+ All Categories
Home > Education > Experiments Related to Psychology

Experiments Related to Psychology

Date post: 04-Aug-2015
Category:
Upload: nivedita-munjal
View: 176 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
42
1 Experiment No. 1 Statement of the problem “To draw a learning curve” Introduction Learning The process of learning begins from the birth of the child and continues till his death. When the child is born, his mind is just like a clean slate. As soon as he comes in contact with his environment, he starts reacting and in this process of interaction of the individual and his environment, the foundation of learning are laid down. Learning occupies an important position in the whole field of psychology. Psychology of learning is very important for teachers, parents, animal trainers for all those who are interested in understanding, controlling and predicting behaviour. Melvin H. Marx defines learning in the following words: “Learning is a relatively enduring change in behaviour which is a function of prior behaviour (usually called practice).” Thus four attributes of learning as a process. 1. Learning is a permanent change in behaviour. 2. Learning is not directly observable. 3. Learning that is result in same change of in behaviour. 4. Learning depends upon practice and experience. Definitions According to Cambridge School Dictionary “how quickly or slowly someone learn a new skill” According to Skinner, “learning is both Acquisition and retention.” According to Kimble, “Learning prefers to more or less permanent change in behaviour which occurs as a result of practice.” According to Munn, “To learn is to modify behaviour.” According to Gates, “Learning is modification of behaviour through experience and training.” According to Crow and Crow, “Learning is the acquisition of habits knowledge and attitude.” According to Pavlov, “Learning is habit formation resulting from conditioning.” Learning Curve Learning curve is a graphical representation of progress and rate of learning, rate of forgetting, rate of retention, for drawing the gap we divide X-axis or horizontal scale into unit of time or no of traits required for learning and Y-axis or vertical scale into appropriate units, accomplishment or material or puzzle etc. The shape of curves indicates the rate of improvement.
Transcript
Page 1: Experiments Related to Psychology

1

Experiment No. 1

Statement of the problem

“To draw a learning curve”

Introduction

Learning

The process of learning begins from the birth of the child and continues till his death. When

the child is born, his mind is just like a clean slate. As soon as he comes in contact with his

environment, he starts reacting and in this process of interaction of the individual and his

environment, the foundation of learning are laid down. Learning occupies an important

position in the whole field of psychology. Psychology of learning is very important for

teachers, parents, animal trainers for all those who are interested in understanding,

controlling and predicting behaviour.

Melvin H. Marx defines learning in the following words: “Learning is a relatively enduring

change in behaviour which is a function of prior behaviour (usually called practice).” Thus

four attributes of learning as a process.

1. Learning is a permanent change in behaviour.

2. Learning is not directly observable.

3. Learning that is result in same change of in behaviour.

4. Learning depends upon practice and experience.

Definitions

According to Cambridge School Dictionary “how quickly or slowly someone learn a new skill” According to Skinner, “learning is both Acquisition and retention.” According to Kimble, “Learning prefers to more or less permanent change in behaviour which occurs as a result of practice.” According to Munn, “To learn is to modify behaviour.” According to Gates, “Learning is modification of behaviour through experience and training.” According to Crow and Crow, “Learning is the acquisition of habits knowledge and attitude.” According to Pavlov, “Learning is habit formation resulting from conditioning.”

Learning Curve

Learning curve is a graphical representation of progress and rate of learning, rate of

forgetting, rate of retention, for drawing the gap we divide X-axis or horizontal scale into

unit of time or no of traits required for learning and Y-axis or vertical scale into appropriate

units, accomplishment or material or puzzle etc. The shape of curves indicates the rate of

improvement.

Page 2: Experiments Related to Psychology

2

Characteristics of Learning Curve

1. Initial Stage: At initial stage progress of learning in slow. The learning takes some

time to get familiar with the material that learner wants learn.

2. Spurt: When learner has overcome the initial difficulties of learning his learning

quickness and rapid learning takes place.

3. Decline: After spurt rate of learning decline.

4. Plateau: After sometime there occurs plateau there is no addition of learning at all

so learning becomes virtually stand still.

5. Spurt: Plateau is again followed by spurt or rapid learning.

6. Final limits: The curve of learning shows that their reaches a limit beyond which no

improvement is possible.

Types of Learning Curve

1. Straight Line Curve: It shows constant rate

of improvement. This type of curve is rarely

found.

2. Negatively Accelerated Curve: In this curve

there is rapid initial rise and this initial rise

gradually decline and curve becomes a

straight line and plateau.

Plateau

Spurt

No. Of Trail/Time

Mat

eria

l to

be

Lear

ned

x-axis

y-ax

is

Mat

eria

l to

be

lear

ned

No of Trails

-ve

No of Trails

Mat

eria

l to

be

lear

ned

Page 3: Experiments Related to Psychology

3

3. Positive Accelerated Curve: In this type of

curve there is slow initial rise in the

beginning and learning starts increasing in

initial stage. This curve is often seen in the

learning situation where task is new or

difficult in the beginning.

4. Combination of Two Types of Curve: It is

combination of convex and concave curve

with plateau. This curve looks like an

alphabet ‘S’. So also it is known as “Signac

Curve” such curves may be convex or

concave in shape in beginning depending

upon the nature of learner, learning

material, learning environment and are

generally obtain in the situation where we

study entire learning of a task zero

performance to its mastery.

Causes of Plateau

1. Fatigue

2. Lack of interest, motivation and purpose on the part of learning of a learner.

3. Transfer of errors from one part of activity to another.

4. Lack of balance among various phases of complex skill.

5. Use of wrong methods.

6. Too much difficulties of the subject.

7. Feeling of dissatisfaction.

Education Implications of Learning Curve

How to overcome plateau

1. Redistribute the work with interest and work period.

2. Introduce new motive, interest or incentive into the activity.

3. Organise the subject matter properly.

4. Use of appropriate methods.

5. Introduction of change in the task.

Research Evidence Experiment by Ebbinyhaus 1902. He conducted experiment on the list of meaningless and non-sense syllables on himself and concluded that mastery of list advances from both the ends towards the middle.

No of Trails

Mat

eria

l to

be

lear

ned

+ve

No of Trails

Mat

eria

l to

be

lear

ned

Page 4: Experiments Related to Psychology

4

Experiment by Modant 1928. He also experiences the same difficulty in the experiment as

non sense syllables. He found first and last portion are memorised earlier than the middles

ones.

Hypotheses

1. With increasing number of trails learning increases and there is decrease in number

of errors as the subject progress in number of trails.

2. Syllables at start and end all learned earlier than those in the middle or time taken to

learn initial ad last non sense syllable is less than time taken for middles ones.

3. To compare the performance of individual subject with that group.

Actual Experiment

Design of Experiment

This experiment will be conducted in laboratory and on a single subject for this ten non

sense syllables will be used, syllables will be made on consonants vowel consonant (CVC)

pattern.

TABLE 1.1

Serial No.

Non sense Syllables

No. Of Trails 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Total Time Taken

1 X A T N N N Y Y Y Y 8 Sec

2 W E Q Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2 Sec

3 V U Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2 Sec

4 Q O C N N N N N Y Y 10 Sec

5 Y I Q N N Y Y Y Y Y 6 Sec

6 X O K N N N Y Y Y Y 8 Sec

7 Q E P Y N Y Y Y Y Y 4 Sec

8 V U Z N Y Y Y Y Y Y 4 Sec

9 Y O Z N Y N Y Y Y Y 6 Sec

10 J U Q Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 2 Sec

Y: Yes N: No Particulars of the Subject Name : Sakshi Age : 25 Gender : Female Qualification : B. Ed., M. A. Physical Health : Normal Mental Health : Sound Place : Psychology Laboratory

Page 5: Experiments Related to Psychology

5

These syllables will be shown to the subject one for two seconds. In the 2nd trail there will be

a gap of 30 seconds. This process will go on till the learner learns all the syllables collectively

for two connective trails.

Few things to be noted during the experiment

1. Number of trails taken per learning.

2. Number of correct syllables in each trail.

3. Number of error committed.

4. Total time taken to learn.

5. Particular of the subject:

Name (Sakshi), Age (25), gender (Female), Qualification (B. Ed MA), Physical (Sound)

and Mental (Sound) Health and Place (Psychology).

