance.And when reminded by M, they would deny even ever knowing about it. M felt this wasa defensive maneuver by the agent or agents behind the "technology."

My wife and I began to notice peculiar things in our own life immediately after M wouldplace a phone call to me. For reasons unknown to us we would start to argue with eachother and have very bad feelings toward one another. It became such a pattern that mywife pointed it out to me. I had never told her anything about M or the content of ourdiscussions.

There was an episode that occurred in 1991 on December 17. Things seemed to be veryintense with M. One night after a particularly intense discussion with M on the phone, mywife began to experience symptoms of lower abdominal pain. She became extremelyweak and felt horribly sick. She recalled that the symptoms were exactly what she hadexperienced after sustaining an iatrogenically caused episode of pelvic inflammatorydisease, after a tubal insufflation blew a smoldering streptococcal infection in herendometrium into her peritoneal cavity. She had undergone an evaluation for infertilityafter coming off the BC pill and not getting pregnant after a year of trying. This acuteP.I.D. almost killed her and we were told that the residual scarring could mean she wouldnever get pregnant. Not withstanding the scarring we were fortunate to have three sonsafter a physician tried her on the fertility pill, Clomid. However, the fact that she hadscarring in her peritoneal cavity from that infection was thoroughly documented.

That night the symptoms got worse and worse. I took her to the hospital for evaluation byher OB GYN. He agreed that she had signs of peritoneal inflammation on physical exam,but her blood work was normal. He said we should go home and see what happened. If itdidn't improve we were to return in the morning and he would do a laparoscopicexamination under anesthesia. As I was leaving the hospital after dropping off herminiscule urine sample, while my wife waited in the car, I had a very unusual experience.It was of a personal nature, but suffice to say that after it, my wife felt better after almostlosing consciousness.

We decided that because it was already arranged for her to have the laparoscopy the nextmorning that we should go ahead with it. We did. We were amazed to hear the results.He doctor said she had the pelvis of a 14-year-old girl. There was no scarring, noevidence of current or prior pelvic inflammatory disease. To this day we do not knowwhat happened to what had been thoroughly documented before. All we know isshe never again has had the kind of sharp pains she would get at intervals from the"tearing of adhesions," which always was the explanation for those pains.

Shortly thereafter, I lost touch with M. About a year later I tried to reach him to see howhe was doing. I was shocked to find that he was no longer working on this project, butwas on to something else. When I said why would you abandon the work you were sofanatically committed to for the sake of humanity, his response was as if he had no ideato what I was referring.




Page 17 of 60

Since then, neither my wife nor myself has had any further personal experience withanything resembling what took place during those years of frequent contact with M. I didsee a number of patients who were afflicted with the voices and urges. I never was able tohelp any one of them.

It has been suggested that this horrible technology is something covertly being used byour government. Although I cannot rule it in or out, I sincerely believe that somethingreal is going on that is not a part of normal physiology to affect these people. Noteveryone who hears voices is a victim of this, just as not everyone who is a victimof this hears voices. My experience suggests to me that there is something definitelyimpacting certain people, perhaps at random, from the outside in.

In conclusion, further scientific investigation like the experiment of Dr. Byrd's forCAHRA to record the voices in victim's heads are needed in order to try to understandthe mechanisms that are producing them. I also feel that being able to determine the typeof signal itself would add valuable clues to the mechanism of transmission. For example,certain psychoactive properties have been attributed to ELF Electromagnetic signals andmicrowaves that are modulated with ELF signals. The presence of such signal means thatthere is a source that is directing them at victims.

It should become possible to test the victim's home and office environments for sourcestransmitting the signals such as telephones, televisions, and computers. Of course, thesignals may be transmitted directly by other technological means, also. If present, thesource would be guilty of illegal interference with the victims' civil rights and ofexperimenting on them without their permission.

Brain imaging techniques are available, such as MRI and PET scans. The MRI is usefulfor examining brain structure, whereas the PET scan is designed to examine themetabolic activity in the brain. Unless a victim has been subjected to signals that affectthe physical structure of the brain, the MRI is of limited value; however the PETscan could determine the difference between internally generated symptoms andexternally generated signals. Another useful technique is the multi-channel EEG beamscan that will indicate alterations in the electrical activity of the brain as a function ofstimulus.




Page 18 of 60

Letter from an unnamed police officer to Miss Eleanor White

Dear Eleanor,

I stumbled across your site only a matter of days ago and I'm afraidto say that the information has confirmed a number of facts that I hadalways suspected to be the case. Throughout recent years we have oftenbeen called in to cases where a victim suspects that he/she is beingstalked by a large gang, and sometimes has some form of photographicevidence to back this up. However, our superiors informed us that theyhad strict orders (from where they were unsure) that we were to ignoreall cases of gang stalking and, if possible, to provide evidence thatthe victim is criminally insane.

From my investigation in recent days it has become clear that:

- Victims are often people living on their own. This is because it is alot easier to marginalize a victim who has no direct relatives tosupport them. It is also very useful for the perpetrators, since thesingleton can be classed as mentally ill and there will be absolutelyno evidence to prove that this is not that case.

- The criminal justice system is strictly under the control of a smallelite who ensure that no charges are pressed against the instigatorsof the gang-stalking.

I will continue to look into the matter in the forthcoming weeks; Iget the feeling that perhaps in the Christmas period we may see asurge in attacks. I will endeavor to keep you informed as long as Iam not silenced.




Page 19 of 60

Excerpts from:

Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons (Declassified)

Addendum to the Nonlethal Technologies Worldwide Study(Ne GIC-I1 47-101-98s)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUnited States Army Intelligence and Security Command

Submitted to Mr. Don Friedman under FOIA request

Because the frequency of the sound heard is dependent on the pulse characteristic of theRF energy, it seems possible that this technology could be developed to the point wherewords could be transmitted to be heard like the spoken word, except that it could only beheard within a person's head. In one experiment, communication of the words from oneto ten using "speech modulated" microwave energy was successfully demonstrated.Microphones next to the person experiencing the voice could not pick up the sound.Additional development of this would open up a wide range of possibilities.

Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private messagetransmission that may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware ofthe technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could bepsychologically devastating if one suddenly heard "voices within one's head."

Mechanism to Reproduce the Desired Effects

Application of electromagnetic pulses is also a conceptual nonlethal technology that useselectromagnetic energy to induce neural synchrony and disruption of voluntary musclecontrol. The effectiveness of this concept has not been demonstrated. However, frompast work in evaluating the potential for electromagnetic pulse generators to affecthumans, it is estimated that sufficiently strong internal fields can be generated within thebrain to trigger neurons. Estimates are that 50 to 100 kV/m free field of very sharp pulses(~1 nS) are required to produce a cell membranic potential of approximately 2 V; thiswould probably be sufficient to trigger neurons or make them more susceptible to firing.

The electromagnetic pulse concept is one in which a very fast (nanosecond timeframe)high voltage (approximately 100 kV/m or greater) electromagnetic pulse is repeated atthe alpha brain wave frequency (about 15 Hx). It is known that a similar frequency ofpulsing light can trigger sensitive individuals (those with some degree of light-sensitivityepilepsy) into a seizure and it is thought that by using a method that could actually triggernerve synapses directly with an electrical field, essentially 100% of individuals would besusceptible to seizure induction. The photic-induced seizure phenomenon was borne outdemonstrably on December 16, 1997 on Japansese television when hundreds of viewersof a popular cartoon show were treated, inadvertently, to photic seizure induction (figure




Page 20 of 60

31). The photic-induced seuzure is indirect in that the eye must receive and transmit theimpulses which initially activate a portion of the brain associated with the optic nerve.From that point the excitability spreads to other portions of the brain. With theelectromagnetic concept, excitation is directly on the brain, and all regions are excitedconcurrently. The onset of synchrony and disruption of muscular control is anticipated tobe nearly instantaneous. Recovery times are expected to be consistent with, or morerapid than, that which is observed in epileptic seizures.

Tunability

There are many degrees of epileptic seizure in diseased persons, and it seems reasonablethat electromagnetic stimulation of neural synchrony might be tunable with regard to typeand degree of bodily influence, depending on the parameters associated with the chosenstimulus. Because there are no actual data to build on, these statements must beconsidered tentative. It is known that in the study of photic-induced seizures, parameterscan be varied so that the individual under study does not actually undergo a grand malseizure. This knowledge gives confidence that the proposed technology would betunable.

Distribution of Human Sensitivities to Desired Effects

It is anticipated that 100% of the population would be susceptible. The mechanism is onethat could act on many individual neuronal cells concurrently and hence does not dependon spreading regions of electrical activity as in the disease state.

Possible Influence on Subjects(s)

If the technology functions approximately as envisioned, the targeted individual could beincapacitated very quickly. Because there have been no reported studies using theconditions specified, experimental work is required to characterize onset time. Differenttypes of technologies could be employed to influence wide areas or single individuals.Because this technology is considered to be tunable, the influence on subjects could varyfrom mild disruption of concentration to muscle spasms and loss of consciousness. Thesubject(s) would have varying degrees of voluntary control depending on the chosendegree of incapacitation.

