+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design...

Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design...

Date post: 26-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
1 Kiran Kumar Chittimaneni Senior Network Engineer [email protected] Enterprise IPv6 Deployment Experiences from the field
Transcript
Page 1: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

1

Kiran Kumar ChittimaneniSenior Network [email protected]

Enterprise IPv6 DeploymentExperiences from the field

Page 2: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

What motivated us to deploy IPv6?

2

Google Culture == Innovation

“IPv6 will enable innovation and allow the Internet’s continued growth”

Early adopters of technology

Page 3: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Eat your own “Dogfood”

3

Launch early, Iterate often

Page 4: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Think Big, Start Small

4

Page 5: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

About the Enterprise Network

5

Distributed Enterprise Network

26000+ Employees

69 Offices in 36 Countries

Multi-vendor network

Page 6: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Design Fundamentals

Dual stack when you can, Tunnel when you must

Design Consistency with IPv4

Design should work across all WAN clouds.

Maximize impact by prioritizing deployment in

Engineering offices

Key Design Decisions

6

Page 7: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

“Rome wasn’t built in a day”

Key Building Blocks

Addressing Plan

Transit Hardware/Software

Routing

SLAAC/DHCPv6

7

Page 8: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Addressing Plan (1 of 2)

PI Address Space from RIRs

8

AMER

ARIN

LACNIC

EMEA

RIPE

AFRINIC

APAC

APNIC

Page 9: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Addressing Plan (2 of 2)

9

Campus - /48

Building A - /56

Vlan 100 - /64 Vlan 200 - /64

Building B - /56

Vlan 100 - /64 Vlan 200 - /64

Page 10: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Routing Policy

10

• HSRPv2

• OSPFv3

• BGP

Protocols

• Longest prefix length accepted/announced is /48

• Import/Export policies for v6 peers consistent with v4

Policy

Page 11: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Transit

11

New Providers

• IPv6 is Mandatory

• Oh, and NO tunnels please!

• IPv6 in Hardware

Existing Providers

• When can you support IPv6?

• How good is your peering?

• Perhaps we need to go get a new provider…

Page 12: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Hardware/Software

12

• Does your existing Routing and Switching hardware support IPv6?

• Is the existing gear interoperable with other vendor equipment

• Does your Wifi gear support IPv6?

• Does your WAN Accelerator or other Overlay networks support IPv6

Hardware

• Test, Test, Test

• Test your design

• Test performance

Software

Page 13: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

SLAAC vs. DHCPv6

13

• Ease of deployment

• Time to delivery is faster

• Readdressing made simple

• Widely implemented

SLAAC

• Allows granular control of IPv6 address allocation

• Poor client support

DHCPv6

Page 14: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Deployment Phases (1 of 3)

14

v6 in the lab

Disconnected

Networks

Beginnings of a

Dual Stack

Cloud

Page 15: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Deployment Phases (2 of 3)

15

Dual Stack Hosts

w/GRE

Partial Dual Stack

Networks w/GRE

Page 16: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Deployment Phases (3 of 3)

16

Dual Stack Office

w/GRE

True Dual Stack Office

Page 17: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Challenges

• Vendors don’t run IPv6 on their corporate networks

• IPv6 still processed in software on many platforms

• Not all vendors support IPv6 yet

Network Equipment

• General lack of ISPs that provide IPv6 on a typical enterprise connection

• Those who do, have very spotty peering

• Many ISPs still rely on Tunnels

ISP Support

17

Page 18: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

Challenges

• No out-of-the-box DHCPv6 support on MacsClient Support

• Personnel training is becoming increasingly important

• Resource allocation is IPv4 centricOrganizational

18

Page 19: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

The Bottom Line

19

It’s not Rocket Science

• IPv6 is easy and simple to deploy

• It just takes some time

Don’t forget to ‘Think Big, Start Small’

• All you need is a vision and a few enthusiastic people

Remember – ‘Rome wasn’t built in a day’

• Take small steps – Start with a lab and build the rest in stages

• Design to the same quality standards as IPv4

Build a “Production” IPv6 Network

• Monitored

• Supported

Launch Early, Iterate Often

• The earlier you deploy, the faster we as an internet community can iterate to make IPv6 a widespread reality

Page 20: Experiences from the field preso-ipv6-rmv6tf-2011.pdf · • Test, Test, Test • Test your design • Test performance Software. SLAAC vs. DHCPv6 13 • Ease of deployment • Time

20

Thank You!

Q&A


Recommended