CHAPTER - V
EXPORT OF CASHEW KERNELS
India's was the first country in the world to develop
cashew as a commercial crop and to set up factories for
processing the raw cashewnuts. India was also the first country
to export cashew kernels and cashewnut shell liquid to many
destinations. Now more than 20 countries are engaged in
cashew cultivation, processing and export. However, India
continues to be the largest producer, processor, exporter and
consumer of cashew kernels and allied products in the world.
In India, unfortunately, cashew has been a neglected
crop. The production of cashewnuts packed at 5,20,000 tonnes
in 1999-2000 but feel to 4,50,000' tonnes in 2000-2001.
Exports are of the view that instead of asking the government
to change land ceiling laws to have large scale plantations of
cashew, it would be better to grow cashew on wastelands.
Export earnings of cashew kernels multiplied more
than five times from Rs.4470 million in 1990-91 to Rs.25,0002
185
million in 1999-2000. But in the subsequent two years, there
was a fall in export earnings instead of an improvement.
Surely, there is an urgent need to bring large tracts of land
under cashew cultivation.
India exports cashew kernels to more than 60
countries. The major markets being the USA, East European
Countries, Canada, Japan, Australia and countries in the middle
east. About 40 per cent of India's export is to USA and
another 40 per cent to East European Countries. Indian
Cashew is also acclaimed for its quality taste and appearance.
The share of different zones in export of cashew
kernels from India for the year 1991-92 was American zone
30.90%, East Europe zone 9.90%, West Europe zone 30.80%,
West Asia zone 5.10%, South East & Far East Asia 17.70%
and Australian zone 5.60% were shown in Figure 5.1.
9.90%
American Zone30.90%
pe
West Ask5.10%
West3C
Fig. 5.1
Export of Cashew Kernels from India
Export for the Year 1991-1992 Share ofdifferent Zone
AustralianSouth East & ZoneFar East Asia 5.60%
186
187
5.1 WORLD EXPORTS OF CASHEW
Though India gets the 3' d place in the production of
raw cashewnuts, it stands first in the industry and export of
cashew kernels. The quantity of kernels exported registered
an up-trend during the post-war period as is evident from
Table 5.1.
India could export as much as 22424 tonnes of
kernels in 1950. From then onwards significant growth of
exports was witnessed almost every year. However, all is not
well with our market share in the total annual world exports.
In 1950 India could account for 99.8 per cent of the total
world exports of cashew kernels. It gradually declined and
reached the rock bottom in 1981 when India could make only
42.1 per cent of the total world exports. However, remarkable
changes came about in 1986 when the total share of India's
world exports stood at 56 per cent. In 1987 it increased to 64
per cent. Once again in 1988 India emerged as the most
prominent exporter of cashew kernels, accounting for 88 per
cent of the world exports were shown in Figure 5.2.
188
Table 5.1
INDIA'S MARKET SHARE IN THE WORLD EXPORTS OF CASHEWKERNELS FROM 1950-1988
Year India's Exports World Exports India's Share(in, tonnes) (in tonnes) (per cent)
1950 22,424 22,458 99.81951 23,907 24,185 98.91952 26,499 26,854 98.61953 28,121 27,256 92.91954 31,652 32,604 97.91955 31,452 32,406 96.81956 32,490 33,519 96.91957 34,577 35,804 96.51958 39,673 40,901 97.01959 38,172 39,302 97.11960 39,436 41,578 94.81961 41,191 42,920 95.91962 46,436 49,080 94.61963 53,395 57,326 93.11964 52,645 57,504 91.51965 53,793 58,830 91.41966 48,616 56,976 89.91967 52,256 53,485 82.31968 60,491 75,749 79.91969 62,678 82,610 75.91970 54,074 78,336 69.01971 59,985 88,710 67.61972 64,542 101,909 63.31973 57,062 96,538 59.111974 57,976 94,072 61.61975 59,174 95,961 61.71976 55,940 94,118 59.41977 40,051 70,653 56.71978 23,820 63,357 37.61979 37,287 95,000 49.71980 36,858 76,000 48.51981 29,449 70,000 42.11982 31,789 N.A. N.A.1983 35,729 N.A. N.A.1984 31,142 55,498 56.01985 31,608 90,596 45.01986 37,395 67,192 56.01987 37,367 58,731 64.01988 31,892 36,206 88.0
Source: Kannan K.P., op.cit., p.21 & 22 (upto 1981) MarketFocus-VI, op.cit., p.10 (from 1982 to 1988).