Technological Status of Generator/Aiming Device

An electric field strength of roughly 100 Kv/m over a time period of 1 nanosecond isapproximately the condition thought to be necessary to produce the desired effect whenprovided to an overall repetition rate of 15 Hz. Such a field may be developed using aradar-like, high-peak-power, pulsed source or an electromagnetic pulse generatoroperated at 15 Hz. These technologies exist today sufficient to evaluate the disablingconcept. Power requirements are not high because the duty factor is so low. Aimingdevices are currently available, but a high degree of directionality at long distances willrequire development. It may be necessary to provide bursts of these nanosecond pulses




Page 21 of 60

in order to stimulate the desired effect. As the duty time increases so does the averagepower requirement for power source. Because there were no open literature reports fromwhich to make inferences, there is some uncertainty about the power levels required.




Page 22 of 60

Patrick Flanagan's Neurophone

Hope for the deaf and superlearning for all

by Eddy Taylor

In 1958, Dr. Patrick Flanagan invented the Neurophone in Bellaire, Texas when he was14 years old. This electronic device transmits sound through the skin, by-passing normalhearing. A family friend who was a patent attorney for Shell Oil, helped Patrick submit apatent application. The patent examiners thought that this was just sound transfer throughbone conduction and refused to issue a patent for 12 years. In a rare meeting in 1970, thepatent office agreed to examine the Neurophone for themselves and meet Patrick and hisattorney. They both encountered a surprise. The examiner had a deaf employee attend themeeting to test the device. The man was totally nerve deaf in one ear and almost totallydeaf in the other. Patrick showed him how to use the Neurophone and played a record ofthe famous Maria Callas singing an opera. As he was able to hear the undistorted beautyof her voice, the tears of joy streamed down his face.

How the genie was lostIn an agonizing infringement, a Defense Intelligence Agency sealed the patent and anational security order forbade Patrick from working on, or even talking about thisinvention. After many years and nearly 300 inventions later, Patrick received theNeurophone for public use. In a triumphant court case, the secrecy and the seizure of thedevice, by the Government Agency, was overruled and the genie was out of the bottle!

Electronic hearing and telepathyTo quote Patrick's Neurophone article in Nexus Magazine-Feb/March 1994, "All hearingaids stimulate tiny bones in the ear. In order for bone conduction to work, the cochlea orinner ear that connects to the 8th cranial nerve must function. People who are nerve deafcannot hear through bone conduction because the nerves in the inner ear are notfunctional. A number of nerve deaf people who have had the entire inner ear removed bysurgery have been able to hear with the Neurophone.

The Neurophone is really an electronic telepathy machine. Several tests prove that itbypasses the 8th cranial nerve or hearing nerve and transmits sound directly to the brain.This means that the Neurophone stimulates perception through a 7th or Alternate Sense!"

Dolphin speakIn a curious parallel to Roxanne Kremer's work on interspecies communication with thePink Amazon River Dolphins, Dr. Flanagan has made impressive technical contributions.In February, 1968, he applied for a patent on a device for translating human speech intodolphin language and vice/versa. This was a result of studies with dolphins in the lagoonof a small island off the coast of Oahu, Hawaii. A vocabulary of 30 words was discovered




Page 23 of 60

before a startling intervention. Six months after applying for the patent, it was placedunder secrecy order #756, 124 by a U.S.Government surveillance agency. Five yearslater, another hard-fought legal battle rescinded the suppression and patent #3,647,970was granted on March 7th 1972. This speech processing patent is actually used as thecircuit in the present version of the Neurophone.

Mind meldExperiments with a Neurophone mind link between two or more people seemingly makespossible learning directly from the mind of another. And I thought this was only in theSCI FI domain of Star Trek's Mr. Spock and certainly beyond the ken of Dr. Spock. NickBegich describes the phenomenon as an electronic 'corpus collosum' between the mindsof 2 people. The corpus collosum is the semi-permeable bridge between the 2hemispheres of an individual's brain.




Page 24 of 60

From CanadianContent.net - Oct 22nd, 2004

Project Bluebird

The CIA has declassified over 18,000 pages of documents on extensive mind controlprograms carried out since the early 1950s.

Project Bluebird was approved by the director of the CIA on April 20, 1950. In a 1951memo, Bluebird states that practical research was to be conducted to include thesespecific problems:

*Can we create by post-H control an action contrary to an individual’s basicmoral principles?

*Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H (hypnotic)condition in an unwilling subject to such an extent that he will perform an act forour benefit?

*Could we seize a subject and in the space of an hour or two by post-H controlhave him crash an airplane, wreck a train, etc.?

*Can we by H and SI techniques force a subject to travel long distances, commitspecified acts and return to us or bring documents or materials?

*Can we guarantee total amnesia under any and all conditions?

*Can we “alter” a person’s personality?

*Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents andthen transfer that control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes oridentifying signs?

*How can sodium A or P or any other sleep inducing agent be best concealed in anormal or commonplace item, such as candy, cigarettes, coffee, tea, beer,medicines? Officially, Bluebird morphed into MKULTRA and was as establishedon 13 April 1953, at Richard Helms’ suggestion as “ultra sensitive work.”

The operational wing of MKULTRA, known as MKDELTA, had as its mission to findout how to use chemical and biological weapon ingredients to alter the human mind.Originally established as a supplementary funding mechanism to the ARTICHOKEproject, MKULTRA quickly grew into a mammoth undertaking that outflanked earliermind control initiatives.

The focal point of MKULTRA was the use of humans as unwitting subjects (withouttheir knowledge or consent). The CIA sponsored numerous experiments of this kind.Regardless of a report by the CIA’s Inspector General in 1963 recommending thetermination of testing on unwitting subjects, future CIA Director Richard Helmscontinued to advocate covert testing on the grounds that “we are less capable of staying




Page 25 of 60

up with the Soviet advances in this field.” On the subject of moral issues, Helmscommented, “we have no answer to the moral issue.”

Army doctors were actively involved in LSD testing at least until the late 1970’s.Subjects of LSD experiments included children as young as five years old, and brainelectrodes were implanted in children as young as 11 years of age. Four of the CIA’sMKULTRA Subprojects were on children.

Brain electrode research was also conducted independently at Harvard by Dr. Delgado’scoauthors, Drs. Vernon Mark, Frank Ervin, and William Sweet. Mark and Ervin describeimplanting brain electrodes in a large number of patients at Harvard hospitals.

A patient named Jennie was 14 years old when they put electrodes in her brain. In theirbook Violence and the Brain, photographs show 18-year old Julia smiling, angry, orpounding the wall depending on which button is being pushed on the transmitter boxsending signals to her brain electrodes. The mind control doctors saw their patients asbiological machines, a view which made them sub-human, and therefore easier to abusein mind control experiments.

When the deployment of Cruise missiles at American bases in the UK was at its height,women peace campaigners staged a series of highly publicized peaceful protests outsidethe perimeter wires. In late 1985, the women in the peace camps at Greenham Commonbegan to experience unusual patterns of illness, ranging from severe headaches,drowsiness, menstrual bleeding at abnormal times or after the onset of menopause, tobouts of temporary paralysis and faulty speech coordination.

Electronics Today magazine carried out a number of measurements, and in December1985 published their report which concluded: “Readings taken with a wide range ofsignal strength meters showed marked increases in the background signal level near oneof the women’s camps at a time when they claimed to be experiencing ill effects.” Theynoted that if the women created noise or a disturbance near the fence, the signals rosesharply.




Page 26 of 60

Microwave Auditory

What possible use could there be for research into microwave auditoryeffects than clandestine messaging? Part of Dr. Lin’s research wasfunded by the U.S. Navy.




Page 27 of 60

Excerpts from:

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rightsby Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton

A Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human RightsViolations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons

Completed December 2006Sonoma State UniversityProject CensoredMedia Freedom Foundation

Psychological Warfare, Information War, and mind control may seem to be exotic topics,but the impact of these technologies and techniques is profound. Our minds are beingimpacted through a longstanding series of programs aimed at manipulating publicopinion through intelligence agencies, think tanks, corporate media and a host of non-governmental organizations designed to engender fear, division and uncertainty in thepublic. Media manipulation involving the artificial framing of our collective reality isoften a hit or miss proposition, but psychological operations have been carried out in thepast, and are being carried out even today, through the practices of “InformationWarfare,” directed at enemies abroad and at the American people.

According to Mary C. FitzGerald of the Hudson Institute, New-concept weapons, such aslaser, electromagnetic, plasma, climatic, genetic and biotechnological are the centralprinciple driving the modernization of national defense. The potential for these weaponsto be used for both good and bad deserves a great deal of attention, but there is little to befound in the media or discussed by our administration.

While developments in brain research are touted for their amazing therapeutic advancesin the medical field, they primarily serve the purposes of the US military. Americanshave little idea about the research concerning the capabilities of electromagnetism,directed acoustics, or computer-human interfacing.

Are new electromagnetic weapons in the possession of the government [to] be used onAmerican citizens? The issue at hand is whether the research and technology currentlybeing developed will benefit or harm us and how much liberty we are willing to sacrificefor a possibly skewed sense of national security and protection.

