+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Experimental acidification effects on aquatic ...as well as all participating 2014 REU students and...

Experimental acidification effects on aquatic ...as well as all participating 2014 REU students and...

Date post: 18-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Experimental design was implemented as shown in Fig. 2 Three sampling strategies were used: 1. Direct measure (drift net samples) (Fig. 3) - Samples taken at 11:00 am, 12:00 pm, 1:00 pm (injection), 2:00 pm and 3:00 pm, and water column filtered for 15 min. At 12:55 pm, COtank opened to allow COto enter the stream for 1 hour 2. Indirect measure/benthic (mini-Surber samples) (Fig. 4) - 3 samples taken Upstream and at the First, Second and Third stations before and after acidification 3. Indirect measure/artificial substrate (leaf pack samples) (Fig. 5) - ~7 g leaf packs developed in stream for 5 days, 3 packs removed prior to COinjection and 3 packs removed after. COtank opened for 1 hour All insects were preserved in the field with 95% ethanol and identified to family level This study shows a decline in stream pH along a gradient associated with the injection of CO 2 (Fig. 6) No significant results were obtained from drift net analysis of macroinvertebrate composition, possibly because low stream flow inhibited effective macroinvertebrate drift (downstream displacement) Leaf pack analysis showed that pH decline had a significant effect on macroinvertebrate composition in terms of abundance (Fig. 7A) and taxonomic richness (7B), with the most pronounced macroinvertebrate response observed at the injection site - These data may suggest a high sensitivity of organisms that use this resource to stream acidification (shredders in order Trichoptera) - Higher composition at the Upstream station after CO 2 injection (Fig. 7A, 7B) may possibly be explained by active upstream movement to avoid the environmental stressor in addition to macroinvertebrate drift downstream Surber analysis showed no significance, but a trend may be present in macroinvertebrate abundance (Fig. 7C) and taxonomic richness (Fig. 7D) before and after CO 2 injection indicating a negative change in composition closest to the injection site that follows a gradient downstream The results of this study can be used to understand the macroinvertebrate response connected with decreased pH and increased atmospheric CO- One component of climate change is increased concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 - Increased CO 2 was shown by this study to be linked to decreased pH in tropical freshwater streams - Macroinvertebrates located at the site of CO 2 injection exhibited the greatest negative response 4 5 6 7 8 11:00 12:00 1:00 1:45 2:00 3:00 pH Time of Day CO 2 -Driven pH Change Upstream Injection First Second Third To experimentally manipulate the Buruquena Stream (Fig. 1) using COin order to measure the effects of acidification on macroinvertebrates in a tropical stream. Crystal C. Purcell¹ and Pablo E. Gutierrez-Fonseca² ¹Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907 ²Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico - Rio Piedras, PO Box 70377, San Juan, PR 00936-8377 Introduction Study Site Methods 0 3 6 9 12 15 Upstream Injection First Second Abundance (ind/g) Stations 0 2 4 6 8 Upstream Injection First Second Richness (#taxa/g) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Upstream First Second Third Abundance (ind/m 2 ) Stations 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Upstream First Second Third Richness (#taxa/sample) * p < 0.05 p < 0.005 Before COAfter CO* * * Figure 4: Mini-Surber used for benthic sampling (indirect measure of macroinvertebrate response) Figure 3: Drift net used for direct sampling of macroinvertebrates in drift Figure 5: Leaf pack used as artificial substrate (indirect measure of macroinvertebrate response) * * Thank you to Pedro J. Torres and Bethany Vázquez for helping with sampling, as well as all participating 2014 REU students and mentors for their input. Figure 1: Location of El Verde Field Station, El Yunque National Forest, Puerto Rico (1A) and study site, Buruquena Stream (1B) Objective