8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 1/7
Experimental Analysis of Performance of
Wireless LAN
U. Ahmad, S.A. Raza, T. MustafaDepartment of Computer Science.
University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.
Dr. Mohsin NazirDept. of Information and Communications Technologies
Lahore College for Women University
Abstract:Wireless local-area networks based on IEEE 802.11 a/b/g standards are growing rapidly.WLANs can provide the benefits of network connectivity without the restrictions of
being tied to a location or restricted by wires. Despite the convenience of mobility, the
performance of a WLAN must be addressed carefully before it can be adopted and
deployed in any environment. In our research, we addressed the impact of various keyparameters on the actual performance of IEEE 802.11g. We performed series of
experiments to assess the performance of IEEE802.11g, in the presence of interferences,and finding the maximum through-put under realistic conditions. In addition the impactof co-channel, adjacent channel interferences and noises on the quality of WLAN speed
was also exposed. Overall, we conducted independent set of experiments to measure the
IEEE 802.11g’s effective application-level throughput. The analysis results andmeasurement provided insights into the required provisioning for 802.11g WLAN to
ensure that it will provide the needed coverage and capacity for the intended users.
I- Introduction:Wireless technologies enable freedom of mobility for users by releasing the constraint of
physical connections – network connections become cable-free. Wireless technologies
use radio frequency (RF) as the medium of transmission, and allow organizations toeliminate cables for simpler network management at effective costs. The IEEE 802.11
standard establishes several requirements for the RF transmission characteristics of an
802.11 radio. Included in these are the channelization scheme as well as the spectrumradiation of the signal (that is, how the RF energy spreads across the channel
frequencies). In IEEE 802.11g, channels 1, 6 and 11 are considered to be non-overlapping
and hence the premise that these channels can be used such that multiple networks canoperate in close proximity without interfering with each other [6]. Interference has
always been considered as an unavoidable peril in wireless networks. Based on channel
of origin, interference can be categorized into co-channel (from transmissions on thesame channel as the receiver) and adjacent-channel (transmissions on adjacent and
overlapping channels). The IEEE 802.11 b/g standards operate in the unlicensed ISM 2.4Ghz spectrum which has 11 out of 14 channels available for use in the US [4, 5]. These
overlapping channels degrade network performance. Few researches have beenconducted in this area. In this paper we present a full scale performance study and
analysis on IEEE 802.11g, to measure its effective application-level throughput under
different scenarios. In order to improve its performance, a clear understanding of WLAN
behavior is needed, therefore measuring and analyzing the performance of system underrealistic conditions is of paramount importance. In my experiments, we studied the effect
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2012
168 http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/ISSN 1947-5500
8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 2/7
of interferences on TCP traffic.
The rest of paper is organized as follows. In section II, we discuss the related work.Experimental setup is described in Section III. Performance evaluation methodology is
explained in section IV. The results obtained are described in section V; we present our
conclusion and discuss future work in section VI.
II- Related Work:Stine et al. (2003) [7] stated that Interference has always been considered as anunavoidable peril in wireless networks. To reverse the effect they constructed simple
analytical and empirical models of such interference occurring in IEEE 802.11 networks,
and illustrated two scenarios where such interference can be exploited. Banerjee (2006) [1] stated that in 802.11 and other wireless networks, adjacent channel interference is
considered a peril. In order to avoid this peril, two simultaneously communicating nodes
that are in close proximity are assigned to different non-overlapping channels, i.e.,
channels 1, 6, and 11 in 802.11b are non-overlapping. Boulmalf et al. (2006) [2]addressed the impact of various key parameters on the actual performance of IEEE
802.11g in the presence of interferences, and found the maximum through-put underrealistic conditions. The analysis results and measurement campaign provided insights
into the required provisioning for 802.11g WLAN to ensure that it provided the neededcoverage and capacity for the intended users. Liese et al. (2006) [3] studied the relative
performances of single and multiple channels in both single hop and multi hop wireless
mesh networks. In one of their experiments, they studied the effect of antenna placementon the access point and determine the impact on performance. Sharma et al. (2006) [6]
characterized the performance of multi-channel IEEE 802.11g wireless networks. They
conducted the experiments on a sample topology consisting of just two flows on non-overlapping channels and found that the expected increase in throughput was seen only
when the separation between the antennas of the radio devices was above a threshold
value.
III- Experimental Setup:One testing location in University of Agriculture Faisalabad was selected for research,
Testing environment consisted of two 802.11g APs, four 802.11g wireless cards, IBMThinkPad same configuration laptops running windows XP and two Dell Latitude dame
configurations laptops as shown in Figure 1.1. Laptops were placed at a distance of 5
meters from APs. Experiments were conducted by keeping channel of one AP constantwhile changing the channels of the other AP in order to check the interference caused by
channel overlapping. Iperf was used to generate TCP traffic and measure the throughput.
SPSS was used to perform analysis of the results that we got from my experiments.