Fig. 5.2
India's Market Share in the World Exports ofCashew Kernels from 1950-1988
100
90
80a,0a)
70
-cCl) 60
U)a)
c 50
40
30 +- I I I I I I
1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
Year
WON
190
5.2. EXPORT OF CASHEW KERNELS
The export of cashew kernel and import of raw nut
was also increased over the years. Import of raw nut increased
over the years was due to requirement of raw material for
processing into cashew kernels. India's shares around 60 per
cent followed by Brazil with 30 per cent and Vietnam in export
of cashew to the worked market. Refer the Table 5.2. During
the year 1999-2000 cashew export was estimated to be Rs.2451
crores. The export growth rate has increased by 25 per cent.
Export of cashew kernels by major producing countries
presented in Table 5.3.
Table 5.2
WORLD CASHEW EXPORTS (MT)
Countries 1999 2000 2001
India 91,124 89,100 1011200
Brazil 23,386 32,582 29,700
Vietnam 21,890 36,740 33,000
E.Africa 4,400 4,400 4,400
Others 2,200 2,200 2,200
Total 11,432000 11,652022 1,703,500
Source: International Tree Nut Council
191
-O
r-
iN- t'.
OO
co
o
tC
)
ccooco,-i
C"1e-4 ,-
4
oC
)LO
r4C
A
'.000
0o'-I.1
0C
1)
-
O0C
- c1)0Lf)tC
in C
)
0-03O
Cd
-
1-1- c
Cl)
o
Ct
C N
o
Vo
00C's
C8ce 0V000-d0'.00zQ
4CI)
r.' 0—
V
•.I4
zVCl)
F-
80zU
E
LI)
-I
cd
IU.
00a.
192
In India, cashew trade is the third highest foreign
exchange earner among agri-based export crops. It is evident
from the Table 4.4 that export of cashew kernel increased from
49,000 MT (1990-91) to 92,461 MT (1999-2000) and growth
rate was positive (6.38%). The export value of cashew kernel
also increased significantly over the years from 1990-91 to
1990-00 and growth rate was 17.30 per cent per annum. This
was due to increase in demand for cashew kernel as well as
increase in the international prices of kernel.
5.3. IMPORT OF RAW CASHEWNUT
In order to bridge the gap between supply and
demand, the cashew industry in India has been relaying heavily
on the imported raw nuts from East African countries. The
quantity in import of raw nut increased from 1991-92 to
1995-96 and it declined during 1996-97 and again increased in
the two consecutive years and it decreased in 1999-2000. The
growth rate of import of raw nut in terms of quantity was
14.03 per cent and CGR in terms of value was 25.74 per cent
were significant and shows increasing trend over the years were
also presented in Table 5.4.
193
Table 5.4
EXPORT OF CASHEW KERNEL AND IMPORT OF RAW NUT
IN INDIA
Year Quantity Value Quantity Value(Mt) (Rs. in Lakh) NO (Rs. in Lakh)
1990-91 49000 38840 82639 44224
1991-92 47738 24370 102080 66909
1992-93 53436 74549 135985 37633
1993-94 69884 104602 191322 48370
1994-95 77000 124602 228109 69194
1995-96 70334 124050 223819 76008
1996-97 68757 158104 192285 64190
1994-98 80625 156000 247181 74060
1998-99 75026 160990 241161 95600
1999-00 92461 245150 226396 105390
2000-01 6.38* 17.30 14.03* 25.74*
Source: Directorate of Cashew Development, Cochin, Kerala.
5.4. TREND IN EXPORT OF CASHEW KERNELS
The commercial export of cashew kernel in the world
first started from India with a shipment of about 45 tonnes of
Kerala in the year 1925 to the U.S.A. By 1930, exports
increased to about 2,300 tonnes and by 1989 to 32,500 tonnes.
194
During the war year exports remained at a low ebb. Thus it is
evident that from the beginning of the cashew trade, India has
been enjoying a virtual monopoly over the processing of raw
nuts as well as export of kernels to the world markets (See
Figure 5.3).
However, keeping in view the world demand, the
supply capacity of the competitors and the processing capacity
in the country. India has launched World Bank known as
Multi State Cashew Project' (This Project is under
implementation in the State of Kerala, Karnataka, Andrapradesh
and Orissa).