Mechanism Streams have highly variable temperature, discharge and pH 1 Of the factors affecting macroinvertebrates, stream acidification is a growing concern 2,3,4 Stream acidification simplifies macroinvertebrate assemblages and reduces taxonomic richness 3,5 , and macroinvertebrates may use passive displacement (drift) to escape the unfavorable conditions of a particular area In a natural stream system, decreased pH can be driven by: the dilution of acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) 2 , organic acids or dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from decomposing leaf matter 2 , precipitation events 2,3,4 , acid rain 6 , and increased dissolved CO2 Some studies have attempted to demonstrate the effect of acidification on macroinvertebrates in tropical streams using HCl 7 or other strong acids Because acidification is not due to HCl in nature, this study experimentally acidified a stream with the addition of gaseous CO- Manipulates the carbonate-bicarbonate equilibrium present in streams 2,7 (see Mechanism) to model stream conditions resulting from an increased level of atmospheric COReferences: 1. Ramírez A, Pringle CM, Douglas M. 2014. Temporal and spatial patterns in stream physicochemistry and insect assemblages in tropical lowland streams. Am Benthol Soc. 25(1):108125. 2. Small GE, Ardón M, Jackman AP, Duff JH, Triska FJ, Ramírez A, Snyder M, Pringle CM. 2012. Rainfall-driven amplification of seasonal acidification in poorly buffered tropical streams. Ecosystems.15: 974985. 3. Lepori F, Ormerod SJ. 2005. Effects of spring acid episodes on macroinvertebrates revealed by population data and in situ toxicity tests. Freshw Biol. 50:15681577. 4. Lepori F, Barbieri A, Ormerod SJ. 2003. Effects of episodic acidification on macroinvertebrate assemblages in Swiss Alpine streams. Freshw Biol. 48:18731885. 5. Durance I, Ormerod SJ. 2007. Climate change effects on upland stream macroinvertebrates over a 25-year period. Glob Chang Biol.13:942957. 6. Driscoll CT, Lawrence GB, Bulger AJ, Butler TJ, Cronan CS, Eagar C, Lambert KF, Likens GE, Stoddard JL, Weathers KC. 2001. Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. BioScience. 51:180-198. 7. Ardón M, Duff JH, Ramírez A, Small GE, Jackman AP, Triska FJ, Pringle CM. 2013. Experimental acidification of two biogeochemically-distinct neotropical streams: buffering mechanisms and macroinvertebrate drift. Sci Total Environ. 443:26777. Figure 2: Experimental design schematic showing the Buruquena Stream with CO 2 injection site, locations of each sampling station and sampling method used per station Results Discussion Acknowledgements 1B. Figure 6: Decline in pH over time at each sampling station associated with CO 2 injection Figure 7: Macroinvertebrate response to CO 2 injection for two sampling methods: abundance (7A) and richness (7B) in leaf pack samples, and abundance (7C) and richness (7D) in Surber samples before and after CO 2 injection 7B. 7A. 7C. 7D. CO 2 + H 2 O H 2 CO 3 H + + HCO 3 - H + + CO 3 2- carbon dioxide water carbonic acid bicarbonate ion hydrogen ion hydrogen ion carbonate ion Stations Stations Experimental acidification effects on aquatic macroinvertebrates in a tropical stream Leaf Pack Abundance Surber Abundance Leaf Pack Taxonomic Richness Surber Taxonomic Richness 1A. 1. Direct measure (drift net samples) (Fig. 3) - Samples taken at 11:00 am, 12:00 pm, 1:00 pm (injection), 2:00 pm and 3:00 pm, and water column filtered for 15 min. At 12:55 pm, COtank opened to allow COto enter the stream for 1 hour 2. Indirect measure/benthic (mini-Surber samples) (Fig. 4) - 3 samples taken Upstream and at the First, Second and Third stations before and after acidification 3. Indirect measure/artificial substrate (leaf pack samples) (Fig. 5) - ~7 g leaf packs developed in stream for 5 days, 3 packs removed prior to COinjection and 3 packs removed after. COtank opened for 1 hour
Transcript
Page 1: Experimental acidification effects on aquatic ...as well as all participating 2014 REU students and mentors for their input. Figure 1: Location of El Verde Field Station, El Yunque

• Experimental design was implemented as shown in Fig. 2

• Three sampling strategies were used:

