Date post: | 20-Feb-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alex-chang |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 26
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
1/26
Extensions of Mendelian Genetics
Dr. E. Hannig
BIOL3301_Sept. 2014
Ratio Review
3:1 Phenotypic Ratio, Monohybrid cross
WWx ww P
Ww F1(100% express dominant phenotype)
self
WW
Ww F2(3:1 phenotypic ratio)Ww
ww
F2: 2 phenotypes, 3 genotypeso Self the F2round seeds.1/3 true-breeding, 2/3 yield round and wrinkled in
3:1 ratio
o Self F2wrinkle seeds.all are true-breeding for the recessive phenotype
Therefore, the 3:1 phenotypic ratio masks an underlying 1:2:1 genotypic ratio, where
the 2/4 represents the heterozygous genotype
That said,for some traits, the F2may show a 1:2:1 phenotypic ratio if the heterozygotesshow a different phenotypefrom the homozygous dominant and homozygous recessive
phenotypes.
In this case, theRalleleis said to be incompletely
dominant.
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
2/26
9:3:3:1 ratio is characteristic of a dihybrid cross involving two independently-assorting
genes that determine discernable traits (e.g., seed color and seed shape, etc.)
RRYYx rryy P [Rround and Yyellow are dominant]
RrYy F1
9/16 round, yellow
3/16 round, green
3/16 wrinkled, yellow F2
1/16 wrinkled, green
The F2 generation (from selfing the F1s):
2
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
3/26
Gene Interaction Leads to Modified Dihybrid Ratios
What if, in a dihybrid cross, the two genes interact with each other in determining a
single phenotype (e.g., flower color or seed shape)??http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/epistasis-gene-interaction-and-phenotype-effects-460
Examples of Dihybrid (Digenic) RatiosRatio Description Name(s) of Relationship
(Used by Some Authors)
9:3:3:1 Complete dominance at both gene pairs; new
phenotypes result from interaction betweendominant alleles, as well as from interaction
between both homozygous recessives
Not named because the ratio
looks like independentassortment
9:4:3 Complete dominance at both gene pairs;
however, when one gene is homozygous
recessive, it hides the phenotype of the other
gene
Recessive epistasis
9:7 Complete dominance at both gene pairs;however, when either gene is homozygous
recessive, it hides the effect of the other gene
Duplicate recessive epistasis
12:3:1 Complete dominance at both gene pairs;
however, when one gene is dominant, it
hides the phenotype of the other gene
Dominant epistasis
15:1 Complete dominance at both gene pairs;
however, when either gene is dominant, ithides the effects of the other gene
Duplicate dominant epistasis
13:3 Complete dominance at both gene pairs;however, when either gene is dominant, it
hides the effects of the other gene
Dominant and recessiveepistasis
9:6:1 Complete dominance at both gene pairs;
however, when either gene is dominant, it
hides the effects of the other gene
Duplicate interaction
7:6:3 Complete dominance at one gene pair and
partial dominance at the other; whenhomozygous recessive, the first gene is
epistatic to the second gene
No name
3:6:3:4 Complete dominance at one gene pair and
partial dominance at the other; when
homozygous recessive, either gene hides theeffects of the other gene; when both genes
are homozygous recessive, the second gene
hides the effects of the first
No name
11:5 Complete dominance for both gene pairs
only if both kinds of dominant alleles arepresent; otherwise, the recessive phenotype
appears
No name
3
http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/epistasis-gene-interaction-and-phenotype-effects-460http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/epistasis-gene-interaction-and-phenotype-effects-460http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/epistasis-gene-interaction-and-phenotype-effects-4607/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
4/26
Interacting Genes in the Same Pathway
Experiment:
Isolate mutants (screen/selection)
Is the mutation dominant or recessive? [here, we want recessive]
Does the mutant strain contain only one mutation relevant to the phenotypescreened/selected for? [here, the answer must be yes]
Construct strains true-breeding for the phenotype
Cross (mate) true-breeding mutants with each other [e.g., true-breeding mutant #1 x true-
breeding mutant #2]
What is the phenotype of the progeny??
This is the standard way of doing complementation testing to determine if two mutants
harbor mutations in the same or in different genes.
4
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
5/26
Example I. Complementation(Complementary Gene Action)
o Complementary Gene Action yields a 9:7 modified dihybrid ratioo If two true-breeding white-flowered plants (the mutant, recessive phenotype),
when crossed with each other, yield blue flowered plants (the wild-type, dominant
phenotype) in the F1, the mutations in each of the plant are said to complement
each otherthe implication here is that the mutations in the two white-flowered plants lie in different genes.
o OTOH, if the cross of two true-breeding white-flowered plants yields white-flowered F1s, the mutationsfail to complementeach other..the implication is
that the mutations in the two white-flowered plants lie within the same gene.