Fig. 5.3
Trend in Export of Cashew Kernelsfrom India (1981-82 to 1991-92)
195
50000
40000
30000
CY20000
10000
El1981- 1982- 1983- 1984- 1985- 1986- 1987- 1988- 1989- 1990- 1991-
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
196
5.5 DIRECTION OF EXPORT OF CASHEW KERNELS
Statistics reveal that India has established a very
good market for cashew kernels in the countries all over the
world. But the size of markets in other countries underwent
considerable changes in 1999-2000.
As it could be seen from Table 1.7 in 1999-2000
the U.S.A. imported 47190 tonnes in the same year from
India. But countries like UK, Japan, UAE, France which were
considered to be the bulk consumers of India Cashew kernels
could occupy only the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th places respectively
with regard to import of cashew kernels from India in
1999-2000.
Thus it is apparent that the growth of international
market is noted for its changes in volume and direction year
after year. The country-wise export of cashew kernels in metric
tonnes from India during 1996-97 to 2000-01 is shown in
Table 5.5 and cashewnut shell liquid in Table 5.6.
zLO xL.L
I-z0U
U-
00uj I
IIz
II
IClc JI
II§h
— Lf) 0 tf) 00 ^D ce) ()% ^O CY) 0 cq 0 C) -t
Lr)
— — —
—
00 ko 00 Ln
cq
iclON0 —000
I
cOC
tt)OC
L()C
D---l-
C'4'-
0C
03_
CN
CO
coo
0
4 ct:2
in
C-4cl It)
Ir--(o
C
CL
t)cJ-C
l)O
O
-C
00 t
CTS
b!ir.
co—
aa
bD
19
7
(.)
000—40E0p4
.1W
II
1980
8I Cd
C042
CoCI)
o0000
-000000
0
C00
00
0cq
co
-s.
cT\ 0
c
ô
000
0-0O
00
0C
'0
c0
00-•0
00
•0
00000dood0000
L O 0
co—
c'0
c'lC
t-o
4C
NO
'iCY
)Io o.
Oc'0
00
-0
•0
c)0
0C
0o
0i--0000O
00
00
00
C'1
000000
'fDa
-c00000cc'l0
000000
cs'100
CD
o0
000t-00--
oa-t--0
00
00
dd
--dddddd
%D
t.-I.
cN
Iq
t
-O
000C
'0\000000 I.-
000000
.-C
C0000
ei
c)C
co
t-
01C
)00C
0- c
ocD
•O4
CdV
Cf)
•-E
'co
o'
0—
C)
cl
zzz
0
co
LI) C
Y
Co
0Co
at
'-I
ci
C'1v
-I
C'
'-4
'-I
tzU)Co
v-Iclbi0
oainCYU.
a.
0C000E0V0ct0000
ceLZ
r' 0\_, ••.-I•00
01..
0
199
5.6. EXPORT THROUGH DIFFERENT PORTS
There are regular shipping facilities from India to all
ports of the world. Major shipments from India take place
through Cochin Port is shown in Figure 5.4. Other ports are
Tuticorin, Madras, Bombay, Murmagoa, Nhava Shiva and
Vishakapatnam. Regular service of container ships are available
from Indian ports on India - USA, India - UK, India - Australia,
India - Japan, India - Middle East and India - Singapore routes.
Export of cashew kernels through there ports in India from the
year 1991-92 to 1995-96 shown with quantity and value in
Table 5.7 and Figure 5.4.
if)Cd
Ihd
II-
Iwi
zz0I-
U-
U-
0C
1C
OO
\Lt)
LI)
LI)
N C
C) '-4
'-4Lo C
o I-
co N
Q\ O
0
00'
0)
LtD-
LOC'
C'
U)C
ot000
0'
(N
Co-N
()LO
0'
C'0
CoLI)0N
CN
If)D
0'-)0O
0C
oQ
CY
) t._ 0
0'
'-4 N
—1 C
') 00 N
0
CY
) NLI).O
00
)t-U
cO
co
000
LI)N
-0'
0'
C'
O t- .O
C
O C
o 0
II) 0
0
0It) C
') t•--
0 '..O
'.Oto
LO
LO
'-4'-4
C
0-C')
'-4C
oU
)0N
-4LtD
't
C)
0)
CY
00000
C')NN
OC
oN
0'C
)C
O N
- C
O N
- N
O II) L
I)C
oO
CoC
1)N
CoN
Co
LO
C') j r-4
N
Nco
o
It'-4
N rN
N'—
NO
CoN
- OC
')CO
0'
C'
C\O
ca
0)N
toCOC
" 0
C') N
Z
Z
'—
C'
toLI) N
- C
V) N
-40
0LI) N
- N
' if)
C')C
')(Y)
00
'-4-
'-4
200
V1000ciceC
OU
) it)
00rrt-4
Ct)II)LI)C
ZZ
ON
Co 0
_
0CO
'-4 U
)
Cd
0
—Cdci
ft41
o
00
.10
0
0
co
•
V00co
Ew0Ln0 co
C
o -s0
•DD
N
IE04-24.I
ECI1
U4-00CL
uj
('1('4a)a)
It
U)
201
88
0
(000) .rw u
i Am
uen
b
202
5.7. EXPORT PROBLEMS
Among the Agro-based export commodities, cashew
has a supreme position. In the near future also, it is likely to
increase, as the Indian Kernels are rated the best in the world
market. Even then exporters have to face some problems.