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2012
169 http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 3/7
Figure 1.1 Experimental Setup
A. Hardware RequirementsSr. No. Brand Computer Operating System Processor RAM
1 IBM T22 ThinkPad Microsoft Windows XP 900 MHz 256 MB
2 IBM T22 ThinkPad Microsoft Windows XP 900 MHz 256 MB
3 Dell Latitude D 600 Microsoft Windows XP4 Dell Latitude D 600 Microsoft Windows XP
Sr. No. Access Points WLAN Standard
1 D Link DWL-700 IEEE 802.11 g
2 D Link DWL-900 IEEE 802.11 g
Sr. No. Wireless Network Cards WLAN Standard
1 D-Link DWL G650 IEEE 802.11 g
B. Software RequirementsSr. No. Tools
1 DU Meter
2 Iperf
3 SPSS
IV- Performance Evaluation Methodology:In our experiments we characterized the results on the basis Throughput of TCP
generated through Iperf. We measured the effect on throughput by changing the
frequency channel schemes:
AP / Wireless Cards Frequency Channel
D-Link DWL 700AP 1D-Link DWL 2100AP 1
D-Link DWL G650 6
D-Link DWL G650 6
D-Link DWL G650 6
D-Link DWL G650 6Table 1.1 Frequency Channel Schemes
The frequency channel scheme showed in table 1.1 was changed as: Keeping 700AP
5 Meters 5 Meters
DWL 700 AP
CH 1 to 11
DWL 2100 AP
CH 1 to 11
DWL-G650
CH 6 fixDWL-G650
CH 6 fix
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2012
170 http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 4/7
TCP Throughut Graph,
Frequency Channel of AP-A=1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H
. 1 0
F . C
H
. 1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=3
0
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
channel 1 and changing 900AP from 1 to 11, than changing 700AP channel to 2 and
again changing 900AP from 1 to 11, utilizing 700AP all channels one time and 900APchannels 11 times thus making 121 possible combinations.
V- Experimental Results:
The experiments were done 10 times in university environment, and the mean results of 10 sheets were calculated. The detail results in the form of graphs are given below:
Figure 2.1: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.2: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.3: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.1 shows that when the channel of
both 2100AP and 700AP is 1 TCP throughput
decreases while with all other channels itsvalue increase because same frequency causes
interference and decrease the throughput due
to overlapping.
Figure 2.2 shows when the channel of both 2100AP 700AP is 2 TCP throughput decreases while with all
other channels its value increased due to the fact that
same channels overlap each other and cause interfer
Highest possible throughput value is achieved when channel of AP2 is in the range of 6-11.
Figure 2.3 shows when the channel of both2100AP and 700AP is 3 TCP throughput
decreases while with all other channels its
value increased due to the fact that samechannels overlap each other and cause
interference. Highest possible throughputvalue is achieved when the channel of AP2 is
in the range of 6-11
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2012
171 http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 5/7
TCP Throughput Chart
Frequency Channel of AP-A=4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
F . C H
. 1
F . C H
. 2
F . C H
. 3
F . C
H . 4
F . C H
. 5
F . C H
. 6
F . C H
. 7
F . C H
. 8
F . C H
. 9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Chart
Frequency Channel of AP-A=5
0
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
F . C H . 1
F . C H . 2
F . C H . 3
F . C H . 4
F . C H . 5
F . C H . 6
F . C H . 7
F . C H . 8
F . C H . 9
F . C H . 1 0
F . C H . 1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g
h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n
M B i t s / s e c
Figure 2.4: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.5: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.6: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.7: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.4 shows that when the channel of
both 2100AP and 700AP is 4 TCP
throughput decreases while with all otherchannels its value increase because same
frequency causes interference and decrease
the throughput due to overlapping. Thecombination of 4-3 and 5-3 gives smaller
throughput values as compared to othercombinations.
Figure 2.5 shows when the channel of both2100AP and 700AP is 2 TCP throughput
decreases while with all other channels its
value increased due to the fact that same
channels overlap each other and cause
interference. Highest possible throughputvalues are achieved with the combination of 2-
5, 10-5.
Figure 2.6 shows that when the channel of both
2100AP and 700AP is 6 TCP throughputdecreases while with all other channels its
value increase because same frequency causes
interference and decrease the throughput dueto overlapping
Figure 2.7 shows when the channel of both
2100AP and 700AP is 7 TCP throughput
decreases while with all other channels its
value increased due to the fact that samechannels overlap each other and cause
interference. Lowest possible throughput
value is achieved when the channel of AP2 is
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2012
172 http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 6/7
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n
M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
F . C H . 1
F . C H . 2
F . C H . 3
F . C H . 4
F . C H . 5
F . C H . 6
F . C H . 7
F . C H . 8
F . C H . 9
F . C H . 1 0
F . C H . 1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T
C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n M B i t s / s e c
TCP Throughput Graph
Frequency Channel of AP-A=11
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
F . C
H .
1
F . C
H .
2
F . C
H .
3
F . C
H . 4
F . C
H .
5
F . C
H .
6
F . C
H .
7
F . C
H .
8
F . C
H .
9
F . C
H .
1 0
F . C
H .
1 1
Frequency Channel of AP-B
T C P T h r o u g h p u t i n
M B i t s / s e c
Figure 2.8: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.9: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.10: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.11: TCP Throughput Graph
Figure 2.8 shows when the channel of both2100AP and 700AP is 8 TCP throughput
decreases while with all other channels its
value increased due to the fact that same
channels overlap each other and causeinterference. Lowest possible throughput
value is achieved when the channel of AP2 is
in the ran e of 5-11.
Figure 2.9 shows that when the channel of both 2100AP and 700AP is 9 TCP
throughput decreases while with all other
channels its value increase because same
frequency causes interference and decreasethe throughput due to overlapping. Highest
throughput values are obtained from 1-5
Figure 2.10 shows that when the channel of
both 2100AP and 700AP is 10 TCP throughputdecreases while with all other channels its
value increase because same frequency causes
interference and decrease the throughput due
to overlapping. Throughput is decreased as thelevel of frequency channels moves from 1 to
11 accept at 10 which gives lowest value due
to interference.
Figure 2.11 shows that when the channel of both
2100AP and 700AP is 11 TCP throughputdecreases while with all other channels its value
increase because same frequency causesinterference and decrease the throughput due to
overlapping. Throughput is decreased as the level
of frequency channels moves from 1 to 11.
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,
Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2012
173 http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/
ISSN 1947-5500
8/2/2019 Experimental Analysis of Performance of Wireless LAN
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/experimental-analysis-of-performance-of-wireless-lan 7/7