In September 2006, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne announced that crowd controlweapons should be tested on Americans first. "If we're not willing to use it here againstour fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," saidWynne. "(Because) if I hit somebody with a non-lethal weapon and they claim that itinjured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the worldpress."




Page 28 of 60

“During the 1990’s, in both presidential administrations, non-lethal weapons such asthese and others received priority funding. The Secretary of Energy under Clinton,O’Leary, warned that over a 40 year period, 500,000 had been unwitting test subjects formilitary research on non-lethal weapons, including MKULTRA who claims among manyvictims, Ted Kaczinky, the Unabomber. There is no way to know who these people areor how to help them because there is paranoia in the military and no oversight inCongress. These black projects probably don’t even make it to the President.”

“The problem is that the military’s role is to be paranoid and think up scenarios where theworst can happen then prepare for this in order to protect the people from a hypotheticalfuture event. But there is little to no oversight. The Senate Intelligence Committee ismade up of people like Ted Stephens who thinks the internet is made up of pipes andtubes. These people do not have the required background knowledge to ask the rightquestions. According to the defense budget report, 40% of the budget is dedicated toblack projects. There is no oversight and no public knowledge. In the European Union,things are much different.”

“In February 1998, I testified before the European Union parliament for an hour and ahalf and convinced them of the detrimental effects of non lethal weapons on humans,their behavior and their minds. The EU was convinced and passed a resolution banningthe use of weapons that can manipulate a person (see Parliament Resolution A4-005/99entitled "Resolution on the Environment, Security, and Foreign Policy" passed onJanuary 29, 1999). During the hearings, the US representative and NATO representativessat in the back and declined to participate when asked. In the US, there is no suchresolution or anything remotely close to being considered by any member of Congress.There is no concern for it in the US because no one knows about them.”

However, hundreds of people continue to assert that a person or persons, whom they donot know, have been targeting them with electromagnetic weapons in a widespreadcampaign of either illegal experimentation or outright persecution. These experiencesinvolved a number of discrete phenomena:

• Hearing voices when no one was present.• Feeling sensations of burning, itching, tickling, or pressure with no apparent physical

cause.• Sleeplessness and anxiety as a result of “humming” or “buzzing”.• Loss of bodily control, such as twitching or jerking of an arm or leg suddenly and

without control.• Unexpected emotional states, such as a sudden overwhelming feeling of dread, rage,

lust or sorrow that passes as quickly as it arises.

The US Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate released a paper in 2004 which presents“Crowd Control Modeling and Simulation.” This report discusses behavioral changes [of]human populations. That the Department of Defense calls for new weapons systemsdesigned to work on the psychological underpinnings of a population should give human




Page 29 of 60

rights activists great cause for alarm. The use of electromagnetic weapons to alter theemotional state, hamper the ability of an enemy or US citizens, to think clearly, and resultin chaos and pain are morally problematic for a number of reasons:

1. Creating fear, anxiety confusion and irrational behavior within an individual or apopulation is counterproductive to the operations of a free society and to theexecution of warfare. Chaos only breeds the need for greater and greater means ofphysical repression; irrational behavior is by definition unpredictable and as suchprovides significant difficulty when the task is to secure an area.

2. These weapons leave no tell tale clues. There are no bullet holes or gross damage(with the exception of those designed to maim, burn or explode targets).

3. They are operated from a great distance, meaning that the operator has no feedback asto the effects of his or her actions. This provides us with a very dangerouscircumstance very similar to Millgram's experiment where we can predict withcertainty gross abuses of power.

4. Any device that invades a persons mind, either through induction of “evokedpotentials” through electromagnetic means or through the various “crazy-making”tactics employed in both information warfare and psychological operations is aviolation of human rights and cognitive liberty.

In terms of authorizing and administering tests of radioactive substances and other testson unsuspecting members of the public, history shows that people without ethicalstandards can rise to positions of great responsibility and once ensconced in suchpositions of trust, produce the most horrifying abuses without fear of reprisal. Whenlayers of secrecy overlay the activities of otherwise rational and intelligent men, thefailings of their hearts more readily show. In the case of actually attempting to controlhuman behavior through both overt and covert means our departments of defense andintelligence agencies, both subordinate to the executive branch of government havehistorically proven incapable of protecting the public and undeserving of the trust giventhem to perform their functions for the public good.

The US has a long history of human rights violations through harassment, telephonetapping, video surveillance, behavior manipulation, torture, drug-induced states ofconscience and psychological control. Congress’s passage of the Military CommissionAct of 2006 put universal human rights outside the scope of US policy. Today, the USgovernment is using the most technologically advanced forms of surveillance and control,along with the propaganda of fear and intimidation against its citizens. The US engagesin covert torture, covert imprisonment, increased censorship and the massive secretclassification of government documents.

John Norseen, a neuroscientist interested in Biofusion, the relationship between humansand computers, says, “If this research pans out you can begin to manipulate whatsomeone is thinking even before they know it.” Norseen says he is agnostic on the moral




Page 30 of 60

ramifications of this research. He feels that he is not a “mad” scientist - just a dedicatedone. “The ethics don’t concern me,” he says, “but they should concern someone else.”

As reported in 2001, the statement of Dr. Eldon Byrd should be considered with greatweight:

“A medical engineer, Eldon Byrd, reported a case that illustrates this point. After workingon the Polaris submarine, which carried long-range nuclear weapons, Byrd developednon-lethal weapons with reversible effects. He regarded this as a humanitarian alternativeto ‘punching holes in people and having their blood leak out in battle. His inventions usedmagnetic fields at biologically active wave frequencies to affect brain function. Byrdcould put animals to sleep at a distance and influence their movements. When the successof his research became evident, suddenly he was pulled off the project and it went"black." His believes the electromagnetic resonance weapons he developed have beenused for psychological control of civilians rather than for exigencies in battle. That is, toensure his participation, he was uninformed about the true nature of the project. Byrd’scase also illustrates how morally tolerable operations may transition to morallyintolerable operations, or at least rise above the atrocity line”




Page 31 of 60

Excerpts From:

Supreme Court Ruling on Limits on Surveillance TechnologyBy THE NEW YORK TIMESWASHINGTON, June 11

FROM THE DECISION By Justice Scalia

This case presents the question whether the use of a thermal-imaging device aimed at aprivate home from a public street to detect relative amounts of heat within the homeconstitutes a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

The Fourth Amendment provides that "the right of the people to be secure in theirpersons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall notbe violated." "At the very core" of the Fourth Amendment "stands the right of a man toretreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion."With few exceptions, the question whether a warrantless search of a home is reasonableand hence constitutional must be answered no.

FROM THE DISSENT By Justice Stevens

There is, in my judgment, a distinction of constitutional magnitude between "through-the-wall surveillance" that gives the observer or listener direct access to information in aprivate area, on the one hand, and the thought processes used to draw inferences frominformation in the public domain, on the other hand.

The court has crafted a rule that purports to deal with direct observations of the inside ofthe home, but the case before us merely involves indirect deductions from "off the wall"surveillance, that is, observations of the exterior of the home. Those observations weremade with a fairly primitive thermal imager that gathered data exposed on the outside ofpetitioner's home but did not invade any constitutionally protected interest in privacy.Moreover, I believe that the supposedly "bright line" rule the court has created inresponse to its concerns about future technological developments is unnecessary, unwise,and inconsistent with the Fourth Amendment.

Justice Stevens apparently failed to consider that the tiny surveillable emanations fromthe brain and nervous system could be technically considered a radio broadcast in hisinterpretation of ‘off the wall’ and thus the ultimate intrusion into the mind would belegally permitted were his views to prevail. Even so, just that is still occurring.




Page 32 of 60

House Resolution 1026Submitted to the Congress on Sept. 20, 2006 by US RepresentativeCynthia McKinney

For the re-opening of investigative hearings into the Counter-Intelligence Program(COINTELPRO) and other intelligence and law enforcement programs and agencies, andan expansion of those hearings to include renewal of previously curtailed abuses, andother activities sanctioned by the USA PATRIOT ACT.

Whereas the Congress condemns any abuse of human, civil, and constitutional rightsundertaken by Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies and agents;

Whereas the Congress acknowledges the violations of law perpetrated by the U.S.Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted under the Counter Intelligence Program(COINTELPRO), and other intelligence agency and law enforcement programs such asCHAOS, GARDEN PLOT, CABLE SPLICER, LANTERN SPIKE, and others, whichtargeted the leadership of progressive social movements and implemented extra-constitutional aggregations of executive power or martial law;

Whereas the Congress recognizes the findings of the Church Committee which identifiedCOINTELPRO and related activities as an illegal, extra-judicial effort designed to disruptand destroy opposition groups and movements, and anti-war protest, among others;

Be it further resolved, That Congress intends to renew legislation that will end theseabuses and fully protect the constitutional, civil, and human rights of all U.S. citizens andothers who fall under the protection of our laws and international laws and treaties theUnited States is signatory to.




Page 33 of 60

Human Brain Implant Research Suspended At Major UniversityBy Andrew Brownstein Staff Writer The Albany Times Union 8-25-99

Albany -- Professor whose work is at issue has focused on surgically inserted mind-control devices

The University at Albany has shut down the research of a psychology professor probingthe "X-Files" world of government surveillance and mind control.