1. Entry of new competitors in the international market.
2. Decreasing availability of raw cashewnuts.
3. Competition from other tree nuts.
4. Low demand due to high price of Indian Kernels.
5. Fluctuations in the price of kernels.
6. Frequent withdrawal from market by some countries.
7. Presence of middlemen.
8. Non-fulfilment of agreement by importers.
9. Quality control in packing.
10. Counter-trade and rupee clearance.
11. Heavy tax charged by EIA.
12. Complicated export formalities.
As cashew kernels constituted one of the major
export oriented agricultural commodities, the Government of
India had been keenly interested in the development of the
industry. For this purpose, the Government had created various
203
institutional agencies and also had formulated suitable
development policies. Among them, formation of the Cashew
Export Promotion Council, establishment of the Directorate of
Cashewnut Development and the policies laid on canalization of
the import, draws relatively more attention. An attempt has
also been, therefore, made under this chapter to assess the role
of the various agencies for the development of the cashew
industry.
5.8 THE CASHEW EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL OF INDIA
The Cashew Export Promotion Council of India
(CEPC) was established by the Government of India on 171
August 1955, with the objective of promoting exports of cashew
kernels and cashewnut shell liquid in foreign market. Following
are the major objectives of the council.
1. Undertaking market studies and surveys in overseas
countries on cashew kernels and C.N.S.L.
2. Sending trade missions to overseas countries.
3. Participating in international trade fairs and exhibitips.
4. Maintaining public relations and conducting publicity to
popularise cashew and to sustain and expand export markets.
204
5. Collecting and disseminating market intelligence on cashew
for the benefit of growers, processors and traders.
6. Assisting in the amicable settlement of trade disputes
between Indian exporters and overseas importers.
7. Giving recommendations to the Government of India and
other public bodies with regard to matters considered to
be in the interest of the cashew industry.
The council functions under the directions of the
Ministry of Commerce. It is an agency sponsored by the
cashew kernel and C.N.S.L. exporters; and the major sources of
funds are from its members and the Ministry of Commerce.
During the initial stages of its functioning about 60 per cent of
the fund requirements were met by the Government of India.
Subsequently, the Central Government had reduced its
contribution. Presently, the council finds a major portion of its
resources from its members. The council has its office at
Cochin and its Chairman is elected from the members and the
Secretary, who is an experienced executive in foreign trade.
From a view of the working of the council, the
following inferences were drawn.
205
1. Though the council is supposed to undertake periodical
studies on market potentialities, it was unable to carry
out such studies due to the constraints in manpower and
financial resources.
2. The council could however, collect, collate the data /
information on exports of kernels and C.N.S.L. and make
them available to all the members. Such information
data would serve as broad guidelines for taking decisions
on the trade.
3. The council also had an updated list of importers of
kernels and C.N.S.L. and also made them available to its
members.
4. To the business enquiries from foreign countries, the
council could supply the list of exporters; and they are
expected to choose the suppliers and negotiate between
them about the quantity, quality, price and other market
arrangements. The council in principle did not favour any
particular member or group of members. The available
information were disseminated to all the members.
The council also could send trade delegations to
various potential market areas and also to the established
Indian cashew importing countries to sustain / develop the trade
relations. The outcome of such trade delegations also were
brought out in small booklets and distributed to all the members.
206
These booklets are priced publications and therefore, they were
also made available to the public. From 1988-89 the council
had sent trade delegations to a number of countries. The
number of delegations the council had sent since 1988-89 to
1991-92 and 2000-01 countries covered and purposes of the
delegations are given in Table 5.8.
The delegations were mainly aimed at increasing the
kernel trade or for the purchase of the raw cashewnuts. The
impact of these delegations with regard to increasing kernel
trade and increased import of the raw cashewnuts is yet to be
quantified. On enquiries, it was gathered from the council that
it is yet to carry out any study to quantify the impacts.