Material Required

1. A list of 10 Non-Sense Syllables in series.

2. Stop watch.

3. Pencil/Pen

4. Graph Paper

5. Blank response sheet.

6. Paper for writing N.S.S.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Time Curve

Time Curve

Tim

e Ta

ken

(in

sec

on

ds)

Non sense syllables

Page 6: Experiments Related to Psychology

6

Table 1.2

Number of Trails 1 2 3 4 5 6

Number of correct non-sense Syllables 4 5 6 9 9 10

Percentage of correct non-sense syllables 40% 50% 60% 90% 90% 100%

Number of incorrect non-sense syllables 6 5 4 1 1 0

Percentage of incorrect non-sense syllables 60% 50% 40% 1% 1% 0%

Learning and Error Curve

Preliminary Set up

The experiment was conducted in psychology laboratory, two chairs, a table was put there

one for subject and one for examiner, cards of NSS and response sheet where kept ready

and step was tested.

Instructions

Before conducting the experiment following instructions were given:

1. I shall present you one by one certain non sense syllables through cards.

2. Each cards will be presented for 2 sec and inter trail time will be 30 sec, try to learn

as many syllables as you can in their respective serial order.

3. These will continue till you memories all the non sense syllables correctly.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Number of correct NSS

Number of incorrect NSS

Number of Trails

Page 7: Experiments Related to Psychology

7

4. After memorising syllables in two consecutive trails correctly experiment will be

over.

5. Be alert and attentive please.

Precautions

1. You will not choose words whose sound resemble to some known words in any

language.

2. You will not repeat same consonant in two successive non sense syllables.

3. You will not start syllables with last consonant of preceding words.

Table 1.3

Serial Number Name of Subject Number of Trails

1 Tanvi 7

2 Vishu 10

3 Tanu 7

4 Meenakshi 6

5 Jashan 8

6 Roopanjeet 7

7 Poonam 6

8 Varinder 5

9 Harnoop 8

10 Gurjeet 9 N=10

=

= 73/10

= 7.3

Page 8: Experiments Related to Psychology

8

Interpretation of Results

A. Hypothesis 1:

1. My subject took 6 trials to learn all the syllables.

2. In her first trail she learnt four syllables and learning was 40%.

3. Second trail she learnt five syllables and learning was 50%.

4. Third trail she learnt six syllables and learning was 60%.

5. Fourth trail she learnt nine syllables and learning went to 90%.

6. In her fifth trail she learnt again nine syllables and learning was 90%. Here she was

forgetting the same syllable again.

7. Her learning got complete in her sixth trail. Seventh trail is also taken to confirm her

learning. She was able to repeat 100% of learning.

B. Hypothesis 2:

As we can observe from the table and graph subject easily learn the syllables in the

beginning and at the end as compared to the middle bocks. But there is an exception

that 1st NSS got remembered in four trails.

C. Hypothesis 3: The result of group data Rages from 5 to 10 and Mean Value is 7.3.

That means average subjects took 7 trails to learn 10 NSS.

Introspective Report

According to the subject, initially she was not confident regarding the learning to non sense

syllables (NSS). But once the trail process started not only her confidence level increased but

also learning became quicker. In 6 trails she was able to learn all of NSS and she did not

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Group Data Table

Group Data Table

Page 9: Experiments Related to Psychology

9

hesitate in taking 7th trail to confirm the learning. She mentioned this experiment as great

method of learning.

References

1. Chuhan S.S. - “Advance Educational Psychology”

Vikas Publishing house, 576 Masjid Road Jung Pura, New Delhi

2. Mangal S.K. - “Advance Educational Psychology” Practice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New

Delhi.

3. Walia J.S. – “Foundation of Educational Psychology” Paul Publishing Company ltd.,

New Delhi

4. D’Mato M.R. “Experimental Psychology” Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Company Ltd.,

New Delhi.

5. Parameswarnan, E.G & Ravichandra K. – “Experimental Psychology” Neel Kamal

Publication Pvt Ltd., Sultan Bazar, Hydrabad.

Date Teacher Signature

Page 10: Experiments Related to Psychology

10

Experiment No. 2

Statement of the problem

“Spaced and un-spaced Method of Learning”

Introduction

Learning

Learning is persistent change in an individual’s possible behaviour due to experience. This definition draws attention to three things:

1. Learning must change the individual in some way: for learning to happen change has to take place. This change, of course, can be at a relatively simple level (as, for example, when we learn a skill like tying a shoelace) or at a more complex one (as, for example, when we encounter a great work of art for the first time), but the principle remain the same.

2. Change comes about as a result of experience: this principle excludes the kind of change that accrues from maturation and physical development.

3. It is a change in his possible behaviour: change has taken place; it is a change in potential rather than in actual performance. Learning something, but giving no hint of this learning in our actual performance until months or years later (as, for example, when a child sees some facts about a foreign country on television and surprises everyone by trotting them out when his class starts to study that country at a later date).

In this way, the term learning broadly speaking, stands for all those changes and modification in the behaviour of the individual which he undergoes during life time. Definition Gardner Murphy (1968): The term learning covers every modification in behaviour to meet environmental requirements. Henry P. Smith (1962): Learning is the acquisition of new behaviour or the strengthening or weakening of old behaviour as the result of experience. Woodworth (1945): any activity can be called learning so far as it develops the individual (in any respect, good or bad) and makes him alter behaviour and experiences different from what they would otherwise have been Kingsley and R. Garry (1957): Learning is the process by which behaviour (in the broader sense) is originated or changes through practice or training. Pressey, Robinson and Horrocks (1967): Learning is an episode in which a motivated individual attempts to adapt his behaviour so as to succeed in a situation which he perceived as requiring action to attain a goal. Crow and Crow (1973): Learning is the acquisition of habits, knowledge and attitudes. It involves new ways of doing things, and it operates in an individual’s attempts to overcome obstacles or to adjust to new situations. It represents progressive changes in behaviour... it enables him to satisfy interest to attain goals. Hilgard (1958): Learning is the process by which an activity originates or is changed through reaching to an encountered situation, provided that the characteristics of the changes in

Page 11: Experiments Related to Psychology

11

activity cannot be explained on the basis of native response, tendencies, maturation, or temporary states of the organism (e.g. fatigue or drugs, etc.). Kimble (1961): Learning is a relatively permanent change in behavioural potentiality that occurs as a result of reinforced practice.

Important Methods of Learning

1. Recitation. 2. Learning by doing. 3. Learning through association. 4. Learning through observation. 5. Learning by whole and part method. 6. Learning by spaced and un-spaced method.

Spaced and Un-Spaced Methods of Learning

a) Spaced Learning: In this method the subject is not required to memorize the assigned material in one continues sitting. After memorising for a while time some rest is provided and the process follows. Principle of work and rest is followed. Advantages of Spaced Learning

1. It overcomes fatigue. 2. The advantage of spaced learning or distributed repetition is greater for the learning

of the more difficult material than that of very easy material. 3. Its advantages are greater for children rather than adults. 4. More helpful for less intelligent persons. 5. Useful while doing lengthy task. 6. Advantage of spaced learning is greater for meaningless material as compared to

meaningful material. Limitation of Spaced Learning

It is not as effective and better as spaced or massed learning.

b) Un-Spaced Learning: In this method the subject is required to memorize the assigned material in one continuous sitting. No rest is provided in this method. Advantages of Un-spaced Learning

1. This method is useful for higher level and intelligent students. 2. Less time consuming. 3. It gives better results for short lessons. 4. Useful for meaningful material 5. More beneficial for children then adults

Limitation of Un-spaced Learning

Fatigue will be there because no rest will be provided.

Research Evidences 1. Ebbinghaus (1905) and Vart (1905) found that it takes a few reading to reach the

criteria of one perfect recitation of list when learning is distributed in several ways and when they occur in succession.

2. Rilay (1952), Cook (1934), Erickson (1942) in their studies of concept formation and investigation of problem solving found that un-spaced learning or practice proves to be better than spaced practice.