5
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
6/26
Lets call the w1 gene from above gene C, and the w2gene above well call gene Pin the
example below. They are different genes.
Thus, a CCpp(white) x ccPP(white) cross will yield CcPpdihybrid F1progeny.
Because the mutants complement each other, they exhibit complementary gene action indetermining flower color.
That is, :
Now lets self the F1blue-flowered (due to anthocyanin production) plants.
In this case, the F1 genotype is CcPp, so the cross isCcPpx CcPp[you will recognizethis as a dihybrid cross; unlike the prior dihybrid crosses we discussed, this one
involves two genes that determine the SAMEphenotype]
Analysis of the F2:
Genotype Flower Color Enzyme Activities
9 C_P_ Flowers colored;anthocyanin produced
Functional enzymes from both genes
3 C_pp Flowers white;
no anthocyanin produced
p enzyme non-functional
3 ccP_ Flowers white;no anthocyanin produced
c enzyme non-functional
1 ccpp Flowers white;no anthocyanin produced
c and p enzymes non-functional
Phenotypically, this gives a 9:7 ratio (pigment : no pigment)this is an example of amodified dihybrid ratio [modified from 9:3:3:1]
Female Gametes
CP Cp cP cp
Male
Gametes
CP CCPP CCPp CcPP CcPp
Cp CCPp CCpp CcPp Ccpp
cP CcPP CcPp ccPP ccPp
cp CcPp Ccpp ccPp ccpp
6
blue
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
7/26
Modifications of the 9:3:3:1 dihybrid ratio is indicative of two genes
involved in determining a single phenotype!
Lets consider other examples..
Duplicate Geneso Instead of two genes
acting sequentially in a
pathway, what if two
genes act at the same stepin a pathway such thateither alone is sufficient
to complete the pathway?o Kernel color in wheat is a
good example [purple vs
non-purple]
here, either geneAorgeneBis sufficient
The cross: Purple x non-purple, both true-breeding
(P) F1 F2AABB(purple) x aabb(not purple) AaBb(purple) self ?????
Female Gametes
B b aB ab
Male
Gametes
B AABB AABb AaBB AaBb
b AABb AAbb AaBb Aabb
aB AaBB AaBb aaBB aaBb
ab AaBb Aabb aaBb aabb
9/16A_B_ Purple kernels, both A and B functional
3/16A_bb Purple kernels, A functional, B is not; either A or B alone is sufficient3/16 aaB_ Purple kernels, A non-functional, B functional; either A or B is sufficient.
1/16 aabb Non-purple, neither A nor B functional.
The modified dihybrid ratio in the case of duplicate genes (functionally, if notstructurally) is 15:1.
7
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
8/26
Recessive epistasis: Generation of an F2 9:4:3 dihybrid ratio.
Epistasis (definition)
o Literally, stand upon;o In the original sense, defined by Bateson, epistasis arises when the effects of
alleles at one locus are blocked by the presence of a specific allele at anotherlocus
o the ability of one mutation to override another in a double mutant..here, we areusually dealing with 2 different mutant phenotypes in addition to wild type.
Mouse coat color primer
o GeneAand gene Care two unlinked genes involved in mouse coat color [otherloci also affect coat color].
o Two true-breeding colors with respect to theAand Cgenes: agouti (AACC) andwhite (aacc)
o The agouti (normal) color begins as black pigmentation of coat hairs, followed
by yellow banding of the hair shafts.
Cross of true-breeding agouti and white mice:Crossing true-
breeding agouti and
white strains yieldsall agouti F1
progeny.
Intercrossing F1males and females
yields yet anothermodified dihybridratio, 9:3:4,
indicative of the
presence of 2distinct genes
involved in the coat
color phenotype
Note the appearance
of a third phenotype
(black coat color)..specifically in a 3/16 ratioindicating that these mice areeitherA-/ccor aa/C-.
8
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
9/26
The 4/16 white progeny indicate the genotype of of those mice (1/16 of
the total F2) isaacc.
9/16A-C-[agouti]3/16A-cc[albino]
3/16 aaC-[black]1/16 aacc[albino]
o The presence of the ccrecessive genotype therefore blocks theexpression of the black coat color phenotype [aa].
o In genetic terms, ccis epistatic to aa, since the double mutantexpresses the cphenotype
o we can interpret this as the recessive c phenotype standing upon the
aa phenotype, and the C gene acting before the A gene in the pathwayleading to the agouti coat color as follows:
C A
albino black agouti
Here, thecgene is referred to as the epistatic gene; theagene is thehypostatic gene in thec/ainteraction.