At conferences, in papers and research over two semesters, Professor Kathryn Kelleyexplored the claims of those who say they were surgically implanted withcommunications devices to read their thoughts.

According to colleagues, Kelley has privately claimed the university is violating heracademic freedom. She declined to discuss the matter with a reporter.

Kelley's research and the controversy surrounding it echoes the experience of John Mack,a renowned Harvard psychiatrist who wrote the 1994 best seller "Abductions: HumanEncounters with Aliens." By lending credence to the stories of those who claimed theywere abducted and molested by space aliens, the book led to an unprecedented inquiry bythe Harvard Medical School. A school committee eventually chastised Mack forengaging in unorthodox research and "affirming the delusions" of his patients.

But unlike Kelley, Mack has an international reputation. He earns hundreds of thousandsof dollars in grants and won a Pulitzer Prize for his biography of T.E. Lawrence, knownas Lawrence of Arabia. And while Harvard challenged Mack's conclusions, theinvestigation at UAlbany is focused on methods.

Last week, university spokeswoman Mary Fiess released this statement on the matter:"The university imposed the suspension because of serious concerns that the experimentdid not meet the standards governing such projects on campus. While we're working togather all the facts in this case, we cannot comment further."

A memo sent to all psychology professors and graduate students last week instructedthem to refer calls "looking for information on any psychological research conducted inour department" to the university's public relations office.

According to three sources -- two faculty members and a graduate student -- the school'sInstitutional Review Board, which monitors human research, closed the project when astudent complained late last spring. The student, sources said, was not allowed to leave alecture that was part of Kelley's experiment. Refusal to allow a subject to leave anexperiment violates National Science Foundation guidelines.

Despite the inquiry, Kelley, a fully tenured professor who earned $67,000 last year, isslated to teach two graduate courses in the fall.




Page 34 of 60

The department became aware of Kelley's theories as early as the spring of 1998, when anote on her office door announced a lecture called "The Psychology of Invading theSelf."

The note described implant research funded by the National Security Agency and theDepartment of Defense with an annual budget of $2 billion. The "uninformed,unconsenting subjects" of these devices were typically "federal prisoners and politicaldissidents," the note said.

At the same time, Kelley won approval from the review board to conduct research on"advances in technology that affect interpersonal communication." In a 16-page outline tothe board, Kelley said she wanted to look at the uses of technology for "monitoring andcontrol." She proposed presenting a lecture to research subjects and then having themrespond to 60 questions about how the case study she would describe affected theirviews.

The interest in technology marked an extreme departure for Kelley, a professor atUAlbany since 1979. Kelley, who earned her Ph.D. from Purdue University, was aprofessor at Marquette University and the University of Wisconsin before joining thepsychology faculty at UAlbany. Her previous research dealt with issues like health, daterape and risk-taking. With her ex-husband, distinguished psychology professor DonnByrne, she co-authored a textbook on gender differences.

The shift in the focus of her research puzzled many. Gregory George, a graduate studentwho has since left the university, said he was part of a team assigned to lay the factualfoundation for the implants research.

To his astonishment, he found several firms had developed "trans-tympanic transducers,"instruments that function as mini-telephones, sending voice messages to the inner ear.Companies declined to market the product for fear of bad transmissions causing deafness,he said.

George believed the point of the research was to look at how people would perceive thosewith the implants, and whether there might be a social stigma attached.

"Kathryn has never been one to go traditional," said George. "But some of us wonderedwhy we were looking at the social stigma of something that hadn't been developed yet.Why not look at the stigma of using something more common, like a wheelchair?"

Papers Kelley delivered at two recent conferences suggest that she was becomingfascinated with the subject of mind control.

At the annual conference of the Eastern Psychological Association in Providence, R.I. --attended by several UAlbany graduate students -- she delivered a paper that looked atimplant claims as "one of the indicators of schizophrenia."




Page 35 of 60

Yet many colleagues began wondering to what extent Kelley believed that such implantswere actually occurring.

"A lot of people wonder where she draws the line," said one graduate student, who askednot to be named. "Is it hypothetical? Or is it fact?"

In a more detailed treatment she gave at a conference earlier this month in Orlando, Fla.,Kelley lent more credence to the phenomenon. She described how a subject might beimplanted with the device during anesthesia, perhaps leaving tiny stitches visible in theear. She called the devices RAATs, short for radio wave, auditory, assaultive,transmitting implants.

"When (short-wave) operators transmit to or scan RAAT implants in victims, they cantalk to the victims remotely and anonymously, and hear the victim's speech andthoughts," Kelley wrote.

The paper noted that the National Institutes of Health denied any governmental role insuch research.

The EPA is a respected psychological organization. But few professors had heard of thegroups behind the Orlando meeting: the World Multiconference on Systemics,Cybernetics and Informatics, and the International Conference on Information SystemsAnalysis and Synthesis. The Web site for the organization, based in Venezuela, said it isdevoted to cybernetics, which it describes as integrating various disciplines into "a wholethat is permeating human thinking and practice."

The current investigation into Kelley's work is considered highly sensitive at theuniversity, coming four years after a gunman who claimed the government plantedmicrochips in his body held a class of 37 students hostage and shot one student during astruggle. Ralph Tortorici, the gunman, recently hanged himself in his state prison cell.

Without commenting on specifics, sociology Professor David Wagner, outgoing chair ofthe review board, said that shutting down a professor's research was "quite rare."

Some faculty members said the last time they remember the board making such a movewas in the early 1970s.




Page 36 of 60

NASA plans to read terrorist's minds at airportsBy Frank J. MurrayTHE WASHINGTON TIMESAugust 17, 2002

Airport security screeners may soon try to read the minds of travelers to identifyterrorists.

Officials of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration have told NorthwestAirlines security specialists that the agency is developing brain-monitoring devices incooperation with a commercial firm, which it did not identify.

Space technology would be adapted to receive and analyze brain-wave and heartbeatpatterns, then feed that data into computerized programs "to detect passengers whopotentially might pose a threat," according to briefing documents obtained by TheWashington Times.

NASA wants to use "noninvasive neuro-electric sensors," imbedded in gates, to collecttiny electric signals that all brains and hearts transmit. Computers would apply statisticalalgorithms to correlate physiologic patterns with computerized data on travel routines,criminal background and credit information from "hundreds to thousands of datasources," NASA documents say.

The notion has raised privacy concerns. Mihir Kshirsagar of the Electronic PrivacyInformation Center says such technology would only add to airport-security chaos. "A lotof people's fear of flying would send those meters off the chart. Are they going to pull allthose people aside?"

The organization obtained documents July 31, the product of a Freedom of InformationAct lawsuit against the Transportation Security Administration, and offered thedocuments to this newspaper.

Mr. Kshirsagar's organization is concerned about enhancements already being added tothe Computer-Aided Passenger Pre-Screening (CAPPS) system. Data from sensingmachines are intended to be added to that mix.

NASA aerospace research manager Herb Schlickenmaier told The Times the testproposal to Northwest Airlines is one of four airline-security projects the agency isdeveloping. It's too soon to know whether any of it is working, he says.

"There are baby steps for us to walk through before we can make any pronouncements,"says Mr. Schlickenmaier, the Washington official overseeing scientists who briefedNorthwest Airlines on the plan. He likened the proposal to a super lie detector that wouldalso measure pulse rate, body temperature, eye-flicker rate and other biometric aspectssensed remotely.




Page 37 of 60

Though adding mind reading to screening remains theoretical, Mr. Schlickenmaier says,he confirms that NASA has a goal of measuring brain waves and heartbeat rates of airlinepassengers as they pass screening machines.

This has raised concerns that using noninvasive procedures is merely a first step. Privateresearchers say reliable EEG brain waves are usually measurable only by machineswhose sensors touch the head, sometimes in a "thinking cap" device. "To say I can takethat cap off and put sensors in a doorjamb, and as the passenger starts walking through[to allow me to say] that they are a threat or not, is at this point a future application," Mr.Schlickenmaier said in an interview.

Both professors also raised privacy concerns.

"Screening systems must address privacy and 'Big Brother' issues to the extent possible,"a NASA briefingpaper, presented at a two-day meeting at Northwest Airlinesheadquarters in St. Paul, Minn., acknowledges. Last year, the Supreme Court ruledunconstitutional police efforts to use noninvasive "sense-enhancing technology" that isnot in general public use in order to collect data otherwise unobtainable without awarrant. However, the high court consistently exempts airports and border posts frommost Fourth Amendment restrictions on searches.

"We're getting closer to reading minds than you might suppose," says Robert Park, aphysics professor at the University of Maryland and spokesman for the AmericanPhysical Society. "It does make me uncomfortable. That's the limit of privacy invasion.You can't go further than that."

"We're close to the point where they can tell to an extent what you're thinking about bywhich part of the brain is activated, which is close to reading your mind. It would beterribly complicated to try to build a device that would read your mind as you walk by."The idea is plausible, he says, but frightening.

At the Northwest Airlines session conducted Dec. 10-11, nine scientists and managersfrom NASA Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., proposed a "pilot test" of theAviation Security Reporting System.