Page 12: Experiments Related to Psychology

12

3. Kimble and Shatal (1952) concluded that spaced learning is quicker than un-spaced or massed or continuous learning.

Hypothesis

In spaced learning less time is consumed to learn than un-spaced learning.

Design of the Experiment

For these experiment two lists of non-sense syllables (NSS) i.e. 10-10 NSS in each list will be

taken. Two lists marked as A and B, A is used for un-spaced learning and B is used for un-

spaced learning. Single subject will be taken for the experiment and time taken to learn by

both methods will be noted and compared.

Administration of the Experiment

Particular of the subject: Name : Dr. Neetu Age : 34 Gender : Female Qualification : Phd Physical Health : Normal Mental Health : Sound Place : Psychology Lab

Material Requirements:

20 cards of Non Sense Syllables, stop watch, pen, paper and response sheet.

Preliminary Set-up

This experiment was conducted in the psychology laboratory, 2 tables and chairs were put

there one for examiner, one for subject ten cards of NSS and response sheet were kept

ready, stop watch was tested and sitting was face to face.

TABLE 2.1 Un-Spaced Method List A

Sr. No NSS No of Trails 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time Taken

1 QUH 2 sec

2 GIW 4 sec

3 YIQ 14 sec

4 FEY 2 sec

5 RUW 10 sec

6 ZAQ 6 sec

7 XOK 8 sec

Page 13: Experiments Related to Psychology

13

8 JUQ 6 sec

9 VUZ 12 sec

10 WEQ 2 sec

Total Time = 66 sec

Instructions

Before conducting the experiment following instructions were presented to the subject. I will present you with two lists of NSS you will have to learn one of them by mass practice or un-spaced method of learning no rest will be given to learn 10 NSS and this process will continue till you master the whole list. In spaced method of learning or distributed practice the rest of 2 minute in each trail will be given so that you are able to recall the syllables this will continue till the whole list is mastered by you here for you in the two lists i.e. 2 sec time will be given to read each non-sense syllables, but inter trail in both the method will be different. In list A inter trail time will be of 30 sec and in list B the inter trail time will be 2 min and interval of 5 minutes will be given in administrating the two lists.

Actual Performance

The experiment was conducted as per designed earlier 10 cards of NSS included in the list A. They were shown to the subject one by one with an exposure time of 2 second for each syllable. Here inter trail time was 2 sec and after completing the ten NSS a blank response sheet was given to the subject. Subject was asked to write down all the ten NSS in serial order. Total number of trail taken and time taken to learn NSS was noticed and after the gap of 5 minutes List B was presented. In the same way List B was analysed but here inter syllables gap was increased to 2 minutes.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Time Curve of Un-spaced Method

Time Curve of Un-spaced Method

Non Sense Syllables

Time Taken (in sec)

Page 14: Experiments Related to Psychology

14

Table 2.2 Spaced Method List B

Interpretation of Results

The results of my subject performance through un-spaced and spaced learning are shown in the above given Table 1 and Table 2.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Time Curve of Spaced Method

Time Curve of Spaced Method

Sr. No. NSS No. Of Trails

1 2 3 4 5

Time Taken

1 YIJ 2 sec

2 ZAQ 4 sec

3 XAZ 6 sec

4 FEQ 4 sec

5 ZUY 8 sec

6 XEF 4 sec

7 QOC 2 sec

8 YUX 6 sec

9 QEP 6 sec

10 VAJ 2 sec

Total Time = 44

Non Sense Syllables

Time Taken (in sec)

Page 15: Experiments Related to Psychology

15

Table 1: Represents the data for 10 NSS learned with the method of un-spaced learning. Total number of trails taken by the subject was 8. To learn all the NSS in order subject took 66 sec.

Table 2: Shows that the subject took only 5 trials and 44 sec to learn all the 10 NSS with the help of spaced method.

To interpret we can say that by spaced method of learning my subject performed better. Number of trails and time taken both reduced as and when compared to the un-spaced method.

Table 2.3

Method Trails Time

Un-Spaced Method 8 66 sec

Spaced Method 5 44 sec

Introspective Report

My subject was very confident and enthusiastic. She enjoyed both the methods but when comes to effective learning she finds spaced method to be better.

References:

Fontana, David - “Psychology for Teachers” The British Psychological Society and Macmillan Publication Limited Chauhan, S.S. - “Advanced Educational Psychology” Vikas Publication House, New Delhi Mangal, S.K. - “Advanced Educational Psychology” Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, Nw Delhi Walia, J.S. - “Foundation of Educational Psychology” Paul Publication, Gopal Nagar Jalandher

Date Teacher’s Signature

Page 16: Experiments Related to Psychology

16

Experiment No. 3

Name of the Test: - Whole and Part Method of Learning

Introduction

Learning is a key process in human behaviour; it pervades everything we do and think.

It plays a central role in the language we speak, our customs, our attitudes and beliefs,

our goals, our personality traits (both adaptive and maladaptive), and even our

perceptions. Having mastered its fundamental principles, you will be in a position to

understand how learning plays its important role in many of the psychological process.

Learning can be defined as any relatively permanent change in behaviour that occurs as

a result of practice or experience. This definition has three important elements:

1. Learning is a change in behaviour, for better or worse, 2. It is a change that takes place through practice or experience; change due to

growth or maturation is not learning. This part of the definition distinguishes learning from innately controlled species-typical behaviour.

3. Before it can be called Learning, the change must be relatively permanent; it must last a fairly long time. Exactly how long cannot be specified, but we usually think of learned changes in behaviour as lasting for days, months, or years, unlike the temporary behavioural effects of factors such as alertness or fatigue.

Definitions According to Daniel Bell in Encyclopaedia of Psychology, “learning is modification due to energies of organism and environment impinging on the organism itself.” According to Garry and Kingsley, “learning is a process by which behaviour is

originated or changed through practice or training.”

According to Woodworth, “learning is a process of acquiring new knowledge and new

responses.”

According to Traver, “learning is a process that results in the modification of

behaviour.”

According to Morse and Winge, “learning can be defined as changing one’s potential for

seeing, feeling and doing through experiences partly perceptual, partly intellectual,

partly emotional and partly motor.”

According to Pavlov, “learning is habit formation resulting from conditioning.”

Skinner defines learning as, “acquisition and retention”.

In short Learning is a fundamental process of life engaging much of our walking hours,

affecting all forms of behaviour, skills, knowledge, attitude, personality, motivation, fear

etc. it involves:

1. Acquisition of new experience. 2. Retention of new experience in the form of impression. 3. Development of experiences step by step. 4. Modification of experiences and creation of old and new experiences. 5. Organisation, synthesis and integration of old and new experiences.

Page 17: Experiments Related to Psychology

17

Methods of learning

1. Recitation Method. 2. Practice Method. 3. Learning through Association. 4. Learning through Observation. 5. Learning by Spaces and Un-Spaced Method. 6. Learning by Whole and Part Method.

Whole and Part Method

Meaning Whole Method Part Method

In this method a poem or material is learned completely by a person. He learns repeatedly and becomes efficient in that task. In whole method the whole task is learned as a whole means completely and fully.

In Part method the whole task is divided into parts and sub-units. One unit is remember fully and second unit is taken, memorized and left out and the process goes on till the time all the units of the material is well learned.

Factor Affecting /Relative Importance of Whole and Part Method

1. Age: Children tend to learn faster with the part method and adult with the whole method.

2. Ability: More intelligent children tend to learn better with whole method and less intelligent with the part method.

3. Stage of Practice: At first better results are obtained with Part method but latter on after practice the Whole method usually proves to be more effective.

4. Distributed Practice: The Whole method has advantage with distributed practice that may be last when repetition is massed.

5. Length of the material: If the task is of moderate size the whole method has been found superior but if it is lengthy then the part method is superior.

6. Difficulty of Material: The whole method tends to lose its superiority with difficult task or material. Difficult material can be learned better with part method.

Whole Method Advantages Limitations

Associations between different forms of lesson are formed which are conducive to better retention but it must be remember that it avoids the formation of needless bounds.

