+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: nili
View: 41 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs: Producer is responsible u ntil the post-consumer stage, including its disposal Includes costs of treatment and disposal in the product’s price Can be voluntary or mandatory Examples are take back programs. International programs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
8
Program s to decreas e e- waste Minimize toxic materials in electronics (DFE, eco- design) Minimize release of toxics at end of life (recycling, reusing, avoid landfills and incineration ) Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs: Producer is responsible until the post- consumer stage, including its disposal Includes costs of treatment and disposal in the product’s price Can be voluntary or mandatory Examples are take back programs
Transcript
Page 1: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

Programs to decrease e-waste

Minimize toxic

materials in electronics (DFE, eco-

design)

Minimize release of

toxics at end of life

(recycling, reusing,

avoid landfills and incineration)

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:Producer is responsible until the post-consumer stage, including its disposalIncludes costs of treatment and disposal in the product’s priceCan be voluntary or mandatoryExamples are take back programs

Page 2: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

International programs

Basel convention Regulates movement of hazardous waste between

countries Solving the e-Waste Problem (StEP) initiative

UN led program Platform to exchange and develop knowledge on WEEE systems

Page 3: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

European Union programs

Restrictions on Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Sets a limit on amount of hazardous substances in

new EEE Energy using Products (EuP) directive

Sets eco-design requirement for new products WEEE directive

Manufacturers must take back their products for proper disposal

Aims to prevent generation of WEEE by promoting reuse and recycling

Page 4: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

United States Programs

Electronics’ life cycle is a linear progression No federal regulation Some states have independently implemented

WEEE programs Some companies (Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic) have

launched their own nationwide recycling program

Page 5: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

Canadian Programs

Electronic Product Stewardship (EPS) Canada Collaboration between industry and government to

find a solution Founded by 16 leading electronics manufacturers Since 2004,  electronics recycling programs across

Canada have diverted over 172,000  tonnes of end-of-life electronics from landfill

Recycle my cell No restrictions on hazardous substances

in EEE

Page 6: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

Albertan programs

Alberta Waste Electronic Incentive Program (2004) Encourage waste minimization and recycling Provides a framework for voluntary collection,

transportation and recycling of electronics Doesn’t require take back, recycling or ban

landfilling Relies on public education/availability of disposal

sites

Page 7: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

Asia, Africa and Latin America

80% of global WEEE are exported to Asia Increase in use of EEE Informal waste management sector is

dominant WEEE scavenging, recycling, dismantling are

huge sources of employment Lack of legislation Lack of logistical infrastructure

Page 8: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs:

What can we learn from these programs?

The new EU directive requires member states that generate more waste to get rid of more waste

How to encourage producers to minimize waste? Assign financial responsibility for WEEE Legislation Consumer demand

Bureaucracy governs legislation Effects of laws may be seen years/decades from now

Harmonization on national/international levels is needed Programs should be adjusted depending on the

region/country of implementation


Recommended