Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kirk-parrish |
View: | 23 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Experience with first-line ARV regimens in Lusaka
Jeff Stringer, MDProfessor, Obstetrics and Gynecology, UAB
Director, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia
The University of Alabama atBirmingham
Why MOH is changing to Tenofovir
• Tolerability• Once daily dosing• ARV sequencing• Better outcomes as first-line
Patients enrolled at Project HEART-supported sites thru Aug ‘07
113,561Enrolled
70,624On ART
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
May-0
4
Aug-0
4
Nov-0
4
Feb-05
May-0
5
Aug-0
5
Nov-0
5
Feb-06
May-0
6
Aug-0
6
Nov-0
6
Feb-07
May-0
7
Aug-0
7
Background
• Patient data captured on forms• Entered in real time into SmartCare EMR• Every pharmacy prescription and dispensation
captured (n=789,541)– Switching very well captured– Reasons for switching not well captured
• D4T and AZT commingled in every clinic• Prescription by availability; anemia
Methods• Comparison of D4T vs. AZT- containing
regimens• Outcome = Mortality
– Post 90-days• Cox Proportional Hazards Regression
– Exposure categorized by initial regimen in crude analyses (ITT)
– Adjusted analyses treat drug exposure as time-varying covariate
23,253on NVP ART > 1
month
45,,492Returned for further
care
59,512 ART NaïveHIV+ AdultsEvaluated
14,020Did not return
12,635AZT
9,962D4T
1,985Late
673Withdrew
748Died
1,804Late
542Withdrew
946Died
6,670Active
9,229Active
656Missing Initial
Regimens
14,506did not start ART146 uncertain start
dates
5,955Initiated with EFV
(TB)
1,632< 30 days on ART
22,597Dispensed
AZT(n=12,635)
D4T(n=9,962)
Age, median (IQR) 35 (30, 41) 34 (29, 40)
Female 58% 70%
CD4 count, median (IQR) 139 (77, 199) 119 (58, 191)
< 50 cells/l 15% 21%
WHO I or II 39% 30%
III 54% 60%
IV 7% 10%
Hemoglobin, median (IQR) 11.6 (10.6, 12.8) 9.6 (8.5, 10.7)
< 8 g/dL 1.8% 17%
BMI, median (IQR) 20.4 (18.5, 22.8) 19.4 (17.4, 21.6)
<16 kg/m2 5.0% 12%
Active TB 0.3% 0.5%
*p < 0.001 for all comparisons (except TB, p = 0.14)
Comparison of patients by initial regimen
Switching from D4T and from AZT: 22,597 Adults in Lusaka
AZT → D4T rate: 27.1 / 100 pt-yrsMedian time to switch: 84 days
D4T → AZT rate: 13 / 100 pt-yrsMedian time to switch: 148 days
Post 90-Day MortalityCrude
WHO I/II 1.0
III 1.97 (1.74 - 2.23)
IV 3.48 (2.96 - 4.09)
CD4 >200 1.0
50-200 0.94 (0.82 - 1.07)
<50 1.90 (1.65 - 2.19)
Age >35 1.0
< 35 1.15 (1.04 - 1.26)
Weight (continuous) 0.95 (0.95 - 0.96)
HgB >10 1.0
8-9.99 2.29 (2.04 - 2.57)
<8.0 3.18 (2.73 - 3.70)
Female 1.0
Male 1.43 (1.30 - 1.58)
AZT 1.0
D4T 1.83 (1.66 - 2.02)
Post 90-Day MortalityCrude Adjusted