Boredom: Children feel bore while using or taught by this method.

This method is based on understanding and insight and hence it is very useful.

This method is not very useful for language related tasks.

It keeps the attention of the student in the material being taught.

It is less superior for less intelligent children.

Intellectually superior children can use this method more effectively.

Less useful while teaching the difficult or complex or meaningless tasks.

Page 18: Experiments Related to Psychology

18

Part Method Advantages Limitations

Learner does not feel boredom and fatigue. In this method the plan or structure of the material is not fully evident until the end of learning.

This method is useful for lengthy tasks. In this method the parts tend to stand out as units and there may be difficulty in linking them together.

It gives better results when the learner is young, in experienced or lack in confidence.

This method is not based on the understanding.

It is useful for difficult and unfamiliar material. Teacher needs special training to accommodate all the factors.

Hypothesis

‘Whole method is better and more economical then Part Method.’

Design of Experiment

For this experiment two poems namely A and B of equal length and difficulty level will

be taken. Poem A will be learnt through whole method and Poem B will be learned

through Part method. Single subject will be taken for experiment and time taken to

learn by both methods will be noted down and compared.

Procedure for Whole Method

1. Firstly the subject will read out whole poem slowly and carefully. 2. Then the subject will reproduce the same poem in the written form. 3. The time taken to read and then reproduce the same poem will be noted down. 4. Subsequent trail will be conducted in the same manner till the subject learns the

whole poem.

Procedure for Part Method

1. The whole poem is divided into 3 small portions. 2. Then the subject will read out one portion carefully and then reproduce it in the

written form. 3. Time taken to read and reproduce the poem will be noted. 4. Same process will continue till one part /portion is learnt completely. 5. Same process will further continue with other portion of the poem.

Particulars of subject

Name: Tanvi Age: 22 Gender: Female Qualification: B. Sc., B. Ed., M. Sc Physical Health: Sound Mental Health: Sound Place: Psychology Laboratory.

Page 19: Experiments Related to Psychology

19

Material required

Poem A and Poem B, stop watch, paper and pencil.

Preliminary Set Up

This experiment was conducted by the classroom students and performed in the

psychology laboratory. A set of two tables and chairs was arranged one for the subject

and another for the examiner. Two poems, stop watch, paper and pencil was kept ready.

Poem A: Change Poem B: A Rose The voice which I did more esteem Than music in her sweetest key, Those eyes which unto me did seem More comfortable than the day, These now by me as they have been Shall never more be heard or seen But what I once enjoyed in them Shall seem hereafter as a dream. All earthly comforts vanish thus, So little of them have we; That we from them, or they from us, May in a moment vanished be: Yet we are neither just nor wise, If present mercies we despise: Or mind not how there may be made A thankful use of what we had.

Lovely rose with petals soft A scent so sweet and light So beautiful a flower With colours shinning bright. But something not so savoury About the fragrant rose- The thorns, so sharp upon the stem, That sharpen as it grows. Yet still lovely is the flower Despite the thorns that prick Just as life and love are sweet They too have thorns that stick. But do not fear to live or love, Life’s not exempt from pain- So pick a rose, you may get hurt, but you will also gain!

Instructions

Before conducting the experiment following instructions were given.

1. I will give you two poems. You will have to learn one by reading as a whole and another poem by reading in parts. Subject has to remember these poems and then you will reproduce these poems in written form.

2. Time taken for reading and reproducing the two poems will be noted and number of words reproduced will be noted down. This process will continue till you are able to remember these poems completely.

Please, now pay attention and be alert.

Actual Performance

In poem A, whole method was used and there were 16 sentences and 105 words. My

subject took 10 trails to make the learning of the poem permanent. My subject took 5

minutes and 7 seconds to read the poem. Whereas subject took 6 minutes and 35

seconds to reproduce it. In case of poem B which is being taught with part method poem

has same 15 sentences and 103 words. My subject took 11 numbers of trails to learn the

poem completely. Subject took 3 minutes and 38 seconds to read the 3 poem and

minutes and 59 seconds to reproduce it.

Page 20: Experiments Related to Psychology

20

Table 3.1- Whole Method

Trails Time taken to Read Time Taken to Respond Number of Words learnt

1 1:05 minute 1:20 minute 40/105

2 60 seconds 1:25 minute 38/105 3 58 seconds 1: 10 minutes 50/105

4 51 second 60 seconds 62/105

5 47 seconds 57 seconds 73/105

6 42 seconds 53 seconds 80/105 7 40 seconds 56 seconds 95/105

8 39 seconds 50 seconds 103/105

9 35 seconds 44 seconds 105/105

10 30 seconds 40 seconds 105/105

Total 5 Minutes and 7 Seconds

6 Minutes and 35 Seconds

Table 3.2: Part Method

Pa

rt 1

Trails Time taken to read Time taken to reproduce Number of words learnt 1 42 seconds 40 seconds 25/35 2 30 seconds 34 seconds 32/35 3 28 seconds 30 seconds 35/35

4 26 seconds 29 seconds 35/35

Pa

rt 2

Trails Time taken to read Time taken to reproduce Number of words learnt 1 45 seconds 47 seconds 23/38 2 32 seconds 37 seconds 32/38 3 30 seconds 30 seconds 38/38

4 24 seconds 28 seconds 38/38

Pa

rt 3

Trails Time taken to read Time taken to reproduce Number of words learnt 1 30 seconds 32 seconds 25/30 2 28 seconds 27 seconds 30/30 3 23 seconds 25 seconds 30/30

Total 3 minutes 38 seconds

3 minutes 59 seconds

Interpretation of Results

The above given tables represent that though more trails(11 in part and 10 in whole

method) are taken during the part method but less time taken(3 minutes and 59

seconds in part method and 6 minutes and 35 seconds) to learn the poem as and when

compared to the whole method.

The time taken is more in whole method as the subject had to write the whole poem

again and again from the starting. This is a clear evidence for the time difference more

in whole method in comparison of the part method. If we talk on the grounds of trails in

case of part method 11 trails are taken as compare to 10 trails in whole method and the

difference of 1 trail is negligible.

Page 21: Experiments Related to Psychology

21

Introspective

Subject was less excited about the experiment because of the less interest in the

literature. That is why the subject was not showing the interest in the beginning of the

test but when the process was cleared to the subject, subject got excited. In case of

whole method the subject got tired soon and was feeling the factor of boredom. In case

of the part method of learning subject enjoyed it thoroughly.

Precautions

1. Before conducting the test the subject should be made to sit comfortably. 2. Proper, friendly environment should be provided. 3. While selecting the poem emphasis should be on the same difficulty level and

length. 4. Time taken to read and reproduce should be noted carefully. 5. Number of words reproduce correctly should be counted properly. 6. There should be no disturbance in the environment 7. Each and every doubt should be cleared before the administration of the test on

the subject.

Reference

Morgan C.T., King R.A., Weisz J.R. & Schopler J. (2009) “Introduction to Psychology” TATA McGRAW-HILL Chohan S.S (2006-07) “Advanced Educational Psychology” Vikas Publication House Mangal S.K (2007) “Advanced Educational Psychology” Ashok K. Ghosh Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. D’Mato M.R (1979) “ Experimental Psychology” TATA McGRAW-HILL Parameswarnan E.G. & Ravichandra K (2005) “Experimental Psychology” Neel Kamal Publication Pvt Ltd.

Date Teacher’s Signature

Page 22: Experiments Related to Psychology

22

Experiment No. 4

Name of the Test: - Achievement test for Mathematics

Author: - Meera Jaiswal and M. K. Hassan

Purpose of the test: - To know about the achievement of 11th grade

students in mathematics.

Introduction

Achievement can be defined as the act of achieving or performing, successful performance or accomplishment. Tests designed to measure current knowledge-the results of previous learning called Achievement test.

Achievement test are also known as proficiency test. It is an effective way to check any weakness the instructor or slackness on the part of examiner achievement test are also effective in the formulation of educational goal.

Achievement test asses the achievement of the students regarding their learning up to a particular fixed point in a set time. In achievement test main emphasis towards content coverage is given.

