+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper...

Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper...

Date post: 20-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: david-knight
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around, more expensive, more standardized “Use for Others” at most national labs (Oak Ridge, LANL, BNL) A few shallow middle depth sites open for users LBL Bldg72 and Oroville Dam – now LOMO at PNNL - soon Deep screening sites are only in development stage WIPP (MEGA ) Soudan: -screening capability in SOLO Plans to create a multi-purpose LBCF Really, Really Deep sites are DUSEL era DEPTH
Transcript
Page 1: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Existing counting facilities in the US

Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty

Commercial LabsLonger turn around, more expensive, more

standardized

“Use for Others” at most national labs (Oak Ridge, LANL, BNL)

A few shallow middle depth sites open for usersLBL Bldg72 and Oroville Dam – nowLOMO at PNNL - soon

Deep screening sites are only in development stageWIPP (MEGA )Soudan: -screening capability in SOLO

Plans to create a multi-purpose LBCF

Really, Really Deep sites are DUSEL era

DEPTH

Page 2: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Sensitivity for US Sites

Surface countersLBL Bldg 72,PNNL, and many other places etc.

Shielded on surface PNNL 17-A

LBNL Oroville

2000 + mweSoudan, MEGA

LoMoCF estimate

Page 3: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Berkeley Complex:

Surface and Shallow Site under same umbrella organization: Institute of Nuclear and Particle AstrophysicsSTAFFKevin LeskoAl SmithDick McDonaldDonna Hurley

Page 4: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Throughput determined by number of Ge detectors

Bldg72 has NaI counters and a 130% HPGe, Oroville has a 80% p-type HPGe

Major User: SNO (screened virgin and machined acrylic, plastic resins, PMT envelopes, internal components, stainless steel, etc.)

Also Clean room preparation and operation, sample handling procedures

Sensitivity is currently limited by detector contamination

Bldg 72 (LBL) Dam (140 mi) from LBL

Page 5: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

PNNL – UW Complex:

Surface + 17-A ULB + new initiative at Lower Monumental Dam

• 1 hr from PNNL

• 37 meters of overburden

• Operated by US Army Corp of Engineers

Page 6: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Inside LoMo Counting Facility:

Currently being used as cosmogenic isolation space for copper stock and MEGA parts

Plan is to install gamma screening in lead cave. Funding is in place.

4’

1’

1’

4’ 1’1’

Wat

er

trou

gh

~8’

Person

Access

4-person elevator access Two sets of 3 HPGe counters with active cosmic veto shield

UWJ.A. FormaggioJ.F. Wilkerson

PNNLC.E. Aalseth

R.L. BrodzinskiT. HossbachH.S. MileyJ.L. Orrell

Page 7: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

WIPP• DOE Facility

• Impressiveinfrastructure

• Modest depth(1600 mwe)

• Science not primary mission

• SEGA underground by next summer (not a screener)

• Assembling MEGA at WIPP now.

• 1st detector ready to take data

• Completed in a couple years.

Page 8: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Low background Screening and Prototyping Facility

at the Soudan Underground Lab

Last Soudan2 proton decay calorimeters (at back) were removed Nov 23rd 2004

SOLO HPGeJim Reeves: Cu Electroforming SBIR + Cu screening detector (microBq/kg)

Diode M (35%)Twin (75%)UF detector (100%)

Arrives 3rd week in March

Page 9: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Low background Screening and Prototyping Facility

at the Soudan Underground Lab

CDMS offices

CDMS Aux Clean RoomBFand SiLi detector, leaching lab? other?

Veto shield repaired last summer DAQ: location & time stamp for each muon

Page 10: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Medtronics “suitcase” experiment (soft memory errors)

COUPP dark matter prototype (J. Collar)

Phase 2 proposal (Reeves SBIR)

Fabricate Ge detectors (Princeton Gamma-Tech SBIR)

Neon dark matter prototype (James White, TAMU)

XENON going to Italy for the espresso and climate?

Other near term users(in ranked-order of real maybe)

Page 11: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Strategy for Soudan LBCF

• Create minimum facility nowDOE University supplements for infrastructure

(power feed, technician, lease fee)Define fee structure for users & sign EPS

• Continue to improve gamma screeningFix Twin, upgrade electronics, upgrade DAQ,Diode-M becomes pre-screener, UF HPGe into castle

• Provide novel beta screeners through CWRU, Caltech … (or possible MRI 2006)

• Take this next year to Increase size of collaboration

Modify design according to input and new users

• Put in complete proposal next Fall ‘05

Funding from NSF, DOE (HEP and Nuc) implies main justification must be from Astro/HEP/Nucl community. Reduce financial impact by maintaining it thru user fees to other groups

DUSEL is a different model – can we get other divisions involved?

Page 12: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

University of Minnesota Intercollegiate Grant

1. Seek out other user communities for LBCF

2. Coordinate low level counting/analysis across sites

Examples of other user communities involved:

Tritium and 14C in groundwater Radioactive environmental sampling (accidental release of radio-isotopes)Exposure assessment studies (14C as a tracer of particiulate lung burden) Epidemiological studies of uranium workers (tissue samples)Short-lived isotopes for sediment datingTracers in uptake and transport (geomicrobiology)Bioremediation studies etc etc…

These “other” users need well-type HPGe, chemical separation, sample handling AND beta-counting applications (14C, 3H, 40K)

DUSEL work has uncovered new synergies with

geomicrobiology, geology, hydrologyWORKSHOP in Minneapolis in July to explore these synergies

Page 13: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Material to be screened:Ge, Si wafersLEDs Copper (detector holders, icebox, copper tape)Low activity solder, silver epoxy, brass screws, cables and connectorsMagnetic shieldStriplines, side coaxes and squet cards, kevlarShielding materials (inner lead, outer lead, copper, polyethylene)

Estimated samples/year (including replicates): 36 samples/year (HPGe)12 samples/year (Ge, Si wafers)

contaminant screened or isotope(s) analyzed 238-U, 232-Th, 40-K, 60-Co, 134-Cs, 137-Cs, 207-Bi, 210-Pb

sensitivity desired (ppb or Bq/kg): 100 mBq/kg to < 0.5 mBq/kg

SuperCDMS (response to DUSEL survey)

Laura’s first draft

How many of these can go through ICPMS or other? How many ultra-low samples?

Page 14: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Ante-room Ante-room

Multi-purpose clean room

Clean room over tank

Water ports with crane

Electro form

40 ft

Upper mezzanine above tank top

Use

r sh

ield

ing

Clean room over tank

anteroomClean room

Clean room

Water tankShieldedbays

mezzanine

anteroom

radon scrubbing plenum.

stairs

current mezzanine

Muon veto shield

Muon veto shield

Muo

n ve

to s

hiel

d Muon veto shield

100 ft

Drawings and Design Consultation: Short Elliott Henderson Engineering, Inc

Page 15: Existing counting facilities in the US Analysis centers at most Universities User fees – cheaper for University faculty Commercial Labs Longer turn around,

Figure E-16 from the Homestake Reference Design

Secure lab

Emanation and leachinglaboratory

(TBA) Pool 2Gd-loaded liq. Scint

for neutron sensitivity or

Mini-Borexino for U/Th down to 10-16 g/g

Pool 112 m cube – ultra-pure water

NAA Laboratory + general environmental sample handling

Built-in liq. Scint acrylic thimble ports read out by PMT’s

for U/Th down to 10-14 g/g


Recommended