WHO I/II 1.0 1.0
III 1.97 (1.74 - 2.23) 1.46 (1.27 - 1.69)
IV 3.48 (2.96 - 4.09) 2.13 (1.76 - 2.58)
CD4 >200 1.0 1.0
50-200 0.94 (0.82 - 1.07) 0.90 (0.78 - 1.05)
<50 1.90 (1.65 - 2.19) 1.35 (1.15 - 1.59)
Age >35 1.0 1.0
< 35 1.15 (1.04 - 1.26) 1.20 (1.07 - 1.34)
Weight (continuous) 0.95 (0.95 - 0.96) 0.96 (0.95 - 0.97)
HgB >10 1.0 1.0
8-9.99 2.29 (2.04 - 2.57) 1.91 (1.67 - 2.19)
<8.0 3.18 (2.73 - 3.70) 2.21 (1.84 - 2.65)
Female 1.0 1.0
Male 1.43 (1.30 - 1.58) 1.80 (1.60 - 2.02)
AZT 1.0 1.0
D4T 1.83 (1.66 - 2.02) 1.15 (1.01 - 1.31)
Post 90-Day MortalityCrude Adjusted Time-varying
WHO I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0
III 1.97 (1.74 - 2.23) 1.46 (1.27 - 1.69) 1.44 (1.25 - 1.66)
IV 3.48 (2.96 - 4.09) 2.13 (1.76 - 2.58) 2.11 (1.74 - 2.55)
CD4 >200 1.0 1.0 1.0
50-200 0.94 (0.82 - 1.07) 0.90 (0.78 - 1.05) 0.90 (0.78 - 1.04)
<50 1.90 (1.65 - 2.19) 1.35 (1.15 - 1.59) 1.33 (1.14 - 1.56)
Age >35 1.0 1.0 1.0
< 35 1.15 (1.04 - 1.26) 1.20 (1.07 - 1.34) 1.19 (1.07 - 1.33)
Weight (continuous) 0.95 (0.95 - 0.96) 0.96 (0.95 - 0.97) 0.96 (0.95 - 0.97)
HgB >10 1.0 1.0 1.0
8-9.99 2.29 (2.04 - 2.57) 1.91 (1.67 - 2.19) 1.72 (1.51 - 1.97)
<8.0 3.18 (2.73 - 3.70) 2.21 (1.84 - 2.65) 1.96 (1.64 - 2.33)
Female 1.0 1.0 1.0
Male 1.43 (1.30 - 1.58) 1.80 (1.60 - 2.02) 1.83 (1.63 - 2.05)
AZT 1.0 1.0 1.0
D4T 1.83 (1.66 - 2.02) 1.15 (1.01 - 1.31) 1.48 (1.30 - 1.69)
1%
9%
26%
64%
Normal (n=13,111)
Mild insufficiency (n=5,249)
Moderate insufficiency (n=1,752)
Severe insufficiency (n=227)
Baseline renal function20,339 patients initiating ART in Lusaka, Zambia
Creatinine clearance calculated by Cockroft-Gault equation
(Mild = 61 – 90 mL/min; Moderate = 31 – 60 mL/min; Severe = < 30 mL/min)
Mortality by baseline renal function20,339 patients initiating ART in Lusaka, Zambia
Creatinine clearance calculated by Cockroft-Gault equation
Mortality risk according to baseline renal function
Crude HR (95% CI)n=16,646
Adjusted HR *(95% CI)n=15,051
Normal renal function Ref Ref
Renal Insufficiency
Mild 1.7 (1.5, 1.9) 1.5 (1.3, 1.7)
Moderate 3.0 (2.7, 3.5) 2.3 (2.0, 2.7)
Severe 6.2 (4.8, 8.0) 4.4 (3.4, 5.8)
* Adjusted for baseline CD4 count, WHO stage, hemoglobin and adherence to antiretroviral drugs
Summary
• Why we’re switching to Tenofovir DF– Truvada is better than combivir
• Gallant et al NEJM 2006
– D4T ass’d with worse outcomes than AZT in our data
• Why we’re worried– Many patients have underlying renal disease– Monitoring of renal function can be difficult in
some settings
End
Study 934
Preliminary 48 week analyses
February 25, 2005
Study 934 Study Design
ART-naïve patients
(n = 517)
randomized 1:1
96 wks
96 wks
Any CD4 cell count
HIV RNA > 10,000 c/mL
TDF QD