NASA also requested that the airline turn over all of its computerized passenger data forJuly, August and September 2001 to incorporate in NASA's "passenger-screeningtestbed" that uses "threat-assessment software" to analyze such data, biometric facialrecognition and "neuro-electric sensing."

Northwest officials would not comment.




Page 38 of 60

Congressional Bill H.R. 2977authored by Congressman Dennis Kucinich, October 2001

The bill sought to ban the placement in Earth orbit of:

“systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energiesdirected at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war,mood management or mind control of such persons or populations”

Exerpt from Rep. Kucinich’s Speech to Americans for DemocraticActionLos Angeles February 17 2002

Let us pray that our nation will remember that the unfolding of the promise of democracyin our nation paralleled the striving for civil rights. That is why we must challenge therationale of the Patriot Act. We must ask why should America put aside guarantees ofconstitutional justice?

How can we justify in effect canceling the First Amendment and the right of free speechthe right of peaceable assemble?

How can we justify in effect canceling the Fourth Amendment probable cause theprohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure?

How can we justify in effect canceling the Fifth Amendment nullifying due process andallowing for indefinite incarceration without a trial?

How can we justify in effect canceling the Sixth Amendment - the right to prompt andpublic trial?

How can we justify in effect canceling the Eighth Amendment which protects againstcruel and unusual punishment?

We cannot justify giving the CIA the ability to target people in this country forintelligence surveillance. We cannot justify a government which takes from the peopleour right to privacy and then assumes for its own operations a right to total secrecy.




Page 39 of 60

Mind Control With Silent Sounds and Super ComputersResonance Newsletter of the MENSA Bioelectromagnetics SpecialInterest GroupEditor Judy Wall

U. S. Patent #5,159,703 dated October 27, 1992Inventor Dr. Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia

Silent Sounds, Inc. states that it is interested only in positive emotions, but the military isnot so limited. That this is a U. S. Department of Defense project is obvious. EdwardTilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., said, "The system was used throughout OperationDesert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully."

Far from necessarily being used as a weapon against a person, the system does havelimitless positive applications. However, the fact that the sounds are subliminal makesthem virtually undetectable and possibly dangerous to the general public.

These weapons were recently transferred from the Department of Defense over to theDepartment of Justice. Why? There are international treaties that exclude weapons ofthis nature in international warfare.

In other words, weapons that are barred from use against our country’s worst enemies(not withstanding the fact that the US did use this weapon against Iraqi troops!) can nowbe used against our own citizens by the local police departments against such groups aspeaceful protestors of U. S. nuclear policies.

The secrecy involved in the development of the electromagnetic mind-alteringtechnology reflects the tremendous power that is inherent in it. Whoever controls thistechnology can control the minds of all men.

As recently as last month [February 1998], this stonewall approach of total denial orsilence on the subject still held fast, even toward committees of the U. S. Congress!




Page 40 of 60

THE ETHICS DON’T CONCERN ME, BUT THEY SHOULDCONCERN SOMEONE ELSE."U. S. NewsBy Douglas Pasternak

Dr. John Norseen, a Lockheed Martin neuroengineer, is conducting research into readingand interpreting "brain prints," sponsored by NASA, DARPA and the Army’s NGIC.One possible application mentioned is scanning passengers’ brain patterns in airports tosearch for a terrorist’s (as usual) brain profile.

If this research pans out, says Norseen, "You can begin to manipulate what someone isthinking even before they know it." But Norseen says he is agnostic on the moralramifications that he’s not a mad scientist-just a dedicated one. Dr. Norseen said, "Theethics don’t concern me, but they should concern someone else."

“We are at the point where this database has been developed enough that we can use asingle electrode or something like an airport security system where there is a dome aboveyour head to get enough information that we can know the number you're thinking," headds.

Dr. John D. NorseenSystems scientist for embedded systemsLockheed Martin Aeronautics CompanyMarietta, Georgia




Page 41 of 60

“Mind War” by Michael Aquino and Colonel Paul E. Valley

"Psychotronic research is in its infancy, but the US Army already possesses anoperational weapons system designed to do what Lt. Col. J.B. Alexander would like ESPto do - except that this weapons system uses existing communications media. It seeks tomap the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then change them in accordancewith US national interests".

[General] Aquino's thesis stated that enemy populations could be subdued by inflicting astate of psychological terror and feelings of eminent destruction, shock and awe in otherwords. He discusses the use of psychotronic weapons or electronic weapons thatinfluence the mind. Capitulation could be induced without firing a shot by using signalspiggybacked on broadcasts of radio, TV and microwave communications to influencethrough subliminal suggestion, holograms, voice-to-skull and silent sound technologiesto manipulate the feelings and thoughts of the target population. During the 1960s hewas prominent in the Church of Satan.

He is now one of the highest ranking officers in the NSA.




Page 42 of 60

Excerpts from:

From “New World Vistas”a book published in 1996 by the US Air Force Advisory Board

We will have achieved a clear understanding of how the human brain works, how it reallycontrols the various functions of the body, and how it can be manipulated (bothnegatively and positively). One can envision the development of electromagnetic energysources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with thehuman body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscle movements,control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere withboth short-term and long term memory, produce an experience set, and delete anexperience set.

It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising thepossibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction. When a high powermicrowave pulse in the gigahertz range strikes the human body, a very small temperatureperturbation occurs. This is associated with a sudden expansion of the slightly heatedtissue. This expansion is fast enough to produce an acoustic wave. If a pulsed stream isused, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range,which is audible. Thus, it may be possible to talk to selected adversaries in a fashion thatwould be most disturbing to them. (Kieth 223)




Page 43 of 60

“Information Operations: A New War-Fighting Capability”Written for the Chief of Staff of the Air Force

The paper asserts that "for continued success as a superpower" the key is "informationdominance".

Part of this dominance will be the development of a space satellite-linked InformationIntegration Center, or IIC, which will act as a central information processing and controlcenter. The IIC will monitor people who have been implanted with a "microscopic brainchip…(the) chip performs two functions. First, it links the individual to the IIC, creatinga seamless interface between the user and the information resources (in-time collectiondata and archival databases.) In essence, the chip relays the processed information fromthe IIC to the user. Second, the chip creates a computer generated mental visualization…

"Implanting "things" in people raises ethical and public relations issues". In the future,"The civilian population will likely accept an implanted microscopic microchip thatallows military members to defend vital national interests". The paper goes on to notethat "The California Institute of Technology has developed an energy efficient computerchip which emulates the analog thinking of the human brain…when this capability isfully mature, this chip could provide the baseline for a brain implant hooked to all thesensory segments of the brain, not just the eye". (Kieth pg 223)




Page 44 of 60

Dr. Michael Persinger

Dr. Michael Persinger, a psychologist and neuro-scientist, "did research on the effects ofelectromagnetic radiation on the brain for a Pentagon weapons project". He has workedin the field for 40 years and has been funded by the Navy and reportedly the NSA aswell. Persinger says brain processes can be circumvented by direct induction of thisinformation within the brain…the basic premise is that synthetic duplication of theneuroelectrical correlates generated by sensors to an actual stimulus should produceidentical experiences without the presence of that stimulus." He is saying that virtuallyany mental state can be artificially injected into a human brain…from an exterior source.The most frightening thing is that the means for doing this already exist in a fullyoperational form on a worldwide basis.

"The power levels for these amplitudes are similar to those associated with the signals(generated globally by radio and communication systems)… Within the last two decadesa potential has emerged which was improbable but which is now marginally feasible.This potential is the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of theapproximately six billion brains of the human species…by generating neural informationwithin a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed."

Persinger's message, minus the jargon, is that the entire human race can be mindcontrolled through the use of electromagnetic influence piggybacked on television andradio networks or other technical means. (Kieth 207)




Page 45 of 60

"Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and Altering BrainWaves"Patent #3951134Robert G. Malech patented in 1976

The patents abstract states, "Apparatus for method of sensing brain waves at a positionremote from the subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies aresimultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject"

"The present invention relates to apparatus and a method for monitoring brain waveswherein all components of the apparatus are remote from the test subject. Highfrequency transmitters are operated to radiate electromagnetic energy of differentfrequencies through antennas, which are capable of scanning the entire brain of the testsubject or any desired region thereof. The signals of different frequencies penetrate theskull of the subject and impinge upon the brain where they mix to form an interferencewave modulated by radiation from the brain's natural electrical activity. The Modulatedinterference wave is transmitted by the brain and received by an antenna at a remotestation where it is demodulated, and processed to provide a profile of the subjects brainwaves. In addition to passively monitoring his brain waves, the subjects neurologicalprocesses may be affected by transmitting to his brain, through transmittingcompensating signals. The latter signals can be derived from the received and processedbrain waves." (Kieth pg 182)

United States Patent - 4,877,027BrunkanOctober 31, 1989Hearing system

Abstract

Sound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in therange of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particularwaveform. The waveform consists of frequency modulated bursts. Each burst is made upof ten to twenty uniformly spaced pulses grouped tightly together. The burst width isbetween 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds. The pulse width is in the range of 10nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. The bursts are frequency modulated by the audio input tocreate the sensation of hearing in the person whose head is irradiated.