9
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
10/26
Heres another gene involved in coat color, theEgene. eemice show arecessive yellow phenotype. An allele of theAgene,A
y, yields a dominant
yellow coat phenotype. The epistasis is complicated because theAgene andtheEgene act in an antagonistic manner (see below)
A agouti-signaling protein
C tyrosinase
E melanocortin-1 receptor (Mcr1)
The biochemistry of this pathway within the melanocyte has been elucidated. Activation
of MC1R (theEgene) turns on production of eumelanin (via the Cgene product), as
opposed to the default production of pheomelanin. The agouti protein acts an antagonistto MC1R, leading toperiodicactivation of the agouti protein (theAgene) and banding of
color on individual hairs. Disruption of other loci, such as the classic tyrosinase locus
(Tyr; previously known as albino..the Cgene), destroys function of the entire pathway.The specific interactions between the proteins in this pathway are representative of
functional epistasis.
10
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
11/26
Other coat color genes in mice:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21249/
The B geneThis gene determines the color ofpigment. There are two major alleles,
Bcoding for black pigment and bforbrown. The alleleBgives the normal
agouti color in combination withAbut gives solid black with a/a. The
genotypeA/ b/bgives a streaked
brown color called cinnamon,anda/ab/bgives solid brown. In horses,
the breeding of domestic lines seems
to have eliminated theAallele that determines the agouti phenotype, although certainwild relatives of the horse do have this allele. The color we have called brownin mice is
called chestnutin horses, and this phenotype also is recessive to black.
The D geneTheDgene controls the intensity of pigment specified by the other coat color genes. The
genotypesD/DandD/dpermit full expression of color in mice, but d/ddilutes thecolor, making it look milky. The effect is due to an uneven distribution of pigment in the
hair shaft. Dilute agouti, dilute cinnamon, dilute brown, and dilute black coats all are
possible. A gene with such an effect is called a modifier gene. In horses, theDallele
shows incomplete dominance. Cases of dilution in the coats of house cats also arecommonly seen.
The S geneThe Sgene controls the presence or absence of spots by controlling the migration of
clumps of melanocytes (pigment-producing cells) across the surface of the developingembryo. The genotype S/ results in no spots, and s/sproduces a spotting pattern called
piebaldin both mice and horses. This pattern can be superimposed on any of the coat
colors discussed earlier, with the exception of albino, of course. Piebald mutations arealso known in humans.
Thus, normal coat appearance in wild miceis produced by a complex set of interacting
genes determining pigment type, pigment
distribution in the individual hairs, pigment
distribution on the animals body, and thepresence or absence of pigment. Such
interactions are deduced from modified
ratios in dihybrid crosses. The figureillustrates some of the pigment patterns in
mice. Interacting genes such as these
determine most characters in any organism.
11
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21249/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21249/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21249/7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
12/26
Coat color in Labrador retrievers..yet another example of recessive epistasis
Bis the dominantBlack allele.
bthe recessive brown allele.Eis the dominant Extension gene, in conjunction withB/bcauses a dog to be black or
brown. eeresults in cream color.
Suppression: Dominant
Example: Malvidin (an anthocyanin) production inPrimula
Requires the product of the Kgene..but, the action of Kcan be suppressed (negated, turned off, masked) by the presence of a non-allelic
suppressor,D, whos effect is dominant [i.e., K-D-strains fail to produce malvidin.
P KKdd(malvidin) x kkDD (no malvidin)
F1 KkDd(no malvidin) !!
F2 9/16 K-D- (no malvidin)
3/16 K-dd (malvidin)3/16 kkD- (no malvidin)1/16 kkdd (no malvidin)
Thus, dominant suppression of theKgene by theDsuppressor yields a 13:3
(mutant : wild-type) dihybrid ratio.
Ques: If the action of the suppressor was recessivewhat would be the phenotypes
of the F1plants? the modified dihybrid ratio???
12
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
13/26
Once you have answered the last question, you should realize that, while
modified dihybrid ratios indicate the involvement of two genes in
determining the same phenotype, they are more likely to rule out
certain types of gene interactions than they are at identifying a single,
specific mechanism.
Suppression: recessiveo A suppressor is an allele that reverses the effect of a mutation of
another gene, resulting in the normal (wild-type) phenotype.