FTC QD
Efavirenz QD
AZT/3TC BID
Efavirenz QD
Adequate Renal and Hepatic Function at baselineFTC/TDF Fixed dose combination tablet was not used
Study 934
Statistical Analysis
• Non inferiority Trial
• 85% power to detect a 13% difference between arms
• Primary Endpoint-Time to Loss Virologic Response (TLOVR)
– FDA-required endpoint
– Similar to ITT Missing = Failure, Switch = Failure
– Requires confirmation for success
– Used by FDA for presentation in U.S. Prescribing Information of newly approved antiretrovirals
a. Median values
Study 934
Baseline Characteristics (ITT)
FTC/TDF (n = 255)
CBV (n = 254)
Agea 36 37
% Female 14% 13%
% White 56% 61%
% Black 25% 20%
% Hispanic 15% 16%
HIV RNA (log10 copies/mL)a 5.0 5.0
% HIV RNA > 100,000 52% 50%
CD4+ (cells/mm3)a 233 241
% < 200 42% 41%
% < 50 15% 11%
Study 934
Baseline NNRTI Resistance (ITT)
• 22 patients (11 FTC/TDF vs. 11 CBV)
• Investigators notified if affected
• FDA recommended excluding these patients for Week 48 primary endpoint analysis (n = 487)
• Primary Efficacy Endpoint (HIV RNA < 400 c/mL) at Week 48 analyzed for both populations, excluding NNRTI-R (n = 487) and ITT (n = 509)
Study 934Proportion with HIV-RNA <400 c/mL (TLOVR) ITT (n = 509)
0
20
40
60
80
100
BL 8 16 24 32 40 48
Weeks
% R
esp
on
der
FTC/TDF 81%*CBV 71%*
*95% CI: (+3.4%, +18.1%)
p = 0.005
Exclude NNRTI-R (n=487): FTC/TDF 84%, CBV 73%, p=0.002 (+4.3%,18.6%)
a. p value 0.016b. p value 0.021
Study 934 Summary Outcomes Wk 48 TLOVR < 400 c/mL
FTC/TDF(N = 255)
CBV(N = 254)
Permanent Study Regimen Discontinuation 19% 29%
Adverse Event 4% 9%a
Lost to Follow Up 5% 7%
Withdrawal Consent/Non Compliance 3% 4%
Other 3% 3%
Virologic Rebound <1% 4%b
Insufficient Virologic Response 2% 1%
Pregnancy 2% 1%
Death <1% <1%
Study 934
Proportion with HIV-RNA <400 c/mL (TLOVR)by Baseline HIV-RNA
FTC/TDF (n=255)
CBV (n=254)
P value
95% CI
HIV RNA (c/ml) at Week 48
100K 80% 71% 0.083 -1.1 to 19.9% > 100K 82% 70% 0.016 +3.0 to 22.7%
Study 934Proportion with HIV-RNA <50 c/mL (TLOVR) ITT (n = 509)
0102030405060708090
BL 8 16 24 32 40 48
Weeks
% R
esp
on
der
FTC/TDF 77%*CBV 69%*
*95% CI: (+0.5%, +15.8%)
p = 0.042
Exclude NNRTI-R (n=487): FTC/TDF 80%, CBV 71%, p=0.027 (+1.2%,16.1%)
Study 934
CD4 Mean Absolute Change from BaselineAs Treated
FTC/TDF 189CBV 158
FTC+TDF+EFV 238 234 223 218 209 198CBV+EFV 222 216 199 188 175 164
0
75
125
175
225
BL 8 16 24 32 40 48
Weeks
Mea
n C
han
ge
(cel
ls/m
m3)
p = 0.002 at Week 48p < 0.001 by AAUCMB
Study 934Resistance Development at Week 48 (mITT)
1. All patients with confirmed >400 copies/mL of HIV RNA at Week 48 or early discontinuation analyzed. Patients with baseline NNRTI-resistance excluded (n = 22).