Page 46 of 60

Excerpts from:

The Revolution in Military Affairs [RMA] and Conflict Short of WarJuly 25, 1994

U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGEMajor General William A. StofftCommandantSTRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE

Director - Colonel John W. MountcastleDirector of Research - Dr. Earl H. Tilford, Jr.Authors - Dr. Steven Metz and Lieutenant Colonel James Kievit

American values also make the use of directed energy weapons against suspectednarcotrafficking aircraft technologically feasible but morally difficult, perhapsunacceptable. The advantage of directed energy weapons over conventional ones isdeniability. Against whom is such deniability aimed?

Deniability must be aimed at the American people, who do not sanction theimprisonment, much less execution, of individuals without a trial (and execution is howthey will perceive it--the argument "we only disabled the aircraft, it was the crash whichkilled the pilot" will carry little weight).

American values and attitudes thus form significant constraints on full use of emergingtechnology, at least in anything short of a perceived war for national survival.Overcoming these constraints to make a RMA in conflict short of war would requirefundamental changes in the United States--an ethical and political revolution may benecessary to make a military revolution.

[Metz and Kievit included the following scenario that projects plausible events occurringbetween approximately two and fifteen years from the year in which they wrote thispaper in 1994. Only the authors can say what secretive and conjectured realities theirscenario actually draws from, though all of it apparently falls within the realm ofpossibillity.]

The revolutionaries first task was to recruit proselytes throughout the government andnational security community. Initially the revolutionaries, who called their new strategicconcept "Dynamic Defense," were opposed by isolationists who felt that new technologyshould be used simply to build an impenetrable electronic and physical barrier aroundthe United States. Eventually the revolutionaries convinced the president-elect followingthe campaign of 2000 that Dynamic Defense was both feasible and effective--a task madeeasier by his background as a pioneering entrepreneur in the computer-generated and




Page 47 of 60

controlled "perception-molding" systems developed by the advertising industry. ThePresident was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed thecore of the RMA in conflict short of war.

The first step in implementing Dynamic Defense was reshaping the national securityorganization and its underlying attitudes and values. Technology provided opportunity;only intellectual change could consolidate it. With the full and active support of thePresident, the revolutionaries reorganized the American national security system to makemaximum use of emerging technology and new ideas.

One of the turning points of the revolution came when its leaders convinced the Presidentand key members of Congress that traditional American ethics were a major hinderanceto the RMA. This was crucial: the revolutionaries and their allies then crafted theappropriate attitudinal vessel for the RMA. Through persistent efforts and verysophisticated domestic "consciousness-raising," old-fashioned notions of personalprivacy and national sovereignty changed. This was relatively easy since frustration withdomestic crime had already begun to alter attitudes and values. In fact, the RMA inconflict short of war was, in many ways, a spin-off of the domestic "war on drugs andcrime" of the late 1990s when the military, as predicted by William Mendel in 1994,became heavily involved in support to domestic law enforcement. The changes inAmerican values that accompanied that struggle were easily translated to the nationalsecurity arena. Once the norms concerning personal privacy changed, law soon followed.

With values changed, technology then opened the door to profound innovation. Vastimprovements in surveillance systems and information processing made it possible tomonitor a large number of enemies (and potential enemies). In the pre-RMA days,psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advancedinto the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethicalprohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) bothinternational and domestic. Cutting-edge pharmaceutical technology also provided toolsfor national security strategists.

Sometimes the revolutionaries found it necessary to stoke the development of technologydesigned specifically for conflict short of war. Whenever possible, profitability was usedto encourage private and quasi-private enterprises to develop appropriate technology.For example, much of the lucrative technology of surveillance, intelligence collection,and attitude manipulation used to solve the domestic crime problem was easily adaptedto conflict short of war. The same held for new weapons, especially nonlethal biologicalones and advanced psychotechnology. Only when there was absolutely no expectation ofprofit did the government directly sponsor research of cutting-edge technology, oftenwith funds freed by disbanding what were seen as increasingly irrelevant conventionalmilitary forces.

The actual strategy built on the RMA was divided into three tracks. The first sought toperpetuate the revolution. Its internal dimension institutionalized the organizational andattitudinal changes that made the revolution possible, and pursued future breakthroughs




Page 48 of 60

in close conjunction with business, the scientific community, and local law enforcementagencies--the core troika of 21st century security. The external dimension actively soughtto delay or prevent counterresponses by controlling information and through well-orchestrated deception.

The operation officially began when the President transferred the Cuban portfolio fromthe Conflict Preemption Agency to the Conflict Containment Agency. An existingcontingency plan with implementing software provided the framework for quick action.Immediately, all electronic communication in and out of Cuba was surreptitiouslytransferred to the national security filter at Fort Meade. This allowed full monitoring,control, and, when necessary, manipulation of private, commercial, and governmentsignals. Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world wereidentified using the Comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These werecategorized as "potential" or "active," with sophisticated computerized personalitysimulations used to develop, tailor, and focus psychological campaigns for each.Individuals and organizations with active predilections to support the insurgency weretargets of an elaborate global ruse using computer communications networks andappeals by a computer-generated insurgent leader. Real insurgent leaders who wereidentified were left in place so that sophisticated computer analysis of their contactscould be developed. Internecine conflict within the insurgent elite was engineered usingpsychotechnology. Psychological operations included traditional propaganda as well asmore aggressive steps such as drug assisted subliminal conditioning. At the same time,Cubans within the United States and around the world were assigned maximumsurveillance status to monitor their physical presence and communications webs.

Since all Americans in Cuba had been bioelectrically tagged and monitored during theinitial stages of the conflict, the NEO went smoothly, including the mandatory healthscreening of all those returning to the United States. Coast Guard aircraft and hovercraftstanched illegal refugees. The attitude-shaping campaigns aimed at the American public,the global public, and the Cuban people went quite well, including those parts usingcomputer-generated broadcasts by insurgent leaders--"morphing"-- in which they wereshown as disoriented and psychotic. Subliminal messages surreptitiously integrated withCuban television transmissions were also helpful. In fact, all of this was so successfulthat there were only a few instances of covert, stand-off military strikes when insurgenttargets arose and government forces seemed on the verge of defeat. U.S. strike forcesalso attacked neutral targets to support the psychological campaign as computer-generated insurgent leaders claimed credit for the raids. At times, even the raidsthemselves were computer-invented "recreations." (These were a specialty of the Army'selite Sun Tzu Battalion.)

Many of the difficult-to-detect drugs and psychotechnology developed for use in conflictshort of war have appeared on the domestic black market and, increasingly, in Americanschools and workplaces. Perhaps most important, Americans are beginning to questionthe economic, human, and ethical costs of our new strategy. A political movement calledthe "New Humanitarianism" is growing, especially among Americans of non-Europeandescent, and seems likely to play a major role in the presidential election of 2012. There




Page 49 of 60

are even rumblings of discontent within the national security community as the fullmeaning of the revolution becomes clear. Since the distinction between the military andnon-military components of our national security community has eroded.

Advances in sensors and other elements of information technology may bring greatbenefits to conventional, combined-arms warfare, but will have less impact in conflictshort of war, which is most often won or lost through the manipulation of images, beliefs,attitudes, and perceptions. These things rather than troop concentrations, command andcontrol nodes, and transportation infrastructure are the key military targets in conflictshort of war. This makes psychological technology much more important than striketechnology. Ways must be found to use emerging technology, including advancedartificial intelligence and information dissemination systems, to help military strategistsdevelop, implement, and continually improve methods of influencing opinion, mobilizingpublic support, and sometimes demobilizing it. There is also the potential for defensivepyschotechnology such as "strategic personality simulations" to aid national securitydecision makers. To date, most analysts feel that the RMA has not generated adequateadvances in such "soft war" capabilities or even the promise of such gains. But ultimatesuccess in applying the RMA to conflict short of war hinges on the development ofpsychotechnology. As this emerges, it could be tested for political acceptability by usingit first in non-lethal operations other than war like humanitarian relief and nationassistance.

Today, two RMAs may be underway simultaneously. The first (and more mature) iselectronic. Its manifestations are improved C4I and precision strike systems. The second(and potentially more profound) RMA is biotechnological, including genetic engineeringand advanced behavior-altering drugs. Because of the compression of time and theshortening of historical patterns, the biotechnical revolution is totally enmeshed with theelectronic. It may ultimately be the combination of the two that proves trulyrevolutionary.




Page 50 of 60

'Air Force Plan: Hack Your Nervous System'DefenseTech.org

The brain has always been a battlefield. New weapons might be able to hack directly intoyour nervous system.

Details of this emerged in a heavily-censored document released to Ed Hammond of theSunshine Project under the Freedom if Information Act. Called “Sensory consequence ofelectromagnetic pulsed emitted by laser induced plasmas,” it described research onactivating the nerve cells responsible for sensing unpleasant stimuli: heat, damage,pressure, cold. By selectively stimulating a particular nociceptor, a finely tuned PEPmight produce sensations of say, being burned, frozen or dipped in acid -- all withoutdoing the slightest actual harm.

The skin is the easiest target for such stimulation. But, in principle, any sensory nervescould be triggered. The Controlled Effects document suggests “it may be possible tocreate synthetic images…to confuse an individual's visual sense or, in a similar manner,confuse his senses of sound, taste, touch, or smell.