However, it is presumed in the cashew trading community that
there is a positive impact of the trade delegations especially in
developing business contacts and further strengthening the
existing relations. A critical assessment of the impact of these
delegations will be interesting for detailed research studies.
207
Table 5.8
YEAR-WISE DETAILS OF THE DELEGATIONS SEND BY THE CASHEW
EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL
Year No. of Countries covered PurposeDelegations
1988-89 4 1. U.K., F.R.G. and Promotion ofNetherlands Kernel Trade
2. Japan, Rep. of Koreaand Hong Kong
3. Canada and USA
4. Vietnam, Thailand, Raw CashewnutIndonesia, Philippiness Buyingand Singapore
1989-90 3 1. USA and Canada Promotion ofKernel Trade
2. Australia, New Zealandand Singapore
3. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, a
Bahrain, Qatar, Omanand U.A.E.
1990-91 3 1. Japan, Hong Kong,Taiwan and SouthKorea
2. USA and Canada
3. Benin, Ivory Coast, a
Senegal, Nigeria,Guinea, Bissau and Togo
1991-92 1 1. Indonesia, Vietnam, Raw CashewPhilippiness and BuyingSingapore
2000-01 6 1. Brazil, Sharjah & Sapin Promotion ofKernel Trade
Source: Office of the Cashew Export Promotion Council, Cochin,Kerala.
208
In addition to the above trade delegations the
council also sponsors Individual Sales Terms to the selected
markets abroad for business negotiations and finalising export
orders. The council also undertakes publicity abroad with a
view to project the qualities of the Indian cashew. For this
purpose the council also participates in International food fairs /
exhibitions and general fairs abroad through the Trade Fair
Authority of India, the centralised authority for organising Indian
participation in fairs / exhibitions abroad. In such fairs the
council exhibits the products received from all its members.
The enquiries received are circulated amongst the members for
further business negotiations.
5.8.1. Council Publications
The council has two regular publications, viz. Cashew
Bulletin which is monthly and Indian Cashew Journal which is
quarterly. The Cashew Bulletin contains market news, country
profiles, Government's notifications and circulars, export and
import statistics, commodity prices, news and notes on cashew,
etc. The monthly bulletin is circulated among the cashew
processors, traders and people having interest in the subject.
The Indian Cashew Journal is mainly meant for improving the
cashew trade; and therefore, it is circulated more among the
209
kernel purchasing countries. Apart from this, the council also
publishes statistical reports, directory of exporters and importers,
information on cashew shell liquid, etc.
The council also provides necessary information and
liaison for bringing together the foreign importers and the kernel/
C.N.S.L. exporters. It also often involves itself in settling
complaints in the matter of exports either on account of quality
and or variations caused, if any, in fulfillment of the contracts.
The council in general had played a satisfactory role
for the development of the cashew trade in the country. With
increased fund position, it can deploy more specialised personnel
in finding suitable markets for the kernels and C.N.S.L. and
also to procure raw cashewnuts from foreign countries. The
council has so far not played any role in developing suitable
markets for cashew feni4 a very potential and valuable
commodity for exporting. Similarly, the scope of the kernels
and C.N.S.L. in making value-added products are also not
exploited. The council can play a major role in these directions
in the near future.
210
5.8.2. Laboratory Division
The Cashew Export Promotion Council of India (CEPC)
has set up Laboratory and Technical Division of international
standard. The services of the Laboratory and Technical Division
will not only be available to cashew industries in India, but
also to the entire food processing industry in India and Abroad.
The worldwide concern for food safety, customer
satisfaction an environmental protection has brought quality into
sharp focus.
Quality has emerged as the key factor deciding
whether a product gets into the mainstream global market or
falls by the wayside. Moreover, the regulator agencies in
different countries including India, now have stringent parameter
on food quality and safety. There was a time when price was
a sure-fire sale bait, but now business perspectives have shifted
from price advantage to product safety, reliability, shelf-life and
consumer acceptance. Only with long-term commitment to quality
can exporters survive and grow in today's intensely competitive
environment. Every food product has to have quality built into
it at all stages of its evolution, production, harvesting, post
211
harvest operations, transport, processing, packaging, storage
distribution and export.
The present system of pre-shipment inspection comes
in only at the point of export. The liberalisation policy for
trade and exports has dispensed with the earlier practice of
compulsory pre-shipment inspection and quality control. Today,
the responsibility for maintaining quality devolves on the
processor exporter himself.