1. Direct measure (drift net samples) (Fig. 3)

- Samples taken at 11:00 am, 12:00 pm, 1:00 pm

(injection), 2:00 pm and 3:00 pm, and water column

filtered for 15 min. At 12:55 pm, CO₂ tank opened to

allow CO₂ to enter the stream for 1 hour

2. Indirect measure/benthic (mini-Surber samples) (Fig. 4)

- 3 samples taken Upstream and at the First, Second and

Third stations before and after acidification

3. Indirect measure/artificial substrate (leaf pack samples)

(Fig. 5)

- ~7 g leaf packs developed in stream for 5 days, 3 packs

removed prior to CO₂ injection and 3 packs removed

after. CO₂ tank opened for 1 hour

• All insects were preserved in the field with 95% ethanol

and identified to family level

• This study shows a decline in stream pH along a gradient

associated with the injection of CO2 (Fig. 6)

• No significant results were obtained from drift net analysis of

macroinvertebrate composition, possibly because low stream

flow inhibited effective macroinvertebrate drift (downstream

displacement)

• Leaf pack analysis showed that pH decline had a significant

effect on macroinvertebrate composition in terms of abundance

(Fig. 7A) and taxonomic richness (7B), with the most

pronounced macroinvertebrate response observed at the

injection site

- These data may suggest a high sensitivity of organisms that

use this resource to stream acidification (shredders in order

Trichoptera)

- Higher composition at the Upstream station after CO2

injection (Fig. 7A, 7B) may possibly be explained by active

upstream movement to avoid the environmental stressor in

addition to macroinvertebrate drift downstream

• Surber analysis showed no significance, but a trend may be

present in macroinvertebrate abundance (Fig. 7C) and

taxonomic richness (Fig. 7D) before and after CO2 injection

indicating a negative change in composition closest to the

injection site that follows a gradient downstream

• The results of this study can be used to understand the

macroinvertebrate response connected with decreased pH and

increased atmospheric CO₂ - One component of climate change is increased

concentrations of atmospheric CO2

- Increased CO2 was shown by this study to be linked to

decreased pH in tropical freshwater streams

- Macroinvertebrates located at the site of CO2 injection

exhibited the greatest negative response

4

5

6

7

8

11:00 12:00 1:00 1:45 2:00 3:00

pH

Time of Day

CO2-Driven pH Change Upstream

Injection

First

Second

Third

To experimentally manipulate the Buruquena Stream (Fig. 1) using

CO₂ in order to measure the effects of acidification on

macroinvertebrates in a tropical stream.

Crystal C. Purcell¹ and Pablo E. Gutierrez-Fonseca²

¹Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907

²Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico - Rio Piedras, PO Box 70377, San Juan, PR

00936-8377

Introduction

Study Site

Methods

0

3

6

9

12

15

Upstream Injection First Second

Ab

un

da

nce

(in

d/g

)

Stations

0

2

4

6

8

Upstream Injection First Second

Ric

hn

ess

(#ta

xa

/g)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Upstream First Second Third

Ab

un

da

nce

(in

d/m

2)

Stations

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Upstream First Second Third

Ric

hn

ess

(#ta

xa

/sa

mp

le)

* p < 0.05

p < 0.005

Before CO₂

After CO₂

* *

*

Figure 4: Mini-Surber used for benthic

sampling (indirect measure of

macroinvertebrate response)

Figure 3: Drift net used for direct sampling of

macroinvertebrates in drift

Figure 5: Leaf pack used as artificial substrate

(indirect measure of macroinvertebrate

response)

* *

Thank you to Pedro J. Torres and Bethany Vázquez for helping with sampling,

as well as all participating 2014 REU students and mentors for their input.