2. Genotyping of 1 additional Combivir patient failed due to technical reasons.3. K103N developed in 21/25 patients; other NNRTI mutations that developed included K101E, K103E,
V108I, V179D, G190A/S, P225H, M230L
FTC/TDF, n=244 N, (% mITT, % VF)
CBV, n=243N (% mITT, % VF)
Virologic Failure 12 232
Any EFV-R3 9 (4%, 75%)
16 (7%, 73%)
Any M184V/I2
(0.8%, 17%)7
(3%, 32%)
Any TAMs 01
(0.4%, 5%)
K65R 0 0
Wild-type3
(1%, 25%)5
(2%, 23%)
Rates of K65R in TDF Clinical Trials
Study 934TDF/FTC/EFV
n=255
n (%)
Study 418TDF/FTC/LPV
n=190
n (%)
Week 48-96 1 (3%) pending pending
Week 24-48 2 (2%) 0 0
Week 0-24 5 (2%) 0 0
Study 903TDF/3TC/EFV
n=299
n ( %)
Time Period
Week 96-144 0
a. Occurring in more than 1 patient in either arm; patients may have > 1 eventb. p = 0.016
Study 934Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation Through Week 48
Safety PopulationFTC/TDF(n = 257)
CBV(n = 254)
No. w/ any Adverse Eventa 10 (4%) 23 (9%)b
Adverse Event
Anemia/ ↓ Hgb 0 14 (6%)
Nausea 1(<1%) 4 (2%)
Fatigue 0 3 (1%)
Vomiting 0 2 (<1%)
Dermatitis (NNRTI) 2 (<1%) 0
Neutropenia 0 2 (<1%)
Study 934Median (Range) Hemoglobin and Hematocrit ValuesDiscontinuations due to Anemia on CBV arm (n=14)
Hem
ato
crit
%
05
10
15202530
35404550
5560
Baseline Nadir
40
47
31
22
33
11
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Baseline Nadir
Hem
og
lob
in (
g/d
L) 13.8
16.0
10.8
6.9
3.7
9.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Baseline Nadir
Hem
og
lob
in (
g/d
L) 13.8
16.0
10.8
6.9
3.7
9.3
Study 934 Calculated Creatinine Clearance (CLcr)
CBV(n=254)
FTC/TDF (n=257)
Baseline CLcr, Mean (ml/min) 129 126
CLcr at week 48, Mean 127 134
Study 934 Serum Creatinine
Maximum Confirmed Toxicity Grade (mg/dL)a
FTC/TDF(n = 257)
CBV(n = 254)
1 (>1.5 - 2.0) 0 1 (<1%)
2 (2.1 - 3.0) 0 1 (<1%)
3 (3.1 - 6.0) 0 0
4 (>6.0) 0 0
a. Confirmed toxicity grade = two consecutive visits
Study 934 Serum Phosphorus
Maximum Confirmed Toxicity Grade (mg/dL)a
FTC/TDF(n = 257)
CBV(n = 254)
1 (2.0-<2.2) 0 0
2 (1.5-1.9) 0 1 (<1%)
3 (1.0-1.4) 0 0
4 (<1.0) 0 0
a. Confirmed toxicity grade = two consecutive visits
• Superior overall response in the FTC/TDF arm compared to CBV arm
• No patient developed K65R• M184V developed less frequently in the TDF/FTC arm than in the
Combivir arm.
• Significantly more CBV patients discontinued due to adverse events
• Similar renal safety profile• No confirmed abnormalities serum creatinine or phosphorus in
FTC/TDF arm
Study 934 Week 48 Summary
AZT Brand (initial)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
D4T Generic
D4T Brand
AZT Generic
AZT Brand
AZT Generic (initial)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
D4T Generic
D4T Brand
AZT Brand
AZT Generic
AZT (initial)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39
D4T
AZT
D4T Brand (initial)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
AZT Generic
AZT Brand
D4T Generic
D4T Brand
D4T Generic (initial)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
AZT Generic
AZT Brand
D4T Brand
D4T Generic
D4T (initial)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39
AZT
D4T
D4T (initial)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
AZT Generic
AZT Brand
D4T Brand
D4T Generic
AZT (initial)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
D4T Generic
D4T Brand
AZT Generic
AZT Brand
All (initial)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
D4T Generic
D4T Brand
AZT Generic
AZT Brand