Page 51 of 60

Microchip Implants, Mind Control and Cyberneticsby Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MDFormer Chief Medical Officer of FinlandDecember 6, 2000

It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which couldthen function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretlybeing discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved.

When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from thebrain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person.Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back tothe person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced. Using a RMS, a land-basedcomputer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to thenervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS, healthy persons can beinduced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.

The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy vanishes for the restof his or her life.

Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and eveninduced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.

This “silent war” is being conducted against unknowing civilians and soldiers by militaryand intelligence agencies. Since 1980, electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) has beensecretly used to control people targeted without their knowledge or consent. Allinternational human rights agreements forbid nonconsensual manipulation of humanbeings — even in prisons, not to speak of civilian populations.

Are we ready for the robotization of mankind and the total elimination of privacy,including freedom of thought? How many of us would want to cede our entire life,including our most secret thoughts, to Big Brother? Yet the technology exists to create atotalitarian New World Order. Covert neurological communication systems are in placeto counteract independent thinking and to control social and political activity on behalf ofself-serving private and military interests.

One reason this technology has remained a state secret is the widespread prestige of thepsychiatric Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV produced by the U.S. American PsychiatricAssociation (APA) and printed in 18 languages. Psychiatrists working for U.S.intelligence agencies no doubt participated in writing and revising this manual. Thispsychiatric "bible" covers up the secret development of MC technologies by labelingsome of their effects as symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.




Page 52 of 60

Centre for Conflict Resolution - Department of Peace StudiesBradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (BNLWRP)Research Report No. 8By Neil Davison and Nick LewerMarch 2006

For police and security sector services this ethical and social problem is not going to goaway. It will, in essence, become a bigger issue, as the new technologies start to mature,and offer a wider range of technological opportunities (with associated socio-politicalimplications) to those responsible for law and order. It will test potential linkagesbetween the temptation of using such technologies for the ‘political control’ ofpopulations, and the police-state relationship.

Neuroscience and the military

In early 2006 the think tank Demos and the Welcome Trust published a collection ofessays entitled Better Humans? The Politics of Human Enhancement and Life Extension.In his contribution, Professor Steven Rose, a leading neuroscientist based at the OpenUniversity, warns of increasing military interest in emerging technologies that mayenable the manipulation of the brain:

...in the panicky environment of the so-called ‘war on terror’ there is increasing militaryinterest in the development of techniques that can survey and possibly control andmanipulate the mental processes of potential enemies.

He points to the use of electromagnetic energy to manipulate the brain:

...there is a long history of attempts by DARPA [US Defense Advanced Research ProjectsAgency] to develop techniques for focusing microwave beams to disorient or confuseopponents. Whether microwave technology is capable of achieving this goal is uncertain.More promising, however, is a much newer technique – transcranial magneticstimulation (TMS). This focuses an intense magnetic field on specific brain regions, andhas been shown specifically to affect thoughts, perceptions and behaviours that aredependent on those regions. Currently usable only when a subject’s head is placed insidethe relevant machine [actually, a means of surveilling and controlling the process ofthought at a distance already exists and has for some decades], TMS at a distance is nowunder active investigation. So is chip technology, which might provide implantedprostheses to overcome sensory deficits or control behaviour.

Ostensibly DARPA’s interest in TMS is in enhancing the performance of US soldiers, asdescribed on the web site of its Defense Sciences Office:

The goal of the Preventing Sleep Deprivation Program is to define and implementapproaches to prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation, and to provide methodsfor recovery of function with particular emphasis on cognitive and psychomotorimpairments. Among the approaches currently under investigation include novel




Page 53 of 60

pharmaceuticals that enhance neural transmission, nutraceuticals that promoteneurogenesis, cognitive training, and devices such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.

However, given the current interest in directed energy and suppressive/incapacitatingweaponry, it is hard to imagine that this technique is not under consideration for use as aweapon. Other means of manipulating the nervous system using electromagnetic beamscertainly are. In the ‘Directed Energy’ section of this report we describe researchsponsored by the US Air Force that seeks to use electromagnetic energy to manipulate thenervous system by altering neurotransmitter release.

Russia is also conducting research into the use of electromagnetic radiation to manipulatethe nervous system.

Bioelectromagnetic weapons

A final report on a three-year US Air Force funded project to study the effects ofradiofrequency (RF) energy on nervous system function gives some insight into an areaof weapons development where there has been much speculation but little availableinformation over many years. Two researchers at the University of Nevada, Reno, Dr.Gale Graviso, an Associate Professor of Pharmacology in the School of Medicine, andDr. Indira Chatterjee, a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, have beeninvestigating the use of RF energy to manipulate the release of neurotransmitters in thenervous system with a view to developing an incapacitating weapon. The researchproject, entitled Sensitivity to Neurotransmitter Release to Radiofrequency Fields, ranfrom 1 June 2002 until 31 May 2005 under contract number F49620-02-1-0306 with theAir Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) for $357,652. The abstract of the finalreport136 is very clear about the purpose of the research undertaken:

Exploring the interactions between radiofrequency (RF) radiation and biological systemsis essential for developing RF-based non-lethal stunning/immobilizing weaponry. To thisend a research effort was initiated to identify RF parameters potentially capable ofselectively altering exocytosis, the process underlying neurotransmitter release andhence nervous system function.

Experiments were conducted on nerve cells from the adrenal medulla section of theadrenal gland. The adrenal medulla controls release of the catecholamineneurotransmitters adrenaline and noradrenaline into the bloodstream. The mainobservation given in the final report on the research is that they found an increase inrelease of catecholamines from these cells as a result of exposure to certain frequencies ofRF energy.

A second concurrent three-year research effort (‘Project 2’) being conducted by the sameresearchers, which began on 1 June 2003, has been funded by the ‘Department ofDefense Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (DEPSCoR)’ and theUniversity of Nevada, Reno with a total of $750,000. This project is not only looking atinfluencing the nervous system with RF radiation but also affecting muscle contraction:




Page 54 of 60

The project addresses the long-term goals set in Project 1 funded by the AFOSR, i.e.investigating the feasibility of designing novel non-lethal stunning/immobilizing weaponsbased on non-thermal effects of RF/microwave radiation on neurotransmitter releasefrom chromaffin cells. It extends the scope of Project 1 by proposing to conductexposures at low levels of microwave radiation, as well as by using another type ofexcitable cell i.e. skeletal muscle cells, to investigate whether RF/microwave radiationwill produce non-thermal effects on muscle contraction, thereby providing anotherstrategy to design novel immobilizing weaponry.

Having learnt about these projects we looked for any announcements about the researchat the time of the initial funding award in 2003, and we found a University of Nevadapress release from March 2003 that is deeply deceptive. Not only does it omit anyreference to the sole purpose of the research, i.e. development of “novel immobilizingweaponry”, but it also claims that the research is for beneficial therapeutic purposes:

As regards the broader issue of whether it is in any way acceptable to developbioelectromagnetic weapons that could have an incapacitating and suppressing effect onpeople by manipulating their nervous system or their muscles, the University of Nevada’s2003 press release and its evident omission answers this question for us.




Page 55 of 60

FUTURE SUB-LETHAL, INCAPACITATING & PARALYSINGTECHNOLOGIES - THEIR COMING ROLE IN THE MASSPRODUCTION OF TORTURE, CRUEL, INHUMANE &DEGRADING TREATMENT

Dr Steve Wright - Director of the Omega FoundationA Draft Paper Presented To The Expert Seminar On SecurityEquipment & The Prevention Of Torture25-26 October 2002. London, UK

This paper covers the emergence of new sub-lethal, incapacitating and paralysingtechnologies and their coming role in the mass production of torture, cruel, inhumane anddegrading treatment. It grew out of the work the Omega Foundation has undertaken forAmnesty International (on electroshock, restraining and torture technologies), theEuropean Commission, the European Parliament and Landmine Action. Throughout itsexistence, Omega has tracked technologies, particularly less lethal weapons) deployed bythe police, military and security services to create human rights violations, includingweapons used in torture. However, such technologies have always been seen by us asmulti-functional, weapons of flexible response rather than specifically designed just for arole in torture.

For many years the US used so called non-lethal weapons in its prisons, for crowd controland often in conjunction with lethal force during war such as the massive use of CS inVietnam against combatants and non-combatants alike. A key strand of such workinvolved the creation of non-lethal weapons for interrogation or as Peter Watson has putit, war on the mind. After World War II, many countries examined the use of chemicalsfor the manipulation of human behaviour and a rich seam of pharmacological workopened up to facilitate these needs and the creation of mechanisms to induce, debilitation,dependence and dread.

Directed Energy or Radio frequency Weapons using the microwave part of theelectromagnetic spectrum are probably the most controversial area of development. Theyare discussed in Non-Lethal Weapon circles but little in the way of hard data is providedgiven their sensitivity. They are seen as offering a potential rheostatic or tunable responsefrom less-lethal; to lethal. Already demonstrated is the ability to induce a heating effectup to 107 degrees F to induce an artificial fever. There has been much speculation but adearth of hard data about such psychotronic weapons which are already worrying thoseconcerned about bioethics. Such electronic neuro-influence weapons would be in breachof the recent EU resolution regarding technologies which interact directly with the humannervous system. Voice to skull technology has already been discussed in the literature.