Definition

According to Crow and Crow (1970), “Achievement means the extent to which learner is profiting from instructions in a given area of learning.” According to Robinson and Harrock (1966), “Status level or individuals learning and his ability to apply what he has learned.” According to Subramanyam (2008), “In education achievement is usually define in three ways. The grade that students earn in school, their performance and standardized test of academic achievement.”

Types of Achievement Test-

Two Types

Subjective Type

Three Types

1. Essay Type

2. Short Answer Type

3. Oral Type

Objective Type

Two Types

1. Recall Type

2. Recognition Type

Page 23: Experiments Related to Psychology

23

Description of the Test

Present test is the objective test for 11th grade students. Test has been treated in Hindi Language. There are 30 items in total related to different areas like arithmetic, algebra, trigonometry, geometry and algebraic equations etc.

Reliability

The test is a reliable measure of Scholastic measure, the split half reliability of the achievement test was found .36 which is significant at .01 levels. After applying the spearman’s Brown formula for the total length of the test was .92. the reliability was high not only for the total test of scholastic achievement but also for the test of language is .80 after applying Spearman’s brown formula the correlation was found to be .90.

Table 4.1: Mean Score of high and low achieving group on total scholastic achievement test, test of language and test of mathematics. Groups Total Test of

Scholastic Achievement

Total Test of Language

Test of Mathematics

(N=100) Mean S.D. T Mean S.D. T Mean S.D. T High Achievement

91.1 15.89

68.9 8.19

22.2 5.46

Low Achievement

89.0 16.27 30.35 11.63 8.65 4.64

=Significant at .05 level.

Validity The content validity of the test is quit high as the teachers of the subject concerned who are selected as judges had agreed that the items foe the test really intended to measure the achievement of students of class 11th. Item Analysis made to find out the discriminatory value of each item argues well for the validity of the scale. Furthermore the test was administered on 100 high achieving groups consisting of only those students who had obtained not more than 33% marks in mathematics and grand total and were rated low by their teachers.

Recall Type Test

Simple Recall Type

Complition Recall Type

Recognition Type

Alternative Response Type

Multiple Choice Type

Simple Multiple Choice Type

Matching Type Multiple Type

Classification Type

Arrangement Type

Finding the best answer

Page 24: Experiments Related to Psychology

24

Table 4.1 Compare the two groups on the test of Language and mathematics as well as on the total achievement test it may be observe that mean scores of high achieving group are significantly higher than that of low achieving group on the total test of scholastic achievement as well as on the test of language and mathematics.

Table 4.2 Observation Total Number of Items 30 Number of Attempted Items 30 Correct Items 27 Incorrect Items 3

Administration of the test Particulars of the Subject Name: Dewanshi Age: 13 Gender: Female Education Qualification: 10th pass Physical Health: Sound Mental Health: Normal Place: Psychological Laboratory Material Required Test Booklet, Manual and pencil/pen

Preliminary Set Up First step is to make the subject to sit properly and rapport was established. Then

subject was handed over a test booklet. Instructions were given to the subject and

subject now just has to put a tick mark on the right answer.

Instructions

The instructions were made clear to the subject this is a mathematics achievement test

there are 30 questions with four alternatives, answer to each question but out of them

only one is correct and one have to put a tick () against the right one. There is no time

limit for this test and try to complete it as fast as you can.

Scoring

The responses of the subject were telly with scoring key. For every right answer one

mark will be given and no marks for wrong. Thus the scores will be calculated.

Table 4.3: Percentile norms of the test of Mathematics Percentile Total Score Percentile Total Score

95 25.05 45 15.23 90 23.87 40 14.46 85 22.71 35 13.69 80 21.56 30 12.92 75 20.70 25 12.08 70 19.88 20 11.74 65 19.04 15 11.14 60 18.24 10 10.28 55 17.49 5 8.9 50 15.99

Page 25: Experiments Related to Psychology

25

Table 4.4: Performance of the Subject

Norms

The raw scores of any individual on any psychological test as such as without any meaning unless we are able to compare his performance with other person tested under same conditions, percentile norms were computed for the percent. Interpretation of the Results

My subject Dewanshi attempted 30 items and her total scores are 27 with a percentile is

95 so she is bright. She attempted all the 30 questions only 27 were answered correct.

Uses of Achievement Test

1. For the assignment of grades. 2. For the classification of individual. 3. Useful to indicate school progress. 4. Useful to vocational guidance. 5. Useful to formulation of educational goals. 6. Useful to check the slackness of the examinee.

Limitation of Achievement Test

1. Scores of Achievement test cannot be taken as bases for deciding students’ promotion to the next grade.

2. Achievement test are difficult to construct as compared to aptitude test or intelligent test.

3. Sometimes results of these achievement tests are taken as a measure of the teacher’s effectiveness.

Precautions

1. Situation should be peaceful. 2. Child should have the subject mathematics in class 11th.

References

Singh A.K. ”Test, Measurement and Research Method in Behavioural Science” by Bhari Bhawan Sharma T.R. “Measurement& Evaluation” 21 Century Publication Patiala. Manual- Meera Jaiswal & M.K. Mathematics Ach Test Published by Agra Psychological cell Agra.

Date Teacher Signature

Raw Score Percentile 27 95

Page 26: Experiments Related to Psychology

26

Experiment No. 5

Name of the Test: - Samoohik mansik Yogyta Parikshan

Author: - Dr. R. K. Tondon

Publisher: - Karuna Tandon

K. G. K College, Muradabad

Introduction

We often comment that a particular child or individual is very intelligent or is not

intelligent all such comments are based on an observation of the performance of an

individual concerned. In comparison of the group but makes an individual to behave or

perform with in his group interest attitude desire for knowledge, communication, skills

and similar attitude contribute towards his behaviour or performance.

However there is something else which is also responsible to a large degree in

Psychology this termed as intelligence in ancient India our Great Rishi named it ‘Vivek’.

Definitions According to Terman, “An individual is intelligent in proportion as he is able to carry on abstract thinking.” According to Wechsler, “Intelligence is the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally and to deal effectively with the environment.” According to Woodworth, “Intelligence is the ability to acquire knowledge.” According to Buckingham, “Intelligence is the ability to learn.”

History of Intelligence

Intelligence is having a long past but short history. The old heritage of Vedas in India

when individuals are engaged in face to face discussion for assessment of abilities of

individual. Some 400 years back in China Competitive examination were held. Besides

this the movements intelligence testing started only 100 years ago. In the beginning,

attempts were made to construct Psychological Test of simple mental functions. The

real credit goes to ‘Alfred Binnet’ of France who was first to measure intelligence using a

suitably scientific test in 1995.

Types of Test

Types of Test

Individual Test

Verbal Test

Non Verbal Test

Group Test

Verbal Test

Non Verbal Test

Page 27: Experiments Related to Psychology

27

Purpose of Test

1. For the selection of suitable candidates for profession and education activities.

2. Its purpose is to classify individuals according to their mental makeup.

3. To collect the reliable data about the individual for making prediction.

4. To measure general intelligence of students for educational, vocational and

Personal guidance.

5. To solve the problem.

6. For diagnosing the causes of Problematic behaviour and suggesting possible

remedial actions.

7. To collect the data for the purpose of research.

Description of Test

Test is named as Samoohik Mansik Yogyta Parikshan.

Table 5.1: Reliability co-efficient by two different Methods Methods Reliability Co-efficient

Split-half .59-.99

K. R. Formula .20-.85

It is a spiral omnibus type of verbal group test containing 100 questions. Everyone has 5

alternatives, to make the scaring objective the test contains 100 items distributed over

areas namely- Number Series, Mathematics instincts, vocabulary, similar, vocabulary

opposite, classification, best answer, analogies, reasoning, following institutions.

All the items have been arranged in increasing order of difficulty. For practice 10

additional items have been provided in the beginning of the test. This test is a hindi

version of the group test of general mental ability.

Reliability of the Test

Reliability of test means consistency of the scores, the reliability coefficient is calculated

by different methods.

