Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | armando-stringer |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
External Examiners’ Conference Context
Professor Pauline KnealePro-Vice Chancellor, Teaching and Learning
External Context
• Centrality of external examiner’s role to assurance of standards and maintenance of quality
• QAA Institutional Audit: confidence in our management of standards and quality
• Mid-cycle follow up confirmed confidence
Institutional Context: Plymouth University• The Enterprise University
• 2012 was our 150th Anniversary year
• Winner of the Queen’s Anniversary Prize
• One of the top 100 global universities under 50 years old/ranked 10th in the UK
• The leading ‘green university’
• 30,000 students and 3,000 staff
• We are ‘off the curve’ - Research excellence with strong inclusivity
• Faculties: – Faculty of Arts– Faculty of Health, Education and Society– Plymouth Business School– Faculty of Science and Technology
• Academic Partnerships
• Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry
Institutional Context: Plymouth University
• Commitment to excellence in teaching and learning – ‘transforming lives through knowledge’
• Research-led teaching, with a focus on practical ‘real world’ learning
• Enterprise and Employability:– Placements, internships and volunteering– 12,000 students in placements– Student Enterprise – Business Ideas Challenge
Institutional Context: Plymouth University
• Students as Partners – Students involved at every level, including in quality assurance and enhancement
• Teaching, Learning and Student Experience Strategy and Assessment Policy
• External examiners comment on whether assessment policy is realised in programmes
Institutional Context: Plymouth University
QAA Quality Code
• Chapter B7: External Examining
• Induction and briefing
The Role of the External Examiner at
Plymouth University
Dr Hilary Duckett
Director, Plymouth Business School
Role of the External Examiner - assessment of standards
External Examiner involvement ensures that:
• the University’s awards are comparable in standard to awards in other UK HE institutions
• standards are appropriate by reference to published national subject benchmarks, FHEQ and the University’s programme and module specifications
Role of the External Examiner – assessment process
External Examiner involvement also ensures
that the assessment process:• measures student achievement against the
intended learning outcomes• is in line with the University’s Assessment
Policy• is operated fairly and equitably and in
accordance with University Regulations
Underpinning processes• Common academic regulations
• Two-tier assessment panels/boards: separate roles of Subject and Award External Examiners clarified in External Examiners’ Notes for Guidance:
Subject external: reviews standards and achievement of learning outcomes
Award external: ensures that decisions on progression/awards for students are in line with the regulations and students treated equitably
Expectations of an Award External Examiner
• Acts as ‘critical friend’ to the Award Assessment Board
• Notes for Guidance made more explicit in response to Chapter B7 of QAA Quality Code:– Role also to provide informative comment
upon whether or not the University is maintaining the threshold academic standards of its awards
Expectations of a Subject External Examiner
• Agree assessments
• Review appropriate sample of work (and agree with subject team the means by which the sample is to be selected)
• Agree with subject team an appropriate method for adjusting module marks if necessary
Subject External Examiners are not expected to:
• Act as second or third markers or conduct viva voce examinations
• Amend individual student marks or review student profiles
• Consider extenuating circumstances
Subject External Examiner
The University also expects the Subject External Examiner to
• carry out an interim visit to see assessment in practice, and meet with students and with the programme team
• submit an annual report
Assessment offences and anonymous marking
• Assessment offences– Committee of Investigation– Role of panel/board– Use of Turnitin
• Policy re anonymous marking of exams and coursework
Responding to External Examiners’ Reports
Sue Gregory
Annual Report
• Integral part of annual review process• Available at
http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/extexam• Deadline – 31 July 2013• Revised in response to publication of
Chapter B7: External Examining• Separate Award External Examiner form
Annual Report cont’d/Contact with Students
• Formal written response• Annual institutional overview report• Shared with student representatives• Sharing External Examiners’ details with
students
How do we use reports? Institutional example 1
• Strengthened briefing arrangements• Institution level EE conference• Subject level checklist developed• Available at
http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/extexam
How do we use reports? Institutional example 2
• Provide feedback on progress re
Assessment Policy• Guidelines for assessing Group work
available athttp://www.plymouth.ac.uk/extexam
How do we use reports? Institutional example 3
• Student engagement with their programme of study
Ongoing support for External Examiners
Sue Gregory
Responsibilities for External Examiners – Central Quality Office
• Appointment and institutional level briefingLetter of appointment and contractInduction packAnnual briefing pack
• Monitoring of reports and response to university issuesSummary of institutional issues
• Website: http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/extexam
Responsibilities for External Examiners – Faculties
• Management of their External Examiners:NominationReportingFee payment
• Support – subject level induction and mentoring arrangements
• Ongoing support for the External Examining role eg arrangements for visits; provision of assessment material