Example: purple eye color inDrosophila
Experiment:
o Start with wild-typeDrosophila(red eyes) and isolate (screen for) rare mutantsthat show a purple eye phenotype.in this case, due to a single recessive
mutation in thepdgene.
o Construct true-breeding strains for the Pd-phenotype (pd/pd)o Reversion analysis (whats that??) to isolate wild-type strains from the true-
breedingpd/pdstrains
o if reversion is due to an unlinked suppressor gene (su) that acts in arecessive manner (therefore, the genotype would be pd/pd; su/su),then
Note: alternatively, I could
cross the suppressor strain
(pd/pd su/su) with a wild-
type strain (pd+/pd+;su+/su+)
13
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
14/26
How do suppressors work?Some possible explanations:
1.Nonsense suppressionthe pd allele contains a nonsense mutationin the protein-coding sequence; su encodes a tRNA suppressor gene
that decodes (at a low rate) nonsense codons
2. The Pd protein normally forms an active complex with the Su protein;however, the pd mutation encodes an altered Pd protein such that it no
longer interacts with Su..so no active complex is formed. The sumutation alters the Su protein such that is restores the interaction Su
with the mutant Pd protein. alone!
Notice that, in this mechanism: only certain
mutations in su will suppress the pd mutation,
and the su mutation alone may have the samephenotype as the pd mutation
3. Two pathways lead to the production of the correct eye colorpigmentone is constitutive, one regulated. The pd mutation knocks
out flow through the constitutive pathway; the su mutation, however,alters the regulated pathway such that it now becomes constitutive.
4. A variation on mechanism #3 is that the su mutations bypasses thepathway blocked by the pd mutation by channeling intermediates
beyond the block from related pathways.5. Still another mechanism is that the pd mutation reduces the function
of the Pd protein to ~25%, which is insufficient to give red eyes. The
su mutation increases the expression (transcription) from the pd genesuch that, even though pd produces protein with 25% function, thereis now more of it.sufficient to give a red-eye phenotype
6. ..I could go on, but I think you get the point
14
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
15/26
Interacting Genes in Different Pathwayso Here we have a situation where two genes are necessary for determining color;
however, in this case, the pathways are separate and both end products are
necessary for normal or wild-type color.
Color in corn snakes: normal (camouflage), black, orange, and albino are
true-breeding phenotypes.
(P) true-breeding orange x true-breeding black(F1) all normal
..intercross F1 males and females
Top left: Normal (aka
camouflaged)
Top right: Anerythstic (unable to
make red/orange pigment)
Bottom left: Amelanistic (unable
to make black pigment)
Bottom right: Albino (unable to
make either pigment)
15
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
16/26
Lethality and Pleiotrophy
Pleiotrophy = single allele having more than one phenotypic effect
Ayallele dominant for yellow coat color
recessive lethal
QUES: How would I determine that all of my yellow mice areAy/A
heterozygotes?
o In addition to a dominant yellow coat color, other phenotypes associated withA
y/Amice include obesity, insulin-resistant type II diabetes, and increased
propensity to develop a variety of spontaneous and induced tumors.
o Molecularly, theAyallele is the result of a deletion near theAlocus that results inoverexpression of the agoutigene. Lethality is likely due to the deletion extending
into neighboring gene(s) and not to overexpression of agoutiitself.
16
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
17/26
The Manx cat
The tailless Manx is the result of a
genetic mutation that was thenintensified by the cats remote
location on the Isle of Man, off the
coast of Britaino The Manx gene is a dominant
allele of the Mgene (ML) that
interferes with spinal
development and shortens thespine of the cat, however not
always to the same extent - creating various types of Manx
Synthetic Lethality
The search for synthetic lethals can be used to search for additional genes that affect thepathway/mechanism you are studying. OTOH, it often yields mutations that alter a
(completely) different pathwaymutant 1 makes cells sick for one reason, mutation 2
also makes the cells sick, but for a different reason. Combining sick mutation 1 with sick
mutation 2 may make cells too weak to survive.
17
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
18/26
Patterns of Dominance
Complete dominance
This is what we have been considering to date [example:RR (red) x rr(white) All redF1s]
Possible explanations:
1. AlleleRproduces 20 units of an enzyme..lets say its required to make the amino
acid leucine
Recessive allele rproduces 12 units of the enzymeDominant alleleR
dproduces 0 units of the enzyme
.but to give a wild-type Leu+phenotype, an organism must produce 30 units of an
enzyme; anything less, the organism is Leu-and requires you add leucine to the media to
grow.
RR= 40 units of enzyme; Leu+
rr= 24 units of the enzyme; Leu
-
Rr= 32 units of the enzyme; Leu+
RRd= 20 units of the ezyme; Leu
-
2. Consider transcriptional activator proteins. These typically contains 2 protein domains
within the same polypeptideone that binds DNA, the other that attracts RNA
polymerase to the gene so it can be transcribed.- a deletion allele of the gene might be recessive, as only one copy of the gene is
necessary.