Validity of Test

Validity means a test must actually measure what it is supposed to measure to get information regarding validity of this test. The form has been correlated against Samoohik Mansik Yogyta Parikshan by Jalota. Thus we may say that the present test has been found highly saturated with 9 factors (Tyagi 1972) and it is highly suitable for general Intelligence of college Adults.

Table 5.2 Percentile Raw Scores Percentile Raw Scores Percentile Raw Scores

100 91 64 45 18 30

99 71 62 44 16 29

98 68 60 44 14 28 97 65 58 43 12 26

Page 28: Experiments Related to Psychology

28

96 63 56 42 10 25

95 60 54 42 9 25

94 60 52 41 8 24

93 59 50 41 7 24 92 59 48 40 6 24

91 58 46 39 5 24

90 56 44 39 4 22

88 55 42 38 3 22 86 54 40 38 2 21

84 53 38 37 1 5

82 52 36 36

80 51 34 36

78 50 32 35 76 49 30 35

74 48 28 34

72 48 26 33

70 47 24 33

68 46 22 32 76 46 20 30

Norms

For accurate and meaningful interpretation of raw scores three types of Norms are provided in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. By consulting Table No. 1 Percentile Norms Raw scores can be converted into Percentile e.g.- A raw score of 60 can be converted into percentage of 94% which means the subject is above the 93% cases.

Table 2 (7 grade Norms) - It is meant to give description of grade directly from raw scores e.g. - A raw score of 76 indicates- Superior intelligence.

Table 3- Raw scores can be interpreted in terms of z-scores or t-scores or deviational I.Q.

Thus Raw score can be interpreted in any of the manner indicated above.

Administration of the Test

Particulars of the Subject

Name: Mrs. Neeta

Age: 34

Sex: Female

Qualification: PhD

Physical Health: Normal

Mental Health: Normal

Place: Psychological Laboratory

Page 29: Experiments Related to Psychology

29

Table 5.3

Grade Raw Scores Description

I 77 and above Very Superior II 65 – 77 Superior

III 53 – 63 Bright Awareness

IV 29 – 53 Average

V 17 – 29 Dull Average VI 5 – 17 Inferior

VII Below 5 Very Inferior

Material Required

Question booklet, manual answer sheet scoring key, pen/pencil etc.

Preliminary Set-up

The test should not be administered on large group first of all the subject was made to

sit properly and rapport should be established then a test booklet and answer sheet was

given to her. She was asked to fill up the preliminary given on the top of the answer

sheet after these instructions were given.

Instructions

This is a general mental ability test you will have to complete it in a given time that is 20

minute test contains 100 questions every questions have 5 options but you have to

choose the right answer in answer sheet you have to right the answer no. i.e. 1, 2, 3 and

so on don’t write anything on our booklet it should be kept neat and clean.

Procedure

After giving the instructions the subject was asked to turn over the page and road the

examples so that subject could understand the method of answering well. When the

examiner is sure that the subject has followed everything then he was asked to start the

test. After 20 minute examiner asked to stop answering and answer sheet with were

taken back.

Scoring

The answer sheet is scored with the help of standard key prepared for this purpose the

key contains correct answer to each questions. The key should be placed on answer

sheet in the manner that the questions number are properly covered answer written on

the sheet are tallied one marks is allotted to one correct answer and no marks are to be

given to be given to wrong answer or un-attempted our there is no negative marking for

wrong answer the sum of all the correct answer gives the total marks obtained by the

subjects.

Page 30: Experiments Related to Psychology

30

Interpretation of Results

My subject got 68 marks in general mental ability test with test with the help of table 1

we can see that 68 raw scare is 98 Percentile and with the help of table 2 we can

interpret the grade norm as she lies in the category of superior.

Educational Implications

1. Intelligence tests can be used to promote pupils. 2. Children can be classified in various categories on the basic of intelligence tests. 3. Scholarship may be given to suitable and appropriate students on the basic of

general mental ability test. 4. Selection of courses for pupils can be made on the basis of mental ability test. 5. Vocational guidance can be given on the basis of intelligence tests. 6. These tests are very useful for research.

Limitations

1. There is shortage of standardised intelligence tests. 2. Intelligence tests are not reliable. They are not exact measures of intelligence. 3. Intelligence tests put on premium on speed. 4. Intelligence tests are not accurate. They contain only a limited number of

questions. 5. Intelligence tests are inevitable which are an essential part of intelligence are not

measured by these tests.

References

Walia J.S. ‘Foundation of educational Psychology’ Paul Publisher, Jalandhar. Mangal S.K. ‘Advanced Educational Psychology’ Prentice Hall of India, Private limited, New Delhi. Chauhan S.S. ‘Advanced educational Psychology’ Vikas Publication, New Delhi. Jalota’s Manual Group Test of Intelligence by Dr. Jalota.

Date Teacher’s Signature

Page 31: Experiments Related to Psychology

31

Experiment No. 6

Name of the Test: - Adjustment Inventory

Author: - V. K. Mittal

Publisher: - MANOVIGYAN KENDRA

Psychological Test

249, Noonia Street, Meerut

Cantt (U.P. India) 250001

Introduction

The dictionary meaning of the word ‘Adjustment’ is to fit, make suitable, adopt, arrange,

modify, harmonize or make correspondent. Thus, when we make an adjustment

between two things, we adopt or modify, harmonize or make correspondent. Thus,

when we make an adjustment between two things, we adopt or modify one or both of

them to correspond to each other.

According to Darwin’s (1859) theory of evaluation, those species which adapted

successfully to the demands of living, survived and multiplied while other who did not

died out. Therefore the adoption or changing of oneself or one’s surroundings according

to the demands of the external environment became the basic need for our survival.

However, the concept of adjustment is not so simple as adoption psychologist and

scholars differ considerably in interpreting its meaning and nature as can be seen from

the following definitions.

James Drever (1952) “Adjustment means the modification to compensate for or meet

special conditions”.

In the words of Webster (1951) “Adjustment is the establishment of a satisfactory

relationship as representing harmony, conformance, adaption or the like.

Carter V. Good (1959) said, “Adjustment is the process of finding and adoption modes

of behaviour suitable to the environment or the change in the environment.”

Description of Inventory

This inventory has provided separate measure of adjustment in four areas at home,

social, health and emotion, college adjustment. There are 80 items which are distributed

in four areas. Respondent are required to response in three categories Yes or No. there

are no time limit. High scores in inventory indicate poor adjustment. The test is meant

for group administration but when required it can also used with individual cases.

Page 32: Experiments Related to Psychology

32

Table 6.1: - The reliability of the inventory is report below after making Spearman’s Brown correlation: Reliability Coefficient N

Split-Half Reliability +.94 95

Table 6.2: - The reliability coefficients for the four areas of the inventory are separately reported below:

Area of Adjustment Corrected Split-Half Reliability Coefficient

N

Home Adjustment +.64 95

Social Adjustment +.44 95

Health & Emotion +.80 95 College Adjustment +.745 95

Reliability

Split half reliability is computed between the scores on odd and even items of the

inventory as well as for four scales separately.

Validity

The inventory has been validated with different indicates at different levels. The

findings are reported below:

High school level (Male)

(i) Only those items are included which passed the 20% criterion of increase or

decrease from the upper criterion group to the lower group.

(ii) The inventory has been validated against the two external criteria.

1. Teacher’s rating of their pupils overall adjustment.

2. Parent’s rating.

As far as teacher’s rating are concerned they were obtained from only those

teachers who were trained post graduates and had at least two year contact with

the student. Only those teachers were included in the study who felt confident to

rate over all adjustment of their pupil. Rating was obtained on a 5 point scale for

objectivity in ratings, the teachers were provided with descriptions of five points

on the rating scale. Ultimately c-coefficient is computed between inventory

scores and teacher’s ratings.

Parents ratings are also obtained on a five point scale and c-coefficient of is computed

between.

a. Total inventory scale and parents ratings.

b. Home adjustment scores on the inventory and parents ratings.