For the past few years, all-round quality upgradation
has ranked high on the operational agenda of Cashew Export
Promotion Council of India and the establishment of the CEPC
Laboratory & Technical Division in 1997 marks a major break
through in this crucial area.
The laboratory represents a unique concept in the
Indian context. It offers testing and certification services to the
cashew industry as well as to organisations processing a wide
range of foods, drinks and drugs. Many of the well-equipped
laboratories in India confine themselves to research and
development work. Their services and facilities are thus limited
in scope and content. The few test laboratories that exist are
212
not adequately equipped to handle certain country specific and
product specific tests.
5.9. DIRECTORATE OF CASHEWNUT DEVELOPMENT
The Government of India had established, the Indian
Central Spices and Cashewnut Committee in 1962 to look after
the development of spices and cashewnuts. The committee also
dealt with basic research for the development of better seeds/
clones and in improving the crop productivity and quality of the
produce. The committees contributions in achieving the above
objectives were felt inadequate; and therefore, it was abolished.
The Government of India subsequently set up the "Directorate of
Cashewnut & Cocoa Development 1966 under the Ministry of
Agriculture at Cochin to look into the development of cashewnuts
and its by-products. The basic research related to the development
of the crop, was entrusted to the Indian Council of Agricultural
Research. Following are the chief functions of the directorate.
1. To formulate suitable development policies and to
implement various policies initiated by the State and the
Central Government.
2. To co-ordinate the developmental efforts under the sector
to achieve the targeted production programmes.
213
3. To help the kernel marketing and to help the cashew
producers to get remunerative prices.
4. To suggest measures for accelerating the tempo of
developmental programmes.
5. To undertake any other function assigned for the
development of the industry by the Central Government.
The directorate from its inception, has been working
for the above objectives. For developing the cashew industry the
directorate had recognised the importance of raw cashewnut
production within the country and to achieve this objective it
had taken a number of developmental measures for extensive
and intensive cultivation.
The intensive programme included demonstration of
improved agro techniques for increasing productivity and adoption
of intensive pest control measures to prevent loss in yield.
These programmes were taken up mainly in the coastal regions.
Kerala, Karnataka, Goa and Maharashtra were the States that
participated from West Coast and Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh,
Orissa, West Bengal and Tripura were the States which had
benefited out of the programme from East Coast region.
214
To achieve the country's long standing goal of
reaching the raw cashewnut production target of 6 lakh M.T.
per annum, the Government of India had fixed a modest target
of achieving production level at 4.24 lakh M.T. during the end
of the Eighth Five Year Plan period. To reach this target the
directorate had chalked out the following specific programmes.
1. New planting with clones conforming to export quality
varieties over an area of 40,000 ha.
2. Replanting of old and uneconomical cashew gardens with
clones of improved varieties over an area of 20,000 ha.
3. Intensive adoption of crop production technology like
adoption of proper nutrition and plant protection measuresin an area of 40,000 ha.
4. Adoption of plant protection measures in plantations
against pests attacking cashew over an area of 1,45,000 ha.
Establishment of regional nurseries to generate clones of
high yielding varieties to cater to Area ExpansionProgrammes, etc.
With concerted efforts, if the directorate can implement
the above programmes, the country's dependence on raw
cashewnut import can be reduced to a large extent.
215
In 1985 the Central Government had further relaxed
the import policies. Under the new policy' along with the C.C.I.
all the processors, export houses and trading houses were
allowed to import raw cashewnuts, subject to the contract that
50 per cent of the import should be canalized through the
C.C.I. This condition was removed when the availability of raw
cashewnuts from the traditional raw nut suppliers like Tanzania,
Mozambique and Kenya declined as a result of the initiation of
processing industries in those countries. The increasing non-
availability of raw cashewnuts from traditional sources made the
import scheme unattractive to the big processors and therefore,
they started looking for new sources of supply. The present
policy of the Government of India on imports is liberal and any
processing unit or trader having import licence can import the
raw nuts for trading / processing purposes.
References
1. 'Facts for you' Magazine - Market Survey, August 2002,
p.16.
2. Ibid.
3. 'The Cashew' Journal, January-March 2002 by Directorate
of Cashew & Cocoa Development, Cochin, Kerala.
4. Mathew, T.J. The urgent need for a Cashew Board, The
Cashew No.24-26 January-March 1987, p.24.
216
5. Cashew Canserie; Vol.VIII, No.3, July-September 86.