- how about a missense mutation in the gene that makes a protein that can bind DNA, butlacks the transcriptional activation domain; this type of allele might be dominant, as it
can bind to DNA perfectly well and, in doing so, block access of the wild-type protein (in
a heterozygous strain) to the DNA. Another possible scenario is the poisoned complexsituation, where the active protein is a complex of multiple polypeptides (either the same
or different ones)..here, incorporation of a mutant/altered protein might prevent the
complex from functioning normally, potentially yielding an inactive complex.
3..and there a quite a few more possibilities
18
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
19/26
Incomplete dominance:o heterozygote phenotype is intermediate between a homozygous
dominant and homozygous recessive phenotype
Incomplete dominance can run the gamut between the rrand theRR
phenotypes, as shown below:
19
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
20/26
Think of incomplete (partial) dominance as a scale. If A1and A2are two
alleles of the same gene:o
If A1is completely dominant, then an A1A2heterozygote has thesame phenotype as an A1A1homozygoteo If A2is completely dominant, then an A1A2heterozygote has the
same phenotype as an A2A2homozygoteo An A1A2phenotype that is roughly in the middle is sometimes
referred to as no dominance; however, for our purposes, unless youhave quantitative data that the phenotype is at the halfway pointbetween A1and A2, well simply call this situation..and anyphenotype between A1A1and A2A2 homozygotes partial
(incomplete) dominance
20
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
21/26
Co-dominance
Blood types are an excellent example of co-
dominance, where in the heterozygoteexpresses both phenotypes (i.e., not some
intermediate phenotype)The three common major blood group
alleles areIA,I
B, and i
Possible combinations of major blood group alleles and their phenotypes:
21
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
22/26
Bombay phenotype: the H gene
Now lets look at a cross in which we consider both gene sets together:
The cross:IAI
BHh x I
AI
BHh [consider that these gene pairs assort
independently from each other] :
22
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
23/26
Ratios look familiar? Maybe not.we havent seen a 3:6:3:4 ratio before,
but this is an excellent example of epistasis. Hmmm.I thought that was
9:3:4..well, it was in the example that we considered (mouse coat colorand theAand Cgenes). The difference lies in the fact that, in the present
situation, we are dealing with co-dominant alleles (IAand I
B).whereas in
the case of theAand Cgenes..we were not!
In the above example:
1. Which is the epistatic allele?2. Which is the hypostatic allele?3. What is the predicted order of execution, assuming both genes operate
in the same linear pathway that leads to major blood group type?
Biochemical basis of
ABO blood group
23
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
24/26
The sickle cell phenotype
The mutation (E6V) is a change in the -globin gene that changes aminoacid 6 from glutamic acid (an acidic amino acid) to valine (a hydrophobicamino acid). The charge loss and its replacement by a hydrophobic amino
acid lead to a decrease in the solubility of hemoglobin and the resultingsymptoms.
Phenotype: anemia [HbAdominant]
HbAHb
A not anemic
HbSHb
S not anemic
HbAHb
S anemic
Phenotype: RBC shape
[HbAincompletely
dominant]
HbAHb
A normal
HbSHb
S RBCs sickle
HbAHb
S RBCs may sickle
under low pO2 (high
altitudes), dehydration, orincreased atmospheric
pressure (e.g., scuba diving),but not all individuals with
SCT (sickle cell trait) areaffected to the same degree.
24
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
25/26
Phenotype: production of specific hemoglobin (biochemical phenotype)
[HbAand Hb
Sare co-dominant]
HbAHbA Hemoglobin A onlyHb
SHb
S Hemoglobin S only
HbAHb
S Hemoglobin A and Hemoglobin S [typically in ~ 60:40 ratio]
Take home: When indicating the dominance/recessiveness of alleles, it is
important to also indicate the phenotype to which you are referring!!
25
7/24/2019 Extensions of Mendelian Genetics_2014
26/26
Variable penetrance and variable expressivity1
Variable expressivity of the Ayallele in mice:
Different alleles may show
variable penetrance and/orvariable expressivity. This
depends to a large degree on
the particular allele, but isalso influenced by non-allelic
modifying genes. Although
this can complicate genetic
analysis, it does open up newresearch to identify the
modifying genes and
determine how they influenceexpression of original gene.
Environment may also play a
role in some cases.
1Unfortunately, these terms are often used interchangeably among non-geneticists, though each term has a
specific meaning.