Page 33: Experiments Related to Psychology

33

Administration of the Test

Particular of the Subject

Name: Roopan Age: 24 Sex: Female Qualification: B.A., B.Ed., M.A. Physical Health: Sound Mental Health: Sound Place: Psychological Laboratory

Material Required

Test-Booklets, manual, stop watch, answer-sheet, scaring key and pencil/pen etc.

Table 6.3: Raw scores and corresponding percentile Percentile College

Above 95

Graduate Post Graduate

225+ 217+

95 225 217

90 222 210 80 216 205

70 204 201

60 197 196

50 192 191 40 187 186

30 182 181

20 176 175

10 167 166

5 153 157

Preliminary Set Up

First of all subject was made to sit properly and rapport was established then a test

booklet and answer sheet was given to the subject and subject has to put a tick mark in

the choices given against a statement.

Instructions

All the instructions were made clear to subject and he was told that, ‘this is an

adjustment inventory & every item in it carries three choices and you have to tick one of

them according to your opinion. This is not a speed test but try to do it quickly as you

can. Don’t write anything on the booklet except whenever told.

Scoring Procedure

See how many responses are encircled in coloured punch of stencil count such

responses for each page and multiply that number of responses by three and then count

Page 34: Experiments Related to Psychology

34

response of ‘?’ and multiply by two and at last count responses which are remaining and

multiplied by one.

Table 6.4

Grades Explanation Score

A Excellent Adjustment 229+ B Good Adjustment 210-229 C Satisfactory 170-210 D Un-Satisfactory 153-170 E Very Un-Satisfactory Below 153

Table 6.5: Position of the Subject

Raw Scores Percentile Grade Explanation

212 90 B Good Adjustment

Interpretation of the Results

My subject attempted all the 80 items. His scores in four areas-home adjustment 52/60,

social adjustment 56/60, health & emotion adjustment 54/60, college adjustment

50/60. And his total score is 160 out of 240 and percentile calculated from percentile

table is 5. This show that my subjects Roopan has a ‘Good Adjustment’ personality.

References Mangal S.K. “Advanced Education Psychology” Chauhan S.S. “Advanced Educational Psychology” Walia J.S. “Foundation of Educational Psychology”

Date Teacher Signature

Page 35: Experiments Related to Psychology

35

Experiment No. 7

Name of the Test: - Multidimensional Personality Inventory

Author: - Manju Aggarwal

Publisher: - Agra Psychological Research Cell,

Agra

Introduction

No topic in the field of psychology is more fascination than personality. Tremendous

research has been done on this topic. If you ask a man, the meaning of the term

personality, he would not be able to give answer to this simple question about

personality because human personality is so complex a phenomenon that it can be

interpreted in many ways.

Meaning

The term ‘Personality’ is derived from the latin word ‘Persona’ which was the name

given to the mask that actors wore in the drama. Personality is the sum total of physical,

intellectual, emotional and social traits of the individuals.

Definitions

According to the Allport, “Personality is a dynamic organisation with in the individual of those psychophysical systems that determines his unique adjustment to his environment.” According to the Cattell, “Personality is that which permits a prediction of what a person will do in a given situation.” According to the Woodworth, “Personality is the quality of individual’s total behaviour.” According to the Kurt Lewin, “Personality is a dynamic totality of system.”

Description of Multidimensional Personality Inventory

This inventory measures 6 dimensions of personality.

1. Extroversion-Introversion: The first area of this inventory is extroversion-inventory which has been considered as one of the important potential personality variables by which one can estimate whether one Person-Orientation is based on objective conditions or facts (Extrovert) or Person-Orientation is based on own self (Introvert).

2. Self Concept: The second factor of personality has been included in this inventory is self-concept. The ‘self’ has also been considered as a central construct of the personality.

3. Independence-Dependence: Dependence vs. Independence is associated with the personality which has close relation to intelligence or uniqueness of the Personality.

Page 36: Experiments Related to Psychology

36

4. Temperament: The factor of this inventory is temperament which refers to reaction of the person towards emotional situation.

5. Adjustment: Adjustment is an index of integral between needs and Press, which has a close relation to personality. It has been considered as a trait of personality.

6. Anxiety: The concept of anxiety occupies a very important place in the study of human personality and multiple activities of the mind.

The present inventory has 120 items in all. Each 20 items are related to different traits

of personality. Each item has three alternative answer ‘Yes’, ‘Sometime’ and ‘No’ which

refers to the extent of agreement and disagreement of the extent of agreement and

disagreement of the context. The present test can be administered individually as well

as in group situation. There is no time limit for the completion of the inventory. Usually

it requires 46 to 50 minutes time. The standard instructions are printed on the front

page of the inventory. The separate answer sheet is available for giving the answer.

Reliability

For getting the reliability co-efficient of the inventory, it was administered to a sample

of 600 students (belonging to high school) intermediate and college, in the sample;

students of all faculties have been randomly selected. The age range was 15 years to 24

years. The average age was 18.5 years; split half reliability was computed for the six sub

scale as well as total.

The test retest reliability of the inventory has been also educated through the method of

test-retest. For this, the present inventory was administered twice on a sample of 100

students of Higher-Secondary school going with an interval of 20 days.

Validity

Altogether the present inventor has content validity because items have been selected

properly and taken either from well known tests or on the basis of expert’s opinions.

For determining external validity, the present test along with the following test was

administered to a group of 100 students (Not included in above sample and the validity

co-efficient were calculated). Dr. Rastogi’s self concept inventory, Dr. Jai Parkash’s

Indian adaptation of Neyman-Extroversion-Introversion on Test. Dr. Srivastava and

Tiwari’s adjustment inventory Dr. Srivastava and Tiwari’s anxiety scale.

For getting the validity of two sub scales Dependence-Independence and Temprament,

20 teachers and 20 parents are requested to rate the subject on the basis of their

temperament and independent-dependent behaviour. The co-relation co-efficient

between the test scores and rating scores have been calculated which come to .82 and

.76 respectively.

Administration of the test

Particular of the Subject Name: Arashdeep Singh

Page 37: Experiments Related to Psychology

37

Age: 23

Sex: Male

Qualification: B.Ed., M.A. (UGC NET)

Physical Health: Normal

Mental Health: Normal

Place: Psychological Laboratory

Material Required

Test booklet, Manual, stop watch, Answer sheet, Scoring, Pen/Pencil.

Preliminary Set-up

First off, subject was made to sit properly and rapport was established. Then a test

booklet and on sheet was given to her. She was asked to fill up the preliminaries given

on the top of answer sheet.

Instructions

After preliminary set up the following instruction were given to her, ‘This is a

multidimensional personality inventory, there is no time limit. There are 120 items in

the test. Each item has three alternative answer ‘yes’, ‘sometime’ and ‘no’ but you have

to choose the right answer. In the answer sheet you have to choose the right answer. In

the answer sheet you have to put a tick mark ( ) under one place (yes, sometime, no)

you are not allowed to put any other sign on the booklet. And each 120 items are

divided in six sections. When the examination made sure that the subject has followed

everything, then she was asked to start the test.

Actual Performance

My subject followed all the instructions giving by me she was very curious about it. She

attempts all the questions although there is no time lime she took only 30 minute to

complete it.

Scoring Procedure

The scoring procedure of this should be inventory is very simple score should be given the following manner Yes=3, Sometimes=2 & No=1

Interpretation

For the interpretation of raw scores the table may be consulted which is based on the

sample of 700 students. The sample has been drawn from the high school intermediate

and degree colleges of Agra. Their age range was 14 years to 26 years. In addition to this

procedure of interpretation of scores, is advised to convert row scares into t-scores or

other standard scores which may prove more fruitful.

Page 38: Experiments Related to Psychology

38

Discussion of the Result

There were 120 items in the test and these are divided into 6parts. In the first part my

subject put mark ‘yes’ at 8 places, ‘sometimes’ at 6 places and ‘no’ at 6 places so she got

42 scores, with the help of table we can see that she is high self-concept.

For the third part, she put tick mark under the option ‘yes’ at 4 places, ‘sometimes’ at 5

places and ‘no’ at 11 places so she got 31 scores with the help of table, we can see that.