Figure 1: Location of El Verde Field Station, El Yunque

National Forest, Puerto Rico (1A) and study site,

Buruquena Stream (1B)

Objective

Mechanism

• Streams have highly variable temperature, discharge and pH1

• Of the factors affecting macroinvertebrates, stream acidification

is a growing concern2,3,4

• Stream acidification simplifies macroinvertebrate assemblages

and reduces taxonomic richness3,5, and macroinvertebrates may

use passive displacement (drift) to escape the unfavorable

conditions of a particular area

• In a natural stream system, decreased pH can be driven by: the

dilution of acid neutralizing capacity (ANC)2, organic acids or

dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from decomposing leaf

matter2, precipitation events2,3,4, acid rain6, and increased

dissolved CO₂2

• Some studies have attempted to demonstrate the effect of

acidification on macroinvertebrates in tropical streams using

HCl7 or other strong acids

• Because acidification is not due to HCl in nature, this study

experimentally acidified a stream with the addition of gaseous

CO₂ - Manipulates the carbonate-bicarbonate equilibrium present

in streams2,7 (see Mechanism) to model stream conditions

resulting from an increased level of atmospheric CO₂

References: 1. Ramírez A, Pringle CM, Douglas M. 2014. Temporal and spatial patterns in stream physicochemistry and insect assemblages in

tropical lowland streams. Am Benthol Soc. 25(1):108–125.

2. Small GE, Ardón M, Jackman AP, Duff JH, Triska FJ, Ramírez A, Snyder M, Pringle CM. 2012. Rainfall-driven amplification of

seasonal acidification in poorly buffered tropical streams. Ecosystems.15: 974–985.

3. Lepori F, Ormerod SJ. 2005. Effects of spring acid episodes on macroinvertebrates revealed by population data and in situ

toxicity tests. Freshw Biol. 50:1568–1577.

4. Lepori F, Barbieri A, Ormerod SJ. 2003. Effects of episodic acidification on macroinvertebrate assemblages in Swiss Alpine

streams. Freshw Biol. 48:1873–1885.

5. Durance I, Ormerod SJ. 2007. Climate change effects on upland stream macroinvertebrates over a 25-year period. Glob Chang

Biol.13:942–957.

6. Driscoll CT, Lawrence GB, Bulger AJ, Butler TJ, Cronan CS, Eagar C, Lambert KF, Likens GE, Stoddard JL, Weathers KC.

2001. Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies.

BioScience. 51:180-198.

7. Ardón M, Duff JH, Ramírez A, Small GE, Jackman AP, Triska FJ, Pringle CM. 2013. Experimental acidification of two

biogeochemically-distinct neotropical streams: buffering mechanisms and macroinvertebrate drift. Sci Total Environ. 443:267–

77.

Figure 2: Experimental design schematic showing the Buruquena

Stream with CO2 injection site, locations of each sampling station

and sampling method used per station

Results Discussion

Acknowledgements

1B.

Figure 6: Decline in pH over time at each sampling station

associated with CO2 injection

Figure 7: Macroinvertebrate response to CO2 injection for two sampling methods: abundance (7A) and richness (7B)

in leaf pack samples, and abundance (7C) and richness (7D) in Surber samples before and after CO2 injection

7B.

7A. 7C.

7D.

CO2 + H2O H2CO3 H+ + HCO3- H+ + CO3

2-

carbon

dioxide

water

carbonic

acid

bicarbonate

ion

hydrogen

ion

hydrogen

ion

carbonate

ion

Stations Stations

Experimental acidification effects on aquatic

macroinvertebrates in a tropical stream

Leaf Pack Abundance

Surber Abundance

Leaf Pack Taxonomic Richness

Surber Taxonomic Richness

1A.

1. Direct measure (drift net samples) (Fig. 3)

- Samples taken at 11:00 am, 12:00 pm, 1:00 pm

(injection), 2:00 pm and 3:00 pm, and water column

filtered for 15 min. At 12:55 pm, CO₂ tank opened to

allow CO₂ to enter the stream for 1 hour

2. Indirect measure/benthic (mini-Surber samples) (Fig. 4)

- 3 samples taken Upstream and at the First, Second

and Third stations before and after acidification

3. Indirect measure/artificial substrate (leaf pack samples)

(Fig. 5)

- ~7 g leaf packs developed in stream for 5 days, 3

packs removed prior to CO₂ injection and 3 packs

removed after. CO₂ tank opened for 1 hour

Recommended