We are supposed to believe that the major role of these disabling and incapacitatingtechnologies is in creating harmless warfare. Work by the Omega Foundation in the pastfor the European Parliament reveals a pattern of such less lethal weapons being used bothfor punishment and for softening up dissenters before deploying lethal force. There is




Page 56 of 60

every expectation that the second generation of these technologies will find similar roles,especially if the companies making such weapons seek wider markets.

Without adequate international controls, we may end up with weapons of masspunishment, and gross human rights violation - taking torture out of the present traditionof 1 (or more) to 1; to a capacity where one person or group can torture or deliberatelydebilitate and punish 1-to many.

The debate on International Law and Non-Lethal Weapons is vitally important, if we areto establish the continuance of basic principles of what is and what is not beyond thelimits of permissibility in the face of US attempts to define these weapons as lyingoutside such restrictions. They are not.

Some of the devices discussed above will find a future role in mass producing torture,cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. Other technologies will follow as governmentsfind ever new mechanisms to quell dissenters, punish civilians who would migrate intotheir territory, as well force multiplying tools or as surprise devices to immobilisecombatants. At both the UN and the EU levels, we should attempt to enhance controls onsuch technologies which are anticipatory in that they can be applied to new devices andinventions on the horizon rather than just the single function torture weapons of old.

Alas, good laws, export controls and regulations do not guarantee good practice.Whatever controls are eventually agreed, it is sensible to assume that loopholes will befound accompanied by traditional denials of government and corporate collusion. Takingthis as a starting point, it would be prudent for the responsible authorities to re-examinethe resources needed both by customs and intelligence agencies to adequately prioritizetracking of malfactors in the future. It would also seem prudent to put in place furtherfield research and audit procedures to ensure that the information required to monitor thetorture trail enables a more prophylactic approach.




Page 57 of 60

New CIA director Hayden plans massive expansion of spying onAmericansBy DOUG THOMPSONMay 31, 2006, 08:19© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Now that he is officially sworn in as the new head of the Central Intelligence Agency,Gen. Michael Hayden plans to build a vast domestic spying network that will pry into thelives of most Americans around the clock.

President George W. Bush told Hayden to "take whatever steps necessary" to monitorAmericans 24/7 by listening in on their phone calls, bugging their homes and offices,probing their private lives, snooping into their financial records and watching their travelhabits.

Can I prove this in a court of law? No. Do I know it is happening? Yes, without a doubt.Enough sources within the CIA, FBI, NSA and Pentagon have come forward in recentdays to warn about Hayden's plans for an expanded, consolidated spy network aimed atAmericans, not terrorists, and violating numerous laws that prohibit such activitiesagainst citizens of this country.

"What Hayden plans to do is not only illegal, it is immoral," says a longtime CIAoperative who may retire early rather than participate in what he sees as an illegalextension of the spy agency's activities.

Hayden, who oversaw the National Security Agency's questionable monitoring of phonecalls and emails of Americas, plans to consolidate much of the country's domestic spyinginto a new desk at the CIA, calling it a "domestic terrorism prevention" operation.

The desk will oversee not only NSA's increased monitoring of electronic communicationsby Americans but also the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's "terroristinformation awareness" program that monitors travel and financial activities byAmericans by gathering real-time data from banks, airlines, travel agencies and creditcard companies.

The CIA operation will also coordinate with the Pentagon's domestic spying program thatmonitors activities of anti-war groups, organizations critical of the Bush administrationsand others tagged as enemies of the state.

FBI agents will step up monitoring of journalists to identify leaks of stories embarrassingto the government. The bureau is already monitoring phone calls and emails by reporterson a routine basis and has increased surveillance of writers for major news organizationsand monitoring of travel and financial records using the DARPA computers.

"This is not 'total information awareness' but 'total information control' aimed at watchingAmericans fulltime and ignoring the protections that are supposed to be guaranteed by




Page 58 of 60

the Constitution," says an FBI agent familiar with the programs. "I didn't sign on for thisand I'm getting the hell out."

In fact, resignations at major U.S. spy agencies are at an all-time high. Exact numbers areclassified but sources say field agents, data analysts and others are leaving in drovesrather than join the frenzy to spy on Americans.

Hayden sailed through the Senate confirmation process defending his domestic spyingprogram at NSA, claiming it was legal. Privacy experts and Constitutional law professorssay otherwise but the Senate rubber-stamped Bush's choice anyway, choosing to ignorethe threats to freedom.

Hayden will have little problem concealing the operation from the public and Congress.Many of the CIA's programs are classified and the agency has, in the past, concealedprograms even from the intelligence committees in both the House and Senate. TheDARPA project and the Pentagon domestic spying programs are "black bag" operationsthat do not require Congressional approval or oversight.

Likewise, many of the details of the NSA domestic spying program were withheld fromCongress and escaped public notice until media reports unearthed them and the Bushadministration now threatens to jail the reporters who broke the story. I wish I couldprove this. I wish one, just one, source on the inside was willing to come forward andallow his or her name to be used but those who might be tempted see what happened toMary McCarthy, the CIA employee fired and under threat of prosecution for leakinginformation about CIA torture camps in Europe.

But I know it is happening. People I've known for years and trust tell me it is happeningand the past record of spying, lies and deceit by the Bush administration point to just suchan operation.

This nation is under attack. We, the people, are under attack. And the enemy in this caseis not an Islamic radical hiding in a cave in Afghanistan but a cabal of truly evil men andwomen at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and on Capitol Hill aided by carefully-picked, law-ignoring appointees at the Hoover Building on Pennsylvania Avenue, a black glass-walled building at Fort Meade, MD, and a complex in Langley, Virginia.




Page 59 of 60

PSI TECH Mission Statement

A message from Jonina Dourif, President and Dane Spotts, CEO

PSI TECH's mission is to evolve human consciousness through the development andtraining of mind technologies. We assert that all people are born with natural psychic orsixth sense abilities, however, in most, it lies dormant. By training our cutting edgeTechnical Remote Viewing® skills, this innate PSI ability or "PSI muscle" as we like tocall it, becomes activated. Awakening this dormant capability in the human race is PSITECH's goal. Once human beings have installed this learned skill, not only will it expandan individual's potential but when enough people become activated, it will shiftconsciousness on a global scale.

PSI TECH had its beginnings in the covert world of military intelligence. The companywas created in 1989 by a few renegade officers in a top secret military intelligence unitwho risked their careers to transfer this classified technology into the private sector.Those individuals knew that when the Defense Intelligence Agency's Remote ViewingOperational Unit lost its funding that this ground breaking technology would be lostforever. PSI TECH was formed to prevent the loss and to secure its subsistence. Severalhighly placed government individuals chose to look the other way, thus, helping to usherRemote Viewing and PSI TECH into the private sector....Imagine a world with no secrets. A future where human beings have developed theirinnate sixth sense and have integrated these abilities into their everyday life. Whenenough people on Planet Earth have installed this skill, it will change the face ofconsciousness. The world will be a very different place. You play an important role inthat future. A player in the biggest and most important game in the universe. All of us atPSI TECH invite you to join us. We look forward to assisting you in developing yourpotential while you assist us in reaching our goal. This is just the beginning.

[No secrets for others and complete secrecy for themselves with disinformation like thatin abundance. What a mass of dangerous lies and half truths by an intelligencecommunity that specializes in those. This, believe it or not, is part of the way that theintelligence community (Nope, no ‘renegade’ offshoot. The CIA does not allow renegadeoffshoots. It plants them.) is seeking to build a future where some have all theinformation (and hence power) and others have very little – can literally sneak into yourhome and even your mind. There is no physical mechanism for natural psychic abilities.That part is sheer lie. There IS hard evidence (the little that has not been destroyed orclassified) that the intelligence community has funded and developed surreptitioustechnologies of extraordinary surveillance and has been applying them for decades incruel and esoteric ways that leapfrog all Constitutional protections of citizens and thatprotect themselves in sheer lack of proof and that they ARE drawing in a big part of theconservative community to leverage those technologies, perhaps without many of thosepersons even knowing that the ‘abilities’ are based on surreptitious technologies at all(or that they themselves can also fall prey to them).]




Page 60 of 60

Dr. James Randall NoblittClinical PsychologistDallas, TexasTuesday, July 22, 2008, 5:49 PM

I am James Randy Noblitt and I have a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology. I am a practicingand licensed Clinical Psychologist. I have written a book which includes the subject ofmind control, and also I have seen many patients reporting that they were abused in mindcontrol experiments. Some of these allegations are that mind control experiments havebeen done either within certain agencies of the United States government, or within theauspices of these agencies. I feel it's very, very important that these allegations beinvestigated thoroughly. We already know that the United States government has beenoccasionally involved in other kinds of unfortunate activities such as studies involvingsyphilis with black people and other such similar situations. This is something that needsserious scientific and congressional investigation.



Date post:	14-Mar-2022
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	8 times
Download:	0 times

Exhibit J – Supporting Documentation

Documents