She has poor temperament. For the fifth part, she put tick mark under the option ‘yes’ at

12 places, ‘sometimes’ at places and ‘no’ at 4 places. So she got 53 scores, with the help

of table we can see that she has good adjustment.

For the sixth part she put tick mark under the option ‘yes’ at 4 places, ‘sometime’ at 6

places and ‘no’ at 9 places. So she got 33 score which implies she has moderate anxiety.

Introspective Report

In starting my subject felt that it was a boring task to answer 120 questions but as she

proceed in the test she felt that it was an inventory, each part of the inventory is related

to the different trait of the personality and after attempting all questions she was

curiosity to know about the results.

References

Mangal S.K. ‘Advanced Educational Psychology’ Prentice Hall of India, Pvt Ltd New Delhi. Manual of Multidimensional Personality inventory by km. Manju Rani Aggarwal, Publication by Agra Psychological Research Cell Agra. Walia J.S. ‘Foundation of Educational Psychology’ Paul publisher, Gopal Nagar Jalandher. Chauhan S. S. ‘Advanced Education Psychological’ Vikas Publishing House 576 Masjid Road, Jangpura, New Delhi.

Date Teacher’s Signature

Page 39: Experiments Related to Psychology

39

Experiment No. 8

Statement of the problem

“To determine the transfer of training with mirror drawing apparatus.”

Introduction

The problem of transfer of training is one of the most interesting and important problems in the study of education and educational psychology. Learning is dynamic process and what is learnt in one situation must have some transfer value. A professor of mathematics would always say “mathematics and language are the meat and potatoes of education diet.” The problem of transfer determines to a large extent the programmes, contents, methods and objectives of education.

Meaning

Transfer of learning stands for the carryover from one act of learning to another or transfer of learning means person’s learning in one situation influences his learning and performance in other situation.

Definition of Transfer of Learning

According to Crow and Crow, “The carryover of habit, thinking, feeling, working of knowledge or of skills from one learning area to another usually it referred as transfer of training.” According to Guthrie and Power, “Transfer may be defined as a process of extending and applying behaviour.” According to Sorenson, “Transfer refers to the transfer of knowledge training and habits acquired in one situation to another situation.” According to Peterson, “Transfer is generalization, for it is extension of idea to a new field.”

Types of Transfer of Training

1. Positive Transfer: - When learning of one activity facilitates the learning of another activity.

2. Negative Transfer: - When previously learnt activity interferes with the learning of another activity.

3. Zero Transfer: - When learning of one activity neither facilitates nor transfers with learning of a new tasks.

Theories of Transfer

1. Theory of mental Discipline this theory assumes that mind is composed of many independent faculties, which are nothing but the muscles of mind and can be strengthened through exercises.

2. Apperception Theory apperception is defined as a process of relation new ideas or mental state to a store of old ones or old experiences.

3. Theory of Identical element this theory asserts that transfer from one situation to another is possible to the extent that there is common or identical element in the situation.

Page 40: Experiments Related to Psychology

40

4. Theory of generalisation according to this theory not identical element is transfer to new situations. A generalisation is a statement of understanding of same relationships.

5. Transfer theory of transfer this theory focus the role of insight in learning something and behaving in a particular way.

6. Theory of ideals according to this theory ideal is deeper than generalizations. Hence ideals are the basis of transfer.

Bilateral Transfer

Human body is divided into two laterals left and right when training is imparted to one

lateral automatically it gets transferred to other lateral it is known as bilateral transfer of

training it can be proved.

Experiment of bilateral transfer of training

There is a mirror drawing apparatus for this experiment. In this experiment the subject was

asked to trace the figure of a star ( ) with his left hand by looking at the fig in mirror, the

time taken was noted down and number of errors were counted then the subject was again

asked to trace the figure of a star ( ) with his right hand by looking at the figure in the

mirror then at last again the subject was asked to trace the figure of star with left hand by

looking at the figure in the mirror then experience counted his error and total time taken in

each trails.

Hypothesis

Practice with right hand results in improvement of performance with left hand.

Table 8.1: No. of error and time taken in each trail

Sr. No. Hand-Used No. of Errors Time Taken

1 Left Hand 42 1 minute

2 Right Hand 35 55 second

3 Right Hand 28 45 second

4 Right Hand 22 48 second

5 Right Hand 18 51 second

6 Right Hand 20 29 second

7 Right Hand 17 36 second

8 Right Hand 21 39 second

9 Right Hand 22 34 second

10 Right Hand 16 33 second

11 Right Hand 17 28 second

12 Left Hand 29 30 second

Design of Experiment

The experiment is designed to see the effect of practice of drawing star shaped figure

through mirror drawing apparatus. The subject is to draw the figure immediately or initially

by non preferred hand then 10 times by preferred hand and last trail by non-preferred hand

Page 41: Experiments Related to Psychology

41

again. To see whether transfer has occurred or not, total time taken and error committed by

the subject in each trails are noted down.

Administration of the Experiment

Particulars of the Subject Name: Manpreet Age: 26 Sex: Male Education Qualification: B.Ed.,M.A. Mental Health: Normal Physical Health: Normal Place: Psychological Laboratory

Material Required

Paper, pen, stop watch, mirror drawing apparatus etc.

Instructions

The subject was given following instructions this experiment is to see bilateral transfer in

Table 8.2: Difference in error and time taken in first and last trail by non-preferred hand

Number of Trails Hand-Used Number of Errors Time Taken

1 Left 42 1 minute

2 Left 29 30 second

Mirror drawing apparatus you have to draw a figure of star shaped by mom-preferred hand

and by looking in the mirror then this figure is to be draw by preferred hand 10 times by

looking in the mirror then in the last trail again this figure is to be drawn by non-preferred

hand the time taken and committed error will be counted in every trail. Now be attentive

and start the experiment.

Result

Table I shows the complete results of the experiment it shows the error committed, time

taken and hand used in each trail.

Table I shows that in the 1st trail with non-preferred hand my subject committed 42 errors in

1 minute and from the 2nd trail to the 11th trail by hand my subject committed 35, 28, 22, 18,

20, 17, 21, 22, 16, 17 and 29 in 55, 45, 48, 51,29, 36, 39, 34, 33 and 28 seconds respected. In

the last trail i.e. by non-preferred hand my subject committed 29 errors in 30 second. It

shows by non-preferred hand error are reduced and total time taken in drawing the figure

were also less.

Table II shows that by using non-preferred hand errors are reduced in the last trail or in the

2nd trail of the non-preferred hand because in the 1st trail number of error are 42 in 1

minute and after that practising with preferred hand errors are reduced then the subject

Page 42: Experiments Related to Psychology

42

uses her non-preferred hand in the last trail. In the 12th trail number of error are 29 in 30

second.

Educational Implication

1. Integrated curriculum: - Curriculum should be an integral whole so that there may be positive transfer of training.

2. Guidance in the selection of curriculum: -The students must be guided in the selection of such courses which have maximum transfer value

3. Attitude of transferability: - Attitude of transferability should be faster among the students.

4. Emphasis on correlation: - Emphasis should be laid on correlation so that previous knowledge may be used in the new task.

5. Law of association: -The teacher should make the best use of laws of association for providing different types of knowledge.

6. Special attention towards intelligent students: - The amount of transfer is closely related to the intelligence of the learner. Bright children tend to transfer the learning more efficiency.

7. There should be a co-ordination between theoretical knowledge and practical experiences.

Introspective Report

My subject was very curious to know about the mirror drawing apparatus and excited to

perform experiment on it. He feels difficulty in first trail while performing with left hand and

commits 25 errors but later on it was proved to be interesting for him and he enjoyed it.

After completing the experiment my subject was curious to know about the results as soon

as possible.

References

Mangal S.K. ‘Advanced Educational Psychology’ Prentice Hall of India, Pvt Ltd New Delhi. Walia J.S. ‘Foundation of Educational Psychology’ Paul publisher, Gopal Nagar Jalandher. Chauhan S. S. ‘Advanced Education Psychological’ Vikas Publishing House 576 Masjid Road, Jangpura, New Delhi.

Date Teacher’s Signature


Recommended